sayenge Thy synnes be released the. For thus iudgeth thapostle that man is freely iustified by fayth These wordes of Barnarde do wonderfullye illustrate and set forthe our cause for he not onely requireth in a generalitie that we shulde beleue our synnes to be pardoned throughe mercye but byddethe vs also put to a speciall faythe by whiche we may beleue that euen vnto our owne selues sinnes be pardoned And he teacheth howe we may be assured of remission of synnes that is to saye whan by faythe hertes be lifted vp and be made quiete and set at rest by the holy ghoste What do our aduersaries require more Dare they yet deny that we obteyne remission of synnes through fayth Or that faythe is a parte of penaunce Thyrdly Our aduersaries say that synne is in this wyse forgyuen because he that is attrite or contrite doth brynge forthe an acte of the loue of god that by this acte he meriteth to receyue remission of synnes This is nothyng els but to teache the lawe and to destroy and abrogate the gospell and to disanull the promyse coÌ„cernyng Christ. For they do onely require the lawe and our workes for the lawe requireth loue Besydes this they do teache vs to truste that we obteyne remission of synnes bicause of contrition and loue What other thynge is this than to sette oure trust and confidence vpon our owne workes and not vpon the worde and promyse made by god of Christe Nowe if the lawe be sufficieÌ„t to the obteynyng of remission of synnes to what purpose nede we the Gospell what nede haue we of Christe if for our workes we obteyne forgyuenes of synnes But we contrarywyse do calle agayne consciences from the lawe vnto the gospell and from the truste in theyr owne workê to truste and to haue sure confidence in the promyse and in Christe because the gospell setteth forthe Christe vnto vs and promyseth remission of synnes freely for Christê sake By this promyse the gospel byddeth vs trust that for Christes sake we be recoÌ„ciled to the father and brought in to his fauour agayne and not for our owne contrition or for our owne loue For there is none other mediator or pacifier than Christe Neyther can we worke the lawe oneles we be fyrste reconciled by Christe And though we coulde do any thyng yet we ought to thinke that not for these workê we obteyne remission of synnes but for Christes sake whiche is the mediator and mercye stocke Yea it is iniurie and dishonour to Christe and a defeatyng of the gospell to thynke that we do obteyne remission of synnes for the law or by any other wayes than through faythe in Christe And this reason we haue handeled before in the title of iustification whan we tolde wherfore we do holde opinion that men be iustified by fayth and not by loue Therfore the doctrine of our aduersaries where as they teache that men for contrition and loue obteyne forgyuenes of synnes and bydde them truste in this contrition and loue is only a doctrine of the lawe and that not vnderstaÌ„ded Lykewyse as the Iewes dyd loke vpon the couered face of Moyses For admitte that we had loue let vs imagyne that we had workes yet can neither loue neither workes be a price raunsome or propitiation for synne Neyther can they be set and pleded as it were in barre agaynste the wrathe and iudgement of god accordyng to that sayenge of Dauid in the psalme Thou shalte nat entre in to iudgement with thy seruaunt for no creature lyuyng shall be iustified in thy syghte Neyther ought the honoure of Christ to be plucte from hym gyuen to our workê For these causes Paule dothe styffly affirme that we be not iustified by the lawe and he setteth agaynst the lawe the ê“myse of remission of synnes whiche is gyuen for Christes sake and reacheth vs that we freelye for Christis sake thrugh fayth receiue remission of sinnes To this promyse Paule dothe calle vs backe from the lawe Upon this promyse be byddeth vs stedfastly to beholde which doutles shal be voyde and of no strength if we be iustified before by the lawe or euer we be iustified by the promyse or if we obteyne remission of synnes for our owne iustice But the case is cleare that therfore the promyse was made vnto vs and therfore Christ was gyuen to vs because we can not worke and fulfyll the lawe wherfore it is necessary that we be fyrst reconciled by the promyse or euer we do worke the lawe But the promyse is onely receyued by fayth Ergo it is necessarye that contrite persones do by fayth receyue the promise of remission of synnes whiche is gyuen for Christis sake and that they do decree with them selfes that they haue the father recoÌ„ciled vnto them selfes freely for Christis sake This is the senteÌ„ce and mynde of Paule in the epistle to the Romanes â–ª where he saythe Therfore by fayth that accordyng to grace or fauour the promise myght be ferme and stable And to the Galathianes he sayth The scripture hath coÌ„cluded al thinges vnder synne that the promyse by the fayth of Iesu Christe myght be gyuen to them that beleue that is to say All men be vnder synne can not otherwyse be delyuered onles by fayth they do take and receyue the promyse of remission of synnes Fyrste therfore we must by faythe receyue remission of synnes before or we do worke the lawe al be it as it was aboue saide loue foloweth faythe because they that be regenerate do receyue the holy ghoste and therfore they begynne to worke the lawe We wolde recite mo testimonies and authorities if it were not so that they be open and at hande to euery deuoute and godlye reader in the scriptures For we couet not to be ouerloÌ„ge and tedious to thentente that this cause or mater may the more easelye be perceyued Neyther is it any doubte but that this is the senteÌ„ce of Paule whiche we do defeÌ„de that by fayth we receyue remission of sinnes for Christis sake and that by fayth we ought to set Christe the mediator agaynst the wrathe of god not our workes And let not the myndes of good men be troubled although our aduersaries do calumniate and corrupte the sentences of Paule There is nothynge spoken so purely and truelye but it may be depraued by captious cauillations We assuredly knowe that this which we haue recited is the very ryghte and true sentence and meanynge of Paule we knowe this oure sentence doth brynge ferme and stable coÌ„forte to godly coÌ„sciences without whiche no man is able to stande in the iudgement of god Wherfore let these pharisaical opinioÌ„s of our aduersaries be reiected and thrust out of mens â—ertes that we do not by fayth receyue remission of synnes but that we must merite remission with our loue and with our workes and that we ought to set our loue and our workes agaiÌ„st the wrath of god· This is the doctrine of
him Thys coÌ„tempt doth marre al theyr good workes for god iudgeth the harte Finally this is very vnaduysedly wrytten of our aduersaryes that men gyltye of eternall punyshement deserue remyssyon of synnes by the acte of loue sythe it is not possyble to loue god onles we fyrste purchase forgiuenes of sinnes by fayth for it is ympossyble for an harte whiche in dede felethe the ire of god to loue god before he perceyue hym pacyfyed I saye so longe as god feareth vs and semeth to cast vs froÌ„ hym into eternall dethe mans nature can not lyfte vp it selfe to loue the angrye iuge punysher It is easye for euyll persons to fayne these dreames of loue that a mortall synner maye loue god aboue all thynges for they fele not what is the ire or iudgemente of god But in the trouble of conscyence and in the very conflycte there the conscyence proue howe false theyr phylosophycal conclusyons be Paule saythe ☞ The lawe workethe anger ☜ he saythe not that by the lawe men deserue remyssyon of synnes for the lawe alwaye accuseth the conscyence and put it in feare Ergo it iustifyeth not for the coÌ„science terrified by the lawe fleeth the iudgement of god wherefore they erre that truste to wynne remyssyon of synnes be the workes of the lawe Thys suffyseth of the iustyce of reasoÌ„ or lawe which the aduersaries teache for here after when we shall shewe our mynde of the iustyce of fayth â–ª the matter it selfe shal constrayne vs to bryng out more recordes whiche maye also helpe to destroye the erroures of our aduersaryes here to fore aledged Bycause therfore that men can not by theyr owne powers do the lawe of god and bycause all be vnder synne and condemned to euerlastynge dethe for thys cause we can not be delyuered from syn by the lawe nor be iustyfyed but the promyse of remissyon of synnes and of iustyfycatyon is geuen for Chryst who is geuen for vs to satysfy for the synnes of the worlde and is set vp as a medyator and a pourger of sinnes This promyse hathe no condycyon annexed of our merites but freely offereth forgyuenes of synnes and iustyfycatyon as Paule sayth ☞ Yf by workes Ergo it is no grace ☜ And in an other plase ☞ The iustyce of god is nowe declared without the lawe ☜ that is remyssyon of synnes shulde hange on our merytes and the reconciliation shuld be by the lawe so it were vnprofytable for we can not do the lawe it shulde also ensue that the promyse of reconcilement shuld neuer chaunce vnto vs. Thus reasoneth Paule Rom. 4. ☞ Yf our enherytaunce shuld cum by the lawe voyde were our fayth and the promyse were of none effecte For yf the promyse shulde requyre a condycyon annexed of our merytes and of the lawe syth we neuer fulfyll the lawe it shulde folowe that the promyse were vnprofytable But syth it is so â–ª that iustyfycatyon chaungeth by free promyse it foloweth that we can not iustyfye our selues For otherwyse what neded god to promise And where as the promyse caÌ„ not be taken without fayth the gospell which is properly the promyse of remyssyon of synnes and of iustyfycatyon for Chryst teacheth the iustyce of fayth which the lawe doth not Nor it is not the iustyce of the lawe For the lawe requyreth of vs our workes and our perfection but the promyse offereth vnto vs whiche be oppressed with synne and deathe frelye reconciliacyon for Chryste which reconciliatyon is receyued not by workes but by onely fayth This fayth bryngeth not with it a trust of the owne workes but onely the trust of promyse or of the promysed mercye in Chryste wherfore thys specyall fayth by which we beleue that our synnes be forgyuen for Chryste and that god is pacyfyed and mercyfull for Chryste obteyneth remyssyon of synnes and iustifyeth vs and by cause in repentaunce that is in the trouble of conscyence it comforteth and plucketh vp our hartes and regenerateth vs and bryngeth vnto vs the holye spirite so that from thenseforth â—e maye do the lawe of god that is loue God feare God thynke that god heareth vs obey god in all afflyctyons it mortyfyeth the coÌ„cupiscence c. Thus fayth whiche freely receyueth remyssyon of sinnes bycause it pleadeth Chryst in estopell agaynst the ire of god as a mediator and mercy stocke pleadeth not in barr our owne merytes or our owne loue which fayth is the true knowledge of Chryste and vseth the benyfytes of Chryst and regenerateth our hartes and goeth before the fulfyllynge of the lawe Of thys fayth ye shall not fynde one syllable in the doctrine of our aduersaryes wherfore we reproue the aduersaryes bycause they only teach the iustyce of the lawe and teach not the iustyce of the Euaungell which preacheth vnto vs the iustyce of faythe in Chryste ⧠What is the iustyfyenge faythe THe aduersaries only fayne that fayth is a knowledge of the hystorye and therfore they teache that it may stonde with mortall syn They speake therfore nothiÌ„ge of fayth by which Paule so oft tymes saythe that men be iustyfyed for they whiche be reputed iust before god walke nat in mortal synne But that fayth whiche iustyfyeth is nat only a knoweledge of the hystorye but it is to assent to the promyse of God in whiche frelye for Chryste is offered remyssyon of synnes iustificacyon And lest a man shulde suspecte that it is only a knowledge we wyl adde more ouer that it is to wyll and to receyue the offered promyse of remyssyon of synnes and of iustification And a man maye easely se the diuersytye betwyxte this fayth and betwyxt the iustyce of the lawe Fayth is a seruice which receiueth of god the offered benifites The iustyce of the lawe is a seruyce which offereth vnto god our merites with fayth on thê fashyon wyll god be serued that we maye receyue of hym the thynges whiche he promyseth and offereth Nowe that fayth sygnifieth not only the knowledge of the hystorye but rather a trust which assenteth to the promise Paule clerely wytnesseth when he sayth Iustyce therfore is by fayth to thentente the promyse shulde be ferme and stable For he meaneth that the promyse caÌ„ not be receyued but by fayth wherfore he compareth and knytteth together as correlatiues promyse and fayth Howe be it it is sone iudged what faythe is yf we consyder the Crede where this artycle is put Remission of synnes wherefore it is not ynoughe to beleue that Chryste was borne dyd suffer and ryse agayne oneles we adde also thys artycle Remyssyon of synnes whiche is the fynal cause of the hystorye To thys artycle we muste refere the reste as that for Chryste and nat for our owne merites we be pardoned of our synnes For what neded Chryste to begyuen for our synnes if our owne merytes maye satysfye for our synnes ⧠wherfore so ofte as we speake of the iustyfyenge faythe it is to be knowen that these .3 obiectes muste mete together
to say kynges be ordeyned to prouyde that godlye thynges that is to witte the gospel of Christe be maynteyned and spredde abrode and that as beinge goddê deputies they shuld defende the lyfe helth of innocent ê‘sones ⧠Of bothe kyndes to be gyuen in the souper of the lorde ⧠IT can nat be doubted but that it is an holy thing and agreing to the institution of Christ and to the wordes of Paule to vse bothe partes or kyndes in the souper of the lorde For Christe dyd institute bothe partes and he dyd institute theÌ„ nat for parte of the churche but for the hole churche For nat onely prestes but the hole churche vseth the sacrament and that by the authoritie of Christ and nat by the authoritie of maÌ„ And thê we thinke that our aduersaries do grauÌ„t Nowe if Christ dyd institute this sacrameÌ„t for the hole churche why is the one kynde taken awaye frome parte of the church why is the vse of the one kynde forbydden why is the ordenaunce of Christe chaunged namely sythe he hymselfe dothe call it hys testamente That if it be nat lauful to breake the testament and laste wyl of a man muche lesse it shal be laufull to breake the testamente of Christe And Paule sayeth that he receyued of the lorde that whiche he taught But he taught the vse of bothe kyndê as the texte euideÌ„tly sheweth Do this sayeth he fyrste speakyng of the body afterwarde he repeteth the same wordê of the cup. And after he sayeth let a man trye and examyne himselfe and so let him eate of the breade and drynke of the cuppe These be the wordes of one disposing and ordering And he speaketh before that they whiche shulde vse the souper of the lorde shulde vse it togither in one company Wherfore it is euident that the sacrament was instituted for the hole churche And the vse ther of remayneth yet in some churches of the Grekes And the same custome was sometyme also in the latine churches as Cypriane and Hierome do witnesse For thus sayeth Hierome vpon the prophete Sophonie Sacerdotes qui â—ucharistiae seruiunt sanguinem domini populis diuidunt c. The prestes whiche do serue the sacramentâ— of the alter whiche do deuide the bloude of the lorde to the people c. The councel of Toletane witnesseth the same Neyther shal it be any greate mastry to gather a greate heape of testimonies Here we wyll nat exaggerate ne amplifie this thing we only leaue it to the wyse reader to be coÌ„sidered what is to be thought of the ordenauÌ„ce of god Our aduersaries in the coÌ„futatioÌ„ do nat go about to excuse the churche froÌ„ whom the one parte of the sacrameÌ„t was takeÌ„ away â–ª It became good and religious men to do thê They ought to haue sought a sure and strong reason to excuse the churche and to teache the consciences whiche can nat be suffred to haue but one parte of yâ— sacrament Nowe they defende that it is well done to kepe awaye the one parte and they forbidde to graunt the vse of bothe partes Fyrste they fayne that in the church the maner was in some places to gyue but the one parte alone And yet can they briÌ„g forthe none auncient example herof but they alledge the places in whiche mention is made of breade as in Luke Where it is writen that the disciples knewe Christe by breakynge of the breade They alledge also other places of breakyng of the breade And albeit we do nat greately saye agaynste them but that some of those places may be vnderstaÌ„ded of the sacramente yet for all that thys dothe nat folowe that there was gyuen but the one parte alone for by namyng of parte the residue is betokened by a comen maner custome of speakyng They adde also of the laicall coÌ„munion whiche was nat the vse of yâ— one kynde alone but of bothe And if at any tyme prestes be byddeÌ„ to vse the laicall communion it is mente that they were remoued from the ministery of consecration And this thyng our aduersaries do knowe wel ynough but they do abuse the ignoraunce of vnlearned men whiche when they here speake of laicall coÌ„munion by and by do dreame of the maner and vsage of our tyme in which to lay men is gyuen but only one parte of the sacrament And se howe shameles they be Gabriel amonge other causes reciteth why bothe partes be nat gyuen because there was a difference to be made betwene laye men and prestes And it is lykely ynough that thys is the chief cause why the prohibitioÌ„ of the one parte is so greatly defended that the dignitie of the ordre by this religious fashyon myght be the better estemed and the more set by Thê is an humaine reason and purpose I wyll nat speake ouer sharply whiche for what ende it serueth it may easly be iudged And in the confutation they alledge of the sonnes of Helie that wheÌ„ the office of the hygh preste was lost they shulde desyre but one parte sacerdotall as it is wrytten in the fyrste boke of kynges Here they say is signified the vse of one only kynde And they adde thys conclusion So therfore our lay men also ought to be content with one part sacerdotal that is to wete with one kynde Uerely our aduersaries do dallye and tryfle wheÌ„ they applye the hystory of the chyldren of Helie to the sacramentes There is described the punyshmeÌ„t of Helie wyl they say thys also that the laye men be kepte from the one parte because of punyshemente The sacramente was instituted to comforte lyfte vp troubled and feared myndes when they beleue that the flesshe of Christe which was giuen for the lyfe of the worlde is meate wheÌ„ they beleue that they ioyned to Christe be quickened But our aduersaries do reason that laye men be kepte from the one parte because of punyshemeÌ„t The laye men say they ought to be coÌ„tente This is very imperiously spoken And why oughte they There oughte nat to be asked why nor any cause is to be enquired but what soeuer diuines say it must be a lawe This is the foule vometyng and dronkyn sayiÌ„g of Eccius For we espye these thrasonicall and proude bragging wordes of these felowes whiche if we were disposed to touche so as we myght do we shulde nat lacke matter nor oratioÌ„ For ye se howe they be past shame He coÌ„maundeth as it were a tyraunte in tragedies that whether they wyll or nat wyll they ought to be contented Shall these reasons which he alledgeth at domes day excuse these men whiche do forbydde parte of the sacrament and whiche do thus rage agaynste good men that vse the hole sacrameÌ„t If they do forbydde it for this skille that there shuld be a difference of the ordre this selfe same reason ought to moue vs that we do nat agre to our aduersaries euen thoughe we were elles minded to haue obserued the custome maner
The confessyon of the fayth of the Germaynes exhibited to the most victorious Emperour Charles the .v. in the Councell or assemble holden at Augusta the yere of our lorde 153â— To which is added the Apologie of Melancthon who defendeth with reasons inuincible the aforesayde confessyon translated by Rycharde Tauerner at the commaundemeÌ„t of his Master the ryght honorable Mayster Thomas Cromwel chefe Secretarie to the kynges grace Psalmo 119. And I spake of thy testimonies in the preseÌ„ce of kynges and I was nat confounded ¶ To the ryght honorable Mayster Thomas Crumwell chiefe Secretarie to the kynges grace and mayster of his Rolles hys humble seruaunt Richarde Tauerner wysheth continuall helthe and prosperitie WHo caÌ„ nat onles he be mortally infected with the pestyferous poyson of enuy most hyghly commende magnifye and extolle your ryght honorable maistershipes most circuÌ„specte godlynes and most godly circumspection in the cause and matter of our Christyan religyon whiche with all indifferencie do not onely permitte the pure true and syncere preachers of godes worde frely to preache but also your selfe to the vttermoste of your power do promote and furder the cause of Christe and nat onely that but also do animate and incourage other to the same â–ª As nowe of late ye haue animated and impelled me to translate the Confessyon of the faythe and the defence or Apologie of the same which boke after the iudgemente and censure of all indifferente wyse and lerned men is as frutful and as clerkly composed as euer boke was vntyll thys day whiche haue bene publyshed or sette forth But to th ende that the people for whose sakes thys boke was commaunded to be translated maye the more gredely deuoure the same I do dedicate and commende it to your name and yf any faultes haue eschaped me in this my translation I desyer nat onely your maystershype but also all that shal reade thys boke to remember the sayng of the poete Horace which iÌ„ arte poetica saythe In opere longo fas est obrepere somnum That is to saye in a longe worke it is lawefull for an man to fall some tymes a slepe But as touchynge your ryght honorable maystershype I doubte nothyng such is your inestimable humanitie but that ye wyll accepâ—e thys my lytle seruyce take it in worth whome I beseche the hyght god that he wyll vouchsaue to furder in all your affayres to the glorie of god and auauncement of hys name Amen ¶ The preface to the Emperour Charles the fyfte MOste inuycte Emperour Cesar Auguste lorde moste gracyous For asmoche as your emperyall maiestie hathe summoned a parlament or asseÌ„ble of the Empyre to be holden at the Cytie of Ausbrough to th entent that there it myght be consulted and delyberated of the aydes and socours to be had agaynste the Turke that most bytter hereditarie and olde ennemie of the Christyan name and religion that is to wytte howe hys furiousnes and cruell enforcementes myght be resisted with durable and perpetuall ordinauÌ„ce and prouision of warre And then also of the disseÌ„tyons in the cause or mater of our holy religion and Christian faythe and that in thys cause of religion the opinions and myndes of eyther parties emonge them selues myght be harde vnderstonded and pondered in presence of the sayde parâ—ies after a charitable fashon with coldnes and sobernes on bothe sydes to be vsed to th ende that tho thinges whiche in the scriptures haue bene otherwyse then ryghtly handled and vnderstâ—nd by eyther perties beynge seâ— aparte and corrected the mater myght be ended coÌ„powned and reduced to one symple vâ—ritie and Christian concorde so that froÌ„ hence forthe one syncere and true religion myght be of vs maynteined and kept that lyke as we be and do warre vnder one Christe so we myght also lyue in one christian Churche in vnitie and concorde For as moche also as we the within subscribed Coruestour or Electour Princes with other to vs conioyned as we le as thother Electours prynces and estates were summoned to the aforsayde parliamente or assemble because we wolde obediently fulfyll your imperiall commaundement we came with all spede and maturitie to the aforsayde Citie of Augusta and whiche we wolde no man shulde iudge to be spoken for bostinge of our selues we were there with the fyrste For as moche therfore as your Emperiall maiestye about the very begynnynge of this assemble and parliament dyd cause it to be propowned and moued to the Coruestours princes and and other estates of th empyre that all the states of th empyre by the vertue of your proclamatyon and decree ought to exhibete ane offer vp theyr opinion and sentence in the vulgare and Latine tongue And after deliberation had the next wednesday agayne answere was made to your Emperiall maiestie that we for our parte wolde the nexte fryday exhibet the articles of our confession Therfore in obeyinge your maiesties wyll and pleasure we here present vnto you in thys cause of religion the confession or our preachers of our selues in which it shal be openly sent what maner of doctrine out of the holy scriptures and the pure worde of god they haue hetherto in our landes Dukedoms lordeshypes and cities taught and haue treated in our churches or congregations That if also thother Electours prynces estates of th empyre with lyke wrytynges in the latine and vulgare tongue according to your motion and propownynge wyl brynge forth theyr opinions in this cause of religion we here offer our selues redy before your maiestie as before our most mercyful lorde with the forsayde princes and our frendes louyngly to commune and entreate of tolerable meanes and wayes to the entent that so moche as honestly may be done we may agre together and the matter beynge peasibly debated without odious coÌ„tention betwixt vs the parties god wyllynge the dissension may be ended and reduced to one true concordaunt religion as we al be do warre vnder ouâ— Christe accordynge to the tenour of your proclamation and that all thynges maye be brought to a godly trouthe whiche thynge we desyre of god with moste feruent requestes But if as moche as atteyneth to thother Coruestours princes and estates whiche be on the other syde this entreatye of the mater in suche sorte as your maiestie hathe wysely iudged it to be handled and entreated that is to wyâ—e with suche mutuall presentation of wrytynges and peasible conferrynge together shal nac procede and go forwarde nor be done with any frute profete here we do openly and solempnely testifye by thys our wrytynge lefte behynde vs that we refuse no maner thynge whiche maye by any meanes helpe to the obteyninge wynnynge of the Christian concorde suche as may stande with goddes lawe and good conscyence as bothe your imperiall maiestie and the other Coruestours and estates of th empyre and fynally all whiche be holden with a syncere loue and zele towarde the Christian religion which shal heare this mater with indifferencie
acknowledge yâ— our harte naturally is voyde of loue of feare of trust towardê god Therfore saieth the prophete After that the haste shewed it vnto me I strake my thyghe Also I sayde in my traunce euery man is a lyar that is to saye an vntrewe thynker of god ⧠⧠Here the aduersaries do also reproue Luther because he wrote that originall synne remayneth after baptime They adde that this artycle was ryghtly coÌ„deÌ„pned by Leo the tenthe But the emperours maiestie shal espye here a manifest be spoken of ciuyle iudgement nat of the iudgement of god They sowe vnto them euen as wysely this sentence Nature is nat euyl this spoken in place is nat repreueable but it maye nat be wrested to the diminishyng of originall synne and yet these sentencies be red amonge scholemen whiche out of due season do mengle philosophie with the gospell Nor these were nat disputed only in scholes but froÌ„ the scholes they were brought to the people And those persuasions raygned and nourished the affiauÌ„ce of humane powers and oppressed the knowledge of the grace of Christe wherfore Luther wyllyng to declare the magnitude of original synne of humane infirmitie taught that the resydues or dregges of originall sine be of the owne nature in man nat indifferent thynges but that we nede the grace of god that they maye nat be imputed and the holy ghoste that it maye be mortified Albeit the scholemen do make lesse bothe the synne and the payne teachynge that man of hys owne power may do the commaundementes of god In Genesis is otherwyse described the payne due for originall synne For there nat only to deathe and other corporall punyshementes mans nature is made subiecte but also to the kyngdome of the deuyll For there is gyuen this horrible sentence I wyl put enmities betwexte the and the woman and betwexte thy sede and her sede Defaute and concupysceÌ„ce be punyshementes and also synnes Deathe other corporall euyls and the tyrannye of the deuyll be properly punyshementes For mans nature is gyuen into boÌ„dage and holden captiue of the deuyl whiche infecteth it with wycked opinions and errours and impelleth it to al kyndes of synne But as the deuyll can naâ— be vaynquyshed without the ayde of Christe â–ª so can nat we by our owne powers redeme our selues out of this bondage The very historie of the worlde sheweth vs howe greate is the power of the deuyls kyngdome The worlde is full of blasphemies agaynste god of wycked opinions and with these bondes the deuyl hath in captiuite the wyse and ryghtwyse men in the face of the worlde In other sume appere more grosse vices But when Christe is gyuen vnto vs whiche taketh awaye these synnes these punyshmentes and destroyeth the kyngdome of the deuyll synne and death the benefytes of Christe can nat be knowen onles we vnderstande our owne euyls Therfore of these thynges our preachers do diligently teache and they teache nat any newe thing but the holy scripture and sentences of holy fathers This we truste wyll satysfye the Emperours maiestie as touching yâ— chyldyshe and colde cauillacions by whiche the aduersaries haue sclaundered our article For we knowe that we beleue ryghtly and with the catholyk churche of Christe But if the aduersaries wyl renewe this contencyon there shal nat lacke lerned men amonge vs that shall make them answere and defende the truthe For the aduersaries in this cause vnderstande nat for the moste parte what they speake OfteÌ„tymes they speake thynges repugnant and they neyther expresse ryghtly dialectically the formall cause of originall synne nor the defaultê as they call them But we wolde nat in thys place ouer subtylly discusse theyr vayne and sophistical argumentê we thought it ynough to recyte the mynde of the holy fathers whoÌ„ we do folowe with commune knoweÌ„ wordê The thyrde article the aduersaries allowe in whiche we confesse two natures in Christe that is to wyte the nature humane assumpt of the worde into the vnitie of hys persone And that the selfe same Christe suffered and dyed to the entent to reconcyle vnto vs the father and rose agayne to the entent to reygne to iustifie and to sanctifie the beleuers cÌ„ accordyng to the Symbole of the apostles and the Symbole of Nicene ⧠⧠Of Iustificacyon ⧠IN the fourthe fythe syxte and also in the twenty article they condempne vs because we teache that men obtayne remission of synnes nat for theyr owne merites but frely for Christe by faythe in Christ. For they daÌ„ne bothe two poyntes fyrste that we denye that men for theyr owne merites do obtayne remission of synnes and secoÌ„darily that we affyrme that by faythe is obteyned remissioÌ„ of synnes and that men be iustified by faythe in Christe But sythe it is so that in this case or controuersie the pryncypall poynte of our religion is debated whiche ryghtly vnderstaÌ„de setteth forthe the honour of Christe and bryngeth a necessarie and plenteous consolacyon to the godly conscyence we desyre that the emperours maiestie wyll heare vs benyngly of these so greate maters For the aduersaries where as they neyther vnderstaÌ„de what is remission of synnes neyther what faythe â–ª neyther what grace nor what iustyce is pytyfully do defyle this poynt obscuryng the glorie and benefytes of Christe and bereue fronâ— the godly consciencies yâ— propouned coÌ„solacioÌ„s in Christe And to the ende we may maynteyne our coÌ„fessyon and assoyle the obiections of our aduersaries we shall fyrste premitte certayne thynges to the ende that the fountaynes of bothe our doctrines aswell ours as the aduersaries may be knowen The hole scripture ought to be distributed iÌ„to these pryncipal places law and promyses For otherwhyles it sheweth the lawe otherwhyles the promyse of Christ as when it promyseth Christ to cum and promiseth for hym remission of synnes iustificacyon and lyfe eternall or where in the Euangell Christ after he ones appered promyseth remission of synnes iustificacyoÌ„ and lyfe eternall we call the lawe in thys disputacyon the preceptes of the Decalogie in what place so euer they be red in scripture Of the ceremonies iudiciall lawes of Moses at thys tyme we speake nothyng Out of these the aduersaries take the lawe because mans reason after a fashyoÌ„ dothe naturally vnderstaÌ„de the lawe For it hathe styl the same iudgement wrytten by god iÌ„ the mynde and by the lawe they seke remission of synnes and iustificacion But the Decalogie requyreth nat only outward ciuile workes whiche reason can after a fashyon fulfyll but also it requyreth other thynges ferre aboue reason as truly to feare god truly to loue god truly to call on god truly to beleue that god heareth vs and to loke for the ayde of god in deathe and all afflictions fynally it requyreth obedieÌ„ce towarde god in afflictioÌ„s and in deathe that we escheue them nat nor grudge nat at them whan god lay them on vs. Here the scholemen folowynge the phylosophiers only do teache the iustice of
that we be iustifyed by the lawe Thaduersaries be deceiued because in this hole coÌ„trouersarie they haue respecte only to the lawe For humane reason can none otherwise iudge but that iustificacion is to be sought for in the lawe because the obedience towarde the lawe is iustice But the Euangel calleth vs away from the lawe to the promises and teacheth that we be reputed iuste nat for the obedience of the lawe for we satisfye nat the lawe but because that reconciliacion is gyuen vnto vs for Christ whiche we only receyue by fayth wherfore before we do the law we must by fayth receyue remission of synnes and reconciliacion O Lorde god with what face dare these men name Christe with what countenaunce dare they beholde the EuaÌ„gell which deny that we obtayne remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes for Christe by only fayth SecoÌ„dly this selfe fulfyllyng of the lawe whiche foloweth renouacion is both smal and vnclene For though renouacion be attempted sumwhat begunne yet the dregges of synne stycke styl in nature alway accusyng vs onles by fayth in Christe we obtayne remission of synnes knowe that we haue a cummynge to god nat for our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe but for Christe Therfore that fulfyllyng of the lawe is nat accepted for it selfe but for faythe Wherfore when Paule sayeth that the lawe is stablyshed by fayth nat only this must be vnderstaÌ„de that they which be regenerate by fayth do conceyue the holy ghoste and haue mocions consentyng to the lawe of god but moste of all it is requysite to adde this that we owe to thynke that we be farre from the perfectioÌ„ of the lawe Wherfore we may nat affyrme that before god we be reputed iust for our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe but we muste thynke that we be recouÌ„pted iust or acceptable for Christe and nat for the lawe or for our workes and that this imperfecte or inchoate fulfyllyng of the lawe pleaseth god because we be in Christe and also that for the fayth in Christ the lackyng of fulfyllyng the lawe is nat imputed vnto vs. Thys teacheth Paule saying Christe redemed vs frome the malediction of the lawe beyng made for vs a curse that is to saye the lawe condempneth all men But Christe because he voyde of synne susteined the penaltie of synne and was made an hoste for vs he toke away the rigorous power of the lawe so that it shall nat accuse nor coÌ„deÌ„pne the beleuers in him for he is our propiciacion for whiche we be nowe accoÌ„pted ryghtwise In lyke seÌ„tence he wryteth to the Colossenses In Christe ye be consummate or perfyte as who shuld say although ye be yet farre from the perfeccion of the lawe yet the dregges or leauynges of synnes do nat condempne you because ye haue for Christ a certayne and ferme reconciliacion so that ye beleue natwithstandyng that synne stycketh styl in the fleshe For the death and the satisfaccioÌ„ of Christe gyuen for vs ought to be set farre aboue the very lawe to th ende that we may be assured that through the satysfaccyon we haue god mercifull vnto vs and nat for our fulfyllyng of the lawe wycked is that truste whiche is put in our fulfyllyng of the lawe But that trust is necessarie which is put in the satisfaccyon for Christe ☞ ⧠⧠☜ Thyrdly Only that thyng iustifieth before god whiche pacifieth the conscience For so longe as the conscience fleeth the iudgement of god and is angry with god we be nat ryght wyse nor viuifyed But only faythe pacifyeth the conscience accordynge to this of Paule Iustifyed by fayth we haue peace Also The ryghtwyse man shal lyue by fayth that is to say by fayth he veynquysheth the feares of death by faythe he is susteined and conceyueth ioye and lyfe And this bringeth fayth nat because it is a worthy worke of it selfe but onely because it reuiueth the offered promyse nothiÌ„g regardyng the owne propre worthynes Only therfore fayth iustifyeth and good workes do please by reason of fayth what can the aduersaries brynge agaynste thys reason what can they inuent agaynst the manifest trouth For the Minor is moste certayne that our workes can nat pacifye the conscience sythe god iudgeth and reproueth vs and sheweth vnto vs our vnclennes And that the scripture dothe oftentymes inculcate dryue into our hedes As the Psalme Non intres in iudicium cuâ— seruo tuo quia non iustificavitur in conspectu tuo 〈…〉 that is to say Enter nat into iudgement with thy seruaunt for no lyuyng creature shal be iustified in thy syght Here he quyte taketh away from all yea and from the saynctes and seruauntes of god the glorie of iustice if god dyd nat pardon but wolde iudge and detecte theyr hertê For where as in other places the Psalmist doth glorie of hys owne ryghtwysenes he speketh of his quarel or cause agaynst the persecutours of the worde of god and nat of hys personal clennes and he desyreth that the quarell and glorie of god may be defeÌ„ded As in the seuenth Psalme Iudica me domine secundum iusticiam meam c. i. Iudge me lorde accordyng to my ryghtwysnes And in another place Iudge O lorde my cause But on the other parte he teacheth that no man can susteyne the iudgemeÌ„t of god if he obserueth our synnes For thus he sayeth Si iniquitates obseruaueris domine domine quis sustinebiâ— If thou woldest marke o lorde the iniquities of men who can o lorde endure And Iob sayeth Vâ—rebar omnia opera mea .i. I feared all my workes Also if I were washed euen as it were with waters of snowe and my handes dyd shyne as moste pure cleane yet thou wylt embrewe me with fylthynes And Prouerb 20. Who can say my hert is cleane And .1 Ioan. 1. If we say that we haue nat synne we seduce our selues and trouth is nat in vs. Also in the Pater noster the holy men desyre remissioÌ„ of synnes â— holy men also haue synnes In the boke of Numer And the innocent shal be no innocent And Zacharie sayeth Silâ—at a facie domini omnis caro .i. Let euery man holde his tongue in the lordê preseÌ„ce And Esaye Euery fleshe is haye and all hys glorie is lyke a flower of the felde The haye wythereth vp and the floure fadeth because the spirite of the lorde hath bloweÌ„ in it that is to say the fleshe and the iustice of the fleshe caÌ„ nat abyde the iudgement of god And Ionas sayeth in the seconde chapiter In vayne they obserue vanities which leaue mercy .i. Al trust is voyde saue the truste of mercye Mercy saueth vs our owne merites our owne propre endeuours saue vs nat These and semblable sentencies in scriptures testifie that our workes be vncleane haue nede of mercie Wherfore workes do nat pacifie the conscience but mercie conceyued by faythe Fourthly Christe ceaseth nat to be a mediatour styll after that we be renewed For they erre which say that he
se what confession auayleth without absolutioÌ„ But if they do nat seperate the receyuing of absolution from confession they muste nedes thynke that faythe is a parte of penauÌ„ce For absolution is nat receiued but by fayth And that absolution is nat receiued but by faythe it may be proued by Paule whiche teacheth that the promyse can nat be receiued but by faythe Howe absolution is the promyse of the remission of synnes Therfore it dothe necessarily require faythe And we do nat se howe he can be sayde to receiue absolution whiche dothe nat assente and agre to it And what other thyng is it nat to agre to the absolution then to accuse god of a lye If the barte dothe doubte it thynketh that those thynges be vncerteyne vayne whiche god dothe promise Therfore it is wrytten in the epistle of Iohan whosoeuer beleueth nat god maketh hym a lyer because he dothe nat beleue in the testimonye whiche god hathe witnessed of his sonne Secondaryly we suppose that our aduersaries do graunt that remission of synnes is eyther parte or the ende or terminus ad queÌ„ as they vse to speake of penauÌ„ce or repentauÌ„ce ergo that thyng wherby remissioÌ„ of synnes is receyued is of ryght added to the partes of penaunce But most certayne it is most vndoubted although al the gates of helle wolde crye agaynste it that remission of synnes can nat be receiued but only by fayth whiche beleueth that sinnes be forgyuen for Christê sake according to that sayeng of Paule to the Romaines whom god hathe set forthe a propitiator by faythe in the bloude of hym Also in the fyfthe to the Romaynes By whom we haue waye throughe faythe into grace c. For the troubled arraryed coâ—icence can nat plede nor laye agaynste the wrathe of god theyr owne workes or loue but so is only the conscience made quiete when it receiueth the mediatour Christe and beleueth the promises gyuen for hys sake for they do nat perceyue what remission of synnes is or howe it cometh to vs which dreame that hartes be set at peace without faythe in Christe Peter alledgeth out of Esaye thys sayeng whosoeuer shall beleue in hym shall nat be confounded or ashamed â–ª Wherfore hypocrites muste neues be confounded which truste that they receiue remission of synnes for theyr owne workê and nat for Christes sake And Peter sayth in the actes To him all the prophetes beare witnes that al whiche beleue in him do receiue remission of synnes throughe his name It coulde nat be spoken more manifestly than yâ— he sayth throughe his name And he addeth all that beleue in hym We do only therfore thus receiue remission of synnes through the name of Christe that is to wete for Christes sake â–ª and nat for any meritê or workes of our owne And this is so done when we beleue that synnes be forgyuen vs for Christes sake Our aduersaries crye out that they be the churche that they do folowe the coÌ„sent of the church But Peter here in thys our cause alledgeth also the coÌ„sent of the churche To him sayth he al the prophetes beare wytnes that by his name they receiue remission cÌ„ Undoubtedly the consente of the prophetes is to be iudged the consente of the vniuersall churche We do neyther grauÌ„t to the byshop of Rome neither yet vnto the church power or authoritie to decre agaynst this coÌ„sent of the ê“phetes But the Bulle of Leo byshop of Rome do openly condempne this article of remission of sinnes our aduersaries do also coÌ„dempne it in theyr confutation By whiche thynge it appereth what maner churche theyr churche is to be iudged whiche not onely with decrees disalowe this sentence that remission of synnes is purchased by faith not for our workes but for Christ but also coÌ„maunde to destroy that sentence and opinion with violence and with the swerde They coÌ„mauÌ„de also with all kynd of crueltie to destroye the good men whiche be of the same opinion and mynde But they wyll saye that they haue greate and famous authours for them as maister Duns Gabriel â–ª and other lyke the sayenges also of fathers â–ª whiche be recited in the decrees but maymed and vnperfecte Certes if we shulde falle to numbring of testimonies they haue the better bande For there is a great rablement of tryfelyng wryters vpon the mayster of the Sentencies whiche do euen as it were conspire to gether in defendyng these figmentes lyes of the merite of attricion and of workes and the thynges whiche we haue here to fore recyted But let no man be moued with the multitude of them For thauctoritie is not greate of the late wryters whiche were not the fathers of theyr owne wrytynges but onely embesylyng and robbyng the olde fathers dyd shyfre and turmoyle opinions forth of one boke in to an other They vsed no maner iugemeÌ„t but only after the fashyon of the Senatours whiche were called Pedarij without any wordes allowed the errours of them that had writen before whom they perceyued not We therfore wyll not be afraide to set this sayenge of Peter who allegeth the consente of the prophetê agaynst the legions of sententiaries be they neuer so manye And to this preachynge of Peter is added the testimonie of the holy gost For thus sayth the texte Adhuc loquente Petro uerba haec cecidit spiritus sanctus sup omnes qui audiebant uerbum .1 And as Peter was yet speakynge these wordes the holy ghoste lyghted vpon al them which dyd heare the worde Let all good godly consciences therfore knowe that this is the coÌ„maundement of god that they shulde beleue theyr synnes to be freelye forgyuen them for Christes sake and not for our owne workes And with this coÌ„maundement of god let them strengthen and susteyne them selues agaynst desperation and agaynst the terrours of synne and of deathe And let them knowe that this senteÌ„ce opinion hath always remayned in the churche amoÌ„ge holy and good men sythe the begynnynge of the worlde For Peter dothe clearely alledge the consent of the prophetes And the writynges of thapostles testifie that they were of the same mynde we haue also testimonies of the fathers For Barnarde sayth the sawe in playn and open wordes Necesse est enim primo omnium credere quod remissionem peccatoruÌ„ habere noÌ„ possis nisi per indulgeÌ„tiam dei sed adde adhuc ut credas hoc quod per ipsum peccata tibi donantur Hoc est testimonium quod ê‘hibet spiritus sanctus in corde tuo dicens dimissa sunt tibi peccata tua Sic enim arbitratur apostolus gratis iustificari hominem per fidem .i. For it is necessarye fyrste of all to beleue that thou canste not haue forgyuenes of synnes but by the indulgence of god but adde yet hereunto so that thou doste beleue this also that by hym thy synnes be forgyuen the. This is the testimonie which the holy ghost heareth in thy herte
thynge thou shalte bynde vpon earthe it shal be bounde in heuen And what soeuer thyng thou shalte louse vpon erthe it shal be loused also in heuen Howe be it as we haue sayde before the keye hath not power to laye on punyshementes oâ— to institute honourynge of god but onely it hath coÌ„maundement to forgyue synnes vnto them whiche be conuerted and to rebuke and excoÌ„municate them which wyll not be conuerted For as to louse signifiethe to forgyue synnes so to bynde signifiethe not to forgyue synnes for Christe speaketh of a spirituall kyngdome And the commaundement of god is that the ministers of the gospel shulde assoyle them whiche be coÌ„uerted accordynge to that texte of Paule Power and auctoritie is gyuen vs to edification Wherfore the reseruation of cases is a politicall and ciuilâ— thynge For it is a reseruation of canonicall punyshement and not a reseruation of synne in the syghte of god in them whiche be truelye conuerted Wherfore oure aduersaries do iudge well whan they do graunte that in the article of deathe that reseruation of cases ought not to let absolutioÌ„ We haue set forthe and declared the summe of our doctrine as touchynge penaunce whiche doctrine we knowe assuredly to be godly and holsome to good myndes And good men if they shal compare our doctrine with the most confuse and troublesome disputations of our aduersaries shall perceyue ryghte well that our aduersaries haue lefte out the doctrine of faythe iustifieng confortyng godly hertes For they shall see that our aduersaries do fayne many thingê of the merite of attrition of that endeles rehersal of synnes of satisfactions hangynge nothyng together and as the olde prouerbe is touching neither heuen ne earth but strayeng and wanderyng clene wyde from the purpose and such as euen our aduersaries them selues can not sufficiently declare ☞ Of the numbre and vse of the ⧠sacramentes ⧠IN the .xiij. article our aduersaries do allowe that we do saye the sacramentes not only to be signes or tokens of profession amonge men as certayn men do fayne but rather to be signes and testimonies of the wyll of god towardes vs by whiche god moueth and styrreth hertes to beleue But here they byd vs also to accompte seuen sacramentes We thynke that men oughte to beware that the thynges ceremonies instituted in the scriptures be not despised howe many soeuer they be Neyther do we thiÌ„ke it to make any great matter although diuerse men for cause of teachyng do nombre or recken diuerse wayes so that they kepe well the thynges taught in the scripture For the olde wryters haue not all numbred them after one maner and facyon If we call sacramentes rytes or ceremonies whiche be coÌ„maunded by god vnto whiche is added a promyse of grace it is an easye thyng to iudge whiche be ê“prely sacramentê â–ª For rytê or ceremonies iÌ„stituted by men shall not after this maner proprely be called sacramentes For it belongeth not to the auctorite of man to promyse grace wherfore signes instituted without the coÌ„mauÌ„dement of god be not sure and vndoubted tokeÌ„s of grace albeit peraduenture they teache ignoraunte simple persones or elles put them in remembraunce of somewhat The very sacramentes therfore be Baptisme the Souper of the lorde Absolution whiche is the sacrament of penaunce For these rytê or vsages haue for them the coÌ„maundement of god and haue also added vnto them a promyse of grace whiche is proprely belongyng to the newe testameÌ„t For hertes ought surely and vndoubtedlye to beleue that whan we be baptised whan we do eate the bodye of oure lorde whan we be assoyled that god dothe verely forgyue vs for Christes sake And god doth also by the worde the ceremonie moue and styrre the hertes to beleue and to gather fayth as Paule saythe â—ides ex auditu Fayth is by hearynge And lykewyse as the worde runneth in to the eares that it may stryke vnto the hertê euen so the ceremonie of it selfe runneth in to the iyes to moue and styrre the hertes The effecte of the worde and of the ceremonie is all one as it was full excellently sayde of sayncte Augustine who saythe that a sacrament is a visible worde because the ceremonie is receyued of the iyes and is as it were a picture of the worde signifienge the same thynge that the worde dothe signifie wherfore theffecte of them bothe is all one Confirmation the last enneylyng be rytes or ceremonies receyued of the fathers which the churche dothe not require as necessary to saluation bicause they haue not the coÌ„maundemeÌ„t of god wherfore it is not vnprofitable to disseuer these ceremonies from the other aboue sayd whiche haue the expresse coÌ„maundement of god to maynteyne them and a clere promyse of grace Preesthod our aduersaries do vnderstande not of the administratioÌ„ of the worde of god and of the sacrameÌ„tes to be gyuen forthe vnto other but they do vnderstande it of sacrifice as thoughe in the newe testamente there oughte to be a preesthod lyke vnto the preesthode leuitical coÌ„mauÌ„ded by Moses law whiche shulde make sacrifice for the people and deserue remission of synnes to other men We teache that the sacrifice of Christ dyenge on the crosse was sufficient for the synnes of the hole worlde and dothe not nede besydes the helpe of any other sacrifices as thoughe it were not sufficient for oure synnes wherfore men be iustified not for any other sacrifices but for that onely sacrifice of Christe if they beleue them selues to haue ben redemed with that sacrifice Therfore preestes be elected called properlye to teache the gospell and to ministre sacramentes to the people Wherfore if ordre be vnderstanded of the ministratioÌ„ of the worde of god we wyll nat stycke to call ordre a sacrameÌ„t For the ministration of the worde hathe for it the commaundement of god And it hathe many greate promises as in the fyrst chapitre to the Romans The gospel is the power of god to saluation vnto euery one that beleueth Also Esaie in the .55 chapitre My worde that shal go out froÌ„ my mouth shall nat retourne vnto me voyde but it shall do what soeuer thingê I haue willed c. If ordre after this maner be vnderstanded we wyll nat be greued to call also the imposition or layeng on of the handes a sacramente For the churche hath a coÌ„maundement to constitute and ordeyne ministers whiche ought to be verie acceptable vnto vs because we knowe that god dothe approue that ministration and is present at that ministratioÌ„ And it is profitable also as much as may be to garnishe the ministration of the worde with al maner prayse agaynst mad men whiche dreame that the holy ghoste is gyuen nat by the worde but for certaine preparatioÌ„s of theyr owne if they syt ydle holdynge theyr tonges in darke places lokyng after illumination lyke as they dyd in olde tyme whiche were called enthusiastes whiche fayned them selues
shal excuseys to al them that shal come after vs so that it can nat be layde to our charge ne any faute can be put in vs that the auctoritie of bysshoppes is minished and enfebled when men shall reade and heare that we albeit we desyre the bysshoppes nat to vse this vniuste crueltie towardes vs yet can we iÌ„ no wyse obtayne any maner equitie or ryght of them Of mans traditions in the churche IN the .xv. article they receyue the fyrste parte in which we say that those rites and ceremonies in the churche are to be obserued which may be obserued with out any syn and whiche helpe to the keping of tranquilite and good ordre in the churche The seconde parte they vtterly condempne in which we say that mans traditions instituted to appeace god to merite grace and to satisfy for synnes be contrary to the gospell Albeit in our confession coÌ„cernyng the choyse of meares we haue spoken many thynges ynough of traditions yet this natwithstaÌ„ding certayne thingê shal here brefly be repeted For although we thought that our aduersaries wolde for other causes defende the traditions of men yet we dyd nat thynke that euer they wolde haue coÌ„dempned this our article whiche is That we deserue nat forgiuenes of siÌ„nes or grace through the obseruyng of mennes traditions Syth therfore thys article is condempned we haue an easy and a playne cause Now our aduersaries do openly play the Iewes and do openly oppresse the gospell with deuillyshe doctrines For than dothe the scripture call tradicions the doctrines of deuyls wheÌ„ it is taught that they be seruices profitable to deserue remissioÌ„ of synnes and grace For then they endymme the gospel they minishe the benefite of Christ they annulle the iustice of faythe The gospel teacheth vs that we through faythe for Christes sake frely receiue remission of sinnes and be recoÌ„ciled to god Our aduersaries coÌ„trary wyse make another mediatour that is to wete these traditioÌ„s For the traditions sake they wyll obteine remission of sinnes by these they wyll appease the wrathe of god But Christe sayth openly They honour me in vayne with the coÌ„maundementes of men We haue herebefore largely disputed that men be iustified throughe faythe whan they beleue that they haue god pacified not for our workes but frelye for Christe This is vndoubtedly the doctrine of the gospell for Paule sayth playnly to the Ephesians Ye be freely saued through faythe and that not of your selues it is the gyfte of god and coÌ„methe not of men Nowe our aduersaries say that men deserue remission of synnes by these humane obseruaunces What other thyng is this than besides Christ to set vp a nother iustifier a nother mediator Paule saythe to the Galathians Ye be fallen from Christ ye whiche be iustified by the law â–ª that is to saye if ye thynke that by the obseruynge of the lawe ye deserue to be accompted ryghtuous in the syght of god Christe shall nothing auayle you For wherunto nede they Christ which thynke them selues to be ryghtuous by theyr owne obseruynge of the lawe God hath set forthe Christe vnto vs that for this mediatours sake and not for our iustices sake he wyll be mercyfull to vs. But these men thynke that god is pacified and made mercyfull for our traditions sake and not for Christê sake They take therfâ—â—e â—om Christ the honour and prerogatiue of a mediator Neyther is there any difference betwyxte our traditions the ceremonies of Moyses law as concernynge this matter Paule therfore condempneth the ceremonies of the lawe of Moyses lykewyse as he condempneth traditions bicause they were iudged to be workes whiche dyd merite iustice in the syght of god by reason wherof the benefite of Christe and the iustice of faythe were obscured wherfore he putteth awaye the lawe he puttethe awaye traditions and proueth playnlye that not for these workes sake but for Christis sake remission of synnes is freelye promysed so that by faythe we receyue it For asmoche therfore as by faythe ne receyue remission of synnes and syth through faythe we haue god mercyfull and fauourable to vs for Christis sake it is playne errour and heresy to decree that by these obseruauÌ„ces we deserue remission of sinnes If any man do here say that we deserue not by these traditions remission of synnes but that we being alredy iustified do by these traditions deserue grace here agayne Paule cryeth agaynst hym sayeng that Christ shuld be the minister of synne if after iustification it were to be thoughte that afterwardes we be not reputed ryghtuous for Christis sake but that fyrst we ought by other obseruations to deserue to be reputed ryghtuous Also to a testament made by man nothynge ought to be added Ergo to the testament of god whiche promysethe that for Christis sake he wyll be mercyfull vnto vs it oughte not to be added that fyrste by these obseruations we ought to merite to be reputed acceptable ryghtuous Howbeit wherto nedethe any longe disputation No tradition hath ben instituted by the holy fathers for this entent that it shulde merite forgyuenes of synnes but they haue ben instituted for cause of good ordre to be had in the churche and for cause of traÌ„quilitie And though any man wolde institute certeyn workes to deserue remission of synnes or ryghtuousnes howe shall he know that those warkê please god whan he hath no testimonie or witnes of the worde of god Howe shall he make men assured of the wyll of god withoute the coÌ„maundement and worde of god Dothe not god euerywhere in the prophetes forbydde to institute any peculiar maner of honour or seruice without his coÌ„mauÌ„dement In Ezechiel it is wryten thus In the preceptes of your fathers do ye not walke neyther do ye kepe theyr iudgementes ne be ye polluted with the ydoles of them I am your lorde god â–ª walke in my preceptes and kepe my iudgementes and worke ye them If it be laufull for men to institute worshyppyngê or seruice and by the sayde seruices they merite grace â–ª than shall the honourynge seruice of all nations be to be allowed than the honours instituted by Ierohoam other without the lawe shal be to be approued For what difference is there if it hath ben laufull for vs to institute seruices profitable to merite grace or iustice whye was not the same thynge laufull to the gentyles and to the chyldren of Israel But therfore were the honours of the Gentyles and of the Israelites disalowed because they thought them selues by the sayde honours to merite remission of sinnes and iustice and dyd not knowe the iustice of fayth Finally wherby be we made sure that honours or seruices instituted by men without the coÌ„maundement of god do iustifie For of the wyll pleasure of god nothynge can be affermed without the worde of god What if god dothe not accepte ne allowe these seruices Howe than do oure aduersaries afferme that they iustifie sythe this thynge can
with them There be other diuersities betwixt the ordre of prestes and the state of the people but it is easy to se what is theyr entente and why they do defende this diuersitie or difference so greatly But we leaste we myghte seme to minishe the true dignitie of the ordre wyll speake nomore at this tyme of this theyr craftye and subtyle purpose They alledge also the peryll and ieoperdie of spyllyng and certayne lyke thynges whiche haue nat so greate strengthe as to chauÌ„ge the ordenaunce of Christ. And let vs put the case that it were free eyther to vse the one parte or bothe Howe can yet the prohibition be defended Howbeit the churche dothe nat take this libertie vnto her that she may make of Christê ordenauÌ„ces thinges indifferent We verely do excuse the church which hathe susteined this iniury and wronge because they myght nat be suffred to haue bothe partes but the auctours and causers whiche do defende that it is wel done to prohibite the vse of the hole sacrament and which nat only do prohibite the vse but also do excommunicate and persecute with violence them that do vse the hole sacramente these persones I saye we can nat excuse Let theÌ„ loke to theyr owne charge howe they wyll make aunswere to god what cause they wyll shewe of these theyr purposes and ententê Neyther is it to be iudged forthwith that the churche dothe ordeyne or approue what soeuer thynges the bysshopes of Rome do ordeyne namely sythe the scripture dothe prophesie of bysshopes and curates that they shulde so do as Ezechiel sayeth Peribit lex a sacerdote The lawe shall begyn to peryshe at the preste ⧠Of the wedlocke of preestes ⧠NOtwithstandyng the greate infamy which goeth abrode of the filthie single lyfe of prestes yet neuertheles or aduersaries dare â—at only defende the bysshop of Romes lawe vnder the wycked cloke and false pretence of the name of god but also they dare exhorte the emperour and the princes that in nowyse they shulde suffre the wedlockes of prestes to the greate shame and infamy of the Romayne empire for so they speake What more vnshamefastnes hathe euer ben redde in any hystorye then is this of our aduersaries For the argumentes whiche they vse we shall reherse afterwardes Nowe let the wyse reader considre what shame these vile wretches haue whiche say that wedlocke dothe engendre shame and infamy to the empire as who shulde saye that the churche is greatly garnyshed and renoumed by the open infamy of those vngratious and prodigious kyndes of lechery whiche do brenne amoÌ„ge these holy fathers whiche outwardly do couÌ„terfet and pretende the sadnes and vertue of Curius but in corners liue most viciously and voluptuously Yea and a greate parte of those thyngê may nat be so moche as named with honestie whiche these men ceasse nat to do with great boldnes And these theyr prodigious voluptuousnes and lustes they desyre to haue defended with your moste chaste ryght hande moste noble Emperour whome euen certayne olde ê“phecies do call the kyng with the chaste face For it apperith very well that this was spoken of you pudicus facie regnâ— bit ubique The chaste in face shall raygne euery where They desyre that contrary to the lawe of god contrary to the lawe of all nations coÌ„trary to the canones of the couÌ„cels ye shulde pul in sundre and breake matrimonies that ye shulde ordeyne greuous sore punyshmentes agaynst innocente men for cause of wedlocke that ye shulde kyll prestes whoÌ„ euen the Barbarianes do reuerently and religiously spare that ye shulde dryue women fatherles chyldren into exile as persons outlawed and banished Suche sort of lawes they offre vnto you moste good and moste chaste Cesar whiche no barbarous nation beit neuer so cruell and beastly coulde fynde in theyr harte to heare But for asmoche as in these your gratious maners there can be no filthynes or crueltie we hope that ye wyll in this cause deale gentely with vs namely after that ye shall knowe that we haue mooste wayghtye causes for the mayntenauÌ„ce of our sentence opinion taken out of the worde of god agaynst whiche oure aduersaries do set moste tryfelynge and most vayne persuations And yet they do not defende single lyfe earnestely For they knowe howe fewe of them do kepe chastitie but they cloke their kyngdome with a colour and semblaunce of religion to the whiche kyngdome of theyrs they do reken single lyfe to be very profitable so that now we may perceyue that Peter gaue warnynge very well that in tyme to come false prophetes shulde deceyue men with fayned wordes For our aduersaries nothynge say nothyng wryte nothyng do in all this hole cause truely simply playnly charitablye but in verye dede they stryue aboute theyr lordeshyp and kyngedome whiche they do falsely suppose to be in ieopardie and this they go aboute to fortifie and maynteyne vnder the wycked pretence and colour of vertue and holynes But we in no wyse can approue this lawe of lyuynge single without wyues which our aduersaries do so greatly defende because it is repugnaunte to the lawe of god to the lawe of nature and disagreinge from the very canones of the councaylles And vndoubted it is also that it is superstitious and perylous For it engendreth infinite sclaunders synnes and corruptynge of the publyke maners Other of our coÌ„trouersies do require some disputation of lerned men In this matter the thynge is so manifest on bothe sydes that it nedeth no disputation at all onely it requireth a iudge that is a good man whiche feareth god And notwithstandyng that we defende the manifeste veritie yet our aduersaries haue deuised certeyne cauillations to mocke out our argumentes Fyrste of all the booke of Genesis teacheth that men were created that they shulde be frutefull that the man shulde desyre the company of the woman and contrarywyse by ryght reason For we speake not of concupiscence whiche is synne but of that appetite which shuld haue ben in nature vncorrupted whiche they call naturall appetite And this appetite is verely goddes ordenaunce of the one kynde or sexe to the other Nowe sythe this ordenauÌ„ce of god can not be taken away without the siÌ„guler and special worke of god it folowethe that the lawe of contractynge of matrimonie can not be taken awaye with statutes or vowes Our aduersaries do make here a cauillation and say that at the begynnynge of the worlde it was coÌ„maunded that the earthe shulde be fylled but now the earth beinge full they say that wedlocke is not coÌ„maunded Se howe wysely they iudge The nature of man is formed and created thrughe that worde of god that it shulde be frutefull not only in the begynnyng of creation but so loÌ„ge as this nature of the bodies shal be euen likewise as the earthe is made fruteful by vertue of thê worde Germinet terra herbam uirentem Let the earth briÌ„g forth grene grasse By thê
is to saye Drawe nere to hym and be assoyled for he is remission of synnes PeradueÌ„ture ye demauÌ„d of me who this is Herken what he sayth his owne selfe I am the breadde of lyfe who so euer coÌ„meth to me shall not be hungry who soeuer beleueth in me shall neuer be thrustye Here he witnesseth that in the sacramente is offered remission of synnes He witnessethe also that it ought to be receyued by faythe A thousande lyke testimonies hauiÌ„g the same sentence that this hath be redde amonge the fathers workes whiche euery of them our aduersaries do yet wreste wrynge to the worke wroughte and to be applied for other men where as the fathers do openly require fayth and speake of the peculiar consolation of euery man particularly and speake not of application for other Besydê this there be redde also sentences of thankes gyuynge as for example that sentence moste swetely spoken of Cypriane concernynge them that in due and godly wyse receiue the sacrament Pietas inter data condonata se diuidens gracias agit tam ubeâ—is beneficij largitori That is to say Pietie or godlynes deuidyng it selfe betwene the thynges gyuen and the thynges forgyuen gyueth thankes to the gyuer of plentifull benefitê that is to say it consyâ—â—â—eth the thingê that be gyuen and the thynges that be forgyuen that is it compareth together the greatnes of the benefites of god the greatnes of oure euylles as of death and of synne and gyueth thankes c. And hereof came vp the name of Eucharistia in the churche Neyther is the ceremonie it selfe a gyuyng of thankes by the vertue of the worke wroughte to be applyed for other men to merite to them remission of sinnes or to delyuer the soules of deade men These thynges be repugnaunt and contrarye to the iustice of fayth as who shulde say that the ceremonie without faythe coulde profete eyther the doer or others ⧠Of the names of the Masse ⧠OUR aduersaries call vs backe agayne vnto graÌ„mer they take argumeÌ„tes of the names of the masse which nede not any loÌ„ge disputation For it folowethe not that the masse although it be called a sacrifice is a worke gyuynge grace by the vertue of the worke wroughte or applied for others dothe merite remission of synnes to them Liturgia the greke worde saye they betokeneth the same that SacrificiuÌ„ doth in the latine tonge And the grekes call the masse Liturgiam ergo c. Why do they here leaue out the old name Synaxis whiche worde shewethe that the Masse was in olde tyme a coÌ„munion and participation of many men But let vs make answere to Liturgia This worde dothe not signifie properly a sacrifice but rather a comen ministerie or seruice and greethe very metelye to our senteÌ„ce that is to witte that one ministre consecratyng dothe exhibete to the residue of the people the body and bloude of our lorde lykewise as one ministre teachyng ministreth and gyueth to the people yâ— gospell of Christ as Paule saythe Let men so iudge vs as of the ministers of Christe distributers of the mysteries or sacramentê of god that is to wit of the gospell and of the sacramentes and in the seconde to the Corinthianes he saythe For Christê cause we execute this Ambassade euen as though god dyd desyre you by vs we pray you for Christes cause that ye be reconciled â–ª c. So the name of Liturgia agreythe very conuenientlye to a ministerie And it is worde vsed in the publyke ministeries And amoÌ„ge the grekê it signifieth comen charges as tribute costes of prepayryng theyr nauie or other lyke thynges as witnesseth the oration of Demostenes whiche he made agaynst Leptine whiche sayde oration he spendeth al together in disputation of the comen offices and liberties where he vseth this worde Liturgia signifienge comen chargê And so they spake also in the tyme of the Romaynes as it appereth in the rescripte of Pertinax themperour in the paragraffe De iure immunitatis in the lawe Semê‘ There also Liturgia is vsed for comen charges And the comentarie of Demosthenes wryteth yâ— Liturgia is a kynde of tributes the costis of the comen plays the costis of prepayrynge theyr shyppes and of suche other comen charges And Paule vsed the same worde for a comen ministratioÌ„ of almoyse in the secoÌ„de epistle to the Corinthes sayenge The office of this comen gyuyng of almoyse not onely suppliethe the nede of the sayntes but also it causethe that the moo do gyue thankes plentuously to god c. And in the seconde to the Philippianes he callethe Epaphrodite Liturgon that is to say a ministre of his necessite in which place without doubte by that worde can not be vnderstaÌ„den a preeste But we shall not nede to brynge forthe any mo testimonies for asmoche as examples do offre them selues euerye where to them yâ— rede Greke auctours in whose workê Liturgia is vsed for the comeÌ„ ciuile charges or offices And because of the diphtoÌ„ge graÌ„marions do not brynge forthe this worde out of Lite whiche betokenethe prayers but it hath his name of the publyke coÌ„men goodê whiche they call Leita so that Leiturgeo is asmoche to say as I do ordre haue yâ— charge and haÌ„dling of the goodê of the comen weale But it is a madde thynge that they do thus reason mention of the altare is made in holy scripture ergo the masse muste nedes be a sacrifice for the parable of the altare is alledged of Paule by a similitude And this worde Missa they fayne to be sayde of an altare in the Hebrue tongue But what nede they to fetche the Etimologie so farre onles it were because they wolde shewe forthe theyr connynge in the Hebrue tongue What neded to seke the Etymologie so farre whan we reade this worde Missa in the boke of Deuteronomie where it signifieth collations or giftes of the people and not the oblation of the preest For euery one that came to the solemne feaste of Easter was bounde to brynge some gyfte for theyr portion shotte towardê the comen souper This maner dyd christen men kepe at the begynnyng Whan they came together they broughte loues of breade wyne other thynges as witnessethe the canones of the apostles Therof a parte was taken to be consecrate The rest was distributed to yâ— poore with this maner they also reteyned the name of collations or shottes And by reason of suche collations it appereth also yâ— the masse otherwhyles is called Agape that is to say a charitie onles ê‘chaunce a man had rather haue it so called because of the comeÌ„ refectioÌ„ or souper But let vs passe ouer these trifles For I woÌ„der that thaduersaries bringe forth so lyghte sclendre coniectures in so greate and wayghtie a matier For though the masse be called an oblation what maketh this word to those dreames of the worke wroughte and
called Aerius whom they saye was condempned because he dyd deny that in the masse oblation was made bothe for quicke and deade This colour they vse often tymes they alledge olde heresies with them they falsely compare our cause to the entent that with suche comparison they myght make vs more hated Epiphanius witnessith that the opinion of Aerius was that prayers for deade men be vnprofitable This opinion Epiphanius reproueth Neyther do we defende Aerius but we stryue with you which wyckedly defende an heresy manifestly contrary to the sayeng of the prophetes apostles and holy fathers that is to wete that the masse by the vertue of the worke wroughte dothe iustifie and that it dothe merite remission of synnes as they call it a pena et culpa euen also to vnrightuous men for whom it is applied if they make no stoppe or impediment of theyr owne parte These poysoned errours we disalowe whiche minishe the glorye of the passion of Christ and vtterly oppresse the doctrine of the iustice of faythe Suche lyke persuasion hadde the wycked Iewes in the lawe that they merited remission of sinnes by theyr sacrifices throughe the vertue of the worke wrought dyd nat receiue it frely by faythe Therfore they encreaced those ceremonies and sacrifices they ordeyned the honouryng of Baal in Israel in Iurie also they made sacrifice in the halowed woodes Wherfore the prophetes condempnyng this persuasion dyd warre nat onely with those worshyppers of Baal but also with other prestê whiche made the sacrifices ordeined by god with that wycked opinion But this persuasion cleauith in the worlde and shall cleaue alwayes I meane that ceremonies and sacrifices be redemptioÌ„s of synnes Carnall men do nat suffre this honoure to be gyuen onely to the sacrifice of Christ that it is the very raunsome and propitiation because they perceiue nat the iustice of faythe but gyue egall honour to other seruices and sacrifices Therfore lykewyse as in Iurye there stycked a false persuasion among the wycked bysshops concernyng sacrifices and lykewyse as in Israell there coÌ„tinued the worshipping of Baal and other lyke And yet neuertheles was the churche of god amonge them whiche dyd dysalowe and rebuke those wycked sacrifices and seruices So lykewyse in the kyngdome of the pope there remaineth the worshyppyng of Baal that is to saye the abuse of the masse whiche they applye to the ende that they may by it merite to vnrightuous men remission of synne and of punyshmeÌ„t for siÌ„ne And this worshyppyng of Baal with the Popes kyngdome is lykely to coÌ„tinue vntyll Christe shal come to iudge and vntyl the tyme that the glorie of his commyng shall destroye the kyngedome of Antichriste In the meane season all that truly beleue the gospell ought to improue and rebuke those wicked seruices and worshyppinges deuised agaynst the coÌ„maundement of god to obscure and dymme the glory of Christe and the iustice of faythe These thynges we haue spoken breffly coÌ„cerning the masse to the entent that al good men in what couÌ„trey soeuer they dwel may knowe and vnderstande that we with greate affectioÌ„ and diligence defeÌ„de the dignitie of the masse and shewe the right vse of it and that we haue moste rightuous causes to dissent and disagre from our aduersaries And here we wolde that all good men toke admonition and counsayle that they do nat helpe our aduersaries which defende the prophanation and abusyng of the masse leaste they charge them selues with the feloushyp of other mennes synne This is no tryflynge matter but a wayghty cause and a greate busynes yea no lesse then that busines of Elie the prophete whiche did improue and vehemently rebuke the honourynge of Baal Yet we haue set forthe this so greate a matter myldely and coldely and we haue nowe made answere without raylyng or euyll wordes But if our aduersaries do prouoke vs to gather together all kyndes of theyr abusynges of the masse the matier shall nat be so myldly handeled ⧠Of abbey vowes ⧠WIth vs in a certayne towne of Turingia called IsenacuÌ„ more thaÌ„ thyrty yeres ago there was a certayn freer of saynt FrauÌ„cê ordre IohnÌ„ Hilten by name whiche of his owne companye was caste into pryson bycause that he had rebuked certayne very notorious abuses For we haue sene the workes whiche he wrote by whiche it may be wel ynough perceyued what maner doctrine it was that he taught And they whiche knewe hym reporte of him that he was a gentle olde man sadde without any waywardnes This IohnÌ„ shewed before many thyngê whiche partly haue come to passe al redy and partly seme to be nere at hande whiche thyngê we wyl nat recite leaste any man wolde interprete them to be rehersed eyther of displeasure and euille wyl towardes some persone or elles of fauour and for the pleasure of some man But in coÌ„clusion when eyther by reason of age or of fylthynes of the prysoÌ„ he was fallen into disease and sickenes he sent for the wardeyn of the place to come vnto him that he myght gyue him knowledge of his infirmitie and sycknes When the wardeyn enflamed with pharisaical harred agaiÌ„st hym had begonne to chyde with hym and to rebuke hym sharpely for his doctrine whiche semed to be agaynst the proffettes of the ketchyn than this IohnÌ„ leauynge the mention of his infirmitie and beinge inwardlye sorye and syghynge sayde that he was ryghte well coÌ„tentid to suffre al those iniuries for Christê sake For he had neyther wryten nor taughte any thynge that myghte appayre or hurte the state of religious men he onelye rebuked he sayde certayne abuses notoriouslye knowen But there shall another come sayd he in the yere of our lorde god M.D.xvj. whiche shall destroye you neyther ye shall be able 〈◊〉 resiste hym This sentence concernyng the decaye of the kyngedome of religious men and the nuÌ„bre also of the yeres his frendê afterwardê dyd fynde also wryten in his workes amonge the annotatioÌ„s whiche he had lefte vpon certeyne places of Daniel And thoughe howe moche this sayeng is to be regarded the ê“ffe of the thyng shall declare yet be there other signes and tokens as sure and as vndoubted as the gospell is whiche threaten a chaunge to come vnto the kyngdome of freers other religious ê‘sones For it is euidently knowen howe moch hipocrisy there is in abbeys how greate ambition howe greate couetousnes howe moche blyndenes and ignoraunce and how moche crueltie of euery vnlerned foole howe greate vanitie in sermones how greate crafte in imaginyng often tymes newe wayes to get money And there be other vices also besydes these whiche I lyst not at this tyme â—o reherse And where as in old tyme abbeys were the scholes of Christis doctrine nowe they be growen out of kynde as it were from a golden kynde to an yirnye kynde bryngyng nothynge els but myschiefe and destruction The rychest monasteries onely fynde and norysshe an ydle multitude whiche there vnder false