Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	body_n	bread_n	wine_n	1,851	5	8.1707	4	false

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A08846	A full declaration of the faith and ceremonies professed in the dominions of the most illustrious and noble Prince Fredericke, 5. Prince, Elector Palatine published for the benefit and satisfaction of all Gods people ; according to the originall printed in the High Dutch tongue ; translated into English by Iohn Rolte.	Rolte, John.; Beard, Thomas, d. 1632.	1614 (1614)	STC 19130; ESTC S1329	121,244	211

Scripture Clearance of the third contrariety betwixt Doctor Luthers opinion and the holy Scripture as wee haue aboue touched is this that the holy Scripture saith Christ once dying for vs can henceforth die no more Which is euen as much as if it said his body can be no more without blood and his blood can be no more really seuered from the body or be shead out of the body But Doctor Luthers opinion brings this with it that now euery day namely as often as the holy Communion is administred that the body of Christ is without blood and that the blood of Christ is really seuered from his body For the bread is indeed seuered from the wine really When now the body is in the bread and not in the wine and contrariwise the blood is in the wine and not in the bread then is it indeed manifest that they must be separated really from each other And Doctor Luther yeelds that that is his meaning where he saith I am to know that I receiue the body of Christ in the Sacrament without blood Tom. 3. fol. 529. Vpon this Contrariety doe wee not finde any thing of respect which Doctor Luther hath answered in his strife writings Neither doe wee see how it is possible to answere any thing groundedly and therefore it remaines as it is And this is now sufficiently spoken of the second cause why wee cannot giue approbation to Doctor Luthers opinion about the bodily presence of the body and blood of Christ in the bread and wine of the holy Supper namely whilest such an opinion hath not onely no ground in Gods word but also is manifoldly against the same 3 The third cause wherefore we yeeld not no Doctor Luthers opinion namely whilest it hath no testimony from the old Apostolicall Churches but was first batchâ—d in the blindest times of Popery The third cause is that such a construction hath no testimony from the Apostolicall Churches but was first founded many hundred yeeres after the birth of Christ in the very darkest daies of Popery as the Reader may easily come to vnderstand out of the following witnesses of the old Doctors of the Church Tertullian who liued about the yeere of Christ 200. saith The Lord tooke bread and diuided it amongst his Disciples and made the same his body in that he said This is my body that is a representatioÌ„ of my body Cyprian who liued about the yeere after Christ Serm. de Chrism 240. saith That the bread and the wine are the body and the blood of Christ as the betokening and the betokened thing vsed to be tearmed with one name Gregory Nazianzen Apologet. who liued about the yeere of Christs birth 360. nameth the bread a signe answerable to the body of Christ Chrysostome who liued about the yeere after the birth of Christ 370. saith Psal in 22. Bread and wine are a figure of the body and blood of Christ Also Homil 17. ad Heb. the Supper is a token and signe of remembrance of the death of Christ Augustine who liued about the yeere after the birth of Christ 390. saith The Lord hath commanded a representation of his body in the Supper a Psal 3. Also The Lord hath himselfe not spared to say This is my body when he gaue but a token of his body b Contra Adim C. 12. Also The Sacrament is named being one thing with the name of the same thing which it signifieth c Epist 23 ad Bonif. Also The Scripture vseth euen so to speake that it nameth the token as the betokened thing d In Joh. N. 63. Also The heauenly bread which is the flesh of Christ is in his kinde called the body of Christ it being indeed a Sacrament that is a holy token of the body of Christ which was hanged vpon the Crosse visibly palpably and dyingly And the offering of the flesh which is performed by the hands of the Minister is tearmed the suffering and dying of Christ vpon the Crosse not that it is the thing it selfe but that it betokeneth it as a mystery e Sent. Prosp Theodoret Dial. 1. who liued about the yeere after the birth of Christ 440. saith Our Sauiour himselfe hath changed the names and hath giuen the name of the tokens to his body and of his body to the tokens c. And in sundry places hee nameth the bread and wine in the Supper a representation and opponent signe of the body and blood of Christ Beda who liued about the yeere after the birth of Christ Super Lucam 730. saith Christ hath instituted in stead of the flesh and blood of the Lambe the Sacrament of his flesh and blood in the representation of bread and wine De coeâ—â— Domini ad Carolum Magnum Bertram who liued about the yeere after the birth of Christ 800. when some began to beleeue the bodily presence of Christ in the Supper and being demanded thereabouts by Charles the great freely declared That the bread is figuratiuely and not really the body of Christ From the witnesses it is very manifest that the euill custome of the bodily presence of Christ in the Supper did not arise before such time as that Popery got the mastery Wherefore cannot wee otherwise estimate such a custome but for a Popish leauen About which no man hath any iust cause to wonder that Doctor Luther who otherwise was a deadly enemy to the Popedome did neuer encounter this abomination of the Popedome Euen Elias the Prophet also did not encounter the calues of Bethel 2. King 25.15 which Ieroboam had set vp but they remained euen vnto the daies of King Iosias and yet neuerthelesse they were Baalitish abominations God hath such a manner that hee accomplisheth not all by one man that so no man might be made an idoll but must ascribe the honour onely to him And also there were outward causes which were a hinderance to Doctor Luther that he could not attaine to the true ground of this matter For first hee was borne and brought vp in the Popedome and hee was a Frier full fifteene yeeres long in which many yeers and from his childhood the euill custome of the bodily presence of Christ in the bread was so strongly rooted in him that he could not easily remoue it out of his heart afterwards Euen as also many other Popish errours as the Purgatory Transubstantiation the Communion vnder one kind and honouring of the Sacrament calling vpon the Saints c. in the beginning of his Reformation for certaine yeeres together cleaue fast vnto him Secondly and whereas Doctor Carlstadt would shew vnto him that hee failed in this point then did not Carlstadt onely bring it in very vnbefittingly in that that he said that Christ with the word this pointed not to bread but to his by-sitting body at table which Doctor Luther could easily confute him in and so thereby he was more and more fortified in

with one word It betokeneth the new birth or regeneration For regeneration is nothing else but a deading of the old man and quickening of the new Euen so saies Doctor Luther Tom. 1 Jen. fol. 204. 205 26. This is the true signification of the Sacrament Also it is not enough that a man know what the Sacrament is and what it signifieth Also yet was Christs body giuen therefore that the signification of the Sacrament might be taken to heart And therfore also is this rule false and nothing where men say That in the Sacraments of the new Testament there are no significations Therefore cannot the words of Christ haue that construction This is my body as if he had said this signifies my body There are significations in all Sacraments as well in the new as in the old Testament Onely heere is the difference that the Sacraments of the old Testament had relation to the Messias to come but the Sacraments of the new TestameÌ„t haue their relatioÌ„ to Christ already come As Doctor Luther himselfe very notably and well sheweth in the Church Postill in the exposition of the words of Saint Paul 1. Cor. 10.3.4 Our fathers haue all eaten one food namely with vs and haue all drunke one spirituall drinke c. where he saith It is euery where one faith and spirit Postill Wittenberg anno 1540 in the winter part fol. 275. though seuerall tokens and words be there The tokens and words are from time to time deliuered otherwise But there remaines yet all one faith in the onely one God who by seuerall tokens and words deliuered at times doe communicate one faith and spirit and worketh in all the Saints of God by the same one manner of pardon of sinnes deliuery from death and purchase of saluation whether it bee in the beginning middle or end of the world That is Pauls meaning here that he fathers haue eaten the same food and drunke the same drinke with vs yet addeth he that word spiritually vnto it For outwardly and bodily had they other tokens and words then we but euen the very same spirit and faith of Christ which we haue But to eate and drinke spiritually is nothing else then to beleeue the word and tokens of God as Christ also saith Ioh. 6. He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood dwelleth in me and I in him Also my flesh is meate indeed and my blood is drinke indeed that is hee that beleeueth in me he shall liue Also they drunke of the spirituall rocke which followed which was Christ that is they beleeued in the same Christ in whom wee beleeue although hee was not then come in the flesh but should come afterward And the token of such their faith was the materiall rocke where they drunke of the materiall water euen as wee by the materiall bread and wine vpon the alter eate the true Christ spiritually that is in eating and drinking outwardly doe wee nourish faith inwardly Whilest now these things are thus and whilest in all Sacraments there are significations and signes as also the Apology of the Auspurges Confession saith with the ancient Doctor Augustine of all Sacraments The Sacrament is a visible word for the outward token is a picture whereby the same is signified which is preached by the word c. Seeing therefore say wee that there are significations in all Sacraments therefore it followes that also this manner of speech hath place in all Sacraments where one saith This is this or that when it is meant this betokeneth this or that Neither can any waighty cause be showne wherfore the words of Christ This is my body should not euen so bee vnderstood as if hee had said this betokens my body or which is all one this is a token or remembrance or calling to mind of my body Out of which wee doe further conclude whilest the words of Christ This is my body must not bee so vnderstood as if he had said Therein is my body but may well be vnderstood so as if he would haue said this betokens my body that accordingly Doctor Luthers opinion where hee saith that the body of Christ is in the bread out of Christs words where hee said This is my body hath no necessary conclusion And this is the first cause why wee cannot leane to Doctor Luthers opinion about the reall presence of the body of Christ in the bread namely whilest such a construction hath no ground in the word of God it being so that in neither stands expresly in the words of Christ neither can bee drawne from thence by any necessary consequence The second cause why we cannot yeeld to Doctor Luthers aboue named opinion is this The second cause why we cannot leane to Doct. Luthers opinion namely whilest it is flat against Gods word for that wee see and are assured in our hearts that such an opinion hath not onely no ground in the word of God but also that it runnes flatly against the same For first of all so witnesseth Gods word cleerely that Christ ascended into heauen fortie daies after his resurrection and at present is no more vpon the earth I am no more in the world saith Christ Ioh. 17.11 And the Apostle to the Hebrewes shewes it very largely that he must by the offering of his body enter into the heauenly Sanctuary And concludes therout that therefore if hee were vpon earth then were hee not Priest in the 8.9 10. Chapters See Reader this is the cleere and infallible word of God that Christ is not any more bodily vpon earth therefore cannot the contrary that hee is now vpon earth bee true Secondly the word of God witnesseth cleerely that Christ hath once himselfe renounced and said that the bodily eating of his body is not profitable to saluation the flesh profiteth not namely to be eaten with the mouth as the Capernaites meant that they must eate his flesh Iohn 6.63 What now Christ hath once cast away as vnprofitable to saluation that is vnpossible that hee should againe haue euer ordained it as profitable to saluation For he recals not his word neither wil he rebuke himselfe of lying as Doctor Luther truly writeth Tom. 3. fol. 530. B. Thirdly the word of God witnesseth plainely That Christ once dying for vs henceforth dieth no more Rom. 6.9.10 Therefore shall not his blood heereafter bee seuered from his body any more really Tom. 3. fol. 529. as Doctor Luthers opinion sheweth For hee saith his body is in the bread without blood and his blood in the wine without the body This is as much as if he said that his body is dead in the Supper For a body without blood is dead Now his body cannot die any more therefore neither can the opinion of Doctor Luther of the reall and separated presence of the body of Christ in the bread and his blood in the wine be right Doctor Luther troubleth himselfe very much C'earanâ—e of the first difference betwixt

Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Text snippets containing the quad