Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n
Text snippets containing the quad
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
A04388
|
One of the foure sermons preached before the Kings Maiestie, at Hampton Court in September last This concerning the antiquitie and superioritie of bishops. Sept. 21. 1606. By the Reuerend Father in God William Lord Bishop of Rochester.
|
Barlow, William, d. 1613.
|
1606
(1606)
|
STC 1451; ESTC S100875
|
24,815
|
48
|
to be Preâbyter and then Bishop Which taketh away that distinction of Priority in order not of degree as if the calling Episcopall were a Numeral not a Mânerall function a Priority in order and not a Superiority in degree For the word properly signifieth a staire or step as Act. 21. 35 Paule stoode ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã vpon the staires Which interpretation of mine both Councils and Fathers do coâfirme Concilâuâ African calleth the three functions ecclesiasticall of Bishops Priests and Deacons ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã the three degrees of the Church Conc. Sardicen No man may be called to be a Bishop which hath not risen by euery ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ad culmen Episcopatus Conc. CalcedoÌ To reduce a Bishop ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã backe to the degree of a Priest is sacriledge So NaziaÌ speaking of Athanasius saith that he had ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã as much preheminence honor for his virtue as by his dignity degrees Of Saint Basill also he saith that he rose to his Bishoprik ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã by the order and law of the spirituall Ascent which metaphor Saint Hierom himselfe vseth to Nepotian if thou desire the office of a Bishop gaudeo de ascensu I reioyce at thy Climing and of the same Nepotian fit Clericus per solitos gradus Presbyter In the infancy of the Church these degree were not distinct for they were not extant The first that were made were Deacons Act. 6. Presbyters there were none solemnly ordeined that we read of till Act. 14. 23. Ibid. 14. 23. The highest degree which was the function Episcopal the Apostles reserued vnto themselues a long time and that for 3. maine reasons First there was no Church established and but a few at the first conuerted wherefore all their whole labor they bent in turning the first key to open that dore of faith Act. 14. 27. namely the conuersion of the Gentiles which the Apostle 1. Cor. 16. calleth a great dore effectual al the help they could make either by Prophets Euangelists Coadiutors Pastors Doctors Planters Waterers or whatsoeuer was litle enough for that worke Secondly after the conuersioÌ of many people euen in setled Churches they hasted not to place a Bishop for ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã No great thing is suddenlâe brought to passe saith Nazian and a Presbyter fit to make a Bishop is hardly found saide a Carthaginian Bishop in an open Synod NaÌ ad haec idoneus quis saith Saint Paule though our Church here for a long time doubled the Echo with a quisquis The rule therfore of the Apostle being vnto Timothie that in no case he should take him that was Neophytus a new conuert and make him a Bishop of them the Church was at that time full euen for that cause also they absteined Thirdly few being found fit for that high calling the Apostles left some Churches to be gouerned by Presbyters reseruing stil the highest command to them selues but when they founde that humour whereof Saint Iames speaketh that euery man would bee a maister like Plinie his Amphisbaena a Serpent which hath a head at each end of her body both striuing which shold be the maister-head in the mean time toiles the body most miserably in the end reÌts tears it self most lothsoÌly finding I say those 2. effects which vse to follow Parity Plurality viz. dissention confusion it was generally decreed as Hierom confesseth Vt vnus caeteris superponeretur that one should be placed aboue the rest to gouerne both Presbyters and Flocke and that the whole care of the Church ad vnuÌ pertineret should belong to one he should be stiled by the name of Bishop particularly ouer this Clergy here assembled Timothie who is subscribed in the end of that second Epistle ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã The first Bishop of the Church of Ephesus by impositioÌ of hands ãâã so was Titus also stiled Bishop of Creta as in the subscriptioÌ of that epistle appeareth Yea but these were S. Paules Bishâp say some and betweene them and ours a great ãâã True 1. For varietie of giftes and graces of the spirit A maine difference as ãâã as betwen ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã and ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã 1 Cor. 12. 8. their knowledge for the most part ãâ¦ã Reuelation ours acquired with much study and ndustry 2. In respect of the honour and reuerence which their Clergy and flocke performed to them A great difference ye see Saint Paul describes it 1. Thes. 5. to be ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã more then a superaboundant aw and loue For maintenance they and we somewhat semblable theirs impeached by persecution ours exhausted by Sacriledge It is a prety obseruation though a sharp one which a Romish writer of the Church story long since made that the word Conscientia hath had very ill lucke in the Church of Christ it could neuer yet be at once in full Syllables in the Apostles timeâ when there was Con and Sci a ãâã and a ãâã Clergy then entia was defectiue they had the ãâã of the Spirit but no indowment of possessions Afterwards when there was Con and Entia a religious yea a superstitious and a very ãâã Clergy then Sci was ãâã they were not then the ãâ¦ã And in my time saith he Con and Sci are both gon and like Philâpoemenes armie in Plutarch which had neither head nor feete but whole bellie they be all Entia they haue all the Honours all the Mannors and all the âat of the land But with vs againe it is come round for now that we haue Con and Sci a learned God be thanked and a religious Clergy the Entia are gone our maântenance is imbâaseled our honors enuied yea euen that poore Ens Vrum which by Gods and the Kinges fauour we enioy was of late cast whole into the Kings mercy as if they would haue made vâ non ãâã But the authoritie and preheminence ouer the Cleargie is all ãâã in them and vâ they receiuing it from the Apostles and wee deriuing it from them which is manifest in two principall things wherein the Bishops then and we now are Superior vnto the other Clergy which for your better memorie may be reduced to two words each very like to other ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã First Collation of Rewardes which Saint Paul calleth Ordination Tit. 1. 5. the highest honor that a Bishop can reward a Scholler of desert withall to make him a Priest of the High God Secondly Iuâiciall Censure iâ their Consistorie and Visitation not of the Flocke onely but of the Pastors also both which Iurisdictions Distributiue and Correctiue the Apostles kept vnto themselues till they appointed Bishops either Substitutes in their absence or Successors after their death In the Church of theââalonica where there were many ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã
coÌclusion is found therefore the authoriâââ not committed vnto them Whereupon some because if they grant Imposition of handes they see a superioritie must needes follow haue therefore done as it is recorded of a Painter in the time of Queene Mary who hauing drawne King Henry the 8. against the Queenes comming through the Citty in Triumph with a Bible in his hand beeing checked by a great Counsailor of State and willed to wipe it out because he would be sure to leaue no part of the booke visible hee wiped out Bible hand withall so they with the superiority haue remoued also the ââremony insomuch that in some Churches as it is well knowne to your Maiesty when they admit any into Orders they shake haÌds with them as bidding them welcome into their coÌpany grounding it vpon a Text of Scripture to say no more wrongfully interpreted Gal. 2. 9. where it is said that the â chiefe Apostles gaue vnto Paul and Barnabas dextras societatis the right hanâs of fellowship as if they at that time had either giuen or confirmed vnto them their function Where as the truth is that the Apostles finding the doctrine of Paul and Barnabas to bee all one with theirs and alâo their preaching very effectuall in conuerting many to the faith thervpon they entred a Couenant that Paul and Barnabas should take the charge of the Gentiles and they them selues would be Apostles of the Circumcision and vpon this they strooke handes But Paul and Baânabas Act. 13. 2. receiued also imposition of handes at Antioch If before they came to the Apostles as some thinke then this shaking of handes be it for ordination was superfluous If after as others more probably coniecture then were this defectiue The truth is that the A postle Paul receiued not his function by handes either imposed or stroâken but by especiall reuelation Gal. 1. 1. 2. The handes imposed Act. 13. were commendatiue the right handes stroken Gal. 1. were stipulatiue and therefore no meane Praesbyterial The Professors of Boem wish Imposition of handes in consecration to be retained as signifying 4 thinges fit for a Minister for some of them will haue Ceremonies to bee significant And so much shall serue for the first part We come now to the second that is to Correctiue iurisdiction which Saint Paul to Titus 1. 4. in one worde calleth ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã a setting of things to rights Correction iudicial is either Correctiue or Coactiue either restraining where there is too much forwardnes or inforcing where there is a slacknes this the Rod that the sworde Apostolical Veniam ad vos in virga 1. Cor. 4. there is the poâ vâinam abscindantur qui perturbant vos there is the sword Apostolique âal 5. 12. Both these the Apostles kept in their owne handes as will appeare for example in the Church of Corinth where there were many excellent Preachers Presbyters of eminent gifts yet none of them could proceede against the incestuous offendor before they had receiued a Commission from S. Paul who beeing offended that they had no sooner informed him Iam iudicââi saith hee as soone as he heard it I haue already decreed to deliuer him to Satan He did not say decreed that you shall deliuer him and therefore willeth them in the name of Christ and his spirit that his authoritie being with theÌ to execute that his decree and deliuer him vp whether by excommunication or corporall infliction is not to this purpose But where they placed Bishops vnto theÌ they transmited the same preeminence Against an elder receiue no accusation saith Saint Paul to âimothy he saith not against a Co-Presbyter as his equal but he speaketh vnto Timothy a Bishop as a Iudge of Presbyters saith Epiphan In particular if any of the Clergie do ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã preach any other doctrin theÌ that which is âound prohibe command him not to do it If any of them do preach prophanely or bablingly Cohibe restraine him that their doctrine spread not to further hurt If Timothy might not thus censure alone which is the opinion of some without the consent of the bench what needed that dreadful charge vnto him 1. Tim. 5. 21. I charge thee before God Christ Iesus his elect Angels that thou proceede in this order without preiudice or partialitie the 2 cuâ throâes of al vpright proceedings For had hee bin to sit in the Consistory only to cap voices himselfe hauing no Negatâue scarse a casting voice allotted him what feare might bee either of his preiudice to the cause or partiality to the accused sithence that as in Arithmetâke the number of voices do there ouer sway and not the waight of reason Again of al Presbyters is expected the abiââty to ech of theÌ coÌmitted the authority ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã to censure gaine-âaiers but with force of argument not in place of iudgement For vnto Titus alone a Bishop was that ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã that vniuersal authority Tit. 2. 15. commended both for pulpit Consistory for I haue lefâ thee at Creta to reas esse thinges amisse saith the Apostle vnto him Tit. 1. 5. For particulars if any preach otherwise then becomes him ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã it is thy duââ to put him to silence Tit. 1. 10. And ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã reproue some of them sharpely as the word signifieth eueÌ with cutting them short that their vnround doctrine infect no further And againe if an Heretique after the first and second admonition recant not ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã avâyde him that is excoÌmunicate him Tit. 3. 10. To say this authority was committed vnto either of them as Euangelistes First that is but a coniecture for there is as good proofe that Timothie was an Apostle as that he was an Euangelist for he that sayde vnto him 2. Tim. 4. 5. Fac opus Euangelistae Doe the worke of an Euangelist which is the ground of that gift the same sayd also of him 1. Cor. 16. 10. Operatur opus Domini sicut ego Hee worke the Lords worke euen as I And we all know Saint Paul was an Apostle Secondly the worke of an Euangelist ceased with the function as beeing but temporarie and personall but these things which Saint Paul inioynes to Timothie as a Bishop must remaine in the Church gouernment to perpetuall succession For so the Apostle 1. Tim. 6. 14. chargeth him before God and his sonne Christ that hee keepe these Inâunctions without stayne or changâ ill the comming of our Lord Iesus Christ. Which tiâothie could not performe in his own persoÌ who as the Apostle knew could not liue so long therfore as S. Ambrose well obserueth it is spoken to Timothie a Bishop as a precept for those that should succeed him in the same function much lesse were they imposed vpon him as a Presbyter for though the names in Scripture be