Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	blood_n	bread_n	wine_n	1,397	5	8.0276	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A96805	The abridgment of Christian divinitie so exactly and methodically compiled, that it leads us, as it were, by the hand to the reading of the Holy Scriptures. Ordering of common-places. Vnderstanding of controversies. Cleering of some cases of conscience. By John Wollebius. Doctor of Divinity, and ordinary professor in the University of Basil. Now at last faithfully translated into English, and in some obscure places cleared and enlarged, by Alexander Ross. To which is adjoined, after the alphabetical table, the anatomy of the whole body of divinity, delineated in IX. short tables, for the help of weak memories.; Christianae theologiae compendium. English.	Wolleb, Johannes, 1586-1629.; Vaughan, Robert, engraver.; Ross, Alexander, 1591-1654.	1650 (1650)	Wing W3254; Thomason E1264_1; ESTC R204089	204,921	375

Sacrament of the New-Testament in which Christians that are of age receive spiritually Christs body and blood sealed to them in the reception of Bread and Wine according to Christs institution The RULES I. The Lords Supper is called metonimically the Eucharist or Thanksgiving Sinaxis or a collection the Lords Table the New-Testament and Synecdochically the breaking of Bread II. It hath the same efficient causes that Baptisme hath III. The outward matter thereof or Signes are Bread and Wine IV. The Supper is lame without both Signes and to rob the people of the Cup is Sacriledge Mat. 26.27 Drink yee all of this 1 Cor. 10.16 The Cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the Communion of Christs blood And 11. v. 26. As oft as you shall eat this Bread and drink of this Cup you declare the Lords death V. The inward matter is Christ with all his satisfaction and merit VI. As it is Jewish superstition to use unleavened Bread so the Popish Penny-Wafers are superstitious reliques VII It s outward form consists in Actions and Words VIII The Actions are the breaking of Bread and powring out of Wine the distribution of both Signes and the receiving thereof with the hand and mouth IX The word is the whole Institution containing the Eucharist the command and the promise but the promise chiefly X. Therefore it is impiety to think that the Bread is turned into Christs body only the bare accidents remaining by the low mumbling of these five words For this is my body and that with one breath and the Priests intention XI The internal form consisteth in the Analogie of the signe and the thing signified in which by Bread and Wine are signified Christs body and blood as spiritual meat and drink but by the breaking of Bread and powring out of the Wine are represented the breaking of his body or crucifixion and sheding of his blood and lastly by the distributing and receiving of both the applying of Christs death XII The breaking of Bread is not a thing indifferent For Christ made use of this himselfe and commanded it to be used saying do this which he himselfe explained adding This is my body which is broken for you From this the Supper is so called by this also the Churches union is shewed 1 Cor. 10.17 We being many are made one bread and one body for we are all partakers of one bread XIII The words This is my body can neither be meant of transubstantiation nor of consubstantiation but the meaning is This to wit the Bread is the Sacrament of my body The Papists interpret the words these That which is contained under the kind of Bread is my Body The Lutherans these in with under this is my Body The reason of our interpretation is explained in the former chapter They say that it is absurd to use tropical phrases which are obscure in Christs Will and Legacie Bur 1. This supposition of theirs is false that tropical phrases are obscure for we use tropes oftentimes to illustrate 2. It is false also that tropes are not used in Wils and Testaments for Jacobs Will shews the contrary Gen. 49. And Mose's Deut. 33. David 2 Sam. 23. Tobias 4. Matathias 1 Mac. 2.3 If there be no Trope in the Lords Supper then let them shew how the Cup can be called the New Testament in his blood without a Trope That saying of Austins Advers Adimant cap. 12. is worthy here to be set down The Lord doubted not to say this is my Body when he gave the Signe of his Body XIV It is one thing to say that Christ is present in the Bread and another to maintain his presence in the Supper for Christ is present in his Deitie and Spirit he is present also in his body and blood by a Sacramental presence 1. Of the Symbol not that he is present in the Bread but that he is represented by the bread as by a Symbol 2. Of Faith whereby we apply Christ with his merits to us 3. Of Vertue and efficacie XV. The proper end of the Supper not to speake of others is to seale our spiritual nutrition or preservation to life eternal by the merit of Christs death and obedience whence depends the union of the faithful with Christ and with themselves XVI It is an intolerable abuse to take this Sacrament to prove ones innocency in the courts of justice to confirm mens covenants to prosper our purposes and actions c. XVII The Lords Supper must be often times taken As often as you shal eat this bread c. 1 Cor. 11.26 XVIII The Supper differs from Baptisme not only in external signes but in its proper end because Baptisme is the signe of spiritual Regeration but the Supper of nutrition also in the object or subject to which for Baptisme is given to Infants the Supper to those onely who are of years and have been tryed they differ also in time for Baptisme is used but once the Lords Supper often-times XIX The Popish Masse is altogether repugnant to the Lords Supper 1. The holy Supper is instituted by Christ the Masse by the Pope 2. the Supper is a Sacrament instituted in memory of Christs sacrifice which was once offered but the Masse among Papists is the sacrifice it self to be offered every day the Ancients indeed called the Lords Supper a sacrifice yet not expiatory for sins but Eucharisticall and such as is joyned with prayers and charitable works which are acceptable sacrifices to God 3. Christ did not offer himself in the Supper but on the Crosse but they will have Christ to be offered in their Masse 4. Christ instituted his Supper for the living but the Masse is celebrated for the dead also 5. In the Holy Supper Christs body was already made by the virtue of the Holy Ghost not of bread but of the Virgins blood In the Masse Christs body is made anew by the Priest uttering his five words and that of bread 6. In the holy Supper there was and remained true Bread and true Wine and it obtained this name even after consecration In the Masse if we will believe it there remains onely the outward species of the Element and the accidents 7. In the holy Supper they all drank of the cup as Christ commanded in the Masse the Lay-people are denyed the cup. 8. In the Supper Bread was broken to represent Christ's body broken on the Crosse In the private Masse the bigger Hoast is broken into three parts the first is for the triumphant Church the second for the Church in Purgatory the third for the Church here on earth CHAP. XXV Of the nature of the visible Church HItherto of the outward communion of the Covenant of grace follows the externall society of the visible Church whereby all that be called are accounted for members of the Church Now the Church is considered either in it self or in opposition to the false Church the Church is considered in her self in respect of her own nature and

Isa 6.2 How much lesse then could any man intercede whereas there is not one just Person Rom. 3.10 The evill that was to be taken away was sin and the consequents of sin the wrath of God the power of Satan both temporal and eternal death Now I pray by whose suffering could that infinite Majesty be satisfied which was offended unlesse by his suffering who was also Infinite By whose Intercession could the wrath of God be appeased but by his onely who is that best beloved Sonne of God By whose strength could Satan with the whole power of darknesse be overcome except by his who in power exceeds all the Devils who finally could overcome death except he who had the power over death Heb. 2.15 But the good things that were to be restored were perfect righteousness adoption into sons the Image of God the gifts of the Holy Ghost life eternal and such like but now who could bestow that righteousness on us except he who is justice it self Who is so fit to make us the sons of God as he who is by nature the Son of God Who was so fit to restore in us the Image of God as he who is himself the image of the invisible God Who can bestow on us the holy Spirit so assuredly as he from whom the Spirit proceedeth Who at last can give us life eternal but he who is life it self Joh. 1.4 XII That he might be man the justice of God required which as it leaves not sin unpunished so it punisheth not sin but in that nature which sinned The first branch of this Rule is plain both by the justice and by the truth of God By his justice because God by this doth not onely resist but also punish sin Psal 5.5 6 7. For thou art not a God that hast pleasure in wickedness nor shall evil dwell with thee the foolish shall not stand in thy sight thou hatest all workers of iniquity thou shalt destroy them that speak lies the Lord will abhor the bloody and deceitfull man Now by the truth of God because the threatning which was given before the fall could not be in vain therefore Socinus is idle and foolish who that he might overthrow the merit of Christ feigns such a justice of God which doth not necessarily inflict eternal death or require satisfaction and which in this respect can be content to lose its own right but if sins are to be punished they were surely to be punished in our nature for to man the Law was given and to man death was threatened therefore it lies upon man to suffer the punishment XIII It was requisite that God and man should be united in one Person that he might be a Mediator between God and us He was therefore the medium between God and man that is he was at the same time God and man that he might perform those things which were to be effected towards God and man Heb. 5.1 These works of God and man do require both natures in the same person of which in the next Chapter more at large The parts of Christs Incarnation are two to wit the Conception and the Nativity In the Conception three things for the better understanding are considerable the forming the assuming and the personal union of the humane nature The forming of the humane nature of Christ is that whereby it was produced without the help of man of the Virgins blood by the operation of the Holy Ghost The RULES I. The Holy Ghost is not the material but the efficient cause of Christs conception For he was conceived not of his substance but by his power not by generation but by his commanding force and benediction Aug. II. The next or proximate matter was the blood of the blessed Virgin III. the form of Christs conception consisteth in the preparing and sanctifying of the Virgins blood by the vertue of the Holy Ghost in the forming of the body whereby together at the same instant it was made perfect and not successively as the bodies of other men are Lastly in the inspiring of the reasonable soul Whereas fourty dayes are appointed in ordinary generation for the time of forming the embryo the body of Christ was perfected in a moment otherwise not Christ the man but an embryo had been conceived IV. The end of Christs miraculous conception was that he might be free from Original sin for this sticks close to all that are of and by Adam that is to all who are naturally descended from him but it was needfull that Christ should be born without sin that we might have a holy High Priest Heb. 7.17 The assumption of the humane nature is whereby Christ assumed truly a humane soul and body with all their affections proprieties and infirmities yet without sin The RULES I. Christ assumed not man but the humanity not the person but the nature For otherways he had not been God-man and one person but two persons and so there had been two Christs The Scripture stiles him Emanuel because the same who is with us that is to say who is man is also God Isa 7.14 the same eternall Word is said to be made flesh Joh. 1.1 and the same is called both Davids Son and his Lord Mat. 22.42 II. And not onely did he assume a true humane body consisting of three dimensions and a true soul but also the essential Properties III. Yea and he took our infirmities too but not those damnable ones but such as were faultlesse and miserable These infirmities are either of the body or of the soule Again the infirmities of the body are from external causes as the calamities and torments inflicted by enemies Or they have their being from some internal cause and they follow wholly our nature since it fell front its primitive happinesse as to be cold to be hot to thirst to hunger to be in pain to grow weary and such like But the infirmities of the soule are sadnesse feare ignorance c. IV. So likewise he took upon him our affections but free from all disorder or inclination to evil The Personal Union is whereby the Person of the Son of God did communicate his Hypostasis or Personality to the humane nature and he so knit it to himself and with his divine nature that the propriety of both natures being entire he is in one Person God and man The RULES I. Christs humane nature hath no other or particular Hypostasis or subsistence then that of the Word that is of the Son of God In this point Christ differs from all other men because every man hath a peculiar Hypostasis or manner of subsisting by which he differs from other Persons besides his Essence consisting of body and soul but Christs humane nature wanting a proper subsistence is assumed into the fellowship of the Hypostasis of the divine nature neither doe we inferre from hence that the humane nature in Christ in this point is more inferiour then in other men for it is so much the

for it is one thing not to account us unrighteous and another thing to esteem us righteous Which that we may the better understand we must know how these terms are different Not just and just Unjust and just Not just and unjust Not unjust and just Not just and just are contradictories Vnjust and just are partly privatives partly contraries Not just and unjust also Not unjust and just are diversa We must also know that Unjust and Just are not immediate contraries for the medium is innocent who is neither unjust nor just Now whereas the remission of sins is a removing or putting away of our sins but the imputation of justice is the adjudging of it to be ours by that we are accounted for not unjust or innocent by this for just Now who knowes not that it is more to be just then to be innocent only and not only to have done no evil but also to have done good But although these two now in man differ not in subject but in some respect only yet heretofore they differed in subject also For Adam in Paradice was innocent but not just for he was at length to attain justice by his perfect obedience 2. They differ in their proximate and proper causes for Christs death and passion are the cause or remission of sins which are expiated by them Heb. 9.22 Without blood there is no remission 1 Joh. 1.7 The blood of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sin But the cause of the imputation of justice is Christs perfect obedience Rom. 5.19 For as by the disobedience of one man many are made sinners so by the obedience of one many are made righteous We have shewed above Cap. 18. that this obedience is that actual by which he fulfilleth the whole Law for us 3. They differ in their proper effects for by remission of sins we are freed from damnation Rom. 5.9 Much more then now being justified by his blood we shall be saved from wrath through him But by imputation of righteousnesse we attain over and above life eternal Rom. 5.17 Much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousnesse shall reign c. so Gal. 4.5 both effects are put Made under the Law that he might redeem them that are under the law that is under the curse of the law and that wee might receive adoption It is then a greater benefit to redeem a Slave and being redeemed to adopt him then onely to redeem it is a greater favour to give and forgive then barely to forgive therefore that justification is lame by which onely Christs passion is imputed and which onely consisteth in remission of sins Here divers things are objected 1. The Scripture in many places makes mention of Christs Passion or Remission of sins onely But this is no wonder for in many places it speaks Synecdochically its sufficient that it explains it self in the above-cited places 2. The Apostle promiscuously useth these phrases as equavalent to forgive sins and to impute righteousnesse Rom. 4.5 6. But we answer that it is one thing for propositions to be equivalent and an other thing for one proposition to follow upon or to conclude another as Paul out of this phrase of David Psal 32.2 Blessed are they whose sins are forgiven them c. collects this that David doth describe him to be blessed to whom righteousnesse is imputed without works The reason of the consequence is because if the remission of sins be free then so is also the imputation of justice Although then that is not formally spoken by David which Paul affirmeth v. 5. yet it is spoken by way of consequence yea it is an argumentation as Chrysostome saith from the lesser to the greater for if he be blessed whose sins are forgiven then much more blessed is he to whom besides righteousnesse is imputed 3. To whom sins are forgiven to him also righteousnesse is imputed and whosoever is freed from damnation he is inheritor of life eternal therefore these benefits are not different Ans Those things are not the same which are in the same subject together For so it would follow that Vocation Justification and Sanctification are not different benefits because every man that is called is also justified and sanctified 4. In the pardon of sins there are the sins of omission pardoned and therefore by that man is made perfectly just They adde the reason of the consequence Because he performs all things who omits nothing Ans The consequence is false because there is one cause why we are said to have omitted nothing another why we are said to have done all things We are said to have omitted nothing because Christ hath suffered for our sins also of omission But we are said to have performed all things because he hath for us performed all things Besides to have omitted nothing and to have done all things differ in respect of punishment and reward for although the fault and the punishment are remitted to him who omits what he should do yet for this there is no reward due to him 5. It is absurd that the same debt should be paid twice If therefore satisfaction is made for sin by Christs suffering satisfaction also is not to be demanded by active obedience Ans Here is Ignoratio Elenchi for there is is not a double payment of the same debt but two parts of one payment Neither is Christs active obedience required to make satisfaction for sin but to satisfie for our interest in the Kingdom of heaven 6. If it be the same thing to be liberal and not to be prodigal nor covetous then it is the same thing to be just and not unjust Ans The Assumption is false because these are not immediate opposites for there are men who are neither covetous nor prodigal nor liberal 7. If it be the same thing to be clothed and to have nakednesse covered then it is the same thing to have our sinnes remitted and justice imputed because by the garment of Christs righteousnesse our sins are covered Ans This is an unfit simile for the sinner must not only be clothed but he must be first unclothed to wit from the rags of sin Therefore as Joshuah the High-Priest had his filthy garments taken from him first then new garments were put upon him and a crown on his head Zac. 3.4 5. So we also first must be divested of this dirty garment of sin then we are clothed with the glorious garment of Christs righteousnesse XVI The form of Justification taken passively is whereby believers lay hold on Christ with all his merits by the hand of faith and apply him to themselves XVII The end of that benefit is Gods glory and our salvation XVIII Out of this commemoration of causes we firmly gather That man is not justified before God by his good works and merits Reas I. For to be justified by grace and by merit are repugnant Rom. 3.24 They are justified freely by his grace v. 28.

was the instrument used to propagate Christianity 8. Christ is so far from using violence that he will rather suffer the tares to grow with the good corn then pluck them by force 9. We find that violence is rather a hinderer then a furtherer of Religion for the more that men are persecuted for their conscience the more eager they are to hold it The stronger the wind blowes so much the faster doth the traveller hold his cloak The blood of Martyrs hath evermore been the seed of the Church 10. The forcing of Religion hath been the cause of much mischief murthers disorder and changes in States therefore the wise Romans permitted the Jewes after thy were subdued to use freely their own Religion neither did they force any of their conquered Nations to accept the Roman religion 11. Where violence is used there can be no justice 11. Nor God for he is not to be found in earthquakes whirlwinds and fire but in the soft and still voice 13. The forcing of Religion is the maintaining of hypocrisie for all such are hypocrites who are forced to professe outwardly what inwardly they hate 14. The forcing of Religion is the undoing of Religion for it s most dangerous enemies are the secret enemies that lurk in the bosome of the Church they 'll kisse Religion with the mouth and in the interim stab it with their hidden knife 15. Faith is the gift of God being a theological vertue infused not acquired if it be not then in our own power to believe till it be given us from above how can it be in the power of any other to make us believe how can they force us to take that which is not given to professe that which we have not received Religion is to be taught not to be forced IX Religion may be defended by Arms but not propagated by Arms. Examples of pious Kings the Macchabees Emperours as Constantine and Theodosius shew this X. Reformation of Religion belongs to the Prince or Magistrate After the examples of Moses Joshua David Asa Jehosaphat Hezekiah Josiah Constantine Theodosius c. XI If a Magistrate proves the Churches enemy and will not be intreated to give way for a Reformation then it lies upon them to reform whom God hath furnished with necessary gifts for that purpose neither in such a case must we stay for consent of Church or Bishops Examples are in Gideon Jehoiadah Macchabees Apostles c. Sure if our Predecessors had stayed for the Popes consent there had never been a Reformation Contrary to true Religion are Epicurisme and false Religions CHAP. V. Of works belonging in special to the Second Commandment IN true Religion we must consider its parts and time appointed by God The parts are two to wit the Forme or rite whereby God will be worshipped in his Church and the Sanctification of his Name all the rest of our life The form of his worship is that which he hath prescribed to us in his Word which is handled in the Second Precept the summe whereof is this That God should be worshiped in such manner as he hath prescribed This appears by the right Analysis of the second Command which is foolishly confounded with the first For as in the first Command is set down who must be worshiped for God so in this second is shewed after what manner he will be worshipped And as in the first internal idolatry is contrary so in the second external is opposed to this worship The parts of this Command are two a Prohibition and a Confirmation Of the Prohibition there are two branches the first is of the making the second of the worshiping of Idols Of the making he saith Thou shalt not make to thy self any graven image or likenesse c. which he illustrates by enumeration of particulars following to wit of any thing in heaven above or in the earth beneath or in the waters under the earth The veneration of idols is declared two wayes 1. By bowing to them 2. By worshiping of them The Confirmation contains a threatening and a promise both are illustrated from the nature of God and from the object In the one he describes himself to be a jealous God visiting iniquities c. In the other merciful In the one he denounceth punishment to the third and fourth generation of them that hate him but in the other his mercy to the thousand generation of them that love him It is easie then to see what is the summe of this precept by the proceeding thereof 1. From the particular to the general for Idolatry is forbid with all such rites as are either contrary to or not contained in the Word of God 2. From the negation to the affirmation of the contrary for it is commanded that we worship God in that way which he hath prescribed to us In the rites prescribed to the Church we must observe both the helps and parts thereof The parts are the right use of the Word and Sacraments and Prayer The right use or handling of the Word and Sacraments is when the one is preached the other administred according to Christs institution Prayer is whereby we speak to God in the true and humble contrition of heart of such things as are agreeable to his holy will This consisteth in calling upon God or in giving of thanks The Rules I. The common efficient cause of Prayer is the whole Trinity but in particular the Holy Ghost Whence he is called the Spirit of Prayer Zach. 12.10 II. The impulsive cause on Gods part are his Commands a Promise of being heard b his majesty c his goodnesse d his benefits e But on our part is out need which is gathered by the consideration of our wants calamities tentations and dangers c. a Psal 22.8 50.15 Isa 55.6 b Mat. 7.7 1 Tim. 2.1 Jam. 1.17 Isa 65.24 and other places now alleadged c 2 King 19.15 d Psal 86.4 5. e Psal 34.5 103.2 c. III. The matter of Prayer are things obtained and to be obtained IV. The form or Idea of true and religious Prayer is the Lords Prayer The parts of this are four the Preface the Petitions the Confirmation and Conclusion The Preface is this Our Father which art in heaven Set down to this end that our minds may be disposed 1. To docility for it shews who is to be invoked to wit that God who in Christ is made our Father by adopting us for his sons 2. To humility because he is not an earthly but an heavenly Father 3. To assure us we shall be heard For he will hear us because he is our Father and can hear us because he is in Heaven 4. For charity because we are taught to say Our Father Of the Petitions there be two ranks the first is of them that concern God the first and chief whereof is Hallowed be thy Name to this the the two latter are subordinate Thy kingdome come thy will he done on earth as it is in heaven The