Raoul Duke of Sueue he desired the Bishoppes to gather together at Bresse where in their Sinode they excommunicated and deposed the Pope and elected Clement Bishop of Rauenna to bee his successor for whose establishment the Emperour tooke Armes and entered Italie Henry the fifth was forced to Warre against Pascall who had mooued the Romaines to mutiny against him to the ende to haue slaine him because he endeuored to mainteine the auncient rightes of the Empire concerning the collations of Bishoprickes Frederick the first vnderstanding the arrogant presumption and obstinate resolution of the Popes Adrian Alexander the third and Victor importing that it lay in them to giue the Empire to whome they pleased did seauen tymes enter Italie with an army where he fought a blooddy battell in the which dyed 12000. of Pope Alexanders partakers who therewith prouoked caused the liuely Picture of the â—ame Emperour to be drawen and sent the Table to the Soudan of Egipt against whome the saide Emperor was gone withal aduertising him y t vnlesse he procured his death by treason or otherwise he should neuer haue peace wherevpon the Emperor recreating himselfe a litle from his Armye was taken and brought before this heathen who shewed him the Popes Letter togither with his Picture and yet neuerthelesse put him to his Raunsome and so sent hym home honestly as abhorring the treason of the great Priest of the Christians against this Prince who ventured his life for the maintenaÌ„ce of his Religion Hereat was the Emperour so offended y t at his returne he entered Italy againe forced y e Pope to flee in counterfaite apparell after y t the Bishops had in a Synode condemned him as a traitor to the Empire yea which is more as a conspired enemie to Christian faith Phillip this mans sonne being by Innocent the 3. sclaundered amoÌ„g the Princes of the Empire was counsailed by the Bishoppes of Germany to haue his reuenge by armes Ottho the 4. being in Rome was so sâ—arred by the driftes of the same InnoceÌ„t that he was driuen to haue recourse to force in which conflict perished a number of the Citizeâ—s of Rome Frederick the 2. in whose time Innocent the 4. Honore and Gregory the 9. did in Italy begin y â— quarell of y e Guelphes against the Gibelins who mainteyned them selues vnder the auncient obedience of the Empire was by the aduice of al his Princes and Prelates compelled to oppose himselfe against the practizes conspiracies which these high Priestes wrought against him The Emperour Albert King Phillip of France doubted not to bend them selues against the oppression of Boniface the eight to contemne his excommunications vntill King Phillip assembled the Prelates of Fraunce by whose sentence he was declared a Scismaticke Hereticke inuader of the holy Sea and a perturber of the peace of the Church as hauing molested all Italy with the factions of the Whites and the Blackes Henry the 7. of the house of Luxembourg to the ende to withstand Clement the third the mainteyner of Robert King of Sicill a rebellious vassall to the Empire was driuen to come to handy strokes with him and his partakers the like did Lewes of Bauier against Iohn the 23. and other y e Popes of his tyme who without either cause or reason had declared him an Hereticke because hee would not yeeld to them the Imperiall authoritie in Italy neither put the Empire into the subiection of the Bishop of Romes Sea In our tyme Lewes the 12. King of France and the Emperour Charles the fifth how dealt they most iustly with the Popes that would haue dispensed with and exceeded the boundes of their duetie To bee briefe in other the Prouinces of the Empire infinite are the examples of Kings and Princes who with the aduice of the Prelates and Nobilitie of their Dominions haue with armes withstood the ambitious and passionate practizes of the Popes in whom it had bene more seemely to haue gouerned the Church and spiritual Hierarchy and not to haue thrust their Sythes into other mens haruest whereof is without doubt proceeded the destruction and deformitie of the West Catholick Church together with the full fall of the East Church into the which by those meanes is entered the Wolfe that hath deuoured Gods flocke whereof they shall assuredly aunswere 24 Now haue wee yet the second question to enquire of for our better instructioÌ„s in this matter That is whether the King of Nauarre bee an Hereticke His aduersaries doe say that his opinion of Religion was lately condemned in the late oecumenicall Counsaile holden at Trent Hereto he aunswereth that the same pretended Counsaile was not lawfully assembled because therein the Pope executed the roume of both Iudge and party also that such as prosecuted reformatioÌ„ in the Church were not heard To bee briefe there may be debating and many nullities may be alleadged aswell in the forme as in the decrees of the sayde Counsaile whereto neede no more respect â—ee had then to the counsaile of the wicked of which the Psalmist doth speak or vnto those that the Prophet termeth Counsailes of vanitie yea and Sainct Iohn writeth Beleeue not euery spirite but prooue whether they be of God Saiuct Hierome also teacheth vs that the doctrine of the holy Ghost is the same which is set downe in the Canonicall Scriptures against which if the Counsailes determine any thing it shall be wicked Also when the Emperor Martian in the Counsaile of Chalcedon forbad to dispute or call into question such thinges as had bene well decreed in the same holy assembly he thereby ment not to grauÌ„t free libertie to Counsailes against Gods worde but he speaketh onely of such thinges as were well and lawfully ordeined according to y e rule of the holy Scriptures by the which those that vphold the same opinion with the King of Nauarre doe pretend to shewe that the Cleargy who were assembled in the Counsaile of Trent alone haue greatly erred which their inquisition and search beeing by Gods owne mouth permitted to the Church may not well be refused Trye all sayth the Apostle and hold that which is good And in deede if the Counsayle of Trent bee aunswerable to the doctrine of Iesus Christ If the trueth hath appeared therein then neede it not to feare the tryall at the fire thereof which is the true touchstone of humaine traditions The worde of GOD is pure and feareth not the fiery tryall for it is a true saying The lawe that will not bee tryed may iustly be suspected After then that in a generall and free Counsayle all parties haue bene heard that by the onely worde of God and without affection they haue debated their cause so that finally the opinion which the sayd Lord King of Nauarre holdeth bee adiudged hereticall he is so Catholick and zealous a Prince and one that so feareth God that he wil not stick publickly in the Church to confesse he hath
Colledges and Vniuersities of this Realmes are abrogated as are also the conseruators Ecclesiasticall of the Vniuersities together with the priuiledged of this Crowne It forbiddeth such as haue made vowe of Religion in any wise to dispose of their gotten goodes whether moueable or immoueable contrary to the ordinance of the States of Orleans conformably with the decree of the Counsaile of Mogonce holden in y e time of Charlemaign It permitteth the begging Fryers to enioye and possesse rents landes reuenues and immoueable goodes contrary to the Counsaile of Vienna holden in the yeere of 1310. and infinite auncient arrestes of the Court It taketh from the King the nomination in Couents and Monasteries reguler which to him apperteyneth also the Triennalitie of Abbesses and Prioresses appointed by the sayde Estates It permitteth Munckes to meete and hold congregations and Chapters generall which in an Estate is perilous and daungerous and a matter whereby they bee accustomed to withdrawe themselues from vnder the authoritie and power of the King and all other temporall Magistrates in respect whereof also such assemblies haue by the arrest of the Court bene many tymes declared abusiue It giueth the Bishop authoritie to institute newe Feastes which haue bene reproued by many arrestes of Parliament namely by the prouinciall Counsayle holden at Sens in the yeere 1527. It encrocheth Lay patronages if the patrones by authenticall writings proue not the presentations continued and hauing taken effect 50. yeeres together and reiecteth al other kinde of proofe It giueth to the Ecclesiasticall Iudge notice of the right and possession of the sayd patronages obteyned by foundation donation or construction within these fortie yeeres which is a great intrusion vpon the King and his Magistrates It erecteth a newe kind of Iudges delegate whom it calleth Apostolick and authorizeth the Bishops to choose them euery one in his owne Dioces without the Kings knowledge or authoritie which are so many creatures not subiect to that Maiestie where-vnder they liue It declareth the Pope to be aboue him and forbiddeth Bishops to humble and submit themselues to Kings and Lordes It commaundeth all Clergie hauing of right and custome voyce in the prouincial Counsaile to receiue this preteÌ„ded Counsaile to sweare obedience to the Pope and thereof to make publicke profession It enioyneth Vniuersities not to teach any thing but what shalbe conformable to the decrees of the sayde Counsaile and to take solemne and yeerely oathes to his holinesse It commaundeth all Lordes Princes to keepe the sayd Canons renewing the auncient vsurpatorie Decretals of Boniface the eight and others heretofore abrogated in Fraunce as well by Edicts and ordenances Royall as by the arrestes of the Courtes of Parliament and great Counsaile By the sayd Counsaile the causes of our French Bishops are drawne to the Court of Rome and Popes Consistorie contrary to the dignitie of the royall Maiestie and the auncient Canons of the vniuersall Church whereby the criminall causes of Bishops yea in cace the same concerned their depriuation or discharging did belong to the Bishops of the Countrey or Synodes prouinciall and not to the Pope as by many the arrestes of the Court concurring with the generall Counsailes of Constantinople and Carthage it doth appeare besides that herein the sayd Counsaile greatly derogateth froÌ„ the Kings soueraigntie and Iurisdiction that euermore he hath had ouer the Bishops of his Realm witnesse the examples of Giles Bishop of Rheims of Pretextatus Bishop of RoaÌ„ of Didier Archbishop of Vienna and many others of whom Gregory of Tours Aimoinus Ado Vincent the Historiall doe make mention In brief to vse few words this pretended Counsaile taketh away the most auncient liberties of our Church so to make a Proppe to the Popes abuâ—ions It also dissolueth reuoketh and maketh voyde Mariages not contracted in the face of the Romish Church wherein consisteth the Seede of a million of troubles Ouarels Processes and strifes in infinite families of this realme which vnder the authoritie of the King with his good liking and vnder the protection of his Edicts of pacification haue contracted Matrimony and begotten Children who thereby should be declared illegitimate depriued of their Parents Successions and their â—Wues denounced Concubines Harlots to their true Housbands contrarie to all equitie which in summe is as much as to bend themselues against God to erect in other mens Realmes assemblies of people not subiect to the same to bring into the Church a greater deformation and to make the King of Fraunce his Serieant or executioner of his commaundements yea such a one as should haue no authoritie to order his Realme So that those which now so earnestly doe prosecute that publication of the sayd Counsaile shall neuer perswade mee that they are French men but rather that they shewe them selues Solliciters of the Popes affayres and dignitie rather his Seruants theÌ„ their Kings and soueraigne lords Thus doe you seee howe by the aduice and iudgement of the honestest greatest French Catholikes liuing vnder the traditions of the Romish Church this Counsaile of Trent may not be accompted other then a notorious conspiracie and coniuration against the authoritie and dignitie of this Crowne aud of the Subiectes thereof of whatsoeuer calling that shall find them selues offended and therfore we should greatly iniury any one of ours of whatsoeuer estate in calling him Heretick for not obeying submitting him selfe or consenting against his Countrey to the malicious conspiracies of the Pope and straungers that doe enuie the greatnesse of this Estate Especially the King of Nauarre whome the matter chiefliest doth concerne should haue greatest cause to be agrieued in respect that at this day he hath the Honor to be the principall branch of the Royall tree of France and so consequently more neerely bound then any other to preserue and mainteyne the rightes liberties and dignities of this glorious and redoubtable Monarchie 56 Moreouer the sayd Lord King of Nauarre demaundeth of you by vertue of what doe you esteeme hym an Heretick and obstinat parson For it is certaine that he onely may be tearmed an Heretick who vpholdeth a false doctrine contrary to the holy Scriptures of the ould and newe Testament beleeuing amisse in any one of the Articles of our faith as did y e Manicheans Nestorians Sabellians Arrians and their like Now to say trueth they would perswade vs that the opinion houlden by the saide Lorde King of Nauarre was monstrous we haue bene hallowed after them like Dogges wee haue bene forbidden their company as of infidels and miscreants I beseech you therefore let vs carefully looke into the confession of their faith and we shall find them Christians such as agree with vs in the articles of our belief doe worship the same God seeking saluation in the same Iesus Christ Chrildren of the same father beleeuing the same Bible assuring them selues in the same Gospell as in the same Buckler of their faith requiring part in the same inheritance and in vertue of
shewe you the welth of the Church bringeth you into suspition among both rich poore Theeues and Slaunderers that seeke your spoyle besides that you are therby filled with cares lyings in waight braules strifes hatered feare couetousnesse and perpetuall sorrowe such as the miserie of our worlde can teach vs wherein it is true that the most part of the Clergie haue no other minde neither doe moue warre for any other cause but onely for feare of losing so great rents and reuenues which wrongfully they deuour out of the goodes of the poore Whereby wee may perceiue that in such men we haue no more left but the shadow remembrance and be wailing of the Christian Church springing and florishing in pietie for whose sake the Apostles would neuer possesse any thing and before Gods people nourished the Leuites widowes and Orphans For when the Church thought it good to haue reteine any thing for the reliefe of the poore and of the Pastors thereof it committed the distribution and ordering thereof to such among them as by the Church were thereto elected because the people but especially the Princes were either sworne enemies to the faith and persecutors of the Spouse of Iesus Christ either at the least weake of small zeale or but meanly grounded therein wherevpon the treasure and common Storehouse was vsually committed to the custody of the Bishop as vnto hym that was accompted most glorious in pietie and duetie in the holy distribution that he made whereof he reserued onely sufficient for the necessitie of his owne liuing Like as Socrates writeth that Chrisantus daily reserued onely two Loues for his owne sustenance Of this common store committed to the handes of the Bishop is it come to passe that when hee began to serue him selfe and badly to employ to his priuat commoditie like a thiefe that thing which to hym in the qualitie of a steward onely subiect to render accompt was committed he found him selfe farre richer more mightie and better at ease then the rest of the Clergie and therevpon by the sligtes of the Deuill who had thrust into his hands so much wealth to corrupt the holines example and eminencie of the Church of the sonne of GOD through the euill housbandry of the heads thereof began to bragge aboue all other But so soone as Princes began to taste of and auctorize Catholick Religion they sought also to become Stewards and housbanders of Church goods as making a part of their common wealthes because as Oâ—tatus Mileuitanus did verie wisely say It is certaine that the common wealth is not in the Church but contrariwise the Church is in the common wealth vnder the aucthritie whereof she displaieth the Sunne Beames of her fayre face Herevpon doe wee reade that the Emperour Constantine the great was the kéeper and disposer of the treasure and goods of the Church after the example of the auncient kings of Iuda of whome among other it is found of Ioas the he by the counsaile Ioiadas the Priest fearing lest the Priestes should bestow that money which the people had contributed towarde the reparations of the Temple amisse commaunded it to be put in a Cofer and distributed in the presence of one of his men And in deede at the beginning the Church was vnder the authoritie of Christian Princes not only in respect of the temporall goods thereof but also as concerning the institution of the charge Iurisdiction gouernment and correction of the maners of the Cleargie by the sayd reason of the aforenamed Bishop of Africke whereof I will seeke no better Testimony then that which saint Augustine writeth who teacheth vs that the notice of Ecclesiasticall causes was coÌ„mitted to the Emperour Constantin saint Hierom also aleadgeth very good reasons in his Commentary vppon Hieremy whose opinion is confirmed by Gratian in his Decrees For in troth kings by this care and diligence doe testifie their zeale and pietie to Religion In consideration whereof Gregory reporteth that the first Emperours and Christian Kinges did giue and conferre the Churches in which power the Cannon Doctors Bald. Archid. Panorm and some others are forced to graunt that by reason of their Crowne they are grounded vpon common Lawe And before them Saint Ambrose in his Discourse De tradendis Basilicis did maintaine the same Neuerthelesse such asdoe reade Histories are not ignorant what Tragedies the Popes within these sixe hundreth yeres haue for this article raised against the Emperours of Germany whome in the end they haue driuen to giue ouer the game so as there remaineth but little of that former aucehoritie Royall in Christendome sauing in the Maiestie of the Flowerdeluce which God bee praysed hath hitherto kept it selfe hole and a Virgin and so wil stil keepe it selfe if the good and naturall Frenchmen would put to their helping hand as by y â— oath of Nature that they owe to the Dignitie of this Crowne they are bound For they must vnderstand that it is one of y e greatest points wherevpon the Pope is so importunate to publish his pretended Counsaile of Trent in Fraunce through the assistance of the Spaniard by the ministerie of his Proctors the vnthankfull Nourse children of this Realme for the abasing and deminishing of the dignitie of our Crowne which euermore thankes be to God hath had soueraigne power institution iurisdiction and police ouer the Clergie and the Officers and Magistrates vnder the Kings aucthoritie in his Parliaments greate Counsaile euen since the planting thereof haue power and aucthoritie by appeale of abuse fallen before them by his Maiesties Subiecs to breake disanulle and cut of whatsoeuer shall bee found to haue bene made pronounced decreed adiudged established and ordeined by the Pope the Bishops or other Delegates of the Ecclesiasticall de audience against the holy Decrees Lawes Edicts and Ordenaunces of his sayd Maiestie or arestes of y â— sayd soueraigne Courts because in trueth the Prince is the guardian reuenger and reformer of Ecclesiasticall discipline as the auncient Bishops and Popes more honest and not so ambicious as the most parte of ours haue often openly confessed Yea it so appeareth in the Epistle of Pope Iohn the eleuenth which beginneth Inter claras C. de Tri. written to the Emperour Iustinian at such tyme as no doubt the Church was vnder the dominion of the Emperour as all men may perceiue by the first booke of IustiniaÌ„s Code by his nouell constitutions 3. 5. 6. 16. 37. 56. 57. 58. 59. 67. 83. 117. 123. 133. 146. Also since by the edict of Tiberius the seconde Basil Leo the Philosopher Alexis and sundry other Emperours of the East In our France the Pope and Clergie cannot deny the ordinary collations euermore made by our Kings as testefieth Gregorie of Tours Aimonius with the rest of the auncient Historographers of our NatioÌ„ neither the goodly orders reformatioÌ„s of y e Church made by Clouis in the Synode that he called at Orleans
of the same were led by the will of God or whether therein they enterprised any thing repugnant thereto especially sith the question concerneth the maintenance of the peace liues and soules of so many millions of parsons who either might or are already lost vpon this quarell And this I will say more that sith the fault hath proceeded of our Prelates who haue fallen a sleepe and haue not mainteined the fare that they ought for the nourishment of their Flockes who being ignorant in the most part of the principles of their religion haue gone out of their ranck and doe perticulerly require the reasons thereof it is most necessary gently to giue them a taste of the same without sword or fire vntil the condemned bee at large heard in their defences and lawfully conuict 14 Moreouer I dare aduowe that in Realmes and Empires natural Succession receiued by the estates is of such force that the best and most Catholicke Parsons neuer enterprized against y ◠progresse of the same as occasions haue bene ministred no not for Heresie although it were condemned and with all solemnitie accursed by the Church of GOD Notwithstanding vndoubtedly by other dealing they might haue hoped for better and that they were in maner assured of manifold afflictions at hand Had not certein Bishops Arriens infected Constantius whē he succeeded his father although he were very yong What was the cause that Zeno being an heritick was neuerthelesse made Emperour after his father in lawe Leo but that the Empire was atteyned for his wife AriadNe and little Leo sonne to the said Zeno whom his Grandfather had instituted to bée his heire in consideration whereof the Christians were content to beare that affliction Constantine the third and the fifth whē they were called to the Empire were heretickes but yet in asmuch as they were lawfull successors to the last deceased the Church would not meddle with them When Anastaze the first was chosen no other cause moued y e Patriarke of Constantinople and the people to force a promise from him that afterward hee should be a Catholicke or at the least that he should not make any alteration or stirre vp any broyle in the Church of God but onely because he was then an Eutichian who was condemned by the Counsaile of Chalcedon and the same is the onely caution that you may exact or require of your King in cace he were other then a Catholicke sith the Christian Church neuer desired greater assurance of the aforenamed then their faith and royall promise I might bee tedious if I should rehearse vnto you an infinite number of other examples whereby euery one may manifestly perceiue that the holy Primitiue Church neuer accoumpted it so smal a matter to violate the lawes of the Estate or to habandon that obligation that wee owe to such a Prince as is either lawfull successor to the deceased or els solemnly elected Who is he that wil not thinke the Bishoppes of those former tymes that I speake of to haue bene farre more zealous in their charge and better liuers thē the most parte of ours in respect whereof they might euen with their credite only haue sooner perswaded the people that thei gouerned for Religion and godlinesse sake to haue expelled deposed and banished those hereticall Emperours aswel as to haue admitted them into that succession that by the politick order of the Empire was vnto them due either to obey or yeeld them al fidelitie was it want of power all the world being Christian euen in the Prime of the Church about one hundred yeeres after that the Temples of the Greeke Idols had bene shut vp whereby not so much as the memorie of them remained among the subiects of this great Monarchie I will by the way rehearse vnto you a Decree of the Church made for y e posteritie of Kings least you shuld thinck me either to be led by affection or to haue told you fables Heare therfore the wordes of the Fathers assembled in a Counsaile Like as the Insolencie of wicked Kings haue euermore bene odious and abominable to the subiects so haue the people alwaies liked wel of the prouident foresight of the good who therefore could suffer or beholde a Christian offending in that poinct or that were desirous to expell the posteritie or ligne Royall from such rights and dignities as thereto doe apperteyne Such dealing doe we therefore expressely forbid in fauour of the posteritie of the most excellent Prince Chintillus we doe renew and cōfirme the decree that was made the last yere at the Synode houlden in this Church concerning the loue and good will that euery one is bound to beare to the Kings ligne and to the defence and preseruation which all subiectes of the Estate doe owe thereto to the ende the successors be not maliciously defrauded of the merites of their predecessors in the augmentation of their Crowne or their great liberalitie toward their subiects Also that none doe enterprize to hurt them because it is meete that by the authoritie of a Counsaile we do graūt peace to the succession and posteritie of those by whose meanes and vnder whose protection wee haue aforetyme bene preserued Admit therfore that the Church made this Decree in respect of that obligation that she deemed the subiectes ought to the posteritie of their Kings either for the loue and reuerence of those that had well gouerned their Commonwealths euen as GOD who is the author and holder vp of Monarchies would neuer take the Scepter wholy from Iuda for his seruaunt Dauids sake yet if our selues would but call to mind so many good Kings of this race especially the father of the house of Bourbon the Lorde S. Lewes whō for his good life the Church hath canonized and whose memorie ought to be vnto vs holy honorable we should shewe our selues most wicked periurde vnthankful and disloyall persons if wee should seeke or but make any countenaunce to thinke vpon innouating any thing against this posteritie 15 Good men are not ignorant of the pretences that these great bucklers of the faith doe take hold of which are first that the King of Nauarre being King would polute subuert abolish Catholick Religiō in France and force his subiects to become huguenots But to say the trueth this vizard is lesse then nothing for his former behauiours will presently force vs to confesse the cōtrary because our selues haue seene with what importunacie he hath besought our Kinges as beeing their subiect and perswaded them to suffer him and his partakers to liue vnder their obedience in all libertie of conscience Wherefore then should we thinke that when he were soueraign he would practize against his people any enterprize repugnant to that lawe which himselfe being in their race sought to enioye vnder the Kings his Lords Shal we presume that such a Christiā wise Prince instructed in the feare of God would become a Tyrant torment the soules of his subiects against
theÌ„ due together with that which was assessed vpon the heads of euery of his Apostles euermore referring the reward of his grace reuenge of trespasses against him committed vnto the kingdome of heauen enioining his Apostles to doe the like and to imitate his example as they haue done The Apostle Sainct Paule sayd Let no man that fighteth in the Lordes warfare trouble himselfe with the matters of this life Againe The minister of the Lorde ought to be louing to all men meet to teach paciently bearing with the wicked with modestie reprouing such as withstaÌ„d the trueth Briefly in one word to say all there be two kinds of Iurisdictions the one earthly coÌ„mitted into the hands of Kings and Princes to whome euery one of whatsoeuer degree or calling Spirituall or Temporall Priestes Bishops or high Priestes ought to obey as it is written Let euery soule bee subiect to the superiour powers vpon which place Chrisostome sayth the Apostle vsed this word euery to shew that there is no creature that may be exempt whether he be saith he Apostle Prophete Euangelist Priest Monk or other whosoeuer We also finde that in the Primetiue Church before pride Ambition tooke roote in the Bisshops hartes that the Popes of Rome neuer made any question thereof Wee haue also amoug vs a request exhibited by Boniface the first to Honorius Emperour of the West wherein hee beseecheth him to decree that afterwarde the Bishops and Popes of Rome might not bee chosen by fauour or any other vnlawfull meane whereto the same most Catholike Prince maketh an aunswere worthie such a request In the time of Odoacer King of the Herules who began to raigne at Rome in the yeere 471. and ruled full 14. yeres after hee had put to death Orestes and his Sonne Augustulus the last Emperour of the West vntill Charlemagne there were goodly decrees published and receiued in the Church by the Clergie vntill such tyme as Theodoricke the Wisigot whome Zeno the Emperour of the Eeast sent into Italy had ouerthrowen hym Pelagius the first made confession of his faith and sware in the hands of Ruffin the Embassadour of of Childebert King of France Pope Leo the fourth sware and protested that he would and did intend to obserue the Lawes which the Emperour Lothair the first sonne to Lewes the Meek and Neuew to Charlemagne made at Rome in the presence of Pope Eugenius the second whereof some are inserted into the Booke of Digestes the inscription whereof do import that the Emperour made them ante ianuas beati petri ad limina in atrio which was the place where the Christian Emperours were wont to make and publish their Edicts if we maye beleeue Cassiodore and others The said Emperour also created certaine Magistrates in the Towne to exercize the imperiall Iurisdiction The same Leo doth sufficiently declare what respect the high Priests of Rome did in those daies beare to the Emperours when he sued to the same Lothaire and his sonne Lewes the second to conferre the Church of Rheatine or Tusculum to one Colonus a Deacon assuring their Maiesties of his sufficiency and promising in the name of the sayde Colonus that he should praye to God for them This was the same Leo that pleaded his cause and purged himselfe of the treazon whereof hee was accused before the Emperour Lewes the seconde sonne to the sayd Lothaire as appeareth in the decree of Gratian. The like declaration did Pope Iohn the eight make to the same Emperour Lewes the second sonne to Lothaire By the decretall Epistle of Honorius the third who liued about the yeere 1216. it appeareth that as yet the remembraunce of the Emperours lawes was not vtterly abolished out of the Catholick Church and that the Priestes and high Priestes had not as yet wholy shaken of the yoke of y â— same no not in those that they terme Spirituall causes as if any question were moued of an oath in law for the decision of proces in which cace he reneweth the auncient edict of Martian and IustiniaÌ„ the first To coÌ„clude for the stopping of the mouthes of those that doe maintaine that the Pope Bishops or other of the Cleargie may establish any earthly Kingdome apart which shal not bee subiect to the Emperours and Kings of this world but rather such a one as may at pleasure commaunde and supplant the same let them dilligently search throughout the whole Scripture what authoritie the Kings and Princes of Israel had ouâ—r the Priestes and Cleargie in Gods lawe which since the tyme of grace is not deminished and there shall they euidently finde their great authoritie ouer them notwithstanding it was neuer lawfull for the Kings to execute the office of the Priestes for vndoubtedly the ministerie is one thing and the orders discipline of the Cleargie is an other and meerely temporall The other head of Iurisdiction is in heaueÌ„ which we are to looke for at the iudgement of GOD and yet not to perswade our selues that the lawe of Iesus Christ is lame or vnperfect because in it it conteineth not any punishment or earthly reuenge of trespasses against euill liuers considering that the same beeing heauenly and spirituall it will yeeld reward or punishment in the euerlasting world so that as sayd Alexander Seuerus of periury Whosoeuer offendeth against God hath God a sufficient reuenger our good God hath referred to himselfe all the punishment to the end the sinner may haue meanes to acknowledge his offence and repent the same in this world True it is that if y e earthly Magistrate hath in his pollicie taken any order for such causes then is it his office to reuenge the iniurie done to his edicts and decrees for so as saith Isidore The Kingdome of God encreaseth through the meanes of earthly Realmes to the ende such as be of the body of the Church if they offende or blaspheme may be punished by the rigor of Princes and so that discipline whereto the Church can not binde them may neuerthelesse bee preserued through the authoritie of Monarchies The like wherof haue bene vsed against heretickes by all Christian Princes especially in our France by an infinite number of lawes both olde and newe of our most Christian Kings And in troth if the Bishops or Priestes should take notice of the punishmeÌ„t of hereticks it would breede confusion of Iurisdictions and offices aswell might the Goldsmith be iudge of the golde that himselfe had wrought The Phisition of his owne cure to bee briefe euery one should pleade and decide his owne cause contrary to al reasonable order The example also of the Apostle Sainct Paule whome the Iewes accused of heresie doth sufficiently teach vs when by himself it appeareth that he was brought before Festus the Emperours Lieutenant vnto whom the accused did confesse that y â— notice of his cause did apperteine and therefore required
beeing second after God of whom he houldeth his authoritie and hath nothing greater thē the heauenly power Constantius Valens Zeno Anastazius Iustinian the first and second Heraclius Leo the 3. Phillip Bardanes Constantin the 5. Leo the 4. and some other Emperours who were adiudged hereticks were neuer deposed notwithstanding the Catholicke Church condemned their errors which neuerthelesse is permitted to excommunicate Kings and Princes Sectaries of false opinions or otherwise euill liuers in cace the same will not acknowledge their vice or trāsgression which one onely Bishoppe or high Priest whatsoeuer may not doe without the iudgement and notice of the Church after it hath heard the King or Prince in his exeptiōs and defences wherein vndoubtedly ought to be strictly obserued all order of Iustice in respect aswell of the grauitie of the cause as of the qualitie of the person in question wherevpon may depend the trouble and subuertion of Christiā policie through such ciuil warres as might ensue together with the bloud of the poore faithfull which the weapons of the prouoked Prince might shed as Sainct Augustin to the same purpose doth confesse and discourse vpon in his Glose vpon that precept whereby wee are commaunded to obeye our Kings Moreouer excommunication denoūced contrary to the orders of the auncient fathers obserued in the Church and without the knowledge thereof would proue vniust and vtterly voyde and thereby not the taxed but the taxer might take harme as Gratian teacheth expounding a place of S. Hierome vpō Leuiticus Pope Leo also affirmeth that the priuiledge of Peter is in force wheresoeuer iudgemēt is giuen according to his equitie Innocent the third how zealous he was of his authoritie confesseth that if the excommunicated pretende that vniustly hee was so denounced hee maye complaine and exhibite the cace of his innocencie In France by the priuiledges of the Flowerdeluce it hath often by arrest of y ◠Court bene adiudged y t the King his officers or subiects in body or communaltie cannot bee excommunicated by the Pope or any other Bishop whosoeuer Whervpon Charles du Molin a famous aduocate and one of the greatest Lawyers of his time testified that he had to that ende an expresse Bull of Pope Martin the 5. which was nothing repugnant to the lawe by the Popes commonly obserued for Iohn the 22. declareth that he may graunt priuiledge to some one that hee shall not bee excommunicated whereupon Pope Eugenius the fourth concurring with the Court of the holy Apostolick Sea graunted to the French that no Bishop whatsoeuer should entangle them in the sentēce of excōmunication But we haue not for this occasiō to deale either with Bulls or priuiledges of y e Church of Rome for by the rights authority dignitie of the Maiestie of our king it is not lawfull for the Pope or any Bishop whatsoeuer to excommunicate either towne or communaltie subiect to the Realm of Fraunce By reason whereof in the yeere 1488. the Atturney generall appealed as of abuse from the excommunication that the Pope had laid vpō the Inhabitants of Gaūt because they had dealt hardly with the Emperour Maximilian their Earle and Vassall to the King of Fraunce to whome onely hee ought to haue had recourse as vnto his Lord for remedie the Pope hauing no authoritie ouer the subiects of this Crowne To y ◠same ende also Charles the fifth by an Edict verefied in his Parliament in the yeere 1369. expressely forbad all Bishops and Prelates for whatsoeuer cause to lay the sentence of excōmunicatiō vpon any Towne Communaltie Colledge or body corporate of his Realme the same beeing vnder the onely correction and power of himselfe and of none other in the world which Edict was also renewed by Lewes the 11. in the yeere 1467. whereof is growne a custome inuiolably obserued in France as the Oracle of Apollo of Appellations as of abuse in the Court of Parliament against the Pope and his Cleargie without which remedy the Priestes would in France erect an other and more mightie Monarchie then the Kings for the maintenance and dignitie of the which al good Frenchmen ought rather to dye then suffer it to be diminished So that the Pope and Bishops can proceede no further then to excommunication of perticuler persons according to the order of old tyme obserued by the holy Decrees and Canonicall constitutions Thus to conclude you see how to proceede against Kings and soueraigne Princes Hereticks or otherwise offensiue to the Christian Church which excommunicatiōs being by order of law euermore obserued in the florishing and Primitiue Church denounced wee are to dispute whether by the same we bee discharged of y t faith and oath that by nature wee owe vnto them Wherein are but too euidently knowne the constitutions of the Popes Gregorie the 7. Honorius the 3. Lucius the 3. Innocent the 3. and others by the which they doe not onely declare the subiects of an hereticall or excommunicate Prince absolued from their oath of fidelitie but which is more doe vpon the like penaltie forbid the vassals to obey their Lord after he is adiudged such a one Neuerthelesse I thinke not but such decrees proceeded of a meruelous passion of the Popes of those daies against the Princes of their time And in deede Iohn Andrew Innocent Archidiaconus Panorme many other learned glozers vpon the Decretals being of a contrary aduice doe alledge great difficulties therevpon and in their hypotheses doe perticulerly expounde them in cace by the sentence of excommunication it bee expressely set downe that y ◠subiects shall be discharged of all right of vasselage otherwise they doe iudge the obligation not to be extinct or diminished by the excommunication of their Lord which last in sundry considerations full of Religion and ciuill pietie seemeth to be of great apparēce and too too true First that we are bound to obeye our Kings whether good or bad because they are chosen giuē to vs by the hād of God euen such as it please him to giue to rule ouer vs. Secondly that the excommunication importeth no alteration or diminutiō of the qualitie of the person nec habetis capitis minutionem as the Lawyers doe saye to conteine or comprehend therein depriuation or publication of goodes sed motionem ab ordine Christianorum coetu as saith Modestin of Senator qui Senatu motus capite minutus non est Romae morari potest Moreouer excommunication is a Spirituall discipline medicine and admonition and hath no participation with worldly and temporall goodes and meanes whether great or small as S. Paule saith The armors of our warres are not carnall therfore sith Realmes and Lordships are for the most parte patrimoniall or at the least terestriall whose propertie and possessiō doth no way concerne the kingdome of God the declaratiō of the losse of the one bringeth no consequence for the depriuation from the other Paul the Lawier
prouoked vnder pretence of the sayd interdiction did him some displeasure Howbeit so soone as hee seemed willing to mend his maners toward the English natioÌ„ they fell at his feete and expulsed Lewes of Fraunce whom they had subrogated in his place so soone as the sayd Iohn was dead admitted his sonne Henry King Henry the eight of the same Ile was very faithfully obeyed by his subiects after that Pope Paule the third had excommunicated interdicted aggrauated and reaggrauated the curse against him wherby some were somewhat shaken froÌ„ his obedieÌ„ce Suâ—noo King of Denmarke about the yeere of our Lord 850. was iustly excoÌ„municated by y â— Bishop of Roscholech for becomming an Apostata and procuring to slay sundry of the Princes of his blood in the Church founded in the name of the holy Trinitie in the same Towne of Rhoscholech the entry into which Church this Bishop forbad him together with the communioÌ„ of the faithfull but he did not neuerthelesse depriue him of his Crowne neither did his subiects refuse him their faithfull seruice although Canutus and Wademarus two of his chiefest fauorites and priuy Counsailors who sought to share the Realme with Suercherus King of Sueden did thereto suborne them Brigerus King of Sueden who raigned about the yere 1300. was one of the most wicked and cruell Kings that could be especially against the Church and Churchmen but chiefly against Nicholas Archbishop of Vpsale whom together with the rest of his Bishops he committed to prison wherevpon they excommunicated him and Turgillus Canutus his Lieutenant general and author of his behauiours neuerthelesse the people though therby stirred vp against their King and hauing greater opportunitie to rebel and shake of the yoke of his obedience vnder the conduct of Wademarus and Henry his brothers who sought no better occasion to put out their brother would neuer hearken to theÌ„ neither hinder or become cruell to their naturall Lord so as the two brothers were forced to employe their other friendes for the executing of their inteÌ„ts against Brigerus whom when they had taken prisoner they were neuerthelesse compelled to force al the townes neither found they any one that would yeeld to them so greatly did the Subiectes of the Realme accoumpt themselues bound to the seruice of their King whom they knew to be wicked excommunicate and an euill liuer besides a prisoner and captiue in the power of his brethren whom in the ende they forced to set him at libertie to submit themselues to his obedience Of such force is the bond of good people to their King whatsoeuer he be In Poland Bolesâ—aus a Prince of most wicked life a commoÌ„ adulterer an enemie to the Church and Cleargie after Stanisâ—aus Bishop of Cracouy had often admonished him to amend was by him at length excommunicated whereat the King being offended did put the sayd Bishop to death for which cause Pope Gregory the seuenth did confirme and aggrauate the sayd excommunication with a generall interdiction against the Realme about the yeere 1079. yet did he still raigne by the consent and with the obedience of the Polonians ouer whom he ruled a whole yere and more vntill in his iourney to Ladislaus King of Hungary hee flewe himselfe peraduenture through the iust iudgement of God The Emperour Sigismund and his faction could neuer winne the Bohemians from the due affection that they ought to his brother Winceslaus their naturall King though vicious wicked filthy for the which offences through the practises of the said Sigismund he was often emprisoned and excommunicated by the Bishops of that couÌ„trey yea by the Electors deposed from the Empire so as in the ende he dyed in Boheme still taking the place order and qualitie Royall through the goodwill of his Subiects who deemed that the same could not perticulerly conteyne any dispensation to discharge the subiects therof of the oath and faith that to him they ought as also they may not be discharged froÌ„ his bondage but onely by death or his owne liberall cession which he would make to an other as did Albert King of Sueden about the yeere 1388. beeing prisoner to Margaret Queene of Denmark and Norway to whom he yeelded whatsoeuer his right to the Crowne of Gothland and Sueden whereby the States of the countrey sware their faith and homage to the sayde Margaret and after they had secretly enquired of their King sundry times solemnly desired him to shew them his mind or els to discharge them of the duetie wherein they stood bound to him although vndoubtedly the Suedens had great cause to seeke his mishap for all Histories doe agree that neuer Prince committed so many outrages and wrought so many iniuries to his subiects as had this Albert. It therefore remaineth that by the lawe of Nations the inuiolable keeping of the obligation that the subiectes doe owe to their naturall Prince and not to depart therefro at the appetite or sentence of others haue euen among the most barbarous people bene euermore obserued so as wee ought in respect of the bonde that wee owe him say of the King and his bloud as of Matrimonie whom God hath ioyned together let no man put a sunder 22 But let vs more perticulerly learne whether the sentence of excommunication were lawfully vppon reasonable cause and exemplary occasion pronounced against a King and done by the iudgements of many Popes of Roome within these fiue hundred yeeres against such Kings and Emperours to whoÌ„ they haue borne bad minds Although I thinke it not meete to ground any lawe vpon the examples of these men in troth full fraught with ambition more then humaine affection but it is requisite to examine this question by the rules of Gods lawe and politicke reason established for the preseruation of the societie of mankinde Herein therefore I say y t the sentence of excoÌ„municatioÌ„ denouÌ„ced against a King how iust soeuer the cause bee and conteyneth dispensation for the oath and duetie that the subiects do owe vnto him this licence and tolleration vnto the people graunted is repugnant to the lawe of God and all mans reason For sith the subiects are by Gods commandement bound to obeye their Princes whatsoeuer without any further enquirie of their consciences and behauiours they cannot by any tradition or permission of man either generall or perticuler be dispensed with because no man can enterprize vpon Gods ordenances and euery dispensation so graunted is voyde as beeing repugnant to the deuine prouidence As Pope Leo and Vrban haue very wisely confessed Especially sith this dispensation cannot bee put in execution without great sclaunder and shedding of bloud by reason of such warres and quarels as will be raysed through the rebellion of the Subiects against their Prince their Kings resistance not onely in respect of his conscience but also for his Estate and the defence of his Crowne In such necessities therefore Pope Gelasius teacheth vs that we are especially