Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	bishop_n	king_n	parliament_n	2,699	5	6.9602	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A80048	Judges judged out of their own mouthes or the question resolved by Magna charta, &c. Who have been Englands enemies, kings seducers, and peoples destroyers, from Hen. 3. to Hen. 8. and before and since. Stated by Sr. Edvvard Coke, Knt. late L. Chief Justice of England. Expostulated, and put to the vote of the people, by J. Jones, Gent. Whereunto is added eight observable points of law, executable by justices of peace.	Jones, J., Gent.; Coke, Edward, Sir, 1552-1634.; England. Magna Charta.	1650 (1650)	Wing C4938; Thomason E1414_1; ESTC R13507	46,191	120

chief Court could command Bishops to give their clergy to such as ought to have it another cause was That the life of a man ought to be tryed before Judges of learning and experience of the Laws of the Realm for Ignorantia Judicis est saepenumerò calamitas innocentis These are the reasons that the Lord Coke alledgeth why some Pleas of the Crown were taken from Sheriffs Castellans Escheators Coronors and Bailiffs under which names saith he are comprehended all inferiour Judges Justices and Courts of Justice albeit saith he it be provided by the 9th chap. of Mag. Charta That the Barons of the five Ports should have all their Liberties and Customs These general words saith he again must be understood of such Liberti●s and Customs as are not afterwards in the same Charter by express words taken away and assumed to the Crown Might not the Kings inferior Courts command ordinary Ministers to give men their Clergie Expost and Quer. And might not that serve before Magna Charta as it is usual since For seldom or never in our memories did Bishops themselves attend any court for that service and now should they be necessary onely for that imployment So the Kings Court would be onely to command them but if Bishops may be spared why may not that Court for that cause And if by this Charter the King resumed some Pleas of the crown from those that formerly had them dor●● et follow that he resumed all Ple●● from those that formerly had them And if under the name of Bailiffs be comprehended all Judges and Justices are not the Judges of the Common-Pleas and Barons of the Exchecquer so comprehended And are none of them of such learning and experience in the Laws of the Realm to try the life of a man as Judges of the Kings-Bench Or else why are they sent for Goal-deliveries aswel as Judges of the Kings-Bench are Was it not provided by the 9. chapter of Mag. Charta That London and other Cities Burroughs and Towns as well as the Barons of the five Ports and other Ports should have their Liberties and Free-Customs Are all these now resumed by this 17. chap Who can understand so Or what meaneth the L. C. by his riddles Shall Magna Charta contradict it self though the Lord C. would and doth here and elsewhere Are not Commissions of Oyer and Terminer usual for Tryal of mens lives where Judges of the Kings-Bench cannot reach or dare not go Doth not London and other Corporations execute their Charters by their Recorders when the Kings-Bench gives them leave and then do not the Judges of the Kings-Bench grant that such Judges may be as learned and experienced in the Laws as themselves for the Trying of mens lives Are not mens lives Tryable for matter of Fact and not of Law except Treasons that reach to thoughts Are not Jurors the Judges of matters of Fact What great learning or experience in Law is requisite for a Judge to pronounce the sentence of death where the verdict hath determined the life But how many true men have been hanged and thieves saved by Judges interposing and obtruding their pestifferous pretended learning and experience in the Laws between the weak consciences of ignorant Jurors and the truth which kind of Jurors they make Sheriffs return for such purposes when they may have such returned as know the Facts and have sounder learning and experience in express Law than themselves All Wears from henceforth be utterly put down by Thames C. 23. Wear● c. and Medway and throughout all England but onely by the Sea-coasts It was specially given in charge by the Justices in Eyre saith the Lord C. that all Juries should inquire of all such as Fished with wears and Dams L. C. upon M. C. fol. 38. and it appeareth saith he by Glandvil lib. 9. c. 11. That when any thing is unjustly occupied within the Kings demesne or obstructed in publick waies or Rivers turned off their right channels or Citie-streets built upon and in general as often as any nusance to the Kings holding or his High-way or to any Citie is committed That is a purpresture viz. an Inclosure whereby one in chroacheth or maketh that several to himself which ought to be common to all or many and every publick River or stream the Kings High way If Wears be nusances as I am sure they are throughout England Expost and Quer. and Wales and if Commissioners for Sewers and Justices of Peace for want of them be sufficiently authorized to reform such wrongs and do not because chief doers thereof or sharers in the unlawful gain made thereof themselves why not Justices in Eyer imployed to execute their charge for the general amendment thereof for the publick good One Measure of Wine shall be throughout our Realm C. 29. Measures c. and one measure of Corn viz. according to the Quarter of London and Haberjects that is to say two yards within the list and as it is of Weights so shall it be of Measures This Act concerning Measures L. Cok● upon M. C. fol. 49. and Weights that there should be one Measure and one Weight through England is grounded upon the Law of God Deut. 25. v. 13 14. And this by Authority of Parliaments hath been often enacted but never effected If Weights and Measures throughout England ought to be one Expost and Quer. and that not onely by the Law of God as the Lord C. instanceth but also by this Charter of Agreement between the King and the People Why did not the Lord C. being chief Justice of England sworn to do Law and Justice too and between King and People as partly before did and hereafter further shall appear he was or ought to have been see this point of Justice so highly required by the Law of God and so mutually agreed upon by the Kings of this Land and their Subjects duly executed Nothing shall henceforth be given for a Writ of Inquisition Ca. 16. Inquisition nor taken of him that prayeth the Inquisition of Life or Member but it shall be granted freely A Writ of Inquisition L. C. upon M. C. fol. 42. viz. De odio atia anciently called De bono malo c. which the Common-Law gave a man that was imprisoned though it were for the most odious cause for the death of a man for which without the Kings Writ he could not be bailed Yet the Law favouring the Libertie and Freedom of a man from Imprisonment c. until the Justices in Eyre should come at what time he was to be tryed he might sue out this VVrit directed to the Sheriff c. If a Writ De odio atia was given by the Common-Law Expost and Quer. to a man Imprisoned for the most odious cause even for the death of a man and if the Common-Law favoured the Liberty of a man Imprisoned so that he should be Bailed for such a Fact until

all whose ways are to Injustice as aforesaid How can that Law be called Common to all which They and these their Creatures Monopolize Ingross and Appropriate all to themselves as aforesaid And We will C. 2. Judgements That if any Indgement be given from henceforth contrary to the points of the Charters aforesaid by the Iustices or by any other Our Ministers that hold Plea before them against the points of the Charters it shall be undone and holden for nought Whatsoever Judgement is given against this Statute of Magna Charta L. Coke upon Con. C. f. 527. c. is made void by this Act and may be reversed by a Writ of Error because the Judgement is given against the Law for this Act saith Soir de fair pur nienttenus viz. as the Stat. Englisheth it self It shall be undone and holden for nought Expost and Quer. If so Why should not all Iudgements appearing as aforesaid to be contrary to Mag. Charta which are given for Arrests and Imprisonment of mens Bodies for Debt be undone and held for nought Why did Mr. Garland lately trouble the most High Court of Parliament whereof by so doing he shewed himself an unworthy Member with a ridiculous useless Act of his drawing for the Enlarging poor Prisoners for Debt Why did not he if he did ever read this place of the Lord 〈◊〉 mind the Parliament to command the Judges who seem if they have read it to have forgot it to reverse their Erroneous judgements against Debtors so far as they extend to their Imprisonment and to send their Liberate to all their Goalers to set open all their Goal dores and let forth so many of the Prisoners for Debt as they have left alive The poor because they have no Estate whereof to pay the rich because they have Estates sufficient for all or part against which Estates so much of their judgements may stand as concerneth that and not their Bodies and Executions may be taken thereupon by Elegit or Fieri facias according to the Statute of Westminster the 2. cap. 18th agreeable to Magna Charta and the Parliament not to be troubled except to Impower the Iudges by an Order to rectifie their judgements according to that Law which is in force and so forgo their Errors and Repealed Statute of the 25th of Ed. 3d c. 17th which ought to be no Guid Leader or Teacher to learned and grave Judges that can never be misguided by the right law if as the Lord C. saith they certainly know it and be pleased truly to follow it And by this course as well the Creditors of the rich Debtors as the poor Prisoners for Debt that have been wronged by the Judges Erronious judgements and proceedings against Mag. Charta may be partly redressed and so rest satisfied until the Parliament be pleased to right them further as shall appear hereafter they may So likewise may that Prisoner which is Imprisoned again after his inlargement by Garlands Act be Enlarged again by the same Judge that Committed him without troubling the Parliament or People with any such Appeal as is lately divulged or suffering the Apprentices Out-Cry to run so far That now it will never be stopped till the Thieves be taken And that all Arch Bishops Cap. 4. Excom c. and Bishops shall pronounce the Sentence of Excommunication against all those that by word deed or counsel do contrary to the said Charters or that in any point break or undo them And that the said Curse be twice a year Denounced and Published by the Prelates aforesaid And if the same Prelates or any of them be remiss in the Denunciation of the said Sentences the Arch-Bishops of Canterbury and York for the time being shall Compel and Distrain them to the Execution of their Duties in Form afore-said This Excommunication the Prelates could not pronounce without Warrant by Authoritie of Parliament L. C. upon Confir Cart. f. 527. because it concerned Temporal causes Expost and Quer. Was not the Authority of this Parliament sufficient Warrant for Prelates to pronounce Excommunication according to the Tenor and limitation of this Act Doth not the Lord Coke say before That this Act is not onely an Express Confirmation of Magna Charta but also a Confirmation of it in Law Doth he not say before that That Magna Charta should live for ever and in all Successions of Ages for evermore Is not the substance of the Excommunication given by this Act to the Prelates to pronounce Had the Prelates any more to do therein but to pronounce an Excommunication What meaneth Ipso Facto in the Act but to let all future Ages understand That the breach of Mag. Cha. which is a Declaration of the Fundamental Laws of England is such an Offence as deserveth an everlasting Curse inflicted by the Law it self upon the Breakers for ever Which Curse receiveth no more strength from the Pronouncer than a Sentence of Death from a Iudge who doth but tell a Fellon whom the Law condemneth what shall be the manner of his Death If any Excommunication was ever pronounced by virtue of this Act as there were two in two several Kings Reigns were not those Excommunications in force and so to continue as long as Magna Charta it self the Prelates and their Successours neglect of their Duties by discontinuing such Denunciations twice yearly afterwards notwithstanding If so Are not those Excommunications still in force except Absolutions be produced granted and given by equal Authority to that whereby those Excommunications were Denounced If so Are not Excommunications until Absolutions of the same accompt and validity in Law as Out-lawries until they be reversed If so Are not all the Lands Goods and Chattels of all Excommunicats now the States as formerly they were the Kings and so Seizable Sequestrable and Convertible to that use until Absolution And ought not satisfaction precede Absolution Ought not that satisfaction extend to every particular man that hath been wrong'd in this case which as the L. C. saith is a Temporal case and so called in respect of the interest of all men called by the Clergy Temporal for distinction from themselves that would be called Spiritual And so as I believe not to be commuted by a Prelatical Sentence to a trivial Pennance nor pardoned by Parliament without excepting every particular Interest And what Parliament can Pardon or Absolve Offendours against Magna Charta but by the Rules of Magna Charta without offending Magna Charta themselves and incurring the same Excommunication as they have incurred that would be Absolved If Excommunications be no Terrors to Atheistical Judges Justices c. who neither Believe nor fear Heaven Hell God Justice nor Laws though they cannot in nature and reason but know that such there are and are to be beleived feared and obeyed shall not Excommunications be sufficient Warrants for Christians English Christians in England being warranted not onely as the L. C. saith By

Misdemeanours are comprehended all breaches of Magna Char and all Offences against all Statutes in force and concurrent with Mag. Char. and the Petition of Right which all Justices of Peace and Magistrates in their several jurisdictions are Authorized and sworn to hear and determine without fear favour or respect of persons How then to be excused or delayed by any Writ or command of any Superiour And how are the Judges of the Kings-Bench whereof the chief was the Kings Deputy by Writ now Superiour or equal to any other Judges or Justices If that maxim be true moritur Actio cum Personâ But the Office of a Deputy dyeth with its Master as a Letter or Warrant of Attorney with its maker the King-Bench may be spared as well as his person And all causes in this Common-wealth be called Common-Pleas and tryed by the Common Law of the land and Verdicts of common people and Free-holders of every County and Corporation before the Free Judges Magistrates freely chosen by the said Common and Free-People to justifie them at home and not before mercinary makers expounders and sellers of all Lawes and Liberties as they please at Westminster And doth not the said Stat. of 28. Ed. 3. warrant Justices of Peace or any two of them whereof one to be of the Quorum to call and keep Sessions as often as they see need to do justice to their Countrey See the Stat. at large and Cromp. I. P. fol. 112. and F. H. I. P. fol. 10. Whereunto adde That as Magna Charta compriseth all the Law of this land agreed upon by Kings and People and would be read and published in English as aforesaid for the better understanding thereof by all English People to the end that the ignorance of their Law should be not excuse for any of them to transgress it So how needless it is if not pestiferous to have this Common-Law reduced to a private mercinarie Trade or particular science exceeding the seven Liberal by such professours thereof as have and do endeavour to disguise mask and hide it from all but themselves in base French and Latine intricacies and obscurities to the end to make all persons offendors thereof and none excusable but by their resolutions of their own Riddles which are alwaies answerable to their Fees be the cause right or wrong whereby the cure of Law becometh an incurable disease until that superfluous mercinary profession be abolished or regulated so as the best and soundest Lawyers may be used in Parliaments as in former times to sit upon Wol-sacks to answer to what that high Court shall be pleased to aske them and not as members of that Court to make Lawes and Oaths for others which they never observe themselves but for their own gain and the peoples damage To which end they alwaies preamble their inventions against Mag. Char. with titles of Acts for the good of the people when in their subsequents they hurt all but themselves As passing by all former their last Acts for the inlarging of poor prisoners for debt sufficiently witness whereby neither creditor nor debtour are any way relieved but both further entangled and Lawyers Fees more procreated Videat experientia Conclusivè That there can be no firm peace or end of Wars till there be an end of mercinarie professours of Law less needful or useful for Parliaments or People than Bishops or such as might be used there or elswhere for saying or reading prayers while these neither pray preach nor study but their own lucrative magnificence every where upon the peoples purses Adde lastly Such Justices of Peace as will not execute Mag. Char. with its confirmations and the Petition of Right and desert and wave the execution and practice of contradictory Statutes for zeal to their Creatours or fear to be unmade by those that made them ought to be deserted and waved by all good Patriots of their countrey as excommunicated persons and breakers of M. Chà And such onely as will execute Mag. Ch. c. ought to be confirmed by the choise of the People in their Counties respectively whereby they may act as the ancient Conservatours of the Peace did by the Common Law of England before Mag. Char. and since which was to conserve the Peace of England by all necessary means word or sword unlimited by Prerogative Statutes devised by mercinary Lawyers to steal from the People their birth-right Authority in the name of the King unto themselves to sell delay and deny it at their pleasures which to do is apparently contrary not onely to Mag. Char. and the Common Laws of England and also to common reason but chiefly to the divine Providence of God for neither Law Reason nor Divine justice would ordain a man to conserve the publike peace of Gods people which peace as they is his own without giving that man an unlimitable power by which he may execute his Office and without which he cannot FINIS

should others that are not such indeed be sheltered to defend or countenanced to offend under that pretence And as for Members of any Court why ought not they to sue and be sued by their Atturneys in other Courts than their own since it is unnatural for any bodie to suffer any of its Members though never so corrupt to be put to any smart which it may avoid And may not nay ought not every just Court avoid such suits and the suspition of their injustice by entertaining them and proceeding therein by leaving them to the justice of other Courts of competent judicature as all other Courts do leave their Members to the mercy of the Courts at Westminster or may not nay ought not all Courts of judicature within their jurisdictions determine the causes of all such Members of the Courts at Westminster as shall be found and arrested within their jurisdictions notwithstanding any Writs of priviledge or other Writs to remove them before they be determined rather than the Courts at Westminster may send for the Members of every Court to be justified by them For who can say he hath ever found any justice there against any priviledged man And how many that be no Members of any Court there indeed are so countenanced as subordinate to some ill Member or other there and have their Law for nothing to bring Fees and gain to one or other of those courts out of honestmens purses and Estates against whom they can shew no colour of right any where but where they know they shall be favored and their Adversaries oppressed And how many men of good Estates have been and daily are not onely oppressed but undone by that means Thirdly for Trespass vi Armis Is it but a common-Plea and consequently proper to all courts of Record and rather to be tryed within that jurisdiction where the offence is committed than elsewhere And hath not the King his Fines imposed and levyed by the authority of all such courts as wel as by the Kings-Bench Fourthly for Replevins may they not as well be removed to and determined by the Common-Pleas as in the Kings-Bench Fifthly what meaneth the Lord by his words viz. Originally restrained but that the Kings-Bench is restrained from having any original Writs Returnable thither in Real Pleas And is it not as much restrained from originals in Personal Pleas that are as Common-Pleas as Real by this Statute Or by what other Statute Law or President is it inabled to have any originals returnable to it for debt when the Register and Ret. brevium have no such Presidents as aforesaid Is not therefore all the practice of the Kings-Bench for debt unjust and perjurious as aforesaid and moreover a faint Action c. as the prisoners for debt in that Court have lately set forth by their Petition to the Lord General and his Officers concerning this matter A Free-man shall not be ameirced for a small fault Caput 14. Ameirciaments but after the quantitie of the fault and for a greater fault after the manner thereof saving to him his contenement or Freehold And a Merchant shall be likewise ameirced saving to him his Merchandize And any other Villain than Durs shall be likewise ameirced saving his Wainage if he fall into Our mercy And none of the said Ameirciaments shall be assessed but by the caths of honest men of the Visionage Carls and Barons shall not be ameirced but by their Peers and after the quantitie of their trespass No man of the Church shall be ameirced after the rate of his spiritual benefice but after the rate of his lay teuement and the quantitie of his trespass A Free-man here Lord Cook upon Magna Charta fol. 27. hath a special understanding saith the L. C. and is taken for a Free-holder and this appeareth by this clause Salvo contenemento suo viz. Saving his Free-hold c. This Act extendeth to Ameirciaments not to Fines imposed by any Court of Justice c. Free-men are not intended to officers or ministers or officers of justice c. The Writ of Moderata misericordia giveth remedie to the Partie that is excessively ameirced c. Albeit the Law of England is a Law of mercy yet it is now turned to a shadow for where by the wisdom of the Law these Ameirciaments were instituted to deter both Domandants from unjust suits and Defendants from unjust defences which was the cause in former times of fewer suits c. If amerciaments were instituted to deter Plantiffs from unjust suits Expost and Quer. and Defendants from unjust defences and were the causes of fewer suits in former times how comes the Law turned to a shaddow in the Lord Cokes time when in the Kings-Bench and Cmmon-Pleas am erciaments were as frequent and greivous as in any other time and suits no fewer nay more numerous than before as Records of both Courts declare unless he means that all the Writs in the Register and Natura brevium both original and judicial whereby suits were determined amongst neighbours friendly at home became useless since Habeas corpus c. carried all to Westminster And that there injustice shaddowed under the name and habit of justice remunerated the litigious supporters of her being with such shares of her spoils that though she trebled their amerciaments she made them alwaies gainers unless when to satisfie their revenge rather than their purses they commuted their monies for counsels and countenances to undo the opposers of their malice whereby both parties became loosers and often ruined and injustice onely remained the gainer and increased her kingdom as the Divel doth his by such suitors and made more suits for Westminster than all the Courts of Errors and their Judges Lawyers and Attorneys there shall wear out while they live without extraordinary helps of their servants No town or Free-man shall be distrained to make Bridges or banks C. 15. Bridg. Banks but such as of old time and of right have been accustomed to make them in the time of King Henry our Grandfather No Banks shall be defended henceforth C. 16. Banks but such as were in defence in the time of King Henry our Grandfather by the same places and the same hounds as were wont to be in his time Both the next precedent chapters sufficiently expound themselves so that the Lord Coke speaketh no more to this matter but that the Mirrour saith That diver Rivers and their Banks were in his time appropriated and blocked up by divers persons to debar common-fishings which were wont to be used there in the time of King H. 2. And I believe there are many more so done more lately which Commissioners for Sewers shall do well to look to No Sheriff C. 17. Pleas Crown Constable Escheator Coroner or any other our Bailiffs shall hold Pleas of the Crown One mischief before this Statute L. Coke upon M. C. 30. was saith the Lord Coke That no Court but the Kings