the question he woulde sodaynlye cutte off the occasion of doubt or else the wordes Euen as are referred only to that which is next afore that is to saye that by the hearing of fayth lhey had the ministration of the Spirite and of vertues as if he would say that there shined in the grace giuen vnto them a similitude or likenesse with Abraham Beleeued God With this Testimonie hee proueth as well in this place as in the fourth Chapter to the Romaynes that men are iustified by fayth because Fayth was imputed to Abraham for righteousnesse Fyrste brieflye is to be vnderstanded what Fayth in this place meaneth with Paule secondlye what righteousnesse thyrdlye why fayth is deemed the cause of iustification Fayth is not taken for euerye perswasion which men may haue of the truth of God for be it that Caine had a hundred tymes beleeued God when he tolde him he would punishe him he hadde not bene the nere to obtayne righteousnesse Abraham therefore was iustified by beleeuing because whereas he had of God a promise of his fatherly goodnesse he did certaynely and surely embrace the same than Fayth in this place hath a relation and respecte vnto suche a worde of GOD as men hauing it in possession may rest in it and sticke fast to it As touching the worde Righteousnesse the manner of speaking of Moses is to be marked for whereas he sayth It was imputed to Abraham for righteousnesse because he beleeued hee declareth thereby that he is righteous that is so taken with GOD. And whereas men haue not righteteousnesse layde vp in themselues they obtayne the same by imputation because GOD doth impute Fayth vnto them for righteousnesse Wee are sayde than to bee iustifyed by Faith not because fayth doth poure into vs an habite or qualitie but because we are accepted before GOD. And why is there so great honour attributed to faith that it is called the cause of our righteousnesse Firste wee must knowe that it is the instrumentall cause onely for to speake properly our righteousnesse is nothing else but a free accepting of GOD in which lieth the foundation of our saluation but because the Lorde in giuing vnto vs a Testimonie of his loue and grace thorowe the Gospell doeth communicate vnto vs that righteousnesse which I haue spoken off therefore we take holde of it by fayth Therefore when we attribute mans iustification vnto fayth wee dispute not of the principall cause but we note onelye the manner whereby men come to true righteousnesse For this righteousnesse is the meere gifte of God and not a qualitye whiche sticketh or is in man but is possessed onely by Fayth neyther yet that by the deserte or merite of Fayth that it should be as a due rewarde but because we receaue by Fayth that which GOD of his owne accorde and good will doth giue therefore all these speeches are of like force That we are iustified by the grace of God That Christe is our righteousnesse That the mercye of GOD is the cause of our righteousnesse That righteousnesse is gotten vnto vs by the death and resurrection of Christ That righteousnesse is giuen vnto vs by the Gospell That we obtayne righteousnesse by Fayth Whereby it appeareth howe childishlye they erre whiche woulde make these propositions agree together Wee are iustified by Fayth and Workes both for hee that is iust by Fayth he being bare and voyde of his owne righteousnesse resteth in the onlye grace of GOD. And this is the reason why Paule to the Romaynes doth conclude that Abraham is destytute of Glorye before GOD because hee hath obtained righteousnesse by Fayth Rom. 4.2 for it is not sayde that Fayth was imputed vnto him for parte of righteousnesse but for righteousnesse simplye without more wordes therefore Fayth was vnto him in the whole for righteousnesse Fynallye Fayth beholdeth nothing beside the mercye of GOD and Christ deade and raysed agayne Therefore all merite of workes is shutte out from the cause of iustification when as all is assigned to fayth For fayth for that it contayneth in it selfe the free goodnesse of God Christ with all his good things the testimony and witnesse of our adoption whiche is giuen in the Gospell is vtterly opposite and set against the law the merits of workes and the worthinesse of men for whereas the Sophisters doe thinke that it is only set agaynst ceremonies the order of the disputation or reasoning shall by and by with small adoe thorowly reproue them We must therefore beare in mind that they that are iust by fayth are iust without themselues that is in Christ whereby also the foolishe cauillation of some which dally with Paule is confuted because say they Moses calleth righteousnesse goodnesse or honesty and so it signifieth nothing else but Abraham was accounted a good man because he beleeued God Such frantike sprites doth Sathan at these dayes rayse vp to ouerthrow the certayntie of the Scripture with crooked slaunders as it were with mynes But Paule who knew that Moses in that place taught not children grammar but that he spake of the iudgement of God did not without cause take the worde Righteousnesse after the maner of a Diuine for we are not deemed righteous before GOD after the like reason wherewith we haue prayse of goodnesse before men but when we bring perfecte obedience of the Lawe For righteousnesse is opposite or sette againste the breaking of the Lawe yea euen in the least iote or tittle but because we haue not it I meane righteousnesse of our selues God doth freelye giue it vnto vs. Obiection But here the Iewes shake vp Paule for that he hath wrongfully wrested Moses wordes to serue his owne turne for Moses there in that place doth not entreate of Christe or of the life euerlasting but maketh mention onely of the earthye promise The Papistes also are not farre off from the Iewes for albeit they dare not reproche Paule yet they do altogether ouerturne Paules intent and purpose Answere I aunswere Paule taketh it for a thing graunted as an vndoubted Principle among Christians that whatsoeuer promises the Lorde gaue vnto Abraham they did appertayne or depend on that firste promise I am thy God Genesis 17.1 Thy rewarde is exreeding greate Gen. 15.1 And in thy seede shal all nations be blessed Gen. 22.17 18. And therfore whē Abraham heard this Thy seed shal be as the sande of the sea c. he stayed not in that word but rather he included it in the grace of adoption as the part in the whole moreouer whatsoeuer promise was giuen he did not otherwise receiue the same than as a testimonye of the fatherly grace of God that thereby hee mighte take sure confidence of saluation For euen in this doe the Children of God differ from the vnbeleeuers for that they in deede haue the vse of God his benefites together with the children of God but yet like beastes they regarde not that which is higher but as for God his Children because
them to keepe the lawe from which he himselfe woulde be free For beside this that euery man ought to keepe that Law which he prescribeth vnto other in this yet he offended the more for that hee would compell the Gentils to Iudaisme and he being himselfe a Iew permitted to himselfe libertye For the Law was giuen to the Iewes and not to the Gentils Therfore he vseth an Argumēt a minori ad mains frō the les to the more furthermore this was an hard and a violent coaction that he did renounce vnto the Gentils communion or partaking except they wold receaue the yoke of the law which was an vniust offer conditiō And the whole force of the reprehending cōsisteth in this word * That is the law which of Chrisostom Hierom was not perceiued for the vse of ceremonies was free to edification so that the faithfull were not robbed of their liberty nor necessitie laid vpon thē from the which the gospel hath set thē free 15 We are by nature Iewes I know that to some it semeth to be a figure called Anthypophora in English an obiectiō as thogh Paul did preuēt in the persō of the aduerse party that which he mought obiect that is that the Iewes haue a greater priuiledge as they commonly saye not that they might boast immunitie or freedome from the law for it shoulde haue bene more then vnlikelye for them vnto whome the lawe was giuen to boast of that but because they ought by certayne notable tokens to be distinguished from the Gentils That therfore I neither wholy reiect neyther yet altogether allowe as by and by it shall appeare Some doe vnderstande this as spoken in the person of Paule but in this sence if thou wouldest laye the burthen of the Lawe vppon the Iewes it were more agreeable to reason for it commeth vnto them by inheritaunce but this exposition doth not agree neither It is rather than the seconde parte of the sentence which beginneth with the figure Occupatio Occupatio is a Figure whereby in preuenting our aduersaries Obiections we confute the same for whereas there was a difference betwene the Iewes and the Gentils for that the Gentils were vnholy and vncleane but the Iewes holy as farre forthe as God had adopted them for his people the Iewes might contende as touching this prerogatiue But Paule by preuenting dothe wisely wreste it to the contrarye for seing that the Iewes themselues with all their dignitie were constrained to flie to the faithe of Christ howe muche more behoued it the Gentils to get saluation by faith The mind of Paule than is thus We which seme to excell other which haue bine through the benifite of his couenaunt alwayes nighe God haue neuer the later founde no reason or meane to get saluation but vy beleuing in Christ why than should we prescribe any other meane vnto the Gentils For if the Lawe were necessarie or els could preuaile the folowers thereof vnto saluation it would moste of all haue preuailed vs vnto whome it was giuen and if so be that we haue left it and are gone vnto Christ much lesse are the gentils to be vrged to take it vppon thē The word Sinner doth signifie here as it doth often in other places vnholye or lost and estraunged from God such were the Gentils who had no fellowship with God but the Iewes were by adoption the Children of God and therefore segregate or set apart into holynesse Whereas he sayth by nature hee doth not meane that they are by nature free from the corruption of mankinde for Dauid who discended by lineage from Abraham confesseth that he was begotte of vncleane seede Psa 51.7 but the remedye of grace wherewith they were sanctified didde suppresse the corruption of nature to whiche they were in daunger And because the promise made the blessing an inheritaunce therefore it is called a good thing naturall or by nature So to the Romaynes Chap. 11. ver 16. he sayth they were sprong oute of an holy roote Therefore when hee sayth We are by nature Iewes is as muche as if he shoulde saye Wee are borne holye not by our owne desart but because we are chosen of God to be his people We than which by nature were Iewes what haue we done wee haue beleeued in Christ To what ende haue wee beleeued that by the fayth of Christe we mighte be iustifyed For what cause Because we were conuinced and put oute of doubte that men could not obtayne righteousnesse by the workes of the Lawe Hee than reasoneth after the nature and effecte of faith that the Iewes are not iustified by the Lawe For as they who would establish their owne righteousnesse of workes are not subiecte to the righteousnesse of GOD Rom. 10.3 so on the contrary part they whiche beleeue in Christe doe confesse themselues to be sinners and renounce the righteousnesse of workes Hee is busied here in the chiefest questyon naye rather in the whole summe almost of the controuersie is included in this proposition wherefore it is meete the more dilligently to stande vpon the discussing of this present place Firste and formost this is to be noted that righteousnesse must bee sought by the fayth of Christ because we cannot bee iustified by workes Now it is demaunded what hee meaneth by Workes of the Law The Papistes being beguiled by Origen and Hierome doe suppose that the controuersie is of shadowes onelye nay rather they doe firmely define so and therefore they doe alwaye by the Workes of the Law interprete ceremonies as though Paule didde not dispute of the free righteousnesse which is giuen vnto vs by Christ neyther doe they holde it to be an absurditie that no man is iustified by the workes of the Law Without rime or reason and yet they holde that wee are accounted righteous before GOD through the merite of workes To bee shorte they account no mention to be made of morall workes in this place But the Texte doeth plainelye shewe that the morall law is comprehended also in these wordes for almoste whatsoeuer thinges Paule will afterwarde adde or speake they doe pertayne to the morall lawe rather than to the ceremoniall moreouer he doeth alway set the free accepting or allowing wherewith God doth vouchsafe to accepte vs agaynste the righteousnesse of the law But the aduersaries obiect Obiection That workes shoulde haue bene named without any addition except Paule would restrayne it to some certaine specialtye I aunswere Answere That of this kinde of speaking there is a very good reason for although a man might excell the Aungels in holynesse yet were there no rewarde due for his workes except in this respect because it is promised of the Lorde therefore wheras the perfection or perfect obseruation of the lawe is righteousnes and hath the reward of eternall life laide vp therfore it commeth of God who pronounceth that they shall haue the victory which doe fulfil the same of which matter I will speake more in place
and to be iustified by anothers grace or fauour therefore the one is ouerthrowne of the other This is the summe now let vs touch euery parte The iust shall liue by faith Because I haue expounded this place of Abacuc 2.4 in the Epistle to the Romaynes 1.17 it shall not be now needefull to repeate euery thing that belongeth to the exposition thereof the Prophet in that place doth set the arrogant confidence of the flesh opposite or agaynst true fayth hee pronounceth that by it namely Fayth the iust shall lyue wherby he declareth that they are not sustained onely for a time that they should fall whan any storme came but that they stand for euer so that they cease not to liue euen in the middest of death And so gibers with their cauillations auaile nothinge when they alleadge that the prophete in that place dothe take the worde Fayth more largely than Paule doth in this place for simply without more adoe he calleth faith a quiet certentie of the conscience which leaneth vpon God only therfore Paule hath aptly vsed this testimonie 12 But the lawe is not of faith Sure it is that the law is not repugnant or contrary to faith or else God should be vnlyke to himselfe but wee muste alwayes respecte this that Paule speaketh as the circumstaunce of the cause in hand did require Therefore the repugnancie or contrarietie of the Lawe and Faith is in the cause of iustification for more easilye shall you couple fire and water together then make these two agree Men are iustified by Fayth and Men are iustified by the Law The Law than is not of faith that is to saye it hath a waye to iustifie men that is cleane contrary from faith But hee that shall doe these thinges The diuersitie is in this poynte that a man by fulfilling the law is accounted righteous by the righteousnesse of the Law which he proueth by the testimonie of Moises Leuit. 18.5 And what shall be the righteousnesse of fayth He defineth it Rom. 10.9 If wee beleeue Christ to haue dyed for our sinnes c. And yet notwithstanding it followeth not thereof that eyther fayth is ydle or that the faithfull shoulde cease from good workes for the question is not in this place whether the faythfull ought to keepe the law so farre forth as they can which is not to be doubted but whether they obtayne righteousnesse by workes the which is impossible Finallye if any obiect Sith God promiseth life to the doers of the Lawe Obiection Aunswer why doth Paule say they are not iust the aunswere is eazie Therefore none are iust or righteous by the workes of the law because there is none that doe them For we graunt the doers of the law to be righteous if there be any such but because the couenaunt is conditionall therefore are all excluded from life because no man performeth the righteousnesse whiche he oughte That must be kept in remembrance which afore I warned you of That they doe the Law not which in part obay it but which doe fulfill euery iote of righteousnesse from whiche perfection all are very farre off 13 Christ hath redeemed vs. He had made all who were vnder the law guiltie to the curse And thereof sprang a greate difficultie for that the Iewes could not rid themselues from the curse of the Law and therefore setting forth a remedie hee resolueth this doubt by teaching that we are deliuered by christ whereby he doth the more confirme his intent and purpose For if we bee therefore saued because wee are deliuered from the curse of the law than is not righteousnesse by the law afterwarde hee ioineth the maner of deliueraunce It is written cursed is euery one which shall be hanged on Tree Deut. 21.23 Christ was hanged therefore hee wente vnder that curse and now it is certainlye true that he suffered not this punishmente for his owne cause it followeth then that eyther he was crucified in vayne or else that our curse was layde vpon him that we might be losed from the same And he sayth not that Christe was cursed but a curse which is more for he signifieth that the curse of all men was included in him If this seeme hard vnto any man let him also be ashamed of the crosse of Christ in the confession whereof we boast neyther was God ignoraunt what ende of death his sonnes death shoulde be when hee pronounced this Cursed is euery one that shall hang on tree But some man will obiecte Obiection Aunswer How happeneth it that the sonne being beloued of the Father is cursed I aunswere Two thinges are to be considered not onely in the person of Christe but also in his Manhoode the one that hee was the vnspotted Lambe of GOD full of blessing and grace the other that hee tooke vppon him our person and therefore hee was a Sinner and guiltye of the curse not so muche verylye in himselfe as in vs but yet neuerthelesse that he hadde neede to be so in oure steade And so he coulde not be without the grace of GOD and yet hee sustayned his ire for how coulde hee reconcile vnto vs the father who was offended with him and vnto whome hee was hated therefore the will of the Father alwayes rested in him Agayne howe shoulde hee haue deliuered vs from the wrath of GOD excepte he had translated the same from vs vnto himselfe therefore was he striken for our sinnes and he founde God as an angrye Iudge This is the folishnes of the crosse 1 Corinth 1.18 to be wondered at euen of the Angels which doth not onely ouercome but also swalowe vp all the wisedome of the worlde 14 That the blessing of Abraham He doth more nerely apply to his purpose that which he saide namely That wee are deliuered by Christe from the curse of the Lawe that is to saye that the blessing promised to Abraham had the foundation in him and therfore to come to the Gentils For if the Iewes muste be deliuered from the Lawe that they maye be the heires of Abraham what shall let the Gentils that they should not obtaine that same good thinge Moreouer if this blessing bee in Christe alone it is faith alone in Christe which maketh vs partakers thereof Whereby we may receaue the promise I take the promis of the Spirite to bee spoken after the Hebrewe fashion for spirituall promse for although this promise pertayne vnto the new testament I will poure out of my spirite vpon all flesh Esa 44.3 yet Paule in this place respecteth another thing for he semeth to me to set the Spirite opposite to all externe or outwarde things not to ceremonies onely but to carnall generation also so that in this place there is no respect of persons Therefore he sheweth that by the nature of the promise the Iewes differ nothing from the Gentils because if it be spirituall it is receaued by faith onely 15 Bretheren I speake after the manner of men although it be a
iustifieth is alone but we affirme that it is alwayes ioyned with good works only we contend that it alone auaileth vnto iustification The Papistes themselues like Tormentoures doe teare and rente Fayth miserablye while sometime they make it vnshaped and without charitie and sometime shaped as for vs we holde that true faith cannot be plucked away from the Spirite of regeneration but when we speake of the cause of iustification than we shutte oute all workes As touching this presence place Paule doeth not reason whether charitie worketh with fayth to iustifie but onely sheweth what are now the true excercises of the faythfull least he shoulde seeme to make Christians idle and as it were like to blockes Therefore when you are in hand with the cause of iustification take heede you admitte not anye mention of charitie or of workes but firmelye holde fast that which shutteth them out In as much as Paule here doeth not entreate of iustification nor yet assigneth the prayse thereof to charitie in part we may thereby readilye conclude that by the same reason it should follow that Circumcision and ceremonies did iustifie in time past For as he commendeth faith with charitie in Iesus Christ so before the comming of Christ ceremonies were required But that was nothing to the deseruing of righteousnesse which the Papists also will confesse and therefore we must not thinke so of charitie neither 7 Ye did run wel who did hinder you that you should not obay the truth 8 The Perswasion is not of him who hath called you 9 A little leauen leaueneth the whole lumpe 10 I am perswaded of you in the Lord that you will thinke no other thing he that troubleth you shall beare iudgement whosoeuer he be 11 And I Bretheren if as yet I preache Circumcision why as yet doe I suffer persecution the offence of the crosse is done away I would to GOD they also were cut away which trouble you 7 Ye did run well He doth of a sette purpose mingle the reproche of their present backsliding with the praise of their former course that being ashamed they maye the more willinglye returne into the way It is a token of wondering that he asketh them who led them away from the right course whereby hee may make them the more ashamed I thought good once againe to turne the Verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to Obay rather than to Beleeue because now alreadie they had embraced the puritie of the Gospell and were caried away from obaying it 8 The perswasion is not of him He contended afore with reasons now at last he goeth to it by authoritie wheras he crieth vnto them that this perswasion came from some other place than from God For this admonitiō should not haue very much waight were it not vpholded by the authoritie of the person But Paule of his owne right mighte so boldlye speake to the Galathians for that hee was a Preacher vnto them of that calling that GOD called them with and therefore hee nameth not GOD but he signes him out by a Periprasis Periphrasis 〈◊〉 fight whē a thing is signified in many words that may be said in one as one that selleth raysons c. for a grocer as if he should saye God is not at controuersie with himselfe hee it is who called you into saluation by my preaching This newe perswasion then came from some other place Therefore if you will haue the calling of God ratified take heede you giue no eare vnto them who bring in amongst you new inuentions Although I confesse the greeke Participle be of the present tence yet because it is taken indifinitely it liked me to turne it thus Which hath called you for to take away doubtfulnesse in the meaning 9 A little leauen I referre it to the doctrine and not to the men for he aduiseth them how hurtfull a thing the corruption of doctrine is least they should not repute it as commonly men doe as a thing of no daunger or else of no great daunger For Sathan creepeth in with this vndermining so that he doth not openlye shake the whole doctrine but infecteth the purenesse thereof with false and forged opinions many because they consider not the greatnesse of the euill are lesse vehement in resisting the same therefore the Apostle here doth crie out that no iote of safetie doth remayne after that the truth of God is corrupted and he vseth the similitude of leauen which although it bee but a little doeth sende out it sharpenesse into the whole lumpe Therefore we must carefully beware that we suffer not any thing to be deuised and put to the pure doctrine of the Gospell 10 I am perswaded Hee doeth agayne turne all his sharpe speeche from the Galathians vnto the false Apostles hee sayeth they were the cause of the euill to them hee threatneth punishmente hee sheweth that hee hath good hope of the Galathians because they will returne readylye and easilye to agree to the truth And that giueth vs a courage when wee heare that wee are well hoped of for wee counte it a foule matter to deceyue the opynyon of them who iudge louingly and friendly of vs. And because it was the worke of GOD to bring the Galathians agayne to the pure Doctrine of fayth from whiche they hadde swarued hee sayeth he hopeth in the Lord whereby he monisheth them that returning or repentaunce is a heauenlye gifte that they also might aske the same of God He that troubleth you It is a confirmation of the sentence going afore because after a sort he layeth a great part of the blame vppon those deceiuers by whome the Galathians were beguiled for looke what reuengement hee denounceth agaynste them from the same for the moste parte doeth hee exempt the Galathians But whosoeuer they be that giue occasion of hurly bulyes to the Church whosoeuer breake the vnitie of fayth whosoeuer make concorde shake and decaye lette them heare and if they bee in their right wits let them shake for feare at this speeche for GOD by the mouth of Paule doeth pronounce that no suche Authoures of offences shall scape vnreuenged This peece Whosoeuer helde hath a force in it for in as muche as the false Apostles by theire greate wordes did terrifie the ignoraunte and vnlearned multitude it behoued Paule on the other side so loftily to extoll his doctrine that hee shoulde spare none whiche durste quetche agaynste him whatsoeuer tytle otherwise they were knowne by 11 And I bretheren An argumente drawne from the finall cause I mought sayth he auoyde the hatred of men daungers and persecutions if I woulde but onlye mingle ceremonies with Christ whereas therefore I contende so greatlye aboute this matter to maintayne the contrarye I doe it not for myne owne cause nor yet for myne owne profite But doeth it therefore followe that it is true whiche hee teacheth I aunswere that the right affection and pure conscience of the Teacher is of no small force to winne credite moreouer it is
must bee expounded by the circumstaunce of the place Finally it is euident that we are all accursed by nature the blessing was promised vnto all nations in the hand of Abraham but doe all without acception come vnto it no truelye but they only who are gathered vnto Messias for then are they one people when vnder the guidaunce and conducting of Messias they are gathered together into one body Whosoeuer therefore setteth apart contentiō and enquireth after the truth will easilye acknowledge a cause to be noted in this place and not a naked comparison wherof it followeth That Paule not without cause doth saye That the couenaunt was begonne in Christ or in respect of Christ 17 The Law whiche began If we hearken to Origen and Hierome and all the Papistes there will be nothing adoe to ouerthrow this reason For thus Paule reasoneth The promise was giuen to Abraham foure hundered and thirtie yeres before the Law was giuen therefore the law which came after could not put away the promise and thereof he concludeth that ceremonies are not necessarie Obiection If any man would make exception saying the Sacraments are giuen for the preseruatiō of faith and why doth Paule than sunder them from the promise hee doeth so sunder them that he contendeth about them Aunswer Therefore he doeth consider a certayne higher matter in ceremonyes as the effect of iustification which the false Apostles atttributed vnto them and the binding of the consciences naye rather by occasion of ceremonies hee discourseth of fayth and workes throughly to the vttermoste For were it not for the controuersie aboute obtayning of righteousnesse aboute merite of workes and snaring of the consciences ceremonies would wel stande with the promise What meaneth than this putting awaye of the promise agaynst which the Apostle contendeth because the deceauers did denye saluation to haue bene promised freely vnto men and to be obtayned by fayth but they vrge ceremonyes as things necessary to deserue saluation as by by shall be seene I returne to the wordes of Paule The Lawe sayth he is after the promise therefore it maketh not it voyd for a couenaunt once confirmed ought to abide inviolate and vnbroken Agayn I repeate it Except you vnderstand the promise to be freely giuen the sentence is more than needes for the law and the promise disagree not sauing in the cause of iustification because the lawe maketh a man righteous by the deseruing of workes and the promise giueth righteousnesse freelye and he doth playnelye expounde hymselfe when he nameth the couenaunt to haue his foundation in Christe Obiection But here the Papistes will be in our toppe for they can readilye scoffe oute this argument We saye they doe not any more require the old ceremonies let them be iogging yet neuerthelesse a man is iustified by the morall law for this went before the couenaunte of GOD with Abraham as being created together with man so either the reasoning of Paule is friuolous or in vain or else it is of force against ceremonies only I aunswere Answer That Paule considered the thing as it was namely that no rewarde is due vnto workes but by the couenante of God so although we graunt that the law doth iustifie yet neuertheles before the Lawe men could not deserue saluation by their workes because there was no couenaunt I affirme nothing which the schole Diuines graunt not for they teach that works merite not saluation by an inward worthinesse but by the acceptation of God as they speake it by reason of the couenant Therfore where there is no couenant of God no testimony of accepting or allowing coms in place no works in like maner shal suffise vnto righteousnesse therfore Paules discourse proceedeth finally There was saith he a double or twofold couenant of God with men the former was couenaunted in the hande of Abraham the seconde in the hand of Moses the former was founded in Christ and therefore free therefore the law stepping in could not bring to passe that men could haue saluation without grace because by this meanes the promise should be made of none effect That the sence is thus euen that whiche followeth nexte of all doth shewe 18 If the inheritaunce be by the law Lest the aduersaries shoulde cauill saying that that which they taught did not belong to the dissoluing or abrogating the couenaunt of God he preuenteth all their shifts affirming these two to be contrarye namely that saluation commeth vnto vs by the Lawe and by the promise who dare expounde this of only ceremonyes seing that Paule doth comprehende generallye all whatsoeuer is agaynste the free promise It is not than to be doubted but that he excludeth all kynde of workes and so he sayth Ro. 4.14 If the inheritaunce be by the Law faith is done away and the promise of none effect Why so because saluation should hang vpon this condition If thou satisfie the Law and therefore hee doth by and by conclude that saluation is of faith that the promise may be certayne Let vs therefore dilligently remember why in the comparing of the promise and the lawe the putting of the one ouerthroweth the other namely because the promise hath respect vnto faith and the Lawe hath respecte vnto workes Faith receaueth that whiche is freelye giuen but vnto workes rewarde is giuen and that is it whiche by and by hee ioyneth GOD gaue vnto Abraham not requiring the like recompence as it were but promising freelye for if you vnderstande it to be conditionally this worde Gaue will neuer agree with it 19 For what is the Lawe than it was added because of transgressiōs vntill the seede should come to which it was promised ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediator 20 Furthermore a Mediator is not of one but GOD is one 21 Is the Lawe than againste the Promises of God God forbid for if there had bene a Lawe giuen whiche mought haue made aliue than righteousnesse shold haue bene by the law indeede 22 But the Scripture hath shutte all vnder sinne that the promise by the faith of Iesus Christ might be giuen to them which beleeue When wee heare that the Lawe doeth nothing auayle to bring righteousnesse by and by diuers cogitations come in oure braynes eyther than that it is vnprofitable or to no vse or contrarye to the Couenaunt of GOD or some such like thing yea rather that mighte come in mynde Why shoulde we not saye that of the Lawe which Ieremie chap. 31. ver 31. hath sayde of the newe Testament that the latter was giuen to correcte the weakenesse of the former doctrine Such Obiections as these bee must Paule aunswere if hee woulde satisfie the Galathians Fyrste than hee requireth what the vse of the Lawe is for in as muche as it followed the promise it seemeth that it oughte to supplye that which was wanting in it and certaynely it was doubted hereof whether that the promise by it selfe were of none effecte excepte it were holpen of the Lawe