Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	bishop_n	henry_n	king_n	1,385	5	3.9180	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A70306	The true Catholicks tenure, or, A good Christians certainty which he ought to have of his religion, and may have of his salvation by Edvvard Hyde ...	Hyde, Edward, 1607-1659.; Hyde, Edward, 1607-1659. Allegiance and conscience not fled out of England.	1662 (1662)	Wing H3868; ESTC R19770	227,584	548

and gives this reason why he requires it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We were ordained and appointed of God to preserve the faith holy and incorrupt as we received it the Pope will now tell the Emperour so sed non fuit sic ab initio from the beginning it was not thus no nor in many hundreds of years after and in the sixteenth Action of this Council the acclamations of the Bishops to the Emperour at first calling him Another Constantine another Martian another Theodosius another Justinian are a proof beyond exception for no History is so irrefragable as the Acts of a Council that those Emperours had called the forementioned Councils and the petitions at last of the same Bishops praying for him as the Defender of the Orthodox Religion as the bulwark of the Church and as the Defender of the Faith cannot but assure us that they thought it the Emperours duty to call those Councils because they thought them bound to defend the Faith and to protect the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 You see the title of Defender of the Faith to a King is of much greater antiquity then our Henry the eight as well as the reason of it and so many several laws in the Code and in the Novels of the Catholick Faith of the Sacraments of Churches of Bishops of Synods of Hereticks will be an evidence to the worlds end of the Supremacy of Kings in causes Ecclesiastical no less then those other titles in the institutes and digests that concern liberty and property and the affairs of this world will be an invincible evidence of their Supremacy in civil causes But I may not insist longer upon this Argument such kinde of quotations being fitter for the school then for the pulpit I will onely add this one more from Pope Adrian's own mouth to Charles the Great of France whom he calls Spiritualem Compatrem that is either his Spiritual Godfather for his patronage and care over his Person or his Fellow-Father in spirituals for his jurisdiction and government over the Church and he labours to give him such punctual satisfaction in all particulars concerning the second Nicene Council as if he feared that of Franckford called by Charles would as indeed it did over ballance that of Nice procured by himself no less in truth then it did in authority but we think his Compater to his Lord and Master a little too high though his Successours will not stoop so low for as we allow the Supreme no superiour so we must allow him no equal which is my second conclusion No person but is inferiour to him in power as no power but is inferiour to his in causes whether Ecclesiastical or Civil so no person or persons whether Ecclesiastical or Civil but is and are inferiour to him in power we understand not that Singulis major Universis minor or if we understand it think that Omnis anima speaks as well Universis as Singulis and therefore not onely one and one by himself but also one and all Subjects together all are inferiour to their Sovereign because they are all bound to submit unto him Let every soul be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13. 1. Their convening together doth as much take off their souls as it doth their subjection 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 can never agree but the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is joyned with the universis in the text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 therefore of them also no less then of single persons must the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the next verse be necessarily understood Whosoever resisteth or How many soever resist both alike are comprehended in They that resist and they shall receive to themselves damnation The word here used 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 subordinetur let every soul be subordinate a word that more particularly points at the Ordines regni in the very signification of it because they can never want power to make resistance and seldom want chaplains that encourage them to make it but Ordines sunt ordinandi and subordinandi or else Ordines will be Confusiones Orders must be ordered and subordinate or though called States yet will be Ruines though called Orders will turn Confusions both of the text and of the kingdom and certainly the reasons alledged by S. Paul as equally concern Ordines regni as other Subjects and those as well all as some Universos as well as Singulos First Gods ordinance which may no more be rejected by all then by some by all together then by single persons in particular Secondly Damnation which may be incurred by all as well as by some by a Parliament as well as by Private Gentlemen 'T is true the King may not be so great a terrour to all as to some because all joyning together may not be afraid of his power What then yet I hope all have consciences as well as some and though happily it may not be said of the all of the whole kingdom Ye must needs be subject for wrath because all subjects holding together need not fear their Kings wrath yet it may and must be said of them all Ye must needs be subject for Conscience sake as 't is in the first verse For be they never so many that combine together that will give no satisfaction to the Conscience in regard of it self nor release in regard of God and yet even this very objection is sufficiently answered in the verse before in that he is said To bear the sword as the Minister of God and therefore Not to bear the sword in vain For though happily or rather unhappily in regard of his Person he may bear the sword in vain and perish under it yet in regard of his office he cannot for so he is the Minister of God and consequently a revenger of wrath that cannot fail of his revenge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Epiph. Haer. 40. adversus Archontichos He hath from God the right of the sword not from any other and he hath it for revenge Would to God those men who follow these Hereticks in multiplying powers and principalities though not in heaven yet in earth and in some other things too for these Archontici did abhor baptism and slight the Communion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiph. ibid. I say would those men who follow these Hereticks in this gross opinion would likewise seriously go along with this learned Father in his solid confutation there would never again be any cavilling disputes upon the 13 to the Romans His confutation in brief is this You Archontici think by multiplying powers in heaven to overthrow the dominion and power of one God but indeed you rather establish it For if in earth there may be so many principalities and powers in one kingdom all subject not repugnant to one King then much more so in heaven 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In every kingdom upon earth there are many principalities but they are all under one King Nothing

trembling but as we have out-passed those ten Lepers in our uncleanness so we may not come short of them in their holy fear and faith for as their fear made them stand afar off so their faith made them lift up their voices and say Jesus Master have mercy on us S. Luc. 17. 12 13. then will he give us such a purity as will not onely make us shew our selves to the Priest but also to our God such a purity as will wash our eyes to see him and much more our hearts to love him for so saith S. Peter Act. 15. 9. purisying their hearts by faith not a faith which costs the purse no alms the body no fasting the soul no praying for no true Israelite will ever offer that unto the Lord which cost him nothing 2 Sam. 24. 24. but a faith which so purifies the soul by knowing the truth as much more by obeying it for so saith the same Apostle Seeing you have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the brethren see that you love one another with a pure heart fervently 1 S. Pet. 1. 22. this is the purity of the true Religion it purifies the soul not onely by faith but also by obedience and by love which yet are now generally farthest from many men who would fain be thought to come nearest Purity Thus we have seen Gods truth in his understanding his goodness in his will and his purity in his action it still remains that we consider his Liberty as belonging to them all for Liberty being nothing else but the dominion and power of action must needs be originally in the understanding which alone is able to judge and deliberate of what is to be done what not formally in the will which resolves to do or not to do but effectually 't is onely in the action which is the product of the said deliberate resolution this liberty is now briefly to be handled First as it is in God and then as it is in Religion for being the service of God Gods Liberty is seen in five respects in that he is free from sin free from misery free from obligation free from servitude and free from coaction which is the reason that he can both will and do what and when and where himself pleaseth I need not insist on the proof of these for to name them is to prove them nor can any man deny Gods Liberty in any of these respects but he must deny him to be God and in all these same respects we may see and must acknowlege the Liberty of Religion and to deny it to be free in any of these is to deny it to be Religion that is to say the service of God and to make it to be state policy that is to say the service of men First Religion is free from sin for the superstition and faction and profaneness and other sins that are so rife among Christians to the dishonour of Christ and the reproach of Christendome is a rust that cleaves to the men who are little better then iron not to the Religion which is as pure as the Refiners fire and therefore it is not safe nor fit to say of any order or kinde of Christians that their Religion is rebellion and their faith is faction though we cannot deny of too too many orders and kindes of men who profess Religion that they are both rebellious and factious Secondly Religion is free from misery ask the three children in the fiery furnace they will say their Religion had made them persecuted they will not say that it had made them miserable they profess that they were delivered into the hands of lawless enemies most hatefull apostates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 meaning sure those of their own brethren which had renounced the Law of Moses and their Religion and helped the Babylonians to persecute and infest Jerusalem and to an unjust King and the most wicked in all the world 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thus those blessed Martyrs will tell you they were in persecution the greatest that ever was but they will not tell you they were in misery nay it seems they told the quite contrary for none else could have told it but from their mouths that the angel of the Lord came down into the oven and smote the flame of fire and made the midst of the furnace as it had been a moist whistling wind but you will say these men were partial witnesses in their own cause therefore ask their persecutors they will tell you the same for the Princes Governours and Captains and the Kings Counsellours being gathered together saw these men upon whose bodies the fire had no power nor was an hair of their head singed neither were their coats changed nor the smell of fire had passed on them nay ask Nebuchadnezzar himself who was the authour of the persecution and he will tell you that though he had caused these holy men to be so much afflicted yet he could not cause them to be miserable for at that instant when he had thought they had been burnt to ashes he heard them sing in the flames as saith the Greek Translation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and that probably made him look about to see whence that melody proceeded and finding so sweet a breath to come from the blast of his fire he was astonied and rose up in haste and went to the mouth of the furnace which before bade him keep his distance in that it consumed his officers and called forth the holy and blessed Martyrs who having been delivered from a present death could not be looked on but as men newly risen from the dead Thirdly Religion is free from obligation there is no greater humane obligation then that of nature and there is no greater natural obligation then that which we owe to our Parents yet that may not be alledged to keep us from serving God so Aquinas determines the case Si ergo cultus parentum abstrahat nos a cultu Dei non jam esset pietatis parentum insistere cultui contra Deum ideo in tali casu dimittinda sunt officia pietatis in parentes propter divinum Religionis cultum 22 ae qu. 101. art 4. If our duty to our Parents take us away from our duty to our God as if the Father should command his son to turn rebel or Idolater or the like we must forsake our parents and cleave to God and shew the prevalency of that duty we owe to God by being undutifull to our parents in such a case again there is no civil obligation greater then that we owe to our Governours yet if they command us to sin against God by not speaking nor teaching by not praying nor preaching in the Name of Iesus we have our answer put into our mouths and God put it into our hearts lest atheism get possession there in stead of Christ whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken

appointed by God to limit it though not in regard of laws now what the law doth limit not man but God doth limit Aristot. 3. Pol. 16. doth make the Soveraignty of God and the laws all one in that admirable Axiom of his the foundation of all Politicks or of all good rule in them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He that bids reason govern bids God and the laws govern he makes God and the laws but one government but he that lets in a man le ts in a wilde beast we let not in the man upon the laws when he is a King much less when he is a Subject in saying he is powers but we let in God upon the man and therefore call him powers plurally because he is many powers nay powers indefinitely because he is All powers in one person whereas no one subordinate power may be called powers without some limitation or qualification but the Supreme power may be called so absolutely and sine additamento because all powers are originally in him and derivatively from him if not by mans for some have lately questioned that yet sure by Gods law 1 Pet. 2. 13 14. Submit your selves to the King as Supreme unto governours as unto them that are sent by him even as all motions are originally and virtually in the first Mover the power of judging whether it be to make laws or to repeal them the power of punishing offenders against those laws or the power of the law i. e. of peace and the power of the sword i. e. of war are his powers and our Saviour Christ though he openly said My kingdom is not of this world which may shame them that under pretence of Christs kingdom would engross Supremacy to their consistories yet did he at that very time as openly declare what was the power of the Kings of this world saying If my kingdom were of this world then would my servants fight that I should not be delivered to the Jews S. John 18. 36. Then would my servants fight not against me but for me go you that say and practise otherwise and tell the Eternal Truth that he was mistaken and knew not the constitutions of your kingdom while indeed you know not the constitutions of his But withall take heed that then you put not your kingdom out of this world for the words are undeniable and irresistable If my Kingdom were of this world then would my servants sight that I should not be delivered unto the Jews they would fight with their hands and with their hearts when their hands fail them fight with earth by striving against men in battel fight with heaven by striving with God in prayer and much more fight with hell by striving against devils black-mouthed slanderers and back-biters scorning their mammon rather then their King should be delivered to the Jews to his malicious and bloud-thirsty enemies whatever the Subject can lawfully do by his hand or by his head or by his heart to defend the King and bring his enemies to condign punishment that is the Kings power both for himself and against his enemies nor may we seek to pull this power from a King no more then we may seek to pull a King from his throne for if assistance be the servants duty Then would my servants fight that I should not be delivered saith Christ making it their duty so to do 'T is not possible but resistance should be his guilt a dangerous guilt to himself a scandalous guilt to his Religion so saith S. Paul 1 Tim. 6. 1 Let as many servants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of honour that the name of God and his doctrine be not blasphemed What an unsufferable impiety doth possess those men who think God may securely be blasphemed by their Oaths but what an unpardonable impudence hath bewitched those who think there is a greater blaspheming of God in an hasty Oath then in a studied Rebellion Those tongues will certainly and deservedly one day want a drop of water to cool them that are now set on fire from hell customarily and impenitently to blaspheme the God of heaven but yet we must say what we cannot but see that God is and may be blasphemed with the hand as well or rather as ill as with the tongue 't is not a yea and a nay in the mouth will keep us from being blasphemers if there be a rebellious sword in our hands the unruly tongue and the unruly hand do both blaspheme our God and this text of S. Paul seems to make the unruly hand the greater blasphemer for that blasphemes not onely the name of God as the tongue doth but also his doctrine That the name of God and his doctrine be not blasphemed Is not our Religion the Doctrine of God and how shall we dare to blaspheme that our selves or give others the cause of blaspheming it 'T is not onely a false but 't is also a blasphemous doctrine to say that a servant may count his own master not worthy of all honour much more to say that a Subject may dishonour and reproach nay disobey and resist his King 't is a doctrine not onely against the Law but also the Gospel 't is against the wholsome words of our Lord Jesus Christ v. 3. and none can preach or approve it but men that are Proud doting upon questions and strifes of words supposing that gain is godliness v. 4 5. and from such we must turn away for 't is easie from their conversation to judge of their condition if that be the conversation of the godly which is there described by the Apostle then are such men in the state of grace and condition of godliness but if it be not then in vain do they come with godliness in their mouthes and with Rebellion which is the greatest ungodliness in their hands and in their hearts so that we may now answer the Preachers question in my Text Who can say unto him What doest thou Even such men as S. Paul here speaks of but no other if they be ashamed of owning the character let them be ashamed of answering the question and to shew to all the world that this is the doctrine of all good Protestants I will set it down at large as Musculus a learned protestant writer hath delivered it upon the Psalms and I will bring my instance as Job doth his interpreter but One of a thousand and that shall be upon the fourth Psalm This Psalm saith Musculus is of the same argument with the former though it appear not by the Title or Inscription was made upon the same occasion viz. King Davids being driven from Jerusalem his royal City and Palace by Absalom and his confederates accordingly first he makes supplication to God for mercy v. 1. then presently falls expostulating with his enemies v 2. O ye sons of men how long will ye blaspheme mine honour and have such pleasure in vanity and seek after leasing He