chaunge nor confusion among themselues or among there proprieties so also the actioÌ„s are so the actions of one and the same person that yet they are truely distinguished betwixt themselues and so distinguished that those which proceed from the one nature and are proper thereunto they although they be done with the communion of the other yet it is not lawfull to say that they be done by the other or that Christ doth them according to the other nature 13 Where fore like as wee allowe the fathers when they saye that Christs actions in redeeming sauing vs were are done by god man so also we greatly commend that famous saying of Leo the bishop of Rome in his epistle to Flauianus we teach that it is with a stedfast faith to be holden namely Each forme vvorketh with communion of the other that which is proper to it selfe as the word working that vvhich is proper to the word and the flesh performing that which is proper to the flesh 14 For he suffred for vs died and was buried according to the flesh but he gaue the grace of deseruing and redeeming to his suffring by which he redeemed vs according to his deitie but all these he willed according to both the natures 15 Also he rose from the dead ver 20.21 and ascended in a visible and locall ascension into heauen exalted aboue all Angels according to his humanity yet he wrought the same resurrection ascension and exaltation according to his diuinity but he willed it according to the will of both the natures 16 Like as then we beleeue that Christ redeemed vs according to both the natures according to that God purchased his Church by his owne blood so also we doubt not but the same Christ sitteth at his Fathers right hand and resteth in the heauenly places gouerning all thinges with his Father and dispenseth and communicateth the grace of redemption and euerlasting salvatioÌ„ to the wholle church which is his bodie and to euerie member according to both his natures the word working that which is proper to the word the flesh that which belongeth to the flesh 17 For although he vseth the ministerie of the word and sacraments by men to the imparting of salvation vnto vs yet the same Christ both as he is God and as he is man is properly the very same which calleth vs giueth vnto vs faith and repentance and he iustifieth regenerateth quickeneth and bringeth into eternall life all that beleeue by the working of the power of his might 18 For this cause also our faith whereby we take holde of saluation in Christ and eternall life must not respect and rely vpon either the one or the other nature of Christ severally but on whole Christ himselfe as the Ephesians were said to haue faith in the Lord Iesus 19 Whereon it followeth that who so do deny either the one or the other nature in Christ or deuide the one from the other or confouÌ„d theÌ„ both together so that they acknowledge him not for true God and true man in all things sinne excepted like vnto vs and imbrace him not for such and therefore for a true and perfect redeemer they can neuer be made partakers of redemption and eternal saluation 20 For as he that beleeueth in Christ such as he is hath life eternall so he that beleeueth not cannot haue it Of those thinges which are spoken of our Lord Iesus Christ after the vnion and in what sort they are spoken Out of the 1. to the Ephesians Positions Anno 1582. 1 THe Apostle writeth that Christ was raised from the dead and therefore he truely diâ—â—â—â—â—d in another place The Lord of glory was 〈◊〉 yea we often read howe the sonne of man was deliuered vnto death But in all these enunciations the speach is ever of the same person namely the sonne of God incarnate Therfore the person of Christ which is in these propositions the subiect or that whereof another thing is spoken is vsed to be signified by 3. kindes of names namely by those which betoken the divine nature onely and that sometime in respect of the essence sometime in respect of the hypostasie or persons as The lord of glory the onely begotten sonne of God or which betoken in like sort the humaine nature onely as Man the sonne of Mary or which betokeÌ„ both natures togither as Christ Immanuell god incarnate 2 We adde herevnto that Christs verie persoÌ„ is signified by those names also which are taken from the offices of a mediatour as these Amediatour a Redeemer a Saviour a high priest an Advocate and such like But these may be referred to the third kind because by them are shewed and made known both the natures in one person 3 The concrete names which haue denomination of the natures as Man of the humanity and God of the diety when in speaking of Christ they be the subiects or the first part of the enunciation or sentence they haue two significations one formall as the schooles say and the other materiall of which by the former is meant the verie nature by the other the person which hath such a nature whereof it taketh denomination 4 For as names in the abstract do signifie only the nature and propriety which is in a thing so all names in the concreat doe betokeÌ„ both the nature and qualitie which is in the thing and the hypostasis wherein it is as for examples sake the name of Iust betokeneth both Iustice wher with one is made iust him which is Iust both together 5 Therefore by these Subiect names which hauing their denominations from the natures do shewe the person of Christ sometimes is declared the propriety of the natures sometime the vnity of the person and therefore the Subiects must be vnderstood and expounded according to the diversities of the Praedicates that is of those things which are spoken thereof 6 In this proposition the sonne of God is eternall the subiect namely the sonne of God must be expounded according to the proprietie of the nature But in this the onely begotten sonne of God suffered the subiect the onely begotten sonne of God must be vnderstood according to the vnity of the person For he suffered which was not onely man but also God yet the dietie remaining vnpassible 7 We denie not but manie times are found wordes in the abstract which are the Subiects as the light came into the world as also some which are Predicats as Christ is the light of the world our righteousnesse our peace but these stâ—Ì„d in steade of concretiues as the light came into the world that is he which lighteneth vs. Wherefore for the manner of such like words they are to be referred to some of the foresaid three kindes 8 Furthermore there are three kindes of attributes which vse to be spoken of the same person of Christ God and man by what name soeuer it be signified For some are propper to the divine nature and
draw life frō that but we must also draw it from this To declare plainly this neere and reall copulation of our flesh with the flesh of Christ he brings a similitude of waxe not that it euerie way agreeth in all thinges as is manifest but because it fittly sheweth our communion with Christ to be reall and substantiall And this he ment when concluding he said not onely spiritually but also corporally that is not onely in respect of the spirite but also in respect of the bodie both Christ is the vine and we his braunches This therefore he spake not of the manner of our coupling to Christ whether it be spirituall or corporall but of the thinges which are coupled namely that not onely our soules and our spirites are most neerely ioyned with the soule and spirit of Christ but also our flesh with his flesh This is to be gathered out of the aduersaries proposition against which he argueth which is that wee are not ioyned with Christ in flesh Coll. 500. B. These aduerbs therefore spiritually corporally in Cyrill doe not signifie the meanes by which we are vnited to Christ the vine but the things which are vnited as is already said and declared But the meanes also Cyrill graūteth to be spirituall that is by our faith and by the spirite of Christ for in euerie place hee teacheth and specially vpon the sixt of Iohn that we eate the flesh of Christ by faith And by this eating he prooueth our incorporation Vpon the 13. chapter The 7. aphorisme If any shall make exceptions concerning the law thus were not the elect in the old Testament indued with grace to keepe the law as wee in the new are indued with grace to beleeue the gospell I answer They were but not to the hearing of the law as vve are with faith to the hearing of the gospell but because they first beleeued in the euangelicall promises concerning Christ and for that cause receiued the gift yet but vnperfectly and in part onely to keep the law not because they heard the law but because they beleeued in Christ to come that alwaies the obedience of the lawe might follow of the faith in Christ euen as an effect followeth the cause Vppon the 24. chapter Aphor. 1. When wee saide that the signification of a Sacrament is so receiued that not the word alone nor the element alone but the element together with the word is called a sacrament we ment nothing els but that as the word alone without the element or signe cannot bee said to be a Sacrament so neither cā the signe without the worde For a Sacrament as the church hath vsed to define it is a visible signe of an inuisible grace add by the word that is by Christs institution consecrated to that purpose that is altered from the common vse to that matter So Augustine Tom. 5. de ciuit Dei lib. 10. ca. 5. The visible sacrifice is a sacrament or a holie signe of the inuisible sacrifice And in D. de cons dist 2. ca. sacrif A sacrament saieth he is a visible forme of an inuisible grace And the same Augustine Tom. 9. in Ioh. tract 80. saith concerning the word of the gospell the vvorde commeth to the element and so is made the sacrament euen that visible vvorde as it were A sacrament therefore according to the receiued signification in the church we doe euer did acknowledge to bee a visible signe And whereof of an inuisible grace But from whence hath it the vertue to bee signe of such a thing from the word of Christ the institutor For take away the word and it shal be no Sacrament Pull away the word saieth Augustine and what is the water but water This is the meaning of our words not that the word is the sacrament or to speake properly any parte of the Sacrament in as much as a Sacrament is defined to bee a visible signe of an inuisible grace but because without the word a visible element cannot be a Sacrament of an inuisible thing but therefore it is the visible signe of an inuisible thing because by the word of the Lord it is instituted thereunto Irenaeus also making no mention of the word because that is alwaies supposed hath left in writing that the Eucharist that is the Sacrament of the Eucharist consisteth of two matters an earthly that is the signe a heauenly that is the thing signified neither yet the thing signified is the signe or the Sacrament but because the signe cānot be without the thing signified for else wherof should it bee a signe therefore hee said that the Sacrament of the Eucharist consisted both of an earthly matter that is the signe and a heauenly matter that is the thing signified This belongeth to the confirmation of that which we said concerning the word and the element Vpon the 25. chapter Of baptisme The third aphorisme Of the water it appeareth in the Acts where it is manifestly shewed that neuer any thing was mixed with the water by the Apostles Other forme of baptizing besides that which we haue in the 28. of Matthew Christ did not institute and that the Apostle did simplie follow Christ is beyond al cōtrouersie Where as therefore we read in the Acts that the Apostles baptized some in the name into the name of Christ that doth nothing pertaine to the christian forme of baptisme Iohn indeed baptized into the name of Christ as it appeareth in which name notwithstanding as Ambrose expoundeth it the trinitie was closelie signified as the person anointed that is of the sonne in that he had taken the nature the person annointing that is the father and the annointing that is the person of the holie ghost But Christ himself expresly set downe the proper forme of baptisme saying in the name of the father of the sonne and of the holie ghost Wherefore it is manifest that the phrase of speach to be baptized into the name of Christ doth nothing belong to the forme of christian Baptisme Which is also hereby confirmed that wee neuer reade that the Apostles baptized any saying that they baptized them into the name of Christ but we read onely that many were baptized in the name and into the name of Christ Then what mēt the holie ghost by that forme or manner of speach he ment in my iudgement summarily to shewe thus much First in that they which professed faith in Christ were commaunded to be baptized that it should be done by the name authoritie and commandement of Iesus Christ yea that they should be baptized in this forme In the name of the father the sonne and of the holy ghost euen by commaundement of Christ Therefore they were baptized in the name of Christ that is according to the commandement forme prescribed by Christ Secondly they which were so baptized as they were now incorporated into Christ by faith in Gods sight and admitted into the fellowship of the new couenant so are they by
commaundeth to be performed faithfully and prudently by the other faculties of the minde and instruments of the body Vpon the 19. chap. Of iustification Aphorisme 6. Whereas I so expounded that place concerning the faith of Abraham out of the 15 of Genesis and the 4. to the Rom. as I saide that that same thing was imputed vnto him for righteousnes which hee beleeued concerning Christ the promised seede I did it rather respecting the matter it selfe then the bare word of faith For I was not ignorāt that both Moses and Paule spake of the faith of Abraham that this faith was imputed to him for righteousnes seing the Apostle manifestly gathering a general doctrine from the example of Abraham adioyneth these wordes But to him that vvorketh not but beleeueth in him that instifieth the vngodlie his faith is counted for righteousnes that is hee is therefore accompted iust with God because he beleeueth in him which iustifieth the vngodlie by which place it most plainelie appeareth that from the true iustification of vs are excluded our owne works and that it is whollie ascribed to onely faith aswell touching the ende as touching the beginning But when the question is asked what cause there is why iustification should be attributed to faith and not to the works thereof it is wōt to be aunswered and that both well and truely because faith not the works thereof doth apprehend remission of sinnes and Christ our righteousnes For by it we are not iustified in respect that it is a worke but in respect that Christ is apprehēded by it by the righteousnes of whom alone being imputed vnto vs we are properlie reputed iust before God and this is that which some say how faith iustifieth not in respect of it selfe but in respect of the obiect which it taketh hold on Thus is it manifest that it is true which I saide how that was properlie imputed vnto Abraham for righteousnes for that hee beleeued God concerning Christ namelie that in him all nations should be blessed and therefore Abraham himselfe also Likewise in the last aphorisme Neither deo wee allow of those which set our iustificatiō in the only remission of sinnes denying the imputation of the iustice and obedience of Christ which we thinke to be repugnant to the Scriptures Esay 7. Achild is giuen vnto vs c Whatsoeuer therefore he did or hath it is wholly ours Rom. 5. As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one many shal bee made righteous The disobedience of Adam was the breaking of Gods commaundement therefore the obedience of Christ cōsisteth not onely in his death but also in his whole former keeping of the law Likewise the disobedience of Adam was whollie imputed to vs why not then also Christs whole obedience Also wee are two manner of wayes made sinners by Adams disobedience namelie by imputation of his transgression and by the reall deriuation of sinne that is of concupiscence into vs. Why then should we not thinke the same of Christ The vertue of his obedience to the commaundements of God the father is truely communicated vnto vs so that wee also begine to obey Gods law What lets then why wee may not say that his whole obedience is imputed vnto vs 1. Cor. 1. He is made vnto vs of God wisedome and righteousnes and sanctification and redēption Phil. 2. He became obedient vnto death for which humbling of himselfe and obedience euen vnto death God hath highlie exalted him and in him vs c. He hath deserued by his obedience eternall glorie for himselfe vs as al the schoolemen and fathers do teach Therefore his obedience also to the law is imputed vnto vs for righteousnes Gal. 4. He was made subiect to the law that hee might redeeme those vvhich were vnder the lavve Therefore he kept the law for vs and for our saluation The testimonies of the fathers and also of the learned men of this age for breuitie sake we ouerpasse To conclude we beleeue concerning Christ that as for vs men and for our saluation hee came downe from heauen and was incarnate so also for the same cause he kept the law and did all the other things Vppon the 25. chapter Aphor. 10. and 11.12 When I write this cōfession of saith I write euerie thing vppon a good conscience and as I beleeued so I spake freelie as the holie scriptures doe teach that wee ought to doe My faith is grounded simplie and principallie on the word of God and next somewhat vpon the common cōsent of the whole auncient catholicke church if it doe not gainsaye the holie Scriptures For I beleeue that the thinges which were decreed and receiued of the fathers by common consent of them all gathered together in the name of the Lord without anie contradiction of holie Scriptures that they also though they bee not of equall authoritie with the Scriptures come from the holie ghost Hereupon it is that the thinges which are of this sorte I neither will nor dare disprooue with a good conscience And what is more certaine out of the histories the councells and writings of all the fathers then that those orders of ministers of which wee spake were ordained and receiued in the church by common consent of all the whole christian common wealth And who om I that I should disprooue that which the whole church hath approoued Neither haue all the learned men of this age dared to disprooue the same as knowing both that the church might lawfullie doe so and that all those thinges were ordained and done vppon a godlie purpose and to excellent good endes for edification of Gods children For confirmation sake hereof I haue thought good here to insert that which Martin Bucer of godlie memorie a man both for life and learning most famous hath left written concerning those matters vpon the Epistle to the Ephesians The ministerie of the worde being performed by reading and rehearsing the diuine Scriptures by interpretation and exposition of the same and with exhortations takē there out and also by rehearsall and catechisme which is done by mutuall questions and aunswers of the yong beginner and the catechizer and also by holie conferences and deciding of the hard questions about religion according to this manifold dispensation of wholesome doctrine there are also manie dueties in this function For whatsoeuer belōgeth to the perfectest manner of teaching is with an especiall care to bee vsed in the ministerie of the doctrine of saluation because indeed it ought to be deliuered as a knowledge both of all other most diuine and of all most difficult namelie that he which is man should liue according to God Now they which do teach diligently the artes as they are contained in certen knowne books as if they meane to teach mathematicall principles out of Euclide first of all they will reade and rehearse the same booke by and by they will expound the seuerall words such as euerie one knowes
diuine prouidence yet we beleeue that the Church of god is gouerned by an especiall care and meanes and all the elect people Rom. 8.13 Phil. 2.13 2. Cor. 6.16 yea and all the willes and actions of the elect sith he calleth peculiarlie iustifieth and sanctifieth but not all sith hee vvorketh in them to vvill and performe Act. 4.16 and saith that he dwelleth in them and not in all sith lastlie he leadeth them vnto eternall life but suffereth others in his iust iudgements to walke in their owne pathes and fall into eternall destruction 1. Pet. 5.7 so that worthilie we be commaunded peculiarlie to cast all our care vppon god because he peculiarlie careth for vs. III. That god ordinarilie gouerneth the vvorld by second causes This also we learne by the holie scriptures though God performeth manie purposes of his diuine prouidence by himselfe without any external helper yea and sometimes quite against ordinarie meanes yet he executeth manie more thinges ordinarilye by second causes Hos 2.21.22 as well in the gouernmēt of the whole world as of the church sith he himselfe saieth he vvill heare the heauens the heauens vvill heare the earth the earth vvill heare the corne the corne vvill heare Israell IV. The meanes vnto the ende are not to bee contemned sith god ordereth as vvell the one as the other by his prouidence Whereuppon we also knowe that although we are assured that god hath a care ouer vs yet the meanes which hee hath ordained for the saluation both of our soules and bodies are not to be contemned nor god to be tempted but herein we must followe the Apostle vvho although he vvere assured of the safetie of all them which were in the shipp yet as the mariners went about to escape awaie he saide to the soldiors and to the captaine vnlesse these abide in the shippe you cannot be saued For God who setteth an ende vnto each thing he also hath ordained both the beginning meanes by which that ende is attained vnto V. All thinges come to passe in respect of god necessarilie in respect of vs manie thinges happen casuallie But sith god by his prouidence doeth preserue second causes which he vseth in gouerning the worlde euerie one in her proper nature yea and is the moouer of them and of them some are ordained of their owne nature to certaine and sure effects other some are indefinite Wee knowe and confesse that although in respect of God Mat. 10.29.30 Ex. 21.13 without whose foreknowledge and wil nothing can happen in the world all things are done necessarilie yet in respect of vs and of the second causes manie things happen come to passe chaūceablie For what can bee more chaunceable and casuall to a carpenter and trauailer then if the axe fall out of his hand kill the other yet the Lord saieth that it is he which killed the trauailer And our Lord Iesus died willinglie yet he said Christ must suffer Luc. 24.46 Herode Pilate of their free-will condemned Iesus yet the Apostles saie Act. 4.28 they did nothing but what the hand and counsaile of God had decreed to be done VI. That god is not the author of sinnes vvhich are committed in the world And hereupon we also know and confesse Act. 17.28 that although manie offences are committed in the world by men god in the meane time guiding all thinges 1. Ioh. 2.16 yet the same cannot bee imputed to god nor to his prouidence for he indeede mooueth all thinges and ministreth strength by his prouidence vnto euerie one to worke but yet he instilleth not that corruption to anie whereby they worke amisse As therefore the earth yeelding her sappe aswell to il trees as to good yet is not to be blamed because an ill tree makes ill fruite so much lesse may god rightlie be said to bee either the cause or the author of our sinnes although by the hand of his prouidence he beareth vpholdeth ordereth and guideth euen the wicked Jn him saieth the Apostle we liue vve are mooued Heb. 1.3 Act. 17.28 and haue our beeing namelie wee are mooued of him such as wee are except he by his grace doe make vs otherwise VII The secret counsailes of God in gouerning the world are to be reuerenced not inquired after Meane while the secrete and vvonderfull counsells of god whereby wee see innumerable things to be done and whereof we cannot giue or know any reason the same we behold adore with that reuerēce which we ought contenting our selues with this assured knowledge Mat. 10.29.30 Rom. 9.14 namely that nothing comes to passe in the worlde without the will of God and that will of god to be so just that it is the most certain rule of all iustice therefore that which the Apostle saith must euer bee holden Rom. 11.33 O the deepenes of the riches both of the wisedome knowledge of god how vnsearcheable are his iudgements and his vvayes past finding out Rom. 9.14 Rom. 11.36 Also that Is there anie iniquitie vvith God And yet Of him and through him and for him are all thinges To him be glorie for ouer Amen VIII Errors Wee condemne therefore all scorners and all those philosophers which either do wholie take awaye the prouidence of god out of the worlde or denie that humaine matters and smale things are regarded of god Those likewise which abusing the prouidence of God doe contemne the meanes ordained of God for the saluation of vs both soule and bodie as also those which woulde haue all thinges to come to passe so meerely necessarily that they take awaye all casualtie and depriue men of all libertie lastlie those which will haue God so to worke all thinges in all men that they also doe blasphemouslie prooue him to bee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a iointe-worker an author of sinne CHAP. VII Of mans fall and of originall sinne and the fruites thereof I. Adam sinned of his owne accord by disobedience WE beleeue Gen. 1. 2 Eccl. 7.30 Sirac 15.18 that the first man when he was created after the image of God iust and righteous and meerlie free so as he might if he woulde not haue sinned nor haue died any kinde of death The diuell then alluring him and god not letting him but leauing him in the hāds of his owne counsells he transgressed by disobedience Rom. 5.19 Libera voluntate of his owne accord and of his meere free choise so that he nether can nor ought to ascribe the blame of his transgression to his owne nature giuen to him of god nor to god himself nor to any other thing created but to his own selfe alone because it was his owne vvill II. What and what manner of sinne Adams was For vve knovv that Adams sinne was a voluntarie transgression of gods commandemēt that he should not eate of the forbidden fruit as Moses describeth it and so as the Apostle speaketh it
ouerthroweth common-wealthes This is our faith concerning the gospell of our Lord Iesus Christ IX Errors We condemne therefore the Antinomi whosoeuer disallow the morall law and cast the same out of their churches as contrarie to the gospell or nothing appertaining to christians and do reproue those magistrats which labour to bring in Moses politicall precepts among their people CHAP. XIIII Of the sacraments of the nevv Testament BEcause God to make perfect that communion with Christ wherein consisteth the whole participation of saluation would not onely vse the word of the gospell by it self alone but also other external signes applied and ioyned to the worde of which two consisteth a Sacrament Therefore after our confession of the gospell wee haue also adioyned our confession of the Sacraments and the same briefe and plaine and agreeable to the holy Scriptures and chiefest articles of our christian faith I. VVhat wee meane by the name of a Sacrament We knowe that a Sacrament is properly a holie couenant or oath and promise on both sides that is made betweene God his people not simply but established and confirmed by sacred rites ceremonies as it manifestly appeareth in the Sacrament of circumcision betweene God and Abraham and betweene Christ and vs in Baptisme which succeeded the circumcision Therefore Sacrament is ofteÌ„ taken of the Fathers for that whole action either of Baptisme or of the Lords Supper wherein there goeth before a promise on both sides holily confirmed with external rites and seales or signes and euen with the bloode of Christ But afterward by a Synecdoche they vnderstood by the name of Sacrament onely the rites and signes added to the word And this last signification hath beene much vsed in the church We therefore call a Sacrament according to the significatioÌ„ receiued in the church not the word alone nor the element alone but the element water or bread wine ioyned with the worde of the gospell according to Christs institution according to that same of Augustine To the element commeth the worde and then it is a Sacrament II. Sacraments of what things they bee Sacraments But because euerie Sacrament is a Sacrament of some thing this thing wee saye is that which is meÌ„t in the word of the gospell namely the grace of God in Christ or rather Christ himselfe with grace saluation placed in him For him doth the gospell wholy propound or set out vnto vs and vnto his communion as the word so the Sacraments also were instituted and do draw our mindes by their signification and therefore that which is outwardly giuen wee call it a signe of him which is to be receiued in wardly and that which is done without we cal his seale which the holy ghost worketh inwardly in our hearts III. Of vvhat parts a Sacrament consisteth Hereby also we knowe of what parts properly consisteth a Sacrament namely of the word and outward signe but so as they be referred to the thing signified and represented by them and whereof they are a Sacrament For that wherof any thing is a Sacrament can not be the Sacrament it selfe nor parte of the Sacrament sith euerie Sacrament is a Sacrament of some other thing then it selfe Meane while we doe not simplie separate the thing it selfe from the Sacrament neither do we denie but among the fathers and most of the godlie and learned writers vnder the name of Sacrament is comprehended that it selfe whereof any thing is a Sacrament as by the name of Baptisme not only is vnderstood the outward washing with water and the word but also is contained the verie inwarde cleansing of the conscience from sinne regeneration Therefore we embrace that saying of Ireneus of the Lords supper that it consisteth of an earthly matter and a heauenly Neither doe wee our selues vse to forbeare such kinde of speaches when we talke of the sacrameÌ„ts but yet in this sence not that it is properly a part of the sacrament sith it is rather that to the participation wherof the sacraments doe bring vs but that the sacrament hath a mistical relation vnto it and by the band or knott of this relation the earthly matter is coupled with the heauenly And thus doe wee reconcile many sayings of the learned writers and of the Fathers which seeme to haue some diuers and contrary meanings when indeede their opinions are one the same euery where most of them calling sacramentes simply by the names of signes figures tokens tipes antytipes formes seales sealinges cerimonies visible wordes and such like names others saying it consisteth of an earthly matter a heauenly which howe it is to be vnderstood we declared euen nowe but all often calling the sacraments by the names of those things whereof they bee sacraments after the vse of the holy Scriptures when as notwithstanding all men haue ment and professed in the name of sacraments these three thinges the word the signes added to the word and the thinges where of they are signes IV. Causes why the Lord would haue the external signes added to the word of the gospell and why they are called visible words We beleeue also and freely confesse that these visible signes by Gods institution were added and ought to bee added to the word for a more full and firme confirmation of the word in our mindes sith it is euen vnto such an ende that euery where among all nations they vse to put their seales to writings and to testaments Which is also the cause why Augustine calleth the outward signes the things obiect to our sences visible wordes because indeed they were instituted to this ende and added to the word that they might doe that which the worde doeth that is that the same which the worde signifieth to our eares the signes may represent to our eyes other sences and so might confirme the word and promises of God and as by the word faith is stirred vp in our mindes so also by the outward signes as it were sealed with seales it might be more throughly confirmed and increased and lastly that as the worde so also the holie signes be instruments of the holy ghost by which wee are brought vnto that communion with Christ and do conioyne therein And we haue no doubt but all this was instituted of God for our infirmitie and ignorance and for the weakenes of our faith that the same might be helped not onely by the word but also by the viâ—ible signes by which faith properly we take hold on Iesus Christ and grow together in him V. VVhere the words of the institution are not rehearsed there is no sacrament therefore without vse they bee nothing but as they are in their owne nature But as we beleeue that the signes are added to the word not for superstition but for greater confirmation of our faith so also that the word in administration of the sacraments is necessarie not to charme vs but to stirre vp faith in vs so that where the
ought to be subiect to our princes and rulers in all feare not onely to the good and curteousse but also to the frovvard and vniust XXII Marriage ought to be free aswell to ministers of the church as others Of marriage And we beleeue that this is verie necessary and behouefull to honestie to the saluation of ministers and to the honor of the ministerie it selfe and consequently to the true gouernement of the church that it should be permitted as freely vnto them as it is to al Lay men as they cal them to marrie sith Christ forbad it to no kinde of men nay speaking of single life he said that not al mē do receaue this namely to lead a single life meaning that which the Apostle in round wordes expounded 1. Cor. 7.9 Heb. 13.4 namely he which cannot containe he must marrie a wife For marriage is honourable among all men the bedd vndefiled as with the Apostle wee confesse XXIII Jt is good and commendable if any being indued with the gift of continencie abstaine from marriage Meane while we denie not but they which are indued of God with the gift of a pure single life they may more fittly attend vpon diuine causes and more easily serue the church then they which are married by reason of manie greeuous cares and troubles which marriage bringeth with it and whereby often times euen against our wills wee are drawne awaye from following the diuine causes to deale in domesticall and troublesome businesses of this life as the Apostle also saieth the vnmaried careth for the things of the Lord 1. Cor. 7.32 howe he may please the Lord but he that is married careth for the thinges of the worlde howe he may please his wife And therefore as these men haue their iust commendation which do therefore take a wife that they maye liue with a cleane and pure conscience to God So also do we thinke them worthie to be commended who therefore choose to themselues a chast single life that they may the better employ their labour on the church and in the same do liue so long as they can XXIV Mariages are to bee contracted in the Lord and are reuerently to be esteemed And we know and confesse 1. Cor. 7.39 that all mariages ought to bee contracted in the Lord by the law of nature and the law of God yea and by honest customes of all places and are reuerently to be esteemed Mat. 19.9 and that no man may put away his lawfull wife vnlesse it be for fornication but if any vnbeleeuing woman through hate of religion will not remaine with a beleeuing husband he ought not by force to keep her for one that is faithfull is not in subiection in such thinges 1. Cor. 7.15 but God hath called them in peace XXV Both he which hath put away an adulteresse hee which is forsaken of an vnbeleeuer may no lesse contract newe mariage then hee vvhose vvife is dead We also beleeue that aswell he which hath lawfully put away an adulteresse or is forsakē of an bnbeleeuer maye marie againe as he whose former wife is dead For that saying of the Apostle is euer most true and profitable to all vnmaried persons and widowes Jt is good for them if they remaine euen as I but if they can not containe let them marie 1. Cor. 7.8 for it is better to marie then to burne XXVI That some should bee appointed in the church which should iudge of matrimoniall controuersies But we allow not that any of these thinges bee done in the church without the lawfull knowledge iudgement and sentence of the church and some christian magistrate if there be one and therefore that some godlie skillfull and wise men ought to bee appointed in the church which may discerne and iudge of matrimoniall causes and these matters that nothing be done rashly or vnaduisedly least euerie one should thinke lawfull whatsoeuer he listed but all thinges should be done lawfully to edification and without iniurie to any 1. Cor. 14.26 Rom. 2.24 and least the name of God should through vs bee euill spoken of among the infidells XXVII They which are rulers in the church ought to take care that the children of the faithfull may be christianly instructed and that they may be taught in learning and honest artes With these is ioyned the care of children wee therefore beleeue it is verie necessarie to the continuall preseruation of the church not onely that each seuerall man haue a care to instruct his children in true godlinesse in christian dueties in learning and honest artes but also that the whole church haue a speciall regard thereunto that they may be made fitt and profitable both for the church and common wealth whereto belong both publicke grammer schooles exercises of honest artes and ecclesiasticall catechizings XXVIII Ministers with their families ought to bee maintained Of stipends and church godds with honest and liberall stipends Wee also beleeue that the church cannot well bee gouerned vnlesse such necessarie maintenance be bestowed on the ministers as whereby they and their family may liue in an honest estate For no man except he haue whereupon to liue Mat. 10.10 can do his duetie Christ saieth the workeman is worthie of his wages and the Apostle writeth largely thereof in more thē one place 1. Cor. 9.7 c. shewing by many reasons that ministers which serue the churches ought to receiue of the same church what so is needfull for them 1. Tim. 5.17 c and that they haue good right to demaund the same so farre from offence is it that they should take it as some would cauill yet notwithstanding couetousnesse aswell in all other as chiefly in ministers we do with the Apostle vtterly condemne 1. Tim. 3.3.8 as also wee allow not prodigalitie and we teach that both these faultes are to be shunned and auoyded XXIX The church goods should not be wasted but be bestowed on the maintenance of ministers and other godly vses And whereas manie goods haue in times past and yet in some places are giuen to churches by the liberality of princes other godlie persons wee iudge that if any church haue such goodes great care is to be had that the same be not wasted nor conuerted into prophane vses and much lesse into sacriligious vses nor fained to bee so conuerted but to bee onely bestowed vppon that purpose whereto they were giuen euen to a godly intent And wee well allowe of that auncient partition of church goods where one part went to the bishops that is to the teachers Deu◠〈◊〉 and ministers of the word and their families another to the clerkes that is to students and such as were ordained to the ministerie of the church and to them that attended on the church the third part to poore people and trauelers a fourth part to repairing of churches and schooles to which parte also belong not onely the houses of
of his discipline And therefore wee beleeue that it belongeth to the true gouernment and edification of the church that princes should chiefly subiect themselues to be taught admonished and reformed by the word of God whereby others by their example may doe so also the more chearfully and that if they refuse to do it the princes or rulers maye more freelie punish them for it and compell them to their dueties IX Errors We therefore condemne all contemners of magistrats rebells seditious persons enimies of their common wealth and whosoeuer doe either openly refuse to performe their dueties which they owe to their rulers or doe craftely shift the same We condemn by name the error of the Anabaptists saying it is not lawful for a christiā man to beare office much lesse to vse his authoritie ouer his subiectes in the course of religion affirming that it is free for all men to follow what religion he will none ought to be compelled to faith We disallow them also which giue authoritie in religion vnto magistrats onely as they saye for names sake denying that they haue authoritie to call Synodes to consult about religion to reforme churches and to determine out of the scriptures such thinges as pertaine to the peoples saluation and will haue them to bee nothing else but the executors of those things which the bishop appoint As also neither do we allow those magistrats who without a sufficient knowledge in the causes do alter religion vpon their owne pleasures do condemn men neuer heard and spoile and confiscate their goods set downe rules of religion not out of the scriptures but rather against the word of God and beare themselues not as seruants of God in the church of God but as Lords ouer the churches nor will bowe their neck vnder the yoake of the sonne of God For whome that they may haue a greater knowledge of God and better mindes wee praye and beseech God the Father and the Lord Iesus Christ CHAP. XXVII Of perpetuall remisson of sinns in the church of Christ I. There is a perpetuall dispensation of remission of sinnes in the church and thereunto is the perpetuall ministerie of the word ordayned WE haue before confessed that so soone as any one is ingrafted into Christ by his holy spirit he presently obtaineth forgiuenesse of all his sinnes committed and draweth a new life from his head Christ and so is made a liuelie member of the church But because the most holie ones that are in this militant church do daily sinne euē to the last ende of their liues so that they haue still need of new forgiuenesse of their sinnes and also of new repentance and new faith to apprehend forgiuenesse of sinnes in Christ that faith and repentance is stirred vp by the ministerie of the word and sacraments therefore wee beleeue that remission of sinnes is dispensed and bestowed perpetually in the church by the ministerie of the word and sacraments and that the ecclesiasticall ministerie which is perpetuall in the church is ordained thereunto II. What we meane by the name of remission of sinnes And sith there be three things in sinne the action it selfe the wickednesse of the action therefore the sinners fault remaining in him and lastlie the desert of due punishment cleauing vnto the fault then we vnderstand that our sinnes are forgiuen vs when not onely the faulte and wickednesse of the action is not imputed vnto vs but also when as the desert or guiltinesse is taken awaye and the due punishment pardoned For then are our sinnes properlie forgiuen vs and we when wee desire in prayer that our sinnes may be forgiuen vs wee desire not onely to bee absolued from the fault and that the iniquitie maye not bee imputed vnto vs but also that the punishment and condemnation due vnto vs for the iniquitie may be forgiuen and we deliuered from our debts and guiltinesse seing that neither we can say that we forgiue our brethren their debts vnlesse wee set them free from the debt it selfe and from all satisfaction and seing it is certaine that we are not commaunded to aske any thing but that which he will giue vs and that Christ hath cancelled the hand writing of all our debts hauing himselfe made a perfect and full payment and satisfaction III. The afflictions vvhich the children of God endure after their sinnes are pardoned are not punishments and satisfactions for sinnes past but fatherly chastisement for those to come But whereas God after the forgiuenesse of sinnes is wont to afflict and scourge his children with manie torments wee beleeue that God doth it not for that they should by that meanes either wholly or in part satisfie his iustice for their sinnes seing that one full satisfaction of Christ for vs is inough and more then inough but that by them as by fatherly corrections we may afterwards be more warie and take heed what belongeth to the mortifying of sinne that dwelleth in vs and that we should no more so easilie slipp into sinne whereuppon we with Augustine do cal them and teach that they are to bee called T. 7. de pec mer. Rē lib. 2. c. 33 34. not the punishments of sinne but the tryalls of faith and exercises of the Saints IV. Sinnes are properly remitted of God alone freely and for Christs sake our mediatour Wee beleeue also Ies 43.25 that our sinnes are properly forgiuen vs of God onely by meere fauour and for Christ our mediatour sith also it is he alone against whome we properly commit sinne both mediatly and immediatly whē as we breake his lawe Luc. 23.34 and it is alwaies in the power onely of the creditour to gratifie his debtors and to forgiue their debts Whereupon Christ also as man prayed his father for them which crucified him that he would pardon them Luc. 5.21 c and forgiue them their offences when the Iewes said vvho can forgiue sinnes but onely God he partly by holding his peace and partly by shewing a miracle confirmed it Wherefore in that that Christ of his owne authority forgaue sinnes we with the fathers do beleeue it may well bee concluded he is true God sith the same cannot bee done by any meere creature but onely ministerially or as being a minister as they speak in the name and authoritie of God Mat. 18.18 Ioh. 20.23 Which wee knowe was equallie giuen not to one alone but to all the Apostles and so to all lawfull ministers of the gospell V. Christ God and man indeed forgiueth sinnes but in a diuerse manner as he is God as he is man Whereon it also followeth that Christ god and man which wee also confesse together with the father and the holie ghost forgiueth sinnes but he doth it in one sort as he is God and in another as he is man For as he is god he doeth effect the same properly and of his authoritie but as he is man he doth it and did
a moment be chaunged into the same state with the dead that are risen and then Christ being come downe from heauen euen in the cloudes there shall iudge all men and from thence giue sentence on them shal shew himselfe apparently to all and that all the godlie being taken vpp from the earth euen into the clouds shall goe to meet him 1. Thess 5.1 c. Mat. 24.3 25.31 attended on by the Angells and appearing in his great maiestie and glorie as also he himselfe and his Apostles haue taught and left in writing II. Christ shall visibly returne from one place to another and that with a bodie visible locall and determinate We therefore beleeue Christ shall so return visiblie as he before in the Apostles sight ascended into heauen and shall come euen out of that heauen where he now is therefore from that which is farre distant from the earth and from the clouds vnto which he shall descend and we beleeue he shall so descend with his naturall bodie that it must needs be grauÌ„ted that the same is locall and finite and consequently not existing euerie where seing also the holie ghost describeth such a descending vnto simple people which hee sheweth cannot be made without chaunge of places III. The faithlesse reprobates shall not come vpp to Christ sitting in the cloudes but remaining on the earth shall heare the sentence of the iudge But seing the Scriptures do pronounce only of the godlie that they shall bee caught vpp into the cloudes and shall meete Christ in the ayre wee beleeue that the vngodlie shall not come vp vnto Christ but remaining vnder his feete vppon the earth shall heare that senteÌ„ce of the iudge goe yee cursed into euerlasting fire when all the Saints which shal bee aloft with Christ shall approue the same sentence of the iudge according as the Apostle thinketh 1. Cor. 6.2.3 The Saints shall iudge the world yea and the Angells IV. For what causes that generall iudgement was appointed And wee beleeue that for two causes principally this iudgement was appointed wherin Christ shall sitt as iudge in the sight of all men the first is that such thinges as are nowe hidden vnto men aswel innocencie faith and the good consciences of the godlie as the hypocrisie and vile deeds of the wicked may be openly knowne to all the world and thereby be manifestly seene how iust the iudgements of God were euer from the first to the last Whereuppon also the Apostle called that day the day of declaration The other cause Rom. 2.5 is that the reward which was promised aswell to the good for their good workes as to the bad for their euill deedes should be fully paied and restored as the Apostle saieth 2. Cor. 5.10 wee must all appeare before the iudgement seat of Christ that euerie man may receiue the things vvhich are done in his bodie according to that he hath done whether it be good or euill whereupon also the same Apostle calleth it the day of the iust iudgement Rom. 2.5 V. Aeternall life which shal bee giuen to the elect is called and is a reward yet due vnto vs onely vppon fauour and not but for Christs sake For albeit it be a meere gift of God which the elect shall receiue and purchased by the meritts of Christ alone yet we doubt not but it is named and that it is truely a reward sith the Lord Iesus vouchsafed to call it so namely a free reward seing also that the good works themselues of the godlie and all the causes wherefrom the same do proceed are free gifts of God free election free redemption free calling faith iustification regeneration forgruenesse of sinnes and lastly a free pardon of all wants and imperfections wherewith our good works are infected and a free imputation of Christs perfect obedience wherewith our imperfect obedience is clothed and made acceptable to god and consequently to speak properly is a reward not due vnto vs for our owne workes considered in themselues but for the meriâ—ts of Christ imputed to vs. VI. After the iudgement giuen the godly shal bee presently with Christ in heauen but the vngodly in hell with the deuill his Angells Further more wee beleeue that presently after the same iudgement the godly shall follow Christ into heauen but the wicked shal be thrust downe with the deuills into hell Christ saying to the first come yee blessed of my father but to the other Goe yee cursed into euerlasting fire VII That day shal be to the godly most ioyfull and is therefore to be wished for to the wicked most heauie is therefore eueÌ„ in the only hearing intollerable So do wee beleeue that this last day shal bee vnto them which are grafted into Christ most happie and ioyfull and therefore loued wished of them 2. Tim. 4.8 and ought to be loued wished for of vs and to the wicked the most accursed and wofull day that euer was and therefore no maruaile though they hate that day cannot abide the mention of it VIII Errors We condemne whosoeuer shall denie that Christ shall truely and in verie deede descend in his humaine bodie from heauen into the cloudes and then returne with his chosen into heauen againe and would prooue that it shall all bee without any chaunge of places onely by appearance as they call it a certaine likenesse to the which the Angells doe affirme the contrarie vnto the Apostles Act. 1.11 as yee haue seene him ascend into heauen so shall he come againe VVee disallowe also those which teach that the works of pietie considered in themselues are the true cause for which eternall life is giuen and are the true meritts thereof against which the Apostle also saieth Rom. 6.23 The gift of God is eternall life Neither doe we approue the opinion of the Chiliasts concerning the thousand years wherin Christ with his elect should remaine heere in the earth after the latter iudgement and that they should here liue in the delights yet honest delights of the flesh and should procreate children but Saints so at last be translated vpp into heauen And we condemne and detest their error which stand in contention that the fire whereinto the wicked shal be throwne shall at the length be queÌ„ched so that all euen the deuills themselues shall liue blessedlie in the kingdome of God flatt against the plaine words of Christ goe yee into euerlasting fire Mat. 25.4 CHAP. XXX Of eternall life I. Eternall life shal be giuen to all which by their good workes haue witnessed that they were truely grafted into Christ and haue beleeued in Christ WE beleeue that eternall life that is full and perfect possession of eternall life shal bee giuen in that last daye vnto all who by the apparent workes of true faith and godlinesse shal be declared before al Angells and men manifestly shewed and by sentence of the iudge Christ pronounced to haue beene
repentance and the faith of Christ but seing they were as Luke reporteth onely baptized into Iohns baptisme which notwithstanding they knew not what it was and were altogether ignorant of the baptisme of Christ that is of the spirit he baptized them shewing vnto thē what Iohns baptisme was and how he baptized into Christ not into his owne sprinkling or dipping of the water as though that could be any profite vnto them He therefore baptized them with this baptisme of Iohn that is as Iohn vsed to do into the name of the Lord Iesus and by by after laying on his hands he baptized thē with the baptisme also of Christ that is with the spirit For immediatly the holy ghost came on them as it is there read This there And vpon the epistle to the Ephes chap. 4. the same Bucer writeth thus Hereby it is also manifest that the twelue men at Ephesus which knew not whether there were an holie ghost or no whome Paule baptized were not baptized with the baptisme of Iohn that is with that which he administred but as they witnessed themselues they were baptized into Iohns baptisme For Iohn preached vnto all whome hee baptized that Christ should baptize them with the holy ghost and exhorted them that they would beleeue in him and that of him they might receiue the holy ghost And therefore these Ephesiās could not haue beene ignorant of the holy ghost if they had bin washed with that baptisme which might truely be called Iohns which also the Apostles words to those men doth sufficiently declare Iohn verily baptized with the baptisme of repētance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ For by these wordes he would teach vs that they neuer receiued Iohns baptisme who as yet knew not Iohns preaching of Christ and the promise Thus farre Bucer Seing then the fathers expound this place in Act. 19. as wee haue nowe declared who I pray am I that I should dare or that I ought to gaine-say so many and so learned men in such an exposition of this scripture which neither doth any whitt wrest the text nor contrarieth any other scriptures nor is against the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities For if any man shall obiect out of the text that same truely and but it prooueth nothing against the fathers exposition seing it is no vnusuall thing with the Apostle where hee saieth first truely not alwaies to ioyne the aduersatiue particle but Rom. 3. ver 2. Coll. 2. ver 23. and in other places And vnto this truely another but which Luke for breuitie sake left out might bee vnderstood verie fittly as hereafter we will shew so that it is no necessitie with this truely to ioyne that but which followeth in the 5. verse in which verse the fathers will haue not Paules speach but Lukes to be continued Therefore the fathers exposition is not repugnant to the text nor yet with any other scripture For if any man say Paule writeth to the Corinthians that he is gladd he baptized none but the house of Stephana it may be answered it is true namely at Corinth but these twelue were baptized at Ephesus and besides he speaketh of such as were baptized with his owne hand but these twelue he might baptise by some other to dispute no longer about the circumstance of the time And it is most certaine it is not repugnant to the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities because the fathers do not speake of a baptisme rightly administred as though Paule had repeated that again This expositiō therefore of the fathers in my iudgement cannot easily be refelled And this therfore is the chiefest cause why I haue euer thus thought and yet thinke of this action of Paule although indeed I cannot consent vnto them all in the cause why Paule baptized them but onely to Ambrose and Hierome That Iohns Baptisme Christs Baptisme did differ the fathers teach both by this that Iohn saide how he baptized onely with vvater but Christ should baptize with the holy ghost with fire and also by this that the baptisme of Iohn is called the baptisme of repentance but Christes baptisme is said to bee giuen for the remission of sinnes And because that he prepared the waye to this as Tertull. speaketh that baptisme of repentance was as it were a sueing for the remission of sinnes and sanctificatiō in Christ which was to follow after Read Tertul. of bap pag. 707. So Cyprian also in his sermon of the baptisme of Christ and of the manifestation of the Trinitie pag. 430. So August To. 7. against Petil cap. 7. But all of vs doe not knowe what the father 's mēt by this differēce of the baptisme For they ment not that the one diffred from the other in the matter or in the signe or in the doctrine and forme of baptisine but onely in efficacie that namely although remission of sinnes was giuen to them which were washed with Iohns baptisme yet the same was not of Iohns baptisme that is of water but by the baptisme of Christ which is the baptisme of the spirite whereunto that belongeth I baptize with water but he with the holy ghost And with this baptisme of the spirit were they only baptized which beleeued in Christ whome Iohn saide was then come though all knewe him not Therefore Iohn in his baptisme did inculcate and often repeate this faith as Paule witnesseth in that place of the 19 of the Actes They therefore are deceiued who for this diuersitie did thinke the baptisme of water was to be repeated August against Petil. as we touched a little before sheweth how some held opinion that the 12 did lye vnto the Apostle when being asked vnto what they were baptized they answered vnto Iohns baptisme So by this that first those Ephesians saide vnto him that they had not yet heard whether there were that is whether that holy ghost did exist or not namely the giuer of those giftes whereof the speach was the Apostle might be said to conuince thē of a lye by this argument Whosoeuer haue bin baptized they haue professed faith in Christ as the sonne of God and consequently in the father and in the spirite of them both For Iohn did require this faith according to the same he baptized men and in baptizing he alwayes vrged that Iesus Christ was he which should baptize in the spirit But you by your owne cōfession do not know this spirite c. and so beleeue not rightly in Iesus Christ Therefore c. But surely to saye that these twelue did lye vnto the church and to the Apostle it seemes to me to be to hard and vile a thing in mē which professed Christ And for this cause we did euer better allow of the opiniō of Ambrose Hierome that the 12 did say truely whē they said they were baptized vnto Iohns baptisme but yet not by
Martyrs confirmed and the faithfull do yet assuredly hold Thus saith Vigilius By this the very same is vndoubtedly prooued which was also by the other before namely not onely that the worde and flesh cannot possiblie be both of one nature as the Monophysites affirmed but also that the proprieties of the one nature cannot really be communicated to the other so as indeed it should haue the same in it selfe and that the one nature should be made the very like that the other is as thus that the flesh by reason of the vnion with the word should also with the same word bee made present in all places in it owne esseuce For from this proposition which is held for graunted of all sound beleeuers namely The flesh through the vnion with the word hath not gotten this proprietie of the word that it selfe should with the word be present in all places in it owne substance from this proposition I say he concludeth therefore neither is it made of the same nature with the word This certenly is the argument of Vigilius yea of the whole catholicke church What remaineth onely this that if it may be said to bee present in all places it can be said to bee so by no other meanes then by the Hypostasie of it which is the very word For in Christs humaine nature there be only two things the proper essence of his nature with his proprieties and gifts created and the common Hypostasis with the diuine which is the word it selfe His proper essence is finite or determinate and so is onely within one place The Hypostasis is infinite immeasurable and most simple or vnmixt And therefore in this onely and not in the proper essence the flesh of Christ can be and in verie deed is present in all places That which hath bin said of this propriety the same is also to be thought of all the rest aswell those of the word as of the flesh For also in the argumēt before going against the Monophysites book 4. chap. 4. he concludeth the same from certaine proprieties of the word as is to be vncreated inuisible vntouchable said that it is impossible the flesh should partake in those qualities Hereuppon he concluded therefore the flesh cannot bee of one nature with the word sith it can by no meanes be made inuisible vncreated vntouchable vnderstand this in it owne essence whereas notwithstanding in the Hypostasis of it which is common to it with the vvorde it is in verie deed as in all places present so also vncreated inuisible vntouchable and what not seing in the same Hypostasis it is also god These things are all most assured and plaine and do depend vpon that infallible rule which he deliuered in the fift booke and second chapter namely We saye better and more catholically it is common in him and not vnto him And we say better it is proper to him and not in him I beseech all christians by our Lord Iesus that setting aside all the vaine dreames of priuate men and reiecting all the affections hatreds enmities of their flesh and imbracing the assured and wholesome doctrine of the aūcient church and christian loue wee maye all ioyne together into one holy league of friendship euen as we haue all one God one mediatour one baptisme one hope of our vocation to the glorie of Gods name the building vp of the church the saluation of our soules For sooner then we suppose shall wee be summoned before Christs tribunall seate that euerie one may giue account for that which he hath done in the bodie and in this life seing that after this life there is no hope of pardon no place for amendment CERTAINE POSITIONS OF THE same Zanchius Of some principall articles of our christian faith against diuers heresies at sundrie times disputed on partly at Heidelberg partly at Newstade FOr what purpose I published this confession with my obseruations vpon it for the verie same cause at this time haue I gathered together these positions concerning sundrie matters in question which were handled partly vnder Frederick the third of godly memory at Heidelburge partly vnder my fauourable Lord Iohn Cassimier erector of this schoole here at Newstade against diuers heresies and being all brought together I thought good to haue them printed with my confession thereby that al posteritie might euidently see that I neuer consented to any of these heresies which in these dayes of ours haue beene fetcht againe from the depth of hell and this to Gods glorie the edification of the church and the saluation of manie through our Lord Iesus Christ Amen Of one true god eternall father sonne and holy ghost yeare 1572. 1 THere is one onely Iehouah creatour of heauen and earth and God of Israell 2 And this God though he bee one onely Iehouah yet is he not one but meere Elohim the number and names of whome the sonne of God manifested in the flesh hath clearlie and apparātly reuealed vnto vs without all doubt namely the eternall father the eternall sonne and the eternall holie ghost 3 Further these three Elohim are true existences and those vndeuided liuing vnderstanding willing and therefore as the church hath euer vsed to speake true persons 4 And the father sonne and holie ghost are so distinct among themselues as the one is not the other 5 Yet euerie one of them is the true Iehouah 6 Yet are there not therefore manis Iehouahs but onely one Iehouah Of the nature singularitie and immeasurablenes of one true God yeare 1573. 1 BY the name of the nature of God is vsually signified not onely his essence simplie considered in it selfe but also all his proprieties or attributes by which hee is declared to vs and for our sakes of what sort he is 2 And therefore God is rightly saide of his owne nature to be gentle wise good and such like 3 But albeit hee vseth to applie many qualities like to this his owne nature vnto men by which wee are made iust good wise yet his owne nature he doth communicate to no created thing which hee cannot indeede communicate vnlesse their could more Gods bee made 4 God also besides his other proprieties is simplie simple or vnmixt that he can no waies be said to be compounded of many things no not of his being and essence 5 For although hee attribute vnto himselfe manie thinges in the Scriptures as it were manie qualities as to bee good iust mightie c yet no quality doth in very deed fal into god but of what sorte soeuer hee is the same hee is in his owne simple essence but by these diuerse names the infinite perfection of his most simple essence is signified vnto vs. 6 But God not onely admitteth no composttion in himselfe but also falleth not into concretion or substance of any created thing as that he should bee either the forme or matter thereof 7 God is furthermore truely immeasurable and in finite therefore present euery where and that