standers or that his manifest unchristian dealing may help to open the eyes of such as he labours to delude and bring them to abhorre his way or that the really Religious and righteous dealings of Church and State may more forcibly put him to silence then words or writings can It had been indeed more advantagious to the King's cause and lesse dishonourable to himself to have been silent then thus to have letten out waters to the King 's great prejudice and his owne discredit If he had any expectation that the Man's conscience would have confuted him in most of his assertions why did he hinder that work by confirming him in the truth of his assertions by his weak and foolish replyes Praestat otiari quam nihil agere and why did he not more manfully discover these unchristian dealings the better to undeceive such as he supposeth were deluded What are these manifest unchristian dealings of his Sure the event hath and shall furder we hope declare that his owne dealing hath been much more manifestly unchristian by labouring to blinde the eyes of such as savv before But I suppose he may talke at leasure of his proselyts When the really religious and righteous dealings of Church and State shall forcibly confute what is there said we know not Sure when ever their actions become really Religious and righteous they will condemne his pamphlet to the fire and himself to the correction-house and approve of all which is said in Naphtaly Sometimes sayes he keeping silence is seasonable the Man according to God's owne heart would not suffer Shimei's revileings to be repayed upon the head of that dead dog Hezekiah discharged to answere a word to railing Rabshakeh Ieremiah the Prophet contradicted by the false Prophet Hananiah went his way and said nothing The wise Solomon forbids to take heed to all words that are spoken and to answer a fool according to to his folly The Lord of Kings and Prophets sometimes answered not his accusers a word True sometimes silence is not only seasonable but 〈◊〉 and so would the Kings cause have found it now and by his answering not withstanding of what he here sayes it would seem that Naphtaly is no Shimes Rabshakeh Hananiah nor fool nor an enemy to Christ Or that the King is not like the Man according to God's heart nor like good Hezekiah Nor is this Pamphleter like Ieremiah nor hath follovved either Solomon's advice or Christ's example But I see not why both may not be true Yet furder So it seemed fit to let alone an insolent and forward railer and mocker and not to lavish out precious time which might be better bestowed upon one that gives such visible evidences both of a reasonlesse and unchristian Spirit whose libel may be reckoned amongst the things quae spreta exolescunt and worthy to be answered with nothing but silence contempt Then it seemeth he expecteth a reward also from the Author of Naphtaly for lavishing out so much of his precious time to keep in memory such a book which if he had miskend would have dyed out of minde and which he hath honoured with another answere then silence but all the reward he can expect will be but par pari referre payment without putting any thing in his purse and yet a payment in his owne coine Then to him it is a lavishing of precious time to maintaine the King's cause it seemeth also that he hath lavished out much time upon it and what will not money do The gredy gapeing after which will make a Man not only lavish out precious time needlesly But also put honour and respect on what he accounteth worthy of contempt 10. Let us see what did preponderat and bring this tossed Man to a firme resolution and determine him to bring this brate to light this product of his ill composed heart and not well tempered braine Upon the other hand sayes he it seemed something hard especially in such a distempered time to suffer an insolent person in whose mouth is a rode of pride to cast the truth downe to the ground without control and to tread upon and triumph over a holy and righteous cause and upon honourable persons of all ranks engaged in the maintainance thereof in so abusive despiteful and intolerable a way and not give him any check Not to put some stop to this furious driver who againe and againe assaults this Church with vile lyes and reproaches looked like the betraying and deserting of an honest and honoruable cause or like the hirelings seeing the Wolfe and flying and leaving the flock to be destroyed with delusion fugisti quia tacuisti There is an evil silence that leaves Men in sin as well as an evil speaking that leads Men to sin and we are not only to give an account pro atio so verbo but pro otioso silentio for idle silence when God and the publick necessity of the Church or Society whereof we are members Calleth for a valiant not brutishly violent and forcible way such as this mans pleads for and rational contending for the truth It is sinful pusillanimity and not warrantable prudence to see truth fall in the streets and not lift it up And verily this man seems to be amongst these of Whom Solomon sayes Prov. 26 v. 5. who must be answered lest he seem wise in his owne conceite and to be amongst these Tit. 1 v. 10 11. unruly and vaine talkers and deceivers whose mouths must be stopped that the gangrene of his words may not creep further to the consumption subversion of Church State Faire words ad faciendum populum qui si decipi vult decipiatur But he hath this disadvantage that few that know him will beleeve that these or any of these are the true cause of this undertaking But that rather vvhich he thought good to conceale viz. The Three hundereth pound sterling brought to him by the greater rogue the better rewarded Ia Sharpe deceiver of that ilke for if these things here mentioned had been his end and motive why was he feared that this should have wronged a well composed heart and Should not have been a honouring of God in his station but a needlesse lavishing out of precious time which might be better bestowed Nay there was reason for all this for whether he saw it or not he who together with his complices distempered the times and all things in whose mouth there being a rode of pride did insolently cast the truth downe to the ground as they could and endeavoured to tread upon and triumph over a holy righteous cause and all the maintainers thereof in an abusive despiteful and intolerable way and laboured to lift up an exploded depised and cursed falshood once dethroned with shoutings and great exclamations of joy but we have seen his horns have been but short He is truely as the sober vvill judge the furious driver who againe and againe doth assault the true Church and cause of God with lyes
to asperse then credit the constant integrity of whose conversation will easily stop his foule lying mouth in the Consciences of God's people who know them If these persons get no other Orator to set forth their praises then this man who is a black raven of the same nest I feare their conversation shall never stop all mens mouthes For my part I shall and I suppose that author will be content to referre the determination of this to the consciences of all God's people who know them And let such judge whether they be men of integrity or men of constant integrity we could tell storyes of some but we shall for beare it may be a volum will be made of their prophane practices when such as know them best and observe their wayes shall help us to a legend of their wayes courses And when the world seeth this It will judge of the integrity of their conversation but enough of this trash here 9. In the follovving paragraph beginning Pag. 10. he is at some demurre not knovving vvell vvhat course to take vvith that book which this true Cretian calleth a bundle of impudent lyes and falshoods grosse slanders and revileings not one of which hath he as yet discovered But where lay the difficulty Upon the one hand sayes he it was thought best to neglect the rage of this man if one that hath so much renunced humanity as he is here seen to do may be so tearmed lest by being noticed he might think himself some what A very hard censure to make a supposition if one who speaketh with so much weight of reason as transcendeth the reach of this animal may be tearmed a man If the supposer were not known to be no acute judge being animal amphibion bipes a double face'd gentle man vvho hath turned his coat his tongue too But why would he grudge poor Naphtali this Or doth he think that his taking notice of him will make him esteem the more highly of himself Not one white a stout man will never think himfelf the more valiant 〈◊〉 a foolish childe set upon him with a straw Was there no other reason Especially sayes he lest People who as they affect are ordinarily opinionated might have too much matter 〈◊〉 â—eed their humour to fournish their light discourses 〈◊〉 to ensnare their souls by representing to them the matters of this libel worthy to be buried in oblivion they being too apt whatever Salvo might be added to receive the poison without the antidote according to their prejudices This was a good consideration and if the Man had been as tender as he pretendeth to be hes hould not have digged up what deserved to be buried especially since he might have known he was not able to prepare a sufficient antidote But thought he that his silence would have hindered any to have pondered that book I beleeve indeed his silence had done more good to the King and his cause then all his hote work is like to do and he hath done more to insnare souls if it be to insnare them then Naphtaly did I do not meane by representing some other things to the consideration of people but by his adding so weak and inconsiderable a Salvo that he fixed what Naphtaly said more deeply in their hearts if judicious Readers did not account it unanswerable before they did see his weak non-answereing Reply What further It seemed also Sayes he a matter full of tediousnesse to a well composed heart to enter into a fire of endlesse strife and continual reciprocation of altercations wherein a Man is not likely to finde more truth then he hath already truth in the most important matters in the book having been of old fully vindicated by learned hands and nothing now opposed but old songs chanted over and over againe although like enough to lose much of that charity and calme and composed temper of heart which he had before Then it seemeth his heart was not a well composed heart for it did not seem tedious unto him to enter into this fire of endlesse strife and continual reciprocation of altercation and to spend so much time and paper and paines in vaine And we must pity his case now who hath lost much of that charity and calme and composed temper of heart which he had formetly Sed qui nihil habet nihil amittit a little stok is soon wasted By whom to this day was Lex Rex answered And doth not himself say that Naphtaly out stripes his Masters even as to the most important matters of the book Hovv is it then that he sayes there is nothing but old songs chanted over and over againe This Man is sui similis As yet as inconsistent with himself in his words as in his walk But seing he had the help of so many old Vindicators hovv comes it that he hath acted his part so childishly and vindicated the King's cause worse then any Man that ever put pen to paper as is shewed Why did not this pigmay set himself upon their shoulders that he might have seemed something What was there more on this hand What Man is he sayes he that knowing how much more important work he hath upon his hand for his owne salvation and honouring God in his station in the World would willingly engadge in endlesse contests with persons whose idlenesse gives them too great opportunity of evil doing and who having cast by the Lord's work in building his Church are too much set to do Satan's vvork in dissipating the same Then this Man thinketh it is inconsistent vvith one to minde the vvork of his vvne salvation and to defend the King's cause vvhich is very true Let the King and his party notice this But it is strange that seing he thought the vvork of his opposers Satan's he should not think it incumbent to a tender soul to do vvhat he can to destroy the vvorks of the Devil vve see also that the love of money is the root of all evil and hath caused him run greedily after the error of Balaam for revvard for to purchase the hire he hath cast by the important vvork of his salvation and laid aside the honouring of God in his station This is the Man 's constant integrity As for those Men whose idlenesse he talkes of if he meane Ministers he knoweth who hindereth them from doing the work of the Lord in building his Church and they will ansvvere for it and he also for his share in that and for this vvork of Satan vvhich a little money hath prompted him to and vvhen they are vvrestling and pleading for Zion and the cause of her King God vvill not account them idle nor evil doers nor setters up of Satans work What further It seemed honourable enough sayes he to decline this contention and strife which is like the letting out of watters in expectation that either Mansconscience if it be not infinitly corrupted may the confute him in most of his assertions and
for that truely divine zeal vvhich would more eate us up for the house of God which is desolate and his precious interests which are perfidiously sold and wickedly trode under foot and which would make us never to sit downe satisfied with any concessions or favours how specious soever until we saw our King restored to his owne and brought back to his throne and Kingdome with shoutings and acclamations of joy O dearly beloved stand fast And beware I say of snares but haveing done all stand with your loins girt about with truth and your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace as you have not been frowned out of your integrity so take head ye be not flattered out of it be not so simple as to beleev every word that is spoken for he must shut his eyes and love to be blindfolded who doth not perceive that while the men that lye in wait for your halting and designe to draw you into a compliance with their course of opposition to the work of God speake fair there are seven abominations in their heart Let your eyes be in your head Hold fast what ye have that no man take your crowne The devil is changeing weapons upon you with a designe to give you a parting blovv be vigilant resist him under every shape whereinto he transformeth himself that he may assault overcome you so shall he at last flee from you and ye shall be more then conquerours through him who hath loved you your Exit though upon a scaffold will be unspeakably joyous and full of glory and when ye have made it appeare if called there to that ye love his interests so well that ye continue not to love your owne lives unto the death then shall ye be associat with your blessed brethren and fellow sufferers who overcame the same enemy that continues to make war vvith you and the remnant of the vvomans seed be the blood of the lamb the word of their testimony Ye have not only the advantage of all your persecuters but of many of the professed yea real friends of the vvork a great many of vvhom vvhen called by the same providence to appeare vvith you unto the help of the Lord against the mighty did couch under their burdens and abode amongst the sheepfolds to hear the bleatings of the flocks vvhile like true Naphtali's ye jeoparded your lives in the high places of the field some of whom it may be have added grief to your sorrow have condemned your riseing to justiy their owne sinful shifting and sitting that opportunity against whom we know ye meditat no other revenge then still to love many of them as brethren pray that their leaving you alone may never be laid to their charge And of some also who pretending respect to the cause did a great deal worse by associating themselves with that enemy vvho with open mouth did come upon you to eat you up the expectation of whose heart may be dreadful when he cometh to make inquisition for the blood of his saints and they may tremble at the thoughts of being led out width these workers of iniquity with whom they joyned themselves in the day of your distresse I wish that repentance may prevent this ruine ye have I say the advantages of these have obtained mercy of the Lord to doe and suffer for his sake while many of your brethren have fainted and fled keep your ground for ye are satans great eye sore he seeks you to shake and winnow you with the smooth flattering insinuations of the men vvhose great designe is to secure and setle themselves on the ruines of the vvork of God and seem to offer some thing if ye vvill give them security for your keeping the publick peace that is if ye vvill never offer to put out your hand to strip them of the spoiles of Christ's honour whervvith they have cloathed themselves this is to keep their publick peace to let them live in a peacable possession of vvhat they vvith vvicked hands have taken from Jesus Christ and never to trouble that vvatch vvhich they have set about the grave of his buried interests for fear of its resurrection But I hope that he who hath delivered your soul from death and preserved you vvhile they hunted for your precious life will also deliver your feet from falling that ye may holding still your integrity vvalk before God in the light of the liveing And though the Lord think good to hide his face for a time Let us waite on him who hideth his face from the house of Israel and let us look for him vvho knovves but he be waiting that he may be gracious and that he will be exalted that he may have mercy upon us For the Lord is a God of Judgment blessed are all they that waite for him who knovveth but the vision be only for an appoynted time aud at the end it shall speak and not lie therefore though it tarry let us waite for it because it will surely come and will not tarry Then they vvho are our enemies shall see it and shame shall cover them who said unto us where is the Lord your God Our eyes shall behold them and they shall be troden down as the mire of the streets vve shall no more be tearmed for saken neither shall our land be tearmed any more desolate but we shall be called Hephzibah and our land Beulah vvhen our Lord shall delight in us and our land shall be marryed Let our King come and make haste To him be glory for ever and ever AMEN ERRATA PAg. 3. Lin. 34. Read sincerely p. 12. l. 18. r. there may p. 34. l. 6. for this r. his p. 38. l. 21. r. from a Ibid. l. 22. r. difference p. 71. l. 20. r. mightily p. 79. l. 27. r. precedents p. 83. l. 23. r. Aristocracy p. 98. l. 34. r. Kings p. 1 l. 17. r. at p. 151. l. penult for is r. his p. 188. l. 4. r. politician p. 224. l. 13. r. precipice p. 237. l. 33. for only r. cheif p. 256. l. 15. r. absurd p. 311. l. 13. for virmilion r. nitre p. 429. l. 31. r. his cause p. 437. l. 7. r. this READER IF in some Copies thou finde some moe such like or some other through the transposition of Points or Letters or one Letter for another as n. for u. or t. for r. or s for f or the like that will not readily marre the sense thou mayest be pleased to correct these as thou readest JUS POPULI VINDICATUM OR The Peoples right to defend themselves and their covenanted Religion vindicated CAP. I. The Question cleared and stated THE Surveyer taking but an overlye slight and superficial vieu to the books he would make the world beleeve he confuteth measureth out and treadeth down as any of ordinary capacity compareing his wordy but unworthy pamphlet with what is orderly methodically set downe and strongly and unanswerably confirmed
allovv vvhy shall it be unlavvfull for a considerable part of the land to defend their Lives and Estates their Libertyes and Religion by forcible resistence made unto the Magistrat's Emissaries cruel bloody souldiers vvhen that moral resistence by petition vvhich yet no rational man can account resistence it being rather an act of subjection is contrare to all lavv and equity denyed and also the legal resistance by plea in court is not admitted Doth the municipal lavv of the land permit the one resistence aud vvill not the lavv of nature and nations vvhich no municipal lavv can infringe be a sufficient vvarandice for the other in case of extream necessity If it be said The Soveraigne hath law and right upon his side in this case which he hath not in the other till the law discusse it Ans The Law and Right which he hath on his fide in this case is but meerly pretended as in the other case and is lis sub judice Neither is he to be both judge and party in this case more then in the other againe if it be said that in this case He acteth as a Soveraigne executeing the lawes but in the other case he acteth only as a private person It is answered 1. That even in the other case He may pretend to be acting as a Soveraigne following executeing the lawes as well as in this 2. The Soveraigne as Soveraigne cannot oppresse nor do wrong therefore even in this case when he doth manifest injury unto the subjects contrare to his place vow and promise he acteth but as a private person and not as Soveraigne 2. If it be lawful for private person to warde off and defensively put back personal injurious assaults to the manifest and immediat peril of life without any colour of deserving of reason of law or judicial proceeding Why shal it not also be lawful for private persons to ward-off and defensively put back the injurious assaults of Emissaries to the manifest peril of Life Libertyes States Lively-hoods Consciences and Religion without any rational or real colour of deserving of reason of law of God or nations or judicial proceeding Shal it be lawful for one private person in the defence of his owne life to warde off such illegal extrajudicial and irrational assaults of the Soveraigne himself and shall it be unlawful for a body of a land or a considerable part thereof in the defence of their lively-hoods and so of their owne lives and of the lives of their posterity of their Consciences of their Libertyes and Religion all secured unto them by all bonds vowes Covenants Statutes and Actes imaginable to warde off the irrational furious illegal extrajudicial and mad assaults of the Soveraign's bloody Emissaries Sure rational men vvill see that vvhatever reason vvil evince the lavv fulnesse of the resistence in the former case the same vvill more strongly and plausibly conclude the lavvfulnesse of resistence in this case 3. If it be lavvfull for a private vvoman to defend her chastity dearer to her then life by violent resisting the Soveraignes attempts lest by non-resistance she should be guilty and oh if all the vvomen of the nation vvere of this temper Shall it not also be lavvful for private persons to defend their Lives Liberties Consciences and Religion dearer to them then their Lives yea and defend their chastity too by violent resisting of the furious attempts of the Soveraignes bloody Emissaries sent of purpose to constraine and compel them to perjury vvhen their non-resistence according to their povver and opportunity could not but be interpreted a voluntary and base quiteing of the cause and truth vvhich they vvere bound before God to maintaine vvith their lives and fortunes 4. If it be lavvfull to resist habited notour and compleat tyranny against all appearance of lavv manifestly tending to the destruction of a body of a people or a greater part thereof by hostile furious actions Shall it be utterly unlavvsul to resist notour tyranny yea compleat and habited though not as to re-iterated acts yet as to the ground laid dovvne of a most compleat and habited tyranny against all appearance of divine lavv or just and right humane lavves vvhich should be consonant thereunto tending to the destruction of the Covenanted-libertyes privileges and Religion of the vvhole body of the people and also unto the actual destruction of the libertyes states lives and lively hoods of a great part thereof by hostile furious actions 5. If resistence be lavvful in the case of violent attempts or destruction of all known legall libertyes and the beeing of religion according to lavv Shall resistence in our case be unlavvsul vvhen all the true libertyes of the subjects once established by lavves re inforced by vovves Covennants solemne engadgments and all bonds imaginable and the very being of our Religion as reformed in doctrine vvorshipe discipline and government ratified approved established and confirmed by lavves oathes Covenants vovves and promises vvhich lavves so re inforced vvith oathes protestations attestations declarations solemne vovves and Covenants are by all right divine and humane irrepelable being not only in themselves good and necessary but also becoming hereby sacred vovves to God vvhich must be payed being also fundamentall tearmes of the constitution of the reformed Republick 6. If in the case of Vendition Alienation of and giving the Kingdome to strangers violent resistence be allovved shall it not also be allovved in our case vvhen a land that vvas solemnely devoted consecrated and given avvay to God by solemne vovves and Covenants and the same ovvned approved ratified and confirmed by publick acts edicts proclamations declarations lavves and statutes of plenary and even as to all formalities compleat Parliaments made up of all the Estates of the Realme and the King also is novv treacheroussly and iniquosly forced to depart from their former principles to abjure their former vovves and Covenants to change their God to condemne his vvork and by most abhominable and ever to be-abhorred acts and statutes sold and alienated unto a popish prelatical and malignant faction and designe under vvhich the faithful and true seekers of God's face have and can expect lesse liberty for their consciences then if the whole Kingdome vvere delivered up into the hands of the great Turk Thus vvee see these concessions help our cause vveaken the adversaryes not alittle let us novv proceed to speak to another particular vvhich vvill help us also 2. The authors of Lex Rax and of the Apologetical Relation have sufficiently proved that the late vvarre carryed on by the Parliament of Scotland against the King vvas lavvful both in poynt of lavv and conscience And if that vvas lavvfull as it vvas and shall be found to be vvhen he and all his complices have done their utmost vvith all their lying cavills false calumnies reproaches and vvhat not that Hell can hatch to disprove condemne the same a vvarre raised by the subjects in their owne sin-lesse self
they being properly exnatur a rei and ex institutione instituentium intentione ordained and appoynted for the greater faifty and good of the people And therefore if the Representatives betray their trust the People in so far are as if they had no Representatives and may no lesse defend themselves in extreame necessity then if the officers of their army whom they had chosen and appoynted to defend them against an invadeing enemy should revolt to the enemy they might lawfully rise up in their owne defence and oppse the adversary 7. The law sayeth that deterior conditio domini per procuratorem fieri non debet L. ignorantis ff de procuratoriburs The procurator or advocat his knavery cannot prejudge the Client or wronge his cause And why then shall the perfidy of the peoples Representatives or their betraying of their trust wronge their cause and prejudge them of their just right 8. All will grant That it is as lawful for an oppressed people to defend themselves from the injuryes of a Parliament as from the injuries of a Soveraigne if not more and if it be lawfull for a people to defende themselves against the Tyranny of a Parliament as is more then sufficiently proved by all such arguments as have hitherto by any been made use of to prove it lawful to resist a Soveraigne oppressing and tyrannizing no man of common sense will deny it lawful to a people to defend themselves against oppression and tyranny when they but want the concurrence or countenance of these Parliaments 9. If any should allaige that this is against the law of the constitution of the Kingdom We know no such law beside that though there were any such yet necessity knoweth no law and in cases of necessity such lawes are not to be observed sayeth the law L. ut gradatim § I. de muner honor The lavves of nature are irrevocable and cannot be rescinded by municipal lavves for the lavv tells us that civilis ratio jur◠natur alia corrumpere non pote st L. eas oblig D. de cap. privat Novv the lavv of nature allovving self defence against unjust violence addeth no such restriction viz. that it be done by the conduct and concurrence of the Primores or Parliaments 10. The very concessions of our adversaries fore-mentioned vvill confirme this consequence for in these cases they vvill grant the same liberty to a People vvithout as to a People vvith their Representatives to defend themselves for the vveight and ground is not laid upon the manner or vvay of conduct or managing of the resistence and defence but upon the cause and that is alvvayes the same Yea the necessity as was said is greater though it may be the difficulty is also greater when Representatives desert such as they do represente and instead of helping them with counsel and conduct in their necessity do either deserte them or turne enemies unto them Our 3 argument is taken from the law and light of nature which alloweth to beasts power and ability to defend them selves against violence An argument made use of not only by Lex Rex and the Apology but by Divines Canonists Lawyers and others who write of this subject The civil law it self tells us That his necessary defence of life floweth from the law of nature L. ut vim ff de just jure But here cometh out a green statist and takes on him to cry shame on all who ever wrote on that subject and avovves Pag. 15. That it is too grosse divinity to bring such an argument from beasts We must therefore see vvhether this Man be rational in rejecting such an argument taken from beasts and not rather more irrational then a Brute to deny that to a Rational creature vvhich he cannot but grant to Beasts and Creatures vvithout life as vve see he doth Pag. 14. 15. We shall readily grant vvith'him That God hath given this self defending or preserving povver and propension otherwayes to Men then to inanimate creatures or unto beasts which are under no law but that of meer nature and therefore they are not to defend themselves coeco impetu but rationally and ought to subordinate this natural propension to self defence unto and limite it by the higher lawes of reason and of God Doth he think that such as make use of this argument do suppose That in every case and in every manner of way men are to use and exercise this natural propension to self defence in vvhich and after vvhich Beasts are to use it Sure he is in a great mistake and he vvrongeth the authors of Lex Rex and of the Apolog. c. vvhen he sayeth Pag. 15. That they bring arguments from beasts who being under no law of reason nor grace to limite their propensions may alwayes in all imaginable cases defend themselves with force to perswade men that they may do the like and that their propension for their externall preservation is no more under any restraineing rule to stope the exercise of it then that of Beasts is For they intend no such thing nor are they in the least necessitated to use that argument so They only make use of it to disprove That irrational and more then brutish position and maxime of absolute unlimited and indispensible subjection of subjects to their Soveraigne so that in no case they may or can resist which all the Cabal and royal society of Royalists parasites court flatterers and cavalliers who because they themselves in hopes of some crumbs of allowance have brutishly without regaird had to the Law of God or right reason sold and devouted themselves not only in matters concerning their body but in soul matters unto the meer lust and pleasure of a creature of clay think all others should play the beasts with them do furiously obstinately maintaine And as to this the argument hence deduced is most rational and irrefragable for it is irrational to think That God who taketh much more care of man then of beasts 1 Cor. 9 9. Mat. 6 30. should allow and give unto the inanimate creatures and to the beasts a power and propension to defend themselves against violence and should deny the same to Man so that in no case he should be allowed to exerce that natural propension to defend himfelfe and to resist unjust violence with violence So then we might let his restrictions passe as being no thing to the present purpose for it is but his groundlesse imagination to think that we would equalize Men with Beasts because we will not with him and his party depresse them into a condition belovv beasts yet we shall shortly run over them His first is this when it is seen to be to no purpose by reason of a phisical force But alas doth he think this restriction of the natural propension for felfe preservation is upon men only not upon Beasts also did he not say in the same Page the Major vis and a greater phisical force would hinder
because he had forsaken the Lord God of his Fathers and the Edomites loved not the true Religion but the meritorious cause on Jehorams part is poynted at Answ The text it self and Commentators to vvhom vve may add Iackson on 2 King 8. the Dutch Annot Ibid. give this as the impulsive cause and only motive vvhich they had before their eyes 2. Any who read the text vvill see his reason very unsound for v. 8. it is said that in his dayes the Edomites revolted from under the dominion of Iudah and made themselves a King and no word of this as the impulsive cause there of v. 10. mention again is made of their revolt upon occasion of Iehorams seeking by force to reduce them under his dominion and then in a new period mention is made of Libnah's revolt with the cause and only motive thereof Because he had forsaken the Lord God of his Fathers Then he asks if his adversary thinks that the laying aside of the presbyterian frame is the forsaken of the Lord God of our Fathers and a sufficient cause for any one Towne in the Kingdom to revolt from the King though he do not persecute them nor force them to his way as there is no evidence that Libnah was so used shall a Kings swerving in that one point or if there be greater infidelity be sufficient ground of defection from him Ans I nothing doubt but all such as have imbraced this present course of apostasie are guilty of a grievous revolt having impudently and avowedly departed form a sworne Covenant from a covenanted sworne Religion reformed in Doctrine Worshipe Discipline Government and have in a great part forsaken the God of our Fathers that covenanted God whom our Fathers and we both owned and imbraced as our God and is sufficient cause for any City or Company of men so far to revolt from the King as to refuse to concurre with him in this horrible defection and course of perjury and resist his unjust violence pressing and compelling them to a sinful compliance 2. As it is more then probable that Libnah was no better used then were the people of Iudah by this Tyrannous King and is asserted by the Dutch Annot. on 2 Chron. 21 10. So whatever this lyer suggesteth it is notour that the King hath persecuted and doth persecute and force honest people to follow his way and apostatize with him contrare to their consciences and sworne allegiance unto God and if he add this clause as an exception then seing the truth of the thing is notour he fully accords that there is sufficient cause given for any Town in the Kingdome to revolt which is more then we desire At length he tells us That their revolt was sinfull But when not only thiâ— revolt is recorded as done but such and impulsive cause and motive is added by the Spirit of the Lord without the least hint of any expression condemning the same we dar not be so bold as is this Surveyer Nor are we so foolish as to receive his word contraire to the testimony of so many expositors Hence we have a strong argument For if it be lawful for a part of the people to revolt from a tyrannous Prince making defection from the true and received Religion and forceing his subjects to a sinful defection and complyance with him in his apostasy It must also be lawful for a part of the people to defend themselves by force against the Emissaries of a King departing from his faith and foresaking the Religion which He hath sworne to owne and maintaine sent forth by him or any under him to force by cruel oppression and violence them to a compliance with his sinful way And the antecedent is cleare in this place 3. They must much more condemne Azariah and the fourescore Priests who being commended as me of courage valour resisted Vziah the King 2 Chron. 26 17. c. they expelled him with force stood against him the lxx say they resisted him deturbarunt eum ex eo loco sayeth Vatablus they forced him forth and compelled him to goe out they caused him make haste sayeth Ar. Mont. festinate expulerunt eum sayeth Hieron When he went in the temple to burne incense upon the altaar of incense on some solemne day as Iosephus thinketh So that there is more then a resistance of him by words as some Royalists say even resistence by force and violence Hence we argue if private subjects may by force resist withstand and with violence hinder the King from transgressing the Law of God Then may they much more lawfully resist him and his bloody Emissaryes when He seeketh to oppresse unjustly and to draw people off from the wayes of the Lord. If any say with doct Ferne that because of an expresse Law of God being a leper he was put out of the congregation Then we see that the Prince is subject to Church-censure and so Subjects may judge him and punish him we see also that Princes were subject to ceremonial lawes as well as any of the subjects and why not also to the moral Lawes and if because of a ceremonial Law the King was to be ceremonially punished why also for the breach of moral Law may he not be punished morally Hence will it undoubtedly follow That a Prince rageing and tyrannizeing contrare to all equity and reason may be resisted and his violence repelled with violence even by private subjects Worthy Mr Knox in his debate with Lithengtoun doth form this instance gather That subjects not only may but also ought to withstand and resist their Princes whensoever they do any thing that expresly repugnes to God his Law or holy Ordinance Lithingtoun objected That they were not private subjects but the priests of the Lord and figures of Christ and such have we none this day to withstand Kings if they do any thing wrong He answered that though the High Priest was a figure of Christ yet he was a subject For said he I am assured that he in his Priesthood had no prerogative above these that passed before him now so it is that Aaron was subject to Moses and called him Lord Samuel being both prophet and Priest subjected himself unto Saul after he was inaugurated of the people Sadoc bowed before David c. And whereas you say we have no such Priests this day I might answere that neither have we such Kings this day as then were anoynted by Gods commandement and sate upon the seate of David and were no lesse the figures of Christ Iesus in their just administration then were the Priests in their appointed office and such Kings I am assured we have not now no more then we have such Priests for Christ Iesus being anoynted in our nature of God his Father both King Priest and Prophet hath put an end to all external unction and yet I think you will not say that God hath now diminished his graces from these whom he appoynts
done by the encouragement and assistance of the Spirit of God And if any should reject this instance as impertinent because they suppose Antiochus was not their lawful Supream Magistrate but only a Tyrant without title let them heare what Grotius de jure belli pacis lib. 1. c. 4. n. 7. sayeth to this Like unto this appeareth that deed of the Maccabees for whereas some think to defend these armes upon this gronnd that Antiochus was not King but an invader it seemeth foolish to me seing in all the history of the Maccabees and of such as took their part they never name Antiochus any thing else but their King and that not without ground for long before this the Iewes had acknowledged the authority of the Macedonians unto whose power and place Antiochus did succeed as to that that the law forbiddeth that any stranger should be set over them that is to be understood of a voluntary election and not of what the people might through necessity be forced to do And whereas others say that the Maccabees used only the right of the people cui 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 deberetur Neither is that solide for the jewes being at first overcome by Nebuchadnezar and subjected to him by the law of warre by the same law they did obey the Medes and Persians who succeeded unto the Caldeans and all this Impire came at length into the hands of the Macedonians hence it is that Tacitus reckoneth the jewes amongst basest of such as served these Assyrians Medes and Persians Nor did they require any thing by stipulation from Alexander and his successours but without any condition gave themselves up unto their power as formerly they had been under the command of Darius And if at any time the jewes were permitted to use their owne rites and lawes that was but a begged right which they had through the indulgence of the Kings but not through any imperial law So that there is nothing that can defend the Maccabees but most imminent and certane danger thus he 2. The constant practice of the Waldensian protestants in Piedmont doth shew that this late practice is not so strange uncouth as adversaryes would give it out to be for they never had a Representative to be a screen betwixt them and the tyranny of their princes and yet how oftintimes have they valiently with stood such as came to oppresse them in goods and lives though cloathed with commission from the princes In the yeer 1580. being persecuted by the Lord of Trinity and their popish Soveraignes they assembled solemnely together to consult how to prevent the imminent dangers and after prayer and calling upon God for his grace and spirit of counsel and direction they resolved to enter into a solemne mutual Covenant and to joyn in a League together for defence of Themselves and their Religion and so accordingly did assist one another in their defence which they did with good successe And that alwayes since whenever they were assaulted by the bloody Emissaries of the Duk of Savoy as any may see fully in their history So that whosoever will condemne the late defence must also condemne these poor oppressed protestants who have no other meane to keen them from utter extirpation but this innocent meane of felf defence and of repelling unjust violence with violence for Bonds Promises Covenants binde their Prince as such obligations use to binde some others viz. no longer then they see it for their advantage Neither have they any Representative Prince or Noble man among them to head their matters but meer necessity puts them to use the best expendient they can and forcibly to resist their oppressing Superiours when they send to spoile them of their goods lives and libertyes 3. Some particular cityes in Germany did defend themselves against the Emperour unjustly invadeing their libertyes and assaulting them as may be seen in the history of Germany particularly the Cities of Madenburgh and Breme 4 So in France the Cities of Montobane and Rochel and the Isle of Ree with stood the King when he was seeking to oppresse them And no man will condemne these for acts of rebellion and sedition unlesse they will also condemne our Kings who at least undertook and offered to help and assist them 5. It was this opposition and resistence of privat persons when tyrannized over by Superiours that hath brought the Cantons of Helvetia unto that state of freedome and liberty which they have enjoyed for many yeers and do enjoy this day being now a free Republick as Simlerus showeth in his history of that Republick 6. But that we may come home we finde some remarkeable instances of this nature which no man in reason who shall condemne this late defence shall be able to defend and to beginne with what may be most recent in our memories In the year 1648. There are two signal Instances The one was that violent resistence used against the Parliaments forces at Mauchlin moor Here was not only a resistence in defence of the truth and cause of God then sought to be borne downe and oppressed by a prevalent Malignant faction in Parliament without the concurrence of conduct of the Representatives of the land but directly against them Here was a defence used by way of resistence by meer privat persons without the company or concurrence of one Noble man And yet a resistence that never was condemned by any to this day expect ingrained Malignants but was approved and commended highly by the Parliament anno 1649. the best Parliaments Scotland did see for many yeers Againe thereafter in that same yeer 1648 The forces of the west Countrey arose in defence of the Cause and Covenant of God and that not only without the conduct of a Parliament but against their resolutions It is true there were some Nobles Parliament-men among them and countenancers of them but these acted not nor could act by vertue of any Parliamentary power but only as privat subjects having by reason of their greater interest in the land a greater obligation to lay out themselves and to improve their authority and influence in the countrey for the good thereof and for the cause of God They had it is true by their places and stations greater influence upon the Countrey and a greater backing and so being leading men were in a greater capacity to defend the oppressed truth but all this gave them no publick Magistratical power nor put them in the capacity of a real and formal Representative and yet all this was afterward approved ratified and confirmed by Parliament as good and necessary service to the countrey and to the cause of God A third notable instance is that Anno 1639. There was then no publicke civil judicatory carrying on that defence but Nobles and others each in their capacity and according to their power concurred for the promoveing of that necessary work of defence They did not acte under the notion of any such judicature nor
Nero because they wanted temporal strength But might not that excuse be good in itself though Bellarmine made use of it I suppose upon second search it will be found that they had not such a capacity as he it may be supposeth But of this afterward It brings to his minde also what Creswel the Jesuite said against the Edict of Q. Elizabeth But all this is nothing to the purpose for neither we nor Naphtaly joyne with the Iesuites whatever he say as to the deposeing and throwing downe of Princes and all Magistrates and punishing them by private hands But if he think this condition in private persons resisting of violence Iesuitical viz. if they be in a probable capacity to do it He must give us leave to say It is very rational and he is more then brutish to think otherwise For will he say that it is an indispensable duty for Ten private persones though they had their Magistrates with them to go and resist an army of Ten Thousand unlesse they have an extraordinary particular peremptory cal of God Sure then he but shewes his folly to carpe at such things as these let him read Luk. 14 31. Next let us see what he hath Pag. 84. 85. 86. Where he sayeth 1. That albeit it be God's holy will that in erections of civil government his Truth sincere worshipe and glory in these should be mainly minded and intended by men and it is mens duty so to do yet it is clear that in many places de facto it is not so although men in the general professe aiming at Truth and right worshipe yet there are aberrations in the particular Answ 1. This is very true and not only do we see that it is so de facto but also that where conscience hath been made of mindeing Gods truth sincere vvorshipe and glory and these so twisted in and interwoven with the constitution of the civil government that they became to the subject a piece of their National patrimony secured by all meanes imaginable not only these necessary things are not minded but they are sought to be overturned and destroyed 2. Since he grants that it is men's duty so to do how can he condemne what the honest Parliaments of Scotland did and what the king consented to and owned Was that any thing else but to establish and secure the reformed Religion in Doctrine worshipe discipline and government for the glory of God and the good of the nations Next he sayes Albeit there be in the poynt of truth and the worshipe of God anotable perversion and swerving that doth not at all invalidate the authority nor break the obligation thereunto although it be injurious to favourers of Truth and right Worshipe for although Religion be not minded as it ought to be God will not have the Commonwealths where justice between Man and Man is maintained for his glory casten loose nor have men think themselves loosed from obligation to the government for neither must they be heard who hold that civil dominion is founded on grace nor they who say That infidel heretical or excommunicate Magistrates fall from their power or that the subjects obligation to them ceaseth Answ 1. Yet vvhere the maintainance of Truth and of the right vvorshipe is a fundamental pillar of the constitution and a maine article of the compact betwixt Magistrates and subjects a failing here is a loosing of the government and of the Subjects obligation if not in vvhole yet in so far 2. A pleading for the observation of the compact and maintainance of the Truth and Worshipe of God conforme to sworne compacts is no breaking of the obligation but rather a way to have it strengthened and made more firme Much lesse can they be charged with this who plead only for a liberty of defence of the same Truth and Worshipe against manifest injuries contrary to Covenants vowes and compacts 3. Such as resist the unjust violence of Magistrates do not therby loose themselves from the obligation to government otherwise every woman who in defence of her chastity resisted the prince should die as a Traitor 4. We abhore both that opinion that dominion is founded on grace and that other of the Papists we stand upon other grounds as hath been and may yet be furder shewed The summe of what he says in the 4 place for what he hath said in the 3 place is but some concessions which are touched already is this That to reforme in a publick coactive way by the use of the vindicative and punitive sword belongeth alone to the Magistrate so that persones of meer private capacity cannot use that sword against all Magistrates and their fellow subjects to violent them in matters of Religion or which they account Religion and punish them for not being of their Religion Answ It is but his groundlesse calumny to say that Naphtaly sayes all this and so it is nothing to the question in hand which is concerning privat persons maintaineing their Religion and endeavouring to have corruptions removed which may wel be without the least incroachment upon the Magistrates and since he speakes not to this he either declares himself unable to confute what we say or he fowlely prevaricates to the palpable betraying of his owne cause or both Then he tells us further That the great mistake in all this matter is That we think the Magistrate People are as to their Covenant with God debtors bound in a band conjunctly and severally for one sum so that in the deficiency of the one the other must pay all and hath power to distresse the deficient whereas they binde but for their several moieties of a sum so that if the People reforme themselves and keep themselves pure from abhominations the Magistrates deficiency which they tolerat with grief shall not be imputed to them Because God giveth them not a calling to intrude into the Magistrates office there lyes no obligation on them to force the King or their fellow subjects to external meanes of Worship and Religion Answ This is the summe of what he spendeth many words about but it may be easily answered For 1. By this simile he will wronge the Magistrate for as the People may not presse the Magistrate to pay his moyety how may He presse the Subjects to pay their moyety 2. If the Magistrate break to God and will not pay his moyety of the summe he cannot presse the Subjects to break also and not to pay their part but whether he will or not they are bound to keep Covenant and if he force them his violence is unjust and illegall for no law can warrand People to break their Covenant with God and may lawfully be resisted and this is enough for us 3. A better lawyer then he Althusius pol. cap. 28. n. 18. tels us that in those Religious Covenants Magistrates and People are bound conjunctly and severally so that the whole summe may be required of either of the corrëi Ita sunt corrëi
ground sufficient for some actions whereto there is no extraordinary call Answ Though this be sufficiently answered before yet we say 1. That order is already ruined when the Magistrat destroyeth what he should preserve and so crosseth his commission and who teach that in such an extraordinary case when God's order is violated and broken and all in hazard to be overturned such things might be done which needed not to be done if God's order and appoyntment were observed do not take a way to ruine all order but rather to preserve that vvhich order it self is appoynted as a meane to preserve 2. We plead not for such formal imperate acts in matters of Religion as due to privat persones as we have said But for a povver according to the ability God puteth into their hands to hinder him from being dishonoured to defend their ovvne profession and Religion to hinder an universal apostasy and to endeavour in their capacities to have things righted vvhich are out of order And vvhen private persones are carrying themselves thus vve deny that they are runing out of their rank and calling nor can he prove it 3. Will he say that no actions can be sufficiently justified because done in extraordinary necessities and vvithout an extraordinary call Then he shall condemne the Covenants which David made vvith the men of Israel 2 Sam. 5. and vvhich Iehojadah made betwixt the King the People For he told us that both these vvere in extraordinary occasions and he cannot shovv us any extraordinary call He addeth If Magistrates be deficient privat persons are sufficiently discharged if they keep themselves pure and do vvhat possibly they can for advanceing Religion in their privat capacities and by their Elicite acts if a mans eyes be put out his eares or other senses will goe as far to supply that defect as may be yet cannot help the body by elicite acts of seeing So whatever length private persons may goe for the good of the body they must not goe to exercise and exert formally acts magistratical Answ All alongs we heare nothing but dictatings This and this he sayes and there is an end a noble patron of a desperat cause and worthy of a great hire But. 1. The question still abideth undiscussed how far privat persons capacity doth reach for that they must do more then keep themselves pure we have shevved 2. If they may do what possibly they can for advanceing Religion in their capacities they may do more then he will have them doing for then they may defend Religion with the sword and with violence hinder idolatry and superstition and what of that nature provocketh God to wrath All this and more is within their capacity and possibility as he would easily grant if the Magistrate vvould but countenance it yea and though he should oppose say vve But he will say these are not elicite acts And vvill he grant nothing else to privat subjects but elicit acts Then he vvill not grant them liberty to disput for Religion to exhort rebuke and admonish c. for these are not elicite acts more then disputing vvith the svvord and so vvith his Philosophick distinctions he vvould charme us into a perfect acquiescence vvith vvhat Religion the King vvill enjoyne 3. Eares and other senses never set up the eyes and gave them povver to see for their good But the People set up the Magistrates and may do when the Magistrate layeth downe his sword or avowedly betrayeth his trust what they might have done before they made choice of him 4. By this Simile it would follow that the People cannot only not do the Magistrate's Imperat acts but not so much as the Elicite acts which he may do vvhich is false 5. Though they cannot exert or exercise Formally acts Magistratical if they may do it Materially we seek no more In end he tell us That it is a dangerous and destructive tenent to be held forth to be beleeved by People That in all cases whether concerning Religion or Liberty when they account the Magistrate to pervert the government that they are Eatenus in so far even as if they had no King and that the royalty hath recurred to themselves and they may act and exercise it formally as if they had no King at all and this he tels us is the expresse doctrine of Lex Rex Pag. 99. 100. Novv that all may see vvhat a shamelesse and impudent man this is and how little reason any have to give him credite I shall recite the authors very words But because sayeth he the Estates never gave the King power to corrupt Religion and presse a false and I dolatrous worshipe upon them Therefore when the King defendeth not true Religion but presseth upon the People a false and Idolatrous Religion this is some other thing then when they account the Magistrate to pervert c. in that they are not under the King but are presumed to have no King eatenus so farre are presumed to have power in themselves as if they had not appoynted any King at all If an incorporation accused of Treason in danger of the sentence of death shall appoynt a lawyer to advocate their cause if he be stricken with dumbnesse because they have losed their legal and representative tongue none can say that this incorporation hath losed the tongues that nature hath given them so as by natures law they may not plead in their owne just and lawful defence as if they had never appoynted the foresaid lawyer to plead for them The King is made by God and the People King for the Church and People of God's sake that he may defend true Religion for the behove and salvation of all If then he defend not Religion NB in his publick and Royal way It is presumed as undenyable That the People of God who by the law of nature are to care for their owne soull are to defend NB in their way true Religion which so nearly concerneth them and their eternall happinesse Now let any judge if this be so dangerous and destructive a tenent As he would make his reader beleeve But it is easy for him who hath no shame to pervert sentences which he cannot confute and then call them dangerous and destructive and thus he will make the rabble of the degenerate clergy and other simple ones beleeve that he hath confuted Lex Rex And thus dealeth he with Naphtaly as we have shewed already Having thus considered all which the Surveyer hath here and there spoken against that which we have said let us now come to apply what hath been said unto our present purpose of vindicating the late act of defence which by what we have said we finde cannot be justly condemned as treasonable or rebellious but rather approved and commended as loyall service to God and the Countrey For 1. Thereby they were professing their constancy in adhereing to the reformation of Religion in doctrine worshipe Discipline and Government which was
consonant to the word of God and publickly received with all solemnities imaginable notwithstanding of acts and lawes made to the contrary and no true Christian will say That subjects should imbrace any Religion which Magistrates will countenance and prescribe be what it will or upon that account 2. As they were thereby declareing their soul abhorrence of these corruptions which were countenanced and authorized by sinful acts and statutes so they were defending to the utmost of their power the reformed Religion according to their Covenant and vow to God And that such a defence as this is lawful we have shewed 3. They were defending themselves against intolerable and manifestly unjust violence offered because of their adhereing to the cause of God and to the reformed Religion which King Parliament and all rankes of People in the land were solemnely sworne to owne and avow all the dayes of their lives really sincerely and constantly as they should answere to God in the great day no lesse then they 4. They were mindeing their Oath and Covenant made with God with hands lifted up with solemne attestations and protestations the Covenants which they did make and renew in the presence of Almighty God the Searcher of all hearts with a true intention to performe the same 5. They were endeavouring in their places and stations according to the latitude allowed in times of such necessitie and in matters of such weight and moment to have the Church and Kingdome purged of these abhominable and crying corruptions and grievous abhominations which provoke the Lord to wrath against the whole Church and Kingdome 6. They were defending the maine fundamental law and constitution of the Kingdome and that maine article of Agreement and Compact betwixt Soveraigne and Subject which all the members of the Nation were no Lesse bound unto then they 7. They were joyning together as detasteing that detestable indifferency and neutrality abjured to defend and assist one another in the same cause of maintaining their reformed Religion with their best counsel bodyes meanes and whole power against the old inveterate and Common enemie that malignant spirit and rage according to their Covenants 8. They were repenting of their National sin in complying by their sinful silence not giving open faithful and faire testimony when the Truth of God was openly and violently trode under foot with that dreadful course of backslideing which was violently carryed on They were calling for justice and valiently pleading for truth sinfully and tyrannically borne downe and oppressed They were with zeal and courage valiently interposeing labouring to put a stop to the begun and far-carryed-on defection when truth was failing and he who depairted from evil made himself a prey that God might pardon and look in mercy on the land They were endeavouring to stand in the gape and make up the hedge and pleading with their Mother Church or a malignant faction in her shamefully departing from God when there was no other way or meane to be followed or essaved When all these things are duely considered and laid together It will appeare to impartial and unbyassed persones That the late act which is so much condemned and cryed our against is not so hainous and unpardonable a crime as this Surveyer and his wicked party vvould give it out to be but vvas a noble and laudable interprize for the glory of God the good of Religion Church and Kingdome beside that it vvas a most necessary and unavoydable act of self defence Since the Scriptures formerly cited vvill allovv more unto private persons then vvhat this Surveyer restricketh them unto as vve have shevved in a time of defection Then vvhen there vvas no other vvay left to do these dutyes there required and vvhen vvith all several other things did call aloud to a mutual conjunction in armes for defence of one another and repelling of unjust violence and prosecuteing the holy and necessary ends of the Covenants vvhich they svvore no man in reason can suppose that such a vvork is repugnant to Scripture or right reason but rather most consonant to both And though many do and will condemne the same even as to this interprize of Reformation upon what grounds and motives themselves best know yet Our worthy and Noble Reformer famous Mr Knox if he were living this day would be far from speaking after the language of such For he in his appellation Pag. 22. c. hath these words The second is that the punishing of such crimes as are idolatry blasphemy others that touch the Majesty of God doth not Appertaine to the Kings and chief rulers only but also to the whole body of the People and to every member of the same according to the vocation of every man and according to that possibility and occasion which God doth minister to revenge the injury done against his glory when that impiety is manifestly knowne And that doth Moses plainly speak Deut. 13 v. 12 13 14 15 16. in these words if in any of the cities c. plaine it is that Moses speaketh not nor giveth charge to Kings Rulers and judges only but he commandeth the whole body of the People yea and every member of the same according to their possibility And who dar be so impudent as to deny this to be most reasonable and just for seing that God had delivered the whole body from bondage and to the whole multitude had given his law and to the twelve Tribes had he so distributed the inheritance of the land of Canaan that no family could complaine that it was neglected was not the People and every member addebted to acknowledge and confesse the benefites of God Yea had it not been the part of every man to have studyed to have keeped the possession which he had received Which thing God did plainly pronounce they should not do except that in their hearts they did sanctify the Lord God that they embraced and inviolably keeped his Religion established and finally except they did put away iniquity from amongst them declareing themselves earnest Enemies to these abhominations which God declared himself so vehemently to hate that first he commanded the whole inhabitants of that Countrey to be destroyed and all monuments of their idolatry to be broken downe But in such cases Gods will is that all creatures stoup cover their faces and desist from reasoning when commandement is given to execute his judgement Albeit I could adduce diverse causes of such severity yet will I search none other then the holy ghost hath assigned first that all Israel hearing of the judgement should feare to commit the like abhomination and secondly That the Lord might turne from the fury of his anger might be moved towards the People with inward affection be mercyful unto them multiply them according to his oath made unto their Fathers Which reasons as they are sufficient in God's children to correct the murmuring of grudging flesh so ought they to provoke every man as before
not only have brought wrath upon themselves but also upon all the People So the wickednesse of Hophny and Phinehas was part of the cause of that sad discomfiture that the People of Israel did meet with 1 Sam. 2 ver 12. comp with Cap. 3 ver 11. and with Cap. 4 ver 10 11. So Esai 43 ver 27 28. because the Teachers had transgressed against the Lord. Therefore was Iacob given to the curse and Israel to reproaches So Lam. 4 v. 13. among other provocations the sinnes of her Prophets are mentioned and the iniquities of her Priests So Micah 3 v. 11 12. Because the Heads did judge for reward and the Priests did teach for hire and the Prophets did divine for money Therefore Zion was to be plowed as a field and Ierusalem to become heaps and the mountaine of the house as the high places of the forest 2. That the sinnes of a few have procured judgments unto the whole multitude or put them in hazard thereof So Deut. 13 v. 12 17. the Apostate city would kindle the fiercenesse of God's anger against the whole People For it is said The Lord would not turne from the fiercenesse of his anger and shew them mercy and compassion and multiply them until it were destroyed and all that was within it So Num. 25. for the sinne of these who joyned with Baal peor the anger of the Lord was kindled against the whole congregation So when Moses was speaking unto the two Tribes and halfe Num. 32 14 15. he sayeth And behold yee are risen up in your Fathers stead to augment yet the fierce anger of the Lord toward Israel for if yee turne away from after him he will yet againe leave them in the wildernesse and yee shall destroy all this People So Ios 7 ver 5. for one Ahan's sin all Israel was troubled and Ios. 22 v. 17. 18. say the commissioners of the whole congregation unto the two Tribes and half And it will be seing ye-rebel to day against the Lord that to morrow he will be wroth with the whole congregation of Israel And it was this which moved all the Tribes to goe against Benjamin Iudg. 20 3. That the Subjects have suffered sad and dreadful judgments for the sinnes of their Rulers As Micah 3 9 10 11 12. formerly cited Abimelech's sin Gen. 20. was like to hazard himself and all his Kingdome ver 7 9. For Pharaoh's refusing to let Israel goe not only he and his Princes but his Subjects through all his coasts did smarte Exod. 6 and 7 8 and 9. and 10 Cap. Neh. 9 v. 10. So Saul's sin in seeking to destroy the Gibeonites brought on three yeers famine on the land in the dayes of David 2 Sam. 21 v. 1. So David's sin of numbering the people cost the lives of three score and Ten thousand 2 Sam. 24 v. 1 2 15. 1 Chron. 21 1 2 14. So the Lord threatned by the Prophet 1 King 14 ver 16. that for the sins of Ieroboam who did sin and who made Israel to sin he would give up Israel And for Ahab's sin of letting Benhadad goe the Man of God told Ahab 1 King 20 ver 42. Because thou hast let goe out of thy hand a man whom I appoynted to utter destruction therefore thy life shall goe for his life and thy People for his People So for Manasseh's sin Ier. 15 ver 4. The Lord sayes I will cause them to be removed into all King domes of the Earth because of Manasseh the son of Hezekiah King of Iudah for that which he did in Ierusaelem So it is also spoken 2 King 21 ver 11 12 13. Because Manasseh King of Iudah hath done these abhominations therefore thus sayeth the Lord God of Israel behold I am bringing such evil upon Ierusalem and Iudah that whosoever heareth of it both his eares shall tingle c. And notwithstanding of the reformation that was in the dayes of Iosiah Yet this judgement came to be accomplished and the Lord sent the bands of the Caldees and of the Syrians surely so it is said 2 King 24 v. 3 4. at the commandement of the Lord came this upon Iudah to remove them out of his sight for the sinnes of Manasseh according to all that he did and also for the innocent blood that he shed which the Lord would not pardon And 2 King 23 26. Though there was a great work of reformation done in the dayes of that non-such King v. 25 Iosiah yet it is sayd notwithstanding the Lord turned not from the fiercenesse of his great wrath wherewith his anger was kindled against Iudah because of all the provocations that Manasseh had provoked him with all Yea so did this sin of Manasseh provoke the Lord against the land that how beit Manasseh himself repented and found mercy 2 Chron. 33 v. 12. and questionlesse many of the People turned with him yet these same sinnes of Manasseh are mainly taken notice of as the procureing cause of that final stroke Out of these particulars these few things are very obvious to any 1. That People combined into a society have great cause not only to look to their owne carriage but also unto the carriage of others Since the carriage of others will bring them in hazard of God's judgments and hasten downe vengeance wrath from God on all sure they have need to look about them 2. Especially they have reason to take notice of the publick carriage and deportment of Princes and Pastors seing in a special manner those highten the wrath hasten the judgments of God as hath been shewed 3. If these sinnes in Princes Pastors and others were not committed those plagues and judgments which are threatned and at length executed upon that account would have been prevented 4. If People considering their hazard by reason of these publick transgressions had actively bestirred themselves interposed as that these iniquities had not been committed they had not smarted so for as they did not had they felt the weight of the hand of Gods anger as they were made to do 5. It was not enough for them to have keeped themselves free of these actual transgressions whereof others were really guilty for we finde some punished for that iniquity of others which could not be laid to their charge as actors 6. How ever such as were so punished were not free of inherent transgressions and other sinnes which deserved judgment at the hands of the Lord yet when the Spirit of the Lord is pleased to make no mention of these as the Procureing cause of these plagues but seemeth to lay the whole or maine stresse of the businesse upon that sin committed by others we must thinke that that hath had no small influence but rather a mine causality in the procureing of these plagues and it becometh us to be sober in inquireing after other causes hid from us and rest satisfied with what the Spirit of the Lord is pleased particularly and evidently to poynt
forth unto us and pitch upon as the peccant and procureing cause 7. Though we could not satisfy wrangling wits touching the equity of this which yet the common and ordinary practice of men forfaulting a whole posterity for one mans transgression will not suffer us to account insolent yet we ought to rest satisfyed with what is clearly and undenyably held forth in the word and beleeve that for these causes such and such plagues were inflicted upon distinct and different persones because the spirit of truth sayeth so 8. As all Scripture was given by the inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine for reproof for correction for instruction in righteousnesse that the Man of God may be perfect thorowly furnished unto all good works 2 Tim 3 v. 16 17. So these particular passages so particularly described are written for our learning Rom. 15 ver 4. and are out examples that we should not do as they did 1 Cor. 10 v. 6. and are written for our admonition 1 Cor. 10 ver 11. And therefore we must not look slightly upon them but ponder then narrowly as so many documents given us for our use and instruction and particularly that we may take warning to prevent such evils Now let us hear what the Surveyer sayeth Pag. 51. He layes downe two assertions 1. That no man is involved in divine judgments and punishments for the sinnes of others as the deserving cause of his punishment if he be no way accessory to these sinnes of others 2. That no private Subject is accessory to the sins of Rulers nor involved in the punishments of the same meerly upon the accouut of his tolerating the sinnes or not violent resisting the Magistrate in his sinful courses Answ Not to enlairge on these now because of what he is to say in explication of these we are then to speak I would only at present enquire 1. What accession had the army of Israel which was defate by the Men of Ai a stroke which made Iosua rent his cloaths and fall upon his face to the Earth until the even tyde he and the elders of Israel and put dust upon their heads unto the sin of Achan And why doth the Spirit of the Lord say Ios. 7 v. 1. That the Children of Israel had committed a trespasse in the accursedthing And againe ver 10 11 12. And the Lord said unto Iosua Get thee up wherefore lyest thou thus upon thy face Israel hath sinned and they have also transgressed my Covenant-for they have taken of the accursed thing-and they have put it even amongst their owne stuff Therefore the Children of Israel could not stand because they were accursed neither will I be with you any more except yee destroy the accursed from amongst you Though we can learne of no accession which they had unto this particular fact yet we see the whole body is punished as guilty and must be legally purified and sanctified and purged from that contagion 2. What accession had all these who suffered in these three yeers famine which was in David's dayes unto that bloody act of Saul and his house which was committed many yeers before thousands of these who suffered therefore knew the right hand from the left or were borne possibly 3. What accession had the children unborne to the third and fourth generation unto the sinnes of their forefathers and yet the holy Lord thinks good to visite their iniquities on them 4. What accession had the People unto David's sin of numbering the people doth not David himself say 2. Sam 24 ver 17. But these sheep what have they done But let us heare how he explaineth this A certane thing it is sayes he that God doth not properly punish any man but in reference to his owne personal sins as the deserving cause of the punishment albeit he may and often taketh occasion in his wise providence to punish men for their owne sinnes from the sinnes of others and in that only sense they may be said to be punished for the sins of others But every soul suffers for his owne sin Divine justice finding causes of punishment in every one that is punished either their personal accession to the sinnes of others which is their owne sin or else some other sinnes for which he may in justice inflict the punishment upon them albeit the impulsive cause or occasion rather for punishing in such a manner and time c be from the sinnes of others Ans 1. Though vve desire to be vvise unto sobriety in this matter and not to meddle vvith matters beyond our reach yet vve think it saifer to speak in the language of the Holy Ghost then in the vvords of this Surveyer vvho giveth us no Scripture for vvhat he sayes The expressions of Scripture hold forth some thing more then a meer occasion It semeth strange to say that Ahan's sin should have been only an occasion of that discomfiture when the Spirit of the Lord sayes that Israel had sinned and therefore could not stand before their Enemies because they were accursed and that till this accursed were taken from amongst them he would not be with them any more 2. He vvould do vvell to explaine to us vvhat he meaneth by a proper punishment and vvhat is the opposite tearme thereunto 3. We grant divine justice findeth deserving causes of punishment in all in whom is original sin but vve suppose that vvhen that is not mentioned as the procureing cause of such a stroke but the sin committed by another vve ought to look on that mainly as having a procureing causality in that affliction 4. How ever we see he granteth one may be punished for the sin of another or upon occasion of the sin of another as he loveth to speak to which he hath no personal accession 5. If these sinnes of others were only the occasion of punishing in such a manner or time how cometh it that the very punishment it self is removed upon the taking away of that sin according to God's appoyntment and God is pacified toward the whole as he was vvith Israel vvhen Ahan vvas killed and Seven of Saul's sones hanged up 6. But whether vve take these sinnes of others as impulsive causes or occasions of such punishments This is cleare That if these sinnes had been prevented these punishments had been prevented also so that if Saul had not gotten liberty to have staine the Gibeonites in his bloody rage contrare to oath and Covenant these three yeers famine had not come And if David had been hindered from numbering of the people and had not gotten his vvill these Seventy thousand had not died then as they did And seing no other cause or occasion is rendered of this it vvould clearly warne all in a Community and Society to labour by all meanes according to their power and places to hinder the Committing or removing when committed of these sinnes which bring heavy plagues on the Community The Dutch Aunot on 2 Sam. 21 1. say that
murther or to consent thereunto to bear hatred or to let innocent blood be shed if we may withstand it c. Citeing in the Margine Ezech. 22 1 2 3 4. c. where the bloody City is to be judged because she relieved not the oppressed out of the hand of bloody Princes v. 6. And to what Ambrose sayeth de office Lib. 1. c. 36. saying qui non repellit a socio injuriam si potest tam est in vitio quam ille qui facit i. e. he who doth not repel an injury from his brother when he may isas guilty as he who doth the injury And this he cleareth by Moses his deed defending the Hebrew against the Egyptian CAP XI Of our qualified alledgiance to the King Our Arguments hence THe author of Naphtaly Pag. 177 said That all powers are subordinate to the Most high and appoynted and limited by his holy will and commandement for his owne glory and the Peoples good and our allegiance was and standeth perpetually and expresly thus qualified viz. in defence of Religion and Liberty according to our first and second Covenants all allegiance obedience to any created power whatsoever though in the construction of charity apparently indefinite yet in its owne nature is indispensably thus restricted By which words any who will duely consider the scope which that author doth drive at will see That his meaning was That as obedience and allaigeance is to be given to Magistrates only in the Lord So the same ought to be promised with this qualification or limitation so far as it is not contrary to Religion and Liberty of the Subject thus we all swore to defend his Majesties person and authority in the preservation and defence of the true Religion and Libertyes of the Kingdomes and it is plaine to all who will not shut their eyes that the foresaid author putteth no corrupt glosse upon that necessary clause and qualification for while he is dissuadeing from taking of that bond which was urged upon the People of Edinburgh he useth the words cited furder addeth To renew the same or take any the like oath of allegiance purely and simply purposely omitting the former and due restriction especially when the powers are in most manifest notorious rebellion against the Lord opposition to his cause and Covenant is in effect equivalent to an expresse rejecting and disowning of the same limitation and of the Soveraigne prerogative of the Great God and King over all which is thereby reserved as much as in plaine tearmes to affirme That whatever abused authority shall command or do either as to the overturning of the work of God subverting of Religion destroying of Rights and Libertyes or persecuting of all the faithful to the utmost extremity we shall not only stupidly endure it but activly concurre with and assist in all this tyranny What could have been spoken either more full or plaine both for explicating the genuine import of that restriction or qualification or the authors Orthodox sense thereof Yet behold how this wrangling pamphleter because he can get nothing to say against the truth asserted must wrest words and sense and all that he may have something to say against the straw-adversary of his owne setting up Therefore he tells us Pag. 6. Can this assertion subsist that neither alledgiance or fidelity nor obedience is to be given to any created power but in defence of Religion and Liberty As if Naphtaly had meaned That no alledgiance fidelity or obedience was due or to be given to the created powers but when and in so far as they did actually owne and contribute their utmost for the promoving or establishing of Religion and the Liberties of the People Whileas his meaning is clearly seen to have been this That as all powers are subordinate unto God the great King over all So all alledgiance fidelity or obedience is to be promised and given unto them with a reserve of the allegiance fidelity and obedience due to God the Highest of all and that man's interest is not to be preferred unto God's but alwayes acknowledged in subordination thereunto So that when earthly powers are stated Enemies to Christ and his interest no absolute allegiance fidelity or obedience is to be promised But alwayes with this restriction or limitation Neither are the Subjects bound to concurre or assist them while in such a stated course of opposition to the King of King's and while actively endeavouring to destroy his great interest in the world But what sayes our Surveyer furder That obedience is not to be given unto any creature on earth against Religion or the revealed will of God shall be easily granted we ahhore the very thought of so doing Ans Though he abhore the very thought of so doing yet many will say that he hath not abhorred to do it It is against God's expresse and revealed will to commit perjury and renunce a Covenant sworne with hands lifted up to the most high God and yet he knowes who is guilty of this maketh the will of a creature the Law of the Conscience when the appendix is a full belly Againe sayes he it shall not be said that obedience is to be given to powers against the liberty competent to us as subjects and consistent with Soveraignity yet so that the measure of that liberty must not be made by every man's private will but by the declarature of the Parliament representative of the Subjects which best knowes what thereunto belongs Answ This royal liberal man would seem to yeeld something in favours of the liberty of the People but with his annexed clause and restrictions he takes all back again For 1. sayes he it must be consistent with Soveraignity and how wide a mouth this Soveraignity hath in his and his complices estimation many know and we have seem in part even so wide as that is shall swallow up all the Peoples liberties like one of Pharaohs leane kine that eates up the fat and yet is never the fatter Then 2. it must be determined by the Representatives as if the Representatives were not ex officio bound and obliged to maintaine the Liberties of the People which belong to the People ere the Representatives have a being and as if it were in the power of the Representatives to sell and betray the Libertyes of the People or as if no more were competent to the Subjects de jure then what they will Hath a man no more right to his lands aud heritages then what his advocate who betrayeth his trust for a larger summe of money alloweth him or declareth We know Parliaments can basely betray their trust and sell away the Libertyes of a People contrare to their vow and oath to God and their obligation to the People whose trustees they should be and shall People have no more liberty competent to them then what a perfidious company conspired against the good of the Commonwealth to pleasure a sinful Creature determineth
7. Mat. 10 ver 40. as if God were doing personally these acts that the King is doing and it importeth as much as the King of Kings doth these acts in and through the Tyrant Now it is blasphemy to think or say That when a Kings is drinking the blood of innocents and vvasting the Church of God That God if he vvere personally present vvould commit the same acts of Tyranny God avert such blasphemy and that God in and through the King his lavvsul deputy and vicegerent in these acts of Tyranny is wasting the poor Church of God If it be said in these sinfull acts of tyranny he is not God's formal vicegerent but only in good and lawful acts of Government yet he is not to be resisted in these acts not because the acts are just and good but because of the dignity of his royal persone Yet this must prove that these who resist the King in these acts of Tyranny must resist no ordinance of God but only that we resist him who is the Lord's deputy What absurdity is there in that more then to disobey him refuseing active obedience to him who is the Lord's deputy but not as the Lord's deputy but as a man commanding beside his Master's warrand 5. Pag. 263. That which is inconsistent with the care and providence of God in giving a King to his Church is not to be taught Now God's end in giving a King to his Church is the feeding saifty preservation the peacable and quyet life of his Church 1 Tim. 2 2. Esai 49 ver 23. Psal 79 7. But God should crosse his owne end in the same act of giving a King if he should provide a King who by office were to suppresse Robbers Murtherers and all oppressours and wasters in his holy mount and yet should give an irresistible power to one crowned Lyon a King who may kill a Thousand Thousand protestants for their religion in an ordinary providence and they are by an ordinary law of God to give their throats to his Emissaries and bloody executioners If any say the King will not be so cruel I beleeve it because actu secundo it is not possible in his power to be so cruel we owe thanks to his good will that he killeth not so many but no thanks to the genuine intrinsecal end of a King who hath power from God to kill all these and that without resistence made by any Mortal man Yea no thanks God avert blasphemy to God's ordinary providence which if Royalists may be beleeved putteth no bar upon the illimited power of a Man inclined to sin and abuse his power to so much cruelty Some may say the same absurdity doth follow if the King should turne papist and the Parliament and all were papists in that case there might be so many Martyres for the truth put to death and God should put no bar of providence upon this power more then now and yet in that case King and Parliament should be judges given of God actu primo and by vertue of their office obliged to preserve the people in peace and godlinesse But I answere If God gave a lawful official power to King and Parliament to work the same cruelty upon Millions of Martyrs and it should be unlawful for them to defend themselves I should then think that King Parliament were both ex officio and actu primo judges and Fathers and also by that same office Murtherers and butchers which were a grievous aspersion to the unspotted providence of God 6. Pag. 331. Particular nature yeelds to the good of universal nature for which cause heavy bodyes ascend aëry and light bodyes descend If then a wild bull or a goaring Oxe may not be let loose in a great market confluence of people and if any man turne so distracted as he smite himself with stones and kill all that passe by him or come at him in that case the man is to be bound and his hands fettered and all whom he invadeth may resist him were they his owne sones and may save their owne lives with weapons Much more a King turning a Nero King Saul vexed with an evil spirit from the Lord may be resisted and far more if a King endued with use of reason shall put violent hands on all his subjects kill his sone and heire yea any violently invaded by natures law may defend themselves the violent restraining of such an one is but the hurting of one Man who cannot be virtually the Commonwealth but his destroying of the community of men sent out in warres as his bloody Emissaries to the dissolution of the Commonwealth 7. Pag. 335. By the law of Nature a Ruler is appoynted to defend the innocent Now by Nature an infant in the womb defendeth it self first before the parents can defend it Then when parents and Magistrates are not and violent invading Magistrates are not in that Magistrates Nature hath commended every man to self defence 8. Ibid The law of nature excepteth no violence whether inflicted by a Magistrate or any other unjust violence from a Ruler is thrice injustice 1. He doth injustice as a man 2. As a member of the Commonwealth 3. He committeth a special kinde of sin of injustice against his office But it is absured to say we may lawfully defend our selves from smaller injuries by the law of Nature and not from greater c. These and many moe to this purpose may be seen in that unansvverable piece But I proceed to adde some mo◠here 9. If it be lawful for the people to rise in armes to defend themselves their Wives and Children their Religion from an invadeing army of cut throat Papists Turks or Tartars though the Magistrates Superiour and inferiour should either through absence or some other physical impediment not be in a present capacity to give an expresse warrand or command or through wickednesse for their owne privat ends should refuse to concurre and should discharge the people to rise in armes Then it cannot be unlawful to rise in armes and defend their owne Lives and the lives of their Posterity and their Religion when Magistrates who are appoynted of God to defend turn enemies themselves and oppresse plunder and abuse the innocent and overturne Religion presse people to a sinful compliance there with But the former is true Therefore c. The assumption is cleare Because all the power of Magistrates which they have of God is cumulative and not privative and destructive it is a power to promove the good of the Realme and not a power to destroy the same whether by acting and going beyond their power or by refuseing to act and betraying their trust 2. No power given to Magistrates can take away Natures birth right or that innate power of self defence 3. It can fare no worse with people in this case then if they had no Magistrates at all but if they had no Magistrates at all they might lawfully see to their owne self
Prophets and of Christ and his Apostles do not condemne it as simply sinful And that by this argument of his it should be utterly unlawful now for Frame and Holland and other adjacent Countreyes to joyne together in one and proclame King Charles their Soveraigne Lord and King because neither Prophets nor Apostles taught any such doctrine that many several societies should joyne together under one head And who is a friend to the Kings greatnesse now If this man be worthy of his wages let all the World judge Moreover they would tell him that in the dayes of some of the Prophets there was a greater dissipation and secession then any that is now desired when the Ten tribes separated themselves from the other two in the dayes of Rehoboam and erected themselves in a distinct Republick under a distinct Supreame Magistrate and we finde not this reproved by any of the prophets yea we finde a Prophet sent to tell Ieroboam that God would give him Ten Tribes 1. King 11 ver 21. c. and when Rehoboam would goe and reduce them under his subjection by the power of the sword we finde another Prophet sent to disswade him in the Name of the Lord 1 King 12 ver 22 c. and saying that that was from the Lord. And sure this positive is as forcible as his negative And furder even in the dayes of the primitive Christians the Roman Empire was divided and how it is now subdivided and re-subdivided into many fractions we all know and can he shew us where any of the godly zealous Christians and servants of God spoke against this as a seditious practice But is may be that he vvill prove this assertion though not dissonant to Religion yet dissonant to sound reason Let us hear hovv he doth it For sayes he Pag. 5. it hath a clear tendency to break in pieces all humane societyes which no wit of man can preserve from dissolution if this principle be drunk in For by this Man's opinion the judgement of the pervesion of the ends of government is put over to the discretion of the sufferers of prejudice and they are accordingly to determine their actions and nothing should hinder them but want of probable capacity to through their work But poor Man as he hath made shipevvrack of faith and of a good conscience so hath he made shipvvrack of his reason also for his adversary vvould novv think the cause vvon For grant once that a secession and separation may be made vvhen the ends of government are manifestly perverted and they vvill seek no more for they vvill readily grant it ought not to be vvhen there is no just cause suppose that a great part should in their discretion judge there were real cause And where is he now Where is the position that is so dissonent to Religion and Reason Will he also owne it Did Naphtaly say that when ever a few of a society thought in their judgement of discretion that the ends of government were perverted they were replased into their primaeve state of liberty and free to make separations from the old society and associate into new combinations And since he did not say so how can this advocate make his position appeare dissonant either to Religion or Reason But the man let him be never so well hired is obliged to reason no better then he can Let him grant and he cannot well deny it that it is lawful for a great society to divide into two or moe lesser when the ends of government are really and manifestly perverted in that greater society so united and his adversaries will soon satisfy him if he be rational or a man fit for society who will be ruled with reason concerning the judgement of that perversion He but exposeth himself to pity when he cryeth out taking also God's name in vaine To what times are we reserved wherein the unmeasureable and aciousnesse of Men dar present such poyson to a Christian People and to attempt the breaking them in pieces by such doctrines which both Religion and sound Reason abhorres For no body hath either seen Religion nor found Reason alleged against that position which he sayeth Naphtaly setteth down But we will see more of this vaine Man's ridiculous ranting in the following words Dar this libeller so speaketh this non-sensical railer say that this is a fundamental constitution of political societies that at the arbitrement and lust of any minor part of private persons pretending a perversion of the ends of government a pretence that will never be wanting to Malecontents and Malapert wicked ones Even Katherines and highlandish theevs and it is real to them if they themselves be admitted judges they may make secession from the society in which they are imbodied and renunce their obligation to the government thereof Now he soares high in his scurril rhetorik and as ornaments of his discourse he must bring in his Katherines and Highlandish theeves but to what purpose is all this superfluity of vaine empty words Where or when said Naphtaly That that was the fundamental Constitution of politick societies What rational Man ever said so Is this the only thing which he denyeth Sure he is an ill maintainer of the union of his Majesties dominion for his adversaries will grant all this and yet say and be able to maintaine for any thing that he hath said that when the Ends of government are maniâ—estly and notoriously perverted people relapseing into their primaeve liberty and privilege may according as the exigent of their case requireth associate into new societies for their defence and preservation But he addeth pag. 6. Suppose there be a breaking off upon that pretension which will never be wanting to cover sedition and confusion of perversion of the ends of government the party making secession may haply meet with the same measure they gave for if a minor party arise among them with the same accusations must they not have the same privilege And where shall there be a stand His adversaries would soon reply that whatever be in that absurdity it doth not concerne them for they plead not for a dissolution upon a meer pretension of this perversion And beside they plead not for it even where there is a real and not our perversion as a thing necessary which they must goe about never once consulting whether it be expedient or inexpedient and whether they see a more feazable way of attaineing the ends of government without such perversion after the separation is made them before or not But only as a thing lawful which may be done when they see it most convenient for the ends of government And when they walk by this rule and principle they will soon see where to make a stand For they will finde that the crumbling of Societies into too many and too small bodyes would put them as far from attaineing the ends of governments as they were while associated in a greater body And this is
so must be a precedent example for judges and Magistrates in all time coming and by this example any member of the Council might lawfully rise up and execute judgment on this wicked wreatch and his cursed fraternity who have brought by their apostasy and defection from the Covenant and cause of God the wrath and curse of God upon the land 2. That Phineas was the High Priest's sone we know and that he was afterward High priest himself is truth but that he was at this time a publick Magistrate or a member of the great Sanhedrin we see not It is true there were some Princes of the tribes men of renowne Numb 1. ver 16. but he is not mentioned among those neither were these the great Sanhedrin So these princes of the assembly Numb 16 2. were not the Sanhedrin which did consist but of 70 Members Numb 11. Nor was Phineas one of them And that congregation of the children of Israel mentioned Numb 25 6. amongst whom Phineas was ver 7. was not the Sanhedrin which we never finde as I remember so called but the whole body of the People who were then mourning partly for the sin commited and partly for the execution when the heads of the People vvere hanged up and a thousand moe killed by the judges at Moses his command for Paul 1 Cor. 10 ver 8. sayes there died of the plague tvventy three thousand and here vve finde there fell in all tvventy foure thousand Againe it is remarkable that this single act of Phineas in killing two persons is so much rewarded and taken notice of by the Lord yea more then the many who were killed by the judges ver 5. So that it seemes he was no publick Magistrate and that he did it with the approbation of Moses is probable but that Moses did command him we see not only we finde that the Zeal of God moved him and therefore is he highly rewarded though he was but the son of Eleazar the son of Aaron Yea that which the Surveryer citeth out of Deodat rather confirmeth this for Deodat calleth it an act of extraordinary zeal motion of God's Spirit and he addeth that Moses the Supreme Magisstrate did approve it but what needed this if he had been a Magistrate seing there was a command given to the Magistrates ver 5. and a command is more then an approbation Aquinas and Gerhard call him it is true a judge but we see no proof unlesse they could evince that he was a member of the Sanhedrin of which Gillespy speaks in his Aarons rod. lib. I. c. I. The Dutch Annotat. on Psal 106 31. Suppose him to have been no Magistrate but say that this fact was beside his ordinary calling His 2. answere is Pag. III. That suppose he had been a meer private person yet it could prove nothing because he did it with the approbation and good liking of Moses and so he is but the executor of that unanimous sentence Answ But not only is this not written but the scripture giveth another ground of his fact then any warrand or command of Moses And so his answere in rebus facti a non scripto ad non factum non valet consequentia is not to the purpose Now I say the scripture giveth another ground viz. his zeal for his God which is not spoken of the other judges who ver 5. were commanded of Moses to execute judgment yea that word Psal 106 30. then stood up Phineas and executed judgment clearely hinteth at more then his being a meer satelles Magistratus and the ample reward which was given him and the Lord 's counting it to him for righteousnesse speak some other thing then that he had a call of the Magistrate and was his executioner In the 3 place he sayes The cases are different for then was horrible idolatry and villanous whordome committed avowedly and with a high hand in the sight of the Sun and in way of open doing despite to God but it is not so now Answ Prudence might have taught him to have concealed this for it were easy to draw such a parallel as would make him afrayed if any did intend to follow that example For I am sure what ever he account of the present apostasy and how ever he mince it as no doubt zimri would have minced his uncleannesse when he justified the fact before the Council as he told us Iosephus said yet the apostasy and perjury is open avowed abhominable and villanous committed in the sight of the Sun in despite of God and maintained as right and lawful howbeit it be such as the very heavens may be astonished at For such open avovved malapert vvickednesse defection and perjury all things considered vvas never heard of in any generation Hovv our reformation aud confession of faith is maintained vve have heard and albeit he make all the change to be only a change of the exterior forme of Church government yet when he is before his judge he shall finde in the cup of this iniquity manifest avowed perjury overturning of the work of God destroying of the interest of Christ blasphemy near unto that unpardonable sin if not the very same in fathering the works of the right hand of the Most high on Satan open and avowed persecution of godlinesse opening of a gap to all licentiousnesse horrid iniquity increase of idolatry villanous and avowed whordome Sodomy atheisme and devilry and more wickednesse then tongue can tell or pen can paint out but is on clear record before the Lord. 4. Sayes he Let it be so that he was a meer private man and had no warrand from the Supreame Magistrate to do what he did his fact cannot warrand Men to attempt the doing of such acts unlesse they can shew as good warr and and approbation from God as he could Answ That he had God's warrand and approbation vve do not doubt but that it was such an approbation as was peculiar to extraordinary un-imitable acts is the thing in question we grant with him That God is the Lord of all Magistrates and of all men's lives can when it pleaseth him crosse ordinary rules and apppoynt some to execute his judgments extraordinariely but the question is whether every thing which the Surv. accounteth extraordinary is so indeed He may sayes he send Moses to kill the Egyptian Eglon to kill Ehud he should say Ehud to kill Eglon Elias to destroy companyes of men with fire from heaven or to kill Baal's Priests He may command Abraham to kill his sone Isaac he may excite David to a bloody duëel Sampson to murther himself Ans Will the Surveyer account these instances alike extraordinary and unimitable Sure Royalists will think that Ehud's killing of Eglon may warrand any private person now to kill a tyrant without title But I lay more weight upon Iohn Knox his distinction in this matter in his debate with Lithingtoun hist. of reformation Pag. 390. edit in fol. And as touching sayes Mr.
was their want of an institution of Christ that made all with the irrefragability of reason reject them as no officers of Christ And we shall willingly conclude this with his words following Who can think that a Christian People will not readyly follow the footsteps of the flock in former generations Provideing he will suffer us to adde this In so far and so long as they walked after their master Christ and followed his institutions 6. Then Pag. 8. He sayes it is not His intention Either to provock any fearers of God who have been perhaps in an houre of tentation miscarryed to irregular courses following too readyly in the simplicity of their hearts cunning leaders who have had too much dominion over their faith these we judge worthy of greatest tendernesse in dealing with them But who are those Sure by the carriage of the present powers enraged and animated by the perfidious Prelates we heare of none who meet with any tendernesse though he judge them worthy of greatnest tendernesse And what are these irregular courses Is it an irregular course to refuse to run with this perjured Prelate his fraternity to the same excesse of apostasy and as far from their sworne allegiance to God as his debauched conscience hath carryed him What was the tentation which made them stand fast He knowes better what tentations and whether they lasted for a day or for an houre they were which drew him off sure they had none such to move them to stand fast but the fear of God which he stoke off made them mindeful of their Covenants What are these cunning leaders which he sayes had dominion over their faith They follow no leader but their Master Christ But because he hath hung his faith at the King's girdle and hath no other principles to walk by he supposes all others to be of his stamp and must needs hang on some body But he will finde them to be persons of conscience and not so ready to follow any man in the simplicity of their hearts as he suppoâ—eth Then being in a good mood he lets out a flash of hope saying Nor are we without hope that God who stills the noise of the seas c. Psal 65 ver 7. will in time allay their animosities and rebuke the stormy winde and seas of their passions that they may be still and that he will bring them to consider their wayes wherein they have exceeded and give them to know how ill and bitter a thing it is to forsake their owne mercies in the ordinances of God for the want or having of this or that forme of external government Now we see that the tender mercyes of the wicked are cruel when we see the tendency of the best of the wishes and hopes of this Man when he is in his best mood But we are confident his hopes shall perish as doth the hope of the Hypocrite because it is not bottomed on faith and he hath no ground to beleeve that such as have hitherto keept themselves pure shall at length turne in with them to the swineish pudle We beleeve That that God who stills the noise of the seas the noise of the waves and the tumult of the People shall in due time make this true of them when he shall shew himself the hearer of prayers and when he shall have purged away our transgressions and shall satisfy us with the goodnesse of his house and even of his holy temple and so prove himself to be the God of our Salvation Psal 65 ver 2 3 4 5. We hope also he shall bring us to consider these wayes wherein indeed we have exceeded and make us know hovv ill and bitter a thing it is to forsake our owne Mercyes in not adhereing to all the ordinances of God so faithfully as vve vovved in our Covenants to do even to that external forme of government vvhich Christ hath instituted and hath so signally ovvned as his ordinance by his rich blessing follovving thereupon amongst us vvhatever this indifferent-laodicean-latitudinarian think of the matter 7. To vvhom then vvould this Man reach a blovv These we aime at sayes he in this parallel with Anabaptists are the Naphtalian party i e the furious sort of these who under the conduct of this teacher and his like make sport of rebellions murthers assassinations Novv the man is in his element dipping his pen in gall and spevving out the venome of his heart against the zealous maintainers of the interests of Christ therefore his tongue is ready to utter his mischievous calumnies and his anile rhetorick flovveth over all its banks for sayes he they are a furâ—ous sort that make sport of rebellions murders assassinations vve knovv what this aimes at but he might say vvoe to ill company that they have hardned and harnessed their heart O rare thetorick as appears by their writtings and deeds that they have become stout in a dedâ—lent greedinesse O soaring elequence to commit any wickednesse which they account meet to serve their designe as if their supposed good cause could legitimate the worst course all which he must confirme with lies and say who make no reckoning as their Doctor here professeth of overturning thrones of making the land drunk with the blood of the inhabitants multiplying fatherlesse and widowes in the midst thereof and introduceing greatest confusion and calamites because forsooth they would have the order which Christ hath established in his Church introduced and Antichristian confusion with all the calamities that attend it and support it ejected and extirpated that may make all faces gather blacknesse and all to smite on the thigh crying alas for the day No he needs not feare that any face should gather blacknesse or that any should have cause to cry alas for the day but the cursed crue of apostat perjured prelats with their underlings supporters and adherents Then he proceeds like himself If so be sayes he they may upon the ruins of all erect the idol of pretended parity of Ministers which when they have set up the imperious agitators will as they have done formerly baffle if any offer be to level them to other and howsoever the weaker brethren must be Enterteaned with faire words and noddified with notional disputs anent their parity with the best that they may think themselves some what Yet how disdainfully was it and yet would be taken if these low shrubs should assay a practicall parity with the tall cedars in the governement of affaires We see at what this wormwood man aimeth It is a wonder what peace he hath now seing he looketh on himself as Lord prelate as well as the best that he is not advanced to be a member of Councel and Lord of the Session with others It seemeth he is content now to be noddified with a notional disput anent his parity seing he hath gotten the fat portion he gaped for the only desireable thing viz. his bishoprick Be like the thing that moveth his splene now