very growing vp with christ himself from which we haue affirmed the same to flowe This is the lawe of righteousnes to haue that doone to our selues that we woulde do to others euen as it were from a fountaine because afterwardes wee fetch from him both true life and also all thinges necessarie to saluation Neither would I iudge it to be refused that a like interpretation may againe be ioyned to this our manner of speaking that Christ is spirituallie in the supper least any man shoulde thinke that we separate Christs power from the very flesh of Christ or imagine vnto him a speciall bodie Q 9 What is to bee iudged of this manner of sayeng That Christ is present in the supper and is distributed also by an incomprehensible manner or after a sorte that can not bee vnderstoode A We vse this manner of speech but yet in a far other sense and meaning than some are woonte A corrupt interpretation For vnlesse peraduenture wee be deceiued they seeme to take this saying after this sort as though by a certaine diuine and heauenlie power by reason also of the personall vnion of the flesh with the godhead Christs flesh should be really at one time and together both in heauen and in earth But though we neither deny the omnipotencie of GOD neither the true coniunction of the thing A true interpretation with the signes and of the faithfull with Christ himselfe we do yet notwithstanding by reason of the truth of Christs flesh and his ascension likewise plainly affirme that the body of Christ is nowe verily absent from the world Actes 3.21 shal remaine absent vntill he come to iudge the quick and the dead Neuertheles we confes this mysterie of god to be incompreheÌ„sible beyond our vnderstanding Faith ioyneth things together that be as farre asunder as heauen and earth whereby it falleth out that that which is and remaineth in heauen not els-where that so we may draw life and saluation from him who is trulie offered vnto vs and in deede communicated of vs. For albeit wee knowe first that the Holie-ghost that is to say gods power doth worke this The power of the spirite and of the force of faith and then that as in regarde of our selues all this is to be receiued of vs by the onelye instrument or meane of faith yet the power of the spirit and the force of faith doo exceede all our vnderstanding whereby it commeth to passe also that euen this whole action is verie properly called a mysterie or secret as the Greeks vsed to terme it Q 10 How is the matter or thing of the Sacrament communicated or partaken of vs A The matter of the Sacrament that is to say Christ himselfe is receiued of vs by a spirituall manner thorow faith And wee call that a Spirituall manner of receiuing or communicating Spirituall receiuing what it is not onelie in which Christ his spirite is communicated with vs but also that which is not earthlie or naturall but dependeth of the incomprehensible power of the Holie-ghost by which most straight bond indeede the members are more and more ioyned wyth their head For we exclude and shutte out all powring abroade and mingling of substaunces and also all fitnesse of ioyning together of naturall partes and yet can holde and mainâ—â—ine a true growing vppe of the faithfull with Christ which can not bee hindered by anie distaunce of places for our faith cleaueth vnto the worde of God who indeede performeth that which he promiseth Q 11 In what sense are these speeches To eate the Lords body and to drinke his bloud and other such like to be admitted A We say Eating and drinking referred to Christs bodie and bloud must be figuratiuelie vnderstoode that these manner of speeches do also beloÌ„g to that communicating or partaking whereby wee laye holde of Christ euen in the simple word or in the worde it selfe alone yea wee affirme that they are verye effectuall and significant but so that the wordes of eating and drinking when they are spoken of the taking of the body and bloud of Christ are no lesse figuratiuely to be vnderstoode than if a man should attribute to faith a mouth and teeth Two causes why the holie-ghost vseth borrowed speeches The first Now we alleadge two chiefe causes why the holy-ghost speaketh after that manner one cause is that hee may shew how strait our coniunction with christ is by the meanes of faith for nothing more groweth vp and increaseth with vs than meate and drinke without which no man caâ—â—â—asse ouer his time or spend this life â—he other cause which also properly hath place in the Sacraments is The second that by this way and meanes it may be declared how true the Lorde is in deliuering the matter it selfe which he promiseth by signes as it were by certaine pledges giuen for thereby it commeth to passe that though the onely signes are taken wyth the hand and receiued wyth the mouth yet that also which beside the signes is truely offered and by faith onely spiritually receiued is said to be taken eaten drunken c And for this cause we acknowledge Why we vse not the fathers phrases in the â—upper that the holie Fathers haue vsed manie other forms of speaking not vnlike these which wee notwithstanding will not at this day heedelesly vse but suppose rather that the same are to be mitigated by some profitable and fitte interpretations and the rather bicause of many errors spread abrode by Sathan and many controuersies also by this occasion stirred vp in the church of God Q 12 How are these wordes This is my bodie and this is my bloud to bee expounded A Euen after this maner This The wordes of the institution expounded particularlie and as it were one after an other that is to say this bread this wine is to wit sacramentally for not whatsoeuer is anie thing is by one onely way a thing Nowe the question is heere concerning the Sacraments And wee plainly say sacramentally bicause the Lorde did indeede offer not bare breadâ— and wine only but the true signes of his bodie and bloud neither onely these signes but besides them also his body and bloud to be enioyed possessed of vs euen into euerlasting life which life euerlasting also we drawe from him being communicated vnto vs. Luke 22.19 20. My body and my bloud that is not an imagined bodie or fained bloud but that selfe-same body which was giueÌ„ for vs and that self-same bloud whiche was shead for vs of both which wee are indeede by faith made partakers as the signes doo truely witnes Q 13 What do the wicked or vnbeleeâ—ers receiue The institution of the supper dependeth vpon Gods trueth A We hold and teach that by an agreeing iudgement and holy consent that the institution of the sacrament doth hang vpon the trueth of God therefore that in the
vtterlie ouerthrowe and destroy the nature of a sacrament which as all men knowe and confesse must euer consist of two partes to wit of visible elements and inuisible graces the trueth whereof appeareth not onely by the generall consent of all men as before is alleadged but also by the particular viewe of all the Sacramentes mentioned in the olde or newe testament But this trueth is not onely defaced and laid euen wyth the ground but swalowed vp also and as it were broght to nothing if so be it that the nature and substance of the elements bee either chaunged or vanish awaie in this matter of the lords supper as some affirme and hold the things represented by the same come in their place The reason wherof is plaine and euident to witte that the one parte of the Sacrament namely the visible signe is then and there absent And therefore it must of necessitie followe that not onelie the nature of a Sacrament is destroyed but by consequent also the Sacrament it self because the nature of a thing being taken away the thing it selfe can not stand or continue for the nature is it whereof the thing it selfe consisteth Yea this also falleth out vpon it that those men that in the pride and vanitie of their owne hearts inlarge the number of Sacraments aboue them that christ hath left vnto his church publishing to the worlde that there are seauen where indeede there are but two In the true and naturall vse of the worde Sacrament are founde not onelie to bee clippers of the Lordes coine but vtter defacers of his holie ordinaunce in taking from the Churche whatsoeuer they pretend to the contrarie one of those that Christ hath left to the same for the comforte thereof beeing founde likewise by this meanes not onelie presumptuous against Christ but iniurious also to the people in spoiling them of so great consolation So fruitfull in vngodlinesse is the euill weede of corrupt doctrine Indeede if the signe of the sacrament and the thing signified by the same were thinges contrary they might haue some shew of reason for this vnmeasurable affection but forasmuch as wee all knowe them to be not things contrary but diuers no doubt but they not onely may but do very well stand together the one of them beeing so farre from destroying or defacing of an other that they in a most louing consent agree and concurre together to the setting foorth of Gods glorie and the spirituall good and comforte of hys children Wherefore I saye it cannot be auoided but that they doe very ill that do thus malapertlie disioyne and put in sunder such things as God hath most wiselie ioyned and glewed as it were fast together 2 Secondlie I affirme that this doctrine is woonderfullie iniurious vnto the glorified bodie of our Sauiour not onely whilest it fetcheth him from heauen the place of all such blessednesse as can not be conceiued much lesse spoken of into the earth the place of all vnspeakeable miseserie and wretchednesse which yet is not all this circumstaunce further aggrauating the error of this vniust assertion that they make the blessed body of Christ our Lord and god subiect to the call of a mortall and miserable creature the priest I meane as they name him as though if he bade go it should go or if he commaunded it to come it shoulde come c But also whilest it maketh it to be rent and torne in peeces not only with the teeth of good mē a matter which our nature abhorreth both in respect of the rawnes of it also in respect of the substāce of it for we are not Anthropophagi that is eaters of mans flesh but euen with the teeth of the wicked and vngodlie also which euen for this cause if there were no more is most vntrue and false because that then they shold liue for euer Iohn 6.54 in as muche as all that eate his fleshe and drincke his bloude haue this promise that they haue eternall life And yet these wicked menne cease not heere but proceede to further impietie some of the chiefest among them affirming though in deede others are not so resolute in it by whyche also wee may see that there is not so muche vnitie or consent amongest Popishe diuines and doctors as they pretend that mice rattes dogges hogges and other vnreasonable creatures falling vpon consecrated hostes and deuouring the same doo vndoubtedlie eate the blessed bodie of our Sauiour And if they staied heere their sinne were somewhat lesse but this is not all the mischiefe that falleth out in this behalfe for whereas in trueth and christian religion the bodie of our Sauiour Christ is now immortall and in immortall glorie as Gods worde and the articles of our Beleefe agreeing wyth the same doo plainelye teache vs these menne subiect it to putrefaction corruption and wormes by reason of the long reseruation thereof and at the last to consuming in the fire a fact of most horrible crueltie if it were Christes flesh but no maruaile though they deale so wyth him when they handle hys Saints as hardelie as that commeth vnto which thing experience of all ages dooth sufficientlye prooue because it maye not otherwise bee made awaye as they themselues confesse if it be once taken wyth hoarinesse mouldines or such like If any man doubt of the truth and certaintie of these points obiected against them lette hym but reade their owne workes and hee shall see the matter sufficientlie cleared Yea I suppose that the verye aduersaries themselues will not growe so shamelesse as to denie that which with a full mouth and in the open Sunne light hath beene published by the best of their side And if they woulde or shoulde yet wee haue the liues and the leaues the wordes and the workes in sentence and sense for manner and matter to charge them wythall and to throwe this dung into their faces 3 Thirdly I say that by consequent it dooth most cursedly confounde if not vtterlie subuert and ouerthrowe the humanitie of our Sauiour with his Godhead whilest that which indeede and all trueth is proper and peculiar to the eternall Deitie onely for example to be euerie where which can not agree to anie but to GOD alone as both reason and religion will sufficiently perswade if wee will giue eare vnto the same is yet notwythstanding most blasphemouslye attributed and ascribed to his manhoode which as hath beene already shewed before and shall more plainelie if GOD will be prooued heereafter is and must of necessitie since the time of his moste glorious ascension into Heauen and sitting at the right hande of the maiestie of GOD his Father the very onelie seate and throne as it were of his bodilie residence bee circumscriptible and tied to a place As for that which they are woont vsuallie to obiect for the impeachement of this trueth and the establishement of their owne errour beeing taken from the glorification of our Sauiours bodie is easily beaten backe and
we are woont euerie where to beat vpon this point that by the sacraments Christ is not signified vnto vs as when we beholde Cesars image picture we are woont to remember Cesar and nothing beside for in the signes hauing the word adioined vnto them we teach Christ and all his benefits to be so represented to vs and our mindes that he togither with all his graces is giuen to vs to be inioied of vs and in deed to be participated but yet after a spirituall maner and by faith Wherefore this action is not vaine neither are the signes and the very rites thereof naked emptie matters sith that which is signified is both most truelie offered vnto vs by God himselfe and most effectuallie receiued of such as beleeue This kind of signification Bernard well declareth by the similitude of a ring which the bridegrome deliuereth vnto the betrothed bride to the end that so she may not onelie thinke vpon the bridegrome deliuering it but that by this pledge of promise he might after a sort deliuer himselfe ouer vnto hir also And therfore Christ did not onelie say Matth. 26 2◠This is my bodie but also he added Take ye and eat ye Mainteiners of the truth charged to be defacers of the sacraments Ye see brethren what we thinke and hold touching these mysteries also what iniurie is offered vs when men say that we doo euacuat disanull the sacraments and transforme them into certeine vaine spectakles and shewes of Christ that is absent Other mens malice must not hinder vs from speaking truth Let vs notwithstanding as plainlie as possible we can declare what that is which is so in outward signes set before our minde to be looked into that yet notwithstanding it is a faithfull and beleeuing soule trulie exhibited and offered to be partaken by faith And what is that I say Truelie the bodie and bloud of the Lord. But who teacheth vs this or so instructeth vs Euen Gods owne sonne for he saith This that is to say Matth. 26.26.28 This bread is my bodie And this that is to say This wine conteined in this cup is my bloud By the way I will put you in minde of one thing Contention about wordes though it be not alwaies good yet when it may cleere the truth it may well be vsed least anie man might be offended because I say not This is my bloud in the masculine gender but This is my bloud in the neuter gender referring it either to the wine which is the neuter gender in Latine or to the cuppe conteining the wine which in Greeke is the neuter gender also for though I loue not to striue about words yet this point is well woorthie the marking Certeinlie he that saith Hic est sanguis meus in the masculine gender that is This is my bloud dooth point to or shew foorth nothing but his bloud But it is certeine that as before Christ did not propound his bodie vnto his disciples without bread so euen in this other part when Christ said so he would not set his bloud before his disciples without wine Therefore this Greeke Pronoune 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being of the neuter gender must needs be referred to the signe that is to say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the cup which is therefore expreslie put downe in Paule concerning which or of which the bloud it selfe may be spoken wherevpon this ariseth that the Greeke Pronoune 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this cannot declare anie other matter or thing than this that is to say this thing or matter which I hold in my hāds to wit the wine that is cōtained in this cup which indeed cānot be expressed by this word Hic a Pronoune of the masculine gender as the meanest Grammarians may well and easilie perceiue Christes verie bodie bloud is the matter o◠thing signified in the Lords supper But to returne to the matter By these thinges you may perceiue what we vnderstand by the name or word of the thing it selfe or by the terme trueth sacramentallie sigifined namelie the bodie bloud of the Lord Iesus Wherefore first of all we dissent from the anabaptists In the matter of the supper we agree not either with the Anabaptists or sacramentaries who in sted of the matter of the sacrament signified doo put downe I knowe not what shadow or figuratiue thing as though it were some warlike cognizance pledge or watch-word by which christians might be discerned from such as be no christians Next we dissent from them likewise Or with such as vnderstand it onelie concerning Christes merits sundered from Christ himselfe who for the matter of the Sacrament established Christes force and power as also his merites but yet seuered from Christ himselfe For Christ said not this is the merit of my bodie Luke 22.19.20 which is deliuered for you but This is my bodie and this is my bloud neither is it without cause definitiuelie before hand added which is deliuered for you and which is shed for you So that it could not more plainelie haue beene said that verie Christ himselfe whose bodie was giuen for vs and whose bloud was shed for vs is truelie and verilie giuen vs in the supper to be the food of eternal life to vs. And therfore the matter of that sacrament is in deed that verie bodie which he offered vp for vs on the crosse and that bloud which he shed for the forgiuenesse of our sinnes so far off are we from deeming or thinking of some figuratiue or typicall bodie or some allegoricall bloud as certeine most fond men who doo not indeed well vnderstand their owne wordes minde and opinion are not ashamed to speake and write of vs that we so holde Now I come to the third point of this discourse for first I haue spoken of the signes and secondlie of the things signified Two sorts of people that in the sacrament of the supper haue erred in and about the right coniunction of the signes and the thing signified Now we are to see in the third place what is the knitting or ioining togither of the signes and the thinges signified wherein for the most part consisteth the whole determination of all this controuersie touching the sacraments The papists haue altered the ioining togither of the signes and the thing signified into a transmutation or change one of them into another than which what can be more absurd For certeinlie if the bread and the wine be in deede changed into the bodie and bloud of Christ as they affirme then we cannot chuse but affirme also that this is not to ioine the signes with the thinges signified but to change the signes into the thinges themselues or else the signes vanishing away or perishing to put the thinges themselues in their roome But let these men go as who in deed deserue not anie confutation their assertions be so absurd and blockish There are others at this present no
of Christ as they will needes haue it The former of these I grant to wit that by the cuppe should be meant the wine contained in the cup but the latter I denie to wit that that wine should be in substance the very bloud of Christ and this I do deny standing vpon the reasons which I haue before spoken and alleaged But howsoeuer it be whether there be meant therby this wine alone or together with the wine euen the bloud it selfe yet needes must these deadly enimies of tropes and figures acknowledge one figure here to wit a Metonomia of the thing containing for the thing contained yea and that same verie trope of the same figure Synecdoche which wee haue spoken of before wherby it commeth to passe that the wine and the bloud are saide to be the bloud Now then let them tel me how See for the proofe of this Genesis 17.9 without a crope or figure that shall be counted the couenant it selfe by meanes whereof the couenant is established And yet this further I would gladly demaund of them if the bare word or letter being so precisely obserued that reall consubstantiation must of necessity ensue how it can be that this should not followe likewise that the signes beeing not onely distincted but in very deede and truth separated and sundered also the body it selfe shoulde not likewise in deede bee separated and sundered from the bloud Consubstantiation erronious and al that is obiected for iâ— most weake I many times thinking and that earnestly of this one matter to wit why diuers did so greatly vrge this same rule Consubstantiation euen as if it were the principall point of all our religion of a truth nothing could come into my minde but that which was most easie to be confuted As for the that they say An obiection that vnles Christs very body and his very bloud be beleeued to be so present that it may be receiued with the hands and with the mouth or else the bread and the wine shall be but emptie and void signes I say it is of no force In good sooth suppose yee that yee speake the trueth Belike then all the sacraments that the Fathers had The answeare â—â—ken from an absurditie before that Christs flesh was indeede created were voide and of no force Their Sacraments saith Augustine were in signes diuers but in matter equall But in what matter were they equall Euen in Christ the only matter of the sacraments for that same spirituall word that is as the selfe-same writer vpon the 77. August in psa 77 psalme expoundeth it signifieng some spirituall thing was Christ they did eat the same meat that we eat 1. Corint 10.2.3 and did drinke the same drinke to wit Christ that was to be born as we eat and drinke Christ alredy borne who is a spirituall meat and drinke How vntrue therefore is it that the signes are of no force except the thing signified being in deede also present bee coupled and ioyned with the signe 2 A second reson standing vpon comparison of the element of baptisme with the elements of the supper Yea shall we say that the water of Baptisme is an idle signe yet I neuer hard of any man that would say that the bloud of Christ was indeede consubstantiated together wyth the wine But against this they replie saieng the reason or cause of that is because the Lord saide not that that water was his bloud Let vs grant that and yet in the meane while wee haue gained this that the sacrament is not abolished or made of no force though the signe bee in one place and the thing signified thereby bee in an other so that both of them be truly offered and giuen And this much or hitherto haue we spoken of this third point that is to say of the sacramentall coniunction or ioyning of the signe with the thing signified Now the summe of this true and right beleeuing iudgement is this to wit The summe of that which hath bin saide touching the sacramental coniunction of the sigâ— and the thing signified that that is a sacramentall coniunction wherby it commeth to passe that through gods ordinance that which is signified by the signes vsed though nowe it be neuer so farre from vs I meane Christ himselfe as in respect of his flesh is yet notwithstanding through the power of the holie ghost but yet in suche a spirituall sorte and manner as wee shall declare heereafter as truely and verily offered vnto vs and giuen vs to be enioyed of vs as verily as the signes themselues are looked vpon wyth the eies touched with the handes and receiued and perceiued also wyth the mouth But let vs now come at the length The fourth or last part of this discourse to the fourth or last question and points to wit what manner of taking or receiuing there is both of the signs themselues and of the thing signified Concerning the taking or receiuing of the signs there is no controuersie or doubt made of it A syllogisme but that it is naturall and outward because it is manifestly and plainely perfourmed of all them that come vnto it by bodily instruments and meanes The maior But as for the things signified to wit that very flesh of Christ and that very bloud of his they are so receiued and taken euen as they are present and offered The minor But they are present and offered also to our mind and faith because they are nowe as wee haue saide not on earth The conclusion but in heauen and therefore they can not bee taken or receiued otherwise than by our minds and faith Augustine Augustine also speaking well and rightly touching this point after this manner Why preporest thou thy mouth and bellie This foode belongeth not to the bellie but to the minde Beleeue and thou hast eaten Wherevpon also this likewise followeth that all that come to the Lordes table as the same Augustine saith receue the body of the lord Augustine that is to say the sacrament of the Lordes body to wit the bread vsed at may be one euen as thou and I are one And in one worde as you would say to finish the matter if onelie the members of Christ are to be saued then they must needes confesse that wee are thorowe faith truelye grafted into Christ and that euen before wee come to the supper in so muche as no manne can rightlye and orderlye come to the supper which is not nowe already both in baptisme and in the worde That followeth not that the aduersaries fantasie become a member of Christe and therefore is vnited with Christe him selfe And yet it dooeth not heerevppon followe that the institution of the Supper is superfluous by which wee doo not indeede at the first pushe but yet notwithstanding in processe of time doo growe vppe more and more in Christ For him that wee doo alreadye possesse must
very action of the Lords supper rightlie administred the bread is alwayes a true signe of the Lords body and the wine a true signe of the Lords bloud to whomsoeuer they be offered or giuen A bad conclusion iustlie reuerted and cast vpon the aduersaries themselues Nowe whereas some would thervpon gather and inferre that al do receiue the whole sacrament we can at no hand grant it for this consequence or reason is not of force God doth offer it to all therefore al receiue it But rather on the contrary side we gather and reason thus God dooth in the Sacrament offer two things and that indeede as verilie and trullie the one as the other but both are to be receiued by meanes and instruments altogether diuers and different that is to say the outward signs are to be receiued bodily and the thing it selfe spiritually by faith Therefore because euery man bringeth his mouth The reason why some receiue woorthilie other some vnworthilie al receiue the outward signes some indeede worthilie and othersome vnwoorthilie but because the faithful beleeuers onelie bring the mouth of faith therefore the faith all only receiue the matter it selfe therforâ— also life euerlasting And the vnbeleeuers eate and drink iudgement to them selues because they discerne not that is to saye 1. Corinth 11 2â— despise and reiect the Lords bodie offered them neyther haue they any regard therof Wherefore this their condemnation proceedeth not of the bodie and bloud of the Lorde vnworthily receiued for seeing that they are not receiued but by faith they are neuer receiued vnwoorthily neither can they indeede bee otherwise than liuelie and quickening things but of the body and bloud of the Lord From whence the condemnation of the wicked floweth in that they do vnwoorthily eate at the Lords table therefore contemned and reiected because in this action neither the bread should be duely considred as bread but as a pledge of the lords body nor the wine regarded onely as the wine but as a sure pledge of the Lordes bloud Therfore hence it commeth to pas To receiue without faith iâ— to receiue vnworthilie that whosoeuer hee be that receiueth this bread and wine vnworthily that is to say without faith doth despise not the bread and the wine but the body bloud of the Lord in those pledges is therfore guilty of the body bloud of the Lord A reason why all receiue not Christ in the supper which hee receiued not but which he had in consideration or due regard of for Christ doth not â—â—icken or cause to liue al them to whom he is offered whether this be doone in the word alone or in the sacraments but hee doth indeed quickeÌ„ al them of whom he is receiued bicause he cannot bee receiued of any other but of the faithfull only as for those of whom he is dispised he doth iudge them al Two sayings of the auncient fathers very charitably interpreted so far off is it that hee is of them receiued Notwithstanding for some of the fathers sakes the reuerence we carie them me thinke that this saying the body of Christ is of euery one receiued might be born withall this also that of the faithfull it is receiued worthily to life of the vnfaithfull vnworthily to iudgement but yet for all the we must of necessitie ad such an interpretation as may shew this thing to be true that is so far forth as the name of the thing signified that is of the bodye is transferred or attributed to the signes themselues so farre forth also as by this speech they may be properly or fitly shewed foorth not what euery one receiueth but what the Lorde of his owne goodnes offereth to euery one The conclusion The conclusion consisting first of a wish which hath two parts This is the summe of al those things which are taught in our churches and congregations concerning the matter of the sacrament so far forth as I could euer obserue gather or learne And the thing wee wish and desire is that that men would so prouide for the churches peace and quietnes that al manner of speeches not vsed in Scripture might bee auoided so farre foorth as coulde be And againe that if for doctrines sake or the teaching of others any thing shall be thought good to be changed that then all ambiguitte and doubtfulnes might be remoued and taken away Secondly of a promise which also hath two partes But if any thing in this doctrine deliuered can be shewed or prooued not to be agreable to Gods word we are readie not onely to be taught and instructed but also to thanke as there is good cause such as shall teach vs that so at the length wee may wholie and altogither thinke one thing in the Lorde which GOD is our witnes we doo with al our heart day and night earnestlye desire of his mercifull goodnes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The substance of the Lords supper shortlie and soundlie sette forth for the instruction and comfort of all true christian Readers TO cleare yea to void al the controuersies that froÌ„ time to time haue crept into the church of Christ concerning the matter of the lords supper these three circumstances are meete especially to bee considered 1. Corinth 11.23 1 First who ordained it to wit Iesus Christ our lord and sauior which tendeth to two especiall ends first to prooue his eternall deitie or godhead because it belongeth to God alone and none other to institute and ordaine holie signes and Sacraments in his church whereof also it should seeme there is very great and good reason both in as much as the Church it selfe is 1. Timoth. 3.15 the house of the liuing God and his peculiar inheritance and also because it belongeth to him alone to giue that virtue strength vnto elements of common and vncleane by sin to becom purified and holy thorow grace secondly it seemeth to teach vs to haue a more reuerent regarde to come to the sound knowledge and religious vse thereof not onelie because hee being God and the ordainer therof hath all power in his owne handes to punishe the prophane contemners and abusers of the same but also because hee of whome wee haue that that we haue not onely as in consideration of our name Christian but also as in respect of all other both spirituall and bodily graces hath instituted the same for his own glorie and our good 2 Secondly Matth. 26.26 we are to consider when it was instituted to wit before his death and suffering and that immediatelye after hee hadde with his disciples eaten the passeouer by which we may see the Lorde Iesus had as great eare for vs as for the fathers before his being and manifestation in the flesh prouiding also thereby not only for our forgetfulnesse that we might haue the continuall remembraunce of his death passion before our eies 1. Corint