draw life frō that but we must also draw it from this To declare plainly this neere and reall copulation of our flesh with the flesh of Christ he brings a similitude of waxe not that it euerie way agreeth in all thinges as is manifest but because it fittly sheweth our communion with Christ to be reall and substantiall And this he ment when concluding he said not onely spiritually but also corporally that is not onely in respect of the spirite but also in respect of the bodie both Christ is the vine and we his braunches This therefore he spake not of the manner of our coupling to Christ whether it be spirituall or corporall but of the thinges which are coupled namely that not onely our soules and our spirites are most neerely ioyned with the soule and spirit of Christ but also our flesh with his flesh This is to be gathered out of the aduersaries proposition against which he argueth which is that wee are not ioyned with Christ in flesh Coll. 500. B. These aduerbs therefore spiritually corporally in Cyrill doe not signifie the meanes by which we are vnited to Christ the vine but the things which are vnited as is already said and declared But the meanes also Cyrill graūteth to be spirituall that is by our faith and by the spirite of Christ for in euerie place hee teacheth and specially vpon the sixt of Iohn that we eate the flesh of Christ by faith And by this eating he prooueth our incorporation Vpon the 13. chapter The 7. aphorisme If any shall make exceptions concerning the law thus were not the elect in the old Testament indued with grace to keepe the law as wee in the new are indued with grace to beleeue the gospell I answer They were but not to the hearing of the law as vve are with faith to the hearing of the gospell but because they first beleeued in the euangelicall promises concerning Christ and for that cause receiued the gift yet but vnperfectly and in part onely to keep the law not because they heard the law but because they beleeued in Christ to come that alwaies the obedience of the lawe might follow of the faith in Christ euen as an effect followeth the cause Vppon the 24. chapter Aphor. 1. When wee saide that the signification of a Sacrament is so receiued that not the word alone nor the element alone but the element together with the word is called a sacrament we ment nothing els but that as the word alone without the element or signe cannot bee said to be a Sacrament so neither cā the signe without the worde For a Sacrament as the church hath vsed to define it is a visible signe of an inuisible grace add by the word that is by Christs institution consecrated to that purpose that is altered from the common vse to that matter So Augustine Tom. 5. de ciuit Dei lib. 10. ca. 5. The visible sacrifice is a sacrament or a holie signe of the inuisible sacrifice And in D. de cons dist 2. ca. sacrif A sacrament saieth he is a visible forme of an inuisible grace And the same Augustine Tom. 9. in Ioh. tract 80. saith concerning the word of the gospell the vvorde commeth to the element and so is made the sacrament euen that visible vvorde as it were A sacrament therefore according to the receiued signification in the church we doe euer did acknowledge to bee a visible signe And whereof of an inuisible grace But from whence hath it the vertue to bee signe of such a thing from the word of Christ the institutor For take away the word and it shal be no Sacrament Pull away the word saieth Augustine and what is the water but water This is the meaning of our words not that the word is the sacrament or to speake properly any parte of the Sacrament in as much as a Sacrament is defined to bee a visible signe of an inuisible grace but because without the word a visible element cannot be a Sacrament of an inuisible thing but therefore it is the visible signe of an inuisible thing because by the word of the Lord it is instituted thereunto Irenaeus also making no mention of the word because that is alwaies supposed hath left in writing that the Eucharist that is the Sacrament of the Eucharist consisteth of two matters an earthly that is the signe a heauenly that is the thing signified neither yet the thing signified is the signe or the Sacrament but because the signe cānot be without the thing signified for else wherof should it bee a signe therefore hee said that the Sacrament of the Eucharist consisted both of an earthly matter that is the signe and a heauenly matter that is the thing signified This belongeth to the confirmation of that which we said concerning the word and the element Vpon the 25. chapter Of baptisme The third aphorisme Of the water it appeareth in the Acts where it is manifestly shewed that neuer any thing was mixed with the water by the Apostles Other forme of baptizing besides that which we haue in the 28. of Matthew Christ did not institute and that the Apostle did simplie follow Christ is beyond al cōtrouersie Where as therefore we read in the Acts that the Apostles baptized some in the name into the name of Christ that doth nothing pertaine to the christian forme of baptisme Iohn indeed baptized into the name of Christ as it appeareth in which name notwithstanding as Ambrose expoundeth it the trinitie was closelie signified as the person anointed that is of the sonne in that he had taken the nature the person annointing that is the father and the annointing that is the person of the holie ghost But Christ himself expresly set downe the proper forme of baptisme saying in the name of the father of the sonne and of the holie ghost Wherefore it is manifest that the phrase of speach to be baptized into the name of Christ doth nothing belong to the forme of christian Baptisme Which is also hereby confirmed that wee neuer reade that the Apostles baptized any saying that they baptized them into the name of Christ but we read onely that many were baptized in the name and into the name of Christ Then what mēt the holie ghost by that forme or manner of speach he ment in my iudgement summarily to shewe thus much First in that they which professed faith in Christ were commaunded to be baptized that it should be done by the name authoritie and commandement of Iesus Christ yea that they should be baptized in this forme In the name of the father the sonne and of the holy ghost euen by commaundement of Christ Therefore they were baptized in the name of Christ that is according to the commandement forme prescribed by Christ Secondly they which were so baptized as they were now incorporated into Christ by faith in Gods sight and admitted into the fellowship of the new couenant so are they by
malice and therefore he had no part in the kingdome of Christ Many also as saith Augustine doe eate the bread of the Lord but not the bread the Lord. For as they that heare the gospel are not all made partakers of the forgiuenes of sinne declared therein vnlesse they repent them of their former ill-life and doe beleeue in Christ so neither do they obtaine those things which are represented and offred by the sacraments because they receiue the same sacramentes vnlesse they haue also true repentance and faith XIV By the vnworthinesse of the receiuers the vertue of the Sacraments is not taken away nor weakened Neither yet do we thereby weaken or take away the vertue of the sacraments and the force and power giuen vnto them of God which we acknowledge to depend not vpon the vnworthines of the ministers or receiuers but on the faith and vertue of Christ the institutor of the sacraments For euen as the gospell doth keepe vnto it selfe alwaies both the signification though it bee not vnderstood of all and the power of giuing all things which it offreth though all bee not made partakers thereof euen so the sacraments those visible wordes doe the like namely that as the gospell of it selfe is the power of God to saluation but indeed to none but the beleeuers So also the sacramentes are alwaies the working instruments of the holy ghost to saluatiō howsoeuer none receiue this powerfull working but the true beleeuers For which cause the Apostles feared not to call them all which were baptized 1. Cor. 6.11 holy renued righteousse although they knew that among them were many hypocrits For by such speaches they declared the great power giuen by God vnto the sacraments what we should beleeue they would work vnlesse perhaps our hypocrisie did hinder them In which sence if a man saye that who so doe eate the bread of the Lord they also are made partakers of the Lords body that is it cannot stand with the vertue of the sacrament and with the vertue of the author and distributor thereof but who so be partakers of the sacramēt must needs also be partakers of the thing signified and offered by it such a manner of speach we cannot disallow so that such expositions might be added by which the people might be instructed and those false opinions conceiued before of the worke wrought might be drawne out of their mindes XV. Betvveene the signes and the matters is a sacramentall vnion and what it is And although we saye that the matter of the sacraments is not tied to the sacraments or included in them namely either physically or locally or corporally or also by any knott or bande as though God had simply promised the very matters themselues to euery one that should receiue the sacraments howsoeuer they lacked faith so that he were bound to communicate them vnto vnrepentant and vnbeleeuers yet we take not away all coniunction and copulation of the thing signified with the signes For we acknowledge confesse a sacramentall that is such an vnion as is agreeable to a sacrament with the thinges of the Sacrament And this sacramentall vnion consisteth in a certaine mistical and holy relation namely in as much as the signes do signifie the things and offer them to be receiued the things are signified by the signes and are giuen to be receiued no otherwise thē the vnion is betweene the word signifying exhibiting and betweene the things by the word signified and exhibited But the coniunction aswell that of the sacraments as this of the word with the things themselues hangeth or dependeth vpon the wil and counsell of God the institutor who when he instituted the preaching of the gospell and administration of the sacraments did institute them to this ende and purpose as is declared both that we hearing the word and seeing and receiuing the signes should by by lift vpp the eyes of our minde to the things signified by them beeing offred vnto vs should receiue them with the hands of faith and might indeed be vnited vnto Christ whom they preach vnto vs and shewe as it were with the finger by their signification Therefore as the coniunctiō of vs with Christ is al full of mistery as the Apostle teacheth in the 5. to the Ephe. So also we thinke this vnion both of the word sacramēts with the things wherof they be signes and sacraments to be misticall and spirituall XVI A definition of the sacraments We iudge therefore sacraments in fewe wordes to comprehend manie things to bee externall signes and such as are obiect to our senses ioyned to the word of the gospell according to Christes institution for our ignorance and infirmitie and the more earnestlie to stirre vp and confirme our faith by which all men are seriously called to the true and reall communion with Christ and so with his flesh and blood and consequently to the parking of all the good things which ar in Christ and which are signified offred by the word and by the signes and as for the elect faithfull they are indeed drawne by the holy spirit inwardly working in their mindes that they being incorporated to Christ may accomplish and make vpp the bodie of the whole church preordained of the Father to his owne praise and glorie and their eternall blessednesse XVII The sacraments of the old Testament what in general they had in them common vvith ours Touching the sacraments of the old Testament there is no cause we should speak much seing they are quite abrogated only this that the Fathers had the same God the same promises the same mediatour the same spirite of regeneration the same faith and hope and the same sacraments in respect of the substance which is Christ howsoeuer in cerimonies they were diuerse from ours especiallie sith theirs were deliuered to them for the same ende and purpose for which ours were deliuered to vs namely that they might bee confirmed in the faith of Christ and bee ioyned in communion with him Whereunto belong those sayings The lambe slaine from the beginning of the worlde Apoc. 13.8 1. Cor. 10.4 Heb. 13.8 Also All did drinke of the same rock and the rocke was Christ And Christ yesterday to day and for euer XVIII There be onely two sacraments of Christs church And wee acknowledge two sacramentes which are properly to be called by that name and which haue euer bin common to the vniuersal church of Christ Baptisme the Lords supper of which the one properly belongeth to the beginning of the communion with Iesus Christ the other to the increase whereupon also the one is called the water of regeneration the other the holy banquett and supper XIX Errors Wherefore we cannot allow of those who will haue sacramentes to be there where no word is heard but only the element seene nor those which distinguish not the matter of the sacrament from the sacrament but will haue it come into the mouth aswell
commaundeth to be performed faithfully and prudently by the other faculties of the minde and instruments of the body Vpon the 19. chap. Of iustification Aphorisme 6. Whereas I so expounded that place concerning the faith of Abraham out of the 15 of Genesis and the 4. to the Rom. as I saide that that same thing was imputed vnto him for righteousnes which hee beleeued concerning Christ the promised seede I did it rather respecting the matter it selfe then the bare word of faith For I was not ignorāt that both Moses and Paule spake of the faith of Abraham that this faith was imputed to him for righteousnes seing the Apostle manifestly gathering a general doctrine from the example of Abraham adioyneth these wordes But to him that vvorketh not but beleeueth in him that instifieth the vngodlie his faith is counted for righteousnes that is hee is therefore accompted iust with God because he beleeueth in him which iustifieth the vngodlie by which place it most plainelie appeareth that from the true iustification of vs are excluded our owne works and that it is whollie ascribed to onely faith aswell touching the ende as touching the beginning But when the question is asked what cause there is why iustification should be attributed to faith and not to the works thereof it is wōt to be aunswered and that both well and truely because faith not the works thereof doth apprehend remission of sinnes and Christ our righteousnes For by it we are not iustified in respect that it is a worke but in respect that Christ is apprehēded by it by the righteousnes of whom alone being imputed vnto vs we are properlie reputed iust before God and this is that which some say how faith iustifieth not in respect of it selfe but in respect of the obiect which it taketh hold on Thus is it manifest that it is true which I saide how that was properlie imputed vnto Abraham for righteousnes for that hee beleeued God concerning Christ namelie that in him all nations should be blessed and therefore Abraham himselfe also Likewise in the last aphorisme Neither deo wee allow of those which set our iustificatiō in the only remission of sinnes denying the imputation of the iustice and obedience of Christ which we thinke to be repugnant to the Scriptures Esay 7. Achild is giuen vnto vs c Whatsoeuer therefore he did or hath it is wholly ours Rom. 5. As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one many shal bee made righteous The disobedience of Adam was the breaking of Gods commaundement therefore the obedience of Christ cōsisteth not onely in his death but also in his whole former keeping of the law Likewise the disobedience of Adam was whollie imputed to vs why not then also Christs whole obedience Also wee are two manner of wayes made sinners by Adams disobedience namelie by imputation of his transgression and by the reall deriuation of sinne that is of concupiscence into vs. Why then should we not thinke the same of Christ The vertue of his obedience to the commaundements of God the father is truely communicated vnto vs so that wee also begine to obey Gods law What lets then why wee may not say that his whole obedience is imputed vnto vs 1. Cor. 1. He is made vnto vs of God wisedome and righteousnes and sanctification and redēption Phil. 2. He became obedient vnto death for which humbling of himselfe and obedience euen vnto death God hath highlie exalted him and in him vs c. He hath deserued by his obedience eternall glorie for himselfe vs as al the schoolemen and fathers do teach Therefore his obedience also to the law is imputed vnto vs for righteousnes Gal. 4. He was made subiect to the law that hee might redeeme those vvhich were vnder the lavve Therefore he kept the law for vs and for our saluation The testimonies of the fathers and also of the learned men of this age for breuitie sake we ouerpasse To conclude we beleeue concerning Christ that as for vs men and for our saluation hee came downe from heauen and was incarnate so also for the same cause he kept the law and did all the other things Vppon the 25. chapter Aphor. 10. and 11.12 When I write this cōfession of saith I write euerie thing vppon a good conscience and as I beleeued so I spake freelie as the holie scriptures doe teach that wee ought to doe My faith is grounded simplie and principallie on the word of God and next somewhat vpon the common cōsent of the whole auncient catholicke church if it doe not gainsaye the holie Scriptures For I beleeue that the thinges which were decreed and receiued of the fathers by common consent of them all gathered together in the name of the Lord without anie contradiction of holie Scriptures that they also though they bee not of equall authoritie with the Scriptures come from the holie ghost Hereupon it is that the thinges which are of this sorte I neither will nor dare disprooue with a good conscience And what is more certaine out of the histories the councells and writings of all the fathers then that those orders of ministers of which wee spake were ordained and receiued in the church by common consent of all the whole christian common wealth And who om I that I should disprooue that which the whole church hath approoued Neither haue all the learned men of this age dared to disprooue the same as knowing both that the church might lawfullie doe so and that all those thinges were ordained and done vppon a godlie purpose and to excellent good endes for edification of Gods children For confirmation sake hereof I haue thought good here to insert that which Martin Bucer of godlie memorie a man both for life and learning most famous hath left written concerning those matters vpon the Epistle to the Ephesians The ministerie of the worde being performed by reading and rehearsing the diuine Scriptures by interpretation and exposition of the same and with exhortations takē there out and also by rehearsall and catechisme which is done by mutuall questions and aunswers of the yong beginner and the catechizer and also by holie conferences and deciding of the hard questions about religion according to this manifold dispensation of wholesome doctrine there are also manie dueties in this function For whatsoeuer belōgeth to the perfectest manner of teaching is with an especiall care to bee vsed in the ministerie of the doctrine of saluation because indeed it ought to be deliuered as a knowledge both of all other most diuine and of all most difficult namelie that he which is man should liue according to God Now they which do teach diligently the artes as they are contained in certen knowne books as if they meane to teach mathematicall principles out of Euclide first of all they will reade and rehearse the same booke by and by they will expound the seuerall words such as euerie one knowes
chaunge nor confusion among themselues or among there proprieties so also the actioÌ„s are so the actions of one and the same person that yet they are truely distinguished betwixt themselues and so distinguished that those which proceed from the one nature and are proper thereunto they although they be done with the communion of the other yet it is not lawfull to say that they be done by the other or that Christ doth them according to the other nature 13 Where fore like as wee allowe the fathers when they saye that Christs actions in redeeming sauing vs were are done by god man so also we greatly commend that famous saying of Leo the bishop of Rome in his epistle to Flauianus we teach that it is with a stedfast faith to be holden namely Each forme vvorketh with communion of the other that which is proper to it selfe as the word working that vvhich is proper to the word and the flesh performing that which is proper to the flesh 14 For he suffred for vs died and was buried according to the flesh but he gaue the grace of deseruing and redeeming to his suffring by which he redeemed vs according to his deitie but all these he willed according to both the natures 15 Also he rose from the dead ver 20.21 and ascended in a visible and locall ascension into heauen exalted aboue all Angels according to his humanity yet he wrought the same resurrection ascension and exaltation according to his diuinity but he willed it according to the will of both the natures 16 Like as then we beleeue that Christ redeemed vs according to both the natures according to that God purchased his Church by his owne blood so also we doubt not but the same Christ sitteth at his Fathers right hand and resteth in the heauenly places gouerning all thinges with his Father and dispenseth and communicateth the grace of redemption and euerlasting salvatioÌ„ to the wholle church which is his bodie and to euerie member according to both his natures the word working that which is proper to the word the flesh that which belongeth to the flesh 17 For although he vseth the ministerie of the word and sacraments by men to the imparting of salvation vnto vs yet the same Christ both as he is God and as he is man is properly the very same which calleth vs giueth vnto vs faith and repentance and he iustifieth regenerateth quickeneth and bringeth into eternall life all that beleeue by the working of the power of his might 18 For this cause also our faith whereby we take holde of saluation in Christ and eternall life must not respect and rely vpon either the one or the other nature of Christ severally but on whole Christ himselfe as the Ephesians were said to haue faith in the Lord Iesus 19 Whereon it followeth that who so do deny either the one or the other nature in Christ or deuide the one from the other or confouÌ„d theÌ„ both together so that they acknowledge him not for true God and true man in all things sinne excepted like vnto vs and imbrace him not for such and therefore for a true and perfect redeemer they can neuer be made partakers of redemption and eternal saluation 20 For as he that beleeueth in Christ such as he is hath life eternall so he that beleeueth not cannot haue it Of those thinges which are spoken of our Lord Iesus Christ after the vnion and in what sort they are spoken Out of the 1. to the Ephesians Positions Anno 1582. 1 THe Apostle writeth that Christ was raised from the dead and therefore he truely diâ—â—â—â—â—d in another place The Lord of glory was 〈◊〉 yea we often read howe the sonne of man was deliuered vnto death But in all these enunciations the speach is ever of the same person namely the sonne of God incarnate Therfore the person of Christ which is in these propositions the subiect or that whereof another thing is spoken is vsed to be signified by 3. kindes of names namely by those which betoken the divine nature onely and that sometime in respect of the essence sometime in respect of the hypostasie or persons as The lord of glory the onely begotten sonne of God or which betoken in like sort the humaine nature onely as Man the sonne of Mary or which betokeÌ„ both natures togither as Christ Immanuell god incarnate 2 We adde herevnto that Christs verie persoÌ„ is signified by those names also which are taken from the offices of a mediatour as these Amediatour a Redeemer a Saviour a high priest an Advocate and such like But these may be referred to the third kind because by them are shewed and made known both the natures in one person 3 The concrete names which haue denomination of the natures as Man of the humanity and God of the diety when in speaking of Christ they be the subiects or the first part of the enunciation or sentence they haue two significations one formall as the schooles say and the other materiall of which by the former is meant the verie nature by the other the person which hath such a nature whereof it taketh denomination 4 For as names in the abstract do signifie only the nature and propriety which is in a thing so all names in the concreat doe betokeÌ„ both the nature and qualitie which is in the thing and the hypostasis wherein it is as for examples sake the name of Iust betokeneth both Iustice wher with one is made iust him which is Iust both together 5 Therefore by these Subiect names which hauing their denominations from the natures do shewe the person of Christ sometimes is declared the propriety of the natures sometime the vnity of the person and therefore the Subiects must be vnderstood and expounded according to the diversities of the Praedicates that is of those things which are spoken thereof 6 In this proposition the sonne of God is eternall the subiect namely the sonne of God must be expounded according to the proprietie of the nature But in this the onely begotten sonne of God suffered the subiect the onely begotten sonne of God must be vnderstood according to the vnity of the person For he suffered which was not onely man but also God yet the dietie remaining vnpassible 7 We denie not but manie times are found wordes in the abstract which are the Subiects as the light came into the world as also some which are Predicats as Christ is the light of the world our righteousnesse our peace but these stâ—Ì„d in steade of concretiues as the light came into the world that is he which lighteneth vs. Wherefore for the manner of such like words they are to be referred to some of the foresaid three kindes 8 Furthermore there are three kindes of attributes which vse to be spoken of the same person of Christ God and man by what name soeuer it be signified For some are propper to the divine nature and
of the Manichęs concerning the two beginninges the chiefest good and the chiefest ill of which all things should haue their originall namely good things of the good and ill things of the ill Moreouer we condemne the Stoicks and such like which teach that all sinnes are equall that one offence is more grieuous then another lastlie those vvhich will affirme that there maye some man bee found in the worlde which is quite voide of all sinne CHAP. VIII Of mans free-will after his fall Liberum arbitrium I. What we vnderstand by the name of free-will SIth all men after Adams fall and by his fall are conceiued in sinne Eph. 2.3 Gal. 6.5 8.21 and are borne the children of vvrath and proone not vnto goodnesse but exceedingly vnto wickednes this is our beleefe and confession concerning the freewill of a man not regenerate By the name of freewill wee doe so meane the free choise of a man that we doe not yet separate from it the facultie of the vnderstanding whereby we iudge determine vpon things as what is good and what is ill or what is to be chosen and what to be refused II. That the question is two folde one concerning the nature the other concerning the power of freewill But wee distinguish the question concerning the nature of the vvhole freewill from the question concerning the nature of mans choice Nature we call that naturall essentiall proprietie giuen of god vnto the will or choice whereby whatsoeuer it willeth whether good or ill the same it willeth freelie with meere accord and consent euer voide of all manner of constraint But by the name of power we vnderstand an abillitie or force giuen vnto vs whereby wee can both discerne in the minde what is good and what is ill also in the will to make choise of the one and refuse the other III. That freewill is alwaies free from constraint Euen as therefore the substance of freewill was not lost by sinne for the vnderstanding and the will and the whole substance of the minde remained so beleeue wee that the nature thereof was not lost but whatsoeuer it willeth yet as well ill as good that it willeth the same freelie and without all constraint as Augustine truelie saide free-will is alwaies free namely from constraint but is not alwaies good IV. Three kindes of thinges and actions vvherein the povver of mans freevvill is occupied But of the power to choose the good or refuse the ill thus wee thinke Wee distinguish good and ill into three kindes that is in such things as pertain to the animal life in such things as pertaine to humane life and in such as pertaine to the diuine that is a christian life Of the first kinde are such thinges as are in a manner common vnto vs with beastes doe belong vnto the vegetable and sensitiue faculties In the second kinde are reckened such thinges as are proper vnto man and pertaine to a humaine minde as are all the artes aswell mechanicall as liberall the morall and politick vertues lastlie all sciences and al philosophie And the third kinde containeth onelie those good thinges and good actions which are ordained onelie to the kingdome of god a christian life as are the true knowledge of god faith and the effects therof regeneration obedience charitie and other of the same sorte V. The povver in a man not regenerate is verie weake in those things which pertaine to humaine life To speak nothing therfore of mans power after his fall in knowing in desiring yea and if occasion be offred in choosing and following those things which pertaine to the sustaining of this animall life and the happie leading thereof and to eschewe the contraries because they belong not to religion and to manners in which pointe notwithstanding dailie experience teacheth vs howe great an infirmitie both of iudgement and appetite hath taken hold on man wee beleeue that although by the mercie of God there is some light remaining in mens mindes partlie for the iudging of what is right and wrong good and euill in humaine affaires and partlie for the attaining to the knowledge of diuerse thinges of artes and instructions and sundrie vertues yet that smale light what so it is is left so little in mans minde and his will so depraued that vnlesse the minde bee helped by light from heauen his will inclined by speciall grace to choose that which is good and refuse the ill men can neither learne the arts truelie and profit by anie instructions nor attaine vnto anie vertues although there may be in the vnregenerate neuer so manie euen as Augustine not without cause did write that all the learning or vertues Tom. 7. con Iul. Pel. lib. 4. cap. 3 or rather the images of vertues which were in the Romaines and other heathen people were the singuler gifts of god VI. A confirmation of the former opinion For neither were nor are al the infidells indued equallie with the same vertues knowledge so that therby it manifestlie appeareth that these were not the giftes of nature but gifts of god added to nature VII In those thinges vvhich pertaine to god and to true piety a man not regenerate can do nothing But in things pertaining to God godlines religion and christian life we beleeue that the minde of a man not regenerate is so darkned and his heart so vnsounde and all the powers in him so extinguished that hee can neither know god and the things belonging to god nor loue him and desire any thing acceptable vnto him much lesse bee obedient to his will as he ought 1. Cor. 2.14 sith the Apostle saith The naturall man perceiueth not the thinges that are of god neither can he know them how should he therefore will Ioh. 15.5 and performe and Christ saith without me ye can do nothing VIII A confirmation of the former opinion For as a man beeing dead vnto nature and to men can do none of those things which belong to nature and to man so neither can hee which is dead vnto god in sinne truely know or doe those things which belong vnto god or true godlinesse but shall altogether consume and putrifie in sinne vnlesse he be deliuered out of the same with grace by Christ and bee called to life againe For all mē without Christ and not regenerate by Christs spirit are quite dead so as they are said to bee truely reuiued raised vp and borne againe which are deliuered from sinne by faith in Christ and do serue him IX Errors Wee therefore condemne all Pelagians which teach the contrarie and doe exroll the power of freewill against the grace of Christ so do we detest and accurse the Manichęs others which make man to be but as a block which hath no iudgement nor any free libertie of will no not in ciuill causes CHAP. IX Of the promises of redemption and saluation by Christ I. That Christ the man from heauen was
laid vp in him requireth onely these three things First that being touched with an earnest griefe of our whole life ledd amisse wee might desire from our heart to haue our mindes and so all our affections chaunged renued into the obedience of the diuine will and that we might earnestly pray and doe our best endeuour that it might be so Secondlie that imbracing Christ by a true faith withall his treasures wee might beleeue firmely and without any wauering that all our sinnes are for euer pardoned of the fauour and mercie of god through Christ alone and we receiued into grace made the children of God and heires of euerlasting life Lastly that beeing thus perswaded of the free and eternall saluation through Iesus Christ wee should thence foreward labour by all meanes to obserue whatsoeuer Christ hath commaunded to the glorie of God and profite of our neighbour so as faith do euermore accompanie vs to the ende whereby we beleeue that howsoeuer in this new obedience we err or do offend yet for Christs sake it shall not be imputed to vs but contrariewise by the perfect obedience iustice and holinesse of christ imputed vnto vs our imperfect obedience shal be perfected and shal be taken and reputed for most perfect in the sight of God And to three thinges are all the preceptes of christ referred namely that renouncing all vngodlines worldly desires wee should liue in this world in respect of our selues soberlie in respect of our neighbour iustly in respect of God godlie Tit. 2.12 looking for that blessed hope and the comming of the glorie of the great God This wee beleeue to bee the summe of those thinges which christ requireth of vs in the doctrine of the gospell and therefore that they bee true gospellers and christians indeede that bende their whole studie and care hereunto VII Jn what thinges especially the Gospell differeth from the Law And nowe of that which is alreadie saide it appeareth that we do not confound the Law with the Gospell For albeit wee confesse that God is author aswel of the Law as of the gospell and that of it selfe it is as well holie iust Exo. 20 and good as the gospell Rom. 7.12 yet we hold that ther is no smale difference betwixt them both not onely because the Lawe was deliuered to the Israelites alone and the gospell pertaineth to al people and nations and also not onely because that was for a time and to continue but till christ and the gospell is euerlasting and also not onely because that was deliuered by Moses and declared by the Prophets and the gospell was brought by christ and published to the whole world by the Apostles But indeed and most especially for these causes First because the matter of the law is onely commandementes with irreuocable curses thereunto ioyned if they bee broken neuer so little It hath also promises not onely of earthlie but also of heauenly blessings but al of them with the condition of perfect obedience and none merely free But the gospell is properly a happie message setting before vs gratis christ the redeemer forgiuing sinnes and sauing vs yea and requiring nothing at our handes for the obtaining of life euerlasting but a true faith in christ which faith cannot bee without true repentance nor without a care to doe the will of God that is to liue so berly iustly and godly as is aboue declared Moreouer because the law did not performe that which it required nether had it power whereby to saue therefore was vnsufficient and a killing letter the minister of wrath and death more prouoking then taking away sin But the Gospell what it requireth the same it performeth and therefore whatsoeuer it offereth the same also it truely imparteth vnto vs For as much as the holy ghost is by it powerful in the elect at the preaching of the Gospell stirring vp in them that true faith wherby they apprehend christ offred and with him eternall life For faith is by hearing of the Gospell Rom. 10.17 but obedience is not by hearing of the Lawe because the holie spirite giueth no man strength to the hearing of the Lawe by which hee might obserue the same as he stirreth vp faith in the elect to the hearing of the gospell For which cause as the Lawe is called a killing letter so is the Gospell called a quickning spirite and therefore is a true and forcible instrument to saluation vnto euerie beleeuer Whereon also followeth the third difference namely that the Law was not written in their hearts but remained written onely in tables and therfore did not chaunge men But the Gospell is written by the holie ghost in the hearts of the elect therefore it chaungeth and renueth them 2. Cor. 3.18 because it is the instrument of the holie ghost to sanctifie and to saue vs. VIII The Law of Moses is partly taken away and partly not taken away by the Gospell Of this which we haue said it also plainelie appeareth what our faith is of the abrogation of the law by the gospell First wee beleeue that in the gospell so farre forth as it declareth all things which in the old Testament did figuratiuely foreshew of Christ to bee fullfilled in this Iesus as is saide before in the 11. chapter we are taught that the law of Moses concerning cerimonies sacrifices and all Moses outward worship are simply abrogated according to that saying of the Apostle Heb. 9.10 Ioh. 1.17 that all these things vvere inioyned vntill the time of reformation and that The Law was giuen by Moses but the trueth came by Jesus Christ Moreouer so farre forth as the gospell is the instrument of the holy spirit whereby we are ingrafted and vnited to Christ made partakers of redēption and saluation as is said before in the 12. chapter So far also we confesse that the morall law touching the cursse against the transgressors is abrogated by the gospell of Christ according to that of the Apostle Rom. 8.1 There is no condēnation to them that are in Iesus Christ where of this is a token that they walke not after the flesh but after the spirit But now so farre forth as the doctrine of the Gospell requireth our repentance and the holinesse of life and that we liue soberly righteously and godly therein it taketh not away the law concerning māners for it is wholy consonant and agreeable with the doctrine of the gospel of eschewing vices and following vertue Lastlye in as much as Christ in his gospel did not take away the politicke lawes of the nations which were not contrarie to the law of nature Therefore wee thinke it lawfull and free for any gouernors to bringe among their subiectes such politick lawes as were deliuered to the people of Israell and by the same then which none are more iust to rule and gouerne the people Therefore they do exceeding great iniurie to the Gospell of Christ that saye it troubleth or
a moment be chaunged into the same state with the dead that are risen and then Christ being come downe from heauen euen in the cloudes there shall iudge all men and from thence giue sentence on them shal shew himselfe apparently to all and that all the godlie being taken vpp from the earth euen into the clouds shall goe to meet him 1. Thess 5.1 c. Mat. 24.3 25.31 attended on by the Angells and appearing in his great maiestie and glorie as also he himselfe and his Apostles haue taught and left in writing II. Christ shall visibly returne from one place to another and that with a bodie visible locall and determinate We therefore beleeue Christ shall so return visiblie as he before in the Apostles sight ascended into heauen and shall come euen out of that heauen where he now is therefore from that which is farre distant from the earth and from the clouds vnto which he shall descend and we beleeue he shall so descend with his naturall bodie that it must needs be grauÌ„ted that the same is locall and finite and consequently not existing euerie where seing also the holie ghost describeth such a descending vnto simple people which hee sheweth cannot be made without chaunge of places III. The faithlesse reprobates shall not come vpp to Christ sitting in the cloudes but remaining on the earth shall heare the sentence of the iudge But seing the Scriptures do pronounce only of the godlie that they shall bee caught vpp into the cloudes and shall meete Christ in the ayre wee beleeue that the vngodlie shall not come vp vnto Christ but remaining vnder his feete vppon the earth shall heare that senteÌ„ce of the iudge goe yee cursed into euerlasting fire when all the Saints which shal bee aloft with Christ shall approue the same sentence of the iudge according as the Apostle thinketh 1. Cor. 6.2.3 The Saints shall iudge the world yea and the Angells IV. For what causes that generall iudgement was appointed And wee beleeue that for two causes principally this iudgement was appointed wherin Christ shall sitt as iudge in the sight of all men the first is that such thinges as are nowe hidden vnto men aswel innocencie faith and the good consciences of the godlie as the hypocrisie and vile deeds of the wicked may be openly knowne to all the world and thereby be manifestly seene how iust the iudgements of God were euer from the first to the last Whereuppon also the Apostle called that day the day of declaration The other cause Rom. 2.5 is that the reward which was promised aswell to the good for their good workes as to the bad for their euill deedes should be fully paied and restored as the Apostle saieth 2. Cor. 5.10 wee must all appeare before the iudgement seat of Christ that euerie man may receiue the things vvhich are done in his bodie according to that he hath done whether it be good or euill whereupon also the same Apostle calleth it the day of the iust iudgement Rom. 2.5 V. Aeternall life which shal bee giuen to the elect is called and is a reward yet due vnto vs onely vppon fauour and not but for Christs sake For albeit it be a meere gift of God which the elect shall receiue and purchased by the meritts of Christ alone yet we doubt not but it is named and that it is truely a reward sith the Lord Iesus vouchsafed to call it so namely a free reward seing also that the good works themselues of the godlie and all the causes wherefrom the same do proceed are free gifts of God free election free redemption free calling faith iustification regeneration forgruenesse of sinnes and lastly a free pardon of all wants and imperfections wherewith our good works are infected and a free imputation of Christs perfect obedience wherewith our imperfect obedience is clothed and made acceptable to god and consequently to speak properly is a reward not due vnto vs for our owne workes considered in themselues but for the meriâ—ts of Christ imputed to vs. VI. After the iudgement giuen the godly shal bee presently with Christ in heauen but the vngodly in hell with the deuill his Angells Further more wee beleeue that presently after the same iudgement the godly shall follow Christ into heauen but the wicked shal be thrust downe with the deuills into hell Christ saying to the first come yee blessed of my father but to the other Goe yee cursed into euerlasting fire VII That day shal be to the godly most ioyfull and is therefore to be wished for to the wicked most heauie is therefore eueÌ„ in the only hearing intollerable So do wee beleeue that this last day shal bee vnto them which are grafted into Christ most happie and ioyfull and therefore loued wished of them 2. Tim. 4.8 and ought to be loued wished for of vs and to the wicked the most accursed and wofull day that euer was and therefore no maruaile though they hate that day cannot abide the mention of it VIII Errors We condemne whosoeuer shall denie that Christ shall truely and in verie deede descend in his humaine bodie from heauen into the cloudes and then returne with his chosen into heauen againe and would prooue that it shall all bee without any chaunge of places onely by appearance as they call it a certaine likenesse to the which the Angells doe affirme the contrarie vnto the Apostles Act. 1.11 as yee haue seene him ascend into heauen so shall he come againe VVee disallowe also those which teach that the works of pietie considered in themselues are the true cause for which eternall life is giuen and are the true meritts thereof against which the Apostle also saieth Rom. 6.23 The gift of God is eternall life Neither doe we approue the opinion of the Chiliasts concerning the thousand years wherin Christ with his elect should remaine heere in the earth after the latter iudgement and that they should here liue in the delights yet honest delights of the flesh and should procreate children but Saints so at last be translated vpp into heauen And we condemne and detest their error which stand in contention that the fire whereinto the wicked shal be throwne shall at the length be queÌ„ched so that all euen the deuills themselues shall liue blessedlie in the kingdome of God flatt against the plaine words of Christ goe yee into euerlasting fire Mat. 25.4 CHAP. XXX Of eternall life I. Eternall life shal be giuen to all which by their good workes haue witnessed that they were truely grafted into Christ and haue beleeued in Christ WE beleeue that eternall life that is full and perfect possession of eternall life shal bee giuen in that last daye vnto all who by the apparent workes of true faith and godlinesse shal be declared before al Angells and men manifestly shewed and by sentence of the iudge Christ pronounced to haue beene
repentance and the faith of Christ but seing they were as Luke reporteth onely baptized into Iohns baptisme which notwithstanding they knew not what it was and were altogether ignorant of the baptisme of Christ that is of the spirit he baptized them shewing vnto thē what Iohns baptisme was and how he baptized into Christ not into his owne sprinkling or dipping of the water as though that could be any profite vnto them He therefore baptized them with this baptisme of Iohn that is as Iohn vsed to do into the name of the Lord Iesus and by by after laying on his hands he baptized thē with the baptisme also of Christ that is with the spirit For immediatly the holy ghost came on them as it is there read This there And vpon the epistle to the Ephes chap. 4. the same Bucer writeth thus Hereby it is also manifest that the twelue men at Ephesus which knew not whether there were an holie ghost or no whome Paule baptized were not baptized with the baptisme of Iohn that is with that which he administred but as they witnessed themselues they were baptized into Iohns baptisme For Iohn preached vnto all whome hee baptized that Christ should baptize them with the holy ghost and exhorted them that they would beleeue in him and that of him they might receiue the holy ghost And therefore these Ephesiās could not haue beene ignorant of the holy ghost if they had bin washed with that baptisme which might truely be called Iohns which also the Apostles words to those men doth sufficiently declare Iohn verily baptized with the baptisme of repētance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ For by these wordes he would teach vs that they neuer receiued Iohns baptisme who as yet knew not Iohns preaching of Christ and the promise Thus farre Bucer Seing then the fathers expound this place in Act. 19. as wee haue nowe declared who I pray am I that I should dare or that I ought to gaine-say so many and so learned men in such an exposition of this scripture which neither doth any whitt wrest the text nor contrarieth any other scriptures nor is against the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities For if any man shall obiect out of the text that same truely and but it prooueth nothing against the fathers exposition seing it is no vnusuall thing with the Apostle where hee saieth first truely not alwaies to ioyne the aduersatiue particle but Rom. 3. ver 2. Coll. 2. ver 23. and in other places And vnto this truely another but which Luke for breuitie sake left out might bee vnderstood verie fittly as hereafter we will shew so that it is no necessitie with this truely to ioyne that but which followeth in the 5. verse in which verse the fathers will haue not Paules speach but Lukes to be continued Therefore the fathers exposition is not repugnant to the text nor yet with any other scripture For if any man say Paule writeth to the Corinthians that he is gladd he baptized none but the house of Stephana it may be answered it is true namely at Corinth but these twelue were baptized at Ephesus and besides he speaketh of such as were baptized with his owne hand but these twelue he might baptise by some other to dispute no longer about the circumstance of the time And it is most certaine it is not repugnant to the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities because the fathers do not speake of a baptisme rightly administred as though Paule had repeated that again This expositiō therefore of the fathers in my iudgement cannot easily be refelled And this therfore is the chiefest cause why I haue euer thus thought and yet thinke of this action of Paule although indeed I cannot consent vnto them all in the cause why Paule baptized them but onely to Ambrose and Hierome That Iohns Baptisme Christs Baptisme did differ the fathers teach both by this that Iohn saide how he baptized onely with vvater but Christ should baptize with the holy ghost with fire and also by this that the baptisme of Iohn is called the baptisme of repentance but Christes baptisme is said to bee giuen for the remission of sinnes And because that he prepared the waye to this as Tertull. speaketh that baptisme of repentance was as it were a sueing for the remission of sinnes and sanctificatiō in Christ which was to follow after Read Tertul. of bap pag. 707. So Cyprian also in his sermon of the baptisme of Christ and of the manifestation of the Trinitie pag. 430. So August To. 7. against Petil cap. 7. But all of vs doe not knowe what the father 's mēt by this differēce of the baptisme For they ment not that the one diffred from the other in the matter or in the signe or in the doctrine and forme of baptisine but onely in efficacie that namely although remission of sinnes was giuen to them which were washed with Iohns baptisme yet the same was not of Iohns baptisme that is of water but by the baptisme of Christ which is the baptisme of the spirite whereunto that belongeth I baptize with water but he with the holy ghost And with this baptisme of the spirit were they only baptized which beleeued in Christ whome Iohn saide was then come though all knewe him not Therefore Iohn in his baptisme did inculcate and often repeate this faith as Paule witnesseth in that place of the 19 of the Actes They therefore are deceiued who for this diuersitie did thinke the baptisme of water was to be repeated August against Petil. as we touched a little before sheweth how some held opinion that the 12 did lye vnto the Apostle when being asked vnto what they were baptized they answered vnto Iohns baptisme So by this that first those Ephesians saide vnto him that they had not yet heard whether there were that is whether that holy ghost did exist or not namely the giuer of those giftes whereof the speach was the Apostle might be said to conuince thē of a lye by this argument Whosoeuer haue bin baptized they haue professed faith in Christ as the sonne of God and consequently in the father and in the spirite of them both For Iohn did require this faith according to the same he baptized men and in baptizing he alwayes vrged that Iesus Christ was he which should baptize in the spirit But you by your owne cōfession do not know this spirite c. and so beleeue not rightly in Iesus Christ Therefore c. But surely to saye that these twelue did lye vnto the church and to the Apostle it seemes to me to be to hard and vile a thing in mē which professed Christ And for this cause we did euer better allow of the opiniō of Ambrose Hierome that the 12 did say truely whē they said they were baptized vnto Iohns baptisme but yet not by