is bound to what is impossible No Tyrant euer bound his subiects to impossibilityes and should God do it from whome so barbarous cruelty is most far wherfore for this very thing that the ten commaundements began to be impossible to be kept they ceased also to bind and therfore they appertaine nothing vnto vs. Further because Caluin teacheth that al our works be fowle staynes filth and synne before God but none caÌ„ be bound to commit sin therfore we are not bound euen to labour or oÌ„ce put our hand towards the fulfilling of the decalogue or of any part of it The same I might confirme by other reasons but these may serue the turne by which it is also manifest out of Caluins doctrine that the dealogue appertayneth nothing vnto vs. Secondly these two Religions make no difference of good and bad works before God but only before men For as the works that are said to be euil haue their manifest malice euen so to the good workes of the iust they attribute a secret malice in regard of the internal concupiscence by reason of which malice they will haue them to be mortal syns before God And if it be so wherfore should I rather attend to good works with the afflâ—cting punishing of nature with the wasting of goods then to bad that go accompanyed with great pleasures ofteÌ„tymes with profit and commodity also For sith both be bad before God wherfore should I not prefer those in which there is a temporall both pleasure and gaâ—ne before them which are not done without molestation trouble and losse Thirdly for that both Religions teach that a man is by speciall fayth alone iust before God without any good work of his part and that to him who hath this fayth no syn is imputed So teacheth Luther in very many places as hath been declared before Of which Doctrine he inferreth l. de libert Christ de capt babyâ— tib â— Instit c. 8. § 68. l. 3. c. 4. § 28. That incredulity alone is syn and that the incredulous and vnbeeleuing alone are to be damned and that he who retayneth his fayth cannot be damned at all The same teacheth Caluin when he sayth All syns be to vnbeleeuing mortall to the beleeuing all be veniall He calleth them venial because God imputeth them not vnto them but in what they are done pardoneth and forgiueth them And to is doctrine plainely followeth of this principle wherby they conclude that speciall fayth alone is the cause of iustification that is that a man is iust before God by this alone that he firmely beleeueth that Christ hath fully satisfied for his syns for that by this faith Christs satisfaction is applied vnto him and is made as it were his own so as by it be is reputed iust before God though he find no change of will at all within And therfore while this fayth continueth no syn can hurt him because he abideth in Christs iustice he firmely retâ—yneth it by fayth And if we ground our selues vpon this doctrine we haue no cause to feare the committing of any wickednes whatsoeuer For no punishment nor vengeance is for it to be feared at Gods hands sith God imputeth it not for a fault by occasion of Christs satisfaction communicated vnto vs by fayth And can Atheisme giue greater liberty to all manner of wickednes to all impurity of life Some Caluinist Ministers in England confesse it plainely inough who of that opinion of Caluin touching the iustification of fayth Refert ex Foxo Guil. Reginaldus l. 4. pag. 1020. among others do deduce and man tayne these conclusions 1. All those do erre who thinke that they are to be saued when they shall haue done many good works 2. It is nothing necessary for vs to lavour for the purchasing of life euerlasting by our good works sith we haue it euen now 3. This is one of the principall errors that beareth sway in the Christian world to thinke that good works profit any thing to Saluation 4. Our syns withdraw nothing from Gods glory for as much as all the burt of syn consisteth in the scandall of our neighbour 5. Christ hâ—th with his bloud redeemed and deliuered vs from all sâ—ns and lawes in so much as from this tyme forward no law bindeth vs in conscience Heere we are in expresse words freed from the decalogne and from all precepts of Sacraments 6. You owe nothing vnto God but fayth that you confesse Iesus Christ and beleeue that he is risenfroÌ„ death for so you shall be saued In all other things God leaueth you in your liberty to follow your own will For you may do all things without scruple of conscience for you cannot perish nor be damned whatsoeuer you shal outwardly do or leaue vndoÌ„e All this they deduce and that most rightly out of that foundation of Iustification by special fayth first laid by Luther and Caluin in whose writings also all these former grounds almost are expressely had Who now could wish or imagine greater liberty to all wickednes Adde hereunto what hath been said before in the second Consideration where we laid down three other manners by which this liberty is graunted I omit to speake of that window that Caluin hath opened when he taught l. 2. Inflit. c. 25. §. â—2 That the paine of the damned is nothing els then to feele God an aduersary and to be put in feare by him though that paine be represented vs by things corporall as by darknes weeping gnasshing of teeth the inextinguible fire c. By which words he plainely insinuateth that hell is nothing els but vaine terrors For if God inflicteth not any paine but only affrigteth the damned certainely vaine is that terrour and to be laughed at vaine be the paines of hell and nothing to be weighed or regarded at all The X. Reason That they renew old Heresies EVERY Religion is to be auoyded that contayneth heresyes formerly condemned by the Catholique Church which haue euer been held and reputed for heresyes But these new Religions contayne such heresyes yea they seeme to be nothing but a masse and heape of diuers heresyes in scueral ages taught by diuers arch heretiks in former tymes by the Catholike Church condemned therefore they are to be shuÌ„ned We are to proue our minor and therfore let vs consider the principall points of doctrine that these religions maintaine 1. Both as well Luther as Caluin teach that there is no liberty of will And Luther in his 36. article affirmeth that it is the principall soundation of his religion But this was long agoe the heresy of Simon (a) Caluin l. 1. Recognit Magus and Valentinus as testifieth S. Augustine haer 11. and of the (b) Aug. haer â—6 Hier. in prlog contra Pelag. Manichies and of (c) in â—ont Constant sess 8. VVicliffe c. 2. Both do teach that God is the instigatour or mouer to all wickednes and that all euylls be done
acknowledging of one God I add further Then in vayne was Christ made man in vayne did he worke so many Miracles that so he might be acknowledged and belieued to be the Mossias Sauiour of the world in vaine was he crucified and dyed For none of all these thinges was necessary to mans saluation it being sufficient to send preachers about the world to perswade men the beliefe of one God After this manner reasoneth the Apostle Gal. 2. If iustice be by the Law then in vayne saith he is Christ dead which is as much to say if Iustice can be obtayned by the knowledg of one God and obseruation of the Law in vayne was Christ crucifyed because then the death of Christ had not byn necessary for our saluation The 2. Reason Besides Rom. 3. Apoc. â— 7. Act. 4. hence it must necessarily follow that the whole Scripture is false since that it telleth vs how Christ is our Sauiour Mediatour and Redeemer and propoundeth him vnto vs as a Propitiatour by â—aith in his bloud by whose Sacrifice â—e are reconciled vnto God by his bloud our sinnes are washed away and with whose faith we are iustified Nâ—â—ther is there any other name vnder hâ—â—â—en giuen vnto men in which they â—â—ght to be saued Thus speaketh the 〈◊〉 Scripture and all this must needes be friuolous and false if euery man may be saued in his owne Religion But some may perhaps obiect that Christ is indeed our Redeemer and that all our good commeth from him yet his faith notwithstanding is not absolutely necessary For it is sufficient that we belieue that all our good commeth and proceedeth from the bountifull goodnesse of God vnto vs neyther is it needful for vs to know by what meanes it is bestowed vpon vs. But this not only repugneth to the holy Scripture but also it is against the reason of the holy Scripture because the sayd holy Scripture doth euidently teach vs that Christs redemption is not applied vnto vs but by fayth and therfore all such as are destitute of the fayth of Christ are voyd of their iustification and remayning still guiltie of sinne are the children of wrath and in danger of eternall damnation It repugneth to reason Why Christian saith is necessary to saluation because to the end that we may become partakers of any great and vnaccustomed benefit all reason requireth that we acknowledge the benefit and our be â—â—â—â—ctor and that we honour him as it be cometh vs with all thankes-giuing for â—oth the condition of the benefit and of our benefactor doth require of vs this gratefulnesse of mind Seing therfore that the benefit of our redemption is so great and vnaccustomed and he who bestowed it vpon vs so great and famous as also the meanes wherby he bestowed it vpon vs so strange and meruaylous it is requisit we should acknowledge all these things least we should liue and dye vngratefull toward so great a benefactor and least insteed of blessing thanking him after the manner of the Iewes we curse and blaspheme him It is therfore an absurd thing to esteme those who do not beleeue in Christ to be partakers of eternall saluation prepared for vs by Christ The which also by this may be confirmed because none can be saued who doth not know God and the benefit of his creation for otherwise all Idolators might be saued neither therfore can he be saued who doth not know the benefit of his redemption because the benefit of our redemption is farre greater and more admirable and doth more appertayne to the Glory of God and of Christ our Redeemer and requireth also of vs greater honour seruice and thankes giuing Neyther is it sufficient for vs to know in generall that all good thinges come vnto vs from God for this is not sufficient for the honor and gratitude which is dew vnto him but we must also know what and how great the benefit is as also by what manner way and meanes he bestowed it vpon vs that is to say that he hath deliuered vs from sinne and euerlasting death and that he hath opened vnto vs the way to eternall life that after a most admirable manner to wit by ioyning our nature vnto his by suffering therein death for vs. For this especially commendeth his charity mercy and iustice this also exacteth at our hands all duery prayse and thankes-giuing these therefore are most necessarily to be knowne to saluation The 3. Reason If euery one may be saued in his owne fayth then therfore that fayth is sufficient to saluation which is not a gift of God but an humane perswasion The ground of faith among â—e Iewes Turkes is false conceyued by our private iudgement relying vpon humane authority built vpon a deceitfull foundation For the Turkes although they belieue one Goâ— to be the Creatour of heauen and earth and to be the rewarder of both good and euill workes their faith notwithstanding is not of the holy Ghost but of their owne priuate iudgment or rather of the Diuel for they do not belieue so because God hath reuealed it vnto men by any true Prophet but because Mahomet whome they thinke to be the Prophet of God his instrument to teach mortall men hath so set it down in his Alcoran Albeit therfore that which they belieue be true yet because the ground of their beliefe and the whole reason therof is fâ—lse and pestilent to wit that Mahomet is a Prophet of God the faith it selfe whereby they belieue is deceytfull and the foundation therof whereupon it is grounded is hurtfull to saluation necessarily inclining and forcing the mind to cast it selfe into all the pâ—stiferous errours of that sect How therfore caÌ„ that faith be called sufficient for them vnto saluation or that they can be saued by that faith How can that which is vncertayne deceitfull pestiferous be made the foundatioÌ„ of our instice before God or of eternall saluation In like manner albeit the Iewes do belieue the same or rather more thinges agreable vnto truth yet the faith wherby they do belieue them is deceytfull and voyde of the spirit of God For the whole reason or cause of their beliefe is because the Rabbyns and Doctors of their Synagogue do so interpret the holy Scriptures vnto them For they are the rule of their beliefe or which is all one the holy Scripture as it is subiect to their interpretation But this whole reason of their beliefe is deceytfull and no lesse hurtful and dangerous then that of the Turkes for it is no lesse hurtefull to belieue that their Rabbyns interpreting the holy Scriptures are indued with the spirit of God then to belieue that Mahomet is the Prophet of God neither are they drawne into lesser absurdityes by the force of that principle How therfore can that faith be the foundation or ground of saluation The 4. Reason Finally this opinion maketh no difference betwixt Turcisme Iudaisme and Christianisme
religion hath shined with the greatest glory of miracles of wisdome and of sanctity of her followers throughout all former ages and doth at this day also shine it is needfull therfore of greater and more euident miracles now wherby lawfully put her out of possession and reiect her as also there is more need of greater knowledg sanctity and publike fame in the followers of these new religions now then euer was in the old And lastly if the religion of the old Testament amongst the Iewes was to be changed and that they were to passe from a shaddow to the truth or from a type or patterne to the true sampler it selfe although our Lord might most clerly haue conuinced and shewed out of the Scriptures that this mutation and change was to be made and that himselfe was sent of God for the same purpose he thought good notwithstanding to cōfirme the same with very māy most wonderfull miracles that there might be left vnto them no occasion of doubt or turning backe how greatmiracles then shall we thinke to be needfull now for the changing of religion in the new Testament when as the Scriptures do cleerly denounce that there thalbe no more changes made but that God wil be present with her for her assistance to the worlds end and that the gates of hell shall not preuaile against her For what wisdome were it for any man to belieue so great a thing so new and paradoxicall so much against Scripture and iudgment of all the ancientt Fathers without extraordinary great miracles Nay what miracles can there be great inough to make a man at least probably to belieue so strang a thing Heerhence it is manifest that we haue great cause to require of them such miracles and that they deale perfidiously with vs when as they would haue vs to giue them credit in matters of so great importance without miracles and vnlesse we do belieue all vpon their bare word they presently raise vp grieuous presecutions against vs. But they will say Whether do they proue ther doctrine out of the Scriptures We proue our opinions and doctrine out of the Scripture Be it so but yet according to your owne sense and iudgment and not according to the consent of the Ancient Holy Fathers and the receaued Doctors of the Church who liued before these our controuersies so could not be any way partial therin Againe their arguments like vnto spiders webbs are very easily dissolued by Catholike Doctors besides that there are so many new Reformers sprong vp within these 80. or 90. yeares so many repayrers of the decayed Church so māy reniuers of the extinct Religion who also be most contrary one to anothers and what one buildeth vp another pulleth downe yet notwithstanding do they all confirme their opinions out of the Scriptures all do rest vpon her testimony alone all do make Scripture the only foundation of their building and therfore the proofe of all is to be admitted or of none And lastly seing that nothing is to be belieued vnlesse Scripture say it Where I pray yow doth it say that you or he or such a one was sent of God for the reforming and restoring of the decayed Church and Religion They will say Whether it be a miracle to haue many followers perhaps that they want not miracles for that it is a very great miracle that in so short tyme so many haue imbraced this new Ghospell And this perhaps might haue some colour if their religion were more austere and strict vnto the flesh then is the Catholike But seing that this their new Doctrine doth banish all austerity and sharpnes of the Catholike Religion and giue all liberty to the flesh what miracle is it if many follow and imbrace the same what meruayle is it if weighty things fal to the ground when as their props be takē away or that riuers run into the sea their dāmes stops remoued our corrupt nature doth most of all incline to liberty which it findeth in these new religions and therfore we do the soner imbrace and follow them not because we being persuaded by the force of reason do belieue that they are more holy but because we find in them that which we sought for and that which without feare we might enioy vnder the colour of religion and piety Moreouer this miracle may aswel be brought on the behalfe of all the Sectes of all these new Reformers as of one for that many haue ioyned themselues not only to the Caluinists but also to the Lutherans and Anabaptistes and therfore they must be all holy and come from God as their Author But God cannot deny himselfe nor destroy that which he hath established and therfore cannot be Author of so contrary religions the one damning the other to the pit of hell The V. Reason From the Conditions of their Liues and Manners THE fifth reason is because that these Religions were brought in by men of bad life and such as were noted of infamy pride enuy and notorious detraction giuing shew of nothing lesse then an Apostolicall Spirit For as for Luther we know that he was somtymes a professed Monke and Priest thet by bound with a double vow of continency We know also that leauing his Monastery and casting of his habit and profession be returned to a secular life againe where ioyning himselfe to a professed Nunne whome he enticed out of her Cloister he liued dayly in her company by which fact in the iudgment of all the world he committed a twofold synne of Sacriledge and did alway reiterate the same as often as he abused her body What manner of life can be more scandalous then this Moreouer we know that he was so exceedingly giuen to good cheere and lust that he was dayly occupied in banquetting and drunkennesse (a) lib de vita coniugali affirming that a woman was more necessary then to eat drinke or sleep that it was (b) Serm. de matrimonio lawfull to vse the maid if the wife refused to do her duty The life of Caluin is written by Hieronymus Bolsecus Iulius Brigerus and others being full of most notorious wickednes to wit false accusations of others murthers robberyes filthy and lewd behauiour all which things haue byn obiected against him by diuers wryters wherunto I could yet neuer see any answere Of Luthers infamy it is manifest to all the whole world that wheras he being a professed Monke and a Priest he ioyned himselfe to a professed Nunne which fact by the iudgment of all learned Doctors purchaseth infamy For if by the Emperours lawes that man be infamous who is taken in adultery L. Palam S. Quiin adulterio ff de ritu nuptiarum how much more is he infamous that hath twice contracted sacrilegious mariage and dayly vseth sacrilegious copulation For that it is a far more filthy thing to be an Adulterer of Christ then an Adulterer of the wife or husband The infamy of
IF any of these new Religions for example that of Caluin were Christâ—true Religion besides other absurdities insinuated before this would further follow that all Catholikes which haue byn from the Apostles tymes vntill this present be damned and adiudged to paines cuerlasting for as much as according to a principall doctrine of the Caluinists they wanted iustifying faith and therefore iustice also before God whence it is that they continued in their syns and died in them For faith necessary to iustification as this religion holdeth is that whereby a man stedfastly beleeueth that himselfe is iust before God for Christs satisfaction which is to him by this faith applyed and imputed And certaine it is that this faith was vnknown to the world vntill Luthers tyme neyther doth he deny it but gloryeth rather that he notified and reuealed to the world the true manner of iustification obscured by antiquity The same is manifest by the writings of all the ancient Fathers both for that besids faith they require an inward chaung of the will and purpose of keeping the whole law and also for that they condemne that security of saluation and will haue a man to worke his saluation with feare and trembling and to be alwayes sollicitous and carefull and therefore they do all with one consent reiect that speciall Fayth by which a man certainly beleeueth himselfe to be iust as meere presumption For though we are to belâ—eue that Christ hath on his part most fully satisfied for vs yet it is not manifest vnto vs whether we haue done all that which is on our part necessary for the making of ourselues partakers of this satifaction and whether we haue not at one tyme or other lost our part in it Manifest therefore it is that all those of former tymes wanted this fayth and consequently they are all damâ—ed so many holy Fathers so many 〈◊〉 so many Virgins and Saints Irenaeus Iustine Gregory Thaumaturgus Nazianzen Basill Chrysostome Damascene Hilary Ambrose Hierome Augustine Martin Nicolas Antony Benedict Bernard Dominicke Francis Laurence Vincent Sebastian Catharine Cecily Agnes and infinite others who were admirable to the world eyther for their sanctity and miracles or for the glory of martyrdone Finally all that haue been before vs euen from the Apostles tyme till now be damned And to vse Tertullians words l. de praescript adueâ—sus haereticos In vaine hath the Gospell byn so many ages preached in vaine haue so many thousands been baptized in vaine haue so many works of saith been exercised so many vertues and so many gifts of grace to no purpose wrought so many priesthoods and so many offices admitted in vaine and to be short in vaine haue so many martyrdomes been crowned But how past beliefe absurd and blasphemous a matter is this How contrary and repugnant to the iudgement of the whole world and of all ages past Neither can it be sayd that their ignorance excused them because none can be saued without faith without the iustice of Christ without the participation of Christs satisfaction without the remission of sins as the Scripture especially of the new Testament euery where teacheth no ignorance can make or cause that any may be saued without them Wherefore there is no ouasion heere for they eyther be all damned or els Luthers and Caluins Religions be false and impious in their principall doctrine touching Iustification Loe heere 12. Reasons by which it is made plaine that these new Religions be to be shunned as false pernicious and now we come to our last Consideration X. CONSIDERATION and conclusion of this whole ConsultatioÌ„ LASTLY that Religion is to be imbraced during life that we would wish we had followed and held at the houre of our death and whereof we may be able to giue a iust accompt when we shall stand before the tribunall seat of Christ For touching what is to be done there cannot a better CoÌ„sultation be had then by the consideration of death and of the latter Iudgment namely that we make an election of that here which in the article of our death may make most to our profit and shunne that which may at that tyme procure or cause our certaine ruine perdition or at least hazard the same And such is the Catholike religion that we shal haue a will to preferre it when we come to dye is euident First by the example of very many who though they haue lyued as heretiks yet when they come to dye do desire to dy Catholikes for so to do they deeme it most for their security Secondly for that euery one then wisheth he had done many good works and that he had carefully taken heed of all sins to both whereof the Catholike Church hath effectuall iuducements and Lutheranisme and Caluinisme haue neither the one nor the other but rather bringeth in a contempt of good works and liberty of life Thirdly for that the Catholike Religion hath many remedies and preseruatiâ—es which are not in that dreadful passage to be coÌ„temned as repentance for heir sinns the absolution of Priests the Sacraments oâ— Extreme Vnction holy Eucharist which cause great comfort and confidence to the faithfull for by them Christs satisfaction is communicated vnto vs. But a naked faith is a very cold and weake help in that article For how may you in earnest perswade your selfe that Christ is propitious and mercifull vnto you that you are iust and to be by Christ saued who contemne the â—emedyes by him appointed and determine to dye out of the communion of the Catholike Church All lects of this tyme do brag of this fayth but all of them shall not be saued for as much as there is but one true religion of Christ out of which none can be saued as not only all Catholiks but Lutherans also Caluinists and Anabaptists do also teach And therfore your speciall fayth will not profit you any thing vnles you professe Christs true religion That also such as haue imbraced the Catholike fayth and perseuered in it shall easily be able to giue an accompt of that they haue done vnto the supreme Iudge and that not any daunger at all iâ— on that part to wards them is cleare For suppose that I stand before that dreadfull Tribunall and am asked wherfore I imbraced the Catholike or Papistical religion as they now tearme it and that I did not rather leauing it passe to that new religion created and reformed â—y Caluin I will with great security answere That I therfore held the Catholike sayth What a Catho like will answere at the day of â—udgment because it teacheth me to abstract my mind from â—errene things and to transferre it to the loue of câ—â—estiall It further â—eacheth me to maister and mortify my flesh and to crucify it with the nayles of the fâ—are of God to insist in good works to obay Superiors to attend to prayer and to cut off all liberty of synning Therefore I held the Catholike Religion