David no Christian who was a Man after God's own Heart Neither can I believe with him that the Apostle's Exhortation Phil. 4. Whatsoever things are True Honest Just Pure Lovely of Good Report if there be any Praise think on these things is no Part of Christianity or that a Man may be a Saint and not a Christian or that a Child of God is not a Good Christian or that James was mistaken who said That the Pure and Vndefiled Religion was to keep our selves unspotted of the World which strange kind of Consequences unavoidably follow from J. Faldo's Assertion and Definition For our Parts As we think it no Wrong to Christianity so no Discredit to our Cause that it should be reported that we believe the Word nigh in the Heart the Apostle Paul calls the Word of Faith and Reconciliation to have been preached by Moses that Chist the Promised Seed bruised the Serpent's Head as well before as at and since his Visible Appearance That Enoch when he walked with God walked in the Light in which he felt the Blood of Christ cleansing from all Sin That the Spirit of God strove with Men as well before Christ's Coming as since and that some were led by it before as well as since and therefore Children of God and if Children then Heirs Heirs of God and Joynt-Heirs with Christ Not that we deny a Preheminence to Christ's Visible Coming â—nd the greater Benefits that came into the World thereby we would not be thought so to mean at no hand only this that something of that Divine Life Power Wisdom and Righteousness that then so super-excellently appeared and broak forth was revealed in all former Ages as Mankind was in a Capacity to receive it wherefore the Difference lay in the Manifestations of the One Thing necessary and not in several things So that the Law is as it were the Gospel begun and the Gospel the Law finished or as Augustine expresses it Lex est Evangelium absconditum et Evangelium est lex revelata The Law is the Gospel obscured the Gospel the Law revealed That is suited to the Capacity of Ages But J. Faldo is Angry that in my Recital of these words out of his former Discourse But the Thing Christianity might well be before the Name Christian that I left out these following words so short a space Saying I am a Man of a seared Conscience and that it is pitty any Reader should be so tame to be thus imposed on Rejoyn I know not what he means by these last words unless he would have every Man that reads me beat me I have alwayes thought it becoming a Minister of the Gospel to make People Tame and not Wild Sufferers not Hectors but such Expressions very well suit with John Faldo's Religion For my Conscience it is not so seared but I can feel and resent John Faldo's Injustice God knows I left out no words designedly nor could the Insertion of them have disappointed me For if the Thing Christianity may be before the Name a Day then a Year and so an Age till we shall come to the first Man that ever God saved All Men must be saved by either Law or Gospel Now the Law strictly considered could never save it gives Life to none So imports the Scripture and so asserts B. Vsher B. Sanderson Allen and others then it must have been by the Gospel which is by the Apostle called the Power of God unto Salvation and if all Men that were ever saved were saved by the Gospel then True Christians unless Men may believe the Gospel be saved by the Life and Power of it and yet be no Christians that is not the Men the term Christians given first at Antioch doth fignifie I shall offer this short Argument to the Reader 's consideration If He that is born again be a Christian and such as enter into the Kingdom of God be born again then because Abraham Isaac Jacob Samuel David c. entered into God's Kingdom it follows that they were born again and consequently Christians How pernicious is that Principle which denyes the New Birth to be so much as any part of Christianity when indeed the greatest as Christ's own Saying proves The Truth of the Matter is The very Life Power and Spirit of the Gospel or Christianity which to other exteriour Performances is as the Soul to the Body John Faldo would fain exclude from any Share in Christianity and for our preferring and pressing That as the most important Matter he over-runs us with all the Vilifying Scornful Epithetes a Lucian could bestow upon a Christian Indeed his Frothiness is such that were it not for their sakes who may yet be ensnared by his Adventrous and Imperious Assertions and Reflections I should not think his Vindication worth one Minute of my Time But he proceeds Rep. I undertook to prove Quakerism No Christianity from the confessed Newness of it by their own Party Penn tells us p. 21. the first Letters of the Names of some the bare Names of others whose words I quoted but dare not transscribe their words being so fair to my Purpose only a part of Penington's who saith of the Quakers Dispensation that it swallowed up that of Christ and the Apostles which Penn would take off by telling me I have no Candor in so Construing the words as if Penington who was a Schollar could not express his Mind congruously but must have Penn to be his Interpreter Rejoyn Now what any can make of this Cloudy Paragraph that has not read our former Books indeed of the greatest part of his Vindication if then I know not but sure I am he ignorantly or willingly puts the Lye upon himself and greatly berayes his own Weakness Is this your Combatant you that blow him with Pride and Rage that he may only have Wind to Crack out against the Quakers What Reply is this wretched disingenuous Section to my Answer If I quoted not E. Burroughs's and J. Whitehead's words at length and but a few they were I quoted that for which the rest left out were quoted He would fix the beginning of Quakerism about the Year 1651. this was the Drift of his Quotations from whence he concluded Quakerism No Christianity Hear my Answer and by that it will appear how suitable or sufficient his Reply is Well But when came this Quakerism into the World He tells us about the year 1651. quoting E. B's Epistle before G. F's Great Mystery also a small Treatise writ by John Whitehead Isaac Penington from whence he infers that Quakerism is a late Dispensation therefore not that of Christianity But certainly this Man hath taken a very Quick Course to Vnchristian himself and all the Presbyterians Independents and Anabaptists in the World as well as the Quakers For I would ask him if there was not a Time since the Primitive Age wherein Darkness hath overspread the Earth the Beast did Reign and the pure Religion was
went too far In his second he has done little else What shall we say of those whose Pride has brought them to such a pitch of Passion that Rage must follow Reproof and Revenge a Confutation Without out breaking one part of the Law of Modesty I may say for I know he is irrecoverably gone in my Answer Not one Charge can he prove nor one Friend of ours can he make to speak to his Purpose He was for having us to assassinate our selves our Friends he would fain have to turn Executioners to their own Principles This Fool 's Paradise pleased him but the Discreet know and think better Some were startled at the Pretences of the first wherein nothing less then our own Books wâ—â—e to bear Witness against us who are now great Abominators of his Injustice and Railing Blessed be God for that Good Success we hope the like of our following Endeavours I have for the sake of such as expect an Answer sent forth this Rejoynder wherein several weighty Points are as clearly handled as Time Place and other Occasions would permit It greatly concerns all to be fully satisfied therein And I hope there is enough said for all Impartial Readers to reap that Benefit I seek no Revenge I aim not at Reputation God is Record neither has he done enough to raise up the One or question the Other yet he has done doubtless what he could and I must take the Will for the Deed. I shall not show my self so Personally concerned in this Rejoynder as his Personal Reflections would make me 't is below the Spirit of a Christian Man to be disturbed by such Barks of Malice Curs yelping at the Moon neither questions nor ecclipses her Light 'T is a sort of Suffering I must expect to undergo and the best is I find little Difficulty in it And though I shall not cite all his Injustice towards me for that were well nigh to transcribe his Book yet that which may be requisite to give a further Relish of this pretended Christian may be done in its proper place In the mean time I shall betake my self to the Consideration of such Passages in his Reply as may be thought to call for my Rejoynder and that without those insolent Checks frequent Abuses and very vain and gingling Taunts he has cramb'd his Pamphlet with For I can suffer that my self I cannot let the Truth suffer Nor can I think my Silence to his Revilings the worst Answer especially when my Religion will not allow of a like Return in Vindication For though Scoffs and Abusive Reflections may discredit an Adversary with the Weak or Prejudiced yet with a Serious Reader such rather pollute then defend a Cause I will leave the whole Honour of that Way of Confutation to my Adversary not being in such Necessity for Conquest as to take that Dishonourable and Dishonest Way of procuring it If I can make my Rejoynder a little more intelligible then he has done his Reply defend the Truth I own and honour so as to answer my Reader 's Conscience I shall have obtain'd my whole End and maugre the Impetuous and blustering Humour of a few Enraged Adversaries my Mind will sweetly rest in Peace with God in whom I have believed and for whose Cause only I am thus warmly concerned in the World CHAP. I. Of Christianity in General JOhn Faldo in his Book entituled Quakerism No Christianity begins with his Account of Christianity What it is as I honestly observed in my Answer called Quakerism a New Nick-Name for Old Christianity What he laid down was this By Christianity we are not to understand all those Matters of Faith and Practice which Christianity doth obliege us unto for Christianity is a large and noble thing and takes in all that 's worthy in those Religions which it hath out-stript To which I gave this Answer though disingenuously mangled and transposed by my Adversary A strange Definition of true Christianity For if to Believe and Do all Christianity requireth be not Christianity then there is something beyond all that Christianity requireth to be believed and done that is Christianity else I understand nothing This is all he brings of my Answer to ground his Reply upon omitting that part of his Definition and my Return to it which in Honesty stood him most upon to consider But first let us hear his Reply to what he has quoted for Reply and Rejoynder distinguish our matter Reply You may as well affirm a Finger to be a Man when separated from the rest of the Man as common Justice Truth c. to be Christianity Rejoynder Though the Finger be not the Man yet it is Part of the Man therefore common Justice Truth c. by his own Instance are a Part of Christianity but if no Part of Christianity then may Christianity be without Justice or Truth My Drift was in my Answer and is in my Rejoynder That something of what was at Antiâ—ch called Christianity was in the World before Chrst's Visible Appearance at Jerusalem And that his Coming was but to bring the World to a more improved Knowledge and large Enjoyment of that Divine Power Wisdom Life and Righteousness which former Ages had comparatively but an obscure Sight and imperfect Sense of and this was my Reason because the contrary Opinion excludes all antecedent times from any Share in Christianity and plainly shuts them out of all Hope of Eternal Salvation which my Adversary takes a little notice of in these words Rep. If the Scripture had any where said that none but Christians shall be saved his Consequence had been grounded But he might have found asserted in my Book THAT SALVATION DEPENDS ON A RIGHT BELIEF AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE COVENANT OF GRACE Rejoyn The Scripture saith as I instanced for Proof of that little Part of my Answer by him considered For there is no other Name under Heaven given among Men whereby we must be Saved neither is there Salvation in any other Now how to distinguish betwixt a Man being saved by Christ and his being a true Christian I must declare my Ignorance Nay John Faldo though in Contradiction to himself tells us That Salvation depends on a right Belief and Acceptance of the Covenant of Grace Let him either show how a Man may rightly believe and accept of the Covenant of Grace and yet be no Christian or else he does nothing to his own purpose whatever he does for ours Christ is called God's Covenant The New Covenant stands in him How a Man may believe in the Covenant and not in Christ How in Christ and not be a Christian concerns John Faldo to reconcile only Reader let me tell thee that of about Six Pages concerning Christianity this Man has not undertaken Eight Lines to reply to neither are those the Strength of my Discourse To conclude I dare not repute Enoch to be no Christian who walked with God Abraham no Christian who saw Christ's Day and rejoyced
unworthiest Reflections however unprovoked without any Reproof is to merit their sharpest Retorts in the most vilifying Terms I know not what to infer from such an humorsome Carriage but that it is expected from the Quakers Religion it should bear that which J. Faldo's Vindication tells us his cannot a great Credit to our Cause against his Will Thus far of Christianity and Quakerism as they are contra-distinguished by our Adversary CHAP. III. Of the Scriptures MY Adversary begun his first Chapter in his former Discourse upon this general Charge The Quakers deny the Scriptures The Proof he offered was this The Quakers deny the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament to be the Word of God and therefore they deny the Scriptures Upon this account I thus delivered my self He entitules his Chapter That the Quakers deny the Scriptures I was almost astonished at it because he pretended to prove all out of our own Books and none such had ever come to my Hand but upon Perusal I found this to be the Upshot That the Quakers deny the Scriptures to be the Word of God My Adversary's Reply is Rep. This is not the first Cordial you have made of a wilful Vntruth nor yet the last by a great many And you who summed up nine Arguments of mine more which were the Contents of the nine Chapters next following should have been ashamed of calling this one which was the first of ten the Vpshot and then insult But I shall try how you break this single Cord this one of ten Rejoyn I will not say he has Wilfully wronged me but Wronged me he has I did not say that it was the Upshot of his whole Discourse concerning the Scriptures but of that single Chapter For had I reputed his nine following Arguments undeserving of any notice I might have called this single one the Upshot but having singlely refuted his subsequent Arguments I could not in good sense call the First the Vpshot 'T was not therefore the Vpshot of the Whole but of that Chapter in which the Word is used I had good Reason so to term it since the Proof was too particular for the Charge It was not my wilful Untruth but his Mistake His suggesting as if I only encountered that single Cord is very Disingenuous for I throughly considered Nine following Chapters Hear him further Rep. That you deny the Scriptures to be the Word of God you grant But you say pag. 25. I declare to the World that we own them to be a Declaration of the Mind and Will of God with many other things which I have shewed to be short of the main Ends of the Scriptures Rejoyn Whether those other things left out are short of the main Ends of the Scripture or no will best be seen by considering what those Things are I do declare to the whole World that we believe the Scriptures to contain a declaration of the Mind and Will of God in and to those Ages in which they were written being given forth by the holy Ghost moving in the Hearts of holy Men of God That they ought also to be Read Believed and Fulfilled in our Day being Useful for Reproof and Instruction that the Man of God may be perfect Now if this belongs not to the main Ends of Scriptures either there are none or they are unknown However it was 〈◊〉 much the End as name of Scripture that was then controverted Again he goes on thus Rep. I shall easily grant that one Word may stand representative of many An odd Phrase that represents him not able to express himself congruously I have heard of Persons as Parliament-men but never of a representative Word before Rejoyn He might have pardoned me an Incongruous Phrase if such it had been for I have twenty times over been so kind to him But I must tell him it is not less proper though less used in Words then in Persons He shews Ignorance in that Philosophy he pretends to be a Master of where there are many single words or Terms that are significative of entire Sentences but argumentum ad hominem granting to the Scriptures that they are the Word of God does not our Adversary repute that Title Representative as well as Expressive of those many thousand Words contained therein if so then there is a Representative Word If not it can never be called so in our Adversary's sense Again he brings me in thus I think it is as good sense to call a King's Letters King as the Scriptures the Word of God Rep. But by your favour Mr. Penn It is neither non-sense nor bad sense to call a King's Letter the Word of a King Rejoyn This is nothing to the purpose the Stress lies here The Word of God being a Title given to Christ as the Title King is to a supreme Magistrate whether it be Reverent or Significant to call the Declaration Christ the Word of God any more then to call the Declaration of a King by the Title of King For we therefore decline to give that Title to any thing below Christ himself to whom the Scriptures most emphatically ascribe it Because I said that it might be the Word of Advice Reproof Instruction which Christ the Great Word of God livingly sows in the Hearts of Men and Women that Christ spoke of when he said The Cares of the World choak the Word and it becomes Unfruitful He replyes Rep. Here you have yielded the Cause to save Christ from being the choaked and unfruitful Word Rejoyn I need not have done so for any such Reason since Christ may in a sense as well be Choaked as by Sin afresh Crucified and the Spirit Quenched Nor could unfruitful obliege me to give away the Cause since the Word is alwayes Vnfruitful where rebelled against But is there no Difference J. Faldo between a Word of Advice spiritually livingly and powerfully sown in the Heart by Christ the great Word of God and that Advice Reproof or Instruction declared by Writing This brings to the Point Whether the Scriptures or Christ may most deservedly be stiled the Word of God Christ is God's living Oracle and rightly called the Word of God because that which livingly speaks forth the Will of God to the Souls of Men The Scriptures are but that Revelation declared and recorded consequently they can have no right to that Title which is so suitably ascribed to the Author of that Revelation To be sure J Faldo acknowledges that they are not the Living Powerful Self-sufficient Word of God Nor does he pretend to dispute for them to be such a Word of God as the Quakers deny them to be Though it seems very strange to me that there should be Two Words of God the one quite differing from the other or that any Word of God if two there were should be of it self Impotent or Insufficient as he seems to allow in his first Book pag 20 27. Vind. pag. 14 16. That the Word of God
far beneath those noble Gentiles who not having an outward Law were a Law unto themselves having the Effect of it written in their Hearts their Conscience bearing witness c. And this we may boldly say That such as ever acted from that inward Sense never thought they did God Good Service in Killing his Servants whilst great Admirers of the Letter of the Scriptures and who as concerning this Commandment Thou shalt not Murder thought themselves most unblamable believed They did God Good Service in killing his Servants Nor can I think it so great a Disgrace to our Cause that we ingenuously profess the Reason why we desire to fear God and keep his Commandments doing unto others as we would have them do unto us not so much to be from the Letter of the Scripture as the Convictions of the Eternal Light and Spirit of God in our Consciences As it ought to be unto John Faldo and his Adherents who ground their Obedience upon the Letter of the Scripture and not upon such internal Convictions What is it but to say They could Lye Swear Steal Kill c. without any Remorse did they not find such Injunctions and Prohibitions upon record A Consequence so detestable yet so natural to their Principles that if this render them not able Guides to the very Confines of Rantism and Atheism I shall gladly ask an Excuse for my Ignorance But that I may leave nothing undone that may compleat the Satisfaction of every moderate Inquirer I shall further weigh and rejoyn to these words of his They who thought they did God good Service in Killing his Servants did not sin in the least because they were not convinced of a Command to the contrary nor the Idolaters in the Case of Baal because they thought Baal to be a God indeed Now Reader observe the Evasion This Passage relates not to Men's practising what God Commands or our Tenderness in imitating other Saints without Commission for fear we should offer strange Fire which is our Question but their doing that which God never commanded yea which Mankind in all Ages hath adjudged impious and which to be sure his Holy Spirit that E. B. said All Men should wait to be convinced assisted and led by in fulfilling God's Commandments never moved any to He unworthily draws a general Conclusion against us from meer particular Premises It seems Men are to act without if not against Conviction upon his Principle and that it is the same thing with him to commit moral Enormities from an Hardned Heart and to be tender of taking up any external Practice or performing some Religious Duty without the Convictions and Leadings of the Holy Spirit The Apostle said to such as had not as yet so full clearness as others That if any were otherwise-minded God would reveal it He did not injoyn them during that Scruple to believe or practice the thing doubted but therefore did Persecutors act inexcusably in their fiery Zeal because their blind Consciences checkt them not Again If Blindness came from Education it is though Blindness still and therefore it was basely done of J. Faldo to say in our Name that it is not Sin in the least c. more excusable for in the dayes of such Ignorance God winks But if it be a Blindness proceeding from long Disobedience and Rebellion against the Convictions and Strivings of the Good Spirit of God as his Word Hardned implies then I say it is not only very hainous in God's Sight but those Persons can never be excused neither from great Guilt nor the Sense of it in themselves let them or J. F. talk never so much of Conscience Besides the most Essential and Universally Necessary Commands of God were through all Ages confest to both before there was any of those Writings we rightly call the Scriptures of Truth from the Law of Nature as many stile it or rather the Law God placed in Man's Nature and since where they have never been Therefore whatever particular hardned and seared Consciences may say we have the Consent of Mankind and their own Rebellion and Lewdness against them But the Words of J. Faldo in plain terms import as if 1 st Men were not generally convinced of the Righteousness of the Moral Commands of God but that Men keep them because they are in the Bible only which runs against the Testimony of Scripture the Consent of Ages and the Writings and Judgment of the most Honest and Learn'd Protestants 2ly As if it were a like Evil Conscientiously to forbear Running Willing and Striving in Matters of Worship without the Spirit 's Conduct and searedly to plead for the Commission of Murder and Idolatry because Men of such Consciences bogle not at it though that is more then J. F. can prove I mean that they have no Stroak or Remorse 3 ly As if we could worship preach gather Churches and administer Gospel-Ordinances aright without the Spirit 4 ly That he is not convinced by any other Testimony then the Scripture without of any Transgression against God's Law 5 ly It supposes that if Men stay'd till the Spirit mov'd they should stay long enough who vainly prate of Praying by the Spirit notwithstanding never considering that the Spirit standeth ready to Reveal it self to their Assistance and Assurance who wait for it and that all the Children of God are led by the Spirit of God which being our Position had it but been weighed by this Adversary he could not methinks be so Unjust in his Aggravations 'T is true should we believe as he doth the Spirit is not to be waited for now adayes to lead us or that it is not ready to our Information when we wait for its Discoveries and Leadings our Assertion would look very absurd and loose for it were to let fall all Worship but not upon our own Principle as I said before for first all Worship to God ought to be performed by the Assistance of his holy Spirit for of our selves we can do nothing that is Good And secondly God's Spirit is ready to assist instruct and comfort those that wait diligently and patiently for it yea God has given it to the Rebellious that it may judge them if it don't lead them It is such Protestant Doctrine that I wonder Men should not know their Admired Ancestors Faith when they met it Oh great Degeneration into Hardness and Ignorance Lastly There is the same to be said against him that pretends to ground all upon the Scripture that he objects against us who plead for the Conviction of Conscience which the Instance of the Jews Murder of our Lord Jesus Christ unanswerably proves There was a Law that Blasphemers should be put to Death By this Law they apprehended Jesus adjudged and got him to be executed These Men above any Age exalted the Scriptures as the Only Rule Where lies the Mistake Not in the Scripture but in their blind and envious Application of it Now I ask if the only Way
Christian to read what is contained in the two pages quoted of vilifying Reproach to the Scriptures If this be not opposing the Spirit of God to the Scriptures the Devil himself must dispair of inventing words to express it by Thus far John Faldo And indeed I must confefs If all or any of these things were ever said or publish'd by VVilliam Smith there is great Cause for Amazement and Abhorrence too But what said I to this Truly enough but that J. F. was careful to conceal he brings in a small Limb of my Answer and then scares it with hard words Take notice of his Reply to what he ventures to trans-scribe of my Answer Rep. Penn saith VV. Smith reflected not in the least upon the Scriptures nor those Doctrines which were truly received thence No such words can be produc'd by our Adversary No Jesuit in the World did ever out-do VV. P. in Equivocations and Subterfuges His stress lies on the words TRULY received thence Rejoyn Suppose them to be my stress what Subterfuge lies there Are there not Doctrines falsly deduced through Men's Ignorance of the true Intendment of Scripture And do not such as confidently think them to be truly receiv'd from Scripture as if they really were so But the Stress lies here with J. F. His Religion cannot bear a Scruting and is as well nigh as shy of a Search as Mahometism it self Though had John Faldo and the rest of his Gang continu'd where they were the poor Quakers might have had an Inquisition with a VVitness at their Heels by this time But he has a further Comment for us Rep. The Quakers allow no Doctrine to be truly received from the Scriptures but such as is received by immediate Inspiration and not from the Authority of the VVritten VVord Rejoyn VVhere 's the Opposition now Doth not he set the Authority of the Scriptures against the Inspiration of the Holy Ghost at least exclude the holy Inspiration from any share in that Authority and so do what he can to shuffle out the Spirit from being concerned in the Authority of the Scriptures which is if not the only yet the greatest Proof of their Authorities since it is chiefly by the Testimony of the Spirit in our selves that we know them to have bin given forth by the Inspiration of the holy Ghost in others as held both the Primitive Christians our Famous Martyrs and most Considerable Protestants He speaks as if he affected Obscurity and aim'd only at jumbling and intricating instead of explaining the Matter But had we put the Spirit in Opposition to the Letter it is no more then what the Scripture hath done before us as H. Bullenger that notable Reformer observes upon Rom. 2. 29. The Spirit saith he is opposed to the Letter as when Paul saith The Circumcision of the Heart is the Circumcision that consisteth in Spirit not in the Letter And again The Lord hath made us able Ministers of the New Testament not of the Letter but of the Spirit for the Letter killeth but the Spirit giveth Life 4 Dec. 8 Serm. A notable Application to our Purpose but while we only so oppose them as to give the Preference to the Holy Spirit J. F. falls foul of us for a Pack of Enthusiasts shutting out the Spirit at least setting it aside to exalt the Letter But what doth he mean by these Terms Immediate Inspiration for a Mediate Inspiration I never heard of Sure I am that Inspiration is God's own Breathing into the Soul by which it hath Understanding given it whether it be of things written or not written and how that can be done and not immediately I know not If he will exchange his impertinent Distinction of Mediate and Immediate for Ordinary and Extraordinary we shall allow him more then we can upon the other for by Ordinary Inspiration or Revelation I understand such daily and common Vision and Discovery to the Soul as concerns it in its general Station respecting God and Men By Extraordinary such as great Fore-Sights or Divine Prospects which give to fore-tell or prophesie things to come or decide some signal Controversie or very special Case of Difficulty The first is what I speak of and do affirm that neither can the Scriptures be understood our Souls fed and comforted nor our Duties to God rightly perform'd without it The last is a Case so peculiar that all along it is plain I never intended it But if by Immediate Inspiration respecting us he understands that from thence forwards we cast off all Scripture as an antiquated or insignificant piece of Business which are yet Words too Modest for his Malice to father upon us as I shall anon make appear then doth he wrong us and our Doctrine to an high Degree And no matter what he thinks of me or what Names he may please to call me who is too far gone in his present splenetick Disease to think any better of such as I am I shall plainly set down what was my Meaning by the Words he cavils at viz. TRULY received thence I hope to their Satisfaction who will be more dis-interested in their Judgment By Doctrines TRULY owned and received from Scripture we mean such holy Truths as God by his Spirit inlightning our Understandings hath given us a true Discerning of to be such and those are they which we put in Opposition to Men's Carnal Interpretations upon and Imaginary Deductions from the Scriptures and not that we clash the Spirit 's Inspiration against the Scripture for they harmonize and bear reciprocal Testimonies to each other And this God that knows all Hearts both knows to be our true Sense in the Matter controverted and will one day abundantly prove to our Adversary's Eternal conviction This I fear J. Faldo will never swallow and why because it would choak him Perhaps I must be a Jesuit an Equivocator and what else he pleaseth but wherefore because it strikes at his Honesty indeed Dishonesty for he had rather we were what he sayes we are then receive a Contradiction by finding us otherwise then he hath so confidently represented us to be So much dearer is Humor Pride and Worldly Credit to him then our being not so mistaken as he thought for Is this Man like to make Converts that first maims my Answers and then either pelts what he doth take with Dirt or if one Sense worse then another may be had that usher'd in with a Rant and wound up with a Quibble must be given for an apt and irrefutable Reply This hath hitherto been his Practice and we now go upon both a Proof of it and yet more evidently to clear the Truth In that little piece of my Answer he cropt off from the rest for after his wonted manner he thought it not best for him to encounter it at large but a snap and away I told him that he could produce no such Words as Traditions of Men Earthly Root Darkness Confusion Corruption Deceitful Whore's Cup c.
and Drinks observed is Jewish and as I said in my Answer to plead for a Legal Dispensation and Bondage to the Shadows of the good Things to come thereby making Christ's Coming of none Effect But to proceed Reply p. 50. Yet though P. give me bad Words to strengthen his Argument he grants what I say to be true in his Anger for sayes he Christ is to the Saints now who rightly believe in him the End of all Meats Drinks Washings Dayes Here Lord's Supper Baptism Christian Sabâ—oth or Day of Holy Rest are all denyed in FOVR Words Rejoynder If they be it is his own Fault for instead of my granting what he sayes to be true I never mentioned them and indeed he hath so manifestly given away his Cause by this unadvised Expression as we need no more against him on this Occasion For those four Words by which he makes me to deny the Lord's Supper Baptism and the Christian Sabbath are such as we must reject or we turn the Gospel-Ministration out of Doors They are the Apostle's own Words to the the Collossians Col. 2. 16 17. Let No Man therefore Judge you in Meat or in Drink or in respect of an Holy Day or of the Sabbath Dayes which are a Shadow of things to come but the Body is of Christ and to the Hebrews Chap. 9. vers 10. which stood onely in Meats Drinks and divers Washings and Carnal Ordinances imposed on them until the Time of Reformation I say here the four Words are denyed to be Evangelical viz. Meats Drinks Washings Days since J. F. will have the Supper to be consider'd under Meats Drinks Baptism under Washings and the Christian Sabbath under Dayes either He must with us Deny them as Meats Drinks Washings and Dayes that are abolish therefore not fit to be continued under the Evangelical Administration or maintain the Continuance of Meats Drinks Washings and Dayes to keep up the Supper Baptism and Sabbath and thereby espouse the Jews Quarrel against the Christians and defend the most Rank Childish and Carnal Part of Judaism against Christianity it self My Reader may by this perceive what a Gospel it is John Faldo would have who pleads for the use of those things under the Gospel which are repugnant to the Nature of it for in one place the Apostle calls them Shadows and in another such Figures as cold not make such as used them perfect as pertaining to the Conscience Hebr. 9. 9. which the Gospel doth not continue but make an utter End of by the bringing in a more excellent Covenant Hope and Service His saying I was Angry and gave him bad Words is like the rest What shall I say to a Man that dares say any thing be it never so far from Truth provided it may cast an Odium upon me where he can't confute me The Hardest Words I gave were that he basely wrested our Words of which let the Reader judge And for Anger God knows I had none I pitty him But he goes on Reply pag. 50. W. P. to make a full End adds or any other Elementary Temporary or Figurative Worship Now if he can shew us any Gospel-Worship considered intirely and formally that is not Temporal Worship he will do more then ever Man yet did but in the mean time he hath confirmed my Charge Rejoynder I have confirmed it by the Rule of Contraries or by the same Figure our Friends Writings use to maintain his Accusations Certainly J. F. can never mean as he writes and be knowing and Honest too If to confute his Charge be to establish it I hope my Reader will say I have done it effectually I know not whether to impute it to his Vanity or Lazyness for at every turn we must prove his Charges give Evidence against our selves and dye by our own hands while it is to be remembred that amidst all this Folly J. Faldo must have the Liberty of Tempering with his Witnesses that is Resting Patching Adding Diminishing Transposing Mis-interpreting our Words and Meanings or else he would be wholely at a Loss Many Instances I have given of his Skill herein and his pretty sort of Wresting the Word Temporal in this very Sentence doth make up another for I mean by Temporal as the Words Elementary and Figurative immediately following do fully explain no other then such a Worship as is instituted for a set time till something more excellent and durable comes in the room of it as the Typical Worship of the Jews that served its Season and then gave place to the Spiritual and Eternal Worship of the New and Everlasting Covenant And this Man takes me as if I understood it of a Worship performed within time in any Sense thereby making me to deny the Performing of Worship to Almighty God the time Men live in the World because it may be called from the Word Time or Tempus Temporal restraining that to the Nature of VVorship which only relates to the Act of VVorship As thus The Act or Performance of VVorship may be to day the Nature of that VVorship Eternal so that VVorship may be performed within Time and yet not be by Nature Temporal But the VVorship of the Jews respecting those Exteriour and Shadowy Things was by Nature Temporal Reply pag. 50. VV. P's next Fault he finds is with my saying That Penington meant by the City of Abomination visible Worship If the Worship which he acknowledgeth God to be found in and which Professors about the years 43. 44 45 46 used were visible Worship or any part of it Visible Worship then Penington said it of Visible Worship Rejoynder A Fault so palpable is soon found VVho not stark blind with Envy would make so ill a Construction of so found an Expression I. P. said The Lord would not spare such as do not come out of the City of Abomination that is saith J. Faldo Visible Worship as if they were Synonimous or Terms of equal Signification City of Abomination that is Visible Worship back again Visible VVorship that is City of Abomination Is this Man fit to write of Religion that adventures so boldly to pervert Men's VVritings But he thinks this will excuse him that I. P. meant such Worship as God was found in and which Professors used about 4. 3 44 c. but this is too boldly obtruded for what Man can think I. P. so brutish as to call that Worship in which Himself confesseth God to be found the City of Abomination I. P. spoak of the Nature of and not the Visibility of Worship for there is not a word of it in his Writings so that he endeavours to maintain one Falshood by another But that his Charge is yet true against the Quakers he produceth a Testimony out of G. F's Myst pag. 65. Paul brought the Saints off from the Things that are seen and Water is seen and its Baptism adding Now unless W. P. will say That Things seen are not visible G. F. hath certainly failed W. P.
Sermons upon Job 32. 8. It is the Spirit of God who dwells in Men c. Man sayes he cannot discern any whit of God's Secret until he be enlightned we can never by our Will reach so high as to know God we must put our Reason from us and renounce it utterly what sayes J. Faldo to this Doctrine of his Father Calvin Again If we will have our Lord to fill us with his Wisdom it behoveth us to become Fools that is to say We must not bring any thing of our own for that were the shutting of the Door against God H. Bullenger's 4. Decad. Serm. 5. p. 665. The Spirit of Man praying in this World being enlightned and kindled with the Spirit of God groaneth and maketh Intercession for the Saints W. Perkins the English Calvin in the same men's Thoughts p. 336. 21. writes thus All Exercises of Christian Religion are to be in the Spirit The Inward Motions of the Spirit are of themselves the Worship of God whereas our Words and Deeds are not simply but so far forth as they are found in the renewed Motions of the Heart Gualt Cradok upon Ephes 3. p. 169. That you may see the greatness of his Power what a World of Prayers doth the Spirit of God put into thy Heart that thou art never able to utter with thy Mouth All the Wisdom of the World cannot make one spiritual Petition We may make Forms of Prayer but now the Spirit of God that knows the Mind of God THAT makes Prayers according to the Will of God and HE Spirit prayes with Sighing and Groaning unutterably I speak to them that know the working of the Spirit If the Lord should only hear the Prayers thou makest with thy Mouth thou wouldst be a Poor Man but the Lord respects the Prayer of thy Heart W. Dell. Serm. Christ Spirit c. p. 35. When God hath a Mind to give us the Spirit he puts us in Mind to ask it yea God gives us the Spirit that by it we may ask the Spirit seeing no Man can ask the Spirit but by the Spirit Acts 1. 14. Dr. J. Everad the great Spiritual Separatist in King James and Charles the firsts Time Be assured whatever Prayers whatever Sighs whatever Groans thou puttest up to him he loaths all but what his SON MAKES but all his Requests are heard and granted pag. 225 Be sure that your Prayers be such as become God's Ear to hear for all the Prayers of ALL FLESH through the whole World is displeasing to God pag. 243. Not the best Duties you can perform will please him except they be salted and seasoned by his own Son p. 9. Never think that all your Prayers your Tears your Alms c. pleases him but only that which is his Son 's own Action and Work in you p. 355. But know he God regards none of these Prayers But when his Son in whom he is well pleased when he prayes he hears him alwayes but if any other Prayes he regards not p. 438. 442. Again It must be his Son's Work in us else he loaths all even the best of the Sacrifices if it be not Jesus Christ in us that doth all viz. that loves God and fears God and obeyes God and believes in God c. his Father regards it not But what thinks J. Faldo of all these Things J. Calvin W. Perkins H. Bullenger Gu. Cradok are unquestionable W. Dell Master of Cajus Colledge in late times And for Dr. J. Everad his Works were licenced Decemb. 6. 1652 by no less Man then J. Caril and approved by Tho Brooks and Mat. Parker all three Independent Pastors the first lately deceased the other two not many dayes ago living who I hope are able to justifie their Kindness to that notable and doubtless very religious Man Perhaps the Truth may find better Quarter for these great Authors Sake therefore I bring them though indeed it is truly lamentable that the Professors of our Age will not know the Doctrines of Men they hold in great Admiration when they meet with them in the poor Quakers Writings but instead of acknowledging miseraby brow-beat them with oppobrious Language thereby bringing the greatest Truths into Suspition with the Vulgar But Oh Lord God of Truth This hath been the Portion of thy People and Lot of thy Children whom thou hast gathered out of the World in all Ages at the Hands of those who boast themselves in other Mens Labours and have a Name to live but are dead to that Life in which they should live to thee They seem to honour the Prophets and garnish the Sepulchres of thy Servants that are at rest but having erred from the Conduct of thy Spirit and resisted the holy Motions of it they are become the greatest Persecutors Resisters and Vilifiers of thy holy living pure and spiritual Way Oh Lord God arise for thy great Names Sake seaze upon their Consciences by thy Invisible Word of Power Lay Judgment to the Line and Righteousness to the Plummet Dash their fine carved Images in Peices and let thy consuming Fire take hold on their Chaff and Stubble and bring them to thy righteous Ballance that they may see they and their Religion to be lighter then Vanity that they may witness thy mighty Work of Redemption and Salvation before they depart hence and are never seen more through Jesus Christ the alone Advocate and Mediator Intercessor Redeemer and Saviour of all thy dear Children who have believed in his Heavenly Appearance by whom be Everlasting Honour Glory and Dominion Amen CHAP. VI. Of Positive Ordinances as our Adversary calls them to wit Baptism and the Supper HE introduced his Discourse of Baptism and the Supper with an Account of the Nature of these Ordinances distinguishing them by Natural and Positive He excepts against my reporting of one part of his Doctrine calling it by no milder a Name then Forgery I will give both our Quotations that my Reader may the better see what Ground he hath for such severe Reflection I cited him thus The Ordinances hitherto considered are called Morral from their Natural Obligation although respecting their Substance they deserve a more Evangelical Denomination without which we cannot call them Christian Ordinances This he calls Forging Corupting his Words and that he that hath the Conscience to deal with such an Adversary may make him say what he lists Reply p. 56. I will now puncually transcribe his Words as himself hath quoted them and a plain self-Defeat will lye at the bottom of all this Displeasure Reply p. 66. My Words were these to a Letter The Ordinances I have hitherto considered are called Morral from their Natural Obligation although that Substantial and Essential Part and Qualification of them their Respect to a Mediator will require a Denomination more Evangelical and without which we cannot call them Gospel or Christian Ordinances Let VV. P. make the best Advantage for his Causes these Words will afford him and spare not Rejoynder Having
that Salvation is intailed by the Gospel on a mighty Confidence or vehement Perswasion of what Christ hath done for them p. 160. Thus teacheth D. Patrick D. Tillatson D. Cradock W. Shirlock and others called Episcopalians to say nothing of the general Independents and Baptists how this will agree with J. F. But above all how Episcopalians are no further concerned in his Book then vindicated a Story he hath the Confidence to tell in his Preface whilst they are so manifestly contradicted in the great Point of Justification every common Capacity will see without further pointing And so we proceed to the next Exception he makes against my Defence of a Saying charged by him upon R. Farnsworth as fit for his Turn Reply p. 72. To the second Citation viz. What Righteousness Christ performed without me was not my Justification neither was I saved by it W. P. seeks to mend one Error by another much akin to it thus VVhat gives daily Access and Acceptance to and with the Lord is that Preparation of Clean and Righteous Adornment the Soul actually receives from Christ c. Take Justification in this Sense and not for Remission and let our Adversary do his worst There needs a Diver of Delos to make very good Sense of these words I am so wâ—ll acquainted with the Quakers Meanings as well as their Sayings that I dare affirm he intends by all this no other Righteousness for Access and Accâ—ptance then what is subjected in Men and is therefore their own Righteousness Rejoynder The words he charged upon R. Farnsworth I defended conditionally that is That if ever he spoak or writ them he did not intend any Benefit that came by Christ's Offering of himself by the Eternal Spirit a Sacrifice for all for the Remission of Sins that are past through the forbearance of God which is the first part of Justification But that the Justification and Salvation he understood were not from the Guilt of Sin past by Christ's Offering c. but from the Root Nature and Power of In-dwâ—lling Sin through the Powerful Operation of Christ's Spirit in the Inward Parts in the Heart and Conscience But first let is be remembred that he cited no Book a Fault I found with him before and desired him just where he leaves off that the next time he would let us know what was the Book that afforded that Expression which he hath not done next That he dares affirm we intended our own Righteousness to be that which gives us Acceptance with God whereas in so many words I said that the Clean and Righteous Adornment which gives the Soul Admittance into God's holy Courts must actually be received from Christ the Lord her Righteousness which four words with a great many more he disingenuously skipt For those words of his subjected in Man I know not what he means by them unless it be a Righteousness within the Power and Ability of Man to bring forth for I know no other Righteousness that can be subjected in Men and that this was not my Meaning notwithstanding his obtrusive Confidence my own words plainly evidence He might as properly say that a Child's being washed clean by its Father is its own Cleanness or that it made it self clean or because a poor Man in Rags intreats some better Rayment at the Charity of a great Man and that he would please to take him into the Capacity of a menial Servant therefore that Livery or Apparel bestowed upon him by which he is denoted and hath the Access proper to one of his Family was of his own proper Cost or Working and not the Gift of his Lord and Master If this be Absurd John Faldo's Consequence cannot be Rational In short The Everlasting Righteousness which Christ brings into his People by which he fits them for his Father's Communion is not the less of him nor the more of or from us because in us But that I may not trouble my self to challenge him to prove this Pernicious Meaning to be ours he sayes he will prevent me with a Citation out of W. Smith's Cat. p. 74. Quest What is the Righteousness that justifies in the Sight of God Answ For we have Life before we have Motion to act or do any thing that is pleasing to God and in that Life we have Salvation and so Life and Salvation is freely given us from God Reply pag. 72. This Citation Mr. Penn had to consider in this Chapter he pretends to answer but he forbears it among many other which say more for my Purpose then he dare transscribe Rejoynder If there were others more to his purpose then this he is to blame to conceal them but believe him that will I cannot And we have Cause to think that if he hath misapplyed this he would not have been very faithful in the rest I do seriously profess I never met yet with his Peer for quoting First there is no such Question either in pag. 74. or in several pages before or after that if in the whole Catechism Secondly he hath left out Five Words of the Answer which stood us most upon to be cited and altogether the true Question which was this Quest But whether do you not depend upon the Things ye do for Life and Salvation Answ Nay we do not so for we have Life before we have Motion to act or do any thing that is pleasing unto God What Reader can be clearer first then his Denyal of our Dependance upon Good Works for Life and Salvation Next What plainer then that he excludes Action and consequently Works as in the Creature from so much as pleasing God unless God vouchsafe to breath the Breath of his own Life and thereby impower him to bring forth Fruits of Holiness Lastly That the Reason of Man's Acceptance is not his own Works or Actions but his being found acting and working in the Living Faith which is the Gift of God by and through which Access to and holy Fellowship with God are enjoyed by his Children And thus much W. Smith's following words tell us and so Life and Salvation is freely given us from God and by his Grace we are saved through the Faith which we have in him and that puts us upon Motion and Action to do his Will in all things and yet not to depend upon what we do for Life But do all things which he commands us from the Motion or first setting on work of his Life and this is Life before Action which moves us to Action and not Action before Life thereby to attain Life Catechism page 73 74. Now Reader this considered give us thy Judgment of J. Faldo's daring Proof Doth it not to a Tittle make good his Charge That the Quakers are for Justification by their own Works What sort of Conscience must he have that dares look the World in the Face and obtrude such arrant Vntruths upon it Doth this Scandalous Perversion become a Man who two pages off tells us of his abhorring
Pet 1. 19. OUr Adversary imployes his 19th Chapter in defence of his Exposition of 3 Passages in Scripture against what I offered in my Answer to be the true Scope and Intendment of them But what shall I say so lamely doth he cite me so constantly overlook me that unless he had hop'd to be believ'd write what he would or that what he writ would pass for a Reply whether it deserved to be called so or no I can see no Pretence for continuing the Controversie for either he grantâ— what we say by contradicting himself or sayes nothing to what we deny that may strictly merit our notice But let him speak for himself Reply p. 80. Vpon my Exposition of Joh. 1. 9. That was the true Light c. W. P. makes a huge Brag of the Advantage I give his Cause and thus he argues from my Words If Christ made all things then Christ was before his Appearance p. 168. and consequently Christ was and is the Word which was with God and is God and the Light of Men c. Rejoynder If he saith nothing as nothing he sayes to what he cites blame not me for I would have reported it But whether I had any Advantage or having it bragged of it will be best seen by giving my Answer as it lay If Christ be that Light which is that Word which made all things and therefore God as saith J. Faldo then Christ was before his bodily Appearance and consequently our former Chapter is justified on our Part against his Notions of the Lord 's Christ but J. Faldo expresly sayes p. 84 85. as the Word is the Light of Men so or in that Manner is Christ the Light of Men nay he calls it Christ appearing in the Flesh consequently Christ was before he took that Flesh or appeared in that Body not to constitute him or make him Christ but to transact work declare and bring to pass by and through it as a peculiar Vessel and prepared holy Instrument therefore Christ was and is that Word which was with God and is God and the Light of Men. This was my Argument grounded upon his Concessions What Advantage it is to our Cause let it answer for it self what Bragg I made I know not unless it was my calling his Acknowledgments a Justification of our fore-going Chapter I leave the Meaning of his Silence to my Reader and insert his Reply to another part of my Answer which was this And least we should yet mistake him he calls it God manifested it in the Flesh and that he might speak all for us in a little give the Deaths Wound to his own Cause he tells us in so many Words That the Salvation and Life Eternal of poor Sinners was wrapt up in Christ as God Mark his Reply Reply p. 80. Yea and as Man too yet as this excludes not his Divinity as necessary to our Salvation neither doth his Diâ—ity exclude his Humanity as necessary Rejoynder These Words Yea and Man too are added but with this woful Impertinency that they wholy contradict his Saying Salvation of poor Sinners was wrapt up in Christ as God for they imply a Denyal of Man's Salvation being wrapt up in Christ as Man and that this was his Meaning take his own Words as they ly in his own Book part 2. p. 85. And this I take to be the Import of the 4th verse 10. 1. In him was Life and the Life was the Light of Men That is the Salvation and Life Eternal of poor Sinners was wrapt up in Christ as GOD who being SO QUALIFIED was capahle of working it I say again and all reasonable Men must acknowledge I did not wrong his Meaning but gave his Sense and not mine To be sure there are no such Words as these yea and as Man too which is just as if I should say The Vnderstanding of a Man is wrapt up in him as he is a reasonable Creature being charged with a self-Contradiction should absurdly add yea and as an Animal too There needs so pointing at so much palpable Weakness His other Words about the Divinity 's not excluding the Manhood of Christ as necessary to Salvation is no part of the Question but a meer go by Slip to the Buâ—â—ness for all was necessary that God thought necessary that is instrumentally But will it therefore follow that the Salvation and Life eternal of poor Sinners was wrapt up in Instruments But let us see what he sayes at the Defence I made for my rendring of the Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 enlightned in my Book entituled the Spirit of Truth vindicated Hear him Reply p. 81. I know not any Cause he hath to think me stumbled at his rendring 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 enlightned unless for rebuking him for wastng so many pages in quoting Authorities for that which would be granted easily Rejoynder He and his Friend H. H. are the more to be blamed that they put me to so much Expence to make good it at least he intented to grant me but his easie granting is of those things that are too hard to be kept however I accept his Acknowledgment as also of his Silence to what I writ in Defence of our Understanding the following Words so much Controverted by some Every Man coming into the World However there is one Passage that must not slip It is this Reply p. 81. The last part of my Exposition viz. Thatâ— he THAT WAS the true Light points at Christ's Appearance in the Flesh I added in his State of Humiliation This faith W. P. P. 178. stints Christ to that Appearance denyes Christ now to be that true Light that enlightens all and he might as well infer that because the Word was with God and was God therefore he is not now with God or God But to blast all in a Breath sayes he Is this your Tertullus I would have Mr. Penn more solid and pertinent or leave his scribling Humor which at this rate is fit to write to none but those that can find Refreshment by a Dutch Woman's Babbling though understanding not one Syllable upon the Conceit it comes all from the Spirit Rejoynder Whether my Answer or his Reply be more solid and pertinent I shall leave with my Readers to judge Oh how ready are Men to condemn in others what they indulge in themselves It is strange to me if my Adversary be not guilty in censuring but that hurts him more then me I say again that his Drift was to unconcern That was the true Light in any other Time then Christ's Coming in the Flesh to which I opposed about a page and a half of which he hath reported not above four Lines and those not as they lay Take it Reader briefly thus If the Word that made all things which was with God and was God was that true Light as sayes J. Faldo himself p. 84. then can it never be restrained to that Appearance as the Beginning or End of it
have our Being for we are also of his Off-Spring Erasmus in Deut. saith non supra â—e sed intrate est Sermo valde i. The VVord is not above thee but very within thee The Samaritan Coppy hath it not the Word but the Thing is in thee according to the Hebrew Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is often so translated Fagius upon the Place in Deuter. thus In Corde dicit quia Legem cordibus Judaeorum inscripserat Dominus priusquam in Tabulis illis lapâ—deis Decologum insculpsisset i. e. In the Heart saith he because the Lord haâ—â— written the Law in the Hearts of the Jews before he had graven the Decalogue in the Tables of Stones For its being such a Word as useth to be in the Mouth I must tell him that is such a Word as useth to be in the Heart too which he takes no Notice of in my Answer and I am sure it is not so impossible for the Eternal Word to express it self by the Mouth of a Man and so may be said to be in the Mouth as it is for the Book of written Laws and Statutes to be in the Heart Besides the Commandments are mentioned verse 10. but this Commandment or Word verse 11. 14. which cannot in good Sense be called the same but rather that Law Word or Commandment mentioned by the Apostle Rom. 2. 14 15. which he acknowledgd the good Gentiles both to have had written in their Hearts and to have lived up to in good Measure unless we can suppose that God hath been less propitious to the Jews then to the Gentiles I mean that God gave the Gentiles an inward and the Jews only an outward Law But suppose what our Adversary sayes of the Word in Deuteronomy to be true he hath confounded himself in this That he makes the Word Rom. 10. 8. the same with the Word mentioned Deut. 13 14. The one is as sayes J. F. the Word of Jewish Statutes among whom is the Hand wring of Ordinances the ceremonial and judicial as well as morral Law The other is the Word of Faith which blots out the Hand-writing of Ordinances and ends the Ceremonial and Judicial Law But because these two Laws or Words cannot be one and the same and yet that the Apostle alludes to the Words in Deuteronomy it follows that it cannot be the Book of written Laws but the Word that begets Love to and Faith in God for that was the Word the Apostle preached Nay we may go further yet and assert the Word mentioned in Deuteronomy to be Christ himself for if that be one with the Word of Faith the Apostle writes of to the Romans then because the Word of Faith Rom. 10. 8. is Christ the Word mentioned in Deuteronomy must also be Christ that are one and the same Word the Apostle's Allusion proves and J. F. confesseth and that the Word of Faith Rom. 10. 8. is Christ let the two fore-going Verses of the Text be consulted But the Righteousness of Faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thine Heart who shall ascend into Heaven that is to bring Christ down from above or who shall descend into the deep that is to bring up Christ again from the Dead but what saith it The Word is nigh thee even in thy Mouth and in thy Heart that is the Word of Faith which we preach verse 6 7 8. where nothing is more clear then that the Word nigh in the Heart is Christ the Word for the Question here is how they shall get Christ as it was in Deuteronomy how they should get the Word The Apostle answers it though not under the Name of Christ yet under a Name attributed to Christ If our Adversary count Christ and the Word of Faith two differing things by the same Reason may we say that the Word in Deuteronomy concerning which none needeth to ask who shall go up in Heaven to bring it down and the Word nigh are two Words but if that Question be needless Who shall go up into Heaven to fetch it down unto us ver 12. be answered in ver 14. viz. but the Word is very nigh unto thee and consequently that it is but one Word or Commandment that is understood in the Question and the Answer then may we with good Reason conclude that Christ in the 6th and 7th Verses and the Word of Faith in the 8th Verse are one and the same thing under two Names else there can be no Sence or Coherence in the Apostle's Words for what Answer is this But what sayes it The Word is nigh thee in thy Mouth and in thy Heart that is the Word of Faith which we preach to this Question Who shall ascend to bring Christ down Who shall descend to bring Christ up If Christ and Word of Faith are not Synonimous or equivalent Terms The Question the Apostle makes the Righteousness of Faith to forbid is about Christ's Absence or Remoteness from the Heart Say not in thy Heart and it is answered and resolved with the Nearness of the Word in the Heart which could be no answer or Solution in case that Word was not Christ or Christ that Word for the Reason why the Righteousness of Faith saith on this wise Say not in thy Heart who shall ascend to fetch Christ down implies that he is not shut up in some remote place but that he is nigh and needs no fetching and if nigh then not another from the Word nigh which is the Answer to the Question To make it yet plainer and detect my Adversary I will parrallel the Case Jacob being ancient desired to see Josâ—ph before he died suppose him to have askt how shall I do to see Joseph and that some body answered Do not ask how â—hou shalt see Joseph for thou seest Reuben Tell me if this would be thought a fit Answer to Jacob's Question yet this must be the Cause of those who deny Christ and the Word to be one in this Place But if some body should have said to him Do not ask who shall show thee thy SON JOSEPH for the RVLER of all Egypt standeth nigh thee Would not every Body think the Person meant Joseph that was so This is so plain to our Pupose that every common Understanding may discern the Reasonableness of our Interpreration For the Greek being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it makes nothing against us in that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hath the same Significaiton with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Scapula informs us out of Plato Clemens Alexandrinus Admon ad Gent. on 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 calls it the Word of the Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. the HEAVENLY WORD the true Contender for Mastery crowned in the Theater of the whole World and in his Strom l. 2. speaking of the same Place Rom. 10. saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The DIVINE WORD cryes calling all Men without Distinction which must needs be Christ the
Holy Ghost The Durableness of this Kingdom is laid down by Daniel and the Time came that the Saints possessed the Kingdom whose Kingdom is an Everlasting Kingdom Dan. 7. 22. 27. Yet upon these so innocent Expressions so scriptural and therefore so easily defensible doth this Adversary of ours call an Evidence of the blasphemous unheard of Passages and Principles among our Ministry conceived vented and allowed which did the World know it would make their Ears tingle and their Hearts ake But we will see if these Words belong not of more Right to a Passage that fell from the Mouth of a Court-Chaplain in the Golden Age of Independency not in a private Letter but a publick Auditory that we may help him to a clearer Sight of his own Folks and that his severe Exclamation better suits them then us After the Death of O. C. that all due Acknowledgments might be paid to his Memory for the noble Acts he did of breaking all Oaths he made to God and Men to advance his own Family and Interest though to the Scandal of Religion and Loss of the Cause a certain Chaplain of his broak forth with this Extatical and Elegiack Assertion that if that were the Word of God meaning the Bible in his Hand then as certainly that blessed Spirit the Protector was with Christ at the right Hard of the Father and if he be there what may his Family expect from him for if he were so useful and helpful and so much Good influenced from him to them when he was in a mortal State how much more Influence will they have from him now he is in Heaven THE FATHER SON AND SPIRIT THROUGH HIM BESTOWING GIFTS AND GRACFS UPON THEM I will omit naming the Party he is dead I give the Fact and it speaks so much Idolatry that nothing ranker can be produced of the most Extravigant Votaries of Rome God if it pleaseth him of his great Mercy give this poor Man Repentance before that Hour overtake him in which it will be hid from his Eyes which ends my Return to these hard and evil Speeches I shall as my Manner hath been produce the Testimonies of certain considerable Men in defence of what we believe concerning the Light within and others relating to the Soul of Man for their Sakes whom Tradition hath abused the frequent Clamours and Invectives of many against us blinded so as to think we are the Sink of Error and off-scouring of all Heresy to the End that they may see our so much decryed Doctrine clearly and abundantly approved by such as are of general Reputation among them Of the Light shining in Man Vatablus and Drusius upon Job 24. 13. They are of those that rebelled against the Light say that it is the Light of God and that it is God himself I suppose none will doubt that this Light shined in the Consciences of those that rebelled against it consequently the light that shines in the Conscience is the Light of God as he is the great Sun of Light Munsterius and Clarius upon Job Ch. 25. 3. Upon whom doth not his Light arise ask Who is there in whom the Light of the Divine Wisdom doth not shine Codurcus is of the same Mind saying he enlightneth all Men referring us to John's Testimony Drusius upon the same Place queries Who receiveth not his Light and is not illuminated by his Light Erasmus and Vatablus on Joh. 1. 9. calls it the Fountain of Light whence the Light also flowed to John himself Now if this Light be in Men and of the Fountain of Light which say they is God I hope none will deny theâ—â— the Light that shines in Men is divine Light and consequently God 1 Joh. 1. 5. Zegerus on Joh. 1. ver 4 5. In him was Life and the Life was the Light of Men c expresseth himself thus That Life by which all things were made that which is the Word yea which is God the Fountain of all Life that alwayes was and is the Light of all Men and it shineth in the Darkness of our Souls which the Prince of Darkness had darkened Cameron on the place saith It is to be understood especially of that Light which is unto Salvation and whereby it comes to pass that we are freed from the Darkness of Sin and Death All which is to say that the Light which shineth in Man's Heart is Divine and Saving therefore God manifesting himself in Man Dr. H. Moor in his Philosophick Cabbal pag. 27. sayes The Light pursued Adam and upbraided unto him his Case after his Transgression and that it was the DIVINE Light wherefore he was ashamed and hid himself at the Approach of the DIVINE Light manifesting himself to him to the Reprehension and Rebuke of him And the DIVINE Light charged all this Misery and Confusion upon the Eating of the forbidden Fruit and Luscious Dictates of his own Will And the DIVINE Light spoak IN Adam concerning the Woman What work hath she made here Thus doth he make the Light that reproves in the Conscience to be the Divine Light and consequently of the Nature of God who is the great Fountain of Divine Light Nay to put it out of doubt he reads those words which in Genesis say It was God himself that reproved Adam after the manner before expressed to wit the Divine Light in Adam reproved him thereby making the DIVINE LIGHT in Adam and GOD to be ONE and the same Being Of the Soul Justin Martyr brings Tryphon questioning thus concerning the Soul and himself allowing it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. That is Is the Soul Divine and Immortal Is it a Particle of that Commander Himself and as it seeth God so is it also permitted to contain Divinity in our Mind and thereby even now to be happy Yea altogether said I. Tertullian de Anima p. 297. asserts the Immortality and Divinity of the Soul P. Fagius in Gen. 2. 7. Rabbi Nehamanides hath observed That he that breatheth on any contributes something of his own to it whence Christ our Saviour when he would communicate the Holy Spirit to his Disciples he did it by breathing upon them signifying that he contributed to them something of his own that was Divine The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth something DIVINE and HEAVENLY some think 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because the Immortal Soul of Man is a certain DIVINE THING come from Heaven And the Poets call the Soul of Man a PARTICLE OF DIVINE BREATH 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a breath or spiritus DIVINE HEAVENLY Vital Immortal and Enduring forever The Soul of Man DIVINE and HEAVENLY consists in a DIVINE and HEAVENLY Spirit The Author Hiskuni understands it to be an Inspiration from the Holy Spirit of God Peter Martyr speaks of the Soul thus in Psalm 94. We are taught not to with-draw from the Divine Nature those things that are perfect and absolute in us pag. 12. and in pag. 122. They say says he 〈◊〉