works and of this kinde of couenant accordingly and as we purposed in this present treatise CHAP. III. Of the couenant of grace IN the free couenant of grace or of the Gospel the first grounde is our mediator Iesus Christ 1. Ground of the couenāt of grace crucified also and dead or which is the same in effect the bloud of the mediator the vertue whereof is twofold The first serues to satisfie the iustice and wrath of God for our sinnes for the breach of that couenant of works The second is to purchase and merit a new grace mercie of God for vs. And this grace or mercie of God 2. Grounde obtained by the bloud of the mediator is y e second ground of the couenant of grace wherby we stand reconciled vnto God and in grace with him Wherefore the first immediat grounde of the couenant of grace is Gods free sauour or mercie whereby mans miserie is presupposed and not nature or any good thing in it For that all our naturall goodnes after the breach of that couenant of works is quite vanished that is to say nature as touching holines iustice and wisdome is vtterlie lost For we are not to approue their iudgment which say that the freedome of will that is the goodnes and holines of nature is much worne and weakened as they speake in this corrupt nature And thus far of the ground of the couenant of grace Vpon this ground I say first of the bloud of Christ next of God free mercie in Christ the couenant of grace vsually so called is founded The first and principall grace promised in this couenant is righteousnes which must necessarily heere haue the first place for after the breach of the couenant of works that one first originall iustice as they call it was quite lost and vniustice did succeede into the place thereof And this iustice which is here promised in the couenant of grace is no inherent righteousnesse as that originall iustice was but it is the righteousnesse of our mediator Iesus Christ which is ours by faith and by the imputation of God for which cause the Apostle cals it the righteousnes of God for without this imputatiue iustice we can not Rom. 3. 20. possiblie stand before the tribunall of God and by the imputation of this righteousnesse are we said to be iustified before God Next after this kinde of righteousnes which is by imputation there is another kind of inherent iustice promised in the couenant of grace euen such a sanctitie and goodnes of nature as was lost in the fall of man and this is but begunne in this life but perfected in another And this inherent iustice is nothing else but life eternal in vs begunne I say in earth and perfected in heauen And this heauenly and spirituall life doth proceede from that righteousnes of Christ which is imputed vnto vs by faith For that righteousnes of Christ is effectuall in vs vnto eternall life by the spirit of Christ who sanctifieth and quickneth vs. And thus far of the promise which is in the couenant of grace Now it followeth that wee see what the condition is of this couenant The verie name of the couenant of grace might seeme to require no condition for it is called a free couenant because God freely The condition of the couenant of grace and as it might seeme without all condition doth promise herein both righteousnes and life for he which promiseth to giue any thing freely he bindeth not to any condition But we are to vnderstand that grace here or the particle freely doth not exclude all condition but that only which is in the couenant of workes which is the condition of the strength of nature and of works naturally iust and good as we may call them which can in no wise stand with Gods free grace in Christ Iesu For neither that freedome of will which doth import some purity holines in nature nor the works of free-will as they call them can agree with the grace of God in Christ Iesus What is the condition then which this word grace or freely will admit in this couenant of grace I answer assuredly none other thē that which may stand with Christ and with Gods free grace and that is faith only which is also by grace for it is Gods free gift Phil. 1. 29. It is giuē vnto you not onely to beleeue in him but also to suffer for his sake hauing Christ first the obiect thereof and next Gods free mercie in Christ for faith embraceth Gods mercie in Christ and makes Christ effectuall in vs vnto righteousnesse and life For this cause Paul Rom. 4. 16. saith our inheritance is by faith that it might come by grace Ephe. 2. 8. Ye are saued by grace by faith and that not of your selues that is as he after expoundeth it not of works so he concludeth that saluation because it is of Gods free grace by faith is the free gift of God Wherefore we see faith stands best with the grace mercie of God as without Rom. 6. 23. which Christ and Gods mercie in him cannot bee effectuall vnto righteousnesse and life For if we receiue not Christ by faith and Gods mercy in Christ Christ and the mercie of God can profit vs nothing vnto iustification and life Howbeit we be heere to remember that whereas God offereth righteousnesse and life vnder condition of faith yet doth he not so respect faith in vs which is also his owne gift as he doth the obiect of faith which is Christ and his owne free mercy in Christ which must be apprehended by faith for it is not so much our faith apprehending as Christ himselfe and Gods mercy apprehended in him that is the cause wherefore God performeth the promise of his couenant vnto vs to our iustification and saluation Wherefore the condition of the couenant of grace is not faith onely nor the obiect of faith only which is Christ but faith with Christ that is The condition of the couenant of grace the faith that shall apprehend Christ or Christ with faith that is Christ which is to bee apprehended by faith Note then briefly this howe these three are one in substance the ground of the couenant of grace the condition of it and the cause wherefore God performeth the condition yet in reason they differ something For Iesus Christ is the ground being absolutely considered without any respect of application vnto vs. But Christ is the condition of the couenant as he is to be applied vnto vs and must be embraced by faith for euerie condition is of a future thing to be done And the cause also of the performance of the couenant is Iesus Christ alreadie embraced and applied vnto vs by faith Wheras Paul then saith that we are iustified by faith his meaning is that wee are iustified by Christ applied vnto vs by faith alreadie in our effectuall calling which by order of nature goeth euer before the
chiefly by simplicity and sincerity which is opposed to hypocrisie and dissembling Therefore a deepe hypocrisie which is contrary to sincerity possesseth the heart of this man Now the heart so affected doth beleeue apprehend and reioice not sincerely for a true cause for which it ought to do these things but for other worldly causes It followeth therefore that the cause of these euils doth lurke in the heart Wherefore if any man will not be a temporizer A good admonition for a temporizer let him aboue all things looke to his heart and sift and examine it diligently night and day so long till hee feele that the faith of Christ takes roote in the bottome of his heart and doth throughout possesse the whole heart as much as may be Out of these things which we haue spoken touching the properties of this faith and of the cause of them a marke may be taken whereby any one may discerne true iustifying faith from temporary And that is in a word sincerity in doing in beleeuing in apprehēding in reioicing Synceritie in doing all things throughout the whole course of the life Now sincerity is knowne by this if all things be done and performed by vs for God and for Christ whether those things be of small or great moment Whether ye eate or drinke or whatsoeuer ye doe doe all to the glory of God 1. Cor. 10. 31. By these things which haue beene spoken it is easie to gather a definition of this faith For Tempor F. defined temporary faith is a knowledge in the minde and an apprehension in the will of Christ with all his benefits but yet tēporary or enduring but for a time And thus much of temporary faith The miraculous faith followeth which is the third vnproper signification of the word of faith Touching this faith these are testimonies Matth. 17. Yf ye haue faith as a graine of mustard seed 1. Cor. 13. If I had all faith so that I could remoue mountaines The reason of the name is this 4. Miraculous faith It is termed miraculous from the effect of it because it is powerfull to doe miracles The obiect thereof is not the bare generall word of God but rather a special promise or reuelation made to some one touching the doing of some certaine miracle Now that the bare generall word sufficeth not it appeareth hereby for because many holy men haue had faith in the generall word yea they haue iustifying faith in the promise of grace and yet could doe no miracles Simon Magus beleeued by an historicall faith in the generall word and yet he could do no miracles therefore hee would haue bought this facultie with money for a price Act. 8. 31. Vnlesse therefore vnto the generall word there be added a speciall promise or reuelation it is no miraculous faith which is a certaine speciall and extraordinarie gift of the Spirit Wherein the Aduersaries do erre verie much who thinke that the generall word sufficeth for this to make a miraculous faith The subiect of it The subiect of a miraculous faith is the mind first vnderstanding and withall iudging the speciall promise and then the will or the heart apprehending that which is promised The parts of the nature thereof are a knowledge with a iudgement of the mind and an apprehension with the will and heart Out of these things now spoken I gather this definition of this Faith that Miraculous faith is a Miraculous faith defined knowledge in the mind and an apprehension with the will of a speciall promise or reuelation for the doing of a miracle Thus farre of miraculous Faith and in summe of the true doctrine of faith CHAP. XXXI The opinion of the Aduersaries concerning Faith IT followeth now that we see briefly what the aduersaries doe hold touching Faith First they do not acknowledge the diuers significations of Faith they entreat onely of one faith and that they terme iustifying that is as they expound the word that The Popish opinion of Faith which disposeth vs to iustice being to be infused after in the time thereof Thus thinks Bellarmine in his Treatise touching faith In this doctrine of faith which they terme iustifying they differ from vs first about the obiect of it Indeede they doe not denie that the obiect of faith is the mercie of God in Iesus Christ offered in the Gospell that is that it is the Gospell and the promises of grace concerning Christ and Gods mercie in him But they will haue the obiect to be not onely the word of the Gospell but equally the vniuersall word of God To confirme this opinion of theirs they alleage that definition of faith which is set downe Heb. chap. 11. 1. Faith saith the Apostle is the ground of things that are hoped for and the euidence of things which are not seene This say they is the definition of iustifying faith But this definition stretcheth it selfe not onely to Christ to the promises of God and to the Gospell concerning him but also to the whole word of God to all things that are contained in the word of God For example it stretcheth it selfe to the word of God which is concerning the creation of the world as is euident by vers 3. which followeth in the same chap. By faith we vnderstand that the world was ordained by the word of God Hence they conclude that iustifying faith hath the whole word for the obiect of it But to this we answer that not onely iustifying Faith is defined by the Apostle in that place but that that definition of Faith is common to all the significations of faith as is plaine enough by that induction of examples which followeth in that place and chapter Neither is that their argument which they gather out of the coherence of the text of anie force They say that that faith is defined of which the Apostle spake in the last verses of the chapter going afore Now the iust shall liue by faith c. But there the Apostle spake of iustifying Faith therefore heere in the 11. chap. iustifying faith is defined I answer this definition I confesse doth belong to iustifying faith but not to that alone but it is commō to it with other significations of Faith as with historicall Heb. 11. 1. A generall definition of faith common to all kinds of faith faith and miraculous c. as is euident by the induction that followeth Seeing therefore that this definition doth not onely belong to iustifying faith it followeth that out of this definition they get not that they would haue namely that the obiect of iustifying Faith is equally the vniuersall word of God Therefore let the obiect thereof properly be that which it apprehendeth and that is the Gospel and the promise concerning Christ Secondly they dissent from vs about this same speciall obiect namely the mercy of God in Christ For we say and affirme that the obiect of iustifying faith is not onely a generall mercy
in all succeeding ages God himself with his owne hand did first write in tables of stone the words of the Decalogue Next after this he gaue it in charge vnto Moses that he should afterwards write and record all things which hee receiued at Gods owne mouth and that the people of God might be assured that the bookes of Moses came not by mans will but were giuen by diuine inspiration the Lord sealed 2. Tim. 3. 16 and testified these writings to be his heauenly oracles by manie great wonders before they were written when they were written and after they were written And Moses wrote the Word of both couenants of both I say Legall and Euangelicall but whereas he gaue but as it were the first lineaments of the Euangelicall couenant he set forth the Legall couenant clearely and in full measure For the legall couenant in the bookes of Moses is cleerely recommended and vrged but the Euangelical more darkly set before vs. For which cause all the doctrine of Moses is said to be legall The Law came by Moses Ioh. 1. After Moses God stirred vp his Prophets whose writings also he confirmed with his great miracles and gaue them great authoritie yet were they not to set forth any thing diuers or contrary to the doctrine of Moses and the Patriarches nor to publish any thing but what was grounded in the bookes of Moses but by diuine reuelation they did ad more cleere interpretations as the morning starre of the new testament did more neerely approch These holy men wrote the summe and chiefe heads of their doctrine euen so much as God himselfe thought meete to be reserued for posterity And these records being written were laid vp with the holie books of Moses which were kept in the side of the Arke Iosh 24. 26. Finally after the incarnation of Christ the Euangelicall doctrine or the Gospell first beganne for certaine yeares to be deliuered by voice and to be preached by Christ himselfe and then after by his Apostles And lastly the same was written by the Apostles The works of Gods law and nature are commanded in the bookes of the new Testament And the verie moral law is expounded by Christ himselfe freed from the leauen and corruption of the Pharisees but the works of the law and nature are not recommended to the end that by them men might be iustified and saued but they be commended either to prepare men to intertaine grace offered or to quicken them to proceed and grow in grace receiued as is before shewed Againe the works of regeneration be commanded not for iustification but as testimonies of that iustification which is by faith and of thankfulnes vnto God for which cause so soone as the Apostle hath taught the doctrine of faith he descends to the works of the lawe teaching men that their life and conuersation must be worthie that high calling whereunto we are called in Christ Iesu See Ephe. 4. 1. 1. Thess 2. 12. But faith in Christ is that which is principally required in all the books of the new Testament And thus farre generally of the written word of the couenant CHAP. VII The number of the controuersies which are concerning the written Word and of the first controuersie whether the Scripture be the word of God THere be two kinds of controuersies concerning the holy Scripture The first kind is of such controuersies as bee more essentiall that is which concerne the very essence if I may so speake or being of the Scripture The second kind is of those controuersies which bee more accidentall and doe not so neerely concerne the essence of the Scripture Of the first kind there are ten controuersies or questions the first is Whether the Scripture Propheticall and Apostolicall bee the word of God The second is How it may appeare that this Scripture is Gods word The third is Of the antiquitie of it The fourth is Of the perspicuity or cleerenes of it The fift is Of the simplicitie or plainnesse of it The sixt is Of the viuacitie quickening power or life of it The seuenth is Of the simple euident necessitie of it The eight is Of the perfection sufficiencie thereof that it is sufficient and perfect in it selfe without all vnwritten verities or traditions whatsoeuer The ninth is Whether the Scripture may bee the iudge to determine all controuersies The tenth is Whether the Scriptures Propheticall and Apostolicall must haue the chiefe place of excellency and be in authoritie aboue the Church As for those eight controuersies which follow the two first they are touching the properties of the holie Scripture and these when we shall haue proued that the Scripture is Gods word will appeare euidently for they are necessary consequents of that Theoreme For grant we this that the Scripture is Gods word then these things must follow necessarily first that it is most ancient secondly most cleere thirdly most simple or pure fourthly most powerfull fiftly most necessarie sixtly most perfect seuenthly the greatest best iudge of all controuersies without exception eightly most excellent But for as much as the aduersaries denie these eight properties therefore as is a foresaid there is of euerie one of them a speciall controuersie We are then to handle these controuersies in order and first of that which by due right naturally is to haue the first place Whether the Scripture be the word of God The Aduersaries graunt generally that the holy Scripture is the word of God but when they are brought from the generall to a speciall they break from vs. To speake more plainely the word of God at this day is twofold in the Church of God 1. immediate 2. mediate I call that the Gods written word immediate word of God which doth proceede immediately out of Gods owne mouth and that I call mediate which the Lord speakes by his preacher or Minister We hold then and auouch that the holie Scripture is that immediate and primarie word of God and to bee vnto vs in steed of that first immediate and liuely voice of God himselfe yea that it serues vs in place not only of that liuely voice of God but also of the secret and insearchable mind of God and of Gods vnspeakeable mysteries Our arguments are these 1. For that this is the verie will of God They haue Moses saith he and the prophets that is the bookes of Moses and the Prophets Luk. 16. 29. 2. If we had nothing to supply the defect of the liuely voice of God then doubtlesse our state were worse then that of the old Church of the Iewes which had the oracles of God but it is against all light of reason so to Rom. 3 1. 2. affirme 3. Our third reason is this The first ground of our faith must be either the liuely voice of God or the verie mind and counsell of God or something to supply the want of Gods liuely voyce and of the secret mind of God which must also be
constancie of the Martyrs which daylie seale with their blood the truth of this heauenly doctrine the persecution raised by the enemies of the Church against it the enmitie of Sathan against it and the preseruation of the diuine oracles of God vnto our times and to be short the testimonie of the true Church of God for it All these are without or beside the Scripture and giue vs a secundarie kinde of demonstration whereby the holy Ghost worketh also as it pleaseth him and openeth the eies of our vnderstanding inlightening vs to see and heare God him-selfe speaking and shining in the Scripture But here we be to obserue that the holy ghost doth God rather by these meanes the testimonie of the Church and couersation of the saints prepareth vs to receiue the pretious faith not beget faith in our harts properlie and principallie by this second kinde of externall meanes for the proper and principall instrument of God to breed faith is the very word of God himselfe for it must be necessarilie either the liuely voice of God or the sacred scripture which serueth vs in steede of the liuelie voice of God himselfe but either prepares our hearts only to receiue faith afterwards Io. 4. 1. Pet. 3. 2. 3. wards by the word of God or to confirme the same in some sort beeing already ingendred in our hearts by Gods word For this cause this second kind of meanes sometimes is sent before the voice of God in the scripture whereby the holy Ghost otherwhiles makes mens minds ready to intertaine faith and grace offred This we reade of Augustine for he speaks it of himselfe I would not haue beleeued the gospell but that the authority of the Catholicke Church moued me thereunto by which words he meaneth that when he was a Manichee he was prepared by the authority and testimonie of the Church to beleeue the Gospell Afterwards notwithstanding the same holie spirit which thus prepared him by the testimonie of the Church I say the same spirit did beget faith in Augustines heart by the very scripture of the gospell whereby he did beleeue that the gospell was the verie word of God For this cause he speaks else where of himselfe And let vs follow them saith he which doe inuite vs first to beleeue that which we cannot behold Augustines wordes as yet that being strengthened by faith it selfe we may be worthie to vnderstand what we beleeue not by the relation of men but by the grace of God himselfe inwardlie confirming and inlightening our mindes So the woman of Samaria Io 4. as a member of the Church did by her kinde of preaching prepare the Samaritanes to the faith of Christ they hauing heard Christ himselfe said to the woman We beleeue no longer because of thy sayings for Io 4. 42 1. Pet. 3. 2. 3. Win them with your conuersation which are without the word we haue heard him our selues and know that this is indeed the Christ the Sauiour of the world By which wordes they plainely testified that they were prepared only by the womans testimonie to embrace the faith and that faith was ingendred in their hearts by the powerfull voice of Christ himselfe Wherefore it is cleere that sometimes this kind of meane and argument as is aforesaide goes before faith is begotten in the heart to prepare vs and sometimes this followes faith for confirmation And sometimes also this kinde of argument goes before faith and followes after it it goes before I say for preparation it followes after for confirmation For the spirit teacheth vs many waies applying himselfe to diuers men in diuers Note well Io. 3. manners as it seemeth good vnto himselfe and as mens infirmities do require And here we be to obserue that there is no absolute necessitie of this secondarie kind of argument which is externall and lesse principall to beget faith in vs. For it ought to suffice vs if the spirit teach vs onely by Gods worde but to helpe our weakenes the same spirit addeth the other secondarie kind of argument as Christ plainly teacheth vs Io. 5. where he sayth the testimonie of Iohn Baptist concerning him was not simply necessarie but that God so prouided to helpe their weakenesse and vnbeliefe ver 33. Iohn gaue testimony to the truth but I desire not the testimonie of man Neuerthelesse these things I speake that ye may be saued And that Iohns testimonie was but a secondarie argument only and that Christs owne record of himselfe was the first he sheweth plainly in the words following ver 36. But I haue a greater witnes then the witnes of Iohn for the works which the Father hath giuen me to finish the same works that I do beare witnes of me that the Father sent me And this is our iudgment concerning this argument whereby we proue the Scripture to be the word of God and our answere to the question wherefore it is so as we auouch it What the Papists thinke in this matter it is easily seene How the Papists proue the scripture to bee Gods word by their words and writings Their iudgement briefly is this The meane and principall argument and in a manner the only way with them to demonstrate the scripture to be Gods word is the testimony of the church not only the catholick as they speak but also those of their church which haue preserued the faith as they speake by contiall successions from the Apostles vnto our times and here they vnderstand principally the Popes who as they say succeeded Peter and his chaire These men will haue the Church the iudge and interpreter of all Scriptures from whose iudgement it may not be lawfull for any man to depart for an appeale to any other iudge And they ascribe this dignity prerogatiue to the testimony of the Church because they will haue the Scripture which is written in the heart of the Church to be the principall Scripture and that we account and esteeme of the voice of the Church as the very liuely voice of God himselfe as if God now spake first principally in his Church and by the voice of his Church If they will haue it so that the voice of the Church bee the primarie voice of God and the primarie Scripture of God it is euident that they deeme the greatest light we haue is to be found in the voice of the Church and the same to be most cleere and demonstratiue not only to vs but also in and by it selfe and therefore that this light inlightens the sacred Scripture not in respect of vs only but in respect of themselues also For which cause one of them hath said that the The blasphemy of Papists Scripture is of no more validity without the authority of the church then AEsops fables For the voice of the church being vnto them the primarie voice of God in all respects for as much as it is liuely and vocall and for this cause both by nature
that distinction of temporall and eternall punishments to be allowed for it is certaine that whosoeuer are punished temporally for their sinnes and in that respect and for that cause such also without repentance shall be punished for their sinnes eternally for temporall punishments of the vngodly in this life are the very beginnings of eternall punishments to be suffered in another life And thus farre of repentance CHAP. XXXVII Of mans Free-will AFter the doctrine of Faith Hope and Repentance the doctrine of Free-will is to follow because the Aduersaries do attribute Faith hope repentance or as they call it Penance to the liberty of our will as to the principall agent or cause but they assigne to grace the second place in the worke of Faith hope and repentance for they say after that Free-will is stirred vp by a preuenting grace man by the benefit of his free-will doth of his owne strength beleeue hope and repent him of his sinnes And as for grace that is only a fellow-worker say they and a helper of mans Free-well which principally worketh in faith hope and repentance But to this we haue answered before in the doctrine of repentance we shal hereafter answer it a little more plainely Now hauing thus far shewed the occasion why after the doctrin of Faith hope and repentance we speake of Free-wil let vs come to the point it selfe and discourse of it The will of man is a facultie The wil described of the reasonable soule following next after the facultie of reason for the mind first vnderstandeth and thē iudgeth The function and vse thereof is in willing in nilling in choosing in refusing and in doubting of those things which were before concealed and considered of in the vnderstanding The obiects therof are things simply good and euill and things indifferent I call those things simply good which are commanded by some expresse Things simply good law of God I call those things simply euill which are forbidden by the some expresse lawe of God And those things I count indifferent which are neither expresly commanded nor expresly forbidden in the law of God And if they be commanded or forbidden by anie law of God that is by accident to wit so farre forth as they further or hinder the edification of our neigbour These obiects of the will I subdiuide again into their final causes or ends and into those meanes which tend and leade vs to the ends And thus I apply the functions of the wil to the ends and to the meanes We be said as well to will and nill the meanes as the ends vnto which they serue for to will and nill are things generall but we are said onely to accept and to reiect and to doubt of the meanes for these things are speciall And thus farre of the will according to our present purpose There is ascribed vnto the will a certaine propertie which the Latines call Libertie the Greekes a Power as Libertas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 9. 20. where the Apostle speakes of the power the Potter hath ouer the clay And 1. Cor. 7. 37. He that hath power ouer his owne will As if he should haue said hee that hath libertie or power of his will in our vulgar tongue it is called Soueraingtie This libertie of the will is as it were a royall power and the Greeke word is vsed to set forth the power of a king or some supreme Magistrate Rom. 13. 27. Let euery soule be subiect to the higher power For this cause the will in the soule of man is receiued as a Queene and in that respect is said to haue as it were the iurisdiction in her owne hand But to come to some description of Free-will This freedome of will is a libertie whenas a thing being offered to the wil as to a certain Queene whether it be good or euill or indifferent the will euen then can by it own A descripttion of free-will proper right and power either will it or nill it reiect or receiue it or hold a man in suspence For which cause commonly in schooles it is defined to be a power or facultie to like or dislike things that are directly opposite that is to incline to either part of the contradiction to receiue or reiect the one or the other and thus commonly they describe it Yet I like best this descriptiō to wit that libertie of will should bee in respect of good and euill things for concerning them the controuersie is it is I say a power of the will or a certaine right it hath whereby of it selfe and of it owne inward and naturall motion without constraint it wils onely that is good it chooseth the good it wils not that is euill it reiecteth that is euill In one word libertie of will is a power vnto good not to euill I am induced to like best this definition of libertie by the example of the libertie of God himselfe who by the confession and grant of all men most freely wils and Gods free-will doth all things notwithstanding the libertie of God is not so defined that it should be a certaine power whereby he doth so will good as though he might nill it or doth not so will euill as though he might will it but the liberty of God is this of his owne right without constraint onely to will that which is good and nill that is euill Againe the same is plaine by the example of the blessed Angels who haue liberty to that is good onely and not vnto good and euill that is they do not so will good as if they might nill it for they are so gouerned Freedome of Angels strengthened of God that their will onely is inclined to good doth abhor from euill To conclude the same is shewed in the example of Adam of his state before his fal for then truly the liberty of his will was to will good Adams freedom in his innocencie only not both good and euil that is he did not so will good as if he might nil it except you vnderstād a remote power wheras we by this word Liberty to speake properly do vnderstand a more neere faculty of the soule I call that a remote facultie which is incident to the matter as is the power or propertie of laughter in the bodie of a man before it hath either forme or life I call that Remota potentia a neere facultie which is incident to the forme as laughter Propinqua potentia in a man that hath life So in the will of man there is a remote power as appertaining to the matter and there is a neere power as pertaining or consequent to the forme but we as a little before we spake by liberty vnderstand not that remote power which is incident to the matter but that neere power which is consequent to the forme and by the forme we vnderstand that sanctitie which is according to the
grace This might appeare by manie arguments which now I willingly passe ouer The end and vse of the promise in the couenant of grace is that men cast downe and humbled in the sight of their owne sinne and miserie by the legall couenant might be raised vp and comforted by hearing and receiuing that righteousnesse and life which is freely promised and offered to the beleeuers in the Gospell Of this vse reade Rom. 5. 1. Therefore being iustified by faith we haue peace with God This is the proper end of the Euangelical doctrine therefore the second and principall part of the Gospell doth consist in the doctrine of the couenant of grace which is properly and principally to beare this title of an Euangelicall doctrine teaching vs what Christ our mediator is what his humiliation first next his glorification and then what benefits life and righteousnes we get by him and these be the speciall branches of the Gospell and of that ioyfull message of our saluation Last of al the vse of those particular promises is that Gods Elect iustified renewed comforted and quieted in their consciences may testifie their thankfulnesse by their holy obedience and good works The Apostle noteth this end Tit. 2. 11. 12. 13. 14. For that grace of God which bringeth saluation vnto all men hath shined teaching vs that renouncing vngodlinesse and worldly lusts we liue soberly iustly and godly in this present world And for that this is the end of these promises they haue also their place in the third part of the doctrine of the Gospell which concernes the life and Christian conuersation of the Saints for which cause ye haue these promises often in the Gospell annexed to exhortations admonitions and instructions concerning manners as Gal. 6. after that vers 6. he had giuen in charge that he which is catechised in the word should minister vnto him which teacheth him of all his goods hee forthwith addeth vers 7. and 8. a promise and a threatning Againe vers 9. hauing warned them not to waxe wearie in weldoing he addeth this promise We shall reape in due time if we faint not So Ephe. 6. after that his charge giuen to seruants to serue their maisters in al vprightnes ver 5. 6. 7. he addeth a promise v. 8. Whatsoeuer good thing euery man doth that shall he receiue of the Lord. The like testimonies are euery where in which ye may find admonitions exhortations and instructions confirmed with promises and threatnings Of this kind then are al those promises before mentioned which must be carefully discerned first from the couenant of works next from the couenant of grace wheresoeuer we find them in reading the new Testament And finally concerning the aforesaid promises wee are to obserue first that the condition of the works of regeneration and grace is required of beleeuers not as merits but as duties only and testimonies of their thankfulnes to God their redeemer like as the conditiō in the couenant of works is not of merits but of duties onely and of testimonies of their thankfulnes to God their creator I grant that the works of regeneration are necessarie vnto eternall life promised in the Gospell but not as merits or meritorious causes but as the means and way wherein we are to proceed on frō iustification and regeneration vnto glorie and life eternall They may also be said to bee causes after a sort for they please God in Christ and in some respects moue him but not as merits but as effects of the only merit of Iesus Christ whereof they testifie But of this wee shall speake in place more conuenient Secōdly note in this third kind of promises that the condition therein is of the works of regeneration which are also most perfect in their kind for the great iustice of God cannot beare the least defect The rule also of all works is the iustice of God whereof ye haue a certaine expresse image in the morall lawe Wherefore the condition here is of works most absolute but not in thēselues but in Christ and in the perfection of his satisfaction and merit If ye obiect Doth not the lawe require that perfection of works which is in works themselues I answer it doth so of them which are vnder the couenant of works vnder the law and without Christ but as for such as be in the couenant of grace and in Christ it doth not require a perfection in the works of regeneration but is content with the good beginnings which the beleeuers haue the perfection of whose obedience is supplied and to be found in Christ Iesus For like as hee iustified vs of his meere grace in Christ and by his merit being his enemies so now much more will he accept vs Note Rom. 5. 9. 10. 11. 12. being iustified and regenerate I say much more will he accept vs being his friends and our obedience in Christ euen for his merit sake For so the Apostle concludeth Rom. 5. 9. Being iustified therefore by his bloud we shall now much more be preserued from wrath by him And thus farre of these three kinds of promises which are distinctly set downe in the New Testament And here this might also be demāded whether these 3. kinds of promises be not as distinctly to be found in the old Testament I answer they may so be found yet not without some difference for that the old Testament did serue specially to prepare men to receiue Christ which in his appointed time was to come For the law was a schoolemaister vnto Christ Gal. 3. Therefore the greatest part of the old Testament is spent in propounding repeating expounding the couenant of workes And because Christ was not as yet manifested in the flesh therefore the doctrine of the couenant of grace is more sparinglie and darkelie set forth in it Finallie as touching the faithfull in the old Testament which embraced Christ the mediator of the couenant of grace howsoeuer then but shadowed before their eies in types and figures to them I say being iustified in him which was to come regenerat by his grace the promises of eternal life were made vnder condition of the works of regeneration as this promise made to Abraham Gen. 17. 1. Walke thou before Rom 4 me and be thou vpright I wil make my couenant with thee This promise was made to Abraham being before iustified by faith and renewed by grace The like promises are often in the old Testament annexed to moral precepts as in the books of the Prouerbs and Ecclesiastes And thus farre of the couenant of grace the ground thereof the promise thereof and the condition thereof Now it remaineth that we answere a question or two concerning this couenant The first whether the couenant of works be abolished and of none effect to such as 1. vse of the couenant of workes or of the Morall lawe be vnder the couenant of grace I answer the couenant of works hath two endes and vses The first and proper
vnder the couenant of works in respect of vs for being vnited to that diuine nature it is become a mediatour for vs to make intercession and peace betweene God offended and man offending For Christ our Mediatour albeit he be God and man in that personal vnion yet was he made subiect to the couenant of works and to the course of the law for vs properly in respect of his humane nature that as the Apostle speaketh he might redeeme vs from the law and the curse of the law See Gal. 4. 4. and 5. After that the fulnesse of time was come God sent his Sonne made of awoman made subiect to the lawe to redeeme them which vvere vnder the lawe And Galath 3. ver 13. But Christ saith he hath redeemed vs from the curse while he was made a curse for vs. Christ therefore our mediator subiected himselfe vnto the couenant of works and vnto the lawe for our sake and did both fulfill the condition of the couenant of works in his holy and good life euen in the highest degree of perfection as being God and man euen that most holy one of God in one person and also he did vndergoe that curse which was denounced against man in that couenant of works if that condition of good and holy works were not kept for in the couenant of works ye haue together with the promise of life to him who doth well a commination of euerlasting death to him who doth not well For this cause Christ our mediator both did wel according to the promise died also according to the curse denoūced Wherefore we see Christ in two respect to wit in doing suffring subiect to the couenant of works to haue most perfectly fulfilled it that for our sake whose mediator he is become It may be demaunded Had it not beene sufficient for our good and to the end he might redeeme vs if he had only liued well and holily and not also so to haue suffered death for vs I answer it had not sufficed for all his most holy righteous works had not satisfied the iustice and wrath of God for our sins nor merited the mercie of God reconciliatiō righteousnes life eternal for vs the reason is for that the iustice of God did require for our breach of Gods couenant that we should be punished with death eternall according to the condition denounced and annexed to the promise of that couenant Therefore no good works of our owne or of any Mediator for vs after the breach of that couenant of works could haue satisfied the iustice of God which of necessity after asort required the punishment and death of the offender or certainly of some mediator in his steed If then all the good holy works of the Mediator could not satisfie that wrath and iustice of God for sin it is cleere they could not meritany new grace or mercy of God for vs. But you will say that the good and holy works of Christ our Mediatour haue wrought some part at least of that satisfaction whereby Gods iustice was appeased for vs and some part of that merit whereby Gods fauour was purchased for vs I answer these works did serue properly for no part of satisfaction or merit for vs for that to speake properly the death of Christ and his passion onely did satisfie Gods iustice and merited his mercie for vs. If anie will yet further demaund May we not diuide the satisfaction and merit of Christ into his doings and suffrings that we may speake on this manner Christ by his death and passion hath satisfied Gods iustice and by his good and holy works he hath merited Gods mercie for vs that so satisfaction may bee ascribed to his death and merit to his workes that the righteousnesse wherewith wee are iustified before God may bee partly the satisfaction which Christ perfourmed by his death for vs partly the merits which he obtained by his works for vs I answer to speake properly the satisfaction and merit which is by the only passion of Christ both He saith we are iustified only by the passiue righteousnesse of Christ was and is our righteousnesse or the satisfactorie and meritorious death of Christ or the satisfaction which was by Christs death or the merit of his death or the obedience of Christ as being obedient to his Father vnto the death the death also of the Crosse to bee short that iustice of Christ which he obtained when in his passion he satisfied his Fathers wrath this is our righteousnesse For we may say that either the death of Christ or his satisfaction or his merit or his obedience or his righteousnesse is imputed vnto vs for righteousnesse For all these are taken for one and the same thing But here it may bee replied If the works of Christ cannot properly procure for vs any satisfaction nor merit nor anie part of satisfaction or merit then it may bee demaunded What hath beene and what is the vse of Christs works or of his actiue obedience or of the obedience of his life I answer that the holinesse of the person The actiue obedience of Christ or the righteousnes and holinesse of his person and life how it is the ground of the satisfactorie and meritorious passion of Christ of Christ and of his natures diuine and humane and of his works is the verie ground or foundation of the satisfaction and merit which wee haue in the passion of Christ that is the excellencie and worthinesse of that person and of his works did cause that his passion was both satisfactorie and meritorious for if this person which suffered had not beene so holy and excellent as also his life so pure and godly it is most certaine that his passion could neither haue satisfied Gods wrath nor merited mercie for vs. For which cause the Apostle Heb. 7. 26. speaking of this ground of this meritorious passion of Christ saith that such an high Priest it became vs to haue which is holy blamelesse vndefiled separate from sinners and made higher then the heauens And thus farre of Christ and how hee may bee said to be vnder the couenant of works And that he was not vnder the couenant of grace the matter is so cleare that it needs no disputation For the couenant of grace was made in him and established in his bloud and the promise in the couenant of grace is made to them which were vniust and dead in sinne because of the breach of that couenant of works and lastly Christ not vnder the couenant of grace the condition in the couenant of grace is faith in Christ the mediator Wherfore if ye respect either the ground or condition or promise of the free couenant Christ can not be said to bee vnder it And thus farre of both couenants of them which are vnder the couenant of God either of works or of grace CHAP. V. A comparison of our iudgment and of the Aduersaries concerning both these
is he who heareth the word and by and by receiues it with ioy yet hath no roote in himselfe but is for a time and when persecution and trouble ariseth because of the word is offended presentlie To the same purpose reade I. uk 8. 13. Of this faith see also Heb. 6. 4. 5. For it cannot be that they which haue beene once inlightened and tasted of the good word of God and of the powers of the world to come if they fall awaie c. To conclude of this faith ye haue Ioh. 5. 35. He namely Iohn was a burning and a shining candle and ye would for a time haue reioiced in his light The reason of the name is this it is called Temporarie because it endures but for a time and it endureth but for a time because it hath no roote It hath the same obiect with iustifying faith which is properly so called namely Iesus Christ with his benefits offered in the word of the Gospell and in the Sacraments wherein it differs from historicall faith which hath for the obiect thereof the vniuersall truth It hath The subiect of a temporary faith the same subiect with iustifying faith for it hath it scat both in the mind and also in the will and heart Last of all it hath as many parts of nature as the iustifying faith hath For it is a knowledge of the vnderstanding conioyned with both the iudgements of the mind it is the apprehension of the wil or heart whereout follweth also the stirring of the affections as of ioy delight c. But that I may speake a little more largely of this apprehension which is in Temporarie faith and of this ioy First it is certaine by the scripture that these things are in the Temporarie faith For Christ saith in Matth. That hee which is but for a time doth receiue the word and that with ioy And in Ioh. The Iewes are said to haue reioiced for a time in the light of Iohn Baptist And to the Hebr. How the historicall and temporary saith differ one fro another and both from the iustifying there is attributed to this faith not onely the enlightening of the mind but also the taste of the heart and that performed not onely by the word but also by the Spirit for he saith They which haue beene made partakers of the holy Ghost Therefore in Temporarie faith there is indeede a kind of apprehension there is indeede a certaine ioy wherein Temperarie faith differeth from historicall faith For in historicall faith these things are not indeed but he that hath it doth faine and dissemble and lie in his outward profession that he hath these things wherfore he is a shamelesse hypocrite But hee that hath temporarie faith hath these things indeede apprehension I say and ioy after a certaine manner neither doth he so faine or sie as he that hath an historical faith yet he is an hypocrit because this apprehension and this ioy are not sincere albeit after a certaine manner they be true I say they are not sincere because they are not for that cause for which they should be that is they are not for Christ himselfe offered in the preaching of the Gospell they are not for Gods sake they are not for his glory nor for those heauenly benefits of Christ his righteousnes and eternall life but they are for other causes as for the newnesse of the Gospell which is to bee vnderstood in that place Ioh. 5. 35. He was a burning a shining candle and ye would haue reioiced for a time in his light namely for the newnesse of the matter Secondly they be because of a licentiousnesse to sinne which men by and by snatch to themselues vpon the hearing of free iustification by Christ and Christian liberty To conclude they are for riches honours and other commodities of this life Now seeing the Temporizing professor hath these causes propounded to himselfe in hearing and receiuing the word and in reioycing it must needes be that these are not sincere in him For nothing is done sincerely vnlesse it bee Synceritie done in respect of the glorie of God And herein differs Temporarie Faith from iustifying For the iustifying Faith doth all things for Christ himselfe for God himselfe for the heauenly and spirituall benefits of Christ as much as it can for mans infirmity Out of this therfore it followes that the Temporizer is also an hypocrit seeing he is not sincere and that the Temporizer is an hypocrit temporary faith is hypocriticall seeing it is not sincere Out of that againe that it is not sincere another thing followeth namely that it is not sound firme for nothing that is not sincere can be sound For those causes vpon which it depends are not sound as for example those worldly things as riches honours of the world c. In which thing temporary Faith differeth from iustifying Faith for iustifying Faith as it is sincere so it is sound For of that it is said Col. 2. 5. And the stedfastnesse of your The difference betwene a temporary faith and true iustifying faith faith in Christ For iustifying Faith is as it were a solide body consisting of three dimensions length bredth depth for it possesseth the depth and lowest of the heart but temporary Faith is not a body with three dimensions but only a surface sticking in the vpper part of the heart for it is not either a sound light enlightening all the heart or a sound apprehension arising from the bottome of the heart or to conclude a sound ioy possessing the whole body but all these things are only superficiall in the temporary Faith Whereupon Heb. 6. that apprehension of heauenly things which is therein is compared to tasting or sleight touching seeing that the heart doth but as it were with the tip of the tongue lightly tast those heauenly things and not quite drinke them vp and receiue them into it selfe Againe out of this that temporarie Faith is not sound another thing also followeth namely that it doth not endure for euer but onely for a time For that which is not sound is not durable and perpetuall but only temporary Wherein also it differeth from iustifying faith which as it is sound so it is perpetuall and constant From this property this faith tooke her name and was called temporary now this property doth presuppose the two other going before namely first that it is not sounde secondly that it is not sincere albeit it bee in some sort true While I consider somewhat more diligently of the cause of these three properties I found that it is not to be imputed so much to those outward things for which this faith doth apprehend Christ in the word and reioiceth in him as to the inward euill affection of the heart For the heart of man as Christ sayth is stony ground that is it is neither good nor honest of it owne nature Now we measure this goodnesse and honesty
faculties of the mind and will and last of all it dooth end and rest in the heart To conclude it may easily be gathered by that which hath bin sayd in the the treaty of the parts of it what the definition of repentance is that it Repentance desined is an after-wit after the deede and euill committed and a sorrow because God is offended and from that sorrow a certaine change of the whole minde from euill vnto good The effect of repentance is in the outward life to wit an amendment of life bringing forth fruit worthy of repentance Matth. 3. vers 8. There is question concerning repētance whether it be the same with regeneration or new birth for the common oipnion of Dimnes is that the benefits of regeneration and new birth differ not in matter it selfe notwithstanding it appeares vnto vs that there is a differēce between these two and it shall appeare to them also who diligently Repentance and regeneration differ consider the ends of both for repentance is to be referred to our effectuall calling and it is an effect of faith which is another part of our effectuall calling for as many as beleeue they repent they change their counsell and returne to a better mind But regeneration is the beginning of our glorification and the beginning of a new creature Repentance goeth before iustification euen as faith and hope for of the Baptist it is said That he preached the baptisme of repentance for the remission of sins Marke 3. 4. Luk. 3. 3. But regeneration followeth iustification for being iustified we receiue the spirit of sanctification whereby we are renewed and as it were find a new creation begun euen in this life Repētance is the cause regeneration is the effect for therefore God doth renews vs in How reneneration and repentance differ Christ and make vs new men because we repent vs of our old life and begin to be wise after sin cōmitted Notwithstanding in the middle place betwixt repentance regeneration comes in iustification when as God doth of his meere mercy grace accompt and repute vs as iust The name of repentance employeth sorrow but the name of regeneration gladnes To conclude the points of repentance as whence it proceeds whereunto it tends they are deedes the euil or sin committed and the good which ought to be practised but the bounds of regeneration are qualities inherent corruption and sanctity or holinesse which is wrought in vs the old man and new man renewed in Christ But you will say in repentance there is a change from euil to good a change I say of the mind hart I answer in our effectuall calling there begins a change of y e mind of man Notwithstanding al Diuines distinguish calling faith from regeneration why then should they not in like manner distinguish betweene repentance which followeth faith and our effectual calling regeneration for euery change of the mind is not to be deemed forthwith How repentance followeth regeneration regeneration but there are certain changes of mans mind which goe before regeneration and which prepare the mind and so the whole man vnto regeneration and to that new creation in which kinde repentance is an especial grace These things are to be distinguished not in time but in nature for at that very same instant we beleeue and be effectually called and do repent and be iustified and be regenerate CHAP. XXXV How farre a wicked man may proceed in repentance HAuing thus far spoken of repētance which is proper to the elect godly we are next to consider how far the reprobate and vngodly man may proceed in repentance All wicked vngodly men do not make like progresse for they profit some lesse some more in the work of repētance We wil first speak of them which be least proficient These first haue a sorrow or horror in their minds which Degrees of repentance in the impious commeth from the law and that not for sinnes or any offences committed against God properly and truly but because of the punishment of sinne properly and for sin accidentally because punishment followeth sin Next after this sorrow there followeth in them some dislike in mind of the sinne committed but because of the punishment Note this distinction but as touching affection to the good which ought to be don so far they come not Further yet there followeth in the wil a declining from euil committed but because of the punishment for in the meane while their will is not bent or inclined to the good which ought to be done After this little change of the wil there followeth in the heart a detestation of euill committed but in regard of the punishment for all this while the heart dooth not proceede to loue iustice or the good which ought to be done And as touching the outward life there is no good change or holy amendment in it In this kind was Iudas the traitor of whose repentance read Mat. 27. where first it is said that Iudas did repent him of that he had done Note here in this word his sorrow Iudas example anxiety of hart Next he is sayd to haue brought againe y e 30. pieces of siluer to the high priest whēce may necessarily be gathered a change of the wil of the mind and of the heart which thing also by his owne confession may appeare because he said afterward I haue sinned betraying the innocent bloud for this word doth argue a dislike of sin in some sort and a renouncing and detestation of sin albeit not sincere but principally in respect of the punishment accidentally in respect of the sin because sin and the punishment thereof goe together finally whereas he cast the siluer peeces into the temple it appeares there was in him an inward dislike and detestation of euill and yet that no amendment of life followed this change of mind it appeares in this because presently going aside he hanged himselfe There are other impious men who proceed a little further in repentance then these hauing in their minds some change vnto good their mindes allowing that which is good and their will choosing the same and their heart affecting it yet these things be not sincere in them but proceede from feare of punishment And as concerning the amendmēt of their outward life they begin that also but as the Prophet saith Their goodnesse vanisheth as a morning cloude and as the morningdew Amos. 6. Of this number was Saul Sam. 15. Achab. 1. Kin. 21. Saul And of this kind also it seemes was Esau Gen. 27. His sorrow appeareth by his teares shed the change also of his mind in some sort vnto good appeares by that it is said he would haue obtained the blessing he sought the blessing but there was nothing sincere in him For forthwith after he returned to his old haunt or wonted course againe The wicked which yeeld best signes of repentance are those who haue