Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	bishop_n	church_n	rome_n	6,168	5	7.0527	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A41326	The liturgical considerator considered, or, A brief view of Dr. Gauden's considerations touching the liturgy of the Church of England wherein the reasons by him produced for imposing the said liturgy upon all, are found to be so weak, his defence of things offensive in it so slight, the arguments against the liturgy by himselfe afforded, are so strong, that some, who upon His Majesties declaration did incline to the liturgy, are now further from it, by reading his wordy discourse about it : also some reasons humbly rendered, why many ministers, as yet cannot conform to that liturgy, but not out of disloyalty, pride, ingratitude, peevishness, nor schismatical petulancy, as the sarcastical pen of this uncharitable doctor hath published ... / by G.F.	Firmin, Giles, 1614-1697.	1661 (1661)	Wing F956; ESTC R843	47,787	64

interfer with such an inference That Liturgies are of ancient use in the Church I agree but Liturgy as Episcopacy primitive was in nature clearly different from what they are now pleaded to be Ancient Liturgies were not set and prescribed Forms of publick worship Smectymnus hath asserted Answer to the Remonstrance Vindication of the Answer p. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21. and well cleared it against the Remonstrant and that out of Justin Martyr Tertullian Austin the Carthaginian and Milevitan Councils That un ill the time of the Arrian and Pelagian Errors there were no Set Forms of prayer in the Church and then the liberty was only restrained which hath been since destroyed men being only bound to confer the prayers of their own composing cum fratribus instructioribus and Forms digested by the latter of these Councils were imposed no further than by a placuit ut preces quae probatae fuerint in concilio ab omnibus celebre●t●r and only enjoyned that the prayers of particular Ministers should be approved by more prudent men the original Liturgies of both Jew and Christian were plain Rubricks English Directories for the method and order of preaching reading prayer administrations of Sacraments and publick worship It is an easie matter to make a bravado and noise of the Liturgies of S. James Basil Cyril Chrysostom whil'st none are produced and proved legitimate if there be any not apparently fictitious bring them forth to a Test or Standard we will joynislue and try the despised Directory and extolled Service-bock and freely consent to retain that which best agreeth and to reject the other until then bears us not down like Children with big words without cause methinks it were hugely worth the enquiry what Liturgy King Lucius received when Faganus and Damianus converted his Subjects the Church by them const tuted had setled publick worship It is apparent that Eleu●herius the then Bishop of Rome referred him to the Canon of Scripture for to frame all his constitutions by it would much fortifie our pretenders to Antiquity to find out the Liturgy used in England before Austin the Monk brought over his Roman Missal Antiquity is a poor whil'st no part of the Service-book as to its frame order doth pretend higher than the time of Pope Damasus 376. after Christ and the whole Fabrick is apparently of a much later date I would desire men may no longer be cheated with words they who talk or write for Episcopacy of Liturgy let them declare the meaning and acceptation of their term themselves have made ambiguous for although I could willingly consent unto a Set-form of publick worship as convenient Crutches for Ministers of weak abilities who need no less Set-forms of Preaching even composed Sermons for whom finding Homilies the constant Concomitant of Liturgies in this sense I am apt to think they were at first prepared yet I conceive this will better advise the Churches care to have more able Ministers who may not need them than warrant the imposing either of them on more able men unto the depriving of the Church of the edifying gift of prayer or preaching nor do all the Arguments yet produced conclude for any such prescription nor can they give the least of satisfaction to a serious spirit owning the antecedent but denying the consequence as unjustly inferred to make a meer clamour in the world against which whether there be not Reason with a full answer to all the supposed advantages of such an imposition suggested by-our Antagonist I refer thee to the consideration of this ensuing Tract Some Cynthius seems here to pluck me by the ear and say Sir you run too fast and tell us nothing that is urged for Set-forms of prayer is sufficient to conclude the imposing of the prefer bed English Service-book whereas you are to consider it is established by Law and calls for your obedience which if you yield not you are bound to produce your Exceptions by way of Apology to anticipate the sufferings which impend over your head To this I briefly answer I know not what to understand by established by Law we have since the Reformation had as many different Service-books as Soveraigns The Book of Queen Elizabeth two of King Edwards one of Queen Elizabeths one of King James and one of King Charls the First though not commanded yet used in England pretended to be onely autherized by Act of Parliament and that this was under colour of Explanation altered by Royal Authority all that call to mind the Conference at Hampton-Court in 1603. and consider King James his Proclamation for conformity to and practice of his Book as the onely publick form of serving God established and allowed in this Realm and that the Book received among us is greatly different from what it was established is suggested by the late Reasons for Reformation in Worship and cannot be detected for want of a Sta●dard to which it should be compared I would thank that judicious Lawyer who in this case would resolve me these two Queries 1. Ought not a Form Method or Order enjoyned by a Law ●●b poena to be used and that exclusive with a n●ne other to be enrolled as the Standard to which on all suspicion of variation men must have recourse in order to their convictions and for want of such Standard the Law be not voided by an impossibility of conviction 2. In case one Form O der or Method be established by Act of Parliament another by the Kings Commission and Proclamation as the onely Form establish d and ●llowed which of them must be embraced and practiced and in default for which of them must we be convicted and punished if by the last we conceive our selves at present discharged by a power His Majesties De●laration no way short of what is pleaded for its establishment if by the first we conceive our selves discapacitated by that publick charge made by Royal Authority which for want of the Standard we cannot discover Untill these be resolved we can easily see what is offered to us and exercised by others but know not what is es●ablished by Law against which we are not to offend Neverthelesse to stay the censures of peevishnesse and stubbornesse cast on us by passionate men we humbly professe our consciences do interdict our use of the Common-prayer on three as we judge them weighty and important Grounds or Reasons 1. The Common-prayer Book is capable and so qualisied that it ought to be abolished 2. The Form and Order of the Service-book used among us is Superstitious and unsutable to Solemn Publick Worship 3. The Common-prayer Book hath been expelled our Church by a lawful and just Authority and stands excluded by Sacred Oaths and a most publick National Solemn League and Covenant First We cannot return unto and receive again what is capable and so qualified that it ought to be abolished for that we as Ministers of the Gospel charged with the Method and Order of Divine

Worship are in our places and capacities bound to abolish all things abominable for their unprofitableness and inexpediency but in our places we can onely enforce such abolition by declaring against and not receiving assenting to or admitting as the standing order of publick Administrations that which in our consciences we are convinced is so inconvenient or otherwise qualified that it ought to be abolished as the Jewish did so the Romish Rites must lose their dignity by non-submission to them That our Service-book may be abolished without sin none can or will deny whilst the exceptions against it corrections of it Apologies for its faults and defects with the confessions of such who contest for it do proclaim it an humane Constitution subject to corruption and inconveniency and thereupon alterable at humane pleasure Three things necessitating the Church to abolish what is humane though in it self good are written on our Liturgy in most legible Characters First The similitude and symmetry of it unto the Popish S●rvice and Religion wherein it is both mov●ns minding us of those superstitious dreams and fancies which dictated the order and at first occasioned the use of the several parts thereof as the Sacrament of Pennance Doctrine of Venial sin and P●iestly Absolution the ground of the Confession Misreatur and Absolvtion the miraculous efficacy of the words directing the Kyrie Eleyson with the three-fold sin Original Venial and Mortal which directed it to Father Son and holy Ghost the sanctifying influence of the words of the Pater Noster making it necessary to begin and end nay essential to every act of Devotion and duty of Religion the miraculous power of particular Rogations the Reason of the Letany the hearing of the heavenly Quire which is suggested as the occasion of the Angelick Hymn and so of other parts which I cannot stand to mention but also movens inclining and apting us to receive and again professe that form of worship with little variation or difficulty This similitude and symmetry is apparent by these things 1. The original Extraction of it was and it cannot be denied from the Romish Breviary Ritual Missal and Pontifical Fox Acts and Mon. p. 1272. 1273 1274 1275. into which it may be with ease again resolved 2. By the order and several parts thereof which must run unto Romish fancy for a rational soundation the Word of God and nature of the duty not dictating any 3. By the groundlesse Insurrection of the Rebels of Devon and Cornwal on the introducing of it into the English Church witnessed in the Expostulatory message of King Edward the sixth in these words As for the Service-book in English it hath manifest Reasons for it pag. 1189. and yet p●rchance seeme●h to you a new Service and indeed is none other but the old the self-same words in English which w●re in Latine if the service of the Church were good in Latine it remaineth good in English for nothing is alter'd but to speak with knowledge what was spoken in ignorance 4. The attractive influ●nce it had on the Papists who for eleven years in Queen Elizabeth's time came to Church without any conversion to true Religion Abbot Bishop of Canterbury in his Explicatio illustrium quaestionum c. 4. p. 112. Morton's Appeal p. 46. but on the conformity of the English to the Romish service on which ground Pope Plus the 4th and Gregory the 13th offered to confirm it and the Fathers of Trent assured our Catholick Nobles that the Pope might do it without any dammage to the Catholick Cause And the Messengers from Rome entertained here by Secretary Walsingham at their return wondered their Lord the Pope was so ill advised or at least informed as to Interdict a Prince whose service was so like his own and caused the Bull against the Queen to be recalled 5. Bristow's Motive 34. The assurance Harding Bristow and Carrier those seducing Jesuites gave themselves that they might yet convert England to the Catholick Church whose Service and Ceremonies she yet retained Confid p. 45. sect 8 9. the l●st of whom saith expresly The English Common-prayer and Catechism containe●h no point of Doctrine contrary to the antiquity of the Romish Service 6. The Service was and yet is the Engine of Accommodation between Rome and England on the designed Spanish Match unto which none was more potent than the similitude and symmetry of the English to the Romish Service Cabala Lord Keepers Letter to the Duke p. 79. of which that the Court and Clergy of Spain might be convinced the Bishop of Lincoln then Lord Keeper caused the English Liturgy to be translated into Spanish by a Franciscan seeming Protestant and sent it to the Duke of Buckingham there resident to obviate the Exception Ecclesiastick policy lib. 5. sect 28. and facillitate the Enterprise This to some seemeth an Exception of no value and I concede to the learned Hooker that 't is too hard to say in nothing we may follow Rome for in what they do as men Nature will necessitate what as prudent men Discretion will advise what as Christian men Religion will constrain us to conform But our stumble is at what they do as Romish Babylon for as such disordered and superstitious service is derived from them and the difference is vast between Scriptures Sacraments and Ministery which must not nor can be changed because they passed through a Romish Chanel and human Constitutions of Method and Order which ought so to differ from as to speak detestation of what is Idolatrous and determine an incapacity if possible of being thereinto again resolved The removal of the High Places did not more advance the Reformation than the not-demolishing them did occasion and facillitate Israel's backsliding in Religion Sure I am the Primitive Fathers and our Protestant Writers apprehended God's mind to be that His People avoid the Symbols as well as abhor the Substance of False-worship and infer it from Exod. 23.13.20 Zech. 13.2 Deut. 7.15 Isa 30.22 1 Thess 5.22 Jud. 23. and interdicted in their Councells conformity to the Jews or Heathens in their Festivals Eusebius devita constant lib. 3. cap. 17. observation of Easter Fasting on Sundays Monuments of Martyrs adorning their houses with Bay-leaves and green Boughes and bringing Wine and Cakes to the Church and the like Concil Cartha Can. 5.14 15. Bract. Can. 32.73 Con. Phi. Can. 27. De Corona militum lib. de Idolatria August Confess lib. 6. cap. 2 Confutation of the man of Chester fol. 54. against all which * Tertullian urged with much earnestness our Arguments as doth also Ambrose to * Monica the mother of Austin who are seconded by Calvin Musculus Beza Zanche Peter Martyr our own Fulk Jewel Andrews Sutliffe and who not against the Papists in many things Rejected and the Rejection thereof defended by this very Plea And Bishop Pilkington in our very case of the Common-prayer book confesseth That in Mariage which is least offensive