him Thys coÌ„tempt doth marre al theyr good workes for god iudgeth the harte Finally this is very vnaduysedly wrytten of our aduersaryes that men gyltye of eternall punyshement deserue remyssyon of synnes by the acte of loue sythe it is not possyble to loue god onles we fyrste purchase forgiuenes of sinnes by fayth for it is ympossyble for an harte whiche in dede felethe the ire of god to loue god before he perceyue hym pacyfyed I saye so longe as god feareth vs and semeth to cast vs froÌ„ hym into eternall dethe mans nature can not lyfte vp it selfe to loue the angrye iuge punysher It is easye for euyll persons to fayne these dreames of loue that a mortall synner maye loue god aboue all thynges for they fele not what is the ire or iudgemente of god But in the trouble of conscyence and in the very conflycte there the conscyence proue howe false theyr phylosophycal conclusyons be Paule saythe ☞ The lawe workethe anger ☜ he saythe not that by the lawe men deserue remyssyon of synnes for the lawe alwaye accuseth the conscyence and put it in feare Ergo it iustifyeth not for the coÌ„science terrified by the lawe fleeth the iudgement of god wherefore they erre that truste to wynne remyssyon of synnes be the workes of the lawe Thys suffyseth of the iustyce of reasoÌ„ or lawe which the aduersaries teache for here after when we shall shewe our mynde of the iustyce of fayth â–ª the matter it selfe shal constrayne vs to bryng out more recordes whiche maye also helpe to destroye the erroures of our aduersaryes here to fore aledged Bycause therfore that men can not by theyr owne powers do the lawe of god and bycause all be vnder synne and condemned to euerlastynge dethe for thys cause we can not be delyuered from syn by the lawe nor be iustyfyed but the promyse of remissyon of synnes and of iustyfycatyon is geuen for Chryst who is geuen for vs to satysfy for the synnes of the worlde and is set vp as a medyator and a pourger of sinnes This promyse hathe no condycyon annexed of our merites but freely offereth forgyuenes of synnes and iustyfycatyon as Paule sayth ☞ Yf by workes Ergo it is no grace ☜ And in an other plase ☞ The iustyce of god is nowe declared without the lawe ☜ that is remyssyon of synnes shulde hange on our merytes and the reconciliation shuld be by the lawe so it were vnprofytable for we can not do the lawe it shulde also ensue that the promyse of reconcilement shuld neuer chaunce vnto vs. Thus reasoneth Paule Rom. 4. ☞ Yf our enherytaunce shuld cum by the lawe voyde were our fayth and the promyse were of none effecte For yf the promyse shulde requyre a condycyon annexed of our merytes and of the lawe syth we neuer fulfyll the lawe it shulde folowe that the promyse were vnprofytable But syth it is so â–ª that iustyfycatyon chaungeth by free promyse it foloweth that we can not iustyfye our selues For otherwyse what neded god to promise And where as the promyse caÌ„ not be taken without fayth the gospell which is properly the promyse of remyssyon of synnes and of iustyfycatyon for Chryst teacheth the iustyce of fayth which the lawe doth not Nor it is not the iustyce of the lawe For the lawe requyreth of vs our workes and our perfection but the promyse offereth vnto vs whiche be oppressed with synne and deathe frelye reconciliacyon for Chryste which reconciliatyon is receyued not by workes but by onely fayth This fayth bryngeth not with it a trust of the owne workes but onely the trust of promyse or of the promysed mercye in Chryste wherfore thys specyall fayth by which we beleue that our synnes be forgyuen for Chryste and that god is pacyfyed and mercyfull for Chryste obteyneth remyssyon of synnes and iustifyeth vs and by cause in repentaunce that is in the trouble of conscyence it comforteth and plucketh vp our hartes and regenerateth vs and bryngeth vnto vs the holye spirite so that from thenseforth â—e maye do the lawe of god that is loue God feare God thynke that god heareth vs obey god in all afflyctyons it mortyfyeth the coÌ„cupiscence c. Thus fayth whiche freely receyueth remyssyon of sinnes bycause it pleadeth Chryst in estopell agaynst the ire of god as a mediator and mercy stocke pleadeth not in barr our owne merytes or our owne loue which fayth is the true knowledge of Chryste and vseth the benyfytes of Chryst and regenerateth our hartes and goeth before the fulfyllynge of the lawe Of thys fayth ye shall not fynde one syllable in the doctrine of our aduersaryes wherfore we reproue the aduersaryes bycause they only teach the iustyce of the lawe and teach not the iustyce of the Euaungell which preacheth vnto vs the iustyce of faythe in Chryste ⧠What is the iustyfyenge faythe THe aduersaries only fayne that fayth is a knowledge of the hystorye and therfore they teache that it may stonde with mortall syn They speake therfore nothiÌ„ge of fayth by which Paule so oft tymes saythe that men be iustyfyed for they whiche be reputed iust before god walke nat in mortal synne But that fayth whiche iustyfyeth is nat only a knoweledge of the hystorye but it is to assent to the promyse of God in whiche frelye for Chryste is offered remyssyon of synnes iustificacyon And lest a man shulde suspecte that it is only a knowledge we wyl adde more ouer that it is to wyll and to receyue the offered promyse of remyssyon of synnes and of iustification And a man maye easely se the diuersytye betwyxte this fayth and betwyxt the iustyce of the lawe Fayth is a seruice which receiueth of god the offered benifites The iustyce of the lawe is a seruyce which offereth vnto god our merites with fayth on thê fashyon wyll god be serued that we maye receyue of hym the thynges whiche he promyseth and offereth Nowe that fayth sygnifieth not only the knowledge of the hystorye but rather a trust which assenteth to the promise Paule clerely wytnesseth when he sayth Iustyce therfore is by fayth to thentente the promyse shulde be ferme and stable For he meaneth that the promyse caÌ„ not be receyued but by fayth wherfore he compareth and knytteth together as correlatiues promyse and fayth Howe be it it is sone iudged what faythe is yf we consyder the Crede where this artycle is put Remission of synnes wherefore it is not ynoughe to beleue that Chryste was borne dyd suffer and ryse agayne oneles we adde also thys artycle Remyssyon of synnes whiche is the fynal cause of the hystorye To thys artycle we muste refere the reste as that for Chryste and nat for our owne merites we be pardoned of our synnes For what neded Chryste to begyuen for our synnes if our owne merytes maye satysfye for our synnes ⧠wherfore so ofte as we speake of the iustyfyenge faythe it is to be knowen that these .3 obiectes muste mete together
worke at all onles it also be frely gyueÌ„ vnto yâ— And a lytle after he sayth Let no maÌ„ therfore begile hym selfe for yf he wyl consyder wel he shall fynde with out doute that he is not able to go forthe with tenne thousande agaynste hym whiche commeth to hym with twenty thousande c. We therfore to th entent that consciences shulde retayne a sure and vndouted consolation and hope do cal men backe agayne to the promise of Christe and do teache that it is necessarye to beleue that god for Christes sake and nat for the lawe dothe forgeue synnes doth iustifye and dothe gyue eternall lyfe accordynge to that saynge Who so euer hath the son hath lyfe But it is a worlde to heare howe our aduersaryes do dally and elude thê sayinge of Christ. When ye haue done all thynges yet say ye we be vnprofytable seruauntes In the confutatyon thus they corupt it fyrst they go about to coÌ„found vs with our owne reason by a fourme of argument which is called antistrephon in this maner If when we haue done al thinges we must saye we be unprofytable saruauntes g o ergo moche rather when we haue beleued all thynges we maye say that we be vnprofitable seruauntes Marke I praye you howe greatly our aduersaryes be delyted in vanities and in chyldishe sophistrie But albeit these folyshe trifles be nat worthy to be refuted and dysproued yet neuertheles we shall make answere to them in fewe wordes Theyr argumente called antystrephon is vicious and nothynge worth For our aduersaryes be deceyued in thys worde faythe which yf it betokened the knowledge of the historye or yf we had sayde that faythe of her owne worthines had saued then shulde the symylytude be of moche more strengthe that we be vnprofytable seruauntes thoughe we had beleued But we do speke of the fayth and truste of the promyse and of the mercy of god And thys faythe dothe graunte that we be vnprofytable seruauntes yea thys is the verye voyce and saynge of fayth that our workes be vnworthy and that we be vnprofytable seruauntes And for thys only cause we speke of faythe and seke mercie because we knowledge our selues to be vnprofytable seruauntes For faythe dothe therfore saue because it receyueth mercie or the promyse of grace all thoughe our workes be vnworthy And after this vnderstandynge the antystrephon dothe nothynge hurte vs when ye shal haue beleued all thynges yet say ye we be vnprofytable seruauntes it is well sayde yf it be onely vnderstonded that worthynes is taken from workê But agayn on the contrary syde yf it be thus vnderstonded that faythe also is vnprofytable then the symilitude is nothynge worthy to say when ye shall haue done al thynges do nat truste to your workes So whan ye shall haue beleued do not trust the promyse of god These thynges do not agre together for they be verie fare vnlyke Unlyke causes vnlyke obiectes of confydence and truste be in the fyrst proposytion and in the latter Truste in the fyrst proposytion is the trust of our owne workes Truste in the latter proposytion is the trust of goddes promyse Nome Christe condempneth confydence and truste in our owne workes but he dothe nat disalowe the trust in his owne promyse he wyllith nat that we despayre of the grace and mercie of god he rebuketh our warkes as vnworthy but he rebuketh not the promyse whiche frely offereth mercy And Ambrose speketh excedyngly wele in thê poynte thus Grace is to be knowen but nature is not to be knowen we muste truste to the promyse of grace and not to our nature But our aduersaries folowe there accustomed maner They do vngraciously wrest the sentence that maketh for fayth agaynst the doctrine of fayth For this cauillation dothe abrogate the gospel to say â–ª when ye shall haue beleued all thynges saye that fayth is vnprofytable Doth nat the gospell promyse remission of synnes and saluatioÌ„ euen vnto them whiche haue no good workes at all so that they wyll be conuerted and nat despayre but by fayth in Christe obtayne remission of synnes Do our aduersaryes bydde them despayre whose consciences fynde no good warkes whiche they may plede agaynst the iudgement of god Wyl they say vnto theÌ„ that faythe is vnprofytable God gyue these sophisters a myschefe with such cauillations whiche do subuerte the hole gospell whiche do abrogate the free remyssyon of synnes whiche do take awaye from godlye conscyences ferme and sure consolatyons But that cauillatyon amonge other is vtterlye childishe wher as they interprete the seruauntes to be vnprofytable because the workes be vnprofitable to god but profitable to vs. But Christ speketh of yâ— vtilitie and profet whiche maketh god dettour to vs of grace Howbeit it is besyde the purpose here in this place to dispute of vtilitie or inutilitie For vnprofitable seruauntes betoken vnsufficient or vnable seruauntes for no man feareth god so muche no man loueth so muche no man beleueth or trusteth god so muche as he ought to do no man fulfilleth the lawe But let vs nowe passe ouer these vayne cauillations of our aduersaries of whiche howe men wyll iudge if at any tyme they shal be brought forthe in to lyght Wyse men may easely gesse In wordes moste playne and euident they haue fouÌ„de a starriÌ„g hole But who seeth nat that in this place is reâ—uked the confidence and truste of our owne workes But our aduersaries do crye agaynst vs that eternall lyfe is due of worthynes for our owne god workes bycause eternal lyfe is called a rewarde We wyll make a shorte and a playne answere Paule calleth eternall lyfe a gyfte because when we be reputed ryghtuous for Christes sake we be also made the sonnes of god and coinheritours with Christ. But in another place it is wrytten Plentuous shal your rewarde be in heuen If our aduersaries do thiÌ„ke that theâ—e thinges be repugnaunte the one to the other let them selues dissolue the doubte But they be none indiffereÌ„t iudges For they leaue out this worde gyfte they leaue out also the fountaynes of the hole busynes that is to saye in what wyse men be iustified and that Christe is contynually a Mediatour In the meane season they pycke out thys worde rewarde And that they do most bytterly interprete nat only agaynst the scripture but also agaynste the custome and vsuall maner of speakyng Hereof they reason because it is called rewarde that therfore our workes are suche whiche ought to be the pryce for which eternall lyfe is dewe Uerely thys is a newe kynde of logyke We hear thê worde rewarde ergo our workê do satisfy and fulfyl the lawe Ergo we be accepted to god for our owne workes and nede nat the mercy of Christ the propitiatour or faythe receiuiÌ„g mercy And they cumulate a greate heape of argumentes one vpon another after the maner of Chrysippus Good workes be the pryce for whiche eternal lyfe is due Good workes do
sayenge Thy synnes be released the. For thus iudgeth thapostle that man is freely iustified by fayth These wordes of Barnarde do wonderfullye illustrate and set forthe our cause for he not onely requireth in a generalitie that we shulde beleue our synnes to be pardoned throughe mercye but byddethe vs also put to a speciall faythe by whiche we may beleue that euen vnto our owne selues sinnes be pardoned And he teacheth howe we may be assured of remission of synnes that is to saye whan by faythe hertes be lifted vp and be made quiete and set at rest by the holy ghoste What do our aduersaries require more Dare they yet deny that we obteyne remission of synnes through fayth Or that faythe is a parte of penaunce Thyrdly Our aduersaries say that synne is in this wyse forgyuen because he that is attrite or contrite doth brynge forthe an acte of the loue of god that by this acte he meriteth to receyue remission of synnes This is nothyng els but to teache the lawe and to destroy and abrogate the gospell and to disanull the promyse coÌ„cernyng Christ. For they do onely require the lawe and our workes for the lawe requireth loue Besydes this they do teache vs to truste that we obteyne remission of synnes bicause of contrition and loue What other thynge is this than to sette oure trust and confidence vpon our owne workes and not vpon the worde and promyse made by god of Christe Nowe if the lawe be sufficieÌ„t to the obteynyng of remission of synnes to what purpose nede we the Gospell what nede haue we of Christe if for our workes we obteyne forgyuenes of synnes But we contrarywyse do calle agayne consciences from the lawe vnto the gospell and from the truste in theyr owne workê to truste and to haue sure confidence in the promyse and in Christe because the gospell setteth forthe Christe vnto vs and promyseth remission of synnes freely for Christê sake By this promyse the gospel byddeth vs trust that for Christes sake we be recoÌ„ciled to the father and brought in to his fauour agayne and not for our owne contrition or for our owne loue For there is none other mediator or pacifier than Christe Neyther can we worke the lawe oneles we be fyrste reconciled by Christe And though we coulde do any thyng yet we ought to thinke that not for these workê we obteyne remission of synnes but for Christes sake whiche is the mediator and mercye stocke Yea it is iniurie and dishonour to Christe and a defeatyng of the gospell to thynke that we do obteyne remission of synnes for the law or by any other wayes than through faythe in Christe And this reason we haue handeled before in the title of iustification whan we tolde wherfore we do holde opinion that men be iustified by fayth and not by loue Therfore the doctrine of our aduersaries where as they teache that men for contrition and loue obteyne forgyuenes of synnes and bydde them truste in this contrition and loue is only a doctrine of the lawe and that not vnderstaÌ„ded Lykewyse as the Iewes dyd loke vpon the couered face of Moyses For admitte that we had loue let vs imagyne that we had workes yet can neither loue neither workes be a price raunsome or propitiation for synne Neyther can they be set and pleded as it were in barre agaynste the wrathe and iudgement of god accordyng to that sayenge of Dauid in the psalme Thou shalte nat entre in to iudgement with thy seruaunt for no creature lyuyng shall be iustified in thy syghte Neyther ought the honoure of Christ to be plucte from hym gyuen to our workê For these causes Paule dothe styffly affirme that we be not iustified by the lawe and he setteth agaynst the lawe the ê“myse of remission of synnes whiche is gyuen for Christes sake and reacheth vs that we freelye for Christis sake thrugh fayth receiue remission of sinnes To this promyse Paule dothe calle vs backe from the lawe Upon this promyse be byddeth vs stedfastly to beholde which doutles shal be voyde and of no strength if we be iustified before by the lawe or euer we be iustified by the promyse or if we obteyne remission of synnes for our owne iustice But the case is cleare that therfore the promyse was made vnto vs and therfore Christ was gyuen to vs because we can not worke and fulfyll the lawe wherfore it is necessary that we be fyrst reconciled by the promyse or euer we do worke the lawe But the promyse is onely receyued by fayth Ergo it is necessarye that contrite persones do by fayth receyue the promise of remission of synnes whiche is gyuen for Christis sake and that they do decree with them selfes that they haue the father recoÌ„ciled vnto them selfes freely for Christis sake This is the senteÌ„ce and mynde of Paule in the epistle to the Romanes â–ª where he saythe Therfore by fayth that accordyng to grace or fauour the promise myght be ferme and stable And to the Galathianes he sayth The scripture hath coÌ„cluded al thinges vnder synne that the promyse by the fayth of Iesu Christe myght be gyuen to them that beleue that is to say All men be vnder synne can not otherwyse be delyuered onles by fayth they do take and receyue the promyse of remission of synnes Fyrste therfore we must by faythe receyue remission of synnes before or we do worke the lawe al be it as it was aboue saide loue foloweth faythe because they that be regenerate do receyue the holy ghoste and therfore they begynne to worke the lawe We wolde recite mo testimonies and authorities if it were not so that they be open and at hande to euery deuoute and godlye reader in the scriptures For we couet not to be ouerloÌ„ge and tedious to thentente that this cause or mater may the more easelye be perceyued Neyther is it any doubte but that this is the senteÌ„ce of Paule whiche we do defeÌ„de that by fayth we receyue remission of sinnes for Christis sake and that by fayth we ought to set Christe the mediator agaynst the wrathe of god not our workes And let not the myndes of good men be troubled although our aduersaries do calumniate and corrupte the sentences of Paule There is nothynge spoken so purely and truelye but it may be depraued by captious cauillations We assuredly knowe that this which we haue recited is the very ryghte and true sentence and meanynge of Paule we knowe this oure sentence doth brynge ferme and stable coÌ„forte to godly coÌ„sciences without whiche no man is able to stande in the iudgement of god Wherfore let these pharisaical opinioÌ„s of our aduersaries be reiected and thrust out of mens â—ertes that we do not by fayth receyue remission of synnes but that we must merite remission with our loue and with our workes and that we ought to set our loue and our workes agaiÌ„st the wrath of god· This is the doctrine of
the lawe not of the gospell whiche doth fayne and imagine that man is fyrste iustified by the lawe before that he be reconciled by Christ to god notwithstandyng that Christe hym selfe saythe Without me â—e can do nothynge Also I am the true vine and ye be the braunches But oure aduersaries do imagine that we be the braunches not of Christ but of Moyses For they wyll fyrst be iustified by the law and offre theyr loue workê vnto god before that they be reconciled to god by Christe before that they be braunces of Christe Paule contrarywyse sayth playnly that the law can not be wroughte nor fulfylled without Christe Therfore the promyse is fyrst to be receyued that by faythe we maye be reconciled to god for Christis sake or that we worke the lawe These thynges we do iudge to be clere euident ynough to godly coÌ„sciences And herof they shall playnely ê‘ceyue the cause why we dyd heretofore holde opinion professe that men be iustified by fayth and not by loue For we muste plede agaynst the wrathe of god not our loue or our workes nor truste in our loue and workes but Christe the mediator and we muste fyrste receyue the promyse of remission of synnes or euer we worke the lawe Finally Whan shall the conscience be set at reste if we do receyue remission of synnes because we loue or worke the lawe For the law wyll always accuse vs bicause we neuer satisfie the lawe of god accordyng to the sayenge of saynte Paule Lex iram operatur The lawe worketh wrathe Chrisostome asketh the question concernyng penaunce wherby we be assured that our synnes be forgyuen vs our aduersaries also in the senteÌ„ces do aske the question concernyng the same thynge This can not be declared neyther consciences can not be made quiete onles they know that it is the coÌ„maundement of god and the very gospell that they shulde be assured that for Christes sake synnes be freely forgyuen and that they shulde not doubte but that they be freely forgyuen vnto them selfes If any manne dothe doubt he as IohnÌ„ sayth accuseth the diuine promyse of a lye This certeyntie and assuraunce of faythe we teache is required in the gospell But oure aduersaries leaue mennes conscieÌ„ces vncertayne and in a doubtfulnes Nowe coÌ„sciences do worke nothyng by fayth whan they do coÌ„tinually doubt whether they haue remission Howe can they in this doubtfulnes call vpon god Howe can they ê‘suade them selues be assured that they be herde Thus all theyr lyfe is without god and without the very true honoure and worshyppynge of god This is it that Paule saythe that what soeuer is not done of faythe is synne And bicause they continue alwayes in this doubtfulnes they neuer haue experieÌ„ce what faythe is So it coÌ„meth to passe at the laste that they fall in to desperation Suche is the doctrine of our aduersaries euen a verye doctrine of the lawe a dissanullyng and an aâ—rogation of the gospell and a doctrine of desperation Nowe we do gladly permitte vnto all good men to gyue iugement of this place concernyng penaunce for it is playne ynoughe without any maner of obscuritie and to pronounce whiche of vs haue taughte the more godly and more holsome doctrine for consciences whether we or our aduersaries Certes these dissensioÌ„s in the churche do nothyng delyte vs wherfore if we had not great and necessarie causes to dissent from our aduersaries we wolde with ryghte good wyll holde our peace Nowe sith it is so that they condempne the manifest and open veritie it standeth not with our profession neither is it laufull for vs to leaue this cause vndefended whiche is not ours but Christê cause and the cause of the churche We haue shewed for what causes we haue put these two partes of penauÌ„ce contrition and faythe And we haue done it so moche the rather bicause there be borne aboute many sayenges concernyng penaunce whiche be alledged of the fathers but maymed and vnperfecte whiche our aduersaries haue detorted wrested to the defacynge of faythe As for example Penaunce is to sorowe bewayle the offeÌ„ces coÌ„mitted and not to coÌ„mitte agayne whiche thou oughteste to bewayle and sorowe Also penaunce is a certeyne punyshement or vengeaunce of the sorower aueÌ„gyng in hym selfe the offence whiche he is sorye that he hath coÌ„mitted In these sayenges is no mention of fayth no not so moche as in the scholes whan they do interprete and declare them is any thyng at all added of faythe Wherfore we to th entent that the doctrine of faythe myght be the better espied haue nombred faythe amonge the partes of penauÌ„ce For those sayenges whiche do require coÌ„trition or good workes and whiche make no mention of faythe that iustifiethe the very thynge it selfe shewethe that they be very perylous And doubtles it may be thoughte and that not without cause that those men lacked a poynt of prudence wysedome whiche haue heaped together these peced and patched rablemeÌ„tes of sentences and decrees For where as the fathers in diuerse other places do speake of the other parte of Penaunce it shulde haue bene profitable to haue pyked out the sentences of both partes â–ª and to haue ioyned them together not only out of one parte For Tertulliane speakethe ercellently of faythe amplifienge the othe of the lorde whiche is in the prophete â–ª Viuo ego dicit dominus nolo mortem peccatoris sed ut conuertatur et uiuat .i. I lyue saythe the lorde I wyll not the deathe of a synner but that he be conuerted lyue For in as moche as the lorde dothe sweare ther he wyll not the deathe of a synner he shewethe and declareth that credence fayth is required by whiche we shuld beleue his othe surely reken with our selues that he dothe forgyue vs. The promyses of god ought to be of greate auctoritie with vs although they be made without any othe put vnto them at all But this ê“myse is also coÌ„fermed and bounde with an othe Wherfore if any man doth not surely reken with hym selfe that he is forgyueÌ„ he denyeth that god hath sworne a true othe whiche is so great a blasphemie that there can none be imagined more haynous For thus saythe Tertulliane He calleth vs to saluation with a reward swearyng also in that he saythe I lyue and couetethe that we gyue credece vnto hym O blessed be they for whose cause god sâ—â—eareth O moste wretched be we if we beleue not the lorde whan he also sweareth And here it is to be knowen that this faythe oughte to thiÌ„ke that god freely forgyueth vs for Christis sake bicause of his owne ê“myse and not because of our workes or contrition confession satisfaction or loue For if faythe shulde leane vnto these workes be grounded vpon them anone it is made vncerteine and doubtfull For the fearefull coÌ„science doth se that these workes be vnworthy Therfore saythe Ambrose very
acknowledge yâ— our harte naturally is voyde of loue of feare of trust towardê god Therfore saieth the prophete After that the haste shewed it vnto me I strake my thyghe Also I sayde in my traunce euery man is a lyar that is to saye an vntrewe thynker of god ⧠⧠Here the aduersaries do also reproue Luther because he wrote that originall synne remayneth after baptime They adde that this artycle was ryghtly coÌ„deÌ„pned by Leo the tenthe But the emperours maiestie shal espye here a manifest be spoken of ciuyle iudgement nat of the iudgement of god They sowe vnto them euen as wysely this sentence Nature is nat euyl this spoken in place is nat repreueable but it maye nat be wrested to the diminishyng of originall synne and yet these sentencies be red amonge scholemen whiche out of due season do mengle philosophie with the gospell Nor these were nat disputed only in scholes but froÌ„ the scholes they were brought to the people And those persuasions raygned and nourished the affiauÌ„ce of humane powers and oppressed the knowledge of the grace of Christe wherfore Luther wyllyng to declare the magnitude of original synne of humane infirmitie taught that the resydues or dregges of originall sine be of the owne nature in man nat indifferent thynges but that we nede the grace of god that they maye nat be imputed and the holy ghoste that it maye be mortified Albeit the scholemen do make lesse bothe the synne and the payne teachynge that man of hys owne power may do the commaundementes of god In Genesis is otherwyse described the payne due for originall synne For there nat only to deathe and other corporall punyshementes mans nature is made subiecte but also to the kyngdome of the deuyll For there is gyuen this horrible sentence I wyl put enmities betwexte the and the woman and betwexte thy sede and her sede Defaute and concupysceÌ„ce be punyshementes and also synnes Deathe other corporall euyls and the tyrannye of the deuyll be properly punyshementes For mans nature is gyuen into boÌ„dage and holden captiue of the deuyl whiche infecteth it with wycked opinions and errours and impelleth it to al kyndes of synne But as the deuyll can naâ— be vaynquyshed without the ayde of Christe â–ª so can nat we by our owne powers redeme our selues out of this bondage The very historie of the worlde sheweth vs howe greate is the power of the deuyls kyngdome The worlde is full of blasphemies agaynste god of wycked opinions and with these bondes the deuyl hath in captiuite the wyse and ryghtwyse men in the face of the worlde In other sume appere more grosse vices But when Christe is gyuen vnto vs whiche taketh awaye these synnes these punyshmentes and destroyeth the kyngdome of the deuyll synne and death the benefytes of Christe can nat be knowen onles we vnderstande our owne euyls Therfore of these thynges our preachers do diligently teache and they teache nat any newe thing but the holy scripture and sentences of holy fathers This we truste wyll satysfye the Emperours maiestie as touching yâ— chyldyshe and colde cauillacions by whiche the aduersaries haue sclaundered our article For we knowe that we beleue ryghtly and with the catholyk churche of Christe But if the aduersaries wyl renewe this contencyon there shal nat lacke lerned men amonge vs that shall make them answere and defende the truthe For the aduersaries in this cause vnderstande nat for the moste parte what they speake OfteÌ„tymes they speake thynges repugnant and they neyther expresse ryghtly dialectically the formall cause of originall synne nor the defaultê as they call them But we wolde nat in thys place ouer subtylly discusse theyr vayne and sophistical argumentê we thought it ynough to recyte the mynde of the holy fathers whoÌ„ we do folowe with commune knoweÌ„ wordê The thyrde article the aduersaries allowe in whiche we confesse two natures in Christe that is to wyte the nature humane assumpt of the worde into the vnitie of hys persone And that the selfe same Christe suffered and dyed to the entent to reconcyle vnto vs the father and rose agayne to the entent to reygne to iustifie and to sanctifie the beleuers cÌ„ accordyng to the Symbole of the apostles and the Symbole of Nicene ⧠⧠Of Iustificacyon ⧠IN the fourthe fythe syxte and also in the twenty article they condempne vs because we teache that men obtayne remission of synnes nat for theyr owne merites but frely for Christe by faythe in Christ. For they daÌ„ne bothe two poyntes fyrste that we denye that men for theyr owne merites do obtayne remission of synnes and secoÌ„darily that we affyrme that by faythe is obteyned remissioÌ„ of synnes and that men be iustified by faythe in Christe But sythe it is so that in this case or controuersie the pryncypall poynte of our religion is debated whiche ryghtly vnderstaÌ„de setteth forthe the honour of Christe and bryngeth a necessarie and plenteous consolacyon to the godly conscyence we desyre that the emperours maiestie wyll heare vs benyngly of these so greate maters For the aduersaries where as they neyther vnderstaÌ„de what is remission of synnes neyther what faythe â–ª neyther what grace nor what iustyce is pytyfully do defyle this poynt obscuryng the glorie and benefytes of Christe and bereue fronâ— the godly consciencies yâ— propouned coÌ„solacioÌ„s in Christe And to the ende we may maynteyne our coÌ„fessyon and assoyle the obiections of our aduersaries we shall fyrste premitte certayne thynges to the ende that the fountaynes of bothe our doctrines aswell ours as the aduersaries may be knowen The hole scripture ought to be distributed iÌ„to these pryncipal places law and promyses For otherwhyles it sheweth the lawe otherwhyles the promyse of Christ as when it promyseth Christ to cum and promiseth for hym remission of synnes iustificacyon and lyfe eternall or where in the Euangell Christ after he ones appered promyseth remission of synnes iustificacyoÌ„ and lyfe eternall we call the lawe in thys disputacyon the preceptes of the Decalogie in what place so euer they be red in scripture Of the ceremonies iudiciall lawes of Moses at thys tyme we speake nothyng Out of these the aduersaries take the lawe because mans reason after a fashyoÌ„ dothe naturally vnderstaÌ„de the lawe For it hathe styl the same iudgement wrytten by god iÌ„ the mynde and by the lawe they seke remission of synnes and iustificacion But the Decalogie requyreth nat only outward ciuile workes whiche reason can after a fashyon fulfyll but also it requyreth other thynges ferre aboue reason as truly to feare god truly to loue god truly to call on god truly to beleue that god heareth vs and to loke for the ayde of god in deathe and all afflictions fynally it requyreth obedieÌ„ce towarde god in afflictioÌ„s and in deathe that we escheue them nat nor grudge nat at them whan god lay them on vs. Here the scholemen folowynge the phylosophiers only do teache the iustice of
promyse that free and the merytes of Chryst as a raunsom and redeÌ„ption Promyse is receiued by fayth this worde fre excludeth our merites signyfyeth that only by mercye is offered the benefyte of Chryst the merytes be the rauÌ„som for there must be some certaine redeÌ„pcion for our siÌ„nes The scripture oft times cryeth for mercy And the holy fathers many tymes say that we be saued by mercy So oft then as mencioÌ„ is made of mercy it is to be knoweÌ„ that fayth is ther requyred which receiueth the ê“mise of mercy And agayn so oft as we speke of faith we wyll that the obiecte be vnderstaÌ„de that is to say the promised mercy For faith doth not therfore iustify or saue because it is of it selfe a worthy worke but only because it receyueth the mercy promysed And thê seruice thêlatria is most highly coÌ„mended in prophetes psalmes wher as the law teacheth not fre remissioÌ„ of sinnes But the fathers knowe the promyse made of Christ that God for Christ wolde remyt synnes wherfore when they vnderstode that Chryst shuld be a pryce and raunsome for our synnes they knewe that our workes were not a raunsome of so great a thyng Therfore they receiued by fayth fre mercy and remissyoÌ„ of siÌ„nes lyke as the holy fathers of the newe testament do Here vnto belong tho oft repetycyons of mercye and faythe in the psalmes and prophetes as here Si iniquitates obseruaueris domine c. Yf thou markest iniquities o lorde lorde who shall susteyne Here he coÌ„fesseth hys synnes and yet he alledgeth not hê merytes He addeth For with the is mercyfulnes Here he lyfteth vp him selfe with the truste of the mercye of God And cytethe the promyse Sustinuit anima mea in verbo eius sperauit anima mea in domino My soule is susteyned in hys worde my soule hathe trusted in the lorde that is to saye because thou haste promysed remyssyon of synnes by thys thy promyse I am susteyned And Paule cyteth the hystorye of Abraham Abraham beleued God and it was recompted vnto hym for ryghtwysnes That is to wytte Abraham perceyued that God was vnto hym mercyful only for hys promyse sake He assented to the promyse of God nor suffered not hym selfe to be plucked away frome it all thoughe he sawe hym selfe vnclene and vnworthye He perceyued that God performeth hys promyse for hê owne truthe and not for our workes or merytes Trulye the affrayed hartes can haue no rest if they shulde thynke that for theyr owne workes or owne loue or fulfylliÌ„ge of the lawe they shulde please God for in the fleshe stycketh synne whiche alwaye accuseth vs. But then the hartes haue rest wheÌ„ in such affrayes they assure them selues that we therfore please God be cause he hathe promysed and that God perfourmeth hys promyse for hys owne truthe and not for our worthynes Thus Abraham herde thys saynge Feare thou not for â–ª I am thy protector Here he raysed vp him selfe and felte God mercyful vnto him not for hys owne deseruynge but because the promyse of god must nedes be iuged true this faythe therfore is imputed to hym for ryghtwysnes that is because he assenteth to the promyse and taketh the offered reconsilement he is nowe truelye iuste and accepted vnto God not for hys owne workes but bycause he taketh the free promyse of god Thys auctoryte of Genyses pleased Paule not without cause we se howe he layth on howe ernestlye he taryeth vpon that poynte because he sawe that the nature of fayth myght in that poynt be easaly espyed He sawe that the recorde of the imputacyon of iustice was added not with out a greate skyll He sawe that the lawde of desernynge iustyfycacyon and of pacyfyenge the conscyence was taken away from workes â–ª when Abraham is therfore pronounced ryght wyse because he assenteth to the promyse and taketh the offered reconcilement he pleadeth not in barre of goddes ire hys owne merytes or workes wherfore thys place dylygently consydered may plenteouslye instructe godlye myndes in thys matter whiche shall so be vnderstonde yf the affrayed myndes haue it before them and assure theÌ„ selue that they ought to assente to the free promyse For otherwyse they can not be quyete onles they presuppose that they haue god theyr good lorde because he hath so promysed and not bycause our nature lyfe and workes be worthye Therfore also the fathers were iustifyed not by the law but by the promyse and fayth And it is a wonderfull thynge that the aduersaryes do make so lytle of faythe syth they se it throughe out al scrypture praysed for the moste hyghe seruyce as in the .49 Psal. Call on me in tyme of trybulacyon and I shal delyuer the. Thus wyll god be knowen thus he wyll be worshyped by receyuynge benefytes of hym and receyuynge them for hys mercyes sake and not for our owne demerytes Thys is the moste ample consolacyon in all afflyctyons And such consolacyons our aduersaryes go about to destroye and putte out of vre in that they make faythe so lytle a seruyce and onlye â—eache men to contende with god by our owne workes and merytes ¶ That the only faythe in Chryst iustyfyeth FYrste leste a man wolde thynke that we speake of the ydle knowledge of the Hystorye we wyll shewe howe faythe cummeth After we wyl shewe that it iustyfyeth and howe thys must be vnderstande then we wyll assoyle thobiections of the aduersaryes Chryste in the last of Luke coÌ„maundeth his dyscyples to preache repentaunce in hys name and remyssyon of synnes For the gospell argueth euery man to be vnder synne and to be gyltye of eternal ire and deth and offereth for Chryst remissyon of sinnes iustificacion which is receyued by fayth Preaching of penauÌ„ce which reproueth vs dothe fray the conscyence with true ernest afrayes In these the hartê ought agayne to conceyue consolacyon which shal be yf they trust to the promyse of Chryst that for hym we haue remyssyon of synnes Thys faythe erectyng and comfortynge vs in those affrayes takethe remyssyon of synnes iustyfyeth and viuifyeth For that consolacion is a newe and a spiritual lyfe These be plaine and open and the godlye maye vnderstande them also the churche haue recorded the same The aduersaryes neuer shewe truly howe the holye gost is gyuen They fayne that the sacramentes gyue the holye gooste ex opere operato sine bono motu accipientis euen of the verye worke it selfe without any good motyon of the receyuer as thoughe the geuynge of the holy goste were an idle thynge But where as we speake of suche faythe whiche is not an idle thought but which deliuereth from dethe and createth a newe lyfe in our hartes and nedeth the holy gost it standeth not with mortall synne but so longe as it is present it bryngeth forthe good frures as we shall say here after what can be spoken of the conuertynge of the vngodly or of the maner of regeneratynge more sympely and more
meriteth only the fyrst grace and that we theÌ„ by our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe do please and deserue euerlastyng lyfe The mediatour Christe taryeth styll and we must alwaies thynke that for him we haue god pacifyed although we be vnworthy as Paule sayeth By hym we haue an entre to god thorugh fayth For our fulfyllyng of the lawe as we sayde is vnclene sythe our nature is horriblely corrupted Therfore the Psalme sayeth Blessed be they whose synnes be forgyuen Wherfore we haue nede of remission of synnes yea euen when we haue good workê But that remission is alwayes purchased by faythe so Christe remayneth a byshop and mediatour g o ergo that fulfyllyng of the lawe pleaseth nat of it selfe But because we coÌ„ceiue Christ by fayth and fele that we haue god pacified nat for the lawe but for Christe Fyfthly If we shulde thynke that after baptisme we ought to be accepted nat by fayth in Christ but for our fulfyllyng of the lawe our conscience shulde neuer be quyete but shulde runne into desperation For the lawe alwayes accuseth syth we neuer satisfy the lawe which thyng the hole churche coÌ„fesseth For Paule sayeth Good that I wolde do I do nat but euyl that I wolde nat do I do He also sayeth In mynde I serue the lawe of god but iÌ„ fleshe I serue the lawe of syn For who sufficiently loueth or sufficiently feareth god who paciently ynough susteyneth tribulacions whiche god putteth vpoÌ„ him who doth nat oft doubt whether humane thynges be ruled by goddes prouidence who doth nat oft doubte whether god heareth his prayer who dothe nat oft disdysdayne and grudge that the wycked haue better fortune than the godly people and that the godly be oppressed of the vngodly who is nat angrie with the iudgemeÌ„t of god whan he semeth to caste vs away who doth satisfy his calliÌ„g who loueth his neyghbour as him selfe who is nat ouerthrowen of his concupisceÌ„ce Of these synnes speaketh the psalme sayeng For this euery saynt shal pray to the. Lo here he sayeth that sayntes or holy men desyre remission of synnes They be more then blynde which se nat that the euil affectioÌ„s iÌ„ the fleshe be nat synnes of whiche Paule sayeth The fleshe lusteth agaynst the spirite the spirit agaynst the fleshe The fleshe distrusteth god trusteth in thinges present seketh humane socours in distresse and affliction yea agaynste the wyll of god it fleeth tribulations whiche by the commaundement of god it oweth to suffre it doubteth of the mercy of god The holy spirite in meÌ„nes tencies of the lawe one solution may be gyueÌ„ that the lawe can nat be done without Chryst if any ciuile workes be done without Christ they please not god Wherfore when the workes be preached it is necessarye to be added that fayth is requyred that for faythe they be preached that they be frutes and testimonies of faythe What thynge can be spoken more symply and syncerely thaÌ„ this doctryne For it is necessarie to the knowledge of the benefytes of Christ to discerne the promyses from the lawe Ambiguouse and perilous causes do engender many and sundry solutions But in good and ferme causes one or two solutions taken out of the fountaynes do answere all that maye be obiected Whiche thynge also appereth in thys our cause For that rule whiche I ryght nowe recyted expounneth all the saynges whiche be recited of the lawe and of the workes For we graunte that the scripture otherwhyles doth teache the lawe otherwhyles the free promyse of remyssyon of synnes for Christe But our aduersaries do vtterly destroy the promyse in sainge that fayth dothe not iustifie but teache that for our loue and workes we receyue remission of synnes reconciliation For yf remissyon of synnes shulde hange of the condicion of our workes so were it very vncertayne For we neuer do sufficient workes Then the promyse shall be put out of yre Wherfore we call agayne good myndes to the coÌ„sideration of the promisses and we teache them of the free remyssyon and reconcilement that is made by the faythe in Christe After thys we adde also the doctrine of the lawe nat that by the lawe we shulde deserue forgyuenes of siÌ„nes or that for the lawe we shulde be compted ryghtwyse and nat for Christ but for thys entent because god requireth good workes For we muste wysely distincte the lawe and the promyses It must be sene what scripture gyueth to the lawe and what to the promyses For it prayseth and commaundeth good workes in such sorte that it taketh not awaye the free promyse nor the benefyte that we haue by Christe For good workes are to be done because God requireth them and therfore they be the effectes of regeneration as Paule teacheth We be his worke made by Christe Iesus to good workes whiche God hathe prepared that we shuld walke in them Wherfore good workes ought to ensue faythe as a geuynge of thankes towarde god also that in them faythe maye be bothe excercised and encrease and be shewed to other that by our confessyon other maye be styrred to deuotyon Therfore sayth Paule that Abraham toke circumcisioÌ„ not that for the very worke he shuld be compted ryghtwise but that he might haue a marke printed in his body wherby he myght be brought in rememberaunce and conceyue styll more faythe and more Also to thentente he shulde confesse hys fayth before other and by hys wytnessynge prouoke other to beleue So Abell by reason of hys faythe offered a more acceptable sacrifice for the sacrifice pleased god not for the very sacrifice but bycause Abel by hys faythe was assured that god was pleased with him because of hê mercie And he dyd that worke only to th ende to excercise his faythe and to prouoke other by hys ensample and confessyon to beleue Syth good workes ought after thys sorte ensue faythe men that can nat beleue and determyne in theyr hartes that they be frely pardoned for Christes sake â–ª do vse workes farre an other way These persons when they see the workes of sayntes and holy persons they iudge after a worldly fashoÌ„ that the sayntes by tho workes haue deserued forgiuenes of synnes and that for tho workes they be accompted ryghtwyse before God Therfore they folowe them and thynke that by lyke workes they deserue remyssion of synnes they go aboute to pacifye the ire of God and truste that for suche workes they shall be accompted ryghtwyse These wycked opinions in workes we damne Fyrst because they obscure the glory of Christ when men do propowne to god these workes as a pryce raunsom Thus the honour due to only Christ is gyuen to our workes Secondly because that notwithstandynge all theyr good workes yet the conscyence fyndeth no peace in them but heapynge workes vpon workes in true trobles at laste dispayreth for when it findeth no worke clene ynoughe the lawe alwayes accuseth and engendreth ire Therdly Such neuer atteyne to the knowledge of god when
se what confession auayleth without absolutioÌ„ But if they do nat seperate the receyuing of absolution from confession they muste nedes thynke that faythe is a parte of penauÌ„ce For absolution is nat receiued but by fayth And that absolution is nat receiued but by faythe it may be proued by Paule whiche teacheth that the promyse can nat be receiued but by faythe Howe absolution is the promyse of the remission of synnes Therfore it dothe necessarily require faythe And we do nat se howe he can be sayde to receiue absolution whiche dothe nat assente and agre to it And what other thyng is it nat to agre to the absolution then to accuse god of a lye If the barte dothe doubte it thynketh that those thynges be vncerteyne vayne whiche god dothe promise Therfore it is wrytten in the epistle of Iohan whosoeuer beleueth nat god maketh hym a lyer because he dothe nat beleue in the testimonye whiche god hathe witnessed of his sonne Secondaryly we suppose that our aduersaries do graunt that remission of synnes is eyther parte or the ende or terminus ad queÌ„ as they vse to speake of penauÌ„ce or repentauÌ„ce ergo that thyng wherby remissioÌ„ of synnes is receyued is of ryght added to the partes of penaunce But most certayne it is most vndoubted although al the gates of helle wolde crye agaynste it that remission of synnes can nat be receiued but only by fayth whiche beleueth that sinnes be forgyuen for Christê sake according to that sayeng of Paule to the Romaines whom god hathe set forthe a propitiator by faythe in the bloude of hym Also in the fyfthe to the Romaynes By whom we haue waye throughe faythe into grace c. For the troubled arraryed coâ—icence can nat plede nor laye agaynste the wrathe of god theyr owne workes or loue but so is only the conscience made quiete when it receiueth the mediatour Christe and beleueth the promises gyuen for hys sake for they do nat perceyue what remission of synnes is or howe it cometh to vs which dreame that hartes be set at peace without faythe in Christe Peter alledgeth out of Esaye thys sayeng whosoeuer shall beleue in hym shall nat be confounded or ashamed â–ª Wherfore hypocrites muste neues be confounded which truste that they receiue remission of synnes for theyr owne workê and nat for Christes sake And Peter sayth in the actes To him all the prophetes beare witnes that al whiche beleue in him do receiue remission of synnes throughe his name It coulde nat be spoken more manifestly than yâ— he sayth throughe his name And he addeth all that beleue in hym We do only therfore thus receiue remission of synnes through the name of Christe that is to wete for Christes sake â–ª and nat for any meritê or workes of our owne And this is so done when we beleue that synnes be forgyuen vs for Christes sake Our aduersaries crye out that they be the churche that they do folowe the coÌ„sent of the church But Peter here in thys our cause alledgeth also the coÌ„sent of the churche To him sayth he al the prophetes beare wytnes that by his name they receiue remission cÌ„ Undoubtedly the consente of the prophetes is to be iudged the consente of the vniuersall churche We do neyther grauÌ„t to the byshop of Rome neither yet vnto the church power or authoritie to decre agaynst this coÌ„sent of the ê“phetes But the Bulle of Leo byshop of Rome do openly condempne this article of remission of sinnes our aduersaries do also coÌ„dempne it in theyr confutation By whiche thynge it appereth what maner churche theyr churche is to be iudged whiche not onely with decrees disalowe this sentence that remission of synnes is purchased by faith not for our workes but for Christ but also coÌ„maunde to destroy that sentence and opinion with violence and with the swerde They coÌ„mauÌ„de also with all kynd of crueltie to destroye the good men whiche be of the same opinion and mynde But they wyll saye that they haue greate and famous authours for them as maister Duns Gabriel â–ª and other lyke the sayenges also of fathers â–ª whiche be recited in the decrees but maymed and vnperfecte Certes if we shulde falle to numbring of testimonies they haue the better bande For there is a great rablement of tryfelyng wryters vpon the mayster of the Sentencies whiche do euen as it were conspire to gether in defendyng these figmentes lyes of the merite of attricion and of workes and the thynges whiche we haue here to fore recyted But let no man be moued with the multitude of them For thauctoritie is not greate of the late wryters whiche were not the fathers of theyr owne wrytynges but onely embesylyng and robbyng the olde fathers dyd shyfre and turmoyle opinions forth of one boke in to an other They vsed no maner iugemeÌ„t but only after the fashyon of the Senatours whiche were called Pedarij without any wordes allowed the errours of them that had writen before whom they perceyued not We therfore wyll not be afraide to set this sayenge of Peter who allegeth the consente of the prophetê agaynst the legions of sententiaries be they neuer so manye And to this preachynge of Peter is added the testimonie of the holy gost For thus sayth the texte Adhuc loquente Petro uerba haec cecidit spiritus sanctus sup omnes qui audiebant uerbum .1 And as Peter was yet speakynge these wordes the holy ghoste lyghted vpon al them which dyd heare the worde Let all good godly consciences therfore knowe that this is the coÌ„maundement of god that they shulde beleue theyr synnes to be freelye forgyuen them for Christes sake and not for our owne workes And with this coÌ„maundement of god let them strengthen and susteyne them selues agaynst desperation and agaynst the terrours of synne and of deathe And let them knowe that this senteÌ„ce opinion hath always remayned in the churche amoÌ„ge holy and good men sythe the begynnynge of the worlde For Peter dothe clearely alledge the consent of the prophetes And the writynges of thapostles testifie that they were of the same mynde we haue also testimonies of the fathers For Barnarde sayth the sawe in playn and open wordes Necesse est enim primo omnium credere quod remissionem peccatoruÌ„ habere noÌ„ possis nisi per indulgeÌ„tiam dei sed adde adhuc ut credas hoc quod per ipsum peccata tibi donantur Hoc est testimonium quod ê‘hibet spiritus sanctus in corde tuo dicens dimissa sunt tibi peccata tua Sic enim arbitratur apostolus gratis iustificari hominem per fidem .i. For it is necessarye fyrste of all to beleue that thou canste not haue forgyuenes of synnes but by the indulgence of god but adde yet hereunto so that thou doste beleue this also that by hym thy synnes be forgyuen the. This is the testimonie which the holy ghost heareth in thy herte
well in his worke of PenauÌ„ce these wordes folowynge Therfore it is conuenient that we beleue both that penauÌ„ce is to be done and that forgyuenes shal be gyuen but yet so that we do hope forgyuenes as through faythe For faythe obteyneth as it were by an especialtie or obligation Also faythe it is whiche dothe couer our synnes So than there be senteÌ„ces in the workes of the fathers not onely of contrition and workes but also of faythe But our aduersaries because they neyther perceyue the nature of penaunce neyther the sayenges of the fathers do pyke out the sayenges concernyng the one parte of penauÌ„ce that is to wit workes But those thyngê whiche be spoken in other places of faythe because they do not vnderstande them they passe them ouer ⧠Of confession and satisfaction ⧠GOod men may easely iudge that it is verie profitable and necessary that the true doctrine be kepte concernynge the partes aâ—ouenamed that is to wete concernyng contrition and faythe Therfore in settynge forthe of these places we haue alwayes most busied our selues and as for confession and satisfaction we haue nat greatly coÌ„tended nor striuen For we also do retayne kepe styll confession and specially because of absolution whiche is the worde of god because the power of the keyes by the auctoritie of god dothe pronouÌ„ce and gyue seÌ„tence of euery thiÌ„g Wherfore it shulde be a wycked dede to take away priuate absolucion out of the churche Neyther do they perceyue and vnderstande what is remission of siÌ„nes or what is the power of the keyes who soeuer they be that do despyse and take away priuate absolution But coÌ„cernyng the rehersall and reckenyng vp of synnes particularly by name in confession we haue sayde before that we do nat thynke it necessary by the lawe of god For where as certeyne meÌ„ do obiecte that a Iudge ought fyrste to knowe the mater before that he do gyue sentence this obiectioÌ„ is nothyng to this purpose For absolutioÌ„ is but the execution of the benefite gyuen by an other and nat a iudgement For Christe gaue charge and coÌ„mauÌ„dement to forgyue synnes Thys commaundement the ministers do eâ—ecute They haue no coÌ„mauÌ„dement of knowiÌ„g the synnes that be secrete Thys thynge may well be perceyued herof because they forgyue innumerable synnes whiche they them selues do neuer remembre to whome they be forgyuen And if remission shulde hange vpon the knowledge of sinnes then al the mater shulde be vncertayne and doutful But in those synnes whiche be openly knowne what maner iurisdiction the churche hathe that belongeth nat to thê preseÌ„t disputatioÌ„ For these because they be open and knowen they be accused by name and afterwardes be forgyuen by name if the doer of them wyl be receiued agayne of the churche And it is a folyshnes to apply vnto this mater the sayeng of Salomon whiche is thys Diligenter cognosce vultum pecoris tui .i. Knowe diligeÌ„tly the face of thy catayle For SalomoÌ„ speaketh no whit of coÌ„fession but he gyueth a morall lesson and instruction to an housholder that he shulde vse that whiche is his owne and forbeare from that whiche is an other mans and he biddeth hym to loke diligently vnto his owne thyngê but yet in suche wyse that hys mynde beyng occupied and set all vpon the desyre of gatheryng goodes he do nat caste away the feare of god or faythe or the loue of the word of god But our aduersaries do merueilously transforme and chauÌ„g the wordes of scripture into what soeuer sentences or meanynges it lyketh them selues here vnto theÌ„ this worde knowe betokeneth to here confessions The face betokeneth nat the outewarde conuersation but the secretes and priuities of conscience And catayle signifieth men Forsothe a goodly and a propre interpretation and semely for suche despysers of the studies of eloquence But if any man lyste by a similitude to translate thys instruccion from the householde keper and to apply it vnto a pastor or curate of the churche then doubtles he ought by the face to vnderstande the outwarde coÌ„uersatioÌ„ Thys shal be a more apte a more agreable similitude But let vs passe ouer these thynges some tymes there is mention made of confessioÌ„ in the psalmes as Dixi coÌ„fiteâ— or aduersum me iniustitiam meam domino et tu remisisti iniquitatem peccati mei .i. I sayde I wyll confesse and knowledge agaynst my selfe my wickednes vnto the lorde and thou haste forgiuen the wickednes of my syn Suche maner coÌ„fession of syn whiche is made vnto god is the very ryght contrition For when coÌ„fession is made vnto god it muste nedes be done with the harte and nat only with the mouthe so as is done of the players in enterludê Suche maner confession therfore is contrition in whiche we felyng perceiuyng the wrathe of god do coÌ„fesse that god is wrothe nat with out iuste cause and that he can nat be pacified with our workes And yet neuertheles we seke mercie of god for hys promyse sake Suche maner coÌ„fession is this confession of the prophete Tibi soli peccaui c. To the alone haue I synned that thou mayste be iustified mayst ouercom when thou shalt iudge that is to say I knoweledge my selfe to be a synner and to haue deserued euerlastyng wrathe neither can I set my ryghtuousnes nor my merites agaiÌ„st thy wrathe Therfore I pronounce the to be rightuous when thou doste condempne punyshe vs I pronouÌ„ce that thou haste the victorie wheÌ„ hypochrites do iudge the that thou arte vnrightuous because thou doste punyshe or condempne theÌ„ wel deseruyng it yea more ouer our merites can nat be sette agaynste thy iuâ—gement but in suche wyse we shal be iustified if thou doste iustify vs if thou dost repute vs iustified through thy mercye Perauenture suÌ„me man wyll alledge Iamys who sayeth coÌ„fesse your synnes one of you to another But he speaketh nat here of confession to be made to the preestê but in a generalitie of the reconciling of bretherne among them selues for he biddeth coÌ„fession to be made of eche to other Furthermore our aduersaries shall condeÌ„pne many of the moste approued auctours if they wyll contende that the rehersall of synnes in confession is necessary by goddê lawe For although we do approue coÌ„fession and do iudge that a certayne examination is profitable to the entent that men may be the better instructed and taught yet neuertheles the thyng is in suche wyse to be moderated and measured that consciences be nat tangled and snarled whiche vndoubtedly shall neuer be quiete if they shulde thynke that they can nat obteyne remission of sinnes onles they make that scripulous and iuste rehersal of synnes That sayeng doubtles is verie false whiche our aduersaries haue put in the coÌ„futation that an hole and perfecte confession is necessary to saluation For suche confession is vnpossible And I pray you what snares caste they here vpon the conscieÌ„ce whan they require a hole
thynge thou shalte bynde vpon earthe it shal be bounde in heuen And what soeuer thyng thou shalte louse vpon erthe it shal be loused also in heuen Howe be it as we haue sayde before the keye hath not power to laye on punyshementes oâ— to institute honourynge of god but onely it hath coÌ„maundement to forgyue synnes vnto them whiche be conuerted and to rebuke and excoÌ„municate them which wyll not be conuerted For as to louse signifiethe to forgyue synnes so to bynde signifiethe not to forgyue synnes for Christe speaketh of a spirituall kyngdome And the commaundement of god is that the ministers of the gospel shulde assoyle them whiche be coÌ„uerted accordynge to that texte of Paule Power and auctoritie is gyuen vs to edification Wherfore the reseruation of cases is a politicall and ciuilâ— thynge For it is a reseruation of canonicall punyshement and not a reseruation of synne in the syghte of god in them whiche be truelye conuerted Wherfore oure aduersaries do iudge well whan they do graunte that in the article of deathe that reseruation of cases ought not to let absolutioÌ„ We haue set forthe and declared the summe of our doctrine as touchynge penaunce whiche doctrine we knowe assuredly to be godly and holsome to good myndes And good men if they shal compare our doctrine with the most confuse and troublesome disputations of our aduersaries shall perceyue ryghte well that our aduersaries haue lefte out the doctrine of faythe iustifieng confortyng godly hertes For they shall see that our aduersaries do fayne many thingê of the merite of attrition of that endeles rehersal of synnes of satisfactions hangynge nothyng together and as the olde prouerbe is touching neither heuen ne earth but strayeng and wanderyng clene wyde from the purpose and such as euen our aduersaries them selues can not sufficiently declare ☞ Of the numbre and vse of the ⧠sacramentes ⧠IN the .xiij. article our aduersaries do allowe that we do saye the sacramentes not only to be signes or tokens of profession amonge men as certayn men do fayne but rather to be signes and testimonies of the wyll of god towardes vs by whiche god moueth and styrreth hertes to beleue But here they byd vs also to accompte seuen sacramentes We thynke that men oughte to beware that the thynges ceremonies instituted in the scriptures be not despised howe many soeuer they be Neyther do we thiÌ„ke it to make any great matter although diuerse men for cause of teachyng do nombre or recken diuerse wayes so that they kepe well the thynges taught in the scripture For the olde wryters haue not all numbred them after one maner and facyon If we call sacramentes rytes or ceremonies whiche be coÌ„maunded by god vnto whiche is added a promyse of grace it is an easye thyng to iudge whiche be ê“prely sacramentê â–ª For rytê or ceremonies iÌ„stituted by men shall not after this maner proprely be called sacramentes For it belongeth not to the auctorite of man to promyse grace wherfore signes instituted without the coÌ„mauÌ„dement of god be not sure and vndoubted tokeÌ„s of grace albeit peraduenture they teache ignoraunte simple persones or elles put them in remembraunce of somewhat The very sacramentes therfore be Baptisme the Souper of the lorde Absolution whiche is the sacrament of penaunce For these rytê or vsages haue for them the coÌ„maundement of god and haue also added vnto them a promyse of grace whiche is proprely belongyng to the newe testameÌ„t For hertes ought surely and vndoubtedlye to beleue that whan we be baptised whan we do eate the bodye of oure lorde whan we be assoyled that god dothe verely forgyue vs for Christes sake And god doth also by the worde the ceremonie moue and styrre the hertes to beleue and to gather fayth as Paule saythe â—ides ex auditu Fayth is by hearynge And lykewyse as the worde runneth in to the eares that it may stryke vnto the hertê euen so the ceremonie of it selfe runneth in to the iyes to moue and styrre the hertes The effecte of the worde and of the ceremonie is all one as it was full excellently sayde of sayncte Augustine who saythe that a sacrament is a visible worde because the ceremonie is receyued of the iyes and is as it were a picture of the worde signifienge the same thynge that the worde dothe signifie wherfore theffecte of them bothe is all one Confirmation the last enneylyng be rytes or ceremonies receyued of the fathers which the churche dothe not require as necessary to saluation bicause they haue not the coÌ„maundemeÌ„t of god wherfore it is not vnprofitable to disseuer these ceremonies from the other aboue sayd whiche haue the expresse coÌ„maundement of god to maynteyne them and a clere promyse of grace Preesthod our aduersaries do vnderstande not of the administratioÌ„ of the worde of god and of the sacrameÌ„tes to be gyuen forthe vnto other but they do vnderstande it of sacrifice as thoughe in the newe testamente there oughte to be a preesthod lyke vnto the preesthode leuitical coÌ„mauÌ„ded by Moses law whiche shulde make sacrifice for the people and deserue remission of synnes to other men We teache that the sacrifice of Christ dyenge on the crosse was sufficient for the synnes of the hole worlde and dothe not nede besydes the helpe of any other sacrifices as thoughe it were not sufficient for oure synnes wherfore men be iustified not for any other sacrifices but for that onely sacrifice of Christe if they beleue them selues to haue ben redemed with that sacrifice Therfore preestes be elected called properlye to teache the gospell and to ministre sacramentes to the people Wherfore if ordre be vnderstanded of the ministratioÌ„ of the worde of god we wyll nat stycke to call ordre a sacrameÌ„t For the ministration of the worde hathe for it the commaundement of god And it hathe many greate promises as in the fyrst chapitre to the Romans The gospel is the power of god to saluation vnto euery one that beleueth Also Esaie in the .55 chapitre My worde that shal go out froÌ„ my mouth shall nat retourne vnto me voyde but it shall do what soeuer thingê I haue willed c. If ordre after this maner be vnderstanded we wyll nat be greued to call also the imposition or layeng on of the handes a sacramente For the churche hath a coÌ„maundement to constitute and ordeyne ministers whiche ought to be verie acceptable vnto vs because we knowe that god dothe approue that ministration and is present at that ministratioÌ„ And it is profitable also as much as may be to garnishe the ministration of the worde with al maner prayse agaynst mad men whiche dreame that the holy ghoste is gyuen nat by the worde but for certaine preparatioÌ„s of theyr owne if they syt ydle holdynge theyr tonges in darke places lokyng after illumination lyke as they dyd in olde tyme whiche were called enthusiastes whiche fayned them selues
to say kynges be ordeyned to prouyde that godlye thynges that is to witte the gospel of Christe be maynteyned and spredde abrode and that as beinge goddê deputies they shuld defende the lyfe helth of innocent ê‘sones ⧠Of bothe kyndes to be gyuen in the souper of the lorde ⧠IT can nat be doubted but that it is an holy thing and agreing to the institution of Christ and to the wordes of Paule to vse bothe partes or kyndes in the souper of the lorde For Christe dyd institute bothe partes and he dyd institute theÌ„ nat for parte of the churche but for the hole churche For nat onely prestes but the hole churche vseth the sacrament and that by the authoritie of Christ and nat by the authoritie of maÌ„ And thê we thinke that our aduersaries do grauÌ„t Nowe if Christ dyd institute this sacrameÌ„t for the hole churche why is the one kynde taken awaye frome parte of the church why is the vse of the one kynde forbydden why is the ordenaunce of Christe chaunged namely sythe he hymselfe dothe call it hys testamente That if it be nat lauful to breake the testament and laste wyl of a man muche lesse it shal be laufull to breake the testamente of Christe And Paule sayeth that he receyued of the lorde that whiche he taught But he taught the vse of bothe kyndê as the texte euideÌ„tly sheweth Do this sayeth he fyrste speakyng of the body afterwarde he repeteth the same wordê of the cup. And after he sayeth let a man trye and examyne himselfe and so let him eate of the breade and drynke of the cuppe These be the wordes of one disposing and ordering And he speaketh before that they whiche shulde vse the souper of the lorde shulde vse it togither in one company Wherfore it is euident that the sacrament was instituted for the hole churche And the vse ther of remayneth yet in some churches of the Grekes And the same custome was sometyme also in the latine churches as Cypriane and Hierome do witnesse For thus sayeth Hierome vpon the prophete Sophonie Sacerdotes qui â—ucharistiae seruiunt sanguinem domini populis diuidunt c. The prestes whiche do serue the sacramentâ— of the alter whiche do deuide the bloude of the lorde to the people c. The councel of Toletane witnesseth the same Neyther shal it be any greate mastry to gather a greate heape of testimonies Here we wyll nat exaggerate ne amplifie this thing we only leaue it to the wyse reader to be coÌ„sidered what is to be thought of the ordenauÌ„ce of god Our aduersaries in the coÌ„futatioÌ„ do nat go about to excuse the churche froÌ„ whom the one parte of the sacrameÌ„t was takeÌ„ away â–ª It became good and religious men to do thê They ought to haue sought a sure and strong reason to excuse the churche and to teache the consciences whiche can nat be suffred to haue but one parte of yâ— sacrament Nowe they defende that it is well done to kepe awaye the one parte and they forbidde to graunt the vse of bothe partes Fyrste they fayne that in the church the maner was in some places to gyue but the one parte alone And yet can they briÌ„g forthe none auncient example herof but they alledge the places in whiche mention is made of breade as in Luke Where it is writen that the disciples knewe Christe by breakynge of the breade They alledge also other places of breakyng of the breade And albeit we do nat greately saye agaynste them but that some of those places may be vnderstaÌ„ded of the sacramente yet for all that thys dothe nat folowe that there was gyuen but the one parte alone for by namyng of parte the residue is betokened by a comen maner custome of speakyng They adde also of the laicall coÌ„munion whiche was nat the vse of yâ— one kynde alone but of bothe And if at any tyme prestes be byddeÌ„ to vse the laicall communion it is mente that they were remoued from the ministery of consecration And this thyng our aduersaries do knowe wel ynough but they do abuse the ignoraunce of vnlearned men whiche when they here speake of laicall coÌ„munion by and by do dreame of the maner and vsage of our tyme in which to lay men is gyuen but only one parte of the sacrament And se howe shameles they be Gabriel amonge other causes reciteth why bothe partes be nat gyuen because there was a difference to be made betwene laye men and prestes And it is lykely ynough that thys is the chief cause why the prohibitioÌ„ of the one parte is so greatly defended that the dignitie of the ordre by this religious fashyon myght be the better estemed and the more set by Thê is an humaine reason and purpose I wyll nat speake ouer sharply whiche for what ende it serueth it may easly be iudged And in the confutation they alledge of the sonnes of Helie that wheÌ„ the office of the hygh preste was lost they shulde desyre but one parte sacerdotall as it is wrytten in the fyrste boke of kynges Here they say is signified the vse of one only kynde And they adde thys conclusion So therfore our lay men also ought to be content with one part sacerdotal that is to wete with one kynde Uerely our aduersaries do dallye and tryfle wheÌ„ they applye the hystory of the chyldren of Helie to the sacramentes There is described the punyshmeÌ„t of Helie wyl they say thys also that the laye men be kepte from the one parte because of punyshemente The sacramente was instituted to comforte lyfte vp troubled and feared myndes when they beleue that the flesshe of Christe which was giuen for the lyfe of the worlde is meate wheÌ„ they beleue that they ioyned to Christe be quickened But our aduersaries do reason that laye men be kepte from the one parte because of punyshemeÌ„t The laye men say they ought to be coÌ„tente This is very imperiously spoken And why oughte they There oughte nat to be asked why nor any cause is to be enquired but what soeuer diuines say it must be a lawe This is the foule vometyng and dronkyn sayiÌ„g of Eccius For we espye these thrasonicall and proude bragging wordes of these felowes whiche if we were disposed to touche so as we myght do we shulde nat lacke matter nor oratioÌ„ For ye se howe they be past shame He coÌ„maundeth as it were a tyraunte in tragedies that whether they wyll or nat wyll they ought to be contented Shall these reasons which he alledgeth at domes day excuse these men whiche do forbydde parte of the sacrament and whiche do thus rage agaynste good men that vse the hole sacrameÌ„t If they do forbydde it for this skille that there shuld be a difference of the ordre this selfe same reason ought to moue vs that we do nat agre to our aduersaries euen thoughe we were elles minded to haue obserued the custome maner