all euill For these are the effectes to come of that present and perpetuall wil of God towards vs which wee apprehend by faith Rom. 8.24 Wee are saued by hope but hope that is seen is not hope But if we hope for that we see not we doo with patience abide for it 1 Obiection Life euerlasting is a thing to come We beleeue life euerlasting Wee beleeue therefore that which is to come that is faith is also of things to come and so faith is hope it selfe Ans The Maior must bee distinguished Life euerlasting is to come tru as concerning the consummation or accomplishment therof But it is present vnto vs as cōcerning the wil and vnchaungeable purpose of God who hath decreed from euerlasting that which he hath begun in vs and will also in due time accomplish it Againe it is present vnto vs as concerning the beginning therof For euerlasting life is begun here in the elect by the holy ghost Wherefore faith apprehendeth it as it is present both in respect of the purpose of God in respect of the beginning thereof in vs. For he that beleeueth feeleth and knoweth that he is quickened and resolueth this to bee the will of God that that quickening and reuiuing which is here begunne shall bee absolued in another life Iohn 5.24 He that beleeueth in the sonne hath passed from death to life Iohn 17.3 This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only verie God and whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ Gal. 4.6 God hath sent forth the spirit of his sonne into your harts which crieth Abba father Rom. 8.24 We are saued by hope 1. Ioh. 3.2 Now are we the sonnes of God but it doth not yet appear what we shal be By faith thē we are certein that those blessings also which as yet we haue not are notwithstanding ours for Gods promise for the vnchangeable will in God to giue them vs but in certain hope wee looke for them as concerning their accomplishment Faith apprehendeth the promises of thinges to come hope relieth on the thinges promised The summe is There is one and the same act and operation of faith and of hope but they differ in consideration It is called faith as it doth apprehend things to come as if they were present in regard of the vnchangeablenes of Gods will It is called hope as it doth certainlie look for the bestowing of those things Therfore Heb. 11 1. it is shewed that faith is the ground substance of things which are hoped for that is it is that which maketh things which are hoped for to be extant and present in that manner as hath bin shewed Shorter thus Faith apprehendeth the promises concerning things to come as they are to come Hope the things themselues which are promised 2 Obiection Faith is the euidence of thinges which are not seene therefore not of thinges present Aunswere It is the euidence of thinges which are not seene to wit by the outward senses but they are seene by the eies of the mind euen as if they did lie open to the eies of the bodie Againe they are not seene in respect of their accomplishment or consummation 5 What are the causes of Faith THE first and principall efficient cause of faith is the holie ghost illightening the minde that it may vnderstand the word and moouing the will that it may assent vnto the woord once vnderstoode Yee are freelie saued by faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God Ephes 2.8 Obiection The Diuel hath faith It is wrought therefore in him by the holie ghost Aunswere What faith is in the Diuel is wrought by the spirit of God but that by a generall woorking onely whereby hee worketh in all euen in Diuels and hypocrites what-soeuer knowledge or vnderstanding is in them 1. Cor. 12. c. not by a speciall and proper action or working wherby to regenerat or sanctifie them that they might truely acknowledge him to bee the author of this gift and magnifie him therefore after which maner hee woorketh faith in the elect alone The Diuels therefore and hypocrits haue faith from the spirit of God but the elect from the spirit of God sanctifieng them The instrumentall cause of faith in generall is the whole worde of God the Lawe and the Gospell written spoken readde heard The chiefe instrumental causes of ingendering iustifieng faith are the preaching of the word and the vse of the sacramentes meditated likewise many works miracles of God in the world But the chiefe and proper instrument of iustifieng faith is the preaching of the Gospell the vse of the sacraments For these doth the holy ghost vse as instruments yet not necessarie but arbitrarie at his own good pleasure both to stir vp faith in vs and to nourish strengthen increase the same Rom. 10.17 Faith commeth by hearing Rom. 1.16 The gospell is the power of God vnto saluation to euerie one that beleeueth 1. Cor. 4.15 I haue begottē you through the gospel Mar. 16.16 He that shall beleeue and be Baptized shall be saued Act. 22.16 Wash away thy sins 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread which we break is the communion of the bodie of Christ Wherefore ordinarilie iustifieng faith is neuer engendred in those who are of yeares to receiue it without the preaching of the gospell The cause of that faith which worketh miracles is not simply the woorde of God but there must necessarily come thereto an especiall and immediate reuelation from God The formal causes of faith a sure and ful confidence in Christ The obiect of faith Christ and his benefites promised The final causes of faith Gods glorie our saluation The formall cause of iustifieng faith is a certaine knowledge confidence in Christ The obiect of it is Whole Christ and his benefits promised in the word Likewise God fauorable to vs through Christ The subiect wherein it remaineth is the vnderstanding will of man The end or finall cause 1 The glorie of God to wit the celebration of his trueth iustice bountie mercie which hee hath shewed in the sending of his Sonne and in the giuing of faith in him 2 Our Saluation that we may receiue the blessings which are promised in the worde 6 What are the effects of faith The effectes of faith iustification and regeneration THe effects of iustifieng faith are 1 The iustifieng of vs before God 2 Peace of conscience or ioy resting on God Rom. 5.1 Beeing iustified by faith we haue peace with god 3 Our whole conuersion which followeth faith and beginneth at the same time with faith For by faith are our hats purified 4 The fruits of conuersion repentance euen good woorkes For whatsouer is not of faith is sinne Hither may be referred also the consequences of faith that is encrease of spirituall corporal giftes The first then and immediate effect of iustifieng-faith is Iustification from this afterwardes flow al other benefites
All other proofes and arguments may be referred vnto these 2 What is the last iudgement IN euerie iudgement are the Accused the Accuser the iudge the cause examination hearing of the cause the Law according to which iudgement is giuen the sentence of absolution and condemnation and the execution thereof according to the Lawes Judgement then in generall is an inquisition or examination of a cause by an ordinarie and lawfull iudge according to iust Lawes and a pronouncing of sentence and the exequution thereof according to iust Lawes Nowe is it easie to define this iudgement of God This iudge hath no neede of inquisition or examination of the cause or of witnesses and accusers seeing he is himselfe the searcher of harts Therefore there shal be only the iudge men of whom sentence shall be giuen the law according to which sentence shal be giuen execution The definition of it is this 1 The last iudgement is a iudgement which God shal exercise in the end of the world by christ who should then visiblie descend froÌ„ heauen in a cloud in the glorie maiesty of his Father Angels by whom also then shall be raised from the dead all men which haue died since the beginning of the world vnto the end thereof but the rest who are then liuing shal be sodainly chaunged and all presented before the tribunall seate of Christ who shall giue sentence of al and shal cast the wicked with the diuels into euerlasting tormentes but shall receiue vp the godlie vnto himselfe that they maie with him and blessed Angels enioie eternal happinesse and glorie in heauen It may be defined more brieflie on this wise The last iudgement shall bee a manifestation or declaration and separation of the iust and vniust who euer haue liued or shall liue from the beginning of the woâ—ld vnto the end proceeding from God by christ and a pronouncing of sentence on these men and an execution thereof according to the doctrine of the Law and Gospel The partes of this definition wee wil now in few wordes confirme 1. That iudgement shall be a manifestation of the iust and vniust For Reuel 20.12 The books shall be opened that the secrets of hartes may bee laied open 2. There shall bee a separation of the iust and vniust For Mat. 25.32 Christ shall place the sheep on his right hand but the goats on his left hand 3. This manifestation and separation shal be wrought of God by Christ If of God then shal it bee a most diuine and iust iudgement Rom. 3.6 Jf God bee vnrighteous how shall hee iudge the world Jt shall bee made and wrought by christ because Iohn 5.22 The Father hath committed all iudgement vnto the Son And Act. 17.31 God hath appointed to iudge the worlde by a man 4. Jâ— shall bee a pronouncing of sentence Mat. 25.34 Come yee Blessed of my Father We are Blessed of God not in Adam but in his seed and therefore the sentence shall bee giuen according to the gospel For by nature wee are subiect vnto the wrath of God Therefore also shall the godly say When saw wee thee hungering or thirsting They shall confesse that the retribution of rewardes commeth not by their merit but by his grace Furder after this manner the wicked and the godly shall bee iudged according to the Lawe and Gospell Absolution shall bee principally according to the Gospel but shal be confirmed by the Law Condemnation shal bee principally by the Lawe but shall be confirmed of the Gospel Sentence shal bee giuen on the wicked according to their owne merite Sentence shall be giuen on the godlie according to Christes merite applyed vnto them by faith a testimonie and witnesse of which faith shal be their workes Now to be iudged is to bee declared iust before the tribunal of Christ and to enter into euerlasting life and that with a respect and condition of faith which is required in the Gospell Obiection But vnto euerie man shall be giuen according to his workes Therefore iudgement shall be giuen on al according to the doctrine of the Law Aunswere In this sense shal be giuen also vnto the elect according to their works not that their works are merites but in that they are the effects of faith Wherefore vnto the elect shal be giuen according to their woorkes that is they shal be iudged according to faith to be iudged according to faith is to be iudged according to the Gospel But the iudge maketh mention of our woorks and not of faith First because he wil haue it knowen to others why he so iudgeth least the vngodly condemned persons might obiect that hee giueth vs eternal life vniustly Wherefore he wil shew them our workes and will bring them forth as testimonies to refute them that we haue in this life applyed vnto vs Christes merit Secondly That wee maie haue comfort in this life that we shall hereafter according to our works stand at his right hand 3 Who shall be iudge CHrist shall bee the iudge Iohn 5.22 Hee hath committed all iudgement vnto the Son Neither yet are the Father the holie Ghost remoued from this iudgement But Christ immediatly shal speake and giue sentence and that in his humane nature And when he speaketh God shal speake not onely because he himselfe is God but because the Father shal speake by him The iudgement then shall belong vnto all three persons of the God-head as concerning their consent and authority but vnto Christ as touching the publishing and exequuting of the iudgement For Christ shall visibly giue sentence of all which sentence he shal also together execute The church also shal iudge as touching the approbation and allowing of this iudgement as Christ saith Luk. 22.30 That the Apostles shal sit on twelue seates and shall iudge the twelue tribes of Israel that is they shall subscribe vnto Christes iudgement and approoue his sentence The causes why Christ man shall bee iudge are these 1. Because the church is to bee glorified by the same Mediatour by whom and for whom it was iustified Act. 17.31 God wil iudge the woorld in righteousnesse by that man whome hee hath appointed Matth. 24.30 They shal see the sonne of man come in the cloudes of heauen with power and great glorie Ioh. 5.27 The Father hath giuen power to the Sonne to execute iudgement in that hee is the Sonne of man 2. That we maie haue comfort knowing him to bee our iudge who hath purchased vs with his bloode and who maketh vs his brethren yea his parts and members For he is 1 Our brother and our flesh 2 He hath promised and saide Ioh. 3.36 He that beleeueth in the Sonne hath eternall life cap. 6.24 Verilie verily I say vnto you hee that heareth my word beleeueth in him that sent me hath euerlasting life and shall not come into condemnation but hath passed from death vnto life The third cause why he commeth is to deliuer his Church
wee beleeue that the scriptures were deliuered from heauen be the witnes of the church who seeth not that heerby the autoritie of mans voice is made greater then of the voice of God For he that yeeldeth his testimonie vnto an other so that he is the onely or the chiefe cause why credence is giuen vnto the other out of all doubt greater credite is giuen vnto him then vnto the other who receiueth his testimonie Wherefore it is a speech most vnwoorthy the maiestie of God that the voice of God speaking in his holie booke is not acknowledged except it bee confirmed by the witnesse of men Secondarily 2. Reason Our comfort Faith is groūded on approoued witnes therfore not on mans wheras the doctrine of the Prophets Apostles doth preach of so great matters as the certaine knowledge of thē is so greatly desired of all who are well disposed and the conflictes of doubtfulnes in all mens mindes are so great what full assurance of our faith can there bee what sure consolation against the assaultes of temptations if that that voice on which our confidence relieth bee no otherwise knowen vnto vs to bee indeed the voice of God but because men say so in whom wee see so much ignorance error and vanitie to bee that no man scarcely especially in matters of some weight doth attribute much vnto their woorde except other reasons concurre with it 3 Reason The confutation of our enemies Thirdly the truth of God and christian religion is plainly exposed vnto the mockes and scoffes of the wicked if we going about to stop their mouthes do therefore onely desire that we should be credited that our Religion is from God because our selues say so For if they bee by no other confutation repressed they will with no lesse shew of truth deny it than wee affirme it 4 Reason Witnesses Last of all the scripture it selfe in many places is against this opinion doth chalenge a far higher authoritie vnto it selfe thē which hangeth vpon mens woords For so sayth Christ himselfe Iohn 5. I receiue not the record of man signifieng thereby that his doctrine stood not no not on Iohn Baptists testimonie although yet he did alleadge it but as of lesse account that he might omit nothing by which men might be moued to beleeue Therefore he addeth But I saie these thinges that you may beleeue I haue a greater witnes then the witnes of Iohn And if Christ nowe beeing humbled said these thinges of himselfe then surely shall they be no lesse true of him being in glory and sitting in his throne And 1. Corinth 2. Paul saith My word and my preaching stood not in the entising speech of mans wisedome but in plaine euidence of the spirit and of power that your faith should not be in the wisedome of men but in the power of God If so bee then our faith must not rest no not vpon reasons wisely framed by men much lesse shal it depend on the bare word of men Eph. 2. the Church herselfe is said to bee builded vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles If then the confidence and confession of the Church staieth on the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles as on the foundation the certainty of the Scripture cannot hang on the Churches witnes For so should not the Church be vpheld by the testimonie of the Prophets and Apostles but by her owne And 1. Iohn 5. it is said If we receiue the witnes of men the witnes of God is greater If it be greater then the authoritie of it hangeth not on the record of man But wee are to giue more credence vnto God witnessing the Prophets and Apostles writings to bee indeede his voice then vnto the Church affirming the same Now that it is said of the contrary That they are true the Church alone doth witnesse Answere The minor is false That by the Churches Obiection 1 record alone it doth appeare vnto vs that the sacred bookes which wee haue were written by the Prophets and Apostles whose names they beare in their forhead and that euen vnto vs they are come vncorrupt this we grant not For God farre more certainly testifyeth both in the Scripture and in the hartes of his Saints that no fained or forged thing is in these books thē it can be by the Church and all the creatures of the world confirmed They therefore who stand vpon the Churches testimonie alone in this point shew that themselues haue not as yet felt or vnderstood the chiefest testimonies Furthermore they say that the bookes authentike The discerning of bookes Answere The Minor is false 1 The working of the holy Ghost or as they Obiection 2 terme them Canonical of both Testamentes are discerned from the Apocryphall by the Churches iudgement and therefore that the autority of holy canon doth depend on the churches wisedome But that this difference of the bookes is not determined by the churches iudgement but being imprinted into the books themselues by the Spirite of God is onely acknowledged and approoued by the Church this is easily to be vnderstood if the causes of this difference be considered For either in these which are called Apocryphall the force and maiesty of the heauenly spirit doth lesse euidently appeare in the weight and vehemency of woordes and matter then in others of which it is clear that they are the heauenly oracles therefore set downe in writing by diuine instinct that they might be the rule of our faith or it cannot be determined neither out of these books themselues 2 The certainty of authours nor out of others which are canonicall that they were written either by the Prophets or Apostles because either they were not penned by those whom God by certaine testimonies hath warranted vnto vs to be endued with a prophetical spirit or themselues do not shew any certaine authors of them or by their forme of speech or other reasons it may be gathered that they were not left of them whose names they beare Now as touching either this euidence of the spirit or certainty of the authors we builde not our iudgement on the testimonie of the Church but of the bookes themselues And therefore not for the Churches iudgement onely do we iudge some bookes to be canonicall and the foundation and rule of our faith and do therefore accept of the doctrine of other some because they agree with the canonicall but rather for the verie causes of this difference which wee finde in the bookes them-selues Obiection 3 The Church is more ancient than the Scripture 1. Answere The minor is false As for that which some men say that the Church is ancienter then the Scriptures and therefore of greater autoritie it is too trifling For the woord of God is the euerlasting wisedome in God him-selfe Neither was the knowledge of it then first manifested vnto the Church when it was committed to writing but the manifesting of it began together with the
you into all truth for hee shall not speake of himselfe but whatsoeuer hee shal heare shal hee speake and hee wil shew you the things to come Hee shall glorify mee for hee shall receiue of mine and shall shew it vnto you To this witnes do the Apostles appeal as beeing the chiefe and alone sufficient The Apostle Paul 2. Cor. 1. And it is God which stablisheth vs with you in Christ who hath also sealed vs and hath giuen the earnest of the spirit in our hartes And 1. Thes 1. For our Gospel was not vnto you in word onely but also in power and in the holy Ghost and in much assurance And 1. Iohn 2. But yee haue an ointment from him that is holie and yee haue knowen al thinges Wherefore wee must euer remember this that by the alone witnes of the holy spirite wee are mooued forcibly in our harts to beleeue the Scripture and to submit our selues vnto it as vnto the voice of God and that by al the other before alleadged Testimonies al men indeed are conuicted and the godlie also profitably confirmed but no man is turned vnto God thereby without the spirit witnessing within him For whenas he once breedeth this most assured persuasion in our mindes that the doctrine which is conteined in the holy Bible is of a truth the wil of God worketh that comfort and change of our minds and harts which is promised and taught in this booke by our experience and feeling it is so confirmed that while this remaineth within vs though al Angels men should say contrarie yet we would beleeue this to be the voice of God Obiection The scripture beareth witnes of the spirit therefore the spirit not of it Answere but if that remaine not or be not in vs though al should say it yet we would not beleeue it Neither doth not the spirit therefore establish the autoritie of the Scripture because we are to examine what the spirit speaketh within vs by the rule of the Scripture for before that this is done of vs the spirite himselfe declareth vnto vs that the Scripture is the word of God and inspired by him that he wil teach vs nothing in our hartes which is not agreeable vnto that Testimonie before set downe of him in the Scripture And if this be not first most certainlie persuaded vs of the spirit himselfe we will neuer recal our opinions of God his worship to the Scripture as the onelie rule to trie them by Now then after it is declared vnto vs by diuine inspiration that the Scripture is a sufficient witnes of that diuine Reuelation in our harts then at length do we find our selues to be confirmed by the mutual Testimonie of the same spirite in the Scripture and in our harts and we beleeue the Scripture affirming of it selfe that it was deliuered by diuine inspiration to the holie men of God as it said 2 Tim. 3. and 2. Pet. 1. OF THE FOVRTH QVESTION For what cause no doctrine beside the holy Scripture is to be receaued in the Church The scripture is of God therefore the rule of faith WHEREAS it appeareth vnto vs that it is the woorde of God which the Prophets and Apostles haue left in writing there is no man which doth not see that the Scripture must bee the rule and squire by which all thinges which are taught and done in the church must be tried Now all thinges of which there vseth to arise questions in the Christian Church doe appertaine either vnto doctrine or vnto discipline and ceremonies That the word of God ought to be the rule vnto both sorts it is out of doubt But in this place wee speake of the doctrine of the church which consisteth in the sentences and decrees which wee are bound by the commandement of God to beleeue or obey and therefore they can not bee chaunged by the autoritie of any creature they are become obnoxious vnto the wrath of God whosoeuer submit not themselues in faith and obedience vnto them To these decrees and preceptes the Papists adde many sentences which not onely are no where deliuered in the Scripture but are repugnant vnto it and they contend that the Church or the Bishops haue autoritie of decreeing yea contrarie and besides the Scripture what the Church must beleeue or doe and that mens consciences are bound by those decrees no lesse than by the woordes of the holy Scripture to beleeue or obey Contrariwise wee beleeue and confesse that no doctrine is to bee proposed vnto the Church not onely if it bee repugnant vnto the holie Scripture but if it bee not conteined in it And whatsoeuer either is not by the expresse testimony of the holie Scripture deliuered The difference of the Scripture of other mens opiniōs or doth not consequently follow out of the woordes of the Scripture rightly vnderstood that wee hold may bee without any hurt or conscience beleeued or not beleeued chaunged abrogated and omitted 1 The Scripture only is of it selfe to be beleeued and the rule of faith For wee must euer hold a necessarie difference betweene the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles and the writinges and doctrine of others in the Church first that the Scripture onely neither hath nor can haue anie error in anie matter other teachers both maie erre and oftentimes also doe er when they depart from the written woord of God Againe that the Scriptures are beleeued on their own word because we know that God speaketh with vs in them others haue credit not because themselues say so but because the scripture witnesseth so neither a whit more than they can proue by the Scripture Wherefore we doe not reiect others doctrine and labors in the Church but onely setting them in their owne place we submit them vnto the rule of Gods word This doctrine first is deliuered of God himselfe and that not in one place onely of the Scripture as Deut. 4. You shal not ad vnto the word which I speak vnto you neither shal you take away frō it And in the last Chapter of the Apocalyps I protest vnto euerie man that heareth the words of the Prophesie of this book if any man shal ad vnto these things God shal adde vnto him the plagues that are written in this book And if anie man shal diminish of the words c. Neither onely by these wordes is forbidden that no false things openly repugnant to the written woord be added to the doctrine of the church but also that no vncertaine things or things not appertaining vnto it be mingled therewith For it is not in the power of any creature to pronounce what we are to thinke of God and his wil but this is onely to bee learned out of that which is disclosed in his woord And therefore the men of Beraea are commended Act. 17. Who searched the Scriptures daily whether those thinges were so 2 Faith is grounded only of the word Secondly
made against the distinction of the Maior proposition in appointing either our selues or another Where only one meanes of satisfieng is put downe there must not be sought for or set downe another But the Lawe acknowledgeth and putteth downe onely one means and way of satisfieng to witte by our selues Therefore wee must not set downe also another neither must wee say either by our selues or by another Aunswere We graunt the whole reason being vnderstoode of the Law or according to the declaration of the Law For in the Law in vaine is sought the way of satisfieng by another Againe the Law teacheth onely one way or meanes of satisfieng yet so that it no where excludeth or denieth the other meanes which is by another For no where doth the Lawe say ONELY by our selues satisfaction must be made to the Law And albeit God did not expresse that other meanes in the Law yet in his secret counsail hee vnderstood it and left it to bee reuealed by the Gospel The law requireth our selues to satisfie The gospel sheweth and Gods mercie admitteth another to satisfie In this therefore we must seeke it This double meanes of satisfieng is to be obserued the former meanes of satisfaction the Law and iustice of God requireth to wit that satisfaction be made by vs the other doth the Gospel declare and the mercy of god admit Reply The doctrine of the Gospel then is disagreeing from the Law Aunswere It is not disagreeing Because the Law putteth it not exclusiue as shutting out al other neither what the Law teacheth not dooth it therefore deny or take away Lastly that a Mediatour is necessarie to make satisfaction to the iustice of God for vs many other thinges declare 1. The tremblings and tormentes of conscience in euerie one 2. The paines of the wicked 3. The sacrifices ordained by God whereby was desciphered Christes onely perfect Sacrifice 4. The Sacrifices of the Heathen For when as they were pressed with the prickes of conscience they sought for a meanes without themselues whereby they might pacifie God 5. The Sacrifices of hypocrits 6. The sacrifices of Papistes 3 What is the office of a Mediatour THe office of a Mediatour is To deale with both parties What the mediator doth with God both the offended and the offender First with GOD who was offended our Mediatour had necessarily to do these things 1. To make intercession for vs vnto him and to craue pardon for our fault 2. To offer himselfe for to satisfie 3. To satisfie indeede the iustice of GOD by suffering for our sinnes punishment sufficient though temporall 4. To craue of God and also to obtaine that he would accept of this satisfaction as a price of sufficient woorthinesse for which hee woulde account vs for Children pardoning our offences 5. To bee our surety and to promise in our behalfe that at length we wil leaue off to offend him by our sinnes Without this suretiship or promise intercession findeth no place no not with men much lesse with God Secondly with the party offending that is with vs What he doth with man our Mediator must do these things 1. He must be the messenger or embassador of God the father vnto vs that is to shew and open this decree of the father that hee dooth present himselfe to make satisfaction for vs and that God wil for this satisfaction pardon vs and receiue vs into fauour This vnlesse he should perform we should bee euer ignoraunt of this will of God and so should not be desirous of so great a benefit nor euer attain vnto it For there is no desire after that which is vnknown 2. Hee must perfourme this satisfaction by the pouring out of his owne blood because otherwise the iustice of God shoulde be violated 3. He must impute and apply that satisfaction vnto vs. 4. Hee must cause vs by giuing his holy spirite vnto vs to agnise this so great a benefit and to embrace and not reiect it For neither can any reconcilement be or any amity be knit betweene parties who are at variaunce except both partes accorde 5. Hee must by the same spirite cause vs to leaue off to sinne and beginne to bee conformable to Gods Lawe that is he must regenerate vs and restore the lost Image of god in vs. 6. He must preserue maintaine shield vs in this reconcilement and obedience begunne in vs against the Diuels and all enimies yea against our owne selues least we reuolt againe 7. Hee must glorifie vs being raised againe from the dead that is perfect and finish our saluation which is begun or all the giftes both which we haue lost in Adam those which himselfe hath merited for vs. In merit and efficacie doeth the Mediatourship consist The office therefore of the Mediator consisteth in merite in efficacy or forcible operation For in these two are all those things which we haue mentioned comprehended absolued Ioh. 10. I laie downe my life for my sheep I giue vnto them eternall life God giueth vs eternall life and this life is in his Sonne Iohn 1. In him was life Iohn 5.26 As the Father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath hee giuen to the Sonne to haue life in him-selfe As the Father raiseth vppe the dead and quickeneth them euen so the Sonne quickeneth whome hee will The benefites of the Mediatour Nowe when question is made of the office of the Mediator question is made withall concerning his benefites For the office inioyned of God vnto the Mediatour is to bestowe benefits which Paul 1. Cor. 1.30 compriseth in fowre generall heades as it were when hee saith Christ is made of God vnto vs wisedome and righteousnesse and sanctification and redemption I. Wisedome 1 He is called wisedome first because he is the matter or subiect of our wisedome 1. Cor. 22. I esteemed not to know any thing among you but Iesus christ him crucified This is our chiefest wisedome to knowe and beleeue that Christ is appointed our sauiour by whom wee beeing reconciled to GOD haue giuen vnto vs the holy spirite righteousnesse and euerlasting life Secondly Because hee is the cause or author of our wisedome and that three waies 1 Because hee hath brought foorth out of the bosome of the eternall father wisedome that is the Doctrine of our redemption 2 Because he hath ordained and doth preserue the ministerie of his woord by which he informeth vs of the fathers will and his office 3 Because hee is forcible and effectuall in the hartes of the chosen and maketh them to yeeld their assent vnto the woorde or Doctrine and to bee refourmed by it according to his Image For these three causes hee is called the woorde and the image of GOD as it is saide No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and hee to whom the Sonne will reueale him Shorter thus Christ is called our wisedome because hee is 1 The subiect 2 The author 3 The meanes of
purchased by the blood of Christ which all we beleeue to be giuen vs by faith If therefore faith be the next cause of our Iustification in respect of vs it is also the cause of those thinges which necessarily followe Iustification Luk. 8.48 Thy faith hath saued thee In a worde The effects of faith are Iustification and Regeneration which is begunne here and is to bee perfected in the life to come Rom. 3.28 10.10 Acts. 13.39 7 Vnto whom faith is giuen IVstifieng faith is only proper to the elect Iustifieng faith giuen to all the Elect and to them onely and that to all of them For it is giuen to the elect alone and to all the elect euen to infants as concerning some inclnation Ioh. 6.44 No man cā come to me except the father which hath sent me drawe him Ioh. 20.16 Ye beleeue not for yee are not of my sheepe Mat. 13.11 It is giuen to you to knowe the secrets of heauen but vnto them it is not giuen Act. 13.48 And they beleeued as many as were ordained to euerlasting life Rom. 8.30 Whome hee predestinated them also hee called and whome hee called them also hee iustified Ephes 2.8 Faith is the gift of God Rom. 10.16 All haue not harkened to the gospell 2. Thes 3.2 For all men haue not faith Temporarie faith and the faith of miracles is giuen to those who are members of the visible Church only that is hypocrites But now neuerthelesse this faith of miracles ceaseth which florished in the Primatiue Church for that nowe the Doctrine is sufficiently confirmed Historicall faith all they haue who are by profession of the Church whether they be of the godly or reprobates yea and they also who are not members of the Church but enimies as Diuels Tyrants Historicall is a part of Iustifieng faith because there can bee no assent or perswasion of a thing which is not first knowen Obiection Historicall faith is a good worke Historical faith which is good in it selfe made ill The Diuels haue Historicall faith Therefore they haue good woorkes Aunswere Historical faith is a good worke if it be ioyned with an application of those thinges whereto it assenteth that is with confidence Reply Historicall faith is a good woork though it bee not ioined with confidence because it is an effect of the spirite of God Therefore the Diuels haue good woorkes Aunswere Historical faith is a good woorke in it selfe but is made ill by an accident for that the reprobate doe not apply those thinges to themselues which they knowe and beleeue to bee true Wherefore the Diuels are saide to tremble for that they doe not think that God is towardes them also such as is described in his woorde good mercifull c. The summe is As the substaunce it selfe of the Diuels and other things which they retaine still of their first creation so also both the knowlege and faith which they haue concerning diuine matters are in themselues very good because they are the effects and gifts of god but they are made euil by an accident euen by reason of their abusing of them for that they referre them not to this end as to shewe themselues gratefull vnto God the author of these good things and to magnifie him for them A beleeuing inclination in infante though not an actual beleefe Obiection Against this that all the Elect are saide to haue faith some thus reason Many infantes are of the Elect and yet haue not faith Therefore al the Elect haue not faith Answere They haue not indeede actuall faith but they haue a power or inclination to beleeue which the holy Ghost as is fittest for their capacity and condition woorketh in them Wherefore that remaineth stil which before was confirmed That all the Elect haue faith And further this I adde that not only faith but the confession also of faith is necessary for al the Elect which are growen to years and vnderstanding 1. Because of the commandements of God Exod. 20. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lorde thy God in vaine Therfore thou shalt take it aright He that shal confes me c. Mat. 10.32 2. Because of the glory of god Let your light shine before the woorlde Mat. 5.16 3. Bicause faith is not idle for it is as a fruitful tree 4. That we may bring others to Christ And thou beeing conuerted confirme thy brethren Luc. 22.32 How to know that wee haue faith Now we know that we haue faith 1. By the testimony of the holy ghost and by a feeling of true faith in our selues or by the thing it selfe that is by a true and vnfained desire of receiuing the benefits offered by Christ For he that beleeueth knoweth that hee dooth beleeue 2. By the strife and conflict within vs of the faith of doubtfulnes 3. By the effects that is by an earnest purpose of obeying God according to all his commandements Against the certainty of faith The certaintie of faith whereof we spake in the definition of faith some dispute on this wise Obiect 1. They who may fal before the end of their life into sin dānation cannot be certain of their saluation euerlasting life This is proued because to be certaine and to be in possibility to fall are contrary one to the other It is false therefore which is taught in the definitiō of Iustifieng faith to wit that euerlasting life is giuen vs and so our faith to be certaine and assured of it Ans To be in possibility of falling or failing that is finally True faith may faint for a time but cannot fail finallie is contrary to the certainty of our saluatiō But they who are once inriched by god with true faith doe not fail finally Reply 1. All that are weak may faile finally We are al weak Therefore we maie fail finally Auns The Maior is to bee distinguished All that are weak may faile finally true if they stoode by their owne strength But we who are beleeuers stand preserued and vphelde by the grace and power of God Therefore can wee not finally fail For whom God hath once embraced with his fauour them he wil not nor suffereth to fal vtterly from his grace Reply 2. But god hath no where promised that he wil keep and preserue vs in his grace Answere Yes he hath promised and expressed it Ioh. 1.28 I giue vnto them eternal life and they shall neuer perish neither shall any pluck them out of mine hand My father which gaue them me is greater than all and none is able to take them out of my fathers hand I and my father are one Rom. 8.38 I am persuaded that neither death nor life nor Angels nor principalities nor powers nor thinges present nor thinges to come c. shall bee able to separate vs from the loue of God which is in Christ Iesus Reply 3. But it is saide 1. Corint 10.12 Let him that thinketh hee standeth take heede least hee
faith sighes and ardent praiers a sincere professing of Christianitie 1. Corint 12.3 No man can saie that Iesus is the Lord but by the holy ghost In a woorde by faith and repentaunce we know that the holie Ghost dwelleth in vs. OF THE CHVRCH THE questions to be obserued 1 What the Church is 2 How many waies it is taken 3 What are the markes thereof 4 Wherefore it is called holy and Catholique 5 What is the difference betweene the Church the common-weale or ciuil state 6 Whence it is that the Church differeth from the rest of mankinde 7 Whether any may be saued out of the church 1 WHAT THE CHVRCH IS VVHen the question is what the Church is it is presupposed that there is a Church so that it is not necessarie to make a question Whether there be a church Now as concerning the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ecclesia which we cal the church it is natiuely a Greeke woord and commeth from a word which signifieth to cal forth For the custome was in Athens that a companie of the citizens were called foorth by the voice of the crier from the rest of the multitude as it were namelie and by their Hundreds to an assembly wherein some publique speech was had or to heare relation made of some sentence or iudgement of the Senate And thus differeth the word Ecclesia from Synagoga or Synagog For Synagoga signifieth any manner of congregation be it neuer so common and inordinate But Ecclesia betokeneth an ordained congregation and such as is called together for some cause From hence the Apostles translated the name Ecclesia to their purpose terming the Church by it for resemblaunce and likenesse sake For the church is gods congregation neither comming together by chance without cause nor beeing inordinate but called foorth by the voice of the Lorde and the crie of the word that is by the ministers of the gospel from the kingdome of Satan to hear or embrace Gods word This congregation or companie of those which are called of God to the knowledge of the gospell the Latines keeping still the Greeke woorde call Ecclesia But it shall bee requisite that we a little more fully define what the Church is The church of God is a congregation or companie of men The definition of the Church chosen from euerlasting of god to eternal life which from the beginning of the woorld vnto the ende thereof is gathered of the sonne of god out of all mankinde by the holie ghost and the Woorde consenting in true faith and which the Sonne of God defendeth preserueth and at length glorifieth with glorie and life euerlasting Thus is the true Church of God defined whereof the Creede dooth properly speake Obiection 1. They which are in the church perish not as the definition affirmeth Manie hypocrites are in the Church Therefore either hypocrites shall not perish or it is false that they which are in the Church perish not Aunswere They which are in the inuisible Church perish not and of this was our definition But the Minor proposâ—â—ion speaketh of the visible Church in which are manie hypocrires Obiection 2. Where the inuisible church is not neither is the visible Jn the time of popery was not the inuisible church therefore there was not the visible Aunswere I denie the Minor For there also were remnantes that is there were alwaies some mingled with those dregs who held the foundation some more purely some lesse In summe the Church was oppressed but not extinguished 2 How manie waies the church is taken THE church is taken either for the true church The false Church or for the false The false church is vnproperly called the church and is a companie arrogating vnto themselues the title of Christes church but which do not folow the same but rather persequute it The true church is either visible The true church 〈◊〉 either vâ—â—ible or inuisible or inuisible The visible church is a companie among men embracing and professing the true and vncorrupt doctrine of the Lawe and the Gospel and vsing the Sacramentes aright according to Christes institution and professing obedience vnto the doctrine in which company are many vnregenerated or hypocrites In the 〈…〉 perish consenting notwithstanding agreeing to the doctrine in which also the Son of God is forcible to regenerate some by the vertue of his spirite vnto euerlasting life Hither appertaine the parables of the seede and the tares The inuisible church is a companie of those which are elected to eternall life in whom a newe life is begun here by the holie Ghost is perfected in the woorlde to come They which are in this inuisible church They which are in the inuisible Church neuer perish neuer perish neither are any hypocrites therein but the Elect only of whom it is said Ioh. 10.28 No man shal plucke my sheep out of mine hands Moreouer both these partes of the true Church both visible and inuisible are either vniuersall or particular The Vniuersall visible Church The Vniuersall visible Church is the companie of all those which professe the doctrine wheresoeuer in the worlde they be The particular Visible Church The particular visible is also a companie of those which professe the doctrine but in some certaine place The Visible Church is Vniuersall in respect of the profession of one Faith in Christ and of one Doctrine and worshippe But it is particular in respect of place and habitation The Vniuersall Inuisible and of diuersitie of rites and customes So also the Inuisible Church is Vniuersall as all the Elect in whatsoeuer place they bee and at whatsoeuer time they liued haue one faith The particular Inuisible againe it is particular as either in this or that place they haue the same faith Now all particular Churches are partes of the Vniuersall and the Visible are partes of the Vniuersall church Inuisible And of this Vniuersall Jnuisible Church doth the Article of our Creed speake properlie I beleeue the Holie Catholique Church For besides that the vniuersall inuisible church is catholique it is also nobilitated with this title that it is Holie Furder in this is the true communion of Saints between Christ and al his members It is called inuisible not that the men are inuisible but because their faith and godlinesse is inuisible neither is knowen of anie but of themseleus in whom it is neither can wee indeede discerne certainly the godly from the hypocrites in the church The TriumphaÌ„t and Militant parts of the Vniuersall Inuisible The partes of this vniuersal inuisible church may these two not vnfitly be accounted The church Militant and Triumphant The Militant is in this world fighting warring vnder the banner of Christ against the Diuel the woorlde and our flesh The Triumphant which both now triumpheth with the blessed Angels in heauen and shall after the resurrection enioie a full triumph Nowe although the Militant church is
iustification but as effectes of faith and as it were a testimony of their faith and thankefulnes For faith is not without her fruit Now to applie the merit of Christ is the proper act of faith but other good workes are not so though they also proceede from faith Wherefore also the apprehension of Christs merite is after another manner required in them that are to bee iustified than are other good woorkes For faith with this her proper act without which faith cannot bee considered is required as a necessarie instrument whereby we applie Christs merite vnto vs. But good woorkes are not required that by them we may apprehend Christs merite and much lesse that for them wee should be iustified but that by them we may shew our faith which without good woorkes is dead and is not knowen but by them Whatsoeuer is necessarily coherent with the cause that is not therefore necessarily required to the proper effect of that cause but good workes although they are necessarily coherent and ioined with faith yet are they not necessarie for the apprehension of Christs merit that we should ouer and besides faith by them also apply the same vnto vs. 6 Obiection The Messias bringeth euerlasting iustice and righteousnes Jmputed righteousnes is not eternall Therefore wee are not thereby iustified Aunswere It is said that Christes righteousnesse shall bee an euerlasting righteousnesse but after a diuerse manner For in the life to come wee shal bee iust after another manner than in this life For although we shall then be iust by the same righteousnes euen by the righteousnes of Christ imputed vnto vs yet with this shall also the legal iustice and righteousnesse be continued so that then also by the legall righteousnesse we shall be perfectly iust because now onely we are as concerning that but in part and beginning iust Each iustice both the iustice of the Law and the iustice of the Gospel is eternall by continuation And the iustice and righteousnesse of the Gospell that is the iustice of Christ imputed vnto vs is eternal by continuation of the imputation The iustice of the Law is eternal by continuation of good woorkes euen as it is continued by good woorkes first and beginning in this life vntill at length after this life it bee perfected and become perfect and so continue to al eternity 7 Obiection Knowledge dooth not iustifie Faith is a knowledge Therefore faith doth not iustifie Aunswere Knowledge alone dooth not iustifie But iustifieng faith is not a knoweledge onely but also a confidence and sure persuasion whereby as a meane we apply Christes merit vnto vs. And furthermore Knowledge and this sure persuasion are much different Knowledge is in the vnderstanding but this is in the will Therefore a sure persuasion or confidence is not only a knoweledge of a thing but also a will and purpose of doing or applieng that which wee knowe or of resting in it so that wee are thereby secure and take ioie of heart therein 8 Obiection Saint Iames saith cap. 2.24 Yee see then how that of workes a man is iustified and not of faith onelie Answere 1. Hee speaketh of that iustice whereby wee are iustified through our workes before men that is are approued iust or are found to be iustified but he speaketh not of that iustice whereby we are iustified before God that is whereby wee are reputed of God iust for vniust For hee saith in the same chapter Shew me thy faith by thy works and J will shewe thee my faith by my woorkes 2. He speaketh not of a true or liuely faith but of a dead faith which is without works 9 Obiection Euil workes condemne Therefore good workes iustifie Ans 1. These contraries are not matches for our euil works are perfectly euil our good workes are imperfectly good 2. Although our good woorkes were perfectly good yet should they not deserue eternal life because they are debts Vnto euil workes a reward is giuen by order of iustice vnto good works not so because we are obliged and bound to doe them For the creature is obliged vnto his creator neither may he of the contrary bind god vnto him by any works or means to benefit him 10 Obiect Saint Iohn saith 1. Ioh. 3.7 He that doth righteousnes is righteous Therefore not he that beleeueth Ans 1. He is righteous before mē that is by doing righteousnes he declareth himself righteous to others but before god we are righteous not by dooing righteousnes but by beleeuing 2. He sheweth there not how we are righteous but what the righteous are when he saith that hee that is regenerated is also iustified 11 Obiection Christ saith Luk. 7.47 Many sinnes are forgiuen her because she loued much Therfore good works are the cause of iustification Ans 1. Christ here reasoneth from the latter to the former from the effect which commeth after to the cause which goeth before Manie sins are forgiuen her Therefore shee loued much and because there is a great feeling in that woman of the benefite it must needes therefore bee that the benefite is great and many sins are forgiuen her That this is the meaning of Christes woordes appeareth by the parable which hee there vseth 2. Not euerie thing that is the cause of consequence in reason is also the cause of the thing it selfe which followeth in that consequence of reason Wherefore it is a fallacie of the consequent if it bee concluded Therefore for her loue manie sins are forgiuen her For the particle because which Christ vseth doth not alwaies signifie the cause of the thing folowing It foloweth not The Sunne is risen because it is day Therefore the day is cause of the rising of the Sun the contrarie rather is true 12 Obiection That which is not in the Scripture is not to be taught or reteined That wee are iustified by faith onelie is not in the Scripture neither the wordes themselues nor the sense of the woords Therefore it is not to be reteined Aunswere To the Maior we say That which is not in Scripture neither in words nor in sense is not to be reteined But that we are iustified by faith onely is conteined in Scripture as touching the sense thereof For we are said to be iustified freely Rom. 3.27 Gal. 2.16 Eph. 2.8 9. Tit. 3.5 1. Iohn 1.7 without the workes of the Law by faith without merite Not of anie righteousnesse which we haue doone The blood of Jesus Christ cleanseth vs from al sinne Therefore no woork shall be meritorious If no worke Therefore are we iustified by faith onely apprehending Christes merit Wherefore wee are necessarily to retaine the particle onelie 1. That all merite either of faith or our workes maie be remooued from this woork of our iustification 2. That it maie be shewed that faith not the merite of faith is necessarily required to iustice because the iustice or merite of Christ is giuen by faith onely and by this meane alone we receiue that iustice and
enchanters request 4 Superstition which is to attribute such effectes to certaine things or obseruations of gestures or woordes as depend not ether on natural or moral reason or on the word of God and either doe not at all follow and fall out or are wrought by the Diuels and other causes than those wherby they were thought to haue bin done Vnder this vice of superstition are comprehended South-saieng Leuit. 19.26 Isay 44.25 47 13. obseruations of dreames diuinations signes and predictions or foretellings of Wyzardes all which are by expresse wordes condemned in the Scriptures 5 Al trust and confidence which is reposed in creatures For this is manifestly repugnant to the true knowledge of one god to faith hope For trust and confidence is an honour due vnto god alone which who so translateth vnto creatures dooth in very deede imagine moe gods Wherefore god in his word doth vtterly condemne those Psal 46.2 Ier 17 5. Mat. 6.24 Eph. 5 5. who repose trust and confidence in things created as in men And also hee condemneth those which put their trust in their owne workes and in riches which al couetous men do and so vnder the name of this vice is couetousnes also comprehended 6 Jdolatrie which is most of all repugnaunt vnto the true knowledge of god and to faith Now there are two kinds of Jdolatrie 1. When another is woorshipped than that one true God This kinde of Idolatrie doth properly belong vnto the first commandement 2. When albeit the true God is worshipped yet neuerthelesse he is worshipped after another manner than God himselfe hath in the second commaundement and also commonlie in his word prescribed either by internal worship or by external worship or external rites and ceremonies This other kind of Idolatrie is forbidden in the second commaundement 7 The contempt of God which is to know those thinges of God which are true but not to bee moued thereby to loue him Vnto faith are repugnaunt of one side which offendeth in the defect of faith 1. Vnbeliefe which assenteth to such doctrine as is heard known concerning God 2. Doutfulnes which neither assenteth stedfastly to the doctrine of God neither dooth altogether gainsay it but beeing floting and wauering hath a weake inclination nowe to one part and now to another 3. Distrust which applieth not vnto it selfe the knowledge which it hath of God and his promises and doth through feare of Gods forsaking vs surcease the dooing of that it should doe 4. A dissembling or hypocritical faith 5. Temporarie faith or a reuolting from faith which is to yeeld an assent to the doctrine of the Church and to reioice in the knowledge thereof and to embrace it for a season but without any applying or full persuasion of the promise of Gods grace and without regeneration and therefore to be ouercome through temptations or other causes and so to cast away againe that assent and profession of godlines Mat. 13.20 He that receiued seed in the stonie ground is he which heareth the woorde and incontinentlie with ioy receiueth it Yet hath he no roote in himselfe and dureth but a season for as soone as tribulation or persecution commeth because of the word by and by hee is offended Acts. 8. Simon also beleeued and was baptized Heb. 6.4 Jt is impossible that they which were once lightened and haue tasted of the heauenlie gift c. Nowe amongest those which are repugnaunt vnto faith of the other side which offendeth in the excesse are 1. Tempting of God which is through an vnbeliefe or distrust or contempt of God and a trust or loue of our owne wisedome iustice or power and glorie to depart from gods woord or order and so to make trial of gods truth or power and stubbornly and proudly to prouoke god vnto anger Deut. 6 Mat 4. Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy god Exod. 17.2 Moses saide vnto them why contend yee with me Wherefore doe ye tempt the Lord 1. Cor. 10.22 Do we prouoke the Lord to anger 2. Carnal securitie which is to liue without thinking of god and his will or of our owne infirmitie and daungers and without acknowledging or bewailing of our sinnes and without the feare of god and yet to promise vnto our selues an indemnitie from the anger of god and from punishment without faith or repentance This is often and most grieuously accused in the scripture Mat. 24. Christ speaketh of that securitie and carelesnes which shal bee at his second comming Psalm 36. Wickednes saith vnto the wicked man euen in mine heart that there is no feare of god before his eies For hee flattereth himselfe in his owne eies Psal 94.7 They saie the Lord shall not see neither wil the god of Jacob regarde it But this carnal securitie differeth from spiritual securitie because the carnal persisteth in sinnes and feareth not the anger of god and punishment because either it knoweth not mans weakenes and sinne and gods wrath or contemneth it But the spiritual securitie is a faith and hope which being ioined with true repentance without sinne and in feare of gods chastisements doth not yet fear gods forsaking because it is assured of gods vnchāgeable fauour towardes it Whereof it is spoken Rom. 8.31 Jf god be on our side who can be against vs Vnto Humilitie is opposed in the extremitie of excesse Pride or arrogancie which is to ascribe his giftes not to god but to his owne worthines or abilitie and therefore to stand in admiration of himselfe and his gifts not truely to feare god neither to acknowledge and bewaile his defects and so further to be aspiring to higher place and calling standing not vpon god but vpon his owne giftes to attribute also to himselfe those thinges which hee hath not to attempt thinges aboue his power and not belonging vnto his calling to contemne and debase others in respect of himselfe to beleeue none but to couet to excel and be eminent aboue others to referre his gifts and counsels principallie to his owne glorie to be angrie with god and men to fret and sume against god when his desires and counsels are hindered and also to accuse God of errour and vniustice if Gods counsels agree not with the iudgements and affections of men Vnto humility is opposed in the extremity of defect A faigned modestie or humility which is a double pride and it is to hunt after the praise and commendation of humility by denying of those thinges outwardly which yet a man dooth in his minde attribute vnto himselfe either truely or falsly and by refusing of those thinges which he most of all desireth and couertly laboreth to compasse Vnto patience in the extremity of defect impatience is contrary which is through the not knowing and distrust of Gods wisedome prouidence iustice and goodnes not to bee willing to obey God in suffering such aduersitie as he willeth vs to suffer and through griefe to fret against God or to do somewhat against
creation of mankind and the first beginnings of the Church in paradice yea the woord is that immortall seede of which the Church was borne The Scripture is first in nature as the cause The Church therefore could not bee except the woord were first deliuered Now when wee name the holy Scripture wee meane not so much the characters of the letters and the volumes but rather the sentences which are conteined in them which they shal neuer be able to prooue to be of lesse antiquitie then the Church For albeit they were repeated and declared often after the beginning of the gathering of the Church 2. Answere The Maior is false A yonger workmā may be more skilful than an elder yet the summe of the Law Gospell was the same for euer To conclude neither is that which they assume alwaies true That the autority of the ancienter witnes is greater thā of th◠yōger For such may be the conditiō quality of the yonger witnes that he may deserue greater credit then the ancienter Christ being man bare witnes of himselfe Moses also and the Prophets had long time before borne witnes of him neither yet is the autoritie therefore greater no not of all the other witnesses then of Christ alone In like sort the Church witnesseth that the holy Scripture which wee haue is the woord of God The Scripture it selfe also doth witnes of it selfe the same but with that kinde of witnes that is more certaine and sure than all the othes of Angels and men There is alleadged also to this purpose a place 1. The pillar of truth to Timot Obiection 4 3. Where the Church is called the pillar and ground of the truth But since the Scripture doth teach otherwhere and that not once that the foundation of the Church is Christ and his word it is manifest inough that the Church is the pillar of the truth not a foundamentall or vpholding piller but a ministeriall that is a keeper and spreader of it abroad and as it were a mansion place or sure seat which might carrie the truth left with her and committed vnto her in the open face of all mankinde Acts. 9. Gal. 2. 1 Thes 2. 2 Thes 1. Tit. 1. euen as the holy Apostle Paul was called an elect vessell to beare the name of God before the gentiles and kinges neither yet did Paul get credit vnto the Gospell but the Gospell vnto Paul So likewise are the Apostles termed pillars Galat. 2. not that the Church rested on their persons but that they were the chiefe teachers of the gospell and as it were the chieftaines and maisters of doctrine For a man is not bound to beleeue those that teach on their bare woord but for the proofes which they bring of their doctrine Furthermore they alleage a sentence of Austin out of Obiection 5 his booke entituled against the Epistle of the foundation A place of Augustine 1 Answere An example maketh no rule chap. 5. I saith Augustine would not beleeue the Gospell except the authoritie of the catholicke Church did mooue mee thereunto But first if it were true that either Austin or some others did giue credence vnto the Gospell onely for the Churches autoritie yet might there not bee fashioned a rule hence of that which all men either did or ought to doe But that this is not the meaning of Austine 2 Aunswere He speaketh of himselfe as yet not cōuerted or not sufficientlie confirmed which these mē wold haue they do easily perceaue who weigh both the whole course of this place the phrase of speech which is vsual vnto Austen For Austen going about to shew that the Manichees were destitute of al proof of their doctrine first he opposeth one who as yet beleeueth not the gospel and denieth that such a one is able any way to be conuicted by the Manichaeans for he were to be conuicted either by argumentes drawen out of the doctrine it selfe of which the Manichaeans haue none or by the consent of the catholike Church from which themselues were departed for example sake he proposeth himselfe who should not haue had beleeued the Gospel except the authoritie of the catholik Church had moued him thereunto Austen therefore speaketh this not of himselfe as hee was then when hee writ these things against the Manichaeans but of himselfe before hee was yet conuerted or not sufficiently confirmed And that hee speaketh not of the present but of the time past the words that follow do manifestly declare whom then I beleeued when they said Beleeue the Gospel why should I not beleeue them when they say Beleeue not a Manichean For hence it appeareth that when he saith he was mooued especially by the authority of the Church he meaneth it of that time at which he obeied the Churches voice that is departed from the Manichaeans vnto the true Church But after that once he was conuerted and had perceaued the truth of doctrine that his faith was not now any more builded on the authoritie of the Church but on a far other foundation himselfe is a most sufficient witnes for vs whereas in the selfesame book Therefore he did beleeue the Church especially before he was able to perceiue it cap. 14. he saith on this wise Thou hast purposed nothing els but to commend that thy selfe beleeuest and to laugh at that which I beleeue And when as I of the other side shal commend that which myselfe beleeue laugh at that which thou beleeuest what dost thou thinke we must determine or do but euen to shake handes with them who bid vs to know certaine things and afterward will vs to beleeue things that are vncertain and let vs follow them who bid vs first to beleeue that which as yet we are not able to perceaue that being more enhabled by faith it self we may discerne to vnderstand that which we do beleeue not men now but God himselfe inwardly strengthning and illightning our mind Wherefore they do manifest iniury vnto Austen who draw that which himselfe confesseth of himselfe when hee was not yet conuerted or was but weake vnto that time when he affirmeth far otherwise not of himselfe onely but of al the godly For so reuerent a regard ought we to haue of the worde of God and such also is the force and efficacy of the holie spirit in confirming the harts of beleeuers that we beleeue God yea without any creatures Testimony euen as Elias forsooke not god 1. Reg. 19. The application of the answere no not when he thought that himselfe only was left aliue of the true worshippers of God If therefore either Austen or whosoeuer els being not as yet conuerted vnto religiō nor as yet hauing experiēce of the certainty of it in his hart That followeth not which they would 1 Because there is more in the Consequent than in the Antecedent 2 Because thereis a fallacy of the Accident A declaration of the like example 1 The
following it But God suffereth them for a while to haue their swinge and to florish that by the scandal of the crosse the faith and patience of the godly may be more exercised and tried vnto the wicked there may be left a time of repentance and when they abuse the long-suffering of God that then at length so much the iuster and heauier plague may light on them And therefore the holy Scripture in so many places as in the Psalmes 37.52.57.58 often elsewhere comforteth the godly against this kind of tentation foretelling vnto them defence and deliuery but destructiō Obiection 2 vnto their enemies Not all Neither is thereby the force of this proofe weakned because that all the persecutours of the Church are not in Tragicall manner taken out of this life For whiles God doth take vengeance on most of them in this life he doth sufficiently shew what he would haue to be thought of the rest verily that they are his enemies whom without they repent he will plūge into aeternal plagues the beginning and feeling of the which is desperation in which all the enemies of Christian Religion end their daies yea they who are not oppressed with any other calamities of this life To conclude that it may be manifest Not for this cause Answere Yea for this cause that they are Obiection 3 not onely for other transgressions so punished of God God doth so often denounce in his worde that such shal bee the ends of his enemies and that for this very cause because they go about to extinguish the people and true worship of God Yea furthermore they are not a few frō whom while they lie in torments their cōscience wresteth out this confession that they haue drawen these miseries vpon themselues by persecuting the godly as from Antiochus Epiphanes Iulian the Apostata And since that al the aduersaries of the Church in their calamites and death are destitute of comfort it is manifest that they suffer as the enemies of God and therefore are far from true Religion Now that which the wicked alone doe there is no doubt but that is in the number of their Sinnes for which they suffer punishment Wherefore the ouerthrowes of the enemies of the Church are no obscure Testimony of the wrath of God against them euen as God himself saith of Pharao To this same purpose haue I stirred thee vp Exod. 9. Rom. 9. that I might shew my power in thee and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth 10 The consent of true doctrine 10 The consent of the parts of doctrine 11 The confession and constancy of Martyrs and the iarring of others euen about the chiefe pointes 11 The testimonies and confessions of Martyrs who sealing with their blood this Doctrine doe shewe euen in the middest of death that they indeede doe so thinke as they taught and that they drawe that comfort out of it which they did preach vnto others And hence also it appeareth Obiection 1 that the certainty of this holy doctrine dependeth not on mens record Doth the certaintie of doctrine depēd of men though the constancy of Martyrs and other godly men giue comfort vnto vs. For albeit the Testimony of the Saintes too doth concur as a lesse principal proofe vnto our confirmation yet in their examples is seene a far other euē the testimony of God himself who strengthneth and comforteth them so that they are ready to sustaine any thing for his name sake Neither ought that to mooue vs a whit if other sectes also tel vs of their Martyrs For first Obiection 2 they are far behind that number of Martyrs Others are Martyrs also which the Church hath Answere They differ Againe there is not that alacritie and cheerfulnes found in them in suffering punishmentes which is in most of the martyrs of Christ so that it may easily appeare that they neuer feele that security of conscience and ioie of hart in God which the Godly feele And thirdly which is chiefely to bee considered the defenders of wicked doctrine suffer as being cōuicted of their errors But the godly no falshood being shewed in their confession are Tyrannically by their persecutors drawen vnto punishment whereas the persecutors themselues are conuicted of their impiety and iniurie euen as the Lord promiseth I wil giue you a mouth and wisedome where-against al your aduersaries shal not bee able to speak or resist Wherefore albeit sometimes some men suffer for their doctrine the certainty whereof they are not able to confirme neither to themselues nor to others yet doe they it not fenced by any diuine strength and comfort but being blinded by their owne stubburnes or pride and the illusions of the Diuel they run headlong to destruction contrariwise it is saied of the godlies Martyrdome Philip. 1. It is giuē vnto you for Christ not onely to beleeue in him but to suffer for his sake 12 The godlines and holines of those of whom the sacred Scriptures haue been written and who truely embrace this doctrine 13 Their plaine dealing in detecting of vices 14 The Testimonie of the holy Ghost 13 Their ingenuitie and plaine dealing in opening faults committed either by them or theirs whom the holy ghost hath vsed in committing this doctrine to writing 14 The testimonie of the holy Ghost which crieth in the hartes of the godly Abba father This testimonie doth not onely prooue which all the former also do but it perswadeth too For faith is nothing els then a firme assent by which wee agree vnto all the woord of God deliuered vnto vs and a confidence by which euery one of vs do know resolue that God according vnto the tenor of this Scripture is mercifull good vnto vs. Which confidence there followeth ioyfulnes resting in God and calling on him with an assured hope of obtaining those good things which according to the prescript of his woord wee begge of him Nowe that both of these that is both this assent or assurance of our doctrine and the liuely consolation which thence springeth neither do rest vpon the testimony of mē nor of any creature but is inflamed and strengthned by no other doctrine then of the Prophets and Apostles read heard and meditated of by them this euery one of the godly through a liuely and certain feeling of their hearts haue experience of This spirit therefore God adioyneth as a witnes vnto his woord Esai 19. This is my couenant with them saith the Lord my spirite that is vpon thee and my woordes which I haue put in thy mouth shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out out of the mouth of thy seed saith the Lord from hencefoorth euen for euer This spirite also Christ promiseth as the chiefe witnesse of his doctrine vnto his Disciples Iohn cap. 15. When the comforter shall come hee shall beare witnes of mee And cap. 16. When he is come which is the spirit of truth hee will lead
faith which is spoken of in the Church is a part of diuine worship that is the sure assent by which wee embrace euery word of God deliuered vnto vs because it is impossible for vs to be deceiued by it if we vnderstand it aright Further also that it may breed in vs a true woorshipping of God and comfort of our soules it must stand sure and immoueable against temptations But there is no certain doctrine cōcerning God religion besides that which is knowen to be reuealed in his woord We may not therefore giue the honor which is due vnto God vnto men neither may wee go from certain thinges vnto vncertaine but cleaue onely to the woord of God in the doctrine concerning religion and therefore humane decrees must not bee accounted amongst those preceptes which wee are to embrace by faith Faith commeth by hearing hearing by the word of God c. 3 Things necessary to be beleeued or done are part of diuine worship But things not prescribed are not part of diuine worship Therefore they are not necessarie Thirdly for so much as the woorship of God is a woorke commaunded of God perfourmed by faith to this ende principallie that God may bee honored it is manifest that to beleeue and doe those thinges which can not bee denied or omitted without offending of God is the woorship of God and contrariwise that God can not bee woorshipped but by the prescript of his will both the consciences of al men and God himselfe in his holy woord doth testify as Esai 29. and Matt. 15. In vain do they woorship mee who teach the doctrines and commaundementes of men It is as wicked therfore to number those things which are not expressed in the woord of God amongest those which are necessarie to bee beleeued and done in matters of religion as it is vnlawful for any creature to thrust vpon God that woorship which himselfe neuer required Fourthlie 4 The Scripture is sufficient there cannot be anie thing added of men vnto his doctrine without great iniurie and contumelie done vnto the holy Scripture For if other thinges besides these which are written are necessarie to the perfection of true Religion then doth not the Scripture shew the perfect maner of worshipping God of attaining to Saluation which fighteth with the plaine words of Scripture which affirme that God hath opened vnto vs in his word as much as hee would haue vs know in this life concerning his wil towards vs as Christ saith Iohn 15. Al thinges which I haue hard of my father I haue made knowen vnto you And Paul Act. 20. I haue kept nothing back but haue shewed you al the counsaile of God And 2. Tim. 3. Knowing that thou hast knowē the holie Scriptures from a Childe which are able to make thee wise vnto Saluation through the faith which is in Christ Iesus For the whole Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to improue to correct to instruct in righteousnes Fiftly 5 Other Doctors may er the Prophets and Apostles cannot therfore they are tied to these we are to consider the degrees of them who teach in the Church For therefore is the authoritie of the Prophets and Apostles far higher then of other Ministers of the Church because God called thē immediatly to declare his will vnto other men and adorned them with Testimonies of miracles and other thinges by which hee witnessed that he did so lighten and guide their minds with his spirit that he suffered them to erre in no one point of doctrine other ministers are called by men and may erre and doe erre when they depart from the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles Wherefore the Apostle Paul Ephe. 2. saieth That the Church is builded vpon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles And 1. Cor. 3. That hee had laied the foundation and other then that could no man lay others build vpon it gold siluer precious stones wood hay stubble Now it is manifest that they who may err ought to be tied vnto their doctrine who are warranted by the testimonies of God that they can not erre Wherefore all other teachers in the Church must not bring any new point of doctrine but onely propound and expound those thinges vnto the Church which are deliuered by the Prophets and Apostles For these causes therefore doth the whole auncient Church with great consent submit it selfe vnto the rule of the sacred Scriptures whose autoritie yet ought of right to bee somewhat greater than these men who both in woords and deedes fight against this opinion Basil in his Sermon of the confession of saith saieth that it is a falling from the faith and a fault of pride either not to admit those thinges which are writtē in the holie Scriptures or to add any thing to them And August in his third Epistle For neither ought wee to account of euery ones discourses though they bee catholick and woorthy men as of the canonical scriptures that it may not bee lawfull for vs without impairing the reuerence which wee owe to those men to dislike and refuse any thing in their writinges if peraduenture we shal find that they haue thought otherwise thē the Scripture hath as it is by Gods assistāce vnderstood either of others or of our selues And Epist 112. If ought be confirmed by the plain autoritie of the diuine Scriptures of those which are called in the Church canonical wee must without any doubting beleeue it as for other testimonies by which any thing is mooued to bee beleeued thou maist chuse whether thou wilt beleeue thē or no. But against these testimonies of the Scriptures the auncient church the aduersaries of the truth contend that besides the doctrine which is comprised in the holy Bible other decrees also made by the autoritie of the Church are no lesse vnchangeable and necessarie to saluation then the oracles Propheticall and Apostolick Obiections of the Papistes And that they may not without some shew and pretence take vpon them this autority of decreeing what Obiection 1 they list besides and contrary vnto the Scripture they alleage places of Scripture The scripture doth not remaine perfect in which some writinges of the Prophets and Apostles are mentioned which are not come to our handes as Num. 21. is named the Book of the warres of the Lord. Ios 10. The Booke of the iust And often in the books of Kings The Booke of the Chronicles of the Kings of Iuda In the Epistle catholicke of Iude are alleaged the prophecie of Enoch and the storie of the bodie of Moses And lastly the Apostle Paul 1. Cor. 5. and Eph. 3. maketh mention of his Epistles which now the Church hath not Hence therefore these men will conclude that the doctrine of the sacred Scripture is maimed and that therefore the defect hereof must be Supplied by the Church But first of all concerning the holie Scripture we are to know that so
magnifie the bountifulnes of God towards vs we must aske all thinges of him as beeing our creatour and soueraign Lord who hath the right and power of giuing al good things to whom and how far he will himselfe and vse those things which are granted to our vse with a good conscience to the glorie of god who gaue them And that this may be done we must not by our infidelity cast our selues out of that right which wee receiue in Christ if god of his own power autority either giueth vs lesse than wee would or take away from vs that which he hath giuen wee must submit our selues patiently to his iust purpose most profitable for our saluation And seeing the soule is the better part of man the happinesse of the bodie dependeth on the happinesse of the soul seing also we are created to immortall life we ought to haue greater care of those things which belong to the soule and eternal life than of those which belong vnto the bodie and this tēporall life And at length seeing the end and blessednes of man is the participation communicating of god his knowledge worship let vs euer tend vnto it referre thither al our life actions And seeing we see one part of mankinde to be vessels of wrath to shewe the iustice and seueritie of God against Sinne let vs bee thankefull to God for that of his meere and infinite goodnesse he would haue vs to bee vessels of mercie to declare through all eternitie the riches of his glorie Last of all that we maie learne consider and begin these thinges in this life let vs to our power tender and helpe forward the common society and saluation of others for which we are borne OF FREE-WILL WHEREAS God is a most free agent and man was created to the image of God The causes of diuers controuersies arisen about free-will yea and was furnished with libertie of will it seemeth to many not to agree that all the actions of mans will are gouerned by the vnchangeable prouidence of God that the nature of men is so corrupted by the fall of our first parents and Originall sinne that it is able to bring forth nothing but that which is euill and displeasing God without the renewing and especiall benefite of the holy Ghost For neither do they acknowledge that for liberty which is tied to any necessity neither seemeth it that wee shoulde graunt the whole libertie of the will to haue beene lost by sin because also after the fal there are left in men some prints and steps of Gods image and the blame and crime of sinne cannot be laid on men except the will be free To this is added the pride of mans wit which admitteth nothing more hardly than that the glorie and original of all good should be transferred from men to God alone Further also the notable vertues of men not regenerated and lastly the iudgement of our sense and reason which doth not marke without the light of Gods woorde the secret gouernement of Gods prouidence in humane actions Wherefore hereupon haue risen controuersies debates concerning free-wil while the olde diuines yeelding too much vnto the Philosophers swelling with a vain perswasion of wisedome and righteousnesse and the latter ascenting vnto the former haue either spoke more magnificently than they ought to haue done of the strength and power of mans will or haue endeuoured to arrogate that vnto men which is not found in them since the first fall But let vs remember that this doctrin of free wil is a view and contemplation not of mens ability and excellencie but of their weaknes and misery which is therefore to bee ioined with the doctrine of the creation and fall of man that wee knowing the more from what top of dignity and felicity into how deepe a gulfe of ignominie and misery we are cast by sinne may not more deepely plunge our selues by a vaine confidence of our owne strength vnto euils but may incline to a true humility and thankfulnesse towards God and bee of him reuiued quickned and healed For that the scope of this disputation may be knowen and the vse thereof perceiued The state of the maine question about free will we must vnderstand that the principal question in it is this Whether as man auerted himselfe from God and corrupted himself so of the other side he be able by his owne strength to returne to God and to receiue grace offered by God and to amend himselfe And further whether the will of man be the first and principal cause why others are conuerted others persist in their sins and as wel of the conuerted as not conuerted others are more others lesse good or euil and in a woord doe either good or euill some after one maner some after another To this question the aduersaries Pelagians and the like make answere That so much grace is both giuen of God and left by nature to al men that they are able to returne vnto God and obey him neither ought we to seeke any other cause before or aboue mans wil for which others receiue or retaine others refuse or cast awaie diuine succour and aide in auoiding sinne and do after this or that manner order and institute their counsailes aad actions Contrariwise we haue learned out of the sacred scripture That albeit by nature so much of God and his wil is knowen to all as maie suffice for taking away all excuse from them of sin and although it be manifest that many woorks morally good may be done euen of the vnregenerate and the wil doth in them freely make choise either of good or euil yet no work pleasing to God can be vndertaken or perfourmed by any man without regeneration and the especial grace of the holy spirit neither can more or lesse good be in any mans counsailes or actions than God of his free and purposed goodnes to euery one doth cause in them neither any other way can the wil of any creature be inclined than whither it shal seeme good to the eternall and good counsel of God And yet all the actions of the created wil both good and bad are wrought freelie The chiefe questions here to be obserued are fiue 1 Of the word liberty or freedome 2 What is the liberty of the wil. 3 What is common and what diuerse in the liberty of will which is in God in Angels and man 4 Whether there be any liberty in vs and what 5 The degrees of free wil. 1 Of the word Liberty Libertie from bond misery THere is one kind of liberty from bond and misery And this signifieth a relation or respect that is the power or right or ordering either of person or thing made either by ones wil or by nature to deale at his owne arbiterment or motion according to honest Lawes or order agreeable to his nature and to enioy commodities conuenient for him without inhibition or
Maior For the promise euen in those who receiue it not hath this vse that it may bee made manifest that God doth not reioice at the destruction of any and that hee is iust in punishing when as he doth so inuite thē vnto him who through their ingratitude contemne and refuse gods promises Secondly we distinguish that vnto them indeed the promise is vnprofitable to whom the condition adioined is neuer made possible through faith and grace of iustification by Christ and of regeneration by the holy Ghost But so it is made possible vnto the elect Wherefore God deludeth nether but earnestly declareth to both of them what they ought to be vnto whom he giueth euerlasting life and how vnwoorthy they are of Gods benefites and shall neuer bee partakers of them vnlesse by the free mercy of God they be exempted from destructiō further also he allureth more and more and confirmeth the faithful to yeeld obedience Lastly they cite also other sayings which seeme to place conuersion and good-woorks in the will of men Psal 119. I haue applied my heart to fulfil thy statutes 1. Ioh. 5. verse 18. He that is begotten of god keepeth himselfe These the like sayings attribute the woorke of god vnto men first because they are not only the obiect but the instrumēt also of gods woorking which the holy spirite exerciseth in them Then because they are such an instrument which being renewed and moued by the holy spirit doth also it selfe woorke together and mooue it selfe For there is not one effect ascribed vnto the holie ghost and another to mans will but the same to both vnto the holie ghost as the principal cause vnto mans will as a secondarie and instrumentall cause The third degree of libertie in man regenerated The third degree of libertie belongeth to man in this life as he is regenerated but not yet glorified or in whom regeneration is begun but not accomplished or perfected In this state the will vseth her libertie not onely to worke euill as in the second degree but partly to doe ill and partly to do well And this is to be vnderstood two waies First that some works of the regenerate are good and pleasing to God which are done of them according to Gods commandement but some euil displeasing to god which they do contrary to the commaundement of God which is manifest by the infinit fallings of holy men Secondly that euen those good works which the conuerted doe in this life albeit they please God by reason of Christes satisfaction imputed vnto them yet are they not perfectly good that is agreeable to Gods law but vnperfect stained with many sins therefore they cannot if they be beheld without Christ stand in iudgement escape damnation The cause of the renewing and beginning of this liberty in man to good is the spirit working by the wil. The cause for which the wil beginneth to work well is this because by the singular grace or benefite of the holy spirit mans nature is renewed by the word of God there is kindled in the mind a new light knowlege of god in the hart new affections in the wil new inclinations agreeing with the Lawe of God and the will is forcibly and effectually mooued to doe according to these notions and inclinations and so it recouereth both the power of willing that which God approueth and the vse of that power and beginneth to bee conformed and agreeable to God and to obey him Deut. 30.6 The Lord thy God wil circumcise thy hart the hart of thy seed that thou maiest loue the lord thy god with al thine heart Ezec. 36.26 A new hart wil I giue you and a newe spirit wil I put within you and I wil take away the stony hart out of your body and I wil giue you an heart of flesh and I wil put my spirit within you and cause you to walke in my statutes Act. 16. The Lord opened the hart of Lidia that she should attend to those things which were spoke of Paul 2. Cor. 3. Where the spirit of the Lord is there is libertie Why the will in the regenerate vseth liberty not onely to good but to euil also The causes for which the will vseth her libertie not onely to the choosing of good but of euill also are in number two The first for that in this life the renewing of our nature is not perfect neither as concerning the knowledge of GOD neither as concerning our inclinations to obey GOD and therefore in the best men while they liue here remaine stil many and great sinnes both originall and others The Second for that the regenerate bee not alwaies ruled by the holy spirite but are sometimes for a time forsaken of GOD eyther for to try or to chastise or humble them but yet are recalled to repentaunce that they perish not Of the first cause it is said Rom. 7. I knowe that in me that is in my flesh dwelleth no good thing for to wil is present with mee but I finde no meanes to performe that which is good Marc. 9. I beeleue Lord but help thou my vnbeliefe Of the second cause it is said Psa 51. Take not away thy holy spirit from mee Isaiah 63.17 O Lord why hast thou made vs to erre from thy wayes and hardned our heart from thy fear Returne for thy seruaunts sake 1. Kings 8.57 The Lorde our God bee with vs that hee forsake vs not neither leaue vs. Therefore the regenerate man in this life doth alwaies goe either forwarde or backewarde neuer continueth in the same state Hence are deduced these 2. conclusions first as man corrupted before he be regenerated can not begin new obedience pleasing acceptable vnto God So he that is regenerated in this life although he beginne to obey God that is hath some inclination and purpose to obey God according to all his commaundementes and that vnfained though yet weak and strugling with euil inclinationes affectiones and desires and therefore there shine in his life and manners a desire of pietie towardes God and his neighbour yet can hee not yeeld whole and perfect obedience to God because neither his knowledge nor his loue of God is so great and so syncere as the law of God requireth and therefore is not such righteousnes as may stande before God according to that saying Psal 143.2 Enter not into iudgement with thy seruaunt for in thy sight shall none that liueth be iustified The second They who are ōcuerted can no farder retein good inclinations neither thoughts and affections and a good purpose to perseuere and go forwarde therein than as the holy spirit worketh and preserueth these in them for if he guide and rule them they iudge and doe aright but if he forsake them they are blinde they wander slip and fall away yet so that they perish not but repent and are saued if so bee they were euer truely conuerted 1. Cor. 4. What hast
of Christ applied vnto vs by faith and yet according to workes as according to the tokens or testimonies of faith from which they proceede and which they as effectes thereof doe shewe to bee in men 4 Obiection The Scripture in manie places ascribeth perfection of good woorkes to Saintes euen in this life and saith that they are perfect and did walke with their whole and perfect heart before God Psalme 119. I haue sought thee with my whole heart and in the same Psalme Blessed are they that keepe his testimonies and seeke him with their whole heart Genes 6. Noah was a iust and vpright man in his time 2. Chron. 15.17 The heart of Asa was perfect in all his daies Matth. 5. In what sense the Scriptures sometimes ascribe perfection of workes to the regenerate in this life Bee yee perfect as your father in heauen is perfect Answere First these and the like speeches speake of that perfection which is not of degrees but of partes or of the integritie and syncerity of the obedience begun in them Perfection of degrees or obedience perfect in degrees is that which hath not onely all the parts of obedience but that degree also which the law requireth in vs. Such a perfection haue not the regenerate in this life They haue indeede all the partes of obedience begun in them but yet weakely so that they are here daily more and more perfected but attaine not to the chiefe and due degree thereof vntill they inioy the life to come The perfection of partes is the integrity of obedience or whole obedience begun according to the whole law or it is a desire and endeuor to obay God and withstand corrupt lustes according not to some only but to al the commandements of his lawe The perfection of securitie is a desire or studie of obedience and godlinesse not fained but true and earnest albeit somewhat bee wanting to the partes as touching the degree This perfection to wit both the integritie and syncerity of obedience is in al the regenerate For vnto them is it proper to submit themselues to the commaundementes of God euen to all without exception and to beginne in this life all the partes of true godlinesse or obedience This is called also the iustice of a good conscience because it is a necessarie effect of faith and pleaseth God through Christ And albeit in all men euen in the most holy much hypocrisie remaineth as it is saide Euerie man is a lyer yet there is a great difference betweene them who are wholy hypocrites and please themselues in their hypocrisie hauing no beginning or feeling of true godlinesse in their hearts and those who acknowledging and bewailing the remnantes of hypocrisie which are in them haue withal the beginnings of true faith and conuersion vnto God Those hypocrites are condemned of GOD these are receiued into fauour not for this beginning of obedience in them but for the perfect obedience of Christ which is imputed vnto them And therefore to this declaration or exposition another is also to be added That they who are conuerted are perfect in the sight of God not onely in respect of the partes of true Godlinesse which all are begunne in them but also in respect of the degrees of the true and perfect righteousnesse of Christ imputed vnto them As it is said Coloss 2.10 Yee are compleate in him Heb. 10.14 With one offering hath he consecrated for euer them that are sanctified But they reply that the perfection also of degrees is attributed vnto the Saintes in the Scripture 1. Corint 2. vers 6. Wee speak wisedome among them that are perfect 1. Cor. 14. Be perfect in vnderstanding Eph. 4. vers 13. Till we all meete together in the vnity of faith and knowledge of the Sonne of God vnto a perfect man and vnto the measure of the age of the fulnesse of Christ. But these places also doe not call them perfect in respect of the Law of God that is in respect of that degree of knowledge and obedience which the Law requireth in vs but in respect of the weaker who haue lesse light and certainty and readines confirmed by vse and exercise to obey God to resist carnall lustes and to bear the crosse For so is this perfection expounded Heb. 5. and Ephes 4.14 That we be no more children wandering and carried about with euerie wind of doctrine Philip. 3.12 Not as though I had alreadie attained to it or were already perfect They oppose against these aunsweres a place out of 1. Iohn 4. vers 17. Herein is the loue perfect in vs that we should haue boldnesse in the daie of iudgement for as he is euen so are we in this woorld There is no feare in Loue but perfect Loue casteth out feare for feare hath painfulnesse and hee that feareth is not perfect in Loue. But Saint Iohn meaneth not that our Loue towardes GOD but Gods Loue towards vs is perfect that is declared and fully knowen vnto vs by the effects or benefites of GOD bestowed vpon vs in Christ Our regeneration newnes of life doth assure vs of our iustification as being an effect thereof or as Saint Paul speaketh Roman 5. Where hee saith that the Loue of GOD shed abroad in our heartes by the holy Ghost is the cause why wee doe without feare and with bouldnesse expect the day of iudgement And of this mercy and free Loue of GOD towards vs hee signifieth that by this token or testimonie wee are assured because in this life wee are refourmed by the holy spirite to his image For by our regeneration wee are assured of our iustification not as by the cause of the effect but as by the effect of the cause Nowe though regeneration be not perfect in this life yet if it bee indeede begun it sufficeth for the confirmation and proouing of the truth of our faith vnto our consciences And these very words which S. Iohn addeth Loue casteth out fear shew that Loue is not yet perfect in vs because wee are not perfectly deliuered in this life from fear of the wrath and iudgement of God and eternal punishment For these two contrary motions are now together in the godly euen the fear and loue of God in remisse and low degrees their feare decreasing and their loue and comfort or ioy in God encreasing vntill ioy get the conquest and perfectly cast out all trembling in the life to come when GOD shall wipe away euery teare Diuers places of Scripture to be vnderstood of the vprightnesse of a good conscience not of anie perfect fulfilling of the Law in the godly Obiection Iohn 3.21 He that doth truth commeth to the light that his deedes might bee made manifest that they are wrought according to God 1. Iohn 3.20 If our heart condemne vs not then haue wee boldenes toward God Psalm 119. I haue not declined from thy Lawe Therefore the good woorckes of the regenerate maie bee alleadged and stand in Gods
none Answere It is free vnto God to saue either al or none or some for he was not bound to vs that he should saue vs. Rom. 11.35 Who hath giuen vnto him first and he shal be recompensed Yet is it necessarie that he should saue some not by any absolute necessitie but by such as is called necessitie by supposition First because God hath most freely and vnchangeably decreed The necessitie not absolute but depending on the vnchangeable will and decree of God promised this deliuerie published A syllogisme thereof may be framed on this wise It is impossible that God should either lie or deceiue But God hath auouched and promised by an â—th that hee will not the death of a sinner but will that hee bee conuerted and liue The conuersion therefore and deliuerie of man not onelie may bee wrought but necessarily also is wrought Secondly In the beginning God created maÌ„ that he might for euer be magnified of him Epes 1.6 He hath made vs to the praise of the glorie of his grace And Psalm 89.48 Hast thou made al men for naught Wherefore seeing God is not frustrated of the end of his counsels it is necessarie that some be deliuered Thirdly God did not in vaine send his sonne into the world and deliuer him ouer vnto death Iohn 6.39 I came downe from heauen to doe his will which hath sent me And this is the fathers will which hath sent mee that of al which hee hath giuen mee I should loose nothing Mat. 9.13 I am come to call sinners to repentance 18.11 The Sonne of man is come to saue that which was lost Rom. 4.25 He died for our sinnes and is risen againe for our iustification Fourthly God more enclineth to the exercising and setting forth of his mercy than of his anger But he sheweth his anger in punishing the wicked Therefore he must shew his mercy in sauing the Godly 4 What manner of Deliuery this is THe deliuerie and setting of man at libertie is necessarilie compleat that is in al ponites perfect Our deliuerie most perfect euen from both euils both of crime and of paine First because God is not a deliuerer in part onely but saueth and loueth perfectly those whom hee saueth 1. Iohn 1.7 The bloode of Iesus Christ cleanseth vs from all sinne to witte as touching both the formall partes thereof the guilt and the corruption of sinne Secondly because he doth perfectly punish the wicked that his iustice may bee exactly satisfied by their punishment Therefore doth hee perfectly deliuer the godly from punishment because he is more inclining propense to mercy than to anger Thirdly because we were fully perfectly lost in Adam But Christs benefit is not imperfecter or of lesse force than the sin of Adam which it would be if he did not perfectly deliuer because al haue lost al their righteousnesse saluation and blessednes in Adam Therefore righteousnes and felicity is restored by Christ Each of these deliueries both from the euill of crime and from the euil of paine or punishment is necessarily perfect Because the image of God glory and blessednes which is restored vnto vs by Christ our redeemer is more glorious greater than that Our deliuerie from eternall death perfect in this life from other calamities in the life to come which we lost in Adam Our deliuery from euerlasting death or damnation is most perfect euen in this life both as touching the parts thereof and also in degree Because Christs satisfaction for our sinnes which is imputed vnto vs is a most perfect conformity and correspondence with the law of God Now from other calamities we shal be fully deliuered in the life to come when as the remnants of sin in vs shal be vtterly abolished In the meane season they are mitigated vnto the godly euen in this life turned into fatherly chastisements Our deliuerie from sinne in part here by regeneration but perfect in the life to come Our deliuery from crime or sinne by regeneration is perfect not at once in a moment but successiuely by degrees For in this life it is perfect as concerning the partes thereof but as by a beginning onelie that is all the partes of obedience are begunne in the redeemed or beleeuers so that as long as we liue here it is daily augmented by new accessions and encreasings But after the departure of the soule out of the body this deliuerie is perfecter because then man doeth wholy cease from sinne After the resurrection and glorification it shall bee most perfect both as touching the partes thereof and in degree For then shall God bee all in all that is hee shal immediatly blesse vs with exceeding happinesse so that nothing shall remaine in vs repugnaunt to God but whatsoeuer shal be in vs that shal be of god But now there is somewhat in vs which is not of GOD euen sinne it selfe 5 By what meanes mans deliuerie may be wrought THe meanes whereby we may be deliuered from the curse and beeing reconciled to God may be accounted iust before him is only one euen a full and condigne or worthy satisfaction that is punishment for sinnes committed or obedience omitted For the Lawe The law being transgressed no satisfaction but by suffering due punishment when as wee haue not perfourmed obedience dooth iustly exact punishment of vs this being sufficiently paied wee are receiued of God into grace and beeing indued with the holy spirit are renued to the image of God that wee may hence-forward obey his Law and enioy euerlasting blissefulnes Beeing therefore reconciled vnto God by satisfaction most fully perfourmed vnto the Law we are deliuered then from sinne also that is from corruption it selfe by regeneration that is by the forcible working of the holy Ghost abolishing it in vs and restoring true holines and righteousnes heere by beginning it and in the life to come also by perfecting and absoluing it This deliuery is necessarily knit with the former as a necessary effect with his proper nearest cause For God wil of that condition accept of this satisfaction and for it pardon our sinne so that wee leaue off to offend him hereafter thorough our sinnes and be thankfull vnto him for our sinnes pardoned and other his benefites For to bee willing to bee receiued into Gods fauour and yet not to be willing to cease from sinning is to mock God Wherfore they who are receiued of God into fauour are withall regenerated and satisfaction is the cause as of acceptation so also of regeneration Now that if satisfaction or sufficient punishment come not betweene there is no deliuery from the guilt or from sinne it selfe the cause hereof is gods great iustice and truth which his mercy dooth no way ouerthrowe Deut. 27.26 Cursed bee hee that confirmeth not all the woordes of this Law to doe them Matth. 5.18 It is not possible that one iot of the Law should fall that is be frustrate till al thinges
the rest This differeth from the other kindes of faith in that this onely is the certaine confidence whereby wee apply Christes merit vnto our selues And we apply it vnto our selues when euerie one of vs doe certainely resolue that the righteousnesse or merite of Christ is also giuen and imputed to vs that wee may be esteemed for iust and righteous of God and also may be regenerated glorified Confidence or trust is a motion of the hart or wil following and pursuing some good thing reioicing and resting therein It is a motion of the heart because it is a following and pursuing of a good thing a desire of retaining that good which a man already doth enioy It is reioicing because it is glad of the present grace of God towardes euerie of vs of full deliuerance from the gilt of sin from sinne it selfe in part because by that which euery one enioyeth in present hee conceiueth euerlasting hope of blessings to come as of euerlasting life of ful deliuery from al euill both of crime and paine and therefore is free from the feare of future euill To him that hath shall bee giuen The holie spirite giuen vnto vs is the earnest and pledge of our full redemption 2. Corinth 1.22 and 5.5 Ephes 1.13 Againe iustifieng faith differeth from the rest in this also that this iustifieng faith is concerning all spirituall giftes and whatsoeuer belong to our saluation and is properly and simply or absolutely called faith in the Scripture and is proper also and peculiar to the elect and chosen The faith of miracles is of a certaine gift whereby we are not bettered which we may want without any hinderaunce to our saluation neither is it giuen to al the faithful nor at al times Historicall faith is a part of the Iustifieng and befalleth to al both the godly and hypocrits but is not sufficient alone to saluation because it applieth not to it selfe those benefits which are knowen vnto it out of the word Temporary faith hypocrites haue Iustifieng faith therefore comprehendeth historicall but this is not sufficient to make a iustifieng faith as neither are the other two For If the inheritance be of faith that faith then shal be one of these foure But it is not of historicall faith otherwise the Diuels also shoulde bee heirs Neither of temporary for that is reiected by Christ Nor of the faith of miracles if so Iudas also should be heire The inheritaunce therefore is of iustifieng faith which is properly called faith The more general or material cause of faith is a knowledge and assent For if we speak properly we are not said to assent vnto a doctrine which we know not The difference or formall cause is to apply the promise of grace once known and as it were to claim it for him that knoweth it For this causeth faith to be and to be called iustifieng The subiect or part of man wherein it remaineth is the heart or will The peculiar affection or property of it is to rest ioy in God whereby it is distinguished from all the other sorts of faith The holy spirit is the principall efficient cause thereof Instrumentall causes are the word and Sacramentes Furthermore what iustifieng faith is No man knoweth what iustifieng faith is but hee that hath it no man vnderstādeth but he who hath it for he that beleeueth knoweth that he doth beleeue As he who neuer hath tasted honny dooth not verily knowe that it is sweete though you te l him much of the sweetenesse of honny But whosoeuer truely beleeueth that is hath a sauing faith hee both hath experience in himselfe of these things and also is able to declare them to others First hee beeing conuicted thereof in his conscience knoweth that whatsoeuer thinges are spoken in the Scriptures are t ue and diuine For faith is builded vpon a certaine or assured and diuine Testimony otherwise were it not a full perswasion 2. Hee findeth himselfe bound to beleeue them For if I confesse them to bee true therefore is it meete and iust that I should assent vnto them 3. Hee is certaine that thorough Christes satisfaction hee is receiued of God into fauour and is endewed with the holy Ghost and is by him regenerated and directed 4. Hee applieth vnto himselfe all these thinges and dooth thus gather and conclude of the former I knowe that those thinges which are promised belong vnto mee that is with a certaine confidence hee thus concludeth By the present loue of God towardes me and the beginninges or first fruites of the holy Ghost I certainly resolue and am perswaded that God will neuer chaunge this his good will towards mee and therefore I hope also for a consummation and accomplishment of these blessinges that is for plenary and full redemption 5. He reioiceth in the present blessinges which he hath but most of all in the certaine and perfect saluation to come and this is that peace of conscience which passeth all mans vnderstanding 6. Hee hath a will to obey the doctrine of the Prophetes and Apostles without ani◠exception in doing or suffering whatsoeuer is therein commaunded If I wil beleeue God I must obey his will and thinke that this his will is not reuealed vnto vs from men but from him Wherefore a man endued with iustifieng faith doth that duty which is imposed vpon him striue the world and the Diuell neuer so much against him and vndergoeth beareth and suffereth whatsoeuer aduersities for the glory of God cheerefully and boldly hauing God his most benigne and good father 7. Hee is certaine that his faith though it bee in this life imperfect and languishing and often very much eclypsed yet being builded vpon the promise of god which is vnchangeable dooth neuer altogether failor die but the purpose which it hath of beleeuing and obeying God continueth it striueth with doubtes and temptations and at length vanquisheth and in the celestiall life which is to come shall hee chaunged into a full and most certaine knowledge of God and his will where wee shall see God face to face 1. Cor. 13.12 4 How faith and hope differ and agree ALbeit faith hope agree in that they both respect the same benefits and therefore Heb. 11.1 faith is saide to be of things which are hoped for as also in that they are mutuallie ioyned in an inseparable bond For he that is certaine of the present wil of God towards him Faith apprehendeth things present hope respecteth thinges to come is also certaine of his will to come because god doth not change Yet notwithstanding they must not be confounded but distinguished For faith taketh hold of the present good as remission of sins or reconciliation regeneration or the beginning of obedience life euerlasting in vs. Hope eyeth the good to come as the continuance of our reconciliation and the perfecting or accomplishment of euerlasting life or our conformitie with God that is full deliuerie from
a sonne and a man and yet the manhoode or to be a man is one thing the fatherhoode or to bee a father another but there is not one subsistent which is the father and another subsistent which is a man but one and the same subsistent is both because both manhoode and fatherhoode is in him manhood absolutely fatherhood respectiuely as in regard of his Sonne Of the worde essence also it is furder to be noted that God or the Deitie or diuine essence is not in respect of the persons the same which the matter in respect of the effect because God is vnchaungeable neither is compounded of matter and forme Therefore we cannot say wel Three persons are or consist of one essence Neither is it as the whole in respect of the parts because God is indiuisible Wherefore it is not well saide that the person is a part of the essence or the essence consisteth of three persons for euery person is the whole diuine essence one and the same Neither is it as the general to the speciall because the persons are not specials but indiuiduals Neither is it simplie as the special to the indiuiduals because the diuine essence it selfe is indiuiduall or one in number and the persons are not another or a diuerse or a separated thing from the essence but euery person is that essence Therefore it is well said God or the Diuine essence is the father is the sonne is the holy ghost Likewise The three persons are one God or in one God Againe they are one and the same essence nature diuinity wisedome c. They are of one or the same essence nature diuinitie c. Yet it cannot bee saide well they are of one God Wherefore the diuine essence is in respect of the persons as a thing after a rare and singular maner communicated in respect of those things vnto which it is common For neither is there the like example of community in any created things For a generall is a certain thing common to manie specials a general and special to manie indiuiduals but yet so that they are affirmed of those manie plurallie not singularlie as that the father and the sonne or this father and sonne are two liuing creatures two men But wee maie not speake after this sort of God and the diuine persons as to saie the father and the sonne are two Gods two spirites two omnipotentes c. Because there is but one GOD one spirite one omnipotent c. Wherefore that affirmation the father is God the Son is God the holy Ghost is God is a true affirmation affirming that which is more common of a thing which is more restrict that is affirming the essence of the indiuidual which hath in some sort an analogy and proportion only with the speciall affirmed of his indiuiduall but is not at al the same nor of the same kind 6 Whether these names are to be vsed in the Church THese names are to be vsed and reteined in the church Obiection But these names namely Essence person and Trinitie are not in the Scripture therefore they ought not to be vsed and reteined in the Church Answere These names which are not in the Scripture neither the words themselues nor the sense of them are not to be vsed but both the names them selues of essence and person are found in the Scripture and the thing also or the doctrine it selfe concerning them The name Essence is expressed by the name of Iehoua which is frequent in the Scripture Likewise by the name of Beeing which often also offereth it selfe in the Scripture Exod. 3.14 I am that I am Reuel 1.8 Which is and which was and which is to come The woorde Person is expressed by the greeke woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 13. which woord is there interpreted Person The ingraued forme of his person The name of Trinitie is signified 1. Iohn 5.7 There are three which beare recorde in heauen the father the woorde and the holie ghost and these three are one And this for the names themselues Now for the thing As often as is mentioned one Iehoua so often is mentioned one essence As often as the Father the Sonne and the holie ghost is called Iehoua so often the three persons of the Diuinitie are expressed that is three subsisting three vnderstanding c. And this aunswere yeeldeth the first cause why these woordes ought to bee reteined in the Church because namelie they are extant in the holie Scripture either in woordes or in sense and meaning The Second cause is because they are fit to expound the phrase and speech of the Scripture vnto the vnlearned And furder if no woordes were to bee vsed but such as are extant in the Scriptures all interpretation shoulde bee taken away For interpretation requireth that the words of Scripture bee expounded to the vnlearned by such words as being more vsual in other languages or matters doctrines are more easie for them to vnderstand paueth and maketh plaine away vnto them for the vnderstanding of the speech and phrase of Scripture The third cause is that the sleights and sophismes of heretiques which for the most part they goe about to cloake and couer with the woords of holie Scripture are more easily espied and taken heede of if the same things bee expounded in diuerse woordes and those especiallie short perspicuous and significant So the sectaries and followers of Seruetus do confesse that the Father the Sonne and the holy ghost are one God but not one in essence but by propagation that is that they are not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the same in substance but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like in substance Likewise they graunt the Sonne to be true God but they deny him to bee the same in substance with his father But therefore is it that heretiques will none of the Churches phrase speech because they dislike the thing it selfe For if there were a consent an according in the thinges we shoulde easily come to an agreement about the woordes 7 How many persons there be of the Diuinity or God-head IN one diuine essence are subsisting three persons Three persons are one God and one God is three persons and those truely distinct one from another by their properties namely the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost each of which three persons notwithstanding are one and the same God eternal infinit most perfect in himselfe And these persons are consubstantiall and coeternal without any confounding of their properties and respects as also without anie disparagement or inequalitie betweene them And that there are three persons each of which are that one true God creatour of all thinges is prooued first by testimonies of Scripture which are taken partly out of the olde Testament and partly out of the newe The old Testament yeeldeth vs many testimonies Gen. 1.2 The spirite of God mooued vpon the waters Then God said let there be light Exod. 3.2 The Lorde is
anothers action whether present or past or to come to bee moued thereby to determine and doe a thing 5 The vnchangeablenes of Gods foreknowledge 5 What God vnchangeablie foreknoweth he also vnchangeablie will from euerlasting But God from euerlasting foreknoweth vnchangeablie all things euen those which are most mutable Therefore hee woulde from euerlasting vnchangeablie all thinges either simplie or in some sort and respect The Minor is manifest The Maior is thus prooued All certain and vnchangeable prescience or foreknowledge dependeth on an vnchangeable cause But there is no vnchangeable cause besides the will of God For all second causes are in themselues changeable and might haue not beene Therefore Gods will alone is the cause of his vnchangeable prescience that is GOD therefore foreknoweth that a thing shall be so because he will and decreeth it to bee done so either simplie or in some respect For if he simplie woulde it not it coulde neuer haue beene done and foreknowen of him The summe is Gods will and decree is the cause both of the euent and of the foreseeing or foreknowing of it but the foreseeing is not the cause of the effect Moreouer prescience in GOD is not seuered from his will and woorking as in creatures but they are both but one thing differing in consideration onely Num. 23.19 Hath hee saide it and shall hee not doe it And hath he spoken and shall hee not accomplish it 6 All naturall good thinges are from GOD as the first cause But all the faculties motions actions of all things 6 God the cause of all good as it is good as they are meerely such are naturall good thinges that is thinges made and ordeined of GOD in nature Therefore all are from GOD their authour and effectour and are wrought by GODS prouidence Acts. 17.28 In him wee liue and mooue and haue our being A Confutation of certaine Sophismes or cauils which are wont to be obiected against the prouidence of god mouing and gouerning al and euerie particular whether good or bad great or small most iustlie The first of confusions and things disordered in nature No confused or disordered thinges haue their being Confusions as they are such are not from God as efficient of them but directing them or are gouerned by the prouidence of god 1. Cor. 14.33 But whatsoeuer thinges are vnder the son are confused because all are vanity Eccles 1.14 Therefore they are not ruled and gouerned by diuine prouidence Answere The Maior proposition consisting of doubtfull termes is to be distinguished No confuse thinges true if they be simply confuse are gouerned by the prouidence of god that is the prouidence of god working them as they are confuse All thinges that are vnder the Sonne that is humane thinges are confuse and vaine true but not simplie so that no order and good at all lieth hid and is found in that confusion For if they were such god for his great goodnes and iustice would not permit them to be done Wherefore if by the confusions of the would they collect and conclude that there is no prouidence there is more auouched in the conclusion than was conteined in the premisses or they proceed from that which is in some respect so to conclude the same to be simply and absolutely so For whereas many thinges in the world are well ordered as the celestiall motions the preseruation of the kindes of al thinges commonweals the punishments of wicked men many more it may not by this argument be concluded of al things but of those onely which are done against the order by god appointed that they are not gouerned by his prouidence but those things in which a most manifest order doth appeare shal be an euident testimony of gods wisedome effectual working But if then they conclude that those disordered thinges are not ruled and gouerned of god so also shall there bee more said in the conclusion than was in the premisses For it foloweth thereof not that the things confuse troubled but that the confusion or troubling of order which is in theÌ„ is not of god As the wicked were created of god albeit their wickednes proceeded not froÌ„ god but from theÌ„selues For euery thing is not necessarily auouched of the concrete or subiect so qualified which is affirmed of the abstract or quality it self Wherefore if it be again replied putting this Maior That disordered things are not or are not ruled of god and therfore many things in the world not done by his prouidence eueÌ„ thus too is the Maior diuersly faulty For first that it be graÌ„ted that things disordered if they be simply such are not or are not ruled of god yet caÌ„not this be granted of them if both confusioÌ„ order in diuers respects be found in theÌ„ There is order euen in disordered â—hinges Nowe neither diuels nor men commit any thing so repugnant to the order setled by god wherein albeit in respect of their corrupt wil it be most disordered there is not yet the most wise order of diuine iustice power and goodnesse lieng hidde vnder that confusion which themselues haue caused and for the most part also the same doth manifestly appear the euent or god himselfe by his word declaring it Great confusion was there in the Iewes detestable murder when they crucified the sonne of god and yet notwithstanding the hand and counsel of god hath defined determined nothing with more woonderful order and wisedome than the death of the sonne for our sinnes Al humane thinges therefore are vaine not in respect of the will and decree or prouidence of god for if we respect it they are most wel ordered euen such as in mens iudgementes seeme most disordered but in respect of men as concerning both the fault and the punishment For first all our thinges GOD not illightening correcting and directing vs by his spirite are euil and displeasing GOD. Secondly they obtaine not their expected and hoped euentes or those at least-wise not firme and stable neither such wherein sound and solid felicitie and blessednesse doth consist Thirdly That wisedome also which is the knoweledge of Gods will and a true desire to bee obedient thereunto in this life is ioyned with manifolde errors sinnes and calamities Therefore humane matters are not ruled of GOD that is woorking them as they are confuse and sinnes but are ruled of GOD permitting sinnes euen as they are sinnes and directing them to most good endes but woorcking all that is good euen those thinges which lie did in thinges disordered and confuse Moreouer the euils which iust men suffer and the good which the vniust enioie seeme disordered to mens iudgements but according to the iudgement of GOD there is a most iust order in them for those causes which are vttered in the woord of GOD. And those things are to bee remooued from the will and woorking of GOD not which in our iudgement but which in the iudgement of God are disordered
work so cannot withall not worke or work otherwise because two contradictories cannot bee both at one time true FORTVNE and CHANCE are sometimes taken for the euents themselues or effects which follow causes that are causes but by an accident by reason of such causes Fortune and chaunce as are causes by and in themselues but not knowen to vs as when wee say good or euil fortune happy or vnhappy chance sometimes they signify the causes of such euents either the manifest causes which are causes but by an accident as when any thing is said to be don by fortune or by chance or the hidden and vnknowen causes which are causes by and in themselues As it is said in the Poet Omnipotent fortune and fate ineuitable And they are wont to cal that fortune which is a cause by an accident in voluntary agents whose actions haue some euent that seldom happeneth besides their appointment As he that digging with purpose to builde findeth treasure Chaunce they call an accidentall cause in naturall agentes whose motions haue effects neither proper to them neither alwaies hapning that without any manifest cause directing it as if a tile falling from a house kill one that passeth by By the name of FATE or destiny Fate or destinie The difference between the stoickes and th◠churches doctrine concerning Gods prouidence somtimes is vnderstoode the decree prouidence of God As that of the Poet Leaue off to hope that the fates of the gods are moued with entreaty But the Stoickes by this woorde vnderstoode the immutable connexion and knitting of all causes effectes depending of the nature of the causes themselues so that neither the second causes are able to woorke otherwise than they woorke neither the first cause can woorke otherwise than doe the second and therefore all effectes of all causes are absolutelie necessarie This opinion of the Stoickes because it spoileth God of his libertie and omnipotency and abolisheth the order and manner of woorking in second causes disposed by Gods diuine wisedome not onely founder Philosophy but the Church also reiecteth and contemneth and doth openly professe her dissenting from the Stoickes First because the Stoicks tie god to second causes as if it should be necessary for him so to woorke by them as their nature dooth beare and suffer But the Church teacheth that God worketh not according to the rule or lore of second causes but second causes according to the prescript of GOD as beeing the chiefe and most free gouerner and lord and therefore are subiect and tied to his wil pleasure Secondly the Stoikes were of opinion that neither God nor second causes can doe any thing of their owne nature otherwise than they do The church affirmeth that not only second causes are made ordained by god some to bring forth certaine definit effects some variable and contrary but God himselfe also coulde from euerlasting either not haue decreed or haue decreed wrought otherwise either by second causes or without them and by them either changeable in their own nature or vnchangeable al things whose contrary are not repugnant to his nature that hee hath so decreed them and doth so work them not bicause he could not otherwise but because it so pleased him as it is said Ps 115.3 Our god is in heauen he doth whatsoeuer he wil. And Luk. 1.37 With god shal nothing be impossible that is which is not against his nature or whereby his nature is not ouerthrowen as it is saide 2. Tim. 2. Out of this then which hath beene spoken we answere vnto the argument which was That which is done by the vnchaungeable decree of God is not done contingently but necessarily All thinges are doone by the vnchangeable decree of God nothing therefore is doone contingently neither by fortune or chaunce but all necessarily First wee say there is more in the conclusion than in the premisses when the opinion of the Stoicks is obiected to the Church For albeit the church confesseth al euents in respect of gods prouidence to be necessary yet this necessity is not a Stoical fate destiny because the church defendeth against the Stoikes both liberty in god gouerning things at his pleasure a chāgeablenes in second causes sheweth out of gods word that god could both nowe doe and from euerlasting haue decreed many things which neither hee doth nor hath decreed And therefore the church also hath absteined from the name of fate Necessitie of consequence or supposition doth not take away contingency least any should suspect her to maintaine with the Stoicks an absolute necessity of al things Secōdly if remouing stoicisme yet notwithstāding the necessity of al things the abolishing of cōtingency fortune chance be obiected we make aunswere to the Maior by distinguishing the words For those things that are done by the prouidence decree of god are done indeed necessarily but by that necessity which is by supposition or of consequence not by simple necessity or absolute Wherefore it followeth that all things come to passe not by simple absolute necessity but by that of supposition or consequence And necessitie of consequence doth not at al take away contingency The reason hereof is this Because the same effect may haue causes whereof some may produce it by an order changeable some by vnchangeable order therefore in respect of some it is contingent in respect of some necessary For as the originals or causes of contingency in things are that liberty which is in the will of god and Angels and men and the mutable nature of the matter of the elementes together with the readinesse or inclination thereof to diuers motions and formes so the cause of absolute necessitie in God is the very vnchangeable nature of god but the cause of that necessitie which is onely by consequent is the diuine prouidence or decree comming between those things which are in their own nature mutable also the nature of things created which is framed and ordained of god to certaine effects and yet subiect to the most free wil gouernment of god either according or besides or contrary to this order which himselfe hath made In respect therefore of second causes some things are necessary which are done by causes woorking alwaies after one sort as the motion of the son the burning of any matter put vnto the fier if it be capeable of burning some thinges are contingent which haue causes working contingently that is apt and fit to produce or to forbeare producing diuerse contrary effects as the blasts of windes the locall motions of liuing creatures the actions of mens wils But in respect of the first cause that is of the wil of god all thinges which are or are doone in Gods externall and outward woorks are partly necessary partly cōtingent necessary as euē those things which haue second causes most chaungeable as that the bones of Christ on the crosse were not broken
by the souldiers by reason of the vnchangeablenes of the decree prouidence of God contingent by reason of the liberty of his eternal and vnchangeable decree and the execution thereof euen those thinges which as concerning their owne nature haue second causes most vnchangeable as the motion of the sunne shadowes What contingencie is denied If therefore by contingency they meane the changeablenesse of effects which they haue by the nature of second causes or by the power and libertie of God it doth not follow that things are not contingent because of that necessity which they haue by the prouidence of God For this dooth not take away but preserueth rather the nature order maner of woorking in second causes ordeined by God But if by contingency they mean the changeablenes of second causes and effects so floting and wauering that they are not ruled and gouerned by Gods prouidence any such contingency the Scripture dooth not admit or approue Whether the motions of a creature are contingent or necessarie Hereby we also vnderstand when it is demanded concerning the motions effects of creatures whether they are to be termed necessarie or contingent that some verily are more rightly properly called contingent than necessarie though both contingent necessary are wrought by diuine prouideÌ„ce For they are rather to bee called such as they are of their own nature by the nature of their neerest causes than as they are in respect of Gods prouidence which is a cause more remoued farther off And nothing is more either certaine or manifest than that according to the nature of second causes some thinges should bee changeable some vnchangeable yet by the power of God though al things in the creatures may bee changed they are made notwithstanding vnchangeable because of the certaintie of his decree and diuine prouidence So likewise we answere concerning fortune chance What fortune and chaunce is denied For if by these names be vnderstood such causes or euents by accident as haue no cause which is proper and by it selfe a cause they ought to be far abandoned from the church of Christ But if wee vnderstand thereby a cause which is by it selfe a cause proper though vnknowen to our senses and reason or such causes by accident which haue notwithstanding some secret proper cause adioined nothing hindereth in respect of second causes which are causes by accideÌ„t in respect of our iudgemeÌ„t whereby we attain not to the proper that which is by it selfe the cause of these euents that to be or to be a thing fortuning or don by chance which in respect of gods prouideÌ„ce commeth to passe by his most accurate and vnchangeable counsel decree according to those sayings Matth. 10.29 One sparowe shal not fal on the ground without your father And Pro. 16 33. The lot is cast into the lap c. The fifth Sophisme of the mutility or vnprofitablenesse of meanes THat which shal be vnchaungeably and necessarily God is effectual in working by meanes which himselfe hath freely ordained by the wil prouidence of god in vain to the furdering or hindering of that are means applied as the vse of the ministery the magistrate lawes exhortations promises threatnings punishmeÌ„ts praier our study endeuors But al things are done by the decree of god vnchangeably neither can they which woorke by the prouidence of God worke otherwise than they doe Therefore al those means are vaine fruitlesse Ans It is not necessary that the first principal cause being put the second instrumeÌ„tal cause should be remoued and taken away In vain are second causes means applied if god had determined to execute his decrees without meanes neither had commaunded vs to vse them But seeing god hath decreed by those means in some to worke faith conuersion some to bridle keep vnder some to leaue excuselesse hath for that cause commanded vs in his word to vse theÌ„ they are not in vain vsed and applied Yea when there commeth no profit by these meanes yet they profit to this that they leaue the wicked without excuse As therefore the sunne doth not in vaine daily rise and set neither are the fieldes in vaine sowed or watered with the raine neither bodies in vaine with foode refreshed though God createth light and darcknesse bringeth forth the corne out of the earth and is the life length of our daies so neither are men in vaine taught or study to conform their life vnto doctrine though all auaileable actions and euentes proceede not from any but from God For God from euerlasting decreeed as the endes so the meanes also and prescribed them vnto vs whereby it seemed good to him to bring vs vnto them Wherefore we vsing those meanes doe well and obtaine profitable and frutefull euentes but if wee neglect them either by our fault we depriue our selues or others of those blessings offered by God or if God euen in this contempt of his woorde haue mercie of vs or others yet our conscience accuseth vs of open and grieuous sinne Wherefore wee must vse meanes Why wee must vse meanes first that we may obay God therein who both hath decreed endes and ordained meanes to those ends and prescribed them vnto vs neither tempt him by contemning these to our owne peril and danger Secondly that we may obtaine those blessings decreed for vs according to his promise and that to our saluation Thirdly that we may retaine a good conscience in vsing the meanes although the expected euent doe not alwaies followe either in our selues or others The sixth Sophisme of the merit of good euill WHatsoeuer is necessarie doth not merit rewardes or punishmentes But all morall good and euill is doone necessarilie Therefore neither the good meriteth reward nor the euill punishment Aunswere This argument is handled by Aristotle in his Ethicks Lib. 3. Cap. 5. But the aunswere thereto is easie No good worke of the creature meriteth reward First the maior is either particular and so there is no consequence or sequele or beeing generally taken is false and that euen in morall or ciuil consideration to wit in respect of those thinges which are necessarie by supposition and yet are done freely as the actions of men Secondly we grant the reason in respect of the iudgement of god concerning good works For the creature cannot merit any thing no not by his best workes of God Because both they are due and are the effects of God in vs. And therefore the more good things God woorketh in vs so much the more he bindeth and endebteth vs to him Wherefore in the godly Euâ—â— workes merit punishment iustly God crowneth and rewardeth of his free bountifulnesse not their merites but his owne giftes But as touching euill woorkes we deny the reason for they merit punishment and that most iustly For although men forsaken of God cannot but sinne yet the necessity of sinning both
and of saluation and euerlasting life 4 At length also assuming taking vnto him humane nature to teach as by his voice the will of god concerning vs and towards vs and to confirm this doctrine by Miracles 5 Not only to giue oracles and prophecies to open the will of god by prophets and to teach expound it himselfe present in humane nature but also to ordaine institute the ministery of the woord and sacraments that is to call and send Prophets Apostles and other ministers of the Church and to furnish them with giftes necessarie to this ministerie Iohn 20.21 As the Father hath sent mee so send I you Ephes 4.11 He Christ hath giuen some Apostles and some Prophetes some Doctours Luk. 21.15 I will giue you a mouth and wisedome where-against all your aduersaries shall not be able to speake nor resist So 1. Pet. 1.10 The spirit of Christ is saied to haue spoken by the prophetes 6. To giue the holy Ghost Mat. 3.11 Hee will baptise you with the holy Ghost and with fire 7. To be through his owne and others ministerie effectuall in the hartes of the hearers that is by his spirit to lighten our mindes that wee may vnderstand those thinges which hee teacheth vs of God and his will either by his own voice or by the voice of others Luk. 24 45. Then opened hee their vnderstanding that they might vnderstand the scriptures 8. To effectuate also that which by the efficacie of his spirit he speaketh in our heartes that is to moue our will that wee may yeeld our assent and obedience to those thinges which by his teaching wee learne and knowe Eph. 5.25 Christ gaue himselfe for the Church that he might sanctifie it and clense it by the washing of water through the worde And these thinges Christ did doth performe euen from the beginning of the church to the end of the world and that by his own authority and power and for this very cause is hee called the Word Mat. 11.27 No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and he to whom the sonne wil reueile him Ioh. 5 21. As the Father so the Sonne quickneth whom he will By these things which haue beene now spoken is also vnderstood what difference there is betweene Christ other Prophets both of the old and newe testament why he is the chiefe prophet doctor The difference eminency consisteth in his nature office 1 Christ is the verie sonne of God god and lord of all doth immediatly vtter the woord of the Father is the embassador and mediator sent of the father Other prophets are only men his seruants called sent by him 2 Christ is autor reueiler of the doctrine therefore the Prince of all Prophets Others are s gnifiers of that which they haue receiued from Christ For whatsoeuer knoweledge and Propheticall spirite is in them all that they haue from Christ reueiling and giuing it to them Therefore is the spirit of christ said to haue spoken in the prophets Neither hath he opened only to the prophets the doctrine which he teacheth but also to all the godly Ioh. 1.16 Of his fulnes haue we all receiued that is al the Elect euen froÌ„ the beginning of the world vnto the end Ioh. 1.18 No man hath seen god at any time the only begotten sonne which is in the bosome of the father he hath declared him 3 His Prophetical wisedome is infinit and perfect therefore in al gifts he excelleth others 4 This Prophet christ appointeth the ministery sendeth ordaineth Prophets and Apostles he giueth the holie Ghost gifts necessarie for the prophets Apostles al ministers of the word to the perfourming of their duty Ioh. 16.14 He shall receiue of mine shall shew it vnto you He will lead you into al trueth 5 Christ himselfe is not onlie autor of the doctrine erectour maintainer of the external Ministery but also by his own other Prophets voice outward ministerie he preacheth effectuallie to men inwardlie through the vertue and working of the holy ghost Others are onely the instrumentes of Christ and that arbitrarie and at his disposition and direction 6 The Doctrine of christ which beeing made man hee vttered by his owne and his Apostles mouthes is much more cleare ful than the doctrine of Moses the Prophets of the old Testament Christ therefore hath authoritie of himselfe others from him if Christ speake wee must beleeue him for himselfe others because Christ speaketh in them These things are expresly prooued by these places of holy writ Hebr. 1.1 At sundrie times and in diuerse manners god spake in the old time to our Fathers by the Prophets Jn these last daies he hath spoken vnto vs by his Sonne And cap. 3.3 This man is counted woorthie of more glorie than Moses in as much as hee which hath builded the house hath more honour than the house Ioh. 16.14 The spirit of truth which I will send you shall receiue of mine and shal shew it vnto you Mat. 17.5 This is my beloued sonne in whom I am well pleased Heare him Luc. 10.16 Hee that heareth you heareth mee and hee that despiseth you despiseth mee and him that sent mee 3 WHAT CHRISTS PRIESTHOOD IS A priest in general A Priest in generall is a person ordeined by god to offer for himselfe and others oblations sacrifices to pray for others and to instruct Vnder praier is comprehended blessing which is to wish them good from God A typical priest There is one Priest which is signifieng or typical another signified The typicall Priest was a person appointed by God 1. to offer typical Sacrifices 2. to make intercession for himselfe and others 3. to declare to the people the doctrine of the Law and the promise of the Messias and true Sacrifice which was to come Such were al the Priestes of the old Testament For these three properties which we haue reckned were common to the High-Priest with other inferiour Priestes The High priest But some thinges the High-Priest had proper peculiar to himselfe 1. That he alone entered into the Tabernacle called the Holiest of al or Sanctuarie that but once euerie â—eare not without blood which he offered for himselfe and the people burning incense there and making intercession for the people 2. That his rayment was more gorgious 3. That he was set ouer the rest 4. That he onlie was consulted of questions or matters doubtful waightie and obscure whether appertaining to religion or to the common-wealth and did returne the aunsweres of God for the Princes and the people 5. and therefore did gouerne and order some counsels and offices of the state and kingdom did see that al things were lawfully administred The inferiours were all the other priests of the old Testament whose office it was to sacrifice to praie to teach the doctrine of the Lawe and the promise of the Messias to come
is most absurd or hee was this from the beginning of the worlde Heb. 3. Hee is made the builder of the house whereof Moses also was a part Hebr. 13. Iesus Christ yesterdaie and to daie and the same for euer Our Second aunswere is by denying their interpretation For Saint Iohn there speaketh of the first creation Which we shewe First Because he speaketh of the second afterwardes As manie as receiued him to them hee gaue power to be the Sennes of God Likewise Of his fulnesse haue all wee receiued and againe Grace and trueth came by Iesus Christ Now he therefore setteth down the first creation before because both creations are the worke of the same That therefore he might shew that the second creation was wrought by the woorde it was necessarie for him to teach that the first also was wrought by it For the same is the Creatour and repairer of the worlde Secondly Because he saith the world was made by him Reply The woorlde heere is taken for the Church Aunswere No for hee addeth And the woorlde knewe him not The same woorlde which was made by him knewe him not Therefore hee meaneth the wicked whether elect or reprobate Thirdly other places demonstrate the same Iohn 5.17 My Father woorketh hitherto and I woorke Wherefore both of them from the beginning of the woorlde woorke the workes of both creations In the same place verse 19. Whatsoeuer thinges the Father dooth the same thinges dooth the Sonne also And vers 20. The Father sheweth him all thinges whatsoeuer hee himselfe dooth Therefore not onlie the workes of the second creation but also of the first creation preseruation and administration of the world In the same place it is said As the Father quickeneth so the Sonne quickeneth whom he wil. But the Father was from the very beginning the giuer of corporal spirituall life Col. 1.16.17 By him were all things created which are in heauen and which are on earth thinges visible and inuisible whether they be thrones or dominions or principalities or powers all thinges were created by him and for him And hee is before al thinges and in him al things consist Thus farre of the first creation that which followeth speaketh of the second creation Reply 1. All these speake of the instauration of the Church Answer No. Because that comprehendeth also the Angels Reply 2. The Angels also were restored by Christ and ioined to their head Auns But the new creation is called a restoring from sinne death to righteousnesse and life this agreeth not to the Angels Reply Heb. 1.2 By whom also he made the worldes The worlds that is the new Church Aunswere 1 God made the old also by him because it is one Church hauing one head and foundation 2 The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is vsed in that place signifieth in Scripture the world not the Church And faâ—der when it is there added Bearing vp al thinges by his mighty worde those words speak of the preseruation not only of the Church but of al things And moreouer he rendereth a cause why he is the heire not only of the Church but of all Creatures namely because he is the creatour preseruer of all thinges Heb. 1.10 Thou Lord in the beginning hast established the earth the heauens are the works of thine hands Reply In these wordes he conuerteth his speach to the Father to prooue that he was able by his power to lift vp the Sonne to diuine maiestie Aunswere This is â—â—â—mpudent shift and elusion 1 Because it is saide before But vnto the Sonne which appertaineth to both places of the Psalme cited by the Apostle 2 Because the Psalme dooth entreat of Christes kingdome and therefore those words which there are spoken of the Lord are to be vnderstood next immediatly of his person secondarily and mediately of the father Reply 1. If he made all thinges then then father made them not by him Aunswere Both he made them and they were made by him Ioh. 5. Whatsoeuer things the Father dooth the same dooth the Sonne also And yet the father dooth them by him Reply 2. The creatour cannot be compared with the creatures But Christ is there compared with the Angels Therefore creation of thingeâ—â—s not attributed vnto Christ Aunswere He is not comparâ—d with the creatures in any proportion but without proportion This the place it selfe of the Psalme prooueth â—he heauens shall perish but thou doost remaine Reply 3 Iâ— hee were creatour and equall with the Father hee could not sittâ— at his right hand Aunswere Wee may inuert this and saâ— of the contrarie rather if he were not equal he could not sitte at his right hand Because none but the omnipotent and true God is able to administer the kingdome of heauen earth Phil. 2.6 who beeing in the forme of god thought it no robberie to be equal with God Isay 45.23 Thus saith the Lorde that created heauen Euerie knee shall bowe vnto me This is saide of Christ Rom. 14.11 Phil. 2 10. Againe Isay 48.12 I am I am the first and I am the last My hand hath laide the foundation of the earth and my right hand hath spanned the heauens when I call them they stand vppe together These wordes Christ applieth vnto himselfe Reuelat. 1.18 and 22.23 In it was life In the word was life and the life was the light of men Wee interpret That the sonne of God is by himselfe the life as is the Father and the fountaine giuer and maintainer of al life as wel corporall and temporall as spirituall and eternall in all from the verie beginning of the world Iohn 5. He hath giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe as the father hath life in himselfe They conster it That the man Iesus is the quickener or giuer of life because in him is the life of all that no man without him and all by him are saued These are their words Vnto which we reply If hee giue eternall life to all so that no man hath is without him Therefore either no man was quickened before hee was borne of Mary which were absurd or hee was the quickner giuer of life from the beginning Euen as Ioh. affirmeth this of him as beeing verified in him also before hee was made fleshe Neither can this be vnderstood onely of his merit whereby hee deserued this life for men For that life is in him signifieth that hee is by his efficacie and effectuall woorking the quickner and reuiuer as himselfe expoundeth it Iohn 5. and 10. and the aduersaries themselues confesse So are wee also to vnderstand his illightening of men that is the knowledge of God the author whereof hee was in all euen from the beginning as himselfe saith No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and hee to whome the Sonne will reueile him And Iohn Baptist saith No man hath seene God at ANY TIME the Sonne hath declared him And the light shineth in the darckenes
passed his substaunce into the flesh begotten but because in miraculous sort hee formed in the Virgins wombe of her substance the body of Christ so that it should not be contaminated or polluted with original sinne For neither could Christ bee in that sort conceiued by the holy Ghost as that his fleshe shoulde issue from the spirits substance and that for these causes 1. Because if this were graunted then were he not borne man of the Virgin or propagated of the Virgins substance 2. Because God is not changed into flesh 3. Because the Word tooke the flesh but was not changed into it 3 Obiection Jn God are not two natures Christ is God Therefore there are not two natures in him Aunswere Meere particulars doe enforce nothing For if the Maior bee taken vniuersallie it is false whosoeuer is God in him are not two natures this generall proposition is false The Maior therefore is true as touching God the father and God the holy Ghost but not as touching God the sonne incarnate Replie 1. But nothing can bee added vnto God by reason of the great perfection and simplicitie of his nature Christ is God therefore the humanitie could not be added vnto his diuine nature Aunswere Nothing can be added to God whereby his essence may bee changed and perfected But in that God the Word ioined the humane nature vnto him personallie there came no chaunge or great perfection thereby to the Word which tooke it but to the nature which was taken Replie 2. Humane nature cannot come vnto him who dwelleth in the light that none can come vnto 1. Tim. 6.16 Aunswere This is true if so God doth not assume and take it vnto him Replie 3. But it is ignominious for God to be a creature Christ man is God Aunswere The chaunging of the Godhead into a creature woulde haue beene ignominious and reprochful vnto the Word but that the godhead shoulde bee vnited vnto a creature is is most glorious vnto god as who by that meanes hath demonstrated and made knowen his infinite both goodnesse and wisedome and iustice and power to the whole world 2 Whether Christ be one person or mo IN Christ are two perfect natures whole and distinct and double properties also and operations naturall but one person which subsisting in both these natures diuine and humane is truely designed by the concrete termes or voices of both natures For it was requisit that one the same should be Mediator both by merit by power But they who make two persons make also two Christs with Nestorius the one a man passiue and crucified the other God not crucified and onelie assisting the man Christ by his grace 1 Obiection Jn whom are two things which in themselues make two whole persons in him also are two persons But in Christ are two things which make two whole persons namely the Word which is by it selfe a person subsisting from all eternitie and the bodie and soule which beeing vnited make likewise a person Therefore in Christ are two persons Aunswere We denie that part of the Maior to wit That the bodie and humane soule doe as in other men so also in Christ concurre to make a created person of the humane nature and diuers from the person increate and eternall of the Woordc For albeit the humane nature in Christ compounded of a bodie and a reasonable soule is an indiuidual and particular or singular substance as being from other indiuiduals of the same nature distinguished by certaine properties and accidents yet neither was it or is it a person or subsistence For first A person is that which is not onelie a particular or singular thing but also it selfe consisteth and subsisteth in it selfe and by it selfe not susteined in or of anie other But CHRISTS humane nature now from the verie first beginning thereof dependeth and is susteined by the person of the Word For it was at once both formed and assumed of the Word into vnitie of person and made proper vnto the Word before and without which assumption or personal Vnion it neither was nor had beene nor shoulde be so that this Vnion being dissolued and loosed it must needes follow that that this flesh and this soule should be brought to nothing Therfore Christs humane nature hath not any subsistence or person proper vnto it selfe Secondly Jt belongeth to the nature or definition of a person that it be an indiuidual incommunicable and also no part of another But the nature which the Word took and assumed belongeth to the substance of one Christ a part also of whom it is after a sort Therefore in it selfe and by it selfe it is no person Reply That which appertaineth to the substance of a person and is a part thereof cannot be a person The word appertaineth and belongeth to the substaunce of Christ and is after a sort a part of him as well as the humanitie Therefore neither shall the word be by this reason a person Ans The Maior proposition if it bee vnderstood simplie or vniuersally is false For a reasonable soule existing in the bodie is not a person but a part of an humane person which the soule together with the bodie doth make yet notwithstanding the same soule being loosed from the bodie is a person by it selfe not that compound and mortall person whereof it was a part that is an humane person but a person most simple and immortall such as are the Angels because it subsisteth out of the bodie by it self neither is part of another So may it be said of the Word if it be constred aright with indifferencie that the Word in it selfe and by it selfe is not the whole person of Christ or the Mediatour as he is Christ and Mediatour that is is not that whole thing which is Christ who is not onely God but also man and yet is in it selfe and by it selfe the perfect and whole person of the Godhead truelie subsisting before the flesh was that is the onelie begotten sonne of God For this selfe same person existing in it selfe from euerlasting and remaining for euer most simple and vncompound is by the assuming of humane nature made in time after a sort compound that is the Word incarnate Wherefore in respect of the person considered in Vnion or incarnate the Word is rather considered as a nature and both it selfe and the humane nature may be called as it were the parts of whole Christ are so called also of many of the auncient Fathers which were sound in faith not that the flesh assumpted did adde any part to the subsistence of the Word or as if of the Persons of the Word and the humane nature as being vnperfect parts was made another perfect person of a certaine third Essence consubstantiall with neither of those natures of which it is compounded but because the person of the Word altogether one and the same which before the flesh was taken consisted in the diuine nature onely doth now after the taking
the flesh taken or assumpted is truely vnited both to the person and to the nature of the Word For the person is not any seuerall thing or reallie differing from the essence but is the essence it selfe yet is it well saide that the flesh is vnited to the Word in person only and Likewise that the person onely of the Word is incarnate The reasons hereof are 1. Because not the Father nor the Holy Ghost were incarnate but the sonne onely 2. Because the first and neerest terme of this vnion is the person onely of the Word assuming and taking the flesh but not the Godhead For the person onely is proper vnto the Word the essence of the Godhead is common to him and the same with the Father and the Holy Ghost This is plainely taught by the 6. Toletan Councel Cap. 1. in these wordes The son onely tooke the humanitie in singularity of person not in vnitie of diuine nature that is in that which is proper vnto the son not which is common to the Trinitie And Rusticus in his dialog against the Acephalists Not god the Word by the diuine nature but the diuine nature by the persō of god the Word is said to be vnited to the flesh And a little after Wherefore both God the Woorde and his nature is incarnate hee by him selfe in that he is himselfe his nature not so but by the person God the Word then as touching himselfe is vnited to the flesh for he is made one person and one subsistence with the flesh but as touching his nature hee is conioyned rather than vnited because there remaine still two natures Wherefore either foule shamefull is the follie or notorious the malice and slaunder of certaine smatterers that of this verie orthodoxall and sound position not of the schoolmen onely but of Councels also and auncient Fathers The flesh is vnited to the Word in person onely or according to subsistence and this onely maketh the proper difference of personall vnion they inffer that by this meanes the diuine nature of the Woorde is drawen away from the personall vnion But let them againe and againe looke vnto it least by that their reall communicating of the essentiall properties of the Godhead which are the verie diuine essence common to the sonne with the Father and the holy Ghost which communication they will haue to bee the personall vnion which they define by it they ouerthrowe as well the eternall Godhead of Christ man as also the manhood it selfe and withall plainlie incarnate the whole Trinitie That then one and the same Christ is and is called truly and reallie the verie eternall God immense omnipotent creatour and true naturall man finite weake subiect to passions and sufferinges and a creature the onely cause is the vnitie of person subsisting in two natures perfect whole and reallie distinct diuine and humane For euerie indiuiduall and person is denominated or named of the natures or formes and their properties and operations cōcurring or subsisting in it Wherefore seeing in the same indiuiduall person of the Word doe truely subsist and belong to the substance of one Christ these two most diuers natures vnto one and the same Christ of which soeuer nature he be called do agree are affirmed of him all the attributes and properties both diuine and humane but after a diuerse manner For the attributes which agree to Christ in respect of the personall vnion are of two sorts some are attributes or properties of the natures others of his office The naturall attributes are those which are proper to ech nature whether the same bee essentiall belonging to the essence of the thing or which necessarily followe accompanie it without which the nature can not consist or accidentall which may bee away and wanting without the destruction of the nature The essentiall properties and perfections of the Godhead are to be eternall vncreate immense euerie where present not to be circumscribed in place omnipotent omniscient and the like which are the verie essence of the Godhead as also to create to giue the Holy Ghost to regenerate The essentiall attributes of the humanity are to haue a soule vnderstanding immortall and a body compounded of elements consisting of skinne bloud flesh bones veines and sinowes hauing a certaine and definite greatenesse figure proportion and collocation or localnes of partes and therefore to be circumscried in one place to be solid visible palpable and such like These Christ reteineth for euer because without these nothing can bee a humane nature The accidental properties of the humanitie are those infirmities which ensued vpon sinne which infirmities Christ together with the humane nature it selfe assumed and tooke without sinne For he tooke the forme of a seruant which by his resurrection and ascension hee laide down againe The attributes of his office are called those which agree not to one nature onely but to both together that is it agreeth to the whole person according to both natures as being the compound of both A rule to be obserued as touching the attributes or properties of both natures in Christ BOTH natures and their properties are truely and reallie affirmed of the person and of themselues interchangeably in concrete termes or voices yet so that the proper predicate which is proper vnto one nature is attributed to the person not according to both natures but according to that onely to which it is proper The reason is for that one and the same person subsisting in two natures hath and reteineth for euer reallie the properties of both natures and also because one and the same person is signified by the concrete voices of both natures As therefore one the same man is liuing and corporeal according to diuerse natures and the corporeal is liuing by the soule onely and contrarilie the liuing is corporeall by the bodie onely For both soul and bodie are of the substance and essence of the same man So likewise one the same Christ is God eternal immense omnipotent according to the God-head onely is man the Virgines sonne created finite infirme and did suffer according to his humanity onely So likewise God is man borne of a Virgine annointed with the holy Ghost and suffered according to the flesh And man is God eternal creatour omnipotent giueth the holie Ghost not according to the humane nature but according to the diuine For the sense and meaning of these speaches is The person which is God creatour of thinges omnipotent by reason of the God-head the selfe-same person is man a creature infirme by reason of the flesh subsisting in it But notwithstanding one nature and the properties thereof whether they bee vttered in abstract or in concrete voices cannot be affirmed of the other nature or forme truly and really The reason is Because the vnion is not made in the nature that is two natures are not made one nature and because in neither nature the properties of the other doe reallie exist neither can exist
the verie essence it selfe of the God-head c. Therefore if Gods omnipotencie bee really communicated to Christs humanitie so that this also is by reason of the omnipotency communicated vnto it reallie omnipotent of necessity then by reason of the same omnipotency really communicated Christes humanitie shall bee indeed an essence subsisting of it selfe and by it selfe incorporeall eternall immense creatres of all thinges that is God himselfe blessed for euer and so by consequent the diuine person For an essence intelligent subsisting by it selfe which also is God must needs be the person And these are the fruits of reall communicating of properties in natures The participation of the God-head exaltation and maiestie of the flesh and such like is not a real communicating of the essentiall properties of the God-heade made into the humane nature or an omnipresence omniscience omnipotency that is a God-head of the man-hood For such a communicating should not perfect but destroy the man-hoode and conuert it into the God-head and dissolue the personal vnion of distinct natures but it is First the verie vnion of the humanitie with the Word in such sort as it being created finite doth together with al the essential properties therof subsist not in a created person of the same humane nature but in the increate and eternal person of God the Word by reason of which vnion God the Word but not the God-head is is called trulie man and contrarie man but not the manhood is and is called truly eternall God No dignitie eminence can be imagined greater than this neither doth it agree to anie but to the flesh of Christ onely Secondly Jt is the excellencie of gifts For these christs humanitie receiued without measure that is all whatsoeuer and most great and most perfect that maie fall into a created and finite nature Thirdly The office of the mediator to the perfourming whereof the vnited but yet distinct properties and operations of both natures doe necessarily concur Fourthly The honor and worship which by reason of the Mediatorship agreeth is giueÌ„ to whole christ according to bâ—th natures keeping still as was before saide the difference of properties and operations in natures Now whatsoeuer testimonies some bring either out of the Scriptures or out of the Fathers which were sound in faith thereby to proue that their Eutychian transmutation and a third kind of communicating forged by themselues that is exequation or equalling of natures all those testimonies indeed belong either to the grace of vnion of the natures which is signified by the communicating of properties or to the grace of Christes Headship which compriseth the office and honour of the Mediatour which are affirmed of whole Christ by waie of communicating or to the habituall grace that is the created giftes which Christ receiued without measure which are properly affirmed of the flesh or humanitie These giftes which are also called graces are not properlie effectes of the personal vnion as are the attributes or properties of the natures and office First because they are communicated to the manhoode as well of the Father and the Holie Ghost as of the Word or Sonne For he is said to haue receiued of the Father the spirite without measure that is aboundauntlie likewise to be annointed with the Holy Ghost And if the giftes were effects of the vnion it would follow of necessity that the flesh was vnited not to the Son only but to the Father also and the holy Ghost Secondlie The vnion of the flesh with the Woord was from the verie moment of the conception alwaies most perfect But the consummation and perfection of giftes was not vntil the accomplished time of his resurrection ascension For hee was indeede humble weake and contemned he was indeede ignorant of some things he did indeede encrease in wisedome stature and in fauour not with men onely but also with God himselfe Thirdly The flesh when it was in the state of humility had not immortality or a nature not subiect to sufferings or the like and yet remained it alwaies vnited with the Woorde Wherefore the habitual giftes or graces of the humanitie for which it is also in it selfe reallie wise mighty iust holie follow not the personal vnion in respect of dependency as the effect followeth and dependeth of this cause but onely in respect of order Because namely the humane nature was first to subsist and bee before it were enriched with giftes and it subsisteth vnited to the Woord in the very first moment of the conception But after what maner the humanitie is vnited vnto the Sonne of God hath beene said before For by the special and miraculous working of the holy Ghost in the womb of the virgine of her blood was the flesh of christ formed sanctified and vnited according to subsistence or personally vnto the Wâ—ord 4 Why it was necessarie that the two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God FOR what cause Christ our Mediatour was to bee together both a true and perfect iust man and true that is by nature GOD hath beene declared of vs before in the common place of the Mediatour in the 4 question pag. 237. For the woorke of our redemption could not haue bin compassed and finished by the Mediator without the concurrence of diuers natures operations in the same person For albeit he suffred died in the flesh yet his passion and suffering would not haue that force and efficacy to redeeme iustifie sanctifie vs neither could christ haue applied those benefites vnto vs except he had bin withal true and natural God Of the Incarnation of the Word the confession made by the Fathers of Antioch against Paulus Samosatenus TAKEN OVT OF THE ACTES OF THE FIRST EPHESINE COVNCEL VVEE confesse our Lord Iesus Christ begotten before all worlds of his Father but in the last times borne according to the flesh of the Virgine by the holy Ghost subsisting in one person onely made of the celestiall God-head and humane flesh Whole God and whole man Whole God also with his bodie but not according to his body god Whole man also with his God head but not according to his God head man Againe whole adorable also with his bodie but not according to his bodie adorable Whole adoring also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead adoring Whole increat also with his body but not according to his body increated Whole formed also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead formed Whole consubstantial with god also with his body but not according to his body consubstantiall as neither also according to his Godhead he is coessentiall with men but hee is according to the flesh consubstantiall vnto vs existing also in his Godhead For when wee say hee is according to the spirit consubstantiall with God wee doe not say hee is according to the spirit coessentiall with men And contrarily when wee affirme him to bee according to the
from the concrete to the abstract the reason doth not follow Christ therefore suffered according to his humane nature onelie making a sufficicnt and most perfect satisfaction thereby for our sins Which his satisfaction is made ours by applicatioÌ„ which is double The one from god who iustifieth vs for christs merit maketh vs to cease from sin The other from our selues who by faith apprehend applie vnto vs Christs merit by being fully persuaded that God for the ransome of his Son doth pardon vs our sinne Nowe that there was another nature in christ which nether suffered nor died is proued by these testimonies Ioh. 2.19 Destroie this Temple in three daies I wil raise it vp again 1. Pe. 3.18 was put to death concerning the flesh but was quickned in the spirit Reu. 1.18 I was dead and behold J am aliue Ioh. 18. I haue power to laie downe my soule and power to take it vp againe 3 The causes impellent or motiues of Christs Passion 1 THE loue of God towardes mankind Ioh. 3.16 So God loued the world that he gaue his onlie begotten Sonne 2. The mercy of God towards men fallen into sin 3. The wil of God to reuenge the iniurie of the Diuel who in reproch and despite of God auerted vs from him and maimed the image of God in vs in despite of the creator But here it maie be demaunded whether Christ fulfilled the Lawe or no and secondly if he did why then hee shoulde suffer so bitter a Passion Whereunto we aunswere first that he fulfilled the Law 1. By his righteousnes in obseruing it 2. By satisfaction in suffering punishment for our sinnes who had transgressed it Both which are most perfect Nowe to the second demand then why if Christ fulfilled the law was he so grieuously punished of God seeing punishment is the wages of sinne and sinne was not in him who neuer committed anie We answere that it was not for himselfe but for vs that hee was punished Reply A righteous man ought not to be punished for the vnrighteous Aunswere True except first he voluntarilie offer himselfe for them Secondly except he willinglie do suffer in such sort for them as that he yeelde a sufficient ransome and payment Thirdly except he haue the power of recouering himselfe out of the punishment once suffered Fourthly except he be able to bring to passe that they also for whom he offereth himselfe to satisfie leaue off to transgresse and sinne hereafter Fifthly except he bee of the same nature with them for whom he satisfieth If such a satisfier bee substituted there is nothing committed against the iustice of God for in so suffering both are saued both he that suffereth and they for whome hee suffereth Now such a suretie and satisfier was Christ who is not onelie man or of the same nature with vs but wee are also his members when the whole suffereth punishment the members also and partes are punished And for this coniunction of ours with Christ our head the Apostles commonly say that he suffered in Christ 4 The final causes or ends of his Passion THE first final cause or end of his passion is That his passion might bee a sufficient ransome for our sins or the redeeming of vs. 2. The mâ—nifesting of the loue goodnes mercie righteousnes of God while he punnisheth his sonne for vs. The chiefe finall causes then are Our saluation and the glorie of God To the former belongeth the knowledge of the greatnesse of sinne that we may knowe how great an euil sinne is and what it deserueth and further to knowe that death is not now pernicious and hurtfull to the Godly and therfore not to bee feared To the latter belongeth our Iustification wherein all the benefites are comprehended which Christ merited by dying euen our deliuery from death which hee bestoweth vpon vs. Obiection If hee haue satisfied for all then al should be saued Answere He satisfied for al as touching his satisfaction but not as touching the application thereof al not applying it vnto them Wherefore hee hath satisfied for al but doth not deliuer all but only those who by faith applie it And those he deliuereth 1. Because the Father ordeined him to this or because the Father will 2. Because the Son willingly offereth himselfe 3 Because this ransome is sufficient SVFFERED VNDER PONTIVS PILATE MEntion is made of Pilate in Christs passion 1. Because Christ would receiue from him a testimony of his innocencie that thereby we might knowe that he was pronounced innocent by the voice of the iudge himselfe 2. Beecause it was requisite that he should be solemnly coÌ„demned that we might know that hee though innocent was notwithstanding condemned that we might not be coÌ„demned as also he sustained death that we might be freed from it 3. That wee might be aduertised of the fulfilling of the Prophecy Gen. 49.10 The scepter shall not depart from Iudah nor a Law-giuer from betweene his feete vntill Shilo come For then was the Scepter taken from Iudah when Christ was a little after condemned of Pilate a Romane gouernour of whom before he was absolued This circumstance therefore is diligently to be coÌ„sidered in Christs passion that we may know him to be the Messias because al conditions are fulfilled in him which are required in the Messias Whereof this Prophecie of the taking away of the Scepter from Iudah was one 4. That we might know that Christ was condemned of God himselfe also and therefore that hee satisfied God for vs. For the head and gouernour of ordinarie iudgement is God himselfe Wherefore Christ was not to haue beene priuily taken away by the Iewes neither to be drawen to death by tumult and disorderlie but by lawefull order and iudgement and by inquisition made concerning all the accusations of Christ God would haue him first to be examined that his innocencie might appeare Secondly to be condemned that it might appeare that hee beeing before pronounced innocent was now condemned not for his owne fault but for ours and that so his vniust condemnation might be insteed of our most iust condemnatioÌ„ Thirdly to be put to death both that the prophecies might bee fulfilled and also that it might appear that both Iewes Gentils did put Christ to death CRVCIFIED I Beleeue in Christ Crucified that is I beleeue Christ did vndergo this punishment and this curse of the Crosse for my sake and that he was made obnoxious for my sake to Gods curse which I and we all deserued a type also of which curse was the death of the Crosse cursed by God himselfe Now for three causes would God haue his Sonne suffer the punishment of so ignominious a death 1 That we might knowe The curse due for our sinnes to haue laine vpon him so should be stirred vp to greater thankefulnesse considering how detestable a thing sinne is so that it could not be expiated or satisfied for but with the most bitter and most opprobrious and shamefull
woord of God is the instrumental cause Now the cause of the difference beeing known let vs in a woorde see what that difference is Three sorts of men Wee are to obserue therefore that there are three sortes of men verie much different one from another For some men are euen in profession estraunged and aliants from the church as who deny faith or repentance and therefore are openly enemies of the Church others are called but not effectuallie which are al hypocrits Others lastly are called effectually which are the Elect who are but a little portion according to that of Christ Matt. 20.16 Many are called but few are chosen 7 Whether anie one maie bee saued out of the Church None saued out of the church NO man can bee saued out of the Church For whomsoeuer God hath chosen and elected to the ende which is eternal life them he hath chosen to the means which is the inward and outwarde calling Obiection Therefore Election is not free Aunswere It is free because God chose freely both to the end and to the meanes But after he hath once destined and ordeined men to meanes hee neuer changeth Wee are here also to holde against the Anabaptistes That infantes which are borne in the church are also of the church OF PREDESTINATION THIS common place of Predestination or election and reprobation ariseth out of the former place Of the Church is ioyned with it The special questions are 1 Whether there be Predestination 2 What it is 3 What is the cause thereof 4 What are the effectes thereof 5 Whether it be vnchangeable 6 How far it is knowen vnto vs. 7 Whether the Elect bee alwaies members of the church and the reprobate neuer 8 Whether the Elect fal from the church and the reprobate remaine euer in the church 9 What vse there is of this Doctrine 1 WHETHER THERE BE PREDESTINATION Predestination proued by Testimony of scripture THAT there is predestination testimonies of scripture do confirme Mat. 20.16 Many are called but few are chosen Ioh. 15.16 Yee haue not chosen mee but I haue chosen you Iohn 10.16 Other sheep haue I also which are not of this foulde Eph. 1.5 Predestinate according to the good pleasure of his will Acts. 18.10 J haue much people in this citie Eph. 1.4 Hee hath chosen vs in him Rom. 8.30 Whom he predestinate them also hee called By these and the like places wee learne that some are elected some not and therefore there is predestination When the Question is whether there be predestination theÌ„ this is in Question Whether there bee any such counsell of God which hath seuered some to bee saued and others to bee reprobate Some say that Election when mention is made thereof in scripture is taken for some excellencie for which a man is worthy to bee elected or chosen as wee may say a Choise and gallant horse So also they interpret reprobation but falsely for it is the eternall counsell and purpose of God That there is Reporbation is apparent by diuerse places Reprobation proued by scripture S. Paul saieth Rom. 9.22 That god doth shew his iustice on the vessels of wrath Mat. 13.11 It is giueÌ„ vnto you to know the secrets of the kingdome of heauen but to them it is not giuen Iud. vers 4. who were before of old ordeyned to this condemnation Mat. 14.25 â—hou hast had these thinges from the wise Iohn 10.26 Ye are not of my sheepe Pro. 16.4 He hath made al things for his own sake euen the wicked for the day of euill 1 Obiection But the promise of grace is vniuersall Aunswere It is vniuersall in respect of the faithfull that is it belongeth to all those who beleeue But it is particular in respect of al men Our aduersaries say that those which are conuerted maie fal awaie Which is to weaken and diminish the general promise Reply But it is said 1. Tim. 2.4 That God will that al men be saued But contrarie Matth. 20.16 Places of scripture reconciled concerning gods wil to saue and not to saue men Manie are called but fewe chosen Matth. 13.15 This peoples heart is waxed fat saith the Lorde least they shoulde returne that J might heale them And heere it is saide that God will that some bee not saued Therefore these testimonies are contrarie one to another Aunswere 1. God wil that al be saued as he is delited with the saluation of all Albeit elsewhere it is saide That hee reioiceth at the destruction of the wicked Prou. 1.26 yet hee reioiceth not thereat as it is a vexation or destruction of his creature but as it is an execution of his iustice 2. Hee wil that all bee saued in as much as he inuiteth al to repentance But he wil not haue all saued in respect of the force and efficacie of calling Actes 17.27 He dooth good vnto al if so be they might haue groped after him and found him Rom. 11.7 The Elect obtaine it the rest are hardened He saith verily vnto all Honesty of life pleaseth me yee owe it vnto me But he saith not to al I wil worke it in you but to the elect onely because from euerlasting it hath so pleased him 2 Obiection He that giueth vnequallie to those that are equal is an accepter of persons Aunswere It is true First if hee giueth to those which are equall vnequallie for anie outward causes or respectes that is for such causes as are not that condition in respect of which equall rewardes or punishmentes were to be giuen or not to be giuen that is when the cause which is common to both is neglected and other thinges regarded which are not the cause as riches honours and the like But here God respecteth the receiuing of this benefite and conuersion and giueth eternall life to them which haue these Secondly he that giueth vnto those which are equall vnequallie beeing bound to anie were an acceptour of persons But God giueth most freely of his meere mercy and grace Hee is bound to no man because we were his enemies therefore he might most iustly haue excluded all And if vniustice shoulde any waie fal into God which God forbid that we should think he should be vniust an acceptour of persons in that he giueth any thing at all But if thou beeing moued with pittie and compassion shouldst giue a farthing to one begger and a pennie to another thou art not therefore an acceptour of persons Matth. 20.15 Js it not lawfull for mee saith Christ to doe as I will with mine own Js thine eie euil because J am good Rom. 11.35 Who hath giuen first vnto the Lord To knowe this is behoouefull for the glory of God 3 Obiection Jt is meete and iust that he who hath taken a sufficient ransome for all sins should receiue al men into fauor God hath receiued a sufficient ransome for the sins of the whole worlde Therefore he should receiue al into fauor Christs ransome though
worketh also in them to be warie and to take heed thereof Rom. 8.3 Whom hee predestinate them hee iustified They therfore doe amisse who thinke to receiue comfort without any desire of a good conscience Replie But if they must take heed and beware they are vncertaine Aunswere No because they haue this as a spur to goe forwarde and perseuere But To bee certaine and not to haue a desire of repentance amendment of life implieth a contradiction as if thou shouldest say I am certaine of my reward therefore I will not runne for a rewarde is not giuen but to him that runneth These propositions doe mutuallie one follow another To bee certaine of saluation and to haue a desire of conuersion and amendement of life 2 What Predestination is PRedestination differeth from prouidence The difference bâ—tweene predestination and prouidence as a speciall from the generall For prouidence is the eternall counsell of God concerning al creatures but Predestination is the eternall counsel of GOD concerning the sauing of men and Angels Wherefore Predestination is the eternal most iust and vnchangeable counsel of God of creating men of permitting their fal into sinne and eternal death of sending his Sonne into flesh that hee might bee a sacrifice and of conuerting some by the woorde and the holie ghost for the Mediatours sake and sauing them in true faith and conuersion and of leauing the rest in sinne and eternall death raising them vp to iudgement casting them into eternal paines Here is spoken of men which shall bee saued and not saued therefore to them onely and not to Angels doth this definition of Predestination agree Election The partes of Predestination are Election and Reprobation Election is the eternal vnchaungeable free and most iust decree of god whereby hee hath decreed to conuert some to Christ to preserue and keepe them in faith and repentaunce and by him to giue them eternall life Reprobation Reprobation is such a decree of god as whereby hee hath decreed to leaue some according to his most iust iudgement in their sinnes to punish them with blindnesse and damnation and to condemne them beeing not made partakers of Christ euerlastingly That Election likewise as also Reprobation are both the decree of god these and the like sayinges doe prooue John 13.18 I know whom I haue chosen 2. Tim. 1.9 His grace was giuen to vs before the worlde was Rom. 9.18 He hath mercy on whom he wil. Both therefore election and reprobation were made by counsell and therefore both are a decree and that eternal because there is no new thing in God but all from euerlasting and the Scripture doth manifestlie saie Ephes 1.4 That God hath chosen vs before the foundation of the worlde Seeing then hee hath chosen vs hee hath therefore reiected the rest That which the verie word of choosing doth shew For whatsoeuer is chosen the same is chosen other thinges beeing reiected This Election is of grace and free that is not in respect of anie good foreseene in vs. He hath mercie on whom he will that is He giueth freely what he giueth Joh. 15.16 You haue not chosen me 3 What the causes of Predestination or Election and Reprobation The efficient cause of our election Gods good pleasure not any thing in vs. THE efficient and motiue cause is the good pleasure of God Matth. 11.26 Jt is so O Father because thy good pleasure was such God hath not foreseene any thing in vs for which he should choose vs for there can be no good in vs as of our selues For if anie good bee found in vs that hee dooth worke wholy in vs and hee woorketh nothing in vs which hee hath not decreed to woorke from euerlasting Wherefore the alone gracious and most free good pleasure of God or the alone free mercy of God is the efficient and motiue cause of our Election Ephes â— 5. God hath predestinate vs to be adopted through Jesus Christ vnto himselfe according to the good pleasure of his wil. See further Roman 9.11 Coloss 1.12 2. Timot. 1.9.10 The cause of reprobatioÌ„ in God In like manner also the efficient cause of Reprobation is the most free good pleasure of God For wee beeing all by nature the children of wrath had al perished if sin were the cause of reprobation Wherefore the cause of reprobation is not in men themselues but that is in God his will of shewing foorth his iustice Therefore of particular men why this man is elected and he reprobated there can bee no other reason giuen but the good pleasure of God onely But the cause of damnation is altogether in men The cause of Damnation in men which is sinne The supreme final cause of Predestination is gods glorie and the last and proper final cause of Election is the manifestation of Gods goodnesse and mercie in freelie sauing the Elect. The next neerest finall cause of our Election is our Iustification when God dooth in his Sonne freely account vs for righteous Both which finall causes the Apostle compriseth in these wordes Ephes 1 6. He hath predestinate vs to the praise of the glorie of his grace wherewith he hath made vs freely accepted in his beloued Likewise of the contrarie The first final cause of Reprobation is the declaration of gods iustice seueritie and hatred against sinne in the reprobate 1 Obiection God did foreknowe our workes Therefore he choose vs for our woorks Aunswere He did foreknowe those good thinges which he purposed to woorke in vs as also he foreknewe the persons otherwise he could not haue foreknowen any good workes So could he not haue foreseene any euill except he had purposed to permit the same 2 Obiection Christs merite applied vnto vs by faith is the cause of our Election Therefore not the good pleasure of God Answere Christes merit is not the cause of election but is reckoned among the effects thereof 3 Obiection Euil workes are the cause of reprobation therefore good workes are the cause of election Aunswere Euil workes are not the cause of reprobation but of that which followeth reprobation that is of damnation Good workes go not before in him that is to be iustified muchlesse are they the cause of election but they followe in a man beeing iustified and draw their original and their perpetual efficacy and vertue from gods meâ—e grace 4 Whaâ— are the effects of Predestination THE effect of election is the whole woork of our saluation and al the degrees of our redemption 1. The creation and gathering of the church 2 The sending and giuing of Christ the Mediatour and his Sacrifice 3. Effectuall calling of men to his knowledge which is the conuersion of the Elect by the holie Ghost and the woorde 4. Faith iustifâ—cation regeneration 5. Good woorkes 6. Finall perseueraunce 7 Raising vnto glorie 8. The effects of Reprobation Glorification and eternal life The effects of Reprobation are the creation of the reprobate priuation
that hee hath done If then the bodies which haue sinned shall receiue accordingly not other bodies but the same shall rise And the very word it selfe of rising enforceth as much for nothing can rise but that which is fallen Wherefore seeing our bodies shall rise no other bodies shall rise or bee quickened than those which haue fallen and are dead or no other than those which doe fall and die How flesh and bloud i◠denied the heauenly inheritance Obiection But saint Paul saith that flesh and bloud cannot inherite the kingdome of god Therefore our bodies cannot possesse the kingdome of god because they are flesh and bloud Answere The flesh oftentimes signifieth some qualitie or the substaunce in respect of some certaine qualitie So flesh that is being sinfull and corruptible shall not possesse the kingdome of God but our flesh then shall no more be able to sinne neither shall it bee corruptible Obiection 2. Our bodies shall be spirituall 1. Cor. 15.44 Jt is sowen a naturall bodie and is raised a spirituall bodie Therefore our bodies shall not then haue the properties of our flesh Aunswere In what sense our bodies shall bee spirituall They shall bee indeede spirituall but shall not haue all the properties of a spirite but some onely because they shall bee agile and quicke mightie and vncorrupt and indeede are therefore chieflie called spirituall because they shall be guided by the spirite neither shall any more the naturall life remaine in them That this is true is apparent by these reasons 1. The Apostle himselfe addeth This corruptible must put on incorruption 2. Hee calleth it a spirituall bodie but a spirite is no bodie 3. Jf anie bodie after the resurrection should be so spirituall as not retaining at all anie bodilie properties then surelie Christs bodie should haue beene so but now he saith to the Apostles Luk. 24.39 Handle me and see for a spirite hath not flesh and bones as ye see mee haue Obiection 3. How are wee saide to beleeue the resurrection when as yet wee are saide to hope for the resurrection to come Answere We are saide to hope for the resurrection as it is an effect of Gods counsell wee are saide to beleeue it as it is the counsell it selfe and purpose of God 9 Whether the soule be immortal The causes for which this Question is to bee moued Mat. 22.23 2. Tim. 2.17 BEsides that this question belongeth to the Article of the Resurrection the explication also thereof in it selfe shal not be altogether vnprofitable or fruitlesse For not now onely doe they beginne to dispute against the immortalitie of the soule but the Sadduces also denied it as they likewise that said the Resurrection was past alreadie vnto him that beleeued neither made anie other resurrection besides that spirituall resurrection of the regenerate Likewise also some Anabaptists denie the immortalitie of the soule Moreouer Paul the third Pope of Rome when he was breathing out his soule and readie to dy said that now at length he should trie know three things whereof in his whole time he had much doubted 1. Whether there were a god 2. Whether soules were immortall 3. Whether there were any hel Wherefore it ought not to seeme straunge if this question be moued neither shal it bee altogether vaine and needelesse both because it serueth for the controuling and refuting especially of Epicures and also because it maketh for the better vnderstanding of some places of holy Scripture But because there haue beene and euen nowe are who haue taught that the soule of man like as of bruite beastes is nothing else but life or the vitall power arising of the temperature and perfection of the bodie and therefore dieth and is extinguished together with the bodie and as some of them speake who wil seeme to beleeue the resurrection of the dead doth sleepe when the bodie dieth that is is without motion or sense vntil the raising of the bodie which indeede is nothing else than that the soule is mortal that is a meere qualitie onlie in the bodie and when the bodie is dissolued becommeth nothing because if it were an incorporeal substance it could not be without sense and motion against these we are to holde the recordes of Gods woorde and writ concerning the spiritual and immortal substaunce of mans soul The soule an in corporeall substance That the soule of man is not onely a forme or perfection or temperament or force and power or an agitation arising out of the temperature of the bodie but a substaunce incorporeall liuing vnderstanding dwelling in the bodie and susteining and moouing it these places following of holy Scripture doe shewe Psalm 48. His soule shal be blessed in life Heb. 12. God is called the Father of spirites And it is saide of the faithfull Yee are come to the celestial Ierusalem and to the companie of innumerable Angels and to the spirites of iust and perfect men 1 Cor. 2.11 No man knoweth the thinges of a man saue the spirite of a man which is in him In these and the like places of Scripture both the soule of man is called a spirite and the properties of a liuing vnderstanding substance are attributed vnto it Wherefore to no purpose doe the aduersaries of this doctrine oppose those places in which the name of the soul is taken for the the life and wil of man as Matth. cap. 6. The soul is more woorth than meate Iob. 13.14 J put my soule in my hand For by the fore-alledged places it is manifest thnt this is not general but is vsed by a * Metalepsis figure of speech whereby we cal the effect by the name of his cause Now the immortalitie of the soule is prooued by manifest places of holie Scripture 1. Luk 23.43 The soule immortall Christ hanging on the crosse said to the theefe this daie shalt thou be with me in Paradise But he could not be there in bodie because that was dead and buried Therefore his soule was gathered with Christs into Paradise and so consequentlie the soul liueth 2. Paul saith Phil. 1.23 I desire to be loosed and to be with christ he speaketh of the rest ioie which he should enioie with christ But they who feele nothing what can their ioie or happinesse bee Wherefore they also are refuted in this place who saie mens souls sleep so withall denie the immortality of the soul 3. Wised 3.1 The souls of the iust are said to be in the hands of god 4. Matt. 22.32 God is not the god of the dead but of the liuing Therefore the soules liue 5. Luk. 23.46 Into thy hands I commend my spirit 6. 2 Corinth 5.8 When we remoue out of the body we may goe vnto the Lord. Wherefore the soules sleep not as some Anabaptistes wil haue thē but enioie immortall life and celestiall glorie with the Lorde 7. In the Reuelation cap. 6.10 The soules of the godly that were killed are said to
of Christ imputed vnto vs. Christ is in respect of our iustification 1. As the subiect matter wherein our iustice is 2. As the impellent cause because he obtaineth it 3. As the chief efficient because he together with his Father dooth iustifie vs and 4. Because he giueth vs faith whereby we beleeue and apprehend it The mercy of god is as the impellent cause thereof in GOD. Christes satisfaction is the formal cause of our iustification giuing the very life and being vnto it 7 Why Christes satisfaction is made ours by faith onelie Faith the apprehensiue instrument of Christs satisfaction CHRISTES satisfaction is made ours by faith alone 1. Because faith is the onely instrument which apprehendeth Christs satisfaction 2. Because the proper act operation of faith and not any other act of vertue is the application or apprehension of Christes merite yea faith is nothing else than the acceptation it selfe or apprehension of anothers iustice and of the merit of Christ 3. It is done by faith onely because we are iustified by the obiect of faith onely to wit by the merite of Christ alone besides which there is no iustice of ours nor any part thereof For wee are iustified freely for Christes sake without woorkes There is nothing which is our iustice and righteousnes before God neither in whole nor in part besides Christes merite onely by receiuing and beleeuing anothers iustice and not by working wee are iustified Not by working nor by meriting but by apprehension and acceptation only we are iust and righteous Wherefore we are iustified by faith onely by faith as Saint Paul speaketh as by a mean and instrument but not for faith as the Papistes say who wil admit both these maners of speaking as if faith were indeede the application whereby we apply vnto our selues Christes iustice but were also besides a certaine work or merite whereby we merite to bee iust Nowe the exclusiue particle onely is added that whatsoeuer merit of ours may bee excluded and faith vnderstoode with relation and respect to Christes merit which is our iustice That so the sense may be Christes merite iustifieth vs and not faith it selfe that which is apprehended dooth iustifie vs and not the instrument which doth apprehend Neuerthelesse this proposition Wee are iustified by faith may bee vnderstoode also without relation to wit wee are iustified by faith as by a meane But this proposition of the Apostle Faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse and other the like are necessarilie to bee vnderstoode with a relation vnto Christes merite and iustice Faith was imputed vnto him for righteousnes as faith is the apprehending instrument of righteousnes apprehended faith beeing as it were the hande wherewith the Iustice of Christ is receiued and by this means faith is wholy excluded frō that which is receiued by faith vnto which nature notwithstanding of faith it were repugnaunt That For faith we should be iust and righteous For if for faith then faith were nowe no longer an acceptation of anothers righteousnesse but were a merit and cause of our owne iustice neither should receiue anothers satisfaction which now it should haue no neede of Obiections against this Doctrine of Iustification 1 OBiection Wee are iustified by faith Faith is a woorke Therefore we are iustified by the woorkes thereof that is by the merite of faith Aunswere First the consequence of this reason is denied because more is in the conclusion than in the premisses of which premisses this onely followeth That by that worke wee are iustified as by an instrument or meane not as an impellent cause Nowe it is one thing to be iustified by faith that is to be iustified faith only being the meane to receiue it by the bloode of Christ and it is another thing to be iustified for faith that is for the merite of faith 2. The kinde of affirmation is diuerse for in the Maior faith is vnderstoode with relation to Christes merite in the Minor it is taken absolutelie and properlie 2 Obiection Justice is that whereby wee are formallie or essentiallie iust Faith is iustice Therefore we are by faith formallie and essentiallie iust Aunswere The consequence of this reason is to bee denied because the kinde of affirmation is diuers For the Maior is meant properly but the Minor * Per Metalepsin figuratiuely one thing being taken for another faith for the obiect of faith which is Christs merite and iustice 3 Obiection Faith is imputed for righteousnes as Paul saith Therefore for faith we are righteous Aunswere This is also figuratiuely vnderstood because by faith which is imputed for righteousnes is correlatiuely vnderstood the obiect of faith vnto which faith hath relation For Christs merite which is apprehended by faith is properly our iustice and this merite of Christ is the formall cause of our iustice The efficient of our iustice is God applying that merite of Christ vnto vs. The instrumental cause of our iustice is faith And therefore this proposition We are iustified by faith being legallie vnderstoode with the Papists is not true but blasphemous but being taken correlatiuely that is Euangelically with relation to Christs merit it is true For the correlatiue of faith is the merit of Christ which faith also as a ioint-relatiue or correlatiue respecteth and as an instrument apprehendeth 4 Obiection That which is not alone dooth not iustifie alone Faith is not alone Therefore faith dooth not iustifie alone Aunswere Here is a fallacie of composition the reason beeing deceitfully composed For the woorde alone is composed and ioined in the conclusion with the predicate which is the woorde iustifie but in the premisses or antecedent it is ioined with the verbe is The Argument is true if in the conclusion alone bee not sundred from the verbe is or from being which is the participle of is but bee ioined with it on this wise Faith therefore doth not iustifie alone that is being alone For if it be so vnderstood the argument is of force for faith is neuer without workes as her effects Faith iustifieth alone but is not alone when it iustifieth hauing workes accompanying it as effects of it but not as ioint-causes with it of iustification 5 Obiect That which is required in those who are to be iustified without the same faith doth not iustifie Good works are required in those who are to be iustified Therefore without good workes faith doth not iustifie Auns The particle without is ambiguously doubtfully taken for in the Maior it is taken thus Faith without it that is being without it doth not iustifie So that the same fallacie is in this obiection which was in the former The Minor also of this obiection is more at large to be explaned In them who are to be iustified moe things are required but not after the same maner Faith is required in them who are to be iustified as an instrumēt apprehending anothers iustice Good works are required in them not as a cause of
are good which wee doe but the manner after which wee doe them is not good OF SACRAMENTS THE Sacraments are a part of Ecclesiastical ministerie And as touching Ecclesiastical ministerie the questions are 1. What is the vse of the ministerie 2. What are the partes thereof 3. In what those partes agree and accord 1. The chiefe and last vse of the ministerie of the Church is that we beeing brought to Christ may be confirmed and assured of Gods will that is that it teach vs the will of God exhort vs to embrace Gods blessinges and benefites and ascertaine vs of the continuance of the same 2. The parts of the ministerie are the Sacraments and the word 3. The Sacraments so accord and agree with the word that whatsoâ—uer is promised vs in the word of the obteining of our saluation by Christ the same the sacraments as signes and seales annexed to the word as it were vnto a Charter or letters patent confirme vnto vs more and more thereby to help and relieue our infirmitie Whereby also it is apparent that the chiefe vse of the sacramentes to is in respect of God the confirmation of our faith like as also the ministers themselues whatsoeuer they doe in respect of their ministerie that they especiallie doe to declare and confirme gods will vnto vs. Obiection Jt is saide That the spirit and the Word worke faith in vs and the sacraments nourish it being wrought These three therefore differ nothing one from an other Aunswere First The Holy Ghost worketh and confirmeth faith in vs as the efficient cause thereof the Word sacraments as Instrumental causes 2. The Holy Ghost also can work faith in vs without them But the Word Sacraments without the holie Ghost can woorke nothing 3. The holy ghost wheresoeuer he dwelleth is effectuall in woorking The word Sacraments are not so These things brieflie were first to be spoken in general concerning the ministerie It remaineth that we now in fewe woordes entreat Of the Sacraments which are the other part of the ministerie of the Church The right and direct methode of interpreting this doctrine of the Sacraments requireth that first wee speake of the Sacramentes in generall And this way may wee not vnfitly entreat in speciall of the Supper and Baptisme to wit if wee take in declaring each Sacrament in special the same questions and that course and order of the same questions which wee must obserue and follow concerning the Sacramentes in generall and lastly if wee applie those testimonies which speake of the Sacraments in generall to the handling and declaring of the Sacraments in special The chiefe Questions concerning the Sacraments 1 What Sacraments are 2 What are the ends of Sacraments 3 Jn what Sacraments differ from Sacrifices 4 Jn what they agree with the Word in what they differ from it 5 How the SacrameÌ„ts of the old new TestameÌ„t agree 6 What Sacramental vnion is 7 What the things differ from their signes 8 What forms of speaking of the Sacraments are vsual to the Church and Scripture 9 What is the lawful vse of the Sacraments 10 What the wicked receiue in the vse thereof 11 Howe manie Sacramentes there are of the newe Testament 1 WHAT SACRAMENTS ARE. The originall of the word Sacrament THAT we may know what Sacramentes properly are the name it selfe of Sacrament is first to be considered Among the auncient Romanes this word Sacrament signified a solemne forme of an oath taken in warre which they called a militarie Sacrament so called of Sacrando that is of sacring or consecrating them because by that oath euerie one was consecrated or destined to this captaine and not to any other to serue him Heereof it is that some will haue these ceremonies instituted by God therefore to be so called for that as souldiours did oblige and binde themselues by that military Sacrament vnto their captaine so wee bind our selues vnto our captaine Christ by a solemne oath in the presence of god Angels and men This truely is not vnapt or vnmeete metaphor but yet I thinke rather that the original of this name came from the olde Latine Translations in which wheresoeuer the worde mysterie is vsed in the new Testament for the same they commonly in Latine put the woorde Sacramentum Now mysterie commeth from a Greeke verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to institute instruct or initiate one in holy matters or matters of religion But that Greeke verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is deriued from another which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to shut because as Eustathius saith they who were initiated or entred in holy rites were to shut their mouth not to vtter those thinges which were secret Nowe a mystery is said to be either a secret thing it selfe or the signe of a secret thing or that which hath a secret signification which none vnderstand but they who are initiated in holy rites By a signe wee vnderstand an externall and corporall thing and action or a ceremony instituted and ordained by God which betokeneth a certaine internall thing and spirituall Which the Grecians call a mysterie and is otherwise called of Diuines a Sacrament And some such signes god alwaies would haue to bee extant in his Church whereby the good will of God towardes men might be recorded and made knowen that men of the other side might declare and shewe their faith towardes God and other duties of piety and godlinesse Sacramentes therefore are so called mysteries because they haue a secret signification which none vnderstand but they who are initiated and instructed concerning the substaunce of sacred matters or the pointes of Christian Religion HAuing seene now what the name of Sacrament signifieth it resteth that wee consider the thing it selfe and define what Sacramentes are The definition whereof is this Sacramentes are sacred signes and seals obiect to our eies The Definition of sacramentes ordained and instituted by God that by them he might the more declare and seal the promise of his gospel vnto vs. The partes of this definition are in number three The first part apperteineth to the kinde of Sacramentes the latter two to their difference To the kind whereof they are it apperteineth that they are sacred signes seals that is diuine The sacraments are sacred seals signifieng or betokening sacred things such as belong to gods worship and the saluation of men A signe and a seale differ one froÌ„ the other as a general thing froÌ„ a thing more special For euerie seale is a signe but not euery signe a seal A seale certifieth and confirmeth a thing A signe onely sheweth it A sign is a thing signifieng somewhat else than that which it sheweth to the senses or a signe is that whereby the vnderstanding vnderstandeth some thinges else besides the signe it selfe So wordes are the signes of thinges Moreouer signes are of two sortes some are onely signifieng others are confirming also that is such signes
for it doth not being receiued into vs quicken vs by working in vs new corporal qualities like as a medicine dooth but the bodie of christ nourisheth and quickeneth vs after a maner diuers from that natural nourishing and accordingly as this manner of nourishing and quickening requireth so receiue we christs bodie The maner whereby christs bodie and bloud nourisheth vs is 1. The respect of his merite For for vs christs bodie is giuen and his bloud shed for vs and for the bodie and bloud of christ wee haue eternal life giuen vnto vs. After this manner then the bodie and bloud of christ quickeneth vs as it is a merit deseruing for vs this blessing 2. His bodie and bloude quickeneth or nourisheth vs when wee receiue that merite of christs bodie and bloud that is when we beleeue with a true faith that for it wee shall haue eternall life This faith resteth and hangeth on christ hanging on the Crosse not corporallie dwelling in vs. 3. It nourisheth vs when the same spirite vniteth vs by faith vnto christ and worketh the like in vs which it doth in christ For except wee be graffed into christ wee doe not please God For hee will on that condition receiue vs and pardon vs our sinnes So that by faith through the working of the holy Ghost we bee ioined with christ and engraffed into him Seeing then this is the maner whereby the bodie and bloude of christ quicken and nourish vs there is no need of any descending of the bodie and bloud of christ into our bodies 4 Obiection The eating of bread is done by the mouth But the eating of the bodie is the eating of bread Therefore the eating of the bodie is done by the mouth and is corporall when it is saide Take and eate Aunswere This eating whereof mention is made heere is perfourmed by the mouth not simplie but as concerning the signe But it is not doone by the mouth but is spirituall as concerning the thing signified spirituall Reply This is my bodie that is the inuisible bodie which J haue in my handes Aunswere But the bodie is the thing signified and spirituall other-wise there will bee no proportion betweene the signe and the thing signified It followeth therefore that hee saieth The bread is my bodie So that the bread is that whereof the bodie is affirmed For in this speech the thing signified is affirmed of the signe 5 Obiection The Wordes are not to bee changed Christ vsed the woord Js Therefore there may not be put in place thereof the word Signifieth Aunswere The woords are not to bee changed into another sense than God wil haue But otherwise they are often to be changed As when it is said Pluck out thine eie For woords are to bee vnderstoode according to the nature of thinges Moreouer they themselues who accuse vs of change doe more make this chaunge and mutation than we Reply The bodie of christ was broken and crucified for vs not the signe of the bodie Therefore the bread is the substantiall bodie of christ Answ I grant for the bread signifieth that very bodie which was borne of Marie crucified Question Why then are the things signified attributed to the signes Two causes why the thinge signified are attributed to the signes and the signes called by their names if neither consubstantiation nor transubstantiation bee thereby signified Aunswere There are two causes alleadged heereof A similitude or likenesse and a certainty 1. The similitude or proportion of signes and the thing signified is first As the bread and wine nourish our body so the body and bloud of christ nourish vs vnto euerlasting life Secondly As the bread and wine are receiued by the mouth so the body and bloud are receiued by faith Thirdly As the bread is eaten being broken so the bodie of christ is receiued being sacrif ced and broken Fourthly As in corporall foode is required an appetite vnto it so also in this spiritual foode is required faith Fiftly As of many cornes is made one loafe so are we being many made one bodie Wherefore by reason of this similitude of the signe and the thing signified the thing signified is attributed vnto the signes 2. The certainty of the signes in the cause likewise why that is affâ—rmed of the signes which is proper vnto the thing signified For the sâ—gnes testifie that christes sacrifice is accomplished and for our behoofe and commodity because it is certainly and truly applied vnto vs. Here last of al is to be obserued that the eating of christs body dooth comprise and comprehend 1. Faith 2. That by faith we are made partakers of christ that is we are vnited vnto Christ and our communion is wrought by faith and the holy Ghost is the bond of this our vnion and coniunction with Christ 3. That wee are made partakers of Christs benefites iustification and remission of sinnes And this ensueth of that vnion of Christ with vs. 4. Jt comprehendeth also the benefite of our regeneration whereby we are made like and conformed vnto christ because the same spirit dwelling in vs and in christ worketh also the same things in vs. This eating is easily collected as out of many other places so also out of this saieng of christ I am the liuing bread which commeth downe from heauen if any man eate of this bread hee shall liue for euer And the bread that I will giue is my flesh which I wil giue for the life of the world 5 What is the difference betweene the Lords supper and the popish Masse THIS question is necessary by reason of errours which haue câ—ept into the church It is otherwise demanded Why the Masse is to be abolished â—ut here this questioÌ„ is also conteined and comprehended because these differences and contrarieties of the Lordes supper and the Masse are the causes why the Masse is to bee abolished First let vs speake a few woordes of the name of the Masse or Missa The word Missa seemeth to haue his name from an ancient custome of Ecclesiastical rites actions The originall of the woord Missa which we call the Masse in the end whereof leaue was giuen of departure to the Catechumenes the possessed with spirites and the excommunicated persons and so the woord Missa seemeth to be vsed as it were a mission or sending awaie because it was the last part of diuine seruice Others wil haue it to be so called from a dimission or from the manner of dimissing them because they were demised with these words â—te Missa est that is go you may depart or as others interprete it goe now is the collection or alms which they will haue to be called Missa of the sending it in as we may so speak or throwing or casting it in for the poore Some wil therefore haue it deriued from the Hebrue Masah that is tributes which was wont to be paied of euery one The word is found Deut. 16.10 Missach nidbath iâ—decha A free
therefore neither doe we so cheerfullie and perfectlie as we ought perfourme these workes vnto God and our neighbour J see another Law in my members rebelling against the Lawe of my minde And this is the cause why the works of the godly cannot stand in iudgement 4 How our workes though not perfectlie good please God ALbeit our works be not done according vnto the Law but are contrariwise manie waies defiled they please God notwithstanding through faith and for the merit and intercession of Christ our Mediatour remaining now also intercessour for vs with his Father Whence Christ is called our High-Priest by whom our woorks are offered hee is called also the Altar wheron our works being put are pleasing to God whereas otherwise they would stincke in the sight of God The works of the person which pleaseth god so please God as the person himselfe doth Nowe the person pleaseth God by the imputation of the righteousnesse and sanctification or satisfaction of Christ beeing clad namelie with the righteousnes puritie and sanctification of Christ that is the person pleaseth God for the Mediatours sake and therefore the woorks also of the person are for the Mediatours sake pleasing and acceptable vnto god God doth not examine our vnperfect iustice our works as they are in themselues according to the rigour of the Law according to which he should rather condemn them but he regardeth and considereth them in his son Whereof it foloweth that we do as it were supplie and repaire our want defect with the perfection of Christs satisfaction 5 Why we are to doe good works OVT of the doctrine of free satisfaction humane reason reasoneth on this wise He is not bound himselfe to satisfie for whom another hath alreadie satisfied Christ hath satisfied for vs. Therefore there is no neede for vs to doe good woorks Aunswere There is more in the conclusion of this reason than in the premisses For this onely should follow be concluded Therefore we our selues are not bound to satisfie and this wee grant 1 In respect of Gods iustice which doth not exact a double paiment 2 In respect of our own saluation which otherwise should be none at all Reply Satisfaction is perfect obedience we are not bound to satisfaction Therefore neither are we bound to perfect obedience no not in the life to come For whō another hath satisfied for he himselfe is not enforced to satisfie But the obedience of Christ is not a ful satisfaction for our sinnes Therefore the fomer consequence is true Aunswere There is yet more concluded than the premisses would afford For this should followe that obedience is neuer at any time to bee performed of vs as thereby to satisfie for our sins already cōmitted or which shall be committed vntill the end of our life But it followeth not hereof that wee must not bee perfect in the life to come For then also wee shall bee bound to perfect obedience we shall be like vnto the Angels and our worke shall be perfectly good although that perfect obedience then due neither shall nor can be a satisfaction or ransome for our sinnes to wit for that obedience which we omitted in this life and yet was due to be performed of vs. For he that oweth twenty florens doth not pay his debt if he repay ten florens Wherefore the Maior proposition hath a double meaning and is true if it be taken in this sense whom an other hath satisfied for hee himselfe is not bound to satisfie to wit for those thinges for which satisfaction was made before So we are not bound to satisfie for our sinnes which we now commit For Christ hath fully perfectly satisfied his Father for all our sinnes and hath performed perfect obedience vnto the Lawe in our behalfe which otherwise wee shoulde haue performed in this life vnto the lawe and which we in this life omit and are no way able to perfourme Now for this end hath Christ satisfied for vs and redeemed vs by his bloud that at length we might in the life to come cease from sinne and performe that obedience vnto him which then we are to performe Neither dooth it for all this hereof followe that God requireth a double obedience or satisfaction of vs. For God excteth obedience hence-forward of vs as thereby to shewe our thankefulnesse and not to satisfie for those sins which we commit in this life For wee are neuer able to satisfie by that obedience which we owe for that obedience which we doe not performe neither is there any other besides Christs satisfaction required for that obedience which is not performed by vs in this life this satisfaction of christ is sufficient to expiate and doe away all our sinnes God notwithstanding doth in this life also require of vs this our obedience though yet it be but begun and vnperfect For seeing God so greatly hated sinne that satisfaction could not be made vnto him for sinne but by the death of his only begotten Sonne wee verily must also hate it euen as himselfe also cōmandeth vs to fly abhor it from our hart and soule And Christ hath not therefore freely redeemed vs that it might hence forwarde be lawful for vs to giue our selues ouer vnto sinne but that being freed from sinne wee should hereafter begin to liue to him onely This end of our redemption which Christ himselfe respected is cause sufficient for which al of vs should necessarily doe good workes because namelie they are testimonies and effectes of that new life which is at length after this life to be accōplished Besides this cause there are manie others also in like sort most weightie which we wil in few words declare We are to doe good woorkes in respect of God our selues and our neighbour In respect of God 1. Because of the commandement of God Let your light so shine before men that they maie see your good workes and glorifie your Father which is in heauen God requireth the beginning of obedience in this life and the perfection thereof in the life to come Wherefore we are necessarilie to giue our selues to good workes that wee maie perfourme due obedience vnto God who requireth it of vs. Joh. 15·12 This is my commaundement that yee loue one another Rom. 6.18 Beeing made free from sinne yee are made the seruantes of righteousnes 1. Thess 4.3 This is the wil of God euen your sanctification 2. For the glorie of God The setting foorth of Gods glorie is the chiefe end why God commaundeth and wil haue good works to be don of vs that both by them we maie worship and magnifie god and others seeing the same maie glorifie our heauenly father like as that saying of christ before alleadged out of S. Matthew doth teach vs. 3 Because of that thankefulnes which the regenerat ow. It is right and iust that by whom we are redeemed and from whom we receiue exceeding great benefites and those of al sorts we should also loue magnifie worship
Matth. 12.31 Euery sinne and blasphemy shal be forgiuen vnto men but the blasphemie against the holie Ghost shal not be forgiuen vnto men Whence it appeareth seeing Paul saith hee was a blasphemer and yet obtained pardon and seing likewise christ affirmeth that some blasphemy is forgiuen and some is not forgiuen that the name of blasphemy is taken in diuers senses Vnto the confession of the truth is repugnaunt first The denial of the truth for feare of hatred or persequution or ignominie This deniall is of two sortes The first is an vniuersal and general defection from true religion which is to cast awaie the profession of the truth either certainelie or doubtfullie knowen and receiued with a certaine and purposed aduise and with the whole hearts desire of resisting God and without anie griefe or remorse of flying and shunning this casting awaie of the truth and without any purpose of obeying God in applying vnto himselfe the promise of grace and in shewing repentaunce This denial is proper to reprobats and hypocrites Whereof is spoken Matt. 13. and Luk. 8. and 1. Joh. 2. And this defection if it be don against the truth certainly knowen is sinne against the holy Ghost whereof none repent The other denial is special and particular which is the denial of weaklings is committed either through error not voluntary neither purposed or through feare of affliction when as notwithstanding there remaineth still in the hart an inclination and griefe detesting that weaknesse and denial and some purpose also to struggle out of it and to obey God by applying vnto himselfe the promise of grace and by giuing himselfe vnto repentaunce Into this denial may the elect and regenerate fall but they get out of it againe and returne vnto the confession of the truth in this life as it is shewed and exemplied in Peter Matth. 26. Secondlie Vnto confession is also opposed dissimulation or dissembling and hiding of the truth when as Gods glorie and our neighbours safetie requireth a confession of the truth which then requireth it when false opinions concerning God and his wil or woorde or concerning the church seeme to be confirmed and strengthned by our silence in the mindes of men or when those thinges remaine secret and hidden which God wil haue known and manifest for the maintenance of his glorie against the reproches of the wicked for the conuincing of the obstinate and for the instructing of those which are desirous to learne or lastly when our silence maketh vs suspected to be approuers and abetters of the wicked Thirdly vnto the right and lawfull confession of truth is opposed an vnseasonable and vntimelie confession that is whereby without any aduancing of Gods glory and without the furtherance of any ones safety and without any necessity of discharging his calling or duety there is stirred vp either a derision and euill entertainment of the truth or the fiercenesse and cruelty of the enemies against the godly Such a confession whereas it dooth rather darken than set forth the glory of God rather hindereth than furthereth the safety of the Church swarueth plainly from the scope and end of true and lawful confession and therefore is not a right vsing but an abusing of Gods name Therefore Christ forbiddeth it Mat. 7. Giue not that which is holie to dogs And Paul Tit. 3.10 Reiect him that is an heretique after once or twise admonition knowing that he that is such is peruerted and sinneth beeing damned of his own self Neither doth that crosse this which is said 1. Pet. 3.15 Be readie alwaies to giue an answere to euerie man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekenesse and reuerence For Peter willeth vs to be alwaies in a readinesse or furnished to make aunswere concerning the summe and groundes of Christian doctrine yet so as that it is not necessary to vtter and expound all vnto euery one but vnto all those which require a reason and an account of our faith therby either to learne it or to know it But whom we see once to scoffe at the true doctrine which hath beene expounded confirmed vnto them if they again require a reason and account of our faith we are not to make further answere For so Christ himselfe after hee had sufficiently confessed and confirmed his doctrine by testimonies answereth nothing vnto the High-Priest and Pilate touching the false witnesses and Luk 22. himselfe rendereth this reason of his silence If J shal tel you you wil not beleeue me Another reason is giuen by Isaiah cap. 53. He was oppressed and was afflicted did not open his mouth that is because Christ knewe he was now to suffer according to his fathers will after his cause was sufficiently defended he is not careful of deliuering his person from iniuries contumelies and punishments For he knewe that this obedience did tend to his fathers glorie But contrariwise when the High-Priest adiureth him he confesseth himselfe to bee Christ because then his silence woulde haue giuen suspicion of contempt of the name of god whereby he was adiured Obiection We do not perceiue who are swine and dogs wherefore we are to render a reason of our faith to al without putting anie difference Aunswere Christ doth not cal al wicked men swine or dogs but those only who contemne and make a mock of the doctrin confirmed which they haue heard and which hath beene expounded vnto them 2. Christ willeth not vs to iudge of dogs and swine by the secretes of their hearts but by their present words and deedes If againe it be replied In matters of difficultie and such as are hard to be iudged except there be deliuered some certaine and exact rule how to iudge and deale mens consciences are left wauering and in doubt 1. But if also we are to iudge of the outward shew of swine and dogs it is hard to pronounce who are to bee accounted for swine and dogs Therefore mens consciences are left in doubt vnto whom and when confession must bee made The Minor is false For Christ wil haue none to be counted for dogs and swine but such as shew manifest stubburnes and obstinacy in their woords and deedes of whom it is no hard thing to iudge out of the word of God And further the holy Ghost is promised vnto all that aske him by whom their iudgementes and actions may be directed that they er not And lastly seeing in this life we attaine not vnto the perfection of Gods Law neither in other things neither in this point they who ioine the desire of Gods direction with an earnest care of Gods glory and loue of their neighbour may and ought to be certain assured either that their counsels are so ruled by the holy Ghost that they erre not or if they er that yet their error is pardoned forgiuen them And this certainty sufficeth for the reteining of a good conscience If lastly it be obiected That tyrants and manie Magistrates
is that some certaine time be alotted to the ministery of the Church or to the publick seruice of God The other part is Ceremoniall and Temporarie namely that that time be the seuenth day that therin be kept the Leuitical ceremonies That this part bee temporarie and the other perpetual is vnderstoode by the end of the commaundement and by the causes of both parts whereof more shal be spoken afterwardes Now we wil in few words expound the wordes both of the commaundement and of the reason adioined vnto the commandement Which being once knowen so much the easier shal bee vnderstoode those things which are afterwardes to bee spoken concerning the sabboth Remember thou keep holy the sabboth daie that is with great care and religion keepe holy the sabboth day Not without cause doth God so seuerely commaund the keeping of the sabboth 1. Because the breach and violating of the sabboth is the breach and violating of the whole worship of God For the neglect of the ministery doth easily corrupt the doctrine and worship of God 2. Because by the exacting of the ceremoniall or typical sabboth God would signifie the greatnesse and necessitie of the spiritual sabboth 3. Because god wil haue the external sabboth to serue for the beginning and perfecting of the spiritual sabboth in vs. 4. Because he willeth the sabboth to bee kept holy and to be sanctified that is that sinnes should be eschued and auoided therein good works done and that it should not be spent in slothful idlenesse Now god is otherwise said to sanctifie the sabboth than are men God is saide to sanctifie the sabboth because he appointeth it for diuine worship men are saide to sanctifie it when they referre it to that vse vnto which god hath appointed it Thou and thy sonne and thy daughter c. He will haue also our children and familie to cease from their labours for two causes 1. Principallie that these also may be brought vp by their parents and masters in the seruice of God and may be admitted vnto the ministerie of the Church For God will haue these also to be members of his Church 2. Because hee will haue especiallie on the Sabboth day loue and bountifulnesse towards our neighbour to be shewed and seene in the Church The strainger c. Hee willeth also straingers to intermit their labours and that if they were conuerted vnto true religion because they were of the houshold of the Churche if they were infidels he commandeth it thē not in respect of themselues but in respect of the Israelites 1. Least by their example they should giue offence vnto the Church 2. Least their libertie might bee an occasion vnto the Jewes to accomplishe by them those labours which it was not lawfull for them to woorke by them selues and so the lawe of God should bee deluded Hereby is aunswere made vnto three questions 1. Whether other nations were also bound to the Mosaical ceremonies if any of them liued among the Iewes 2. Whether they which are aliens from the church may or ought to be forced to religiō 3. Whether the sacraments among which was also the Sabboth ought to be cōmon vnto Infidels with the Church Vnto these questiōs we thus answer As concerning binding constraint the strangers which conuersed among the Iewes were not forced either to al ceremonies or to religion but to external discipline which was necessary for the auoiding of breeding offences in the Church wherein they liued For a Magistrat ought to be a maintainer of discipline order according to both tables of the Decalogue amongest his subiectes and to forbid manifest idolatry and blasphemies Moreouer as cōcerning the binding there was a peculiar consideration and respect of the sabboth which was not then first by Moses prescribed vnto the Israelits but commanded by God from the beginning of the world vnto all men and so did bind all men vntill the comming of the Messias Although indeed this commaundement and ordinance was so growen out of vse among other nations that they accounted it among the number of the chiefe reproches wherewith they derided and scoffed at the Iewes Furdermore the sabboth was no sacrament vnto Jnfidels because neither did the promises belong vnto them that God would be their sanctifier neither were they therefore constrained to cease from their daily labours as for a testification or confession of this promise but onely for auoiding of offence and for preuenting of such occasion of breaking the sabboth as might bee giuen by them vnto gods people These thinges are also the better vnderstood by this that their cattle also are commaunded to rest whose rest had no respect or consideration either of Gods woorshippe or of a Sacrament but was commaunded only in respect of men 1 That all occasion of labouring might be cut off by forbidding the labour or vse of their beasts 2 That also they sparing brute beasts might learne how greatly God wil haue regard to be had of mercie and fauourablenesse towards men For in sixe daies This reason which is annexed vnto the commaundement is drawne from Gods rest appertaineth to the ceremonial commaundement concerning the Seuenth day And rested on the seuenth day That is hee ceased to create anie newe partes of the world as being nowe perfect and such as god would haue it to be This seuenth day he consecrated to diuine seruice 1. That by the example of his owne rest as a most forcible and effectuall argument hee might exhort men to the imitation thereof And so the imitation of this rest is double Ceremoniall or signifieng and Morall or spirituall or signified 2. That this rest of the seuenth day might bee a monument of the creation then finished and absolued by God and of his perpetuall preseruation and gouerning of his worke euer since that day vnto his owne glorie and the safetie of his chosen and that so it might be a pricke to stir vs vp to the consideration magnifieng of Gods workes towardes mankind Furdermore God did not therefore grant six daies vnto labour and the seuenth to diuine woorship that on other daies the worshippe of God shoulde bee omitted but hee requireth these two thinges 1 That on the sabboth day there bee not onely a priuate seruing of God as on other daies but also a publike seruing of him in the Church 2 That on that day all other labours should giue place both to the priuate and publicke seruice of God which on other daies euerie one doth exercise according to his vocation We are furder to beware of a Jewish superstition which Christ also doth once again refute in the Gospel namely to thinke it vnlawfull to performe on the sabboth day whatsoeuer woorkes belonging to the necessitie either of his owne life or of anothers For by the end of the commaundement it appeareth that only seruile woorkes or such as hinder the exercise of the ministerie are forbidden of God but not those which hinder not the
of sanctifieng of the sabboth We wil shortly propound them on this wise 1 Vnto the deliuering and teaching of the doctrine is opposed the omitting or neglect of teaching As also a corrupting or maiâ—ing of the doctrine or a fitting of it vnto the opinions affections lusts or commodities of the Magistrates or others 2. Corint 2.17 For we are not as manie which make merchaundize of the word of God but as of sincerity but as of God in the sight of God speak we of Christ 2 Vnto the right due administration of the Sacraments is opposed an omitting or neglect in the Church of exhortation to the receiuing of the sacraments as also a corrupt and vnlawful administration of the sacramentes when somewhat is either taken from or added to the ceremonies instituted of God or is altered chaunged in them or when some are excluded from the Sacramentes which should be admitted or are admitted which should by Gods ordinance be driuen from them or when the people is not instructed concerning the right and lawfull vse of them 3 Vnto the studie of learning the doctrine is repugnaunt 1. A contempt and neglect of the doctrine that is either not to afford our presence in sacred assemblies when there is no iust cause to hinder vs and to busie our selues in such works on the sabboth day as might haue been differred or not to giue eare and attendaunce to Sermons and the preaching of Gods woorde or not to meditate consider and examine the doctrine of the Church 2. Curiositie which is a desire study of knowing those things which God hath not reueiled vnnecessary strange and vaine 4 Vnto the right vse of the sacramentes is contrarie the omitting and contempt thereof as also a profaning of them when they are not receiued as God hath commaunded neither by them for whom they were ordained Likewise also contrary thereto is all superstitious vsing of them when as saluation and the grace of God is tied to the obseruation of the rites and ceremonies or when they are vsed to such ends as God hath not appointed 5 Vnto publike praiers is opposed the neglect of them an hypocritical presence at them without anie attention and inward deuotion Likewise such reading or praieng as serueth not for any edifieng of the Church 1. Cor. 14.16 When thou blessest with the spirit how shal he that occupieth the roome of the vnlearned saie Amen at thy giuing of thankes For he knoweth not what thou saiest For thou verily giuest thanks wel but the other is not edified 6 To the bestowing of Almes is repugnant a neglect of the works of charitie as when wee doe not according to our power succour the poore that stand in need of our help 7 To the honour of the ministerie of the church is opposed the contempt of the ministerie as when either the ministerie of the Church is abolished or committed to men vnworthy and vnable or is denied to be the means instrument which God will vse for the gathering of his Church likewise when the ministers are reproched when their doctrin is heard and not obeyed in the ordering of our life when the works of charity are neglected when necessary mainteinaunce is not allowed the Ministers when the defence and protection of them and other duties of thankefulnesse are not perfourmed towardes them when the mainteinance of Schooles and studies and learning is neglected when the tolerable defectes of the Ministers are not borne with and when for such the ministery suffereth reproch and contumely In like maner also is it against the vse of the whole ministerie not onely when some one priuately neglecteth or omitteth the vse of the ministerie but also when one by his commandement and persuasion or example or by some other hinderance calleth away his children family or any other from the vse of the ministery 5 How the sabboth belongeth vnto vs. THE seuenth day was euen from the beginning of the world designed by God to signifie that men should after the example of God himselfe rest from their labours 〈…〉 from sinnes And afterwards in Moses Lawe this commandement was againe repeated and then withal was the ceremony of ceasing from labour on the seuenth day ordayned to be a sacrament that is a signe and token of that signifieng whereby god signified himselfe to bee the sanctifier of his church that is to pardon her al her sins offences â—o receiue her into fauour to endue rule her with his holy spirite for the beginning of newe and euerlasting life in her in this life which afterwardes should be accomplished perfected for by the Messias promised to the fathers And this is the reason why the ceremonial sabboth of the seuenth day is now to be abolished namely because it was typical admonishing the people of their own duty towards god of gods benefits towards them which was to be performed by christ for which selfesame cause also al the other sacramentes sacrifices ceremonies made before after the Lawe were abolished by the comming of Christ by whom that was fulfilled which they signified But although the ceremonial sabboth is abrogated and disanulled in the new testament yet the moral sabboth continueth stil and belongeth vnto vs and euen the verie generall of the ceremoniall sabboth belongeth vnto vs and dooth still remaine which is that some time is to be alotted for the ministerie of the Church For we must euer haue some day wherein the word of god may be taught in the Church and the Sacramentes administred But neuerthelesse we are not restrained or tied to haue either saturday or wednesday or any other certaine day therefore the sabboth doth not belong vnto vs ceremonially in special and particular albeit it dooth belong vn vs so to al men euer continueth both morallie ceremonially in general Obiections against the abrogating of the ceremonial sabboth THE Decalogue is a perpetual Law The commaundement of the sabboth is a part of the Decalogue therefore it is a perpetuall Law and not to be abolished Aunswere The Decalogue is a perpetual Law as it is a Moral Law But the additions or circumstances and limitations of the Morall preceptes annexed by way of signification were to be kept vntil the comming of the Messias 2. The commaundments of the Dacalogue belong vnto vs. This is a commaundement of the Decalogue Therefore it belongeth vnto vs. Aunswere The commandements of the Decalogue which are Morall belong vnto vs. But this commandement is in part ceremonial so as it is ceremonial it belongeth not vnto vs albeit the general belong vnto vs. The reasons why the ceremoniall Lawe belongeth not vnto vs are especially these 1. One part of this Law of sanctifieng the sabboth is ceremonial 2. Paul saith Coloss 2.16 Let no man condemne you in respect of an holie daie 3. The Apostles themselues did change the sabboth 4. From the end or purpose of the Law It was a type
Likewise Reioicing at another mans harme and vncompassionatenesse voide of al griefe In the excesse Remisnesse when they are spared whom God wil not haue spared which is cruel pitty whereby the whole societie of men is hurt yea he himself also who is spared Vnto Amitie or Frindship are opposed 1. Jn the defect al iniustice and treacherie whereby frindship is violated enmitie neglect of frindes deniall of good wil and mutual duties a faigned shew of frindship 2. Jn the excesse flatterie or vniust gratifieng likewise lightnes in ioining and loosing friendship THE SEVENTH COMMANDEMENT THOV shal not commit adulterie The end of this commaundement is The preseruation of chastitie and wed-locke Now when God nameth adulterie hee doth not forbid that only as being the most grosse vice of all those which are repugnaunt to chastity but also al vices that are contrary to chastity and such as are of neere affinity vnto them likewise their causes occasions effects antecedentes consequents and of the contrary he commandeth al things which make for the preseruation of chastitie The reasons are these 1. By one special the rest that are of neere affinity with that are vnderstoode So when adultery is forbidden other speciall vices of lustes are condemned and Adultery is mentioned because it is reckoned amongest the grossest vices of lustes 2. Where the cause is condemned there also the effect is condemned and so of the contrarie So here are commaunded or forbidden as wel the antecedentes as the consequentes 3. The end and scope of this commaundement is the preseruing of chastity and protecting of wedlocke among men Whatsoeuer therefore maketh for the preseruing of chastity and for the protecting of wedlocke is commaunded in this Law and the contrary is withall forbidden The vertues of the seuenth commaundement are in number three Chastitie Shamefastnes Temperancy Chastity is a vertue preseruiug cleannes of mind body agreeing with the will of God and auoiding all lustes forbidden by God all vnlawful companings and inordinate copulation all the desires occasions causes and effects either in single life or in wedlocke Chastitie hath his first original from a * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Greeke woord which signifieth to adorne because it is an ornament not onely of the whole man but also of all the rest of the vertues Wherefore that name was giuen by speciall regard and preeminence to this vertue because it is one of those principall vertues that make the Image of god Now there is a double chastitie one of single life an other of mariage Chastitie of single life is a vertu auoiding al lusts remaining in a sole state without mariage Chastitie of marriage is to obserue in marriage the order instituted by the woonderful counsell of God The causes of chastitie are 1. The commaundement of GOD. 2. The preseruation of Gods Image 3. A studie and desire to auoide the defacing of Gods image and the coniunction that is betweene God and the Church 4. Rewards and punishments The extremities of chastitie are All lustes their causes occasions and effects all vnlawfull coniunctions all corrupt desires that violate and hurt the conscience also in marriage For by reason of the corruption of our nature all sinnes are not taken away by marriage as when the chiefe and principall ende of marriage is not respected Shamefastnes is a vertue abhorring all filthinesse ioined with a shame griefe sadnes either for some former vncleannes or for feare of falling into any hereafter and hauing a purpose and desire to flie not onely vncleannes it selfe but also the occasions and tokens and signes of vncleannes Shamefastnes is required vnto chastitie as a furtheraunce and cause of chastitie and also as an effect consequent and signe thereof The extremities or vices contrarie to shamefastnes are 1. Shamelesnes or impudencie which maketh light of vncleannes 2. A rude and vplandish bashfulnes or an vnciuil and peruerse bashfulnes when a man is ashamed of that whereof hee ought not to bee ashamed as of a thing which is good and honest and requireth not any bashfulnes to bee shewed therein Temperancie is a vertue obseruing the meane agreeable to nature honestie mediocritie order of persons places and times according to the lawe and rule of nature in things concerning the body as in meat drink Temperancie is required vnto chastitie as a cause without which wee cannot be chast The extremities of temperancie are Jntemperancie in meate quaffings of drink Likewise an hurtful teÌ„perancie or too great abstinence hypocritical not greeable to nature such as is the abstinencie of Eâ—emites Whereas all sorts of lusts are repugnant vnto chastitie and to the drift and scope of this commaundement the same are to bee noted and obserued They may bee referred vnto three seuerall kindes Of the first kinde are those which are contrarie to nature and from the Diuel namely such as are euen against this our corrupt nature not onely because they corrupt it and bereaue it of that conformity with God but also because this our corrupt nature abhorreth them of this kind are those which are recited by the Apostle Rom. 1. as confounding of kindes and sexes likewise the vnnatural abusage of woman-kind These heinous sinnes and horrible trespasses are to bee punished by the magistrate with extraordinarie punishments Incest hath for a great part a repugnancie with this our nature albeit there were examples of incests in our first pareÌ„ts because those were doone but of necessitie and by dispensation from God himselfe Therefore this was an exception from the generall rule Of the second kinde are those which proceed from this our corrupt nature as fornications amongst those that are free froÌ„ marriage adulteries betweene persons that are both married companings of married persons with others that are vnmarried If a married person haue companie with another married person it is a double adulterie for he violateth both his owne wedlocke and the others If a married man haue to doe with an vnmarried woman it is simple adultery Simple fornication is of those that are vnmarried Magistrates are by duty bound seuerely to punish incestes adulteries For they are much more heinous than thefts robberies God appointeth death for adulteries Nowe although God did not ordaine that simple-fornication also should be punished with death yet when he saith after Let there not be a whore among you hee signifieth that it is to bee punished in his kinde There are other things also which are committed of this our corrupt nature with an euil conscience as lustes and euill desires vnto which we yeeld or wherewith wee are delighted neither endeuour to auoide them Such vitious and lewd desires and the like although they bee not punished in the ciuill court yet are they ioyned with an euill conscience and are punished of God Of the third kind are corrupt inclinations vnto which yet good men doe not yeeld but with-stand them and take away from them all occasions and their
life our obedience being here augmented with continual encreases may bee at length perfected and consummated that so we then may no lesse doe the will of God than it is alwaies doone of the Angels in heauen When therefore we pray That Gods will bee doone in earth as it is in heauen this particle as dooth not betoken the degree but the kind of doing it which is the beginning of performing Gods will And for these causes also dooth Christ ad these words as in heauen that it may be as it were an example of patiēce which we ought to folow that he might propose a goale mark vnto vs whereunto we ought to striue We are to obserue here the difference which is betweene these three former petitions In the first we desire sanctification or the true knowledge worship of god Jn the second the gathering preseruation and gouernement of the church that God would rule vs by his spirit defend and protect vs and deliuer vs from al euils both of crime and paine Jn the third that euery one particularly in their vocation may obey god that is that euery man be with diligence occupied in his proper duty function and direct al things to the glory of God take wel in worth whatsoeuer God sendeth on him Moreouer these three petitions are so linked together that one consisteth not without the other and like as the third petition serueth for the second so dooth the second for the first For the name of the Lord is not hallowed or sanctified except his kingdome come and the kingdom of God doth not come except those means be put whereby it is aduaunced And those meanes are the duties of euery particular mans calling and vocation Wherefore we desire that God will bury in vs euil lusts and desires that himselfe alone will work in vs by his spirit that so we beeing furnished and vphelde with this his diuine grace may fulfil our duty be answerable vnto our calling THE FOVRTH PETITION GIVE vs this daie our daily bread In this petition wee desire corporall blessinges concerning which wee are to obserue these questions 1 Why corporal blessings are to bee desired 2 How they are to be desired 3 Why Christ comprised corporal blessings vnder the name of Bread 4 Why he calleth it our bread 5 Why he calleth it daiely bread 6 Why he addeth This day 7 Whether it be lawful to desire riches 8 Whether it be lawful to treasure vp any thing for the time to come 1 Why we are to desire corporal blessings WE must desire corporall blessings 1. In respect of Gods commaundement which may suffice vs albeit there were no other cause And we haue a commandmēt hereof from God both general and special For christ saith in generall Matth. 7 7. Aske and yee shal receiue And a special commandement he setteth down before this forme of praier which himselfe prescribed vnto vs Mat. 6.9 After this maner therefore praie ye by which commandment Christ also willeth vs to desire Bread or corporal blessinges Now whereas Christ saith Seeke first the kingdome of god again Take no thought what ye shal eat he doth not therein forbid vs to desire corporal blessings but he forbiddeth this distrustfulnes 2. In respect of Gods promise because God hath promised that he wil giue vs thinges necessary for our life and he promised these to no other end than that we shoulde desire them of him he promised thē that we should therby haue a spiritual not a fleshly security Mat. 6.32 Your father knoweth what ye haue need of 3. In respect of gods glorie that namelie there maie be a knowledge profession of gods prouidēce especially towardes his church God wil haue vs to ascribe this praise vnto him because he is the fountain of al blessings benefits that we may not deem these things to come by chance to vs. 4. Because the desiring and expecting of these blessings is the exercise of our confidēce in the promise of grace or it is the exercise of our Jnuocatiō faith hope For we cannot promise vnto our selues corporal blessinges nor desire them except we resolue that we be in fauor except we be assured of spiritual blessings of gods wil towards vs. For these corporal blessings God promiseth to the godlie onely and therefore we must be persuaded that we are of the nūber of them to whom god hath promised to giue them 5. That we maie do the wil of god here on earth which without dayly bread we cannot here do Ps 115.18 The dead praise not the Lord. 6. That the desire of these blessings may be a cōfirmatiō in our minds a profession before the world that God is he who giueth euen the least benefites 7. For our comfort That we may know that the church shal euer be preserued when god heareth vs according to his promise Wherefore we reape great comfort by the desire of corporal blessings because we so acknowlege and certainly persuade our selues that these corporall blessings are tokens to vs of gods fatherly good wil towards vs. 2 How corporall blessings are to be desired COrporal blessings are to be desired 1. with a confidence and ful persuasiō of gods fauor because otherwise god might answer that vve are not of them vnto vvhom he hath promised these things 2. With a conditiō of gods wil pleasure that is vvith a submitting of our vvill to gods vvill because god hath promised these blessings not vvith any determined or definit circumstāces 3. With faith belief of gods hearing vs so that we certainly beleeue that God will giue vs so much as sufficeth 4 To this end as therby to serue god our neighbor They who desire thē not after this sort are not heard that is such things are not giuen them as may tend to their safety and albeit they receiue that which they desire yet are they not indeed heard of god because those things which they receiue are not good and profitable vnto their saluation We are here to obserue that the Lorde commaunded vs in generall to pray for corporall blessings neither hath defined in his worde what corporall blessings he will giue vs and hath with this condition promised to giue them vs namely as the saftie and saluation of euerie one and the manifestation of his glorie requireth The reasons hereof are these 1 Because we oftentimes know not what we aske what is expediēt for vs And often we aske things neither profitable to vs nor seruing for Gods glorie or the saluation of others But God knoweth best what is conuenient and meete for vs for the manifesting of his glory and for the furdering of our owne saluation Seeing then we often erre in desiring corporall blessings God giueth none other vnto vs than such as he knoweth to be meet and profitable for vs. But spirituall blessings god hath promised not in general onelie but both speciallie simply without
but of Christ who hath fully satisfied him for vs. Reply Then is not yet this freely because wee haue merited it in Christ Aunswere That merit is not our merite because the father gaue vs his sonne freely who meriteth without any merit of ours comming between and that merit of Christ is imputed vnto vs through grace therefore freely for that merit are our sinnes remitted vs whereupon also it is truely and wel added that for Christs satisfaction our sins are not imputed to vs. For we desire not that god would do contrary vnto his iustice would not account vs in mind for sinners but that he would impute vnto vs anothers righteousnes that is the righteousnes of Christ wherewith we being clothed our sins also may be couered 3 Why we are to desire remission of sinnes WE are to desire remission of sinnes 1. That we maie be saued because without remission of sinnes we cannot be saued And this benefite God giueth not but onely to those that desire it 2. That we may be put in minde of the remnauntes of sinnes which are euen in the holiest men and that to this ende that repentaunce maie euermore encrease Wherefore wee are daily also to beg and desire remission of sinnes 3. That wee maie desire and receiue the former blessings because without remission of sins those blessings either are at al not giuen or are giuen to our destruction So the wicked doe indeed often receiue them but not for their saluation as turning rather to their condemnation Obiection What wee haue that we neede not desire But the godly haue remission of sinnes Therefore the godly haue no need to desire it Ans The godly indeed haue remission but not wholy neither also as concerning continuaunce but only as touching the beginning thereof This remission must verily be continued and God also doth continue it to them vnto whom hee remitteth their sinnes in his sonne yet with this condition that they daily pray for and desire that continuaunce Although then god hath remitted vnto vs our sinnes yet hee will notwithstanding that we aske and desire pardon for them and therefore we desire that what sins wee commit or shal commit the same god would remit vnto vs. 4 How our sinnes are remitted vnto vs. OVR sinnes are so remitted vnto vs as wee forgiue and remit our debters And this Christ added 1. That we may rightlie desire remission of sinnes and so that we may come to pray with true faith repentance a signe and token whereof is the loue of our neighbour 2. That when wee finde in our selues true faith and repentance we may so haue a certain argument and comfort in vs that we are of the number of them vnto whom remission is promised and that therefore wee shal doubtlesse obtaine remission of sins when as we may be certainly assured by this that we our selues remit vnto others from our heart their trespasses against vs that we please God albeit many remnaunts of sinne are dwelling as yet within vs. Obiection 1. He that remitteth not is not remitted We remit not Therefore we are not remitted Aunswere He that remitteth not fully and perfectly is notwithstanding remitted so that hee remitte truely and sincerely Obiection 2. Christ willed vs to desire that God will so remitte vs our sinnes as wee remitte our debters But wee doe not perfectlie remit our debters Therefore he willed vs to desire that god wil not perfectly remitte vs our sinnes Ans This is a fallacy of speech deceiuing by miscōstring a word For the particle as in this petition dooth not signifie the degree of remission or a comparison of our remission with that remission wherewith God remitteth vs our sinnes but it signifieth the kinde of remission namely the trueth and sincerity of our remission whereby wee forgiue others from our hart and with a readie wil of forgiuing them or to speak shorter heere is not made a comparison according to degrees but according to the truth of the thing or according to the trueth of remission so that the meaning is so perfectly God remitteth vs our sinnes as we truly and certainely remitte and forgiue our neighbour or Forgiue vs our debts because we forgiue our debters Reply Then is our remission of others the cause why God remitteth vs. Answere This a fallacy putting that for a cause which is no cause For our remission wherwith we forgiue others though not perfectly yet sincerely is only an argument and testimony vnto vs that god wil remit vs our sinnes For our remission and forgiuing of others cannot merit 1. Because it is vnperfect 2. Albeit it were perfect yet should it not merit because what we now perfourme that we owe vnto god For were it so that we did now perfourme perfect obedience to god yet were wee bound of duty to perfourme it Reply But neuertheles yet here is betokened an equalitie of remission in vs and god Aunswere Not an equality but a likenesse and similitude of the kinde of remission Obiection 3. He that remembreth iniuries and is desirous of reuenge doth not truly remit and forgiue But we all remember iniuries and are desirous of reuenge Therefore we doe not truly remit and forgiue Aunswere They that remember iniuries that is without a resistance and dislike of this remembraunce or with a yeelding thereto doe not truely remit If then wee withstand and resist the remnauntes of sinnes which as yet cleaue fast vnto vs and doe not yeelde vnto them nothing hindereth why wee maie not bee saide to remitte others truelie and from our heart and so also to attaine vnto that in regarde where-of this particle as was added of Christ to wit which before also we mentioned to desire and pray rightly Now we rightly pray and desire in faith and repentance both which this petition confirmeth Faith is confirmed and strengthned by this petition because when we truely remit our neighbour we may and ought certainly to resolue that our sins are also remitted vs and so haue we a good conscience are assured that we are heard according to this promise of Christ Math. 6.14 Jf ye doe forgiue men their trespasses your heauenlie father will also forgiue you True repentance also is confirmed and increased in vs by this petition For by this petition we are prouoked and incited to true repentaunce the chiefe part whereof is the loue of our neighbour For if we will be forgiuen we must forgiue others Both causes are conteined in the word of Christ before alleaged out of Matthewe as also in the rest which are presently added in the same place in Matthewe by way of opposition If yee doe forgiue men their trespasses your heauenlie father will also forgiue you that is assure your selues also that your heauenly father heareth you In which worde is comprehended the confirmation of our faith But if yee doe not forgiue men their trespasses no more will your father forgiue you your trespasses In these words is added a spurre to
selfesame particle betokeneth a certaintie or confirmation of our faith whereby we trust that we shal be heard Wherefore Amen signifieth 1. So be it and sure and certaine be that which wee desire and let God condiscend and aunswere vnto our request 2. So God being not vnmindful of his promise truly and certainly heare vs. FINIS ¶ A TABLE OF THE COMMON PLACES AND PRINCIPALL QVESTIONS HANDLED IN THIS SVMME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION THE PREAMBLE A THREEFOLD order or three parts of the study of Diuinity 2 Of a Catechism or Catechising doctrine What a Catechisme is 2 In the Primitiue Church two sorts of Catechumeny 3 Catechising as the Doctrine of Baptisme of laying on of hands euer hath beene vsed in the Church and the reasons why still it ought 3. 4 Of the holy Scriptures Two opinions of religion but one alone true 5 What the holy Scripture teacheth or how Christian religion is diuided 6. 7 True religion ought to bee discerned from others and why 8 The difference of the true Doctrine of the Scriptures from others 10 The difference of true Doctrine from Philosophy 11 Certain notes whereby the tru church is distinguished from others 12 Whence it may appeare that this religion was once deliuered from god which is contained in the Scriptures 12 The authority of the Scriptures dooth not depend of the Church with reasons for proofe aunsweres to the contrarie obiections 13. 14. 15. 16. 17 Reasons for proofe of the certaintie truth of the holy Scriptures 20. 21 The difference betweene the prophecies of the heathen and them contained in the holy Scriptures 23 The spirit of Christ a sufficient witnesse of his Doctrine 27 No doctrin besides the holy Scripture is to be receiued into the church and the reasons why with answers to the contrary obiections 28. 29. 30 The obseruing of the Lords day left arbitrary to the Church 36 How controuersies doubtfull places are to be decided 46 Of the true comfort of the Godly The way to attaine to this comfort and the parts thereof 53 Why the knowledge of our misery deliuery and thankfulnesse is necessary to this comfort 55. 56. 57 THE FIRST PART OF THE MISERY OF MAN HOWE a man commeth to the knowledge of his misery 60 Of Sinne. Whether sin be or whence it appeareth to be in vs. 63 What sinne is 65 How many kinds of sin there are 67 Of Orginall sinne Whether there be Original sinne 6◠What Originall sinne is 68 Whether the souls of the children bee deriued from the souls of the Parents 71 What Actuall sinne is 78 Raigning sinne 78 Sinne not raigning or veniall 79 Sinne against the conscience not against the conscience 86 Sinne pardonable vnpardonable 87 Sin of itselfe sin by an accident 94 The workes of the regenerate vnregenerate differ seuen maner of waies 98 What are the causes of Sinne. 99 What are the effects of sinne 115 Of the creation of man What man was created of God 124 For what man was created 125 Of the image of God in man What the image of God in man is 128 How far foorth the image of God was lost how far it remaineth 130 How it is repaired in vs. 131 How the image of God is in Christ and how in vs. 132 Of the first sinne What that first sinne of Adam Eue was 134 What were the causes of the first sinne 135 What are the effects of the first sin 135 Why GOD permitted the first sin 136 Of free-will The causes of diuers controuersies risen about free-will 138 Of the word Liberty 140 What is the Liberty of will 141 What is like or common and what is different in the liberty of will which is in God in Angels and men 144 Whether there be any liberty in vs what it is 157 There are foure degrees of freewill 159 Of euils of punishment Of the euils of punishment 192. Howe many kinds of afflictions there be 194 What be the causes of them 198 What are the comforts that are to be opposed against them 200 THE SECOND PART OF MANS DELIVERY WHAT mans deliuery is 226 Whether any deliuery might bee wrought after the fall 227 Whether deliuerie bee necessarie and certaine 231 What manner of deliuerie this is 231 By what meanes mans deliuery may be wrought 233 Of the Mediatour What a Mediatour is 238 For what cause a Mediatour is necessarie 239 What is the office of a Mediator 241 What maner of Mediatour ours ought to be 243 Who is may be that Mediator 250 That there is but one Mediatour 252 Of the couenant What a couenaunt is 253 Howe a couenaunt may bee made betweene God and men 255 whether there be but one couenāt 255 In what the old and new couenaunt agree and in what they differ 256 Of the Gospel What the Gospel is 159 Whether the Gospel hath bin alwaies knowen 261 Howe the Gospell differeth from the Law 264 What are the proper effectes of the Gospel 267 Whence the trueth certainty of the Gospel may appeare 267 Of faith The necessitie of the true doctrine of faith 268 What faith is in general 270 What are the kinds of faith 272 How those kindes differ 275 How faith hope differ agree 278 What are the causes of faith 276 What are the effects of faith 280 Vnto whom faith is giuen 281 Conclusions comprising the summe of faith 285 Of the Creede or Symbole of the Apostles VVhat a Symbole is 287 What are the parts of the Apostolick Symbole 288 The first part of the Creede of God the Father Creatour The sense and meaning of the words I beleeue in God the father Almighty Creatour 291 Of God VVhether there be a God 294 VVho and what God is 301 An explication of the description of God deliuered by the church 305 VVhence it may appeare that there is but one God 336 VVhat these woordes Essence Person Trinity betoken and signifie 340 VVhat difference betweene Essence and Person 341 VVhether these names are to bee vsed in the church 345 How many persons there be of the Diuinity or Godhead 347 How the three persons of the godhead are distinguished 349 VVherefore this doctrine is to be held and maintained in the church 351 Of Creation VVhether the woorld were created of God 355 How God made the world 362 For what cause god created the world 367 Of Angels VVhat good Angels are 369 Of euil spirits or Angels 375 Of Gods prouidence Errors concerning Gods prouidence 379 Whether there bee any prouidence of God 380 VVhat the prouidence of God is 385 A confutation of certaine Sophismes or cauils which are wont to be obiected against the prouidence of God moouing and gouerning all and euery particular whether good or bad great or smal most iustly 405 VVhy the knowledge of this doctrine concerning Gods prouidence is necessarie 426 The second part of the Creed of God the redeemer VVhat is signified by the word Iesus 430
commandment of Christ and his Apostles vsing the keies of the kingdome of heauen ought to driue them from this Supper till they shall repent and chaunge their manners 83 What are the keies of the Kingdome of heauen Preaching of the Gospell and Ecclesiasticall Discipline by which heauen is opened to the beleeuers and is d Math. 16.19 18.18 shutte against the vnbeleeuers 84 How is the kingdome of heauen opened and shut by the preaching of the Gospel When by the commaundement of Christ it is publickely declared to all and euerie one of the faithfull that all their sinnes are pardoned them of God for the merite of Christ so often as they imbrace by a liuely faith the promise of the Gospel but contrarily is denounced to all Infidels hypocrites that so long the wrath of God and euerlasting damnation doth lie on them as they e Ioan. 20.21.22.23 Mat. 16.19 persist in their wickednesse according to which testimonie of the Gospel God wil iudge them as wel in this life as in the life to come 85 How is the kingdome of heauen opened and shut by Ecclesiasticall Discipline When according to the commaundement of Christ they who in name are Christians but in their doctrine and life shewe themselues f Rom. 12.7.8.9 1. Cor. 12.28 aliens from Christ after they hauing beene sometime admonished wil not depart from their errours or wickednesse are made knowen vnto the Church or to them that are appointed for that matter purpose of the Church and if neither then they obey their admonition are of the same men by interdiction from the Sacramentes shut out from the Congregation of the Church by God him selfe out of the kingdome of heauen And again if they professe and indeede declare amendment of life are g Mat. 18.15.16.17 1. Cor. 5.3.4.5.2 Thes 3.14.15 2. Ioh. 10.11 2. Cor. 2.6.7.10.11 â— Tim. 5.17 receiued as members of Christ and his Church AFter it hath beene shewed in the first part that men are become obnoxious vnto euerlasting pains and punishmentes by reason of obedience not yeelded vnto the lawe a question by and by ariseth Whether there is or bee graunted anie escape or deliuerie from these punishmentes To this question the lawe maketh aunswere that a deliuerie is graunted so that perfect satisfaction be made vnto the law and the iustice of God by sufficient punishment paied for the sinnes committed For the lawe bindeth either to obedience or that beeing not performed to punishment The performance of both which both of obedience punishment is perfect righteousnes and iustice and on both followeth the approbation allowing of him in whom that righteousnesse is Now the meanes and manners of satisfaction are two one by our selues which the lawe teacheth and the iustice of God requireth for wee haue sinned But this satisfaction deliuereth not from eternall malediction because it is neuer sufficient and finished but indureth to all eternity The other meanes of satisfiyng is by an other that is by Christ This meanes doth the Gospell shewe and the mercie of God freely offer neither yet is it repugnaunt to his law and iustice because in no place the lawe misliketh or reiecteth it This satisfaction or punishment is temporall and yet sufficient that is equiualent to euerlasting punishment and therefore a price worthie inough for our deliueraunce Wherefore since Christ hath paied in our behalf vnto the law a sufficient punishment for our sinnes the iustice of God and the sentence of the lawe altogether willeth and requireth that we bee admitted vnto a reconcilement with him that is be approued of God and receiued into fauour Furthermore by the questions of the Catechisme a little before propounded two things are taught concerning mans deliuerie The first is that it is possible and after what sort The second is by whom and by what maner of Mediatour it may be atchieued The places here to be discoursed of are three 1 Of Mans deliuerie 2 Of our Mediatour 3 Of the Couenant OF THE DELIVERIE OF MAN THe questions to bee considered hereof are fiue 1 What mans deliuerie is or in what things it consisteth 2 Whether anie deliuerie might be wrought after the fall 3 Whether it bee necessarie and certaine 4 What manner of deliuerie it is and whether it bee perfect that is a deliuerie from the euill both of crime and paine 5 By what meanes it may be wrought 1 WHAT MANS DELIVERIE IS THis worde Deliuerie is respectiue For all deliuerie and libertie hath a respect to somewhat to wit it is a graunt whereby any one is licensed according to honest lawes or the order of nature to be free from subiections defects and burdens not proper vnto his nature and to doe thinges agreeable vnto his nature without lette or hinderaunce The deliuerie of man an immunitie from miserie and the gilt of sinne So the Deliuerie of man is an immunitie from miserie that is from the guilt and subiection or tyrannie of sinne or it is the right and power restored by Christ to liue freely according to GODS lawe and to inioy those commodities which were at the beginning graunted by GOD vnto mans nature without prohibition or impediment For thus to liue agreed vnto mans nature in respect of his creation and not to liue thus is mans most miserable and shamefull seruitude As therefore the miserie and seruitude of man comprehendeth sinne and death or punishment so his deliuerie is a deliuerie from sinne and death or a restoring of righteousnes and life euerlasting Nowe Deliuerie from sinne is the perfect both pardoning of sinne that it may not for euer bee imputed And also the abolishing of it in vs by regeneration or newnesse of life which is begunne here but to bee perfected in the world to come Deliuerie from death is a Deliuerie both from Desperation or the feeling of GODS wrath which beeing in the wicked here begunne shall continue euerlastingly and is called euerlasting death and secondly from corporall death and all calamities and miseries by our Resurrection and Glorification In summe That Deliuerie is a full restoring of life euerlasting that is of Holinesse Righteousnesse and felicitie or perfect Blessednesse and so of all good thinges which are contrarie to those euils It is called Deliuerie because men without Christes satisfaction are helde as it were fettered in gyues and Captiues of sinne and hell 2 Whether anie Deliuerie might be wrought after the fall THis question is necessarie For if there be no deliuerie of vs out of miserie in vaine make wee question of the rest Againe there is some cause to doubt thereof to them especially The deliuerie of man possible The causes of which possibility in God onelie vnto whom the doctrine of the Gospell is vnknowen The Deliuerie therefore of man is possible And the causes of the possiblenesse thereof are in GOD alone declared in the sacred Scripture The first is his mercie and immeasurable goodnesse which that hee woulde
exercise in sauing of vs not impeaching his iustice he hath vttered in his word Iohn 5.21 The father quickeneth whom he will The second is his infinite wisedome whereby hee knoweth how to turne the purposes of the Diuel imagined and deuised to the reproche of GOD himselfe by corrupting mankinde and to the ouerthrowing of the saluation of Gods chosen euen to the manifesting of his owne glorie and to the saluation of his chosen God therefore by this his wisedome hath found out an admirable temperament and such as no creature coulde haue found of his iustice and mercie in deliuering man that is such a way whereby hee might shewe his exceeding both mercie and iustice The third is Gods omnipotencie wherefore hee is able to performe that deliuerie of man from sinne and death which hee through his immeasurable mercie and wise counsaile decreed Luc. 1.37 With God nothing shal bee impossible To denie then mans deliuerie is to spoile God of infinite wisedome goodnes and power against that which is said 1. Sam. 2.6 The Lorde bringeth downe to the graue and raiseth vp Psal 68.20 To the Lord God belong the issues of death Isai 59.1 The Lords hand is not shortened Obiection What the vnchangeable iustice and truth of god requireth that is vnchangeable But the iustice and truth of god requireth the casting away and damnation of man for god had expresselie threatned euerlasting death to the transgressours of his lawe and the iustice of god will destroie euerie thing that is not conformable thereunto Therefore the casting awaie of man from the face of god is vnchangeable neither is it possible that without the impeaching of gods iustice and truth man should escape euerlasting damnation Aunswere The Maior is to bee distinguished What the iustice of God requireth to wit simplie without al condition that is simply vnchangeable It requireth the casting away of man with this condition except there bee interposed a full and perfect satisfaction Wherefore the iustice of GOD requireth that a sinner either satisfie or bee cast away Mathew 5.36 Thou shalt not come out thence vntill thou hast paide the vtmost farthing Replie But impossible is it for vs to satisfie for our sinnes or to beare sufficient punishment so that wee may come from thence Aunswere It is impossible in respect of our selues but not in respect of God He knoweth the meanes how by an other full satisfaction may be made for vs. Adam after his fall before by special reuelation hee was assured of the promise could not hope for deliuerance But that our deliuerie by another is possible is knowen onely by the promises of the Gospel and the reuealing of the holy Ghost forcibly mouing our hearts to beleeue the Gospel Here ariseth a question Whether Adam after his fall might haue certainly promised himselfe deliuerie Wee aunswere that hee coulde not without especiall promise and reuelation And before he had this nothing could present it selfe vnto his mind but the great iustice truth of God exacting of him euerlasting punishment for not yeelding obediēce For flesh bloud reueal not those things which are the peculiar and proper benefites of the Mediatour But some man may except that the selfe same causes notwithstanding doe remaine euen nowe after the publishing of the Gospell to wit the iustice and truth of GOD who is neuer chaunged If then Adam coulde not hope for deliuerie before the promise was published neither could he after the publishing thereof For so hee might haue reasoned It is impossible that the iustice and truth of GOD shoulde bee impeached But mans recouering and escaping out of punishment would impeache the iustice and truth of GOD because euerlasting punishment shoulde not bee inflicted on man which yet the iustice and truth of GOD require For the punishment to bee euerlasting and yet man to wade and escape out of it are thinges contradictorie and of flatte repugnauncie Therefore mans escape and deliuerie out of punishment is impossible This Obiection or temptation Adam might by the promise nowe made haue repelled on this wise The Minor is true if the escaping bee such that sufficient punishment and equall to the sinne bee laide neither vpon the sinner himselfe nor on another who offereth himselfe in the sinners place But the iustice of GOD hath inflicted punishment sufficient for our sinnes on his owne Sonne who offered himselfe of his owne accorde to sustaine it for vs. Wherefore mans escaping out of miserie by the full satisfaction performed by the Sonne of GOD doth not impeache but rather establish Gods iustice But againe it is replied That which necessarilie doth not conclude punishment to insue doth leaue some hope neither willeth vs to dispaire of deliuerie from punishment But the euent hath taught that the casting away of man is not necessarilie concluded or inferred vpon the first fall of Adam Therefore Adam beeing fallen no not before the promise published concerning the seede of the Woman ought altogether to haue dispaired of his deliuerie Aunswere Hee ought not verily to haue dispaired neither coulde hee haue inferred vpon his fall necessarily that his deliuerie out of miserie was simplie impossible but neither coulde hee of the otherside haue certainely promised vnto himselfe or hoped for it before the publishing of the Gospell Because neither hee nor any creature was able Humane reason might probablie coniecture but not necessarily conclude mans deliuerie or shoulde for euer haue beene able of himselfe to perceiue or so much as imagine vnto himselfe a maner of escaping punishment not repugnant to the iustice of God except GOD had declared and reuealed the same by his Sonne Hee might truelie as others likewise who liue out of the Church destitute of the worde of promise haue probablie reasoned that one day there shoulde bee a deliuerie First because it is not meete that man the most excellent creature shoulde bee made of GOD to sustaine the greatest punishment and that for euer Againe For that it seemeth not likely that GOD woulde haue deliuered a lawe to man to no effect that is which shoulde neuer bee perfectly performed by him But except the voice of the gospel had come mā would neuer haue beene able by these reasons long to haue withstood the tentation of the Diuel who woulde easily haue refuted them by his owne example Wherefore albeit these two reasons are of themselues most true for GOD did not make mankinde vnto perpetuall miserie neither made hee a lawe to no effect yet man beeing fallen is not able by reason of his blindnesse and corruption without the promise and grace of the holy Ghost to assent vnto them that is is not able of them certainely and necessarily to infer that he knoweth and hopeth for his deliuerance out of paine and miserie 3 Whether Deliuerie be necessarie and certaine THat some should be deliuered and saued from destruction is necessarie Obiection But it is free vnto God The deliuerie of some necessarie euen to saue
beginning of the woorlde who knewe GOD aright Therefore in Iesus the Sonne of Marie is another nature besides his fleshe which is the Sonne of GOD and subsisted from the beginning of the woorlde reueiling GOD vnto men not onely to those of the godly who liued since hee tooke fleshe but to those also who liued before it Againe Iohn 3.13.17.19.31 Iohn 16.28 c. Hee is called the sonne who came from heauen who beeing in earth is in heauen who came into the woorlde not as other men from the earth but from aboue out of heauen from the Father So that then hee was before he came into the woorlde But the fleshe of CHRIST is not of heauen neither came it from heauen Therefore there must needes bee another nature in him in respect whereof hee is the onely begotten Sonne of GOD euen before he tooke fleshe of the Virgine Againe He that was manifested in the flesh is GOD 1. Timot. 3. and therefore another nature from the flesh For God is one thing who is manifested and the flesh another thing wherein hee is manifested The Sonne of God is hee that was manifested in the fleshe 1. Iohn 3.5 For this purpose appeared the Sonne of GOD that hee might take away our sinnes and that hee might loose the woorkes of the Diuell Therefore the Son is God and another nature from the flesh that is the man Iesus is the sonne of God in respect not only of his humanity but also of his diuinity which besides and before the fleshe existed in him and by the assumption of the flesh was made as it were visible and conspicuous Wherefore it followeth also and that necessarily that that was a subsistent and a person For that which is by nature a sonne is also a person But Christes diuinitie or nature which was also before his flesh is the Sonne of God by nature Therefore it is a subsistent and a person in the flesh taken or assumpted and before it To the fourth classe belong those places of Scripture The Word is a person before Iesus borne of the Virgin and he is the sonne which affirme Christ man to be the word incarnate The Argument is this The word is a person which both existed before Iesus was borne and now dwelleth personally in the fleshe taken of the Virgine But that word is the Sonne Therefore the sonne is a person The Maior is proued because those thinges are attributed vnto the Word Ioh. 1.1 Ioh. 1 5. Reu. 19. which only agreeth to a thing subsistent liuing intelligent woorking that is to a person For the Woord was before al creatures with the father God by him were al things made hee was autor of al life and light in men hee was in the world from the beginning and not knowen he hath his own country and nation he came vnto it in his name men beleeue he giueth power to be the sons of god to others by his own autority power he doth assume take flesh is therein manifested seen handled conuerseth and dwelleth amongst men The Minor is proued Because the Word is called the onelie begotten Sonne of GOD Iohn 1.14.18.34 Reuelat 2.18 c. And because the same properties are attributed to the Woorde and the Sonne For the Sonne is in the bosome of the Father reueiling GOD vnto men By him the woorlde was created In him is life hee was sent and came from Heauen into the woorlde Hee tooke the seede of Abraham Likewise the life which is the woorde was with the Father before the incarnation and manifestation of Christ Therefore god was euen then the father of the Word and the Word the sonne of god But seeing the newe Arrians doe maruailouslie depraue by their newe and craftie deuised Sophismes this notable place of Iohn concerning the Woorde subsisting before the fleshe borne of the virgine and creating and preseruing all thinges that thereby they might robbe and despoile the Sonne of GOD of his true and eternal deity it seemed good here to adioine those things which Zacharias Vrsinus some yeares since noted drue out as to be opposed against these corruptions and forgeries briefely indeede and barely after the manner of Logicians yet such as are learned and sound whereby also the like corruptions and wrestings of places of holy Scripture may easily be obserued discerned and refuted IOHN purposing to write the Gospell of Christ in the first entrance proposeth the summe of that Doctrine which he purposed to deliuer and confirme out of the storie and Sermons of Christ And seeing the knowledge of Christ consisteth in his person and office The argument of Iohns gospel hee describeth both and sheweth that Christ is the eternall Sonne and Woorde of God the Father who taking fleshe was made man that he might be made a sacrifice for our sinnes and might make vs through faith in him the Sonnes of God and heires of eternall life This Woorde then whom afterwards he calleth the onely begotten Sonne of the Father he saith nowe to haue beene in the beginning which sheweth his eternity These woords of the holie Euangelist they corrupt and depraue who raise againe Samosatenus blasphemies from the pit of hell expounding this beginning of the beginning of the gospels preaching doone by Christ In the beginning was But contrarie S. Iohn and the Church euen from the Apostles and their scholers time doe vnderstand that beginning of the world wherein all things to haue beene first created by GOD Moses in the first Chapter of Genesis recounteth For Iohn saith that the Worlde was made by him and further that euen then in that beginning hee was God and that the true God creator which is onelie one and was in the beginning of the worlde Replie 1. Beginning dooth not signifie eternitie Therefore wee depraue it who so expound it Aunswere Wee doe not so expound it but that euen then in the beginning of the worlde was the Word and therefore was before the creation of the world and whatsoeuer was before this was from euerlasting And so is the scripture wont to speake Eph. 1.4.1 Pet. 1.20 Pro. 8 22 23. c. where wee may see a large place concerning wisedome whose eternitie is there signified in this that it is saide to haue beene before the creation of the worlde Replie 2. Beginning often signifieth the beginning of the gospels preaching Yee were with me from the beginning I said not to you from the beginning Aunswere This sheweth that somtimes it so signifieth but not alwaies And we are stil to conster it of that beginning which the text sheweth As also in other places Reuel 1.8 I am α ω the beginning and the end the first and the last The woorde The corruptors say The man Iesus Christ is called the Woorde because hee speaketh and teacheth the will of the father Wee say that hee is called indeede the Woorde for this cause because hee declareth God his wil but yet in respect
of his diuinitie not of his humanitie The reasons hereof 1. Because his humanitie was not from the beginning of the world 2 Because this Word was made flesh that is tooke on humane nature 3. Because this Woorde did lighten al men from the beginning of the world whosoeuer had the knowledge of God and how much soeuer they had Hee was the life and the light of men lightning euerie man which commeth into the worlde Againe NO MAN hath knowen the Father but the sonne and hee to whom the sonne wil reueile him Againe NO MAN hath seene God AT ANIE TIME The sonne which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him Reply 1. Heb. 1. It is said Now God hath spoken vnto vs by his sonne Aunswere That is by his sonne made man Replie 2. He is not saide any where in the old Testament to haue spoken Aunsw Yes by the Angel of the lord who also himselfe is Lord. Likewise Isay 6.9 The Lord appeared speaking whom S. Ioh chap. 12.40 affirmeth to haue bin Christ Reply 3. The Woorde is saied 1. Iohn 1.1 to haue beene palpable visible and so forth Aunswere That is by reason of the flesh which hee tooke Replie 4. But hee is no where saide inuisible Aunswere Iohn 1.5.10 hee is saide to haue beene in the world vnknowen and this Iohn speaketh of him as hee was before his incarnation And then hee was in the worlde inuisible Likewise Iohn 14 23. I and the Father will come vnto him And in the same place I will not leaue you comfortles I will come vnto you Mat. 28 20. I am with you alway vntill the end of the world that is inuisibly as is the Father And if they wil denie him to bee with vs because hee is not seene they shal also exclude the father Replie 5. Hee is with vs in power and vertue not in essence Aunswere This obiection were rather to bee hissed our than to bee refuted because hee hath not an infinite power and vertue who hath a finite essence Iere. 10.11 The gods that haue not made the heauens and the earth shall perish from the earth howe much more then the makers of such Gods And the worde was with God in the beginning Wee interpret this that the sonne was coeternall with the Father and so ioined with him that notwithstanding hee was distinct in person from him 1. They say That this Doctour and teacher the man Iesus was knowen of GOD alone and not of men but hee was the Messias Vnto whom wee aunswere 1. To be or not to bee with one when it is spoken of a person is neuer read in this sense as to signifie to be knowen or not knowen of one It is therefore an impudent forgery 2. Iohn himself expoūdeth it The Son which is in the bosome of the Father This dooth not onely signifie to bee knowen but also to bee indeede in the Father to bee entirely loued of him and to bee fellowe and compartner of the secret and hidden counsels of the Father 3. Hee saith of himselfe that hee came downe from Heauen That he came from the Father and came into the woorlde that he returneth to the Father with whom he was before This doth not signifie a knowing or a not knowing but an existence and beeing 4. By him all creatures were made of the Father Therefore he was present with the Father 5. He was in the woorld before hee beeing made man came vnto his owne and yet not knowen Therefore to bee in the woorlde and to bee knowen of the woorlde are not all one And by a consequent neither is it al one to bee with God and to bee knowen of God 6. Christ himselfe expoundeth it J in the Father and the Father in me This signifieth not only a knowlege but a coexistence and ioint being mutual And that Word was God We interprete That the Woord is true god eternall creatour of heauen and earth the same god with the Father and therefore diuerse from him as the Woorde from him that speaketh by him and the Sonne from the Father but hauing the same nature and essence of the godheade in him which the Father hath as CHRIST him selfe saith J in the Father and the Father in mee Hee is euerie wherein the Father as the Father euerie where in him But they saie that hee is GOD in respect of his giftes woorthinesse excellencie and office but not by nature Which they prooue because others also are in this sense and respect called god which haue not anie Diuinitie of themselues Therefor Christ also after the same manner seeing hee also hath his Diuinitie from the Father Further they adde That wee make two gods and deale contumeliouslie with the Father Wee aunswere That we make not two Gods because The Sonne is one with the Father as god that is hauing the same essence in him which the Father hath but is diuerse and distinct from him as the Sonne and hauing in him the same Deitie which the Father hath communicated But they are blasphemous and contumelious against the Father and the Sonne because they honor not the Sonne as they honour the Father Ioh. 5.23 Now that S. Iohn vnderstandeth a Sonne not a made created and inferiour god to the Father and a diuerse god from him is prooued and confirmed by manie reasons but some fewe shall nowe suffice 1. Simplie and absolutelie without restraint to anie certaine circumstaunce none is called god in the Scripture besides the onelie true god eternall creatour of the world 2. That the Worde was god before thinges were created and is the creatour of all thinges Saint Iohn dooth teach 3. Hee sheweth That hee is the author and fountaine of life and knowledge in men euen from the beginning For this signifieth the true light that is which is properlie by it selfe light it selfe the originall of light in others 4. This Word giueth power to bee the Sonnes of God This none can do but the true God alone 5. Wee are to beleeue in his name But wee must beleeue in none but GOD onelie as himselfe prooueth that therefore they must beleeue in him because they beleeue in God Iohn 14.1.6 And Iohn 1.23 Iohn Baptist saith that he baptizeth with the holie Ghost And CHRIST himselfe often saith that hee wil send the holie GHOST from the Father But no man can send the spirite of GOD and woorcke by him in the heartes of men but onelie hee whose proper spirite this is namelie GOD. 7. John Baptist is called the fore-runner of CHRIST who shoulde prepare his waie But hee prepareth the waie of the LORDE Isaie 40.3 Iohn 1. verse 23. and Chapter 3. verse 28. Luk. 3.4.8 Christ himselfe Iohn 5.23 saith That the Father will that all should honour the Sonne as they honour the Father But no creature albeit excellent can bee equalled in honour with the creator 9. Euerie where he is called the true God and the Lord. 1. Iohn 5.20 This is
writing by S. Paul himselfe So Paul saith of the Lordes supper 1. Cor. 11.23 I haue receiued of the Lord that which also J haue deliuered vnto you But this tradition after the Euangelistes himselfe also hath set downe in writing The Iesuites cite the saying of Paul 2. Thes 3.6 Withdraw your selues frō euery brother that walketh inordinately and not after the tradition which hee receiued of vs. But a little after in the same chapter hee describeth what tradition he meaneth as it is manifest to him that looketh on the place And yet will they thence prooue that many thinges are to bee beleeued which can not bee proued by anie testimonie of Scripture The like impudencies they shewe in another testimony taken out of Luke Act. 16.14 They deliuered them the decrees to keep ordained of the Apostles Elders which were at Jerusalem When a little before Cap. 15.23 he witnesseth that those decrees were set downe in letters written by the Apostles But wee are to keepe and hold the notes and marcks before set downe First in respect of Gods glorie that enimies may be discerned from Sonnes Secondly In respect of our own saluation that we may ioine our selues to the true Church For there are three sorts of men 1 They who openly professe and declare themselues to be enimies 2 Hypocrits 3 The company of the Elect chosen 4 Why the Church is called holy and Catholicke THE Church is called Holy The church holy in respect of Christs holinesse imputed and their own begun Catholique in respect of place and time 1 Because Christes sanctification is imputed vnto it 2 Because al his members haue begunne al the parts of obedience It is called Catholicke 1 In respect of places because it is spread through the whole world For there is one Vniuersall Church of all places degrees of life neither is it tied to a certaine place kingdome or to certain succession 2 In respect of times Because there is but one true Church of all times which also is at all times so Catholicke as that it is dispersed through the whol world nether is at any time tied to any certain place Jt is not called Catholicke because it possesseth many kingdomes For Catholicke is a title giuen vnto the Church in the Apostles time for before time the Church was limited within narrowe bondes Nowe that there is but one Church of al times and ages from the beginning of the world vnto the end it is out of doubt For 1 It is manifested that the Church hath euer been Neither can Abrahams daies be obiected as if before he was called there had beene no worship of the true God in his familie and himselfe had beene after his calling alone without anie others For before his calling he held the foundations and grounds of Doctrine of the true God though it were darkned with superstitions mingled therewith Againe Melchisedec liued at the same time who was the Priest of the most high God and therefore neither was Abraham after his calling alone but there were others besides him worshippers of the true God whose priest was Melchisedec 2 That the Church as it hath beene euer so shall also continue euer appeareth by these testimonies Isay 59.21 My woordes shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy seed Ier. 33.20 If the night and day may bee chaunged then shall my couenant also be changed Mat. 28.20 I am with you alway vntill the end of the world Moreouer Christ was euer and euer shal be King Head and Priest of the Church Wherefore the Church was euer and euer shall be And hence also it is manifest That the Church of both testaments is one and the same that which is confirmed also by the article folowing For Christ is the sanctifier of his Church who is common to men of both testaments Hither appertaineth the Question of the authoritie of the Church Which I omit In this we wil consider here onely that opinion or saying The church doth not erre How the church may bee saide not to erre Which is true after this sort First the whole doth not erre though some members thereof doe er Secondly it doth not erre Vniuersally although in some pointes of Doctrine it may Thirdly It erreth not in the foundation 5 In what the Church differeth from the common-weal 7 Differences betweene the Church and common-weale THE Church differeth from the common-weal 1. Because common-weales are distinct and kingdomes of the world in diuerse places and times The Church is alwaies one and the same at all times and with all men 2. The kingdomes and states of the world haue many Heads or one chiefe Heade and many other inferiour Heades besides and that on earth The Church hath but one and that in heauen 3. The common-wealth is gouerned by certaine lawes made for the maintenance of outwarde peace and tranquillity The Church is ruled by the Holy Ghost the worde of God 4. The common-wealth or ciuill state requireth outward obedience onely The Church requireth both as well inwarde obedience as outwarde 5. In ciuill states and common-weales there is power and libertie to make new lawes positiue by the authoritie of the magistrate the violating of which lawes bindeth mens consciences and deserueth corporal punishmentes The Church is tied to the woorde of God vnto which it is not lawfull to adde ought or to detract ought from it 6. The ciuill state hath corporall power where-with it is armed against the obstinate disobedient For he may and ought by force to curb these and to punish them by the sword The Church punisheth by denouncing of Gods wrath out of the worde of God 7. Jn the Church are alwaies some Elect Holie but not alwaies in the common-wealth 6 Whence ariseth the difference of the Church from the rest of mankinde THE cause of the difference is the Election of God Election putteth the difference betweene the Church and others Act. 14.16 Jn times past god suffered all the Gentiles to walke in their owne waies Rom. 9.18 God hath mercie on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth Ioh. 6.37 Al that the Father giueth me shal come to me Rom. 8.29.30 Those which hee knew before he also predestinate to be made like to the Image of his Sonne and whom he predestinate them also he called By these wordes we are also taught that the promise of grace is generall in respect of the Elect or beleeuers God verilie would haue all to be saued and that Rom. 11.7 1 Jn respect that he loueth the saluation of all But the Elect only haue attained to that saluation 2 In respect that he inuiteth al to saluation But the rest haue beene hardened The Efficient cause then of this difference is the Election of God willing to gather vnto himselfe a Church in earth Secondly the Sonne is a mediate executour of this will and purpose The holy ghost immediate Thirdly The