Scripture sets forth one Catholick Church so also many particular Churches as so many Political Societies distinct from each other yet all compacted together as parts of that one ample Society the Catholick Church Each of these particular Churches have their proper Elder or Elders Pastor or Pastors having authority of teaching and ruling them in Christs name An Ecclesiastical Order of Presbyters or Elders that are not Bishops is not found in holy Scripture For all Presbyters or Elders being of a sacred Order in the Gospel Church that are any where mentioned in Scripture are therein set forth as Bishops truly and properly so called and are no where set forth as less than Bishops These Elders or Bishops are Personally to Superintend all their Flock and there is no grant from Christ to discharge the same by Delegates or Substitutes A distinction between Bishops and Presbyters and a Superiority of the former over the latter was after the Scripture times anciently and generally received in the Christian Church Yet it was not a diversity of Orders or Offices essentially different but of degrees in the same Office the essential nature whereof is in both The Bishop of the first Ages was a Bishop not of a multitude of Churches but of one stated Ecclesiastical Society or single Church whereof he was an immediate Pastor and he performed the work of a Bishop or immediate Pastor towards them all in his own Person and not by Delegates and Substitutes and he governed not alone but in conjunction with the Presbyters of his Church he being the President Though several Cities in the same Kingdom have their different municipal Laws and Priviledges according to the diversity of their Charters yet particular Churches have no Divine Laws and Priviledges diverse from each other but the same in common to them all because they have all the same Charter in specie from Christ. Therefore each of them have the same power of Government within themselves And the qualifications requisite to make men Members or Ministers of the Universal Church do according to Christs Law sufficiently qualifie them to be Members or Ministers of any particular Church to which they have a due and orderly call Local presential Communion in Gods Ordinances being a main end of erecting particular Churches they should in all reason consist of Persons who by their cohabitation in a vicinity are capable of such Communion and there may not be a greater local distancâ— of the Persons than can stand with it A Bishops Church was anciently made up of the Christians of a City or Town and the adjacent Villages who might and did Personally meet together both for Worship and Discipline All Christians of the same local Precinct are most conveniently brought into one and the same stated Church that â—here might be the greatest Union among them and that the occasion of straggling and running into several Parties might be avoided Yet this local partâ—â—ion of Churches is not of absolute necessity aâ—d invariable but if there be some insuperable impediment thereof the partition must be made as the state of things will admit No Bishop or Pastor can by Divine right or warrant claim any assigned circuit of Ground as his propriety for Ecclesiastical Government as a Prince claims certain Territories as his propriety for Civil Government so that no other Bishop or Pastor may without his Licence do the work of the Ministery in any case whatsoever within that Circuit It is not the conjunction of a Bishop or Pastor with the generallity or the greater number of the People that of it self declares the only rightfull Pastor or true Church within this or that Circuit For many causes may require and justifie the being of other Churches therein Seeing particular Churches are so many integral parts of the Catholick Church and stand in need of each others help in things that concern them joyntly and severally and they have all an influence on each other the Law of Nature leads them to Associations or Combinations greater and lesser according to their capacities And the orderly state that is requisite in all Associations doth naturally require some regular Subordination in the several parts thereof either in way of proper authority or of mutual agreement And the Associated Churches and particular Members therein are naturally bound to maintain the orderly state of the whole Association and to comply with the Rules thereof when they are not repugnant to the Word of God A Bishop or Pastor and the People adhering to him are not declared to be the only true Church and Pastor within such a Precinct by their conjunction with the largest Combination of Bishops or Pastors and their Churches For the greater number of Bishops may in such manner err in their Constitutions as to make rightly informed Persons uncapable of their Combination A National Church is not a particular Church properly so called but a Combination or Coagmentation of particular Churches united under one Civil Supream either Personal as in a Monarchy or Collective as in a Republick And the true notion thereof lies not in any Combination purely Ecclesiastical and Intrinsecal but Civil and Extrinsecal as of so many Churches that are collected under one that hath the Civil Supremacy over them The National Church of England truly denotes all the Churches in England united under one Supream Civil Church-Governour the Kings Majesty Civil Magistrates as such are no Constitutive parts of the Church The Christian Church stood for several Centuries without the support of their authority But Supream Magistrates have a Civil Supremacy in all Ecclesiastical matters and a political extrinsecal Episcopacy over all the Pastors of the Churches in their Dominions and may compell them to the performance of their Duties and punish them for negligence and mal-Administration and they may reform the Churches when they stand in need of Reformation The possession of the Tithes and Temples doth not of it self declare the true Pastor and Church nor doth the Privation thereof declare no Pastor and no Church For these are disposed of by the secular power which of it self can neither make nor make void a Pastor or Church A Diocess is a collective body of many Parishes under the Government of one Diocesan If the several Parishes be so many particular Churches and if their proper and immediate Presbyters be of the same order with those which in Scripture are mentioned by that name and were no other than Bishops or Pastors then a Diocess is not a particulaâ— Church but a Combination of Churches anâ— the Diocesan is a Bishop of Bishops or Governour over many Churches and their iâ—mediate Bishops If the Parishes be not a knowledged to be Churches nor their Presbyters to be realy Bishops or Pastors but the Diocess be held to be the lowest Political Church and the Diocesan to be a Bishop of the lowest rank and the sole Bishop or Pastor of all the included Parishes I confess I have no knowledge of the Divine
into destructive error and practice Wherefore the Text is ill applied to the rigorous condemnation of honest and peaceable men that dissent only in some accidental or â—nferior points of Religion for which the Apostle forbids Christians to despise or judge one â—nother Yet not only false Teachers but all â—chismaticks are here condemned under this deâ—â—ription viz. those that cause Divisions and Offences And though they be not direct opâ—osers of sound Doctrine yet being Dividers 〈◊〉 Disturbers they practice contrary to the â—octrine of Christ which teacheth Unity â—ove and Peace But still it must be observed â—â—at the reality of Schism lies not in being divided or disordered but in causing the division or disturbance or in a voluntary violation of or departing from true Church-Unity They that cause Divisions are not excused from Schism by the support of Secular Power nor are others convicted of it meerly by the want of that Support The Magistrates power in Sacred things is accumulative not destructive oâ— diminitive to the rights of Christs Ministers and People It takes not from them any thing that Christ hath granted them but gives them a better capacity to make use thereof CHAP. IV. Of the Schisms that were in the morâ— ancient times of the Church and thâ— different case of the Nonconformistâ— in these times OF those parties which were anciently râ—upted Schismaticks as violating the Unâ—ty of the Church yet not Hereticks as dâ—nying any Fundamental point of the Chrisâ—â—an Faith the Novatians and Donatists are the chiefest note Forasmuch as both theâ— are looked upon as the greatest instances Schism it may be requisite for me to considâ—â— the true state of their separation from the main body of the Christian Church passing by accidental matters and insisting on the merits of their cause according to their main Principles and Practices As concerning the Donatists the breach made by them had this rise Donatus with â—is Complices vehemently opposed Cecilianus who had been chosen Bishop of Carthage in design to thrust him out of his Bishoprick They accuse him of being ordained by one that had been a Proditor and of having admitted into Ecclesiastical Office one that was guilty of the like fault This Cause was by the Emperor Constantine's appointment heard before several Councils and many Judges The Accusers still fail in their Proofs of the â—hings objected Cecilianus is acquitted and confirmed in his Office The Party of Donatus failing in their design were carried in a boundless rage of opposition to a total and â—rreclaimable Separation from all the Churches â—hat were not of their Faction and became very numerous upon a pretence of shunning â—he contagion of the wicked in the Communion of the Sacraments Their principles were that the Church of Christ was no where â—o be found but among themselves in a corner of Africa also that true Baptism was not Administred but in their Sect. Likewise they proceeded to great tumult and violence and rapine And a sort of them called Circumcelliones gloried in a furious kind of Martyrdom partly by forcing others to kill them and partly by killing themselves The Novatians took their name and beginning from Novatus a Presbyter first at Carthage afterwards at Rome who held that they who lapsed in times of Persecution unto the denying of Christ were not to be readmitted unto the Communion of the Church though they repented and submitted to the Ecclesiastical Discipline of Pennance He separated from the Roman Church and was made a Bishop by Bishops of his own judgment in opposition to Cornelius Bishop of Rome Cyprian gives a very bad character of him aâ— a turbulent arrogant and avaritious Person But of what Spirit soever he was his Judgment and Canon was received among many that were of stricter lives and he himself iâ— reported to have suffered death in the persecution under Valerian At the Council of Nice Acesius Bishop oâ— the Novatians being asked by Constantine whether he assented to the same Faith witâ— the Council and to the observation of Easteâ— as was there derceed answered that he full assented to both Then being again askeâ— by the Emperor why he separated from thâ— Communion he recited for himself things done in the Reign of Decius and the exquisite observation of a certain severe Canon that they who after Baptism had fallen into that kind of sin which the Scripture calls a sin unto death ought not to be partakers of the Divine mysteries but to be exhorted to repentance and to expect the hope of remission not from the Priest but from God who hath power to forgive By this it appears that the Novatians did not deny the Salvability of the lapsed or others that had fallen into a sin unto death but only refused to admit them to Sacerdotal Absolution and Church-Communion And thus they made a very unwarrantable separation grounded upon an unjust rigor of very bad consequence Nevertheless their error was no other than what holy and good men might be ensnared â—n by the appearance of a greater detestation of â—in and its tendency to prevent the lapse of Christians into Idolatry and to make them more resolved for Martyrdom And by as â—redible History as any we have of the anâ—ient times they are reported to have had among them men eminently Pious and some â—amous for Miracles They unmovably adâ—ered to the Homousian Faith and for the maintenance of it together with the Orthodox â—uffered dreadfull Persecutions They had some Bishops remarkable for Wisdom an Godliness and such as were consulted with by some of the chief of the Catholick Bishops and that with good success for support of the Common Faith against the Arrians and such like Hereticks Under a certain Persecution wherein they were Companions of the self same suffering it is said that the Catholicks and Novatians had Prayers together in the Novations Churches and that in those timeâ— they were almost united if the Novations had not utterly refused that they might keep up their old institutes yet they bare such good will one to another that they would die one for another These and many other things of like nature are reported of them by Socrates whom some indeed suspect to have been addicted to them yet upon no other ground but because he gives them their due upon evident proof And besides what he hath reported Sosomen thus testifies of them L. 2. C. 30. That when other Sects expired the Novatians because they had good men for the Leaders of their way and because they defended the same Doctrine with the Catholick Church were very numerous from the beginning and so continued and suffered not much dammage by Constantines Law for suppressing of Sects And Acesius their Bishop being much favoured by the Emperor for the integrity of his life greatly advantaged his Church Also L. 4. C. 19. He reports the great amity that was between them and the Catholicks in a time of common Persecution Whether the case of the Dissenters from the
which weak consciences will take offence my liberty is turned into bondage and I am left in thraldom to other mens endless Scrupulosities This is I think a yoke which Christians are not fit nor able to bear This bondage is greater and the burden lies heavier upon me if by reason of others weakness I must be bound up from observing an indifferent thing at the command of Rulers and by them made the condition of my liberty for publick Service in the Church when my conscience is fully satisfied that it is lawfull and otherwise expedient for me to do it As for the warrantableness of enjoyning the Ruler must look to that Are some displeased and grieved that I do it As many or more may be displeased and grieved if I do it not Do some take occasion by my necessary use of a just liberty to embolden themselves to sin My forbearing of it may be an occasion of sin to others as their persisting in some troublesom Errour to their own and others Spiritual dammage and in unwarrantable non-compliance with their Governours And the loss of my liberty for publick Service consequent to such forbearance must also be laid in the ballance When both the using and forbearing of mâ— liberty is clogged with evil consequents I knoâ— no safer way than duly to consider of what moment the consequents are on either side and tâ— incline to that which hath the lesser evil Here in the Wisdom of the prudent is to direct his waâ— upon the impartial view of all circumstance which come under his prospect And if gooâ— conscience and right reason guided by the general Rules of Gods Word lead me to make usâ— of my Christian liberty in compliance with mâ— Superiors I must humbly and charitably apply my self to remove the offence that some take by clearing the lawfulness and expediency oâ— my act to their judgments But if that cannoâ— be discerned by them I am by my Christiaâ— good behaviour to make it evident to theiâ— consciences what in me lies that what I do 〈◊〉 do sincerely and faithfully and that I am nâ— temporizer man-pleaser and self-seeker 〈◊〉 humbly conceive that that high saying of thâ— Apostle If meat make my Brother to offend 〈◊〉 will eat no Flesh while the World standeth doth admit such equitable interpretation as thâ— circumstances of time place person and thâ— whole state of things declares to be most reasonable A humble representation of my own case touching the exercise of the Ministery I Have been in the Ministery near fourty years having been ordained Presbyter according to the Form of Ordination used in the Church of England And being called to this Sacred Order I hold my self â—ndispensibly obliged to the work thereof as God enables me and gives me opportunity The nature of the Office is signified in the Form of Words by which I was solemnly set apart thereunto viz. Receive the Holy Ghost whose sins thou dost forgive they are forgiven and whose sins thou dost retain â—hey are retained And be thou a faithfull Dispenser of the Word of God and of his holy Sacraments in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost Amen The former part of these Words being used by â—our Saviour to his Apostles in conferring upon them the Pastoral Authority fully proves that the Office of a Presbyter is Pastoral and of the same nature with that which was ordinary in the Apostles and in which they had Successours Likewise this Church did then appoinâ— that at the ordering of Priests or Presbyters certain portions of Scripture should be read as belonging to their Office to instruct them in the nature of it viz. That portion oâ— Act. 20. which relates St. Pauls sending to Ephesus and calling for the Elders of the Congregation with his exhortation to them To take heed to themselves and to all the Flock over which the Holy Ghost had made them Overseers to rule the Congregation of God Or else 1 Tim. 3. which sets forth the Office and due qualification of a Bishop And afterwards the Bishop spake to them that were to receive the Office of Priesthood in this form of words Ye have heard brethren as wel in your private examination and in the exhortation and holy Lessons taken out of the Gospels and Writings of the Apostles of what dignity and how great importance this Office is whereto ye are called that is to say the Messengers the Watchmen the PASTORS and Stewards of the Lord to teach to premonish to feed to provide for the Lords Family I mention my Ordination according to the Episcopal Form because it is of greatest esteem with them to whom this Representation is more especially tendred Nevertheless I own the validity of Presbyterial Ordination and judge that Ministers so Ordained may make the same defence for exercising the Ministery in the same case that is here represented Christ is the Author and the only proper Giver of this Office and though he give it by the mediation of men yet not by them as giving the Office but as instruments of the designation or of the solemn investiture of the Person to whom he gives it As the King is the immediate Giver of the power of a Mayor in a Town Corporate when he gives it by the Mediation of Electors and certain Officers only as instruments of the designation or of the solemn investiture of the Person I am not conscious of disabling my self to the Sacred Ministrations that belong to the Office of a Presbyter by any Opinion or Practice that may render me unfit for the same Touching which matter I humbly offer my self to the tryal of my Superiors to be made according to Gods Word Nothing necessary to authorize me to those Ministrations is wanting that I know of I am Christs Commissioned Officer and I do not find that he hath revoked the authority which I have received from him And without the warrant of his Law no man can take it from me Nor do I find that the nature of this Office or the declared will of Christ requires that it be exercised no otherwise than in subordination to a Disocesan Bishop That I do not exercise the Ministery under the regulation of the Bishop of the Diocess and in other circumstances according to the present established Order the cause is not in me who am ready to submit thereunto but a bar is laid against me by the injunction of some terms in the lawfulness whereof I am not satisfied whereof I am ready to give an account when it is required I do not understand that I am under any Oath or Promise to exercise the Ministery no otherwise than in subordination to the Bishop or the Ordinary of the Place The promise made at my Ordination to obey my Ordinary and other chief Ministers to whom the government and charge over me is committed concerns me only as a Presbyter standing in relation to the Bishop or Ordinary as one of the Clergy of