that false and peruerse opinion shall be held for seditious and to bee censured All Strangers that shall write and publish it for sworne Enemies of the Crowne All his Maiesties Subiects that shall adhere vnto it of what qualitie or condition soeuer they be for Rebels infringers of the fundamentall Lawes of the Kingdome and guiltie of Treason in the higstest degree And if there be found any booke or Discourse written by any Stranger Ecclesiastike or of any other qualitie that containeth any proposition contrarie to the said Law directly or indirectly the Ecclesiastikes of the same Order established in France shall be bound to answere them to impugne and contradict them incessantly without respect ambiguitie or equiuocation vnder paine of being punished with the same punishments as aboue said as abetters of the enemies of this State This Article is in effect and substance all one with our new Oath of Allegiance and the lawfulnesse thereof is manifest by the former Discourse and how greatly Card. Peron was mistaken in impugning the said Article Widdrington sheweth both in his Answere to Fitz-herbert part 3. chap. 11. num 15. seq and in his Discussion of the decree of the Lateran Councell against Lessius part 2. sec 9. and part 3. sec 9. A Copie of the Arrest or Decree of the Parliament of Paris wherein Card. Bellarmine his booke against William Barclay is condemned Taken out of the Records of the Court of Parliament the 26. of Nouember 1610. THis present day the Kings Solicitours Lewis Seruin the Kings Attorney making the Declaration and Lewis Duret the Kings Aduocate subscribing aduertised the Court that it was related to them that some few daies since there hath beene divulged in this city of Paris a new booke entituled Tractatus de potestate Summi Pontificis in temporalibus aduersus Gulielmum Barclaium Auctore Roberto S. R. E. Cardinale Bellarmino Romae per Bartholomaeum Zannetti printed this present yeere out of which booke diuers persons some with a good intent and others with an euill haue divulged many things which they haue collected from thence And because this Booke doth containe propositions which are preiudiciall to the Kings power and authoritie and to the State of France of whom the Author speaketh in the same manner as of other Kings Princes and Common-wealths they haue through their care gotten a Copie thereof which they hauing exactly read and examined thought it their duties to aduertise the Parliament of those things which are against the Powers established by God and especially against this Kingdome Wherefore they haue obserued that Cardinall Bellarmine doth in this new Treatise not only teach those propositions which hee affirmed in his former books as in that booke which is intituled De Romani Pontificis Hierarchia written in the time of Pope Sixtus the V. and dedicated to the said Pope which he hath deuided into fiue books in the last whereof hee maintaineth that the Pope hath temporall power indirectly But they also haue obserued that to this erroneous assertion others no lesse false and tending further are added in the places by them cited which the Parliament if it be so pleased may behould And first the very Title is to be obserued wherein he giueth to the Pope a power in temporals Then hee bringeth diuerse authorities from the writings of Italians French-men Spaniards Germans English Scots beginning with Pope Gregorie the VII who liued in the yeere of our Lord 1073. c. Wherefore to the end that fraud and deceit may for the safegard of true French men be preuented the aforesaid Attorney generall considering that in regard of Conscience and the office which hee beareth in being the Kings Attorney he is bound sincerely to discharge his duty produceth Cardinall Bellarmines booke which was written when our King Henry the Great was liuing in whose raigne none durst aduenture to diuulge the same but published forthwith as soone as he was dead wherein hee hath noted diuers places which the Parliament may peruse especially pag. 37 38. 57. 58. and 76. 77. to which may be added 160. 115. 116. And moreouer he exhibiteth in written hand the requests which the Kings Attorneys doe in the Kings name demand to wit that by Decree of the Parliament it be enacted That none of what qualitie or condition soeuer shall receiue haue keepe print or vtter this booke of Bellarmine vnder paine of Treason ordained against those that shal transgresse the same c. The matter being examined The great Chamber Criminall and of the Edict being assembled THe Court hath decreed and doth decree that no person of what qualitie or condition soeuer vnder payne of Treason ordayned against those that transgresse the same doe receiue keepe communicate print vtter or sell the said Booke which contayneth that false and detestable proposition tending to the subuersion of supreme Powers established and ordayned by God inciting Subiects to rebellion and derogating from the authoritie of Princes animating to attempt against their liues and Crownes and finally to disturbe the publike peace and quietnesse Those that haue Copies of the saide Booke or know any that haue are commanded forthwith to make it knowne to their Iudges that vpon the demand of the Kings Attorneys Inquisition bee made against the Crime and those that be guiltie be punished accordingly It forbiddeth vnder the same punishment Doctours Professours and others to treat dispute write teach directly or indirectly in Schooles Colledges or other places the said proposition The said Court doth ordayne that this Decree bee sent read published recorded and obserued according to the afore said manner and forme in all the Benches subiect to the Iurisdiction of this Court. The Substitutes to the Kings Attorney are commanded to cause forthwith this Decree to be put in execution and to aduertise the Court within a moneth of their diligence Made in Parliament vpon Friday 26. Nouemb. 1610. Signed VOISIN The decree being made the Kings Attorneys were sent for to whom the pleasure of the Court was signified and according to the Decree the said Booke of Bellarmine was deliuered to their hands A Decree of the Court of Parliament made the 26. and executed the 27. of Iune 1614. Against a Booke printed at Collen this present yeare which is entituled Francisci Suarez Granatensis Societatis Iesu doctoris Theologi Defensio fidei Catholicae Apostolicae aduersus Anglicanae sectae errores contayning many maximes and propositions contrarie to the Soueraigne powers of Kings ordayned and established by God the safetie of their persons the peace and quietnesse of their States The Place ✚ where the Kings armes of France and Nauarre are set At Paris By F. Morel and P. Mettayer the Kings ordinarie Printers and Stationers 1614. With his Maiesties Priuiledge Taken out of the Records of the Parment The Court of the great Chamber Criminall and of the Edict assembled hauing seene the Booke printed at Collen this present yeare entituled Francisci Suarez Granatensis Societatis
Wee most humbly beseech Her Maiestie that in this our recognizing and yeilding Caesars due vnto Her wee may also by Her Gracious leaue be permitted for auoyding Obloquie and Calumnies make knowne by like publike Act that by yeilding Her right vnto Her wee depart from no bond of that Christian Dutie which we owe vnto our Supreme spirituall Pastour And therefore wee acknowledge and confesse the Bishop of Rome to be the Successour of Saint Peter in that See and to haue as ample and no more Authoritie or Iurisdiction ouer vs and other Christians then had that Apostle by the gift and commission of Christ our Sauiour and that Wee will obey him so farre forth as we are bound by the Lawes of God to doe which we doubt not but will stand well with performance of our Duty to our Temporall Prince in such sort as we haue before professed For as we are most ready to spend our bloud in the defence of Her Maiestie and our Country so we will rather lose our liues then infringe the lawfull authoritie of Christs Catholike Church William Bishop Iohn Colleton Iohn Mush Robert Charnocke Iohn Bosseuile Anthonie Hebborne Roger Cadwallader Robert Drury Anthony Champney Iohn Iackson Francis Barneby Oswald Needham Richard Button This Protestation of the thirteene Catholike Priests to which a great number more would haue subscribed if the Articles which those Priestes gaue vp to the State had beene returned them backe but some few dayes before the end of the time prefixed to them by the Proclamation to make known to the State their Allegiance was the ground and foundation from whence the Parliament as the Lord Archbishop of Canterburie D. Bancroft told a friend of mine framed the forme of this new Oath of Allegiance as agreeable to the doctrine which any Catholike subiect according to the grounds of true Catholike Religion might lawfully maintaine to make thereby a true distinction not betweene Protestants and Catholikes but betweene ciuilly obedient Catholikes and in all other things good Subiects and such other Catholikes as in their hearts maintained the like violent bloodie maximes that the Powder-Traitours did See beneath in the third Obseruation And doubtlesse whosoeuer will compare the new Oath and their Protestation together and doe withall consider that Queene Elizabeth was long before that time depriued of all Regall power authoritie dignitie and Iurisdiction by the Bull of Pius Quintus and also obserue vpon what assured grounds and principles those Priests could lawfully acknowledge her Maiesty to haue as full Authority Power and Soueraignty ouer them and all the Subiects of this Realme as any Her Predecessours euer had and also could lawfully promise that they would yeild to Her Maiestie all Obedience in Temporall Causes notwithstanding any authority or any Excommunication whatsoeuer denounced or to be denounced against Her Maiestie or Her Subiects as is aforesaid he will cleerly perceiue that their Protestation is all one in effect and substance with this new Oath of Allegiance and that the only difference betwixt them is that in the Oath the Popes authority to depose the King c. is expresly and in plaine wordes denyed and in their Protestation the deniall thereof is only couertly vertually and by a necessary consequence implyed notwithstanding all the euasions tergiuersations turnings windings sayings and vnsayings which any one of these Priests if for some worldly respect or other motiue hee should now repent him of what he had done could to excuse himselfe from Periurie possibly vse or inuent A Copie of Master Iohn Colletons Petition to the Lord Archbishop of Canterburies Grace wherein hee confirmeth his former Protestation many yeeres after the new Oath of Allegiance was established IF your Grace and the State saw the present affections of my heart and were pleased to looke on my carriages past neyther trouble some or vnrespectiue I hope the fauour I am to desire albeit it may seeme extraordinary yet the same could not altogether be deemed vnworthily extended The voluntarie and free Recognition I made in the late Queenes Reigne as it then sufficed and is now extant in print so doth it still witnesse the readinesse of my professed Allegiance in all Secular and Ciuill affaires Neither haue I bin am now or by Gods grace euer shall be otherwise affected then in like sort to acknowledge his Maiestie that now gouerneth for my lawfull Dread Soueraigne obey in all Politicall administration and defend his sacred Person Crowne and Dominions to the vttermost of my power against all enemies of what place and calling soeuer The commiseration I most humbly beseech your Grace to take of my aged yeeres accompanied with sundrie infirmities is to stand so good Lord vnto me as to enlarge me vpon sufficient securitie for my appearance before your Honour at the time your Lordship shall thinke fit to assigne An euident meane of lengthing my life beside the easing of the heauy charge my imprisonment imposeth I would very gladly haue beene herein my owne Sollicitour in person but that I hold the boldnesse greater in respect of my disgracefull state then I durst to aduenture on without your Lordships good liking thereunto first vnderstood 26. of March 1610. Your Graces most suppliant Petitioner IOHN COLLETON A Copie of the Declaration and Acknowledgement which Master Iames Houghton alias Thomas Green a Religious Priest of the Order of Saint Benedict and professour of Dininitie made vnder his owne hand writing to the Lord Bishop of Durham the first of Nouember 1619. touching his opinion of the Oath of Allegiance Iames Houghton alias Thomas Green his opinion touching the Oath of Allegiance 1 FIrst I do ingenuously confesse that his Maiestie had very iust cause by occasion of that most trecherous plot of the Gunpowder-Treason to propose to all his Subiects English Catholikes 〈◊〉 Oath of ciuill fidelitie and obedience due vnto Kings both by the Lawes of God and Nature and that in most effectuall and peremptory termes for tryall of their fidelity and loyalty to Hâ—… Maiestie their true Soueraigne Lord and King 2. Secondly it seemeth to me that the Church had done her dutie if she had shewed her dislike of that odious practice of the Gun-powder-Treason by some publike declaration in detestation thereof both for his Maiesties satisfaction and for the confirmation of his Catholike Subiects in their fidelity and allegiance vnto Him 3. Thirdly I doe ingenuously confesse that to me it seemeth most true that the doctrine which approueth murthering of Kings by their owne Subiects or any else is both damnable and hereticall yea though it be in casu Apostasiae a fide aut Infidelitatis in case of Apostasie from faith or of Infidelitie 4. Fourthly I do ingenuously grant that it seemeth to mee in my priuate iudgement that there is nothing in the Oath but that it may according to Roger Widdrington his Glosse and Exposition be lawfully taken of English Catholikes His Maiesties Subiects though some both Learned and Religious hold
Oath that doe any way appertayne to the Ciuill and Temporall Obedience due to His Maiestie whom hee acknowledgeth for his true and lawfull King and Soueraigne ouer all His Domioions And Martinus Becanus a famous Iesuite in the first Edition of his Controuersia Anglicana writeth thus Becanus in Controuersia Anglic cap. 3. p. 102 And truly to me it is certaine that all the parts and propositions of the Oath are not false if they bee well declared For these are true first that King Iames is lawfull King of England Scotland and Ireland Secondly that in the same Kingdomes he is the Supreme or Soueraigne Lord in Temporalls 2. First therefore if wee consider the end of this Oath which is only to make profession of our temporall Allegiance and to make a true distinction not betwixt Catholikes and Protestants c. the expresse declaration of His Maiestie and the rules before mentioned in the second and third Obseruation it is euident that by those wordes Soueraigne Lord is not to be vnderstood the Kings Supremacie in Spirituall and Ecclesiasticall but only in Temporall and Ciuill causes 3. Secondly it is also euident that albeit by force of the expresse wordes and the plaine and common vnderstanding of the same to which the seuenth branch of this Oath tyeth the swearer wee are bound only to acknowledge that King Iames is lawfull and rightfull King of this Realme and of all other His Maiesties Dominions and Countries and not that Hee is the Soueraigne Lord of the same both for that those words Soueraigne Lord are put only ex parte subiecti and not ex parte predicati and therefore by vertue of the words are not affirmed as likewise he that stileth the Pope most holy and most blessed doth not affirme him to bee most holy and most blessed vnlesse the words most holy most blessed be put ex parte predicati also that if we regard the force and vertue of those words Soueraigne Lord they haue not the same sense which the words lawfull and rightfull King haue seeing that one may be a lawfull and rightfull King and yet not the Soueraigne Lord of His Kingdome as if the Emperour should make the great Duke of Toscan King of Hetruria he would be lawfull and rightfull King of that Countrie and yet not the Soueraigne or Supreme Lord of the same because hee is as a feudarie subiect to the Emperour Neuerthelesse because the lawfull and rightfull King of England is also the Soueraigne Lord of the same by reason and vertue of the matter we may lawfully and if it bee demanded at our hands are bound to acknowledge and sweare that King Iames is not only the lawfull and rightfull King of England of all other His Maiesties Dominions but also the Soueraigne or Supreme Lord of the same And in this sense both the XIII Priests and also M. Greene vnderstood the word Soueraigne in their Protestation and Declaration 4. Neither is it to the purpose which some obiect that the King of England is the Popes Vassall and as a feudarie subiect to him in Temporals and therefore the Pope and not King Iames is the absolute Soueraigne and supreme Lord in Temporals of this Kingdome For although wee should absurdly admit that for the title and clayme of Temporall Soueraigntie which the Pope pretendeth to haue ouer this Kingdome by vettue of some grant of former Kings may bee brought some probable proofe as there cannot seeing that it is euident that no King of England hath authoritie to giue away His Kingdome or make it subiect in Temporals to another Prince without the consent of the Kingdome it selfe and that no colour of any probable proofe can bee brought from any Authenticall Instrument to shew that the Kingdome of England euer consented to any such grant yet considering that no probable title can bee a sufficient ground to depriue any man of that Right Dominion or any other thing which he actually possesseth but such a title must bee most certaine and out of all controuersie as I shewed aboue in the Fift Obseruation it is manifest that notwithstanding any such probable title euery subiect of this Land may lawfully acknowledge by Oath that King Iames is not only the lawful and rightfull King of this Realme and of all other His Maiesties Dominions and Countries but also the Soueraigne or supreme temporall Lord of the same CHAP. II. The Second Branch of the Oath and an Explication thereof ANd that the Pope neither of himselfe nor by any authoritie of the Church or See of Rome or by any other meanes which any other hath any Power or Authoritie to depose the King or to dispose any of his Maiesties Kingdomes or Dominions or to authorize any forraigne Prince to inuade or annoy Him or his Countries or to discharge any of his Subiects of their Allegiance and Obedience to his Maiestie or to giue license or leaue to any of them to beare Armes rayse Tumults or to offer any violence or hurt to His Maiesties Royal Person State or Gouernment or to any of His Maiesties subiects within His Maiesties Dominions 1. This Branch supposing the former Obseruations hath in it no difficultie at all although wee should admit that the immediate obiect thereof or which is all one that which in this Branch by force of the words we are bound immediately to sweare is not only our sincere acknowledgement and perswasion but also that absolutely and assuredly the Pope hath not any authoritie to depose the King c. For considering that the whole tenour of this Branch tendeth to practise namely to depose to dispose to inuade annoy beare Armes rayse Tumults offer violence or hurt and to discharge subiects of their Allegiance and also that it is a doctrine approoued by many learned Catholikes and who haue examined all the arguments on both sides and consequently that it is truely probable that the Pope hath no authoritie to depriue Princes or to dispose of their Temporals it is as cleere and manifest that any man whether hee bee the Kings subiect or no what opinion soeuer he followeth in speculation concerning the Popes authoritie to depriue Princes yet hee may as certainly acknowledge and sweare that the Pope hath no authoritie to depose the King that is to practize his deposition or any other of those things mentioned in this Branch as it is cleere and manifest that hee may certainly acknowledge and sweare that the Pope hath no authoritie to commit open iniustice and that in a doubtfull vncertaine and disputable case the condition of the possessour is to bee preferred 2. Neither doe temporall Princes or other priuate men that haue any thing in their possessiō greatly regard what learned men who by the subtiltie of their wits can easily finde out some probable colour of a broken and pretended title may speculatiuely dispute in Schooles concerning their titles so that in practice notwithstanding such disputations and speculations they bee secured from
being put out of that which they really and bona fide doe possesse And doubtlesse most miserable were the state of all men that possesse any thing of worth and much more of Princes if vpon a title which some learned mâ—n may in speculation approoue it were lawfull to inuade their possessions before a lawfull Iudge and who is certainly knowne so to bee hath decided and determined the title or controuersie To preuent which mischiefe all Natitions being guided herein by the light of naturall reason haue agreed in this manifest principle that it is open iniustice to put any man out of his possession vpon any title which is not most certaine and free from all controuersie vntill a lawfull and vndoubted Iudge hath decided the matter I said a lawfull and vndoubted Iudge for if it be doubtfull vncertaine and questionable whether he be a lawfull and competent Iudge to determine that cause his decision cannot be sufficient to end the controuersie For which cause the Pope is not to bee accounted a lawfull and competent Iudge to decide this question concerning his owne pretended authoritie to depriue Princes for that it is a controuersie among learned Diuines and approued by very many as Pope Adrian the Cardinaell of Cambray the Cardinall Cusanus the Cardinall Panormitan the Cardinall of Florence Master to Panormitan Iohn Patriarch of Antioch Abulensis Ioannes Parisiensis Ioannes Gerson Iohn Maior Almaine and almost all the Vniuersitie of Paris cited by Widdrington Widdring in the discouerie of D. Schulkeuius slanders §. 7. that the Pope is not a competent Iudge to decide or define infallibly any doctrinall point and much lesse in his owne cause without a true and vndoubted generall Councell and therfore although he should hereafter as yet he hath not attempt to define and decide this question his decision could not end the controuersie nor giue sufficient warrant to any man to practize the deposition of Princes vpon so doubtfull vncertaine and questionable power or title 3. Neuerthelesse it behooueth temporall Princes to be very carefull that their titles to the Dominions which they lawfuly possesse be not so much as speculatiuely or only for Disputation sake disputed pro and contra by learned men least that some ignorant or turbulent spirits which either doe not know or of set purpose to colour their practices vnder a pretence of a probable title will not take notice of the manifest difference betwixt speculation and practice may take occasion thereby to disturbe the publike peace and to molest annoy or to offer any violence or hurt to their Royall Persons States or Gouernment For which cause the Parliament of Paris hath with great wisdome and reason oftentimes by publike Edicts ordained See beneath in the end of this Treatise some of these Decrees that the doctrine of deposing their Kings should not bee so much as taught and maintayned to bee probable or problematike that occasion be not giuen to seditious spirits who know not or will not take notice of the difference betwixt speculation and practice to attempt vnder pretence of a probable title any violence against the Crowns or sacred Persons of their Kings And the reason is manifest for that the temporall Common-wealth hath good and full authoritie to forbid the teaching and publishing of any doctrine which is not necessarie whereby probable danger to the Crownes and liues of temporall Princes and perturbations in the Common-wealth may arise 4. First therefore by those words of this Branch nor by any other means with any other it is euident that the Parliament which representeth the whole bodie of the Kingdome or Common-wealth did not intend to meddle with the authoritie which the whole Kingdome or Common-wealth may according to the opinion of some Doctors pretend to haue in some cases ouer their soueraign Prince as Lessius and others whom the Authors of the Prelate and the Prince doth seeme to follow doe idly obiect And although the meaning of those words were to deny that the whole Kingdome or Common-wealth hath no authoritie to depose their King yet considering that it is also a probable doctrine approued by many learned Catholike Diuines and Lawyers cited by Widdrington Widdr. in Apolog nu 111. and in his Answere to Fitz-herb part 3. cap. 11. nu 36. 37. that the Common-wealth hath no such authority it is also lawful for any man of what opinion soeuer hee bee in speculation concerning this authoritie of the CoÌ„monweath to acknowledge and sweare that the Common-wealth hath no more authoritie to depose the King that is to practize his deposition then she hath to commit open iniustice But the true meaning of His Maiestie and the Parliament is as the words themselues doe plainely signifie only to deny the Popes authoritie to depose c. to wit that the Pope neither of himselfe that is neither as a sole and totall cause nor by any authoritie c. that is neither as an Instrument or Minister of the Church or See of Rome nor by any other meanes with any other that is nor as a principall or true and proper partiall cause or Agent hath any authoritie to depose the King c. 5. Neither by those wordes or to authorize any forraigne Prince to inuade or annoy Him or His Countries did His Maiestie and the Parliamenâ— intend to denie the authoritie which temporall Princes may haue in somâ— cases to make warre against their neighbour Princes and consequently against His Maiestie if he should giue them iust cause of warre yet euer obseruing that no probable power cause or title can bee a sufficient ground to punish any Prince or to inuade His Countries but as the expresse words do plainly shew only to deny the Popes authoritie to authorize any forraigne Prince to inuade or annoy Him or His Countries because all the authoritie which temporall Princes haue to make warre or to inuade the Kingdome of an other Prince for what cause crime or end so euer it bee is deriued from their temporall Soueraigntie grounded vpon the Law of Nature or Nations not from the Popes authoritie And likewise all the authority which the temporall Common-wealth may pretend to haue in some cases to rise vp in Armes against their Prince is not deriued from the Popes warrant license or authoritie but if there be any such power from the Law of Nature And therefore with great reason this Clause denyeth in the Pope all power and authoritie to authorize any forraigne Prince to inuade or annoy His Maiestie or his Countries or to giue license or leaue to any of his subiects to beare Armes rayse Tumults or to offer any violence or hurt to His Maiestis Royall Person State or GouernmeÌ„t because although they shuld haue any such authoritie leaue or licence wherewith His Maiestie and the Parliament would not in this Oath intermeddle they haue it not from the Pope but from the Law of Nations or Nature 6. Secondly in this Branch is not
denyed the Popes authoritie to command in temporals in order to spirituall good or to declare that they who haue authoritie to depose or to make warre are bound to vse their temporall authoritie and to draw forth the temporall Sword when the necessitie of the Church and the spirituall good of soules shall require the same for this authoritie of declare and command doth not exceede the limits of spirituall power as Widdrington hath shewed at large heretofore Widdr. in Apol nu ◅ and in all his other Bookes very often but especially in his Answere to Fitz-herb But here is only denyed the Popes authoritie to depose temporall Princes to dispose of their temporals to vse or draw forth the temporall Sword or to authorize temporall Princes or subiects to vse or draw forth the same for whosoeuer giueth authoritie to another man to vse the temporall Sword hath authoritie to vse it himselfe although sometimes for want of strength or some other necessarie Instrument hee cannot vse it himselfe yet still he hath authoritie to vse it 7. And although a Commander which I wish the Reader to obserue for the Author of the Prelate and the Prince is commmonly said to doe that thing which is done by his Commandement and so hee that counsaileth consenteth or any way concurreth although per accidens and not by any proper vertue or influxe of his owne is said to doe that thing as hee that applyeth fire to straw or commandeth counsaileth yea or doth not hinder the applying thereof when hee is bound to hinder it is said to burne the straw although hee bee no true and proper efficient cause of the burning thereof but only a cause per accidens yet a Commander is not said to doe that which hee commandeth as a true and proper cause or as hauing authoritie to doe that thing which hee commandeth whereof this Branch of the Oath doth only speake but only as a cause per accidens which according to the doctrine of all Philosophers is no true and proper efficient cause vnlesse by his proper power vertue influxe or authoritie hee concurre to the doing thereof and that the person commanded hath his power vertue or authoritie to doe that thing deriued from the Commander or depending on him 8. For which cause a Painter who commandeth his Seruant to make a Picture and giueth him rules and directions how to mingle his Colours and afterwards to apply them which without the directions of his Master hee himselfe could not doe is the principall cause and agent of making that Picture and the Seruant is only his Instrument or Minister for that all the Arte hee hath to make that picture is deriued from the commaundement and directions of the Painter and depending on him and yet a King who hath no skill to paint and commaundeth the Painter to make a picture is no true and proper efficient cause of making that picture but onely a cause per accidens by morally applying the Painter that hath skill to vse the same So likewise a Prince who commandeth his Officers to condemne and put to death an egregious malefactour is the principall cause of his death and the Officers are onely his Instruments Ministers and Executioners for that all the authoritie which they haue to condemne and kill that malefactour is deriued from the Prince and depending on him because onely the Prince doth authorize or giue them authoritie to pronounce and execute that sentence And yet the Pope commaunding a Prince to vse his temporall sword power or authoritie when the necessitie of the Church shall require the same as to make warre inuade any Countrey or to put any egregious malefactor to death is onely a cause per accidens of that warre c. by applying morally to wit by his commandement the person who hath authoritie to make warre c. to the making thereof But the Pope is no true and proper cause of that warre c. neither can hee bee said to make that warre as hauing authoritie to make it or as authorizing or giuing authority leaue or licence whereof onely this branch maketh mention to the Prince to make that warre c. Neyther is the Prince in making that warre c. the Popes Instrument Minister or Executioner as the Author of the Prelate and the the Prince absurdly affirmeth for that he hath not his authoritie to make warre c. deriued from the Popes commandement or depending on it whereas according to the doctrine of all Philosophers it is necessary to an Instrument that it haue all it vertue to worke deriued from the principall Agent or depending on it but all the authoritie which temporal Princes or Common-wealths haue in temporall affaires is deriued from the law of Nations or Nature and not from the Popes authoritie or commandement 9. By which it is apparant how grosly the said Author of the Prelate and the Prince in excepting against this Branch was mistaken for not considering the difference betweene a Commander who hath onely authoritie to command but not to execute or doe that which hee commandeth to be done and a Commander who hath authoritie both to commaund and also to execute or doe that which he commandeth to be done although perchance he cannot effect it for want of strength or effectuall meanes but not for want of authoritie as euerie lawfull Prince hath sufficient authoritie to subdue his Rebels and yet hee cannot alwaies effect it not for want of authority but for want of strength force or effectuall meanes because his Rebels are more strong and potent then he is CHAP. III. The Third Branch of the Oath and an Explication thereof ALso I doe sweare from my heart that notwithstanding any Declaration or sentence of Excommunication or Depriuation made or granted or to be made or granted by the Pope or his Successours or by any Authoritie deriued or pretended to be deriued from him or his Sea against the said King his Heires or Successours or any absolution of the said subjects from their obedience I will beare faith and true allegiance to his Maiestie his Heires and Successours and him and them will defend to the vttermost of my power against all cōspiracies attempts whatsoeuer which shall be made against his or their Persons their Crowne and dignitie by reason or colour of any such sentence or declaration or otherwise and will doe my best endeuour to disclose and make knowne vnto his Maiestie his Heires Successors all Treasons Traiterous Conspiracies which I shall know or heare of to be against him or any of them 1. This Branch of the Oath is somewhat clearer then the former because it doth not expressely and in plaine tearmes deny the Popes Authoritie to depriue or depose Princes but it onely containeth in expresse words a promise which the Subiect confirmeth by Oath that if in case the Pope hath denounced or hereafter should denounce any sentence of Excommunication or Depriuation against the King his Heires
Iesu Doctoris Theologi Defensio fidei Catholicae Apostolicae aduersus Anglicanae sectae errores contayning in the third Booke Chap. 23. p. 376. 79 80 82. Chap. 29. p. 410. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20. Chap. 6. pag. 834. Chap. 8. pag. 844. and in other places many propositions contrarie to the Soueraigne powers of Kings ordained and established by God the peace and quietnesse of their States and that it is lawfull for their subiects and strangers to attempt against their persons Conclusions of the Kings Attorney generall All which beeing considered The said Court hath declared and doth declare the propositions and maximes contayned in the saide Booke to bee scandalous and seditious tending to the subuersion of States and to induce the subiects of Kings and soueraign Princes and others to attempt against their sacred persons and the discourses making mention of King Glodoueus and Philip the Faire to be false and slanderous Hath ordayned and doth ordayne the said Booke of Suarez to bee burned in the Court of the Palace by the Executioner of high Iustice Hath made and doth make iniunctions and inhibitions to Stationers and Printers not to print sell or vtter it and to all persons of what qualitie or condition soeuer not to haue copie out keepe teach in Schooles nor in other places nor to dispute the said maximes and propositions It doth ordayne that according to the Arrest made the 8. of Iune 1610. that the Decree of the Theologicall Facultie made the 4. of Iune the same yeare of renewing the doctrinall Censure of the said Facultie made in the yeare 1408. confirmed by the Councell of Constance together with this present Arrest or Decree as also those of the yeare 1578 and 95. bee read every yeare the 4. day of Iune as well in the said Facultie as in the Colledge of the Priest and Schollers of the Colledge of Claremont This Colledge of Claremont is the Iesuites Colledge and of the foure Mendicants And that at the instance of the Kings Attorney generall informations be taken of the transgressions against the said Arrests and Inhibitions bee made against the copying out hauing and keeping the like bookes Made in Parliament the 26. day of Iune 1614. Signed VOISIN Moreouer it is decreed that the Fathers Ignace Armand Rectour in this Citie Cotton Fronton and Sirmund shall be sent for the first day of the Court and it shall be shewed them that contrarie to their declaration and the Decree of their Generall made in the yeare 1610. the Booke of Suarez hath beene printed and brought into this Citie against the authoritie of the King the safetie of his Crowne and State And it shall be enioyned them to cause their Generall to renew the said Decree and that it be published and that they bring in the Act within sixe moneths And that they prouide that no bookes contayning such damnable and pernicious propositions bee hereafter made or published by any of their Societie And that it bee inioyned them to perswade the people by their Preachers the Doctrine contrarie to the said propositions Otherwise the Court wil proceed against the transgressours as against Traytors and perturbers of the publique peace The aforesaide Arrest or Decree and what hath beene decreed was pronounced in the presence of the Fathers Ignace Armand Charles de la Tour who came in place of Father Cotton absent Fronton du Duc and Iames Sirmund And the Arrest was executed before the great Staires of the Pallace the 27. of Iune 1614. A Copie of another Arrest or Decree of the Parliament of Paris wherein the former doctrine of practizing the deposition of Soueraigne Princes is condemned and the former Decrees made against the Bookes of Card. Bellarmine and Suarez are againe confirmed An Arrest or Decree of the Court of Parliament touching the Kings Soueraigntie in Temporals and against the pernicious doctrine to attempt vpon the sacred persons of Kings The place ✚ of the Kings Armes of France and Nauarre At Paris By F. Morel P. Mettayer the Kings Ordinarie Printers and Stationers 1615. Taken out of the Records of the Parliament WHereas the Kings Attourney Generall hath complayned to the Court all the Chambers thereof being assembled that albeit by many Arrests or Decrees heretofore made with great and mature deliberation the Court hath confirmed the Maximes which haue at all times beene held in France and are naturally engrafted to the Crowne That the King doth not acknowledge any Superiour in Temporals of his Kingdome but God alone And that no power or authoritie can rightfully release his Subiect from the Oath of Allegiance and Obedience which they owe to Him nor suspend depriue or depose him from his said Kingdome and much lesse to attempt or to cause to attempt either by publike or priuate authoritie against the sacred persons of Kings Neuerthelesse it hath beene aduertized that by Discourses as well in priuate as in publike many persons doe presume to call in question the said Maximes to dispute of them and to hold them for problematike from whence may arise very many inconueniences which of necessitie must be prouided against and that speedily Hee the said Attourney requesteth that seeing the Court is assembled all businesses set aside it will bee pleased to ordaine that the said Decrees shall be renewed and againe published in all the Benches subiect to the Iurisdiction of this Court to the end that the mindes of all the Kings Subiects of what quality or condition so euer may be kept firme and assured concerning the said Maximes and Rules and for the safetie of the Kings life the publike peace and quietnesse With Inhibitions not to transgresse the same vnder the penalties set downe by the said Arrests And that it be enioyned to all their Substitutes to cause the publication thereof to be made and to certifie the Court within a moneth vnder paine to be depriued of their Offices The Court all the Chambers being assembled hath ordayned and doth ordayne that the Arrests of the 2. Decemb 1561. the 29. Decemb. 1594 the 7. of Ianuarie and the 19. of Iuly 1595. the 27. of May the 8. of Iune and the 26. of Nouemb. 1610. and the 26. of Iune 1614. shall bee kept and obserued according to their forme and tenour Forbidding all persons of what qualitie or condition soeuer to transgresse the same And to this end they shall bee published in the Bayliwikes Stewardships and other Benches subiect to this Court by the care of the Substitutes to the Attourney Generall who shall certifie the Court with in a moneth vnder paine to answere it at their perill Made in Parliament the second of Ianuarie 1615. Signed VOISIN The lawfulnesse of all these Arrests or Decrees is manifest partly by that which hath beene said in this Treatise in the Fourth and Fift Obseruation and in the Second Third and Fift Chapters and more particularly by Widdrington in his Discussion of the Decree of the Lateran Councell against Lessius part 2. sect 9. for that Christian Princes by vertue of their temporall power haue good full authoritie according to the doctrine of Ioannes Parisiensis Ioh. Paris de potest Reg. Pap. c. 21. ad 37. Victoria Victoria Relect. 1. de potest Eccles sec 7. §. octaua propositio Sotus Sotus in 4. dist 29. q. 1. ar 4. Bānes Bannes 2. 2. q 11. ar 4. q. 1. in fine Couerrunias Couerr cap. 35. pract quest which is grounded in manifest reason to forbid the maintayning teaching and publishing not only of hereticall erroneous and false propositions but also of all vnnecessarie doctrines and positions be they neuer so probable as the teaching and publishing of the same is dangerous to the Crownes and liues of temporall Princes and tendeth to the subuersion of the State and to the disturbance of the publike peace in the Ciuill Common-wealth whereof the Prince hath charge and to punish with temporall punishments the teachers maintayners and publishers of such dangerous and seditious doctrines Haec omnia Ecclesiae Catholicae indicio subiecta sunto FINIS Page Line Faults corrected 8. 13. would would not 35. 4. at first at the first 71. 16. Authors Authour 87. 27. or vnlawfull or lawfully 133. 20. bound bound 144. 16. bound bound 146. 10. dipose dispose 187. 1. and to be and be 191. 4. Deputies Deputies