seemed indeed to haue beene done vpon some colour of reason but it had a most ill issue and wee affirme that this is it that IOHN in the Reuelation doth meane by the image of the Beast 4 For hence it came to passe the aequality of the Churches beeing taken away and the order of Priorship beeing vnder the colour of auoiding schisme transformed into superioritie that in steede of the Apostolicall and the truly diuine gouernment of the church by the Eldership the humaine order of Bishoppes was by little and little brought in and from thence presentlie sprang that horrible Antichristian tyrannie the chief head whereof nowe for these manie yeares hath beene that counterfait Romaine Bishop 5 Yet of this order as long as the Lord raised vp those who did so vse this office of Bishop invēted by man as they did maintaine and set forward Gods Church there was some vse as whereby in some sort the puritye of Christian doctrine hath bene maintained 6 It was apointed to the ouerthrow of the endeuours of Sathan and his ministers not by man but by God both before the comming of Christ and in the time of the Apostles that there should bee held certaine Assemblies of the godlie both for the preseruation and reformation of Religion and also for the appeasing of controuersies risen in the Church the which meetings are called in the storie of the Christian Church by the name of Synods and Councels 7 But when as these euils did not alwaies infect the whole bodie of the Churche but did rather spring from particuler members It was not without great cause obserued in the ancient Church that certain Prouinciall assemblies should be helde at appointed times wherin the controuersies if any had risen in the prouince wer determined according to the worde of God and the outward order of the Church so appointed as was thought expedient 8 As often as the harme grew farther there is no dout but the godly the religious Pastors of churches though dwelling in diuers Prouinces did yet conferre togeather without any ambition concerning the remedies thereof as it apeareth out of the stories of the Councels and the writings of the ancient Fathers that were before the councell of Nice the aeternal God verie mightily blessing their zeal before euer the ambition of Bishoppes seas was knowen in the Church 9 But as Christian Religion after that the Romaine Empire submitted it self vnto Christ vnder CONSTANTINE the great began greatly to florishe all outward persecution being ended So Sathan on the other side began after a marueilous sort openly to set vp the Mystery of iniquity which before hand secretly had taken some growth 10 Hervpon that authority of the Seas ouer their brethren and fellowe-Ministers was established in that first councell of Nice which otherwise was a Christian assemblie and one of the most famous since that time the which authoritie could bee afterward restrained by the force of no Canons and decrees but that it brake vnto that horrible tyrannie which wasted and at this day dooth deuour the whole Church 11 There were notwithstanding the Lorde rightlie vsing this euill vnto the preseruation of his Church in these times Councels gathered and ended vnto many good purposes by the authority of godlie Romaine Emperours against those haeresies which inuaded the vniuersall body of the Church and they are therfore called general councels because the Emperours of Rome did then gouerne the most part of the world 12 Now it is manifest that these councels were graunted by the Emperours vpon the entreatie and requeste of godlie Bishops whereas otherwise the haeretickes and factious heades would not haue yealded vnto the Ecclesiasticall censures and judgements of the godly Pastors and Elders had it not beene for the authoritie of the Emperours especiallie seeing manie Churches woulde receaue those that were cast out by their Pastors as the whole auncient storie doth testifie 13 It is also manifest that the Bishops themselues or such as was sent by them to supplie their roomes satte as the Iudges in these councels and meetings for the Episcopall degree of superioritie which was euen then a great staine vnto the Church of God was euen at that time crept thereinto 14 Yet in these meetings either the Romaine Emperour himself or some noble men sent with commission by him in his stead were present but not as beeing to judge or to giue the definitiue sentence but as beeing to moderate the behauiours of the Bishops themselues which yet sometimes they could by no meanes bring to passe as yet appeareth in that sacrilegious synod of EPHESVS otherwhiles though with great labour they did in some sort effect 15 In these Synods were heard and admitted euen lay-men as they call them that no man should be condemned before his cause were heard Now the whole controuersie concerning Christian Religion was first of al properly defined out of the written word of God Next and in the second place were brought the auncient Christian Fathers yet so as of them selues they were not beleeued but receiued so far as they agreed to the word of God To conclude the determination of the Synods being sent vnto the Christian Emperours were established by their vnviolable constitutions 16 In these Synodes were determined both the waightier controuersies risen among the Bishoppes themselues togeather with their elections and depositions and also the rules concerning the generall gouernement of the Church which the Greekes call Canons were enacted 17 Hence it appeareth what place those Councels are to haue which are called by the authoritie of the counterfeit Romaine Bishop and concluded by the suffrages and voyce of his own vassals both to the establishing of his tyranie and also to the ouerthrow of all godlines and whatsoeuer good order hath bene confirmed by the approoued ancient Canons 18 Now that the Romain Empire is seuered into parts and the gouernment of Christendome deuided into diuers kingdomes and estates If any man should demand what way we think meet for the gathering of Synods we answer after this sort 19 First in those Churches who haue Christian Magistrats care is to be had after the truth of Religion and the right gouernement of the Church be established that they haue setled ordinary meetinges according to the conuenient distribution that they haue made of their Churches to the ende that the controuersies either alreadie risen or beeing likelie to arise maye bee appeased and preuented and the progresse of the Churches of euery Prouince may be looked vnto vnto which worke the authoritye of the Christian Magistrates is also to be vsed 20 But where the Magistrates doe not professe true religion we see not to what end the appointing of Synodes either ordinarie or extraordinarie should depend vppon their authoritie In such a case then the Pastors are wisely to fore-see that the Church of God be gouerned notwithstanding all the impediments of the aduersaries 21 Now what hope there can be of a generall Counsel
sort doth appertain vnto the soule namelie in that respect that by the resurrection it was restored againe vnto the bodie that is vnto his proper instrument 5 Heere it is also gathered that the same verie bodie which was laid in the graue rose againe 6 The Resurrection did abolish none of the essentiall qualities of the bodie of which sort are to haue a quantitie and to bee finite whence followeth that it is also enclosed within the compasse of the members thereof and is contained in a place We do condemne therfore the Eutychians who held that he had a bodie that was not bodilie and the Valentinians who said that it was an aierie bodie and the Marcionites who turned his true bodie vnto a shadow both before and after the Resurrection 7 By the same reason also doth fall to the ground that inuented forgerie both of Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation as beeing altogether repugnant vnto the truth of the bodie of Christ 8 Christ was the first that rose hauing swallowed vp mortalitie and remooued at once all the infirmities of the naturall life from him selfe although that after his resurrection he did trulie eat and drinke that he might make vs fullie assured that he tooke vpon him again a true bodie 9 Christ which is proper to him alone rose againe by the power of his owne Deitie and not by any borrowed strength or by the force of anie creature Therefore his Resurrection is a most true demonstration that he was trulie God 10 There was great cause why Christ shoulde ryse the third day and not before least that if he had risen sooner his death should haue seemed to be but fained or if he had staied longer in the graue the faith of the elect might haue beene hazarded 11 The Resurrection of Christ was necessarie to the accomplishing of our saluation because that as it behooued him to suffer the death due vnto our sinnes so also it was needfull that death should bee ouercome by him that hee might bring vs vnto aeternall life beeing deliuered from mortalitie 12 It was agreable also vnto the justice of God that Christ should enioy aeternall glorie euen by the condition of the legall couenant which is do this and liue 13 The Resurrection of Christ is a sure pillar of our resurrection because the church is as it were the complement or filling vp of Christ and therefore taking away that head of Christian religion vaine were the preaching of the Gospell Therefore we detest from our harts the Saducees and all Philosophers that haue denied the resurrection of the flesh 14 The doctrine of the Resurrection hath beene continuallie held in the church of God the which also though it do depend vpon the omnipotencie of God onelie may yet in some sort by laying downe some sure grounds and principles bee probablie gathered by humaine reason 15 Our bodies shall not be two in nomber after the resurrection but the verie same bodie that lay downe in the graue shall rise againe The opinion therefore which IOHN the Bishop of Ierusalem held concerning the taking vp of an other body is worthelie condemned 16 The Resurrection of Christ doth properlie belong vnto the elect seeing the wicked are to ryse againe not by the vertue of his resurrection but by the just judgement of GOD vnto aeternall damnation euen by the force of that penaltie which GOD added vnto the commandement hee gaue to ADAM The day that thou shalt eate thou shalt die the death euen the first and the second death 17 It is no wonderfull case that Christ after his Resurrection did not openlie manifest himself vnto all men for as there is a time of mercie so is there a time of judgemēt with God 18 Christ proued his Resurrection vnto his disciples by all kinde of arguments as by the testimonies both of Angels of weomen and of men vnto whome he presented himselfe aliue euen in the same bodie that was marked with the scarres of the wounds adding thereunto also the testimonies of the Prophets 19 Vnto all these things he adjoined his conuersation which he had with them for the space of fourtie daies least either a shorter time should not suffice or if he had continued longer he might seeme to haue risen to such a life as he lead heere at the first 20 Hetherto also belongeth the manner of his appearing which was in some respect naturall that it might be manifest that neither his resurrection nor his glorie did take from him his true humanitie whereby he is and shall be our brother for euer and yet notwithstanding supernaturall that all might knowe him hauing laide downe this naturall life to be vnto vs the first fruits of a spirituall and an aeternall 21 Now seeing both this hystorie of the Resurrection and also testimonies of the Prophets which fore-tolde the same were published openlie and in the audience of as manie as would heare not onelie of the Iewes but of al other people and was also confirmed by all kinde of miracles it must needs be that neither the Iewes nor anie other people can complaine that Christ after hee had risen againe did not offer himself to be seene of them 22 And seing that Christ came to saue his elect wholly both soule and bodie and that his resurrection is his true and full victorie it followeth that that spirituall resurrection whereby it commeth to passe that our soules beeing spiritually vnited vnto Christ the old mā beginneth to die in vs being by little and little to be worne away is buried and the new man riseth again doth depend vpon the resurrection of Christ that euen as Christ after his resurrection not before as far as he is our head began to liue that aeternall life after he had ouercome all the infirmities of this naturall life which sinne excepted he had vndergone for our sakes so that qualitie of an vncorrupted life being begun in our soules while we liue heere and proceeding farther after the dissolation of this bodie is at the length to bee fullie perfected when the restitution of our bodies shall be accomplished and so the elect shall liue that aeternall life with Christ the type of which benefite is the Sacrament of Baptisme vnto vs. 23 Nowe euen as the Spirit of Christ passed from the Crosse into Paradise at the verie same moment that it departed out of the bodie thēce returned into the bodie that whole Christ in respect that he was man might be afterwards glorified so we do beleeue that their spirits who die in the Lord do straight way depart vnto God there to enjoy that measure of glory that is appointed for thē vntill that they beeing adjoined againe vnto the same bodies which will be the verie same in substance trulie corporal though in a far more excellent estate shal liue vnder Christ their head for euermore We do condemne therfore both that fable of Purgatory fire and also their doctrine who dreame that the soules of the departed
same both in regard of the signes also of the things signified 15 The most meete place for Baptisme to bee administred is that where the worde is preached and the most meete time is the time of the preaching euen for this cause if their were no more that publicke praiers which are of great force in this action may bee joyned with the administration of the Sacraments 16 Yet may particular Churches appoint the time and the place as circumstances shall require 17 The vse of witnesses called God-Fathers is neither absolutelie necessarie nor yet to bee cleane rejected but such witnesses onelie are to be chosen as both knowe and are also likelie to performe what they promise concerning the holie bringing vp of the infants Defended by IAMES ROVLAND a Low-countrey man PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE LORDS SVPPER LX. 1 THe other perpetuall Sacrament of the whole Christian Church is the Supper of the Lord figured by diuers types vnder the olde couenaunt 2 For it was meet the Mediatour being now come the couenaunt beeing nowe last renewed by him that the olde seales of the couenaunt should be changed into such as might agree to the time both of the ordaining of them and also of their last renuing and so might euen declare that the Mediatour was come both by water and by blood 3 Nowe the Supper is that last Sacrament of the newe Testament or that publick action of the Christian church wherein as the bread being broken is giuen to be eaten and the wine powred out giuen to be drunk after the corporall manner so the bodie of Christ beeing deliuered to death and his blood being shed to seale vp those that are in league with God is giuen vnto the faithful that can examine themselues and are spirituallie receaued of them by faith for those endes which wee will presentlie set down 4 The authour both of the thinges deliuered and of the action is Christ onelie who as far as this Testament is called the new is the onlie testator but in respect that it hath regard vnto the couenaunt that joineth others therin the authour thereof is he who is the authour of the couenaunt The Church is the partie vnto whome the promise is made and therefore the Church is not to take vppon it the authoritie to confirme this couenaunt 5 The matter of the Supper are the signes and the things signified Vnder the name of signes are comprehended not onlie the substantiall things themselues namlie the bread and the wine but also the rites and the whole action as farre as it is Sacramentall namelie the breaking of the bread the powring out of the wine the delyuering and receauing of both whereunto is joined the nourishment of the bodie arising of the receauing of it 6 Touching the bread whether it should bee leauened or vnleauened touching the wine whether it shoulde bee pure or mixed with water and if wine bee wanting whether it be lawfull to vse some other drinke we thinke them matters about which no great contentions are to be raised so that if necessitie so require that which is the speciall thing be retained namelie meat and drinke meete for nourishment and answerable vnto the proportion of the signes and the things signified 7 The administration of the signes because they are present vnto our outward senses hath Christ committed vnto the Ministers of the worde but yet so as the efficacie of the administration doth not depend vpon them but vppon Christ onelie 8 For this cause also the things which we name signes are receaued by the mouth of the bodie and therefore also by the wicked although they account them not for signes but for common things and that the receauing of them is turned vnto their greater damnation 9 The thinges sealed are the bodie and the bloode of Christ the offering and receauing of both and the spirituall nourishment arising therefrom or rather whole Christ God and man with all his benefites and the newe couenant confirmed by the death of the testator 10 For although the receauing of the bread and the wine doth onelie signifie the communion of the body and the blood yet because wee are made one with Christ by meanes of his humaine nature it doth seale vnto vs the whole benefite of saluation because neither the manhood can be seperated from the word nor the humanitie subsist without the Deitie or his benefits without the whole person and therefore the one are neither receaued nor deliuered without the other 11 It is not without cause that Christ hath seuerallie ordained the bread to be the Sacrament of his bodie and the wine of his blood and commanded them to bee seuerallie deliuered in the Church For the bodie and blood are not sacramentally represented vnto vs in this action as the whole humanitie of Christ being glorified doth now liue but in regard that they were offered vppon the crosse for vs the blood being powred out of the bodie Vaine therfore is that concomitaunce as they call it or inseparable conjunction of the body and the blood vnder both kindes seuerallie whereas the bodie is here laid before vs and giuen to bee considered by our faith as being without blood and the blood as powred out of the bodie by death 12 The things signified because they are giuen vnto our minde and that to establish and increase a spirituall life in vs are giuen by Christ himselfe and receaued through faith by the power of the holie Ghost whence it commeth that they are proper and peculiar vnto the faithfull onelie 13 Yet doth it not follow that the bread and the wine giuen vnto the vnbeleeuers are not Sacramentes For in respect of Christ he giueth vnto euerie man that whollie which he promiseth in his worde vz. the signes vnto the bodies and the thinges vnto the soules that are endued with true faith wherevpon it is no maruell if the one of them alone be receaued by the vnworthie communicants as bringing onelie their bodie and that polluted too vnto the Lords Table whereas they want the mouth of the minde that is faith 14 The forme consisteth in the apt and meet that is sacramentall and respectiue conjunction and analogie or agreement of the outwarde signe and the inwarde mysterie The Transubstantiation of the signes and the thinges signified and the essentiall consubstantiation of the things signified with the signes are to bee rejected for the former doth abolishe one part of the Sacrament to wit the signes both of them are directlie contrary both vnto the Articles of our faith concerning the truth of Christs bodie and also vnto the vse of the Sacraments whence followeth that most horrible and detestable bread-worship 15 The agreement of the signes and the things signified is manifest for as breade and wine doe nourish vs in this life euen so the bodie and blood of Christ purchase aeternall life vnto vs. Both the bread and the wine therefore are to bee deliuered in the Supper both to the end that the
15 Vnbrideled contumacie is almost the most hainous sinne against the Church whether it bee that hee who is called refuseth to appeare or that beeing lawfullie admonished and conuicted he denie to confesse his fault as it deserueth 16 After the lawfull triall of the cause both the whole fact togeather with the circumstances are carefullie to bee considered and also great regarde is to bee had of the sinner himselfe brieflie all things are to bee referred vnto this end namelie that regard be had both to the coÌ„science of the sinner and also to the aedification of the Church in preuenting offences 17 For the end of these Censures is of two sorts the one that a timelie and a conuenient remedie may bee applied to the sinner who is neither to bee left in his sinne nor swallowed vp with heauinesse The other ende is both that the Church may bee purged from offences and infected by no contagion and also that euerie man may bee instructed and taught by the example of others 18 There is also a difference to bee made betweene those who doe confesse their faultes and those who doe professe their repentaunce least that a fained confession bee rashlie beleeued or that whilst some one is borne with by vntimelie leâ—itie a sufficient care should not bee had for the publick aedification of the Church as the example shewed by the Lorde himselfe vpon MARIE MOSES sister dooth declare Touching which point a perpetuall rule neither can nor ought to bee set downe by reason of the varietie and diuersitie of the circumstances Wherefore with reuerence of the Fathers bee it spoken wee doe not allowe of the too great seueritie of manie of the auncient Cannons in appointing the space of repentance from the which necessitie compelled them to depart by bringing in their indulgences 19 The sortes of these Ecclesiasticall Censures are Admonition Suspension from the Supper of the Lord which they call the lesser Excommunication publick Excommunication vnto the time that repentance bee testified as it is manifest that the Hebrewes also had a three-folde Excommunication Yet as touching perpetuall ANATHEMA or Excommunication to death the Fathers of the soundest judgement justlie disliked the same 20 We are to abstain from the companie of those that are publicklie excommunicated to the end as the Apostle witnesseth that they may be ashamed yet so as we are to performe towards them all those things which appertain to admonish them of their dutie and to call them to the right way 21 This Excommunication is altogeather a spirituall chastisment and dooth directlie belong vnto the amendement of the conscience Wherefore they are ouerthrowne both by the word of God by the testimonies of the whole Ecclesiastical storie who do attribute the authoritie of the Eldership in binding and loosing vnto the Magistrate though Christian much more they who leaue no place vnto those Ecclesiasticall judgements where there is a Christian Magistrate seeing on the contrarie side they can be no where more practised than vnder his wings wheÌ„ as his authoritie who is the maintainer and defender of this whole diuine ordinaunce is vsed against the disobedient neither was there anie other course taken in the auncient Church euen vnder the most religious Emperours They doe also greeuouslie erre who as it is vsuall amongst the Papists drawe meere Ciuill causes vnto this Ecclesiasticall Court. For Christ did not onelie distinguish but also most manifestlie seuer the office of the Magistrat from the ecclesiastical functions although he hath commanded all those who execute the Ecclesiasticall functions aswel as al the rest of the subjects to submit them selues vnto the power of the Magistrates in those thinges which are properlie belonging to his office And againe hee will haue Kings and Emperours themselues to be subject vnto the authoritie of the Ecclesiasticall Ministerie and to the commandement of his word Nowe of this diuine order wee do acknowledge that the Magistrats are ordained the maintainers and defenders 22 The contract of Mariage seeing in part it is manifest and properlie diuine namelie in the consideration of the verie bond and couenaunt of the mariage and in part meerelie Ciuill as far as it belongeth vnto the common soeietie of men in that diuers ciuil conditions belonging to the things of this life are adjoyned thervnto wherefore Matrimonial controuersies are in some sort to be referred vnto the determination of the Eldership as shall bee spoken more fullie God willing in the proper place thereof 23 They who haue authoritie to binde the sinner the cause beeing lawfullie tried haue also authoritie to loose and to restore him to the Church when hee hath approoued his repentance 24 This confession that is this profession of repentaÌ„ce whether it be done before the Eldership or publickly in the congregation of the Church is to go before his absolution and reconciliation with the church in such sort as the neglecting hereof is to be takeÌ„ for vndoubted contumacie They are therefore deceaued who thinke that those who are bound in the Consistorie of the Eldership are to be left vnto their owne judgement and triall And they offend no lesse who as they haue abolished the Eldership so also haue they coÌ„manded this confession which is onelie proper vnto those that are tied by the judgement of the Eldership as a law common to al Christians and haue turned it vnto auricular confession which is to bee done eyther vnto the Masse-priest or vnto the Confessor as they commonlie call him 25 Seeing this confession though most acceptable vnto God is not therefore ordained that it should bee a satisfaction for sinne in the presence of God but onelie that the Church may be assured of the repentance and restoring of the sinner it is onelie thus farre necessarie as he who hath not performed the same before his death the fault not beeing his is yet justlie accounted as absolued if he hath repented in his hart Detestable therefore is their opinion who will haue the punishment which they call Satisfactorie the Canons tearmed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be meritorious satisfactory in the presence of God and vnder that pretence haue for the most part made that purgatorie fire of theirs and brought into the Church their Indulgences which they sell for money being so manie blasphemies against that one oblation of the Sonne of God 26 The Eldership dooth properlie neither binde nor loose for this is the proper right of Christ alone but it doth onelie apply the word of God after the lawfull triall of the cause vnto the sinner either for his retaining or releasing vpon earth and it pronounceth vpon earth in the name of God and of Iesus Christ that either contumacie had bound or repentaÌ„ce had loosed the conscience of the sinner before the Lord in heaueÌ„ neither is it to be doubted but that which is thus done vpoÌ„ earth is ratified in heauen Friuolous therefore is that objection of some who to the end they might
the Sonne of God tooke vpon him 8 For whatsoeuer is not the diuine essence thervnto the essentiall attributes of the Deitie cannot be communicated 9 The actions furthermore which we said to be also attributes of the Deitie wee deuide both into those which they call remaining because they doe so continue in the Deitie that worketh as they bring forth no worke out of the doer of which sort are prouidence and predestination and also into those which may be tearmed passing that is those which leaue some worke out of the doer or doe inferre a suffering vnto some thing as are creation and redemption 10 As for the attributes which haue their names from the effects proceeding from God vpon the creatures thogh they seeme to haue had their beginning in time as where God is called the Creator redeemer c. yet wee denie that either they put any change in God or do agree vnto him by way of accident Defended by IOHN CASTOL of Geneua THE SIXT SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE OMNIPOTENCY OF GOD. THE ATTRIBVTES OF GOD IN GENErall haue bene dealt with now some of them in speciall are to be handled 1 THe omnipotencie of God is that very immeasurable and infinite essence of God which is communicable vnto no creature alwaies doing neuer suffering and which cannot decist to be that which it is 2 This being in deed but one may yet in diuerse considerations be said to be manifolde 3 For the omnipotencie is one way considered when we speake of it as God doth alway worke in him selfe it is another way regarded in respect that God worketh out of him selfe and can worke innumerable thinges if it pleaseth him 4 For wee hold that God is omnipotent in as much as besides that he is able to do whatsoeuer he will he can both will and do innumerable things which hee will neuer either will or doe We do therefore condemne them who say that God is for no other cause omnipotent but in as much as hee can without exception worke whatsoeuer can bee either spoken or imagined And we doe dislike of them who thinke that God is in that respect onely called omnipotent because he can do onely whatsoeuer he will For his power is in it selfe infinite whereas his will is as it were bounded within the verie act of will 5 Now we hold that God cannot do any of these things which either are repugnant vnto his personall proprieties as that the Father cannot bee begotten neither the Sonne begotten or are contrarie vnto his essence as to be finite or which implie a contradiction of which sort it is to make that a bodie shall bee truly naturall and yet neither to haue quantity nor to be contained in any place Brieflie we denie that God can doe any thing which if they were done might shew him to haue defects and weaknes in him as to die to lie to sinne c. 6 And as by faith we beleeue according vnto the Scriptures and the Creeds appointed in the church that God only is omnipotent so we do professe and publish the same with our mouth 7 For it is no lesse repugnant vnto his nature that there should be many omnipotents then that there should be many Gods Whence it is that Christian Religion doeth not acknowledge in God distinct into three persons three omnipotents but one omnipotent Now concerning the humane nature of Christ although it be vnited vnto the deuine in the person of the Sonne who is but one yet as it is not therefore made God so is it not properlie made omnipotent but it retained even it own infirmities before it was glorified wherein it might suffer and dye for vs and now being glorified although it be free from all infirmities and glorious yet is it not in it selfe made omnipotent Defended by WILLIAM MOâ—NES of Niuerse THE SEVENTH SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE KNOWLEDGE THAT IS IN GOD. I VNto the treatise of Gods omnipotencie is to be joined the declaration of the knowledge that is in him being a doctrine verie necessarie to the end that the true God may bee seuered from the false and that from it we may take counsell and consolation II Now this science or knowledge is considered both in it selfe simplie when the question is what and of what sort it is and also in respect of the things that it doth know III By this knowledge we meane an absolute and a most cleare knowledge in God both of himself and of all things created whereby he doth not onlie know all things to bee but also the reason why they are so And this knowledge is different from all the sight that men and Angels haue not by comparison that it is greater and theirs lesser but altogether in the whole nature of it The which difference wee discerne by these notes 1 That this knowledge is essentiall and euen the vnderstanding essence of God 2 That it ariseth not from the outwarde senses or from the notions that the vnderstanding doth apprehend by reasoning by joining things together and by deuiding or yet from the report of any other no not from the knowledge of principles and causes that are of themselues formed in the vnderstanding 3 That it is neither any habite nor action nor any thing different from that verie thing that doth vnderstand that is from the essence of God seeing it is moste simple 4 That it vnderstandeth all things at once 5 That it is most certaine 6 That it is alwaies the same IIII Now in respect of the things that it doth know wee affirme that God doth know al things by himself of himself 1 Himself properly and most fullie 2 All things past present and to come euen those things that are casuall 3 Yea and such things as neither are nor euer shal be 4 Euen euill things 5 Yea infinite 6 And euen all the motions of the will and their issues 7 And not onely by a generall knowledge of generall things but euen by a most exact and perfect of euerie particular V This knowledge which in respect of things to come is called praescience or fore-knowledge is not the cause of the existence of thinges although there is nothing to come to passe which God did not fore-know that it should come VI This knowledge either in whole or in part can no creature be capable off Defended by IOHN FLORIDVS of Angieu THE EIGHT SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE VVILL OF GOD. 1 THe discourse concerning Gods will which is most of al to be sought into for our saluation followeth that which is concerning his knowledge 2 By the worde WILL in God wee vnderstand both the diuine essence which doth imbrace and delite in that chiefe and soueraigne good which it hath in it selfe and also in respect of the thinges that God will haue done wee meane the verie action of will 3 And in this latter regard it is also considered two manner of waies either as it is a decree certaine
we are by little and little to climbe higher higher vnto the full assurance of our free aeternall Praedestination in Christ which is joyned with continuall praier hearing of Gods word and perseuerance in well doing 16 Now all those whome it pleaseth the same GOD who is debter vnto no man in justice to leaue in their own corruption either altogeather not called or called but without the opening of the heart and worthelie to deliuer vp vnto Sathan and their owne concupiscence being such also as wilfully and willinglie harden themselues will hee one day according vnto his aeternall Praedestination adjudge togeather with Sathan vnto aeternall punishments laying open in their iust destruction the glorie of his great and most iust hatred against euill 17 The manifesting of this decree of Reprobation is to be left vnto God vnlesse it be apparant in any that they haue sinned against the holie Ghost as in times past it was with IVLIAN the Apostata The cause why wee are not to determine of Rebrobation from the effects of Sathan and our corruption that sinne against the holie Ghost onelie excepted as wee are to gather our Election from the working of the holie Spirite in vs is this Euen because it hath pleased our mercifull GOD to shew that some yea of the greatest sinners at their very last gasp were of the number of his elect by bestowing forgiuenes of sins vpon them by his extraordinary fauour as it fell out with the theefe that hung vpon the Crosse 18 Those therefore who holde on the waye of destruction are so to bee tolde of their dutie as leauing vnto God the secrets of his judgements we are not to dispaire of anie mans saluation For it is a true consequence indeed to say I beleeue as it appeareth by the effects therfore I am elected and appointed vnto saluation But it is no necessarie consequent to say I do not beleeue and I tread the path of destruction therefore I am a reprobate and appointed to damnation For he that beleeueth not to day may bee endued with faith to morrow But thus rather we are to make a true conclusion I do neither beleeue the Gospell nor labour to beleeue but continue in the way of destruction Wherefore except I betake mee vnto an other course I shall perish And therfore I wil enter vnto an other way which God laieth before mee And these are the cogitations which all pastors are bound by duty with great care to lay before their wandring sheepe 19 God therfore in appointing some of free-gift vnto saluation and others vnto just condemnation is neither author of sinne nor respecter of persons but thereby sheweth himself to be the true God in deed Defended by RAPHAEL EGLINE of Tigurine PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE CREATION OF ALL THINGS AND THEIR DIVISION XII WE HAVE DONE WITH GODS PROVIdence and Praedestination nowe wee are to entreat of the works of God wherby he doth as it were make him selfe visible vnto vs that is concerning the creation of all things and their distinction 1 CReatiō is the external work of God fore-known and decreed by him of his vnspeakeable goodnes from aeternitie whereby vnto the glorie of his Name he did create of nothing all things that are without him that is all things that haue a substance different from his essence 2 The alone soueraigne cause therefore of the world and all things that haue being therein is God who made all things not after the manner of men but without all labour and also without the worke help and seruice of anie other but by his word alone that is by his Sonne through the power of the holie Ghost For the workes of the Trinitie are vnseparable 3 Neither did he frame all those things of anie fore-being stuffe or matter but euen of nothing that is from that which was not by his word alone he gaue being vnto all things that are Those Philosophers therefore doe erre who held that the world was aeternall and those also who deemed it to haue bene made and formed of moates by chance together with these who taught this visible worlde to haue bene framed by some other then by God In which error was CERINTHVS CARPOCRATES the ARCHONTIANES and others who attributed the work of the creation only vnto certain vertues and powers 4 The chiefe end of the creation is that there should be some who should enjoy the louing kindnes of God in the true tast thereof and glorifie his Majestie for euer To this end were Angels and men created A secundary end of the creation is that all other creatures shoulde together set foorth the glorie of God and serue to the vse of man 5 Now although by the order of nature from one as far as it is one there can proceed but one and that God of all other things is most single and but one yet the infinite varietie of things proceedeth from the same wisedome of God from whence their creation and gouernement doth depend For he worketh not according to the course of nature but doth whatsoeuer he will aboue all nature most freelie and voluntarilie Yet in that inaequalitie of things there appeareth greatest aequalitie yea the diuersitie of things appeere to be but one in respect that whatsoeuer hee hath created are referred vnto that generall kind of the beeing of things which is but one 6 The essentiall diuision of things is from their matter and their forme in which respect some things are visible as all simple mixt bodies either without life and breath or enjoying both Some also are inuisible as Angels the soules of men whose effectes are manifest though both their Materiall and Formall causes as also other circumstances of the time and place wherein they were created be obscure and in some sort vnknowen vnto vs. 7 Now all these things which God created could not but be good seing he himselfe is most good for they were created of him exceedinglie good and most pure without all corruption hauing nothing in them which did not declare the omnipotencie and the exceeding goodnes of the Creator In this originall integritie men and euill Angels might haue still continued if they had woulde and men might haue conuayed the same vnto their posteritie In stead whereof God for the sinne of man did curse the inferiour Creatures which he had created for mans sake 8 As concerning Euill it is not anie thing created or hauing beeing but onelie signifieth the meere absence of the good that ought to be present neither is it in the subjects as an accident but as Priuation opposite vnto good rather expelling the same then hauing beeing in it selfe 9 And although it doth marre that which otherwise is good in it selfe yet is it by accident the cause of good That the degrees of thinges created may appeare which haue their state according as they haue the greater or lesse good in them So vnto the good of all things in generall Euill seemed to bee in some
vtterly denied that there were anie angels And ORIGEN likewise who with PLATO affirmed that those spirituall minds as often as they offended were fallen and thrust into bodies APELLES the heretick also who said that the bodies which the Angels tooke vpon them were neuer created and LACTANTIVS FIRMIANVS who dreamed that Angels were not presentlie at the beginning of the world appointed to guide and protect man In summe wee condemne all those who either make them coaeternall with God or attribute vnto them the worke of the Creation as did SIMON MAGVS CERINTHVS SATVRNINIVS and CARPOCRATES Defended by IOHN IAMES COLER of Tigurine PRINCIPLES CONCERNING MAN XII 1 SEing that man is the most excellent of all the visible workes of God for whose cause next vnto Gods all other things were created we holde it a matter belonging vnto a Diuine to entreat of the nature of Man 2 Man is neither the bodie nor the soule seuerallie considered but composed of both that is of soule and bodie joined together by a most straight and most louing band 3 The truth of Gods worde doeth witnes that there was but one man created at the first who was to bee the originall of all other men And so all those that proceded from him should be tyed together by a common bond of blood Wee doe then reject the opinion of such Philosophers as haue denied one certaine man to haue had his beginning first of all other 4 The bodie of that first man was formed by God of the dust of the earth that is as wee interprete it of the foure elements that it should not be a graue of the soule as PLATO thought but a most excellent and a most meete instrument to performe the faculties of the minde 5 Now in respect that this bodie was made of qualities repugnant one to the other it was mortall in the first creation of it for repugnancie or discord is the authour of dissolution yet by the appointment of God it was made immortall that it should be the habitation of the immortall soule but after the entrance of sinne into the worlde it returned vnto the former necessitie of mortality The PELAGIANS therefore do erre in holding that the bodies of men were naturallie subject vnto death and in attributing the cause of death to be onely the discord of the contrary qualities Other points that belong vnto the frame and beautie of mans body we leaue to be discussed by naturall Philosophers and phisitians As also manie things that they teach concerning the powers of the soule becaus we think it meet that we containe our selues within the bonds of diuinitie And now we will speak of the essence of the soule 6 The essence of the soule can scarce be knowne for it is not to bee perceaued by the instrument of any the senses of our bodies yet by the faculties and operations of it it doth in a sort open it selfe vnto vs. And therefore it is vsuallie described and pointed out after this plaine maner 7 The soule of man is an essence created according vnto the image of God infused into the bodie that man cōsisting both of bodie and soule should be capable to know and glorifie God 8 The soule of man is properlie trulie called a soule for that facultie which is in beasts and plants is by reason of the scarcity of words so called of the Latines For seeing the same doth not subsist of it self that it is nothing els but a power arysing out of the properties of the matter forme it scant retaineth the name of a being much lesse deserueth to be called a soule 9 The soule of man is of a spirituall and not of a bodily nature subsisting by it selfe not vnaduisedlie made of moates not a fire or anie other of the foure elementes or yet anie thing compact of the elementes not any number not an harmony not any facultie brought forth out of the matter brieflie not anie part cut as it were out of the Deitie but wiselie created of nothing after a manner vnknowne vnto vs by God who woorketh most freely 10 Now although it hath a beginning yet doeth it remain immortal not onlie because of it owne substance it is vncompounded and voide of al contrarieties and bodilie accidents but especiallie in asmuch as it is so created of God that of it selfe it can liue exist and continue for euer And it doth rather afforde life vnto the bodie than deriue it from the same The which wee doe beleeue in asmuch as it is proued vnto vs by the most sure testimonies of the holy scriptures rather then because it is demonstrated by philosophicall reasons Wee condemne therefore the MANICHAEES GNOSTICKES and PRISCILLIANISTS who haue said that the soule was of a double nature whereof the one was from a good beginning vz. a good God The other from an euill The SELEVCIANES HERMINIANES PROCLIANES who held that the soule was not made by God but by Angels The LVCIFERIANES and TERTVLLIANISTS who were of opinion that it was a bodilie substance and such as could fall off or be shelled from the bodie and remooue from one bodie to an other The ARABIANES and the NAZARITES who thought it mortall the ORIGENISTS who judged that all soules shoulde aeternallye liue in heauen and the APOLLINARISTS whose opinion was that one soule was begotten of another 11 Neither is the soule of the same nature and sort that the Angels are as ORIGEN thought who made onlie an accidentall and not a substantiall difference between Angels and the soules of men Now that essentiall difference although it cannot be easilie knowne is yet in some sort perceaued by this adjunct vz. that Angels can not be ordinarilie joined vnto bodies wheras the soules may Now the soule is also not onelie the first mouer of the bodie but euen the verie cheef and especiall forme of a man whereby first of all and of it selfe A man is that which hee is and for whose cause the bodie is so framed as it is to the ende that a most honorable lodging should be prepared for a most honorable ghuest 12 The soules of all men are not one as THEMISTIVS and the followers of AVERROIS thought but of euerie particuler man there is a perticular soule which can as naked and bare formes consist and remaine when they are seuered from the bodie as in deed they do for a time when as they being out of the bodie do expect the aeternall and indissoluble conjunction that they are to haue with the same 13 And seing that the form of euerie thing doth not onlie make vp the whole but also euery part thereof and no part can effect the office thereof except the forme bee present and seeing when the same departeth it ceaseth from doing wee do defend that common opinion out of AVGVSTINE vz. that the soule is whollie in the whole and whollie in euery part Although there be this diuersitie of the being of it in the whole and in the
God and wee say that we cannot by our owne strength prepare any way for vs to come vnto God but that if wee will come vnto him he must draw vs. 10 It must needs be therefore that hee must first regenerate vs and make vs the sonnes of God and new creatures In which worke we are not co-workers with God but meerelie such as stand still while he worketh that wee may be wrought vpon and reformed by him euen as we were at the first created by him without anye helpe of ours 11 Nowe after regeneration wee are by faith drawne from death vnto life and to will is present with vs but so as wee are compassed about with manie hinderances by reason of the stings of sinne and the flesh in vs which are not vtterlie done away yet wee begin to bee co-workers with God and wee are so wrought vpon as wee also doe work And we shall then whollie obey him and stick vnto him euen when our full restitution beeing wrought wee shall enjoy that blessed and heauenly life 12. The discourse concerning voluntarie changeable and immutable thinges we thought meete to bee seuered from the quaestion of Free-will and placed in the doctrine of Gods prouidence Defended by FRANCES BVEFETIVS of Angiers PRINCIPLES CONCERNING SINNE XVII 1 THe estate wherevnto both ADAM and all his posteritie did fall is contrarie vnto that integritie wherein he was created at the first 2 For whereas the nature of man was then such as hee could haue liued according vnto the vpright and aeternall law which is nothing els but the will of God Sin hath brought him nowe to that passe that hee doth of a set purpose disobay the same 3 Sinne is not a bare want or priuation of good but a swaruing from the will of God 4 And wee thinke that it may bee thus fitlie defined Namely that it is whatsoeuer is against the law and will of God 5 For the force of sinne dooth not depend vppon the breach of some humaine constitution but vpon the transgression of Gods will onelie And therfore the definition of the Philosophers is most vnperfect who account sinne to be that onely which is repugnant vnto reason For reason it selfe can doe nothing els but go astray vntill it be lightned by the light of God The Libertines also are to bee condemned who make that onely to be sinne which a man 's owne conscience thinketh to be sinfull 6 The seat or subject of sinne is the verie soule it selfe that is the reason and the will For the former of these being ignorant of that which it should know or els ruling amisse as well in commanding as in forbidding hath sinne cleauing vnto it And the latter either when it willeth amisse that which it ought not to will or when it willeth not that which it ought to be desirous of sinneth The bodie is onelie the instrument of the soule in sinning 7 Some of the causes of sinne are inward as the will which before sinne came was in ADAM onely mutable But after sinne as well in him as in his posteritie was both mutable and corrupt Some outwarde as the Deuill and the diuerse objects that are laied before vs. 8 But as concerning the Lord hee in no wise can bee thought the Author of sinne who is so farre from turning men from himselfe that hee rather seeketh to conuert all men vnto himselfe as vnto the onely true and perfect end Yet hee is said to make them to doe that which is sinfull when he doth not restraine them from sinning the which whole worke is onelie to bee ascribed vnto his wisedome and justice We do condemne then the MANICHAEES the VELENTINIANS the SELEVTIANS c. who affirmed that sinne proceedeth from God 9 The effect and wages of sinne is death and that aeternally because it is committed against him who is aeternall and infinite That distinction of sinne then into mortall and veniall is improper saue onelie in the diuerse respects of the elect and the reprobate For vnto the elect all sinnes are veniall through Christ But vnto the reprobates there are no sins but they are mortall And it is manifest that the PELAGIANS doe erre when they say that death is natural vnto the bodie 10 Yet for all this we thinke not all sinnes to be equal in that sence that the Stoicks did But wee acknowledge certaine degrees in them according vnto the diuersitie of their objects and circumstances yet the originall corruption and guilt is alike aequall in all men Seeing all men are alike the sinfull sinnes of sinfull ADAM Defended by STEPHEN BLOIVS of Augiers PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE DIVISION OF SINNE XVIII SEING WE HAVE SPOKEN OF SINNE in generall now we will deale with the same in speciall 1 THe principall sorts of sinnes are named two vz. Originall and Actuall which notwithstanding are rather issuing then disagreeing the one from the other for the one is as it were the cause and the root the other as the fruit and effect 2 Originall sinne is somtimes called absolutelie sinne Otherwhile flesh olde and first ADAM the sinne of nature concupiscence the lusts of the fleshe the lawe of the members the heart of man c. 3 And it may be thus fitlie defined namely an infection deriued from ADAM vnto all mankind 4 The subject wherevnto it cleaueth is not onelie the bodie but euen the soule also For whole man euery part of him is altogether corrupted and the powers and actions as well the superiour as the inferiour both of bodie and soule are polluted whence it commeth that in the affection and wil all things are depraued and peruerted and in the reason it selfe there is nothing but blindnes the ignorance and hatred of God 5 Now although the soule which is not taken from Adā but immediatlie created by God may seme to be voyd of this infectiō and that it seemeth not meet that the sins of the Fathers should be punished in the Children yet seeing ADAM is considered not onlie as some particuler man but as the beginning whēce al mākind did issue in whome also were all the gifts that were to bee bestowed vpon the whole ofspring he by his sinne lost them both to himself and vnto all men that proceed from him who are now in that only respect that they are and do resemble the image of ADAM hatefull vnto God Wee doe condemne therefore the PELLAGIANS who held that men were sinners not by birth but onely by immitation 6 In all men Christ onely excepted there is the same originall sinne and it hath spread it selfe alike vppon all men Neither are there any diuerse sorts of originall sins The Papists then doe erre who do except others besides Christ from originall sinne as the virgin Mary 7 There are two effectes of originall sinne the guilt or the offence whereby all men euen infants which yet haue committed no actuall sinne are made subject vnto Gods wrath and both deathes and also the want and priuation of
of effectuall Regeneration doth teach comfort raise and confirme vs in all our conflictes against Sathan ◅ill wee obtaine the crowne which is giuen of free gift though vnto these onely that do lawfully striue and ouercome Defended by HILARIVS FANTRAT an English-man of Guernzie PRINCIPLES CONCERNING MANS IVSTIFICATION IN THE SIGHT OF GOD. XXIIII 1 THat we may haue a sure foundation of aeternall life and may worship God in this life with a quiet conscience the doctrine of mans justification in the presence of God is very necessary 2 Iustification therefore is a free imputation of righteousnes made of God by and for Christ to saluation vnto euery one that beleeueth 3 But in asmuch as God is exceedingly mercifull and exceedinglie just and that his mercie doth not abolish his justice which remaineth vnviolated it behooued that his justice shuld be fullie satisfied before such time as he could poure forth his mercie vpon mankind and therefore that Christ should be God and man 4 For he who is onelie man cannot be able to sustaine the wrath of God nor on the other side hee who is onelie God because that God can bee subject vnto no kinde of suffering 5 Therefore God the Father beeing drawen in mercie woulde haue his onelye begotten Sonne at the appointed time to become true man without any confusion or mingling of the natures might reconcile men vnto God 6 The efficient cause therefore of the righteousnes imputed vnto vs is the mercie of God the Father and his free loue towards vs for he it is that saueth and justifieth 7 The materiall cause is Christ crucified and risen for vs where three thinges come to bee considered the one whereof consisteth in the punishments whereby hee hath most fullie satisfied for all our sinnes The other standeth in his obedience the fulfilling of the whole lawe by him for vs the third is the most perfect repairing and integritie of our nature in the flesh which Christ tooke vpon him wherby the filthines of our nature is couered that it commeth not into the sight of God 8 The formall cause is the verie imputation of Christs righteousnes by meanes whereof we are accounted to be freed from sinne just holie and heires of aeternall life 9 The instrumentall is of two sortes the one in respect of God that justifieth which is Christ himselfe the other in respect of vs that lay holde vpon imputation of righteousnes and the same is faith imbracing firmely the promises of the grace of God in Christ 10 The finall likewise is two-folde the one in respect of GOD and that is that hee might declare his righteousnes vnto men by partaking the same with them and also the glorye of his name the which hee maketh more cleare in the vessels of mercie the other in respect of vs that wee may at the length enjoy indeed that life which is laied vp for vs in the Heauens which now we possesse by hope onely 11 The effect inhaerent in vs as in a subject is that newe qualitie which is called inhaerent righteousnes or regeneration which in no wise doth absolue vs in the presence of God but is onely a most sure witnes of our engraffing into Christ and therefore of our free absolution in him 12 This righteousnes seeing it cannot bee giuen vnto anie saue onely vnto the elect by faith hath annexed vnto it the gift of perseuerance although by their fault it seemeth sometimes to be ceased 13 Whence we gather that they who haue bene once endued by God with this righteousnes can neuer fal away from his grace and as for them that shall neuer bee partakers heereof they shall perish for euer We do therefore condemne those that gaine-say this Doctrine I The LIBERTINES and the EPICVRES who when they heare that man is not justified by workes nor by his owne righteousnes but by the righteousnes of another namelie by the righteousnes of Christ imputed by faith casting off all care of good workes haue endeuoured and daily do labour to bring a kinde of prophane and godles security ◠into the Church II The PAPISTS who denie that wee are justified by Faith onlie but do attribute part of our justification vnto workes and such works as are meritorious III OSIANDER who held that man was justified by the essentiall righteousnes of God Defended by WILLIAM QVARCINVS Tarbiensis PRINCIPLES CONCERNING SANCTIFICATION XXIIII SEING THE EFFECT OF FAITH IS twofold Iustification and Sanctification it followeth that hauing spoken of the former we adioyn the latter vnto it 1 HEre first of al we do especiallie distinguish Sanctification whereof we are now to speak from that most perfite integritie which in Christ is imputed vnto vs as the effect is to be seuered from the cause and the fruit from the tree 2 To expresse this wherof we now speake there do occurre manie diuerse names in the holie Scriptures as are these especiallie in the new testament Sanctification regeneration newnes of life Baptisme taken passiuely Spirite mortification of the olde man and the quickning of the newe with other the like phrases which would be too long to be heere recited 3 Sanctification in this place we describe to be an effect proceding frō the holy Ghost working in the minds of the faithfull wherby by a little a litle euen vnto the end of this life as the naturall corruption is purged so the image of God is repaired in vs vntill after death it be perfitely finished in the other world 4 This guift as also all others which it bestoweth vpon vs dooth the holie Ghost whollie drawe from Christ in whome the Scripture giueth vs speciallie to consider in his death buriall and resurrection the subduing of that originall corruption of ours which was imputed vnto him whence it commeth to passe that wee deuide our whole sanctification into these three members mortification buriall of the old man and the rising againe of the new 5 The mortification of the olde man wee call the effect of that spirituall and most powerfull application of the death of Christ wherby our corruption receaueth a deaths wound so that it is no more so powerful to stirre vp in our minds wicked motions such as are contrary vnto Gods will 6 The burying of the olde man is also an effect of the spirituall application of Christs buriall whereby our olde man being alreadie wounded by that deadly stroke dieth by little and little vntill at the length after the death of this bodie it be brought to nothing For as the buriall of the bodie is a going forward of death so also the burying of the olde man is nothing els but a continuance still proceeding further and further of that mortification which went before 7 The raising againe of the new man is also an effect of the spiritual aplication of the resurrection of Christ wherby it commeth to passe that the new man is raised vp in vs that is that the qualities of our minde to wit our
vnderstanding and will are renued vnto true holines of life 8 These being renued by faith powred into vs though all the time of our being heere we doe but in a sort vnderstand and will the thinges that are of God yet neuerthelesse our workes which belong vnto Gods seruice are fauourablie accepted by his Majestie as proceeding from Christ liuing and working in vs by the holy Ghost 9 In this respect then we make this difference between Philosophicall and Christian vertues that the former proceeding from a minde not yet regenerated are no other then filthie and impure in the presence of God whereas the latter on the other side doe of fauour please God and are in mercie crowned by him because hee looketh vppon them as fruits of faith flowing from Christ who is the Authour of all our purity and holines 10 Out of these thinges which haue bene spoken may be vnderstood not onely al the parts of our sanctification but euen the causes which concurre for the making vppe thereof may bee so easilie gathered as it may be well perceaued that we put the holy Ghost for the efficient fayth for the instrumentall the force and efficacie of that essentiall holines which is in Christ for the materiall the renuing of our whole minde from impure vnto pure and vpright qualities for the formall and the worshippe of God tending vnto his honor and the loue of our neighbour according vnto the prescript rule of the first and second Table for the finall cause thereof 11 Whence it apeareth that the Libertins who loath the practise of good workes are not to be reckoned vp amongest the number of true Christians seeing they neglect the chiefe end of a Christian life It appeareth also that the PELAGYANS and the halfe PELLAGIANS the PAPISTS are to bee detested because the former of them doe affirme that we are sanctified by nature onely the latter partly by nature and partly by grace Defended by FRANCES Pâ—FAYRIVS of Bearne PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE IVSTIFICATION OF SINFVLL MAN IN THE PRESENCE OF GOD. XXVI 1 IN asmuch as our whole saluation consisteth in our justification before GOD it is needfull that wee maintaine the true doctrine thereof against al the corruptions of the same if so bee that wee will obtaine saluation 2 This justification then is when God doth attribute the sanctification of his Sonne Iesus Christ performed for mankind vnto those that beleeue in him 3 For whereas God is exceedinglie merciful and excedinglie just his mercie indeed did desire the redemption of man but his justice demaunded an absolute and euery way a perfect satisfaction for the same 4 To the end therfore that the Lord might bestow his mercie vpon vs it was needful that his justice should be satisfied 5 Now the most seuere justice of God could not be satisfied either by him who should be onely man because no Creature no not the Angels themselues can so sustaine the waight of Gods anger as they may be deliuered therfrom much lesse deliuer others or yet by him who shuld be onelie God because the Deitie cannot bee subject vnto any sufferings 6 Therefore God the Father mooued by his vnspeakeable mercie would haue that onelie Sonne of his Coessentiall and Coaeternal with him as he had promised vnto the Fathers when Sin first entered into the world at the time appointed to become true man who as beeing true God and true man without any confusion of the two natures might reconcile men with God 7 Of the justice of this Mediatour the which justice is laied against those thinges that make vs guiltie of Gods wrath there are three parts The one is the penalty sustained for the satisfaction of all our sinnes which hee discharged to the verie vttermost farthing The other is the absolute fulfilling of the whole lawe of GOD thereby couering our whole guiltines both that which wee haue by our originall blemishe or by sinning sinne and also by the sins that ar the most bitter fruits of that root The third is the repairing of our humaine nature in that most perfect humanitie which Christ tooke vpon him whereby all our corruptions and staines are blotted out 8 The righteousnes of Christ profiteth vs nothing vnlesse it be made ours 9 Now it becommeth ours not by any infusion either Essentiall as OSIANDER dreamed or qualitatiue as the jangling Sophisters doe auouch but by a spirituall apprehension or applying of Christ effected in our mindes after the which followeth the free imputation of that threefold righteousnes which is inhaerent in the man Christ onely as in the subject 10 Of this spirituall and most effectuall apprehension and application the only inward instrument is true faith which is that full assurance whereby euery one that beleeueth doth imbrace particularlie the righteousnes of christ offered as appertaining vnto them 11 This faith is in noe wise of our selues but from the meare grace of God the holie Ghost mercifully creating the same in the vnderstanding and the harte of the elect that is being the cause that after they haue heard and vnderstood the worde of the Gospell they doe trulie beleeue although not perfectlie whoe also doth afterwarde seale vp and nourishe this gift in them as they doe learne more and more by the dailie hearing and meditation of the word of the said Gospell and as the Sacraments annexed vnto the worde doe most effectuallie witnesse vnto them 12 Now as the same Christ doth reconcile them vnto his father and purchase vnto them the title of the heauenlie inheritance who being freelie made partakers of that three-folde righteousnes doe lay hold vpon him by faith euen so doth hee sanctifie them by his Spirite abollishing the olde man in them by a little and a little both kindling a new light in their vnderstanding and also sturring vp holie motions in their wils to the end that strongly resisting with all their might the reliques of the old man they shuld beginn both to will and to doe that which is good 13 That newe qualitie then called inhaerent righteousnes and regeneration testified by good workes is a necessarie effect of true faith whence it is to bee gathered that good workes are by no meanes the causes but onelie the witnesses of that imputed justification whereby alone trobled consciences are at rest for they are no otherwise to be considered then as things that necessarilie followe the beleeuers being alreadie justified in Christ 14 Therefore we are said to be justified by faith onelie without any works not that true faith is at any time alone or destitute of good works but in asmuch as workes how good so euer they be do not concurre or availe to the obtaining of the righteousnes of Christ 15 The square and only rule of these good works according to the which they are to be directed most diligently to be waied is the wil of God laied open to vs in the law 16 Now althogh that they who are after this maner reconciled vnto God
through Christ aprehended by faith do daily sin and though also that their good works are not every way perfect but defiled by sinne whereof wee haue many remnants stil continuing in vs after our renuing yet those that do beleeue are to feare no condemnation but may assuredly wait and looke for aeternall life wherof they shal be vndoubtedly partakers These Doctrines therefore are to be detested 1 That no man can be assured of his saluation 2 That the naturall remnants of Free-will beeing holpen by preuenting grace do worke together with or further the first grace to beleeue to do good works 3 That Iustification before the tribunall seat of God is to be attributted if not wholie yet in part vnto good workes and that as being meritorious 4 That the essential righteousnes of christ that is wherby Christ was God is powred into vs which was the phrenesie of OSIANDER 5 That we cannot be justified by a righteousnes that is not inhaerent in our selues 6 That our Iustification in the sight of God is an effect of our Regeneration 7 That it is false that wee are justified by faith 8 That Christ dooth purchase the dignitie of merit by our good workes which is a new-coyned falshood of the Iesuits 9 That the law which God hath left to vs in the Scriptures is not the onely rule of good workes 10 That the merrites of Christ onely are not sufficient for vs vnto saluation 11 Thar Christ in regard of the guilt and the punishment hath onely satisfied for sinnes past that is for sinnes going before Baptisme 12 That in the sinnes which follow baptisme the guilt is onelie remitted and not the punishment also 13 That originall sinne is vtterlie taken away by Baptisme and that by the worke wrought 14 That the good works of the faithfull are in no wise sinfull 15 That there may be some workes of Super-errogation Defended by BARTHOLMEVV RHODINGVS of Hafsia PRINCIPLES CONCERNING GOOD WORKES XXVII 1 GOod workes are as necessary for the sound and the vndoubted discerning of true sanctification in a regenerate man wherof we haue spoken as are good fruits in a tree that beareth to shew that it hath bin rightlie graffed 2 We call good works the effects of those actions onelie which in the regenerat by the working of the Spirite of God through faith are squared according vnto the prescript rule of Gods law that in them God might be glorified and our neighbours helped 3 There are foure thinges then to be especiallie obserued in this definition the holy Ghost as the efficient cause Faith the instrumentall the law of God the formall Gods glorie and the edification of our neighbour as the finall 4 Out of these former parts rightlie vnderstoode the whole doctrine of good workes is made cleare and with al the false doctrines both of ancient and new writers in this argument are out of them easily confuted 5 In the first place then to speak of the efficient cause we affirme that we are enabled to doe good workes onely by the grace and assistance of the holy Ghost renuing our harts when as it doth incline our vnderstanding our wil all our members which are turned from God in such sort as we do obey the knowen will of God for the worketh in vs both to will and to do The PAPISTS then are deceaued who leaning vpon their owne strength do brag of their free-will and their naturall abilities as if it laye in them to preuent or go before the first grace by a kinde of Praeparation and as though of themselues they could in a sort bring foorth good workes 6 Secondly as faith cannot be without good workes so good workes can not be where there is no faith Whereupon we condemne their errour who boldlie auouch that good workes were or coulde bee done by profane men or such as were not endued with faith howe just and wise soeuer they were accounted seeing whatsoeuer is done without faith is sinne 7 Although wee professe that good works are no lesse necessarily conjoined with faith then light with the Sunne or heat with the fire yet do we not say that they are therfore respected of God as though by them we deserued either to bee justified before him or to bee made his Children 8 And they are to be accounted to deale no lesse impudentlie then rashlie and ignorantlie who raise vp the slander that we contemne and reject good workes because we hold that men are justified by faith onlie 9 Thridlie seeing the Law of God is the cause which giueth the forme vnto good workes that is the name of true goodnes we auouch that none of those things which haue no other ground then the bare will or reason of man can be reckened among good workes 10 In like manner that a man may bee said to do well it is not sufficient that what he doth be found to be commanded in the Law of God but this also is required that he assuredlie know that what hee doth bee enjoined vnto him by the Lord and that he doe it with an intent to obey God therein For whatsoeuer is done with a doubtfull conscience is sinne 11 And although the good works of the regenerate be not perfect because we cannot in this life no not though we be assisted by the holie Ghost liue according vnto the prescript of Gods law but rather our good works are stained with manie blemishes yet they do please God not for any worthines of theirs but partly because our defects are couered by the holines merites and intercession of christ and partly because GOD dooth of fauour approoue and crowne them not as they are in them selues but as the effects of his Spirite in vs and witnesses of our faith Whence wee gather that the DONATISTS PELLAGIANS PHARISIES ANABAPTISTS MONKS and the rest of that batch are to bee condemned who brag of a perfection of life and obedience and doe securelie rest themselues in their own workes as though they were in euerie point answerable vnto the law of God 12 Lastly although we haue said that the ends of good workes are the glorie of God and the aedification of our neighbours yet doth it not therefore follow that â—…ereby other ends of greatest moment be excluded of which sort are the testimonie of a good conscience the sure token of true Religion or Christian faith the assurance of our aeternall election the auoyding of the punishment due vnto euill workes and the vndeserued obtaining of the good works Wherefore we may justlie accuse all Atheists Antinomians quarrellers with the law as though it were repugnant vnto it self Hypocrits Libertines and impenitent persons as guilty of impietie who either do despise good works as being vnprofitable or condemne them as burdensom vnto the conscience 13 Neither is it to bee concluded in asmuch as in this mater we make mention of rewards as the scripture doth that therefore they are by merite due vnto good workes For whatsoeuer wee doe or
cause made known before the Presbyterie not that anie satisfaction shoulde thereby be made vnto God as though the penaltie were satisfied but to the end that the pride of the sinner being beaten downe the Church might haue a sure testimonie of his repentance those punishments wee say haue the saide Papists changed with manifest impietie into certaine formes of penalties that partlie are full of superstition and partlie altogether blasphemous which also they teache to bee such a satisfaction of the penalty in the presence of God as deserueth remission of sinnes 15 Vnto this most foule delusion they joyne an other twofolde error to wit purgatorie and indulgences wheras indulgence was nothing els at the first but some mitigation of the seueritie of the Canons whereby vpon good grounds some fauour was shewed vnto those that had offended least they should haue bin swallowed vp with over much heauines Wee detest therefore that whole fable of purgatory as being an execrable impietie and meere contrarie vnto our free reconciliation by Christ 16 The lawe is properlie the object of repentance as the promises of the Gospell are of fayth Therfore to speake properlie Faith is the mother and not a parte of repentance 17 Yet if by repentance wee will vnderstand the whole change of man vnto better we acknowledge that fayth is a principall parte thereof whereby a man is changed from beeing an vnbeleeuer to be a beleeuer 18 Nowe we rightly gather by the former things that repentance is a meere gift of God and that it is ridiculouslie said to arise from our naturall free-will seeing by nature we are seruants vnto sinne 19 And seeing that the flesh doth in some sort remaine in vs two things doe followe thence first that continuall Repentance is required of vs as long as we are in this life Secondly that Repentaunce is acceptable vnto God not by any merrite thereof but onelie by his meere free mercie 20 We condemne the Nouatians who deny repentance vnto them that are once fallen 21 And the Annabaptists who dreame that they haue attained vnto a perfect degree of righteousnes in this life 22 And that ouer great seueritie of the Cannons who did exclude the Ministers of the Church after they had once made publicke repentance from al hope of being receaued againe Defended by DANIEL DOOLEGIANVS a Low-countrey man PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE CONCEPTION OF IESVS CHRIST XLI SEING WE HAVE SVFFICIENTLY SPOken of the person and office of Christ and also of the Lawe which bringeth vs vnto Christ we thinke it meet now particularly to handle those things out of the Creed of the Apostles which Christ in the performance of his office hath done for vs beginning with his conception in the wombe of the Virgine 1 BY Conception wee vnderstande that which was made within the Virgin namely that in deed essentially she should beginne to beare in her wombe that Sonne of God which was true God and true man 2 Neither was that man formed any space of time before the person of the word was vnited vnto him but that Man began to bee at the one and the verie same moment that it was personallie assumed by the aeternall word 3 This humanity was and shal continue for euer a true and a perfect humaine nature in regard both of the bodie and soule beeing then made when as it was conceaued in the wombe of the Virgine and not before 4 That aeternall person also of the word or of the Sonn of God Coessentiall with the Father is the true person of the Sonne of God 5 In this conception which was a beginning in time of that personall vniting the one nature did not simplie assume the other but the person of the Sonne tooke vppon him the nature of man in that one particular man and did preferre it vnto the dignitie of the person of the Deitie Wherein notwithstanding doe remaine both the very natures also their proprieties wherby they are that which they are distinguished without anie confusion or separation 6 Whereas DAMASCEN then doth call the person of Christ wholie considered a compound person because hee is God and man his words are warily to be taken For the partes concurring togeather for the making of some third thing which of it selfe is not as the soule and the body in the making of a man doe of them selues exist before the third thing made of them is existent But in the person of Christ the Deitie of the worde doth not onely sustaine the consideration of the one nature but euen of the whole person attributing this vnto that man that hee doth subsist in the very Sonne of God and is not man alone of him selfe For otherwise there should be one person of the Son of God and another of the Sonne of man neither wherof could of him selfe be the Mediator 7 The parts furthermore that properlie make vpp the whole are compounded togeather But the Deity can admit no composition seeing it is most perfect and therefore in this conception it did preferre that man vnto the dignitie of the diuine person but so as nothing was added thereby vnto the worde but rather that that man did receiue this personall dignitie from the word whereby it is come to passe that as wee haue said he is exalted aboue the Angels the natures yet remaining 8 Therefore Christ was rightlie said by the Fathers to be greater then himselfe and lesser then himselfe 9 Nowe this assumed bodie was made out of the substaunce of the Virgin Marie according vnto the promises made by the Prophets in which respect he the very same who is the Sonne Coeternall and Coessentiall with the Father is trulie the Sonne of ADAM out of the stocke of ABRAHAM and DAVID Coessentiall also with his Mother 10 This conception the effect whereof was the personall vnion of the word and that man could not possiblie be wrought by the power of any Creature 11 Furthermore Christ is said in the beliefe according vnto the Scriptures to bee conceaued of the holie Ghost which is as the Angell GABRIEL doth expound the power of the most high and the third person in the Deitie 12 Yet cannot Christ bee said therefore to be the Son of the holy Ghost for in this conception the holy Ghost doth not sustaine the consideration of the Father who begate of his owne substance but of a cause forming the flesh out of a matter taken els-where 13 Yet is this Conception the worke of the whole Trinitie but distinctlie considered for the Father doth send his Son into this flesh the Sonne is conceaued in this flesh the holy Ghost dooth forme this flesh out of the substance of the Virgin 14 Although that that Virgine blessed aboue all women was yet the daughter of ADAM and therfore infected of her selfe with that vniuersall contagion of all mankind whereof also vndoubtedly she brought forth some fruits Yet notwithstanding the flesh of Christ was in no wise poluted with that contagion but as
punishment of the wicked 11 The especiall ende for the which eternall life is bestowed vpon vs is this namly that acknowledging the immeasurable and infinit mercy of God wee may attribute vnto him eternall praises as it is meete 12 We shall at the time when God hath appointed be put in full posession of that life at which time the number of those that are to bee saued being fulfilled Iesus Christ shall be seene of vs who looke for him to our saluation to come as a redemer from Heauen 13 Seeing the Lord hath put this day in his own power to be inquisitiue when the same shal be is a point of extreame madnes We do therefore condemne those both olde and new writers who breaking into the secrets of God do think that they can set downe when that day shall be whereas the knowledge heereof is not giuen no not to the Angels themselues 14 It is our dutie therefore rather to be watchful least being drowned with the delightes of the worlde and the flesh and as it were overwhelmed in a dead sleepe that last day do come vpon vs being vnprepared at vnawares 15 Now although the full perfection of that life which wee hope for be referred vnto the very last day yet notwithstanding it taketh certaine beginnings in our mindes even while we are heere when as the holy Ghost dooth by the preaching of the worde dispell the darcknes of our minde and indue the same with the true knowledge of God whence afterwarde doth proceed a willing minde to obey his commandements and that hope which cannot deceaue them that beleeue 16 Vnto this eternall life which shall bring vnspeakable felicitie vnto the elect death eternall is oposed which shall bring vnto the wicked that destruction which neuer shall haue an end 17 Even as that most happie felicitie cannot nowe be comprehended of vs so also that miserie of the damned is altogether incomprehensible 18 This most horrible state is called the second death not because that either the soul is thereby seperated from the bodie or that the soule or the body of the damned do suffer death but because that as by the first death the body and the soul of the wicked is dissolued the one of them hastning vnto putrefaction the other going to haue a tast of the eternall paines even so by this second punishment both the soule and the body are not only wholie excluded for euer from Gods fauor but also adjudged vnto his most fearefull and neuer ending curse 19 For the like cause is this death called eternall fier because that fier is a most sharp vehement punishment but wee are not here curiouslie to dispute touching the paines of Hell lest that wee thereby run into poeticall fables 20 Yet do these verie fables teach vs that the doctrine concerning the eternall punishment which the wicked are to vnder goe euen after this life did alwaies sound in the worlde The Epicures therefore and such as deny the immortallitie of the soule are confuted not onely by the word of God but also by common sense 21 That these punishments are eternall whereunto eternall life is oposed it is manifest by the expresseâ—â—ord of God and also by the infinit nature of Gods majestie who is offended The Church therfore justly condemned the Origenists whoe dreamed that the wicked and the Diuells themselues hauing fulfilled those punishments should at the length be deliuered 22 Yet dooth our Sauiour Christ manifestlie witnes MAT. 10.13 that the state of the damned in respect of the measure of their punishments shall not be alike Defended by IAMES TREMVLAEVS of Geneua FINIS THE TABLE AND ORDER OF THE PRINCIPLES CONTAINED in this Treatise 1 PRinciples concerning God pag 1. 2 Of the holy and vnsearchable Trinitie 3. 3 Of God the Father and the Sonne 5. 4 Of the holy Ghost 9. 5 Of the attributes of God in general 10. 6 Of the omnipotencie of God 12 7 Of the knowledge that is in God 13. 8 Of the will of God 15. 9 Of the goodnes grace loue and mercie of God 16. 10 Of Gods prouidence 17. 11 Of Gods eternall Praedestination 19 12 Of the creation of all things and their diuision 23. 13 Of good and euill Angels 26. 14 Of man 30. 15 Of the faculties of the soule of man 33. 16 Of Free-will 35. 17 Of Sinne. 37. 18 Of the diuision of Sinne. 39. 19 Of the restoring of man-kind 41 20 Of the personall vnion of the two natures in Christ 43. 21 Of the office of Christ 25. 22 Of Faith 47. 23 Of the causes and effects of faith 49. 24 Of mans justification in the sight of God 52. 25 Of Sanctification 54. 26 Of the justification of sinfull man in the sight of God 56. 27 Of good works 60. 28 Of the Law of God 63. 29 Vpon the preface of Gods Law and the first Commandement 66. 30 Vpon the second Commandement 68 31 Vpon the third Commandement 72. 32 Concerning vowes 75. 33 Vpon the fourth Commandement 78. 34 Vpon the fift Commandement 82. 35 Vpon the sixt Commandement 86. 36 Vpon the seuenth commandement 89 37 Vpon the eight Commandement 92. 38 Vpon the ninth Commandement 94. 39 Vpon the tenth Commandement 97. 40 Concerning Repentance 100. 41 Of the conception of Iesus Christ 104 42 Of the natiuitie circumcision and baptisme of Christ 108. 43 Of the Passion and death of our Lord Iesus 111. 44 Of his buriall and descention into hel 115. 45 Of his Resurrection 121. 46 Of his ascension into heauen 125 47 Of his sitting at the right hand of the Father 128. 48 Of his comming againe to judge the quicke and the dead 131. 49 Of faith in the holie Ghost 136. 50 Vpon the Article I beleeue that there is an holie Catholicke Church 139. 51 Vpon the Article I beleeue that there is a Communion of Saints 144. 52 Of the word of God 147. 53 Of Traditions 151. 54 Of Councels and Fathers 153 55 of the Sacraments 160. 56 Of the agreement and difference betweene the Sacraments of the olde and new testament 167. 57 Of the numbers of the Sacraments of the new Testament 169. 58 of Baptisme being the first Sacrament of the new Testament 172. 59 The second sort of principles concerning Baptisme 177. 60 Of the Lords Supper 180. 61 of the popish masse 185. 62 of Consubstantiation 189. 63 Of prayer or the inuocation of Gods name 193 64 Vpon the preface of the Lords praier 197. 65 Touching the Petitions of the Lordes praier in general and particularly touching the first of them 202. 66 Of the second petition 208. 67 of the third petition 208. 68 Of the fourth petition 212. 69 of the fift petition 216 70 of the sixt petition 219 71 Vpon the conclusion of the Lordes prayer 222. 72 of the sacred ministerie of the Church where the doctrine of the Law and the Gospell are compared together 274 73 of the ministers of Gods worde vnder the Gospel 281. 74 of the false ministerie of the Gospell 233 75 of the Ecclesiasticall functions that ar depraued and retained onely in name in the counterfait Romish church 238 76 of the power and authoritie of the Church 242. 77 of Ecclesiasticall censures and excommunication 251. 78 of the magistracie 258. 79 of remission of sinnes and the sinne against the holie Ghost 263. 80 of the resurrection of the fleshe 266. 81 of Eternall life 272. FINIS Beare good Reader with the false pointing in some places of the booke correct the nomber of the Principles according vnto the Table and mend these faultes with thy Pen. Pag. 10. lin 5. by for be Pa 16. lin 33. beget for begotten Pag. 19. lin 33. vvhich for of Pag. 20. lin 31. Read The Lord then vvas so far from bereauing c. Pag. 34. lin 2. adde grovving lin 23. ad in Pa. 35. ad subiect vnto none the supreame gouernour of himselfe Pa. 43. lin 23. seemeth for serueth Pag. 44. lin 34. This for the. Pa. 48. lin 29. as for for Pa. 49. lin 25. lost for left Pa. 52. lin 24. adde that hee pag. 62. lin 21. adde revvard of and 24. ad or Pa. 72. lin 5. derogate for degenerate Pa. 79. lin 35. signifiing for signified Pa. 83. lin 25. dele honor and 26. ad honor Pa. 93. lin 9. dele as Pag 103. lin 6. read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Pag. 114. lin 3. Read and although he vvas at the first pronounced innocent by Pilate c. Pa. 117. lin 5. Read for vs into c. Pag. 129. lin 30. Read tvvo sittinges Pa. 132. lin 20. Read those things vvhich Pag. 148. lin 7. olde for nevve Pa. 153. lin 3. councelles for counsellers Pag. 154. line 13 Read or primacie Pag. 168. line 38. in for into Pag. 207. line 16. summe for some Pag. 209. line 1. are for or Pag. 209. line 18. fift for first Pag. 221. line 5. in Pag. 223. line 29. Being for Seeing Pa. 227. line 17. either for ever Pag. 232. line 28. by the for of Pag. 135. line 1. for for from line 19. this for thus and 23. that vvhen c. 37. cyties for rites Pag. 246. line 3. it is c. Pag. 251. line vlt. rulers for rules Pag. 259. line 2. better for more Pag. 262. for for that
whole analogie may be kept and also for the cause alledged in the 11 principle 16 This analogie doth depend vpon the diuine ordination institution or blessing by vertue wherof common things are drawne vnto a holie vse The signes therefore haue by the ordinance of God no consideration at all of a Sacrament saue onely in the action of their lawfull administration Neither are wee to imagine of any force that should bee engraffed in the signs themselues seing they differ from common things in regard of a Sacramentall signification onely and that in the very vse That carrying about an adoration of the signes is most horrible Idolatrie 17 As the whole force of the Supper and the Sacramentall formes of speach doe arise from this analogie so they are to be judged thereby These speaches therfore This is my body the cup is the new Testamēt in my blood are not to be expoūded according to the words but according to the meaning that is by a Sacramentall Metonymie or chaunge of the name whereby those things are said to be that wherof onely they are a signe 18 The proper and principall endes of the Suppcr are both the serious remembraunce joyned with thankes-giuing of the death of Christ to his glorie and our profite and also the neerer ingraffing of vs into the body of Christ by faith beeing strengthened and increased and our neerer vniting with God the Father by meanes of the Mediator who dwelleth in vs by his Spirite 19 The lesse principall endes are the mutuall communion and loue of the faithfull being members of the same body the outward witnessing of that mutuall consent and the preseruation of publicke meetings 20 The effects of the Supper doe differ from the ends but in respect onely For seeing it is ordained by Christ vnto these ends it cannot be but that they should ensue vppon the lawfull vse of the Supper yet so as the instrumentall signification is attributed vnto them as their worke whereas the whole efficacie is solie referred vnto the holie Ghost 21 The profit and efficacie of the Supper is not to bee tied vnto the verie moment of the action of receauing but doth extend it selfe vnto our whole life yet is not the action once celebrated to bee for this cause euer after neglected seeing no man hath such a perfection of faith in this life as he standeth not in need of this support Defended by IANES ARMINIVS of Holland PRINCIPLES TOVCHING THE POPISH MASSE LXI WEE HAVE SPOKEN IN THE FORMER Principles concerning the true vse of the Supper of the Lorde now wee are to shew in few wordes how the said vse hath bene diuerslie depraued by Sathan 1 OF all the errors that haue risen about the holie Supper of the Lord that inuention of Transubstantiation is the most ouglie which was brought in and confirmed especially by LANFRANKE about the yeare 1050. 2 For when as the words of Christ instituting this Supper ar to be vnderstood acording vnto his mind who speaketh them which alwaies ought to be regarded in all acts and especiallie in Testaments so that in this Sacrament the bodie and bloode of Christ are truelie but sacramentallie and by faith giuing credite without question vnto his woordes receaued The Transubstantiators contrary to all reason and vse of Sacraments haue so obstinatelie stooke to the woordes that manie absurdities haue risen thereof 3 First of all seeing all Sacraments do consist of signes and things signified they doe take away the nature of the signes For they teach that after the Consecration as they call it the signes do not remaine but that the thing it self onelie is presented vnto vs. 4 Secondlie the Sacramentall participation beeing thus abolished they make a kinde of imaginary receauing of the Lords bodie and blood whereby as they hold the bodie which is nowe in heauen is reallie and corporallie present in infinite places at the same time and is receaued at once in whole and in part by manie and by one which thing as it is most absurde so doth it ouerthrow the articles of the Ascension and sitting at the right hand of the Father 5 Thridlie they haue fained such a change as maketh that which is not to be and that which is not to be For they doe so spoile the bread and the wine of their essence as they desist to be bread and wine and begin to be some other thing and they dreame of accidences that are inhaerent in no subjectes against the first article of the beleife which teacheth that the Lord is the Creator and preseruer of the things which he made 6 And heere they doe verie foolishlie bring in the omnipotencie of God for wee are now to enquire not what God can but what hee will doe according to his written worde Moreouer it cannot be either that God can lie or that Christ can be contrarie to himself both which wil necessarilie come to passe if anie thing be said to haue beene ordained by Christ contrary to the articles of our faith 7 Hence haue risen two most greeuous errours the former touching the worshipping of the bread and the wine the which in a verie fearfull blasphemous sorte are thus commonlie saluted by the Papists ALL HAILE SAVIOVR OF THE VVORLD THE VVORD OF THE FATHER THE TRVE SACRIFICE LIVELIE FLESH THE VVHOLE DEITIE TRVE MAN c. The other touching the expiatorie and propitiatorie oblation for the sinnes of the quick and the dead which the Church of Rome doth properly call the Masse and wherein they place the somme of all Christianitie 8 For the Masse is not that mingle mangle patched vp as it were of the shreds of diuerse places gathered heere there out of the Scripture and other authours which are the reliques of the auncient Liturgie or common seruice booke of the Christians but it is that ordinarie propitiation and oblation called by them their vnbloodie Sacrifice which is offered vnto God the Father for the sinnes of the quick and the dead 9 Nowe they offend in this point first because they change the Sacrament into a sacrifice wheras Christ commaunding vs to receaue and not to offer ordained a Sacrament and not a Sacrifice 10 Next in that they falslie teach that in the Christian Church there remaineth after the death of Christ anie expiatorie Sacrifice besides the verie bodie of Christ which is endued with a true humaine nature and soule 11 Thridlie in that they closelie accuse that one and most perfect sacrifice of Christ of imperfection by iterating the same euerie hand while For iteration is a note of imperfection as the Apostle saith Heb. 7. 12 Christ indeed commanded all the faithfull to celebrate the memorie of his passion but hee gaue no commandement vnto anie that he should bee sacrificed For there ought to be no mention of the NAME and office of a PRIEST or of an ALTER at this day in the Church of Christ For Christ is now the onelie and the chief Priest who offered himself