Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	bishop_n	ecclesiastical_a	law_n	2,368	5	5.0759	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A81829	The povver of the Christian magistrate in sacred things Delivered in some positions, sent to a friend, upon which, a returne of his opinion was desired. With some considerations, upon the answer; and a digression concerning allegiance, and submission to the supreame magistrate. By Lewis du Moulin, History-reader of the University of Oxford.	Du Moulin, Lewis, 1606-1680.	1650 (1650)	Wing D2551; Thomason E1366_4; ESTC R209267	40,736	161

which of them the Temple and Priesthood did belong Letter GRegory of Tours who wrote about the yeare of our Lord 585. the historie of France in the 18 chap. of the 5 book speaks thus to the King Chilperick If any of us O King go besides the path of righteousnesse thou mayest redresse him but if thou dost transgresse who shall be able to correct thee we speak to thee and thou hearest us but if thou wilt not who shall have the power to condemne thee but he that is Iustice it selfe At that time the Bishop of Rouen named Praetextat was in great reputation yet was this Bishop being accused to have adhered to Meroue who rebelled against Chilperick clapt into prison by the Kings command and sore beaten and banished to Garnsey Consideration ALL this is sufficient to prove that the Soveraigne power of the State hath alwayes challenged power over Ecclesiasticall persons by that which follows it will be as clear that they challenge likewise the cognizance and ordering of Ecclesiasticall causes and actions Letter THE Greek Emperours have called all the oeconomick Councells not expecting the consent of the Bishop of Rome and often against his consent as the first Councell of Constantinople and of Chalcedone Yea in matters of Religion and Ecclesiasticall policy one cannot deny but that the Soveraign power of the State hath made orders David made twenty foure ranks of Priests Salomon had the chief oversight of the building of the Temple and bringing in all the vessels We see in the Code of Iustinian great number of Lawes concerning not only the policy of the Church but also the purity of the doctrine as be the titles de summa Trinitate fide Catholica de Episcopis Clericis ne sanctum Baptisma iteretur By which Lawes it appeareth that the Emperours had power to punish the Bishops namely by the 123 Authentick chap. 1. the Emperour speaketh thus Si quis autem extra memoratam observationem Episcopus ordinetur jubemus hunc Episcopatu depelli Yea he there addeth pecuniary Fines Consideration AS by these Lawes in the code of Justinian it appeareth that the Emperours had power to punish the Bishops as the Letter saith so doe they much more clearely assert the right and power which the Supreame Magistrate hath not only over all causes they call Ecclesiasticall but to make Lawes and Constitutions of the same nature as the causes be Letter A Great part of the Capitularies of Charles the great and of Lewis le Debonnaire are Laws Ecclesiasticall like those we read in the Councels of those dayes The Councell of Meyns held in the yeare 813. begins thus Carolo Augusto verae religionis Rectori Defensori Sanctae Ecclesiae And the second Councell of Meyns speaks thus to Lewis le Debonnaire at the opening of it Domino Serenissimo Christianissimo Regi Ludovico verae religionis strenuissimo Rectori Defensori Sanctae Ecclesiae I doubt not but these Emperours made those Lawes by the counsell of the Bishops and Prelats within their Dominions But they were willing to have them currant under the name of their Imperiall Lawes and the stamp of their Authority for the Soveraign Magistrate is the servant of God appointed by God to see the Law of God observed amongst men and the pure worship of his name set up Consideration THe Soveraigne Power is constituted by God to the end that men might live godly justly soberly and peaceably A Heathen could say that in a Common-wealth the first care must be Religion the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Arist And there is good reason that the Soveraign Magistrate should seeke after that which he is in the first place to ask for which is the Kingdome of Heaven being the basis of humane society so saith Cicero Religio est humanae societatis fundamentum But that the duty of the Supream Power is equally to order the religion and the civill government St. Austin doth plainely set it downe in the third Book against Cresconius Grammaticus In hoc Reges sicut eis divinitus praecipitur Deo serviunt in quantum Reges sunt si in regno suo bona jubeant mala prohibeant non solum quae pertinent ad humanam societatem verum etiam quae ad divinam religionem In that Kings as they are injoyned by God doe serve God as they are Kings if within their Kingdom they command good things and forbid evill things not onely in things belonging to humane society but also to divine religion Letter ANd I doe not believe that in England there is any Minister of the Word of God found who doth not acknowledge a subjection to the Sovereign Magistrate but is rather exceeding joyfull that the holy Ordinances are setled by publick authority and therefore there is no feare that any of them should goe about to perswade that there must be an Ecclesiasticall Common-wealth differing from the civill and one Common-wealth within another 'T is all the fault we finde with the Pope and his Clergy that they have made Imperium in Imperio and that the Clergy by his Lawes cannot be convented before the Royall Judges for they have Courts of Judicature and Prisons severed from the civill they have their appeales to the Roman Court and are freed from taxes and impositions Consideration THat power which the Ministers doe challenge in censuring and punishing of offenders suspending from the communion or excommunicating as inherent and intrinsecall to the Ministers of the word and not being a branch depending of the jurisdiction of the Soveraign Christian Magistrate that power I say thus challenged is as much as to constitute one Common-wealth within another Letter FOr I doe not thinke that Bishops or Ministers ought to render themselves Judges in any cause civill or capitall to punish the offenders by imprisonment taxes or bodily penalties Jesus Christ never authorized them so to doe for he would not so much as accept of being an arbiter in sharing of an Inheritance For these reasons I doe not believe that those in whose hands God hath now entrusted the Soveraign Power in England shall have any ground of fearing that the Ministers so long as they discharge their calling making use of that authority that Jesus Christ hath given them have any intention to intrench upon the Power and Authority of the Soveraign Magistrate But because the third Article attributing to the Supream Magistrate a right to order all humane actions tending to the Soveraign end which is the glory of God and the salvation of souls might seem to draw this consequence that the soveraign Magistrate is judg of all actions about Ministry and the Preaching of the Word therefore the article addeth a prudent cautition viz. That we must obey the Soveraign Magistrate so long as his commands are not repugnant to Gods commands for if he should command the abjuring of the Christian Religion or bowing before an Idol or should introduce another propitiatory sacrifice for sinnes

wrath sets the most contemptible amongst men and children for Kings even children in judgement over the people that they may depend more on the King of Heaven Yet the most part what they want in personall abilities to act of themselves they recompence in judgement and discretion about the choice of Counsellours many unlearned Fathers and unacquainted in the wayes of education of children will have a good sagacity in choosing able Tutours for their children In like manner the Soveraigne Magistrate may wisely order the course of Law Sciences Arts Trades Manufactures though he be litttle or nothing versed at all in any of them And if it were required that the Soveraigne power should be exactly conversant in all the actions they order there had need to be in a State so many Soveraigne powers as there be acts and disciplines and were they never so capable yet they will do wisely to choose able Counsellours much more in a matter of so high importance as is the deciding of controversies in Religion and ordering the actions belonging to the Kingdome of heaven ubi magna negotia magnis egent adjutoribus and amongst those Counsellours none will be so fit as Divines men of Learning Gravity and Piety Thus if the Soveraigne power goeth about to reform the abuses of severall Professions and Arts within his Dominions as for example of Physick no doubt but he will joyn with his Counsell the most skilfull of that Art But that the Pastours or Ministers are not the fittest to have a Supream Iurisdiction over persons and causes they call Ecclesiasticall reason and the sad experience of former times teacheth us for were they endowed with knowledge by Revelation and had Ecclesiasticall Assemblies compounded meerely of Divines a non-erring gift not communicable to any other Assemblies of men I should willingly and necessarily admit that Divines ought to be assisting the Christian Magistrate not onely as Counsellours but also as Iudges coequall to them yea Superiours in that Iurisdiction which they challenge to themselves but the gifts of Government being not inseparably joyned with those of preaching and the Ministers not being endowed with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or infallibility more then those that sit at the Stern of the State can be I do not see but that their proper place and employment is to be counsellours to the Soveraigne power in matters belonging to the Kingdome of heaven But being falne insensibly upon the rank and station that Ministers ought to keep in a Christian Common-wealth because it is a matter complicate with the question in hand concerning the pretended Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction distinct from the Civil it will not be amisse to discusse which of the Governments either by Bishops or onely Presbyters is most consistent and compatible with the peace and safety of a Christian Protestant State If it be admitted on all sides that there is but one power of Legislation and Jurisdiction in all causes and over all persons belonging to the Supream Magistrate I conceive that then Bishops overseers set over many Congregations besides that they are more agreeable with the Primitive institution will much ease the Supream power of the care they must take in ordering persons and causes nearer concerning the Kingdome of heaven for his inspection being but over the Bishops Factions and Heresies will not so easily spread among the multitude of the Christian people as if he were immediately to overlook the actions of the great body of Presbyters who being numerous may easily escape his eyes and have a greater freedome to innovate Therefore Moses being Supream in all causes and over all persons It was a wise counsel of Jethro his father in Law to wish him to set under him men over the people who besides that they bore the burden with him those men being far lesse for number then the people it was easie for Moses to oversee them But under those Magistrates who should condescend to a divided and distinct Iurisdiction one being civill and exercised by themselves the other Ecclesiasticall and of Divine right belonging to the Ministers of the Gospell In that case I do conceive that few Bishops set over Presbyters and being Independent from any other power have a greater opportunity to Lord and tyrannize over the Christian people then a numerous company of Presbyters of the same rank and equall Authority can have Letter NOw for that the Author of the articles would have this distinction of civill and spiritual abolished 't is a thing very hard to change and alter the nature of things as if one would take away the distinction betwixt black and white Let men doe what they can and say what they will the questions about Faith will be still spirituall things and suites in Law for money or houses will be still civill and temporall matters If we change the words the nature of things cannot suffer alteration Consideration THe Magistrate is no more head of two things Church State then of thousand kinds of actions in a Christian Common-wealth which for every one of them needs not a particular Soveraign a Power Now these two things Christian Church and Common-wealth cannot be so much as conceived to have a reall being without each other for as every man is a reasonable creature and every reasonable creature a man so every Christian Common-wealth is a Church and every Christian Church a Common-wealth I speak of those Churches that have as large and spacious extent of place as the Common-wealth it selfe for in some other sence a family in a house is called a Church and according to that acception every Church should not be a Christian Common-wealth I think the Church is not different from the Christian Common-wealth more then the understanding is from the Soul for as powers and faculties are believed by great Philosophers not to be distinguished really from the Soul however though there should be a difference it cannot be so distinct as that the power can have a distinct being from the Soul but that at least all powers are subaltern and subordinate to the chief power called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which sits at the stern of all faculties and directs and modifies all actions though never so severall contributing as well to ratiocination and vision as to the coction and expulsion In the like manner that Soveraigne power in a State though one in essence hath its severall faculties or powers from which severall actions do stream tending to the ordering of the whole man in his being and well-being as well in things of the inward man as the outward And to follow he analogy between the body of man and the State it is no little illustration to beget belief that as the primum movens or Soveraigne power is one and extends it self as far as it is circumscribed by the cuticula or thin skin there being not one Soveraigne power for the head another for the lower regions and a third for the hands and feet So in

Letter that Jesus Christ did not except against the power that Pilate tooke to judge him but rather said that that power was given him from God Thus in the fourth of the Acts Peter and John doe not except against the validity of the Court over them but freely acknowledge their Judges We are examined say they of the good deed done in the impotent man The state of the controversie was whether it was lawfull to heal any one in the name of Jesus Peter in the name of the Apostles proved it was lawfull because Jesus was an Head over the Church and was author of Salvation which they further strengthened by proofes from his Resurrection and antecedent Oracles and when they were forbidden to preach any more in the name of Jesus they replied Judge yee whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more then unto God Intimating that even the power of judging whether Jesus was the Messias did belong unto them Letter Of the Power of Kings over the lives and calling of the High Priest we have a cleare example in the 1 Book of the Kings Chap. 2. Vers 26. where Salomon saith to Abiathar Thou art worthy of death but I will not at this time put thee to death only was contented to thrust him out from being Priest unto the Lord and confined him to his house at Anatoth and oft-times the Roman Emperors and the Christian Kings have punished Bishops and Pastors with banishments stripes yea with death The Emperour Constantius did remove Liberius Bishop of Rome from the function of his Episcopacy and banished him to Berea Consideration THis example and many more he addeth are sufficient to evince that the Magistrate hath power to exauctorate or degrade and thereupon to put another in the place He that hath power to expell a Bishop from his Dominion hath also power to thrust him out of his Sea which is within the Dominion and if the Election was not an Act of the Soveraign Power either by his concession or delegation to others the Minister or Bishop could not be put out but by the power that invested him Any Act which may contribute towards the securitie peace and weal of the state is of the cognizance of the supream power of that State and the Jus sacrum was comprised under Jus publicum for the definition of Jus is the knowledge of Divine and humane things Letter IN the dayes of Valentinian Damasus and Ursicinus being competitors of the sea of Rome the sedition being grown to that height as that there was found 137 dead bodies in a Basilisk but the commotion was appeased by the authority of the Emperour who expelled Ursicinus and setled Damasus In the yeare of our Lord 420. there arose a great strife between Bonifacius and Eulalius competitors for the sea of Rome by the clashing of the Suffrages of the people of Rome to whom at that time belonged the power and right of election But the authority of Honorius intervening he thrust out Eulalius and preferred Bonifacius and withall made this Law that if it falls out that against right and by the rashnesse of the contending parties two are made Bishops we will not suffer that either of them be Bishops this Law is found in the Decree of Gratian Distinct 79. Canon si duo forte Consideration THough the election of Pastors should naturally belong to other Pastors or Christian people as naturally every one chuseth a Tutour to his sonne a Patient what Physician he liketh best a Merchant his Factor yet no doubt but the Soveraign power may exercise such actions that have no definitive bounds and rules prescribed by the dictates of nature thus in many places the Soveraigne power will provide Tutors for Pupills publick Schoolmasters for youth Physicians for Townes and Cities Besides the Factions Schismes and Heresies may so rend the State that if the supream power hath not a chief regulating hand in the election of Pastors calling or convocation of Synods it will never be able to settle the peace and security of the State upon a right Basis The Canons about elections have no life nor validity but what they receive from the supream power much lesse the elections which are regulated according to the canons and decrees Letter IN the yeare of our Lord 451. The Emperour Theodosius the II. whose piety and goodnesse is generally commended expelled Nestorius Patriarch of Constantinople and banished him In the yeare 498. a great strife happened about the election of a Bishop of Rome betwixt Symmachus and Laurentius the King Theodorick taking notice of the strife and hearing that Symmachus had been first named preferred him before Laurentius but soon after Symmachus being accused of many crimes he appointed Peter Bishop of Altin to iudge of the accusations and look to the disorders of Rome In the year 525. King Theodorick sent Iohn Bishop of Rome Ambassadour to Iustine the Emperour but this Iohn behaving himselfe contrary to his instructions Theodorick put him to death in prison Gregory the I. Bishop of Rome who wrote about the yeare of our Lord 595. writing to Maurice the Emperour calls himself unworthy servant and subject to his commands yea dust and ashes in his presence and a worme In the yeare 654. Constant the Emperour put Martin the Bishop of Rome in chaines and banished him to Chersonesus where he died Under Pepin Charles the Great and Lewis le Debonaire the power of the Romane Pontife grew by the liberality of those Kings yea since them have they been often ill intreated punished degraded and deposed by the Emperours of Germany and the Kings of Italy and the Histories of Germany France and England are full of examples of Emperours and Kings who have dealt roughly with the Bishops putting them out of their sea c. There is no doubt made when the King Clouis was a heathen but that he had an absolute power over all French both Lay and Ecclesiasticall and that retained still the a Christian he being afterwards same power else he had been a loser by his change and suffered a diminution of authority in his Empire Under the first line of our Kings Councells were assembled by their command and the Bishop of Rome never intermedled and had neither Nuncioes nor Legats in France Consideration THat the Supream power even of contrary Religion challenged power as well over Eclesiasticall persons as causes and were acknowledged competent Iudges we may see by the appeal of Saint Paul who appealed to Cesar I stand saith he at the Judiciall seat of Cesar there I must be indged and when Saint Peter not declining the Iudgement of the Councell said Act. 4. Whether we ought rather to obey God or man Judge yee And the great controversie about the Temples of Jerusalem and Garizin between the Iewes and the Samaritanes was decided by Ptolomeus King of Egypt and which was most materiall by the Law of Moses and his judgement was right pronouncing to

besides the death of Christ then such commands were not to be obeyed Nor doe I say that therefore the State must be embroiled and the Magistrate resisted but that one is rather to endure martyrdome or all kind of persecution then to lose his soule in giving obedience to such commands Thus have the three friends of Daniel done and all the faithfull martyrs We see in the Apologetick of Tertullian that in his time the Christians did fill the greatest part of the Roman Empire which might have been very empty had they gone about to flee for persecution into a remote Country Read St. Austin upon the 124 Psalme Valentinian the II. was laboured to take away the Temples from the Orthodoxes and give them to the Arrians but Ambrosius Bishop of Milan withstood him but how he tels you himselfe Dolere potero potero flere potero gemere adversus arma milites Gottos lachrymae meae arma sunt talia enim sunt munimenta Sacerdotis aliter nec debeo nec possum resistere To this exception I would adde another that the Magistrate must be obeyed in the actions in which he acts as Magistrate and for such a one taken For if a Soveraign Prince be in a Ship and a storme happens I doe beleeve that the Master Pilot ought rather to follow the rules of his art than the will of the Prince who is not versed in navigation The Magistrate indeed may forbid the mariners to lanch out of the Port and to saile into Spain or the Indies or to import or export such and such wares but it doth not belong to him to order how the Ship must be steered or the sailes hoised up Thus a Prince learning to ride ought if he meanes to learn to obey the Master of the horses yea as a Saveraign Prince he hath power over the person life and goods of the Master of the horses yea I say that the yielding of the Prince to the Rider is a kind of a command to the Rider so to deale with him I say the same of a Magistrate sick obeying the prescripts of a Physitian he doth obey as a man and not as a Magistrate whereupon a question may be moved whether the Magistrate being at publique prayers and partaker of the Sacraments is there as a Magistrate or as a Christian Consideration THis similitude or relation betwixt a Prince in a storm and the Pilot and betwixt a Prince sick and a Physitian is very pertinent to declare that the power of the Pastor over the Soveraign Magistrate is of the same nature and proportionable to that power which the Physitian hath over the Soveraign Prince being sick or that of a skilfull Pilot in a storme over him who may be his King but unskilfull in the art of navigation This power is rather a friendly counsell though exercised and uttered in a commanding way specially in the mouth of a Minister who in the name of God may command a Soveraigne Prince to redeem his sins by a speedy repentance for in effect 't is but declaring unto him what be the commands of God for the good of his soule Thus a Physitian following the rules of his art and his long experience may charge a King his patient as he tenders his owne health which he must not obstinately cast away to refraine from such and such meates and doubtless that King would grievously sinne against God who rejecting the counsell of the Physition and wilfully obeying his owne lust and appetite should thereby fall into a relapse It might happen in a storme or shipwrack that the Pilot should use a kinde of compulsion and violence towards his Soveraign pulling him as it were out of danger and forcing him to hearken to the meanes of his preservation for which he ought not to be blamed Letter I Think also that we should make a distinction between a Magistrate that is faithfull and orthodox and one that is an Ethnick or an Heretick for under a heathen Magistrate I doe not see how it can belong to any but the Pastors of the Church to manage the Church for shall a heathen Magistrate and persecutor be a judge of the articles of the Christian faith or make use of suspension or excommunication Whence it followeth that the state of the Church may subsist although the power of the Keyes and the governing of the Church be not in the Magistrate If the heathen Magistrate should forbid the Pastors upon paine of death to hold councels or Ecclesiasticall assemblies or to preach the Gospel or if there be such an urgent necessity of calling a Councell to stop the current of a pestilentiall heresie or to degrade some Pastors that disturbe the peace of the Church or that have crept in forcibly may the Pastors be condemned if they doe privately convene themselves contrary to the will of the Magistrate Consideration THis is one of the strongest arguments that can be alledged for the power of the Keys and Ecclesiasticall Courts and Jurisdiction different and independent from the civill Magistrate because there hath beene sometimes Church-government calling of Synods and exercise of Jurisdiction against the will of the soveraigne Power and not complicate with the civill Power But in mine opinion it hath no strength all for first I lay down this for a ground that the Magistrate whether Orthodox or not doth retaine still the same supream power over all persons and causes of what kind soever Secondly that in all persons and actions of men under the soveraigne Power this grand rule must be first observed that God must rather be obeyed then man Thirdly that many actions of all kinds naturall or voluntary even meetings assemblies and orders obliging some men or society may be done without the cognizance of the soveraigne Magistrate For first If heathenisme or heresie could devest a man of the power he hath over all persons and causes by that unjust lawes should be no lawes a diseased man by the same reason should cease to be a man and a wicked Emperour as Heliogabalus should not have beene ranked among the Emperors nor acknowledged for the supreame Judge of the Land because a bad one I confesse that a Heathen or hereticall Soveraigne cannot but judge amisse of persons and causes either out of ignorance or malice but ignorance of what is right doth not devest him of his right neither doth a wicked managing of his owne right hinder it to be a right still Depraved actions in nature continue to be actions still An Orthodox Soveraign Magistrate falling into heathenisme or heresie as Julian the Apostate loseth no part of his supreame power he that over all causes and persons no more doth the Soveraigne Magistrate get any addition or extent of power if from heresie or heathenisme he is converted to the Christian Religion 'T is the duty of a Magistrate to defend and propagate Christian Religion It is the Fathers duty to provide for his children the part of the Supreame Judge to

persons are subject to the Soveraigne Magistrate in whose hands God hath put the Sword and that he hath power over the lives and goods of the Pastours of the Church and may iustly punish them when they are perturbators of the publick peace and become obnoxious by their wicked lives that the duty of the Magistrate is to restrain them if they behave themselves tyrannically in the use of the Keyes and break the peace of the State Consideration THis alone is sufficient to evince that in a Christian Common-wealth there can be but one Soveraigne power over all persons causes and actions for it is absurd to conceive that the Supream Magistrate hath power over the person of the Minister and not over the actions and causes for which he may and must be punished by the said Magistrate and 't is no lesse absurd to conceive that the Magistrate may justly put to death a Minister or punish him with banishment yet may not have the power to degrade him it being a rule in philosophy that if the whole be in the power much more a part of the whole and if the same Supream Magistrate may justly degrade him who doubts but he may as justly challenge to himself the right of choosing him else which is all one as if he had chosen the Pastour himself he may put by not onely the said Pastour but so many one after another as are substituted by the power they call Ecclesiasticall till the Pastor chosen be according to his owne mind Letter ANd because it might fall out that in Nationall and Provincial Synods the overseers of Churches should transgresse the limits of their calling and meddle with civill affaires in which the Civill Magistrate is interessed it stands with reason that these Synods be not convened without the will and consent of the Soveraign the ancient Emperours have yet done more then that for in the universall Councils they have been present as Constantine in the Council of Nicaea and Marcian at the opening of the Chalcedoine Council or in their stead they have sent Earls Patrices or Consuls as we may see in the Acts of the Council of Chalcedoine and the II. Councill of Nicaea in the said Acts we see that the said Patrices and Earles abated the insolency of some Bishops and commanded them absolutely The title given them by the Councill was Gloriosissimi Iudices Consideration THis likewise proveth the necessity of one Soveraigne power over all persons meetings causes and actions Synods being assemblies of wise and learned Councellours to advise the Supream power in matters of Doctrine and Discipline as the Supream Magistrates power is to call them so to determine the members that are called to it as Marsilius Patavinus saith Generale concilium convocare personas ad hoc idoneas determinare pertinet ad Legislatoris authoritatem part 2. cap. 20. and not onely so he only doth preside and reserveth himself the facultie of approving disproving examining and rejecting what he thinks fit even after the Synod is broken up and their conclusions and Canons are ratified by him as the Ecclesiasti-Historie tells us Letter AS for decisions of points touching Doctrine of faith although the Emperours never iudged of these matters yet did they maintain their authority giving Judges to whom they commanded to decide the differences as Constantine did when the Donatists came to complain to him for he gave them some Bishops for Judges to whose Judgement they not yielding he called a Councill to pronounce a definitive sentence but these Judges which the Emperour gave to decide matter of Doctrine were alwayes Bishops and Ecclesiasticall persons by that means the Emperonr kept his authority over Bishops Consideration OBserve that not the Churches nor the Synods but the Emperour nameth the Judges The difference was betwixt the Donatists and other Bishops of Africa the Donatists with a great deale of submission besought the Emperor to give them Judges out of France The Emperour gave them 3 French and with them Miltiades Bishop of Rome 'T is here further to be observed that as the Letter saith the Donatists did not condescend to the determinations of the 4 Judges which is not to be understood as if they rejected the sentence of the Judges or of the Emperor as issued from incompetent Judges or appealed to a Synod for quite contrary they appealed to the Emperour who indeed thereupon called another Synod to compose the controversie which was about Caecilianus accused by the Donatists of many crimes and to have been unduly elected from that Synod in which they were condemned they appealed againe to the Emperor who for the second time called another Councill at Arles of which the Donatists not being satisfied that Caecilianus should be confirmed in his Sea of Carthage appealed the third time from the Councill to the Emperour who condemned the Donatists and banished them Neither were the Donatists ignorant that the decision of the Emperour should be the ultimate definitive judgment And the very Bishops did use to give account of what passed in Synods Thus Constantine called the Bishops convened at Tyr to him to give an account of what passed in the Assembly Among the Councils of France we read that the heads of the debates in Synods were referred ad sacratissimum judicium that is the counsell of the King or rather the King himselfe and that in the year 813. the addresses to Charles the Great doe refer the determinations of the Councell to be examined amended and confirmed by him and that by his wisedome he would vouchsafe to supply what had beene wanting on their part Letter IF the Soveraigne Counsill be minded to reserve to himself the decision of points of Doctrine and of all Ecclesiasticall affaires it were in that case needfull that the Councill should be composed partly of Pastors and Doctors and Ecclesiasticall persons skilled in these matters as it was practised in the Palatinate afore the late troubles which is confirmed by the example alledged by the Author of the Articles We find saith he that in the Common-wealth of the Jewes in one onely Synedrium all causes were decided and all kinds of persons might be convented In this Synedrium the Nasi was President who usually was the High Priest and most in it were Priests or Levites The same thing was practised in England before these late alterations there being a Soveraign Counsell called the High Commission in which the Arch-bishop was President to whom were joyned in Commission as Assessors some Counsellors at Law of the Country Consideration 'T Is sufficiently granted that though it be admitted that Ecclesiasticall and Civill causes are belonging to two distinct Jurisdictions yet they may confluere in unum and be made of two one under one single Soveraign Power That the Powers were not divided in the Common-wealth of the Jewes it may be easily gathered by the Story of the Jewes from Moses to the Captivity Moses himselfe was a Soveraigne Judge in all causes