manifest vnto thee Vnto the manifestation of God is subordinated the preseruation of societie in mankinde For except there were men God shoulde not haue whom to manifest himselfe vnto The preseruation of the society of men I will declare thy name vnto my brethren To this preseruatiō there folow next in order the duties of nature and the mutuall good turnes and benefites of one man towards an other For no societie or coniunction or conuersing of men together can be or consist without mutuall dueties passing enterchangeably betweene them Wherefore the societie of men and mutuall communicating and imparting of dueties betweene them are the subordinate endes of man created seruing for the obtaining of the principall end which is the manifestation participation or fruition knowledge praise and worshippe of God When therefore God is saide to be the ende of man it is meant of him manifested participated knowne and worshipped And in this end as being the chief and last the whole felicitie and blessednes and glorie of man consisteth 1. Obiect Heauen earth and other creatures which are void of reason Other creatures are said to praise God as being the matter of his praise which yet they shoulde not bee if man and Angels were not are said to worshippe and magnifie God Therefore the worship and praise of God is not the proper end why man was created Answere This reason hath a fallacie of equiuocation or ambiguitie Creatures voide of reason are saide to worship and praise God not that they vnderstand ought of god or know and worship him But because they bearing certain prints and steps of Diuinitie in them are the matter of gods praise and worship But the creatures endewed with reason are said to praise and magnifie god not onely because in them are extant most conspicuous and notable testimonies of god but chiefly because they beeing endewed with a power facultie of vnderstanding of conforming themselues to the will of god know by the beholding contemplation of gods works in thēselues other creatures the infinite goodnes wisedome power iustice bounty and maiestie of god and are raised and stirred vp to worship god aright both in minde and in worde and in the whole obedience according to his diuine law And if god had not created creatures of reason and vnderstanding who might beholde consider and with thankefull minde acknowledge his workes and the order and disposing of thinges in whole nature other thinges which are voide of reason might no more be saide to praise and worship god that is to be the matter and occasion of praising him than if they had neuer beene at all 2. Obiection The felicitie and blessednes of man is a qualitie or condition and estate in which or with which man was created that is it is a part of the image of God and a forme or propertie of man Therefore it belōgeth to the first question what man was created and not to this of the end of mans creation Answere This hath no contrarietie in it for the same may be in diuers the finall cause the formal For the soule and the properties or faculties thereof are both the formal and final cause of a liuing bodie the forme as they actuate and giue life vnto the bodie the ende as the bodie is framed of nature for this that the soule may informe it and exercise by it his operations actions In like sort the blessednes of man or participation or fruition of god as also the knowledge of god is a propertie and part of the image of god in man in respect of the beginning when man by his creation beganne both to bee and to bee iust and blessed it is the ende of man in respect of continuance perseuerance that is as god created man wise iust and blessed for this that hee shoulde continue so for euer that is man was created iust and happie he was created for this that he might be iust and happie Wherefore albeit the existence of blessednesse and the continuance abiding of the same are the same in the thing it selfe yet in consideration and respect they are diuers By reason of which diuers respects felicitie wisedome holines are both a qualitie and an end of man that is are referred to the questions WHAT and FOR WHAT man was created This first creation of man is diligently to be compared with the miserie of mankinde as also the end for which we were created with the aberration and swaruing from the end that so by this meanes also wee may know the greatnes of our miserie For howe much the greater wee see the good was which wee haue lost so much the greater wee know the euils to be into which we are fallen OF THE IMAGE OF GOD IN MAN The chiefe questions hereof are 1. What the image of God in man is 2. How farre forth it is lost and how farre it remaineth 3. How it is repaired in man 4. How it is in Christ and how in vs. 1 What the image of God in man is The image of god to be considered not in the body but in the soule SEing god is not corporeal neither hath a body we must consider this image not in the body but in the soule of man and because it is very much darckened and almost blotted out by sinne wee must iudge of it not by that state in which men began to be after sinne was committed but by the repairing which commeth by Christ that is by the nature of man regenerated And to conclude whereas there is but a small beginning of regeneration in this life we shall at length in the euerlasting life and glorie behold and vnderstand perfitely the image of God wholy restored shining in vs. It is not to be sought onely in the substaunce but chieflie in the qualities and giftes of the soule Further that wee are not to seeke the image of God in the substaunce alone of the soule but chieflie in the vertues and giftes with which it was adorned of God in the creation it is euen thereby manifest for that the nature and substaunce of the soule remaineth euen in the vnregenerate but the image of God for the most part is lost yet notwithstanding because the soule is an vnderstanding spirite the more excellent spirite the more excellent part of mans substance separable from the body immortal the beginning and cause of life and mouing in a liuing body wee must confesse that the nature thereof though vnregenerat is some shadow of that Diuinitie But the image of God seeing the substance as of spiritual natures in generall so of the minde of man is vnknowne to vs in the mist and darkenes of this life is to be considered in those faculties and operations in which wee see man to excell other creatures and know him by the word works of God to bee agreeable and conformed vnto God These faculties are especially two The vnderstanding and will The
that is a Sauiour Because he saueth vs from al our Å¿ Mat. 1.21 Heb. 7.25 sinnes Neither ought any safety to bee sought for from any other nor t Act. 4.12 can elsewhere be found 30 Doe they then beleeue in the only Sauiour Iesus who seeke for happinesse and safety of the Saintes or of themselues or elsewhere No. For although in worde they boast themselues of him as their sauiour yet indeed they deny the onlie Sauiour a 1. Cor. 1.13 30. c. Ga. 5.4 Iesus For it must needes be that either Iesus is not a perfect Sauior or that they who embrace him as their Sauiour with a true faith possesse all thinges in him which b Heb. 12.2 Isa 9.6 Col. 1.19.20 2.10 Isa 43.11 25. Ioh. 1.16 are required vnto saluation 31 Why is he called Christ that is annointed Because hee was ordained of the Father and annointed of the holy Ghost the c Ps 45.8 Heb. 1.9 Deut. 18.15 Acts. 3.22 chiefe Prophet and d Ioh. 1.18 15 15. Mat. 11.27 Ps 110.4 Heb. 7.21 10.21 Doctour who hath e opened vnto vs the secret counsaill and all the will of his father concerning our Redemption And the high-Priest who with that one onely Sacrifice of his bodie hath f Rom 8.34 5.9.10 redeemed vs and doth continuallie g Ps 2.6 Luk. 1.33 make intercession to his father for vs. And a king who ruleth vs by his word and spirit and defendeth and h Mat. 28.18 Ioh. 10.28 maintaineth that saluation which hee hath purchased for vs. 32 But why art thou called a Christian Because through faith I am a member of Iesus i Acts. 11.26 1 Cor. 6.15 christ and k 1. Ioh. 2.27 Is 59.21 Ioe 2.28 partaker of his annointing that both I may l Mat. 10.33 confesse his name present my selfe vnto him a liuely m Rom. 12.1 Apo. 5.8.10.1 Pet. 2.9.2 Tim. 2.12 Rom. 6.12.13 Apo. 1.6 sacrifice of thankfulnes and also may in this life fight against sin and satan with a free good coÌ„science afterward n 1. Tim. 1.18.19 enioy an euerlasting kingdom with christ ouer al creatures 33 For what cause is Christ called the only begotten sonne of God when we also are the sonnes of God Because christ alone is the coeternal natural son of the eternall o Ioh. 1.14 Heb. 1.2 Ioh. 3.16 4.9 father we p Rom. 8.5 Eph. 1.6 Ioh. 1.12 1. Ioh. 1.3 are but sonnes adopted of the father by grace for his sake 34 Wherefore callest thou him our Lord Because he redeeming ransoming both our body and soul from sins not with gold nor siluer but with his precious blood deliuering vs froÌ„ al the power of the diuel hath set vs a 1. Pet. 1.18 10.1 Cor. 6.20 7.23 Ep. 1.7 1. Tim. 2.5.6 free to serue him 35 What beleeuest thou when thou saist He was conceiued by the holy ghost borne of the Virgine Mary That the sonne of God who b Ioh. 1.1 17.5 Rom. 1.4 Col. 1.15 c. Ps 2.7 Mat. 3.17 16.16 is and continueth true and euerlasting c Rom. 9.5 Is 7.14 9.6 1. Io. 5.20 Io. 20.28 God d Ioh. 1.14 Gal. 4.4 tooke the verie nature of man of the flesh and bloode of the Virgine Mary by the woorking of the holy Ghost f Ps 132.11 Act. 2.30 c. Rom. 1 3. that withal he might be the true seed of Dauid like vnto his brethren in al things sin excepted a Mat. 1.18.20 Luc. 1.35 36 What profit takest thou by Christs holy conception and natiuity That hee is our i Heb. 2.16.17 Mediatour and dooth couer with his innocency and perfect holines my sins g Phil 2 7. in which I was conceiued h Heb. 4.15 7.26 that they may not come in the sight of k Psal 32.1.1 Cor. 1.30 Ro. 8.3.4 Gal. 4.4.5 God 37 What beleeuest thou when thou saist He suffered That hee all the time of his life which hee lead in the earth but especially at the end therof l 1. Pet. 2.24 3.18 Is 53.12 susteined the wrath of God both in body and soule against the sin of al mankind that he might by his passion as the onely m 1. Ioh. 2.2 4.10 Rom. 3.25 propitiatory sacrifice deliuer our body and soule from euerlasting damnation and purchase vnto vs the fauour of God righteousnes and euerlasting life 38 For what cause should hee suffer vnder Pilate as being his iudge That he being innocent and n Luk. 23.14 Ioh. 19.4 condemned before a ciuil iudge might o Psal 69.4 Is 53.4.5 2. Cor. 5.21 Gal. 3.13 deliuer vs froÌ„ the seuere iudgement of God which remained for al men 39 But is there any thing more in it that hee was fastned to the crosse than if hee had suffered any other kind of death There is more For by this I am assured that he took vpoÌ„ himself the curse which did lie on me For the death of the crosse was p Deut. 21.23 Gal. 3.13 accursed of god 40 Why was it necessary for Christ to humble himselfe vnto death Because the iustice and truth of God could by no a Gen. 2.71 other meanes be satisfied for our sins but by the very death of the b Heb. 2.9.14.15 Phil. 2.8 Sonne of God 41 To what end was he buried also That thereby he might make manifest that he was c Acts. 13.29 Mat. 27.60 Luk 23.53 Io. 19.38 c. dead indeede 42 But since that Christ died for vs why must we also die Our death is not a satisfaction for our sinnes but the abolishing of sinne and our passage into d Ioh. 5.24 Phi. 1.23 Rom. 7.24 euerlasting life 43 What other commodity receiue wee by the sacrifice and death of Christ That by the vertu of his death our old man is crucified slaine and e Ro. 6.6.7 c. buried together with him that hencefoorth euill lustes and desires may not f Rom. 6.12 raigne in vs but wee may g Rom. 12.1 offer our selues vnto him a sacrifice of thankesgiuing 44 Why is there added He descended into hel That in my greatest paines and most grieuous tentations I may support my selfe with this comfort that my Lorde Iesus Christ hath h Isay 53.10 Matth. 27.46 deliuered me by the vnspeakable distresses torments and terrors of his soul into which he was pluÌ„ged both before and then especially when hee hanged on the crosse from the straits and tormentes of hel 45 What doth the resurrection of Christ profit vs First by his resurrection he vanquished death that hee might i 1. Cor. 15.16 54.55 Rom. â—4 25 1. Pe. 1.3 c. 21. make vs partakers of that righteousnes which hee had gotten vs by his death Again we are now also k Rom. 6.4 Col. â— 1. c. Ep. 2.5 stirred vp by his
are free from these paines that is hee speaketh of felicity and liberty which is not in Hell Whereupon also it is clear that Christ spake this to the Theefe not of his God-head but of that which suffered which was his soul For the godhead was with the Theefe neither did Christ suffer or was deliuered as touching his God-heade but as touching his soule Lastly Christ descended not into Hell locally as touching his bodie because his body was in the graue neither rose from any other place but from the graue It followeth therefore that this article cannot bee vnderstood of a locall descension into Hell Aunswere 2 Albeit it were true that Christ descended locally into Hell yet hee shoulde not haue descended for this cause which they imagine as namely to deliuer the Fathers Which also is prooued by this reason If Christ descended locally into Hel he descended either to suffer or to deliuer Not to suffer because now all thinges were finished on the Crosse as christ himselfe also hanging on the Crosse said Jt is finished He descended not to deliuer the Fathers 1 Because he did this before in suffering for them on earth 2 Hee did the same by the power and efficacie of his God-heade from the verie beginning of the worlde not by the descension of his soule or bodie into Hel. 3 The Fathers were not in Limbo Therefore they could not be deliuered thence As it is saide Luk. 16.46 Betweene you and vs there is a great gulfe set so that they which would go from hence to you cannot neither can they come from thence to vs. And in the same place Lazarus is said to bee in Abrahams bosome not in Limbo The soules of the iust are in the hand of God 3 Objection Christ indeede did not descend into Hell either to suffer or to deliuer but as some wil to shewe the Diuell and Death his victorie and so to strike a terrour into them Which they say is confirmed by that place of Peter 1. Pet. 3.19 By the which he also went preached vnto the spirits that are in prison which were in time passed disobedient Answere That for this cause Christ descended into Hell is not found in scripture that place of Peter is thus to be vnderstood Christ went that is beeing sent from the beginning of the Father vnto the Church by his spirite that is by his God-head and vnto the spirites that are now in prison that is in Hell hee preached in time passed when as yet they liued were disobedient namely before the flud and in the time of Noah inuiting them to repentance So is also another saieng of Peter to be vnderstood 1. Pet. 4.6 The Gospel was also preached vnto the dead That is vnto those which are now dead or were then dead when Peter wrote this and who then liued when the Gospel was preached vnto them Reply Christ descended into the lowest partes of the earth Ephes 4.9 Therefore to Hell Aunswere Into the lowest partes of the earth that is into the earth which is the lowest part of the world This interpretation is prooued by the scope and drift of the Apostle who maketh in that place an opposition of christs great glory his great humiliation But were it so that these places which some alleage for to establish this opinion were to be vnderstood of a locall descension of Christ into Hell yet would they not make for them but rather for the papists who teach That christ preached vnto the Fathers in Hell and thence deliuered them Now if these testimonies help not the Papists muchlesse wil they helpe them For it is certaine that it cannot be thence prooued that Christ descended into Hell to strike a terrour into Death and the Diuell This opinion indeed is not impious or vngodly is approoued by manie of the Fathers but yet I leaue it because it is not grounded on anie firme reasons and contrarie reasons are at hand easie to be had For 1. Christ himselfe said which testimonies haue now often beene recited This daie shalt thou bee with mee in Paradise Father into thy hands I commend my spirite Againe It is finished 2. Jf hee descended to triumph this Article should bee the beginning of his glorification But it is not likelie that Christ tooke the beginning of his glorification in hell For it is apparent by the opposition of the Article following That christes Descension was the lowest degree of his humiliation And yet I confesse withall that christ stroke a great terrour into the Diuels but that was by his death whereby hee disarmed and vanquished the Diuel sin and death THE THIRD DAY HE ROSE AGAINE FROM THE DEAD I Beleeue that Christ shooke off death from himselfe quickened his deade body reunited his bodie vnto his soule restored vnto himselfe a blessed celestial and glorious life and that by his owne proper power The chiefe Questions of christs resurrection are 1 Whether Christ rose againe 2 How he rose 3 For what cause he rose 4 The fruit of his resurrection 1 WHETHER CHRIST ROSE AGAINE THat Christ rose againe is prooued by the testimonies of Angels weomen Euangelistes Apostles and other Saintes who after his resurrection sawe him felt him and talked with him And wee were to beleeue the Apostles in respect of the authority which they had from heauen although they had not seene him 2 HOW CHRIST ROSE CHRIST rose first by his owne power euen by his Godheade Iohn 2.19 Destroie this temple and in three daies I will raise it vp againe Ioh. 10.18 I haue power to laie downe my soule and haue power to take it vp againe Ioh. 5.21 As the Father raiseth vp the dead and quickeneth them so the Sonne quickeneth whom he will Obiection But the Father raised him Rom. 4.24 Therefore hee raised not himselfe Aunswere The Father raised the Sonne by the Son himselfe not as by an instrument but as by another person of the same essence and power with the Father The Sonne is raised of the Father by himselfe Himselfe hath raised vp himselfe by his spirite Secondlie Iesus Christ true God and man rose according to that nature according to which he suffered namelie according to his humane nature euen the true humane nature and the same in essence and properties and that not deified but glorified al infirmities thereof beeing done away Luk. 24.39 Behold my handes and my feete for it is I my selfe handle me and see me for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see mee haue And truely nothing else coulde rise againe but that which had fallen The same bodie therefore which fell did rise againe which is the greatest comfort vnto vs. For hee must haue been one and the same Mediatour who should merit for vs a communicating and participation of those benefits which we had lost by sin who should restore the same vnto vs and applie them to euerie one Againe except Christes fleshe hadde risen neither shoulde ours rise
From what euils he saueth vs 433 How he saueth 434 VVhom he saueth 437 Of Christ What is signified by the name of christ 437 What Christes vnction or annointing is 438 What his Prophetical function 444 VVhat his Priesthood 448 VVhat his kingdome 451 Of the communion of the faithful with Christ vvhat the Annointing of Christians is 452 In what sense christians are called prophets 456 vvhat is the Priesthoode of christians 456 vvhat is the kingdom of christians 458 Of Christ the Sonne of God How manie waies men are called sons 461 How christ is the son of God 463 vvhy christ is called the only begotten and first begotten sonne of God 464 Of Christs Diuinitie The sonne of God is a subsistent in the flesh borne of the virgin and before the flesh 467 The sonne of God Christ is a person reallie distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost 498 The Worde is equall consubstantial with the Father 500 503 Other rules whereby the obiections of the Arrians are dissolued 507 The principall arguments against the Diuinitie of the Sonne and the Holie Ghost with the answeres vnto them 509 Of Christ our Lord. In what sense christ is called Lord 514 For what causes he is our Lorde 515 Of christs conception by the holy ghost and birth of the Virgin Marie 518 The common place of the two natures in Christ vvhether there be two natures in christ our Mediatour 520 vvhether christ be one person or moe 525 vvhat maner of vnion this is of the two natures in christ and how made 529 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of both natures in christ 536 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of christ the Mediatour 544 vvhy it was necessary that two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God 550 Of Christs humiliation that is of his Passion vvhat Christ suffered 554 According to which nature christ suffered 556 The causes impellent or motiues of christes Passion 55â— The final causes oâ— ends of his Passion 558 Of Christs death How christ is said to haue beene dead 561 vvhether it was requisite and necessary that christ should die 562 The fruit of christs death 564 His burial 566 His descension into hel 567 Of Christs glorification that is of his Resurrection vvhether christ rose againe 571 How christ rose 571 For what cause he rose 572 vvhat are the fruits of christes Resurrection 576 Of Christs Ascension into heauen vvhither christ ascended 580 How wherefore christ ascended into heauen 582 587 vvhat is the difference between christs Ascension and our 588 vvhat are the fruits of christs AscensioÌ„ 589 Of Christs sitting at the right hand of GOD. vvhat the right hand of God signifieth 591 vvhat is to sit at Gods right hand 591 vvhether christ did alwaies fitte at the right hand of God 595 vvhat are the fruites of christes sitting at the right hand of the father 597 Of Christs comming to iudgement vvhether there shal be any iudgement 599 vvhat the last iudgement is 601 vvho shal iudge 603 vvhence and whither christ shal come 604 Howe christ shall come to iudgement 605 vvhom christ shal iudge 605 vvhat shall be the senteÌ„ce executioÌ„ 606 For what cause that iudgemeÌ„t shal be 607 vvhen it shal be 608 vvherefore God woulde haue vs certaine of the last iudgement 608 For what causes God would not haue vs certain of the time of iudgement 609 For what cause GOD differreth that iudgement 609 Whether the last iudgement be to bee wished for 610 The third part of the Creede of the Holie Ghost the sanctifier What the name spirite signifieth 610 Who and what the holie Ghost is 611 What the office of the holy gost is 617 Of whom the holie Ghost is giuen and wherefore 621 To whom the holie Ghost is giuen 622 How he is giuen receiued 624 How the holie Ghost is reteined 625 Whether and how the holie ghost may be lost 625 wherefore the Holie Ghost is necessarie 626 Howe wee may knowe that the holie ghost dwelleth in vs. 627 Of the Church What the Church is 627 How many waies the Church is taken 629 What are the tokens and markes of the church 631 Why the church is called Holy Catholicke 633 In what the church differeth from the common weale 634 Whence ariseth the difference of the church from the rest of mankinde 635 Whether any one may be saued out of the church 636 Of Predestination Whether there be Predestination 636 What Predestinâ—tion is 641 What are the causes of Predestination or Election and of Reprobation 642 What are the effects of Predestination 644 Whether Predestination be vnchangeable 645 How far forth Predestination Election and Reprobation are known vnto vs. 645 Whether the elect be alwaies meÌ„bers of the church the reprobate neuer 646 Whether the elect may fall from the church and the reprobate abide alwaies in the church 648 What is the vse of this doctrine 649 Of the communion of Saints 649 Of the remission of sinnes What remission of sinnes is 651 Who giueth remission of sinnes 652 For what remission of sinnes is graunted 653 Whether remission of sinnes agreeth with Gods iustice 653 Whether remission of sinnes be freely giuen 654 To whom remission of sins is giuen and how 655 Of the Resurrection of the flesh What the Resurrection is 656 The Errours concerning the Resurrection 656 Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall certainely be 657 For what end the Resurrection shall be 659 By whom the Resurrection shal be 660 How the Resurrection shal be 660 When the Resurrection shal be 661 What bodies shal rise 661 Whether the soule be immortall 662 Of euerlasting life What euerlasting life is 670 VVho giueth euerlasting life 672 To whom euerlasting life is giuen 673 For what cause euerlasting life is giuen 673 VVhen how euerlasting life is giuen vnto vs 674 675 VVhether wee can bee assured in this life of euerlasting life 675 Of Justification VVhat iustice or righteousnes is in generall how manifold it is 677. 678 In what iustice differeth from iustification 679 VVhat is our iustice 680 How Christs satisfactioÌ„ is made our iustice and righteousnes 681 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours 683 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours by faith onely 684 Obiections against this doctrine of iustification aunswered 685 Of Sacraments VVhat sacraments are 694 VVhat are the ends of sacraments 697 In what sacraments differ from sacrifices 699 In what sacramentes agree with the word and in what they differ from it 700 How the sacraments of the old new Testament agree how they differ 702 VVhat the sacramentall vnion is 703 In what the thinges differ from the signes 704 VVhat phrases and formes of speaking of the sacraments are vsuall vnto the church and scripture 705 VVhat is the right and lawful vse of sacraments 705 VVhat the wicked receiue in the vse administration of the sacraments 706 How
his law therfore euen the least sin meriteth eternal abiection and casting away Most certainelie both in respect of his iustice which abhorreth and punisheth whatsoeuer is not agreeable vnto it and in respect of his truth because hee had denounced before that he woulde punish men if they obeied not his commaundement God therefore seeing he is true doth neuer change this his sentence 1 Obiection But the wicked florish here Aunswere The wicked florish but for a short time to bee cast at length into eternal tormentes except they repent Yea in this life also they are punished First they are miserablie vexed with the torments and terrors of conscience which in the reprobate are the beginning and sense of eternall paines 2. Euen those good things which they vse with greatest pleasure serue for their punishment and destruction and verilie so much the more how much the lesse they know and acknowledge them for a punishment For it is a most grieuous punishment not to receiue gods gifts in respect of gods promise nor to know the right vse of them neither with his giftes to receiue a will and abilitie also to vse them well For if these thinges concurre not in the fruition of good things mens sinnes and punishment must needs be the more encreased and exasperated and thereby except there come conuersion eternal destruction or death is certainely purchased 3. They are afflicted with other punishmentes also most grieuous oftentimes yet with more grieuous in the life to come where it shal bee a continuall death not to bee dead 2 Obiection But God made not euil and death Aunswere The euils of sin and punishment had not come if man would He made them not in the beginning and further also after the beginning neither euill nor death shoulde haue beene except our selues had woulde For they ensued on the voluntarie sinne of man God forcibly inflicting them as a most iust punishment 3 Obiection If God punish sinnes with present and euerlasting punishments he punisheth the same twise is vniust but God punisheth sinnes with present and euerlasting punishmentes therefore he punisheth the same sinne twise and is vniust Answ The Minor is to be distinguished for it is but one punishment but hath seueral parts For present punishments are the beginning of euerlasting because they are not sufficient to satisfie Gods iustice 4 Obiection If God punish sinnes with eternall punishments Then either all of vs perish or Gods iustice is not satisfied Aunswere If God should punish our sinnes in vs with eternal punishments we should all perish neither should we euer recouer vs thence but hee doth not so punish them in vs neither yet is Gods iustice impeached or violated because hee punisheth our sinnes in Christ with a punishment temporall but yet equiualent to euerlasting This equability doth the Gospel adde vnto the rigour and seueritie of the law 5 Obiection The iustice of God permitteth not that the same sinne be twise punished but our sinnes are most fullie punished in his sonne and this punishment is imputed vnto the godlie or beleeuers Therefore the same ought no more to bee punished in the godlie and so they are vniustlie afflicted Aunswere The afflictions of the godly are not punishments and satisfaction for their sinnes but onely fatherly chastisementes and the Crosse whereby they are brought to humility Which that it may bee better vnderstoode wee are necessarily here to speake of afflictions or calamities OF AFFLICTIONS The chiefe questions are 1 How manie kindes of afflictions there be 2 What be the causes of them 3 What comforts are to be opposed against them 1 How manie kindes there be of afflictions SOme afflictions are temporal and some eternall Eternal are the tormentes of the soule and bodie proper vnto the wicked into which all the Diuels are to bee throwen and all wicked men who are not conuerted in this life The qualitie of these tormentes is expressed when they are called in scripture a worme fire horror euerlasting torment likewise euerlasting death which is not a destruction of the bodie and soule or a perpetuall senselesnes but an infinite and endlesse continuaunce of those tormentes which the wicked in this life dispairing begin to feele or it is neuer to be dead yet to die continually that is to liue forsaken and abiected of God subiect to all tormentes both of bodie and soule But wee are here to collect testimonies of scripture against Epicures of which heard not a fewe are found euen in the Popes court thereby to demonstrate that the pains torments of the wicked both in bodie and soule Why the punishment of sinne ought to bee eternall shal be eternal 1. Isai 66.24 Their worme shal not die their feare shal not be put out Mar. 9.43 Into hell into the fire that neuer shal bee quenched where their worme dieth not the fire neuer goeth out Mat. 25.41 Go into euerlasting fire which is prepared for the Diuel his Angels 1. Pet. 4.18 If the righteous scarcelie be saued where shall the vngodlie sinner appear Mat. 10.28 Feare him who can cast both bodie soul into helfire The soul is the cause fountain of sins the body as a thing without reason and brutish doth execute that which the soul sheweth commandeth wherefore both the author instrument of sins shal be punished 2. The reason also why the paines and punishments of sins should be eternal infinit is euident because for sin committed against the infinit good an infinit punishment is iustlie exacted neither coulde there be made by anie temporall punishment of a meere creature sufficient satisfaction vnto gods infinit eternal iustice therefore the temporal punishment of Christ that it might be sufficient to deliuer the elect was to be equiualent to eternall pains Here the Epicures obiect He that is exceeding mercifull How Gods mercie and his iustice stand together in inflicting eternall punishment cannot behold the eternal torments of his creatures much lesse inflict such on them God is exceeding merciful because his mercie doth far exceed our sins Therefore he doth not suffer his creatures to remain in eternal torments Answ The Maior is true when exceeding most exact iustice such as is in god doth not exact require that exceeding sinne haue exceeding punishment Replie Exceeding strict iustice doth not stand with exceeding mercie because that admitteth no mitigating equabilitie In God is exceeding iustice therefore not exceeding mercie Answ Both the Maior and the proofe thereof is false Because God punishing of his exceeding iustice our sin with exceeding punishment doth notwithstanding shewe exceeding equability and fauorablenes whiles he translateth the punishment thereof from vs laieth it vpon his sonne They frame also the same reply on this wise With him that followeth extreme or strict iustice mercie and equabilitie hath no place But god in punishing sinnes foloweth strict iustice Therfore he is not merciful To which we answer 1.
obserued that Paschal sacrameÌ„t being abolished 2. That the same thing might be signified difference only of time excepted For the Paschal Lamb signified Christ which should come and should be sacrificed The supper Christ already sacrificed Obiection But when the supper was instituted Christ was yet to be sacrificed Aunswere But then was at hand the offering vp and sacrificing of Christ For a few houres after he was sacrificed and the supper was from that time forward to signifie christ sacrificed 3. That he might stir vp in his Disciples and in vs greater attention and marking of the cause for which he did institute it and that we might vnderstand how earnestly Christ would haue this supper to bee recommended vnto vs seeing he did nothing before his death but that which was of most weight and moment Therefore did he in the very point or instaunt before his death institute it For it is as it were the testament and last wil of our testatour For which cause it is added In the same night that he was betraied Hee tooke bread That is vnleauened bread nor leauened which then they did eat of at the table The institution of the Supper and Vnleauened bread did concur then together and fall out by an accident and therefore he prescribed not any certaine manner of baking bread for the lords supper Yet notwithstanding the bread of the Lords supper differeth from common bread because this is taken for the nourishment of the bodie but that for the foode and nourishment of the soul that is for the confirmation of our faith And here wee are to note that he is saide to haue taken bread from the table Hee tooke not his bodie therefore neither tooke hee his bodie in the bread with the bread or vnder the bread When hee had giuen thankes He gaue thanks for his office now performed and finished on earth his last act yet remaining to bee done that thus it had pleased the Father to redeeme mankind or that the typicall passouer was abolished and the signified passouer was now exhibited or lastly hee gaue thankes for the admirable and wonderfull gathering and preseruing of the church Hee brake it That is he brake the bread which hee tooke from the table distributed the same being one amongst many not any other inuisible thing hidden in the bread He brake not his bodie but the bread as S. Paul saieth The bread which we breake c. Now he distributed the bread being one among many because wee that are many are one bodie But the cause for which hee brake this bread was to signifie his passion and the separation of his bodie from his soul Wherefore the breaking of bread is a necessarie ceremonie both in respect of the signification in respect of our confirmation and therefore is this ceremonie also to bee reteined 1. Because Christ hath commaunded it 2. For our owne comfort that we may knowe the bodie of Christ to haue beene as certainly crucified for vs as we see the bread to bee broken 3. That the opinion of transubstantiation and consubstantiation may be pulled out of mens mindes Take This commandement belongeth to the disciples and to the whole Church of the new Testament Whence it is cleare and manifest 1. That the masse is not the Supper of the Lord but a priuate supper of him that sacrificeth 2. That we must not be idle beholders of the supper but religious receiuers of it 3. That the lords supper is not to be celebrated but in an assembly or congregation 4. That the supper is a signe in respect of God This is my body This that is this bread Obiection Then should it haue been said * These Greeke pronouns caÌ„not bee expressed with the like English particleâ— Because the woordes BREAD and BODY being of diuerse genders in Greeke the Greek pronouns also are diuerâ—e when aâ— in English our particle THIS serueth for woordes of all genders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aunswere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as if he had said this thing which I haue in my hand And that it is so to bee vnderstoode is prooued by these reasons 1. Christ tooke nothing but bread hee brake bread and gaue bread to his disciples to eate 2. Saint Paul saith expresly The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of â—hrist 3. Of the Wine it is said This cup is the new testament Wherefore after the same manner is it saide This that is this bread is my bodie that is a signe of my bodie which is broken and deliuered vnto death Wherefore farre be it from vs that we should say that Christ took bread visiblie and his bodie inuisiblie It is to be obserued that hee saith not Jn this is my bodie or this bread is my bodie inuisible but This bread is my bodie Which for you My Disciples that is for your saluation Is broken Obiection But Christes bodie neither was nor is broken Aunswere Hee hath a respect to the signification which the breaking of the breade did import Nowe this breaking signifieth the paines and renting of Christes bodie and the violent sundering of his soule and bodie one from the other For as the bread is broken and parted into diuers partes so the soule and bodie of Christ were separated and parted from each other Do this That is Being gathered assembled together take bread giue thankes distribute it Hee vnderstandeth the whole action which hee commaundeth and that to vs which beleeue and not the Iewes who were ready to crucifie him In remembraunce of me That is Thinking and meditating of my benefites which I haue done for you and which are by these rites recalled into your memory and further verily feeling and finding in heart that I giue you these my benâ—fites and therefore celebrating them by publique confession before God and Angels yea before men also and so giuing me thankes for them This remembraunce is the whole whose partes are the memory of christes benefites faith whereby we apply christ his merit vnto vs thankfulnesse or publique confession of his benefits Wherefore it followeth not Christ did institute his supper for a remembraunce of him therefore he did not institute it for confirmation of our faith For this obiection is no lesse friuolous than if I should say The holy Ghost confirmeth our faith Therefore the supper doth not For as it hath beene said before the reason followeth not to the remoouing of the instrumentall cause by the putting of the principall cause as neither dooth it follow to the deniâ—l of a paâ—â— by the putting of the whole For Remembrance compriseth the remembring of christes benefites faith and thanksgiuing For by his sacramentes christ remembreth vs of himselfe and his benefites and by his sacraments he raiseth and establisheth in vs our trust and confidence in him And further of that remembraunce of christes benefites it must follow that wee also yeelde thankes vnto him therefore publiquely This
Al stubburnes and disobedience and cruelty 3. Making shew semblance of obseruing our duty and hypocrisie 2 Vnto particular distributiue iustice are opposed 1. Error which taketh away an office from him vnto whom it is du and giueth it vnto another who should not administer it or vnto whom it doth not agree 2. Rashnes or accepting of persons partiality in distributing offices or in giuing honors or in bestowing rewards 3 Vnto sedulitie is opposed 1. Negligence or slothfulnesse which either doth not looke after matters or doth willingly let them passe and perfourmeth the parts of his duty either not willingly or not entirelie or not diligentlie 2. A shew of diligence which dooth his duty chiefly for his owne glory commoditie sake 3. Curiositie which intrudeth insinuateth himselfe into other mens duties 4. Arrogancie which giueth that vnto himselfe which he hath not or bosteth of that which he hath 4 Vnto grauitie are contrarie 1. Leuitie not obseruing seemlinesse or conueniencie or constancie or not hauing a desire of reteining his good name estimation 2. Swelling or ambition which is to lift vp him-selfe in respect of his owne calling or gifts and to contemne and neglect others to be aspiring to higher places to seeke the applause and approbation of man not for anie desire of Gods glory or of his neighbours safetie but onelie for an ambitious humour and desire of preeminence 5 Vnto Modestie are repugnaunt 1. Jmmodestie which reteineth not a seemlie conueniencie in words deeds behauiour and apparell 2. Arrogancie which in opinion speech challengeth more vnto him-selfe than his strength will beare or doth either admire his owne gifts or vaunt of them without need 3. Shewe of modestie which is in his admiration of himselfe yet to extenuate and debase himselfe to be backwards in receiuing of honors or offices which a man desireth to hunt after his owne praise or an opinion of modestie 6 Vnto loue are repugnant 1 Vnnaturalnesse which either hateth or doth not affection and loue those which are neere of bloud vnto him neither is carefull of others safetie 2 Jndulgentnesse or cockering which for the loue of any either winketh at their sinnes being pernicious either to themselues or others or dooth gratifie them in thinges forbidden 7 Vnto Thankefulnesse are repugnant 1 Vnthankefulnes which doth not acknowledge or doth not professe the author and greatnesse of the benefit receiued or doth not endeuour to perform mutuall duties 2 Vnlawful gratifieng or parasite-like flattering 8 Vnto Aequitie are repugnant 1 Jmmoderate and vnlawfull rigor in censuring of those that sinne through infirmitie without any enormous harming either of their own safetie or others 2 Slackenesse not punishing or reprehending according to his place enormous faults 3 Flatterie which for to currie fauour and for commodities sake praiseth that which is not to be praised or attributeth greater thinges vnto one than are beseeming for him THE SIXT COMMANDEMENT THOV shalt doe no murther The scope or end of this commandement is the preseruation of the life safetie of mens bodies of the welfare both of our selues others Here are forbidden al those thinges which tend to the destruction of our life or the life of others Now in this prohibition is named murther thereby to take away together with the effect the proper causes thereof and vnder the name of murther are all sinnes which accompanie it comprehended that by signifieng thus the heinousnes and grieuousnes thereof wee may bee the more effectuallie withdrawen ad deterred from committing thē And contrarily here are commanded all those things which tend to the safetie of our life and others The substance and summe of the commandement is that we neither harme by any externall work either our owne life or the life of any other or any mans safety and welfare of bodie either by force or by deceit neither wishe in affection or will an impairing thereof or signifie by any tokens any such affection or will but of the contrary endeuour to defend and preserue the same to the vtmost of our power Here is to bee proued 1. That internal things are also commaunded and forbidden by this commaundement 2. That the defence of our neighbour is commaunded 3. That the hurting either of our selues or others is forbidden 1 Internall thinges are commaunded and forbidden 1. Because when the effect is commaunded or forbidden the cause is also commaunded or forbidden 2. From the scope and end of the commaundement God will not haue vs to hurt any Therefore hee forbiddeth the meanes also whereby wee may hurt 3 Whosoeuer is angrie with his brother vnaduisedlie shal be culpable of iudgement 2 The defence of our neighbor is commanded Because negatiue commandements include affirmatiues Thou shalt doe no murther Therefore thou shalt help aid thy neighbour 3 The hurting as well of our selues as of others is forbidden because the causes why God commandeth vs to haue regard of anothers life are the same in vs. 1 The Jmage of God in man 2. The similitude and likenes of nature and our original from our first Parents We may not bee cruel against our owne flesh but as all haue issued from the same namely frō our first Parents are our flesh so are we our selues especiallie Therfore we lesse ought to hurt our selues than others 3. The greatnes of the price and raunsome wherewith Christ purchased all the members of the Church 4. The coniunction of Christs members And seeing these causes are found in our selues also it followeth that by this lawe euery one is forbidden to hurt or neglect his owne life or bodie Wherefore Thou shalt doe no murther signifieth 1 Thou shalt not desire to murther either thy selfe or others For what God will haue not to bee doone of vs that dooth hee not grant to be wished or desired 2 Neither shalt thou intimate or signifie anie desire of murthering either thy selfe or others For the desire and wishing whereof God forbiddeth he forbiddeth also any inckling or signification thereof to be giuen either in words or behauiour or countenance 3. Neither shalt thou put this desire in execution For the desire and signification whereof God forbiddeth hee verily much more forbiddeth the practise and execution thereof The contrary then is Thou shalt loue thy selfe and others 1. In heart and desire 2. Jn signification 3. In practise and execution Hence spring and arise all the vertues of this commandement and likewise the contrary vices vnto them The vertues of this sixt commaundement THOSE things that are here commaunded tend as it hath beene saide to the preseruation of the life or safetie of men And the safetie of men is preserued either by not hurting or by helping them Whereby are made two diuers kindes of vertues of this commaundement the former wherof conteineth the vertues which tend to the not hurting of mans safetie the other compriseth the vertues which tend to the helping and furthering of mens safety The vertues
death we answere that those were punished in Christ with a punishment which both for the grieuousnes of the punishment for the dignitie of the person who suffered it is equiualent to those eternall punishments which were to bee inflicted vpon vs for our sinnes As it is said Esa 53. He hath laid vpon him the iniquities of vs all Against that which we affirme that eternall death is the effect of al sinnes yea euen of the least The 1. Obiection is Why the during of punishment ought to be alike to al sinnes but not the degree of punishment Like is not to be giuen vnto things vnlike But sinnes are not alike Therefore al ought not to be punished with eternall death Aunswere There is more in the conclusion of this reason than was in the premisses For only this followeth to be concluded Therefore all sinnes ought not to bee punished with like punishment For all sinnes euen the least deserue eternall punishment because all sinnes offend against the eternall and infinite good Wherefore as concerning the lasting of the punishment all sinnes are punished with like punishment but not as concerning the degrees of punishments All sins are punished with eternall torments yet so as not with equal torments The seruaunt who knoweth the wil of his master and doth it not shall be beaten with manie stripes It shal be easier for them of the land of Sodom in the daie of iudgement than for thee Al sinnes are not equal Here the Stoicks obiect That al sinnes or vices are ioined with anie one vice and therefore all are alike and equall But neither is this consequence of force whereas also things vnlike and vnequal maie bee ioined together neither is the antecedent graunted That seemeth to be proued by the saying of Iames cap. 2. He that faileth in one is guilty of al. But Iames saith not that all sins or vices concur and are ioyned with one but first that in the breach of one point the whole law is violated as the whole bodie is said to be hurt when one part is harmed Then that there concurreth with euery sin the fountaine or cause of al other sins that is the contempt of God And this euil beeing seated in the hart doth violate the loue of God and so al other parts of our obedience towards God For no woork which proceedeth not from the perfect loue dread and reuerence of God can agree with the Law of God or please God And yet haue we experience that this hindereth not but that he which is infected with one vice may bee propense and prone to some sins more and to some lesse especially since vices themselues also are one opposite to another by the one of which contraries and not by both at one time euery man violateth vertue Neither are those principles also of the stoicall philosophers to be graunted That how farre soeuer thou goe in sinning after thou hast once past the line or middle which is vertue it is not material for the encreasing or augmenting the fault of passing beyond the line And that al vertues are alike and equall one to another so that no man is stronger than a strong man For whereas sin is a swaruing frō the middle it is manifest that how much greater the swaruing is so much is the sin more grieuous And that vertues are both in the same in diuers men otherwhile greater otherwhiles lesser euen as much as the qualities of the body are different in degrees experience doth witnes Wherfore in the iudgemēt of god also there are degrees put aswel of punishmēts as of sins 2 Obiect Gods great mercy his iustice neither impeached by other in punishing sin with eternal punishment Hee that is exceeding merciful doth not punish all sinne with exceeding and extreme punishment neither is to al eternitie angrie with sinne or looketh vpon the torments of his owne woorke For extreme iustice which doth strictly follow right and lawe in punishing admitteth no fauourable equity which yet mercie especially exceeding mercy doth vse and shewe But God is exceeding mercifull Therefore hee doth not punish all sinne with exceeding that is euerlasting punishment Or God punisheth all sinne with extreme punishment Therefore hee is not mercifull Auns First wee are to distinguish the ambiguitie of the Maior Hee that is exceeding mercifull doth not inflict exceeding and extreme punishment that is except his iustice require it But that God should punish all sinne with euerlasting punishment his exceeding iustice requireth which is Psal 5.5 earnestly and exceedingly to hate and punish all whatsoeuer is not agreeable to his Lawe So that except hee did punish it with sufficient punishment hee should not bee mercifull but light and cruell Secondly wee deny the consequence of the reason because it is a sophisme reasoning from that which is not the cause as beeing the cause For the iudge is not therefore vnmercifull for that hee executeth a robber on the wheel because he doth it according to iustice neither is delighted with the torment and death of a wretched man but had rather he were saued if so the Lawes permitted Right so God according to his infinit wisedome euen in inflicting extreme punishment on all sinne doth notwithstanding shewe immeasurable and manifould mercy and contrariwise in shewing exceeding mercy doth most straitly and exactly execute his iustice For 1. He punisheth our sinnes sufficiently and fullie not in vs but in his onely begotten sonne our guilt being translated on him 2. He offereth remission of sinnes and grace to al men who receiue his Son the Mediator with true faith and conuersion 3. Hee woorketh also that faith and conuersion by his spirit in the Elect. 4. Hee preserueth his elect in afflictions 5. At length he fully deliuereth them And all these things hee doth of his free mercy not bound or obliged thereto by any merite of ours 6. He is not delighted with the destruction of the reprobate who refuse that grace offered but by differring their punishment and by other great and diuers benefits he inuiteth them to repentaunce Wherefore the execution of Gods iustice is not repugnaunt to his mercy neither doth his mercie take away or make breach of his iustice but they are both coupled with a marueilous temperature in preseruing and sauing vs. How God is said remit nothing of his iustice and yet to be mercifull 3 Obiection is against this That god doth so exercise his mercy as he doth not thereby make breach of his iustice He that remitteth nothing of extreme iustice is not at all merciful but onely iust God remitteth nothing of extreme iustice because hee punisheth all with a sufficient punishment Therefore God is onely iust and not mercifull Aunswere We deny the Minor For god giueth vs his Sonne and punisheth him for vs of his meere mercie not of any right not bound thereunto by anie merites of ours Besides the Maior of the second Obiection is to be distinguished
all euill For these are the effectes to come of that present and perpetuall wil of God towards vs which wee apprehend by faith Rom. 8.24 Wee are saued by hope but hope that is seen is not hope But if we hope for that we see not we doo with patience abide for it 1 Obiection Life euerlasting is a thing to come We beleeue life euerlasting Wee beleeue therefore that which is to come that is faith is also of things to come and so faith is hope it selfe Ans The Maior must bee distinguished Life euerlasting is to come tru as concerning the consummation or accomplishment therof But it is present vnto vs as cōcerning the wil and vnchaungeable purpose of God who hath decreed from euerlasting that which he hath begun in vs and will also in due time accomplish it Againe it is present vnto vs as concerning the beginning therof For euerlasting life is begun here in the elect by the holy ghost Wherefore faith apprehendeth it as it is present both in respect of the purpose of God in respect of the beginning thereof in vs. For he that beleeueth feeleth and knoweth that he is quickened and resolueth this to bee the will of God that that quickening and reuiuing which is here begunne shall bee absolued in another life Iohn 5.24 He that beleeueth in the sonne hath passed from death to life Iohn 17.3 This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only verie God and whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ Gal. 4.6 God hath sent forth the spirit of his sonne into your harts which crieth Abba father Rom. 8.24 We are saued by hope 1. Ioh. 3.2 Now are we the sonnes of God but it doth not yet appear what we shal be By faith thē we are certein that those blessings also which as yet we haue not are notwithstanding ours for Gods promise for the vnchangeable will in God to giue them vs but in certain hope wee looke for them as concerning their accomplishment Faith apprehendeth the promises of thinges to come hope relieth on the thinges promised The summe is There is one and the same act and operation of faith and of hope but they differ in consideration It is called faith as it doth apprehend things to come as if they were present in regard of the vnchangeablenes of Gods will It is called hope as it doth certainlie look for the bestowing of those things Therfore Heb. 11 1. it is shewed that faith is the ground substance of things which are hoped for that is it is that which maketh things which are hoped for to be extant and present in that manner as hath bin shewed Shorter thus Faith apprehendeth the promises concerning things to come as they are to come Hope the things themselues which are promised 2 Obiection Faith is the euidence of thinges which are not seene therefore not of thinges present Aunswere It is the euidence of thinges which are not seene to wit by the outward senses but they are seene by the eies of the mind euen as if they did lie open to the eies of the bodie Againe they are not seene in respect of their accomplishment or consummation 5 What are the causes of Faith THE first and principall efficient cause of faith is the holie ghost illightening the minde that it may vnderstand the word and moouing the will that it may assent vnto the woord once vnderstoode Yee are freelie saued by faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God Ephes 2.8 Obiection The Diuel hath faith It is wrought therefore in him by the holie ghost Aunswere What faith is in the Diuel is wrought by the spirit of God but that by a generall woorking onely whereby hee worketh in all euen in Diuels and hypocrites what-soeuer knowledge or vnderstanding is in them 1. Cor. 12. c. not by a speciall and proper action or working wherby to regenerat or sanctifie them that they might truely acknowledge him to bee the author of this gift and magnifie him therefore after which maner hee woorketh faith in the elect alone The Diuels therefore and hypocrits haue faith from the spirit of God but the elect from the spirit of God sanctifieng them The instrumentall cause of faith in generall is the whole worde of God the Lawe and the Gospell written spoken readde heard The chiefe instrumental causes of ingendering iustifieng faith are the preaching of the word and the vse of the sacramentes meditated likewise many works miracles of God in the world But the chiefe and proper instrument of iustifieng faith is the preaching of the Gospell the vse of the sacraments For these doth the holy ghost vse as instruments yet not necessarie but arbitrarie at his own good pleasure both to stir vp faith in vs and to nourish strengthen increase the same Rom. 10.17 Faith commeth by hearing Rom. 1.16 The gospell is the power of God vnto saluation to euerie one that beleeueth 1. Cor. 4.15 I haue begottē you through the gospel Mar. 16.16 He that shall beleeue and be Baptized shall be saued Act. 22.16 Wash away thy sins 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread which we break is the communion of the bodie of Christ Wherefore ordinarilie iustifieng faith is neuer engendred in those who are of yeares to receiue it without the preaching of the gospell The cause of that faith which worketh miracles is not simply the woorde of God but there must necessarily come thereto an especiall and immediate reuelation from God The formal causes of faith a sure and ful confidence in Christ The obiect of faith Christ and his benefites promised The final causes of faith Gods glorie our saluation The formall cause of iustifieng faith is a certaine knowledge confidence in Christ The obiect of it is Whole Christ and his benefits promised in the word Likewise God fauorable to vs through Christ The subiect wherein it remaineth is the vnderstanding will of man The end or finall cause 1 The glorie of God to wit the celebration of his trueth iustice bountie mercie which hee hath shewed in the sending of his Sonne and in the giuing of faith in him 2 Our Saluation that we may receiue the blessings which are promised in the worde 6 What are the effects of faith The effectes of faith iustification and regeneration THe effects of iustifieng faith are 1 The iustifieng of vs before God 2 Peace of conscience or ioy resting on God Rom. 5.1 Beeing iustified by faith we haue peace with god 3 Our whole conuersion which followeth faith and beginneth at the same time with faith For by faith are our hats purified 4 The fruits of conuersion repentance euen good woorkes For whatsouer is not of faith is sinne Hither may be referred also the consequences of faith that is encrease of spirituall corporal giftes The first then and immediate effect of iustifieng-faith is Iustification from this afterwardes flow al other benefites
shall say Verily there is a reward for the righteous doubtles there is a god that iudgeth the earth And Psa 9.16 The Lord is knowen to execute iudgemēt now albeit the wicked florish often for a while the godly are oppressed yet neuertheles exāples which are fewer in nūber do not weaken the general rule vnto which most euēts agree But if it were so that fewer of the wicked did suffer punishment yet those selfsame examples though but a fewe would testify that god is that he is displeased with the offences of others also who seem to be lesse punished But this is not true no not of any of them that they are not punished in this life For al those who are not before the end of this life conuerted to god if punishment do not sooner ouertake them yet at length they die in dispaire which punishment is more grieuous than all the euils eyther corporall or externall and is the beginning testimonie of euerlasting punishment Now in that this punishment is not sufficient it doth therein agree with all euen the most tragicall cases of the wicked and therefore wee are taught by the doctrine of the Church that Gods lenitie which he doth not seldome vse in this life towards the wicked and his seueritie which hee seemeth to shew towardes the godly doth not at all weaken his diuine prouidence and iustice but rather declareth his goodnes whiles by differring of punishment he inuiteth the wicked to repentaunce and by exercising the godly with chastisementes and crosses hee perfecteth their saluation and also it confirmeth the certaintie of iudgement after this life wherein perfect satisfaction shall be made by the wicked to Gods iustice 7 From a bodie politique which is wiselie ordered by lawes 7 Common weales wisely ordered This coulde not haue beene shewed vnto men but from a minde vnderstanding and approouing this order which minde is God himselfe Moreouer that which is not preserued by humane wisedome or by force or naturall causes neither yet can be ouerthrown by Diuels the multitude of wickedmen hath a defender more potent mightie than these Common-weales are not preserued by humane strength or wisedome are oppugned by the wicked and Diuels Therefore they haue a superior and mightier defender than all these And this defender is God alone 8 From the order and nature of efficient causes 8. The order and nature of efficient causes For it can not bee that the processe and race of efficient causes shoulde bee of an endlesse and infinite extent wherefore there must bee some first and principall cause which may either mediately or immediately produce and mooue the rest on which also all other causes may depende Nowe that the progresse of causes which haue their moouing and beeing eache of other is not infinite they shewe by this reason If the causes of anie effect were infinite whereof some should mooue or produce other some one of these absurdities should follow that either within the compasse of a finite time should bee effected infinite motions and mutations or else at no time those infinite causes euer to attaine vnto their end that is vnto their purposed effect Both which beeing manifestly false and impossible it must needes be that the original of mutations dependeth of some cause immutable eternal and omnipotent 9. The endes of all thinges 9 From the final causes of al things To appoint the endes of all thinges belongeth to a nature which is wise and administreth al things Now al thinges are ordeined to their ends and those also certaine But these endes and vses of thinges haue not their beeing by chaunce or from a nature onely endewed with sense Therefore from some nature which is wise and omnipotent which is God alone For that nature worketh for some end this is so farre from remoouing the framer and artificer from it as rather it most of all confirmeth that there is a minde maker and framer of the woorlde which appointed the actions of nature to these ends and nature deede intendeth to an end thtough the ordination and appointment of another but neither vnderstandeth it nor is moued thereby to work And further that there are manie things in the world which not onlie seeme vnprofitable to all but are also troublesome and pernicious this also doth not infringe the generall rule That all thinges were made to a good vse For by reason of sinne those things nowe hurt which would haue profited men if they had not sinned And therefore to the godly al thinges turne to their safetie yea that punishment it selfe which God inflicteth by other creatures vpon mē serueth for an vse agreeable to the wisedome and iustice of God Many thinges also whereby men feele discommodities haue withal some vses acceptable preseruatiue to mans life And farther there is no one thing among all things which yeeldeth not matter of agnizing and celebrating the wisedome bounty power and iustice of the author 10. Certaine euident foretellings of euents 10 From certaine and cleare significations of future euentes which neither by humane sight or perceiueablenes neither by naturall causes or signes coulde haue beene foreknowen but only beeing reuealed by him who hath both mankinde and the nature of all thinges so in his owne power that nothing can bee doone but through his motion Such are the prophecies of the deluge of the posterity of Abraham of the comming of the Messias Which first is thereby manifest for that the decrees and counsailes of that minde which is the first cause of his owne workes no man can knowe before himselfe and therefore they cannot bee foreknowen of others but beeing disclosed by him Furthermore many Prophecies haue beene vttered in such sort that God hath not onely foretolde things should so come to passe but also that those thinges shoulde bee doone and brought so to passe by him Ezech. 12. Of all thinges foretolde by him hee saith I will speake the woorde and I will doe it Lasty it must needes bee that he knoweth all things who promiseth that hee will giue aunswere concerning all purposes and euentes necessary to bee knowen which shall bee demaunded of him and dooth indeede perfourme this euen as God did among the people of Israel And therefore God himselfe alleageth this as his worke alone for proofe of his diuinity against all forged fained Gods Isa 41.23 Shew the things that are to come heereafter that wee may knowe that you are Gods 11 From heroicall instinctes that is wisedome 11. Heroical and noble instincts of minde and excellent vertue in vndertaking and atchiuing those woorkes which surpasse the common capacity of mans nature Such is the felicity and happinesse of noble artificers or gouernours in searching or polishing artes and in finding out deuises and counsailes Likewise the couragiousnesse of mind in performing the actions of vertue and in menaging matters such as was in Achilles Alexander Archimedes Plato and others 2 Who and what
created by him to declare his iustice power and prouidence The creation of the worlde proued by reason not onely by testimonies of the sacred word Furdermore besides testimonies of Scripture almost innumerable it is confirmed also by firme and true reasons that the world was created of God First The autoritie of God himselfe auouching the same in his word Secondly The originals and beginnings of nations and peoples shew it which could not be faigned of Moses whenas some remēbrance and memoriall of them was then extant amongst manie which yet in processe of time perished Thirdly The noueltie and latenesse of all other histories compared with the antiquity ancientnesse of the sacred storie Fourthly The age of men decreasing which sheweth that there was greater strength in nature at the first and that not without some first cause it hath decreased hitherto Fiftly The certaine course race af times euē from the beginning of the world vnto the exhibiting of the Messias Vnto Testimonies of scripture come also argumentes drawen out of nature it selfe First The order of things instituted in nature which must needes haue beene produced and framed by some intelligent minde farre superiour to all thinges Secondly The excellencie of the mind of men and Angels These intelligent mindes haue a beginning therefore they haue it from some intelligent cause Thirdly The principles or generall rules and naturall notions ingenerated in our minds Fourthly The tremblings of conscience in the wicked Fifthly The constitution and founding of common weales Sixtly The endes of all thinges profitablie and wiselie ordeined Therefore by some cause vnderstanding ordaining them Seuenthly The verie order of causes and effectes which cannot bee carried backward or forward infinitly for then neuer should the end be come vnto or the effect produced Lastly those other arguments and reasons also which proue that there is a God prooue in like manner that the worlde was created of God And although out of Philosophie or those generall principles which are naturallie knowen it cannot bee knowen or shewed Whether the woorlde was created from euerlasting or in time and also Whether it was to haue beene created or no Likewise Whether it shal endure for euer or no and whether it shall remaine the same or is to bee chaunged for these thinges depend onely vpon the will of God which is onely declared to the Church in his worde yet notwithstanding it may bee knowen by the light of nature sithence the woorlde was that it was by God alone produced out of nothing For euen the sounder philosophers are enforced to acknowledge that GOD is the cause efficient or maker of all other thinges which are Therefore hee was the maker both of the first matter of all thinges and of those celestiall and heauenlie spirites and of the soule of man But these thinges are not produced by GOD out of any matter Therefore out of nothing Wherefore whatsoeuer argumentes are brought of Philosophers against the creation of the woorlde it is easie to perceiue that those were not framed out of true philosophie but by the imaginations of men if the order of the generation and mutation of things instituted in nature which was created of God bee discerned from creation God not idle before the world but contemplating from euerlasting his owne wisedom 1 Obiection God say the Philosophers could not bee from euerlasting idle But the world not beeing created he should haue beene idle Therefore the worlde is eternall Aunswere First the Maior is false If it be all one with them to bee idle and not to administer and rule the worlde For GOD created the worlde most freely which beeing not created hee should neuerthelesse haue beene no lesse perfect than he is now whē it is created as who for euer is most perfect of himselfe and in himselfe Secondly the Minor is also false If they meane by idle him who doth nothing at all For God before the creation of the woorlde did contemplate and beholde from euerlasting his own wisedome hee begot the Son from him flowed the holy Ghost he chose vs to euerlasting life hee decreed to produce create the worlde in time Thirdly It is impietie to rush and breake in into the secrets of god who hath prouided and prepared hel for curious seekers or searchers what God did before the creation of things Motion goeth before anie moueable thing which is generated but not before that which is created 2 Ob. They collect arguments also whereby to prooue that this motion or mutation of things which nowe is hath beene from euerlasting Whatsoeuer can any way be mooued or changed say they that either hauing bin such from euerlasting hath admitted no change or motion which were absurd is also denied of vs or hath beene made such by some generation motion But there is no motion or change except there bee some thing before which can be mooued and changed Wherefore no motion of anie thing can be brought which some other motion hath not gone before and so there shall bee no beginning of changes mutations But there is an vntrueth an vnsufficient enumeration in the Maior for that they imagining that thinges coulde neuer be produced out of other but by generation take away from god the power of creating what he wil euen out of no matter preexistent or being before Wherefore our aunswere is that Motion goeth before a mooueable thing which is generated but not which is created There went not any motion before the first beginning of motions in nature but onely the creating will of God 3 Obiect All motion before which was quietnesse or a ceasing of mutation hath another motion going before it whereby is remooued the cause of that quietnesse or let of mutation But they say that according to our assertion there is put a quietnes before the first motion that euer was in the nature of things Therefore there must bee some motion or mutation whereby the cause of that quietnes was taken away so there shall bee no mutation which may be said to be the first Auns The maior is true of the mutation entercourse of things now begunne after the creation but not of the first orignal of these mutations changes which we now see in the world For the let stay of them was then the will of God only which is not taken away but being the same standing immoueable from euerlasting to euerlasting beginneth effecteth the beginnings ends mutations or motions of things and also quietnesse or cessation a continuance in the same state most freely without any mutation or change of himself Seing then this his diuine wil alone beginneth the motion mutation of things without second causes as hee did in the creation of the worlde it was not onely not necessary but not so much as possible by reason of the eternitie and immutability of the diuine wil that there should be any other
nothing For creation properly so called is a production of a thing out of nothing 2 Obiection Of nothing is made nothing Aunswere This principle and rule is true as concerning that order which was appointed by God in nature now created Further by such an agent as is created it selfe nothing is made of nothing but that which is impossible to a creature is possible to God the creator And it appertaineth to our comfort that God hath created all things of nothing For if he hath created all thinges of nothing he is able also to preserue vs and to hinder the attempts of the wicked yea to bring them to nothing 5 God created the world at a certaine and definite time 5 The world created at a certaine time and euen in the beginning of times not from euerlasting For first all thinges were created of nothing and therefore haue a beginning Secondly it is to bee knowen out of the sacred storie how long the world hath lasted For according to the veritie of the scripture by Luthers account they are from the creation of the world to the Natiuitie of Christ yeares 3960. and so to our time namely to the yeare of Christ 1579. there shall be yeares 5539. According to Melancthons supputation the yeares from the beginning of the world are 5541. For from the beginning of the world vnto Christ he numbreth 3962. yeares According to their supputation of Geneua from the creation of the world vnto Christ are 3942. yeares and sixe moneths There shall bee then to the yeare of Christ 1579. from the Creation of the world 5521. years and sixe moneths According to the supputation of Beroaldus from the creation of the worlde vnto Christ are 3928. yeares and so then shall bee to the yeare of Christ 1579. from the creation of the world 5507. yeares These supputations accorde verie well one with another as concerning the graunde number though in the lesser number some yeares are either wanting or abounding By these foure supputations then of the most learned of our time compared together this at the least shal be apparent that God created not the world before these 5541. yeares past and therefore it was not from euerlasting 6 The world created in a certain time 6 God created not the world in one moment but in the space of sixe daies In the seuenth day god ended all his works Obiect He that liueth for euer saith the sonne of Sirach Eccle. 18.1 made all thinges together Therefore hee made all in one moment Ans He speaketh not of a momēt of time but of the whole number of things as if he should say whatsoeuer are they are all from god by creation But the causes why god created not al in one moment are these 1. Because he would haue the creation of the matter it selfe distinct and manifest from the forming and fashioning of the bodies of the woorlde which consist of it 2. Because hee woulde shewe his power and libertie in producing and bringing forth whatsoeuer effects he could that without naturall causes while hee yeeldeth light to the woorld maketh the earth fruiteful bringeth plants out of it euen before the Sun Moon were made 3. He would this way shew his goodnes and prouidence whereby hee cherisheth his creatures and prouideth for them not yet borne bringing beasts into the earth full of plants and food and men into the world most stored and fraught with al thinges apperteining to the necessitie and delight of life 4. He would by that order and course of creation hold vs not in an idle but diligent consideration of his works which also by the consecration of a sabbaoth he hath consecrated to all mankinde 7 All things of the world created good 7 God created all thinges most wisely verie good that is euerie thing in their kind and degree perfect Gen 1.31 All thinges were verie good Wherefore god was not the cause of sin or deformity but sin came into the world by man Obiect Death is euil Likewise it is said There is no euil which the Lord hath not done Amos. 3.6 Ans 1. God at the first creation made all thinges good the euil both of crime or essence of pain or punishment ensued vpon mans disobedience 2. Death calamities are euil in respect of the creature which suffereth them and in the iudgement of flesh but they are good in respect of god who iustly inflicteth them for sin doth purge out that sin in the godly by chastisements Wherefore after the fall of man god was the author of pains punishments because they are in a respect consideration good but sin he doth not cause but onely permit 3 For what cause god created the world THe endes of the creation of al thinges are some general The ends of the creation of the world 1 The glorie of God some speciall and subordinate 1. The first and chiefe end is the glorie of god For he would haue his goodnes wisedome omnipotencie iustice which his properties he sheweth in the creation of al things be knowen magnified of vs. Prou. 16.4 The Lord made al thinges for himselfe Psal 103.22 Praise the Lord al ye his works Rom. 11.36 Of him through him and for him are al things 2. The manifesting knowledge 2 The knowledge of God contemplation of his diuine wisedome goodnes shining in the very creation of things For that he might bee celebrated magnified for his works he was to create those thinges which should know him should praise magnifie him being knowen and manifested vnto them in his woorkes And to this purpose created he natures both endewed with reason without reason that there might bee both those which shoulde praise him the matter of his praise Psalm 19.1 The heauens declare the glorie of god the firmament sheweth the worke of his hands 3. The administration gouerning of the world 3 His prouidence For therefore he created the world that hee might by his prouidence euer gouerne rule preserue it so might perpetually shew forth his maruelous works which he hath done from the beginning of the world now doth wil do but chiefly that he might administer the Church congregation of elect Angels men Isai 40.26 Lift vp your eies on high behold who hath created these things This third end is subordinat serueth for the secōd end 4. 4 That he might gather a church 5 That all things might serue for man To gather a church of Angels men who shuld agnise magnifie this creator 5. That al other things might serue for the safetie both of the soul bodie of man as also for the life necessity delight of men but especially that they might profit the elect eache thing in their due place might be to them as ministers instruments whereby god blessing increasing them might be lauded praised of them Gen. 1.28 Subdue the
was purchased by their owne fault as who freely and willingly departed from God and remaineth in them ioyned and accompanied with great desire delight Wherefore to this that they should merite punishment their own will sufficeth whereas especially the punishment was before denounced This solution or aunswere Aristotle himselfe in the same fifth Chapter giueth vs when as he sheweth that men are diseruedly reprehended and punished for vices either of minde or bodie though they can not auoid them or leaue them because themselues are the cause of their owne vices and haue purchased them vnto themselues of their owne accorde and voluntarilie Lastly of all they wrest also certaine places of Scripture by false interpretations Certaine places of scripture wrested against Gods prouidence against gods vniuersal prouidence As Iohn 8.44 When the Diuel speaketh a lie then hee speaketh of his owne and Iam. 1. God tempteth no man Eccles 15.20 He hath commaunded no man to doe vngodly as also other the like places which denie God to bee the author of sinne But those places attribute vnto the wicked and remooue from GOD the sinnes as lies and temptations to sinne but the actions themselues of the wicked as they are not sinnes but operations and motions seruing for the exercising and manifesting of Gods goodnesse or iustice the whole Scripture sheweth to bee doone by the will of God and also as they are sinnes by his iust permission As of satan deceiuing the Prophetes of Achab of the false Prophets by whom god trieth and openeth the hypocrisie or constancy of men in true religion Acts 5. Satan filled the hart of Ananias 2. Cor. 4. The god of this world hath blinded the harts of vnbeleeuers In these the like saiengs also is discerned the work of the diuel vniustly blinding men to destroy them and of God iustly blinding them by the diuel to punish them Act. 5.38 If this counsel be of men it wil come to nought And Isa 30. Woe to the rebellious children that take counsel but not of mee The counsels of men are said to be not of God but of themselues in respect of the endes which men letting passe the wil of God reuealed vnto them respect and attaine not vnto but not in respect of the ends which god doth respect attaineth vnto as wel by the wicked not knowing or contemning his wil as by the godly or which is in effect the same the coūsels of men are said to bee of them not of God as they are sins that is as they swarue from the known wil of god but not as they are the execution of Gods either secret or knowen wil. 1. Cor. 9. God doth not take care for Oxen Not principally or not in such sort as for men For he giueth also to beastes their meat Those words thē Thou shalt not mussel the mouth of the Oxe that treadeth out the Corne was therefore spoken especially that God might thereby shewe what hee would haue by men vnto men to be performed So the wicked are often said to be cast out of the sight of God not that the prouidence of God is not extended to them but that he doth not tender them with his mercy bountie as he doth the godly For the godly also complaine that they are neglected of god when they are afflicted not that god is not present with them in affliction but that humane sense iudgement suggesteth this vnto vs. And God is saide to set his face against the wicked to cut them off Leu. 20.5 3 Why the knowlege of this doctrine concerning Gods prouidence is necessary The causes why this doctrine is to bee knowen 1 The Glorie of God THis doctrin is necessarily to be known 1 For the glory of god For he wil haue vs to ascribe vnto him most great liberty goodnes wisedome power iustice this he wil haue vs to acknowlege profes against the dreams dotings of Epicures Manichees and Stoicks But if the prouidence of god in mouing guiding al things euen the least both good bad be denied these also his properties are denied And if these bee denied god is not worshipped and magnified of vs but denied 2 Our comfort and saluation 2 For our own comfort saluation that by this means there maie bee stirred vp in vs First patience in aduersitie because all thinges come to passe by the most wise iust and most auaileable counsell and will of our heauenlie father And whatsoeuer either good or bad god sendeth vs in thē we consider the fatherly will of god towardes vs. Whatsoeuer commeth vnto vs by the counsel and will of god and is profitable for vs that we ought to beare patiently but all euils come vnto vs by the counsell and will of god and are profitable for vs Therefore wee ought to beare all euils patiently Secondly That wee may bee thankefull for benefites receiued of god Wee ought to bee thankeful because of whom wee receiue all good thinges both corporal and spirituall great and small to him wee ought to bee thankefull and to serue and worship him But from god the author of all good thinges we haue all thinges Therefore wee ought to bee thankefull vnto god and to worship him Nowe thankefulnesse hath two partes 1. Truth to acknowledge his benefite and to be thankefull both in worde and minde vnto him 2. Iustice to remunerate and make recompence Or Thankefulnesse consisteth 1. In acknowledging of the benefit 2. Jn celebrating it 3 In remunerating it Thirdly That we may conceiue a good hope and confidēce of things to come when as god by his prouidēce deliuereth vs out of euils He that hath decreed vnchangeablie to saue is able will saue beleeuers doth neuer suffer thē to perish Hope here signifieth such a hope as resolueth al things so to be gouerned of god as that also they shall hence forward be profitable for our safetie that he will neuer suffer vs to be pulled away or withdrawen from his loue nor will euer so forsake vs that we perish Because his will and power in preseruing sauing vs is vnchangeable far aboue the forces of al his enimies Fourthly the desire study of godlines praier and labour because although god indeed alone giueth all good things yet he giueth them with this rule and order that they bee desired and expected from him and sought by our labour and study which must bee guided by his word By this it appeareth Al the groundes of religion shaken in peeces if the prouidence of God bee denied that all the grounds and foundations of godlines or religion are pulled asunder if the prouidence of god be once denied such as before it hath been described out of the scripture For 1. We shall neuer be patient in aduersitie except we know it to come from God our Father vnto vs. 2 Wee shall neuer bee thankefull for his benefites except wee acknowledge them to bee giuen vnto
passed his substaunce into the flesh begotten but because in miraculous sort hee formed in the Virgins wombe of her substance the body of Christ so that it should not be contaminated or polluted with original sinne For neither could Christ bee in that sort conceiued by the holy Ghost as that his fleshe shoulde issue from the spirits substance and that for these causes 1. Because if this were graunted then were he not borne man of the Virgin or propagated of the Virgins substance 2. Because God is not changed into flesh 3. Because the Word tooke the flesh but was not changed into it 3 Obiection Jn God are not two natures Christ is God Therefore there are not two natures in him Aunswere Meere particulars doe enforce nothing For if the Maior bee taken vniuersallie it is false whosoeuer is God in him are not two natures this generall proposition is false The Maior therefore is true as touching God the father and God the holy Ghost but not as touching God the sonne incarnate Replie 1. But nothing can bee added vnto God by reason of the great perfection and simplicitie of his nature Christ is God therefore the humanitie could not be added vnto his diuine nature Aunswere Nothing can be added to God whereby his essence may bee changed and perfected But in that God the Word ioined the humane nature vnto him personallie there came no chaunge or great perfection thereby to the Word which tooke it but to the nature which was taken Replie 2. Humane nature cannot come vnto him who dwelleth in the light that none can come vnto 1. Tim. 6.16 Aunswere This is true if so God doth not assume and take it vnto him Replie 3. But it is ignominious for God to be a creature Christ man is God Aunswere The chaunging of the Godhead into a creature woulde haue beene ignominious and reprochful vnto the Word but that the godhead shoulde bee vnited vnto a creature is is most glorious vnto god as who by that meanes hath demonstrated and made knowen his infinite both goodnesse and wisedome and iustice and power to the whole world 2 Whether Christ be one person or mo IN Christ are two perfect natures whole and distinct and double properties also and operations naturall but one person which subsisting in both these natures diuine and humane is truely designed by the concrete termes or voices of both natures For it was requisit that one the same should be Mediator both by merit by power But they who make two persons make also two Christs with Nestorius the one a man passiue and crucified the other God not crucified and onelie assisting the man Christ by his grace 1 Obiection Jn whom are two things which in themselues make two whole persons in him also are two persons But in Christ are two things which make two whole persons namely the Word which is by it selfe a person subsisting from all eternitie and the bodie and soule which beeing vnited make likewise a person Therefore in Christ are two persons Aunswere We denie that part of the Maior to wit That the bodie and humane soule doe as in other men so also in Christ concurre to make a created person of the humane nature and diuers from the person increate and eternall of the Woordc For albeit the humane nature in Christ compounded of a bodie and a reasonable soule is an indiuidual and particular or singular substance as being from other indiuiduals of the same nature distinguished by certaine properties and accidents yet neither was it or is it a person or subsistence For first A person is that which is not onelie a particular or singular thing but also it selfe consisteth and subsisteth in it selfe and by it selfe not susteined in or of anie other But CHRISTS humane nature now from the verie first beginning thereof dependeth and is susteined by the person of the Word For it was at once both formed and assumed of the Word into vnitie of person and made proper vnto the Word before and without which assumption or personal Vnion it neither was nor had beene nor shoulde be so that this Vnion being dissolued and loosed it must needes follow that that this flesh and this soule should be brought to nothing Therfore Christs humane nature hath not any subsistence or person proper vnto it selfe Secondly Jt belongeth to the nature or definition of a person that it be an indiuidual incommunicable and also no part of another But the nature which the Word took and assumed belongeth to the substance of one Christ a part also of whom it is after a sort Therefore in it selfe and by it selfe it is no person Reply That which appertaineth to the substance of a person and is a part thereof cannot be a person The word appertaineth and belongeth to the substaunce of Christ and is after a sort a part of him as well as the humanitie Therefore neither shall the word be by this reason a person Ans The Maior proposition if it bee vnderstood simplie or vniuersally is false For a reasonable soule existing in the bodie is not a person but a part of an humane person which the soule together with the bodie doth make yet notwithstanding the same soule being loosed from the bodie is a person by it selfe not that compound and mortall person whereof it was a part that is an humane person but a person most simple and immortall such as are the Angels because it subsisteth out of the bodie by it self neither is part of another So may it be said of the Word if it be constred aright with indifferencie that the Word in it selfe and by it selfe is not the whole person of Christ or the Mediatour as he is Christ and Mediatour that is is not that whole thing which is Christ who is not onely God but also man and yet is in it selfe and by it selfe the perfect and whole person of the Godhead truelie subsisting before the flesh was that is the onelie begotten sonne of God For this selfe same person existing in it selfe from euerlasting and remaining for euer most simple and vncompound is by the assuming of humane nature made in time after a sort compound that is the Word incarnate Wherefore in respect of the person considered in Vnion or incarnate the Word is rather considered as a nature and both it selfe and the humane nature may be called as it were the parts of whole Christ are so called also of many of the auncient Fathers which were sound in faith not that the flesh assumpted did adde any part to the subsistence of the Word or as if of the Persons of the Word and the humane nature as being vnperfect parts was made another perfect person of a certaine third Essence consubstantiall with neither of those natures of which it is compounded but because the person of the Word altogether one and the same which before the flesh was taken consisted in the diuine nature onely doth now after the taking
Thirdly Christ did rise truly and indeed so that his soule did truelie and indeede returne vnto his bodie and he did truely come foorth euen out of the graue also in despite of the watchmen they beeing withal amased and stroken therewith Fourthly he rose the third daie as it was foreshadowed in Jonas and because that type of Ionas was so fulfilled thence it certainly followeth that this Iesus is the Messias promised vnto the Fathers 3 FOR WHAT CAVSE HE ROSE CHrist rose 1. In respect of the prophecies which were vttered of his resurrection Thou shalt not leaue my soul in the graue neither shalt thou suffer thy holy one to see corruption Psa 16.10 And Isai 53.10 When hee shall make his soule an offering for sinne hee shall see his seede and shall prolong his daies He shall see of the trauaile of his soul and shal be satisfied Matth. 12.39 No signe shall bee giuen vnto it saue the signe of the Prophet Ionas For as Ionas was three daies three nightes in the Whales bellie so shall the sonne of man bee three daies and three nightes in the heart of the earth Matth. 17.23 They shal kill the sonne of man but the third day shall he rise againe Ioh. 20.9 As yet they knew not the Scripture that hee must rise againe from the dead 2. He rose for his Fathers and his owne glorie Rom. 1.4 Declared to be the son of God by the resurrection from the dead Ioh. 17.1 Father glorifie thy Sonne that thy sonne maie also glorifie thee 3 For the worthinesse and power of the person that rose For first Christ is the beloued and onlie begotten Son of God Ioh. 3.35 The father loueth the sonne and hath giuen al thinges into his hand Secondlie Christ is true God and autor of life Ioh. 10.28 I giue vnto them eternall life and they shall neuer perish neither shall any pluck them out of my hand It had beene absurd then that hee should not bee raised who giueth life to others Thirdly Christ is righteous in himselfe and satisfied for our sinnes which were imputed to him Now where sin is not there dooth not death raigne any more 4 In respect of the office of the person who rose For first the Mediatour who was true God and man should raigne for euer 2. Sam. 7.13.14 I wil stablish the throne of his kingdome for euer J will bee his father hee shall bee my son Psa 45.6 Thy throne O God is for euer euer the scepter of thy kingdome is a scepter of righteousnesse Psal 89.3 I haue made a couenaunt with my chosen I haue sworne to Dauid my seruaunt Thy seede will I stablish for euer and set vp thy throne from generation to generation And againe I haue sworne once by my holynes that I will not faile Dauid saieng His seede shall endure for euer and his throne shall bee as the sunne before mee Hee shall be established for euermore as the Moone Ezech. 37.23 24. They shall bee my people and I will bee their god And Dauid my seruaunt shall bee king ouer them and they all shall haue one sheephearde Dan. 7.27 The kingdome and dominion and the greatnes of the kingdome vnder the whole heauen shall bee giuen to the holy people of the most high whose kingdome is an euerlasting kingdome and al powers shall serue and obey him Luk. 1.33 Of his kingdome shall bee none ende Secondly The Mediatour who was to bee our brother and true man should euer make intercession for vs and as an euerlasting Priest appeare for vs before God Psa 110. Thou art a Priest for euer according to the order of Melchisedech Rom. 8.34 It is Christ which is dead yea or rather which is risen againe who is also at the right hand of God and maketh request for vs. Thirdly The Mediatour which is to bee true man should bee Mediatour both by his merit by his efficacie or power For it sufficed not that hee died for vs but hee was furder to bestow through his power his benefites vpon the Church and vs all who by dying or by his death had obtained for vs righteousnes that is the Holy Ghost life and glorie eternall For both belong vnto the Mediatour who therefore obtaineth them for vs by his intercession and death and in whom also the same benefites are therefore placed by the Godhead that hee should make vs partakers of them Ioh. 1.16 Of his fulnesse haue al wee receiued Neither ought it to seeme any maruell that Christ doth bestow the same benefites on vs which hee obtained of the Godhead by his death for vs. For a man may both obtaine a thing of one for another and also bestow the same on him for whom hee obtained it As be it that one maketh request for thee vnto the Prince for a gift of a thousand crounes the prince doth this for his sake that requested it and bestoweth also that gift on him that he may bestow it on thee hee then shall obtaine this gift for thee of the Prince and withall shall bestow the same on thee Now albeit Christ could haue bestowed the benefits of his death vpon vs by his Godhead by the meanes wherof wee are iustified and regenerated and beginne faith and new life by the holy Ghost yet notwithstanding as God decreed by man to raise the dead for by man came the resurrection 1. Cor. 15.21 and by man to iudge the worlde so also hath hee decreed to bestowe these giftes by Iesus man that the same might be and continue mediatour who is true God and man Therefore also it was requisite that Christ should remaine for euer our brother and our head that we of the other side being engraffed into him by a true faith shoulde alwaies remaine his members Which thing al the testimonies doe confirme which attribute an eternall kingdome vnto the seede of Dauid For on that kingdome is our saluation grounded and the kingdome of Christ the Sonne of Dauid could by no meanes haue been eternal if his humane nature had continued in death Obiection But in the old testament before his incarnation or humiliation Christ without his humanitie did bestow the same benefits on the Fathers which hee bestoweth on vs in the new Testament and was no lesse before the taking of flesh Mediatour than since also he did the same thinges before his comming which he dooth after his comming in the flesh Ans But neither had hee then doone those thinges except hee should haue beene afterwards man and haue continued alwaies man so neither now should he doe the same if hee did not reteine the nature which he tooke for euer Iohn 5.27 The father hath giuen the sonne also power to execute iudgement in that hee is the sonne of man 5 He rose for vs and that in three respectes 1. For our Iustification Rom. 4.25 our Lord Iesus christ was deliuered to death for our sinnes and is risen againe for our iustification Now the
resurrection of our Mediatour was requisite for our iustification first because except his punishment had beene finite wee coulde not haue recouered out of euerlasting death from which the Mediatour was so to deliuer vs as that hee shoulde vtterly ouercome it in vs. If then our Mediatour was vtterlie to vanquish and ouercome death in vs hee ought then so to die as to ouercome death first in himselfe and so to fulfill indeede that which was foretolde Ose 13.14 1. Cor. 15.54 Death is swallowed vp into victorie O Death where is thy sting O graue where is thy victorie Againe Except Christ had ouercome death he could not haue bestowed his benefites on vs which by his death hee had merited for vs neither should we knowe that hee had satisfied for vs because if hee had continued in death it had beene a certaine argument that he had not satisfied but was ouercome of death of the burdē of sin For where death is there is sinne or if he had satisfied yet had remained in death this had been contrarie to the iustice of God Wherefore Christ was to rise both that wee might knowe that hee had promerited benefites for vs and also that himselfe might applie the same vnto vs that is that by his merit and efficacy we might be perfectlie saued and iustified 2. Christ rose for our regeneration For iustification or remission of sinnes sufficeth not without the inchoation and beginning of a new life 3. For our saluation and glorification God wil by this meanes euerlastinglie quicken and glorifie vs that beeing inserted and engraffed into the masse of his Son that is his humane nature wee maie for euer bee carried of it and out of it drawe life For these causes it was necessarie that Christ shoulde rise againe that is that his soul which was laide downe from the body should be againe ioined with the same body For resurrection is nothing else than a coniunction or reuniting of the same body with the same soule 4 What are the fruites of Christes Resurrection ALL the causes of Christs Resurrection are not fruites of his Resurrection And after a diuerse maner are the causes and the fruites of his resurrection considered and moreouer the benefites of Christ bestowed by his resurrection are one way considered as causes of Christs resurrection and otherwise as fruites of the same For the Questions are diuerse Wherefore christ rose And What fruits Christs resurrection bringeth vnto vs. Furdermore the fruite of Christs resurrectiō of two sorts the one respecting christ the other vs. For first as the Apostle sayth Rom. 1.4 Hee is declared by the resurrection to bee the Sonne of God euen the onely begotten and beloued Sonne of God who is also God himselfe Againe Christs humane nature also was by his resurrection adorned with that glorie which becommeth the nature of the Son of God The fruit of Christs resurrection which respecteth vs is of many sorts But to speake in general all the benefites of christes death are the fruites which we receiue by his resurrection For Christes resurrection maketh that his death hath his effect Christ by his resurrection dooth applie vnto vs those benefites which he merited for vs by his death by this means the same are the benefits both of his death resurrection which are otherwise merited for vs thā they ar bestowed on vs. For it was not necessarie that the verie act of meriting deseruing should dure all the time both of the old and the new Church but onely the act of bestowing or applieng the same and therefore it was necessarie also that the Mediatour should be continually that hee might bestow those benefites on the Church which hee was once to merite for this can not bee doone without a Mediatour and therefore neither can the Church be for one moment without a Mediator In the old church Christ the Mediator did bestow on the Fathers the benefits of his death to come by the force and efficacy of his resurrection to come nowe he bestoweth them on vs by the efficacie of his resurrection alreadie past It remaineth now that wee in speciall reckon the chiefe fruites which the resurrection of Christ bringeth vnto vs. First then by the resurrection of Christ wee know him to be the Messias as in whom the prophecies were fulfilled Secondly We are confirmed and warranted by Christes resurrection 1. Of his merit That hee hath fullie and perfectlie satisfied for our sinnes For one onelie sinne not being satisfied for had withheld christ still in death He was cast into such a prison as that except he had paied the vtmost farthing he had not beene let goe But he was let goe and dimissed Therefore he paied the vtmost farthing 2. We are confirmed of the application of Christes benefites which could not haue been bestowed if he had not risen For as was said before it was necessarie that the selfesame Mediatour beeing man should rise againe Ioh 7.39 The holy Ghost was not yet giuen Iesus was not yet glorified Wherefore wel saith Saint Paul Rom. 4.25 That Christ is risen again for our righteousnes that is to confer and apply righteousnesse vnto vs. Thirdly A fruit of christes resurrection is the gift of the holie Ghost by whom christ regenerateth vs and giueth vs eternal life Before time the Godlie were also endued with the holie Ghost and regenerated but more sparingly than nowe in the newe Testament and yet both by the force and vertue of his resurrection For the holy Ghost by whose vertue and operation onely wee are regenerated cannot be giuen but by the resurrection and ascension of christ Fourthly We must also ascribe and attribute it vnto christes resurrection that hee preserueth vs by his perpetuall and applied righteousnesse that hee beginneth in vs eternal life and so dooth also ascertaine and assure vs of the consummation and accomplishment of eternall life whereof wee cannot bee certaine except wee haue the beginning thereof and the beginning we should not haue except we had the holy Ghost Fiftlie The resurrection of our bodies is the fruite of christes resurrection 1. Because christ is our Heade and wee his members Now it is expedient for the Heades glorifie that the members bee glorious Christ indeede shoulde bee by himselfe though hee had no members or if his members continued in death but hee should not be Head because he is not heade but in respect of his members Neither shoulde hee bee a king without a kingdome according to the nature of correlatiues whose verie beeing dependeth vppon necessarie relation which one hath to the other and according to the nature of correlatiues a glorious head doth require glorious members and such as are correspondent vnto it 2. Because if Christ be risen he hath also abolished sinne If he hath abolished sinne either hee hath abolished his own sin or ours but not his owne therefore ours If he hath abolished our sin he hath abolished death also For if the cause
that hee hath done If then the bodies which haue sinned shall receiue accordingly not other bodies but the same shall rise And the very word it selfe of rising enforceth as much for nothing can rise but that which is fallen Wherefore seeing our bodies shall rise no other bodies shall rise or bee quickened than those which haue fallen and are dead or no other than those which doe fall and die How flesh and bloud i◠denied the heauenly inheritance Obiection But saint Paul saith that flesh and bloud cannot inherite the kingdome of god Therefore our bodies cannot possesse the kingdome of god because they are flesh and bloud Answere The flesh oftentimes signifieth some qualitie or the substaunce in respect of some certaine qualitie So flesh that is being sinfull and corruptible shall not possesse the kingdome of God but our flesh then shall no more be able to sinne neither shall it bee corruptible Obiection 2. Our bodies shall be spirituall 1. Cor. 15.44 Jt is sowen a naturall bodie and is raised a spirituall bodie Therefore our bodies shall not then haue the properties of our flesh Aunswere In what sense our bodies shall bee spirituall They shall bee indeede spirituall but shall not haue all the properties of a spirite but some onely because they shall bee agile and quicke mightie and vncorrupt and indeede are therefore chieflie called spirituall because they shall be guided by the spirite neither shall any more the naturall life remaine in them That this is true is apparent by these reasons 1. The Apostle himselfe addeth This corruptible must put on incorruption 2. Hee calleth it a spirituall bodie but a spirite is no bodie 3. Jf anie bodie after the resurrection should be so spirituall as not retaining at all anie bodilie properties then surelie Christs bodie should haue beene so but now he saith to the Apostles Luk. 24.39 Handle me and see for a spirite hath not flesh and bones as ye see mee haue Obiection 3. How are wee saide to beleeue the resurrection when as yet wee are saide to hope for the resurrection to come Answere We are saide to hope for the resurrection as it is an effect of Gods counsell wee are saide to beleeue it as it is the counsell it selfe and purpose of God 9 Whether the soule be immortal The causes for which this Question is to bee moued Mat. 22.23 2. Tim. 2.17 BEsides that this question belongeth to the Article of the Resurrection the explication also thereof in it selfe shal not be altogether vnprofitable or fruitlesse For not now onely doe they beginne to dispute against the immortalitie of the soule but the Sadduces also denied it as they likewise that said the Resurrection was past alreadie vnto him that beleeued neither made anie other resurrection besides that spirituall resurrection of the regenerate Likewise also some Anabaptists denie the immortalitie of the soule Moreouer Paul the third Pope of Rome when he was breathing out his soule and readie to dy said that now at length he should trie know three things whereof in his whole time he had much doubted 1. Whether there were a god 2. Whether soules were immortall 3. Whether there were any hel Wherefore it ought not to seeme straunge if this question be moued neither shal it bee altogether vaine and needelesse both because it serueth for the controuling and refuting especially of Epicures and also because it maketh for the better vnderstanding of some places of holy Scripture But because there haue beene and euen nowe are who haue taught that the soule of man like as of bruite beastes is nothing else but life or the vitall power arising of the temperature and perfection of the bodie and therefore dieth and is extinguished together with the bodie and as some of them speake who wil seeme to beleeue the resurrection of the dead doth sleepe when the bodie dieth that is is without motion or sense vntil the raising of the bodie which indeede is nothing else than that the soule is mortal that is a meere qualitie onlie in the bodie and when the bodie is dissolued becommeth nothing because if it were an incorporeal substance it could not be without sense and motion against these we are to holde the recordes of Gods woorde and writ concerning the spiritual and immortal substaunce of mans soul The soule an in corporeall substance That the soule of man is not onely a forme or perfection or temperament or force and power or an agitation arising out of the temperature of the bodie but a substaunce incorporeall liuing vnderstanding dwelling in the bodie and susteining and moouing it these places following of holy Scripture doe shewe Psalm 48. His soule shal be blessed in life Heb. 12. God is called the Father of spirites And it is saide of the faithfull Yee are come to the celestial Ierusalem and to the companie of innumerable Angels and to the spirites of iust and perfect men 1 Cor. 2.11 No man knoweth the thinges of a man saue the spirite of a man which is in him In these and the like places of Scripture both the soule of man is called a spirite and the properties of a liuing vnderstanding substance are attributed vnto it Wherefore to no purpose doe the aduersaries of this doctrine oppose those places in which the name of the soul is taken for the the life and wil of man as Matth. cap. 6. The soul is more woorth than meate Iob. 13.14 J put my soule in my hand For by the fore-alledged places it is manifest thnt this is not general but is vsed by a * Metalepsis figure of speech whereby we cal the effect by the name of his cause Now the immortalitie of the soule is prooued by manifest places of holie Scripture 1. Luk 23.43 The soule immortall Christ hanging on the crosse said to the theefe this daie shalt thou be with me in Paradise But he could not be there in bodie because that was dead and buried Therefore his soule was gathered with Christs into Paradise and so consequentlie the soul liueth 2. Paul saith Phil. 1.23 I desire to be loosed and to be with christ he speaketh of the rest ioie which he should enioie with christ But they who feele nothing what can their ioie or happinesse bee Wherefore they also are refuted in this place who saie mens souls sleep so withall denie the immortality of the soul 3. Wised 3.1 The souls of the iust are said to be in the hands of god 4. Matt. 22.32 God is not the god of the dead but of the liuing Therefore the soules liue 5. Luk. 23.46 Into thy hands I commend my spirit 6. 2 Corinth 5.8 When we remoue out of the body we may goe vnto the Lord. Wherefore the soules sleep not as some Anabaptistes wil haue thē but enioie immortall life and celestiall glorie with the Lorde 7. In the Reuelation cap. 6.10 The soules of the godly that were killed are said to
is confirmed not onely by Christ in the Euangelistes but also by Paul who expresly saith The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ The Signes and thinges signified in the Lordes Supper Moreouer the signes in this sacrament are bread and wine bread broke and eat wine distributed and taken The things signified are 1. The breaking of the body and the shedding of the bloud of Christ 2. Our vnion and coniunction with christ by faith so that wee drawe life euerlasting from him and are made partakers as of Christ himselfe so also of all his benefites as the branches are made partakers of the life of the vine Wee are aduertised of this our communion with christ First by the proportion which the signes haue with the thinges and Secondly by the promise which is adioyned And the proportion dooth chiefâ—â— propose and shewe two things vnto vs 1. The sacrifice of Christ. 2. Our communion with christ because the bread is not only broken but is also giuen vs to eate Now the breaking of the bread is a part of the ceremony whereunto a part of the thing signified dooth aunswere This difference doth Paul testifie when he saith This my body which is broken for you Heere recâ—iuing and eating is a part of the ceremony whereunto dooâ—h aunswere the thing signified â—o wit the eating of christes body Now this diuine and spirituall thing namely the breaking and communicating of christes body is signed and confirmed by this ceremony which is the breaking and receiuing of bread for two causes 1. Because Christ commandeth these rites vnto which we ought to giue no lesse credite than if Christ himselfe did speake with vs. 2. Because hee annexeth a promise that they who obserue these rites with a true faith must be assured and certaine that they haue communion with Christ Wine is added that wee should know the perfection and accomplishment of our saluation to be in his sacrifice that there was nothing which could be further desired The wine is seuered from the breade to signifie the violence of his death because his bloud was sundered from his body 2 What are the ends of the Lords supper THE ends for which the Lords supper was instituted are 1. That it might bee a câ—nfirmation of our faith that is a most certaine testification of our communion and vnion with christ because Christ testifieth vnto vs by these signs that hee doth as verily feede vs with his bodie and bloud vnto euerlasting life 〈◊〉 wee receiue at the hand of the minister these the Lords signes And this testification is directed to euerie one who receiueth the signes with a true faith and furder also wee so receiue the signes at the ministers hand as that rather the Lord himselfe giueth them vs by his m nisters Wherefore christ is saide to haue baptised moe disciples than Iohn when yet hee did it by his Apostles and other disciples 2. That it might bee a publique distinction or marke discerning the church from all other nations and secteâ— For the Lord instituted and appointed his supper for his disciples and not for others 3. That it might be our testification to christ and the whole church Which is a publique confession of our faith and a solemne binding of our selues to thankefulnes and the celebration of this benefite Both which are prooued by these wordes of christ Doe this in remembrance of me This remembrance is taken first for faith in the heart then for thankesgiuing and our publique confession 4. That it might be a bond of the churches assemblies and meetings because the Supper was instituted that it should be done and celebrated in a congregation and that either great or small Therefore the Supper as was said before is called a * Synaxis conuent and Christ expresly commaundeth Drinke yee all of this Likewise Paul When yee come together to eate staie one for another 5. That it might bee a bond of mutual loue and dilection because the Supper testifieth that all are made the members of christ vnder one heade as also Paul saith For we that are manie are one bread and one bodie because we are all partakers of one bread The Lordes supper may not bee celebrated by one alone Of this which hath beene spoken wee gather that the Lordes Supper ought not to bee celebrated by one onely 1. Because it is a communion and the signe of our communion 2. Because it is a thankesgiuing and all ought to giue thankes vnto God and by consequent hee that thinketh himselfe vnworthy to communicate with others in the Lordes Supper doth withall confesse himselfe not to bee fitte to giue thankes vnto God 3. Because christ together with his benefits is not proper to anie but common to all 4. Christ called all his housholde vnto it euen Iudas himselfe 5 That some abstaine from comming to the supper it commeth of a certaine euil and corrupt motion because they thinke them selues not woorthie inough to approche vnto this table All are worthy who beleeue themselues to bee deliuered by Christ from eternall damnation and desire to profite and goe forward in godlinesse In summe if the Supper bee receiued by one onely th t is done against the vse appellation institution and nature of the sacrament Obiection Christ in the word of the Institution of his supper putteth as the principal end of his supper his remembrance therefore the confirmation of faith must not be made the principal end of his supper Aunswere The reason foloweth not to the denial of a part by putting the whole For the remembrance of Christ is the whole wherein is comprised both our confession and our solemne bond to thankefulnesse and also the confirmation of our faith Wherefore rather by inuerting the reason I thus inferre and conclude because the remembrance is the supper therefore it is the confirmation of our faith and because also Christ proposeth vnto vs that ceremonie or rite which must bee vnto vs a remembrance of him he doth verily propose also a confirmation of our faith which is nothing else but a remembraunce of Christ and his benefites Obiection The holie ghost confirmeth our faith Therefore the supper doth not Aunswere The reason foloweth not to the remouing of an instrumental cause by the putting of a principal cause 3 What the supper differeth from Baptisme THE supper differeth from baptisme 1. Jn ceremonies or rites 2. In the circumstances of the institution and vse or in the significations of the ceremonies Baptisme is a signe of the couenant entered and made betweene God the faithfull The supper is a signe of the continuing of that couenant Or baptisme is a signe of regeneration and of our entrance into the church The supper is a signe of their fostering abiding and preseruation who are once entered into the church The new man must first be borne by the spirite of Christ as is a natural man by natural conception and
for it doth not being receiued into vs quicken vs by working in vs new corporal qualities like as a medicine dooth but the bodie of christ nourisheth and quickeneth vs after a maner diuers from that natural nourishing and accordingly as this manner of nourishing and quickening requireth so receiue we christs bodie The maner whereby christs bodie and bloud nourisheth vs is 1. The respect of his merite For for vs christs bodie is giuen and his bloud shed for vs and for the bodie and bloud of christ wee haue eternal life giuen vnto vs. After this manner then the bodie and bloud of christ quickeneth vs as it is a merit deseruing for vs this blessing 2. His bodie and bloude quickeneth or nourisheth vs when wee receiue that merite of christs bodie and bloud that is when we beleeue with a true faith that for it wee shall haue eternall life This faith resteth and hangeth on christ hanging on the Crosse not corporallie dwelling in vs. 3. It nourisheth vs when the same spirite vniteth vs by faith vnto christ and worketh the like in vs which it doth in christ For except wee be graffed into christ wee doe not please God For hee will on that condition receiue vs and pardon vs our sinnes So that by faith through the working of the holy Ghost we bee ioined with christ and engraffed into him Seeing then this is the maner whereby the bodie and bloude of christ quicken and nourish vs there is no need of any descending of the bodie and bloud of christ into our bodies 4 Obiection The eating of bread is done by the mouth But the eating of the bodie is the eating of bread Therefore the eating of the bodie is done by the mouth and is corporall when it is saide Take and eate Aunswere This eating whereof mention is made heere is perfourmed by the mouth not simplie but as concerning the signe But it is not doone by the mouth but is spirituall as concerning the thing signified spirituall Reply This is my bodie that is the inuisible bodie which J haue in my handes Aunswere But the bodie is the thing signified and spirituall other-wise there will bee no proportion betweene the signe and the thing signified It followeth therefore that hee saieth The bread is my bodie So that the bread is that whereof the bodie is affirmed For in this speech the thing signified is affirmed of the signe 5 Obiection The Wordes are not to bee changed Christ vsed the woord Js Therefore there may not be put in place thereof the word Signifieth Aunswere The woords are not to bee changed into another sense than God wil haue But otherwise they are often to be changed As when it is said Pluck out thine eie For woords are to bee vnderstoode according to the nature of thinges Moreouer they themselues who accuse vs of change doe more make this chaunge and mutation than we Reply The bodie of christ was broken and crucified for vs not the signe of the bodie Therefore the bread is the substantiall bodie of christ Answ I grant for the bread signifieth that very bodie which was borne of Marie crucified Question Why then are the things signified attributed to the signes Two causes why the thinge signified are attributed to the signes and the signes called by their names if neither consubstantiation nor transubstantiation bee thereby signified Aunswere There are two causes alleadged heereof A similitude or likenesse and a certainty 1. The similitude or proportion of signes and the thing signified is first As the bread and wine nourish our body so the body and bloud of christ nourish vs vnto euerlasting life Secondly As the bread and wine are receiued by the mouth so the body and bloud are receiued by faith Thirdly As the bread is eaten being broken so the bodie of christ is receiued being sacrif ced and broken Fourthly As in corporall foode is required an appetite vnto it so also in this spiritual foode is required faith Fiftly As of many cornes is made one loafe so are we being many made one bodie Wherefore by reason of this similitude of the signe and the thing signified the thing signified is attributed vnto the signes 2. The certainty of the signes in the cause likewise why that is affâ—rmed of the signes which is proper vnto the thing signified For the sâ—gnes testifie that christes sacrifice is accomplished and for our behoofe and commodity because it is certainly and truly applied vnto vs. Here last of al is to be obserued that the eating of christs body dooth comprise and comprehend 1. Faith 2. That by faith we are made partakers of christ that is we are vnited vnto Christ and our communion is wrought by faith and the holy Ghost is the bond of this our vnion and coniunction with Christ 3. That wee are made partakers of Christs benefites iustification and remission of sinnes And this ensueth of that vnion of Christ with vs. 4. Jt comprehendeth also the benefite of our regeneration whereby we are made like and conformed vnto christ because the same spirit dwelling in vs and in christ worketh also the same things in vs. This eating is easily collected as out of many other places so also out of this saieng of christ I am the liuing bread which commeth downe from heauen if any man eate of this bread hee shall liue for euer And the bread that I will giue is my flesh which I wil giue for the life of the world 5 What is the difference betweene the Lords supper and the popish Masse THIS question is necessary by reason of errours which haue câ—ept into the church It is otherwise demanded Why the Masse is to be abolished â—ut here this questioÌ„ is also conteined and comprehended because these differences and contrarieties of the Lordes supper and the Masse are the causes why the Masse is to bee abolished First let vs speake a few woordes of the name of the Masse or Missa The word Missa seemeth to haue his name from an ancient custome of Ecclesiastical rites actions The originall of the woord Missa which we call the Masse in the end whereof leaue was giuen of departure to the Catechumenes the possessed with spirites and the excommunicated persons and so the woord Missa seemeth to be vsed as it were a mission or sending awaie because it was the last part of diuine seruice Others wil haue it to be so called from a dimission or from the manner of dimissing them because they were demised with these words â—te Missa est that is go you may depart or as others interprete it goe now is the collection or alms which they will haue to be called Missa of the sending it in as we may so speak or throwing or casting it in for the poore Some wil therefore haue it deriued from the Hebrue Masah that is tributes which was wont to be paied of euery one The word is found Deut. 16.10 Missach nidbath iâ—decha A free
Likewise Reioicing at another mans harme and vncompassionatenesse voide of al griefe In the excesse Remisnesse when they are spared whom God wil not haue spared which is cruel pitty whereby the whole societie of men is hurt yea he himself also who is spared Vnto Amitie or Frindship are opposed 1. Jn the defect al iniustice and treacherie whereby frindship is violated enmitie neglect of frindes deniall of good wil and mutual duties a faigned shew of frindship 2. Jn the excesse flatterie or vniust gratifieng likewise lightnes in ioining and loosing friendship THE SEVENTH COMMANDEMENT THOV shal not commit adulterie The end of this commaundement is The preseruation of chastitie and wed-locke Now when God nameth adulterie hee doth not forbid that only as being the most grosse vice of all those which are repugnaunt to chastity but also al vices that are contrary to chastity and such as are of neere affinity vnto them likewise their causes occasions effects antecedentes consequents and of the contrary he commandeth al things which make for the preseruation of chastitie The reasons are these 1. By one special the rest that are of neere affinity with that are vnderstoode So when adultery is forbidden other speciall vices of lustes are condemned and Adultery is mentioned because it is reckoned amongest the grossest vices of lustes 2. Where the cause is condemned there also the effect is condemned and so of the contrarie So here are commaunded or forbidden as wel the antecedentes as the consequentes 3. The end and scope of this commaundement is the preseruing of chastity and protecting of wedlocke among men Whatsoeuer therefore maketh for the preseruing of chastity and for the protecting of wedlocke is commaunded in this Law and the contrary is withall forbidden The vertues of the seuenth commaundement are in number three Chastitie Shamefastnes Temperancy Chastity is a vertue preseruiug cleannes of mind body agreeing with the will of God and auoiding all lustes forbidden by God all vnlawful companings and inordinate copulation all the desires occasions causes and effects either in single life or in wedlocke Chastitie hath his first original from a * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Greeke woord which signifieth to adorne because it is an ornament not onely of the whole man but also of all the rest of the vertues Wherefore that name was giuen by speciall regard and preeminence to this vertue because it is one of those principall vertues that make the Image of god Now there is a double chastitie one of single life an other of mariage Chastitie of single life is a vertu auoiding al lusts remaining in a sole state without mariage Chastitie of marriage is to obserue in marriage the order instituted by the woonderful counsell of God The causes of chastitie are 1. The commaundement of GOD. 2. The preseruation of Gods Image 3. A studie and desire to auoide the defacing of Gods image and the coniunction that is betweene God and the Church 4. Rewards and punishments The extremities of chastitie are All lustes their causes occasions and effects all vnlawfull coniunctions all corrupt desires that violate and hurt the conscience also in marriage For by reason of the corruption of our nature all sinnes are not taken away by marriage as when the chiefe and principall ende of marriage is not respected Shamefastnes is a vertue abhorring all filthinesse ioined with a shame griefe sadnes either for some former vncleannes or for feare of falling into any hereafter and hauing a purpose and desire to flie not onely vncleannes it selfe but also the occasions and tokens and signes of vncleannes Shamefastnes is required vnto chastitie as a furtheraunce and cause of chastitie and also as an effect consequent and signe thereof The extremities or vices contrarie to shamefastnes are 1. Shamelesnes or impudencie which maketh light of vncleannes 2. A rude and vplandish bashfulnes or an vnciuil and peruerse bashfulnes when a man is ashamed of that whereof hee ought not to bee ashamed as of a thing which is good and honest and requireth not any bashfulnes to bee shewed therein Temperancie is a vertue obseruing the meane agreeable to nature honestie mediocritie order of persons places and times according to the lawe and rule of nature in things concerning the body as in meat drink Temperancie is required vnto chastitie as a cause without which wee cannot be chast The extremities of temperancie are Jntemperancie in meate quaffings of drink Likewise an hurtful teÌ„perancie or too great abstinence hypocritical not greeable to nature such as is the abstinencie of Eâ—emites Whereas all sorts of lusts are repugnant vnto chastitie and to the drift and scope of this commaundement the same are to bee noted and obserued They may bee referred vnto three seuerall kindes Of the first kinde are those which are contrarie to nature and from the Diuel namely such as are euen against this our corrupt nature not onely because they corrupt it and bereaue it of that conformity with God but also because this our corrupt nature abhorreth them of this kind are those which are recited by the Apostle Rom. 1. as confounding of kindes and sexes likewise the vnnatural abusage of woman-kind These heinous sinnes and horrible trespasses are to bee punished by the magistrate with extraordinarie punishments Incest hath for a great part a repugnancie with this our nature albeit there were examples of incests in our first pareÌ„ts because those were doone but of necessitie and by dispensation from God himselfe Therefore this was an exception from the generall rule Of the second kinde are those which proceed from this our corrupt nature as fornications amongst those that are free froÌ„ marriage adulteries betweene persons that are both married companings of married persons with others that are vnmarried If a married person haue companie with another married person it is a double adulterie for he violateth both his owne wedlocke and the others If a married man haue to doe with an vnmarried woman it is simple adultery Simple fornication is of those that are vnmarried Magistrates are by duty bound seuerely to punish incestes adulteries For they are much more heinous than thefts robberies God appointeth death for adulteries Nowe although God did not ordaine that simple-fornication also should be punished with death yet when he saith after Let there not be a whore among you hee signifieth that it is to bee punished in his kinde There are other things also which are committed of this our corrupt nature with an euil conscience as lustes and euill desires vnto which we yeeld or wherewith wee are delighted neither endeuour to auoide them Such vitious and lewd desires and the like although they bee not punished in the ciuill court yet are they ioyned with an euill conscience and are punished of God Of the third kind are corrupt inclinations vnto which yet good men doe not yeeld but with-stand them and take away from them all occasions and their
wil vs to desire it But God willeth vs to craue in this life and to desire the perfect fulfilling of the Law 1. Because he wil at length effectuate it in those that desire it therefore hee will giue it vs after this life if wee desire the same here truly and from our heart 2. That we may now goe forward in godlinesse and that the studie of liuing according to the prescript of Gods law may bee daiely more and more kindled and confirmed in vs. 3. That by this desire of fulfilling the Lawe God maie exercise vs in repentance and obedience OF PRAIER THE chiefe Questions hereof are 1 What praier is and howe many sortes there are of praier 2 Why praier is necessary 3 What is required to true praier 4 What is the forme of praier by Christ prescribed 1 WHAT PRAIER IS AND HOW MANY SORTS OF PRAIER THERE ARE. PRaier is a petition ioyned with an ardent and earnest desire whether vttered in woords or not vttered whereby wee aske of the true god reueiled in the word those things which he hath commanded to be asked of him proceeding from an acknowledgement of our necessity and neede with humilitie and repentaunce and confession of our owne vnworthinesse made in true conuersion vnto God in a confidence and sure trust in gods promises for christs sake our Mediatour Saint Paul maketh mention of three sortes of praier 1. Petitions for good thinges 2. Deprecations against euill things 3. Jntercessions and requestes for others The General of these specials is Praier Likewise Jnuocation and Adoration But praier differeth notwithstanding from Inuocation Adoration For Adoration is often times taken for the whole worship of god because whō we woorship him we account for the true God But praier is a part of Inuocation for Jnuocation compriseth these two as a general his specials namely Petition or praier and thankes-giuing For Inuocation or to Inuocate on God is to craue of the true God any thing that is necessary both for the soule and body and to giue thanks for benefits receiued of him Thankefulnes or Thankesgiuing is an acknowledgement of a benefit receiued and a voluntary binding to the performaunce of duties mutuall possible and lawful Thankefulnes conteineth two things to wit truth and iustice 2 Why Praier is necessarie THE causes for which praier is necessary are these 1 The commandement of God because God hath commanded that wee call vpon him and will this way chiefely and principally be worshiped and magnified by vs. Psa 50.16 Call vpon me in the daie of trouble Luk. 11.2 When ye praie say Our Father c. By these wordes of Christ it furder appeareth that the tongue also is required to praier which we may proue also by other reasons 1 God wil haue himselfe magnified with the tongue which hee created chieflie to this end 2. Out of the aboundance of the heart the mouth speaketh 3 Wee are to doe it that others may follow our example 2 Our Necessitie and Want For wee receiue not of God those blessings which are necessarie for our safety and saluation except we aske them of him For God hath promised them to such only as aske them Nowe what wee speake of the necessitie of praier the same is also to bee saide of the necessitie of Thankesgiuing For without giuing of thanks we leese those thinges that are giuen receiue not such thinges as are to be giuen and are necessarie The necessitie of both will easily appeare whether we consider the effects of faith or the cause of faith and so also faith it selfe Faith is kindled or encreased in no man who doth not aske it no man hath faith who giueth not thankes for it and they which are endued with true faith aske the grace of God and they who haue tasted of gods grace shew themselues thankfull vnto God for it and doe more and more craue and desire it Rom. 5.5 The loue of God is shed abroade in our hearts by the holy Ghost which is giuen vnto vs. And the holy ghost himselfe also is obtained by petition or praiers For the holie Ghost is giuen to none but to him that desireth him 1 Obiection But we see the wicked also to receiue the gifts of the holie Ghost Therefore not onlie they that desire him receiue him Aunswere The wicked verily receiue manie gifts but not those principall giftes neither those that are proper to the Elect such as are faith repentance remission of sins regeneration and furder what giftes the wicked receiue those are not auaileable vnto them neither doe they receiue them to saluation Reply Jnfants craue not the holie ghost and yet they receiue him Aunswere The holy ghost is not giuen but to those that aske him that is to those of yeares and vnderstanding who are able to aske him But euen Infants also aske and craue the holy ghost after their manner hauing to wit in possibilitie an inclination to faith and therefore potentially they aske the holy Ghost or haue an inclination to aske him 2 Obiection The Effect is not before his cause But praiers are the effects of the holie Ghost in asmuch as no man can aske the Holie Ghost who hath not the holie Ghost and hee alone woorketh praier in vs Therefore the Holie Ghost is not receiued by praier but is in vs before praier and so by consequent he is not giuen to them onlie that aske him 1 Aunswere Whosoeuer hath not the holie ghost cannot aske him that is as concerning the encrease of him 2 The Effect is not before his cause that is in order and nature but in time they are both together For the holy Ghost is in vs according to nature before praier because we then first begin to desire him to aske him of God when he is giuen vnto vs. But albeit the Holie Ghost is according to nature or order first in vs yet he is not first in vs according to time For as soone as the holy Ghost is giuen we begin to desire his presence When God giueth his spirit at the same time they aske him vnto whome hee is giuen And the Holie Ghost is giuen to none but to him that desireth him for no man desireth him but he who hath in himselfe the beginning of him Whereas then it is said of Christ Luk. 11.13 How much more shall your Heauenlie Father giue the holie Ghost to them that desire him this must not be vnderstood of the encrease onely but also of the beginning of his giftes and graces 3 What is required to true praier THE conditions and circumstaunces of true praier are 1 A direction of it vnto the true God that wee make our praier vnto the true God manifested in the Church by his Prophetical and Apostolique word by his workes of creation preseruation and redemption of the Church As wee haue receiued so are we baptized and as we are baptized so we beleeue and as we beleeue so wee adore and worship the
flesh câ—nsubstantiall with men we doe not affirme him to bee according to the fleshe consubstantial with God For as according to the spirit he is not consubstantial with vs For according to this he is consubstantial with God So of the other side he is not according to the flesh coessentiall with god but according to this he is consubstantiall with vs. And as wee pronounce these to bee distinct diuerse one from the other not to bring in a diuision of one vndiuided person but to note the distinction and vnconfoundablenes of the natures and properties of the Word and the flesh so we affirme and worship those as vnited which make to the manner of the vndiuided vnion or composition Vigilius Lib. 4. against Eutyches IF there be one nature of the Word the flesh how then seeing the Word is euery where is not the flesh also found euery where For when it was in the earth it was not verily in heauen and now because it is in heauen it is not verily in the earth and in so much it is not as that as touching it wee looke for Christ to come from heauen whom as touching the Word we beleeue to bee in the earth with vs. Wherefore according to your opinion either the Word is coÌ„teined in place with the flesh or the flesh is euery where with the Word where as one nature doth not receiue any contrarie or diuers thing in it selfe and it is a thing diuerse and far vnlike to be circumscribed in place and to be euerie where and seeing the Word is euerie where and the flesh is not euerie where it is apparent that one and the same Christ is of both natures and is euerie where as touching the nature of his Godhead but is not euerie-where as touching the nature of his manhood is created and hath no beginning is subiect to death and cannot die the one he hath by the nature of the Word whereby hee is god the other by the nature of his flesh whereby the same God is man Wherefore that one son of God and the same made the sonne of man hath a beginning by the nature of his flesh and hath no beginning by the nature of his Godhead was created by the nature of his flesh and was not created by the nature of his godhead circumscribed in place by the nature of his flesh and not conteined in any place by the nature of his Godhead is lower also than the Angels by the nature of his flesh and is equal with the father according to the nature of his God-head died by the nature of his flesh and neuer died by the nature of his Godhead This is the Catholique faith and confession which the Apostles deliuered the martyrs established and the faithfull hitherto holde and mainetaine Now haue wee in few wordes expounded those articles of the Apostolique creede which intreate of the person of Christ and haue withall declared in the exposition thereof those things which are necessarie for vs to knowe both of the diuinitie of Christ and of his humane nature which was taken by the Word of the seede of Dauid vnited personally with the Word by the vertue of the holy ghost and begotten in maruelous nanner of the Virgines substance And it was requisite not to suffer that any sinne should passe or bee deriued into his substance 1. Because hee was to satisfie for sinne 2. Because it was not conuenient or meet that the Woorde the sonne of God should take a nature defiled with sinne To beleeue then in the son of God conceiued by the holy ghost is to beleeue 1. That he was made man after a marueilous manner and that hee was made one Christ of a diuine and an humane nature 2. That hee being so holily conceiued and borne doth purchase for vs the right and power to bee the sonnes of God Because this person is sufficient able to recouer for vs our lost righteousnes and to bestowe it on vs. For hee is vnited with the Worde that is hee is true and naturall God and man such as the Mediatour ought to bee Hee will also performe this because he was borne to this end euen to sanctifie vs. Of al these euerie one of vs may certainlie collect and conclude That this Christ is our Mediatour And the reason of this collection and consequence is Because by this that he is the only begotten Sonne of God it is manifest that Christ is true God consubstantial coeternal and equall with the Father By his holy conception and natiuitie it is also manifest that hee is true man and that perfectly iust and vnited with the God-heade or Woord and such a one was it requisite our Mediatour should be OF CHRISTES HVMILIATION THE course of order requireth that now consequentlie we expound and declare those Articles which treat of the office of Christ and first of al of his humiliation or humbling which is the former part of Christes office whereunto belong these Articles Hee suffered vnder Pontius Pilate was crucified dead buried descended into hel After we haue expounded these we wil come vnto the rest of the Articles which speake of his glorification which is the other part of Christs office HE SVFFERED VNDER PONTIVS PILATE I Beleeue in Christ which suffered that is I beleeue 1. That Christ froÌ„ the verie moment of his conception susteined calamities mesâ—ries of al sorts for my sake 2. That at that his last time he suffered all the most bitter tormentes both of bodie and soule for my sake 3. That he felt the horrible and dreadfull wrath of God thereby to make recompence for mine and others sinnes and to appease his ire and wrath against mankind These two are different To beleeue that christ suffered and to beleeue in Christ which suffered For that is to haue onely an historical faith of Christes passion neither to repose anie confidence in him but this is to beleeue not onlie that Christ suffered but also to repose and place our trust and confidence in Christs suffering and Passion OF CHRISTES PASSION THE Passion of Christ onelie doth followe next his conception and natiuitie 1. Because in his Passion consisteth our saluation 2. Because his whole life was a Passion suffering and calamitie Yet notwithstanding many things maie and ought to be obserued out of the storie of the whole race of his life on earth For that 1. doth shew This person to be the promised Messias seeing in him concur and are fulfilled all the Prophecies 2. That storie is a consideration or meditation of that humility or obedience which hee perfourmed vnto his Father The chiefe questions of Christes Passion are these 1 What Christ suffered 2 Whether he suffered according to both natures 3 What was the impellent cause of Christes Passion 4 What the final cause or end thereof 1 WHAT CHRIST SVFFERED BY the name of Passion is vnderstoode the whole humiliation or the obedience of his whole humiliation all the miseries
tormentes ignominies paines and grifes vnto all which Christ was subiect and obnoxious as wel in soule as in body from the point of his natiuity vntill the howre of his death resurrection Mat. 26.38 My soul is very heauy euen vnto the death Mat. 27.46 My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Isa 53.4 Surelie he hath carried our sorrowes But principally by the name of Passion is signified the last act of the humiliation and pains of Christ the chiefe part of which his pains and dolours was in his soule wherein hee felt the ire and wrath of God against sinne which also was the cause why he so trembled and shooke at death was so faint-harted in his death whereas other Martyrs of Christ haue susteined stoutlie and couragiouslie extreme torments For the torments punishments of others haue no proportion with the torments and punishments of Christ For others as Stephen Laurence and the like susteined only corporall paines and torments but were vpheld within by the holy ghost But Christ suffered the paines both of body soule For he suffered first our infirmity that is the infirmities of humane nature he hungered thirsted was wearie was stroken with sadnesse and griefe 2 Hee suffered pouertie Luk 9.58 The sonne of man hath not whereon to lay his head 3 He suffered infinite iniuries contumelies slaunders layings in wait for him backbitings reproches blasphemies annihilating and contempt Psalm 22.7 I am a worme and not a man Isay 53.2 He hath neither forme nor beutie when wee shall see him there shall bee no forme that we should desire him 4 Hee suffered the Tentations of the diuel Mat. 4.1 He. 4.15 He was in all thinges tempted in like sort 5 Hee suffered the death of the bodie and that reprochefull and contumelious euen the death of the Crosse 6 He suffered the most grieuous torments of soule that is he found the sense and feeling of the wrath of God against sinne to be laide on him Hereof it was that he cried with a loude voice My God why hast thou forsaken me as if he should saie why doost thou not driue and put away from me so great torments For he signifieth by those words not a diuulsion or separation of his Godhead from his manhood but the differring and delaying of help and succour We see then what and howe great thinges Christ hath suffered for vs which are therefore proposed vnto vs and sette before our eyes to giue vs to consider 1. The history it selfe of Christs passion agreeing with Gods sacred oracles and prophecies 2. The cause or fruites of Christes Passion 3. His example that wee are also to enter into eternal life and heauenlie glorie by death as did Christ and these three thinges are especially to be considered in Christs Passion Obiection There is no proportion betweene temporal punishment and eternal Christ suffered only temporal paines and punishmentes Therefore he could not satisfie gods iustice Aunswere There is no proportion betweene temporall and eternall punishment if they bee considered as beeing both in the same degree and in the same subiect Question But how may the raunsome of one person answere for the sins of an infinit number of men Aunswere It may and that for these two causes 1. Because he is true God which suffered Obiection But god cannot die and suffer Aunswere God cannot suffer in that he is God Or further we graunt that Christ was not God in that he suffered died Obiect Christ is not God in that he suffered Therefore it is false which is saide Acts 20.28 That God hath purchased the Church with his owne bloode Ans This was spoken by a communicating of the properties but this was in the person not in the nature that is That person which is God and man purchased the Church The communicating of properties is to attribute that to the whole person which is proper vnto one nature and this is attributed in a concrete voice not in an abstract because the concrete voice signifieth the person in which are both natures and the property of that nature whereof some thing is affirmed But the abstract name signifieth the nature which is in the person but not the person And therefore it is that nothing hindereth why that which is proper to one nature may not bee affirmed of the whole person so that propertie it selfe be in the person But contrarie of the abstract name onely the properties of that nature are affirmed vnto which they properly belong As of the God-heade which is the abstract name no propertie of the man-hoode maie be affirmed but onelie the properties of the God-heade because the God-heade signifieth not the person which hath both natures but onelie the diuine nature it selfe But of God which is the concrete name the properties not of the God-head only but of the manhood also may be affirmed because God signifieth not the diuine nature but the person which hath both the diuine nature and humane The second cause why the raunsome of one person may aunswere for the sinnes of an infinite number is the grieuousnesse of his punishment because hee suffered that which wee should haue suffered for euer His Passion therefore is equiualent to euerlasting punishment yea it surpasseth it For that God should suffer is more than that all the creatures shoulde perish euerlastinglie 2 According to which nature Christ suffered CHRIST suffered not according to both natures neither according to his God-head but according to his humane nature onely both in body and soule For his diuine nature is immortal Now he so suffered according to his humanity that by his death and Passion he made satisfaction for infinite sinnes of men Question But why could not his God-head suffer Answere Because it is not changeable neither can that which is life it selfe dy This susteined vpheld the humane nature in paines after death restored it to life Obiection God purchased the Church with his owne bloode Actes 20.28 Therefore the god-head suffered Aunswere It doth not follow because an argument from the concrete which is God to the abstract which is the God-heade is if no consequence Againe the kind of affirmation is altered God is said to haue died by a figure of speech which is Synecdoche vsed whē we signifie the whole by a part as whole Christ by God and by a communicating of the properties But when it is said The god-head died that admitteth no figure as beeing a meere abstract The concrete signifieth the subiect or person hauing the nature or forme But the abstract signifieth the bare nature and forme onelie Wherefore the argument doth not follow A man is compounded of the elementes and is corporeal Therefore his soul also is corporeal This cannot follow Because al things agree not to the forme which agree to the subiect the soule is the forme of man man is the essentiall subiect of the soule Wherefore neither doth it follow Christ God died Therefore Christs God-heade died For