pretending to discover Principles and Practices relating to George Fox and hiâ— Party as thou callest them that run paraleâ— with the Church of Rome And then to excuse this thy persecuting Cain-like and Judas-like work against us thou falsly placest it on the Will of the Lord saying The Will of the Lord be done p. 17. whilsâ— thou art doing the Will of the Devil thy Master and Father of Lyes and Lyars adding That 't is but just that Deceit and Idolatry should be discovered in whomsoever c. p. 18. But come on That thou dost do quickly Let 's see what exact Similitudes and eminent Discoveries thou hast shewn and made of our seeming Vnion and Paralel with the Church of Rome Thus thou attempts it viz. 1st 'T is affirmed of the Pope that he is Christ's Vicar on Earth Accounts himself invested with Power to execute outward Laws Edicts and Decrees Herein sayst thou I place not much difference between the Pope on the one part and the Pen-man and some of his the Brethren on the other And why so The Pen-man and his Brethren sayst thou account themselves the Representatives of Christ's inward Government over the Conscience p. 18. That 's an Untruth by the way and none of our words but a scornful Pervertion Where did we so account our selves 'T is improper and unsound to say That visible Men or finite Creatures are the Representatives of Christs inward spiritual Government over the Conscience which is endless and where Christ himself reigns Where did we ever assume a Government in Christ's stead over the Conscience But only as his Servants and Witnesses by his Spirit do commend our selves to every mans Conscience in the sight of God and thereby only represent or shew forth by sound Doctrine and good Conversation That Christ must rule and be obey'd as the Head of his Church which vastly differs from the Pope's false sence of his being Christ's Vicar or Representative on Earth Thou addest viz. And that they are invested with Power to execute outward Laws Edicts and Decrees And what follows on thy discovery and similitude Therefore the Pope and G. F. and his Party seem to be in Vnion and run Paralel with the Church of Rome That 's false The true Apostles and primitive Christians had outward Laws Commands Decrees c. which they practised So hath the Pope and the Church of Rome though not the same What follows Did they therefore seem to be in Union Thy Similitude and Inference are fallacious We differ in the Power and Manner of Execution and our Laws and Decrees which Christ hath given us differ from the Popes The Popes Power is Carnal and Coercive Ours Spiritual and Perswasive The Popes Ecclesiastical Laws Edicts Canons and Decrees are to promote a false Church Idolatrous Worship and Superstition Our Laws and Decrees c. are first written in our Hearts and taught us by Christ Jesus enjoyning us to eye believe and follow him as our Rock our Way and Leader in Holiness and Purity of Life and Conversation Therefore thy Comparison is silly and abusive here as well as Malicious The Pope claims a succession from Peter and Peter's Primacy as their term is as the Rock and Foundation of the Church So do not we but deny that Doctrine as false believing and owning Christ to be the Rock and Foundation nor yet do we assume or pretend any Priviledge Power or Authority over Christ's Church from an outward succession but only being Christ's Witnesses Ministers Servants and Ambassadours are assisted by his immediate Presence Power and Wisdom with us to assist order and govern us in his service and the service of one another in love Again thou proceedest in thy Similitudes viz. 2dly The Pope likewise affirms that the Church of Rome is the true Church and in the true Faith The Romish Clergy teach that we must believe as the Church believes Herein I cannot justly place much difference between the Popish Clergy and Pen-man if he approved this Doctrine viz. The true Church is in the true Faith that is in God and we must either believe thus as the true Church believes or else it were but both a Folly and Hypocrisie to profess our selves Members thereof pag. 18. Thus thou wouldst make me whom I presume thou intendest to resemble the Pope and his Clergy and to seem to be in union with them But dost thou not own the Doctrine to be true in it self viz. 1 st That the true Church is in the true Faith that is in God And darest thou deny this What sayest thou to it Speak out man and be plain to the Point 2 dly That we must either believe THUS i. e in God as the true Church believes or else 't were Hypocrisie to profess our selves Members thereof If thou canst not deny the Doctrine in it self why hast thou made this an Instance of our seeming to be in union with the Popish party For thou knowest in thy Conscience first That it was not spoken of the Church of Rome but in general of the true Church whose Faith is IN GOD which we neither believe of the Church of Rome nor does the Church of Rome believe so of us Where 's then our seeming Union secondly To believe in God as the true Church doth herein the true Church is made an instance and example of Faith in God not to make the Church's believing this or that the sole Reason and Cause of my or our believing the same this were Implicit 't is as not because for Christ who is God is the original efficient cause both of the Church's and my Faith which is in him which is the one living substantial Faith wherein is Unity Whilst thou canst not confute the said Doctrine behold thy Similitude what an empty FALSE SHEW it is What real Protestants in Europe could escape thy Censure of Resembling the Pope and his party nay how canst thou escape thy self upon such Fallacious Similitudes as thou hast invented against us The Pope and his party believe there there is a God a Christ a Heaven a Hell Immortality future states So do all true Protestants What follows according to thy Similitude Ergo all true Protestants seem to be at union with the Pope and his party The Pope and his party believe there is one true â—â—iversal Church and one true Faith So do the Protestants but not so of each other they are not in Union no more are we with the Pope or his party but with the best Reformed Protestants wherein they differ'd from and oppos'd the Church of Rome The Pope believes he is a true Christian and no Apostate So dost thou W. R. believe thou art a true Christian c. What follows Ergo thou dost Resemble the Pope and seemest to be at Union with the Papistical party Is not this argumentum ad hominem like thy Similitudes and more resembling them than thou hast resembled G. F. and his party to the Pope and Church of
then he judges this Inconsistent with that sense viz. That his way of writing is void of Conscience Reason and Religion From whence he infers upon the Pen-man as he calls him Is it not hence plain that such a sense renders those very things acknowledged to be interposed from the Light it self to be void of Conscience Reason and Religion And then crys out at an hideous rate as if he had wholly knock'd down his Respondent O notorious Blasphemy The Pen-man acted in the Dark shown himself unworthy of the name of a Man May without abuse be numbred amongst such sort of Beasts at Ephesus Vnreasonable men I have already prov'd the Pen-man Vnreasonable and Blasphemous yet he may be termed a man though a very Wicked one c. pag. 2 3. with more Aggravations This is the Person that complains of a great Bull against him but observe his furious Bull here and what a wild one and how outragiously mad and false in his Inference What 's the matter with him on which he is so furious It is that his way of writing is deemed void of Conscience Reason Religion c. because it has been confest That the Light sometimes interposeth and makes him concede to Truth But does it hence follow that these very things interposed by the Light are esteemed void of Reason or Religion in themselves No such matter The major part of this work appears such and he is measured by the major part thereof A man may justly be adjudged a Wicked Person when the greatest part of his life is such though he may both speak and act some right things when the Light comes over him and convicts him as Balaam did and some of the wicked Kings of Israel with many others Yea and the Devil himself though a Lyar from the beginning yet is made to grant and speak some Truths when over-powered though contrary to his Nature Besides we do not believe our Adversary to be Conscientious in what the Light interposeth through him any more than that Balaam was a good man when his heart was evil Nor can the Devil 's confessing to Truth at any time render him a good Devil nor of tender Conscience his Nature being contrary to Truth and Goodness § 5. But there lies another great Reflection in the case upon W. R. in his charging the Pen-man suppose my self or any other of our second day's Meeting with Notorious Blasphemy acting in the dark being unworthy the name of a Man numbering him among the Beasts at Ephesus with whom Paul fought having already proved him Vnreasonable and Blasphemous as boastingly and falsly he pretends comparing this also with what he saith of the said Treatise entituled The Accuser of our Brethren cast down viz. 'T is with me to take a little notice thereof I say again a little notice that so the Reader may not think me so Impertinent as to trouble the Press with so great a Volumn as a full Answer to every Impertinency c. Thus W. R. p. 14. chap. 2. See now at what a Villifying and Insulting rate this man writes and how Wicked and Despicable he has rendred the Pen-man as his term is Now W. R. supposing thou takest my self or any other of my Brethren to be the Person thou chiefly smites at how consistent art thou in thy work to spend so much Time Labour and Cost in writing and printing against such a mean inconsiderable and undeserving Person in thy account as unworthy the Name of a Man but rather to be numbred among unreasonable Beasts One would think it should be far beneath a Person of thy Hight Rank and Quality as thy flourishing Vaunts bespeak thee thus to abase thy self as to spend so much time and cost upon such an Inferior Irrational and Inconsiderable Person in thy high Thoughts But art not thou a great Defamer and Opposer in thy said Charge of Notorious Blasphemy and of being unworthy the Name of a Man c Is this thy Christianity Who will believe thee thinkest thou that are not of thy own Party And seeing thou art pleased to signifie what little notice 't is with thee to take of our Treatise we cannot but take notice of thy lofty and slighty way of writing However we have no reason to take this thy little Notice for an Answer for thou hast collected and replied to so little of the matter and hast so much given the GO-BY to the principal and greatest part of our said Treatise as one that has found out the craft of Evasion that 't is a little notice indeed thou hast taken and thy work deserves but little notice to be taken of by others unless to evince thy Envy and its Falshood c. Thy pretence of Vnreasonableness in thy Respondent will not hide thy Loftiness and Contempt nor excuse thy shifting Evasions from those things that are most material and weighty upon thee which every Ingenuous Reader may easily perceive in comparing our said Treatise against the Accuser of the Brethren and thy Seventh Part against ours together § 6. Thou writes much in thy own Justification and to clear thy self of giving judgment on Reports and Jealousies though frequent in thy great Book Thou on thy own behalf sayst I can in Truth delare that I have not at any time positively asserted any thing but what I either know or have had sufficient proof as may render my Pen blameless therein pag. 3. Upon which I would seriously ask thee What sufficient proof hast thou that that was E. Burrough's Epistle which thou hast cited for his Epistle and positively asserted it two or three times to be E. B's Epistle in thy first part of the Christian-Quaker falsly so called which I and many more do not believe it to be E. B's for divers causes having seen John Parrots Name only to a Transcript of it in a Persons Hand writing i. e. J. Batho's that was for a time an Admirer of J. P. How durst thou be so positive in asserting it to be E. B's I dare Challenge thee to produce it under E. B.'s own hand to any of us that knew his hand if thou tookest it not up upon an Implicit belief trust and report As we can prove thou hast written many things from thy own Jealousies and Reports only with this provision in some other things If Reports be true c. to save thee from the censure of drawing a positive Conclusion and then what weight or credit does this add to much of thy Work And I would know what sufficient proof thou hast of thy Story That a Friend of known credit did declare that twelve pence was paid in London on demand of so much for a Certificate in order to the Accomplishment of his Marriage which otherwise might have been obstructed p. 5. I pray thee produce thy Author and Informer for this Story and what Friend of known Credit did so declare for 't is not credited by many However thou art positive in
Light within You Preachers do say in your Declaration that the Son of God is come and hath given you an understanding the which Doctrine I do deny ONE BLOW p. 20. Answ. Thou that canst not reconcile or see the consistency of Salvation by the Man Christ Jesus AND by his Light within art gone from his Light into Imaginations Why hast thou not better observed the Gospel preached by the Angel of the Lord to the Shepherds concerning Jesus Christ the Son of God Luke 2.11 For unto you is born this day in the City of David a Saviour which is Christ the Lord see also Mat. 1.21 Read also good Old Simeon's Testimony which he gave of the Lord 's Christ Luke 2.26 27 28. And also read Verse 30 31 32. For mine Eyes have seen thy Salvation which thou hast prepared before the Face of all People a Light to lighten the Gentiles and the Glory of thy People Israel The true Christ of God is but one though he hath appeared in divers manners both in the Flesh and in the Spirit he is the Light he is the Way to the Father he is the Saviour he is the one Mediator betwixt God and Man even the Man Christ Jesus the heavenly glorious Man the Man that was promised to be for a hiding place who in the dayes of his Flesh said I am the Light of the World And He that is with you shall be in you As he was the eternal Word the Son of God the Life that was in him was the Light of men John 1. both before his coming in the Flesh and ever since and therefore he was that true Light that enlightens every man that cometh into the World he was given for Life and Salvation This our one Lord Jesus Christ is our Light Life and Salvation he is also Judge of quick and dead that MAN by whom God will judge the World in Righteousness he that believeth not in his Name is condemned already and This is the Condemnation that Light is come into the World i. e. the Light of the Son of God and Men love Darkness rather then Light John 3. see also 2 Thes. 1.7 8. When the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from Heaven with his mighty Angels in flaming Fire taking Vengeance on them that know not God and that obey not the Gospel c. Then such shall know him their Judge and Condemner unto their deserved punishment see Verse 9. J. B. You Teachers do hold forth to us Gentiles Christ the Son of God to be our Way to the Father The which Doctrine I would have you to prove One Blow p. 20. Answ. What defidence and unbelief hath entred thee Christ the Son of God testied John 14.6 I am the Way the Truth and the Life No man cometh unto the Father but by me and no man cometh unto me except the Father which hath sent me draw him Wherefore in that no man cometh unto the Father but by the Son the Son is the way to the Father and the Father's drawing or teaching reacheth unto man before he come to the Son or Father that he may be drawn and come to both No mans knows the Father but the Son and he to whom the Son will reveal him Therefore Christ the Son of God is the way to the Father out of Adam in the fall if thou l't believe him and 'T is by one Spirit through Jesus Christ the Mediator that we have access to the Father § 8. J. B. In his gross Errors detected or many of the Doctrines of the leading Quakers disowned as coming from an Antichristian Spirit p. 1. he saith John Webb's Doctrine was That God's appearance in the Sons and Daughters of men is to beget and bring forth that innocent Birth and Babe immortal c. This Doctrine doth signifie that God's appearance is to his Son Christ Jesus and for the begetting and bringing of him forth in the Sons and Daughters of men the which Doctrine I do deny Answ. First God's appearance in the Sons and Daughters of men is not to bring forth a nocent Birth nor a Babe that 's mortal but an innocent Birth and a Babe immortal Except a man be Born of Water and the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God And whosoever is born of God doth not commit Sin for his Seed remaineth in him Secondly This innocent Birth which God by his Spirit brings forth in the Sons and Daughters of men who truly believe relates to them and their souls as begotten and born of the immortal seed by the living word so that this Birth is not Christ Jesus for he is that incorruptible Seed and Word of Life which begets forms and brings forth the Soul of man into his own Nature and Image and so he renews his own Image in man that believes in his Power and so Christ may be said to be formed in us as in a mysterious and elegant way of speaking the property and effect being put for the cause for Christ in himself hath all Power in Heaven and Earth given to him and it hath pleased the Father that all fulness should dwell in him J. B. That God's appearance is in and by his Son Christ Jesus to us and that all are to hear the Son in them by whom the Father speaketh to them and that the Son in us is our way to the Father The which Doctrine I do deny His gross Error p. 1. Answ. Here thou hast denyed sound Doctrine which is according to Christs own Doctrine i. e. He that seeth me seeth the Father also who hath shined in our Hearts to give us the Light of the Knowledge of his Glory in the face of Christ Jesus And my Sheep hear my Voice saith Christ And God hath spoken to us by his Son Thy denying God's appearing and speaking by his Son and his Son to be our way to the Father Herein thou hast not only denyed Christ's own Testimony but the blessed advantage we have by him as MEDIATOR J. B. Another of their Doctrines is That the Quakers ought so to wait upon God as that they may feel the Life in them to flow from Vessel to Vessel whenas they are met together to wait upon God This was Charles Marshalls Wife's Doctrine p. 2 ibid. Answ. This is neither false Doctrine nor gross Error as thou imaginest but sound Doctrine Hannah Marshall knew better than thy self herein for they that truly wait upon God both receive an encrease of Life from him who is the Fountain and feel Life to flow from Vessel to Vessel He that believes as the Scripture saith out of his Belly shall flow Rivers of living Waters This spake he of the Spirit which they that believe should receive And the true Believers all drink into One Spirit And there is among such a spiritual and effectual Communication of Faith and Virtue in the living Communion of the holy Spirit all which thy dark Imaginations have deprived thee of J. B. These Doctrines
thirst after Righteousness By Isabel Yeomans A Warning to London in particular By James Parks A Warning to England in general By J. P. A Testimony to the Lords Power and blessed appearance in and amongst Children A plain Path-way opened to the simple hearted for the answering all Doubts and Objections c. By S. Crisp. A Blast blown out of the North ecchoing up towards the South to meet the Cry of their oppressed Brethren The Lamentable Cry of the Oppressed H. Smith's Books collected into one Volumn The Spirit of the Martyrs revived ☞ A faithful Warning and Lamentation over England By William Bingley Jude 13 14. vers †A Pope reputed no better than an Atheist a Prophaner of the holy Scriptures a Person careless of Religion and Piety an Avaritious Corrupt Person who made great advantage of his impious Indulgencies Pardons c How unjust impious therefore is our Adversary W R. to rake so many Instancies as he hath done out of the History of the Council of Trent of Wicked Popes and their Agents to compare brand and scandalize Us or any of our Friends withal who abhor Popery and all the Popes Corruptions †By Execute I understand minister or put in Practice and not in the common Law sence of inflicting corporal or pecuniary Punishments for that 's not consistent with the Government of a Christian Church * See Rhâ— Annotat. fol. 572. * But I suppose he hath a reserved and other sence for his Distinction between Clergy and Laity here than the common sence â—nd distinction 'T is some reflecting reserve no doubt He may tell his mean-in his next Book * I tenderly forbear exposing the Person 's name at present believing that 't was not by his order or consent that W.R. F B. have made him such a subject of printed controversie as also hoping that he has more charity tenderness in him than to allow of their malicious Books Pag. 27. P. 72. P. 26. P. 27. * As our words are Accuser p. 136. * Who must so exercise and proceed in them if no visible man or men be invested with Power from Christ to execute them or put them in practice Pag. 41. pag. 42. Rom 2 8. 1 Cor. 16.16 1 Thes 5 12 13 14. Heb. 13 17. 2 Pet. 3.2 pag. 45. pag. 45. Accuser c. p. 26 27. P. 52. Page 52. This passage W. R. hath Printed divers times over in his Book against himself p. 55. P. 55. †Francis Bugg's Proposition implyes a Contradiction for if Samuel Cater subscribe the Instrument he ought not to have his Money by the tenure of it because he told not his Name If he do not subscribe it as his judgment then he also ought to have his Money again according to F. B's tenet of Christian Liberty As not seeing it his duty ergo he may not or at least ought not to be compelled to suffer for it Another contradiction is from the ground of his Law or Canon viz. the equality in suffering For by his Rule a poor Minister must suffer 20 l when a rich Hearer whom he ministers to but 5 s. And he on the apparent sight of the Informer must tell his Name when the other but when he is asked it Oh equal levelling Law Are not the children of the world wiser looking on us as Levellers to make the rich Hearers pay the poor Preachers penalties as well as they look on them obliged to maintain them on their own supposition * Marg. added Yet I do not limit Persons in this case there may be a special occasion to tell Names for the sake of others but not to make that a general Rule Friends are to be left free to Gods counsel * Q. added If it be not Dog-Latin Thy Charge collected * Query added I do seriously ask William Rogers if this Paper of ours thus Recommended be sufficient proof of Imposition and being turned Antichristian I desire plain Answer hereunto in relation to what he has granted for a Recommendation c. * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mas. and Fem. * Yet I find it not So manifest afterward in thy Book at all * And whereunto we have a full Answer in being in Manuscript reserved about five Years in order to pursue and detect that of J. P.'s if divulged abroad in Print †As in his opposing Pastors Teachers Elders c. in our day and the Spirit to them and rendring us at inforceing Orders and setting our selves in the place of the HEIR c. And he was Answer'd in his Life time by several of the Servants of Christ wâ—â— withstood his opposition in this matter * For J. Crook hath given publick Testimony against the Payment of Tythes in this Gospel day witness his Treatise i. e. Tythes no Property c. †But I must confess that in our publick Assemblies for divine Worship such postures as bespeak the most Reverence to God and Union among our selves are most commendable edifying and exemplary c. * N. C 's Epistle †So the Work of Backsliders and Apostates tends to fit them to hear and sit under the Parish Priests contrary to the real Christian Quaker Witness F. Bugg's Proposition espoused by him as his own judgment viz. Things Moral under the Gospel men may be commanded by the Magistrate as HEARING is an act purely Moral A man may be commanded to hear the Gospel preacht without being forced to give his assent to it The Light of Nature guides the Magistrate to instruct his Subjects in whatsoever he thinks for their eternal Good And the Light of Nature obligeth every man to hearken c A man that is only commanded to hear and receive Instruction is dealt with as a rational Creature and forced to nothing The Judgment is still left in himself Thus F. Bugg's De Christiana Libertate or Liberty of Conscience pag 91 92. Whereby he has plainly given away and betray'd the cause of all conscientious Dissenters For what place is left for Liberty of Conscience to dissent if the Magistrate may thus enjoyn the Subjects to hear what he thinks is for their eternal Good and they be thus obliged to hear when he thinks 't is for their good to hear the Parish Priests By this Proposition when the Magistrate commands Fr. Bugg to his Parish Church and hear the Priest he is oblig'd so to do by his own Proposition and reserve his judgment in himself whether to accept or reject what he hears Thus he may be in a freedom fitted to act in ALL FORMS But then let him not esteem himself a Christian Quaker but another sort of a Latitude Christian whose Religion and Principle before cited will not oblige him to suffer any more as a Quaker †So the Work of Backsliders and Apostates tends to fit them to hear and sit under the Parish Priests contrary to the real Christian Quaker Witness F. Bugg's Proposition espoused by him as his own judgment viz. Things
Moral under the Gospel men may be commanded by the Magistrate as HEARING is an act purely Moral A man may be commanded to hear the Gospel preacht without being forced to give his assent to it The Light of Nature guides the Magistrate to instruct his Subjects in whatsoever he thinks for their eternal Good And the Light of Nature obligeth every man to hearken c A man that is only commanded to hear and receive Instruction is dealt with as a rational Creature and forced to nothing The Judgment is still left in himself Thus F. Bugg's De Christiana Libertate or Liberty of Conscience pag 91 92. Whereby he has plainly given away and betray'd the cause of all conscientious Dissenters For what place is left for Liberty of Conscience to dissent if the Magistrate may thus enjoyn the Subjects to hear what he thinks is for their eternal Good and they be thus obliged to hear when he thinks 't is for their good to hear the Parish Priests By this Proposition when the Magistrate commands Fr. Bugg to his Parish Church and hear the Priest he is oblig'd so to do by his own Proposition and reserve his judgment in himself whether to accept or reject what he hears Thus he may be in a freedom fitted to act in ALL FORMS But then let him not esteem himself a Christian Quaker but another sort of a Latitude Christian whose Religion and Principle before cited will not oblige him to suffer any more as a Quaker * The substance whereof is answered fully before to W. R. * For tho John Perrot placed his opposition to the Putting off the Hat in Prayer very high as on express Commandment from the Lord God of Heaven as against a Custom Romish Tradition and Triffle in the Apostacy as in his Paper which Richard Hubberthorn answer'd Yet he had more smooth and taking Expressions to temper and gloss his matters withal as The Spirit of the Lamb is Poor Low Humble Patient Content Temperate Chaste willing to Suffer full of Thanks-giving in all things and of Pity Mercy Forgiveness Love unto all not holding Prejudice against any and ready to lay down Life for all Now all that will follow the Lamb wheresoever he goeth must be of this Mind c. as in a Paper of John Perrot's Now here was a more likely shew and resemblance and pretence of Christianity than these Lofty Scorners do appear in though he profest greater things than he possest his Spirit was not in that Lowliness nor was he constant with God His fall should be a warning to many * But it seems T.C. was one then so called and if she was instrumental to induce him to Marry by a Priest contrary to his Perswasion or Profession she had also cause to Repent it and may yet see more cause to Rue it because of his Apostacy * First * First * Their Names I forbear exposing at present to this monstrous Birth they have adopted from Jeffery Bullock But if they shall again suffer or encourage the reading of any such Unchristian disingenuous and malicious Books or Pamphlets as W. R's 7th part by any of their Party in Friends publick Meeting as I understand was once done at Chippinham which was a turbulent irreverent and mad Action then they will more manifestly deserve to have their Names exposed both in relation to that and to Jeffery Bullock and his Books c. * That 's a Whimsie where proves he that Or that the Light of the Moon is Antichristian Matth. 13. * Nâ— marvel if Giles Barnardiston's Wife did say that she trembled to hear the Blasphemy that thou heldst as thou sayest Antichristâ—s Transfor pag. 21. * Nâ— marvel if Giles Barnardiston's Wife did say that she trembled to hear the Blasphemy that thou heldst as thou sayest Antichristâ—s Transfor pag. 21. * These precedent words except that of his Soul are true but not the subsequent * What Scripture hath he that saith His Soul was the Woman's part that dyed The Scripture says otherwise That 't was according to the Flesh he was made of the seed of David Rom. 1.3 * What Scripture hath he that saith His Soul was the Woman's part that dyed The Scripture says otherwise That 't was according to the Flesh he was made of the seed of David Rom. 1.3 Isa. 53. Psal. 90.4 6 9. 102.11 103.15 144 4. See Joâ— 7.6 16.22 Isa. 40.6 James 4.14 His Concessions manifestly Contradictory to his Doctrine of the Soul's Mortality Contradictions