the lawe not of the gospell whiche doth fayne and imagine that man is fyrste iustified by the lawe before that he be reconciled by Christ to god notwithstandyng that Christe hym selfe saythe Without me â—e can do nothynge Also I am the true vine and ye be the braunches But oure aduersaries do imagine that we be the braunches not of Christ but of Moyses For they wyll fyrst be iustified by the law and offre theyr loue workê vnto god before that they be reconciled to god by Christe before that they be braunces of Christe Paule contrarywyse sayth playnly that the law can not be wroughte nor fulfylled without Christe Therfore the promyse is fyrst to be receyued that by faythe we maye be reconciled to god for Christis sake or that we worke the lawe These thynges we do iudge to be clere euident ynough to godly coÌ„sciences And herof they shall playnely ê‘ceyue the cause why we dyd heretofore holde opinion professe that men be iustified by fayth and not by loue For we muste plede agaynst the wrathe of god not our loue or our workes nor truste in our loue and workes but Christe the mediator and we muste fyrste receyue the promyse of remission of synnes or euer we worke the lawe Finally Whan shall the conscience be set at reste if we do receyue remission of synnes because we loue or worke the lawe For the law wyll always accuse vs bicause we neuer satisfie the lawe of god accordyng to the sayenge of saynte Paule Lex iram operatur The lawe worketh wrathe Chrisostome asketh the question concernyng penaunce wherby we be assured that our synnes be forgyuen vs our aduersaries also in the senteÌ„ces do aske the question concernyng the same thynge This can not be declared neyther consciences can not be made quiete onles they know that it is the coÌ„maundement of god and the very gospell that they shulde be assured that for Christes sake synnes be freely forgyuen and that they shulde not doubte but that they be freely forgyuen vnto them selfes If any manne dothe doubt he as IohnÌ„ sayth accuseth the diuine promyse of a lye This certeyntie and assuraunce of faythe we teache is required in the gospell But oure aduersaries leaue mennes conscieÌ„ces vncertayne and in a doubtfulnes Nowe coÌ„sciences do worke nothyng by fayth whan they do coÌ„tinually doubt whether they haue remission Howe can they in this doubtfulnes call vpon god Howe can they ê‘suade them selues be assured that they be herde Thus all theyr lyfe is without god and without the very true honoure and worshyppynge of god This is it that Paule saythe that what soeuer is not done of faythe is synne And bicause they continue alwayes in this doubtfulnes they neuer haue experieÌ„ce what faythe is So it coÌ„meth to passe at the laste that they fall in to desperation Suche is the doctrine of our aduersaries euen a verye doctrine of the lawe a dissanullyng and an aâ—rogation of the gospell and a doctrine of desperation Nowe we do gladly permitte vnto all good men to gyue iugement of this place concernyng penaunce for it is playne ynoughe without any maner of obscuritie and to pronounce whiche of vs haue taughte the more godly and more holsome doctrine for consciences whether we or our aduersaries Certes these dissensioÌ„s in the churche do nothyng delyte vs wherfore if we had not great and necessarie causes to dissent from our aduersaries we wolde with ryghte good wyll holde our peace Nowe sith it is so that they condempne the manifest and open veritie it standeth not with our profession neither is it laufull for vs to leaue this cause vndefended whiche is not ours but Christê cause and the cause of the churche We haue shewed for what causes we haue put these two partes of penauÌ„ce contrition and faythe And we haue done it so moche the rather bicause there be borne aboute many sayenges concernyng penaunce whiche be alledged of the fathers but maymed and vnperfecte whiche our aduersaries haue detorted wrested to the defacynge of faythe As for example Penaunce is to sorowe bewayle the offeÌ„ces coÌ„mitted and not to coÌ„mitte agayne whiche thou oughteste to bewayle and sorowe Also penaunce is a certeyne punyshement or vengeaunce of the sorower aueÌ„gyng in hym selfe the offence whiche he is sorye that he hath coÌ„mitted In these sayenges is no mention of fayth no not so moche as in the scholes whan they do interprete and declare them is any thyng at all added of faythe Wherfore we to th entent that the doctrine of faythe myght be the better espied haue nombred faythe amonge the partes of penauÌ„ce For those sayenges whiche do require coÌ„trition or good workes and whiche make no mention of faythe that iustifiethe the very thynge it selfe shewethe that they be very perylous And doubtles it may be thoughte and that not without cause that those men lacked a poynt of prudence wysedome whiche haue heaped together these peced and patched rablemeÌ„tes of sentences and decrees For where as the fathers in diuerse other places do speake of the other parte of Penaunce it shulde haue bene profitable to haue pyked out the sentences of both partes â–ª and to haue ioyned them together not only out of one parte For Tertulliane speakethe ercellently of faythe amplifienge the othe of the lorde whiche is in the prophete â–ª Viuo ego dicit dominus nolo mortem peccatoris sed ut conuertatur et uiuat .i. I lyue saythe the lorde I wyll not the deathe of a synner but that he be conuerted lyue For in as moche as the lorde dothe sweare ther he wyll not the deathe of a synner he shewethe and declareth that credence fayth is required by whiche we shuld beleue his othe surely reken with our selues that he dothe forgyue vs. The promyses of god ought to be of greate auctoritie with vs although they be made without any othe put vnto them at all But this ê“myse is also coÌ„fermed and bounde with an othe Wherfore if any man doth not surely reken with hym selfe that he is forgyueÌ„ he denyeth that god hath sworne a true othe whiche is so great a blasphemie that there can none be imagined more haynous For thus saythe Tertulliane He calleth vs to saluation with a reward swearyng also in that he saythe I lyue and couetethe that we gyue credece vnto hym O blessed be they for whose cause god sâ—â—eareth O moste wretched be we if we beleue not the lorde whan he also sweareth And here it is to be knowen that this faythe oughte to thiÌ„ke that god freely forgyueth vs for Christis sake bicause of his owne ê“myse and not because of our workes or contrition confession satisfaction or loue For if faythe shulde leane vnto these workes be grounded vpon them anone it is made vncerteine and doubtfull For the fearefull coÌ„science doth se that these workes be vnworthy Therfore saythe Ambrose very
him Thys coÌ„tempt doth marre al theyr good workes for god iudgeth the harte Finally this is very vnaduysedly wrytten of our aduersaryes that men gyltye of eternall punyshement deserue remyssyon of synnes by the acte of loue sythe it is not possyble to loue god onles we fyrste purchase forgiuenes of sinnes by fayth for it is ympossyble for an harte whiche in dede felethe the ire of god to loue god before he perceyue hym pacyfyed I saye so longe as god feareth vs and semeth to cast vs froÌ„ hym into eternall dethe mans nature can not lyfte vp it selfe to loue the angrye iuge punysher It is easye for euyll persons to fayne these dreames of loue that a mortall synner maye loue god aboue all thynges for they fele not what is the ire or iudgemente of god But in the trouble of conscyence and in the very conflycte there the conscyence proue howe false theyr phylosophycal conclusyons be Paule saythe ☞ The lawe workethe anger ☜ he saythe not that by the lawe men deserue remyssyon of synnes for the lawe alwaye accuseth the conscyence and put it in feare Ergo it iustifyeth not for the coÌ„science terrified by the lawe fleeth the iudgement of god wherefore they erre that truste to wynne remyssyon of synnes be the workes of the lawe Thys suffyseth of the iustyce of reasoÌ„ or lawe which the aduersaries teache for here after when we shall shewe our mynde of the iustyce of fayth â–ª the matter it selfe shal constrayne vs to bryng out more recordes whiche maye also helpe to destroye the erroures of our aduersaryes here to fore aledged Bycause therfore that men can not by theyr owne powers do the lawe of god and bycause all be vnder synne and condemned to euerlastynge dethe for thys cause we can not be delyuered from syn by the lawe nor be iustyfyed but the promyse of remissyon of synnes and of iustyfycatyon is geuen for Chryst who is geuen for vs to satysfy for the synnes of the worlde and is set vp as a medyator and a pourger of sinnes This promyse hathe no condycyon annexed of our merites but freely offereth forgyuenes of synnes and iustyfycatyon as Paule sayth ☞ Yf by workes Ergo it is no grace ☜ And in an other plase ☞ The iustyce of god is nowe declared without the lawe ☜ that is remyssyon of synnes shulde hange on our merytes and the reconciliation shuld be by the lawe so it were vnprofytable for we can not do the lawe it shulde also ensue that the promyse of reconcilement shuld neuer chaunce vnto vs. Thus reasoneth Paule Rom. 4. ☞ Yf our enherytaunce shuld cum by the lawe voyde were our fayth and the promyse were of none effecte For yf the promyse shulde requyre a condycyon annexed of our merytes and of the lawe syth we neuer fulfyll the lawe it shulde folowe that the promyse were vnprofytable But syth it is so â–ª that iustyfycatyon chaungeth by free promyse it foloweth that we can not iustyfye our selues For otherwyse what neded god to promise And where as the promyse caÌ„ not be taken without fayth the gospell which is properly the promyse of remyssyon of synnes and of iustyfycatyon for Chryst teacheth the iustyce of fayth which the lawe doth not Nor it is not the iustyce of the lawe For the lawe requyreth of vs our workes and our perfection but the promyse offereth vnto vs whiche be oppressed with synne and deathe frelye reconciliacyon for Chryste which reconciliatyon is receyued not by workes but by onely fayth This fayth bryngeth not with it a trust of the owne workes but onely the trust of promyse or of the promysed mercye in Chryste wherfore thys specyall fayth by which we beleue that our synnes be forgyuen for Chryste and that god is pacyfyed and mercyfull for Chryste obteyneth remyssyon of synnes and iustifyeth vs and by cause in repentaunce that is in the trouble of conscyence it comforteth and plucketh vp our hartes and regenerateth vs and bryngeth vnto vs the holye spirite so that from thenseforth â—e maye do the lawe of god that is loue God feare God thynke that god heareth vs obey god in all afflyctyons it mortyfyeth the coÌ„cupiscence c. Thus fayth whiche freely receyueth remyssyon of sinnes bycause it pleadeth Chryst in estopell agaynst the ire of god as a mediator and mercy stocke pleadeth not in barr our owne merytes or our owne loue which fayth is the true knowledge of Chryste and vseth the benyfytes of Chryst and regenerateth our hartes and goeth before the fulfyllynge of the lawe Of thys fayth ye shall not fynde one syllable in the doctrine of our aduersaryes wherfore we reproue the aduersaryes bycause they only teach the iustyce of the lawe and teach not the iustyce of the Euaungell which preacheth vnto vs the iustyce of faythe in Chryste ⧠What is the iustyfyenge faythe THe aduersaries only fayne that fayth is a knowledge of the hystorye and therfore they teache that it may stonde with mortall syn They speake therfore nothiÌ„ge of fayth by which Paule so oft tymes saythe that men be iustyfyed for they whiche be reputed iust before god walke nat in mortal synne But that fayth whiche iustyfyeth is nat only a knoweledge of the hystorye but it is to assent to the promyse of God in whiche frelye for Chryste is offered remyssyon of synnes iustificacyon And lest a man shulde suspecte that it is only a knowledge we wyl adde more ouer that it is to wyll and to receyue the offered promyse of remyssyon of synnes and of iustification And a man maye easely se the diuersytye betwyxte this fayth and betwyxt the iustyce of the lawe Fayth is a seruice which receiueth of god the offered benifites The iustyce of the lawe is a seruyce which offereth vnto god our merites with fayth on thê fashyon wyll god be serued that we maye receyue of hym the thynges whiche he promyseth and offereth Nowe that fayth sygnifieth not only the knowledge of the hystorye but rather a trust which assenteth to the promise Paule clerely wytnesseth when he sayth Iustyce therfore is by fayth to thentente the promyse shulde be ferme and stable For he meaneth that the promyse caÌ„ not be receyued but by fayth wherfore he compareth and knytteth together as correlatiues promyse and fayth Howe be it it is sone iudged what faythe is yf we consyder the Crede where this artycle is put Remission of synnes wherefore it is not ynoughe to beleue that Chryste was borne dyd suffer and ryse agayne oneles we adde also thys artycle Remyssyon of synnes whiche is the fynal cause of the hystorye To thys artycle we muste refere the reste as that for Chryste and nat for our owne merites we be pardoned of our synnes For what neded Chryste to begyuen for our synnes if our owne merytes maye satysfye for our synnes ⧠wherfore so ofte as we speake of the iustyfyenge faythe it is to be knowen that these .3 obiectes muste mete together
sayenge Thy synnes be released the. For thus iudgeth thapostle that man is freely iustified by fayth These wordes of Barnarde do wonderfullye illustrate and set forthe our cause for he not onely requireth in a generalitie that we shulde beleue our synnes to be pardoned throughe mercye but byddethe vs also put to a speciall faythe by whiche we may beleue that euen vnto our owne selues sinnes be pardoned And he teacheth howe we may be assured of remission of synnes that is to saye whan by faythe hertes be lifted vp and be made quiete and set at rest by the holy ghoste What do our aduersaries require more Dare they yet deny that we obteyne remission of synnes through fayth Or that faythe is a parte of penaunce Thyrdly Our aduersaries say that synne is in this wyse forgyuen because he that is attrite or contrite doth brynge forthe an acte of the loue of god that by this acte he meriteth to receyue remission of synnes This is nothyng els but to teache the lawe and to destroy and abrogate the gospell and to disanull the promyse coÌ„cernyng Christ. For they do onely require the lawe and our workes for the lawe requireth loue Besydes this they do teache vs to truste that we obteyne remission of synnes bicause of contrition and loue What other thynge is this than to sette oure trust and confidence vpon our owne workes and not vpon the worde and promyse made by god of Christe Nowe if the lawe be sufficieÌ„t to the obteynyng of remission of synnes to what purpose nede we the Gospell what nede haue we of Christe if for our workes we obteyne forgyuenes of synnes But we contrarywyse do calle agayne consciences from the lawe vnto the gospell and from the truste in theyr owne workê to truste and to haue sure confidence in the promyse and in Christe because the gospell setteth forthe Christe vnto vs and promyseth remission of synnes freely for Christê sake By this promyse the gospel byddeth vs trust that for Christes sake we be recoÌ„ciled to the father and brought in to his fauour agayne and not for our owne contrition or for our owne loue For there is none other mediator or pacifier than Christe Neyther can we worke the lawe oneles we be fyrste reconciled by Christe And though we coulde do any thyng yet we ought to thinke that not for these workê we obteyne remission of synnes but for Christes sake whiche is the mediator and mercye stocke Yea it is iniurie and dishonour to Christe and a defeatyng of the gospell to thynke that we do obteyne remission of synnes for the law or by any other wayes than through faythe in Christe And this reason we haue handeled before in the title of iustification whan we tolde wherfore we do holde opinion that men be iustified by fayth and not by loue Therfore the doctrine of our aduersaries where as they teache that men for contrition and loue obteyne forgyuenes of synnes and bydde them truste in this contrition and loue is only a doctrine of the lawe and that not vnderstaÌ„ded Lykewyse as the Iewes dyd loke vpon the couered face of Moyses For admitte that we had loue let vs imagyne that we had workes yet can neither loue neither workes be a price raunsome or propitiation for synne Neyther can they be set and pleded as it were in barre agaynste the wrathe and iudgement of god accordyng to that sayenge of Dauid in the psalme Thou shalte nat entre in to iudgement with thy seruaunt for no creature lyuyng shall be iustified in thy syghte Neyther ought the honoure of Christ to be plucte from hym gyuen to our workê For these causes Paule dothe styffly affirme that we be not iustified by the lawe and he setteth agaynst the lawe the ê“myse of remission of synnes whiche is gyuen for Christes sake and reacheth vs that we freelye for Christis sake thrugh fayth receiue remission of sinnes To this promyse Paule dothe calle vs backe from the lawe Upon this promyse be byddeth vs stedfastly to beholde which doutles shal be voyde and of no strength if we be iustified before by the lawe or euer we be iustified by the promyse or if we obteyne remission of synnes for our owne iustice But the case is cleare that therfore the promyse was made vnto vs and therfore Christ was gyuen to vs because we can not worke and fulfyll the lawe wherfore it is necessary that we be fyrst reconciled by the promyse or euer we do worke the lawe But the promyse is onely receyued by fayth Ergo it is necessarye that contrite persones do by fayth receyue the promise of remission of synnes whiche is gyuen for Christis sake and that they do decree with them selfes that they haue the father recoÌ„ciled vnto them selfes freely for Christis sake This is the senteÌ„ce and mynde of Paule in the epistle to the Romanes â–ª where he saythe Therfore by fayth that accordyng to grace or fauour the promise myght be ferme and stable And to the Galathianes he sayth The scripture hath coÌ„cluded al thinges vnder synne that the promyse by the fayth of Iesu Christe myght be gyuen to them that beleue that is to say All men be vnder synne can not otherwyse be delyuered onles by fayth they do take and receyue the promyse of remission of synnes Fyrste therfore we must by faythe receyue remission of synnes before or we do worke the lawe al be it as it was aboue saide loue foloweth faythe because they that be regenerate do receyue the holy ghoste and therfore they begynne to worke the lawe We wolde recite mo testimonies and authorities if it were not so that they be open and at hande to euery deuoute and godlye reader in the scriptures For we couet not to be ouerloÌ„ge and tedious to thentente that this cause or mater may the more easelye be perceyued Neyther is it any doubte but that this is the senteÌ„ce of Paule whiche we do defeÌ„de that by fayth we receyue remission of sinnes for Christis sake and that by fayth we ought to set Christe the mediator agaynst the wrathe of god not our workes And let not the myndes of good men be troubled although our aduersaries do calumniate and corrupte the sentences of Paule There is nothynge spoken so purely and truelye but it may be depraued by captious cauillations We assuredly knowe that this which we haue recited is the very ryghte and true sentence and meanynge of Paule we knowe this oure sentence doth brynge ferme and stable coÌ„forte to godly coÌ„sciences without whiche no man is able to stande in the iudgement of god Wherfore let these pharisaical opinioÌ„s of our aduersaries be reiected and thrust out of mens â—ertes that we do not by fayth receyue remission of synnes but that we must merite remission with our loue and with our workes and that we ought to set our loue and our workes agaiÌ„st the wrath of god· This is the doctrine of
The confessyon of the fayth of the Germaynes exhibited to the most victorious Emperour Charles the .v. in the Councell or assemble holden at Augusta the yere of our lorde 153â— To which is added the Apologie of Melancthon who defendeth with reasons inuincible the aforesayde confessyon translated by Rycharde Tauerner at the commaundemeÌ„t of his Master the ryght honorable Mayster Thomas Cromwel chefe Secretarie to the kynges grace Psalmo 119. And I spake of thy testimonies in the preseÌ„ce of kynges and I was nat confounded ¶ To the ryght honorable Mayster Thomas Crumwell chiefe Secretarie to the kynges grace and mayster of his Rolles hys humble seruaunt Richarde Tauerner wysheth continuall helthe and prosperitie WHo caÌ„ nat onles he be mortally infected with the pestyferous poyson of enuy most hyghly commende magnifye and extolle your ryght honorable maistershipes most circuÌ„specte godlynes and most godly circumspection in the cause and matter of our Christyan religyon whiche with all indifferencie do not onely permitte the pure true and syncere preachers of godes worde frely to preache but also your selfe to the vttermoste of your power do promote and furder the cause of Christe and nat onely that but also do animate and incourage other to the same â–ª As nowe of late ye haue animated and impelled me to translate the Confessyon of the faythe and the defence or Apologie of the same which boke after the iudgemente and censure of all indifferente wyse and lerned men is as frutful and as clerkly composed as euer boke was vntyll thys day whiche haue bene publyshed or sette forth But to th ende that the people for whose sakes thys boke was commaunded to be translated maye the more gredely deuoure the same I do dedicate and commende it to your name and yf any faultes haue eschaped me in this my translation I desyer nat onely your maystershype but also all that shal reade thys boke to remember the sayng of the poete Horace which iÌ„ arte poetica saythe In opere longo fas est obrepere somnum That is to saye in a longe worke it is lawefull for an man to fall some tymes a slepe But as touchynge your ryght honorable maystershype I doubte nothyng such is your inestimable humanitie but that ye wyll accepâ—e thys my lytle seruyce take it in worth whome I beseche the hyght god that he wyll vouchsaue to furder in all your affayres to the glorie of god and auauncement of hys name Amen ¶ The preface to the Emperour Charles the fyfte MOste inuycte Emperour Cesar Auguste lorde moste gracyous For asmoche as your emperyall maiestie hathe summoned a parlament or asseÌ„ble of the Empyre to be holden at the Cytie of Ausbrough to th entent that there it myght be consulted and delyberated of the aydes and socours to be had agaynste the Turke that most bytter hereditarie and olde ennemie of the Christyan name and religion that is to wytte howe hys furiousnes and cruell enforcementes myght be resisted with durable and perpetuall ordinauÌ„ce and prouision of warre And then also of the disseÌ„tyons in the cause or mater of our holy religion and Christian faythe and that in thys cause of religion the opinions and myndes of eyther parties emonge them selues myght be harde vnderstonded and pondered in presence of the sayde parâ—ies after a charitable fashon with coldnes and sobernes on bothe sydes to be vsed to th ende that tho thinges whiche in the scriptures haue bene otherwyse then ryghtly handled and vnderstâ—nd by eyther perties beynge seâ— aparte and corrected the mater myght be ended coÌ„powned and reduced to one symple vâ—ritie and Christian concorde so that froÌ„ hence forthe one syncere and true religion myght be of vs maynteined and kept that lyke as we be and do warre vnder one Christe so we myght also lyue in one christian Churche in vnitie and concorde For as moche also as we the within subscribed Coruestour or Electour Princes with other to vs conioyned as we le as thother Electours prynces and estates were summoned to the aforsayde parliamente or assemble because we wolde obediently fulfyll your imperiall commaundement we came with all spede and maturitie to the aforsayde Citie of Augusta and whiche we wolde no man shulde iudge to be spoken for bostinge of our selues we were there with the fyrste For as moche therfore as your Emperiall maiestye about the very begynnynge of this assemble and parliament dyd cause it to be propowned and moued to the Coruestours princes and and other estates of th empyre that all the states of th empyre by the vertue of your proclamatyon and decree ought to exhibete ane offer vp theyr opinion and sentence in the vulgare and Latine tongue And after deliberation had the next wednesday agayne answere was made to your Emperiall maiestie that we for our parte wolde the nexte fryday exhibet the articles of our confession Therfore in obeyinge your maiesties wyll and pleasure we here present vnto you in thys cause of religion the confession or our preachers of our selues in which it shal be openly sent what maner of doctrine out of the holy scriptures and the pure worde of god they haue hetherto in our landes Dukedoms lordeshypes and cities taught and haue treated in our churches or congregations That if also thother Electours prynces estates of th empyre with lyke wrytynges in the latine and vulgare tongue according to your motion and propownynge wyl brynge forth theyr opinions in this cause of religion we here offer our selues redy before your maiestie as before our most mercyful lorde with the forsayde princes and our frendes louyngly to commune and entreate of tolerable meanes and wayes to the entent that so moche as honestly may be done we may agre together and the matter beynge peasibly debated without odious coÌ„tention betwixt vs the parties god wyllynge the dissension may be ended and reduced to one true concordaunt religion as we al be do warre vnder ouâ— Christe accordynge to the tenour of your proclamation and that all thynges maye be brought to a godly trouthe whiche thynge we desyre of god with moste feruent requestes But if as moche as atteyneth to thother Coruestours princes and estates whiche be on the other syde this entreatye of the mater in suche sorte as your maiestie hathe wysely iudged it to be handled and entreated that is to wyâ—e with suche mutuall presentation of wrytynges and peasible conferrynge together shal nac procede and go forwarde nor be done with any frute profete here we do openly and solempnely testifye by thys our wrytynge lefte behynde vs that we refuse no maner thynge whiche maye by any meanes helpe to the obteyninge wynnynge of the Christian concorde suche as may stande with goddes lawe and good conscyence as bothe your imperiall maiestie and the other Coruestours and estates of th empyre and fynally all whiche be holden with a syncere loue and zele towarde the Christian religion which shal heare this mater with indifferencie
acknowledge yâ— our harte naturally is voyde of loue of feare of trust towardê god Therfore saieth the prophete After that the haste shewed it vnto me I strake my thyghe Also I sayde in my traunce euery man is a lyar that is to saye an vntrewe thynker of god ⧠⧠Here the aduersaries do also reproue Luther because he wrote that originall synne remayneth after baptime They adde that this artycle was ryghtly coÌ„deÌ„pned by Leo the tenthe But the emperours maiestie shal espye here a manifest be spoken of ciuyle iudgement nat of the iudgement of god They sowe vnto them euen as wysely this sentence Nature is nat euyl this spoken in place is nat repreueable but it maye nat be wrested to the diminishyng of originall synne and yet these sentencies be red amonge scholemen whiche out of due season do mengle philosophie with the gospell Nor these were nat disputed only in scholes but froÌ„ the scholes they were brought to the people And those persuasions raygned and nourished the affiauÌ„ce of humane powers and oppressed the knowledge of the grace of Christe wherfore Luther wyllyng to declare the magnitude of original synne of humane infirmitie taught that the resydues or dregges of originall sine be of the owne nature in man nat indifferent thynges but that we nede the grace of god that they maye nat be imputed and the holy ghoste that it maye be mortified Albeit the scholemen do make lesse bothe the synne and the payne teachynge that man of hys owne power may do the commaundementes of god In Genesis is otherwyse described the payne due for originall synne For there nat only to deathe and other corporall punyshementes mans nature is made subiecte but also to the kyngdome of the deuyll For there is gyuen this horrible sentence I wyl put enmities betwexte the and the woman and betwexte thy sede and her sede Defaute and concupysceÌ„ce be punyshementes and also synnes Deathe other corporall euyls and the tyrannye of the deuyll be properly punyshementes For mans nature is gyuen into boÌ„dage and holden captiue of the deuyl whiche infecteth it with wycked opinions and errours and impelleth it to al kyndes of synne But as the deuyll can naâ— be vaynquyshed without the ayde of Christe â–ª so can nat we by our owne powers redeme our selues out of this bondage The very historie of the worlde sheweth vs howe greate is the power of the deuyls kyngdome The worlde is full of blasphemies agaynste god of wycked opinions and with these bondes the deuyl hath in captiuite the wyse and ryghtwyse men in the face of the worlde In other sume appere more grosse vices But when Christe is gyuen vnto vs whiche taketh awaye these synnes these punyshmentes and destroyeth the kyngdome of the deuyll synne and death the benefytes of Christe can nat be knowen onles we vnderstande our owne euyls Therfore of these thynges our preachers do diligently teache and they teache nat any newe thing but the holy scripture and sentences of holy fathers This we truste wyll satysfye the Emperours maiestie as touching yâ— chyldyshe and colde cauillacions by whiche the aduersaries haue sclaundered our article For we knowe that we beleue ryghtly and with the catholyk churche of Christe But if the aduersaries wyl renewe this contencyon there shal nat lacke lerned men amonge vs that shall make them answere and defende the truthe For the aduersaries in this cause vnderstande nat for the moste parte what they speake OfteÌ„tymes they speake thynges repugnant and they neyther expresse ryghtly dialectically the formall cause of originall synne nor the defaultê as they call them But we wolde nat in thys place ouer subtylly discusse theyr vayne and sophistical argumentê we thought it ynough to recyte the mynde of the holy fathers whoÌ„ we do folowe with commune knoweÌ„ wordê The thyrde article the aduersaries allowe in whiche we confesse two natures in Christe that is to wyte the nature humane assumpt of the worde into the vnitie of hys persone And that the selfe same Christe suffered and dyed to the entent to reconcyle vnto vs the father and rose agayne to the entent to reygne to iustifie and to sanctifie the beleuers cÌ„ accordyng to the Symbole of the apostles and the Symbole of Nicene ⧠⧠Of Iustificacyon ⧠IN the fourthe fythe syxte and also in the twenty article they condempne vs because we teache that men obtayne remission of synnes nat for theyr owne merites but frely for Christe by faythe in Christ. For they daÌ„ne bothe two poyntes fyrste that we denye that men for theyr owne merites do obtayne remission of synnes and secoÌ„darily that we affyrme that by faythe is obteyned remissioÌ„ of synnes and that men be iustified by faythe in Christe But sythe it is so that in this case or controuersie the pryncypall poynte of our religion is debated whiche ryghtly vnderstaÌ„de setteth forthe the honour of Christe and bryngeth a necessarie and plenteous consolacyon to the godly conscyence we desyre that the emperours maiestie wyll heare vs benyngly of these so greate maters For the aduersaries where as they neyther vnderstaÌ„de what is remission of synnes neyther what faythe â–ª neyther what grace nor what iustyce is pytyfully do defyle this poynt obscuryng the glorie and benefytes of Christe and bereue fronâ— the godly consciencies yâ— propouned coÌ„solacioÌ„s in Christe And to the ende we may maynteyne our coÌ„fessyon and assoyle the obiections of our aduersaries we shall fyrste premitte certayne thynges to the ende that the fountaynes of bothe our doctrines aswell ours as the aduersaries may be knowen The hole scripture ought to be distributed iÌ„to these pryncipal places law and promyses For otherwhyles it sheweth the lawe otherwhyles the promyse of Christ as when it promyseth Christ to cum and promiseth for hym remission of synnes iustificacyon and lyfe eternall or where in the Euangell Christ after he ones appered promyseth remission of synnes iustificacyoÌ„ and lyfe eternall we call the lawe in thys disputacyon the preceptes of the Decalogie in what place so euer they be red in scripture Of the ceremonies iudiciall lawes of Moses at thys tyme we speake nothyng Out of these the aduersaries take the lawe because mans reason after a fashyoÌ„ dothe naturally vnderstaÌ„de the lawe For it hathe styl the same iudgement wrytten by god iÌ„ the mynde and by the lawe they seke remission of synnes and iustificacion But the Decalogie requyreth nat only outward ciuile workes whiche reason can after a fashyon fulfyll but also it requyreth other thynges ferre aboue reason as truly to feare god truly to loue god truly to call on god truly to beleue that god heareth vs and to loke for the ayde of god in deathe and all afflictions fynally it requyreth obedieÌ„ce towarde god in afflictioÌ„s and in deathe that we escheue them nat nor grudge nat at them whan god lay them on vs. Here the scholemen folowynge the phylosophiers only do teache the iustice of
that we be iustifyed by the lawe Thaduersaries be deceiued because in this hole coÌ„trouersarie they haue respecte only to the lawe For humane reason can none otherwise iudge but that iustificacion is to be sought for in the lawe because the obedience towarde the lawe is iustice But the Euangel calleth vs away from the lawe to the promises and teacheth that we be reputed iuste nat for the obedience of the lawe for we satisfye nat the lawe but because that reconciliacion is gyuen vnto vs for Christ whiche we only receyue by fayth wherfore before we do the law we must by fayth receyue remission of synnes and reconciliacion O Lorde god with what face dare these men name Christe with what countenaunce dare they beholde the EuaÌ„gell which deny that we obtayne remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes for Christe by only fayth SecoÌ„dly this selfe fulfyllyng of the lawe whiche foloweth renouacion is both smal and vnclene For though renouacion be attempted sumwhat begunne yet the dregges of synne stycke styl in nature alway accusyng vs onles by fayth in Christe we obtayne remission of synnes knowe that we haue a cummynge to god nat for our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe but for Christe Therfore that fulfyllyng of the lawe is nat accepted for it selfe but for faythe Wherfore when Paule sayeth that the lawe is stablyshed by fayth nat only this must be vnderstaÌ„de that they which be regenerate by fayth do conceyue the holy ghoste and haue mocions consentyng to the lawe of god but moste of all it is requysite to adde this that we owe to thynke that we be farre from the perfectioÌ„ of the lawe Wherfore we may nat affyrme that before god we be reputed iust for our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe but we muste thynke that we be recouÌ„pted iust or acceptable for Christe and nat for the lawe or for our workes and that this imperfecte or inchoate fulfyllyng of the lawe pleaseth god because we be in Christe and also that for the fayth in Christ the lackyng of fulfyllyng the lawe is nat imputed vnto vs. Thys teacheth Paule saying Christe redemed vs frome the malediction of the lawe beyng made for vs a curse that is to saye the lawe condempneth all men But Christe because he voyde of synne susteined the penaltie of synne and was made an hoste for vs he toke away the rigorous power of the lawe so that it shall nat accuse nor coÌ„deÌ„pne the beleuers in him for he is our propiciacion for whiche we be nowe accoÌ„pted ryghtwise In lyke seÌ„tence he wryteth to the Colossenses In Christe ye be consummate or perfyte as who shuld say although ye be yet farre from the perfeccion of the lawe yet the dregges or leauynges of synnes do nat condempne you because ye haue for Christ a certayne and ferme reconciliacion so that ye beleue natwithstandyng that synne stycketh styl in the fleshe For the death and the satisfaccioÌ„ of Christe gyuen for vs ought to be set farre aboue the very lawe to th ende that we may be assured that through the satysfaccyon we haue god mercifull vnto vs and nat for our fulfyllyng of the lawe wycked is that truste whiche is put in our fulfyllyng of the lawe But that trust is necessarie which is put in the satisfaccyon for Christe ☞ ⧠⧠☜ Thyrdly Only that thyng iustifieth before god whiche pacifieth the conscience For so longe as the conscience fleeth the iudgement of god and is angry with god we be nat ryght wyse nor viuifyed But only faythe pacifyeth the conscience accordynge to this of Paule Iustifyed by fayth we haue peace Also The ryghtwyse man shal lyue by fayth that is to say by fayth he veynquysheth the feares of death by faythe he is susteined and conceyueth ioye and lyfe And this bringeth fayth nat because it is a worthy worke of it selfe but onely because it reuiueth the offered promyse nothiÌ„g regardyng the owne propre worthynes Only therfore fayth iustifyeth and good workes do please by reason of fayth what can the aduersaries brynge agaynste thys reason what can they inuent agaynst the manifest trouth For the Minor is moste certayne that our workes can nat pacifye the conscience sythe god iudgeth and reproueth vs and sheweth vnto vs our vnclennes And that the scripture dothe oftentymes inculcate dryue into our hedes As the Psalme Non intres in iudicium cuâ— seruo tuo quia non iustificavitur in conspectu tuo 〈…〉 that is to say Enter nat into iudgement with thy seruaunt for no lyuyng creature shal be iustified in thy syght Here he quyte taketh away from all yea and from the saynctes and seruauntes of god the glorie of iustice if god dyd nat pardon but wolde iudge and detecte theyr hertê For where as in other places the Psalmist doth glorie of hys owne ryghtwysenes he speketh of his quarel or cause agaynst the persecutours of the worde of god and nat of hys personal clennes and he desyreth that the quarell and glorie of god may be defeÌ„ded As in the seuenth Psalme Iudica me domine secundum iusticiam meam c. i. Iudge me lorde accordyng to my ryghtwysnes And in another place Iudge O lorde my cause But on the other parte he teacheth that no man can susteyne the iudgemeÌ„t of god if he obserueth our synnes For thus he sayeth Si iniquitates obseruaueris domine domine quis sustinebiâ— If thou woldest marke o lorde the iniquities of men who can o lorde endure And Iob sayeth Vâ—rebar omnia opera mea .i. I feared all my workes Also if I were washed euen as it were with waters of snowe and my handes dyd shyne as moste pure cleane yet thou wylt embrewe me with fylthynes And Prouerb 20. Who can say my hert is cleane And .1 Ioan. 1. If we say that we haue nat synne we seduce our selues and trouth is nat in vs. Also in the Pater noster the holy men desyre remissioÌ„ of synnes â— holy men also haue synnes In the boke of Numer And the innocent shal be no innocent And Zacharie sayeth Silâ—at a facie domini omnis caro .i. Let euery man holde his tongue in the lordê preseÌ„ce And Esaye Euery fleshe is haye and all hys glorie is lyke a flower of the felde The haye wythereth vp and the floure fadeth because the spirite of the lorde hath bloweÌ„ in it that is to say the fleshe and the iustice of the fleshe caÌ„ nat abyde the iudgement of god And Ionas sayeth in the seconde chapiter In vayne they obserue vanities which leaue mercy .i. Al trust is voyde saue the truste of mercye Mercy saueth vs our owne merites our owne propre endeuours saue vs nat These and semblable sentencies in scriptures testifie that our workes be vncleane haue nede of mercie Wherfore workes do nat pacifie the conscience but mercie conceyued by faythe Fourthly Christe ceaseth nat to be a mediatour styll after that we be renewed For they erre which say that he
se what confession auayleth without absolutioÌ„ But if they do nat seperate the receyuing of absolution from confession they muste nedes thynke that faythe is a parte of penauÌ„ce For absolution is nat receiued but by fayth And that absolution is nat receiued but by faythe it may be proued by Paule whiche teacheth that the promyse can nat be receiued but by faythe Howe absolution is the promyse of the remission of synnes Therfore it dothe necessarily require faythe And we do nat se howe he can be sayde to receiue absolution whiche dothe nat assente and agre to it And what other thyng is it nat to agre to the absolution then to accuse god of a lye If the barte dothe doubte it thynketh that those thynges be vncerteyne vayne whiche god dothe promise Therfore it is wrytten in the epistle of Iohan whosoeuer beleueth nat god maketh hym a lyer because he dothe nat beleue in the testimonye whiche god hathe witnessed of his sonne Secondaryly we suppose that our aduersaries do graunt that remission of synnes is eyther parte or the ende or terminus ad queÌ„ as they vse to speake of penauÌ„ce or repentauÌ„ce ergo that thyng wherby remissioÌ„ of synnes is receyued is of ryght added to the partes of penaunce But most certayne it is most vndoubted although al the gates of helle wolde crye agaynste it that remission of synnes can nat be receiued but only by fayth whiche beleueth that sinnes be forgyuen for Christê sake according to that sayeng of Paule to the Romaines whom god hathe set forthe a propitiator by faythe in the bloude of hym Also in the fyfthe to the Romaynes By whom we haue waye throughe faythe into grace c. For the troubled arraryed coâ—icence can nat plede nor laye agaynste the wrathe of god theyr owne workes or loue but so is only the conscience made quiete when it receiueth the mediatour Christe and beleueth the promises gyuen for hys sake for they do nat perceyue what remission of synnes is or howe it cometh to vs which dreame that hartes be set at peace without faythe in Christe Peter alledgeth out of Esaye thys sayeng whosoeuer shall beleue in hym shall nat be confounded or ashamed â–ª Wherfore hypocrites muste neues be confounded which truste that they receiue remission of synnes for theyr owne workê and nat for Christes sake And Peter sayth in the actes To him all the prophetes beare witnes that al whiche beleue in him do receiue remission of synnes throughe his name It coulde nat be spoken more manifestly than yâ— he sayth throughe his name And he addeth all that beleue in hym We do only therfore thus receiue remission of synnes through the name of Christe that is to wete for Christes sake â–ª and nat for any meritê or workes of our owne And this is so done when we beleue that synnes be forgyuen vs for Christes sake Our aduersaries crye out that they be the churche that they do folowe the coÌ„sent of the church But Peter here in thys our cause alledgeth also the coÌ„sent of the churche To him sayth he al the prophetes beare wytnes that by his name they receiue remission cÌ„ Undoubtedly the consente of the prophetes is to be iudged the consente of the vniuersall churche We do neyther grauÌ„t to the byshop of Rome neither yet vnto the church power or authoritie to decre agaynst this coÌ„sent of the ê“phetes But the Bulle of Leo byshop of Rome do openly condempne this article of remission of sinnes our aduersaries do also coÌ„dempne it in theyr confutation By whiche thynge it appereth what maner churche theyr churche is to be iudged whiche not onely with decrees disalowe this sentence that remission of synnes is purchased by faith not for our workes but for Christ but also coÌ„maunde to destroy that sentence and opinion with violence and with the swerde They coÌ„mauÌ„de also with all kynd of crueltie to destroye the good men whiche be of the same opinion and mynde But they wyll saye that they haue greate and famous authours for them as maister Duns Gabriel â–ª and other lyke the sayenges also of fathers â–ª whiche be recited in the decrees but maymed and vnperfecte Certes if we shulde falle to numbring of testimonies they haue the better bande For there is a great rablement of tryfelyng wryters vpon the mayster of the Sentencies whiche do euen as it were conspire to gether in defendyng these figmentes lyes of the merite of attricion and of workes and the thynges whiche we haue here to fore recyted But let no man be moued with the multitude of them For thauctoritie is not greate of the late wryters whiche were not the fathers of theyr owne wrytynges but onely embesylyng and robbyng the olde fathers dyd shyfre and turmoyle opinions forth of one boke in to an other They vsed no maner iugemeÌ„t but only after the fashyon of the Senatours whiche were called Pedarij without any wordes allowed the errours of them that had writen before whom they perceyued not We therfore wyll not be afraide to set this sayenge of Peter who allegeth the consente of the prophetê agaynst the legions of sententiaries be they neuer so manye And to this preachynge of Peter is added the testimonie of the holy gost For thus sayth the texte Adhuc loquente Petro uerba haec cecidit spiritus sanctus sup omnes qui audiebant uerbum .1 And as Peter was yet speakynge these wordes the holy ghoste lyghted vpon al them which dyd heare the worde Let all good godly consciences therfore knowe that this is the coÌ„maundement of god that they shulde beleue theyr synnes to be freelye forgyuen them for Christes sake and not for our owne workes And with this coÌ„maundement of god let them strengthen and susteyne them selues agaynst desperation and agaynst the terrours of synne and of deathe And let them knowe that this senteÌ„ce opinion hath always remayned in the churche amoÌ„ge holy and good men sythe the begynnynge of the worlde For Peter dothe clearely alledge the consent of the prophetes And the writynges of thapostles testifie that they were of the same mynde we haue also testimonies of the fathers For Barnarde sayth the sawe in playn and open wordes Necesse est enim primo omnium credere quod remissionem peccatoruÌ„ habere noÌ„ possis nisi per indulgeÌ„tiam dei sed adde adhuc ut credas hoc quod per ipsum peccata tibi donantur Hoc est testimonium quod ê‘hibet spiritus sanctus in corde tuo dicens dimissa sunt tibi peccata tua Sic enim arbitratur apostolus gratis iustificari hominem per fidem .i. For it is necessarye fyrste of all to beleue that thou canste not haue forgyuenes of synnes but by the indulgence of god but adde yet hereunto so that thou doste beleue this also that by hym thy synnes be forgyuen the. This is the testimonie which the holy ghost heareth in thy herte
thynge thou shalte bynde vpon earthe it shal be bounde in heuen And what soeuer thyng thou shalte louse vpon erthe it shal be loused also in heuen Howe be it as we haue sayde before the keye hath not power to laye on punyshementes oâ— to institute honourynge of god but onely it hath coÌ„maundement to forgyue synnes vnto them whiche be conuerted and to rebuke and excoÌ„municate them which wyll not be conuerted For as to louse signifiethe to forgyue synnes so to bynde signifiethe not to forgyue synnes for Christe speaketh of a spirituall kyngdome And the commaundement of god is that the ministers of the gospel shulde assoyle them whiche be coÌ„uerted accordynge to that texte of Paule Power and auctoritie is gyuen vs to edification Wherfore the reseruation of cases is a politicall and ciuilâ— thynge For it is a reseruation of canonicall punyshement and not a reseruation of synne in the syghte of god in them whiche be truelye conuerted Wherfore oure aduersaries do iudge well whan they do graunte that in the article of deathe that reseruation of cases ought not to let absolutioÌ„ We haue set forthe and declared the summe of our doctrine as touchynge penaunce whiche doctrine we knowe assuredly to be godly and holsome to good myndes And good men if they shal compare our doctrine with the most confuse and troublesome disputations of our aduersaries shall perceyue ryghte well that our aduersaries haue lefte out the doctrine of faythe iustifieng confortyng godly hertes For they shall see that our aduersaries do fayne many thingê of the merite of attrition of that endeles rehersal of synnes of satisfactions hangynge nothyng together and as the olde prouerbe is touching neither heuen ne earth but strayeng and wanderyng clene wyde from the purpose and such as euen our aduersaries them selues can not sufficiently declare ☞ Of the numbre and vse of the ⧠sacramentes ⧠IN the .xiij. article our aduersaries do allowe that we do saye the sacramentes not only to be signes or tokens of profession amonge men as certayn men do fayne but rather to be signes and testimonies of the wyll of god towardes vs by whiche god moueth and styrreth hertes to beleue But here they byd vs also to accompte seuen sacramentes We thynke that men oughte to beware that the thynges ceremonies instituted in the scriptures be not despised howe many soeuer they be Neyther do we thiÌ„ke it to make any great matter although diuerse men for cause of teachyng do nombre or recken diuerse wayes so that they kepe well the thynges taught in the scripture For the olde wryters haue not all numbred them after one maner and facyon If we call sacramentes rytes or ceremonies whiche be coÌ„maunded by god vnto whiche is added a promyse of grace it is an easye thyng to iudge whiche be ê“prely sacramentê â–ª For rytê or ceremonies iÌ„stituted by men shall not after this maner proprely be called sacramentes For it belongeth not to the auctorite of man to promyse grace wherfore signes instituted without the coÌ„mauÌ„dement of god be not sure and vndoubted tokeÌ„s of grace albeit peraduenture they teache ignoraunte simple persones or elles put them in remembraunce of somewhat The very sacramentes therfore be Baptisme the Souper of the lorde Absolution whiche is the sacrament of penaunce For these rytê or vsages haue for them the coÌ„maundement of god and haue also added vnto them a promyse of grace whiche is proprely belongyng to the newe testameÌ„t For hertes ought surely and vndoubtedlye to beleue that whan we be baptised whan we do eate the bodye of oure lorde whan we be assoyled that god dothe verely forgyue vs for Christes sake And god doth also by the worde the ceremonie moue and styrre the hertes to beleue and to gather fayth as Paule saythe â—ides ex auditu Fayth is by hearynge And lykewyse as the worde runneth in to the eares that it may stryke vnto the hertê euen so the ceremonie of it selfe runneth in to the iyes to moue and styrre the hertes The effecte of the worde and of the ceremonie is all one as it was full excellently sayde of sayncte Augustine who saythe that a sacrament is a visible worde because the ceremonie is receyued of the iyes and is as it were a picture of the worde signifienge the same thynge that the worde dothe signifie wherfore theffecte of them bothe is all one Confirmation the last enneylyng be rytes or ceremonies receyued of the fathers which the churche dothe not require as necessary to saluation bicause they haue not the coÌ„maundemeÌ„t of god wherfore it is not vnprofitable to disseuer these ceremonies from the other aboue sayd whiche haue the expresse coÌ„maundement of god to maynteyne them and a clere promyse of grace Preesthod our aduersaries do vnderstande not of the administratioÌ„ of the worde of god and of the sacrameÌ„tes to be gyuen forthe vnto other but they do vnderstande it of sacrifice as thoughe in the newe testamente there oughte to be a preesthod lyke vnto the preesthode leuitical coÌ„mauÌ„ded by Moses law whiche shulde make sacrifice for the people and deserue remission of synnes to other men We teache that the sacrifice of Christ dyenge on the crosse was sufficient for the synnes of the hole worlde and dothe not nede besydes the helpe of any other sacrifices as thoughe it were not sufficient for oure synnes wherfore men be iustified not for any other sacrifices but for that onely sacrifice of Christe if they beleue them selues to haue ben redemed with that sacrifice Therfore preestes be elected called properlye to teache the gospell and to ministre sacramentes to the people Wherfore if ordre be vnderstanded of the ministratioÌ„ of the worde of god we wyll nat stycke to call ordre a sacrameÌ„t For the ministration of the worde hathe for it the commaundement of god And it hathe many greate promises as in the fyrst chapitre to the Romans The gospel is the power of god to saluation vnto euery one that beleueth Also Esaie in the .55 chapitre My worde that shal go out froÌ„ my mouth shall nat retourne vnto me voyde but it shall do what soeuer thingê I haue willed c. If ordre after this maner be vnderstanded we wyll nat be greued to call also the imposition or layeng on of the handes a sacramente For the churche hath a coÌ„maundement to constitute and ordeyne ministers whiche ought to be verie acceptable vnto vs because we knowe that god dothe approue that ministration and is present at that ministratioÌ„ And it is profitable also as much as may be to garnishe the ministration of the worde with al maner prayse agaynst mad men whiche dreame that the holy ghoste is gyuen nat by the worde but for certaine preparatioÌ„s of theyr owne if they syt ydle holdynge theyr tonges in darke places lokyng after illumination lyke as they dyd in olde tyme whiche were called enthusiastes whiche fayned them selues
not be affermed withoute the worde testimonie of god And Paule sayth that all that is not of faythe is synne But syth it is so that these obseruaunces haue no testimonie of the worde of god the coÌ„science muste nedes doubte whether they please god and be acceptable to hym or no. And what nede many wordes in a thyng that is manifeste and open If our aduersaries do defende these honourynges inuented by men as thinges deseruyng iustification grace and remission of synnes they do playnly buyld vp the kyngdome of Antichriste For the kyngdome of Antichrist is a newe maner of honourynge deuised by the auctoritie of man reiectynge Christe Lykewyse as the kyngedome of Mahomete hath honouryngê hath workes by whiche it wyll be iustified before god and dothe not thynke that men be iustified in the syght of god freely through fayth for Christê sake So also the papacie shall be a parte of Antichristis kyngdome if it dothe so defende worshyppynges inueÌ„ted by men that they do iustifie For the honoure and prerogatyue of Christe is abbrydged whan they teache that we be not freelye iustified through faythe for Christê sake but by suche maner obseruauÌ„ces And namely whan they teache that suche maner obseruauÌ„ces and ceremonies be not onely profitable but also necessarie to iustification as theyr opinion was herebefore in the .viii. article where they condempne vs because we sayde that it is not necessarye to the vnitie of the churche that there be in all placê lyke and one maner obseruaunces and ceremonies instituted by men Daniel the prophete signifieth and gyueth knowlege that newe fashyons of worshyppes inuented by men shal be the very forme and state of Antichristis kyngdome For thus he saith He shal honour the god Maosis in his owne place and the god whiche his fathers neuer knewe shall he worshyp with golde and syluer and precious stones Here he describeth newe fashyons of honouryng god for he saythe that such maner god is worshypped as the fathers haue not knowen For albeit that the holye fathers also haue had ceremonies and traditions yet they dydde not thynke that these thynges be profitable or necessarye â—o iustification they dyd not mynyshe the glorie the benefite of Christ but they taught that we be iustified through fayth for Christis sake and not for those humane traditions and ceremonies But they dyd obserue the traditions of men for a corporall vtilitie that the people shuld knowe what tyme they oughte to come together and that all thynges shulde be done ordrely and sadly in the churches because of example Finallye that the coÌ„men people also shulde haue a certayne instruction and discipline For the diuersities of tymes and the varietie of ceremonies auayleth to monyshe the coÌ„men people These causes moued the fathers to obserue and kepe ceremonies as Epiphaniê° doth opeÌ„ly witnesse in his disputation agaynst the Encratites whiche dyd lay vpon them selues certeyne traditions they dyd absteyne from wyne euen also in the very â—ouper of the lorde They dyd eate no flesshe no neyther yet fysshe in which thyng they dyd farre passe the freres of dominikes ordre Mariage they dyd hate moste of any thynge albeit the companye of women they dyd not hate For this thynge dothe Epiphanius laye agaynste them For they had flockes of women whiche folowed the same sorte and kynde of lyuynge that they dyd euen as at this daye the religious men coÌ„menly haue monasteries of women nere vnto them And these obseruauÌ„ces they dyd imagine to be the true honoure seruice of god and to be iustice for whiche they were acceptable vnto god and by whiche they dyd pacifie the wrathe of god This opinion doth Epiphanius disproue and sheweth that there be other endes of the traditioÌ„s For he sayth that traditions â—e to be praysed and allowed whiche be made eyther for temperauÌ„ce or for ciuile gouernaunce that is to saye eyther to tame and subdue the fleshe â–ª for the instruction of the vnlerned ê‘sons or els for a ciuile order to be hadde And we also iudge that for these causes traditions may be wel kepte that is to say to th entent that the people shulde be present at deuine seruice in sobre wyse so as Iosaphat and the kynge of Nynyue dyd by proclamation coÌ„maunde fastes Also that the ordre ceremonies in the churche shuld teache the vnlerned what is done in euery tyme. Hereof were ordeyned the Christemas holye dayes the holy dayes of Easter and whytson tyde suche other lyke This is it that Epiphanius saythe that traditions were instituted because of an ordre to be had that suche ordre shulde put men in remembraunce of the historie and of the benefites of Christe For the tokens or markes of thynges beinge aâ— it were paynted and set forth in maners and ceremonies do more effectuallye put the coÌ„men people in remeÌ„braunce than do bokes or wrytynges These endes of traditions and ceremonies were profitable to be shewedde to the people and to be playnely openly declared But to these endes our aduersaries do fayne a nother ende to be ioyned through a certeyn pharisaicall persuasion that is to witte that suche maner obseruauÌ„ces do merite remission of synnes Also that they be seruices necessarye to iustification and that for them men be accompted ryghtuous in the syghte of god This playnly is to honoure god with golde syluer and precious stones and to thiÌ„ke that god is appeased and recoÌ„ciled with diuersitie of garmentes of ornamentes and with other lyke thynges of whiche there is an infinite numbre in the traditioÌ„s of men or els to thiÌ„ke that suche maner tbynges be honourynges of god I meane diuersities of tymes of meates of vessels of apparayle Paule to the Collossianes wryteth that traditions haue the semblaunce and lykenes of wysedome And in very dede so haue they For that fayre ordre is very semely in the churche and for that cause is necessarye But mannes reason because it dothe not vnderstande the ryghtuousnes of faythe it doth naturally imagine that suche maner work iustifie men and that they reconcile god vnto vs. c. Suche was the opinion of the comen people amoâ—ge the Israelities and by the reason of 〈…〉 they dyd augmeÌ„t suche manâ—r ceremonies 〈◊〉 they haue nowe encreased with vs in Monâ—steâ—ies Suche is the iudgemeÌ„t of maÌ„nes 〈◊〉 also â–ª concernynge the exercises of the body concernynge fastynges whose ende in very dede is to tame and to punyshe the flesshe but yet mannes reason doth fayne a nother ende that is to say that they be diuine honours whiche iustifie As Thomas wryteth that fastynge is auayllable to the puttynge awaye and to the prohibition of synne For these be the verye wordes of Thomas Thus the semblaunce and apparaunce of wysedome ryghtuousnes in suche maner workes deceyueth men Besydes this there be examples of sayntes whiche whyles men studie to folowe they often tymes folowe the outwarde exercises but they folowe
to say kynges be ordeyned to prouyde that godlye thynges that is to witte the gospel of Christe be maynteyned and spredde abrode and that as beinge goddê deputies they shuld defende the lyfe helth of innocent ê‘sones ⧠Of bothe kyndes to be gyuen in the souper of the lorde ⧠IT can nat be doubted but that it is an holy thing and agreing to the institution of Christ and to the wordes of Paule to vse bothe partes or kyndes in the souper of the lorde For Christe dyd institute bothe partes and he dyd institute theÌ„ nat for parte of the churche but for the hole churche For nat onely prestes but the hole churche vseth the sacrament and that by the authoritie of Christ and nat by the authoritie of maÌ„ And thê we thinke that our aduersaries do grauÌ„t Nowe if Christ dyd institute this sacrameÌ„t for the hole churche why is the one kynde taken awaye frome parte of the church why is the vse of the one kynde forbydden why is the ordenaunce of Christe chaunged namely sythe he hymselfe dothe call it hys testamente That if it be nat lauful to breake the testament and laste wyl of a man muche lesse it shal be laufull to breake the testamente of Christe And Paule sayeth that he receyued of the lorde that whiche he taught But he taught the vse of bothe kyndê as the texte euideÌ„tly sheweth Do this sayeth he fyrste speakyng of the body afterwarde he repeteth the same wordê of the cup. And after he sayeth let a man trye and examyne himselfe and so let him eate of the breade and drynke of the cuppe These be the wordes of one disposing and ordering And he speaketh before that they whiche shulde vse the souper of the lorde shulde vse it togither in one company Wherfore it is euident that the sacrament was instituted for the hole churche And the vse ther of remayneth yet in some churches of the Grekes And the same custome was sometyme also in the latine churches as Cypriane and Hierome do witnesse For thus sayeth Hierome vpon the prophete Sophonie Sacerdotes qui â—ucharistiae seruiunt sanguinem domini populis diuidunt c. The prestes whiche do serue the sacramentâ— of the alter whiche do deuide the bloude of the lorde to the people c. The councel of Toletane witnesseth the same Neyther shal it be any greate mastry to gather a greate heape of testimonies Here we wyll nat exaggerate ne amplifie this thing we only leaue it to the wyse reader to be coÌ„sidered what is to be thought of the ordenauÌ„ce of god Our aduersaries in the coÌ„futatioÌ„ do nat go about to excuse the churche froÌ„ whom the one parte of the sacrameÌ„t was takeÌ„ away â–ª It became good and religious men to do thê They ought to haue sought a sure and strong reason to excuse the churche and to teache the consciences whiche can nat be suffred to haue but one parte of yâ— sacrament Nowe they defende that it is well done to kepe awaye the one parte and they forbidde to graunt the vse of bothe partes Fyrste they fayne that in the church the maner was in some places to gyue but the one parte alone And yet can they briÌ„g forthe none auncient example herof but they alledge the places in whiche mention is made of breade as in Luke Where it is writen that the disciples knewe Christe by breakynge of the breade They alledge also other places of breakyng of the breade And albeit we do nat greately saye agaynste them but that some of those places may be vnderstaÌ„ded of the sacramente yet for all that thys dothe nat folowe that there was gyuen but the one parte alone for by namyng of parte the residue is betokened by a comen maner custome of speakyng They adde also of the laicall coÌ„munion whiche was nat the vse of yâ— one kynde alone but of bothe And if at any tyme prestes be byddeÌ„ to vse the laicall communion it is mente that they were remoued from the ministery of consecration And this thyng our aduersaries do knowe wel ynough but they do abuse the ignoraunce of vnlearned men whiche when they here speake of laicall coÌ„munion by and by do dreame of the maner and vsage of our tyme in which to lay men is gyuen but only one parte of the sacrament And se howe shameles they be Gabriel amonge other causes reciteth why bothe partes be nat gyuen because there was a difference to be made betwene laye men and prestes And it is lykely ynough that thys is the chief cause why the prohibitioÌ„ of the one parte is so greatly defended that the dignitie of the ordre by this religious fashyon myght be the better estemed and the more set by Thê is an humaine reason and purpose I wyll nat speake ouer sharply whiche for what ende it serueth it may easly be iudged And in the confutation they alledge of the sonnes of Helie that wheÌ„ the office of the hygh preste was lost they shulde desyre but one parte sacerdotall as it is wrytten in the fyrste boke of kynges Here they say is signified the vse of one only kynde And they adde thys conclusion So therfore our lay men also ought to be content with one part sacerdotal that is to wete with one kynde Uerely our aduersaries do dallye and tryfle wheÌ„ they applye the hystory of the chyldren of Helie to the sacramentes There is described the punyshmeÌ„t of Helie wyl they say thys also that the laye men be kepte from the one parte because of punyshemente The sacramente was instituted to comforte lyfte vp troubled and feared myndes when they beleue that the flesshe of Christe which was giuen for the lyfe of the worlde is meate wheÌ„ they beleue that they ioyned to Christe be quickened But our aduersaries do reason that laye men be kepte from the one parte because of punyshemeÌ„t The laye men say they ought to be coÌ„tente This is very imperiously spoken And why oughte they There oughte nat to be asked why nor any cause is to be enquired but what soeuer diuines say it must be a lawe This is the foule vometyng and dronkyn sayiÌ„g of Eccius For we espye these thrasonicall and proude bragging wordes of these felowes whiche if we were disposed to touche so as we myght do we shulde nat lacke matter nor oratioÌ„ For ye se howe they be past shame He coÌ„maundeth as it were a tyraunte in tragedies that whether they wyll or nat wyll they ought to be contented Shall these reasons which he alledgeth at domes day excuse these men whiche do forbydde parte of the sacrament and whiche do thus rage agaynste good men that vse the hole sacrameÌ„t If they do forbydde it for this skille that there shuld be a difference of the ordre this selfe same reason ought to moue vs that we do nat agre to our aduersaries euen thoughe we were elles minded to haue obserued the custome maner