the satisfaction of faith and no where else doth it find rest II. That for the begetting increasing and strengthning of faith it is useful to have important fundamental Truths confirmed by many testimonies of Scripture Again he saith Any one word of God is sufficient to establish the most important Truth to Eternity so as to hang the salvation of all mankind thereon neither can any thing impeach or weaken what is so confirmed No more is required in any case to make Faith necessary on our part as a Duty of Obedience and infallible as to the Event but that God hath by any means by any one word revealed that which he requires our assent unto But God dealeth not upon strict terms Infinite Condescension lies at the bottom of all wherein he hath to deal with us He respects not what the nature of the thing strictly requires but what is needful unto our infirmity and weakness Hence he multiplies his Commands and Promises and confirms all by his Oath swearing to his Truth by himself to take away all pretence of distrust and unbelief For this cause he multiplies Testimonies to the Truths wherein the concernments of his Glory and our Obedience do lie as might be manifested by the consideration of instances innumerable Thus in his name deals the Apostle in this place And this is useful to Faith For 1. What is it may be obscure in one is cleared in another and so what doubts and fears remain on the consideration of one Testimony are removed by another whereby the souls of Believers are carried on unto a full Assurance And therefore because such is our weakness that there is need hereof in our selves such is the Goodness of God that there is no want of it in the Word 2. Faith discerns hereby the weight that God lays upon its embracing of the Truth so testified unto He knows our concernment in it and thereon urgeth us with its acceptance This awakens and excites Faith unto Attention and Consideration the eminent means of its growth and increase It knows that it is not for nothing that the Holy Ghost thus presseth his Truth upon it and attends the more diligently upon his urgency 3. Every testimony hath something single in it and peculiar unto it Though many bear witness to the same truth yet such is the fulness of the Scripture and such the Wisdom of God laid up therein that every one of them hath also somewhat of its own somewhat singular tending to the enlightning and establishment of our minds This Faith makes a discovery of and so receives peculiar profit and advantage thereby And this should teach us to abound in the study and search of the Scriptures that we may thereby come to establishment in the truth God hath thus left us many testimonies to each important Truth and he hath not done it in vain he knows our need of it and his Condescension in so doing when he might have bound us up to the strictest terms of closing with the least intimation of his will is for ever to be admired For us to neglect this great effect and product of the Wisdom Grace and Love of God is unspeakable folly If we think we need it not we make our selves wiser than God if we think we do and neglect our duty herein we are really as unwise as the Beasts that perish Want of this fortifying of faith by a diligent search after the testimonies given unto the truth proposed unto it to be believed is the cause that so many every day turn away from it and therewithall make shipwrack of faith and a good conscience Let us then never think our selves safe in the knowledge and profession of any truth but whilst we continue sincerely in the investigation of all the confirmation that God hath given it in his Word The Opposition made to every Truth is so various and from so many hands that not the least contribution of evidence unto it can be neglected with safety III. The whole Creation of God hath a great concernment in God's bringing forth Christ into the world and his Exaltation in his Kingdom Hence in the Psalm from whence these words are taken all the principal parts of it are called on to triumph and rejoyce therein The Earth and the multitude of the Isles the Heaven and all People are invited unto this congratulation neither is any thing excluded but Idols and Idolaters whose ruine God intends in the Erection of the Kingdom of Christ. And this they have ground for 1. Because in that Work consisted the principal manifestation of the Wisdom Power and Goodness of God The whole Creation is concerned in the Glory of the Creator In his Exaltation doth their honour interest and blessedness consist For this End were they made that God might be glorified The more that is done by any means the more is their End attained Hence the very inanimate parts of it are introduced by a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rejoycing exulting shouting and clapping their hands when the Glory of God is manifested in all which their suitableness and propensity to their proper End is declared as also by their being burdened and groaning under such an Estate and Condition of things as doth any way eclipse the Glory of their Maker Now in this work of bringing forth the first-born is the Glory of God principally and eminently exalted For the Lord Christ is the Brightness of his Glory and in him all the Treasures of Wisdom Grace and Goodness are laid up and hid What ever God had any other wayes before parcelled out of and concerning his Glory by the works of his hands is all and altogether and with an unspeakable Addition of Beauty and Excellency repeated in Christ. 2. The whole Creation receiveth a real Advancement and honour in the Sons being made the first-born of every creature that is the especial Heir and Lord of them all Their being brought into a new dependance on the Lord Christ is their Honour and they are exalted by becoming his Possession For after that they had lost their first Original Dependance on God and their respect unto him grounded on his pronouncing of them exceeding good that is such as became his Wisdom and Power to have made they fell under the power of the Devil who became Prince of this world by sin Herein consisted the vanity and debasement of the Creature which it was never willingly or of its own accord subject unto But God setting up the Kingdom of Christ and making him the first-born the whole Creation hath a right unto a new glorious Lord and Master And however any part of it be violently for a season detained under its old bondage yet it hath grounds of an earnest Expectation of a full and total Deliverance into Liberty by vertue of this Primogeniture of Christ Jesus 3. Angels and Men the Inhabitants of Heaven and Earth the principal parts of the Creation on whom God hath in an especial manner estamped
Promise because he was Childless and said Behold unto me thou hast given no seed as knowing that therein lay the Promise Chap. 15. v. 3. God tells him that he who should come forth of his own Bowels should be his Heir ver 4. which was afterwards restrained unto Isaac chap. 17.21 Thus he is called and separated as from his own family and kindred so from all other Nations and a peculiar portion of the earth assigned unto him and his for their habitation Now the especial End of this Divine dispensation of this Call and Separation of Abraham was to be a means of accomplishing the Former Promise or the bringing forth of him who was to be the Deliverer of mankind from the Curse that was come upon them for their sin For First It is said that Abraham hereupon should be a blessing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And thou shalt be a Blessing not only blessed thy self which is expressed in the former words I will bless thee but the means of conveying Blessings the great Blessing unto others And how was this done in and by Abraham In his own Person he conversed but with few of them unto some whereof through their own sins he was an occasion of Punishment as to the Aegyptians Chap. 12. v. 17. and to the Philistins Chap. 20. v. 4 7. Some he destroyed with the sword Chap. 14.15 and was not in any thing signally a blessing unto any of them So his Posterity extirpated sundry Nations from the face of the Earth were a scourge unto others and occasioned the Ruine of many more He must needs then be made a Blessing unto the world on some other Account And this can be nothing but that he was separated to be the peculiar channel by which the promised blessing Seed should be brought forth into the world Secondly It is said that all the Families of the Earth should be blessed in him Chap. 12. v. 3. that is not in his Person but in his seed as it is expounded Chap. 22. v. 18. that is in the Promised Seed that should come of him Chap. 12.3 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shall be blessed in the passive Conjugation of Niphal referring solely unto the Grace and Favour of God in giving the Seed Chap. 22. v. 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Hithpael so blessed in the Seed when exhibited as that they shall come for the blessing by faith and so in him obtaining it bless themselves And this is spoken of all Nations all Families the Posterity of Adam in general They were all cursed in Adam as hath been declared and God here promiseth that they shall be blessed in the seed of Abraham and by him the seed of the Woman And this blessing must enwrap in it all the good things whereof by the Curse they were deprived or it will be of no use or benefit unto them a Blessing indeed it will not be For a while he intended to leave mankind to walk in their own wayes partly that he might shew his Severity against sin partly that he might evidence the Soveraignty and undeserved Freedom of that Grace wherein he had provided a Deliverer and partly that they might try and experiment their own Wisdom and Strength in searching after a way of Deliverance But in this Promise was the Ore laid up which after many Generations was brought forth and stamped with the Image of God Thirdly The Curse unto Satan is here again renewed I will bless them that bless thee and I will Curse HIM that curseth thee The Blessing is to many but the Curse respecteth one principally that is Satan as the Scripture generally expresseth the opposite Apostate Power under that name Neither is there any just cause of the variation of the number unless we look on the words as a pursuit of the first Promise which was accompanied with an especial Malediction on Satan and who acts his enmity in all obloquie and cursing against the blessed Seed and those that are blessed therein And this change of the number in these words is observed by Aben Ezra 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They that bless thee many He that curseth one as though many should bless and few curse the contrary whereof is true And Baal Hatturim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they that bless thee in the plural Number he â—hat curseth thee in the singular and an interpretation is given of the last word becoming those Annotations which are immeasurably Judaical that is sottish and superstitious 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He that curseth thee I will Curse that is by Gematry Balaam that cometh to curse thy Sons The Numeral Letters of each making up 422. of which fantasticall work amongst some of them there is no end But one Single Person in which way Satan is usually spoken of they saw to be intended which is passed over as far as I have observed by Christian Expositors § 30 After the giving of this Promise the whole Old Testament beareth witness that a Person was to be born of the Posterity of Abraham in and by whom the Nations of the Earth should be saved that is delivered from sin and Curse and made eternally happy Abraham died himself without one foot of an Inheritance in this world nor did he concern himself personally in the Nations of the Earth beyond his own Family Another therefore is to be looked after in whom they may be blessed And this we must further demonstrate to evince the perversness of the Jews who exclude all others besides themselves from an interest in these Promises made to Abraham at least unless they will come into subjection unto them and dependance upon them So high conceits have they yet of themselves in their low and miserable condition The next time therefore that he is mentioned in the Scripture it is said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to him shall be the gathering of the Peoples Gen. 49.10 concerning which place we must treat afterwards at large The People of the world distinct from Judah shall gather themselves unto him that is for safety and deliverance or to be made partakers of the Promised Blessing Hence Balaam among the Gentiles Prophesied of him Num. 24. v. 17 19. And Job among the children of the East that were not of the Posterity of Isaac professed his faith in him Chap. 19. v. 25. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And I know that my Redeemer liveth or is living and afterwards he shall stand on the earth or rise on the Dust. He believed that there was a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Redeemer promised one that should free him from sin and misery Aben Ezra by my Redeemer understandeth a man that would assist him or judge more favourably of his Cause than his friends at that time did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And his Comment on 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is very fond 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He is at present Living or he shall be born hereafter But is this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
Lyranus Cajetan Estlus Ribera A Lapide all desert their own Text and expound the words according to the Original The Antients also as Chrysostom Theophilact and Oecumenius lay the chief weight of their whole Exposition of this place on the words omitted in that Translation The doctrine of purging our sins by Christ is deep and large extending its self unto many weighty heads of the Gospel but we shall follow our Apostle and in this place pass it over briefly and in general because the consideration of it will directly occur unto us in our progress Two things the Apostle here expresseth concerning the Messiah and one which is the foundation of both the other he implyeth or supposeth First He expresseth What he did he purged our sins Secondly How he did it he did it by himself That which he supposeth as the foundation of both these is that he was the Great High Priest of the Church they with whom he dealt knowing full well that this matter of purging sins belonged only unto the Priest Here then the Apostle tacitely enters upon a Comparison of Christ with Aaron the High Priest as he had done before with all the Prophetical Revealers of the Will of God and as he named none of them in particular no more doth he here name Aaron but afterwards when he comes more largely to insist on the same matter again he expresly makes mention of his name as also of that of Moses And in both the things here ascribed unto him as the great High Priest of his Church doth he prefer him above Aaron First In that he purged our sins that is really and effectually before God and in the Conscience of the sinner and that for ever Whereas the Purgation of sins about which Aaron was employed was in its self but typical external and representative of that which was true and real both of which the Apostle proves at large afterwards Secondly In that he did it by himself or the offering of himself whereas what ever Aaron did of this kind he did it by the offering of the blood of Bulls and Goats as shall be declared And hence appears also the vanity of the Gloss of a learned man on these words postquam saith he morte sua causam dedisset ejus fidei per quam à peccatis purgamur quod nec Moses fecerat nec Prophetae For as we shall see that Christs purging of our sins doth not consist in giving a ground and cause for faith whereby we purge our selves so the Apostle is not comparing the Lord Christ in these words with Moses and the Prophets who had nothing to do in the work of purging sin but with Aaron who by Office was designed thereunto Let us then see what it is that is here ascribed unto the Lord Christ. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth most frequently denote real actual Purification either of outward defilements by healing and cleansing as Mark 1.40 Chap. 7.19 Luke 5.12 or spiritual defilements of sin by sanctifying Grace as Acts 15.9 2 Cor. 7.1 Ephes. 5.26 But it is also frequently used in the same sense with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to purge by Expiation or Attonement as Heb. 9.22 23. And in the like variety is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 also used But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to make a Purgation or Purification of our sins cannot here be taken in the first sense for real and inherent sanctifying First Because it is spoken of as a thing already past and perfected having purged our sins when Purification by Sanctification is begun only in some not all at any time perfected in none at all in this world Secondly Because he did it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by himself alone without the use or Application of any other medium unto them that are purged When real inherent Sanctification is with washing of Water by the word Ephes. 5.26 or by Regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost Titus 3 5. And the gloss above mentioned that Christ should purge us from our sins in his death by occasioning that Faith whereby we are cleansed is excluded as was in part shewed before by the Context That is assigned unto the death of Christ as done really and effectually thereby which was done tipically of old in the Legal Sacrifices by the Priests as is evident from the Antithâ—sis couched in that Expression by himself But this was not the way whereby sins were of old purged by Sacrifices namely by the begetting a perswasion in the minds of men that should be useful for that purpose and therefore no such things is here intended 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then is such a purging as is made by Expiation Lustration and Attonement That is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Propitiatio Attonement Propitiation So is that Word rendered by the LXX Exod. 29.36 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the day of Attonement or Expiation They do indeed mostly render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to propitiate to appease to attone but they do it also by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to purge as Exod. 29.37 and Chap. 30 10. So also in other Authors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is expiatio expiamentum piaculum Expiation Attonement diversion of guilt So Lucian 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We cast him down headlong for an expiation of the Army or as one that by his death should expiate bear take away the guilt of the Army And such Lustrations were common among the Heathen when Persons devoted themselves to destruction or were devoted by others to purge lustrate bear the guilt of any that they might go free such were Codius Menaeceus and the Decii whose stories are known This purging then of our sins which the Apostle declareth to have been effected before the Ascension of Christ and his sitting down at the Right Hand of God consisteth not in the actual Sanctification and Purification of believers by the Spirit in the Application of the blood of Christ unto them but in the Attonement made by him in the Sacrifice of himself that our sins should not be imputed unto us And therefore is he said to purge our sins and not to purge us from our sins And where ever sins not sinners are made the Object of any Mediatory acts of Christ that act immediately respecteth God and not the sinner and intends the removal of sin so as that it should not be imputed So Chap. 2.17 of this Epistle he is a merciful High Priest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to reconcile the sins of the people that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to make Attonement or Reconciliation with God for the sins of the people And again He underwent death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the redemption of Transgressions under the first Covenant that is to pay a price for them that transgressors might be set free from the sentence
and all our opinions must be judged But it being manifest at length that no colour was given unto the unjust severities of the Novatians by any thing in this Epistle it was generally embraced And by the conquest of this opposition established its Authority for the future § 17 Bellarmin chargeth Luther Brentius Chemnitius and the Centuriators with the rejection of this Epistle But because I know that some of them are falsly accused by him I am apt to suspect the same of the rest which I have not the opportunity to consult And so I shall not reckon them amongst the opposers of this Epistle The matter is more certain concerning Cajetan and Erasmus the former in his Preface unto the other in his last Annotation on this Epistle denying it to be St. Pauls and questioning yea indeed rejecting its Canonicall Authority To them we may add Eniedinus proceeding upon the same principles and making use of their Arguments to the same purpose These are the chief if not absolutely all who have at any time made any scruple at the Authority of this Epistle The reasons they make use of to justifie themselves in their conjectures are amassed together by Erasmus in his Note on the 24. Verse of the last Chapter of it But because he mixeth together the Arguments that he insists on to prove St. Paul not to have been the Penman of it and the exceptions he puts in unto its Canonicall Authority which are things of a diverse consideration I shall separate them and first take out those that seem absolutely to impeach its Authority leaving them that oppose its Penman to our ensuing Discourse on that question in particular § 18 The first thing generally pleaded is the uncertainty of its Author or Penman Sola omnium Pauli nomen non praefert saith Erasmus How unjust and groundless this pretence is we shall afterwards fully manifest At present I shall only shew that it is in generall of no importance in this cause The Author of a Writing being certainly known may indeed give some light unto the nature and Authority of it When it is confessed that the Penman of any Book was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or divinely inspired and that by him it was written for the use of the Church there can be no question of its Authority But this last of his design directed by the Holy Ghost must be no less known than the former For a man may write one Book by inspiration and others by a fallible humane Judgement as Solomon seems to have done his Philosophicall Discourses that are lost Again when the Penman of any Writing pretending unto Divine Authority is not esteemed nor doth manifest himself in any thing to have been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 immediately acted by the Holy Ghost the writing it self must needs be lyable unto just Exception Wherefore it is confessed that when the Author of any Writing is certainly known much light into its Authority and Relation unto the Canon of the Scripture may be thence received But when this is doubtfull nothing can thence satisfactory on either side be concluded And therefore it hath pleased the Holy Ghost to keep the names of the Penmen of many parts of the Scripture in everlasting obscurity for he borrows no Countenance or Authority unto any thing that proceeds by Inspiration from himself from the names of men There is not then the least strength in this exception for be it granted that we are altogether uncertain who was the Penman of this Epistle yet no impeachment of its Authority can thence be taken unless it can be proved that he was not Divinely inspired But yet to shew the insufficiency every way of this Objection we shall abundantly evince that indeed the very ground and foundation of it is feeble and false The Penman of this Epistle being as well and certainly known as those of any portion of Scripture whatever that are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some whereof were never doubted nor called into question And at least we shall so far evince St. Paul to have been the Author of it as although we shall not from thence take any Argument to prove its Canonicall Authority because it hath it self been called into question yet as to render an Objection from the uncertainty of its Author altogether unreasonable § 19 The remaining Objections are more particular and direct to their purpose by whom they are pleaded As First that the Author of this Epistle cites sundry things out of the Old Testament which are not therein contained Such are many of the Stories related unto in the 11. Chapter and that in particular in Chap. 12. verse 21. where he affirms that Moses upon the Terror of the sight that appeared unto him said I exceedingly quake and tremble This place Erasmus supposeth Hierom to have intended when he sayes that some things are mentioned in this Epistle that are not recorded in the Old Testament And Aquinas perplexeth himself in seeking for a Solution unto this difficulty For First he would refer the place to Moses sight of the Angell in the Bush and not the giving of the Law contrary to the express Discourse of the Context And then he adds dixit saltem facto though he said not so yet he did so And lastly worst of all vel fortè Apostolus aliâ utitur literâ quam nos non habemus or it may be the Apostle used another Text that we have not But there is no need of any of these evasions The Author quotes no Book nor Testimony of the Old Testament but only relates a matter of fact and one circumstance of it which doubtless he had by Divine Revelation whereof there is no express mention in the place where the whole matter is Originally recorded Thus in the beginning of the Chronicles sundry particular Stories as that about the Children of Ephraim Chap. 7.21 no wher 's before written are reported from the same infallible directions that others of the same time were written withall when they were omitted And it is uncouth way of proving an Author not to write by Divine inspiration because he writeth Truths that he could no otherwise be acquainted withall Neither is it unmeet for him that writes by Divine inspiration to mention things recorded in other Stories whose Truth is unquestionable as those are related unto Chap. 11. It seems to be of more importance that if the Objectors may be believed the § 20 Writer of this Epistle citeth Testimonies out of the Old Testament that are no wayes to his purpose nor at all prove the matter that he produceth them for discovering at least that he wrote with a fallible spirit if not also that he dealt scarcely bona fide in handling the cause which he undertook Cajetan insists on that of the first Chapter verse 5. I will be unto him a Father and he shall be unto me a Son taken from the 2 Sam. 7.14 or 1 Chron. 17. ◠which words as he supposeth no
I will wait for him so that their words seem to be taken from this place of the Apostle as apprehending his Testimony to be cited from the Prophet which that it is not we shall prove evidently afterwards The same Verse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Behold I and the children which God hath given me From Isa. 8.17 CHAP. III. § 6 VEr 7 8 9 10 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To day if you will hear his voice harden not your hearts as in the day of Provocation in the day of Temptation in the Wilderness when your Fathers tempted me proved me and saw my Works forty years wherefore I was grieved with that Generation and said they do alwayes err in heart and they have not known my wayes so I swore in my wrath they shall not enter into my rest From Psalm 95. v. 7 8 9 10 11. The Translation of the LXX agrees with the words of the Apostle both of them answering the Original Only the Apostle clearly to express the Reason of Gods Judgements on that people in the Wilderness distinguisheth the Words somewhat otherwise than they are in the Hebrew Text. For whereas that saith When your Fathers tempted me proved me and saw my Works Forty years long was I grieved with that Generation The Apostle adds that season of forty years to the mention of their sins and interposing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wherefore refers his Speech unto the words foregoing as containing the cause of the ensuing Wrath and Judgement And although our present Copies of the Greek Bibles distinguish the Words according to the Hebrew Text yet Theodoret informs us that some Copies made the distinction with the Apostle and added 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which also is observed by Nobilius and this could arise from no other cause but an attempt to insert the very words of the Apostle in that Text as did the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 also reckoned amongst its various Sections though 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 remain in the vulgar Editions CHAP. IV. § 7 VEr 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And God râ—sted on the seventh day from all his works From Gen. 2. v. 2. The Apostle adds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the Text to complâ—â—t his Assertion and leaves out 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which he had made as to his purpose The LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and otherwise also differing from the Apostle CHAP. V. VEr 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thou art a Priest for ever after § 8 the Order of Melchisedech From Psalm 110. v. 4. So also the LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with Jod superfluous 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mos. There is nothing of Variety remaining in these words from any other Translations Ver. 14. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Blessing I will bless thee and multiplying I will multiply thee From Gen. 22. v. 17. The LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will multiply thy seed CHAP. VIII VEr 9 10 11 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 § 9 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Behold the dayes come saith the Lord when I will make a new Covenant with the House of Israel and with the House of Judah Not according to the Covenant that I made with their Fathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the Land of Aegypt because they continued not in my Covenant and I regarded them not saith the Lord. For this is the Covenant that I will make with the House of Israel after those dayes saith the Lord I will put my Laws in their minds and write them in their hearts and I will be to them a God and they shall be to me a people And they shall not teach every man his neighbour and every man his Brother saying know the Lord for all shall know me from the least of them to the greatest of them For I will be mercifull to their unrighteousness and their sins and their iniquity will I remember no more From Jer. 31. v. 32 33 34 35. Instead of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his neighbor ver 11. the LXX read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his fellow Citizen But some Copies of the LXX read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and some of this Text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which makes it evident that there hath been tampering to bring them to Vniformity But the greatest difficulty of this Quotation ariseth from the Agreement of the Apostles words and the Translation of the LXX where both of them seem to depart from the Original For those words in the Hebrew Text v. 33. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which my Covenant they made void and I was an Husband unto them or ruled over them are rendered by them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And they continued not in my Covenant and I regarded them not The Reason of the Apostles Translation of those words we shall manifest and vindicate in our Exposition of the Context At present the coincidence of it with that of the LXX and that wherein they both seem to differ from the Original and all Translations besides the Syriack and the Arabick which are made out of it though the Syriack follow it not in the confused transpositions that are made of Jeremiah's Prophesies from Chap. 25. to Chap. 40. as the Arabick doth is only to be considered which shall be done so soon as we have recounted the remaining Testimonies whereof some are attended with the same difficulty CHAP. IX § 10 VEr 20. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is the blood of the Covenant which God hath enjoyned unto you From Exod. 24.8 The sense of the Hebrew Text is alluded unto not the words absolutely The LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with much difference from the words of the Apostle CHAP. X. § 11 VEr 5. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sacrifice and Offering thou wouldst not have a Body thou hast prepared me From Psalm 40. v. 6. So also the LXX both with great difference from the Original For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 my ears hast thou digged or bored is rendered a Body thou hast prepared me Of the Reason of which difference and agreement we shall treat afterwards Ver. 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Burnt-Offerings and Sacrifices for sin thou hast had no pleasure Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou hast not required the Apostle expresseth exactly the sense of the Holy Ghost but observes not the first exact signification of the word The LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in some copies 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 soughtest not Ver. 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Behold I come in the Head or beginning of the Book it is written of me to do thy will O God That is Gen. 3. v. 15. Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the roll of the Book Symmachus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
farther and assign the rise of this difference unto some other Copies of the Hebrew Text used by the LXX varying from those which now remain Thus in particular in that place of Jeremy before mentioned he conjectures that for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I despised them as another doth that they read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the same purpose for of such conjectures there is no end But as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may well signifie as the Apostle expounds it and in other places doth so as we shall see afterwards so this boldness in correcting the Text and fancying without proof Testimony or probability of other antient Copies of the Scripture of the Old Testament differing in many things from them which alone remain and which indeed were ever in the world may quickly prove pernicious to the Church of God We must therefore look after another expedient for the removal of this difficulty § 20 I say then it is highly probable that the Apostle according to his wonted manner which appears in almost all the Citations used by him in this Epistle reporting the sense and importance of the places in words of his own the Christian Transcribers of the Greek Bible inserted his expresions into the Text either as judging them a more proper Version of the Original whereof they were ignorant than that of the LXX or out of a preposterous zeal to take away the appearancâ— of a diversity between the Text and the Apostles citation of it And thus in those Testimonies where there is a real variation from the Hebrew Original the Apostle took not his words from the Translation of the LXX but his words were afterwards inserted into that Translation And this as we have partly made to appear already in sundry instances so it shall now briefly be farther confirmed For § 21 First Whereas the Reasons of the Apostle for his Application of the Testimonies used by him in his words and expressions are evident as shall in particular be made to appear so no Reason can be assigned why the LXX if any such LXX there were who translated the Old Testament or any other Translators of it should so render the words of the Hebrew Text. Neither Various Lections nor ambiguity of signification in the words of the Original can in most of them be pleaded For instance The Apostle in applying those words of the Psalmist Psalm 40. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unto the humane nature and body of Christ wherein he did the will of God did certainly express the design and intention of the Holy Ghost in them But who can imagine what should move the LXX to render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a word of a known signification and univocal by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when they had translated it an hundred and fifty times that is constantly elsewhere by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an ear which alone it signifies or what should move them to render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to prepare when the word signifies to digg or to bore and is alwayes so elsewhere rendred by themselves Neither did any such thing come into their minds in the Translation of those places whence this Expression seems to be borrowed Exod. 21.6 Deut. 15.17 When any man then can give a tolerable conjecture why the LXX should be inclined thus to translate these words I shall consider it In the mean time I judge there is much more ground to suppose that the Apostles expressions which he had weighty cause to use were by some inserted into the Greek Text of the Old Testament than that a Translation which those that made it had no cause so to do evidently forsaking the proper meaning of very obvious words and their sense known to themselves should be taken up and used by the Apostle unto his purpose § 22 Secondly It is certain that some Words used by the Apostle have been insâ—rted into some Copies of the Greek Bibles which being single words and of little importance prevailed not in them all as may be seen in sundry of the foregoing instances And why may we not think that some whole sentences might on the same account be inserted in some of them which being of more importance found a more general acceptance And how also by other means that Translation was variously changed and corrupted of old and that before the dayes of Hierom Learned Men do know and confess § 23 It is further evident that one place at least in this Epistle which it may be some could not conjecture from whence it should be taken yet finding it urged by the Apostle as a Testimony out of the Old testament is inserted in another place of the Text than that from which the Apostle took it and that where there is not the least colour for its insertion This is the Testimony out of Psalm 95. v. 7. which the Apostle cites Chap. 1. v. 6. in words much differing from those wherewith the Original is rendered by the LXX This some of the Transcribers of the Bible not knowing well where to find have inserted in the very syllables of the Apostles expression into Deut. 32. v. 43. where it yet abides though Originally it had no place there as we shall in the Exposition of the Words sufficiently manifest The same and no other is the cause why 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is rendered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 49. And may we not as well think nay is it not more likely that they would insert his words into the places from whence they knew his Testimonies were taken with a very little alteration of the antient Reading than that they would wholly intrude them into the places from whence they were not taken by him which yet undeniably hath been done and that with success Nay we find that many things out of the New Testament are translated into the Apochryphall Books themselves As for instance Ecclesiasticus chap. 24. v. 3. we have these words in the Latin Copies Ex ore altissimi prodii primogenita ante omnem Creaturam which are cited by Bellarmine and others in the confirmation of the Deity of Christ whereas they are taken from Col. 1.15 and are in no Greek Copies of that Book Upon these Reasons then which may yet be rendered more cogent by many other § 24 instances but that we confine our selves to this Epistle I suppose I may conclude that it is more probable at least that the Apostles interpretations of the Testimonies used by him all agreeably unto the mind of the Holy Ghost were by some of old inserted into the Vulgar Copies of the Greek Translation of the Old Testament and therein prevailed unto common acceptation than that he himself followed in the Citation of them a Translation departing without Reason from the Original Text and diverting unto such senses as its Authors knew not to be contained in them which must needs give
Attonement and Reconciliation and that some such thing was signified in their Sacrifices they do each one for himself torture slay and offer a Cock on the day of Expiation to make attonement for their sins and that unto the Devil The Rites of that Diabolical Solemnity are declared at large by Buxtorfius in his Synagog Judaic cap. 20. But yet as this folly manifests that they can find no rest in their consciences without their Sacrifices so it gives them not at all what they seek after And therefore being driven from all other hopes they trust at length unto their own Death for in Life they have no hope making this one of their constant Prayers Let my Death be the Expiation of all Sins But this is the curse and so no means to avoid it Omitting therefore these horrid follies of men under despair an effect of that wrath which is come upon them unto the uttermost the thing its self may be considered That the Sacrifices of Moses's Law in and by themselves should be a means to deliver men from the guilt of sin and to reconcile them unto God is contrary to the Light of Nature their own proper use and express Testimonies of the Old Testament For First Can any man think it reasonable that the blood of Bulls and Goats should of its self make an Expiation of the sin of the souls of men reconcile them to God the Judge of all and impart unto them an Everlasting Righteousness Our Apostle declares the manifest impossibility hereof Heb. 10. v. 4. They must have very mean and low thoughts of God his Holiness Justice Truth of the Demerit of Sin of Heaven and Hell who think them all to depend on the blood of a Calf or a Goat The Sacrifices of them indeed might by Gods appointment represent that to the minds of men which is effectuall unto the whole End of appeasing Gods Justice and of obtaining his Favour but that they should themselves effect it is unsuitable unto all the Apprehensions which are imbred in the heart of man either concerning the nature of God or the Guilt of Sin Secondly Their Primitive and proper use doth manifest the same For they were to be frequently repeated and in all the Repetitions of them there was still new mention made of sin They could not therefore by themselves take it away for if they could they would not have been reiterated It is apparent therefore that their use was to represent and bring to remembrance that which did perfectly take away sin For a perfect work may be often remembred but it need not it cannot be often done For being done for such an End and that End being obtained it cannot be done again The Sacrifices therefore were never appointed never used to take away sin which they did not but to represent that which did so effectually Besides there were some sins that men may be guilty of whom God will not utterly reject for which there was no Sacrifice appointed in the Law of Moses as was the case with David Psal. 51. v. 16. which makes it undeniable that there was some other way of Attonement besides them and beyond them as our Apostle declares Acts 13. v. 38 39. Thirdly The Scripture expresly rejects all the Sacrifices of the Law when they are trusted in for any such End and Purpose which sufficiently demonstrates that they were never appointed thereunto See Psal. 40 v. 6 7 8. Psal. 50. v. 8 9 10 11 12 13. Isa. 1. v. 11 12 13. Chap. 66. v. 3. Amos. 5.21 22. Micha 6. v. 6 7 8. and other places innumerable Add unto what hath been spoken that during the Observation of the whole Law § 22 of Moses whilest it was in force by the Appointment of God himself He still directed those who sought for Acceptance with him unto a New Covenant of Grace whole Benefits by faith they were then made partakers of and whole nature was afterwards more fully to be declared See Jerem. 31. v. 31 32 33 34. with the inferences of our Apostle thereon Heb. 8.12 13. And this plainly everts the whole Foundation of the Jews Expectation of Justification before God on the account of the Law of Moses given on Mount Sinai For to what purpose should God call them from resting on the Covenant thereof to look for Mercy and Grace in and by another if that had been able to give them the help desired In brief then the Jews fixing on the Law of Moses as the only means of delivery from sin and death as they do thereby exclude all mankind besides themselves from any interest in the Love Favour or Grace of God which they greatly design and desire so they cast themselves also into a miserable restless self-condemned condition in this world by trusting to that which will not relieve them and into Endless misery hereafter by refusing that which effectually would make them Heirs of Salvation For whilest they perish in their sin another better more glorious and sure Remedy against all the Evils that are come upon mankind or are justly feared to be coming by any of them is provided in the Grace Wisdom and Love of God as shall now farther be demonstrated The first intimation that God gave of this work of his Grace in Redeeming mankind § 23 from sin and misery is contained in the Promise subjoyned unto the Curse denounced against our first Parents and their Posterity in them Gen. 3. v. 15. The seed of the Woman shall bruise the Heaa of the Serpent and the Serpent shall bruise his Heel Two things there are contained in these words A Promise of Relief from the misery brought on mankind by the Temptation of Satan and an intimation of the Means or Way whereby it should be brought about That the first is included in these words is evident For First If there be not a Promise of Deliverance expressed in these words whence is it that the execution of the sentence of Death against sin is suspended Unless we will allow an Intervention satisfactory to the Righteousness and Truth of God to be expressed in these words there would have been a truth in the suggestion of the Serpent namely that whatever God had said yet indeed they were not to dye The Jews in the Midrash Tehillim as Kimchi informs us on Psal. 92. whose Title is a Psalm for the Sabbath Day which they generally assign unto Adam say that Adam was cast out of the Garden of Eden on the Evening of the sixth day after which God came to execute the Sentence of Death upon him but the Sabbath being come on the Punishment was deferred whereon Adam made that Psalm for the Sabbath Day Without an interposition of some external Cause and Reason they acknowledge that Death ought immediately to have been inflicted and other besides what is mentioned in these words there was none Secondly The whole Evil of sin and Curse that mankind then did or was to suffer under proceeded from the
he that hath Dominion shall not be taken from the House of Judah And Jonathan 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Kings and Rulers shall not cease from the House of Judah The same words are used by that called of Jerusalem The Authority of these Paraphrases among the Jews is such as that they dare not openly recede from them And therefore Manasse in his Conciliator where he endeavours to enervate this Testimony passeth over these Targums in silence as having nothing to oppose to their Authority which is a sufficient evidence that he saw the desperateness of the cause wherein he was engaged Solomon and Bechai acknowledge Rule and Dominion to be intended in the words but according to the latter they are not to be erected untill the coming of the Messiah which is no less expresly contrary to the Targum then to the Text it self affirming plainly that then it was to end and not begin Add hereunto further to manifest the consent of the Antient Jews unto this sense of the words that in their Talmuds they affirm the Law-giver here mentioned to be the Sanhedrim whose power continued in Judah untill the Shilo came whereof we have spoken before § 26 Unto these Reasons and Testimonies we may subjoyn the use of the words themselves 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is originally and properly a rod or staff all other significations of it are Metaphoricall Among them the principall is that of Scepter an Ensign of Rule and Government Nor is it absolutely used in any other sense in that very frequently Psalm 45. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Scepter of uprightness is the Scepter of thy Kingdom Numb 24.17 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Scepter shall arise out of Israel that is a Prince or a Ruler Targum Christ shall rule out of Israel And this sense of the words is made more evident by its conjunction with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Law-giver he that prescribes and writes Laws with Authority to be observed Deut. 33.2 in a portion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Law-giver hidden that is Moses the great Scribe saith the Targum for as they suppose the Sepulchre of Moses was in the Lot of Gad. Mechokek saith Aben Ezra that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the great President or Ruler Psal. 108.19 Judah 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 my Law-giver with Allusion to this Prediction of Jacob. Isa. 33.22 The Lord is our Judge the Lord is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 our Law-giver These two words then in conjunction do absolutely denote Rule and Dominion The latter Masters of the Jews to avoid the force of this Testimony have coined § 27 a new signification for these words Shebet they say is only a rod of Correction and Mechokek any Scribe or Teacher which they would refer to the Rabbins they have had in every Generation Some of them by Shebet understand a staff of supportment which they were to enjoy in the middest of their troubles so I remember Manasse Ben Israel not long since made it one of his reasons for their admission into England that therein this Prophesie might receive somewhat of accomplishment by this countenance and encouragement in this Land But the most of them adhere to the former sense of the words So they call the story of their calamities and sufferings 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the rod of Judah But this evasion is plainly and fully obviated in the former opening of the words and confirmation of their genuine importance For 1. It is openly contrary to the whole Context and Scope of the Place 2. To the meaning and constant use of the words themselves especially as conjoined 3. To the Targums and all old Translations 4. To the Talmud and all their own Antient masters 5. To the truth of the Story Judah having been long in a most flourishing and prosperous condition without any such signal calamity as that which they would intimate to be intended in the words namely such as for sixteen hundred years they have now undergone 6. The supportment they have had hath not been National nor afforded to Judah as a Tribe or People but hath consisted meerly in the greatness and wealth of a few individual persons scattered up and down the world neither themselves nor any else knowing unto what Tribe they did belong And 7. This hath been in things no way relating to the Worship of God or their Church-state or their spiritual good 8. Their Scribes were not formerly of the Tribe of Judah and their latter Rabbins wholly of an uncertain extraction so that this pretence proves nothing but the misery of their present State and condition wherein they seek a refuge for their infidelity in vanity and falshood Our second enquiry is concerning the subject of the Promise under consideration § 28 which is the Shilo whereby we say the promised Seed is intended About the derivation and precise significations of the word we have no need to contend Most learned men look upon it as derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be quiet safe happy prosperous whence also is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Psal. 122. safety peace prosperity Abundance Hence Shilo sayes Mercer sonat tranquillum prosperum pacatum felicem Augustum victorem cui omnia prospere succedunt signifies one quiet prosperous peaceable happy honourable a Conqueror to whom all things succeed well and happily To this Etymologie of the word agrees Galatinus Fagius Melancthon Pagninus Prusius Schindler Buxtorfius Armama and generally all the most learned in the Hebrew tongue The Vulgar Latin rendring the words qui mittendus est who is to be sent as if it were from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 corrupts the sense and gives advantage to the Jews to pervert the words as both Raymandus and Galatinus observe Neither is there any thing nearer the truth in the derivation of the word from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as though 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 were put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so making it as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quae ei which to him whereunto yet that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Greeks the first mentioned by Eusebius the latter in the present Copies both by Justin Martyr do relate or allude Others suppose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to signifie a Son from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which denotes the after birth or Membrane wherein the Child is wrapt in the Womb. Thence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Shilo should be the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his Son 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is not unusual saith Kimchi But Galatinus supposeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be a foeminine affix denoting that the Messiah was to be the seed of the Woman or to be born of a Virgin Neither is his conjecture absolutely to be rejected Although Mercer pronounce it to be against the rule of Grammar for we know they hold
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Prophet for Prophecy the concrete for the abstract The expression being Metaphorical is capable of a triple Interpretation or Application every one of them proper unto the Messiah his work and the times wherein he came and to no other 1. To seal is to consummate to establish and confirm Things are perfected compleated established and confirmed by sealing Jer. 34. v. 44. Isa. 8. v. 16. John 3. v. 34. Rom. 4. v. 11. In this sense Vision and Prophecy were sealed in the Messiah They had all of them respect unto the coming of the Just One the promised seed God had spoken of him by the mouths of his Holy Prophets from the foundation of the world In the bringing of him forth he sealed the Truth of their Predictions by their actual accomplishment The Law and the Prophets were untill John and then they were to be fulfilled This was the season wherein all Vision and Prophecy centred this the Person who was the principal subject and End of them He therefore and his coming is here foretold 2. To seal is to finish conclude and put an end unto any thing Isai. 29. v. 11. Thus also were Vision and Prophecy then sealed among the Jews They were shut up and finished The Priviledge Use and Benefit of them were no more to be continued in their Church And this also fell out accordingly By their own confession from that day to this they have not enjoyed either Vision or Prophet That work as unto them came wholly to an end in the coming of the Messiah 3. By sealing the confirmation of the Doctrine concerning the Messiah his Person and Office by Vision and Prophecy may be intended The Visions and Prophecies that went before by reason of their darkness and obscurity left the people in sundry particulars at great uncertainty Now all things were cleared and confirmed The Spirit of Prophecy accompanying the Messiah and by him given unto his Disciples foretold by Joel Chap. 2. v. 28 29. was in his Revelations express clear and evident directing unto and confirming every thing belonging unto his Person and Doctrine Neither had these words any other accomplishment but what is contained in these things Sixthly It is affirmed that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Messiah shall he cut off Not occidetur shall § 35 be slain as the Vulgar Latin renders the word but excidetur shall be cut off that is poenally as one punished for sin For the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when it includes death constantly denotes a poenal excision or cutting off for sin See Gen. 17. v. 14. Exod. 12. v. 15. Numb 15. v. 30. This the Jews themselves acknowledge to be the meaning of the Word So Rab. Suadias Gaeon in Haemunâ—th cap. 8. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is not used for slaying unless it be of him who is slain by the sentence of the Judge or is judicially cut off as it said every one that eats of it shall be cut off Levit 17. v. 14. It is then foretold that the Messiah shall be cut off poenally for sin which he was when he was made a curse for sin all our iniquities meeting upon him And this also is intimated in the ensuing particles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not to him For an Objection is prevented that might arise about the poenal excision of the Messiah for how could it be seeing he was every way Just and Righteous To this it is answered by way of concession that it was not on his own account not for himself but for us as is at large declared Isa. 51. Or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not to him may be a farther declaration of of his state and condition namely that notwithstanding those carnal Apprehensions which the Jews would have of his outward Splendour Glory Wealth and Riches yet in Truth he should have nothing in or of this world none to stand up for him not where to lay his head And this is that part of the Prophecy for the sake whereof the Jews do so pertinaciously contend that the true Messiah is not here intended For say they he shall not be poenally cut off But who told them so Shall we believe the Angel or them Will they not suffer God to send his Messiah in his own way but they must tell him that it must not be so To cast off Prophecies when and because they suit not mens carnal lusts is to reject all Authority of God and his Word This is that which hath proved their ruine temporal and eternal they will not receive a Messiah that shall suffer and be cut off for sin though God foretold them expresly that it must be so It is added Seventhly concerning the person here spoken of and whose coming is § 36 foretold 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he shall confirm or strengthen the Covenant unto many The Covenant spoken of absolutely can be none but that everlasting Covenant which God made with his Elect in the promised seed The great Promise whereof was the foundation of the Covenant with Abraham And hence God sayes that he will give him for a Covenant unto the people Isa. 42. v. 6. Chap. 49. v. 8. And the Salvation which they looked for through him God promiseth through the blood of the Covenant Zech. 9. v. 11. This Covenant he strengthened unto many in the Week wherein he suffered even unto all that believed in him This everlasting Covenant was ratified in his blood Heb. 9. v. 15. and after he had declared it in his own Ministry he caused it to be proclaimed in and by his Gospel At the time here determined the especial Covenant with Israel and Judah was broken Zech. 11. v. 10. and they were thereon cast off from being a Church or people Nor was there at that season any other ratification of the Covenant but only what was made in the death of the Messiah § 37 Then also Eighthly did he cause to cease the Sacrifice and Gift or Offering First He caused it to cease as unto force and efficacy or any use in the Worship of God by his own accomplishment of all that was prefigured by it or intended in it Hereby it became as a dead thing useless unprofitable and made ready to disappear Heb. 8. v. 13. And then shortly after he caused it utterly to be taken away by a perpetual desolation brought upon the place where alone Sacrifices and Offerings were acceptable unto God according unto the Law of Moses And this is the third evidence that this Prophecy affords unto our Assertion namely that it is the true promised Messiah and none other whose coming and cutting off is here foretold The great things here mentioned were fulfilled in him alone nor had they ever the least respect unto any other And the Jews do not in any thing more evidently manifest the desperateness of their cause then when they endeavour to wrest these words unto any other sense or purpose § 38 Moreover
called a Prodigie an eminent sign of Gods giving a thing that he should take upon his own power to perform when within the same space of time hundreds of Sons were born to other Women in the same Country And it is ridiculous what the Jews pretend namely that it was great in this that the Prophet should foretell that Conception as also that it should be a Son that should be born and not a Daughter for the work and sign intimated doth not consist at all in the Truth of the Prophets prediction but in the Greatness of the thing it self that was foretold The Jews cannot assign either Virgin or Son that is here intended Some of them § 29 affirm that Alma was the Wife of Ahaz and the Son promised Hezekiah but this is rejected by Kimchi himself acknowledging that Hezekiah was now eight years old being born four years before his Father came to the Kingdom in the fourth year of whose Reign this promise was given unto him Others would have the Alma to be the Wife of the Prophet and the Son promised to be Maker-shalal-hasbaz whose birth is mentioned in the next chapter But neither hath this any more colour of reason For besides that his Wife is constantly called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Prophetess and could on no account be termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Virgin having a Son some years old at that time accompanying his Father that Son of hers in the eighth chapter is promised as a sign quite to another purpose nor could for any reason be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Immanuel whose the Land should be which is said to belong unto this promised child And for what they lastly add concerning some Virgin then standing by who was shortly after to be married it is as fond as any other of their imaginations for besides that the Prophet sayes not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this Virgin as he would have done had he directed his speech unto any one personally present it is a more arbitrary invention no way countenanced from the Text or Context such as if men may be allowed in it is easie for them to pervert the sense of holy Writ at their pleasure On all which considerations it appeareth that none can possibly in this promise be intended but he whose birth was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a miraculous sign as being born of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Virgin and who being born was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God with us both in respect of his person uniting the Natures of God and Man in one and of his Office reconciling God and Man that God might dwell with us in a way of favour and grace and he whose the Land should be in an everlasting Kingdom § 30 I have insisted the longer on this particular because it comprizeth all that the Prophecy is cited for by the Evangelist and all that we are concerned in it This being proved and confirmed undeniably that it is the Messiah whose birth is here foretold as also that he was to be born of a Virgin all other passages whatever difficulty we may meet withall in them must be interpreted in answer thereunto And we have shewed before that by reason of the Typical State and Condition of that people many of the Promises of the Messiah were so mixed with things of thâ—ir then present temporal concernment that it is often a matter of some difficulty to distinguish between them It is enough for us that we prove unquestionably that those passages which are applyed unto him in the New Testament were spoken of him intentionally in the Old which we have done in this place and what belonged unto the then present state of the Jews we are not particularly concerned in However we shall manifest in answer to the remaining exceptions of the Jews that there is nothing mentioned in the whole Prophecy that hath any inconsistency with what we have declared as to the sense of the principal point of it nay that the whole of it is excellently suited unto the principal Scope already vindicated § 31 That then which in the second place is objected by the Jews against our Application of this Place and Prophecy to Jesus Christ is that the birth of the Child here promised was to be a sign to Ahaz and the House of David of their deliverance from the two Kings who then waged war against them And this they say the birth of the Messiah so many hundred years after could give them no pledge or assurance of And 1. We do not say that this was given them as a peculiar sign or token of their present deliverance Ahaz himself had before refused such a sign But God only shews the Reason in general why he would not utterly cast them off although they wearied him but would yet deliver them as at other times And this was because of that great work which he had to accomplish among them which was to be signal marvelous and miraculous And this he calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a sign in its absolute not relative sense as denoting a work wonderfull such as sometimes he wrought to evidence his great power thereby In this sense 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signs are joyned unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Prodigies Deut. 26.22 Jer. 32.20 Nehem. 9.10 where the works so called were great and marvellous not signs formally of any thing unless it were of the wonderful power of God whereby they were wrought So the Miracles of our Saviour and the Apostles in the New Testament are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signs for the same and no other cause And the Word is thus absolutely used very often in the Old Testament Besides that which is Secondly alledged that a thing that shall come to pass many ages after cannot be made a sign of that which was to be done many ages before is not universally true The thing it self in its existence it is true cannot be made so a sign but it may in the Promise and prediction of it And many instances we have of things promised for signs which were not to exist in themselves untill after the accomplishment of the things whereof they were signs as Exod. 3.12 1 Sam. 11.34 Isa. 37.10 1 Kings 22.25 God intending by them the confirmation of their faith who should live in the time of their actual accomplishment Thirdly This sign had the truth and force of a Promise although it was not immediately to be put in execution and that is the reason that the words here used are one of them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 conceive in the preterperfect Tense the other 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in benoni or Participle of the present Tense to intimate the certainty of the events as is usual in the prophetical Dialect Their assurance then from this sign consisted herein that God informs them that as surely as he would accomplish the great promise of bringing forth the Messiah and would put forth his marvelous power therein that
that is the Creation of the whole world and all things contained in it hath been elsewhere proved and must be granted or we may well despair of ever understanding one line in the Scripture or what we ordinarily speak one to another 3. John doth not mention any particular of the old Creation affirming only in general that by the Word all things were made whereof he afterwards affirms that it was the Light of men not assigning unto him in particular the Creation of Light as is pretended 3. He tells us the Article preposed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 intimates that it is not the old Creation that is intended but some new especial thing distinct from it and preferred above it Answ. 1. As the same Article doth used by the same Apostle to the same purpose in another place Acts 14.15 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who made the Heaven the Earth and Sea which were certainly those created of old 2. The same Article is used with the same word again in this Epistle Chap. 11.3 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by faith we understand that the worlds were made where this Author acknowledgeth the old Creation to be intended 4. He adds that the Author of this Epistle seems to allude to the Greek Translation of Isa. 9.6 wherein 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Father of Eternity or eternal Father is rendred the Father of the world to come Answ. 1. There is no manner of Relation between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Father of the world to come and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by whom he made the worlds unless it be that one word is used in both places in very distinct senses which if it be sufficient to evince a cognation between various places very strange and uncouth interpretations would quickly ensue Nor 2. Doth that which the Apostle here treats of any way respect that which the Prophet in that place insists upon his name and nature being only declared by the Prophet and his works by the Apostle And 3. It is presumption to suppose the Apostle to allude to a corrupt Translation as that of the LXX in that place is there being no ground for it in the Original for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the eternal Father and what the Jews and LXX intend by the world to come we shall afterwards consider 5. His last refuge is in Isa. 51.16 Where the work of God as he observes in the reduction of the people of the Jews from the Captivity of Babylon is called his planting the Heavens and laying the foundation of the Earth And the Vulgar Latin Translation as he farther observes renders the word ut corlum plantes ut terram fundes ascribing that to the Prophet which he did but declare and in this sense he contends that God the Father is said to make the worlds by his Son Answ. 1. The work mentioned is not that which God would do in the reduction of the people from Babylon but that which he had done in their delivery from Aegypt recorded to strengthen the faith of Believers in what for the future he would yet do for them 2. The expressions of planting the Heavens and laying the foundation of the Earth are in this place of the Prophet plainly Allegorical and are in the very same place declared so to be First In the circumstance of time when this work is said to be wrought namely at the coming of the Israelites out of Aegypt when the Heavens and the Earth properly so called could not be made planted founded or created Secondly By an adjoyned Exposition of the Allegory I have put my words into thy mouth and said unto Zion thou art my people This was his planting of the Heavens and laying the foundation of the Earth even the erection of a Church and Political State amongst the Israelites 3. It is not to the Prophet but to the Church that the words are spoken and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are not ut plantes ut fundes but ad plantandum to plant and ad fundandum to lay the foundation and our Author prejudicates his cause by making use of a Translation to uphold it which himself knows to be corrupt 4. There is not then any similitude between that place of the Prophet wherein words are used Allegorically the Allegory in them being instantly explained and this of the Apostle whose discourse is didactical and the words used in it proper and suited to the things intended by him to be expressed And this is the substance of what is pleaded to wrest from believers this illustrious Testimony given to the eternal Deity of the Son of God We may yet further consider the reasons that offer themselves from the Context for the removal of the interpretation suggested 1. It sinks under its own weakness and absurdity The Apostle intending to set out the Excellency of the Son of God affirms that by him the worlds were made that is say they Christ preaching the Gospel converted some to the faith of it and many more were converted by the Apostles preaching the same Doctrine whereupon blessed times of Light and Salvation ensued Who not overpowered with prejudice could once imagine any such sense in these words especially considering that it is as contrary to the design of the Apostle as it is to the importance of the words themselves This is that which Peter calls mens wresting the Scripture to their own perdition 2. The Apostle as we observed writes didactically plainly expressing the matter whereof he treats in words usual and proper To what end then should he use so strained an Allegory in a point of Doctrine yea a fundamental Article of the Religion he taught and that to express what he had immediately in the words foregoing properly expressed For by whom he made the worlds is no more in these mens apprehensions than in him hath he spoken in these latter dayes Nor is this Expression any where used no not in the most allegorical Prophecies of the Old Testament to denote that which here they would wrest it unto But making of the world signifies making of the World in the whole Scripture throughout and nothing else 3. The making of the worlds here intended was a thing then past 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he made them that is he did so of old and the same word is used by the LXX to express the old Creation But now that which the Jews called the world to come or the blessed state of the Church under the Messiah the Apostle speaks of as of that which was not yet come the present worldly State of the Judaical Church yet continuing 4. The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which are so rendred taken absolutely as they are here used do never in any one place in the Scripture in the Old or New Testament signifie
the new Creation or state of the Church under the Gospel but the whole world and all things therein contained they do in this very Epistle Chap. 11.3 5. Wherever the Apostle in this Epistle speaks in the Judaical Idiom of the Church-State under the Messiah he never calls it by the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but still with the limitation of to come as Chap. 2.5 Chap. 6.5 And where the word is used absolutely as in this place and Chap. 11.3 it is the whole world that is intended 6. The Context utterly refuseth this Gloss. The Son in the preceeding words is said to be made Heir or Lord of all that is of all things absolutely and universally as we have evinced and is confessed Unto that Assertion he subjoyns a reason of the equity of that transcendent Grant made unto him namely because by him all things were made whereunto he adds his upholding ruling and disposing of them being so made by him he upholdeth all things by the word of his power That between the all things whereof he is Lord and the all things that he upholds there should be an interposition of words of the same importance with them expressing the Reason of them that go afore and the foundation of that which follows knitting both parts together and yet indeed have a signification in them of things utterly heterogeneous to them is most unreasonable to imagine We have now obtained liberty by removing the entanglements cast in our way to proceed to the opening of the genuine sense and importance of these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by whom not as an Instrument or an inferiour intermediate created Cause for then also must he be created by himself seeing all things that were made were made by him Joh. 1.3 but as his own eternal Word Wisdom and Power Prov. 8.22 23 24. Joh. 1.3 The same individual creating act being the work of Father and Son whose Power and Wisdom being one and the same individed so also are the works which outwardly proceed from them And as the joint working of Father and Son doth not inferr any other subordination but that of subsistence and order so the Preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth not of it self intimate the subjection of an instrumental Cause being used sometimes to express the work of the Father himself Gal. 1.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 created so the Apostle expresseth that word Acts 17.24 26. And the LXX most commonly as Gen. 1.1 though sometimes they use 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as our Apostle also doth Chap. 10. He made created produced out of nothing by the things not seen Chap. 11.3 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so that word is constantly rendered by the Greeks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to hide or to be hid kept secret close undiscovered Whence a Virgin is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one not yet come into the publick state of Matrimony as by the Greeks on the same account 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one shut up or a recluse as the Targumists call an Harlot 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a goer abroad from that description of her Prov. 7.10 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 her feet dwell not in her own house one while she is in the Street another while abroad As the Mother of the Family is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the dweller at home Psalm 68.13 Hence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies the Ages of the world in their succession and duration which are things secret and hidden what is past is forgotten what is to come is unknown and what is present passing away without much Observation See Ecclesiastes 1. v. 10. The world then that is visible and a spectacle in its self in respect of its continuance and duration is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a thing hidden So that the word denotes the fabrick of the world by a Metonymie of the Adjunct When the Hebrews would express the world in respect of the substance and matter of the Universe they do it commonly by a distribution of the whole into its most general and comprehensive parts as the Heavens Earth and Sea subjoyning all things contained in them This the Greeks and Latins from its Order Frame and Ornaments call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and mundus which principally respects that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that beauty and ornament of the Heavens which God made by his Spirit Job 26.13 And as it is inhabited by the Sons of men they call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Prov. 8.30 The world of the earth principally the habitable parts of the Earth As quickly passing away they call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in respect of its successive duration 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word here used 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Plural number the worlds so called Chap. 11.3 by a meer Enallage of number as some suppose or with respect to the many Ages of the worlds duration But moreover the Apostle accommodates his expression to the received opinion of the Jews and their way of expressing themselves about the world 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 denotes the world as to the subsistence of it and as to its duration in both these respects the Jews distributed the world into several parts calling them so many worlds R.D. Kimchi on Isa. 6. distributes these worlds into three on the account of which he sayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 holy was three times repeated by the Seraphims There are saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 three worlds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the upper world which is the world of Angels and Spirits 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the world of the Heavens and Stars and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this world below But in the first respect they generally assign these four 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the lower world the depressâ—d world the Earth and Air in the several regions of it 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the world of Angels or Ministring Spirits whom they suppose to inhabit in High Places where they may supervize the affairs of the Earth 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the world of Spheres and 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the highest world called by Paul the third Heaven 2 Cor. 12.2 and by Solomon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Heaven of Heavens 2 Kings 8.27 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Olam hanneshamoth the world of Spirits or souls departed In respect of duration they assign a fivefold world 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 called by Peter the old world or the world before the Flood the world that perished 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the present world or the state of things under the Judaical Church 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the world of the coming of the Messiah or the world to come as the Apostle calls it Chap. 2.5 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the world of the Resurrection
Forma Figura Expressa Forma Figura expressa 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. the Character Image Form Figure express Form express Figure so variously is the word rendered by Translators with little difference It is no where used in the New Testament but only in this place In other Authors it hath many significations Sometimes they use it Properly and Naturally sometimes Metaphoricalâ—y and Artificially as when it denotes several forms of Speech or Orations Properly from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to engrave with a Tool or Style is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is firstly and properly the note or mark cut by a Tool or Instrument into Wood or any other subject capable of such impression or the stamp and sign that is left in the coyning of money The Mark or scarr also left by a Wound is by the LXX termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lev. 13.25 It is in general an express Representation of another thing communicated unto it by an impression of its likeness upon it opposed unto that which is umbratile and imaginary 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Substantiae Subsistentiae Personae Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 substantiae ejus Hypostasis Substance Subsistence Person The word is four times used in the New Testament Thrice in this Epistle In this place and Chap. 3.14 and Chap. 11.1 as also 2 Cor. 9.4 every where in a different sense so that the meer Use of it in one place will afford no Light unto the meaning of it in another but it must be taken from the Context and subject treated of The Composition of the word would denote substantia but so as to differ from and to add something unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Substance or Being which in the Divine Nature can be nothing but a special manner of subsistence But the Controversie that hath been about the precise signification of these words we shall not here enter into the Discussion of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Agens Regens Moderans acting disposing ruling governing also Portans Bajulans Sustinens bearing supporting carrying upholding which of these senses is peculiarly intended we shall afterwards enquire into 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the Word of his Power by his powerful word Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the Power of his Word changing the order of the words but not the meaning of them by the Power of his Word or the Word of his Power that is his powerful Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some would read it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and refer it unto the Father by the powerful Word of him that is of the Father by whose Power they say the Son disposeth of all things But all Copies with Accents have 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 constantly none 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nor will the disposition of the Words bear that reference 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by himself in his own Person 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Purgationem faciens Purgatione factâ Having purged cleansed expiated or purified us from our sins Having made a Purgation or Purification of our sins 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used both neutrally and actively answering to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 both in Kal and Hiphil signifying to sit down and to cause to sit down Chrysostom seems to have understood the Word in the latter sense referring it to God the Father causing the Son to sit down But it is hard to find any Antecedent Word whereby it should be regulated but only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Who in the beginning of the verse that is he himself And as Erasmus observes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the following Words will not Grammatically admit of this Construction for if 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be to be understood actively and transitively it must have been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the Apostle clears the neutral sense of the word Chap. 8.1 It is well then rendered by our Translators he sate or sate down 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Psal. 110.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Plural Number so is the same thing expressed Acts 7.55 and by Mark 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 16.5 Our Apostle constantly keepeth the singular number with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 1.13 Chap. 8.1 Chap. 12.2 The same thing in both Expressions is intended only that of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the plural number is more eminently destructive of the folly of the Anthropomorphites for they cannot hence pretend that God hath a right hand unless they will grant that he hath many which were not only to turn the Glory of the invisible God into the likeness of a man but of a Monster And Austin well observes that in the Psalm where that expression is first used sit on my Right Hand it is added 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord on thy right hand at the Right hand of him who sate on his right hand which removes all Carnal Apprehensions from the meaning of the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This word is seldom used in other Authors twice in this Epistle here and Chap. 8.1 once by Jude v. 25. and no where else in the New Testament by the LXX not at all The Apostle evidently expresseth by it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not as they are used appellatively for Glory Power or Majesty but as they are names and denote the essential glory of God the glorious God So that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is God himself not absolutely considered but with reference unto the Revelation of his Glory and Majesty in Heaven God on his Throne as our Apostle declareth Chap. 8.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Highest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Highest God himself See Luke 1.35 Verse 3. Who being the Brightness of Glory and the express image of his Person and upholding or disposing of all things by the word of his power having by himself purged our sins sate down on the right hand of the Majesty on high THe Apostle proceeds in his Description of the Person in whom God spake in the Revelation of the Gospel ascending unto such a manifestation of him as that they might understand his Eminency above all formerly used in the like Ministrations as also how he was pointed out and shaddowed by sundry Types and Figures under the Old Testament Of this Description there are three Parts The first declaring What he is the second What he doth or did and the third the Consequent of them both in what he enjoyeth Of the first Part of this Description of the Messiah there aâ—e two Branches or it is two wayes expressed For he affirms of him First That he is the Brightnâ—ss Beam or Splendor of the Glory and Secondly the express image or character of his Fathers Person In the second also there
unto us in him alone can we attain a saving Acquaintance with him On this account he tells Philip Joh. 14.9 He that hath seen me he hath seen the Father the reason of which assertion taken from the mutual inbeing of Father and Son and his expression of his mind and glory he asserts in the next verses He then is the only way and means of coming unto the knowledge and enjoyment of God because in and by him alone is he fully and perfectly expressed unto us And therefore this secondly is our great Guide and direction in all our endeavours after an acceptable access unto him Would we come to that acquintance with the Nature Properties and Excellencies of the Father which poor weak finite creatures are capable of attaining in this world which is sufficient that we may love him fear him serve him and come unto the enjoyment of him would we know his Love and Grace would we admire his Wisdom and Holiness let us labour to come to an intimate and near acquaintance with his Son Jesus Christ in whom all these things dwell in their fulness and by whom they are exhibited revealed unfolded unto us Seek the Father in the Son out of whom not one Property of the Divine Nature can be savingly apprehended or rightly understood and in whom they are all exposed to our faith and spiritual contemplation This is our Wisdom to abide in Christ to abide with him to learn him and in him we shall learn see and know the Father also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Unto the Description of the Person the Apostle returns unto an Assertion of the Power of Christ the Son of God and therein makes his Transition from the Kingly and Prophetical unto his Sacerdotal Office on all which he intends afterwards to inlarge his Discourse He shâ—wed before that by him the Worlds were created whereunto as a farther evidence of his glorious Power and of his continuance to act suitably unto that beginning of his exercise of it he addes that he also abides to uphold or rule and dispose of all things so made by him For the Explication of these words two things are to be enquired after First How or in what sense Christ is said to uphold or rule all things Secondly How he doth it by the Word of his power 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken by Expositors in a double sense and accordingly variously rendred in Translations Some render it by upholding supporting bearing carrying And these suppose it to express that infinite Divine Power which is exerted in the conservation of the Creation keeping it from sinking into its Original of confusion and nothing Hereof our Saviour saith My Father worketh hitherto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or yet and I work that is in the providential sustentation of all things made at the beginning And this saith Chrysostom on this place is a greater work than that of the Creation By the former all things were brought forth from nothing by the latter are they preserved from that return unto nothing which their own nature not capable of existence without dependance on their first cause and their perpetual conflict by contrariety of Qualities would precipitate them into 2. Some take the word to express his ruling governing and disposing of all things by him made and which is supposed sustained and so it may denoâ—e the putting forth of that power over all things which is given unto the Son as Mediator or else that providential rule over all which he hath with his Father which seems rather to be intended because of the way expressed whereby he exerciseth this Rule namely by the Word of his Power The use of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not so obvious in this latter sense as it is in the former As in the Proverb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But I see no reason why we should suppose an inconsistency in these senses and not rather conclude that they are both of them implyed For as absolutely it is the same Divine Power and Providence which is exercised in the upholding and the ruling or disposing of all things so all Rule and Government is a matter of weight and burden and he who rules or governs others is said to bear or carry them So Moses expresseth his Rule of the People in the Wilderness Numb 11.11 12. Thou hast put saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the weight or burden of this people upon me and thou hast said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bear or carry them in thy bosome And hence from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to bear or carry is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Prince or Ruler that is one that carries and bears the burden of the people that upholds and rules them To bear then or uphold and to rule and dispose may be both well intended in this word as they are both expressed in that Prophesie of Christ Isa. 9.6 The rule or government shall be on his shoulder that together with his Power and Rule he may sustain and bear the weight of his people Only whereas this is done amongst men with much labour and travel he doth it by an inexpressâ—ble facility by the Word of his Power And this is safe to take the expression in its most comprehensive sense But whereas the phrase of speech it self is no where else used in the New Testament nor is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 applied unto any such purpose else where though once 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be taken for actus or agitatus 1 Pet. 1. we may enquire what word it was among the Hebrews that the Apostle intended to express whereby they had formerly been instructed in the same matter 1. It may be he intended 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a participle from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to sustain to bear to endure as Mal. 3.2 it signifies also to feed nourish and cherish 1 King 4.7 Ruth 4.15 Zech. 11.16 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sustinens nutriens omnia sustaining and cherishing all things But this word hath no respect unto Rule or disposal And in this sense as the work of Creation is eminently ascribed unto the Father who is said to make all things by the Son so that of the preservation and cherishing of all things is here peculiarly assigned unto the Son And this is not unsuitable unto the analogy of faith For it was the power of God that was eminently exalted and is conspicuously seen in the work of Creation as the Apostle declares Rom. 1.20 although that power was accompanied also with infinite wisdom and it is the wisdom of God that is most eminently manifested in the preservation of all things though that wisdom be also exercised in power infinite At least in the contemplation of the works of the Creation we are lead by the wonder of the infinite Power whereby they were wrought to the consideration of the Wisdom that accompanied it and that which in the works of Providence first
they did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or perform the Duty and Homage denoted by this Word unto any but God it is remembred as their Idolatry Rev. 13.12 16. 2. And unto this sense was it restrained of old by the Spartans who denyed that it was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lawfull for them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to fall down to or to adore a man Herodot in Polym And in this sense it is exceedingly restrained from the use and importance of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yea and from that of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Hithpael though that alwayes signifie a bowing down with Respect and Reverence for it is employed to denote Civil as well as Religious Worship But for several sorts of Religious Worship diversified by its Objects the Scripture knows nothing The word properly denotes to bow down and when it is referred unto God it respects the inward Reverence and Subjection of our minds by a Metonymie of the Adjunct See it for Civil respect Gen. 27.29 Chap. 133.6 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Elohim is rendered Angels by the LXX Gen. 31.24 Job 38.7 Psal. 8.6 Psal. 96.8 Psal. 137 1. of which Interpretation of the word we shall treat in the ensuing Exposition This is the second Argument used by the Apostle to confirm his Assertion of the Preference of the Son above Angels and is taken from the command of God given unto them to worship him For without Controversie He who is to be worshipped is greater than they whose duty it is to worship him In the words we must consider 1. The Apostles Preface 2. His Proof And in the latter must weigh 1. The Sense of it 2. The Suitableness of it to his present Purpose His Preface or the manner of his producing of this second Testimony is this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which words have been exposed unto variety of Interpretations for if 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be joyned with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which immediately follows they are to be rendered and when he bringeth in again into the world if with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which follows it after the Interposition of sundry other words then is it to be rendered as by our Interpreters and again when he brings he saith Moreover it is not clear in what sense Christ is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the First-born who is elsewhere termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Only Begotten Son of the Father We must also enquire what is the Introduction or bringing in here intended How and When performed as also what is the world whereinto he was brought The difficulties about all which must be severally considered 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 again may be joyned with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And then the sense of the words must run as above intimated namely when he bringeth in again the first-born into the world And it is evident that most Expositors both Antient and Modern embrace this sense So do Chrysostom Theodoret Ambrose Oecumenius Thomas Lyra Cajetan Ribera Camero Gomarus Estius A Lapide our Mede with many others But about what this bringing in again or Second bringing in of the first-born into the world should be they are greatly divided The Antients refer it to his Incarnation affirming somewhat harshly that he was brought before into the world when all things were made by him 2. Others refer it to the Resurrection which was as it were a second bringing of Christ into the world as David was brought into his Kingdom again after he had expelled by the Conspiracy and Rebellion of Absolom 3. Others refer it unto his coming forth in the Effectual Preaching of the Gospel after his Ascension whereby he was brought forth in another manner and with another kind of Power than that which he appeared in in the Dayes of his flesh 4. Some suppose the Personal Reign of Christ on the earth for a thousand years with his Saints is intended in these words when God will bring him again with Glory into the world of which judgement was Mede and now many follow him 5. Others again and they the most assign the Accomplishment of what is here asserted to the General Judgement and the Second Coming of Christ in the Glory of the Father with all the holy Angels attending him to judge the quick and the dead 6. Some of the Socinians refer them unto the Triumphant Ascension of Christ into Heaven after his Resurrection he having as they fancy once before been taken into it there to be instructed in the Mind and Will of God Now all these Assertions concerning the bringing in of Christ into the world have a Truth in them absolutely considered but whether any of them be here intended by the Apostle we must enquire by an Examination of the common Foundation that all their Authors proceed upon with the Reasons given for its Confirmation Now this is that which we observed before namely that in the Construction of the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 again is to be joyned with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he bringeth in and so to be rendered when he brings in again or a second time the first-born which must needs point to a second coming of Christ of one kind or another And to this purpose they say 1. That the Trajection of the words in the other sense is hard and difficult and not to be admitted but upon very cogent Reasons It is to suppose that the Apostle by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 When Again intends 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Again when And besides the Interposition of the many words between it and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he saith will not admit that they should be conjoyned in Sense and Construction But this Reason is not cogent for 1. Most of the antient Translations acknowledge this Transposition of the words so the Syriack reading thus and again when he bringeth in so the Vulgar Latin and the Arabick omitting the term again as not designing any new thing but meerly denoting a new Testimony And they are followed by Valla Erasmus Beza and the best of Modern Translators 2. Such Trajections are not unusual and that in this place hath a peculiar Elegancy For the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 again being used in the head of the Testimony foregoing this Transposition adds to the Elegancy of the words and that there was cause for it we shall see afterwards 3. The Apostle having immediately before used the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 again as his note of producing a second Testimony and placing it here in the entrance of a third it must needs be used Equivocally if the Trajection opposed be not allowed 2. They deny that the Angels worshipped Christ at his first coming into the world that is that they are recorded so to have done and therefore it must needs be his second coming that is intended when he shall come in Glory with all his holy Angels openly worshipping him and performing his commands This Reason is especially suited unto
the Apostle as spoken of him that is so spoken to him as to continue a Description of him and his State or Kingdom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Psal. 45.7 is the place from whence the words are taken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The LXX render these words as the Apostle Aquila 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thy Throne O God for ever and yet Symmachus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thy Throne O God is everlasting and yet and that because it is not said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 absolutely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as in the Translation of Aquila 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Kingly Throne nor is it ever used in Scripture for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Common Seat Metonymically it is used for Power and Government and that frequently The LXX almost constantly render it by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Athenae lib. 5. A free open Seat with a Foot-stool And such a Throne is here properly assigned unto the Lord Christ mention of his Foot-stool being immediately subjoyned So God says of himself Heaven is my Throne and the Earth is my Foot-stool as the Heathen termed Heaven 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Throne of God Thy Throne O God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In seculum usque in sempiternum perpetuo in seculum seculorum The Duration denoted by the conjunction of both these words is mostly an absolute perpetuity and a certain uninterrupted continuance where the subject spoken of admits a limitation Many of the Greek Interpreters render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 attending to the sound rather than the use and signification of the word so is yet in our language This we express by For ever and ever 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the variation of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the first place before mentioned takes off from the Elegancy of the Expression and darkens the sense for the Article prefixed to the last 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 declares that to be the subject of the Proposition The words of the Psalmist are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Shelet is Virga and Sceptrum and in this place is rendred by Aquila 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Rod a Staff a Scepter always a Scepter when referred to Rule as in this place it is called the Scepter of the Kingdom A Scepter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rectus fuit to be right streight upright principally in a moral sense 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Uprightness 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is properly such a Rectitude as we call streight opposed to crooked and Metaphorically only is it used for moral uprightness that is Equity and Righteousness Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Boderianus Sceptrum erectum a Scepter listed up or held upright The Paris Edition Sceptrum protensum a Scepter stretched out and the stretching out of the Scepter was a sign and token of mercy Esth. 5.2 Tremelius Virga recta which answers mischor in both its acceptations Erpenius to the same purpose Sceptrum rectum a right Scepter Thou hast loved Righteousness and hated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Iniquity Unrighteousness Wickedness 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 propterea propter quod quare ideo idcirco Wherefore for which cause Some copies of the LXX and Aquila read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 seems to have been taken into the LXX from this rendring of the words by the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God thy God hath anointed thee The words in Greek and Hebrew are those from whence the Names of Christ and Messiah are taken which are of the same importance and signification the Anointed one And the same is expressed by the Targumist Aquila 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hath anointed thee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Instrument in doing of the thing intended expressed by the Accusative Case whereof there are other instances in that Language Of old the LXX read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with the Oil of delight or Ornament so that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 came also into the Greek Version from this place of the Apostle and is more proper than the old reading the Oil of rejoycing Joy or Gladness 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before or above those that partake with thee Thy fellows or companions so Symmachus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vers. 8 9. But unto the Son he saith Thy Throne O God is for ever the Scepter of thy Kingdom is a Scepter of Righteousness Thou hast loved Righteousness and hated Iniquity wherefore God thy God hath anointed thee with the Oil of gladness above thy fellows This testimony is produced by the Apostle in answer unto that fore-going concerning Angels Those words saith he were spoken by the Holy Ghost of the Angels wherein their Office and Employment under the Providence of God is described These are spoken by the same Spirit of the Son or spoken to him denoting his Praeexistence unto the Prophesies themselves There is little or no difficulty to prove that this Testimony belongs properly unto him by whom it is applied by the Apostle The antient Jews granted it and the present Doctors cannot deny it One of them sayes indeed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this Psalm is spoken of David or the Messiah These are the words and this is the opinion of Aben-Ezra who accordingly endeavours to give a double sense of the chief passages in this Psalm one as applied unto David another as applied unto the Messiah which he enclines unto Jarchi turns it into an Allegory without any tollerable sense throughout his discourse But though it might respect them both yet there is no pretence to make David the subject of it the Title and whole Contexture of it excluding such an Application The Targum wholly applies the Psalm to the Messiah which is somewhat a better evidence of the Conception of the antient Jews than the private Opinion of any later Writer can give us And the Title of the Psalm in that Paraphrase would make it a Prophesie given out in the days of Moses for the use of the Sanedrin which manifests what account it had of old in their Creed concerning the Messiah Some Christian Interpreters have so far assented unto the latter Rabbins as to grant that Solomon was primarily intended in this Psalm as a Type of Christ and that the whole was an Epithalamium or Marriage-song composed upon his Nuptials with the Daughter of Pharaoh But there want not important Reasons against this Opinion For 1. It is not probable that the Holy Ghost should so celebrate that Marriage which as it was antecedently forbidden by God so it was never consequently blessed by him she being among the number of those strange women which tuâ—ned his heart from God and was cursed with barrenness the first forreign breach that came upon his Family and all
Advantage of them for whom he hath undertaken and whom he designed to bring again into favour and communion with God Hence Believers do no more consider the Properties of God in the Person of the Son absolutely but as engaged in a way of Covenant for their Good and as proposed unto them for an everlasting satisfactory Reward This is the ground of his calling upon them so often to behold see and consider him and thereby to be refreshed They consider his Power as he is mighty to save His Eternity as he is an everlasting Reward his Righteousness as faithful to justifie them All his Properties as engaged in Covenant for their Good and Advantage What ever he is in himself that he will be to them in a way of Mercy Thus do the holy Properties of the Divine Nature become a means of supportment unto us as considered in the Person of the Son of God And this is 1. A great encouragement unto Believing The Lord Christ as the Wisdom of God inviting sinners to come in unto him and to be made partakers of him layes down all his Divine Excellencies as a motive thereunto Prov. 8.14 15 c. For on the account of them he assures us that we may find Rest Satisfaction and an abundant Reward in him And the like invitation doth he give to poor sinners Isa. 45.22 Look unto me and be saved all the ends of the Earth for I am God and there is none else They may justly expect Salvation in him who is God and in whom all Divine Attributes are proposed to their Benefit as they find who come unto him v. 24.25 The consideration hereof prevents all the Fears and answers all the Doubts of them that look up unto him 2. An instruction how to consider the Properties of God by faith for our Advantage that is as engaged in the Person of the Son of God for our Good Absolutely considered they may fill us with dread and terror as they did them of old who concluded when they thought they had seen God or heard his voyce that they should dye Considered as his Properties who is our Redeemer they are alwayes relieying and comforting Isa. 54.4 5. II. The whole Old Creation even the most glorious parts of it hastening unto its period at least of our present interest in it and use of it calls upon us not to fix our hearts on the small perishing shares which we have therein especially since we have him who is Omnipotent and Eternal for our Inheritance The Figure or fashion of this world the Apostle tells us is passing away that lovely Appearance which it hath at present unto us it is hastening unto its period it is a fading dying thing that can yield us no true satisfaction III. The Lord Christ the Mediator the Head and Spouse of the Church is infinitely exalted above all creatures whatever in that he is God over all Omnipotent and Eternal IV. The whole World the Heavens and Earth being made by the Lord Christ and being to be dissolved by him is wholly at his disposal to be ordered for the good of them that do believe And therefore V. There is no just cause of fear unto Believers from any thing in Heaven or Earth seeing they are all of the making and at the disposal of Jesus Christ. VI. Whatever our changes may be inward or outward yet Christ changing not our eternal condition is secured and relief provided against all present troubles and miseries The Immutability and Eternity of Christ is the spring of our consolation and security in every condition The summ of all is that VII Such is the frailty of the nature of man and such the perishing condition of all created things that none can ever obtain the least stable consolation but what ariseth from an interest in the Omnipotency Soveraignty and Eternity of the Lord Christ. This I say is that which the words insisted on as they are used in the Psalm do instruct us in and this therefore we may a little farther improve This is that which we are instructed in by the Ministry of John Baptist Isa. 40.6 7 8. The voyce cryed all flesh is grass and all the goodliness thereof is as the flower of the field the grass withereth and the flower fadeth because the Spirit of God bloweth upon it surely the People is grass The grass withereth the flower fadeth but the word of our God shall stand for ever All is grass fading grass though it bloom and appear goodly for a little season yet there is no continuance no consistency in it Every Wind that passeth over it causeth it to wither This is the best of flesh of all that in and by our selves we are we do we enjoy or hope for The Crown of the Pride of man and his glorious Beauty is but a fading flower Isa. 28.1 What Joy what Peace what Rest can be taken in things that are dying away in our hands that perish before every breath of Wind that passeth over them Where then shall this poor Creature so frail in its self in its Actings in its Enjoyments seek for Rest Consolation and satisfaction in this alone that the Word of the Lord abides for ever in the eternally abiding Word of God that is the Lord Jesus Christ as preached in the Gospel so Peter applyes these words 1 Ep. 1.25 By an Interest in him alone his Eternity and Unchangeableness may relief be obtained against the consideration of this perishing dying state and condition of all things Thus the Psalmist tells us that verily every man living in his best estate is altogether vanity Psal. 39.5 and thence takes the Conclusion now insisted on v. 7. And now Lord seeing it is thus Seeing this is the condition of mankind what is thence to be looked after What is to be expected nothing at all not the least of use or comfort What wait I for My hope is in thee from thee alone as a God Eternal pardoning and saving do I look for Relief Man indeed in this Condition seeks oftentimes for satisfaction from himself from what he is and doth and enjoyes and what he shall leave after him comforting himself against his own frailty with an Eternity that he fancieth to himself in his Posterity and their Enjoyment of his Goods and Inheritance So the Psalmist tells us Psal. 49.11 Their inward thought is that their Houses shall continue for ever and their dwelling places unto all generations and they call their Lands after their own names They see indeed that all men dye Wise men and Fools v. 10. and cannot but from thence observe their own frailty Wherefore they are resolved to make provision against it they will perpetuate their Posterity and their Inheritance This they make use of to relieve them in their inmost Imaginations But what censure doth the Holy Ghost pass upon this Contrivance v. 12. Nevertheless saith he notwithstanding all these imaginations Man being in honour abideth not he is like the
of it contradicted his own light out of hatred unto the Gospel there are sundry Psalms with this Title 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 le David which are expresly affirmed to be composed and sung by him unto the Lord as Psal. 18. whose Title is To the chief Musician 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where the Prefix is repeated to David the servant of the Lord who spake unto the Lord the words of this song So directly do the modern Rabbins contradict their own light out of hatred unto the Gospel Evident then it is that David is not treated of in this Psalm in that he being the Pen-man of it calleth him his Lord concerning whom he treats Besides to omit other instances of alike cogency how or when did God swear unto David that he should be a Priest and that for ever after the order of Melchisedeck The Jews knew well enough that David had nothing to do with the Priesthood So that David had no concernment in this Psalm but only as he was the Pen-man of it He was not herein so much as a Type of the Messiah but speaks of him as his Lord. Wherefore others of them as Jarchi and Lipman and Nizzachon affirm that it is Abraham who is spoken of in this Psalm of whom the one says it was composed by Melchizedech the other by his servant Eliezer of Damascus But the fondness of these presumptuous figments is evident Melchizâ—dech on all accounts was greater than Abraham above him in Degree Dignity and Office as being a King and Priest of the High God and therefore blessed him and received Tithes of him and on no account could call him his Lord. Eliezer did so being his servant but how could he ascribe unto him the sitting at the Right Hand of God how the sending forth the rod of his power from Sion how being a Priest for ever after the order of Melchizedeck or indeed any one thing mentioned in the Psalm These things deserve not to be insisted on but only to manifest the woful pretences of the present Judaical infidelity It appears from the Dialogue of Justin Martyr with Trypho that some of them of old applied this Psalm to Hezekiah But not one word in it can rationally be conceived to respect him especially that Which is spoken about the Priesthood utterly excludes him seeing his Great Grand-father a man of more power than himself was smitten with Leprosie and lost the Administration of his Kingdom for one single attempt to invade that Office 2 Chron. 26. It remains then that this Psalm was written concerning the Messiah and him alone for no other subject of it can be assigned And this use in our passage we may make of the Targum that whereas those words The Lord said do not intend a word spoken but the stable purpose or decree of God as Psal. 2. v. 7. its Author hath rendred them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Lord said in or by his word that is his Wisdom his Son with whom and to whom he speaks and concerning whom his Decree and Purpose is here declared It remaineth only that we consider the Objections of the Jews against our Application of this Psalm unto the Messiah And these are summed up by Kimchi in his Exposition of the Text. The Hereticks saith he expound this Psalm of Jesus and in the first verse they say the Father and Son are designed and they read Adonai with Camets under Nun in which use the true God is signified by that Name And verse the third in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they read Chirick under Ain so making it signifie with thee And what is there said of the beauty of Holiness they ascribe unto that which is from the womb But in all Copies that are found from the rising of the Sun to the going down of it Chiric is with Nun in Adoni and Patha with Ain in Hammeka And Gerolmus Hierom erred in his Translation And for the errour if the Father and Son be the God-head how doth one stand in need of the other and how can he say unto him Thou art a Priest He is a Priest who offers sacrifice but God doth not Of the like nature are the rest of his exceptions unto the end of his Notes on that Psalm To this Lipman addes a bitter blasphemous discourse about the application of those words from the womb v. 3. unto the womb of the blessed Virgin Answ. Our cause is not at all concerned in these mistakes whether of Jews or Christians For the Jews their chief enmity lies against the Deity of our Lord Jesus Christ and therefore what ever testimony is produced concerning him they presently imagine that it is for the proof of his Divine Nature This lies at the bottom of these exceptions of Kimchi Hence he conceives that our argument from this place lies in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the pointing it with Camets Adonai so making it to be the proper Name of God when we acknowledge that it is Adoni pointed with Chiric and signifies my Lord so it is rendred by the Evangelist Matth. 22. v. 45. so by the LXX and by Hierom Domino meo And the argument of our Saviour lies not in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but that he being the Son of David was also then the Lord of David which he could no otherwise be but upon the account of his Divine Nature In the words reflected on by Kimchi it is confessed that there have been mistakes amongst Translators and Expositors Those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are rendred by the LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and by the Vulgar from them tecum principium with thee is the beginning which hath misled many Expositors But Kimchi knew that Hierom had translated them Populi tui duces spontanei Thy people shall be willing leaders giving both the significations of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 though one would suffice Thy people are or shall be willing But this pertains not to the cause under consideration In like manner have those other words been misrendred by the same Translation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 say the LXX and the Vulgar Exutero ante luciferum genui te From the womb before the morning Star have I begotten thee which gave occasion to many uncouth Expositions in Justin Martyr Tertullian Epiphanius Austin and others But the words are rightly rendred The dew of thy birth is from the womb of the morning and express the rise and flourishing of the Kingdom of the Messiah These things prove indeed that it is dangerous to interpret the Scripture without heedful attending unto the Original Text but that the Messiah is not intended in this Psalm they prove not For what they farther object on our supposition of the Divine Nature of Christ That there was no need that God should promise God his assistance it is but an open effect of their ignorance or malice Assistance is not promised the Messiah as God but as made Man for our sakes
and so as a Priest did he offer that Sacrifice without an interest wherein both they and we must eternally perish To conclude this discourse we have many of their own Masters concurring with us in the assignation of this Psalm unto the Messiah and to that purpose they freely express themselves when their minds are taken off from the consideration of the difference that they have with Christians Thus the Author 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in his signs of the coming of the Messiah Armillus shall stir up all the world saith he to war against the Messiah 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whom the holy God shall not compel to war but shall only say unto him Sit thou at my right hand referring unto this place So Saadias Gaon on Dan. 7.13 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is Messiah our righteousness as it is written The Lord said unto my Lord Sit thou on my right hand They affirm the same in Midrash Tehillim on Psal. 18. v. 35. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rabbi Joden said In the world to come the holy blessed God shall cause Messiah the King to sit on his right hand as it is written The Lord said unto my Lord Sit thou on my right hand And to the same purpose are the words of R. Moses Haddarsan in Bereshith Rabba on Gen. 18. v. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rabbi Berechia in the name of Rabbi Levi opened that which is spoken Thou shalt give me the shield of thy salvation and thy right hand shall sustain me Psal. 18.36 In the world to come the holy blessed God shall cause Messias the King to sit on his right hand as it is written The Lord said unto my Lord Sit thou on my right hand And Abraham shall sit at his left hand and the face of Abraham shall be pale and he shall say The Son of my Son sits on the right hand and I on the left But God shall appease him and say unto him The Son of thy Son sits at my right hand and I am at thy right hand as it is written Thy loving kindness shall encrease me And so on Psalm 17. Rabbi Joden in the name of R. Chijah 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The holy blessed God shall place Messiah the King at his right hand as it is said The Lord said unto my Lord. Thus setting aside the mixture of their follies and impieties wherein we are not concerned we have a sufficient suffrage from the Jews themselves unto our assignation of this Prophetical Psalm to the Messiah which is enough to stop the mouths of their modern gain-sayers who neither are able to assign any other Person unto whom it should belong Having then removed their Objections we may return unto the Interpretation of the words The matter intended in the first part of these words or sitting at the right hand of God hath been somewhat spoken unto already and I shall adde but little in the further Explanation of it in this place Some things controverted on these words we may well omit the consideration of as whether were the more honourable place of old the right hand or the left besides they have been sufficiently spoken unto already on verse 3. For whereas there is no mention made any where of sitting at the left hand of God as was observed there is no comparison to be feigned between the one and the other Besides the pretence of the left hand to have been the most honourable place of old is most vain insisted on by some who had a desire to vent new observations of old matters to little purpose And Bellarmine shews what good leisure he had in managing of Controversies when he spent more time and labour in answering an Objection against the Popes Supremacy from Peters being placed in old Seals on the left hand of Paul than of many Texts of Scripture plainly overthrowing his pretensions Neither shall we consider their claim unto this testimony who understanding the Human Nature of Christ to be to be only intended and spoken to affirm that its sitting at the right hand of God consists in a real communication of all Divine Properties and Attributes unto that Nature a pretence very remote from the Apostles design and importance of the words For the Introductory Preface of this Testimony Vnto which of the Angels said he at any time we have already considered it In the testimony it self we must consider 1. The Person speaking the Lord. 2. The Person spoken unto my Lord. 3. The Nature and Manner of this speaking said 4. The thing spoken Sit on my right hand 5. The end hereof as to Work and Operation make thine enemies thy foot-stool 6. The Limitation of it as unto duration until 1. The Person speaking is the Lord The Lord said In the Greek both the Person speaking and the Person spoken unto are expressed by the same name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord only the person spoken unto is not absolutely called so but with relation to the Psalmist 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to my Lord David calls him his Lord Matth. 22.43 But in the Hebrew they have different denominations the Person speaking is Jehovah 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is God the Father for though the Name be often used where the Son is distinctly spoken of and sometimes in the same place each of them are mentioned by that name as Gen. 19. v. 24. Zech. 2. v. 8 9. because of their equal Participation of the same Divine Nature signified thereby yet where Jehovah speaketh unto the Son or of him as here it is the Person of the Father that is distinctly denoted thereby according as was shewed at the entrance of this Epistle 2. The Person spoken unto is the Son 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord David's Lord in what respect we must now enquire The Lord Christ the Son is in respect of his Divine Nature of the same Essence Power and Glory with the Father Joh. 10. v. 30. Absolutely therefore and naturally in that respect he is capable of no Subordination to the Father or Exaltation by him but what depends on and flows from his Eternal Generation Joh. 5. v. 26. By dispensation he humbled himself and emptied himself of this Glory Phil. 2. v. 7 8. not by a real parting with it but by the Assumption of Humane Nature into personal Vnion with himself being made flesh Joh. 1. v. 14. wheren his Eternal Glory was clouded for a season Joh. 17. v. 5. and his Person humbled to the discharge of those Acts of his Mediation which were to be performed in th◠Humane Nature Phil. 2. v. 9 10. This Person of Christ is here spoken unto not in respect of his Divine Nature only which is not capable of Exaltation or Glory by the way of free gift or donation nor in respect of his Humane Nature only which is not the King and Head of the Church but with respect unto his whole Person wherein the Divine Nature exerting its Power and Glory with the
is the same word whereby the reverential Obedience of that people unto the preaching of Philip is expressed v. 6. An Attendance then with a mind ready for Obedience is that which the word imports 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Auditis to the things heard 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. in eo quod audivimus in that which we have heard To the things heard that is by us who are required to attend unto them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This Word is no where else used in the New Testament In other Authors it is as much as praeterfluo to run by So Xenoph. Cyropaed lib. 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to drink of the River running by pereffluamus V.L. ne forté pereffluamus lest perhaps we should run out 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ne fortè lest perhaps improperly it respects times and seasons lest at any time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ne forte cadamus decidamus lest we fall fall down that is perish So is the word also interpreted by Chrysostom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that we perish not that we fall not And he confirms this sense from that saying in the Proverbs Chap. 3.21 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 My Son fall not So he interprets the word In the Original it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 let them not depart the word respecting not the Person spoken unto but the thing spoken of Nor do the LXX in any other place render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as in the next Chapter v. 21. and words of the like signification to decline draw back give over by negligence or weariness Other Antient Translations read nè decidamus ab honestate that we fall not from Honesty and nequaquam rejicias and by no means to reject What sense of the Word is most proper to the Place we shall afterwards consider Verse 1. Therefore for this cause the more abundantly ought we to attend or give heed to the things heard by us lest at any time we should flow out or pass away 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For this Cause as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 therefore wherefore There is in the words an Illation from the precedent Discourse and the whole Verse is an hortatory Conclusion from thence From the Proposition that he hath made of the Glory and Excellency of the Author of the Gospel he draws this inference therefore ought we for the reason and causes insisted on And thus the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 flow out expresseth their losing by any wayes or means the Doctrine of the Gospel wherein they had been instructed and the Benefits thereof Seeing the Gospel hath such a blessed Author we ought to take care that we forfeit not our interest in it But if we take 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the sense chosen by Chrysostom to express the fall and perishing of them that attend not as they ought unto the Word which Interpretation is favoured by the Syriack Translation Then the word therefore for this cause respects the Commination or Threatning included therein As if the Apostle had said therefore ought you to attend that is look to it that you do attend lâ—st you fall and perish I rather embrace the former sense both because the Interpretation of the word used by Chrysostom is strained as also because the Apostle doth evidently in these words enter upon an Exhortation unto Obedience upon his former discourse about the Person of Christ nor without an especial regard thereunto had he laid any foundation for such a Threatning unto Disobedience as is pretended to be in the words of which yet farther afterwards 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ought we the Persons unto whom he makes the Application of his Doctrine and directs his Exhortation Some think that Paul joyns himself here with all the Hebrews upon the account of Cognation and Countrey as being himself also an Hebrew Phil. 3.8 and therefore affectionately respecting of them Rom. 9.3 But the Expression is to be regulated by the words that follow all we who have heard the Gospel preached and made profession thereof And the Apostle joyns himself with them not that there was any danger on his part lest he should not constantly obey the Word or were of them whose wavering and Instability gave Occasion to this Caution but 1. To manifest that the Duty which he exhorts them unto is of general concernment unto all to whom the Gospel is preached so that he layes no singular burden on them and 2. That he might not as yet discover unto them any jealousie of their Inconstancy or that he had entertained any severe thoughts concerning them Apprehensions whereof are apt to render Exhortations suspected the minds of men being ready enough to disregard that which they are perswaded unto if they suspect that undeserved blame lyes at the bottom of the Exhortation The like Condescension hereunto upon the like account we may see in Peter 1 Pet. 4.3 These are the Persons spoken unto That which is spoken to them consists in an Exhortation unto a duty and an especial Enforcement of it The Exhortation and Duty in the first words the more abundantly to attend unto the things heard and the Enforcement in the close of them lest at any time we should flow out In the Exhortation is expressed an especial Circumstance of it the Duty it self and the manner of its performance The first is included in that Word more abundantly which may refer either unto the Causes of the attendance required or unto the manner of its performance In the words as they lye in the Text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 more abundantly is joyned unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 therefore for this cause and seems immediately to respect it and so to intimate the excellent and abundant Reason that we have to attend unto the Gospel But if we transpose the words and read them as if they lay thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 more abundantly respects the following word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to attend unto and so expresseth somewhat of the manner of the performance of the Duty proposed And so our Translators report the sense We ought to give the more diligent heed or give heed the more diligently The Reader may embrace whether sense he judgeth most agreeable to the scope of the place The former construction of the word expressing the necessity of our attention to be intimated from the cogency of the reasons thereof before insisted on is not without its probability And this the meaning of the word agrees unto whether we take it absolutely for so as Chrysostome observes it may be taken though of it self it be of another form or comparatively in which form it is Take it absolutely and the Apostle informs them that they have abundant cause to attend unto the things spoken or heard because of him that spake them
for concerning him alone came that Voice from the excellent glory This is my beloved Son hear him So also in the other sense the Apostle is not comparing the manner of their attending unto the Doctrine of the Law which certainly they ought to have done with all diligence and their attendance unto the Gospel but shews the reasons which they had to attend unto the one and the other as the following verses clearly manifest This then may be that which the Apostle intimates in this word namely that they had more abundant cause and a more excellent reason for their attending unto the Doctrine of the Gospel than they had unto that of the Law on this account that he by whom the Gospel was immediately preached unto us was the Son of God himself But the other application of the word is more commonly received wherein it intends the duty enjoyned In reference unto the Duty exhorted unto there is expressed the Object of it The things heard Thus the Apostle chuseth to express the Doctrine of the Gospel with respect unto the way and manner whereby it was communicated unto them namely by preaching for faith cometh by hearing and hearing is of the word preached Rom. 10.14 15. And herein doth he magnifie the great Ordinance of preaching as every where else he maketh it the great means of begetting faith in men The Lord Christ himself first preached the Gospel Acts 1.1 and verse 4. of this chapter Concerning him it was said from heaven Hear him Matth. 17.5 as he who revealed the Father from his own bosome Joh. 1.18 From him the Gospel became to be the Word heard When he had finished the course of his Personal Ministery he committed the same work unto others sending them as the Father sent him They also preached the Gospel and called it the Word that is that which they preached See 1 Cor. 1. So in the Old Testament it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Isa. 53.1 Auditus an hearing or that which was heard being preached So that the Apostle insists on and commends unto them not only the things themselves wherein they had been instructed but also the way whereby they were communicated unto them namely by the great Ordinance of preaching as he farther declares verse 4. This as the means of their believing as the ground of their profession they were diligently to remember consider and attend unto The Duty it self directed unto and the manner of its performance are expressed in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to attend or give heed What kind of attendance is denoted by this word was in part before declared An attendance it is with Reverence Assent and Readiness to obey So Acts 16.14 God opened the heart of Lydia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to attend unto the things that were spoken not to give them the hearing only there was no need of the opening of her heart for the meer attention of her ear but she attended with readiness humility and resolution to obey the Word The effect of which attention is expressed by the Apostle Rom. 6.17 To attend then unto the Word preached is to consider the Author of it the Matter of it the Weight and concernment of it the Ends of it with Faith Subjection of spirit and Constancy as we shall with our Apostle more at large afterwards explain The Duty exhorted unto being laid down a Motive or Enforcement unto it is subjoyned taken from the danger that would ensue the neglect thereof And this is either from the Sin or Punishment that would attend it according unto the various interpretations of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 flow out or fall before mentioned It it signifies to fall or perish then the punishment of the neglect of this Duty is intimated We shall perish as water that is poured on the earth Thereunto is the frail life of man compared 2 Sam. 14.14 This sense of the word is embraced by few Expositors yet hath it great countenance given unto it by the ensuing discourse verse 2 and 3. and for that reason is not unworthy our consideration For the design of the Apostle in those verses is to prove that they shall deservedly and assuredly perish who should neglect the Gospel And the following particles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and if in verse 2. may seem to relate unto what was before spoken and so to yield a reason why the Unbelievers should so perish as he had intimated which unless it be expressed in this word the Apostle had not before at all spoken unto And in this sense the Caution here given is That we should attend unto the word of the Gospel left by our neglect thereof we bring upon our selves inevitable ruine and perish as water that is spilt on the ground which cannot be gathered up again But the truth is that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 prefixed will not be well reconciled unto this sense and interpretation unless we should suppose it to be redundant and insignificative and so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lest at any time we should flow out should be the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 absolutely that we fall not But there is no just reason to render that word so useless Allow it therefore significative and it may have a double sense 1. To denote an uncertain time quando aliquando at any time 2. A conditional event fortè ne fortè lest it should happen In neither of these senses will it allow the words to be expounded of the Punishment that shall befall Unbelievers which is most certain both as to the Time and the Event Neither doth the Apostle in the next Verses threaten them that neglect the Gospel that at some time or other they may perish but le ts them know that their destruction is certain and that from the Lord. It is then our sinful losing of the Word and the benefits thereof which the Apostle intendeth And in the next verses he doth not proceed to prove what he had asserted in this verse but goes on to other Arguments to the same purpose taken from the unquestionable event of our neglect of the Word and losing the benefits thereof The especial reason therefore why the Apostle thus expresseth our losing of the doctrine of the Gospel by want of diligent attendance unto it is to be enquired after Generally the expression is looked on as an allusion unto leaking vessels which suffer the water that is poured into them one way to run out many As he speaks in the Comedian who denied that he could keep secret some things if they were communicated unto him Plenus rimarum sum huc atque illuc effluo I am full of chinks and flow out on every side And the word relates unto the persons not to the things because it contains a crime It is our duty to retain the word which we have heard and therefore it is not said that the Word flows out but that we as it
the Covenant between him and the people that the Transgression of it so as to disannul the terms and conditions of it had by Divine Constitution the punishment of death temporal or Excision appointed unto it And this in the next words he proceeds to improve unto his purpose by the way of an Argument à minori ad majus How shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation c. There is an Antithesis expressed in one branch as we observed before between the Law and the Gospel namely that the Law was the Word spoken by Angels the Gospel being revealed by the Lord himself But there are also other differences intimated between them though expressed only on the part of the Gospel as that it is in its nature or Effects Great Salvation that is not absolutely only but comparatively unto the benefit exhibited to their fore Fathers by the Law as given on Mount Horeb. The confirmation also of the Gospel by the Testimony of God is tacitely opposed unto the confirmation of the Law by the like Witness and from all these considerations doth the Apostle enforce his Argument proving the Punishment that shall befall Gospel neglecters In the words as was in part before observed there occurrs 1. The Subject matter spoken of so great salvation 2 A further Description of it 1. From its principal Author it began to be spoken by the Lord. 2. From the manner of its propagation it was confirmed unto us by them that heard it 3. From its Confirmation by the Testimony of God Which 4. Is exemplified by a distribution into 1. Signs 2. Wonders 3. Mighty Works and 4. Various Gifts of the Holy Ghost whereof there is 3. A neglect supposed if we neglect and 4. Punishment there intimated wherein 1. The Punishment its self and 2. The manner of its expression how shall we escape are to be considered all which are to be severally explained 1. The subject matter treated of is expressed in those words so great Salvation And it is the Gospel which is intended in that Expression as is evident from the preceding Verse For that which is there called the word which we have heard is here called great salvation As also from the following words where it is said to be declared by the Lord and farther propagated by them that heard him And the Gospel is called Salvation by a Metonymy of the Effect for the Cause For it is the Grace of God bringing salvation Titus 2.11 The Word that is able to save us The Doctrine the Discovery the instrumentally efficient Cause of Salvation Rom. 1.16 1 Cor. 1.20 21. And this Salvation the Apostle calls Great upon many accounts which we shall afterwards unfold And calling it so great salvation he refers them unto the Doctrine of it wherein they had been instructed 〈◊〉 whereby the Excellency of the Salvation which it brings is declared Now though the Apostle might 〈…〉 pressed the Gospel by the word which was declared unto us by the Lord as 〈…〉 the Law by the word spoken by Angels yet to strengthen his Argument 〈◊〉 Moâ—â—â— unto Obedience which he insists upon he chose to give a brief Description of iâ— from its principal Effect it is great Salvation The Law by reason of sin proved the Ministry of Death and Condemnation 2 Cor. 3.9 yet being fully published only by Angels Obedience was indispensibly required unto it And shall not the Gospel the Ministry of life and great salvation be attended unto 2. He farther describes the Gospel from its principal Author or Revealer it began to be spoken by the Lord. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The words may have a twofold sense for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may denote either principium temporis the beginning of time or principium operis the beginning of the work In the first way it asserts that the Lord himself was the first Preacher of the Gospel before he sent or employed his Apostles and Disciples in the same work In the latter that he only began the work leaving the perfecting and finishing of it unto those who were chosen and enabled by him unto that end And this latter sense is also true for he finished not the whole Declaration of the Gospel in his own person teaching vivâ voce but committed the work unto his Apostles Matth. 10.27 But their teaching from him being expressed in the next words I take the words in the first sense referring unto what he had delivered Chap. 1.1 Of Gods speaking in these last dayes in the Person of the Son Now the Gospel hath had a threefold beginning of its Declaration First In Prediction by Promises and Types and so it began to be declared from the foundation of the world Luke 1.70 71. Secondly In an immediate Preparation and so it began to be declared in and by the Ministry of John the Baptist Mark 1.1 2. Thirdly In its open clear actual full Revelation so this work was begun by the Lord himself and carried on to perfection by those who were appointed and enabled by him thereunto Joh. 1.17 18. Thus was it by him declared in his own person as the Law was by Angels And herein lyes the stress of the Apostles Reasonings with reference unto what he had before discoursed concerning the Son and Angels and his Preheminence above them The great Reason why the Hebrews so pertinaciously adhered unto the Doctrine of the Law was the glorious Publication of it It was the word spoken by Angels they received it by the disposition of Angels If saith the Apostle that were a sufficient cause why the Law should be attended unto and that the neglect of it should be so sorely revenged as it was though in it self but the Ministry of death and condemnation Then consider what is your Duty in reference unto the Gospel which as it was in its self a Word of life and great salvation so it was spoken declared and delivered by the Lord himself whom we have manifested to be so exceedingly exalted above all Angels whatever 3. He farther describes the Gospel from the way and means of its conveyance unto us It was confirmed unto us by them that heard him And herein also he prevents an Objection that might arise in the minds of the Hebrews inasmuch as they at least the greatest part of them were not acquainted with the Personal Ministry of the Lord they heard not the word spoken by him For hereunto the Apostle replyes that though they themselves heard him not yet the same word which he preached was not only declared but confirmed unto them by those that heard him And herein he doth not intend all of them who at any time heard him teaching but those whom in an especial manner he made choice of to employ them in that work namely the Apostles So that this expression those that heard him is a Periphrasis of the Apostles from that great priviledge of hearing immediately all things that our Lord taught in his own
thus stedfast upon the account of its being spoken from God and stands in no need of the contribution of any strength Authority or Testimony from men Church Tradition or ought else that is extrinsecal unto it The Testimonies given hereunto in the Scripture it self which are very many with the general Grounds and Reasons hereof I shall not here insist upon and that because I have done it elsewhere I shall only mention that one consideration which this place of the Apostle suggests unto us and which is contained in our second Observation from the word stedfast Take this word as spoken from God without the help of any other Advantages and the stedfastness of it is the Ground of Gods inflicting Vengeance on them that receive it not that obey it not Because it is his Word because it is cloathed with his Authority if men believe it not they must perish But now if this be not sufficiently evidenced unto them namely that it is his Word God could not be just in taking vengeance of them for he should punish them for not believing that which they had no sufficient Reason to believe which suits not with the Holiness and Justice of God The Evidence then that this Word is from God that it is his being the foundation of the Justice of God in his proceeding against them that do not believe it it is of indispensible necessity that he himself also do give that Evidence unto it For whence also should it have it from the Testimony of the Church or from Tradition or from probable moral inducements that men can tender one to another Then these two things will inevitably follow 1. That if men should neglect their duty in giving Testimony unto the Word as they may do because they are but men then God cannot justly condemn any man in the world for the neglect of his Word in not believing it or not yielding obedience unto it And the Reason is evident because if they have not sufficient Grounds to believe it to be his without such Testimonies as are not given unto it it is the highest Injustice to condemn them for not believing it and they should perish without a cause For what can be more unjust than to punish a man especially eternally for not doing that which he had no just or sufficient Reason to do This be far from God to destroy the innocent with the wicked 2. Suppose all men aright to discharge their duty and that there be a full Tradition concerning the Word of God that the Church give Testimony unto it and Learned men produce their Arguments for it if this all or any part hereof be esteemed as the sufficient Proposition of the Scripture to be the Word of God then is the Execution of infinite divine Justice built upon the Testimony of men which is not divine or infallible but such as might deceive For God on this supposal must condemn men for not believing with faith divine and infallible that which is proposed unto them by Testimonies and Arguments humane and fallible quod absit It remaineth then that the Righteousness of the Act of God in condemning unbelievers is built upon the Evidence that the Object of Faith or Word to be believed is from him And this he gives unto it both by the Impression of his Majesty and Authority upon it and by the Power and Efficacy wherewith by his Spirit it is accompanied Thus is every Word of God stedfast as a Declaration of his Will unto us by what means soever it is made known unto us V. Every Transaction between God and man is alwayes confirmed and ratified by promises and Threatnings Rewards and Punishments every trespass VI. The most glorious Administrators of the Law do stoop to look into the Mysteries of the Gospel See 1 Pet. 1.12 VII Covenant transgressions are attended with unavoidable penalties every transgression that is of the Covenant disannulling of it received a meet recompence of reward VIII The Gospel is a Word of Salvation to them that do believe IX The Salvation tendered in the Gospel is great Salvation X. Men are apt to entertain thoughts of escaping the wrath of God though they live in a neglect of the Gospel This the Apostle insinuates in that interrogation How shall we escape XI The neglecters of the Gospel shall unavoidably perish the wrath of God How shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation These last Observations may be cast into one Proposition and so be considered together namely That the Gospel is great Salvation which who so neglecteth shall therefore unavoidably perish without remedy We shall first enquire how the Gospel is said to be Salvation and that Great Salvation and then shew the equity and unavoidableness of their Destruction by whom it is neglected and therein the vanity of their hopes who look for an escaping in the contempt of it By the Gospel we understand with the Apostle the Word preached or spoken by Christ and his Apostles and now recorded for our use in the Books of the New Testament not exclusively unto what was declared of it in the Types and Promises of the Old Testament But by the way of Eminency we appropriate the whole name and nature of the Gospel unto that delivery of the Mind and Will of God by Jesus Christ which included and perfected all that had preceded unto that purpose Now the Gospel is salvation upon a double account First Declaratively In that the Salvation of God by Christ is declared taught and revealed thereby So the Apostle informs us Rom. 1.16 17. It is the power of God unto salvation because therein the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith that is the Righteousness of God in Christ whereby Believers shall be saved And therefore it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Titus 2.11 the saving or salvation bringing Grace of God The Grace of God as that which teacheth and revealeth his Grace And thence they that abuse it to their lusts are said to turn the grace of God into lasciviousness Jude 4. that is the Doctrine of it which is the Gospel And therefore under the Old Testament it is called the Preaching or declaring of glad tydings tydings of peace and salvation Nahum 2.1 Isa. 52.7 and is described as a Proclamation of Mercy Peace Pardon and Salvation unto sinners Isa. 61.1 2. And life and immortality are said to be brought to light thereby 2 Tim. 1.10 It is true God had from all Eternity in his infinite Grace contrived the salvation of sinners but this Contrivance and the Purpose of it lay hid in his own Will and Wisdom as in an infinite Abysse of darkness utterly imperceptible unto Angels and men untill it was brought to light or manifested and declared by the Gospel Ephes. 3.9 10. Coloss. 1.25 26 27. There is nothing more vain than the supposals of some that there are other wayes whereby this Salvation might be discovered and made known The Works of Nature
full assurance of understanding to the acknowledgement of the Mysterie of God and of the Father and of Christ Chap. 2.2 that is that they might have a spiritual and saving acquaintance with the Mysterie of this great salvation the Love Grace and Wisdom of God therein which without this Spirit of Wisdom and Revelation from above we shall not attain unto This then in the first place is to be sought after this are we to abide in constant Prayers and supplications for the teaching instructing revealing enlightning Work and Efficacy of this Spirit that we may be enabled to look into these deep things of God that we may in some measure with all Saints comprehend them and grow wise in the Mysterie of salvation Solomon tells us how this wisdom is to be obtained Prov. 2.3 4 5. If thou cryest after knowledge and liftest up thy voyce for understanding if thou seekest for her as for silver and searchest for her as for hid treasures then shalt thou understand the fear of the Lord and find the knowledge of God It is by praying crying supplications with diligence and perseverance that we attain this Wisdom abide herein or all other attempts will prove but vain How many poor souls otherwise weak and simple have by this means grown exceeding wise in the Mysterie of God And how many more wise in this world through the neglect of it do walk in darkness all their dayes Secondly Diligent study of the Word wherein this Mysterie of God is declared and proposed unto our faith and holy contemplation but this hath been spoken unto in part already and must again be considered and so need not here to be insisted on Thirdly Sincere love unto and delight in the things that are by the Spirit of God revealed unto us is another part of this duty Herein our Apostle declares what was his frame of heart Phil. 3.8 How doth his heart triumph in and rejoyce over the knowledge he had obtained of Jesus Christ and then indeed do we know any thing of the Grace of God aright when our hearts are affected with what we know Peter tells us that the Saints of old in their believing rejoyced with joy unspeakable and full of glory 1 Ep. 1.8 They discovered that in Christ which maâ—â— their hearts leap within them and all their affections to overflow with delight and joy And this is an Essential part of this Holy Admiration which distinguisheth it from that barren fruitless notional speculation of it which some are contented withall This are we to stir up our hearts unto in all our Meditations of the Grace of God and not to rest untill we find them affected satisfied and filled with an holy complacency which is the most eminent evidence of our interest in and Union unto the things that are made known unto us Fourthly All these things are to be attended with thankfulness and praise This the Apostle was full of and brake forth into when he entred upon the description of this Grace Eph. 1.3 4. and this will be the frame of his heart who is exercised unto an holy admiration of it When our Lord Jesus Christ considered the Grace of God in revealing the mysteries of this salvation unto his Disciples it is said of him that he reioyced in Spirit Luke 10.21 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his Spirit leaped in him and he breaks forth into a solemn Doxologie giving Praise and Glory unto God And is it not their duty to whom they are revealed to do that which out of love unto them our Lord Christ Jesus did on their behalf Thankfulness for the things themselves thankfulness for the Revelation of them thankfulness for the Love of God and the Grace of Jesus Christ in the one and the other is a great part of this duty Secondly This will teach us what esteem we ought to have of the Word of the Gospel by which alone this great salvation is revealed and exhibited unto us the great means and instrument which God is pleased to use in bringing us unto a participation of it This one consideration is enough to instruct us unto what valuation we ought to make of it what price we should set upon it seeing we cannot have the pearl without the purchase of this Field Some neglect it some despise it some persecute it some look upon it as foolishness some as weakness but unto them that believe it is the power of God and the wisdom of God To further us in this duty I shall take up some of those considerations which the words we insist upon do offer unto us and thereby also pass through what yet remains for our instruction in them And we may consider 1. The Excellency and Preheminence of the Gospel which ariseth from the first Revealer that is the Lord Christ the Son of God It was begun to be spoken unto us by the Lord Herein the Apostle prefers it before the Law It is that Word which the Son came to reveal and declare from the bosome of the Father and surely he deserves to be attended unto Hence it is so often called the Word of Christ and the Gospel of Christ not only because it treateth of him but because it proceedeth from him and on that account is worthy of all Acceptation And 2. To neglect the Gospel is to neglect and despise the Son of God who was the Author of it and consequently the Love and Grace of God in sending him So the Lord Christ tells them that preach the Gospel he that despiseth you despiseth me and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me Neglect of the Gospel reflects immediately upon the Lord Christ and the Father and therefore our Apostle bids us take heed that we despise not him who spake from Heaven which can be no otherwise done but by neglect of his word Some pretend to honour Christ but they have no regard for his Word yea they may say of it as Ahab of Micaiah that they hate it and have therefore some of them endeavoured to extirpate the preaching of it out of the world as the Papists have done at least have looked on it as an useless thing that the Church might be well enough without But such men will find themselves mistaken when it is too late to seek after a remedy the true Cause of their hatred unto the word is because they can find no other way to express their hatred unto Christ himself Neither did ever any man hate or loath the Gospel but he that first hated and loathed Jesus Christ but against the Word they have many pretences against the Person of Christ none that are as yet passable in the world This makes the Word to bear that which is intended against Christ himself and so will he interpret it at the last day 3. Consider that this Word was confirmed and witnessed unto from Heaven by the mighty Works and Miracles which attended the dispensation thereof So our Apostle here informs us and
other duty or service what ever may he not justly expect that such a one will be diligent in the observation of all his commands especially considering also the Honour and Advantage that he hath by being taken near unto his person employed in his affairs And shall not God much more expect the like from us considering how exceedingly the priviledge we have by this relation unto him surpasseth all that men can attain by the favour of earthly Princes And if we will choose other Lords of our own to serve if we are so regardless of our selves as that we will serve our lusts and the world when God hath had such respect unto us as that he would not suffer us to be subject unto the Angels of heaven how inexcusable shall we be in our sin and folly You shall be for me saith God and not for any other what ever And are we not miserable if we like not this agreement 2. For the manner of our obedience how ought we to endeavour that it be performed with all holiness and reverence Moses makes this his great argument with the people for Holiness in all their Worship and services because no people had God so nigh unto them as they had And yet that nearness which he insisted on was but that of his Institutions and some visible Pledges and Representations therein of his Presence among them now much more cogent must the considerations of this real and spiritual nearness which God hath taken us unto himself in by Jesus needs be to the same purpose All that we do we do it immediately unto this holy God not only under his Eye and in his Presence but in an especial and immediate relation unto him by Jesus Christ. Verse VI. THe Apostle hath shewed that the World to come which the Judaical Church looked for was not made subject unto Angels no mention of any such thing being made in the Scripture That which he assumes to make good his Assertion of the Preheminence of the Lord Jesus above the Angels is that unto him it was put in subjection And this he doth not expresly affirm in words of his own but insinuateth in a Testimony out of the Scripture which he citeth and urgeth unto that purpose And this Way he proceedeth for these two ends 1. To evidence that what he taught was suitable unto the Faith of the Church of old and contained in the Oracles committed unto it which was his especial way of dealing with these Hebrews 2. That he might from the Words of that Testimony take occasion to obviate a great Objection against the Dignity of Christ and Mysteries of the Gospel taken from his Humiliation and Death and thereby make way to a farther Explication of many other Parts or Acts of â—is Mediation many Difficulties there are in the Words and Expressions of these Verses more in the Apostles Application of the Testimony by him produced unto the Person and End by him intended all which God assisting we shall endeavour to remove And to that End shall consider 1. The way and manner of his introducing this Testimony which is peculiar 2. The Testimony it self produced with an Explication of the meaning and importance of the Words in the Place from whence it is taken 3. The Application of it unto the Apostles purpose both as to the Person intended and as to the especial End aimed at And 4. Farther unfold what the Apostle adds about the death and sufferings of Christ as included in this Testimony though not intended as to the first use and design of it And 5. Vindicate the Apostles Application of this Testimony with our Explication of it accordingly from the Objections that some have made against it All which we shall pass through as they present themselves unto us in the Text it self First The manner of his citing this Testimony is somewhat peculiar One testified in a certain place Neither person nor place being specified As though he had intended 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a certain Person whom he would not name But the Reason of it is plain both Person and Place were sufficiently known to them to whom he wrote And the Syriack Translation changeth the Expression in the Text into but as the Scripture witnesseth and saith without Cause The Hebrews were not ignorant whose words they were which he made use of nor where they were recorded The one there mentioned is David and the certain place is the eighth Psalm whereof much need not to be added A Psalm it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the High Praises of God and such Psalms do mostly if not all of them respect the Messiah and his Kingdom as the Jews themselves acknowledge For the time of the Composure of this Psalm they have a conjecture which is not altogether improbable namely that it was in the Night whilest he kept his Fathers sheep Hence in his Contemplation of the Works of God he insists on the Moon and Stars then gloriously presenting themselves unto him not mentioning the Sun which appeared not So also in the Distribution that he makes of the things here below that amongst others are made subject unto man he fixeth in the first place on 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 flocks of Sheep which were then peculiarly under his care So should all the works of God and those especially about which we are conversant in our particular Callings excite us to the Admiration of his Glory and Praise of his name And none are usually more void of holy thoughts of God than those who set themselves in no way acceptable unto him This is the place from whence this Testimony is taken whose especial Author the Apostle omitteth both because it was sufficiently known and makes no difference at all who ever was the Penman of this or that Portion of Scripture seeing it was all equally given by Inspiration from God whereon alone the authority of it doth depend 2. The Testimony it self is contained in the words following v. 6 7. What is man c. Before we enter into a particular Explication of the words and of the Apostles Application of them we may observe that there are two things in general that lye plain and clear before us As First That All things whatsoever are said to be put in subjection unto man that is unto Humane Nature in one or more Persons in opposition unto Angels or nature Angelical To express the former is the plain Design and Purpose of the Psalmist as we shall see And whereas there is no such Testimony any where concerning Angels it is evident that the meaning of the word is unto man and not unto Angels which the Apostle intimates in that adversative 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but but of man it is said not of Angels Secondly That this Priviledge was never absolutely nor universally made good in or unto the nature of man but in or with respect unto the Person of Jesus Christ the Messiah This the Apostle call us to the
Exposition of another part of Christs Mediation as prophesied of in this place For though he was so lessened yet it was not on his own account but that by the grace of God he might taste death for every man Secondly For the other part of the testimony We see saith he upon the evidences mentioned that he is crowned with glory and honour and consequently that all things are put under his feet So that the whole testimony in both parts of it is verified in him and in him alone And hereby he fully evinceth what he had before proposed unto confirmation namely the preheminence of Jesus the Messiah above the Angels or principal Administrators of the Law in this especial instance That the world to come was put into subjection unto him and not unto them and therefore in the state of the Church intended in that expression are his Teachings his Doctrine his Worship diligently to be attended unto by all those who desire to be partakers of the promises and good things thereof Secondly There seems to be a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the words by a transposition of some expressions from their proper place and coherence which must be removed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Some would have those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to belong to the subject of the Proposition whose praedicate alone is crowned with glory and honour whereof the suffering of death is inserted as the meritorious cause So reading the words to this purpose We see that Jesus who was for a little while made lower than the Angels for his suffering of death is crowned with glory and honour Others would have Jesus alone to be the subject of the Proposition of whose praedicate there are two parts or two things are affirmed concerning him First that he was made lower than the Angels the reason whereof is added namely that he might suffer death which is farther explained in the close of the verse by the addition of the Cause and End of that his suffering That by the grace of God he might taste of death for every man so reading the words to this purpose We see Jesus made lower than the Angels for the suffering of death crowned or and crowned with glory and honour The difficulty principally consists in this only namely whether the Apostle by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the suffering of death intend the final cause of the humiliation of Christ he was made low that he might suffer death or the meritorious cause of his Exaltation for or because he suffered death he was crowned with glory and honour And the former seems evidently the intention of the words according to the latter resolution of them and our application of the testimony fore-going For 1. if the cause and means of the Exaltation of Christ had been intended it would have been expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 requiring a Genitive case where the cause or means of any thing is intended but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 expresseth the end of what was before affirmed 2. These words for the suffering of death must express either the minoration and humiliation of Christ or the end of it if they express the end of it then we obtain that which is pleaded for he was made less that he might suffer If they express his minoration it self then the end of it is contained only in the close of the verse that he might taste of death for every man In which exposition of the words the sense would be that he suffered death that by the grace of God he might taste death which is no sense at all 3. If those words denote only the means or meritorious cause of the Exaltation of Christ I enquire what is the medium intended of that end in the close 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he by the grace of God he might taste death The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that so plainly refers unto some preparatory means preceding which in this way can be nothing but the crowning him with glory and honour which we know was not the means but the effect of it He was humbled not exalted that he might taste of death 4. The Apostle doth not meerly take it for granted that Jesus was for a little while made lesser than the Angels but asserts it as proved in the testimony insisted on whereunto he subjoyns the end of that his comparative minoration because he intended it as the especial subject of his ensuing discourse This therefore is the importance and natural order of the words But we see Jesus crowned with glory and honour who was for a little while made lower than the Angels for the suffering of death that he by the grace of God might taste death for every man And the only reason of the transposition of the words consisteth in the Apostles following the order of the things testified unto by the Psalmist first his Humiliation then his Exaltation and yet connecting that which he would next treat of unto that which was first laid down passing by the other as now sufficiently confirmed Thirdly The general design of the words and their order being cleared we shall open them in particular seeing that besides the application of the testimony of the Psalmist unto the Lord Jesus now vindicated there is an assertion in them containing that which of all other things was of most difficult acceptation with the Jews upon the account whereof the Apostle confirms it with many reasons in the verses following to the end of this Chapter And indeed we have here the sum of the Gospel and the Doctrine of it concerning the Person and Office of the Messiah asserted and vindicated from the prejudicate opinions of many of the Jews under these two heads 1. That the salvation and deliverance that God had promised and intended to accomplish by the Messiah was spiritual and eternal from death sin Sathan and hell ending in everlasting glory not temporal and carnal with respect unto the world and the concomitants of it in this life as they vainly imagined 2. That this salvation could be no otherwise wrought nor brought about but by the Incarnation Suffering and death of the Messiah not in especial by Arms War and mighty Power as the People was of old led into Canaan under the conduct of Joshua the Captain of that salvation and as some of them expected yet to be saved and delivered by the Messiah Now the Apostle strengthning his discourse by multiplicity of reasons and arguments he doth not only in these words apply his testimony to what he had before proposed unto confirmation namely the subjection of the world to come unto Christ but also lays in it the springs of those two other Principles which we have mentioned and whose proof and confirmation in the next verses he pursues Sundry things as we have partly seen are contained in the words as first the Exinanition and Humiliation of Christ We see Jesus for a little while made lower and brought into a
the Apostles rejoyced thâ—t they had the honour to suffer shame for his Name Acts 5.41 that is the things which the world looked on as shameful but themselves knew to be honourable They are so in the sight of God of the Lord Jesus Christ of all the holy Angels which are competent judges in this case God hath a great cause in the world and that such a one as wherein his Name his Goodness his Love his Glory is concerned this in his infinite Wisdom is to be witnessed confirmed testified unto by sufferings Now can there be any greater Honour done unto any of the sons of men than that God should single them out from among the rest of mankind and appoint them unto this work Men are honoured according to their riches and treasures And when Moses came to make a right judgment concerning this thing he esteemed the reproach of Christ greater riches than all the treasures of Egypt Heb. 1â— 29 We believe that God gave great honour unto the Apostles and Martyrs of old in all their sufferings Let us labour for the same spirit of faith in reference unto our selves and it will relieve us under all our trials This then also hath Christ added unto the way of sufferings by his consecration of it for us All the glory and honour of the world is not to be compared with theirs unto whom it is given in the behalf of Christ not only to believe on him but also to suffer for him 1 Pet. 4.14 15 16. Thirdly He hath thereby made them usâ—ful and profitable Troubles and afflictions in themselves and their own nature have no good in them nor do they tend unto any good end they grow out of the first sentence against sin and are in their own nature poenal tending unto death and nothing else Nor are they in those who have no interest in Christ any thing but effects of the wrath of God But the Lord Christ by his consecrating of them to be the way of our following him hath quite altered their nature and tendency he hath made them good useful and profitable I shall not here shew the usefulness of Afflictions and sufferings the whole Scripture abundantly testifieth unto it and the experience of Believers in all ages and seasons confirms it I only shew whence it is that they become so and that is because the Lord Christ hath consecrated dedicated and sanctified them unto that end He hath thereby cut them off from their old stock of wrath and the curse and planted them on that of Love and Good-will He hath taken them off from the Covenant of works and translated them into that of Grace He hath turned their course from death towards life and immortality mixing his Grace Love and Wisdom with these bitter waters he hath made them sweet and wholesome And if we would have benefit by them we must always have regard unto this consecration of them Fourthly He hath made them safe They are in their own nature a Wilderness wherein men may endlesly wander and quickly lose themselves But he hath made them a way a safe way That way-faring men though fools may not erre therein Never did a Believer perish by afflictions or persecutions never was good Gold or Silver consumed or lost in this Furnace Hypocrites indeed and false Professors fearful and unbelievers are discovered by them and discarded from their hopes But they that are Disciples indeed are never safer than in this way and that because it is consecrated for them Sometimes it may be through their unbelief and want of heeding the Captain of their salvation they are wounded and cast down by them for a season but they are still in the way they are never turned quite out of the way And this through the grace of Christ doth turn also unto their advantage Nay it is not only absolutely a safe way but comparatively more safe than the way of Prosperity And this the Scripture with the experience of all Saints bear plentiful witness unto And many other blessed ends are wrought by the consecration of this way for the Disciples of Christ not now to be insisted on There remains yet to be considered in the words of the Apostle the Reason why the Captain of our salvation was to be consecrated by sufferings and this he declares in the beginning of the Verse It became God so to deal with him which he amplifies by that description of him For whom are all things and by whom are all things Having such a design as he had to bring many sons unto glory and being he for whom are all things and by whom are all things it became him so to deal with the Captain of their salvation What is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here intended and what is the importance of the word was declared before This Becomingness what ever it be it ariseth from hence That God is he for whom are all things and by whom are all things It became him not only who is so but as he is so and because he is so There is no reason for the addition of that consideration of God in this matter but that the cause is in them contained and expressed why it became him to do that which is here ascribed unto him We are then to enquire what it is that is principally regarded in God in this Attribution and thence we shall learn how it became him to bring the Lord Christ unto suffering Now the description of God in these words is plainly of him as the first Cause and last End of all things neither is it absolutely his Power in making all of nothing and his Sovereign Eternal Being requiring that all things tend unto his glory that are intended in the words But he is the Governour Ruler and Judge of all things made by him and for him with respect unto that Order and Law of their Creation which they were to observe This Rule and Government of all things taking care that as they are of God so they should be for him is that which the Apostle respects This then is that which he asserts namely that it became God as the Governour Ruler and Judge of all to consecrate Christ by sufferings which must be farther explained Man being made an intellectual Creature had a Rule of Moral Obedience given unto him This was he to observe to the glory of his Creator and Law-giver and as the condition of his coming unto him and enjoyment of him This is here supposed by the Apostle and he discourseth how man having broken the Law of his Creation and therein come short of the glory of God might by his grace be again made partaker of it With respect unto this state of things God can be no otherwise considered but as the Supreme Governour and Judge of them Now that Property of God which he exerteth principally as the Ruler and Governour of all is his Justice Justitia regiminis the Righteousness of Government Hereof there are
frequent use when respecting God as its Object it is to praise by Hymns or Psalms as the Apostle here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tibi hymnos câ—nam or te hymnis celebrabo I will sing hymns unto thee or praise thee with hymns which was the principal way of setting forth Gods praise under the Old Testament It is not certain whence the second Testimony is taken Some suppose it to be from Isa. 8.17 from whence the last also is cited The words of the Prophet there 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are rendered by the LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the words here used by the Apostle But there are sundry things that will not allow us to close with this supposal First The Original is not rightly rendered by the LXX and as we shall see the Apostles words do exactly express the Original in another place Besides 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is never but in this place and once more turned into 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the LXX but is constantly rendered by them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So that it is not improbable but that these words might be inserted into the Greek Text out of this place of the Apostle there being some Presumptions and likelihoods that it was the place intended by him especially because the next Testimony used by the Apostle consists in the Words immediately ensuing these in the Prophet But yet that yields another Reason against this supposition For if the Apostle continued on the words of the Prophet to what end should he insert in the midst of them that constant note of proceeding unto another Testimony 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and again especially considering that the whole Testimony speaks to the same purpose We shall then referr these words unto Psal. 18.2 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the LXX render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will hope in him the Apostle more properly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will put my trust in him And that that Psalm had respect unto the Lord Christ and his Kingdom our Apostle sheweth elsewhere by citing another Testimony out of it concerning the calling of the Gentiles Rom. 15.9 Nor was the latter part of the Psalm properly fulfilled in David at all The last Testimony is unquestionably taken out of Isa. 8.17 where the words are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and rendered by the LXX as here by the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is properly nati 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 those that are begotten or born of any one whilest they are in their tender age But it may be rendered by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it is by the LXX Gen. 30.36 Chap. 32.22 Chap. 33.1 2. which is children in a larger sense Verse 11 12 13. For both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren saying I will declare thy name unto my brethren in the midst of the Church will I sing praise unto thee And again I will put my trust in him And again behold I and the children which God hath given me The words contain First A farther Description of the Captain of salvation and the sons to be brought unto Glory by him mentioned in the Verse foregoing taken from his Office and Work towards them and the Effect thereof upon them He that sanctifieth and they that are sanctified which is the subject of the first Proposition in these words Secondly An Assertion concerning them they are all of one Thirdly A natural consequence of that Assertion which includes also the scope and design of it He is not ashamed to call them brethren Fourthly The confirmation hereof by a Triple Testimony from the Old Testament First He describes the Captain of salvation and the Sons to be brought unto glory by their mutual Relation to one another in sanctification He is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he that sanctifieth and they are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they that are sanctified That it is the Son the Captain of salvation that is intended by the sanctifier both what the Apostle affirms immediately of him and them and the ensuing Testimonies whereby he confirms it do make evident And as in the Verse foregoing giving an account why God would have Christ to suffer he describes him by that Property of his Nature which includes a necessity of his so doing so setting forth the Causes on our part of that suffering and the grounds of our advantage thereby he expresseth him and the children by those terms which manifest their Relation unto one another and which they could not have stood in had they not been of the same nature as he afterwards declares Now the same word being here used actively and passively it must in both places be understood in the same sense the one expressing the Effect of the other As Christ sanctifies so are the children sanctified And the Act of Christ which is here intended is that which he did for the Sons when he suffered for them according to Gods appointment as v. 10. Now as was said before to sanctifie is either to separate and to dedicate unto sacred Use or to purifie and make realâ—y holy which latter sense is here principally intended Thus when the Apostle speaks of the effects of the Offerings of Christ for the Elect he distinguisheth between their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or consummation and their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or sanctification Chap. 10.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by one offering he consummated or perfected the sanctified First He sanctifieth them and then dedicates them unto God so that they shall never more need any Initiation into his Favour and service This work was the Captain of salvation designed unto the children that were to be brought unto glory being in themselves unclean and unholy and on that account separated from God he was to purge their natures and to make them holy that they might be admitted into the favour of and find acceptance with God And for the Nature of this work two things must be considered 1. The Impetration of it or the Way and Means whereby he obtained this Sanctification for them and 2. The Application of that Means or real effecting of it The first consisteth in the sufferings of Christ and the merit thereof Hence we are so often said to be sanctified and washed in his blood Eph. 5.25 Acts 20.32 Rev. 1.5 and his blood is said to cleanse us from all our sins 1 John 1.7 As it was shed for us he procured by the merit of his Obedience therein that those for whom it was shed should be purged and purified Titus 2.14 The other consists in the effectual workings of the Spirit of Grace communicated unto us by vertue of the bloodshedding and sufferings of Christ as the Apostle declares Tit. 3.4 5 6. And they who place this sanctification meerly on the Doctrine and Example of Christ as Grotius on this place
them as that they might enjoy the blessed effects thereof in deliverance and salvation Thirdly The Apostle lays down an Inference from his preceding assertion in those words For which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren In which words we have 1. The respect of that which is here affirmed unto the assertion fore-going for which cause 2. The thing it self affirmed which is That the Lord Christ calls the sons to be brought unto glory his brethren 3. The manner of his so doing he is not ashamed to call them so And herein also the Apostle according to his wonted way of proceeding which we have often observed makes a transition towards somewhat else which he had in design namely the Prophetical Office of Christ as we shall see afterwards For which cause that is because they are of one partakers of one common nature He calls them brethren This gives a rightful foundation unto that Appellation Hereon is built that relation which is between him and them It is true there is more required to perfect the relation of Brotherhood between him and them than meerly their being of one but it is so far established from hence that he was meet to suffer for them to sanctifie and save them And without this there could have been no such relation Now his calling of them Brethren doth both declare that they are so and also that he owns them and avouches them as such But whereas it may be said that although they are thus of one in respect of their common nature yet upon sundry other accounts he is so glorious and they are so vile and miserable that he might justly disavow this cognation and reject them as strangers The Apostle tells us it is otherwise and that passing by all other distances between them and setting aside the consideration of their unworthiness for which he might justly disavow them and remembring wherefore he was of one with them he is not ashamed to call them brethren There may be a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the words and the contrary asserted to that which is denied he is not ashamed that is willingly cheerfully and readily he doth it But I rather look upon it as an expression of condescension and love and herein doth the Apostle shew the use of what he taught before that they were of one namely that thereby they became Brethren he meet to suffer for them and they meet to be saved by him What in all this the Apostle confirms by the ensuing testimonies we shall see in the explication of them in the mean time we may learn for our own instruction IV. That notwithstanding the union of nature which is between the Son of God incarnate the Sanctifier and the children that are to be sanctified there is in respect of their Persons as inconceivable distance between them so that it is a marvellous condescension in him to call them brethren He is not ashamed to call them so though considering what himself is and what they are it should seem that he might justly be so The same expression for the like reasons is used concerning Gods owning his people in covenant chap. 11.16 Wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God And this distance between Christ and us which makes his condescension so marvellous relates unto a four-fold head First The immunity of the nature wherein he was of one with us in his Person from all sin He was made like unto us in all things sin excepted The nature of man in every other individual person is defiled with and debased by sin We are every one gone astray and are become altogether filthy or abhominable This sets us at no small distance from him Humane nature defiled with sin is farther distanced from the same nature as pure and holy in worth and excellency than the meanest worm is from the most glorious Angel Nothing but sin casts the creature out of its own place and puts it into another distance from God than it hath by being a creature This is a debasement unto hell as the Prophet speaks Thou didst debase thy self-even unto hell Isa. 57.9 And therefore the condescension of God unto us in Christ is set out by his regarding of us when we were enemies unto him Rom. 5.10 that is whilst we were sinners as verse 8. This had cast us into hell it self at the most inconceivable distance from him Yet this hindred not him who was holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners to own us as his brethren He says not with those proud hypocrites in the Prophet Stand farther off I am holier than you but he comes unto us and takes us by the hand in his love to deliver us from this condition Secondly We are in this nature obnoxious unto all miseries in this world and that which is to come Man now is born to trouble all the trouble that sin can deserve or a provoked God inflict his misery is great upon him and that growing and endless He justly in himself free from all obnoxious to nothing that was grievous or irksome no more than the Angels in heaven or Adam in Paradise Poena noxam sequitur Punishment and trouble follow guilt only naturally He did no sin nor was there guile found in his mouth so that God was always well pleased with him What ever of hardship or difficulty he underwent it was for us and not for himself Might not he have left us to perish in our condition and freely enjoyed his own We see how unapt those who are in prosperity full and rich are to take notice of their nearest Relations in poverty misery and distress and who among them would do so if it would cast them into the state of those who are already miserable yet so it did the Lord Christ. His calling us brethren and owning of us made him instantly obnoxious unto all the miseries the guilt whereof we had contracted upon our selves The owning of his alliance unto us cost him as it were all he was worth for being rich for our sakes he became poor He came into the prison and into the furnace to own us And this also renders his condescension marvellous Thirdly He is inconceivably distanced from us in respect of that Place and Dignity which he was designed unto This as we have shewed at large was to be Lord of all with absolute sovereign authority over the whole Creation of God We are poor abjects who either have not bread to eat or have no good right to eat that which we meet withall Sin hath set the whole Creation against us And if Mephibosheth thought it a great condescension in David on his Throne to take notice of him being poor who was yet the son of Jonathan what is it in this King of Kings to own us for Brethren in our vile and low condition Thoughts of his glorious Exaltation will put a lustre on his condescension in this matter Fourthly He is infinitely distanced from us in his
the waster or destroyer and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to waste or destroy as also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which as John tells us is the Hebrew name of the Angel of the bottomless pit Revel 9.11 as his Greek name is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thirdly The latter Jews suppose that this Angel of death takes away the life of every man even of those who die a natural death And hereby as they express the old faith of the Church that death is poenal and that it came upon all for sin through the temptation of Sathan so also they discover the bondage that they themselves are in for fear of death all their days For when a man is ready to die they say the Angel of death appears to him in a terrible manner with a sword drawn in his hand From thence drops I know not what poison into him whereon he dies Hence they wofully houl lament and rend their garments upon the death of their friends And they have composed a prayer for themselves against this terrour Because also of this their being slain by the Angel of death they hope and pray that their death may be an expiation for all their sins Here lies the sting of death mentioned by the Apostle 1. Cor. 15.55 Hence they have a long story in their Midrash or mystical Exposition of the Pentateuch on the last section of Deuteronomy about Samaels coming to take away the life of Moses whom he repelled and drove away with the Rod that had the Shem Hamphorash written in it And the like story they have in a book about the acts of Moses which Aben-Ezra rejects on Exod. 4.20 This hand of Sathan in death manifesting it to be poenal is that which keeps them in bondage and fear all their days Fourthly they suppose that this Angel of death hath power over men even after death One horrible penalty they fancy in particular that he inflicts on them which is set down by Elias in his Tishbi in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 out of the Midrash of Rabbi Isaac the son of Parnaer for when a man as they say departs out of this world 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Angel of death comes and sits upon his grave And he brings with him a Chain partly of iron partly of fire and making the soul to return into body he breaks the bones and torments variously both body and soul for a season This is their Purgatory and the best of their hopes are that their punishment after this life shall not be eternal And this various interest of Sathan in the power of death both keeps them in dismal bondage all their days and puts them upon the invention of several ways for their deliverance Thus one of their solemn Prayers on the day of Expiation is to be delivered from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or this punishment of the devil in their graves to which purpose also they offer a Cock unto him for his pacification And their prayer to this purpose in their Berachoth is this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That it may please thee good Lord to deliver us from evil Decrees or Laws from poverty from contempt from all kind of punishments from the judgment of hell and from beating in the grave by the Angel of death And this supposition is in like manner admitted by the Mahumetans who have also this prayer Deus noster libera nos ab Angelo interrogante tormento sepulchri à via mala And many such lewd imaginations are they now given up unto proceeding from their ignorance of the Righteousness of God But yet from these apprehensions of theirs we may see what the Apostle intended in this expression calling the devil him that had the power of death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Et liberaret ipsos hos quotquot quicunque and free those who 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to dismiss discharge free and in the use of the word unto the Accusative case of the Person the Genitive of the thing is added or understood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I free thee from this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aristoph to deliver thee from this eye-sore And sometimes the Genitive case of the thing is expressed where the Accusative of the person is omitted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to free or deliver one from fear as here the Accusative case of the person is expressed and the Genitive of the thing omitted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to deliver them that is from death or from fear because of death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is obnoxius obstrictus reus damnas He that is legally obnoxious subject liable to any thing that is Law Crime Judge Judgment Punishment in all which respects the word is used He that is under the power of any Law is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 subject unto its authority and penalty See Matth. 5.21 22. chap. 26.66 Mark 3.29 1 Cor. 11.27 James 2.10 Now the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 servitude or bondage here mentioned is poenal and therefore are men said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 obnoxious unto it Verse 14 15. For as much then as or seeing therefore that the children are were in common partakers of flesh and blood he also himself likewise after the same manner took part did partake of the same that through by death he might destroy make void the authority of him that had the power of death that is the devil And deliver free discharge them who through fear of death were all their life time subject to bondage In former Verses as was shewed the Apostle declared the necessity that there was on the part of God intending to bring many sons unto glory to constitute such an union between them and the Captain of their salvation as that it might be just for him to suffer in their stead In these he proceeds to manifest in particular what that Nature is in the common participation whereof their union designed did consist wherein they were all of one and what were the especial reasons why the Lord Christ was made partaker of that nature This coherence of these Verses Chrysostom briefly gives us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Having shewed the brotherhood that was between Christ and the children he lays down the causes of that dispensation and what they are we shall find here expressed There are sundry things which the Apostle supposeth in these words as known unto and granted by the Hebrews As first that the Devil had the power of death Secondly That on this account men were filled with fear of it and led a life full of anxiety and trouble by reason of that fear Thirdly That a deliverance from this condition was to be effected by the Messiah Fourthly That the way whereby he was to do this was by his suffering All
which as they are contained in the first Promise so that they were allowed of by the Hebrews of old we have fully proved else-where And by all these doth the Apostle yield a reason of his former concession that the Messiah was for a little while made lower than the Angels the Causes and Ends whereof he here declares There are in the words First A supposition of a two-fold state and condition of the children to be brought unto glory First Natural or their natural state and condition they were all of them in common partakers of flesh and bloud For as much then as the children were partakers of flesh and blood Secondly Moral their moral state and condition they were obnoxious unto death as it is poenal for sin and in great bondage through fear of it them who through fear of death were all their life time subject unto bondage Secondly There is a double inference with respect unto this supposition on the part of Christ the Captain of salvation First As to their natural condition that he did partake of it he was so to do He himself also did partake of the same Secondly As to their moral condition he freed them from it and deliver them Thirdly The means whereby he did this or this was to be done evidencing the necessity of his participation with them in their condition of nature that he might relieve them from their condition of trouble he did it by death that by death Fourthly The immediate Effect of his death tending unto their delivery and freedom and that is the destruction of the devil as to his power over and interest in death as poenal whereof their deliverance is an infallible consequent and destroy him c. In the first place the Apostle expresseth as by way of supposition the natural condition of the children that is the children whom God designed to bring unto glory those who were given unto Christ they were in common partakers of flesh and blood I shall not stay to remove the conceit of some who yet are not a few among the Romanists who refer those words unto the participation of the flesh and blood of Christ in the Sacrament whereunto also as we observed the Aethiopick Version gives countenance For not only is there not any thing in the expression that inclines unto such an imagination but also it enervates the whole design of the Apostles discourse and argument as from the former consideration of it doth appear Flesh and blood are by an usual Synecdoche put for the whole humane nature not as though by blood the soul was intended because the life is said to be in it as not acting without it but this expression is used because it is not humane nature as absolutely considered but as mortal passible subject unto infirmities and death it self that is intended And it is no more than if he had said the children were men subject unto death For he gives his reason herein why the Lord Christ was made a man subject unto death That he and the children should be of one nature he had shewed before for as much then as this was the condition of the children that they were all partakers of humane nature liable to sufferings sorrow and death he was so also And this is thus expressed to set forth the love and condescension of Jesus Christ as will afterward appear The second thing in these words is the moral condition of the children and there are sundry things partly intimated partly expressed in the description that is here given us of it as 1. Their estate absolutely considered they were subject to death 2. The consequences of that estate 1. It wrought fear in them 2. That fear brought them into bondage 3. The continuance of that condition it was for the whole course of their lives First It is implied that they were subject obnoxious unto guilty of death and that as it was poenal due to sin as contained in the curse of the Law which what it comprehendeth and how far it is extended is usually declared On this supposition lies the whole weight of the Mediation of Christ. The children to be brought unto glory were obnoxious unto death the curse and wrath of God therein which he came to deliver them from Secondly The first effect and consequent of this obnoxiousness unto death concurring unto their state and condition is that they were filled with fear of it for fear of death Fear is a perturbation of mind arising from the apprehension of a future imminent evil And the greater this evil is the greater will the perturbation of the mind be provided the apprehension of it be answerable The fear of death then here intended is that trouble of mind which men have in the expectation of death to be inflicted on them as a punishment due unto their sins And this apprehension is common to all men arising from a general presumption that death is poenal and that it is the judgment of God that they which commit sin are worthy of death as Rom. 1.32 chap. 2.15 But it is cleared and confirmed by the Law whose known sentence it is The soul that sinneth shall die And the troublesome expectation of the event of this apprehension is the fear of death here intended And according unto the means that men have to come unto the knowledge of the righteousness of God are or ought to be their apprehensions of the evil that is in death But even those who had lost all clear knowledge of the consequents of death natural or the dissolution of their present mortal condition yet on a confused apprehension of its being poenal always esteemed it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the most dreadful of all things that are so unto humane nature And in some this is heightned and increased until it come to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as our Apostle speaks chap. 10.27 A fearful expectation of judgment and fiery indignation which shall devour the adversaries And this is the second thing that is in this description of the estate and condition of the children to be brought unto glory being obnoxious unto the sentence of death they could not but live in fear of the execution of it Thirdly They are by this means brought into bondage The troublesome expectation of death as poenal brings them into bondage into the nature whereof we must a little enquire Sundry things concur to make any state a state of bondage as 1. That it be involuntary no man is in bondage by his will that which a man chuseth is not bondage unto him A man that would have his ear bored though he were always a servant was never in bondage for he enjoyed the condition that pleased him Properly all bondage is involuntary 2. Bondage ingenerates strong desires after and puts men on all manner of attempts for liberty Yokes gall and make them on whom they are desire ease So long as men are sensible of bondage which is against nature for that
which necessarily infers his prae-existence in another nature their perswasion about the Person of Christ is utterly overthrown Their exceptions in their controversial writings unto this place have been else-where considered Those of Eniedinus on this Text are answered by Paraeus those of Castalio by Beza and the objections of some others by Gomarus We shall in the first place consider what is proposed for the confirmation of their sense by Schlictingius or Crellius and then the exception of a very learned Expositor unto the sense before laid down and confirmed And Schlictingius first argues from the Context Praeter ipsa verba saith he quae hunc sensum nullo modo patiuntur ut postea dicemus contextus ratiocinatio authoris id repudiat qui pro ratione argumento id sumere non potuit debuitve quod sibi hoc ipso argumento ratione probandum sumsisset De eo enim erat quaestio cur Christus qui nunc ad tantam majestatem gloriam est evectus non angelicam sed humanam morti variis calamitatibus obnoxiam habuerit naturam bujus vero rei quo pacto ratio redderetur per id quod non angelicam sed humanam naturam assumpserit cum istius ipsius rei quae in hac quaestione continetur nempe quod Christus homo fuit natus nunc causa ratioque quaeratur At vero si haec verba de juvandis non Angelis sed hominibus deque ope iis ferenda intelligamus pulcherrime omnia cohaerent nempe Christum hominem mortalem fuisse non angelum aliquem quod non angelis sed hominibus juvandis servandisque fuerit destinatus But the foundation of this Exposition of the Context is a mistake which his own preceding discourse might have relieved him from For there is no such question proposed as here is imagined nor doth he in his following Exposition suppose it The Apostle doth not once propose this unto confirmation that it behoved the Lord Christ to be a man and not an Angel But having proved at large before that in Nature and Authority he was above the Angels he grants verse 8. that he was for a little while made lower than they and gives at large the reason of the necessity of that dispensation taken from the work which God had designed him unto which being to bring many sons unto glory he shews and proves by sundry reasons that it could not be accomplished without his death and suffering for which end it was indispensibly necessary that he should be made partaker of flesh and blood And this he confirms farther by referring the Hebrews unto the Scripture and in especial unto the great Promise of the Messiah made unto Abraham that the Messiah was to be his seed the love and grace whereof he amplifies by an intimation that he was not to partake of the Angelical nature That supposition therefore which is the foundation of this Exposition namely that the Apostle had before designed to prove that the Messiah ought to partake of humane nature and not of Angelical which is nothing to his purpose is a surmise suited only to the present occasion Wherefore Felbinger in his Demonstrationes Evangelica takes another course and affirms that these words contain the end of what was before asserted verse 14 15. namely about Christs participation of flesh and blood which was not to help Angels but the seed of Abraham and to take them into grace and favour But these things are both of them expresly declared in those verses especially verse 15. where it is directly affirmed that his design in his Incarnation and Death was to destroy the devil and to free and save the children And to what end should these things be here again repeated and that in words and terms far more obscure and ambiguous than those wherein it was before taught and declared For by Angels they understand evil Angels and there could be no cause why the Apostle should say in this Verse that he did not assist or relieve them when he had declared in the words immediately fore-going that he was born and died that he might destroy them Neither is it comely to say that the end why Christ destroyed the devil was that he might not help him or the end why he saved the children was that he might assist them Besides the introduction of this assertion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will not allow that here any end is intimated of what was before expressed there being no insinuation of any final cause in them The Context therefore not answering their occasion they betake themselves to the words Verbum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he significat proprie manu aliquem apprehendere sive ut illum aliquo ducas sive ut sustentes hinc ad opitulationem significandum commodè transfertur quos enim adjutos volumus ne cadant vel sub onere aliquo succumbant aut si ceciderint erectos cupimus iis manum injicere solemus quo sensu Ecclesiastic 4. v. 12. De sapientia dictum est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc est opitulatur quaerentibus se eadem est significatio verbi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quod qui aliquem sublevatum velint illi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 adverso manum porrigere solent It is acknowledged that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth frequently signifie as here is alledged namely to help and assist as it were by putting forth the hand for to give relief But if that were intended by the Apostle in this place what reason can be assigned why he should wave the use of a word proper unto his purpose and frequently so applied by himself in other places and make use of another which signifying no such thing nor any where used by him in that sense must needs obscure his meaning and render it ambiguous Whereas therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies to help and relieve and is constantly used by our Apostle in that sense it being not used or applied by him in this place to express his intention but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies no such thing nor is ever used by him to that purpose the sense contended for of help and relief is plainly excluded The place of Ecclesiasticus and that alone is referred unto by all that embrace this Exposition But what if the word be abused in that place by that Writer must that give a rule unto its interpretation in all other Writers where it is properly used But yet neither is the word used there for to help and relieve but to take and receive Wisdom suscipit receiveth or taketh unto it self suo more those that seek it which is the sense of the word we plead for and so is it rendred by Translators So the Lord Christ suo modo took to himself the seed of Abraham by uniting it unto his person as he was the Son of God In the very entrance also of his discourse this Author acknowledgeth that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉