Hebrew ach to be read as an adversative as Paulus Burgensis readeth veruntamen notwithstanding as though the sense should be this though yee are permitted to shed the bloud of beasts yet it is unlawfull for you to shed the bloud of man 3. Neither is this another exception concerning mans food as Cajetane that as before the bloud of beasts is excepted so here humane flesh that if it be not lawfull to shed the bloud of man neither is it to eat his flesh which first must be kiâ—led before it be eaten 4. Neither need there to be here understood any sentence as this I will not have you to shed mans bloud and then this to follow as a reason for this prohibition to shed mans bloud followeth directly in the next verse 5. But this word translated for may be read as a causall why God would have them abstaine from all cruelty or savage behaviour in eating of the bloud of beasts that they should have a greater detestation of the spilling or shedding of mans bloud Perer. Mercer QVEST. VII How God will require the bloud of man at the hand of beasts Vers. 5. AT the hand of every beast 1. Rupertus by beast understandeth the Devill that shall answer for the death of mens soules but Moses here directly speaketh of the bodily life which is in the spirits and bloud 2. Neither by beasts here are understood cruell and beastiall men for it followeth afterward aâ— the hands of man will I require it c. 3. Neither doth Moses insinuate the death of martyrs which were exposed to beasts for which the persecutors shall answer for that did cast the Saints before the beasts 4. But here is shadowed forth that Law which was afterward published that even the beast that killeth a man should be stoned Exod. 22. QVEST. VIII How his bloud shall be shed that sheddeth bloud Vers. 6. BY man shall his bloud be shed 1. Some reade in homine and referre it to the first clause Hee that sheddeth mans bloud in man as they which are strangled have their bloud shed as it were in them sic Tostatus but in this sense one kinde of murther onely should be prohibited 2. Some read in homine against man that is in despite of man Cajetan 3. But the best reading is per hominem by man and to referre it to the last clause by man shall his bloud be shed that is by the Magistrate as the Chalde interpreteth by witnesse by the sentence of the Iudge for it should seeme that before the floud there was no law made nor power given to man to punish murther as Adam proceeded not against Cain that killed his brother Abel Mercer 4. And this must be understood not de facto sed de jure merito not of the fact for many times murtherers escape but of the right and due desert of murtherers that they are by Gods Law worthy of death and many times where the law of man faileth that such are not executed Gods vengeance overtaketh them such are either slaine in battell or by the hands of other or by some other meanes as it is in the Psalme men of bloud shall not live halfe their daies Psalm 55.24 Calvin QVEST. IX That mans life should be preserved because of Gods image IN the image of God c. 1. Hence it followeth not as Oleaster collecteth that the image of God is in mans body because the image in the soule cannot be by the killing of the body destroyed for the reason concludeth well though this image of God be not in the body yet because the body is the Tabernacle of the soule and beareth that which beareth the image of God it ought for that cause to be reverenced and yet the image of God though not originally or principally yet by the consequent and effects is expressed and shineth in some sort in mans body in that it is made upright and aspiring to celestiall things and so sutable to the soule and in regard that into the hand of man God hath delivered the rule and dominion of the creatures cap. 1. vers 28. 2. Though the image wherein man was created be much decayed and impaired yet some part thereof remaineth for the which the life of man should be spared and preserved Calvin 3. And if for this reason the life of any man whatsoever should be regarded much more the life of Christians in whom this image is renewed in Christ Muscul. QVEST. X. Of the Raine Bow Vers. 13. I Have set my bow in the cloud c. 1. Neither Ambrose conceit can be admitted who understandeth not here the visible Raine-Bow in the clouds but the invisible power of God whereby he sometime intendeth sometime remitteth his judgements as a bow is bent and unbent againe But this collection is contrary to the text which saith The Bow shall be seene in the cloud vers 14. 2. Neither is their opinion found that thinke there was neither raine noâ— Raine-Bow before the floud for how could the plants and fruits of the earth have beene so many yeares preserved without raine so then the Raine-Bow was before the floud but it beganne onely now to be a signe of this covenant betweene God and man as the Lord chuseth sometime naturall things for signes as Bread and Wine and Water in the Sacraments Mercer 3. Neither is the opinion of some Hebrewes to be admitted that thinke the Raine-Bow to have beene before the floud but then it appeared in the cleare aire now in a cloud for the iris or Bow can have no existence or being but in a dewing or stilling cloud Mercer 4. Neither is Thomas Aquinas judgement and Cajetanus sound which thinke that the Râ—ine-Bow is partly a naturall signe that there shall be no floud because the Raine-bow sheweth not but when the clouds are thinne and dispersed whereas thicke and blacke clouds ingender inundations for the causes of the generall floud were not naturall and God without the clouds by the overflowing onely of the waters could drowne the world and beside if the Rain-bow were a naturall signe then before the floud came it might have prognosticated so much but then it should have beene a lying signe for notwithstanding the Raine bowes often appearing before the deluge as it is like the floud came 5. Though the Raine-bow bee not a naturall signe but voluntary depending upon the will and institution of God yet notwithstanding hath it some agreement with that which it is made a signe of like as baptisme in the flesh hath some resemblance of the soule so the Raine-bow is a fit and convenient signe to portend no inundation likely to follow because it is orâ—inarily a signe either of faire weather or of no long raine And it hath beene observed that a Raine-bow in the morning betokeneth showers in the evening faire weather Beside the Raine-bow is found to be wholesome to plants and herbs that where it lighteth it giveth them a more pleasant and
of his place which was done after Tostat. He therefore resolveth that Moses did write this propheticè by a propheticall instinct so also Iun. But this may be rather thought to be added by Ioshua or some other of the Prophets afterward as likewise the story of Moses death and buriall Deut. 34. which is not like to have beene penned by himselfe Piscator 2. Till they came to a land inhabited Augustine thus expoundeth Non quia continuò ut venerunt ad terram habitabilem c. Not because as soone as they came to a land inhabited they left eating of Manna Sed quia non ante But because not before But what land inhabited it was is expounded afterward namely the land of Canaan for though the Israelites possessed before the land of the Amorites on the other side of Jordan yet the Manna ceased not till they had passed over Jordan and were entred into the bounds and borders of Canaan which was the promised land that flowed with milke and hony Tostat. quast 15. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the excellencie and prâ—â—ogative of the Lords day Vers. 5. BVt the sixth day c. it shall be twice so much Origen upon this place well collecteth the prerogative and excellencie of the Lords day beyond the Sabbath of the Jewes proving that the Manna began first to fall upon that day his words are these Si sex diâ—bus continuis ut scriptura dicit collectum est à septima autem die quae est Sabbati cessatum est sine dubio initium ejus à die prima qua est dies Dominica fuit c. If the Manna were gathered six dayes together as the Scripture saith and it ceased upon the seventh which is the Sabbath without doubt it began on the first day which is the Lords day 2. Doct. That it is lawfull to lay up in store so it be done without distrust in Gods providence Vers. 19. LEt no man reserve thereof till the morning Though the Israelites were bound unto this precept because every day they received Manna from heaven and so the Compassions of God were renued every morning as the Prophet Ieremie saith Lament 3.23 yet this taketh not away all store and provision to be laid up aforehand for the sluggard is condemned for his sloth and carelesnesse and is sent by the Wise man to learne of the Ant which gathereth her meat in summer Prov. Our blessed Saviour also commanded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the remainder of the meat to be kept And the reason is not alike for then they received Manna every day and therefore needed not to lay up any thing in store But now the fruits of the earth are onely gathered in summer wherefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the letter of this precept is not to be urged but the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the sense and morall equitie bindeth us still that we take heed of an immoderate distrustfull care in making provision for the time to come but depend upon Gods fatherly providence Pelarg. 3. Doct. How Manna was a type and figure of Christ. Vers. 31. THey called the name of it Man c. The holy Apostle S. Paul maketh this Manna an evident type of Christ calling it their spirituall meat 1 Cor. 10.3 And in many things the type and figure agreeth unto the bodie and substance 1. In the causes of sending this Manna 2. In the conditionâ— and qualities thereof 3. In the manner of the gathering 4. In the use thereof Ferus First touching the causes 1. The Lord had compassion of his people when they were in want and almost famished in the wildernesse so Christ was given unto us that by faith in his bodie and bloud our hungrie soules should bee nourished Marbach 2. The Lord in sending Manna shewed his power his mercie goodnesse and love to his people and in nothing more appeareth the love of God to us than in sending his onely Sonne into the world to die for us 3. The Lord by sending Manna did prove whether his people would walke in his law or no vers 4. So the Lord maketh triall of the obedience of the world in receiving the law of his Sonne Christ that is the Gospell Ferus Secondly concerning the qualities and properties of Manna 1. It was but a small thing yet had great vertuâ—â— and Christ though in the low degree of a servant was of great power 2. The Manna was white and Christ was pure and unspotted 3. The Manna was ground in the mill or beaten in a morter and Christ was beaten and bruised for us Ferus 4. The Manna came from heaven so the Sonne of God descended and tooke upon him our flesh Simler 5. The Manna was sweet and pleasant as hony so is Christ unto the soule 6. The Manna fell with the dew so Christ brought with him abundance of spirit and grace 7. The Manna fell every day and Christ hath promised to be with his Church unto the end of the world 8. The Manna ceased as soone as they came into the land of Canaan and in the next world there shall be no use of the Word or Sacraments Ferus Thirdly in the gathering of Manna these conditions were observed 1. It was lawfull and free for all men and children male and female young and old master and servant to gather the Manna so there is neither bond nor free male nor female but all are one in Christ Gal. 3.28 Simler 2. They were commanded to gather every day and we must all our life long gather of the heavenly Manna 3. They were to goe out of their tents to gather it and wee must depart from our old conversation Ferus 4. They which gathered much had not the more nor they which gathered little the lesse so both those which are strong and they which are weake in faith are admitted to this Manna Marbach Fourthly for the use both good and bad did eat of the Manna so men of all sorts come unto the Word and Sacraments but not all to the same end for as the Manna putrified to those which kept it contrary to Moses commandement so the Word of God and the Sacraments are the savour of death unto death to those which unworthily receive them Ferus But it will here bee objected if this Manna were spirituall and heavenly food to the Israelites as S. Paul saith how is he reconciled with our Saviour Christ who saith Moses gave you not bread from heaven but my father giveth you true bread from heaven Ioh. 6.32 The answer here is ready that our Saviour speaketh according to their capacity and understanding with whom he there dealeth who had a carnall imagination of Manna and could see therein nothing but corporall food Simler 5. Places of Confutation 1. Conf. Against the carnall presence in the Eucharist Vers. 5. THe people shall goe out and gather Rupertus hath upon these words this glosse applying them to the Eucharist Si digne manducare
concupiscence is not sinne whose objections were these 1. Object Such things as are naturall are not evill but concupiscence is naturall therefore it is not evill nor consequently sinne Answ. This argument must be answered by a distinction for by naturall here may be understood that which was made naturall in man by creation before his fall and so the proposition is true but the assumption is false for inordinate concupiscence and appetite was not in man before his fall or it is taken for that which is now incident to mans corrupt nature since his fall and so the assumption is true but the proposition false 2. Object Even in our nature as it now standeth corrupt the appetite or desire to such things as tend to the conservation of nature and to decline and shun the contrarie are not evill but such is the concupiscence to meat and drinke and such like Ergo. Answ. 1. Such motions and appetites of themselves are not evill as they are naturall motions but if they be inordinate motions and exceed a just measure they are evill as to have an immoderate desire to meat or drinke For as it was naturall in Eve to desire to eat of the fruit of the tree yet to desire it against the Commandement of God was evill so is it with these naturall motions if they bee immoderate and inordinate they are evill 2. There are other concupiscences beside these which are neither naturall nor tending to the conservation of nature as coveting another mans house or wife c. which can have no such excuse or pretenâ—â— 3. Object That which is not in mans power to avoid is no sinne but not to covet is not in mans power Ergo it is no sinne Answ. 1. The proposition is false for sinne is not measured by the necessitie or libertie of nature but by the disagreement which it hath with the will of God 2. When God first printed the law in mans nature before his fall then were the precepts of God given unto man in his power to keepe though man by his voluntarie corruption hath lost his power and libertie yet God forgoeth not his power and right of commanding 4. But that concupiscence is sinne it is both evident by this law that would not forbid it unlesse it were sinne and by the Apostle who useth the same argument I had not knowne sinne but by the law for I had not knowne lust except the law had said Thou shalt not lust Rom. 7.7 Vrsin 2. Confut. Against the Papists that denie concupiscence to be sinne in the regenerate SEcondly the Papists are herein Semipelagians who generally affirme and hold that concupiscence remaining after baptisme is not properly sinne nor forbidden by commandement Rhemist 〈◊〉 Rom. 6. sect 6. So was it decreed in the Tridentine Synode that concupiscence non est vere proprie peccatum in renatis is not verily and properly a sinne in the regenerate but that it is so called quia ex peccato est in peccatum inclinat because it commeth of sinne and inclineth to sinne Session 1. cap. 1. They object thus 1. Object Sinne maketh men guiltie before God of eternall death but the regenerate are not guiltie of eternall death therefore concupiscence in them is no sinne Answ. 1. By this reason there shall bee no sinne at all in the regenerate for there is no condemnation at all to them that are in Christ Jesus 2. Neither concupiscence nor any sinne else shall condemne the regenerate but that is not because concupiscence is no sinne but that both it and all other sinnes are pardoned in Christ and so not imputed 2. Object Originall sinne is taken away in Baptisme therefore concupiscence in the regenerate is no sinne Answ. Originall sinne is not simply taken away in Baptisme but onely quoad reatum in respect of the guilt and as the Schoolmen say it is taken away formally in Baptisme but not materially There are two things to be considered in originall sinne the disagreement or repugnancie which it hath with the law of God and the guilt of the punishment This latter way originall sinne is remitted and released in Baptisme it shall never be laid unto the charge of the faithfull as S. Paul saith Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods chosen Rom. 8.33 But the other remaineth still in Gods children as S. Paul confesseth of himselfe Rom. 7.23 I see another law in my members rebelling against the law of my minde but yet though it remaine and have a being in the faithfull it doth not reigne in them as the same Apostle exhorteth Rom. 6.12 Let not sinne reigne in your mortall bodie 3. But that concupiscence is sinne in the very regenerate it is evident by this precept Thou shalt not covet which commandement is given generally to all both the regenerate and unregenerate S. Paul also calleth the rebellion of his flesh which he felt in himselfe being now regenerate the law of sinne Rom. 7.23.25 And the Apostle speaketh to men regenerate when he saith Be renewed in the spirit of your minds Ephes. 4.23 which renovation needed not if concupiscence in them were no sinne 4. But that place of Augustine will bee objected Quamvis insint dum sumus in corpore mortis hujus peccati desideria c. Although while we are in the bodie of this death there be in us the desire of sinne yet if we should give assent to none of them non esset unde diceremus c. dimitte debita nostra we should have no cause to say to our heavenly Father Forgive us our debts c. August epist. 200. Answ. 1. Augustine must be understood to speake of actuall sinnes that if so men had grace never to consent to their concupiscence they should not need to pray for remission of such sinnes 2. And who is there that liveth who sometime is not carried away with concupiscence to give assent unto it So that if Augustine should speake generally of all sinne yet his speech being conditionall if we should give assâ—â— to none of them and that condition being kept of none this proveth not concupiscence not to bee sinne See more of this controversie Synops. Centur. 4. err 16. 3. Confut. That no concupiscence is a veniall sinne in it selfe THirdly Thomas Aquin his assertion commeth here to be examined Not a quòd cupiditas tunâ— est peccatum mortale quando sine ratione c. Note that concupiscence is then mortall sinne when as the things of our neighbours are coveted without reason but when they are reasonably desired it is veniall Thomas in opuscul Contra. 1. This distinction of mortall and veniall sinnes being understood in their sense that some sinnes in the condition and qualitie thereof are mortall some veniall is contrarie to the Scripture which maketh death the wages of sinne Rom. 6.23 that is of all but to the faithfull through Gods grace all sinnes are veniall and shall never be laid unto their charge and so
9.20 4. Therefore these may be the causes why Moses prayeth againe 1. The Lord granted before that he would not destroy all the people at once sed 〈◊〉 ex inâ—ervallo vel per partes but whether he would doe it in continuance of time and as it wore by peecemeale hee knew not which he prayeth for here Lippom. 2. And there might be other sinnes as well as this for the which the Lord should be angry with them as Deut. 9.18 he saith he prayed and fasted because of all their sins Tostat. 3. And now he prayeth not only for the turning away or judgements but that the Lord would be againe fully reconciled unto his people and restore them to their former state and condition of favour Simler 4. And he prayeth not only for the pardoning of their temporall punishment but against everlasting death which sinne deserveth Osiander QUEST LXXVIII What booke it was out of the which Moses wisheth to be raced Vers. 32. IF thou wilt not race me out of the booke which thou hast written 1. By this booke R. Salomon understandeth the booke of the Law as Deut. 33.4 Moses commanded us a Law hee desireth if the Lord were purposed to destroy the people that his name should not be mentioned in the Law nor he taken to be the Law-giver for to what purpose should he be spoken of as a Law-giver unto that people which was not Contra. But this is not the meaning 1. Because the bookes of the Law were not yet written Moses therefore would not desire to be raced out of a booke which was not 2. Neither would Moses aske that of God which was in his owne power to doe now Moses did write the booke of the Law and he might have left out his owne name if he would 3. Againe Moses setteth against this great benefit the safety of the people the greatest losse which he could have but this had beene no such great losse unto Moses not to have his name remembred in any such written booke 4. Moses here useth a disjunctive speech Doâ— this or else race mee c. but if he meant the racing of his name out of the booke of the Law there had beene no disjunction at all for one had followed upon the other for if Israel had beene destroyed neither should Moses have written the booke of the Law which was only given unto Israel for it had beene in vaine to give Lawes unto a people that were not 5. Moses also speaketh of a booke which God had written now Moses writ the booke of the Law the ten Commandements only were written with Gods hand Tostat. quaest 41. 2. R. Abraham Francus who writeth upon Aben Ezra understandeth the racing out of this booke of the death of the body and he addeth further that there is quaedam rota coelestâ—â— a certaine celestiall wheele wherein are many starres which worke by their influence upon those iâ—â—eriour bodies and by the moving of this wheele death or life is caused so that thus he would interpret Moses speech Cause me by the motion of this wheele to dye But seeing the motion of this wheele which he imagineth is the naturall cause as he supposeth of life and death Moses could not dye naturally before his time came and if now he should have died it had beene not a naturall death but supernaturally caused by God therefore not by the motion of any such wheele Tostat. ibid. 3. Hierom also differeth not much from this former opinion in substance understanding Moses desire of death in this life he wisheth Perire in praesentiam non in perpetnum To perish for the present not for ever But whereas the Lord afterward answereth Moses Whosoever hath sinned will I put out of my booke vers 33. it followeth that they which sinne not that is without repentance are not put out of that booke but all as well the righteous as unrighteous the just and the sinners are subject to this temporall death therefore Moses speaketh not of that 4. Hierom hath beside another opinion for upon that place Psalm 69.28 Let them bee put out of the booke of life neither let them bee written with the righteous he inferreth that God hath two bookes viventium justorum of the living and of the righteous that was the booke of the living In quo ante adventum Dei Prophetae Patriarchae scripti sunt Wherein the Prophets and Patriarkes were written before the comming of God in the flesh the other wherein the faithfull are written whereof our blessed Saviour speaketh Rejoyce because your names are written in the booke of life and of the first Moses saith he speaketh in this place So some doe understand this booke in the same sense with Hierom of the booke of Gods Covenant which hee made with Israel out of the which the Gentiles were excluded of which mention is made Ezech. 13.9 where the Lord saith that the false Prophets shall not be written in the writing of the house of Israel So Moses desireth here not to be counted of the family of Israel wherein all the Prophets and Patriarkes were written But if Israel had now perished the booke of Gods Covenant with Israel likewise should have beene no more remembred therefore it had beene superfluous for Moses to desire to be raced out of that booke And againe the booke of the living mentioned in the Psalme is the same with the booke of life spoken of Apocal. 3.5 I will not put his name out of the booke of life In which booke of life not only the Prophets and Patriarkes before Christ but all the faithfull before and since are written 5. Cajetane understandeth it De libro principatuâ— in hoc mundo Of the booke of principality and preeminence in the world for it is decreed with God as in a booke Quod isto vel illi principentur in hac vita That such or such shall beare rule in this life And so Moses desireth to lose his principality and government which the Lord promised him that hee would make of him a great nation c. But whereas they which sinned only are taken out of this booke of life and yet many wicked and evill men are governours in the world it cannot be meant of any such booke or decree of principalitie or government 6. Oleaster by this booke thinketh to be understood the booke of the acts and doings of the righteous which is mentioned Iosh. 10.13 and 2 Sam. 1.18 But there are many righteous men whose names and acts were not written in that booke which is now thought also to be lost therefore it had beene no great matter for Moses to wish to be put out of that booke 7. Burgensis maketh foure bookes of God 1. One is the booke of life wherein only are written the names of the Elect that are ordained unto life as when souldiers are written in the muster booke which are pressed and appointed for warre 2. That also may be called the booke
Gen. 7.2 where mention is made of cleane and uncleane beasts which difference was observed before the floud and continued by tradition not in regard onâ—y of sacrifice but also for their eating as it may appeare in the reviving of this law afterward Levit. 11.47 That there may be difference betweene the uncleane and cleane and betweene the beast that may be eaten and the beast that may not be eaten that then is said by the definition of the law to bee a cleane beast that might be eaten that uncleane that might not be eaten So I conclude this question with the sentence of Ambrose Quicoâ—vivium adornat c. he that prepareth a feast doth kill his oxen and fat cattell before and then biddeth his guests so the Lord ante homini caeterorum animalium praeparavit epulas before prepared the meats of other beasts and then as his friend invitavit ad convivium bid him to the banket Epist. 37. His opinion is that the cattell were provided of God to bee meat for man Mercerus is of another judgement that the eating of flesh was generally forborne before the floud which is also the opinion of the Hebrewes 1. both because it was necessary for the preservation of the kinds of cattell 2. as also herbs being then of greater vertue and strength before the floud and after might suffice for mans sustenance Mercer in v. 29.1 ch Gen. But these reasons conclude not 1. Like as after the floud when liberty was granted to eat flesh as the greene herb yet they did forbeare for a time till the breed of Cattell was increased upon the like reason before the floud immediately after the creation they might abstaine for a time from the eating of flesh but not altogether 2. The great vertue and strength of herbs concludeth that the eating of flesh was not so generall or necessary then as afterward but the whole abstinence from all kind of eating of flesh it concludeth not I rather preferre Musculus opinion who upon the sacrificing of beasts and wearing of their skins inferreth that beasts were killed before the floud and consequently their flesh eaten in 1. Gen. v. 29. 4. The didactica that is places of doctrine observed out of this first chapter 1. Doct. Of the Trinity proved 1. AGainst the Jewes that deny the Trinity and the Sabellians which affirme but one person in the Deity we have evident proofe in this chapter vers 1. where the word God or in the hebrew elohim gods is joyned to a verbe of the singular number bara created noting the singularity of the Godhead and plurality of the persons But exception is taken against this argument by Cajetanus for the which he is reproved of Catharinus another Popish writer lib. 4. animad ver and by Bellarmine lib. 2. de Christ. c. 6. for that it is the use of the Hebrewes to joyne words of the plurall with a verbe of the singular number upon which reason this collection is misliked also by Calvin and Mercerus but it may be replied that it is not the use of the Hebrewes to put in the plurall number that which hath no plurality in nature as to say Gods if there were but one person in the godhead But yet this argument for the Trinity is more evident vers 26. Let us make man after our image c. where God neither speaketh to himselfe saying let us make not I will make neither yet to the earth as though that wrought together with God nor to the Angels for God only created man vers 27. nor yet doth God speake in the plurall number according to the fashion of great men for that use of speeâ—h was not yet knowne but in this forme of speech is set forth the consultation of the blessed Trinity the Father Sonne and holy Ghost 2. Doct. That the heavens and earth had a beginning 2. OUt of the first verse wee conclude that the world had a beginning and that it was created by God contrary to the opinion of Xenophanes who held the world to bee without beginning or end and of the Epicures who did impiously hold that the world was made by chance by the concurrence of bodies together and of Aristotle among the heathen and Eugubinus in Cosmopeia among Christians who affirme Coelum empyraeum the highest and supreme heaven to have beene eternall Likewise wee condemne the folly of the lying Aegyptians and Chaldees who extend the age of the world many thousand yeares before it was made The Aegyptians boasted that they had a continuall succession of Kings 70. thousand yeares Augustine maketh mention of a letter that Alexander writ to his mother Olympias wherein he reporteth that hee heard of an Aegyptian Priest that the Kingdome of the Assyrians exceeded 5000. yeares of the Persians 8000. yeares Pompeius Mela writeth that they have chronicles of 13000. yeares Diogenes Laertius from Vulcan to Alexander accounteth 48860. yeares August lib. 12. de civitate dei cap. 10. The Aegyptians also reckon 100. thousand yeares since they first learned Astrology de civitat dei 18. c. 40. All these are lying fables seeing by just computation of yeares it is found that the world hath not yet continued since the first beginning thereof 6000. yeares 3. Doct. The word from the beginning 3. Vers. 3. THen God said hence Servetus would confirme his wicked error that the word was not from the beginning because the heavens and earth are here said to bee made before God spake But wee have an evident testimony that the word was in the beginning with God and that nothing was made without it Ioh. 1 2 3. and seeing the light was made by this word the word must needs be before the light the cause goeth before the effect so that the heavens and earth were in the beginning made by the word of God but in this place first onely it is added And God said because now more manifestly the wisdome and power of God appeareth in the distinction and perfection of the creatures which before were confused together Calvin Mercer Further another heresie of Servetus is confuted who thinketh that this was a new quality in God to speake which spake not before for this speaking in God was no quality in God as in man but it signifieth only his will and decree though Ab. Ezra doe without cause finde fault with R. Saadian for so expounding this word of God was nothing but Gods decree and commandement whereby the heavens also and earth were first made Psal. 148.5 so that then God thus spake also Calvin Mercer 4. Doct. Of the different beginning of the soules of man and beasts 4. Vers. 24 LEt the earth bring forth every living thing animam viventem the living soule from hence it was gathered that not only the bodies of bruit beasts but their life also and as it were soule were derived out of the earth whereby a manifest difference appeareth betweene the originall of mans soule which was breathed of God
130. three of an 140. and two of an 150. yeares And in these dayes some are found farre to exceed an hundred yeares as I have seene my selfe an old man of 124 yeares of age at Eversden in the County of Bedford who died about ann 1600. or 601. he could remember Bosworth field at the comming in of Henry the 7. being then as he affirmed some 15. yeares old 2. Neither is it to be thought that the yeares of the Patriarkes were accounted as the Arcadians reckoned their yeares by quarters or the Aegyptians by moneths as some have thought for then Henoch begetting children at 65. yeares should by this reckoning not exceed six yeares and a halfe when hee had a child And this Aegyptian yeare consisting of the age of the moone will not allow above two dayes and a halfe to a moneth whereas mention is made of the 17. and 27. day of the moneth Gen. 7.11 and 8.14 It is evident then that the yeares of the Patriarkes were numbred by complete and full yeares consisting of twelve moneths and not after the Aegyptian account And hereunto Pliny giveth testimony who remembreth in the same place before recited that Alexander Cornelius Xenophon doe write that some lived 500. some 600. some 800. yeares Iosephus also alleageth Manethan Berosus Mochus Estiaâ—s the Aegyptian Chalde Phenician Chronologers who testifie that those old fathers lived toward a thousand yeares QVEST. VI. The causes of the long life of men before the floud THe causes of the long life of the Patriarkes may be thought to be these foure 1. The naturall cause the sound constitution of their bodies not yet decayed and the wholesome aire not yet corrupted with terrene exhalations as after the floud 2. The morall cause for the invention and finding out of arts and sciences which as Iosephus writeth they caused to bee graven in two great pillars one of bricke another of stone that if the world were destroyed with water the second pillar might remaine if with fire the first for so had they learned of Adam that the world should be twice destroyed and he saith further that the pillar of stone was to be seene in Syria in his time 3. The civill or politke cause of the long life of the Patriarkes was for procreation and peopling of the world 4. The Theologicall that God by giving them such long life might make triall of their obedience to see if they would use this benefit of long life to the glory of God which they did not and therefore he shortned the age of man Yet the Lord while they enjoyed this long tearme would not suffer any of them to attaine unto a thousand yeares not for that as the Hebrewes suppose God granted of Adams thousand seventy yeares to David not for that reason which seemeth to be too curious whereof Ireneus maketh mention to make good that saying to Adam in what day soever thou eatest thereof thou shalt dye the death because a thousand yeares with God is as yesterday Psal. 90.3 And so Adam died in the first day before he came to a thousand But God hereby would put the fathers in minde of mortality that although they lived many hundred yeares yet none of them filled up a thousand lest they might have too much flattered themselves in long life and seeing a thousand is a number of perfection God would have none of them attaine to 1000. that we might know that nothing is perfect here Mercer QVEST. V. Of the false computation of the 70. Interpreters and whence it is thought to proceed FUrther whereas the Septuagint doe much differ in the account of yeares from the Hebrew text adding to the age of the old world which in true reckoning maketh but 1656. five hundred eighty six yeares more so making the whole number of yeares 2242. It is diversly conjectured how this error should arise 1. Some impute it to the malice of the Jewes that of purpose corrupted the greeke text that the Gentiles should not know the secrets of the Scriptures 2. Some to the prudency of the 70. translators or of the writers and scribes who knowing that the Aegyptians would count it but a fable that the fathers lived so many Astronomicall yeares made a way for them to take it after the count of the Aegyptian yeares whereof ten make but one yeare and therefore they added an hundred yeares to the fathers age before they begat children to make them apt for generation But where the yeares will serve without any such addition they adde none As Iered lived an 162. yeares which because it maketh by the Aegyptian calculation sixteene yeares and some what more the Septuagint there alter nothing This is Augustines conjecture But howsoever the Septuagint came to be so corrupt it is apparantly in many points erroneous 1. They adde unto six of the Patriarkes ages before they begat children to each of them Adam Seth Enâ—s Cainon Malaleel Henoch an 100. yeares and detract them againe in the remainder of their life that the whole summe may agree 2. They take away from Methusalems age before hee had children 22. yeares and adde to Lamechs age 6. yeares as is shewed before 3. They misse in their calculation in Methusalems yeares they make him to live an hundred sixty five before hee begat Lamech and 802. after in all 969. whereas the other numbers put together want two of this summe making but 967. 4. They detract from Lamechs age 24. yeares his whole age according to the Hebrew is 777 according to the septuagint but 753. 5. By their computation Methusalem must live 14. yeares after the floud for they make him to live 802. yeares after Lamech was borne and Lamech lived 188. yeares before Noah was borne and in the six hundred yeare of Noahs age came the floud Lamech and Noah make but 788. yeares after the computation of the Septuagint there remaineth yet 14. yeares of Methusalems life who according to the Hebrew computation died the same yeare in the beginning before the floud came for in the arke hee could not be where only were eight persons Noah and his wife his three sonnes and their wives Genes 7.7 and S. Peter witnesseth that in the arke eight soules only were saved 1 Pet 3.20 and to say that Methuselah was saved in the terrestriall Paradise with his father Henoch is a fabulous fiction without ground Mercerus QVEST. VI. The reason of the inequality of generation in the fathers WHereas the Patriarkes at divers ages began to beget children Mahalaleel and Henoch at 56. yeares Iered at a hundred sixty two yeares Lamech at two hundreth eighty two Noah at five hundred 1. Neither is it to be imputed to Noahs holinesse that so long abstained from mariage seeâ—ng Henoch that for his godly life was translated had children at 65. yeares 2. Neither as Pererius conjectureth is it like that Noah had other elder sonnes which were dead before the floud came for whereas it is
the center of the earth as Plato imagined for by this meanes the waters should ascend three thousand and 500. miles for so farre it is from the Center of the earth to superficies which is against the nature of water 2. Neither was the Sea this great depth which some thinke is higher than the earth and kept in onely by the power of God which now was suffered to overflow the earth for neither is it true that the Sea is higher than the earth as is before declared neither doth Moses make any mention of it which might have beene sufficient by the overflowing to have drowned the earth if naturally it were so much above it 3. Wherefore the fountaines of the deepe were the deepe heads and springs of water within the earth which were opened and enlarged to make this inundation so that the Rivers that runne in the earth were cast up and the deepe gulph gushed forth and these may be the waters under the earth mentionod Exod. 20. vers 4. The windowes also of heaven signifie not the irruption or breaking forth of any waters in the Chrystall heaven as it is called above the starrie skie as Eugubinus and Oleaster imagine for neither are there any such watâ—rs above the heavens as hath beene before declared and if there were how could they passe thorow the starrie heaven without the dissolution and corruption thereof and it would follow that the watery heaven should be now a vacaâ—t and emptie place the waters being descended from thence But the opening of the windowes of heaven betokeneth the breaking of the clouds where the water is contained that whereas at other times The Lord bindeth the waters in the clouds and the cloud is not broken under them Iob 26.8 Now the Lord loosed the clouds which being made as full of windowes powred forth all the water that was kept in them Mercerus Perer. QVEST. XII Of the causes of the floud THese three were the causes of the floud 1. The issuing forth of the waters beneath out of the earth 2. The continuall raine for forty not onely dayes but nights together not onely powring from the clouds but increasing by the liquefaction and distilling of the aire into water Seneca writing of the generall deluge which he speaketh of not as past but to come addeth unto these three other causes 1. Crescunt maria super solitum c. the extraordinary swelling and overflowing of the sea 2. Incipit terra putrescere laxata ire in humorem The earth also it selfe did putrifie and resolve into water 3. He maketh the conjunction of the celestiall bodies another cause that like as he thinketh the world shall be burned when the starres shall concurre in the signe Cancer sic inundationem futuram cum eadem siderum iurba in Capricornum convenerit so hee thinketh there shall bee a generall inundation when the same company of starres shall come together in the signe Capricorne These causes may bee admitted as helping and necessary though not as principall saving that the conjunction of the starres in Capricorne seemeth rather to be a curious inquisition than to depend of any certaine demonstration QVEST. XIII Vpon what day Noah entred into the Arke Vers. 13. IN the selfe same day c. 1. Lyranus reading according to the latine text in the article of that day thinketh that the noone point of day is hereby expressed and so also Oleaster 2. Tostatus taketh it rather for the morning or twilight which is more properly a point parcell or article of the day It betokeneth nothing else but in the same day as I shewed before in the interpretation 3. Some Hebrewes think that this was wednesday when they say that the Sun is strongest that Noah might have some rest before the Sabbath but this is too curious 4. Some doe take this for the day before the floud being the sixteenth of the moneth that Noah entred then and his family before 5. Others thinke that Noah entred seven dayes before according to the text v. 1. Enter thou into the Arke c. v. 4. for seven dayes hence I will cause it to raine v. 7. so Noah entred c. v. 10. and so after seven dayes c. And thus Ambrose expoundeth so that here by way of recapitulation mention is made of the entring of Noah and Iunius to make the sense more full readeth thus In the same day when Noah was entred c. v. 13. c. God shut him in v. 16. He maketh the 13 14 15. verses to depend upon that clause in the 16. verse whereby is shewed how the providence of God watched over Noah and the rest when they were entred so shutting them up that the waters could not enter 6. But Iunius inserteth one word v. 13. which is not in the Hebrew quum ingressus esset when he was entred when is added so that according to the true reading the selfe same day Noah entred c. it is evident that Noah with his sonnes entred the same day wherein the raine began to fall God so providing that against that day all kind of cattell and fowles were present to enter with him And whereas Noah is bid to enter v. 1. before the seven dayes that is to bee understood of the preparing and making all things ready for his entrance Mercerus Now whereas Iunius thinketh that in the very seventh day the floud came and so readeth v. 10. I thinke rather that the seven dayes were fully expired and that upon the 8. day it began to raine because the text is that after seven dayes the waters were upon the earth Mercer QVEST. XIII How Noah was shut up Vers. 16. GOd shut him up c. 1. Not that after Noah was come into the Arke and his sonnes with their wives and the rest of the creatures God by the ministery of the Angels did shut the doore without and pitched it up occlusit pro eo God shut it up for him as Tremelius and Cajetanus read that is whereas Noah being within could not shut up the doore without God did it for him for as Noah opened the doore at his going out so it is like he shut it at his going in but hereby â—s signified that what was wanting in Noahs labour was supplyed by Gods providence and that it was Gods worke to preserve Noah in the Arke Mercer 2. And this was done not so much to keepe him from the sight of the destruction of the world which might have ministred griefe unto him as Chrysostome collecteth for there was a window out of the which hee might behold that fearefull spectacle but to keepe himselfe from the violence and rage of the waters as also from the rage of men Mercer QVEST. XIV The 150. dayes must be reckoned from the beginning of the floud whereof the 40. dayes are a part Vers. 24. THe waters prevailed an 150. dayes This terme must not be counted from the end of 40. dayes mentioned v.
have heard thee c. God had promised before to Hagar that he would greatly increase her seed Gen. 16.10 and yet here it is ascribed to the prayer of Abraham whereby we learne that we are to pray even for those things which we know God purposeth toward us as our Saviour saith Your heavenly father knoweth whereof ye have need before ye aske of him Matth. 6.8 yet in the same place he teacheth his Apostles to pray Mercer 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against adoration of Angels Vers. 3. ABraham fell on his face and God talked with him If it were an Angell that in the person of God talked with Abraham then was this no gesture of adoration in that Abraham fell upon his face for the Angels will not suffer men to worship them Revel 22.9 But if they will needes have it adoration then it was God that talked with him and not an Angell as the words of the text insinuate Muscul. 2. Conf. The circumcision of the male how it served also for the use of the female Vers. 12. EVery man child of â—ight daies c. Though the males only were circumcised because the beginning of generation and so of originall corruption was from them yet it served also for the signe of the covenant for the female sexe because the woman is of the man as the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 11.8 and so was circumcised in the man But hence it followeth not that sacraments now may be applyed to the use and benefit of such as receive them nor which is an usuall thing in the popish Church because there is now no such reason or meanes of communicating the sacraments to the not receivers as circumcision both by the intention of the Author and order of nature in the male was forcible also in the other sex 3. Confut. Sacraments doe not actually conferre grace HEnce also it is evident that Sacraments doe not actually conferre the grace of Justification or remission of sinnes because Abraham was not justified by his circumcision But he was first justified by faith and afterward received circumcision the seale thereof as S. Paul sheweth Rom. 4.10 11. This Irenaeus concludeth Quod non per circumcisionem justificabatur homo sed in signum data est populo clarum fuit judicium ipse Abraham qui ante circumcisionem justificatur c. That man was not justified by circumcision but it was given as a signe to the people Abraham is a cleare evidence who was justified before circumcision Chrysostome also rendring a reason why Infants were circumcised thus writeth Altera causa fuit ut re ipsa discerâ—mus nihil animae circumcisionem illam profuisse sed eam signum tantum gratia esse factam c. Another cause is that we should learne that the circumcision did not profit the soule but was onely a signe of grace for children when they understand not what is done to them can reape no profit thereby to their soules Hence also is confuted the note of some Hebrewes that Abraham chap. 17. vers 1. is bidden to be perfect because he had not yet received circumcision whereby he was made perfect for circumcision was no cause but a signe of his election in the covenant Mercer 4. Confut. Baptisme wheretâ— it excelleth circumcision WHerefore whereas Pererius sheweth a threefold preeminence of Baptisme beyond circumcision 1. In the facility or easinesse of it because it is not so painfull to the flesh as circumcision was 2. In the universality and liberty for baptisme is free for both sexes for all Nations that professe Christ at all times circumcision belonged onely to the Israelites and to males and was tied to the eighth day 3. In the efficacie because baptisme absolveth a man from all sinne and the punishment thereof c. We willingly acknowledge the two first points of preeminence but such an efficacie actually to give remission of sinnes neither circumcision had then nor baptisme now for it would then follow that every one that is baptised is surely saved his sinnes being remitted or else that his sinnes being remitted may returne againe But God useth not where hee hath once forgiven sinnes to remember them any more Esech 18.22 Baptisme then we confesse significationâ— in signification and representation is more rich than circumcision was for washing is a more lively resemblance of our cleansing in the bloud of Christ and it is a commemoration of a benefit performed whereas circumcision was a type of the same to be exhibited But otherwise for the efficacie there is no difference they both are seales and confirmations of faith for the remission of sinnes nor actuall conferrers and bestowers of grace 5. Confut. Abraham the first that received circumcision FUrther Herodotus is here found to be in an errour that thinketh that the Egyptians were the first that were circumcised and that the Jewes received it from them Whereas it is evident that Abraham was the first that received circumcision by the commandement of God himselfe and that the Egyptians above 200. yeare after learned it of the Hebrewes that sojourned with them above 200. yeares more 6. Confut. Neither Circumcision under the Law nor Baptisme under the Gospell absolutely necessary Vers. 14. THe uncircumcised male c. shall be cut off c. This place I shewed before quest 1. to be understood not of children that were uncircumcised which was their parents fault and not theirs but of such as were adulti of yeares therefore it is no good reading to say the uncircumcised man childe but the male Zachar for the infant of eight dayes old mentioned vers 12. is of purpose omitted here Hence then it is inferred that there was no such absolute necessity of circumcision that children wanting it should be damned 1. For the children of Israel were not circumcised for the space of fortie yeares all the time of their sojourning in the wildernesse Ios. 5.6 Neither is it noted to have beene any fault to neglect it because they were continually in their journey So they were charged to keepe the Passeover by an ordinance for ever and whosoever kept it not as it was prescribed should be cut off Exod. 12.14 15. yet upon extraordinary occasion as of some uncleannesse or by reason of a long journey they might deferre the eating of the Passeover till the foureteenth day of the second moneth Numb 9.10 11. yea it is evident that the Passeover after the first institution was but once kept in the wildernesse for the space of forty yeares namely in the first moneth of the second yeare Num. 9. 1. And it was not celebrated againe till Iosua his time Iosua 5.10 after they were entred into the land of Canaan 2. Cajetane a popish Writer giveth good evidence here Consentaneum est ut non puniatur nisi qui culpam admisit infantes antem nullam possunt admittere culpam proinde poena hic designata adsolos adultos spectat ut ii solum merito puniantur
and died c. 1. Though the word gavâ— rather so signifieth expirare to give up the ghost than deficere to faint Hieromes reason is not so good quia non coâ—venit Abraha deficere it was not fitting that Abraham should faint and decrease for no morall decreasing or fainting is here spoken of but onely naturall 2. Neither is this word which signifieth to yeeld up the Spirit used onely of the just as Rabbi Salomon and Lyranâ—â— for the same is uttered of the old world Gen. 7.21 all the flesh yeelded the breath and of Ismael vers 17. of this chapter 3. Neither is Oleasters reason sufficient why we should read rather he fainted than yeelded up the spirit because it followeth he died and so the same thing would be twice expressed for this expiring or yeelding up of the spirit sheweth the facility and easinesse of his death as the word following betokeneth the thing that he dyed so this declareth the manner not that he dyed without any sicknesse or griefe as Aben Ezra for the faithfull are not exempted from the common condition of mankind Vatah. but it sheweth that he willingly rendred up his soule into the hands of God Calvin 4. Cajetanes collection is not here to be refused that three things are set downe by Moses concerning Abrahams departure 1. that he dyed that is was dissolved which belongeth unto the whole man as consisting of body and soule 2. that hee was buried which concerneth his body 3. that he was gathered unto his people in respect of his soule which was joyned to the blessed company of the Saints Cajet in hunc lâ—â—um QUEST XIII How Abraham died in a good age and full of yeares IN a good age satisfied or full of daies 1. In that Abraham is said to have died in a good old age whereas many before him were of longer life and much elder of whom this phrase is not used Philo gathereth that it was not the old age of his body but his perfection of vertue that made a good old age Disce soli viro bonâ— contingere senectutem bonam Know that onely a good old age happened to a good man sic etiam Calvin 2. Hee was full because daies is not added in the originall the Hebrewes gather that he was full not onely of daies but of all other blessings ex Mercer and he was satisfied with daies as not desirous to have his life prolonged Calvin Thus even some among the Heathen were satâ—â—e with daies as Cicero writeth of Cato that he should say Siquis deus mihi largiatur â—t ex hac atate repusrascam in cunis vagiam valde recâ—sem that if God should grant me to become a childe againe and to cry in the cradle I would refuse it Cicer. de senectus Therefore Abraham was in another sort full of daies because his daies were full of vertue hee had not spent his life in vaine but as Apelles the cunning painter was wont to say nullus dies sine linea no day without a line and Titus the Emperour if any day had passed wherein he had not done some good would say to his friends Diemperdidi I have lost a day so no doubt Abraham did passe over his time in fruitfull workes Perer. QUEST XIV How the sinner is said to die before his time ABraham then received a great blessing of God in living both long and well and dying in his time not as the Preacher saith of the wicked man lest thou die in tempore non tuo in a time not thine Ecclesiast 7.19 which is so spoken 1. Not that a man can die before the time appointed of God for a mans daies are determined with God Iob 14.5 2. Nor yet so onely because the wicked is never prepared or fit for death both because he is destitute of vertue as also hee expecteth not death in which respects in some sense he may be said to die not in his time being neither ripe for it in vertue nor looking for it 4. But the sinner is said to die before his time when the naturall course of his life which he in the judgement of man though not in the determination of God might have lived is by some violent and extraordinary kinde of death shortned and cut off as Nadab and Abihu for offering in strange fire were thus before their time consumed with a fire sent from God Levit. 10. ex Perer. QUEST XV. What it is to be gathered to his people Vers. 8. ANd was gathered to his people 1. This people are not the sunne moone and starres or the invisible idaea or formes according to the which these sensible things were made or the foure elements of the which the bodies of men are compounded as Philo imagineth these are but Platonicall conceits and who seeth not how unproperly the name of people agreeth to any of these 2. Neither with Augustine by people doe we understand the society and company of Angels for Ismael also is said vers 17. to be gathered to his people 3. Neither can it bee applied to Limbus patrum where all the just men were from the beginning of the world as Lyranus Rupertus unlesse they will say that Ismael also went into the place of just men who was also gathered to his people and whereas they make Limbuâ— patrum a member of hell a place of darknesse Abraham went not thither seeing Abrahams besome was a place of rest and joy where the Angels were for they carried Lazarus soule thither But these blessed spirits are Angels of light and not of darknesse 4. We also refuse Burgensis conceit who noteth a difference of phrase in the old and new testament when the Scripture speaketh of the dead they are said that die in the new testament to die in the Lord which phrase is not used of any in the old testament because they were not admitted ad beatificam Dei visioneâ—â— to the blessed presence and sight of God Contr. Indeed I grant that after the manifestation of the Messiah to the world the Scripture speaketh more clearely of the faithfull departed in the new testament because the Messiah was then come but not for any such cause pretended for even the soules of the faithfull departed in the old testament did enjoy the presence of God as David saith I shall behold thy face in righteousnesse and when I awake be satisfied with thine image Psal. 17.15 he doubted not but that his soule first apart should see God and then both body and soule in the resurrection and the Scripture speaketh evidently that Abraham Isaack and Iacob did live with God for of them God is called who is not the God of the dead but of the living Matth. 22.32 5. Neither this phrase to be gathered to his people doth only signifie to be in the state of the dead and equivalent to that phrase to sleepe with their fathers which is spoken of the wicked as well as of the righteous as idolatrous Ahaz is
birth of Esau and Iacob which was 15. yeare before Abrahams death and 63. yeares before Ismael died for Abraham lived 175. Ismael 137. yeares and where Isaack was younger than Abraham by 100. and than Ismael by 14. they are found so long to have lived after the birth of these twins from hence then it is evident that the order of time is not alwayes observed in the sacred histories but that sometime is set downe first which was done last 3. Doct. Against the casting of mens nativities Vers. 23. THe elder shall serve the younger This example is urged by Augustine against the Genethliakes that is casters of mens nativities for hereby the vanity of their observations appeareth in that these two twins conceived at once and borne together were of such divers natures and qualities August de civit Dei lib. 4. c. 5. And whereas they answer that in the birth of twins there may bee great diversity by reason of the swift motion of the planets which change their aspects and conjunctions every moment as one Nigidius Figulus would demonstrate by the example of a wheele which while it was swiftly carried about he marked twice with inke which markes when the wheele had left running were found not to be farre asunder whereby he would insinuate that in a small distance of time a great part of the celestiall globe may be turned about But to this fansie Augustine answereth that if the celestiall motions be so swift and continue not in one stay then hardly can any man discerne under what constellation any is borne and Gregory thus wittily derideth their follies that if Esau and Iacob were not therefore borne under one constellation because one came forth after another by the same reason neither can any be borne under one constellation because hee is not borne all at once but one part after another Hâ—m 10. sup Evangel 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against Limbus patrum Vers. 8. WAs gathered to his people c. This the Popish writers do understand of the fathers in Limbus patrum whither Abraham also went sic Lyran in Gen. 49. Rupert lib. 6. in Gen. cap. ult Contra. 1. The place to the which Abraham went is called Abrahams bosome Luke 16 which Augustine by no meanes thinketh to have beene a member or part of hell as they make Limbus 2. The Apostle sheweth to what people the faithfull are gathered Ye are come c. to the company of innumerable Angels c. to the spirits of just and perfect men Heb. 12.22 23. Where then the spirits of just men were there also were the Angels for so we read that Lazarus soule was carried by the Angels into Abrahams bosome But the Angels are not in Limbus patrum upon this reason Lyranus refuseth the interpretation of Augustine and Tostatus who by this people to the which Abraham was gathered understand the society of Angels which is in no place but heaven Lyranus also holding that all the just men from the beginning of the world went to Limbus is confuted by Paulus Burgens who saith that Abraham was the first that went to Limbus because of him first this phrase is used in Scripture That he was gathered to his people Thus we see that these Patrons of Limbus cannot agree among themselves for what certainty of opinion can there be which is not grounded upon Scripture 2. Confut. Election is not of good works foreseene Vers. 23. THe elder shall serve the younger S. Paul inferreth upon this text that wee are not elected by workes but according to the purpose of him that calleth Rom. 9.11 here then the errour of the Pelagians is confuted who taught that men were elected for their good workes fore-seene of God before But this errour is repugnant to Scripture Eph. 14. He hath chosen us in him that we should be holy he saith not because we were holy so that good workes are not a precedent cause of our election but a consequent effect thereof 3. Confut. The soules merited not before they came into the body HEre also that errour ascribed to Origen is overthrowne who thought that the soules have a being before the bodies and that they are disposed of in this life according to the merit of the former life which they lived in before they entred into the body for the Apostle expounding this place saith before they had done either good or evill and immediately before yer the children were yet borne Rom. 9.11 therefore before they were borne they had neither done good nor evill 4. Confut. S. Paul alleageth the examples of Esau and Iacob not for temporall election or figuratively onely of eternall but originally and properly IT is therefore evident 1. That neither Moses writing this prophecie The elder shall serve the younger did not only speake of the externall inheritance and preeminence of Iacob before Esau neither did Paul so understand Moses for then the example had not beene pertinent to S. Pauls purpose who goeth about to prove these two things that all are not the children of promise which are the children of Abraham after the flesh which he shewed by the instance of Ismael and Isaack vers 7. The other point is that Gods election is of grace not by workes as appeareth in the example of Esau and Iacob wherefore the one was hated of God the other loved before they had done good or evill If the Apostle then had brought in an example of temporall election it had been impertinent seeing thorowout the Chapter he treateth of eternall 2. Neither yet was this outward preheminence of Iacob and refusall of Esau a signe onely and figure of their eternall election and reprobation as Lyranus in 1. Malach. And therefore not directly implied in the words but so applied by the Apostle for as the Preacher saith No man knoweth either love or hatred of all that is before them Eccles. 9.4 that is Gods love or hatred is not discerned by the condition of outward things 3. Neither is it the literall and historicall sense only to shew that Esau was temporally rejected but. S. Paul by his divine spirit doth draw it to a mysticall sense as Pererius thinketh in 25. Gen. numer 45. for S. Paul understandeth Moses no otherwise than Malachy did Esau have I hated Iacob have I loved chap. 1.1 who out of Moses words inferreth a conclusion of Gods everlasting love toward Iacob 4. Wherefore the truth is that the very literall and proper sense of these words The elder shall serve the younger written first by Moses and cited by S. Paul doth principally describe the everlasting state and condition before God and are especially to be referred to the celestiall inheritance but secondarily the promise of the externall inheritance of Canaan is here also comprehended This may be made evident by these two reasons 1. That is the proper sense of the place which is principally and chiefly intended by the Spirit but so is this spirituall sense as the
conceived or had heat C. in the ramming or conceiving time of the strong or well bodyed sheepe B. G. T. chashar to joyne together whereof they are called well bodyed or strong sheepe v. 42. When the ewes brought forth he did not put them S. when the ewes were feeble B. G. when they were put together late or in late ramming time H.C.T.P. guataph whereof is derived the word behagnatoph in bringing forth late the not marked were Labans the marked Iacobs S. the late brought forth were Labans the timely or firstlings Iacobs C.H. the feebler were Labans the stronger or well bodied Iacobs T.B.G.P. v. 43. camels asses and mules S. camels and mules câ—t 3. The Explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Whether Rachel envied her sister Vers. 1. RAchel envied her sister 1. Some thinke that this was a kind of zeale rather than envie she grieved rather at her owne infecundity or barrennesse than that her sister was fruitfull Perer. 2. But the text is evident that shee envied her sister shee was offended that her sister was fruitfull and she barren Neither is there any inconvenience to yeeld to those holy women their infirmities they were not Angels Merc. chavah signifieth both to envie and strive with emulation or zeale QUEST II. Of Rachels impatient and immoderate desire of children GIve me children or else I die 1. She saith not so as though Iacob of purpose had restrained his naturall force as R. Levi. 2. Neither is it her meaning that Iacob should by his prayer obtaine children for her as Isaack had done for Rebecca for then Iacob would not have beene angry with her 3. Neither did she thus say as though she did not know that God was the giver of children which she confesseth vers 6. God hath given sentence on my side 4. But thus in her womanly heat she breaketh forth as though the fault was in her husband seeing she should otherwise die either for griefe or that she might as good be dead as beare no children Mercer and that her name by this meanes should die with her Perer. 5. Three reasons made her so desirous of children 1. Her envy for her sisters happinesse 2. That she might be the more deare to her husband 3. Because of the promised seed Perer. QUEST III. Of the causes of barrennesse Vers. 2. IAcob was angry and said Am I in Gods stead c. 1. There are naturall causes of sterility or barrennes either some originall defects in the birth as some are borne unapt for generation or else it may come by diseases sometime the constitution of the body is an impediment as in fat bodies where nature is turned into the nutriment of the body Aristot. lib. 2. de generat animal c. 2. 2. There is a supernaturall cause of barrennesse when it pleaseth God to restraine the wombe as in the women of Abimelecks house Genes 20.18 Foure keyes to open and shut are in Gods hand which the Lord hath not commited to any other either Angell or Seraphim the key of raine Deuter. 28.12 The Lord shall open his good treasure the heaven to give raine the key of food Psal. 104.28 Thou openest thy hand and they are filled the key of the womb the key of the grave when the dead shall be raised Perer. ex Tharg Hierosolym 3. Plato himselfe confesseth that procreation was the gift of God Quamvis in mortali animante fiat restamen divina est pregnatio genitura ab immortalib est Generation though it be done in a mortall creature yet it is a divine thing procured by an immortall power Plat. in Symp. QUEST IV. In what sense Rachel saith she shall beare upon my knees Vers. 3. SHee shall beare upon my knees 1. Not as though Rachel should be her midwife or nurse as Onkelâ—s 2. Or that by her example Rachel should the sooner conceive as the Hebrewes 3. But that as it followeth Rachel might have children by her maid for the children of the bond-maids were accounted as the dames her meaning is that she might dandle them upon her knees and play with them as mothers doe with their children so is this phrase taken Isay 66.12 them shall ye sucke ye shall be borne upon her sides and be joyfull upon her knees 4. Rupertus doth fitly allegorize this saying of Rachel lib. 7. comment in Genes 36. as they which Bilha brought forth were borne upon Rachels knees so qui per prâ—dicationem invidentis auâ—ivit verbum teneat in Catholica ecclesia verae perfectionem fidei ita nihil differet à legitimis filâ—â—s so he that heard the word by the preaching of envious teacherâ— holding the true faith in the Catholike Church may differ nothing from the lawfull children of the Church as the sonnes of Iacobs hand-maids received their inheritance and had their lâ—t amongst their brethren QUEST IV. Whether Ruben brought unto his mother mandrakes Vers. 14. GIue me of thy sonnes mandrakes c. 1. It is most like that they were rather pleasant and sweet flowers where with they used to strew their husbands bed than that heâ—be which is called mandrakes for these reasons 1. Ruben was now but a child of 5. or 6. yeares old and not above for he was borne in the beginning of the 7. last yeares and therefore had no discretion to make choice of flowers for their vertue but for their colour or smell 2. It was now wheat harvest in the spring time which in those countries was in the beginning of May when the Mandrake apples are not ripe for so the Septuagint read Mandrake apples 3. The Mandrakes have a strong smell which the Arabians call Iabrochin of the ranke savour of goats whereas these herbs called dudaim are commended for their sweet smell Can. 7.13 The mandrakes have given a smell and in our gates are all sweet things Iun. 2. Whereas Augustine saith of the mandrakes Rem comperi pulehram suaveolentem sapore in sipido I found them to be faire in shew sweet in smell vnsavory in taste lib. 22. com Faust. c. 56. he may speake of that kind of mandrakes which grew in those hot countries in Africa which might have a more fresh smell but otherwise concerning the mandrakes knowne to us Plinie a diligent searcher of the nature of herbes saith Odor ejus gravis sed radicis mals graviâ—r c. sic noxiâ— vires gravedinem afferunt ipso â—lfactu The smell is very strong specially of the root and apple the force thereof â—ery hurâ—full the very smell bringeth heavinesse Plin. lib. 25. c. 13. Levinus Lemnius confirmeth this by experience that by laying of a mandrake apple in his studie he became so drousie that he could not shake it off till the apple was removed lib. de herb 3. Epiphanius thinketh that the mandrake inciteth and provoketh either man or woman to lust as it is held that they have vertue to cause women to conceive and that Rachel desired
Benjamin was younger than Ioseph but then not above foure or five yeares old and therefore not so capable of his fathers love as Ioseph who began now to shew his vertue and good disposition the rest also of Iacobs sonnes were borne in his old age all within the compasse of seven yeares and he was 84. yeare old when he began to have children â— yet Ioseph was the youngest of them and the first borne of his beloved Rachel much desired and longed for on both sides before he was borne and therefore best beloved when he came 4. Now the reasonâ— why children borne in old age are best beloved of their parents are these 1. Because they are the last borne and the aged parents looke for none after-sembling his mother Rachel Iosephus his heroicall and princely mind which appeared in his dreames a ward Phil. 2. And are most likely to be the longest livers and so to continue their fathers name Cajetan 3. Or for that the aged parents are delighted with the pratling and sport of young children Oleaster 4. Or they are alwayes at hand and in their fathers eye Ramban 5. Or the parents doe it in wisdome to make most of the youngest because they are least able to shift for themselves Other causes there might bee of Iacobs affection to Ioseph as the comelinesse of his body resembling his mother Rachel Iosephus his heroicall and princely minde which appeared in his dreames a prophecie of his honourable estate afterward Philo. His vertuous and godly disposition but these causes are concealed lest they might have increased the envy of his brethren Chrysost. QUEST VII Of Iosephs particoloured coat Vers. 3. HE made him a coat of divers colours the word is passim peeces 1. Some doe read a side gowne or coat as Aquila and Gregory doth thereby understand his constancy and perseverance 2. Some reade tunicam manicatam a sleeved coat Symmach but the word will beare neither of these interpretations 3. Neither yet was it made of divers kinds of threads for that was forbidden by the law Levit. 19.19 whereas in Davids time Thamar did weare such a garment of the same name passim 4. Neither yet was it a white silke garment representing the Priesthood as some thinke 5. Nor yet of divers peeces put together for that had beene no such precious garment 6. But it was a coat of divers colours as the Septuag translate poikâ—lon which seemed as though it had beene of divers parts and peeces Mercer Iun. QUEST VIII The difference betweene envy and hatred Vers. 4. THey hated him 1. There is great difference betweene hatred and envy 1. Men are hated for evill they are envied for some good thing as prosperity riches wisdome 2. Hatred is of some particular matter envy hath a generall object for any thing that happeneth well to a man 3. Hatred may sometime be just as to hate the wicked envy is never just 4. Hatred may be conceived against bruit beasts as a man hateth a serpent or a tode but envy is only against men 5. Envy ceaseth when men from a prosperous state fall into misery but even men in misery may bee hated 6. Hatred is where wee have received hurt but they are often envied of some whom they never hurt 7. Whom men hate they will harme if they can but sometime a mans gifts are envied against whom no hurt is intended 2. Beside these differences betweene envy and hatred envy hath these peculiar properties 1. Envy rejoyceth in another mans fall 2. He that is envied many times fareth the better as Ioseph did 3. An envious man huâ—teth himselfe most and him nothing that is envied 4. An envious man dissembleth in his outward behaviour making outwardly a shew of friendship bearing malice in his heart such was Ioaâ— toward Abner while he embraced him with the one hand he killed him with the other 5. An envious man as Gregory noteth sheweth himselfe to be of a base mind for in that he envieth another he bewrayeth his owne wants not having that which hee envieth in another 3. The remedy against this devouring sinne of envy Basil prescribeth Si nihil rerâ—m humanâ—rum magnum aut vehementer expetâ—â—dum putemus to thinke no humane thing to be of any great reckoning or much to be desired and then shall wee neither envy the rich for his riches nor the honourable person for his honour nor any other for any worldly gift Againe the wise man saith Ne comedas cum homine invido eat not with an envious man or a man that hath an evill eye Prov. 23.6 lest that by conversing with such we learne of their qualities Perer. QUEST IX Of Iosephs dreame why doubled Vers. 6. HEare the dreame which I have dreamed c. 1. Ioseph hath two dreames shewed him both tending to the same end to declare the certainty of his exaltation above his brethren as Ioseph afterward saith to Pharao that had two dreames likewise foreshewing the same thing Gen. 41.32 The dreame was doubled the second time to Pharao because the thing is established with God 2. Iosephus is deceived that â—aith Iosephs brethren found no fault at the telling of the first dreame whereas the text is otherwise they said nothing at the rehearsing of the second referring it to the judgement of their father to whom Ioseph told it againe whom his father rebuked in the presence of their brethren and therefore they spared their reprehension or Moses thought good to omit it Mercer 3. Some doe apply those parables to Christ making him the sheafe of corne to whom all the Patriarks and Prophets do stoope Rupert some also further make Ioseph a type of Christ 1. In that hee uttered dreames as the other parables 2. Christ spake of his exaltation as Ioseph of his 3. Christ was hated for his parables â—s Ioseph for his dreames Perer. QUEST X. Of the divers kinds of dreames FUrther it is to be considered that dreames are divers waies caused 1. Some dreames arise of the fulnesse of the bellie and excesse of drinke such are the dreames of Epicures and drunken persons 2. Some come of emptinesse and want as when an hungrie or thirstie man dreameth of meat or drinke Isay 29.8 3. Some are wrought by the illusion of Sathan 4. Some partly by the illusion of Sathan partly by mans owne imagination Eccles. 5.3 A dreame commeth by the multitude of businesse 5. Some dreames are sent by divine revelation such were those of Ioseph 6. Some proceed partly of our owne serious cogitation partly of divine revelation such were Nebuchadnezars dreames as Daniel saith to him O king when thâ—â— wast in thy bed thoughts came upon thee c. Dan. 2.29 Perer. ex Gregor QUEST XI Ioseph not worthy of rebuke Vers. 10. HIs father rebuked him c. 1. Ioseph did herein nothing worthy of reprehension the neither told these dreames of any vanitie of minde nor of childish simplicitie but as the dreames were revealed
Pererius allegeth that place Psal. 16.10 Thou wilt not leave my soule in hell to shew that sheol is taken for hell it shall not be amisse by the way to examine the sense of this place whereof there are three expositions First some by soule nephesh understand the dead body as it is taken Levit. 21.1 Let none be defiled among the dead the word is nephesh soule Genebrard a popish writer thus confuteth this opinion denying that nephesh is in this place taken for the body but by a metonymie it signifieth the exequies and funerall duties performed to the soule of the dead Contra. Though we also approve not the former exposition of nephesh in this place and that reverend man that so translated Act. 2. hath himselfe in that point altered his translation in his last edition of his annotations upon the new testament yet Genebrard had no reason to deny the word to bee so taken Levit. 21.1 for 1. beside that the Israelites had no such custome to use any suffrages or exequies for the soules of the dead and therefore nephesh can signifie no such thing 2. The defiling was by touching the dead Levit. 22.4 or by going to the dead Levit. 21.11 but the soules of the dead cannot be touched neither could the suffrages for the soules but the presence of the bodies pollute them 3. The Levites are forbidden to defile themselves with the dead saving their fathers and mothers and other of their neare kindred Levit. 22.2 But it is not like that they should have beene forbidden to pray or offer suffrages for any but their owne kindred yea the high Priest is forbidden to defile himselfe for his father and mother vers 10. Let them say also that he was forbidden to pray for the soule of his father and mother if any such thing had beene in use then therefore Genebrards exposition is vaine and without any good ground Secondly Pererius and other of that sort doe take hell here for that locall place and region of soules where they imagine the fathers to have remained before the comming of Christ and Pererius best reason is because the Prophet maketh a manifest distinction betweene the soule and body of Christ and hell and the grave saying Thou shalt not leave my soule in hell nor suffer thy holy one to see corruption Perer. in cap. 13. numer 100. Contra. 1. Here is no distinction of divers parts but an explanation of the same thing in divers words according to the use of Scripture so that what is first said somewhat darkly Thou wilt not leave my soule in grave is afterward more plainly declared that is Thou wilt not suffer thy holy one to see corruption 2. That such locall place of hell cannot be here understood may appeare by these reasons out of the text it selfe 1. That place where Christs soule was not left and it was impossible he should be holden of it God loosed the sorrowes of Act. 2.24 but God loosed not for Christ the sorrowes of hell which he felt not after his passion Ergo Christs soule was not left in hell 2. The not leaving of Christs soule in hell was the cause why his flesh did rest in hope vers 26 27. the not leaving of his soule in the locall place of hell caused not his flesh to rest in hope but the not leaving of it in the grave and the not seeing of corruption for their soules which are left in hell shall also returne to their bodies and bee raised together with them Ergo. 3. That hell where Christs soule is not left is the place where corruption is to be seene for so one clause of the sentence is expounded by the other but in hell there is no corruption Ergo. 4. David when he said Thou shalt not leave my soule in hell spake of Christs resurrection Act. 2.31 but the not leaving of Christs soule in the infernall hell concerneth not the resurrection of Christs body Ergo David meaneth not that hell The third exposition therefore is which I preferre before the rest that Christs soule that is his life or person should not be left in the grave and so this place of the Psalme may bee expounded by the like Psal. 89.48 What man liveth and shall not see death shall hee deliver his soule from the hand of hell or the grave here the Psalmist himselfe expoundeth hell to be death where the soule that is the life lieth as it were hid and buried as Psal. 88.3 My life draweth neare to the grave sic Paul Fag annotat in Chaldaic paraphras in Pentateuch 8. Confut. Iacob goeth mourning to the grave not to hell BUt whereas Pererius yet further in this place concerning Iacobs descending c would have hell and not the grave understood for all goe not downe to the grave and Iacob did thinke that Ioseph was not in the grave being supposed to be torne of wilde beasts the contrary shall now appeare 1. This is a friuolous objection for the grave is not onely a pit or a hole made for the dead but any place where the body falleth to dust and corruption as Iob describeth it chap. 17. vers 13. The grave shall be my house vers 14. I shall say to corruption thou art my father vers 16. They shall lie together in the dust thereof even Ioseph also though he had beene torne of wilde beasts and rotted upon the earth should have had his grave 2. In saying all goe not to the grave he manifestly contradicteth the Scripture as is before alleaged What man shall deliver his soule from the hand of the grave Psal. 89.48 3. Hell in the old Testament is not taken otherwise than for a place of torment and punishment but neither Iacob not Ioseph went to any such place 4. This hell Iacob went unto with his gray head or haires Gen. 42.38 but the grave not hell is the place for gray haires 5. Lastly that sheol here signifieth the grave it is the opinion of Ab. Ezra whom Eugubinus Cajetanus Oleaster Vatablus follow and among the Protestants Fagius Mercer with others 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. That parents be not partiall in their loves toward their children Vers. 4. IOsephs brethren hated him because they saw that their father loved him Ambrose noteth this to have beene an over-sight in Iacob for preferring one of the brethren before the rest who if he in Ioseph loved and preferred his vertue should rather have concealed his affection for as hee well saith it is no marvell if brethren fall out for houses and land when Iosephs brethren hated him for a coat Ambr. lib. 2. de Ioseph Wherefore parents may learne how inconvenient a thing it is to bee partiall toward their children and by immoderate love toward some to exasperate and provoke the rest which the Apostle giveth warning of Fathers provoke not your children to wrath Eph. 6.4 2. Observ. A pitifull man will first offer himselfe to them that are in misery Vers.
for so little Calvin 4. Neither was this portion a severall lot to Ioseph beside the portion that afterwards fell unto Ephraim and Manasseh in the division of the land for they had it in their lot Iosu. 24.32 Mercer 5. Wherefore this portion given to Ioseph was both the citie Sechem and territorie adjoyning whereof mention is made Iohn 4.5 For though Sechem bee not here a proper name as the Septuag read because of the word achad one that is joyned with it for there was but one Sechem yet in this word which signifieth a part or portion there is a fit allusion also to the place it selfe which Iacob giveth Iun. QUEST IX How Iacob is said to have gotten Sechem by his sword and bow Vers. 22. WHich I gat out of the hand of the Amorite by my sword and bow 1. Neither is this understood of the violent taking of the citie by the sword of Simeon and Levi which Iacob should count his act because his familie assisted them and for his cause God spared them Euseb. Chrysostome for Iacob afterward accursed them for this cruell act and professed that hee no waies consented to it into their secret let not my soule come Gen. 49.6 2. Nor yet by the sword and bow Iacobs innocencie and justice is understood whereby hee was delivered Hierom. or his Praiers as the Chalde for we need not flie unto metaphors and figures where the historicall and literall sense may serve 4. It is also a coact and forced interpretarion that Iacob got it by his sword that is by his money which he had by his labour gathered Hierom. 5. And to applie it by the figure prolepsis to the time following when the Israelites expelled the Canaanites by force as Iunius doth is not so sin for this had beene no gift at all and beside Iacob had alreadie possession of Sechem in Canaan and so might dispose of it 6. Neither because it fell to the lot and share of Ephraim and Manasses is it said to be given to Ioseph but Ioseph had a peculiar right in it and therefore was buried there 7. Some by the sword and bow expound the favour and grace which Iacob found with Hemor to buy the ground for so little money but force and favour are two contrarie things 8. Some thinke that Iacob used some ceremonie by the casting of an arrow and holding out a sword as Ioas did in the presence of Elisha 2 King 9. so giving Ioseph possession of that countrie But Iacob speaketh of the time past which I have gotten not any thing done then presently 9. Some thinke that Iacob did indeed some such exploit by force of armes against the Amorites as Abraham did against the foure kings Genes 14. though it be not expressed Cajetane Andre Masius but where the scripture sufficeth we need not devise unwritten stories 10. Wherefore I expound this place by that Gen. 35. vers 5. where after that the Sichemites were destroyed and Iacob at Gods appointment removed to Bethel God sent a feare upon the cities round about that they durst not encounter with Iacob and his familie who as is most like stood upon their guard and armed themselves ready to have resisted their enemies if they had assaulted them And by this meanes because Iacob held the possession of Sechem as it were by warlike policie the Lord causing the Canaanites to feare his force and valour he is said to have gotten it by his sword and bow Lyran. following R. Salomon Mercer This I take to be the most proper exposition QUEST X. How Iacob is said to have gotten Sechem out of the hand of the Amorites Vers. 22. WHich I gat out of the hand of the Amorite whereas Hemor the Lord of Sichem was an Hivite Genes 34.2 the question is how Iacob is said to have gotten Sechem out of the hand of the Amorite for the satisfaction whereof 1. Neither was Sechem the sonne of Hemor called an Amorite of his father for Hemor beginneth with the Hebrew letter cheth Amorite with alepâ— 2. Neither need we suppose that Iacob after he had bought a peece of ground of Hemor did afterward inlarge it by expelling the Amorites as Masius there being no such expressed in the story 3. Neither yet with Pererius are we forced to say that all the Canaanites were called Amorites 4. But it is most like that the Hivites and Amorites were mixed together and that the denomination is taken from the Amorite as the more valiant people Mercer this also confirmeth ouâ— former exposition that Iacob iâ— saying which I gat by my sword and bow out of the hand of the Amorite meaneth noâ— the surprising of the Sichemites by Simeon and Levi for they were Hivites not Amorites but rather the keeping of that possession afterwards from the Amorites which inhabited other cities adjoyning who would have invaded Iacob but that the feare of God came upon them that they durst attempt nothing against Iacobs sons whom they held to be men of valour 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Ministers have no power in themselves to blesse but onely in Gods name Vers. 16. THe Angel blessed the children Iacob taketh not upon him to blesse in his owne name but as a Minister onely and pronouncer of the blessing desireth God to blesse the children Ministers then have no power actually in themselves to blesse or curse but onely as instruments and messengers they pronounce the sentence of blessing or cursing in the name of God so that as the Apostle saith he that planteth is nothing nor he that watereth but God that giveth the increase 1 Cor. 3.7 Calvin 2. Doct. God bestoweth his gifts freely without respect to our worthinesse Vers. 19. HIs younger brother shall be greater than he Ephraim is preferred before his elder brother Manasseh and therefore his tribe beareth the name of his father Ioseph Apocalyp 7.8 whereas Manassehs tribe is rehearsed under his owne name so was Abel preferred before Cain Isaack before Ismael Iacob before Esau this was not for any worthinesse in Ephraim more than in Manasseh for wicked Ieroboam that caused Israel to sinne came of Ephraim but that we should know that all is of Gods grace without any respect unto mens worke as the Scripture saith I will have mercy on him to whom I will shew mercy Rom. 9.15 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against the vulgar Latine translation Vers. 12. IOseph did reverence downe to the ground If Ioseph did shew such great reverence to his father bowing himselfe downe to the ground it is not like that Iacob adored or worshipped the rod and scepter of Ioseph thereby giving honour to his sonne as the blinde Latine translation readeth Hebr. 11.21 see before Chap. 47. confut 1. 2. Confut. Against the superstitious use of the signe of the crosse Vers. 14. DIrecting his hands of purpose c. Hence Perer. noteth that Iacob of purpose layed his hands acrosse to prefigure the mystery of the crosse whereby the Gentiles
worthie si quis salva fide refugiat periâ—ulum instans If one not violating his faith doth shun the instant danger unlesse we will say that Christ when he escaped out of their hands that sought to stone him did it of feare Luke 4. But I rather preferre the 7. exposition before touched QUEST XXII Why Moses sufferings are called by the Apostle the rebukes of Christ. BUt seeing so oft mention hath beene made of that place to the Hebrewes it shall not be amisse briefly to shew the meaning of those other words of the Apostle vers 26. esteeming the rebuke of Christ greater riches than the treasures of Egypt 1. We refuse here the exposition of Lyranus that he calleth the rebukes of Moses the rebukes of Christ because by faith foreseeing what Christ should suffer hee by Christs example was confirmed to endure the like for in this sense they are Moses rebukes rather than Christs 2. Neither are they called Christs rebukes because they were such as Christ commendeth Blessed are they that suffer persecution for righteousnesse sake Matt. 5. 3. or for that Christ was to come of that people and therefore their rebukes are counted the rebukes of Christ Cajetan 4. or because Moses was a figure of Christ and suffered the like rebukes because that as Moses left the Court and palace of Pharaoh to be partaker of the afflictions of his people so Christ descending from heaven tooke upon him our infirmities Oecumenius Theophylact. 5. But they are called Christs rebukes because he suffereth in his members and accounteth their afflictions as his owne in which sense the Apostle saith he fulfilled the rest of the afflictions of Christ in his flesh for his bodies sake which is the Church Col. 1.24 QUEST 23. Why Pharaoh sought to slay Moses Vers. 15. PHaraoh heard of this matter and sought to slay Moses The causes why Pharaoh sought Moses life Iosephus alleageth to be these three 1. Because the Egyptians envied his prosperous successe in the warres against the Ethiopians 2. They feared him as like to be one that aspired to great matters and might seeke some innovation and change in Egypt 3. The Egyptian Priests did prophesie of him that he was like to prove very dangerous to Egypt By these meanes the King was incensed against him But I rather approve that which Philo writeth that Pharaoh was not so much moved against Moses for the death of one Egyptian as for that by this he perceived that Moses was a friend and favourer of the Hebrewes whom he accounted his enemies and an enemie to the Egyptians his subjects and friends Philo lib. 1. de vita Mosis QUEST XXIV The causes why Moses lived in exile and banishment 40. yeares Vers. 15. THerefore Moses fled Zeiglerus thinketh that whereas at the fortieth yeere of Moses age there were 390. yeeres expired since the promise made to Abraham and that tenne yeeres onely remained of the affliction of the people which was to continue 400. yeeres in one place and other Genes 15.13 Moses thought to prevent the time there being but tenne yeeres to come and therefore God punished his presumption with fortie yeeres exile But this cannot stand with the Apostles testimonie of Moses that by faith he forsooke Egypt if it were a worke of faith how could it be a punishment for his presumption Therefore the causes of Moses flight and exile are better touched by Ferus 1. That the people should not depend upon man but trust in God for their deliverance 2. That Moses might be weaned altogether from the pleasures of Egypt and delicate life in Pharaohs Court 3. That he might be taught that the deliverance of Israel should not be by sword or strength but by the spirit of God 4. To punish the peoples ingratitude for not more thankfully accepting of this benefit that God had stirred them up a deliverer for not onely this Hebrew whom Moses rebuked rejected his calling but generally all the people made light of it as S. Stephen sheweth Act. 7.25 QUEST XXV Of Midian what countrie it was and where situate Vers. 15. ANd dwelt in the land of Midian 1. This was the chiefe Citie of the Midianites so called of Midian one of the sonnes of Keturah by Abraham it was situate in Arabia upon the red sea as Iosephus 2. Hierome saith there were two Cities of this name one on the South part of Arabia by the red sea the other by Arnon and Arcopolis the ruines whereof were to be seene in his time 3. The whole Countrie was called Arabia where the Midianites Amalekites Israelites dwelt together Philo. And these Arabians were called Petrei of their metropolis or chiefe Citie Petra Borrh. 4. This Midian was not farre from Mount Sinai for thereabout did Moses keepe his father in lawes sheepe Exod. 3. and thither came Iethro with Moses wife and children and S. Paul placeth Sinai in Arabia Gal. 4. 5. The women of this Countrie joyning with the Moabites inticed the Israelites to commit fornication Numb 25. These Midianites oppressed Israel seven yeeres of whom Gideon slew 135000. Iud. 8. QUEST XXVI Rehuel Iethro Hobab whether the same Vers. 18. ANd when they came to Rehuel their father c. This Rehuel was not the same with Iethro as the Septuagint and Latine translator here read Iethro and as Hierome thinketh they were two names of the same man 2. Neither had he foure names Iethro Rehuel Hobab Keni as Thostatus Lyranus for Hobab was the sonne of Rehuel Numb 10.29 and hee was called Keni of his nation and countrey because he was a Kenite Numb 24.21 Iunius 3 Pererius also is deceived thinking that Hobab was not Moses father in law but his wives brother and his father in lawes sonne because saith he Moses father in law departed from them at Mount Sinai Exod. 18. but Hobab staied with them still and was their guide in the wildernesse Numb 10.31 But Pererius herein erreth also for these two stories of Iethro and Hobab Exod. 18. and Numb 10. must be joyned together they were both one man and hee tooke his leave of Moses as it is shewed Exod. 18. but he returned againe unto them before they departed from Sinai to be their guide as Moses requested Numb 10. and it is like he brought his kindred and family with him because the Kenites are read afterward to have cohabited with Israel Iudg. 1.16.4 Wherefore Rehuel was grandfather unto Moses wife called also their father after the manner of the Hebrewes Iethro and Hobab are the same for they are both said to be the father in law of Moses Exodus 18. and Num. 10.29 and Hobab and Iethro was the sonne of Rehuel ibid. Iun. QUEST XXVII Whether Rehuel were Prince and Priest of Midian Vers. 16. ANd the Prince of Midian c. The Hebrew word is Cohen which signifieth both Prince and Priest and one that is preferred or exalted in any office or authoritie as Davids sonnes are called cohanim
and Antypathies their qualities and operations he can apply and temper the causes together and so is able to worke wonders though not true miracles which are beside the order and course of nature which Satan cannot invert As to put this for an example the small fish which is called Echinus or Remora is able by applying himselfe to the ship to stay it though it bee under saile and have both the sea and winde with it which Plinie sheweth to have beene found by experience how that Antonius his ship at one time and Caius at another were stayed by this fish Now if a Magitian should secretly apply this fish to a ship hee might bee thought to worke a great wonder and yet it should bee naturall The other reason is that beside the knowledge of nature Satan is skilfull of all humane arts and sciences by the benefit whereof even men doe worke wonders as Archimedes was able to stirre a ship with his hand by certaine engines which he had prepared which a great number of men by strength could not doe He also devised such kinde of instruments when Marcellus the Romane Captaine besieged Syracusa whereby they so annoyed their enimies and made such havock and slaughter of the Romanes that Marcellus himselfe said they fought not against men but against the Gods Architas the Pythagorean by Mechanick art made a dove of wood to flie Severinus Boetius made serpentes of brasse to hisse and birdâ— of brasse to sing If men can make such admirable things by art it need not seeme strange if by the power of Satan wonderfull matters are sometime compassed Ex Perer. QUEST XII What things are permitted unto Satan to doe THe next point to be shewed here is what things which seeme to us to be miraculous the Devill may doe by himselfe or his ministers the Magitians First in generall wee are here to consider a twofold action of spirits the one is immediate as they can themselves passe speedily from place to place as Iob. 1. Satan came from compassing the whole earth for if the Sunne being of a bodily substance can compasse the heavens of such a huge circuit many hundred thousand miles about in the space of 24. houres the spirits can doe it with greater agility they have also power to transport bodies from place to place aâ— our Saviour yeelded his body to be transported of Satan to the tempters further confusion The other action is mediate as Satan can transport and bring together the causes of things which being tempered and qualified may bring forth divers naturall effects which are wrought immediatly by those naturall causeâ— yet mediately by Satan which bringeth them together Secondly in particular these things are permitted to Satans power he can transport bodies and carry them from place to place as thâ— Ecclesiasticall stories make mention how Simon Magus was lift up on high in the aire by the 〈◊〉 of Satan but by the prayer of Peter was violently throwne downe so sometime serpents and 〈◊〉 have beene seene flie in the aire Albertus Magnus saith that oxen have rained and fallen out of the aire all which may be wrought by the conveyance of Satan 2. The Devill can suddenly convey things out of ones sight as Apollonius from the presence of Domitian Thus it may be that Gyges if that report be true not by the vertue of a ring but by the power of Satan became invisible 3. They can make images to speake and walke as before wee heard of Apollonius brasen butlers and the image of Memnon so the image of Iuno Moneta being asked if she would remove to Rome answered se velle that she would and the image of fortune being set up said ritè me consecrastis yee have consecrated mee aright Valer. Maxim lib. 1. cap. ultim de simulachris But the Devill cannot give power unto these things being dead to performe any action of life but that hee moveth and speaketh in them as the Angell caused Balaams Asse to speake 4. The Devill can cause divers shapes and formes to appeare as of men Lions and other things in the aire or on the ground as in the life of Antonie the Devill appeared unto him in the shape of terrible beasts 5. And as he can counterfeit the shape of living things so also of other things both naturall as of gold silver meat and artificiall as of pots glasses cuppes for if cunning artificers by their skill can make things so lively as that they can hardly bee discerned from that which they resemble as Plinie writeth of Zeuxis grapes lib. 35. cap. 11. much more can Satan coyne such formes and figures as Philostratus lib. 4. of the life of Appolonius maketh mention how a certaine Lamia pretending marriage to one Menippus a young man shewed him a banquet furnished with all kinde of meat and precious vessels and ornaments which Appolonius discovered to be but imaginarie things and shee confessed her selfe to bee a Lamia 6. The Devill by his subtile nature can so affect the sensitive spirits and imaginary faculty as that they shall represent unto the inward sense the phantasie of some things past or to come and cause them to appeare to the outward sense as wee see that franticke persons imagine many times that they see things which are not and there is no doubt but that the Devill can effect that which a naturall disease worketh 7. Hee can also conforme the fantasies of those that are asleep to represent unto them things which the Devill knoweth shall come to passe and by this meanes to bring credit unto dreames 8. In some things the Devill can interpose himselfe and helpe forward those superstitious meanes which are used to prognosticate as the Augurs by the flying and chirping of birds by looking into the intrals of beasts by casting of lots tooke upon them to divine and the Devill by his mysticall operation concurred with them more strongly to deceive 9. The Devill can stirre up in naturall men the affections of love anger hatred feare and such like as he entred into the heart of Iudas Iohn 13.1 and this he doth two wayes either by propounding such externall objects as helpe to inflame and set on fire such affections and by conforming the inward phantasie to apprehend them Hierome in the life of Hilerius sheweth how a certaine virgin by Magicall enchâ—ntments was so ravished with the love of a young man that shee was mad therewith QUEST XIII How divers wayes Satans power is limited THese things before recited Satan by his spirituall power is able to doe yet with this limitation that his power is restrained of God that he cannot doe what he would but sometime the Lord letteth him loose and permitteth him to worke either for the triall and probation of his faithfull servants as is evident in Iob or for the punishment of the wicked as hee was a lying spirit in the mouthes of Ahabs false Prophets for if Satan had free libertie to
the naturall burning of certaine mountaines as of Aetna in Cicilia Vesuvius in Campania It is found by experience that certaine things putrifie not as the flesh of a Peacoke as Augustine saith and coales upon the which for the same cause Chersiphron founded the temple of Diana lime boyleth with water and is quenched with oile the adamant is so hard that it cannot bee broken upon a smithes anvill the Agrigentine salt melteth in the fire and sparkleth in the water there is said to bee a fountaine among the Garamants that boileth in the night and freezeth in the day the stone Asbestus burneth continually being once set on fire and is never extinct the wood of a certaine figge tree in Egypt sinketh in the water in the Isle Tilo the trees cast no leaves in the Temple of Venus there was a lampe that no tempest could put out and Lodovicus Vives there reporteth that a certaine lampe was found in a grave that had burned above 1050. yeeres At Alexandria in the Temple of Serapis a certaine image of iron did hang in the top by reason of a certaine loadstone which was inclosed in the roofe These and other such like strange things in nature Augustine remembreth Some wee have knowledge of but many secrets of nature are hid from us but knowne unto the spirits who by this meanes doe worke wonders only producing extraordinarie effects of nature 4. Augustine further in another place sheweth the reason thereof in this manner Sunt occulta quaedam semina arborum plantarum c. in elementis c. There are certaine hid seeds of trees plants in the elements for as there are visible seeds so there are hid seeds which give unto the other their vertue like as then the husbandman doth not create corne but bringeth it out by his labour so the evill Angels doe not create things but only doe draw forth those seeds which are unknowne to us but well knowne to them As Iacob did not create that variety of colour in the sheep but by applying of particoloured rods brought it forth sicut ergo matres gravidae sunt foetibus itâ— mundus gravidus est causis seminibus nascentium Then as mothers that are great with child so the world is full of such seeds and causes of the beginning of things which causes they better knowing then we doe worke wonders yea wee see that men by the pounding of certaine herbes and by such like meanes can cause wormes and other like small creatures to come forth To this purpose Augustine QUEST XVI What workes in naturall things are forbidden unto spirits to doe IT followeth now to shew as wee have seene what things are possible to bee done by spirits so what things are out of their reach and beyond their power 1. Touching the immediate action of spirits which is by locall motion the Devill cannot destroy the world or any principall part thereof nor subvert the order and course of nature he cannot change the course of the heavens or put the starres out of their place neither although he may work some alteration in some part of the earth the whole he cannot remove these and such great workes he cannot doe Perer. ex Aquinat the reason is this because this were to crosse the Creator who by his providence as by his power hee created the world and all that is therein so he preserveth the same in that order which he hath appointed as the Psalmist saith The earth is the Lords and all that therein is hee hath founded it upon the sea and established it upon the flouds Psalm 24.1 2. Secondly concerning the other mediate action of spirits by the instrument and mediation of the creatures these things are denied unto spirits 1. They cannot create any thing of nothing for that argueth an infinite power and is peculiar unto God 2. The Devill being himselfe spirituall and without a bodily substance cannot immediatly change or transforme any materiall or corporall substance without some other naturall cause comming betweene 3. Neither can these spirits change any naturall thing into an other naturall thing immediatly without that subordination of nature and preparation and disposition of the matter which is observed in the generation of things therefore hee cannot bring forth a beast without seed nor a perfect beast all at once because naturally both the generation of such things is by seed and they receive their increase and growth not all at once but by degrees and in time therefore when by the operation of Satan lions and beares and such like creatures have beene made to appeare either they were but phantasies and no such things indeed or were transported from some other place and by this reason he cannot restore dead bodies to life because the body being void of naturall heat and spirits is not fit to entertaine the soule 4. Neither can Satan hinder the operation of naturall things if nothing be wanting which is necessâ—ry for their working And generally whatsoever alteration may be made by naturall causes as wormes and frogs and such like may come of pâ—â—refaction these things may be atchieved and compassed by spirits but such changes and transmutations as cannot be done by naturall meanes as to turne a man into a beast are not within the limits of Devils power But when such things seeme to be done they are in shew rather than truth which may be done two wayes either by so binding and blinding the inward phantasie and sense as that may seeme to be which is not or by fashioning some such shape and forme outwardly and objecting it to the sense Perer. Ex Aquinat QUEST XVII Whether Satan can raise the spirits and soules of the dead AMong other things which exceed the power of spirits it is affirmed before that they cannot raise the soules of men departed as Necromancers doe take upon them to talke with the dead 1. Let us see the vaine opinion of the heathen of this devilish Necromancy Porphyrius writeth that the soules of wicked men are turned into Devils and doe appeare in divers shapes and the soules of them that want buriall doe wander about their bodies and sometimes are compelled to resume their bodies Likewise Hosthanes did professe and promise to raise what dead soever and to bring them to talke with the living as Plinie writeth lib. 30. cap. 2. who in the same place reporteth a farre more strange or rather fabulous thing that Appion the Grammarian should tell of a certaine herb called Cynocephalia and of the Egyptians Osirites which hath power to raise the dead and that thereby he called Homers ghost to inquire of him touching his countrie and parents There were among the Gentiles certaine places famous for Necromancie where they received oracles from the dead as they were made to beleeve such was the Cymmerian oracle at the lake Avernam in Campania such was Ericthone the Thessalian that raised up the dead to declare to Sextus Pompeius the successe
of light much more take upon him the shape of a Prophet Out reasons are these 1. Tertullian saith Absit ut animam cujusquam sancti à daemone extractam credamus Far be it from us to thinke that the soule of any holy man can bee brought out by witchery lib. de anima Pererius answereth that the Witch called not up Samuel but it was Gods worke to send him preventing the Witches enchantments Contra. But this is not to bee admitted because the Scripture calleth it an abomination to the Lord to aske of the dead Deut. 18.12 the Lord would not be accessary to any thing which is an abomination before him 2. The true Samuel would not have suffered Saul to have worshipped him with a religious worship as the counterfeit Samuel doth so reasoneth Augustine Pererius answereth that this was not such adoration as is due unto God but that reverence which may be yeelded to Angels and Saints Contra. There are but two kindes of adoration a civill and religious the religious veneration is onely due unto God and therefore refused by the Angel Revel 22. the civill this was not as appeareth by Sauls submisse behaviour and superstitious devotion 3. This Samuel saith Why hast thou disquieted me But Samuels soule being at rest in Abrahams bosome was out of the Devils reach he could not disquiet it Pererius answereth that Saul did disquiet it occasionaliter by giving the occasion not efficaciter as being the efficient cause thereof Contra. But if Samuel spake these words then hee was in truth disquieted the question is by whom if not by the Devils meanes occasioned by Saul than by God but I thinke it will not bee confessed that God disquieteth the soules of his Saints being at rest 4. If the Lord vouchsafed not to answer Saul when hee lawfully sought unto him neither by his Priests nor his Prophets how is it like that the Lord should answer by his Prophet and when he useth unlawfull meanes Pererius answereth that God did not vouchsafe to answer him by any such meanes that hee might know that God had forsaken him but now not seeking unto God but unto a Witch God doth send him a sorrowfull message by that Prophet whom hee would not harken unto while hee lived Contra. Yet is not the objection removed that God should rather answer Saul using unlawfull meanes than when hee used lawfull first if the not answering before shewed that God had left him then the answering now by a Prophet of Gods sending argueth that hee was not altogether forgotten If it bee said that Saul knew him not to bee sent of God but raised by a Witch then it will follow that this Samuel kept him in that error without reproofe which the good Prophet would not have omitted Againe if the heavy answer and message of evill tidings was a signe that God neglected him why then did not the Lord vouchsafe to answer him before at all God would answer him neither good nor evill Thirdly this Prophet being dead could bring him no worse tidings now then he did when he lived that his Kingdome was rent from him and given to another 5. Some adde this as a fifth argument that Samuel would not have said To morrow thou shalt be with mee that is in the state of happinesse seeing hee knew that the Lord had cast him off Pererius thinketh that hee did meane he should descend in generall to hell as all before Christs comming did though not to that region and place of hell Limbus Patrum where the Fathers were Contra. But first Pererius must shew us out of Scripture that there be divers hels In the parable of the rich glutton there are but two places mentioned after this life Abrahams bosome a place of rest whither the Angels carried the soule of Lazarus and a place of torment where the rich man was That Abrahams bosome was no part of hell beside Augustines opinion who cannot thinke taâ—tae felicitatis sâ—â—um membrum inferorum c. that a place of sâ—ch great happinesse was a member or part of hell the text it selfe evidently sheweth as much because it was a place of comfort and joy and of great distance from hell and the Angels of light did minister there who remaine not in the kingdome of darknesse And againe that the Patriarkes and Prophets before Christ were in heaven our Saviour testifieth Many shall come from the East and West and sit downe with Abraham Isaack and Iacob in the Kingdome of heaven Matth. 8.11 Abraham Isaack and Iacob then were now in the Kingdome of heaven and yet Christ in their opinion had not then harrowed hell nor yet emptied Limbus Patrum Some doe expound these words thou shalt be with mee generally of the state of the dead Iun. But beside the opinion of some Hebrewes that doe take these words to bee spoken of Sâ—uls particular state that he should be in some place of rest where Samuel was and hereupon they inferre that Saul died penitently where we receive their interpretation but refuse their collection as being builded upon a false ground the testimony of a lying spirit this place is like to that where David saith of his infant departed I shall goe to him 2. Sam. 12.23 which words doe not onely signifie a generall kinde of departure but a resolution in David that it was well with his child Like also unto this is that phrase Gen. 25. that Abraham was gathered to his people and in the same chapter that Ismael was gathered to his people which seemeth to insinuate that each went unto his people and that Abraham was associate unto the just and righteous departed See more hereof Quest. 15. upon Genes 25. And hereunto the Apostle seemeth to allude when he saith Hebr. 12.23 Yee are come c. to the congregation of the first borne c. to the spirits of just and perfect men shewing the society and communion which we have with the people of God gone out of the world 6. Places of Morall use 1. Mor. They that humble themselves shall be exalted I Have made thee Pharaohs God Moses who before so abased himselfe that hee by all meanes would have declined his calling excusing him by his insufficiencie now the Lord doth exalt him making him superior to Kings he should be as a God to Pharaoh not whom Pharaoh should worship but whom he should feare and stand in awe of he should be as a God to bring plagues and judgements upon him and his land and to remove the same againe Thus is that saying of our Saviour fulfilled He that humbleth himselfe shall be exalted 2. Mor. Gods commandements are simply without any exception to be obeyed Vers. 6. SO Moses and Aaron did as the Lord commanded so did they This repitition is not needlesse but sheweth that they most exactly performed all given them in charge the commandements of God must be obeyed without all exception or limitation An Emperour of Rome commanded a workman from the
search these were the bones of Ioseph certainly knowne they shew the bones and parts no man knoweth of whom for they in divers places offer to the view of the people divers bodies and heads foure or five armes of one Saint neither were these bones of Ioseph carried in the fight of all Israel adored as theirs superstitiously are Simler 3. Conf. Against the heresie of Servetus Vers. 21. THe Lord went before them by day in a piller of a cloud Servetus held this execrable heresie that this increata nubes Christi fuit Deitas that this uncreated cloud was the Deitie of Christ which he calleth filium figurativum the figurative Sonne which detestable heresie is not worthy of any confutation but with all indignation to be rejected and detested for he maketh the Deitie of God corporall contrary to the Scripture which saith God is a spirit and maketh a visible substance to be without beginning whereas all things visible are created Coloss. 1.16 and directly this heresie impugneth that saying of the Prophet Esay chap. 4.5 where he alludeth to this place The Lord shall create upon every place of Mount Sion a cloud and smoke by day c. It was then a created and not an uncreated cloud 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. As the Lord worketh for us redemption so of us he requireth obedience Vers. 2. SAnctifie unto me all the first borne As the Lord had for his part delivered and saved their first borne so he requireth of them their first borne As God hath dealt mercifully and graciously with us so he expecteth somewhat againe of us namely our obedience we must not looke unto that onely which God hath done unto us but consider also what is to bee done by vs. As our Saviour saith to his Apostles As my father sent me so send I you As Christ was sent for our redemption so we must also bee employed in Gods service to testifie our thankfull obedience So our Saviour bidding his Apostles to preach the Gospell addeth teaching them to observe all things which I have commanded you As the glad tidings of salvation is published unto men so of them is required againe obedience Ferus not as an helpe unto their salvation which is perfited without our service but as a true and lively testimonie of our faith whereby we apprehend salvation 2. Observ. How we must offer our first borne unto God AGaine as they were commanded to consecrate unto God their first borne so we must offer our first and best things unto God the Lord will have the prioritie of our service Simlerus As our Saviour biddeth us first to seeke the Kingdome of God and the righteousnesse thereof Matth. 6. our first studies our first times must be consecrated unto our God as the Apostle exhorteth to give up our bodies a living sacrifice holy and acceptable unto God Rom. 12.1 3. Observ. God tempteth his children according to their strength Vers. 17. LEst the people repent when they see warre God hath respect unto his chidrens infirmitie and suffereth them not to be tempted above their power Piscator But Gregorie doth notably amplifie this point Tres modi sunt hominum ad Deum conversorum inchoatio medium perfectio inchoatione inveniunt blandimenta dulcedinis in medio tempore certamina tentationis ad extremum perfectionem plenitudinis c. There are three degrees of men that are converted unto God the beginning the middest and the perfection in the beginning they finde pleasant allurements in the middle hard tentations in the end a full perfection Like as first a man entertaineth his spouse with sweet perswasions afterward being married to her hee trieth her with sharpe reprehensions being thus tried he soundly enjoyeth her So this people being brought out of Egypt primò accepit blandimenta signorum first receiveth alluring signes afterward probationibus exercetur in â—remo they are exercised by tentations in the wildernesse and lastly in the land of promise virtutis plenitudine confirmatur they are fully confirmed Sic Gregor lib. 14. moral cap. 13. 4. Observ. The will of the dead must faithfully be performed Vers. 19. FOr he had made the children of Israel sweare Moses most faithfully causeth the last will and Testament of Ioseph to be fulfilled whereby we are taught that the last minde and will of the dead in honest and lawfull things ought by no meanes to be violated Osiander as the Apostle saith the Testament is confirmed when men be dead Heb. 9.17 God will surely revenge their quarrell whose soules he hath received to his protection whose godly bequests are reversed and their last minde not fulfilled Such as are unfaithfull to the dead will be much more to the living And as God professeth himselfe the speciall protector of the fatherlesse and widow so he will maintaine the cause of the dead that are fatherlesse to the world and their soules as it were widowes for a time absent from their bodies 5. Observ. We must alwayes bee watchfull Vers. 22. THat they might goe both by day and night The people were to take their journey whether by day or night when the cloud was lift up from the Tabernacle they were therefore diligently to take heed both by day and night that they might be readie when the Lord gave them a signe to goe forward wherefore they are said to keepe the Lords watch Numb 9.19 So our Saviour biddeth us also to watch and alwayes to bee in a readinesse because we know not when the master of the house will come at even or at midnight at the cocke crowing or in the dawning Mark 13.35 Pellican CHAP. XIV 1. The Argument and method IN this Chapter is described the most miraculous and admirable passage of the children of Israel over the red Sea there are two parts of the Chapter the bringing of the Israelites unto the Sea to vers 14. their passing over the Sea with the destruction of the Egyptians to the end of the Chapter In the first part is set forth first the counsell of God unto Moses containing first a commandement where they should campe vers 2. then a reason thereof taken from the vaine consultation and opinion of Pharaoh that they were tangled in the land vers 4. then the execution thereof in following after them which is amplified by the overruling cause Gods providence and justice in hardning his heart and the end thereof the glory of God vers 4. 2. Then followeth the execution first in the behalfe of the people they did as the Lord commanded them secondly on Pharaohs part 1. Both in pursuing and following after them with the occasion thereof the report that was brought and their repentance in letting the people goe vers 5. The manner thereof he made readie his horse and chariots vers 6.7 and the ordering and disposing cause Gods justice in hardning his heart vers 8. 2. As also in overtaking them vers 9. 3. Afterward the events hereof are declared 1. The feare of the people
of the change of their minde but they are not to bee forced by any such promise of mariage to accomplish the same 2. The other kinde of espousals is de praesenti pronounced of the time present as if one say Ego te mihi despondeo uxorem I take thee to my wife this contract is actuall and effectuall and cannot bee dissolved being lawfully made for that which God hath coupled together man cannot put asunder Matth. 19.7 and they which are thus contracted are man and wife before God as Iacob calleth Rachel being onely espoused his wife Give me my wife Genes 29.21 and the Angell calleth Mary espoused to Ioseph his wife Matth. 1.20 Hereof it was that by Moses law hee which defloured a maid espoused unto another was to bee stoned to death Deut. 22.23 3. After these espousals there came betweene them and the celebration of the mariage some convenient space of time 1. For publike honestie sake that they should not presently come together as bruit beasts in the heat of their fleshly desire 2. That by this meanes their mindes might bee first knit together before their bodies their desire of each to other by this meanes being kindled and increased 2. That this pause being made if in the meane time there should fall out any just cause of let it might appeare Bucanus QUEST XV. Of mariage consummate and the rites and orders therein to be observed MAriage is consummate by two solemne and publike actions one is religious and Ecclesiasticall the other is Civill 1. The parties espoused are first brought into the face of the congregation both to testifie their unfained consent each to other and that they may publikely bee instructed by the Minister of the duties of mariage and be commended unto God by the prayers of the congregation which godly use of the publike celebration of mariage before the congregation howsoever some schismatickes foolishly and wilfully spurne against it yet is grounded partly upon the example of God himselfe who brought man and woman together and gave them a solemne blessing saying Increase and multiplie partly upon that rule of the Apostle 1. Corinth 14.40 that all things in the Church should be done honestly and by order for by this meanes secret and 〈◊〉 mariages are prevented and the parties freed from all suspition who without this publike solemnitie might bee thought so live incontinently together and seeing all things are consecrate by the word of God and prayer 1. Tim 4.5 it is requisite that such a weightie businesse as this should bee sanctified with prayer and invocation of the name of God 2. The other publike action is Civill in the nuptiall feast or festivitie for it hath beene a commendable custome in all ages and in all nations almost to solemnize mariage with the cheerefull meeting of friendâ—â— as Laban made a feast in the mariage of his daughters Genes 29.22 our blessed Saviour was present at a mariage feast at Cana in Galile Ioh. 2. But the mariage feast ought to bee kept with this cavent that there bee no excesse riot or disorder with other abuses that often fall out in such meetings As in that great feast which the great King of Persia made unto his Nobles such good order was kept that none was compelled to drinke more than hee would himselfe Esther 1.8 This moderate and sober kinde of feasting may safely bee retained among Christians according to S. Pauls rule Philip. 4.8 9. Whatsoever things are true whatsoever things are honest whatsoever things are just c. those things doe and the God of peace shall bee with you Ex Bucano QUEST XVI What conditions are required in lawfull mariage BUt in lawfull mariage divers conditions are required and namely these 1. That Matrimony bee contracted between such parties as are apt for mariage The contracts then and espousals made betweene children are void 2. That there bee a voluntarie consent of both parties not forced or urged thereunto 3. The consent also of the parents or of those which are in the place and stead of parents must not bee wanting 4. There must bee no error in the persons as when they are espoused as virgins which prove afterward to bee otherwise or such like errors and mistakings 5. That honest conditionâ— bee propounded in such contracts with decencie and comelines 6. That Matrimonie bee contracted onely betweene two parties for though the Fathers were permitted to have many wives yet we must live not according to examples but by a certaine law and rule 7. Mariage must bee contracted in the Lord that is onely betweene the faithfull and beleevers and such as consent together in the true faith and religion 8. That such persons contract not together as are within the degrees prohibited either of affinitie and consanguinitie which are expressed Levit. 18. which prohibition of degrees is grounded upon the law of nature and therefore is morall and perpetuall for God did cast out the Canaanites because they were defiled herein Levit. 18.24 Who were not bound to the ceremoniall but to the morall lawes and the end of this prohibition of certaine degrees was for reverence of the neerenesse of kindred and blood as this reason is rendred None shall come neere to any of the kindred of his flesh to uncover their shame Levit. 18.6 and therefore this law is universall and perpetuall Vrsin Concerning the particular limitation of these degrees and right computation of them see elsewhere this matter handled at large Synops contr 15. of Matrimonie qu. 3. QUEST XVII Of the ends of the institution of matrimonie NOw the ends wherefore Matrimonie was ordained are these 1. In respect of the parties themselves there are three ends 1. That they should be a mutuall helpe one unto another both in divine and humane duties as the Lord when hee made woman said I will make an helpe meet for him Gen. 2.18 which helpe is partly in humane affaires as in domesticall duties in governing and ordering the familie in the bringing up and education of children and in personall duties one in helping and releeving another in sicknesse and in health as also in divine one in comforting another in praying one for another and such like 2. Mariage is ordained to bee a remedie against incontinencie and vagrant lust 1. Cor. 7.2 3. For procreation of children which should continue their parents name and succeed in his inheritance as the Lord said unto them Gen. 1.28 Increase and multiplie 2. In respect of the Church and Common-wealth Matrimonie was appointed as a meane to increase them both with profitable members and instruments and therefore parents are charged to bring up their children in the instruction and information of the Lord Ephes. 6.4 that they may bee fit to bee employed in the Church and Common-wealth 3. In respect of God Matrimonie was instituted principally for the setting forth of his glorie that the married parties should together better learne to serve and worship God and to bring up
their children in his feare and in their matrimonie which is a sweet and amiable fellowship is set forth that mysticall conjunction which is betweene Christ and his Church Ephes. 5.32 Ex Bucan Vrsin QUEST XVIII Of the mutuall matrimoniall duties betweene man and wife THe duties to bee performed in mariage are first such as are common betweene man and wife as 1. Mutuall love that they should one love another to love as they are beloved 2. Matrimoniall faith in keeping themselves one to another not seeking after strange flesh 3. A communion of their goods one supplying anothers wants and a communion of affection one having a lively fellow-feeling of anothers griefes 4. The education of their children wherein both the parents are bound to shew their Christian care 5. And mutuall hearing and forbearing one another tolerating their infirmities 〈◊〉 a great desire to have them amended and healed Vrsin 2. The duties required on the husbands part are 1. To instruct and teach his wife and bring her to the knowledge of God 1 Cor. 14.35 2. To be her head to protect and defend her from injuries to guide direct and governe her in discretion Ephes. 5.23 The husband is the woman's head as Christ is the head of her Church 3. To be amiable unto his wife not bitter or cruell unto her Colos. 3.19 not to use her as his maid or servant but as his yokefellow and collaterall companion and coadjutrix in the government of the house 4. To provide for her all things needfull in sicknes and in health for hee is worse than an Infidell that doth nor provide for those of his owne house 1 Timoth. 5.8 5. To honour the wife as the weaker vessell 1 Pet. 3.7 and in his Christian discretion to winne her with lenitie 3. The speciall duties on the behalfe of the wife are 1. To shew her care and diligence in preserving of her husbands domesticall estate and wisely disposing the houshold affaires as that hâ—swively Macâ—on is described Prov. 31. 2. To give due reverence and honour to her husband as unto her head as Sara is commended 1 Pet. 3.7 3. And to bee subject and obedient unto him in all things in the Lord Ephes. 5.22 QUEST XIX Whether marriage be left indifferent to all MAtrimonie is neither denied unto any by the divine institution nor yet commanded unto all 1. It is lawfull and granted unto all to marrie if they will for the Apostle saith that mariage is honourable among all men Hebr. 13.4 because that blessing given unto mariage Increase and multiplie was generall to Adam and all his posteritie 2. As mariage is not necessarily imposed upon all so is it indifferent unto those which have the gift of continencie for although they need not the remedie of matrimonie against fornication having received that speciall gift yet they may desire mariage for mutuall comfort and to have issue and for other ends whereunto marriage was appointed 3. But unto those which cannot containe it is necessarie to use this remedie and to them mariage is not indifferent So the Apostle saith It were good for a man not to touch a woman neverthelesse to avoid fornication let every man have his wife c. 1 Cor. 7.2 and vers 9. If they cannot abstaine let them marrie for it is better to marrie than to burne 4. But though this libertie be given to use the remedie yet there must bee a temperate sobrietie and moderation both in the use of mariage that they doe not give themselves over to fleshly delight but sometime sequester themselves to fasting and prayer 1 Cor. 7.5 And a comely decencie must bee observed both in first and second mariages not hastily and greedily to fall into them as among the Romans Numa made a law that a woman should not marrie within ten moneths after her husbands death Vrsin 2. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Of the generall and particular contents of this precept IN this Commandement under one speciall kinde of adulterie all other acts of uncleannesse whatsoever are restrained and whatsoever belongeth unto chastitie is prescribed and commanded as these three vertues principally 1. Chastitie 2. Shamefastnes 3. Temperance The contrarie unto which vertues likewise are forbidden 1. Chastitie is commanded which is a vertue keeping both the soule and bodie chaste avoiding and shunning all uncleannesse and unlawfull lust both in mariage and in the single estate as also all causes occasions opportunities egging and provoking thereunto as likewise the effects and inconveniences that ensue thereon So the Apostle teacheth This is the will of God even your sanctification that yee should abstaine from fornication that every one of you should know how to possesse his vessell in holinesse and honour not in the lust of concupiscence c. 1 Thess. 4.3 4. Contrarie unto this vertue of chastitie are 1. Such kinds of inordinate lust as are against even this nature of ours as it is corrupt as first the confusion of divers kindes as when men are given over to vile affections to defile themselves with bâ—uit beasts Secondly the abuse of the sex as when men with men worke filthinesse which was one of the sinnes of the heathen Rom. 1.28 Likewise may the feminine sex bee abused Rom. 1.27 Thirdly when as the lawfull sex is used but in too neere a degree as in incest all these are unnaturall lusts and deserve of the Magistrate to bee extraordinarily punished 2. Other kindes of lusts there are which proceed from this our corrupt nature 1. Fornication betweene parties not married when as one with one committeth follie or which is more odious one with many which is the vile practice of strumpets and whores 2. Adulterie either the one partie being married and it is called adulterium simplex simple adulterie or both which is adulterium duplex double adulterie 3. There are beside these evill inclinations of the heart and inward inflammations which the godly doe resist by prayer and cut off the occasions of them and the remedie against this kind of lust is mariage according to S. Pauls rule It is better to marrie then to burne 1 Cor. 7.9 4. Shamefastnesse is here required which abhorreth all kind of turpitude and uncleannesse being alwaies accompained with a certaine griefe and feare lest any thing uncomely should bee committed such was the shamefastnes of Ioseph that being entised often by his shamelesse Mistresse would not afterward come into her companie Contrarie hereunto are 1. Immodestie and unshamefastnesse such as was in Herodâ—as daughter that came in impudently and danced before Herod and the rest that were at the table 2. Obscenitie and uncomelinesse in word or in deed as in Iosephs Mistresse that was not ashamed to move him with her owne mouth to lie with her 3. Temperance is also commanded which is a moderate and sober use of such things as belong unto the bodie as meat and drinke agreeable for the time place and persons as S. Paul saith Be not filled with
preserving and saving the goods of another as Iacob carefully kept Labans sheepe enduring both the frost of the night and the heat of the day Genes 31.40 Contrarie hereunto are 1. unfaithfulnesse in having no care to save the goods of another such a one is the unfaithfull Steward in the Parable that was accused for wasting his masters goods Luk. 16.1 2. Idlenesse and negligence the idle and slothfull S. Paul calleth inordinate walkers and giveth this rule concerning such that hee which would not worke should not â—at 2 Thess. 3.10 Now it will bee here objected that this vertue of Fidelitie belongeth unto the fifth Commandement as it is before rehearsed among the duties there prescribed and therefore appertaineth not to this place The answer is that the same vertue in respect of divers ends and offices by the which vertues are distinguished may bee referred to sundrie Commandements and so the grace and gift of faithfulnesse as it concurreth with obedience and dutie to Superiours belongeth to the fifth precept but as it respecteth the preserving of anothers goods and substance it hath the proper place here 3. Liberalitie is commanded which is a franke and voluntarie collation or bestowing of ones substance upon those which want discerning discreetly to whom where when and how much to give such an one was Iob Who did not eâ—t his morsels alone c. hee did not see any perish for want of cloathing c. Iob 31.17 19. Contrarie hereunto are 1. Sparing niggardlinesse such as was in Nabal that would afford nothing to David in his necessitie 2. And vaine prodigalitie such as was in the prodigall child Luk. 16. 4. Hospitalitie is a kinde of liberalitie which is especially extended to and exercised towards stranger and chiefly such as are exiled and banished out of their owne countrie for the Gospell and the truth sake for this vertue is Lot commended Heb. 13.2 Contrarie hereunto is inhumanitie toward strangers such was the crueltie of the Egyptians toward the Israelites that sojourned among them 5. Frugalitie joyned with parsimonie is a vertue also hitherto belonging which is a thriftie saving of such things as God sendeth and a provident employing of them to some profit whereby one is made more able to give and to shew his liberalitie for frugalitie and parsimonie are the two upholders and maintainers of true liberalitie for without frugalitie liberalitie will degenerate into niggardlinesse and without parsimonie into prodigalitie Of this frugalitie and parsimonie our blessed Saviour gave example when hee commanded after hee had fed the multitudes in the wildernesse that the broken meat should bee reserved and kept Mark 8. Contrarie hereunto are 1. Undiscreet wasting of the goods and unnecessarie liberalitie or rather superfluous prodigalitie as in Herod that promised if it were to the one halfe of his kingdome for a pleasing and wanton dance Mark 6. and the diseased woman had spent all shee had upon Physitians and was never the better Mark 5.26 2. And niggardly sparing when there is necessarie cause of spending as hee that pincheth his owne bellie and defraudeth his owne soule Ecclesiast 4.8 And such an one was that miserable man that Ambrose speaketh of Cui si quando â—vum appositum esset conqueri solebat quod pullus occisus esset Who if an egge were set before him would complaine that a chicken was killed lib. de Naboth cap. 2. hee could not affoord himselfe an egge to eat 3. Places of Controversie 1. Controv. and Confut. Against the Anabaptisticall communitie THou shalt not steale This precept overthroweth that error which first among the Heathen was maintained by Plato that all things among men ought to bee common the same also was held by the Heretickes called Apostolici and in these daies by the Anabaptists for if there were a communitie of goods then no man should have a propertie in any thing and so there could not bee any theft this law then maintaineth every mans peculiar and severall right and interest in that which hee hath First their objections shall bee answered that labour to have a communitie 1. Object The Apostles had all things common in Ierusalem Act. 2.44 Answ. 1. That custome was then both easie because they were few and necessarie for if they had not sold their possessions and so made the use common they by violence should have been stripped of them now there is neither the like facilitie nor necessitie 2. That communion was voluntarie not imposed upon any for it was in their choise whether they would sell their possessions or not as Peter saith to Anâ—â—ias Act. 5.4 After it was sold was it not in thine owne power Vrsin 3. Neither were all things common among them they had some things private and peculiar to themselves as Mary had her proper house and dwelling in the citie Act. 12.12 Simler 4. Beside this was not the generall custome of the whole Church for in Achaia and Macedonia there was gathering made for the Saints at Ierusalem it was then particular for that place and peculiar to that time therefore a generall rule for all times and places cannot bee taken from thence Simler 5. Neither were then things so indifferently common as that every man might take what hee would but the things in common were distributed according as every one had need Act. 5.35 2. Object Christ saith to the young man Mark 10.21 Goe and sell all that thou hast and give to the poore Ergo wee must doe the like Answ. 1. That was a personall precept and belonging to those times So the Apostles did leave their parentâ— and their houses but wee are not commanded now to doe the like Simler 2. Beside our Saviour so said to shew how farre hee came short of the perfection of the law and to humble him that thought so well of himselfe 3. Further our blessed Saviour saith not make thy goods common but give unto the poore which are two divert things Vrsin 3. Object The Apostle saith All things 〈◊〉 yours 1 Cor. 3.21 Ergo all things ought to bee common Answer 1. The Apostles meaning is that all things were ordained for their good whether life or death things present or things to come 2. Hee speaketh not of a common possession of all things in right but that they are common in use they had jus ad rem non jus â—nre right to the thing not in the thing Vrsin Now on the contrary that it is lawfull for Christians to retaine a severall right and propertie in those things which they possesse it may thus appeare 1. The Scripture alloweth contracts as buying and selling as Abraham bought a buriall place of Ephron Gen. 23. David the threshing floore of 〈◊〉 2. Sam. 24. but there can be no such contracts ubi non sunt distincta rerum dominia where there are 〈◊〉 distinct properties in things And if they shall object that these examples of the old Testament belong not unto us wherein they shew their blasphemous error seeing the
pillowes under all arme-holes There are other flatterers in civill affaires such was Iehonadaâ— that applied himselfe to 〈◊〉 filthy humour 2. Sam. 13. thinking thereby to insinuate himselfe unto him being the Kings eldest sonne Pelarg. 3. A double mischiefe commeth by these flatterers for they both corrupt them whom they flatter and nourish them in their evill and feed their humorous disposition as the people puffed up Herod in pride by their flattering acclamations that it was the voice of God not of man Act. 12. So Alexander and Nero were corrupted by flattery and of good Princes became most cruell Tyrants Simler Therefore Diâ—gâ—â—s said well that it was better to fall upon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Crowes than 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 flatterers for they did but devoure the body these did devoure the soule And beside this mischiefe flatterers procure great hurt unto those whom in their flattery they accuse and traduce as Doâ—g was the cause that 85. Priests were put to the sword Simler 5. Another kinde of false testimony is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all kinde of lying and false speaking for lying lips are an abomination to the Lord Prov. 12.22 The beginning of lying was from the Devill Ioh. 8.44 When he speaketh a lye thâ—n speaketh he of his owne he is a lyer and the father thereof and the end of liers is to be cast into the lake that burneth with fire and brimstone Basting Pelarg. Of the divers kindes of lies see before quest 6. QUEST XVIII Of a false testimony which a man giveth of himselfe NOw remaineth the last kinde of false testimonies when one is a false witnesse of himselfe and hereof there are two sorts 1. Arrogancy and vaine ostentation when any maketh his boast of vertue and piety which is not at all in him such the Prophet Esay meaneth chap. 65.5 which say Stand apart came not neare me I am holier than thou Such was the Pharisie that vaunted himselfe before the Lord of his fasting and almes 2. The other is coloured and cloaked hypocrisie such was that of the Pharisies that under pretence of long prayer devoured widowes houses Matth. 23.14 these 〈◊〉 gaine and profit the end of their religion Another sort of hypocrites make the praise of men the scope of their dissimulation such were also the Pharisies that caused a trumpet to be blowne before them when they gave their almes and used to pray in the corners of the streets that they might be seene of men Matth. 6. Like unto these Pharisaicall hypocrites were the Monkes in Popery that through a pretence of religion gathered infinite wealth and riches possessions and lands unto their Monasteries and Cels. All these are enemies to the truth and maintainers of falshood making a lye of themselves Simler 3. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The particular vertues commanded with their contrary vices forbidden IN this Commandement generally is commanded the love confession and defence of the truth and contrariwise is forbidden all lying falshood dissimulation 1. The first vertue then here required is the love of the truth and the franke confession thereof with the mouth and practice in the life therefore the Devill though he sometime speake the truth yet because he loveth it not hee is not of the truth neither can be said to be true The confession of the truth as it concerneth the glory of God belongeth to the third Commandement but as it respecteth the good of our neighbour it is referred to the ninth Concerning this inward love and outward profession of the truth the Prophet David saith describing a righteous man Psal. 15.2 And speaketh the truth in his heart Contrary hereunto are 1. In the defect all kinde of lying whatsoever dissimulation fraud circumventing flattering such the Prophet noteth Psal. 12.2 They speake deceitfully every one with his neighbour flattering with their lips and speake with a double heart the Lord cut off all flattering lips 2. In the excesse there is 1. an intempestive and unseasonable confession of the truth concerning the which our blessed Saviour giveth this caveat Not to give holy things unto dogs nor to cast pearles before swine Matth. 7.6 not in all places and before every one to utter every truth 2. Curiosity which is to enquire things unnecessary or unsearchable as the Apostles were inquisitive after the time of restoring the Kingdome to Israel to whom our Saviour maketh this answer That it was not for them to know the times and seasons which the father hath put in his owne power Act. 1.7 2. Here is required that vertue called Candor which is a favourable interpreting of mens doings and sayings taking all things in the better part and hoping the best where there is no evident cause to the contrary which is an especiall fruit of charity as the Apostle sheweth 1 Cor. 13.7 It beleeveth all things it hopeth all things Contrary hereunto are 1. In the defect first perversenesse taking all things in the worst part and wresting mens sayings and doings to another sense than they meant as the false witnesses did those words of our blessed Saviour Of the destroying the temple and raising it in three dayes which he meant of the temple of his body they turned it to the materiall temple Secondly suspition when men are ready to take every occasion to suspect their neighbour of evill which is contrary to charity which thinketh not evill 1 Cor. 13.5 it is not suspitious Yet all suspition is not condemned in Scripture for our blessed Saviour saith Matth. 10.16 17. Beware of men c. And Bee wise as Serpents c. There is then a good suspition and an evill suspition which are thus distinguished 1. The evill suspition is raised without any cause at all or the same not sufficient the good ariseth of a probable and sufficient cause 2. The evill when upon a bare suspition any thing is certainly concluded the good leaveth the thing suspected in suspense and doubt 3. The evill is when upon suspition followeth hatred and an intention to worke mischiefe the good when one useth his suspition to charitable and friendly admonition 2. In the excesse here offendeth the credulous person that is without all suspition where there is just cause such an one was Godaliah that would suspect nothing of bloudy Ismael that was sent to kill him Ier. 40.16 Secondly the flatterer erreth here who upholdeth men in their sinnes and will not tell them their 〈◊〉 therefore Moses saith Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thy heart but thou shalt plainly rebuke thy neighbour and not suffer him to sinne 3. Simplicity and plainenesse is commanded which is a vertue whereby one plainly and sincerely professeth that which is right and agreeable to the truth without any colouring or cloaking so in Nathanieâ—â— commended for an Israelite indeed in whom there was no guile Ioh. 1.47 Contrary hereunto is doubling and dissembling either in words or workes sayings or doings so Iehâ—nadab that gave that lewd
to Moses but their Elders and the chiefe of them came in the name of the rest Deut. 5.23 Iun. QUEST V. Why the people desire that Moses would speake unto them Vers. 19. ANd said to Moses talke thou with us 1. Some doe here lay fault and blame upon the Israelites in refusing to heare the voice of God and chusing rather that Moses should speake unto them But the Lord commendeth them for so doing Deut. 5.28 They have well said all that they have spoken Therefore they thus spake not as preferring Moses voice before the Lords but because they were not able to heare the Lords voice being so terrible Tostat. quaest 37. 3. And the Lord terrified his people with his thundering voice for these two causes 1. That the people hereby should learne and be taught to feare the Lord. 2. And that they might be driven of themselves by this meanes to desire the ministery of Moses in speaking unto them for it was fit and requisite that as the Lord the Authour and founder of nature had by his owne mouth given such Lawes as were grounded upon nature such as were so evident even by the light of nature as that every one might at the first understand and acknowledge them so that the rest of the Lawes which were not so evident but needed explanation should be declared and rehearsed by Moses Sic Tostat. 4. Beside herein Moses was a type and figure of Christ who is the Mediator betweene God and us and by whom the will of God is revealed unto us Marbach Pelarg. 5. Moses herein formam boni aâ—ditoris describit c. describeth the forme of a good auditour who promiseth to heare and fulfill the precepts of their master Gloss. interlinear QUEST VI. Why the people are afraid they shall dye Vers. 19. LEt not God talke with us lest we dye Wee shall finde in Scripture that it was an usuall thing for men to feare that if they had seene God they should dye as Iacob counteth it a great benefit that he had seene God and yet lived Genes 32. So Gedeon and Manoah when they had seene God were afraid 1. Tostatus maketh this the cause of this feare that if they heard Gods voice any more they should dye because of the infirmity of the body which could not endure the Lords terrible voice for as the harmony of the body is dissolved by any excessive quality as with exceeding great heat or cold Ita excellens tolerabile vel terribile corrumpit potentiam tolerantem So an exceeding terrible or tolerable thing corrupteth and confoundeth the tolerating faculty Tostat. quast 38. But the cause of this feare is not so much in the body for Adam before his fall could endure the voice of God well enough 2. Some understand this of everlasting death Gloss. interlinear But it is evident that they meane the outward and corporall death which is contrary to this temporall life for thus the people say Deut. 5.24 Wee have seene this day that God doth talke with man and he liveth 3. Cajetanus doth gather these two reasons of this their feare both that terrible fire which they were afraid to come neere and the thundring voice of God which they could endure no longer to heare and these two reasons are expressed Deut. 5.25 Now therefore why should we dye for this great fire will consume us if wee heare the voice of the Lord our God any more we shall dye 4. But the greatest cause of this their feare was their sinne Conscius homo peccati c. metuit iram Dei c. Man being guilty to himselfe of sinne feareth the wrath of God Simler as Peter said to our blessed Saviour Luk. 5.8 Lord goe from me for I am a sinfull 〈◊〉 QUEST VII How the Lord is said to come unto them and why Vers. 20. GOd is come to prove you 1. God is said to come unto them not that he goeth from place to place but he came unto them by certaine effects his sinnes and wonders and two other wayes beside the Lord commeth by his word and by afflictions and crosses Simler 2. There are three ends of the Lords comming unto them 1. To trie them 2. That his feare may alway be among them 3. That they sinne not All these three arise one from the other probation and triall worketh feare and feare causeth to flee from sinne 3. So although Moses free them from one kinde of servile feare which was the feare of death and destruction yâ—â— he retaineth them still in that profitable kinde of feare whereby they might be kept in awe and obedience still Simler QUEST VIII How the Lord is said to tempt and prove his people Vers. 20. GOd is come to prove you 1. Deus metaphorice non proprie tentat c. God is not said properly but metaphorically â—o tempt as he is said to be angry Quiâ— facit effectum 〈◊〉 c. because he worketh the like effect as he which tempteth that is to cause the feare and obedience of the people to appeare Cajetan 2. God tempteth the Devill tempteth and man is said to tempt God is not said to prove or try for his owne knowledge and experience Cum omnia Deus videat priusquam 〈◊〉 seeing God knoweth all things before they are done Chrysost. hom 41. in Ioanu But God trieth and proveth Vt nos manifestemur aliis that we should be manifest to others as Abrahams obedience was made knowne to all in that he refused not to sacrifice his sonne vel nobis ipsis or to our selves as the Israelites were tempted in the wildernesse that it might be knowne what was in their heart Deut. 8.2 Tostat. Satan tempteth quia evertere â—ititur because he goeth about to supplant and overthrow us as hee tempted Iob. Home aliquando tentat ut probat aliquando ut rapiat Man sometime tempteth to prove sometime to catch as the Scribes and Pharisies tempted Christ to entangle him Ambros. in 2 Cor. 13. QUEST IX Why the people stood afarre off and where Vers. 21. SO the people stood afarre off 1. Cajetanus thinketh that the people returned not to their tents but stood a little from the mountaine and continued in the place whither they fled before vers 18. Tostat. 2. But it is evident Deut. 5.30 that they were bidden to goe unto their tents Iun. For as Moses went up neerer unto the presence of God so the people went still further backward unto their tents being so commanded of the Lord. 3. The mysticall signification hereof is that our sinnes doe make us stand aloofe off from God untill wee be reconciled by a Mediatour whereof Moses was a type and figure here Simler QUEST X. How Moses is said to draw neere to the darknesse BVt Moses drew neere unto the darknesse c. 1. Moses was in the darknesse before for all the hill was covered with smoake but he was not in that darknesse wherein the Lord was Vbi expressiora signa fiâ—â—ant quibus
apparent as either of simple theft consummate when the thing stollen is killed or sold vers 1. or of theft with violence vers 2.3 or of simple theft not consummate when the thing stollen is yet found with the man v. 4. or secret theft in feeding on other mens grounds vers 5. 2. The Law of burning vers 6. 3. The Law of committing any thing to anothers trust vers 7 8. 4. Of things taken away vers 9. 5. Of things that are hired what is to be done if they decay in his hand that hired them vers 10 11. what if they be stollen 6. The Law of borrowing and lending vers 14 15. 7. Of simple fornication what is to be done if the father consent vers 16. what if he refuse vers 17. The sacred Lawes follow 1. Which are either grounded upon the Law of Nature which are two not to suffer a witch to live vers 18. nor to lye with a beast vers 19. 2. Or upon the institution of God as not to offer unto any strange gods vers 20. 3. Or which concerne the duties of humanity to be shewed 1. Toward strangers vers 21. 2. The widowes and fatherlesse vers 22. whereunto the reason iâ— added containing a commination of punishment against those which oppresse and trouble them 3. Toward the poore neither in oppressing them with usury vers 25. nor keeping backe their pledge vers 26. with the reason vers 27. The publike Lawes are 1. Concerning duties both toward Magistrates in generall not to speake evill of the Rulers vers 28. and in particular toward Ecclesiasticall Ministers in yeelding their tithes and first fruits vers 29 30. 2. And touching the generall duty of sanctimony in themselves vers 31. testified by that outward ceremoniall signe in not eating any uncleane thing 2. The divers readings Vers. 1. Foure small beasts of the flocke for one small beast I. better than foure sheepe for a sheepe B.G.S.L. for the first word is tzon the other sheh and therefore cannot bee interpreted by the same word or than foure sheepe for a lambe C. A. for that had beene unequall or foure sheepe for a small beast P. V. for it might be a goat as well as a sheepe which was stollen and then foure goats were to be restored againe not foure sheepe tzon is a noune collective and signifieth the flocke as well of goats as sheepe Vers. 2. He shall not be guilty of bloud L.C. or of slaughter I.S. better than there shall be no capitall action against him V. or bloud shall not be shed for him B.G. or he shall be subject to death P. bloud shall not â—e to him H. that is the bloud of the slaine shall not be imputed to him it is better referred to the bloud of the slaine than of the killer Vers. 5. If any man doe feed field c. I.C.S. or cause to be fed V.A.P. better than hurt field B. G. L. the word is baghar to feed and two kindes of feeding are touched when one willingly causeth his cattell to feed on others ground or by negligence Vers. 9. In all manner of trespasse B. G. V. or matter of trespasse C.A.P. better than in every businesse of things carried away I. pashagh signifieth to trespasse to rebell or to depart from the will of the master Oleaster It is meant of all kinde of trespasse in withholding another mans goods Vers. 10. Carried away by violence I.V.A. or taken captive S.L.P. better than taken of enemies L.B.G. shabah signifieth to take by force or drive away Vers. 13. He shall bring it for a witnesse V.I.A.P. that is that which is torne for a witnesse C. or witnesse of the tearing B. better than he shall bring record G. here somewhat is wanting or bring unto him that which is slaine I. here somewhat is added or bring it to the doore S. here somewhat is changed Vers. 31. Totâ—â— of beasts C.A.P. cum cater better than tasted before of beasts I. 3. Questions discussed QUEST I. Of the 〈…〉 QUEST II. Why five oxen are restored for one and for a stollen sheepe but foure HE shall restore five oxen for an oxe 1. R. Salomon thinketh that the cause of this difference why an oxe stealer restoreth five a sheepe stealer but foure iâ— because he that stealeth a sheepe taketh more paines in carrying it upon his shoulder than he that driveth an oxe before him Contra. This is a frivolous reason 1. It is untrue which he supposeth for it is more labour to drive unruly oxen than simple and quiet sheepe 2. And what if a theefe steale many sheepe he cannot thâ—n carry them all upon his shoulder 3. Seeing to steale whether with labour or without is a grievous sinne before God â—â—thing ought to be remitted for any labour that is bestowed in a sinfull act 4. If the more labour in stâ—aling doth mitigate the theft then it should be a lesse theft to breake open an house and steale treasure than to take a thing out of the yard but the Law following determineth otherwise that a theefe breaking by night into an house might be killed 2. The ordinary Glossâ— giveth this reason because an oxe affoordeth five commodities it serveth for sacrifice for tillage for food for milke and the skin also is serviceable for divers uses but the sheepe is profitable only for foure of these for all but the second Contra. 1. But seeing an oxe is not onely profitable for these five ends but for twenty more by this reason twenty oxen should be paid for one 2. Likewise other things as gold and silver are employed for divers uses more than foure or five so then in the theft of these things also more than foure or five-fold should be restored Tostat. qu. 2. 3. The Interlinearie Glosse draweth it to a spirituall sense by five understanding the five senses and by foure the foure humours of the body all which must be afflicted by penance But it is not use in Civill and positive Lawes to leave the literall sense and follow a mysticall 4. Lyranus taketh this to be the cause whom Thomas followeth Quia bovâ—s difficiliùs custodiuntâ—r quaâ—â—ves For that oxen are more easily stollen than sheepe because they are more hardly kept and therefore the more easie theft is more severely punished But this is not alwayes so for sometime it is an easier matter to steale many sheepe than one oxe and more easily may they be conveyed away and hid out of the way 5. But Cajetane hath here a conceit by himselfe urging the signification of the word sheh which he saith properly signifieth a lambe to pay foure sheepe for one lambe he taketh to be a greater proportion and punishment than to pay five oxen for one because they were more proâ—e and ready to steale sheepe than oxen Contra. 1. But the word sheh as Oleaster sheweth signifieth not only a lambe but in generall all the smaller cattell as well sheepe and goats as lambâ—
Whether the keeping of the Passeover were the cause of their deliverance or that the cause of the other 7. qu. How these things should be as signets upon their hands and of the superstition of the Iewes in their fringes and frontlets 8. qu. Of the redeeming of the firâ—â— borne of uncleane beasts 9. qu. Of the conditions required in the first borne of cleane beasts 10. qu. Of the law of the redeeming of the first borne of men 11. qu. Of the spirituall application of the law of the first borne unto Christ. 12. qu. Whether the neerest way from Egypt to Canaan were thorow the Philistims country 13. qu. Why the Lord counselleth to prevent dangers 14. qu. Whether the like danger of warre feared with the Philistims did not befall the Israelites with Amilek 15. qu. Of the reasons why the Lord led his people about by the wildernesse 16. qu. Whether the Israelites came up armed out of Egypt or five in a ranke 17. qu. Whether the rest of the Patriarks bones were remoued with Josephs 18. qu. Who it was that appeared in the cloud and how 19. qu. Of the divers properties of the cloud 20. qu. How this cloud differed from other clouds 21. qu. When the cloud began first to appeare 22. qu. When the cloud and fierie pillar ceased 23. qu. Of the foure great miracles which the Lord wrought for his people in the desart 24. qu. Whether the cloud also served to shelter them from the heat of the Sunne 25. qu. Whether the cloud and fierie pillar were two iâ— substance or but one 26. qu. Whether it were a true naturall fire that gave them light by night 27. qu. Whether the pillar of the cloud were moved by any naturall motion 28. qu. Of the times of removing and staying of the cloud Questions upon the fourteenth Chapter 1. QUest Of the place where they are commanded to pitch 2. qu. Why the Lord would have them pitch in so discommodious a place 3. qu. How Pharaoh had word where the Israelites camped 4. qu. Of Pharaohs chariots and horse-men and whether there were any foot-men in this host 5. qu. How the Isaelites are said to come out with a strong hand 6. qu. Whether the Israelites cried unto God in faith 7. qu. Of the great sinne of the people in expostulating with Moses 8. qu. Whether Moses did suffer the people at this time to passe without reproofe for their murmuring 9. qu. When the Lord spake these words mentioned to Moses 10. qu. VVhen Moses cried unto God and how and for what 11. qu. How the Angell is said to remove 12. qu. VVhat winde it was which did blow upon the red sea 13. qu. At what time of the night the sea was divided where Pererius is confuted which thinketh that the Israelites staied five or six houres upon the sea shore before they entered 14. qu. VVhether one way were made in the sea or twelve wayes for every tribe one 15. qu. VVhich of the tribes first entred into the red sea 16. qu. VVhether the Israelites went thorow the midst of the red sea or onely a part of it 17. qu. Of the division of the red sea not the worke of nature but altogether miraculous where Josephus report of the Pamphylian sea giving way to Alexander the great is examined 18. qu. The division of the red sea and of the river Iordan compared together 19. qu. Of the blindnesse of the Egyptians running headlong upon their owne destruction 20. qu. VVhy the Lord looked in the morning toward the Egyptians 21. qu. By what degrees the finall subversion of the Egyptians was wrought in the red sea 22. qu. Of the number of the Egyptians that perished 23. qu. VVhether Pharaoh himselfe were drowned in the sea 24. qu. Whether the Israelites were all gone over when the Egyptians were drowned 25. qu. Why the Egyptians dead bodies were cast upon the shore 26 qu. Of the red sea whence it is so called 27. qu. Of the fabulous reports of the Heathen writers concerning the causes of the departure of the Hebrewes out of Egypt 28. qu. Of the comparison betweene the red sea and Baptisme 29. qu. How the people are said to beleeve Moses or in Moses Questions upon the fifteenth Chapter 1. QUest Of the authoritie and excellencie of Moses song 2. qu. In what order Moses the children of Israel and Miriam sang this song 3. qu. The end of the song of Moses 4. qu. Why the Scripture speaketh so much against horse used in battell 5. qu. How the Lord is said to be the strength and song of his King 6. qu. Whether God appeared in any visible shape unto the Israelites at the red sea 7. qu. In what sense Moses saith hee would build the Lord a Tabernacle 8. qu. How the Lord is said to be high 9. qu. In what sense the Lord is said to be a man of warre 10. qu. Why now it is said his name is Jehovah 11. qu. Of the names of the Captaines set over threes 12. qu. What is meant by the blast of his nostrils 13. qu. Of the vaine boasting of the Egyptians 14. qu. What are the strong before whom the Lord is preferred 15. qu. How the Lord is said to bee fearefull in prayses 16. qu. Wherein the Egyptians are compared unto lead 17. qu. How the earth is said to have swallowed them 18. qu. How the Lord will lead and carrie his people 19. qu. What is meant here by Gods holy habitation 20. qu. What nations should be afraid of the Israelites 21. qu. Why the Lord is said to plant his people 22. qu. In what sense the Tabernacle of the Iewes was called a firme and sure Tabernacle and how long the Temple continued at Ierusalem 23. qu. Of the meaning of these words For ever and ever 24. qu. Whether the 19. verse be a part of Moses song 25. qu. Whether the Israelites went straight over the red sea 26. qu. Of the divers kinds of women-singers mentioned in the Scripture 27. qu. Whether women did at any time publikely prophesie 28. qu. Why Miriam is said to be the sister of Aaron and not of Moses 29. qu. Why Miriam taketh a timbrell 30. qu. Whether the women came with pipes beside timbrels or with dancing 31. qu. Of the lawfulnesse of Instruments of musike 32. qu. Of dancing 33. qu. Whether Miriam did sing the whole song or repeated onely the beginning 34. qu. Whether the desart were simplie a desart and barren place 35. qu. The desart of Shur and Etham were all one 36. qu. Of the place of Marah 37. qu. Of the grievous sin of murmuring 38. qu. Of the divers murmurings of the children of Israel 39. qu. Whether the wood had any vertue that Moses cast into the water 40 qu. Whereon the miracle consisted of hâ—aling the waters 41. qu. Why the Lord used this meanes in healâ—â—g the waters 42. qu. Of the mysticall signification of this tree 43. qu. What lawes and ordinances the Lord