every day more and more deviate from that primitive simplicity But why do I wonder 2 Thes 2.1 Hom. 3. in Rom. Hom. 3. in Tit. 3. seeing God punisheth the world by sending upon it strong delusions in that it loves not the truth But because as Chrysostome saith Errour is various and intricate and hath a restlesse and unstable quality it is no strange thing that of one errour many do arise and that out of one Controversie ten doe proceed At the first the onely Controversie was about the tenth Article concerning Christs body lurking under the bread as also of the orall manducation in the Lords Supper which Controversie was long in agitation amongst the Lutherans but in all the other Articles here set downe by us there was a full consent as the Acts of the Conference at Marpurge Anno 1529. do witnesse yea Divines began to agree in the doctrine of the Lords Supper Anno 1536. but this agreement was quickly broke because after Luthers death some could not handsomely maintainer their opinion of Christs corporall presence in the Bread seeing none of the Evangelists did utter these words of Christ This is my body after this manner This bread is my body or under the bread or under the species of bread lurks my body Besides Christ whom they include in the Wafer or Host according to our Catholick beliefe is not now upon the earth but in heaven sitting at the right hand of God from whence he will come to judge the quick and the dead they were in good hope to shelter their opinion under some other Articles of faith and chiefly under that of the personall union of the two natures in Christ Hence they went about to establish his Ubiquity and Omnipotency hitherto unheard of in the world using this shift If Christs body be every-where it will be also in every Host if it be in every Host then it will be every-where Then they fondly imagined the Article of Christs sitting at the right hand of the Father to be the same with that of the personall union of the two natures as if you would say Christs humanity with the Sonne of God which is that very right hand of God every-where present is personally united and filleth heaven and earth Thirdly because they saw that the Article of Christs Ascension did overthrow the Ubiquity and corporall presence in the Bread by an unheard of and Allegoricall way they expounded Christs Ascension to be meant of nothing else but of his vanishing into the aire of his advancing unto the Divinity and of his Ubiquity To these new monsters of opinions as well the Pontifician Doctors as those of our profession besides divers of the Lutherans did stoutly oppose themselves defending the ancient simplicity and truth of these Articles of our faith which the new Artists of Ubiquity perceiving and finding that they failed here of their purpose they found out new engines and began to accuse those whom they stile Calvinists of other errours to provoke them to Conference and Disputation not onely about the Person of Christ but also about the other Articles of Christianity bragging they could convince them of many fundamentall errours taught in the Reformed Churches Concerning Predestination That all men were not elected but that many were called and few elected Concerning the merit of Christs death That the wicked and incredulous so long as they remained such were not partakers thereof but onely the Elect that beleeved That the promises of the Gospel were universall in respect of the faithful but not of unbeleevers and Epicures Concerning faith That it is the singular gift of God That it is given onely to the Elect in whom onely it is rooted and permanent That the same can never be finally lost because it proceeds of the incorruptible seed of Gods word Concerning the Ministery That Ministers were onely outward dispensers of the word but God wrought inwardly by his Spirit Concerning Sacraments That Christ was yesterday to day and the same for ever and that therefore he was the matter or subject of all Sacraments both of the Old and New Testament Besides that no man either by the word or Sacraments could be partaker of Christ without faith Concerning Baptisme That there was a two-fold washing one outward of water by which the filth of the body is washed away the other inward of the bloud and Spirit of Christ which is the Covenant of a good conscience with God That the Minister baptised onely with water but Christ in the true administration of Baptisme did baptise with the holy Spirit Also that Infidels were not regenerated by Baptisme Also that the children of Christians were children of the promise and of the Covenant even before Baptisme and that for this cause they were to be baptised This doctrine since the yeare 1586. hath beene not onely condemned as Calvinisticall and Hereticall but also reproached and accursed by them who glory in the name of Lutherans And when among the ignorant Vulgar they traduce these Articles as errours of Calvinisme they thinke they have bravely maintained their Cause in defending their fictions of Ubiquity and of a carnall presence in the Lords Supper which now we leave for a while committing our whole cause of God But it is certaine that they have so farre relapsed into the sinke of Pelagianisme and Popery that it is to be feared they will overwhelme the Lutheran Churches with greater darkenesse then ever heretofore and yet alas they stick not to call this the true Evangelicall doctrine and that of the Augustan Confession teaching concerning predestination that in God is no election but that he did promiscuously choose all men Concerning Christs death that he by his death redeemed all men and reconciled them to God that he hath sanctified them and hath received them into favour whether they beleeve or not Concerning remission of sins that a generall pardon is given to all men both faithfull and Infidels Concerning the promises of the Gospell that they belong to all both faithfull and Infidell Concerning Faith that it is the cause of Election that God did first foresee who were to beleeve and persevere that faith is not in our power that notwithstanding it is a worke which God promotes in us and that it may be lost and may be in hypocrites Concerning the Ministery that Ministers may by their preaching conferre divine efficacy and that they are dispensators both outwardly and inwardly Concerning Sacraments that the Sacraments of the Old Testament were onely shadows without Christ the body Concerning Baptisme that there is a mysticall efficacy in the water to wash away sinne and to regenerate that the holy Ghost and his efficacy are annexed to the water that the water and Spirit have the same effect that hypocrites and Infidels in Baptisme are regenerated by the holy Ghost that the Minister doth not onely baptise with water but conferres also the holy Ghost that Christian Infants before Baptisme belong no more to
that had not the Sonne of God revealed it unto us out of his Fathers bosome no wit of men or Angels could have attained unto it In their subjects They vary in their subjects and matter which they handle For the doctrine of the Church comprehendeth the full perfect and entire sense both of the Law and Gospel but Philosophy is quite ignorant of the Gospel and omitteth the principall parts of the Law and rawly and obscurely propoundeth that small portion it retaineth concerning discipline and externall duties drawn but out of some few precepts of the Decalogue It teacherh us also other arts and sciences meete and serviceable for mans life as Logick Physick and the Mathematickes all which are not delivered in Church doctrine but have their proper necessary use in handling and learning the same In their effects They concurre not in their severall effects For the doctrine of the Church alone sheweth us the originall of all evils and mans misery to wit the fall disobedience or sin of our first parents Moreover it ministreth true and lively comfort unto our consciences pointing out the meanes by which wee may wade out of the danger of sin and death and assuring us of life eternall through Christ As for Philosophy it knoweth not the cause of our evils neither yeeldeth it us any sound comfort or consolation Philosophy hath certain comforts common unto her with Divinity Comforts common both to Philosophy and Divinity such are 1. The providence of God 2. The necessity of obeying of God 3. A good conscience 4. The worthinesse of vertue 5. The finall causes or the ends which vertue proposeth 6. The examples of others 7. Hope of reward 8. A comparing of events because a lesse evil compared unto a greater carrieth a shew and shadow of good but true comforts against sinne and death are proper to the Church Comforts proper to Gods Church such as are 1. Free remission of sins by and for Christ 2. The grace and presence of God in our very miseries 3. Our finall delivery and life everlasting Wherefore Philosophy though in respect of Divinity it be unperfect and faile in these premisses yet it never impugneth Divinity Whatsoever erroneous opinions contrary to the true doctrine of the Church occurre in the writings of Philosophers or are cited out of Philosophy to overthrow Scripture all these are either no way Philosophicall but the vaine sleights of mans wit and very biles and sores of true Philosophy such as was the opinion of Aristotle concerning the eternity of the world and of Epicurus touching the mortality of the soule and such like or else they are indeed Philosophicall opinions but unfitly applyed to Divinity The use of these differences in doctrine These maine differences between Christian doctrine and other Religions and Philosophy also are very worthy observation for these ends 1. That Gods glory be no way impaired of us but reserved wholly unto himselfe which cannot be unlesse wee acknowledge and confesse in the face and eye of the world whatsoever he hath precisely commanded us to beleeve either concerning himselfe or his will and that wee adde nothing of our owne braine unto that which hee hath revealed For God cannot be mingled with Idols nor his truth confounded with Satans forgeries without high dishonour to his name 2. That we hazzard not nor endanger our salvation which might happen if erroneously we should imbrace for true Religion any Schismaticall doctrine or heathenish Philosophy 3. That our faith and comfort in Christ Jesus might be strengthened and confirmed which falleth out when wee discerne the perfection of the doctrine of the Church before all other Religions how many important and weighty matters are found in our Religion which are wanting in others What are the causes why they alone are saved who professe this doctrine and other Religions with their Sectaries and adherents are damned and of God rejected Finally that we separate our selves from Epicures and Academicks who either make a mockery of pietie and godlinesse or so rack Religion that they thinke every man in every Religion shall be saved wresting in this sense that saying of the Apostle The just man shall live by HIS faith Now these Epicures are not worthy the answering Rom. 1.17 Hab. 2.4 as for those Academicks they manifestly falsifie the sentence and meaning of the Apostle and are easily refuted For the pronoune HIS in no sort signifieth whatsoever faith every man frameth unto himselfe but the true Catholike faith particularly appropriated unto every man and this word HIS standeth in opposition against any other mans faith though it be a true and good faith and thwarteth and crosseth also the opinion of Justification by works So that the naturall sense of that Text is The just man is justified not by the works of the Law but by faith alone in Christ and that by his owne private faith not by the faith of another man 4 Whence it may appeare that the doctrine of the Church alone was delivered of God 5 By what testimonies the certainty of Christian Religion or Church-doctrine is confirmed GOD in the very creation of the world put this bridle in the mouth of all reasonable creatures that no man without extreame and manifest impudeney such as was the Divell in Paradise durst say that any thing if it were once apparently known to have been spoken or commanded by God might be called into question or that any man might refuse to obey it Here-hence are those things so often inculcated in the Prophets Hearken O heavens and hearken O earth for the Lord hath spoken Thus saith the Lord. The word of the Lord came to Esaias Jeremias c. Sith therefore it appeareth that the bookes of the Old and New Testament are the words of God there is no place left of doubting whether that be the true Religion and Doctrine which is contained in them but whether these books were written by divine instinct and by what proofes and testimonies we are certaine of so great a matter this is a question not to be let passe of us Wherefore this question is necessary For except this above all other things remaine stedfast and immoveable that whatsoever we read in the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles doth as truly declare the will of God unto us as if we did heare God openly speaking tous from heaven it cannot chuse but that the very foundation and whole certainty of Christian Religion must be weakned Wherefore it is a consideration worthy those who are desirous of the glory of God and doe seek for sure comfort to enquire whence it may appeare unto us The first part The authority of the Scripture doth depend on the Church that the holy Scripture is the Word of God To this question now long since answer hath been made by the Papists that forsooth it is not otherwise certaine then because the Church doth confirme it by her testimony But we
as we neither reject nor contemne the testimony of the true Church so we doubt not but their opinion is pestilent and detestable who do often say that the holy Scriptures have not their authority else-where then from the word of the Church 1 Reason The reproach of God For first wicked is it and blasphemous to say that the authority of Gods Word dependeth of the testimony of man And if it be so that the chiefest cause why we beleeve that the Scriptures were delivered from heaven be the witnesse of the Church who seeth not that hereby the authority of a mans voice is made greater then the voice of God For he that yeeldeth his testimony unto another so that he is the only or the chiefe cause why credence is given unto the other out of all doubt greater credit is given unto him then unto the other who receiveth his testimony Wherefore it is a speech most unworthy the majesty of God that the voice of God speaking in his holy Book is not acknowledged except it be confirmed by the witnesse of men 2 Reason Our comfort Faith is grounded on approved witnesse therefore not on mans Secondarily whereas the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles doth preach of so great matters as the certaine knowledge whereof is so greatly desired of all who are well disposed and the conflicts of doubtfulnesse in all mens minds are so great what full assurance of our faith can there be what sure consolation against assaults or temptations if that that voice on which our confidence relieth be no otherwise knowne unto us to be indeed the voice of God but because men say so in whom we see so much ignorance errour and vanity to be that no man scarcely especially in matters of some weight doth attribute much unto their word except other reason concurre with it 3 Reason The confutation of our enemies Thirdly the truth of God and Christian Religion is plainly exposed unto the mocks and scoffes of the wicked if we going about to stop their mouths doe therefore only desire that we should be credited that our Religion is from God because our selves say so For if they be by no other confutation repressed they will with no lesse shew of truth deny it then we affirme it 4 Reason Witnesses Last of all the Scripture it selfe in many places is against this opinion and doth challenge a far higher authority unto it selfe then which hangeth upon mens words For so saith Christ himselfe I receive not the record of man signifying thereby John 5. that his doctrine stood not no not on John Baptists testimony although yet he did alledge it but as of lesse account that he might omit nothing by which men might be moved to beleeve Therefore he addeth But I say these things that you may beleeve I have a greater witnesse then the witnesse of John And if Christ now being humbled said these things of himselfe then surely shall they be no lesse true of him being in glory and sitting in his Throne Paul saith 1 Cor. 2. My word and my preaching stood not in entising speech of mans wisdome but in plaine evidence of spirit and of power that your faith should not be in the wisdome of men but in the power of God If so be then our faith must not rest no not upon reasons wisely framed by men much lesse shall it depend on the bare word of men Ephes 2. The Church her selfe is said to be built upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles If then the confidence and confession of the Church stayeth on the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles as on the foundation the certainty of Scripture cannot hang on the Churches witnesse for so should not the Church be upheld by the testimony of the Prophets and Apostles but by her owne And it is said 1 John 5. If we receive the witnesse of men the witnesse of God is greater If it be greater then the authority of it hangeth not on the record of man but we are to give more credence unto God witnessing the Prophets and Apostles writings to be indeed his voice then unto the Church affirming the same 1 Object That they are true the Church alone doth witnesse Ans The Minor is false Now that it is said of the contrary That by the Churches record alone it doth appeare unto us that the sacred bookes which wee have were written by the Prophets and Apostles whose names they beare in their fore-head and that even unto us they are come uncorrupt this we grant not For God far more certainly testifieth both in Scripture and in the hearts of his Saints that no feigned or forged thing is in these books then it can be by the Church and all the creatures of the world confirmed They therefore who stand upon the Churches testimony alone in this point shew that themselves have not as yet felt or understood the chiefest testimony 2 Object The discerning of books Ans The Minor is false 1 The working of the holy Ghost Furthermore they say That the bookes authenticke or as they terme them Canonicall of both Testaments are discerned from the Apocryphall by the Churches judgement and therefore that the authority of holy Canon doth depend on the Churches wisdome But that this difference of the bookes is not determined by the Churches judgement but being imprinted into the bookes themselves by the Spirit of God is onely acknowledged and approved by the Church this is easily to be understood if the causes of this difference be considered For either in these which are called Apocryphall the force and majesty of the heavenly Spirit doth lesse evidently appeare in the weight and vehemency of word and matter then in others of which it is cleere that they are the heavenly Oracles 2 The certainty of Authors set down in writing by the divine instinct that they might be the rule of our faith or it cannot be determined neither out of these bookes themselves nor out of others which are Canonicall that they were written either by the Prophets or Apostles because either they were not opened by those whom God by certain testimonies hath warranted unto us to be endued with a Propheticall spirit or themselves doe not shew any certain Authours of them or by their form of speech or other reasons it may be gathered that they were not left of them whose names they beare Now as touching either this evidence of spirit or certainty of the authours we build not our judgement on the testimony of the Church but of the bookes themselves And therefore not for the Churches judgement only do we judge some books to be Canonicall and the foundation and rule of our faith and do therefore accept of the doctrine of other some because they agree with the Canonicall but rather for the very cause of this difference which we find in the bookes themselves 3 Object The Church is more
things of chusing Bishops and Deacons of widowes of women to be covered and to containe themselves in silence of not divorcing the husband if he be an Infidell of controversies between Christians But these men remember not that their authority is not equall unto the Apostles authority neither consider they that there is nothing in all these things appointed of Paul which is not agreeable to the rest of the Word of God contained in writing and that many of those things which they alledge are comprehended in the commandements of the Decalogue More trifling is it that they say the forme of Baptisme appointed by Christ was changed by the Apostles because it is read Acts 28.19 that they baptised in the Name of Jesus Christ. For in those places not the forme of Baptisme but the use is declared that is that men were baptised for to testifie that they did belong to Christ Neither yet by the example of the Apostles who interdicted the Churches things offered to Idols bloud and that which was strangled is it lawfull for Councels and Bishops to make decrees and lawes to tie mens consciences For first here againe there must needs be retained a difference between the Apostles by whom God opened his will unto men whereupon they also say It seemeth good to the holy Ghost and to us and other Ministers of the Church who are tied unto the Apostles doctrine Further as concerning this decree of the Apostles they decreed nothing else then what the rule of charity commandeth which at all times would have that in things indifferent men should deale without offence Now if they urge that these ordinances are called necessary yet it doth not thereupon follow that the traditions of Bishops are necessary especially such as are the Bishops of Rome Then that necessity whereof the Apostles spake was neither to last continually neither did it bind consciences for feare of the wrath of God if these things were not observed but it dured but for a time for their infirmity who were converted from Judaisme to Christ or were to be converted 1 Cor. 10. as Paul doth at large teach To these they adde the examples of the Church 4 Object Present examples whom they say even from the Apostles to these very times to have beleeved and observed some things not onely not delivered in the Scripture but contrary to the Scripture They bring forth the selfe same decree of Jerusalem concerning things offered to Idols and bloud which being made of the Apostles and expresly set downe in the Scripture was yet abolished by the Church But it hath been already said that that constitution was made not that it should last for ever but for a time for a certaine cause even for the infirmity of the Church which was gathered from among the Jewes and after that cause ceased that ordinance taketh place no longer Neither yet did it at that time fetter mens consciences as if the worshipping or offending of God did lye in it wherefore the abrogating of it is not contrary but doth very well agree with it To these also they reckon the observing of the Lords day We truly as we doe beleeve this to be an Apostolike tradition and perceive it to be profitable and a farre other manner of one then for the most part they are which they would faine thrust upon us under the Apostles name so we doe not put any worship of God to consist in this thing but know it to be left arbitrary unto the Church Even as it is said Let no man condemne you in respect of a holy day But they affirme also that some things not written are beleeved which yet to call to question wee our selves confesse to be unlawfull as That Infants are to be baptised That Christ descended into Hell Coloss â That the Sonne of God is consubstantiall unto the eternall Father But they are too impudent if they take unto themselves a licence of hatching new opinions because the Church for to expound the meaning of the Scripture useth somewhere words which are not extant in the Scripture But impious are they and blasphemous if they say the doctrine it selfe which the Church professeth in these words is not extant in the Scripture 5 Object The holy Ghost to teach the Church therefore not the Scripture They say also that the holy Ghost is promised the Church that it may teach those things which are not delivered in the Scriptures as But the Comforter which is the holy Ghost whom the Father shall send in my name hee shall teach you all things And When the Spirit of truth shall come hee shall lead you into all truth But here they maliciously omit that which is added And shall bring all things to your remembrance which I have told you John 14.26 and 16.13 Againe Hee shall beare witnesse of mee Againe Hee will reprove the world of sinne of righteousnesse and of judgement Againe He shall glorifie mee for he shall receive of mine and shall shew it unto you For out of these it is manifest that the holy Ghost should speak nothing but that which was written in the Gospel and Christ himselfe had before time taught his Disciples so farre is it that he should bring any thing contrary to them For neither can he dissent from Christ nor from himself So also when they alledge that I will put my law in their inward parts Jerem. 31. 2 Cor. 3.3 and in their hearts I will write it And Yee are the Epistle of Christ written not with inke but with the Spirit of the living God not in tables of stone but in fleshly tables of the heart they do not mark that the Spirit cannot speak in mens hearts contrary unto these things which be revealed in the Scripture neither would God write any other law in mens hearts but that which is already revealed and written and that therefore the Apostle Paul opposeth not the matter written but the manner of writing in tables and hearts one against another because that the same was written in both but there with ink and here with the spirit of God It hath lesse colour which they go about to build out of that place If you be otherwise minded God shall reveale even the same unto you Phil. 3.15 If therefore say they the Church thinke any thing different from the written word that proceedeth from the holy Ghost For the Apostle comforteth and confirmeth the godly that albeit they did not understand somewhat of that which there hee had written or were of any other judgement in it yet that hereafter they should be taught it of God and should know those things to be true which he had written When as therefore it is denied that the holy Ghost reveales any thing diverse from that which is written the rule and mastership of the Spirit in the Church is not taken away but the same Spirit is matched with himselfe that is with the rule of the
3.15 That we may learn to hate sin the Divell and the world If ye were of the world the world would love you We wrestle not against flesh and bloud but against principalities against powers Love not the world neither the things that are in the world Exercise of godlinesse Our exercise or triall that we may go forward and increase in faith hope patience obedience and prayer or that we may have occasion of exercising and trying our selves and that both unto our selves and others our hope faith and patience may be made known For it is an easie matter to glory of our faith in prosperity but in adversity the glory or grace of vertue is conspicuous and eminent He that hath not been tempted what knoweth he Experience bringeth hope Syrac 34.10 Rom. 5.4 Particular defects in the godly Particular defects and failings in the Saints Manasses had his faults Josaphat his and others have other defects therefore Gods chastisements are also divers wherein he sheweth that he is angry also with the sins of the godly and will more severely revenge them unlesse they repent The servant which knew his masters will and did it not Luke 12.47 shall be beaten with many stripes Gods glory in their deliverance The revealing and setting forth of Gods glory in the deliverance of the Church and the godly for God often times bringeth his into extreme dangers that their delivery may be the more glorious as appeareth in the slavery of the Israelites in Egypt and their captivity in Babylon c. that he may I say gloriously deliver them and shew that he hath found a way of delivery where no creature could hope or look for it The Lord bringeth down to hell 1 Sam. 2.6 and raiseth up againe A conformity between them and Christ 2 Tim. 2.12 Rom. 8.29 Matth. 10.24 The conformity of the members with their head Christ in affliction and glory If we suffer with him we shall also reigne with him Those which he knew before he also did predestinate to be made like to the image of his Son The servant is not greater then his Lord neither the disciple above his Master Confirmation and testimony of the truth by their martyrdome Joh. 21.18 The confirmation and testimony of their doctrine in their martyrdoms For when faithfull and godly men suffer any evils and death it selfe for the confession and maintenance of their doctrine they give ample testimony to the world that they are so verily perswaded of the truth of this doctrine that by no means they can forgoe it and moreover that this doctrine yeeldeth and ministreth true and solid comfort in death it selfe and therefore of necessity is the very truth Peter is foretold by what death hee should glorifie God A confirmation of the life to come 2 Thess 1.5 The afflictions of the godly are a confirmation and testimony of the judgement and life to come For the justice and truth of God requireth that at length it goe well with the good and ill with the bad But this cometh not to passe in this life Therefore there is remaining yet another life which is a token of the righteous judgement of God Out of these causes we are to answer the argument which the world useth against the providence of God Object The Church is oppugned throughout the whole world and trodden under foot of all men Therefore it is not the true Church nor protected by God Ans Nay rather because it is persecuted by the wicked ones of this world it is apparantly the true Church For if it were of the world the world would love her owne Joh. 15.19 But the causes of the afflictions of the Church are manifest and evident and the event and end of things shall one day convict the world 3. Comforts to be opposed against afflictions Comforts in affliction OF comforts in afflictions some are proper unto the Church some are common to it with Philosophy Proper are the first and the two last of those which shall be recited the rest are common and that but in outward shew only and in name but not being farther entred into and discoursed of Remission of sins and reconciliation unto God Remission of sins This is the ground and foundation of the rest because without this the rest minister no comfort unto us whilest we doubt of our reconcilement to God for otherwise we alwaies doubt whether the promise of grace belong unto us But if this be once surely grounded the rest are soon built upon it for if God be our Father he will then no way endamage us but be our guardian in whatsoever distresse Rom. 8.31 If God be with us who can be against us The reason is because Take away the cause and you take away the effect take away sin and the punishment of sin is also taken away The necessity of obeying God and the love which we owe him The will and providence of God or the necessity of obeying God in prosperity and adversity because either of these is according to his will and good pleasure The reason of this consequence of obedience is not only because we are unable to resist God but especially we must therefore obey him 1. Because he is our Father 2. Because he hath so deserved of us that for his sake we ought to suffer far greater evils 3. Because the miseries he sendeth us are his fatherly chastisements This comfort calmeth our storming stomacks because it intimateth that it is our Fathers pleasure we should so suffer Job 13.15 Job 1 21. Psal 39.10 Loe though hee slay mee yet will I trust in him As it pleased the Lord so it is come to passe blessed be the name of the Lord. I became dumb and opened not my mouth for it was thy doing The Philosophers say that it is patiently to be suffered which cannot be altered and avoyded They establish a fatall necessity and therefore foolishnesse it were to kick against the pricks but in the heat of calamities they submit not themselves to God nor acknowledge his indignation and wrath nor suffer adversity to that end as thereby to obey him but because they cannot shake them off nor wrest themselves out of them at pleasure This is a miserable cold comfort The worthiness of vertue The worthinesse of vertue that is of obedience towards God which is true vertue for which a man is not to cast away his courage in bearing the crosse Temporall goods are great blessings of God but farre greater benefits are obedience faith hope c. Wherefore let us not preferre lesse things before greater neither let us take away the things of greater value to redeem the losse of things of âesse worth Mat. 10.37 16.25 Hee that hateth not his father and mother for my sake is not worthy of me He that seeketh to save his soule shall lose it This dignity of vertue do the Philosophers most
imparted by the Apostles and every one of them did bestow some part thereof but that cannot be proved This reason may be rendred thereof more probable that it was called a Symbole for that the Articles of faith are the square and rule whereunto the faith and doctrine of all orthodox or right beleeving Christians ought to agree and be conferred The Symbole is called Apostolick Two reasons why the Creed is called Apostolick Because it containeth the summe of the Apostolick doctrine which the Catechumenes were enforced to hold and professe Because the Apostles delivered that summe of doctrine to their Schollers and Disciples which the Church afterwards held as received from them This selfe same Symbole is called also Catholick because there is but one faith of all Christians Why it is called Catholick An answer to a question moved touching other Creeds Here some demand a reason Why after the Apostles Creed other Creeds as the Creed of the Councell of Nice Ephesus and Chalcedon with Athanasius his Creed were compiled and received in the Church Answ These Creeds properly are not others that is quite different in substance from the Apostolick Symbole but are onely a repetition and more ample declaration of this in all which certain words are added as an explication thereof by reason of Hereticks by whom because of the shortnesse thereof this was depraved there is no change either of the matter or of the doctrine but only of the form of declaring it as easily appeareth by comparing them together Other important and weighty causes there were which might compell the Bishops and Doctors of ancient Churches to compose and draw out these briefe compendious formes of confession especially the Church then increasing Four causes why other Creeds were made and received in the Church and heresies growing with and in the Church For instance in few That all both young and old might with more ease bear in minde the main and entire foundation of Christianity comprised in briefe That all might alwayes have in their sight and view the confession of their faith and consolation reaped thence knowing what that doctrine is for which persecution is to be sustained So God in times past made a short summary abstract of his law and promises that all might have it as a rule of life and ground of consolation obvious to their eyes That the faithfull might have a peculiar badge and cognisan whereby to be distinguished both then and in all future ages from infidels and hereticks which with wily glosing sophismes corrupt the writings of the Prophets and Apostles for which very cause also these Confessions were intituled Symboles 4. That there might be some perpetuall rule extant in publike plain briefe and easie to be known whereby to examine all manner of doctrine and interpretation of Scripture to approve and ratifie whatsoever accordeth therewith and refuse and disanull the contrary The Apostolick Creed preferred above other Creeds because 1. The phrase of it is most proper 2. The time most ancient 3. The copy most authenticall Notwithstanding the Apostles Creed far surpasseth the rest in authority 1. Because for the most part it literally consisteth of the proper words and phrases of Scripture 2. Because it is of greater antiquity then other Creeds and was delivered first unto the Church by the Apostles themselves or by their disciples and schollers and since them successively from hand to hand transferred unto us their posterity 3. Because it is the fountaine and originall draught even an authenticall rule of direction to other Creeds which for illustration of this to prevent the fraudulent sleights and forged corruption of hereticks have in universall and generall Synods or Councels been published and authorised by the whole joint-consent of the Church The certainty of this Creed dependeth not on the authority and arbitrement of men or definitive sentence of Councels but on the perpetuall concordance of holy Scripture with them and of the whole Church since the Apostles time retaining and holding fast the Apostles doctrine and testifying to all posterity that they received this doctrine at the Apostles mouthes and the mouthes of their hearers which consent is obvious to any man that daigneth to view it with both eyes and weigh it considerately For certain it is that no Congregation of Angels nor conventicle of men hath any power of instituting new lawes touching the worship of God or new Articles of faith binding the conscience for this is a work proper unto God Neither may we beleeve God for the testimony of the Church but the Church for the testimony of God This doctrine touching the causes and authority of divers Creeds is borrowed out of Ursinus Admonit Neustad de Concordia Burgens written Anno Dom. 1581. where young Divines may if they list reade a large discourse touching the truth and authority of Ecclesiasticall Writers learnedly discussed from 117. page unto the 142. page of the said Tract a briefe Type and Table whereof I have here decyphered THE TABLE The writings touching the doctrine of the Church are 1. Divine that is inspired immediately by God into the hearts of the Prophets and Apostles such as are the Canonicall books of the old and new Testament These alone are simply in their sentences and words full of divine inâpiration and worthy credit and therefore are the sole rule of tryall unto all others 2. Ecclesiasticall that is written by the Doctors of the Church these are 1. Publick to wit written in the common name of the whole Church which again are subdivided into writings 1. Catholick I meane Creeds and Confessions written in the name and with the full consent of the whole orthodox right beleeving Church received and allowed by the authority thereof such as are The Apostles Creed The Creeds of the Councels of Nice ConstaÌtinople Chalcedon Athanasius his Creed 2. Particular namely the Confessions of certain Churches and Councels as divers Catechismes and the Augustanâ Confession 2. Private that is written in the name and by the advice of some one private man or more as Common places Commentaries and such like ON THE 8. SABBATH Quest 24. Into how many parts is the Creed divided Answ Into three parts The first is of God the eternall Father and our Creation The second of God the Son and our Redemption The third of God the holy Ghost and our Sanctification The Explication THe principall parts of the Apostolick Creed are three 1. Of God the Father and our Creation 2. Of God the Son and our Redemption 3. Of God the holy Ghost and our Sanctification that is of the works of our Creation Redemption and Sanctification Ob. 1. Unto the Father is ascribed the Creation of heaven and earth unto the Son the Redemption of mankind unto the holy Ghost Sanctification Therefore the Son and the holy Ghost did not create heaven and earth How our Creation Redemption Sanctification are each appropriated to some one person of the
grounds of Consubstantiation 1. The Vbiquity 2. The words of Christ. The Ubiquity hath beene at large discoursed of before in expounding the Articles of the personall union of the two natures in Christ of his ascension into heaven and of his sitting at the right hands of God the Father and the difficulties therein discussed fully resolved and Ubiquity it selfe confuted Christs words witnesse the Papists themselves neither intimate Consubstantiation neither can beare that interpretation Which the Ubiquitaries also in their writings dissemble not and have therefore devised and invented the Ubiquity because they saw that the ground and foundation of their opinion if it were laid on Christs words only were too ruinous and like to have a speedy down-fall Christ said This is my body which is given for you which words the Consubstantials retaine not Consubstantiation over browne by Christs very words neither literally nor according to their sense and meaning We need not therefore any argument to refute Consubstantiation but Christs very words whereunto we recall them and thus reason against them Christ said not In this bread is my body but This is my body neither is the sense of both these propositions all one seeing the former declareth what is in the bread and where Christs body is the later what the bread it selfe is in the Eucharist Therefore the Consubstantials who teach that in the bread is Christs body retaine neither the letter nor the meaning of Christs words A refutation of objections framed to confirme Consubstantiation Schmidline his argument in the conference at Mulbr Laâ Pag. 159. OBject 1. It is an usuall kind of speech when two things are joyntly given the one apparent the other in covert that that onely be named which appeared not as we say of purses fraught with money This is money of a caske of wine This is wine But Christ in his Supper delivering in the same manner two things joyntly at once namely the bread and his body named that onely which appeared not under the bread saying Take this is my body Therefore Christs manner of speech is most usuall and proper neither needeth it any explication at all Answ To the Major we answer that it is a forme of speech most usuall c. but with this limitation when it is certaine that the thing which is named though it be not apparent yet it is contained in that thing which is apparent as it is certaine that money is in the purse and wine in the caske Otherwise it is no usuall plaine or true forme of speech to say of an empty purse This is money But hitherto it is not cleere neither have the Consubstantials as yet proved that Christs body lay hid in the bread when Christ said thereof This is my body as it ought to be evident that money is in the purse and wine in the vessell when it is said This is money This is wine Yea and we avouch the contrary to wit that Christs body in the first Supper lay not hid in the bread but sate at table and now is in heaven untill it thence returne in judgement Therefore this forme of reasoning is a begging of that which is in controversie betwixt us Answ 2. The Minor also is false For Christ delivering unto his Disciples not his body but bread taken from the table and broken said Take cate This that is this bread is my body Which exposition is proved 1. Because it is said of the cup This cup is the New Testament 2. Paul expoundeth the particle This of the bread saying The bread which we break is the communion of Christs body 3. Because the bread and body of Christ both together are neither properly not figuratively Christs very body and hereby a Tautologie or a vaine and childish iteration of the same thing should be fathered on Christ in saying My body is my body 4. We deny also the consequence because their conclusion compriseth more then their premisses in force For they conclude that it is a most usuall and proper speech But these two usuall and proper are not in force and signification alike For the most usuall form of speech may be figurative as those very triviall and yet Synecdochicall speeches urged by them This is money This is wine who is so mad as to think the purse alone or the purse with the mony is properly money So was that Sacramentall speech of the Passeover frequent and well knowne unto the Disciples of Christ Where wilt thou that we provide the Passeover Yet spake they not properly but figuratively attributing to the signe the name of the thing signified by a sacramentall Metonymie or change of names That which followeth therefore out of the premisses is only this That Christs words were triviall plaine and known to the Disciples but not that they were understood properly literally and without all Trope or Figure Object 2. Christ said This is my body But Christ is true Therefore we must beleeve him setting apart all Philosophicall subtilty and sharpnesse and so by consequent bread is not a signe of his body but his body as the words lie which are simply and literally to be understood Ans Here they alledge us that for a cause which is indeed no cause of the matter in hand For Christs truth is a cause onely that his words are true yea most true to which we ought to give credence setting apart all Philosophicall subtilty but it is no cause why his words should be proper and literally taken For he which speaketh figuratively may also speak truly as Christ him selfe was no lesse true yea truth it selfe when he said I am the light of the world the doore of the sheepfold the good Shepheard the true Vine my Father is an Husbandman ye are the branches then when he said This is my body And they deserve to be hissed out of Schooles who presume to terme figurative speeches by the name of lies 2. We retort their Minor thus Christ is true Therefore he said not that his body lay hid in the bread when all his Disciples saw that it sate at Table 3. We retort their conclusion on them thus Christs words must be understood simply Therefore yee may not cloake and colour them with your glosse which perverteth the letter when ye say that In With Vnder the bread is Christs body or that the bread is the closet of Christs body Object 3. Christ is omnipotent Therefore he can effect that his body should be really in the bread Ans The reason is of no force which will conclude a thing to be done because it may be done The question is not What Christ can doe but what he will He no where promised the presence of his body in the bread or in the presence of the bread Therefore we derogate nothing at all from his omnipotency when we beleeve no such presence Repl. Bread is present in place of the Supper Bread is Christs body Therefore Christs body is present in
fallacies and condemneth their Idols and other vices then any other Sect which rather either tolerate and winke at or patronize and defend them The world hateth me because I testifie of it that the workes thereof are evill John 5.17 John 15.19 If ye were of the world the world would love her owne Gods marvellous preservation thereof The marvellous protection and wonderfull preservation of this doctrine against the furies of Sathan and other enemies of the Church For whereas no Religion is more dangerously at all times without intermission assailed by Tyrants and Heretikes then this of the Church and God notwithstanding hath hitherto wonderfully protected it against the cankred rancour and malice of enemies and the very gates of Hell insomuch as it alone hath persisted invincible whereas other Religions either not at all or slenderly assailed have speedily perished and suddenly fallen to the ground hence we conclude that the doctrine of the Church is approved of God cared for and secured by him Punishments of the enemies of it The punishments of the enemies For without doubt that Religion is allowed and advanced by God whose adversaries God punisheth for oppugning and withstanding it But histories both old and new have registred and recorded the dreadfull and heavie punishments inflicted by God on them who resisted the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles Therefore God countenanceth and authoriseth that doctrine Now although the wicked sometimes flourish in this world and the Church lieth trodden under foot yet the end and event testifieth yea and Scripture teacheth that this is a worke of Gods providence and no casualty or accident neither is God therefore more pleased with them or displeased with his Church For the Church is alwaies preserved even amidst her persecutions and is at length delivered whereas the short felicity of Tyrants and wicked Imps hath a most dolefull and eternall destruction following it Neither is thereby the force of this proofe weakned because that all the persecutors of the Church are not in tragicall manner punished in this life as were Antiochus Herod and the rest For whiles God doth take vengeance on most of them in this life he doth sufficiently shew what hee would have to be thought of the rest of their complices verily that they are his enemies whom without they repent he will plunge into eternall plagues the beginning and feeling of the which is desperation in which all the enemies of Christian Reâigion end their dayes 2 Object Not for this cause yea they who are not oppressed with any other calamities of this life To conclude that it may be manifest that they are not only for other transgressions punished of God God doth so often denounce in his word that such shall be the ends of his enemies Ans Yea for this cause and that for this very cause because they go about to extinguish the people and true worship of God Yea furthermore they are not a few from whom while they lie in torments their conscience wresteth out this confession that they have drawne these miseries upon themselves by persecuting the godly as from Antiochus Epiphanes and Julian the Apostata And since that all the adversaries of the Church in their calamities and death are destitute of comfort it is manifest that they suffer as the enemies of God and therefore are far from true Religion Now that which the wicked alone doe there is no doubt but that is in the number of their sins for which they suffer punishment Wherefore the overthrowes of the enemies of the Church are no obscure testimony of the wrath of God against them even as God himselfe saith of Pharaoh To the same purpose have I stirred thee up that I might shew my power in thee Exod. 9. Rom. 9. and that my Name might be declared throughout all the earth Confession and constancy of Martyrs The testimony and constancy of Martyrs who sealing this doctrine with their bloud do shew in the very midst of most exquisite torments that they do so think indeed as they taught and are firmly perswaded in their hearts of the truth of that doctrine which they have professed and that they draw that comfort out of it which they did preach unto others to wit that for Christs sake they are truly the sons of God and that God careth for them in the houre and point of death God therefore sustaining them by this lively comfort thereby witnesseth that he affecteth the doctrine of the Church for which they suffer The piety of the writers and professors therof The true prety and holinesse of those who wrote the holy Scriptures and made open profession of the doctrine comprised therein For that Religion is most sacred divine which maketh men holy and acceptable unto God But the Patriarchs Prophets Apostles and others who heretofore have and now doe earnestly imbrace this doctrine farre exceed men of other Religions in true vertue and integrity as by the conference and comparison will appeare Wherefore it accordeth with reason that the doctrine of the Church rather then of any other Religion whatsoever is true and divine Their plaine dealing in detecting vices Their ingenuity and plain dealing in opening faults committed either by them or theirs whom the holy Ghost hath used in committing this doctrine to writing The testimony of the holâ Ghost The testimony of the holy Ghost by whose in spiration the Scriptures were written the testimony I say of the holy Ghost in the hearts of them which beleeve that is to say a full faith and firm perswasion that the holy Scripture is the word of God that God according unto the tenour of this Scripture will be mercifull and good unto us which faith there followeth joyfulnesse resting on God and calling on his name with assured hope of obtaining both other good things which according to the prescript of this word we beg of him and even eternall life it selfe For this assent and assurance this lively consolation of the godly testeth neither on the testimony of man nor any other creature but it is the proper effect of the holy Ghost which effect how it is enflamed and strengthened by the same spirit through the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles read heard and meditated all the godly in a lively and certain feeling of their hearts have experience By this testimony of the holy Ghost all that are converted unto Christ have the certainty of heavenly doctrine mainly confirmed and surely sealed up in their hearts And this argument as it is proper unto the regenerate so it forceth their hearts alone not onely to credit the truth and authority of the holy Scripture but also perswadeth them to give an absolute assent thereunto and rest settled thereon All the other testimonies before alledged are common to those that are not converted unto Christ whom they also convict and stop the mouths of them that contradict this doctrine But of themselves they neither
perswade not move the mind to assent without the inward testimony of the holy Ghost But the Spirit of God when he once breedeth this most assured perswasion in our minds that the doctrine which is contained in the holy Bible is of a truth the will of God and worketh that comfort and change of our minds and hearts which is promised and taught in this book by our experience and feeling it is so confirmed that while this remaineth within us though all Angels and men should say contrary yet we would beleeve this to be the voice of God but if that remaine not or be not in us though all should say it yet we would not beleeve it Neither doth not the Spirit therefore establish the authority of the Scripture Object The Scripture beareth witnesse of the Spirit therefore the Spirit not of it Answer because we are to examine what the Spirit speaketh within us by the rule of the Scripture for before that this is done of us the Spirit himselfe declareth unto us that the Scripture is the word of God and inspired by him and that he will teach us nothing in our hearts which is not agreeable unto that testimony before set down of him in the Scripture And if this be not first most certainly perswaded us of the Spirit himselfe we will never re-call our opinions of God and his worship to the Scripture as the only rule to try them by Now then after it is declared unto us by divine inspiration that the Scripture is a sufficient witnesse of that divine revelation in our hearts then at length do we find our selves to be confirmed by the mutuall testimony of the same Spirit in the Scripture and in our hearts and we beleeve the Scripture affirming of it self 2 Tim. 3. 2 Pet. 1. That it was delivered by divine inspiration to the holy men of God 6 For what cause no doctrine besides the holy Scripture is to be received in the Church The Scripture is of God therefore the rule of faith Whereas it appeareth unto us that it is the word of God which the Prophets and Apostles have left in writing there is no man which doth not see that the Scripture must be the rule square by which all things which are taught done in the Church must be tried Now all things of which there useth to rise questions in the Christian Church do appertain either unto doctrine or unto discipline and ceremonies That the word of God ought to be the rule unto both sorts it is out of doubt But in this place we speak of the doctrine of the Church which consisteth in the sentences and decrees which we are bound by the commandement of god to beleeve or obey and therefore they cannot be changed by the authority of any creature and they are become obnoxious unto the wrath of God whosoever submit not themselves in faith and obedience unto them To these decrees and precepts the Papists adde many sentences which not only are no where delivered in Scripture but are repugnant unto it and they contend That the Church or the Bishops have authority of decreeing yea contrary and besides the Scripture what the Church must beleeve or doe and that mens consciences are bound by those decrees no lesse then by the words of the holy Scripture to beleeve or obey Contrariwise we beleeve and confesse That no doctrine is to be proposed unto the Church not only if it be repugnant unto the holy Scripture but if it be not contained in it And whatsoever either is not by the expresse testimony of the holy Scripture delivered or doth not consequently follow out of the words of the Scripture rightly understood that we hold may be without hurt of conscience beleeved or not beleeved changed abrogated and omitted The difference of the Scripture and of other mens opinions For we must ever hold a necessary difference between the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles and the writings and doctrine of others in the Church The Scripture only is of it selfe to be beleeved the rule of faith That the Scripture onely neither hath nor can have any errour in any matter other teachers both may erre and oftentimes also doe erre when they depart from the written word of God Againe that the Scriptures are beleeved on their own word because we know that God speaketh with us in them others have credit not because themselves say so but because the Scripture witnesseth so neither a whit more then they can prove by the Scripture Wherefore we do not reject others doctrine and labours in the Church but only setting them in their owne place we submit them unto the rule of Gods word This doctrine first is delivered of God himselfe and that not in one place only of the Scripture as You shall not adde unto the word which I spake unto you neither shall you take away from it And I protest unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecie of this booke Dent. 4. Revel 22. if any man shall adde unto thâse things God shall adde unto him the plagues that are written in this booke And if any man shall diminish of the words c. Neither only by these words is forbidden that no false things and openly repugnant to the written word be added to the doctrine of the Church but also that no uncertaine things or things not appertaining unto it be mingled therewith For it is not in the power of any creature to pronounce what we are to thinke of God and his will but this is onely to be learned out of that which is disclosed in his word And therefore the men of Beraea are commended Who searched the Scriptures daily Acts 17. whether these things were so 2 Faith is grounded only on the Word Secondly faith which is spoken of in the Church is a part of divine worship that is the sure assent by which we embrace every word of God delivered unto us because it is impossible for us to be deceived by it if we understand it aright Further also that it may breed in us a true worshipping of God and comfort of our soules it must stand sure and immoveable against temptations But there is no certain doctrine concerning God and Religion besides that which is knowne to be revealed in his word We may not therefore give the honour which is due unto God unto men neither may we go from certaine things to uncertaine but cleave only to the word of God in the doctrine concerning Religion and therefore humane decrees must not be accounted amongst those which we are to imbrace by faith Faith cometh by hearing hearing by the word of God c. 3 Things necessary to be beleeved or done are part of divine worship But things not prescribed are no part of divine worship Therefore they are not necessary Thirdly for so much as the worship of God is a worke commanded of God performed
downe from presumption of their own justice and may be prepared to the knowledge of themselves and true repentance Except this be done through the preaching of grace men will become more carelesse and stubborn and Pearles shall be throwne to Swine to be trampled under feet 2. The knowledge of our delivery is necessary for our comfort 1. That wee fall not into desperation Why the knowledge of our delivery is necessary For as soon as we have a knowledge of our sinne wee should be swallowed up of despaire were it not that the meanes of our delivery presented themselves ready at hand with us to succour us 1 To keep us from despaire 2. That wee may thereby be touched with a desire thereof For a good thing not known is not desired according to that 2 To kindle in us a desire of it There is no coveting after an unknowne thing If then we know not the benefit of our delivery we shall not long after it and by consequent we shall not obtaine it nay when we either happen to find it or have it offered unto us we shall not acknowledge it 3. That it may comfort us 3 To comfort us For a good thing not known doth not comfort 4. Lest through the ignorance thereof we our selves should imagine 4 To prevent all erroneous conceits therein or receive imagined by others any manner of delivery to the reproach of Gods Name and hazzard of our own salvation 5. That wee might be made partakers thereof through faith For 5 To gain possession of it by faith faith is not without knowledge and our delivery is apprehended only by faith 6 To work thankfulnesse in us towards God for it 6. That we may be thankefull to God for it For as we desire not an unknowne good so neither do we greatly esteem or account of it neither doe we thinke of rendring condigne thankes for it Now the benefit of delivery is not bestowed on the unthankfull but God imparteth it unto them in whom it hath that end whereunto it was ordained that is Thankefulnesse For these causes to our sound and true comfort the knowledge of our delivery is requisite and necessary both what it is in what manner and by whom it was performed Now this knowledge of our delivery is drawn out of the Gospel heard read and apprehended by faith because faith alone promiseth freedome to them that beleeve in Christ 3. The knowledge of our thankefulnesse is necessary for our comfort 1. Because God exhibiteth this delivery only to the thankefull 1 Why the knowledge of our thankfulnesse is necessary For in these alone God reapeth the end of his benefits which is his worship and their gratefulnesse towards him For thankfulnesse is the chiefe end and scope of our delivery For this purpose appeared the Son of God that he might destroy the workes of the Divell 1 Because God performeth it to the thankfull alone 1 John 3.8 He hath adopted us to the praise of the glory of his grace 2. That we may offer such thanksgiving as is acceptable unto God For God will have us no otherwise gratefull unto him then he hath prescribed in his Word True thankfulnesse therefore is to be learned out of Gods Word 2 To teach us what thankfulness we are to render unto God not fashioned after our own imagination 3. That we may know that those duties which we perform to God and our neighbour are no merits but only a publike declaring of our thankfulnesse And what thou givest thankes for 3 To exclude all shew of merit that thou knowest thou hast not deserved 4. That by our thankefulnesse our faith and comfort may be confirmed 4 For confirmation of faith in us or that by this thankfulnesse wee may be ascertained of this delivery as we are sure of the causes of things when we see their effects for the thankfull doe acknowledgé and professe an assurance of the good they have received Now thankfulnesse it self we know in generall out of the Gospel Thankfulnesse in generall knowne out of the Gospel in speciall out of the Law because the Gospel requireth faith and repentance of them that will be saved We know it in speciall out of the Law because the Law in speciall doth distinctly declare and determine what workes and what kind of obedience is pleasing unto God Wherefore necessarily wee are to treat of thankfulnesse in the Catechisme Object That which of it selfe followeth is not necessary to be taught But thankefulnesse must needs follow of it selfe after the acknowledgement of our misery and delivery Therefore it is not necessary to be taught Answ The fallacy of this argument is called in Schooles A supposall of that to be generally true which is true but in part For thankefulnesse followeth delivery but not the manner of thankefulnesse likewise that is as soone as wee know our deliverance from misery we presently conceive that it is a point of our duty to be thankfull for so great a benefit but what true and acceptable thankfulnesse to God is we know not except we be taught Therefore of the manner of thankefulnesse we are to be instructed out of the Word of God Furthermore the Major proposition is not universally true for a thing which of it selfe doth follow may be taught for greater and fuller knowledge and confirmation And God by this meanes that is to say by his Word delivered and knowne will kindle increase and strengthen thankfulnesse in us The first generall Part of Catechisme touching the Misery of Man On the second Sabbath Quest 3. Whence knowest thou thy misery Answ Out of the Law of God a Rom. 3.10 The Explication IN this first part concerning the Misery of man principally is handled the common place of sin and of the effects and punishments of sin To this are annexed other subordinate places and in this tract lesse principall then the fore-named as the Common places of the creation of man of the image of God in man of originall sin of free-will and of afflictions Touching our Misery we are to know in generall What it is Whence it is knowne and the meanes how 1 What is meant by the name of misery The name of Misery stretcheth farther then the name of Sin By the name of Misery we understand as well the evill of trespasse or offence as the evill of punishment The evill of trespasse is all sin The evill of punishment is all calamity torment and destruction of our reasonable nature To be short the evill of punishment comprehendeth all miseries and sins that follow after wherewith sinnes that goe before are punished So the numbring of the people committed by David is both a sin and a punishment of sin which went before to wit of the adultery and murder committed by David that is to say What the nature of misery is it was an evill both of offence and of punishment Therefore Mans
God in all our inclinations desires and actions in our will heart and outward parts in whose roome is invested a horrible disorder and corruption of the inclinations and motions of our heart and will whence actuall sinnes are hatched 4. Whole and perfect dominion over the creatures For those beasts which feared man before now assault him they lie in waite for him and violence him The fields bring forth thornes and thistles 5. The right and interest of using those creatures which God granted to his children not to his enemies 6. The felicity and happinesse both of this life and of the life to come in place whereof is come death both temporall and eternall with all sorts of calamities Object The Heathen excelled in many vertues and atchieved great workes therefore it seemeth the image of God was not lost in them Two causes why the vertues of Ethnicks please not God Answ The noble vertues and famous exploits of Heathen men pertaine indeed to the reliques and remainder of Gods image in man but so farre are they from being that true and perfect image of God that they rather are meere maskes and shewes of outward behaviour and discipline 1 They proceed not from a true knowledge of God without any obedience of the heart towards God whom they know not and fâie from therefore these workes are not pleasing unto God 2 They have not Gods glory proposed for their end whereas they neither proceed from the true knowledge of God neither are wrought to that end that all the glory may redound unto God 3 How the image of God is restored in us The repairing of the image of God in us is the work of all three persons THE repairing of the image of God in man is wrought by God alone who gave it unto man for in whose power it is to give life in his also it is to restore it being lost The manner of restoring it is this 1. God the Father restoreth it by his Sonne because he hath made him unto us wisdome justification sanctification and redemption 2. The Sonne by the holy Ghost immediately regenerating us 1 Cor. 1.30 2 Cor. 3.18 Rom. 1.16 Wee are changed into the same image from glory to glory as by the Spirit of the Lord. 3. The holy Ghost restoreth it by the Word and use of the Sacraments The Gospel is the power of God unto salvation Now this renuing is so wrought by God as that in this life it is onely begun in the chosen and in them confirmed and augmented unto the end of their life as concerning the soule but as concerning the whole man at the resurrection of the body Wherefore it is to be observed who is the author and what the order and manner of this repairing Quest 7. Whence then ariseth this wickednesse of mans nature Answ From the fall and disobedience of our first Parents Adam and Eve a Genes 3. the whole chapter throughout Romanes 5.12 18 19. Hence is our nature so corrupt that wee are all conceived and borne in sinne b Psalme 51.5 Genesis 5.3 Wisdome 12.10 The Explication HEre wee are first to meditate on the fall and first sin of man whence the corruption of mans nature had his beginning Secondly on sin in generall and especially on Originall sinne Of the fall and first sinne of man Concerning the fall and first sinne we are to consider and know 1 What and what manner of sinne it was 2 What are the causes thereof 3 What are the effects 4 Why God permitted it 1 What and what manner of sinne that first sinne of Adam and Eve was THE fall or first sin of man was the disobedience of our first parents Adam and Eve in paradise or the eating of the apple and fruit forbidden by God Gen. 2.16 17. Thou shalt eate freely of every tree of the garden but of the tree of knowledge of good and evill thou shalt not eate of it for in the day that thou shalt eat thereof thou shalt die the death This commandement of God man through the perswasion of the Divell trangressed and hence is our corruption and misery derived Is then the plucking of an apple so heinous a crime Yea verily a grievous offence The manifoldness of the first sin because in it many horrible sins are fast linked together In pride against God Pride against God ambition and an admiration of himselfe for man not content with that state wherein God had placed him desired to be equal with God This God doth charge him with when he saith Gen. 3.22 Behold the man is become as one of us to know good and evil In incredulity Incredulity and unbeliefe and contempt of Gods justice and mercy for he tempted God and charged him with a lye For God had said Thou shalt die the death The Divel denied it saying Ye shall not die Gen. 2.17 and farther the Divel accused God of envie saying But God knoweth that when ye shall eate thereof Gen. 3.4 5. your eyes shall be opened and ye shall be as Gods knowing good and evil Here Adam gave credence to the Divel did eat of the forbidden fruit neither did he beleeve that God would therefore inflict that punishment on him which he had threatned Now not to beleeve God and of the contrary to beleeve the Divel is to account God for no God nay to seat and install the Divell in the place of God This sin was heavie and horrible above measure In stubbornness and disobedience Stubbornnesse and disobedience towards God because against the expresse commandement of God he did eate of the apple In unthankfulnesse Vnthankfulnesse for benefits received at his creation as for these that he was created to the Image of God and to eternall life for which he rendered this thankes that hee rather hearkened and inclined to the Divel then God In unnaturalnessâ Vnnaturalnesse and neglect of love towards his posterity because miserable and wretched man he thought not with himselfe that as he had received those good things for himselfe and his posterity so he should by sinning against God make losse of them both from himselfe and them In Apostasie Apostasie or manifest defection from God to the Divell whom hee beleeved and obeyed rather then God whom he set up in the place of God with-drawing and sundring himselfe from God Hee did not aske of God those good things which he was to receive but rejecting the wisdome and direction of God by the advice of the Divell will aspire to be equall with God Wherefore the fall of man was no light and simple or single fault but was a manifold and terrible sinne for which God justly rejected man with all his posterity Hence wee easily answer that objection Object No just Judge inflicteth a great punishment for a small offence God is a just Judge Thorefore hee should not have punished the eating of an Apple so
grievously Answ The eating of the Apple was no small sinne but manifold and outrageous in which was conceived Pride Vnthankefulnesse Apostasie c. as hath been already proved Therefore God justly inflicted a great punishment on mankind for the same Repli Yet at the least hee should have spared mans posterity because himselfe hath said Ezek. 18.20 The sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father Answ True if so the sonne be not partaker of his fathers wickednesse But here all are partakers of Adams iniquity 2. What were the causes of the first sin The causes of sin are the Divels instigation mans will freely yeelding unto it THe first sinne of man sprang not from God but from the instigation of the Divell and from the free-will of man For the Divell provoked man to fall away from God and man yeelding to the inticing allurements of the Divell freely revolted from God and wilfully forsook him Now although God left man destitute in his temptation yet he is not the cause of his fall or sinne or destruction of man For in that dereliction or forsaking of man God neither intended nor effected any of these but he proved and tried man to shew how impotent and unable the creature is to doe or retaine ought that is good God not preserving and directing him by his Spirit and together with his triall of man hee in his just judgement suffered the sinne of man to concurre but he was no cause or efficient of it Fleshly wisdome thus reasoneth against this doctrine Object Whosoever with-draweth grace in the time of temptation without which the fall cannot be avoided hee is the cause of the fall but God with-held from man his grace in the time of temptation without which hee could not but fall Therefore God was the cause of the fall Answ The Major is true onely of him who with-holdeth grace when hee is obliged and bound not to with-hold it and him who with-draweth it from such a one as desireth it not from such a one as wilfully rejecteth it and of him who of despight and malice with-draweth it But it is not true of him who is neither bound to preserve and maintaine the grace which hee sometime gave and who with-holdeth it not from such a one as desireth to have it continued but from him who is willing hee should so doe and voluntarily refuseth it and who denieth it not therefore because hee envieth the offendors righteousnesse and life eternall or is delighted with the sinne but onely to this purpose to try him to whom hee hath imparted grace For hee who forsaketh any man on this manner is not the cause of sinne howsoever in him who is thus forsaken sinne necessarily followeth this dereliction and with-drawing of grace Now God in the temptation of man with-held his grace from him not after the former but the latter manner here expressed Wherefore God is not the cause of mans sinne and destruction for with-drawing but man for wilfull rejecting of grace Repl. Whosoever will that such a one be tempted whom he certainly knoweth that he will fall if he be tempted he willeth his sinne which falleth but God would that man should be tempted of the Divell whom he certainly knew that hee would fall for otherwise and against the will of God man could not have been tempted Therefore God is the cause of mans fall Answ This Major is denied as false if it be simply and precisely taken For he is not the cause of sin who will that he who is apt to fall be tempted onely for cause of triall and to make manifest the creatures infirmity Now God in this sense and with this intent suffered man to be tempted that is to be proved But the Divel tempting man to the end that he might sinne and be separate and distracted from God and man willingly obeying the Tempter against the commandement of God they both are the true causes of sinne But of the causes of sinne more shall be spoken hereafter 3 What the effects of the first sinne are THE effects of mans first sinne are Guilt of death Guiltinesse of death and a privation and destruction of Gods Image in our first Parents Originall sinne Originall sinne in us their posterity that is to say the guilt of eternall death and the corruption and aversenesse of our whole nature from God Actuall sinne All actuall sinnes which are sprung of originall for that which is the cause of the cause is also the cause of the effect But the first sinne in man is the cause of his originall sinne and this of his actuall sinne Punishments inflicted for sin All the evils of punishment which are inflicted for sinnes Therefore the first sinne of man is the cause of all other his sins and punishments Now whether it stand with Gods justice to punish the posterity for the sinne of the parents it shall hereafter in the common place of Originall sinne be fully resolved 4 Why God permitted the first sin of man GOD could have kept man from falling if hee would The causes of Gods permission of the first sin but hee permitted him to fall that is hee gave him not the grace of resistance against the temptation of the Divell and that for two causes To shew mans weaknesse and infirmity That it might stand for an example of the weakenesse and infirmity of the creature were it not supported and preserved in originall righteousnesse by the Creator To shew his mercy justice and power That by this occasion God might shew his goodnesse mercy and grace in saving the Elect by Christ and that hee might shew his justice and power in punishing the wicked and reprobate for their sinnes according to these sayings of Scripture God hath shut up all in unbeliefe Rom. 11.32 Rom. 9.22 23. that he might have mercy on all and every mouth might be stopped And God to shew his wrath and make his power knowne suffered with long patience the vessels of wrath prepared to destruction and that hee might declare the riches of his glory upon the vessels of mercy which hee hath prepared unto glory This doctrine concerning the Creation and fall of man is necessary for the Church for many causes and uses which it hath 1. Wee must know that man was created of God without sinne The necessity and use of this doctrine of mans creation lest God be imagined the authour or cause of sinne 2. Whereas mans body was fashioned of clay let us thinke of our frailty that wee be not lifted up with pride 3. Seeing that the workmanship of God is so admirable in the framing of mans body and seeing it was created for the ministery of Gods worship and for God to dwell in and for everlasting life let us neither abuse it to dishonesty neither willingly destroy it neither make it a stie of Divels but keeping it chaste and clean endeavour that it be a temple and
that God plagueth and scourgeth sin with sin and the sins which follow are the punishments of sins which went before Actuall sin Wherefore also God gave them up to their hearts lust unto uncleannesse they wrought filthinesse and received in themselves such recompence of their errour as was meet Objects of sin Rom. 24 27. 2 Thes 2.1 Therefore God shall send them strong delusions that they should beleeve lies c. But whereas the wit of man to such a height of insolency it is grown is accustomed to frame the like arguments for the excusing of it selfe and shifting and posting it from it selfe unto God we must here enter some large discourse of the causes of sin and shake off mans frivolous pretences in his owne behalfe Destiny Some derive the originall cause of sin from the destiny of the Stars saying Foure pretended causes of sin I have sinned because I was borne under an unluckie Planet The Divell Others when they sin and are rebuked for their sinne they make answer Not I but the Divell was in fault that committed this deed Gods will Others leaving excuses directly cast the fault upon God saying God would have it so for if he would not I should not have sinned Gods permission Others When God say they might have hindered me and yet did not himselfe is the authour of my sin With these and the like pretences it is no new thing for men to sharpen their blasphemous tongues against God For our first Parents when they had sinned and were accused of their sin by God they translate and passe over the fault committed from themselves to others neither ingenuously confesse the truth Adam returneth the fault not so much upon his wife as upon God himselfe The woman saith he which thou gavest to be with me she gave me of the tree Gen 3.12 13. and I did eate as if he should say Except thou hadst joyned her to me I had not sinned The woman simply imputeth the fault to the Divell saying The Serpent beguiled me and I did eate These are the false impious and detestable judgements concerning the originall of sinne whereby the majesty truth and justice of God is grievously offended For the nature of man is not the cause of sinne for God created it good and perfect according as it is said And God saw all things which he had made and lo they were very good Sin is an accessary quality which took possession of man after the fall and no substantiall property although after the fall it became naturall and is fitly so termed by Augustine because now we are all borne in sinne Ephes 2.3 and are by nature the children of wrath as well as others But this point would be more amplified and enlarged 1. They who make Destiny a cloak for sinne define Destiny to be a linked order through all eternity and a certaine perpetuall necessity of intents and workes according to the counsell of God or according to the evill Planets Now if you aske them Who made the Planets God say they Therefore these men lay their evill to Gods charge but such a destiny did not all the sounder Philosophers maintaine Destiny is not the cause of sin Lib. 2. cap. 6. much lesse Christians Saint Augustine against two Epistles of the Pelagians unto Boniface They saith he who hold destiny maintaine that not only actions and events but also our wils themselves depend on the position of the Planets at the time of every ones conception or nativity which they call constellations But the grace of God surpasseth not onely all the stars and all the heavens but also the Angels Let us conclude these things with the word of the Lord by his Prophet Jeremy pronouncing to this sense Jer. 10.2 3. Thus saith the Lord Learne not the way of the Heathen and be not affraid for the signes of heaven though the Heathen be affraid of such for the customes of the people are vaine Wherefore that the Astrologers call the Planet of Saturn unmercifull sharp and cruell and the Planet of Venus favourable and gentle it is the vanity of vanities for the stars have no force of doing good or ill and therefore the fault of sinners ought not to be imputed unto them 2. That the Divell is not the onely authour of sin who when as wee commit sin The Divell not the only author of sin should beare alone the blame of the sin and our selves be free from fault it is most of all declared in this that he is able to induce and entice a man to evill but not to compell him For God keepeth under the Divell by his power that he cannot doe what he will but only what and so much as God permitteth him Nay hee hath not so much as power over filthy Swine much lesse over the most noble Soules of men He hath indeed a subtilty great force in perswading but God is stronger who also never ceaseth himself to put good motions into mans mind neither permitteth he more to Sathan then he maketh profitable for man Which wee may see in that most holy man Job in the example of Paul and in his words 1 Cor. 10.13 God is faithfull which will not suffer you to be tempted above that you be able Wherefore they are vain men who unload the blame of their wickednesse on the Divels shoulders 3. It remaineth that we shew also that God is not the authour of sin God is no cause of sin God say these miscreants would have it so for if hee would not I should not have sinned Againe When he might have hindered me and yet did not himselfe is the author of my sin These are meere cavils and foisty Sophismes of the impious rout God might by his absolute power hinder evill but he will not corrupt his creature man being just and righteous Wherefore he dealeth with man after the order of man he proposeth lawes unto him he proposeth rewards and punishments he willeth him to imbrace good and flye evill To the doing of which thing neither denieth he his grace without which we can do nothing neither refuseth he our diligence and labour Here if a man cease and give over the sinne and negligence is ascribed to man not to God though he could have hindred it and did not because he ought not to hinder it lest he should trouble his appointed and settled order and destroy his owne work Wherefore God is not author of evill or sin Now in the processe of this our discourse wee will gather in one the testimonies of Scripture resolve certain doubts and discover the very fountain and originall of sin Many are the testimonies of Scripture which teach us that God is not the author of sin of which it shall suffice to propose only some few God made not death Wisd 1.13 Ezek. 13.11 Psal 5.4 5. neither hath he pleasure in the destruction of the living I desire not
come God neither willing them nor approving them nor causing but only permitting For to permit this kind of punishments which sinners by sinning inflict either upon themselves or others is nothing else then not to cause that evill men should do this which God would have done for punishment to the same end that they may obey this will of God So also we answer to that argument The privation or want of righteousnesse and divine wisdome God inflicteth as a punishment upon men but that privation is sin Therefore God is the causer of sin For this privation is not sin as by the just judgement of God it is inflicted but as it is of men themselves voluntarily brought upon them by their owne misdeeds and demerits and is admitted or received into the mind will and heart even as evill actions are not sins as they are governed by God but as they are done by man They say further Hee that mindeth the end mindeth also the meanes God mindeth the ends of sin that is punishment Punishment and the Manifestation of Gods glory justice are not the ends of sin because men are not by them moved to sin The proper ends of sin and the shewing of justice and wrath in punishment Wherefore hee mindeth sinne also by which those ends are come unto But the Minor is to be denied that Punishment and the Manifestation of the glory of God are the ends of sinne For the end is that which moveth the efficient cause to bring forth an effect but Punishment or the Manifestation of the glory of God do not move the sinners to sin These cannot therefore be said to be the ends of sin But those are the proper ends of sinne which the Divels and men respect in sinning that is the destruction of men the fulfilling of evill desires the oppression and reproach of God and his truth God respecteth those as ends not of mens sin but of his permission of their sin If they reply That men indeed have not those ends but that God respecteth them For that which God permitteth to shew his justice by punishing it the end which God proposeth thereof is the punishment of the sinners and his owne glory but he permitteth sin to punish it and to declare himselfe just by punishing it Therefore these are the ends of sin in respect of the purpose and intent of God We deny the Major for God suffering sinne to be committed respecteth as the end not of anothers work that is of the sinne of Divels or men but of his own work that is of his permission of sin the punishment of sin and the manifestation of his owne justice For sin is one thing and the permission of sin another Exod. 9.16 whereof is spoken For this cause have I appointed thee to shew my power in thee Prov. 16.4 and to declare my name throughout all the world The Lord hath made all things for his owne sake yea even the wicked man for the day of evill God being willing to shew his truth Rom. 9.22 and to make his power knowne hath suffered with long patience the vessels of wrath prepared to destruction Wherefore punishment is not the end but the consequent or proper effect of sin and an accidentary effect thereof is the manifestation of the glory of God Rom. 3.7 as Paul sheweth For if the verity of God hath more abounded through my lie to his glory c. How God is said to will punishment which is the Consequent of sin and not sin it selfe which is the Antecedent If here againe they reply He that will the Consequent will also the Antecedent but God will these things which are the Consequents of sins that is Punishment and Execution of his justice Therefore he will also the Antecedent that is Sin it selfe without which these should not follow or be Consequents We deny the whole consequence of this reason For nothing followeth or can be concluded in reason when both the former propositions are meere particular For the Major of this reason is not universally true but only then holdeth it when as the Antecedent together with the Consequent agreeth with the nature of him which will the Consequent and not when only the Consequent agreeth and not the Antecedent For when it falleth thus out then is the Consequent by his will but the Antecedent is not by his will but only by permission For God is said to will those things which he liketh as agreeing with his nature and rightnesse but to permit those things which yet he disliketh abhorreth and condemneth but neverthelesse for just causes hindereth them not from being done And therefore it is said in the Scripture that he will and causeth life everlasting which is the Consequent and the conversion of men which is the Antecedent and goeth before and that he will not but only permitteth punishment as it is sin which followeth and is the Consequent of sins as is delivered in holy Scripture If againe they urge Rom. 9. Ephes 1. He that forbiddeth not sin when he may forbid it to be committed in him is some cause and fault of sinne but God permitteth it when he might forbid it Therefore there is some cause and fault of sin in him We deny the Consequent because the Major is not universally true For it is onely true of him who doth not perfectly hate sinne The reasons why God not forbidding sin is yet no cause of sin and therefore forbiddeth it not when hee may and who is bound to hinder sin that it be not committed But it is not true of God who with unspeakable anger accurseth and condemneth sin neither yet hindereth is from being committed because he is neither bound to do so neither doth he permit it without most good and just causes God doth not evill when he permitteth evill Rom. 3.8 If they object farther He that doth evill that good may come of it doth not well God when he permitteth evill for good ends doth evill that good may come of it Wherefore he doth against his justice and law and by a Consequent is bound to hinder evill Wee deny the Minor for God when he permitteth evill doth not evill but good For the permission of sin is one thing which is the good and just work of God and sin is another thing which is the evill and unjust work of the Divell or man sinning and transgressing the Law Lastly they say What God permitteth willingly that he will to be done but he willingly permitteth sin wherefore hee will sin to be committed and by a Consequent is the cause of sin God permitting sin doth not will sin to be done But the Major is to be denied God will the permission that is the privation of his spirit and grace but the sinne of his creature which concurreth with it he will not because he neither mindeth it nor approveth it They confirme their Major by this argument To permit is
temptation so neither could he persist in integrity when he was tempted except God had sustained and confirmed him even as he confirmed the blessed Angels that they should not defect and fall away together with the other Apostates Seeing therefore such was the first mans estate from which he wittingly and willingly fell the crime and fault of sin neither can nor ought to be laid on God but on man only albeit notwithstanding he fell by the eternall counsell and will of God The causes of humane reason refuted which lay the fault of the first sin on God Humane reason fancying her owne wit deriving the blame of sin from her self when she heareth these things is troubled and keepeth a stirre and feigneth many absurdities to follow except such a liberty of doing well or evill be given to man that his perseverance or falling depend of his owne will alone First That God was the cause of that first sin and by consequent of all other sins as which came all of the first fall Likewise That he was the cause of the sin of the Divell seducing man especially seeing the first sinne is not to be accounted a punishment as other sins for no sinne had gone before which should be punished with that sinne and therefore seeing God would not will that as a punishment he may seem to have willed it as a sin Answ But although there be nothing to the contrary why sin may not be the punishment even of it selfe whereas in the same action both the creature How the first sin might be a punishment unto it selfe and to that end permitted of God depriving himselfe of that conformity which he had with God might sinne and God depriving him of that good which he of his owne accord casteth away might punish as it is said of covetousnesse There is nothing worse then when one envieth himselfe and this is a reward of his wickednesse Yet notwithstanding there are other ends besides punishment Syrac 14. for which it was convenient for God to will the action both of the Divell and of man God would the temptation of man which was done by the Divell Other ends and causes why God would the action though not the sin both of Sathan and Adam as a triall of man by which it might be made manifest whether he would persevere in true piety towards God even as God himselfe did tempt Abraham immediately when hee commanded him to doe that which hee yet would not have done God would that assent of man by which he did yeeld unto the Divell against the will of God as a manifestation of the weaknesse and feeblenesse of the creature which cannot keep the gifts wherewith he was adorned by God without Gods speciall instinct and aide Likewise he would have this done as an occasion or way to manifest his justice and severity in punishing and his mercy in saving sinners as Exodus 9. Romanes 9. Now God respecting and willing these things in that perswasion and enticement of Sathan and in mans assenting and yeelding thereunto did notwithstanding all this while hate the sinne of both and therefore did not will it neither cause it but justly permitted and suffered it to be done For first Whatsoever things God doth they are alwaies just 2. Hee was not bound unto man to preserve and confirme him in goodnesse 3. He would have man to be tempted and to fall that he might try mans perseverance in true piety towards God 4. That hee might manifest the weaknesse of the creature 5. That his fall might be an occasion and way to manifest Gods justice and mercy These things very well agree with the nature and law of God Now that they say That man did not fall of his owne free-will except hee had equall power as well to persist in obedience as to fall the consequence is not of force because they reason from an ill definition of mans liberty which they imagine cannot stand if it be determined and ruled by God But the whole Scripture witnesseth that it sufficeth for the liberty of the creature if the Will be inclinable of it selfe to the contrary of that which it chuseth and doth of it owne accord chuse that which the mind either liketh or disliketh And hence also is that dissolved that they say That man is not justly punished of God if he could not avoid his fall For he that sinneth willingly or doth draw on himself the necessity of sinning is justly punished his owne conscience accusing him neither is it unjust that he is forsaken of God and deprived of the grace of the holy Ghost who wittingly and willingly casteth it away and that he suffer the punishment of this his ingratitude and contempt of God although he cannot God forsaking him doe otherwise For none is forsaken of God except he be willing to be forsaken As It must needs be that offences shall come Mat. 18.7 but woe be unto that man by whom the offence cometh Gods deniall of grace no cruelty but a way to greater mercy At length they say That God is made cruell envious and far from bounty and mercie if he did not bestow that grace upon man without which he knew man could not stand or consist in temptation and yet would have him tempted of the Divell But these and the like tauntings and reproachings of the workes and judgements of God out of doubt are joyned with great impiety because they over-turn the ground and principle which is the first degree and step to godlinesse and reverence towards God that is that whatsoever God doth it is good and just and not disagreeing from his nature and law whether the reason thereof be knowne unto us or unknowne Wherefore this answer should suffice that it disagreeth not from the mercy and goodnesse of God whatsoever he doth But there is not want also of other answers As that deniall of grace doth not disagree but very well agreeth with the mercy bounty of God when God will have this to be an occasion of bestowing a greater grace and benefit as it is apparent in the fall and restoring of man againe that that is not disagreeing from mercy or any other vertue which doth appertaine to the manifesting of the glory of the chiefe good which is God For although it be mercy not to rejoyce in the ruine or destruction of his creature yet mercy ought not to fight with justice now it is just that more regard should be had of the chiefe good that is God both by himselfe and by others then of all creatures Wherefore very well doe agree together in God his mercy which will not the death of a sinner and his justice which suffereth mankind to fall that by his fall the severity and goodnesse of God may appeare The second degree of liberty after the fall The second degree of free-will is in man fallen borne of corrupt parents and as yet not regenerate In this state
confirmeth the faithful to yeeld obedience Lastly they cite all other sayings which seem to place conversion and good works in the will of men I have applied my heart to fulfill thy statutes Psal 119. He that is begotten of God keepeth himselfe 1 John 5.18 These and the like sayings attribute the work of God unto men 1. Because they are not only the object but the instrument also of Gods working Two causes why the workes of God are attributed to men which the holy Spirit exerciseth in them 2. Because they are such an instrument which being renewed and moved by the holy Spirit doth also it self work together and move it selfe For there is not one effect ascribed unto the holy Ghost and another to mans will but the same to both unto the holy Ghost as the principall cause unto mans will as a secondary and instrumentall cause The third degree of liberty in man regenerated The third degree of liberty belongeth to man in this life as hee is regenerated but yet not glorified or in whom regeneration is begun but not accomplished or perfected In this state the Will useth her liberty not only to work evill as in the second degree but partly to do ill and partly to do well And this is to be understood two waies 1. That some workes of the regenerate are good and pleasing to God which are done of them according to Gods commandement but some evill and displeasing to God which they doe contrary to the commandement of God which is manifest by the infinite fallings of holy men 2. That even those good works which the converted doe in this life albeit they please God by reason of Christs satisfaction imputed unto them yet are they not perfectly good that is agreeable to Gods Law but unperfect and stained with many sinnes and therefore they cannot if they be beheld without Christ stand in judgement and escape damnation The cause of the renewing and beginning of this liberty in man to good is the Spirit working by the Will The cause for which the Will beginneth to work well is this Because by the singular grace or benefit of the holy Spirit mans nature is renewed by the Word of God there is kindled in the mind a new light and knowledge of God in the heart new affections in the will new inclinations agreeing with the Law of God and the will is forcibly and effectually moved to doe according to these notions and inclinations and so it recovereth both the power of willing that which God approveth and the use of that power and beginneth to be conformed and agreeable to God and to obey him Deut. 30.6 The Lord thy God will circumcise thy heart and the heart of thy seed that thou mayest love the Lord thy God with all thine heart Ezek. 36.26 A new heart will I give you and a new spirit will I put within you and I will take away the stony heart out of your body and I will give you an heart of flesh and I will put my spirit within you and cause you to walk in my statutes Act. 16.14 The Lord opened the heart of Lidia that shee should attend to those things which were spoken of Paul 1 Cor. 3.17 Why the Will in the regenerate useth liberty not only to good but to evill also Where the Spirit of the Lord is there is liberty The causes for which the will useth her liberty not only to the chusing of good but of evill also are in number two 1. For that in this life the renewing of our nature is not perfect neither as concerning the knowledge of God neither as concerning our inclination to obey God and therefore in the best men while they live here remaine still many and great sinnes both Originall and others 2. For that the regenerate be not alwaies ruled by the holy Spirit but are sometimes forsaken of God either for to try or to chastise and humble them but yet are re-called to repentance that they perish not Of the first cause it is said Rom. 7.18 I know that in mee that is in my flesh dwelleth no good thing for to will is present with me but I find no means to performe that which is good Mar. 9.24 I beleeve Lord but help thou my unbeliefe Of the second cause it is said Psal 51.11 Take not thy holy Spirit from me O Lord why hast thou made us to erre from thy waies and hardened our heart from thy feare Returne for thy servants sake The Lord our God be with us Isa 63.17 1 Kin. 8.57 that he forsake us not neither leave us Therefore the regenerate man in this life doth alwaies go either forward or backward neither continueth in the same state Hence are deduced these two conclusions 1. As man corrupted before he be regenerated cannot begin new obedience pleasing and acceptable unto God so he that is regenerated in this life although he begin to obey God that is hath some inclination and purpose to obey God according to all his commandements and that unfeigned though yet weak and struggling with evill inclinations affections and desires and therefore there shine in his life and manners a desire of piety towards God and his neighbour yet can he not yeeld whole and perfect obedience to God because neither his knowledge nor his love to God is so great and so sincere as the Law of God requireth and therefore is not such righteousnesse as may stand before God according to that saying Psal 143.2 Enter not into judgement with thy servant for in thy sight shall none that liveth be justified 2. They who are converted can no farther retaine good inclinations neither thoughts and affections and a good purpose to persevere and goe forward therein then as the holy Spirit worketh and preserveth these in them For if hee guide and rule them they judge and do aright but if he forsake them they are blind they wander slip and fall away yet so that they perish not but repent and are saved if so be they were ever truly converted 1 Cor. 4.7 Phil. 1.6 2.13 What hast thou that thou hast not received If thou hast received it why rejoycest thou as if thou hadst not received it I am perswaded that he who hath begun this good work in you will performe it untill the day of Jesus Christ It is God that worketh in you both the will and the deed John 15.5 even of his good pleasure Without me you can doe nothing Who shall also confirme you to the end that ye may be blamelesse in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ 1 Cor. 1.8 and 10.13 God is faithfull which will not suffer you to be tempted above that you be able but will even give the issue with the temptation that ye may be able to beare it 1 Pet. 1.5 You are kept by the power of God through faith to salvation This doctrine
Law causeth wrath c. and The letter killeth By the letter is understood the outward preaching and bare knowledge of those things which we ought to do for it teacheth indeed our duty and that righteousnesse which God requireth at our hands but it doth not make us able to performe that righteousnesse neither doth it shew us any hope to attain thereunto by another but rather accuseth and condemneth our righteousnesse The Gospel is the ministery of life The Gospel is the ministery of life and of the Spirit that is it hath the forcible operation of the holy Ghost adjoyned and doth quicken because by it the holy Ghost as by an instrument worketh faith and life in the elect Rom. 1.15 The Gospel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that beleeveth The Gospel is the preaching of repentance It was said in the definition of the Gospel and in the third difference between the Law and the Gospel that the Gospel requireth both faith and repentance or new obedience and so is the preaching both of remission of sins and of repentance Against this Flaccius Sectaries keep a stir and reason after this sort Ob. There is no precept or commandement belonging to the Gospel but to the Law The preaching of repentance is a precept or commandement Therefore the preaching of repentance belongeth not to the Gospel but to the Law Ans We deny the Major if it be generally meant for this precept is proper unto the Gospel that it commandeth us to beleeve it to imbrace the benefit of Christ and now being justified to begin new obedience or that righteousnesse which the law requireth of us Repl. Yea but the law also willeth us to beleeve God Therefore it is not proper unto the Gospel to command us to beleeve Ans Both the Law and the Gospel require faith The Law exhorteth in generall unto faith and unto such and such works in speciall Both the Law and the Gospel commandeth faith and conversion to God but diversly The Law only in generall commandeth us to beleeve God or to give credit to all his promises commandements and threatnings and that with a denouncing of punishment except we do it the Law saith Beleeve every word of God it willeth therefore that we beleeve and obey this commandement also by which God in the Gospel commandeth us to return unto him and to beleeve in Christ The Gospel exhorteth in speciall unto faith and in generall unto works But the Gospel in speciall and expresly willeth us to imbrace by faith the promise of grace by Christ and to return unto God that is saith not in generall Beleeve all the promises and denouncings of God c. for that it leaveth unto the Law but it saith plainly and expresly Beleeve this promise to wit that thy sins are pardoned thee and that thou art received of God into favour by and for Christ and return unto God Further it exhorteth us both inwardly and outwardly by the holy Spirit and by the word That we walk worthy of the Gospel that is do such works as are pleasing to God but this it doth only in generall not prescribing in particular Thou shalt do this or that but leaveth this unto the Law as contrariwise it saith not in generall beleeve all Gods promises leaving this to the Law but in speciall saith Beleeve this promise Fly unto Christ and thy sins shall be forgiven thee 4. What are the proper effects of the Gospel THe proper effects of the Gospel are 1. Faith because Faith is by hearing Rom. 10.17 2 Cor. 3.8 Rom. 1.16 and hearing by the word of God The Gospel is the ministration of the Spirit the power of God unto salvation 2. Through faith our whole conversion unto God justification regeneration and salvation for by faith as by the instrument whole Christ together with all his benefits is received 5. Whence the truth and certainty of the Gospel may appear THe truth and certainty of the Gospel appeareth 1. By the testimony of the holy Ghost 2. By the prophesies which have been uttered by the Prophets and other holy men 3. By the fulfilling of those prophesies which were accomplished in the new Testament 4. By the miracles whereby the doctrine of the Gospel was confirmed 5. By the end or property of the doctrine of the Gospel because that alone sheweth the way how to escape sin and death and ministreth sound comfort unto afflicted consciences ON THE 7. SABBATH Quest 20. Is then salvation restored by Christ to all men who perished in Adam Ans Not to all a Matt. 7.14 22.14 but to those only who by a true faith are engraffed into him and receive his benefits b Mark 16.16 Joh. 1.12 3.16 18 36. Isa 53.11 Psal 2.12 Rom. 3.22 11.20 Heb. 4.3 5.9 10.39 11.6 The Explication HAving declared the doctrine concerning the means of our delivery through Christ the question Who and By what means they are made partakers of this delivery whether all or only some orderly followeth This twentieth Question therefore is a preparation to the doctrine of faith without which neither the Mediatour nor the preaching of the Gospel profiteth any man Hereby also carnall security is prevented or met withall Gal. 2.17 and that opprobrious contumely that Christ is the minister of sin The answer to this question consisteth of two parts 1. Salvation is not restored by Christ to all that perished in Adam 2. But to those onely who by true faith are ingraffed into Christ and imbrace his benefits The former part is too too evident by daily experience John 3.36 John 3.5 Mat. 7.21 He which beleeveth not in the Son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him Except a man be born from above he cannot enter into the kingdom of God Not every one that saith unto me Lord Lord shall enter into the kingdome of heaven The cause why all are not saved by Christ Why all are not saved by Christ is not the insufficiency of the merit and grace of Christ for Christ is the full propitiatory sacrifice for the sinnes of the whole world as concerning the worth and sufficiency of the ransome and price which he paid but it is the infidelity of men whereby they refuse the benefits of Christ offered in the Gospel and therefore perish not through any defect of Christs merit but through their own fault The other part also is proved by Scripture As many as received him John 1.12 Isa 53.11 to them he gave power to be the sons of God By his knowledge my righteous servant shall justifie many Now the reason why beleevers only are saved is Why the faithfull only are saved by Christ because they only lay hold on and imbrace the benefits of Christ and because in them alone God obtaineth the end for which he delivered up his Son unto death for the faithfull only
whereby wee are out of Gods word informed and instructed unto faith or assent and beleefe as when wee use to say The Christian faith the Apostolike faith Oftentimes it is used for the fulfilling of ancient promises or the things themselves which are beleeved as Before faith came we were kept under the law and shut up unto the faith which should afterward be revealed Gal. 3.23 How faith differeth from all other kindes of knowledge Furthermore albeit there be also other certain notices whereunto we firmly give assent as understanding or apprehension of principles science sapience art prudence for the assent coming unto the notice doth confirme and perfect it so that what knowledge of a thing it had without assent it is imperfect and unprofitable yet none of those are that faith especially the Theologicall such as a little before is described for to those notices or apprehensions we do assent either because they are naturally engraffed in our minds or for that they bring demonstrance or some other true and certain proofs But the Theologicall assent or faith is not neither ariseth it out of the instinct of nature neither out of sense or experience neither out of demonstrations or reasons borrowed from Philosophy but cometh and dependeth of a peculiar and supernaturall revelation or divine testimony That therefore which is added in the former description for the asseveration of God himselfe distinguisheth Theologicall faith from all other knowledges even the most certain And this generall definition of Theologicall faith is necessary that wee may not think that out of Philosophy or such principles as are naturally known to all are to be drawn reasons or arguments sound and sufficient to confirme the articles of our faith but may know that the word of God and those good and necessary consequences and arguments which are framed out of it are a supernaturall light and more certain then all though most exact and exquisite demonstrances either Naturall or Mathematicall of Philosophers 2. How many kinds of faith there are in Scripture FOur sorts of faith are found rehearsed in Scripture 1. Historicall 2. Temporary 3. Working miracles 4. Justifying or saving faith The difference of these kinds one from the other appeareth out of their definitions Historicall faith is to know and think all those things to be true which are manifested from above What historicall faith is either by voice or by visions or by oracles or by any other manner of revelation and are taught in the books of the Prophets and Apostles and thus to be perswaded of them for the asseveration and testimony of God himselfe It is called historicall because it is a bare knowledge of such things as God is said to have done to do or that he will do hereafter of this faith these testimonies of holy Scripture make mention 1 Cor. 13.2 If I have all faith so that I could remove mountains c. Which saying notwithstanding may be construed of all the sorts of faith James 2.19 justifying faith only excepted The divels beleeve and tremble for the divell knoweth exactly both what things are written in the word and also what are not written because hee is a spirit witty quick and learned hee is present and seeth whatsoever things are done in the Church and also through long experience hath known the doctrine of the Church to be true Acts 8.13 Simon Magus beleeved to wit that the doctrine was true which the Apostle Peter propounded but he had not a justifying faith Temporary faith is to assent unto the doctrine of the Church together with profession and joy therein What temporall faith is though not true and unfained that is to say not springing from a lively sense of the grace of God towards them but of some other cause whatsoever therefore it endureth but for a time and in the instant of affliction vanisheth Or It is to assent unto the heavenly doctrine which is delivered by the Prophets and Apostles to professe it to glory therein and to rejoyce in the knowledge thereof for a time not for the application of the promise to themselves to wit not for any feeling in their hearts of Gods grace towards them but for other causes and therefore without any true conversion and finall perseverance in the profession of this doctrine This definition is drawn from the parable and words of Christ He that receiveth seed in the stony ground is he which heareth the word and incontinently with joy receiveth it yet hath hee not root in himselfe and dureth but a season Mat. 13.20 21. for as soon as tribulation or persecution cometh c. The causes of this kind of joy are in a manner infinite and diverse in divers persons yet all of them temporary at whose fading such faith also as is grounded on them flitteth and vanisheth Hypocrites rejoyce at the hearing of the Gospel Temporary faith is led in a string with the commodities of the world and with them doth live and die either because it is a new doctrine in their ears or because it seemeth to sooth and flatter their affections whilest it disburdeneth them of mens traditions as doth the doctrine of Christian liberty of justification c. or because they haunt a licentious custome of sinning or hunt after profits and commodities whether publike or private as riches honour glory c. which then appeareth when the crosse overtaketh them For then because they have no root they are parched and wasted with the heat thereof Thus hypocrites rejoyce they rejoyce not as true beleevers I mean on a sense and feeling of Gods grace working in them and on an application unto themselves of the blessings offered in the word which one thing only in the faithfull is the cause that they are rapt with exceeding true and perfect joy and the removing of this cause sufficeth to make faith temporary The difference of temporall and historicall faith This time serving faith differeth from historicall only in that joy which accompanieth it and not the other for the historicall faith hath a bare and naked knowledge only but temporary faith besides this knowledge rejoyceth therein for time-serving men receive the word with joy whereas divels beleeve historically and yet are hereon touched with no joy but rather tremble they I say joy not in that knowledge they have but wish it were quite extinguished Nay farther they professe not themselves to be followers of that doctrine though they know it to be true but horribly persecute and maliciously oppugne the same Notwithstanding in men historicall faith is sometimes coupled with profession and sometimes also severed from it for oftentimes men professe for I know not what causes that religion and truth which in heart they hate many also which are resolved and know assuredly the verity of Christian doctrine notwithstanding oppose themselves and set their faces against it and these are they which sin against the holy Ghost Object Yea but the
divell hath often professed Christ therefore he doth not oppugne this doctrine The divel professed Christ that for his testimonies sake he might be lesse beleeved Mark 1.25 Acts 16.18 Ans He did this not for any desire of promoting and advancing Christs doctrine but for the hatred he bare unto it that by his testimony he might cause it to be suspected and might mingle therewith his own errours and lies therefore Christ doth command him silence as Paul also doth in the Acts. The faith of miracles is an especiall gift of effecting some extraordinary worke or foretelling some certain event by divine revelation Or What the faith of working miracles is It is a certain perswasion springing from an especiall revelation and peculiar promise of God touching some miraculous effect which he would have done and foretelleth that it shall come to passe For this kinde of faith cannot be drawne simply out of the generall word of God unlesse some singular promise or revelation of God be annexed therewith Of this faith the Apostle saith If I have all faith so that I could remove mountains 1 Cor. 13.2 for although this speech be understood of all the kindes of faith excepting justifying faith yet it is especially referred to the faith of miracles That this faith is diverse from the other kindes is proved by these reasons 1. By that saying of Christ How it differeth from the rest Matt. 17.20 If ye have faith as much as is a graine of mustard seed yee shall say unto this mountain Remove hence to yonder place and it shall remove But many holy men who had a stable faith and both knew the word of God and rejoyced therein and applyed it unto themselves as Abraham David c. yet did not remove mountains Therefore this is a diverse kind of faith from that justifying faith which they had 2. Many Exorcists and the sons of Sceva in the Acts endeavoured to cast out divels Acts 19 1â whereas they had not the gift of it to wit speciall revelation from above and therefore it fell out ill with them the spirit of the possessed man invading disarming and wounding them Acts 8.13 3. Simon Magus is said to have beleeved and yet could hee not work miracles and therefore he would have bought and gotten this power with mony 4. The divell knoweth the story of the Scripture neither yet doth he work miracles because none besides the Creator is able to change the nature of things 5. Judas taught and wrought miracles as did the other Apostles therefore he had an historicall faith yea and perhaps a temporall faith and the faith of miracles yet had he not a justifying faith for hee is called of Christ a divell 6. Many shall say unto Christ John 6.70 Matth. 7.22 23. Lord Lord have not wee by thy name cast out divels but Christ will answer them I never knew you Wherefore the gift of working miracles is given to hypocrites also 7. The other kinds of faith extend to all things that are written in the word and therein proposed to be beleeved but this of miracles is appropriated and restrained to some certain works or extraordinary effects to come therefore it is a distinct kind of faith and different from the rest Justifying or saving faith is properly that which is defined in the Answer to the 21. Question of the Catechism What justifying faith is in which definition the generall or common nature is a knowledge and stedfast assent for of an unknown doctrine there is no faith and it behoveth every man to know the doctrine before he beleeve it 1. The materiall cause thereof whence the Papists implicite faith is refuted 2. The formall The difference or speciall nature is the confidence and applying which every particular man maketh to himselfe of free remission of sins by and through Christ The property and peculiar affection thereof is to rest and rejoyce in God for this so great good 3. The efficient The efficient cause is the holy Ghost The instrumentall cause is the Gospel 4. The instrumentall under which the use also of the Sacraments is comprehended The difference thereof from the rest The subject where it is seated is the will and heart of man Justifying or saving faith differeth from the other kinds of faith in that this onely is the certain confidence whereby we apply Christs merit unto our selves 1. In nature It is a confidence unmoveable and we apply it unto our selves when every one of us do certainly resolve that the righteousnesse or merit of Christ is also given and imputed to us that we may be esteemed just and righteous of God and also may be regenerated and glorified Confidence or trust is a motion of the heart or will following and pursuing some good thing and rejoycing and resting thereon for the words ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã and ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã which signifie beleefe and to beleeve come from ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã which is to be strongly perswaded Whence the word ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã to credit and beleeve even with profane authors is used in this sense to wax confident and to rest on any thing ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã 145. as wee read in Phocilides Credit not the Commons for the multitude is deceitfull And in Demosthenes Thou art confident on thy selfe or buildest too much on thine owne person Confidence is a motion of the heart because it is a following and pursuing of a good thing and a desire of retaining that good which a man already doth enjoy It is a rejoycing because it is glad of the present grace of God towards every of us of full deliverance from the guilt of sin and from sin it selfe in part and because by that which every one enjoyeth in present hee conceiveth hope of everlasting blessings to come as of everlasting life and full delivery from all evill both of crime and pain and therefore is free from the fear of future evill Matth. 25.29 1 Cor. 1.22 5.5 Ephes 1.13 To him that hath shall be given The holy Spirit given unto us is the earnest and pledge of our full redemption Again Justifying faith differeth from the rest in this also that this justifying faith is concerning all spirituall gifts and whatsoever belong to our salvation 2. In object It only concerneth spirituall things and is properly and simply or absolutely called faith in the Scripture and is proper also and peculiar to the elect and chosen The faith of miracles is a certain gift whereby we are not bettered which we may want without any hindrance to our salvation neither is it given to all the faithfull nor at all times Historicall faith is a part of the justifying and befalleth all the godly and hypocrites but is not sufficient alone to salvation because it applyeth not to it selfe those benefits which are made known unto it out of the word Temporary faith
wit as touching their accomplishment and consummation Some reconcile the difference of these two in this manner Faith apprehendeth the promises proposed in the Creed concerning things to come Hope the things themselves promised which are to come But this reconcilement is not so popular and easie to be conceived by the vulgar fort as is the other Object 2. Faith is the evidence of things which are not seen Therefore not of things present Answ It is the evidence of things which are not seen to wit by the outward sense but they are seen by the eyes of the mind even as if they did lie open to the eyes of the body Again they are not seen as is afore-shewed in respect of their accomplishment and consummation 5. What are the causes of faith How the H. Ghost is the principall efficient cause of faith Ephes 2.8 THe first and principall efficient cause of faith both historicall temporary and of working miracles is the holy Ghost howbeit hee is cause of these by his divine generall working only but he is cause of justifying faith by a speciall kinde of working By the grace of God ye are saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God who enlightneth the minde that it may understand the word and moveth the will that it may assent unto the word once understood Object The divell hath historicall faith It is therefore wrought in him by the holy Ghost Ans Yea even whatsoever faith is in the divell is wrought by the Spirit of God but that by a generall and universall working only as hath been said whereby he worketh in all not by a speciall and proper action because by such a kind of working the holy Ghost fashioneth and frameth a justifying faith in the elect alone For verily whatsoever knowledge and understanding is in divels and hypocrites God effecteth it by his Spirit but not so as to regenerate or justifie them that they might rightly acknowledge him to be the authour of this gift and magnifie him therefore for after this manner hee worketh faith in the elect alone The divels therefore and hypocrites have faith from the Spirit of God but the elect from the Spirit of God sanctifying them The word of God preached the instrumentall cause of faith Rom. 1.16 Rom 10 17. 1 Cor 4.15 The instrumentall cause of faith in generall is the whole word of God comprehended in the books of the old and new Testament in which writings also are contained many works and miracles of God besides the word But the chief and proper instrument of justifying faith is the preaching of the Gospel The Gosel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that beleeveth Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God This instrument doth the holy Ghost use yet not as necessary in regard of his working but arbitrary and at his own good pleasure both to stir up faith in us and to nourish strengthen and increase the same Wherefore ordinarily justifying faith is never engendered in those who are of yeers to receive it without the preaching of the Gospel Speciall revelation the cause of faith of miracles The formall cause of faith The object of faith The subject of faith The ends of faith The cause of that faith which worketh miracles is not simply the word of God but there must necessarily come thereto an especiall or immediate revelation from God The formall cause of justifying faith is a certain knowledge and confidence in Christ The object of it is whole Christ and his benefits promised in the word The subject or part of man wherein it remaineth is the understanding will and heart of man The end or finall cause 1. The glory of God to wit the celebration of his truth justice bounty mercy which hee hath shewed in the sending of his Son and in the giving of faith in him 2. Our salvation that wee may receive the blessings which are promised in the word 6. What are the effects of faith The effects of faith THe effects of justifying faith are 1. The justifying of us before God 2. Joy resting on God and peace of conscience Being justified by faith we have peace with God 3. Our whole conversion regeneration and all our obedience which followeth faith and beginneth at the same time with faith For by faith God purifieth our hearts Rom. 5.1 To the effects of faith appertaine also the consequents thereof that is increase of spirituall and corporall gifts and the receiving of the things themselves which faith aimeth at Acts 15.9 The first then and immediate effect of justifying faith is justification from this afterwards flow all other benefits purchased by the bloud of Christ which all we beleeve to be given us by faith faith it selfe being the cause of them for That which is the cause unto any cause of any effect is likewise a cause of that effect If thererefore faith be the next cause of our justification in respect of us it is also a cause of those things which necessarily follow justification Thy faith hath saved thee Luke 8.48 In a word The effects of faith are justification and regeneration which is begun here and is to be perfected in the life to come Rom. 3.28 10.10 Acts 13.39 7. Unto whom faith is given Justifying faith is given to all the elect and to them only Joh. 6.44 10.26 Matth. 13.11 Acts 13.48 Rom. 8.30 Ephes 2.8 Rom. 10.16 2 Thes 3.2 Mat. 7.22 JUstifying faith is only proper to the elect and that to all of them for it is given to the elect alone and to all the elect even to infants as concerning some inclination No man can come to mee except the Father which hath sent mee draw him Ye beleeve not for ye are not of my sheep It is given to you to know the secrets of heaven but unto them it is not given And they beleeved as many as were ordained to everlasting life Whom he predestinated them also he called and whom hee called them also hee justified Faith is the gift of God All have not hearkened to the Gospel For all men have not faith Temporary faith and the faith of miracles is given to those who are members of the visible Church only that is hypocrites Have wee not by thy Name done many great works Cast out divels But now neverthelesse this faith of miracles ceaseth which flourished in the primitive Church for that now the doctrine is sufficiently confirmed Historicall faith all they have who are by profession of the Church whether they be of the godly or reprobates yea and they also who are not members of the Church but enemies as divels and tyrants Historicall is a part of justifying faith because there can be no assent or perswasion of a thing which is not first known Object Historicall faith is a good work The divels have historicall faith Therefore they have good works Answ Historicall
the punishments of the wicked which they suffer besides the torments of conscience for the events of all times constrained men to confesse that their sins are punished with grievous punishments in this life and contrariwise the lot and end of the good to be more pleasant Wherefore there is a mind or understanding power which discerneth honest things from dishonest judge of mankind punishing the wicked and defending the good And that this may not be ascribed to the wisdom or severity of Magistrates or other men this withstandeth and hindreth 1. For that it must needs be that this naturall instinct whereby men judge that offenders are justly punished must proceed from some minde which is enemy to wickednesse 2. For that oftentimes by marvellous and unexpected and unlooked for means they are drawn to the justice and punishment of the Magistrates whose sins before had been privie or who seemed to have been able by their own power or subtilty easily to escape their hands and that especially for that many who through either the negligence or white-liverdnesse of Magistrates are not punished by them yet run into calamities and have allotted unto them ruefull ends And when transgressions and sins increase too much by their impunity whole nations and common-wealths with horrible and manifest examples of Gods wrath perish as the world in the deluge Sodom by fire cast from heaven Pharaoh in the red sea the Jewes and many flourishing kingdoms by most lamentable overthrowes That these things cannot come to passe by chance neither any other way then by the judgement and power of him who is Lord of mankind and nature both Gods comminations and threatnings and the conscience of every one and the order of justice whereby these follow and ensue upon impiety and the very hugenesse weight and greatnesse of things doth convince Wherefore it is said The righteous shall rejoyce when he seeth the vengeance Psal 58.9 10. he shall wash his foot-steps in the bloud of the ungodly Psalm 9.16 So that a man shall say Verily there is a reward for the righteous doubtlesse there is a God that judgeth the earth The Lord is known to execute judgement Now albeit the wicked flourish often for a while and the godly are oppressed yet neverthelesse examples which are fewer in number doe not weaken the generall rule unto which most events agree But if it were so that fewer of the wicked did suffer punishment yet those self same examples though but a few would testifie that God is and that he is displeased with the offences of others also who seem to be lesse punished But this is not true no not of any of them that they are not punished in this life for all those who are not before the end of this life converted to God if punishment do not sooner overtake them yet at length they die in despaire which punishment is more grievous then all the evils either corporall or spirituall and is the beginning and testimony of everlasting punishment Now in that this punishment is not sufficient it doth therein agree with all even the most tragicall cases of the wicked and therefore we are taught by the doctrine of the Church that Gods leâity which he doth not seldome use in this life towards the wicked and his severity which he seemeth to shew towards the godly doth not at all weaken his divine providence and justice but rather declareth his goodnesse whiles by deferring of punishment he inviteth the wicked to repentance and by exercising the godly with chastisements and crosses he perfecteth their salvation and also it confirmeth the certainty of judgment after this life wherein perfect satisfaction shall be made by the wicked to Gods justice Common-weales wisely ordered A body politick wisely ordered by good and wholesome laws could not be decyphered unto mens understanding but by some intelligent mind approving this kind of order and because the divell with the whole rabble and rout of wicked ones pursue with deadly hatred these societies with their discipline it must needs bee God that hath thus long protected and defended it Prov. 8.15 By me kings reigne and princes decreee justice Heroicall and noble instinct of minde Heroicall instincts that is wisdome and excellent vertue in undertaking and atchieving those works which surpasse the common capacity of mans nature such as is the felicity and happinesse of noble artificers and governours in searching or polishing arts and in finding out devices and counsels likewise the couragiousnesse of minde in performing the actions of vertue and in managing matters such as was in Achilles Alexander Archimedes Plato and others All these give evidence that there is some superiour cause which stirreth up these motions and inclinations Moses said of Joshua The Lord himselfe will goe before thee Deut. 31.8 Ezra 1.1 Jude 14.19 hee will be with thee The Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus The spirit of the Lord came upon him Certain and evident fore-tellings of events Certain and cleer significations of future events which neither by humane sight or perceivablenesse neither by naturall causes or signs could have been fore-known as the prophecies of the deluge of the posterity of Abraham of the coming of the Messias c. are necessarily known by his revelation alone who hath both mankind and the nature of all things so in his own power that nothing can be done but through his motion Now this is God only as himself alledgeth this as his work alone for proof of his divinity against all forged and fained gods Shew the things that are to come hereafter that wee may know that you are gods Isa 41.13 Ezek. 12.21 That thing which I have spoken shall be done saith the Lord. The ends of all things The ends and uses of things have not their being by chance or from a nature brutish and only endued with sense but from some nature which is wise and omnipotent which is God alone Now all things are most providently ordained to their ends and those also certaine The constant order of efficient causes The order of causes and effects is finite and it cannot be that the processe and race of efficient causes should be of an endlesse and infinite extent Wherefore there must be some first and principall cause which may either mediatly or immediatly produce and move the rest on which also other causes may depend for in every finite order there is some beginning and principall 2. Who and what God is We must acknowledge God to be such as himselfe hath manifested himself to be WHen it is demanded who is the true God wee are to hold most firmly and surely that he alone is the true God who even from the beginning of mankinde did not only manifest himselfe in the nature of things but by the steps and prints of his divinity shining therein but especially in the Church by his word delivered and other famous testimonies of miracles deliveries
and consolations whereby he plainly teacheth whom and what he will be acknowledged and published by us to be and that hee is not acknowledged or worshipped of any but of them who think according to his word both of him and his will neither is the true knowledge of him found elsewhere then in this word The certainty of this position is hereof most manifest for that all those who imagine God to be other in essence or nature or will then he hath testified himself to be in his own manifestations and revealings do not imbrace and worship at all the true God but another thing of their own framing in stead of the true God according to these sayings Ye worship that which ye know not wee worship that which wee know Joh. 4.22 5.23 for salvation is of the Jewes He that honoureth not the Son the same honoureth not the Father which hath sent him Galat. 4.8 But then when ye knew not God ye did service unto them which by nature are not gods Ye were at that time without Christ Ephes 4.12 and were aliens from from the common-wealth of Israel and were strangers from the covenant of promise and had no hope and were without God in the world Whom ye then ignorantly worship him shew I unto you Acts. 17.23 1 John 2 23. Whosoever denyeth the Son the same hath not the Father But against these things seemeth that to be which Paul saith Rom. 1.19 20. That that which may be known of God is manifest also in men estranged from Christian Religion for that God hath shewed it unto them For the invisible things of him that is his eternall power and God-head are seen by the Creation of the world being considered in his works to the intent that they should be without excuse And Acts 14.15 That God in former ages did not leave himselfe without witnesse and that out of the whole nature of things but chiefly by the minde of man and the difference of things honest and dishonest and by the punishments of the wicked it may in some measure be gathered not only that there is a God but also what he is and therefore many things are found to have been spoken truly by the heathen and others concerning the unity and nature of God But to these objections we answer that there are indeed some true things concerning God manifested otherwise also then by the word delivered to the Church but by them notwithstanding who is the true God cannot be shewed Two causes why tâeglimsle of nature is not sufficient to shew who is the true God and that for two causes For first Those things by themselves are not sufficient for to the knowing of the true God it is requisite that we know and professe not somethings only but all things which he openeth of himselfe and would have known Moreover These selfe same true testimonies of God also which remaine in mens mindes and in nature all they by reason of a naturall blindnesse in them and pravity doe many wayes corrupt who in weighing them follow not the light and interpretation thereof drawn from the word of God delivered to the Church when as even of these which might be known by the help of nature many things they do not know many they faine of their own which have nothing agreeing with the nature and will of God and those things which they doe retain and in shew of words professe they farre otherwise understand then they are proposed of God and declared in his word and in the Church understood and so beholding and sounding in their mouth true sentences and sayings concerning God conceive neverthelesse and foster false opinions of him in their mind This answer S. Paul himself expresseth when he addeth Rom. 1.20 21. That they are inexcusable because that when they knew God they glorified him not as God The âoâce of nature concerning God neither to be rejected no contemned other in âesned of sufficiency ãâã âââ-construing Now albiet Philosophicall wisdome cannot therefore shew who is the true God for that concerning the essence nature will and works of God so much as is necessary to be known it doth not teach and is diversly depraved by men so that out of the Church remaineth no true knowledge of God yet neverthelesse that voice of the nature of things concerning God ought not for these causes to be rejected as false or contemned as fruitlesse for neither is that straight wayes false in it selfe which is perversly construed of men neither fruitlesse for all things nor to all men which availeth the reprobate nothing at all to everlasting salvation For God will also out of the Church bridle the lewd and dissolute by the testimonies which their conscience and punishments give of his will anger and judgement and according to them will he have the life and manners of men ruled He will have mans corruption and his justice made more conspicuous and cleer in punishing them who stubbornly withstand the known truth He will by naturall testimonies mens consciences shewing the imperfection thereof have men stirred up to seek the true God in the Church as it is said that men were therefore placed in the theater of the world Acts 17.27 That they should seeke the Lord if so be they might have groved after him and found him Hereof fee Damâââen iââ ãâã orthâââid Basil âo 4. conââunom Rultice Diaconâ c. 3. ãâã Acephal ãâã thesâ cap 1. â ãâ¦ã a. cap. 5. ãâã Meâaââ 12. c. 7 ãâ¦ã somâââ Scipâoms He will also have them who are converted to him to be more confirmed by the consent of nature and the word as the often alledging of naturall testimonies in the Scriptures declareth Lastly hee will the imperfection of naturall knowledge being considered have mens ignorance concerning God acknowledged and his mercy magnified who discovereth and openeth himselfe in his word God cannot be defined 1. Because he is immense 2. Because his essence is unknown unto us yet some way he way be described according to the measure which himself hath revealed of himself and that so that the description of him shall comprehend such attributes or properties the persons and principall works of the Deity as by them the true God may with halfe an eye be discerned from idols The description of God according to Philosophy The description of God according to the âuâes of Divinity Philosophically he is described on this wise God is an eternall mind or intelligence sufficient in himselfe to all felicity most good and the cause of good in nature But Divinity hath taught the Church of God a more full and ample description of him which is in this sort God is a spirituall essence intelligent eternall infinite other from all the creatures incomprehensible most perfect in it selfe immutable and of an immense power wisdome and goodnesse just true chaste mercifull bountifull most free angry and wroth with sin which essence is the
eternall Father who from everlasting begot the Son according to his owne image and the Son who is the coeternall image of the Father and the holy Ghost proceeding from the Father and the Son even as it hath been manifested from above certaine word thereof being delivered by the Prophets Christ and the Apostles and by divine testimonies That the eternall Father together with the Son and the holy Ghost hath created heaven and earth and all creatures in them and is alwayes at hand with them to preserve guide and governe them by his providence and worketh all good things in all and that in mankinde made after his image hee hath chosen unto himselfe and gathered a Church by and for the Sonne that by his Church this one and true Deity may be according to the word delivered from above acknowledged celebrated and adored in this life and in the life to come and lastly that hee is the Judge of the just and unjust In what the former descriptions differ This Theologicall description of God which the Church delivereth differeth from the Philosophicall description 1 In perfectnesse because the Church in her description addeth many parts by nature unknown unto men as of the Trinity of Election and of the gathering together of the Church by the Son c. 2 In the understanding and declaration of those parts which being known by nature are common to both for the Theologicall description declareth them more certainly and fully 3 In the effect or fruit because by Philosophy or the light of nature men are not able to be brought to the true knowledge of God Two causes why men cannot by the light of nature attaine unto the true knowledge of God both 1. Because it is so maimed and false by mens corruption that we can suck thence no true and sufficient notice of God as also 2. Because when wee know every part parcel and particle thereof it doth not stirre up our minds unto godlinesse that is the love and fear of God The same Theologicall description teacheth us how the true God which the Church worshippeth differeth from the false counterfeit gods three wayes A threefold difference of the true God from false idols 1. In attributes or properties 2. In the persons 3. In the works whereby the persons are revealed for God hath declared himselfe by his works that his nature is such as his attributes import Moreover How in conceiving of the whole nature of God he that is instructed by the Spirit goeth beyond him whom nature informeth he sheweth that there are three distinct persons in one essence of the Deity sith according to the works either of Creation or Redemption or Sanctification hee receiveth diverse names and titles and every person hath his proper appellation God therefore differeth from idols In attributes Mercy In his attributes because they who are not of the Church understand aright and fully no one property of God they understand not what his mercy is because his Son is unknown unto them or at least the doctrine concerning him shamefully corrupted they conceive not what his justice is Justice because the impious and wicked ones beleeve not that God is so grievously offended and angry with sin that we stood in need of satisfaction for it and redemption from thence by the death of his Son neither what his wisdom is Wisdome because the chief part thereof is expounded in his word which the Gentiles have not neither what his truth is because they are utterly ignorant of his promises Truth The like may be truly averred of all the rest Contrariwise the Church attributeth and ascribeth to God all truth justice goodnesse mercy loving affection and kindnesse towards men which properties of God other Sects are either utterly ignorant of or having a glimpse of them they wholly corrupt and deface them God differeth from idols In persons In persons because Ethnicks and other Sects either know not or acknowledge not three persons in one divine essence But the true Church acknowledgeth and maketh invocation to the Father Son and holy Ghost one God consisting of three persons according as he hath manifested himself in his word In works In works because they which are without the Church do not wholly acknowledge or professe the works of Creation and the government of all things for they do not think all things to have been created of nothing by the word of God only they deny that all generally and each in particular even the least are administred powerfully by the omnipotency of God but ascribe very many to chance fortune and humane wisdome Much more are they altogether ignorant of the works of the Churches salvation namely the reconciliation of men with God justification sanctification and full delivery from all sin and misery by the Son and the holy Ghost So then by these means God is discerned from idols and the knowledge of God revealed to his Church in his word is distinguished from that which Ethnicks have derived from nature An Explication of the description of God delivered by the Church GOd is an essence That is a thing which 1. hath his being from none but from himselfe 2. is preserved or sustained of none but subsisteth by himselfe 3. is necessarily 4. is the only cause unto all other things of their being wherefore he is called Jehovah as if you would say being by himself and causing other things to be to wit according to his nature and promises Spirituall 1. Because he is incorporeall as being infinite and indivisible and most excellent 2. Insensible For 1. experience teacheth this 2. God is without sensible qualities which are the objects of the senses and 3. He is immense The eyes perceive onely things finite and which are within a certain compasse 4. He is spirituall because himself both liveth and is the authour of all life both corporall and spirituall Object 1. Against this opinion many places of Scripture have been heretofore by some alledged in which it is written That God and Angels did appear and were seen thereby to prove that their nature is corporeall and visible But wee are to know that not the very substance of God and Angels How God Angels appeared unto men but created shapes and bodies were beheld of men made carried and moved by the will and vertue of God or Angels that by them they might make known their presence and use their ministry and service in instructing men of those things which seemed good unto them And these were sometimes by imagination represented unto the interiour senses of men which also somewhere may and somewhere cannot be gathered out of the circumstances of the histories as the Angels appearing to Abrabam and Lot were invested with true bodies as which might be touched and handled whether Micha before Achab saw with the eyes of his body or of his mind the Lord and his Angels is a matter of doubt But that those
visible shapes were not the very substance of God is hereby manifest for that the Scripture with great consent reacheth that God is seen of no man neither can be seen and incomprehensible and unchangeable But those visible shapes were not alwayes the same Object 2. To these they add that which is said Gen. 32.30 Exâd 33.11 Deut 34.10 Deut 5.24 2. Cot. 13.13 How God is said ãâã seen face ãâã âace that God was seen of Jacob face to face and of Moses and of all the people and that all of us shall see God face to face in the life to come By which Metaphor or borrowed speech is signified a cleer and conspicuous manifestation and knowledge of God which is perceived not-with the eyes of the body but of the mind either by means as by the word by his works and outward tokens and such as run into the senses whence the minde may gather somewhat of God or without means by inward revelation And albeit in the life to come shall be a farte more bright knowledge of God then now yet to know God most perfectly is proper to God onely as it is said Not that any man hath seen the Father save he which is of God ãâã c. 46. hee hath seen the Father So far is it that the invisible infinite and everlasting Deity may ever be conceived by bodily eyes whose nature is not to perceive any objects but such as are finite and limited Object 3. They have alledged also those sayings wherein the parts of mans body are attributed to God But these also are not properly Hâw the parts of ãâã âodvaâe attriâââed unto God but by a Metaphor spoken of God whereby is signified to us a power in God working after an incomprehensible manner his works a certain shadow whereof are those actions which men doe by the ministery and help of their bodily parts as the eyes and ears signifie the wisdome of God whereby hee understandeth all things the mouth the publishing of his word the face the declaration tokens and feeling of his divine goodnesse and grace or severity and anger the heart his love the hands and armes his power the feet his presence Object 4. They have affirmed also because man was made according to the image of God that therefore God hath an humane shape The image of God in man doth not argue a bodily shape in God Ephes 4.24 Not marking that the image of God consisteth not in the shape and figure of the body but in the minde and integrity of nature in wisdome righteousnesse and true holinesse As for Tertullian whereas he reasoneth that God is a body that he speaketh improperly therein and abuseth the word body in stead of substance not only Augustine witnesseth in his Epistle to Quod vult Deus but this is also an argument and proof thereof because he termeth also the souls and Angels oftentimes bodies Wherefore let us know that therefore we are taught the nature of God to bee spirituall Why wee must know God to be spirituall that we may not conceive of God any thing which is grosse terrene carnall and unworthy his divine Majesty neither should deem that he can be perceived by our bodily senses or in thought imagined but should consider his nature by his word and works that wee should not dare to represent him by any bodily shape and in a word that wee should remember that he is to be worshipped not with the gestures or other things of the body but with the minde and spirituall motion of the heart Lastly seeing he alone inspireth into us temporall and everlasting life we should acknowledge the gift of both to come from him out of this fountain only we should seek it and endeavour to referre it wholly to his glory Two reasons why God is to be intelligent Intelligent 1. Because he is the cause both of the mind of man and of the notions shining in it and also of that order which is in the nature of things and Common-weals 2. Because all intelligence or understanding of the creature cometh from him both in respect of the faculty as also in respect of the operation For neither can the efficient and preserving cause of intelligent natures and of the understanding it selfe and order in nature be but intelligent and understanding And therefore the holy Scripture also reasoneth on this wise He that planted the ear shall he not hear Psal 94.9 or hee that made the eye shall he not see Now this wee are to hold against those who setting Nature in the place of God imagine the world and the variety and order of things in it to arise from the matter and the inclination thereof to this forme when as notwithstanding these things could not have their being from a cause not intelligent We are to hold it also thereby to acknowledge not only true knowledge it selfe but also all ability of understanding and the sagacity and capability of the senses and minde to perceive to be the gift of God Eternall That is such an eternity which can have neither beginning The eternity of God without beginning or end Psal 30.2 nor any end of being agreeth to God alone both nature sheweth forasmuch as hee is the first cause of all things and of infinite perfection and power and the Scripture also recounteth as Before the mountains were brought forth or ever the earth and the world were made thou art God from everlasting and world without end But we are to observe that not therefore only the eternity of God is so often inculcated in the Scriptures that in regard hereof hee may be discerned from things created but also Because hee will impart eternity unto us that is he hath purposed and promised that he will give us of his eternall goodnesse and providence eternall blessings and will have continuall care of us through all eternity and will have a kingdom in Angels and men whereof shall be no end Therefore we are given to understand God eternall unto us that God is eternall to us That we may oppose the certain hope of eternall blessednesse grounded upon his eternity against the shortnesse of mortall life and against the frailty of mans condition For seeing hee is eternall he can and seeing he promiseth he will for ever preserve us with his protection For this God is our God for ever and ever And Psal 48.11 Psal 111.9 He hath commanded his covenant for ever Wherefore being upheld with this consolation let us neither refuse to suffer the short misery of this life neither preferre the short felicity thereof before eternall blessings and seeing God will be not only bountifull towards the godly but judge also of the ungodly eternally let the cogitation of the eternall wrath of God keep and hold us in the fear of God that we may not desire to buy the fading shew of whatsoever good with eternall misery God other and diverse from all
and his will 8. And in this his Church towards his chosen Angels and men to whom by his Son he giveth life and glory everlasting And further whom he is angry with and on whom he inflicteth punishment he is not angry with their substance or nature which himself created but with that corruption which came by other means to his divine work Rom. 1.18 The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodlinesse Object No creature visible is subject to so many evils as man Therefore he is not bountifull towards men Answ He is subject to these evils by an accident that is because of sin but withall he is enriched above other creatures with great blessings even when hee is out of the Church but is most happy and blessed if he repent For what cause God is said to be most free Most free God also alone is most free because he alone by nature is such 1. That no fault or misery can fall upon him 2. Neither can he be constrained of any 3. Neither is he bound to any 4. Neither is he subject or tyed to the rule or lore of another Wherefore whatsoever he willeth and doth that hee willeth and doth himselfe most freely when as much and in what manner he will and what he will that is most good and just But here chiefly is considered the freedome of will or liberty from constraint which is the power and ability whereby God without any necessity hath from everlasting decreed the whole order of creation preservation and rule of all things and doth accomplish the same not being constrained or tyed to other causes yet so that he never swerveth from his rightnesse To this bear witnesse his miracles and many examples of deliveries and punishments and many places of Scripture as Whatsoever pleased the Lord that did hee in the heaven and earth Psal 135.6 in the sea and in all the depth It is not hard to the Lord to save with many or with few 1 Sam 14.6 Object 1. That without which second causes which worke necessarily cannot worke doth it selfe also work necessarily Without the first cause which is God second causes which necessarily worke cannot work Therefore the first cause also which is God worketh together with them necessarily Answ The Major is true of such causes as work with absolute necessity but it is false of such as work only of a conditionall necessity that is because it so pleased God who notwithstanding could move them otherwise or else at all not move them or not so much as make them that they should work and should worke after that manner which they do work Therefore all second causes depend on the first but not the first any way on the second Object 2. God is unchangeably good Therefore not freely good Ans This unchangeablenesse doth not diminish but establish the liberty of Gods will for it is not the unchangeablenesse of a nature but constraint and coaction which is contrary to liberty and so much the more freely the will chuseth with how much the greater and surer force and motion it is carried unto her object Object 3. It is said also of particular events that God can only will those things which are best But only those things which he hath decreed are best Therefore he cannot will other things But answer is made to the Minor What things God hath decreed those are best not before but after his decree for Gods will being the rule and square of rightnesse therefore are all things good because hee willeth them Wherefore if hee would have from everlasting had any other thing that then should have been best As that Joseph should be sold and made lord of Egypt and give sustenance to his fathers family was best because God would so Now if God would have any other way exercised Joseph and taken vengeance on his brethren that should then have been the best It followeth therefore that God willeth no other thing after he hath once decreed what he will have done but that hee was able from everlasting to have decreed some other thing for whatsoever he would that from everlasting he would most freely Object 4. Some places of Scripture seem to intimate that the will of God may be sometimes hindered by his creatures as I desire not the death of the wicked Ezek. 33.11 Mat. 23.37 How often would I have gathered thee and thou wouldest not Answ These and the like places only shew with what God is delighted and to what he inviteth and calleth all but not what by his mercy and Spirit he hath purposed to work in every one Wherefore this doctrine of the liberty and free will of God let us diligently maintain that both the glory of God may be vindicated from Stoicall blasphemies and in us faith hope invocating on God and sedulity and earnestnesse in performing our duty may be established if acknowledging God most freely to govern all his creatures we be neither secure in prosperity nor in adversity doe cast away hope and good endeavours The anger of God against sin Angry and wroth with sin Lastly in the description of Gods nature is put That he is angry and wroth with offences and sins which horrible anger and wrath of God whereby hee detesteth and punisheth all sins although all the wicked at length too late perceive and have experience of when they rush into eternall despaire yet such his displeasure and indignation as God will have to be knowne they cannot so much as conceive who are without the Church seeing they neither judge all those evils to be sins which God in his law threatneth hee will punish with everlasting torments neither know the death and punishment of the Son of God then which God could not shew a greater token and argument of his anger against sin The elect and chosen alone are throughly moved by a right and saving knowledge thereof gathered out of Gods punishments and threatnings to conversion and the fear of God But the greatnesse of it no man can fully conceive according as it is said Psal 90.11 Who knoweth the power of thy wrath An Admonition to the Reader CHristian and courteous Reader whereas in the conference of the two copies I found in the former a large Paraphrase delivered by Uâsinus on the description of God and in the latter a brief Abstract thereof collected by David Pareus I judged it meet to retain the Paraphrase for help of weaker understandings and to adjoyn the Abridgement for help of weaker memories If on this advertisement thou advisedly peruse both the one and the other I hope the fruit of both will be neither to thee nor me lost labour A briefe Epitome or Abridgement of the former large Explication of the description of God GOd is an essence That is a thing which hath his being from none but himself and is preserved and sustained of none but subsisteth by himselfe and is the only cause unto
Therefore the world not being created God not idle before the creating of the world but contemplating his owne wisdome Ephes 1.4 he was idle Ans The consequence of this argument is denied For God before the creation of the world did contemplate and behold from everlasting his owne wisdome hee begot the Son from him flowed the holy Ghost Hee chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world to everlasting life hee decreed to produce and create the world in time and provided and prepared hell for curious seekers and searchers into the hidden and secret counsels of God as Augustine prettily answered a certain African demanding of him what God did before the creating of the world He made hell saith he for curious men which rush and break into his secrets Object 2. They collect arguments also whereby to prove That the motion or mutation of things which now is hath been from everlasting Whatsoever can any way be moved or changed say they that either having been such from everlasting hath admitted no change or motion which were absurd and is also denyed of us or hath been made such by some generation and motion But there is no motion or change except there be something before which can be moved and changed Wherefore no motion of any thing can be brought which some other motion hath not gone before and so there shall be no beginning of changes and mutations Ans There is an untruth and an unsufficient enumeration in the Major for that they imagining that things could never be produced out of other but by generation take away from God the power of creating what he will even out of no matter pre-existent or being before Wherefore our answer is That motion goeth before a moveable thing which is generated Motion goeth before any movable thing which is generated but not before that which is created but not which is created Object 3. All motion before which was quietnesse or a ceasing of mutation hath another motion going before it whereby is removed the cause of that quietnesse or let of mutation But they say that according to our assertion there is put a quietnesse before the first motion that ever was in the nature of things Therefore there must be some motion or mutation whereby the cause of that quietnesse was taken away and so there shall be no mutation which may be said to be the first There went not any motion before the beginning of motion in nature but only the creting will of God Answ The Major is true of the mutation and entercourse of things now begun after the creation but not of the originall of those mutations and changes which wee now see in the world for the let and stay of them was in the will of God onely which is not taken away but being the same and standing immovable from everlasting to everlasting beginneth and effecteth the beginnings and ends and mutations or motions of things and also quietnesse or cessation and a continuance in the same state most freely and without any mutation or change of himselfe Seeing then this his divine will alone beginneth the motion and mutation of things without second causes as he did in the creation of the world it was not onely not necessary but not so much as possible by reason of the eternity and immutability of the divine will that there should be any other motion before the originall and beginning of the motions and mutations of nature For God will from everlasting to everlasting that all should then begin to have their moving mutation and being when this beginning was made There is therefore an ambiguity in the word quietnesse Two significations of the word quietnesse in Philosophy for wee grant the Major as concerning that quietnesse which signifieth a privation in the subject that is taken away by re-entry of motion but the Major is false if it mean such a quietnesse as is an absolute deniall of the being of motion this is taken away not by motion but by the will of God which alone without second causes and any motion beginneth motion Object 4. If time be eternall then motion is also eternall for time is the measure of motion whereby wee judge how long or short all motion is But time is eternall because every instant or point of time is the end of that time which went before and the beginning of that which followeth Therefore also motion is from everlasting Time as it is taken for the measure of motion is not eternall Answ The appellation of time here is ambiguous or doubtfull and therefore causeth a double answer For if time be taken onely for the measure of some motion the Major is true but if it be taken for the during of any thing the Major is false as it is manifest in the during of quietnesse which during also is time So also eternity is time without any mutation of the thing which is eternall So the Minor also is true as concerning duration but as concerning the measuring of motion it is false Neither is it furthered by the argument which is adjoyned concerning an instant For the first instant or moment wherein any motion beginneth may be also without any precedent motion for otherwise we should be fain to say that all even the shortest motions of all things were from everlasting And that instant is only the beginning or first point or indivisible moment wherein time by the will of God began to flow or multiply but it is not the end of any time fore-past So the first point in a line hath only line after it not also before it that is it is the beginning of the line not also the end Object 5. Whatsoever hath a beginning hath also an ending The celestiall bodies have no ending Therefore they had no beginning Answ The Major is to be distinguished Whatsoever hath a beginning naturally by motion or alteration of a pre-existen subject hath an ending also and is corrupted to wit naturally by motion Heaven is not corrupted naturally but by the power of God The celestiall bodies are not corrupted that is naturally for they have not a matter which is capable of another form Therefore they had no beginning that is by naturall motion For by order of nature corruption followeth the generation of one thing out of another Now although heaven is not corrupted naturally yet it is corruptible by the absolute power of God working without any motion for the omnipotency of the Creatour is able most freely either to preserve the same state or to change or to bring to nothing as well those things which he formeth out of other things as which he produceth out of nothing Object 6. God is eternall Lib. 1. de Coelo cap. 9. Heaven is the palace and seat of God Therefore heaven is eternall Ans It doth not follow for first there are four terms in this Syllogisme For God is one thing Two causes why
consequence or by supposition which is the immutability and unchangeablenesse of those effects which follow of causes which causes being supposed or put the effect must necessarily follow but the causes notwithstanding themselves might either not have been or might have been changed So are those things necessary which God hath decreed that they should be done in respect of the unchangeablenesse of his decree which decree yet God most freely made that is hee might from everlasting either not have decreed it at all or have decreed it otherwise according to those wordes Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father and hee will give mee moe than twelve legions of Angels Mat. 26.53 How then should the Scripture be fulfilled Likewise Those things are called necessary which are done indeed by such second causes as are so made of God that by their owne nature they cannot doe otherwise than they doe but yet may be by God himselfe either taken away or hindered or altered and changed As the Sun and the shadow going forward in consequence or order of nature with the Sun and yet consisting and standing still in that battell of Joshua and returning backwards in the daies of Ezechias the fire burning bodies within the reach thereof which are capable of burning and yet not burning the three Children in the furnace of Babylon or those things which are indeed in their own nature apt to produce a contrary or diverse thing or to forbeare producing of their effect and yet notwithstanding cannot doe otherwise because they are so moved by God or by other causes which although they be not changed yet might have been changed or when they worke so cannot withall not worke or worke otherwise because two contradictories cannot be both at one time true Fortune and Chance Fortune and Chance are sometimes taken for the events themselves or effects which follow causes that are causes but by an accident by reason of such causes as are causes by and in themselves but not knowne to us as when we say good or evill fortune happy or unhappy chance Sometimes they signifie the causes of such events either the manifest causes which are causes but by an accident as when any thing is said to be done by fortune or by chance or the hidden and unknown causes which are causes by and in themselves As it is said in the Poet Omnipotent fortune and fate inevitable And they are wont to call that fortune which is a cause by an accident in voluntary agents whose actions have some event that seldome happeneth besides their appointment As he that digging with purpose to build findeth treasure Chance they call an accidentall cause in naturall agents whose motions have effects neither proper to them neither alwaies happening and that without any manifest cause directing it as if a tyle falling from an house kill one that passeth by Fate or destiny The difference between the Stoickes the Churches doctrine concerning Gods providence By the name of Fate or Destiny sometimes is understood the decree and provideâce of God As that of the Poet Leave off to hope that the fates of the Gods are moved with entreaty But the Stoickes by this word understood the immutable connexion and knitting of all causes and effects depending of the nature of the causes themselves so that neither the second causes are able to work otherwise than they work neither the first causes can worke otherwise than doth the second and therefore all effects of all causes are absolutely necessary This opinion of the Stoickes because it spoyleth God of his liberty and omnipotency and abolisheth the order and manner of working in second causes disposed by Gods wisedome not only sounder Philosophy but the Church also rejecteth and condemneth and doth openly professe her dissenting from the Stoickes 1. Because the Stoickes tie God to second causes as if it should be necessary for him to work by them as their nature doth bear and suffer But the Church teacheth that God worketh not according to the rule or lore of second causes but second causes according to the prescript of God as being their chiefe and most free Governour and Lord and therefore are subject and tied to his will and pleasure 2. The Stoickes were of opinion that neither God nâr second causes can doe any thing of their own nature otherwise than they doe The Church affirmeth that not only second causes are made and ordained by God some to bring forth certain and definite effects some variable and contrary but God himself also could from everlasting either not have decreed or have decreed and wrought otherwise either by second causes or without them and by them either changeable in their own nature or unchangeable all things whose contrary are not repugnant to his nature and that he hath so decreed them and doth so work them not because he could not doe otherwise but because it so pleased him as it is said Our God is in heaven he doth whatsoever he will With God shall nothing be impossible that is which is not against his nature Psal 115.3 Luke 1.37 or whereby his nature is not overthrowne as it is said 2 Tim. 2. Out of this then which hath been spoken we answer unto the argument which was That which is done by the unchangeable decree of God is not done contingently but necessarily All things are done by the unchangeable decree of God nothing therefore is done contingently neither by fortune or chance but all necessarily First wee say there is more in the conclusion than in the premisses when the opinion of the Stoickes is objected to the Church For albeit the Church confesseth all events in respect of Gods providence to be necessary yet this necessity is not a Stoicall fate and destiny because the Church detendeth against the Stoickes both liberty in God governing things at his pleasure and a changeablenes in second causes and sheweth out of Gods word that God could both now doe and from everlasting have decreed many things which neither he doth nor hath decreed And therefore the Church also hath abstained from the name of fate lest any should suspect her to maintaine with the Stoickes an absolute necessity of all things Secondly necessity of consequence or supposition doth not take away contingency If removing Stoicisme yet notwithstanding the necessity of all things and the abolishing of contingency fortune and chance be objected wee make answer to the Major by distinguishing the words For those things which are done by the providence and decree of God are done indeed necessarily but by that necessity which is by supposition or of consequence not by simple necessity or absolute wherefore it followeth that all things come to passe not by simple and absolute necessity but by that of supposition or consequence And necessity of consequence doth not at all take away contingency The reason of this is Because the same effect may have causes whereof some may produce
him heire of all Hee hath made him heire of all things All that the Father giveth mee shall come to me Thine they were and thou gavest them mee Him hath God lift up with his right hand to be a Prince and Saviour to give repentance to Israel and forgivenesse of sins God hath made all things subject under his feet and hath appointed him over all things to be the head of the Church Now whereas he is our Lord after a far more excellent manner than others we also are far more bound to his allegeance and obedience For he is so our Lord that he doth indeed with us what he will and hath full right and power over us but yet he useth that his power to our salvation only For we receive daily of this Lord moe and by infinite parts more excellent benefits than doe any other throughout the whole world And therefore we ought alwaies to acknowledge the dominion and power TWO parts of our acknowledging Christs dominion over us which Christ hath over us Which acknowledging of his dominion is 1. A profession of so great a benefit of Christ as that he hath vouchsafed to be our Lord and to set free us his enemies into this so fruitfull and glorious a liberty 2. A confession of our bond and duty For Christ being so mercifull a Lord unto us we ought both in word and life to professe our selves as his servants to be bound to faithfull subjection and obedience unto him in all things that he may be magnified of us for ever What is then the meaning of this article I beleeve in Christ our Lord Ans Three divers speeches are here to be observed The meaning of the Article I beleeve in Christ our Lord. 1. To beleeve that Christ is Lord. To beleeve this is not sufficient for we beleeve also that the Divel is Lord but not of all or ours as we doe beleeve Christ to be Lord of us all 2. To beleeve that Christ is Lord and that of all and also ours Neither is it enough to beleeve this For the Divels beleeve also that Christ is their Lord as he hath full right and authority not only over all other things but over them also to determine of them whatsoever pleaseth him 3. To beleeve in Christ our Lord that is so to beleeve Christ to be our Lord that in him we place our trust and confidence and be throughly perswaded that by him we are wholly freed and delivered from all evill and are defended and safeguarded against all our enemies and this is it which we especially ought to beleeve When as therefore we say that we beleeve in our Lord we beleeve 1. That the Son of God Christ is Creatour of all things and therefore hath power over and is Lord of all creatures John 16.5 All things that the Father hath are mine 2. But especially of his Church which being purchased with his own bloud he guideth defendeth and preserveth by his spirit 3. And that I am also one of his subjects whom being redeemed from the power of the Diven he mightily preserveth ruleth maketh obedient unto him and at length enricheth with eternall glory that is I beleeve that hitherto I have been by and for Christ preserved and shall hereafter be preserved of him through all eternity and lastly that he useth and will use his dominion and power which he hath as over all other creatures so over mee unto my salvation and his own glory ON THE 14. SABBATH Quest 35. What beleevest thou when thou saiest He was conceived by the holy Ghost and born of the Virgin Mary Ans That the Son of God who is a John 5.20 Joh. 1.1 17.3 Rom. 1.3 Col. 1.15 and continueth true and everlasting God b Rom. 9.5 took the very nature of man of the flesh and bloud of the Virgin Mary c Gal. 4.4 Luk. 1.31 42 43. by the working of the holy Ghost d Matth. 1.20 Luke 1.35 that withall hee might be the true seed of David e Român 1.3 Psal 132.11 2 Sam. 7.12 Luke 1.32 Acts 2.30 like unto his brethren in all things f Philip. 2.7 Heb. 2.14 17. sin excepted g Heb. 4.15 The Explication The adversaries against whom this doctrine of Christs taking flesh of the Virgin is maintained THE Explication of this Question is very necessary for the convincement and suppression of ancient and late Heretickes who denyed and now deny that the flesh of Christ was taken out of the substance of the Virgin For the Eutychians argue thus Christ was conceived by the holy Ghost Therefore the flesh of Christ was produced out of the substance of the Divinity or out of the essence of the holy Ghost and by this means the divine nature was changed into the humane The particle by in the Article conceived c. implieth not a materiall but an efficient cause Ans The fallacy of this argument is drawn from an abuse of misconstruing of a common phrase of speech For the termes by the holy Ghost or of the holy Ghost doe not signifie unto us a materiall but an efficient cause so that the flesh of Christ proceedeth not out of the essence of the holy Ghost as out of the matter whereof it was made but the whole man Jesus Christ was conceived in the Virgins wombe by the vertue and working of the holy Ghost as appeareth out of the words of the Angel The holy Ghost shall come upon thee Luke 1.35 and the power of the most High shall over-shaddow thee Christ is called the seed of Abraham the sonne of David Therefore hee took his flesh of these Fathers not of the holy Ghost And as wee are born of God because he made us not that we are of his substance So Christ was conceived by the holy Ghost that is hee was conceived by the vertue and operation of the holy Ghost not that he was conceived of the substance of the holy Ghost Object If in this article He was conceived of the holy Ghost the particle Of imply not a materiall cause then in like sort the Article which followeth Born of the Virgin Mary the same particle Of cannot imply a materiall cause and so Christ cannot be said to have taken his flesh of the Virgin Ans The case is not alike in both of these but in this latter Article it must needs signifie a materiall cause The reason is because it was necessary that Christ should come of the seed of David But when it is said Three reasons why the particle ex signifying by or of though in the Article Born of c. it import a materiall cause yet it doth not so in the Article Conceived of c. Three things to be observed in the Conception He was conceived of the holy Ghost the particle Of intimateth no materiall cause The reasons are 1. Because if this were true it could not be true which followeth that Christ was
born of the Virgin Mary 2. Because God is not changeable and therefore the Deity is not changed into flesh 3. Because the Word took flesh and was not changed into flesh What then doth Christs conception of the holy Ghost signifie and import Three things thereby are signified The forming of Christs flesh Luke 1.35 That the masse of his humane nature was created or formed in the wombe of the Virgin miraculously and besides the order of things disposed of God in nature by the immediate working and operation of the holy Ghost without the seed and substance of man The power of the most High shall over-shadow thee Object But wee are also made of God Answ Wee are made of God mediately Christ immediately The sanctifying of Christs flesh That the holy Ghost did the same moment and by the same operation cleanse this masse and from the very point of the conception sanctifie it in the mothers wombe that is sith it became not the Word Foure causes of this sanctifying the Sonne of God to assume unto himselfe a nature polluted with sinne he therefore caused that originall sinne should not issue into it and that for these causes 1. That hee might be a pure sacrifice and a sufficient ransome for our redemption Hee hath made him to be sinne for us which knew no sinne 2 Cor. 5.11 that wee should be made the righteousnesse of God in him 2. That he might also sanctifie us by his sanctitie and holinesse For if Christ had been a sinner he could not have satisfied for us but himselfe should have remained in death Therefore could hee not have been our sanctifier neither by merit nor by his power and efficacy Heâ 2 11. 7 16. For hee that sanctifieth and they that are sanctified are all of one Such an High Priest it became us to have which is holy harmelesse undefiled separate from sinners 3. It was not agreeable unto the Word the eternall Sonne of God to unite personally unto him humane nature being stained and defiled wherein he dwelleth as in his own Temple For God is a consuming fire 4. That wee might know that whatsoever this Sonne speaketh Deut. 4 2â it is the will of God and the truth For Whatsoever is borne of flesh which is sinfull and not sanctified is flesh falshood and vanity Object But he was borne of a mother which was a sinner Why then should not Christ have sin Answ The holy Ghost doth best know how to sever sin from mans nature For sin is not the nature of man but came else-whence even from the Divel Mary therefore was a sinner but the Masse of flesh which was taken out of her substance was by the operation of the holy Ghost at the same instant sanctified when it was taken The uniting of his flesh to his God head The third thing which is sanctified in that Christ is said to be conceived by the holy Ghost is the union of the humane nature with the Word For the flesh of Christ was together both created or formed and also sanctified and united to the Son of the holy Ghost immediatly but of the Father and the Son by the Spirit The sense and meaning then of this Article Which was conceived by the holy Ghost is The full meaning of the Article conceived by the holy Ghost 1. That the holy Ghost was the immediate author of the miraculous conception of the flesh of Christ 2. That he separated all uncleannesse and contagion of originall sin from this conceived off-spring 3. That he united in the very moment of the conception the flesh with the Word in a personall union It is added further in the Creed that he was born of the Virgin Mary that is of the Virgins substance Five causes why Christ was born of the Virgin Mary namely that we might know him to âe and that chiefly for these causes True man That the truth of the humane nature assumed by the Son of God might hereby be signified unto us to wit that he was conceived by the power of the holy Ghost and born true man of the substance of Mary his Mother that is Though the flesh of Christ were miraculously conceived yet it was taken and born of the Virgin Tâââ seed of David That wee might know Christ our Mediatour to be the true seed of David that is to be true man and our brother who hath humane flesh made not of nothing neither else-whence but issued from the seed of David Isaac and Abraham of whom also the virgin Mary her selfe came yea of the very selfe same masse of Adam whereof both they and wee are The Messias That it may certainly appeare unto us that this Jesus born of the Virgin is that Messias promised unto the Fathers Behold a Virgin shall conceive Esay 7.14 Gen. 3.15 and beare a Sonne The seed of the woman shall break the head of the Serpent For it was fore-told by the Prophets that the Messias the Redeemer of mankinde should be borne of the stock of David and that by a miraculous conception and birth having a Virgin for his Mother Wherefore seeing both that is both the prophesies and the miracles are in this Jesus fulfilled there can be no doubt but that this is the Messias true man and true God the reconciler of God and man Without sin That this Christs birth of a Virgin might be a testimony that he is pure and without sin sanctified in the wombe of the Virgin by the vertue of the holy Ghost A signe of our new birth John 1.13 That wee might know the Analogie which is between Christs nativitie and the regeneration of the faithfull For Christs birth of the Virgin is a signe of our spirituall regeneration which is not of bloud nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but of God Quest 36. What profit takest thou by Christs holy conception and nativitie Ans That he is our Mediatour a He. 7.26 27. and doth cover with his innocency and perfect holinesse my sins in which I was conceived that they may not come in the sight of God b 1 Pet. 1.18 19. 1 Pet. 3.18 1 Cor. 1.30 Rom. 8.3 4. Esay 53.11 Psal 32.1 The Explication Two benefits of Christs conception and nativity TWO benefits wee reape from Christs conception and nativity Confirmation of faith A confirmation of our faith that hee is the true Mediatour Consolation A consolation that we through this Mediatour are justified before God The reason hereof is because he cannot be a Mediatour between God and men who is not himself man who is not righteous who is not united with the Word that is who is not by nature true God and true man and of sufficiency and ability to bestow on us his salvation purchased for us For such an High Priest it became us to have which is holy harmlesse underfiled separate from sinners
concurre unto one person because they being united doe make one person or one subsistent incommunicable not sustained in another or of another The Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost are not united in person or personall properties because they have these not the same but distinct By this which hath been said it is manifest that the Union in nature and naturall perfections is an equality of properties and nature but the personall union is when two unlike natures are coupled so that each retaineth his naturall properties and operations whole and distinct but yet have both one and the same subsistence wholly or it is the joyning of two natures different in properties to constitute the substance of one individuall or person that is such a connexion or knitting of them together as they are one individuall subsisting by it selfe or the substance of one individuall But that in Christ the Vnion of the flesh with the Word is not essentiall Why the union of the flesh with the Word cannot be essentiall made in the nature or any essentiall property of the God head is shewed by these reasons 1. Of the God-head and flesh assumed there ariseth not any third Essence but each is and abideth an Essence so perfect and whole as neither especially the Divine as being in it selfe a person and simply void of all change cometh into the composition or compounding as we properly take this word of the other 2. If the Union of the flesh with the word were essentiall it would follow that the humanity once assumed and taken was equalled with the God-head in essentiall properties so by a consequent to be made of the same nature and essence with the Word So Vigilius sheweth Lib 4. The ancient heresies into which they fall who maintaine an Essentiall Union that the Eutychians held two substances to be in Christ of the same nature Wherefore they who will have the essentiall properties of the God-head to be really communicated and common with the flesh so that the flesh should truly and really be and be called omnipotent omniscient and whatsoever else the God-head is they indeed howsoever in words they mightily stand against it hold this Union to be made in essential properties and in nature and both with Eutyches and Swenckfield they confound both natures and take away the difference between the creature and the Creatour and also with Nestorius they frame and make two persons and so bring in a quaternity For albeit they say that they in their confusion or as themselves call it with their Master Swenckfield deifying and majesticall exaltation of the flesh doe retaine the substance of the flesh yet two substances having really the same and like perfections are two subsistents or persons of one nature as are two men and whatsoever other individuals of the same kind or nature Lastly with Sabellius and the Patripassians they incarnate the whole Trinity For there is one and the same essence in number of the divine person and the same essentiall properties Wherefore that which is united and equalled with one of these three according to essence must needs be also united and equalled with the rest Wherefore the Union of both natures in Christ is personall or according to the subsistence proper unto the Word both natures keeping and retaining in that Union their properties whole and unconfounded For the Word did not by uniting humane nature unto it make the same God-head or God and omnipotent immense and infinite but it took the manhood which retaineth still the properties belonging unto it and so did joyn and knit it unto it selfe as to be one person with it and the substance of one Christ Neither is it absurd that a thing which neither is made or is one with another in kind neither any Homogeneall part thereof should yet exist in the same subsistence with it or should subsist in it self wherwith it is united For a graffe hath his subsisting in a tree of another nature or kind The same is the subsistence both of the sprig ingraffed of the tree sustaining the sprig that is they are one and the same individuall tree yet have they and so doe reaine natures in properties most diverse The like reason is there in the two natures of Christ both subsisting in or of the same person of the Son Object The humane nature is united with the Word in person but not in nature Therefore the person is divorced and sundered from the nature Againe The person onely of the Sonne is united with the humane nature Therefore not the divine nature it selfe of the Word Answ In both these arguments is a fallacy from that which is no cause as if it were a cause and both offend in this for that they who so reason against the maintainers of true doctrine and men sound in faith either know not or are not willing to distinguish between these two phrases of speech To be united in nature and to be united to or with a nature when notwithstanding the difference is very great and most familiar and knowne unto the Schoolemen For To be united in nature is to be equalled that is to be made one essence or nature with another To be united to or with a nature is to be coupled and joyned therewith to one subsistence or personality Wherefore the flesh is united to or with the Word not in nature or in essentiall properties that is it is not made with the Word one essence neither made equall unto it in omnipotency wisdome and nature for so should the whole Trinity be incarnate Yet it is united to the omnipotencie wisdome nature and essence of God not simply but of God the Word Now this is nothing else than the flesh to be united to the person of the Sonne or to the Word in person which person is the very divine nature or essence omnipotent wise and whatsoever else is proper to the God-head But albeit the flesh taken or assumed is truly united both to the person and to the nature of the Word For the person is not any severall thing or really differing from the essence but is the essence it selfe yet is it well said that the flesh is united to the Word in person onely and likewise that the person onely of the Word is incarnate The reasons hereof are 1. Because not the Father nor the holy Ghost were incarnate but the Sonne onely 2. Because the first and neerest terme of this union is the person only of the Word assuming and taking the flesh but not the God-head For the person onely is proper unto the Word the essence of the God-head is common to him and the same with the Father and the holy Ghost This is plainly taught by the sixth Toletan Councell Concil Tolet. 6. cap. 1. in these words in these words The Sonne onely took the humanity in singularity of person not in the unity of divine nature that is in that which is proper unto the
it is 1. The very union of the humanity with the Word in such sort as it being created and finite doth together with all the essentiall properties thereof subsist not in a created person of the same humane nature but in the increate and eternall person of God the Word by reason of which union God the Word but not the God-head is and is called truly man and contrary man but not the manhood is and is called truly eternall God No dignity and eminency can be imagined greater than this neither doth it agree to any but to the flesh of Christ only 2. It is the excellency of gifts For these Christs humanity received without measure that is all whatsoever and most great and most perfect that may fall into a created and finite nature 3. The office of the Mediatour to the performing whereof the united but yet distinct properties and operations of both natures doe necessarily concur 4. The honour and worship which by reason of the Mediatourship agreeth and is given to whole Christ according to both natures keeping still as was before said the difference of properties and operations in natures Now whatsoever testimonies some bring either out of the Scriptures or out of the Fathers which were sound in faith thereby to prove that their Eutychian transmutation and a third kind of communicating forged by themselves that is exequation or equalling of natures all those testimonies indeed belong either to the grace of union of the natures which is signified by the communicating of properties or to the grace of Christs headship which compriseth the office and honour of the Mediatour which are affirmed of whole Christ by way of communicating or to the habituall grace that is the created gifts which Christ received without measure which are properly affirmed of the flesh or humanity These gifts which are also called graces are not properly effects of the personall union as are the attributes or properties of the natures and office 1. Because they are communicated to the manhood as well of the Father and the holy Ghost as of the Word or Son For he is said to have received of the Father the spirit without measure that is abundantly likewise to be annointed with the holy Ghost And if the gifts were effects of the union it would follow of necessity that the flesh was united not to the Son onely but to the Father also and the holy Ghost 2. The union of the flesh with the Word was from the very moment of the conception alwayes most perfect But the consummation and perfection of gifts was not untill the accomplished time of his resurrection and ascension For he was indeed humble weake and contemned he was indeed ignorant of some things he did indeed increase in wisdome stature and in favour not with men onely but also with God himselfe 3. The flesh when it was in the state of humility had not immortality or a nature not subject to sufferings or the like and yet remained it alwayes united with the Word Wherefore the habituall gifts or graces of the humanity for which it is also in it selfe really wise mighty just holy follow not the personall union in respect of dependency as the effect followeth and dependeth of his cause but only in respect of order Because indeed the humane nature was first to subsist and be before it were inriched with gifts and it subsisted united to the Word in the very first moment of the conception But after what manner the humanity is united unto the Sonne of God hath been said before For by the speciall and miraculous working of the holy Ghost in the womb of the Virgin of her bloud was the flesh of Christ formed sanctified and united according to subsistence or personally unto the Word 4. Why it was necessary that the two natures should be united in the person or subsistence of the Sonne of God FOr what cause Christ our Mediatour was to be together both a true and perfect just man and true that is by nature man and withall true God hath been declared of us before in the Common-place of the Mediatour For the work of our Redemption could not have been compassed and finished by the Mediatour without the concurrence of divers natures and operations in the same person For albeit he suffered and died in the flesh yet his passion and suffering could not have that force and efficacy to redeem justifie and sanctifie us neither could Christ have applyed those benefits unto us except he had been withall true and naturall God Of the incarnation of the Word the confession made by the Fathers of Antioch against Paulus Samosatenus This confession in taken out of the Acts of the first Ephesââe Councell WE confesse our Lord Jesus Christ begotten before all worlds of his Father but in the last times borne according to the flesh of the Virgin by the holy Ghost subsisting in one person only made of the celestiall God-head and humane flesh Whole God and whole man Whole God also with his body but not according to his body God whole man also with his God-head but not according to his Godhead man Againe whole adorable also with his body but not according to his body adorable Whole adoring also with his God-head but not according to his God-head adoring who le increate also with his body but not according to his body increated Whole formed also with his God-head but not according to his God-head formed Whole consubstantiall with God also with his body but not according to his body consubstantiall as neither also according to his God-head he is co-essentiall with men but he is according to the flesh consubstantiall unto us existing also in his God-head For when we say he is according to the spirit consubstantiall with God we doe not say he is according to the spirit co-essentiall with men And contrarily when we affirme him to be according to the flesh consubstantiall with men we doe not affirme him to be according to the flesh consubstantiall with God For as according to the spirit he is not consubstantiall with us for according to this he is consubstantiall with God So on the other side he is not according to the flesh co-essentiall with God but according to this he is consubstantiall with us And as we pronounce these to be distinct and divers one from the other not to bring in a division of one undivided person but to note the distinction and unconfoundablenes of the natures and properties of the Word and the flesh so we affirme and worship those as united which make to the manner of the undivided union or composition Vigilius Lib. 4. against Eutyches IF there be one nature of the Word and flesh how then seeing the Word is every-where is not the flesh also found every-where For when it was in the earth it was not verily in heaven and now because it is in heaven it is not verily in the earth and insomuch it is not as
of all mankind to be laid upon him Hereof it was that he cried with a loud voyce My God my God why hast thou forsaken me as if he should say Why doest thou not drive and put away from me such torments Mat. 27.46 We see then what and how great things Christ hath suffered for us Quest But whereas the divine nature was united to the humane how could it be that the humane nature should be so broken and weakened that he should breake forth into such out cries especially seeing other Martyrs have been much more stout and courageous in their torments Why Christ was more weakened is his Passion than other Martyrs in theirs Ans The cause hereof was the diversity of the punishment which Christ indured from that which other Martyrs abide Saint Laurence lying on the grid-iron felt not Gods dreadfull wrath against his owne sins and the sins of mankind the whole punishment whereof was laid on the Sonne of God as Esay saith Christ was stricken and humbled for our iniquities Saint Laurence I say then felt not God angry and striking but reconciled and appeased with him gracious and favourable towards him neither sustained he as Christ sustained the horrours of death and hell but had great comfort in that he suffered for the confession of the Gospel and was assured of remission of his sins by and for the Son of God on whom God laid them as it is said Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away the sinnes of the world John 1.29 Hence is it that S. Laurence may seem to have bin more stout and courageous in his martyrdom than Christ in his Passion And hereof it was that the humane nature of Christ though united to the God-head did sweat bloud in the Garden brake into that out-cry My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Mat 27.46 not that there was any separation of the natures but because the humanity was for a time forsaken of the Divinity Lib. 3. adverl haetel Three differences betweene Christs Passion and mens sufferings in as much as the Word as Irenaeus speaketh was at quiet and assisted not nor delivered the afflicted man-hood untill a sufficient Passion was finished and fulfilled Christs Passion therefore differeth from the torments of other men 1. In the very forme for Christ felt the whole wrath of God both in his body and in his soule others not so 2. In the impulsive cause for Christ suffered not for his owne sins but for ours 3. In the end for Christs Passion is the ransome and onely propitiatory sacrifice for our sins the sufferings of other men are no ransome but either punishments or trials or witnessings of the truth Object 1. The order of Gods justice permitteth not that the innocent and righteous should suffer for the unrighteous For it is the point of justice to punish the guilty offendors But Christ was an innocent Therefore Christs Passion seemeth to overthrow Gods justice Ans The righteous may not suffer for the unrighteous unlesse these conditions concurre in his Passion 1. That of his own accord he offer himselfe to punishment 2. That he so voluntarily offer himselfe to punishment that he be able also to pay a sufficient ransome for the offendors whose punishment he undergoeth 3. That he be able to preserve himselfe from perishing therein and able to recover thence 4. That he effect in those for whom he satisfieth that they offend no more hereafter 5. That he be of the same nature which the offenders are for whom he satisfieth If such a satisfier be deputed Gods justice is no way impaired For thus both he that suffereth and they for whom he suffereth are saved Now Christ is such a satisfier For Christ both performed all the forenamed conditions and is not only a man of the same nature with us but we in a nigher degree of conjunction with him are his very members In regard whereof his punishment becometh our punishment and the Apostles every where teach that we all suffered and died in Christ For when the head is afflicted all the members suffer with it More of this argument shall be spoken hereafter in the Article of the remission of sinnes In a word these conditions must concurre to this that one should satisfie for another 1. This satisfaction must be sufficient 2. It must be voluntary 3. It must content him to whom it is due These all are found in Christs satisfaction Object 2. Betweene the satisfaction and the crime there must be some proportion But betweene one mans Passion and the sinnes of infinite numbers of men there is no proportion How then may the ransome of Christ alone answer for the sins of an infinite number of men Answ It may and that for these two causes 1. For the dignity of the person suffering because he is true God and a pure and unspotted man 2. For the grievousnesse of his punishment because he suffered that which we should have suffered for ever His passion therefore is equivalent to everlasting punishment yea it surpasseth it For that God should suffer is more then that all the creatures should perish everlastingly It was the strangest miracle that ever hapned that the Son of God should cry on the Crosse Mat. 27.46 My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Repl. God cannot die and suffer Christ suffered and died Therefore he is not God Answ God that is the person which is onely God cannot suffer or is impassible according to that whereby he is God But Christ is not onely God but man withall Or we may grant the whole reason For Christ was not God according to that wherein he suffered and died that is his humanity Repl. If Christ be not God according to that wherein he suffered then it is false which is said God hath purchased the Church with his owne bloud Answ This was spoken by a communicating of the properties but this was in the person not in the nature that is that person which is God and man purchased the Church by his bloud which he shed in his man-hood What the communicating of properties is The communicating of the properties is to attribute that to the whole person which is proper unto one nature and this is attributed in a concrete voyce not in an abstract because the concrete voyce signifieth the person in which are both natures and the property of that nature whereof something is affirmed But the abstract name signifieth the nature which is in the person but not the person And therefore it is that nothing hindereth why that which is proper to one nature may not be affirmed of the whole person so that property it selfe be in the person but contrariwise of the abstract name only the properties of that nature are affirmed unto which they properly belong As of the God-head which is the abstract name no property of the man-hood may be affirmed but only the properties of the God-head because
the God-head signifieth not the person which hath both names but only the divine nature it selfe But of God which is the concrete name the properties not of the God-head only but of the man-hood also may be affirmed because God signifieth not the divine nature but the person which hath both the divine nature and the humane Object 3. There is no proportion between temporall punishment and eternall Christ suffered onely temporall paines and punishments therefore he could not satisfie for eternall punishment Answ There is no proportion between temporall and eternall punishment if they be considered as being both in the same subject but in diverse subjects there may be The temporall punishment of the Son of God is of more value and worth than the eternall punishment of the whole world for divers causes heretofore alledged Object 4. If Christ satisfied perfectly for all then all must be saved But all are not saved Therefore he satisfied not perfectly for all Answ Christ satisfied for all men as concerning the application of his merit and satisfaction True it is that Christ fulfilled the Law two wayes 1. By his owne righteousnesse 2. By satisfying for our unrighteousnesse and both these he performed most perfectly But the satisfaction is made outs by our private application which is two-fold the former is wrought by God when he justifieth us for his Sons merit and causeth us to cease from sin the latter is effected by us through faith For we then apply unto our selves the merit of Christ when by a true faith we are perswaded that God remitteth our sins for his Sons sacrifice and satisfaction and without this application Christs satisfaction availeth us nothing Object 5. There were also propitiatory sacrifices in Moses Law Answ There were no sacrifices which might properly be termed expiatory but those that were were shadowes onely of Christs sacrifice which onely is propitiatory Hebr 10.4 1 John 1.7 1 John 2.2 For it is impossible that the bloud of Buls and Goates should take away sinnes The bloud of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sinne He is the propitiation for the sinnes of the whole world 2. Whether Christ suffered according to both natures CHrist suffered not according to both natures neither according to his God-head but according to his humane nature onely both in body and soule For his divine nature is immutable impassible immortall and very life it selfe which cannot die Now he so suffered according to his humanity that by his death and passion he made satisfaction for infinite sinnes of men And the divinity sustained and upheld the humanity in the griefes and paines thereof and raised it againe to life when it had been dead Christ was put to death concerning the flesh but was quickned in the spirit 1 Pet. 3.18 4.2 John 2.19 Rev. 1.18 John 10.18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sinnes the just for the unjust that he might bring us unto God Destroy this Temple and I will raise it up againe in three dayes I was dead and loe I am alive I have power to lay downe my life and to take it up againe These testimonies prove that there was another nature in Christ besides his flesh which other nature neither suffered nor died Irenaeus saith As Christ was man that so he might be tempted Lib. 3. cont hares so he was the Word that so he might be glorified The Word indeed and Deity so resting in him that he might be tempted crucified and suffer death and yet united to his humanity that so he might overcome temptation death c. Object God purchased the Church with his owne bloud therefore the God-head suffered Ans It doth not follow Acts 20.28 because an argument from the concrete which is God to the abstract which is the God head is of no consequence Againe the kind of affirmation is altered God is said to have dyed by a figurative speech which is Synecdoche use when we signifie the whole by a part as whole Christ by God and by a communicating of the properties But when it is said The God head died this affirmation admitteth no figure seeing the subject in it is a meer abstract The concrete signifieth the subject or person having the nature or forme but the abstract signifieth the bare nature and forme onely Wherefore as the argument doth not follow A man is compounded of the clements and is corporeall Therefore his soule also is corporeall this cannot follow because all things agree not to the forme which agree to the subject the soule is the forme of man man is the essentiall subject of the soule So neither doth it follow Christ-God died therefore Christs God-head died For from the concrete to the abstract the reason doth not follow 3. The causes impellent or motives of Christs Passion John 3.16 1. THE love of God towards mankind So God loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son 2. The mercy of God towards man fallen into sin Of his mercy he saved us Titus 3.5 3. The will of God to revenge the injury of the Devill who in reproach and despight of God averted us from him and maimed the image of God in us in despight of the Creatour 4. The finall causes or ends of the Passion THE finall causes and fruits of Christs Passion are all one save that they differ in divers respects For in respect of Christ who suffered they are termed finall causes in respect of us they are called fruits The finall causes or ends of his Passion are 1. The manifesting of the love goodnesse mercy righteousnesse of God while he punisheth his Sonne for us 2. That his Passion might be a sufficient ransome of our sins or the redeeming of us The chiefe finall causes then are The glory of God and our salvation To the former finall cause belongeth the knowledge of the greatnesse of sinne that we may know how great an evill sinne is and what it deserveth To the latter belongeth our justification wherein all the benefits are comprehended which Christ merited by dying and by his freeing himselfe from death Hence know we that death is not now pernicious and hurtfull to the godly and therefore not to be feared Quest 38. For what cause should he suffer under Pilate as being his Judge Answ That he being innocent and condemned before a civill Judge a John 18.38 Mat. 27.24 Luk. 23.14 15. John 19.4 might deliver us from the severe judgement of God which remained for all men b Psal 69 5. Esay 53.45 2 Cor. 5.21 Gal. 3.13 The Explication MEntion is made of Pilate in Christs Passion 1. Because Christ did receive from him a testimony of his innocency that thereby we might know that he was pronounced innocent by the voyce of the Judge himself 2. That we might know that he though innocent was notwithstanding solemnely condemned 3. That we might be advertised of the fulfilling of the prophecy Eâck â1 27 I will over-turne
reason of the latter is because all the elect and faithfull and they alone doe by faith apply unto themselves the merit of Christs death and by his application obtaine the efficacy thereof even their justification and salvation according to that saying of Scripture He which beleeveth in the Son hath life everlasting The rest are excluded from this efficacy of Christs death by their own infidelity according as it followeth in the same place He which beleeveth not shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him Wherefore John 3.36 whom the Scripture cancelleth from the participation of the efficacy of Christs death for them Christ cannot be said to have died with respect of the efficacy of his death but in respect only of the sufficiency of his sacrifice because the death of Christ is sufficient to save them if they beleeved but it saveth them not because they beleeve not If any demand what the will of Christ herein was whether he had a will to die for all hee is answered by the same distinction For as hee died so would hee die Whether Christ would die for all men As therefore he died for all in respect of the sufficiency of his ransome but for the faithfull alone in regard of the efficacy of the same so would hee also die for all in generall as concerning the sufficiency of his merit that is hee would in most sufficient maner demerit for all by his death grace righteousnesse and life everlasting seeing he would that nothing should be wanting on his part that there should be no defect in his merit that so all the wicked and reprobate might perish without excuse But for the elect alone hee would die as touching the efficacy of his merit that is hee would not only sufficiently merit grace and salvation but also effectually impart them on the elect alone namely hee would give unto them faith and the holy Ghost and accomplish or effect in them that they should apply unto themselves by faith the benefits of his death and so obtain the fruits thereof In this sense Christ is well said to have died in a different maner for the faithfull and unfaithfull Neither hath this interpretation any inconvenience consequent thereon but accordeth not only with Scripture but even with very experience also both which testifie unto us that the salve of sin and death is most sufficiently and plentifully offered in the Gospel unto all but it is applyed and it cureth the faithfull alone The whole current of Scripture restraineth the efficacy of redemption to some particulars only as to Christs sheep to the elect and to the beleeving whereas on the other side it apparently abandoneth and sequestreth from the grace of Christ the reprobate and unfaithfull as long as they remain such What concord hath Christ with Belial or what part hath the beleever with the infidell Again 2 Cor. 6.15 Christ prayed for the Elect only and beleeving and such as hereafter should beleeve on him I pray not for the world but for those whom thou hast given mee If Christ would not pray for the world to wit for the unfaithfull much lesse would he so die for them John 27.9 as by his death to effect their salvation For it is a lesse thing to pray for a man than to die for him and intercession and suffering of death are the two individuall or inseparable parts of Christs sacrifice of which if Christ deny the ungodly the one who is he that dareth reach out unto them the other Lastly the sounder Fathers and Schoole-men doe thus restraine these texts of Scriptures The opinion of Fathers herein Aug ad cap. ob cap. 1 in Ioh. tract 52. serm 137. de temp Cyr. in Ioh. lib. 11 cap. 19. Prospâr ad cap. Gallorum Lumb lib. 3. dist 22 Sum. de veâit Mat. 26. Quaft 7. and distinguish on them as we doe especially Augustine Cyril and Prosper Lombard thus writeth Christ offered up himself to God the Trinity for all men as touching the sufficiency of the price pay'd but for the elect alone as touching the efficacy because he wrought salvation only for the Predestinate Thomas saith The merit of Christ as concerning the sufficiency thereof equally belongeth unto all but not concerning the efficacy which hapneth partly by reason of free-will and partly by reason of Gods election whereby the effects and fruits of Christs merits are mercifully bestowed on some and by the just judgement of God are with-held from others This is the language of other School-men also Whence it is evident that Christ so died for all that notwithstanding the benefits of his death properly concern the faithfull alone to whom only they are availeable Object 1. The promise of the Gospel is universall as appeareth in that Christ saith Come unto mee all And againe That every man might be saved Also That hee might have mercy on all Therefore it concerneth not the faithfull alone Ans The promise indeed is universall but in regard of the faithfull and penitent For to extend it unto filthy dogs and hogs that is to the reprobate were open blasphemy There is saith Ambrose a certain speciall university of the elect and fore-knowne of God severed and discerned from the generality of all This manner of restraint is deduced out of the very letter of the promise John 3.16 Rom. 322. That every one which beleeveth should not perish but have everlasting life The righteousnesse of God by the faith of Christ Jesus unto all and upon all that beleeve Come unto mee all yee which labour and travell and I will refresh you Hee is rich unto all that call upon him Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved Mat. 11.28 Acts 2.21 Heb. 5.9 Mat. 7.6 Hee is made the authour of salvation unto all that obey him And out of the words of Christ Give not that which is holy unto dogs and cast not pearles before swine Obj. 2. Christ died for all Therefore his death appertaineth not to the faithfull only Answ Christ died for all as touching the merit and sufficiency of his ransom for the faithfull only as touching the application and efficacy thereof For inasmuch as the death of Christ is imparted unto them and profiteth them only it is rightly said to appertain properly unto them alone as before hath bin proved at large Quest 41. To what end was he buried also Ans That thereby he might make manifest that he was dead indeed a Act. 13.29 Mat. 27.59 60 Luk. 23.52 The Explication THE causes of Christs buriall are many For 1. He would be buried in testimony of his true death that we might know that hee was dead indeed For the living are not buried but the dead only As then after his resurrection hee offered himselfe to be seen handled c. for evident proof of the truth of his body raised from death so after his death he offered his body to be
a benefit Christ is made unto us righteousnesse wisdome sanctification and redemption Ye are compleat in him 1 Cor. 1.30 Col. 2.9 which is the head of all principality c. The death of Christ is the impellent or motive cause in effectuating as well our justification as our regeneration in two respects 1. In respect of God because for the death of Christ God pardoneth us our sins and giveth us the holy Ghost and restoreth in us his image Being justified in his bloud Rom. 5.9 10 Gal. 4.6 Being reconciled to God through the death of his Son Because ye are sonnes God hath sent forth the spirit of his Sonne into your hearts which cryeth Abba Father 2. In respect of us also it is an impellent cause because they who apprehend Christs merit by a true faith and apply his death unto themselves for them it is impossible to be unthankfull or not indeavour to live to the praise and honour of his name which is to begin newnesse of life The application of Christs death and the consideration thereof will not suffer us to be ungratefull but forceth us to love Christ again and prove therein our thankfulnesse for so inestimable a benefit No man therfore may imagine any remission of sins without regeneration and he lieth unto himselfe and the world who boasteth of Christs death applied to himself yet hath no desire to live godly and holily to the honor of Christ For all after they are once justified prepare and addresse themselves to doe those things which are gratefull unto God For regeneration or the desire and endeavouring of obeying God cannot be separated from the applying of his death unto us nor the benefit of regeneration from the benefit of justification All who are justified are also regenerated and sanctified and all who are regenerate are also justified Object The Apostle attributeth our regeneration to Christs resurrection why then is regeneration here attributed to his death 1 Pet. 1.3 Answ It is attributed unto Christs death as touching his merit for he merited regeneration for us by dying And it is attributed to Christs resurrection in respect of the applying of it for by rising from the dead hee applyeth unto us regeneration and giveth us the holy Ghost Eternall life Eternall life is also the fruit of Christs death God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but have everlasting life John 3.16 1 John 5.12 God hath given unto us eternall life and this life is in his Son The meaning of the Article I beleeve in Christ dead Now what is it To beleeve in Christ dead Ans It is to beleeve that Christ hath not only suffered extreme torments for my sake but also death it selfe and hath by his death obtained for mee remission of sins and reconciliation with God and consequently also the holy Ghost who beginneth in me a new life that I may again be made the Temple of God and at length attain unto everlasting life wherein I shall worship and magnifie God for ever Quest 44. Why is there added He descended into hell Ans That in my greatest paines and most grievous tentations I may support my selfe with the comfort that my Lord Jesus Christ hath delivered me by the unspeakable distresses torments and terrours of his soule into which hee was plunged both before a Psal 18.5 6. 116.3 Mat. 26.36 27.46 Heb. 5.7 and then especially when he hanged on the Crosse from the straits and torments of hell b Esay 53.5 The Explication Two things are here to be handled 1. The true sense and meaning of this Article 2. The use 1. What the true sense of this Article is or what the descent of Christ into Hell signifieth HEll in Scripture is taken three waies For it signifieth 1. The Grave Three significations of hell in Scripture Then yee shall bring my gray-head with sorrow unto hell Thou wile not leave my soule in hell neither wilt thou suffer thine holy One to see corruption 2. The place of the damned as in the story of the rich man and Lazarus The Glutton being in hell in torments Gen. 42.38 Psal 16.10 lift up his eyes and saw Abraham a farre off and Lazarus in his bosome If I lye downe in hell thou art there 3. The paines of hell that is the terrours and torments of the soule and conscience The paines of hell gate hold upon mee Luke 16.23 Psal 139.8 The Lord bringeth downe to hell and raiseth up that is into exceeding paines and torments out of which afterwards he againe delivereth Psal 116.3 In this third sense it is taken in this Article For it cannot be understood in the first sense of the Grave 1. Because it is said before Hee was buried If any say Why he I is not here taken for the grave that this latter Article is an exposition of the former he saith nothing For as often as two speeches expressing the same thing are joyned together so that the one is an exposition of the other it is meet that the latter be more cleere and open than the former which here is cleane contrary For. To descend into hell is more obscure than to be buried 2. It is not likely in this so brief and succinct a Confession that the same things should be twice spoken in other words Neither can this place be understood of the place of the damned Why hell is not here taken for the place of the damned as is proved by this division 1. If Christ did locally descend into Hell he descended either as touching his God-head or as touching his soule or as touching his body Not as touching his God-head For this is every-where Nor as touching his body For that rested in the grave three dayes as was prefigured by Jonas the type of Christ Because no part of Christ could be in hell neither rose it from any other place but from the grave Nor us touching his soule 1. Because Scripture no where expresseth and mentioneth it 2. Because Christ dying on the Crosse Luke 23.46 23 4â Christs soule descended not locally said of his soule Father into thy hands I commend my spirit And to the Theefe This day shalt thou be with mee in Paradise Therefore the soule of Christ after his death was in the hand of his Father in Paradise not in Hell And that cavill little steadeth the Adversaries of this doctrine that hee might be also in the hand of his Fatheâ that is in his Fathers protection even in Hell according to that Psal 139.8 If I lye downe in Hell thou art there that is there also will God have care of me and there also will he keep me that I perish not for one place interpreteth another And he had said before unto the Thief This day shalt thou be with me in Paradise Luke 23.43 that is in
locall true and visible translation and removing of Christs body into that heaven which is above all visible heavens to that light which is not to be come unto to the right hand of God where he now is and remaineth and whence he shall returne to judgement What Christâ alcension is In this Article as in the former touching the Resurrection two things are to be considered the history and the fruit In the history these circumstances are to be examined 1. Who ascended The same Christ which suffered and died 2. According to what part of him According to his humane nature 3. Whither Up into heaven above these visible heavens 4. By what meanes By the power alone of his owne God-head 5. To what end Even to be our head and heavenly Bishop 6. In what manner Visibly his Disciples beholding him by a true and locall elevation of his body out of earth into heaven 7. When The fortieth day after his Resurrection 8. Where In Bethany at the mount of Olives Of the fruits we shall have fit occasion to intreat in the forty and ninth Question of the Catechisme But all these nine Questions even now proposed may be reduced unto these five immediatly following 1. Whither or to what place Christ ascended 2. How he ascended 3. Wherefore he ascended 4. What is the difference betweene Christs ascension and ours 5. What are the fruits of Christs ascension 1. Whither Christ ascended JEsus Christ-man when he was together with his Disciples in Bethania forty dayes after his resurrection after he had often proved and confirmed his resurrection his true flesh and humanity to his Apostles ascended in their sight into heaven Heaven in Scripture signifieth 1. The aire Behold the fowles of the heaven 2. The skiey region and celestiall Spheres When I behold thine heavens What heaven signifieth Mat. 6.26 Psal 8.4 Ephes 4 10. the works of thy fingers He ascended farre above all heavens namely these visible heavens 3. The place of the blessed which is that space immense most lightsome glorious without and above the whole world and the visible heavens where God sheweth himselfe to the blessed Angels and men where is prepared the seat of our blisse with Christ and the Angels God is said to dwell there not that he is contained or circumscribed in any place but because there doth his glory especially appeare unto the blessed Angels and men It is called in Scripture the new world the new heaven the heavenly Jerulem Paradise the bosome of Abraham This heaven is not everywhere but above separate from earth and hell Betweene you and us there is a great gulfe set Luke 16.25 so that they which would go from hence to you cannot neither can they come from thence to us Heaven is my seat and earth is my foot-stoole In this third signification is heaven here taken Esay 66.1 Christ then ascended into heaven that is Acts 2.21 was carried up into the place of the blessed The holy Ghost came from heaven in the day of Pentecost 2 Kings 2.11 2 Cor. 12. 2. Elias was taken up into heaven Paul calleth it the third heaven Into this heaven namely into the place of the blessed Christ ascended and now is there and shall thence come againe to judgement as many most evident places of Scripture testifie unto us which that Divell the subtle Sophist and deceiver shall never be able to wrest or elude While they beheld he was taken up for a cloud took him up out of their sight Acts 1.9 10 11. And while they looked stedfast towards heaven as he went behold two men stood by them in white apparell Which also said Ye men of Galilee why stand yee gazing into heaven John 14.2 This Jesus which is taken up from you into heaven shall so come as yee have seene him go into heaven In my Fathers house are many dwelling places that is many houses in which we may dwell and remaine I go to prepare a place for you He was taken up into heaven Luke 24 5â Markâ 16.19 Acts 7.56 He was taken up I see the heavens open and the Sonne of man standing at the right hand of God He saw with his bodily eyes indued from above with a new seeing force and sharpnesse beyond and through all the visible heavens Christ in the same humane nature Colos 3.1 Ephes 4.10 in which he had been annihilated and humbled Seek those things which are above where Christ sitteth at the right hand of God He ascended farre above all heavens He is extred into heaven Heb 4.14 7.26 9â4 Phil. 3.20 Made higher than the heavens He is entered into very heaven to appeare now in the sight of God for us Our conversation is in heaven from whence also we look for the Saviour even the Lord Jesus Christ Object But we converse on earth Therefore heaven is in the earth Answ Our conversation is in heaven 1. In respect of the hope and certainty we have thereof 2. In respect of the inchoation or beginning which we have here of that heavenly life which is to be consummated in the world to come In this heaven that is in the house of God and all the blessed Christ ascended God would therefore have us to know the place whereinto Christ ascended 1. That it might be apparent that Christ is true Man and that he vanished not away but doth continue Three causes why the place whither Christ ascended is made known unto us and shall continue for ever true Man 2. That we might know whither our cogitations were to be converted and where we ought to invocate and call upon him that so Idolatry might be avoided 3. That we might know our dwelling place into which Christ will bring us and in which we shall converse and dwell with Christ 2. How Christ ascended into heaven CHrist ascended into heaven first not simply but in respect of his humane nature onely In respect of his humane nature only and that the very same which was borne of the Virgin dead buried and which rose againe Object 1. He that ever is in heauen did not ascend into heaven for then he should have beene sometime out of heaven But the Son of Man was ever in heaven Therefore he is not ascended Answ He that ever was in heaven as touching that whereby he was ever there that is his Divinity did not ascend and so we grant Christ according to his Divinity not to have ascended for that was before in heaven and as when Christ was on earth the same did not therefore leave heaven so when he is now in heaven his Divinity doth not therefore depart from us Cyprian saith The Lord ascended into heaven not where the Word of God before was not sith he was alwayes in heaven abiding in the Father but the Lord ascended thither where the Word being made flesh sate not before Object 2. That which descended did also ascend His
speake and give sentence and that in his humane nature And when hee speaketh God shall speake and when he judgeth God shall judge not only because he himself is God but because the Father shall speak and judge by him The judgement then shall belong unto all the three persons of the God-head as concerning their consent and authority but unto Christ as touching the publishing and executing of the judgement For Christ shall visibly give sentence of all The Son by visible pronouncing of sentence The Church by approbation Luke 21.30 Foure causes why Christ-man shall judge the world which sentence he shall also together execute The Church also shall judge as touching the approbation and allowing of his judgement as Christ saith that the Apostles shall sit on twelve seats and shall judge the twelve tribes of Israel that is that they shall subscribe unto Christs judgement and shall approve his sentence Furthermore the causes why Jesus Christ man shall be Judge are these 1. Because he must judge men therefore he must be beheld of men as a Judge But God is invisible 2. Because God will have the Church glorified by the same Mediatour by whom and for whom it was justified God will judge the world in righteousnesse Acts 17.31 Mat. 24.30 John 5.27 by that man whom hee hath appointed They shall see the Sonne of Man come in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory The Father hath given power to the Sonne to execute judgement in that hee is the Sonne of Man 3. That wee may have this comfort to wit that this Judge whereas he is our Redeemer Heb. 2.11 Ephes 5.30 Brother and Head will be gracious unto us and will not condemne those whom he hath redeemed and purchased with his bloud nay whom he hath vouchsafed to make his brethren and members These are the three things then which comfort us 1. The person of the Judge for he is our brother and our flesh 2. The promise of the Judge for he hath promised and said He that beleeveth in the Sonne John 3.36 and 5.24 hath eternall life Verily verily I say unto you he that heareth my word and beleeveth in him that sent mee hath everlasting life and shall not come into condemnation but hath passed from death unto life 3. The finall cause or end of his coming to judgement For he shall come to set his Church at liberty and to cast the wicked into eternall destruction 4. The fourth cause why Christ-man shall be Judge is the justice of God Because the world hath contumeliously dealt with Christ refusing his benefits Zach. 12.10 John 19.37 therefore They shall looke on him whom they have pierced that hee may the more confound his wicked enemies who shall be forced to behold him their Judge John 12.47 and 3.17 whom they have so much withstood Object Christ saith that he came not to judge or condemne the world How then should hee be our judge Answ Christ in these places speaketh of his first coming which was not to judge the world but to save it but at his second coming hee shall come to be the Judge of the quick and the dead 4. Whence and whither Christ shall come WE look for our judge Christ from heaven For whither the Apostle saw him ascend from thence shall he come 1 Thess 1.7 Mat. 26.64 Phil. 3.10 The Lord Jesus shall shew himself from heaven with his mighty Angels Hereafter shall yee see the Sonne of man sitting at the right hand of the power of God and come in the clouds of the heaven From heaven then where hee sitteth at Gods right hand not out of the aire or the sea or the earth Acts 1.11 For as ye have seen him goe into heaven so shall he come Hee shall descend into the clouds that is he shall descend from heaven visibly into this region of the aire as hee did indeed visibly ascend These things are necessarily proposed that the Church may know whence to expect their Judge and Redeemer For as he will have it known whither he ascended so also will he have it known whence he shall come againe that he might thereby signifie that he hath not laid away that humane nature which hee took 5. How Christ shall come to Judgement HEe shall come 1. Truly visibly and locally not imaginarily Mat. 24.30 They shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of the heaven and so shall know him to be God by his visible majesty As yee have seen him goe into heaven so shall hee come Acts 1.11 But he ascended visibly and locally therefore hee shall descend also visibly and locally They shall look upon him whom they have pierced 2. Hee shall come furnished and prepared with glory and divine majesty with all the Angels Zach. 12.10 with voice and trump of the Archangel with divine power to raise the dead and to separate the godly from the wicked and to cast these into everlasting torments but to glorifie them for ever The Son of man shall come in the glory of the Father that is he shall come furnished with a heavenly multitude of Angels and full of majesty and that not by necessity but by his power and authority shewing himselfe to be Lord over all creatures and that with such glory as only agreeth and is proper unto the Father Whereupon withall is gathered that Christ is not a secondary God but the second person of the God-head equall with the Father For God will not give his glory to another 3. He shall come suddenly when the wicked lookt not for him When they say Peace 1 Thess 5.2 3. peace he shall come as a thiefe in the night 6. Whom Christ shall judge HEe shall judge all men both quick and dead and also the wicked Angels Now men are called quick or dead in respect of the state which goeth before this judgement As they which shall remaine alive untill the day of judgement are called the quick and living all the rest except these are called the dead and these at the day of Judgement shall rise the other which remain then alive shall be changed Which change shall be unto them instead of death and so We shall appeare before the judgement seat of Christ. Object But hee that beleeveth in the Sonne 1 Cor. 15.51 Rom. 14.10 shall not come into judgement and so it followeth that all shall not be judged Ans He that beleeveth shall not come into the judgement of condemnation but shall come into the judgement of absolution Wherefore we shall be judged as the word judgement is more largely taken for both condemnation and absolution The Divels shall not then be judged that is condemned but they shall be judged in respect of the publishing of the judgment already passed on them as also in respect of aggravating of the judgement Object The Prince of this world saith Christ is already judged and condemned John
Christ by faith according to that saying of Christ Except ye abide in me John 15.4 ye shall have no life in you In election and the first cause thereof it is apparently untrue by that testimony of Paul which the objection citeth For he chose us before the foundations of the world were laid not because we would be but that we should be holy and blamelesse Ephes 1.3 not because we were already in Christ but that he might engraffe us into Christ and adopt us to be his sonnes Wherefore our foreseene faith and holinesse is not the cause but the effect of our election in Christ He chose us not then being sons but hereafter to be adopted sons Augustine saith He chose not us because we were then holy neither yet because we would hereafter prove holy but be rather chose us to this end that in the time of grace we might be holy through good works But the Pelagian here contradicting the truth saith God foreknew who would be holy and unspotted by reason of their free-will and therefore he in his foreknowledge chose them such as he knew they would be But the Apostle here stoppeth the mouth of the Pelagian whilest he saith that we should be holy Object 3. Christs merit applyed unto us by faith is the cause of our election Therefore not the good pleasure of God Answ Christs merit is not the cause of election but is reckoned among the effects thereof and amongst the causes of our salvation Hee chose us in Christ that is as in the head Wherefore he first chose the head and ordained him unto the Office of the Mediatourship as Peter testifieth Afterwards he also chose us as members in that head 2 Pet. 1.10 John 3.16 So God loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son c. Wherefore Gods love that is his free election is the cause of his sending of the Son and not the sending of his Son the cause of his love Object 4. Evill works are the cause of reprobation Therefore good works are the cause of election Answ Evill works are not the cause of reprobation but of that which followeth reprobation that is of damnation For if sin had been the cause of reprobation wee had been all reprobates because we are all the sons of wrath Rom. 9.11 12. For ere the children were born and when they had done neither good nor evill that the purpose of God might remain according to election not by works but by him that calleth it was said unto her The elder shall serve the younger Good works goe not before in him that is to be justified much lesse are they the cause of election but they follow in a man being instified and draw their originall and their perpetuall efficacy and vertue from Gods meer grace 4. What are the effects of Predestination THe effect of election is the whole work of our salvation The effects of election Ephes 1.4 5 6 7.8 11. John 6.39 and all the degrees of our redemption 1. The creation and gathering of the Church 2. The sending and giving of Christ the Mediatour and his sacrifice 3. Effectuall calling of men to his knowledge which is the conversion of the elect by the holy Ghost and the World 4. Faith justification regeneration 5. Good works 6. Finall perseverance 7. Raising unto glory 8. Glorification and eternall life The effects of reprobat on Rom. 9.17 Mat. 11.21 Isa 6.9 The effects of reprobation are 1. The creation of the reprobate 2. Privation of Gods grace 3. Blinding and hardening 4. Perseverance in sin 5. Raising to judgement 6. Casting into eternall torments Obj. 1. Divers or contrary causes have contrary effects The effects of election are good works Therefore evill works are the effects of reprobation Answ The Major is not alwaies true in voluntry causes which can work diversly and yet produce no contrary effects as in this place there is a dissimilitude Because God purposed only to permit evill works but to work good in us But the proper cause of evill works is the divell and evill men Obj. 2. But God hardeneth and blindeth men Blindnesse is an effect of reprobation and a sin Therefore sin is an effect of reprobation Ans Blindnesse is a sin in respect of men who admit it and as it is received of them and purchased by their own demerit but as it is inflicted of God it is a just punishment and that God doth deliver some from that blindnesse is of his mercy Obj. 3. Hardnesse or induration is an effect of reprobation and is a sin God is authour of reprobation Therefore of hardnesse also and of sin Ans Hardnesse is an effect of reprobation but so that it is done according to reprobation but cometh not from it Hardnesse and blindnesse or excecation are according to reprobation or according to predestination as they are sins but they are effects of reprobation or predestination as they are most just punishments 5. Whether Predestination be unchangeable Predestination unchangeable PRedestination is firm sure and unchangeable which may appear even by this generall reason because God is unchangeable and doth not depend on the interchangeable course of things but the same rather dependeth on his decree What therefore hee hath from everlasting decreed of saving the elect and condemning the reprobate that hath he unchangeably decreed And therefore both election and reprobation is firm and unchangeable For whom he would and hath decreed from everlasting should be saved them also hee now will and so hereafter perpetually The same also we are to think concerning reprobation neither are there wanting testimonies of Scripture John 6.36 whereby the same is confirmed This is the Fathers will Isa 46.10 that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing My counsell shall stand and I will doe whasoever I will Mal. 3.6 Joh. 10.28 29. 2 Tim. 2.19 I am the Lord I change not None shall pluck my sheep out of my hand Ye beleeve not for ye are not of my sheep The foundation of God remaineth sure and hath this seal The Lord knoweth who are his The foundation which Paul so calleth is the decree of saving the elect 1. Because it is the beginning and well-spring of our salvation and the end thereof and of all the means tending to salvation 2. It is called the foundation for the surenesse and firmnesse thereof because the same is never shaken These things are needfull for us to know that wee may have firme comfort and consolation that we may beleeve eternall life and so all other articles of Christian faith The reason is often repeated and therefore often to be meditated of because hee that denieth himselfe to be certain of the grace to come is uncertain also of the present grace of God For God is unchangeable 6. How far forth Predestination or Election and Reprobation is known unto us and whether wee may and ought to be certain thereof IT
we may in some sort conceive what life eternall is Life is defined among the Philosophers diversly What life is and it is indeed a word of divers significations and signifying divers things Generally both as touching God and Angels living soules and plants it is the existence or being of a living thing For even Spirits live but they have not that from any quickning soule but from their very nature and essence But in wights or creatures possessed of living soules life is properly the being of living creatures which is nothing else but To be indued with a living soule or To have in him a living soule For What a soule is the soule is that whereby such a wight liveth or the essentiall forme of life which who have live It is taken both for the first act that is for the very living and being and for the second act that is for the operation of a living thing Thus therefore it is more fully defined Naturall life is the existence or abiding of the soule in a quickned body and the operation of a living thing Or it is the act and perfection of the soule executing operations proper to a living thing Or finally it is an aptitude of a living thing to work the operations proper unto it and is also the operations themselves by reason of the union of the body with the soule Now when we mention everlasting life we restraine the word life for then we speak of the everlasting life of men and Angels That is called everlasting 1. Which hath neither beginning nor ending so God is everlasting 2. Which hath no beginning and yet hath an ending as the decree of God What everlasting meaneth 3. Which hath a beginning but shall have no end as Angels and the soules of men c. And in this third sense our heavenly life is called everlasting life that is a life having beginning but without end So then the everlasting life of man is nothing else but the eternall being of a regenerate and glorified man which being What everlasting life is is to have the image of God restored according to which man was at the first created to wit to be endued with perfect wisdome righteousnesse and felicity or with a true knowledge and love of God joyned with eternall joy And here in these acts of acknowledging and loving God we for plainenesse sake include the faculties and powers of acknowledging and loving God For to be able to acknowledge God aright and love him no lesse belong to the spirituall life then to acknowledge and love him 1 Cor. 2.14 seeing The naturall man perceiveth not the things of the Spirit of God neither can know them Againe we thus describe it Everlasting life is a perfect restauration of Gods image in us and eternall joy resting on God celestiall glory and abundant fruition of all good things which are required to the state of perfect happinesse More briefly it is a perfect conformity of man with God consisting in the true and perfect knowledge and love of God and in the glory of both soule and body So that to the full understanding of the essence of everlasting life Two parts of this life we are to consider these two things Uunion An union both of our body and soule with God Conformity with God A conformity with God which issueth out of this union as an effect proceedeth from his cause Now this conformity is a perspicuous and evident knowledge of God and his will and his works perfect righteousnesse joy fixed in God incomparable glory wherewith our bodies and soules shall flourish and shine as the Sunne and a sufficiency of all good things in God pertaining to true and perfect blisse All these things doe somewhat expresse the maner and forme of everlasting life Now if we adde hereunto the efficient and finall causes thereof An ample definition of everlasting life an absolute full definition may be thus framed Everlasting life is the eternall habitation or dwelling of God in the Elect by the holy Ghost and the true knowledge of God his will and all his works kindled by the same spirit immediatly in their hearts and true and perfect righteousnesse and wisdome that is a perfect conformity and correspondence of their will and powers and operations with the mind and will of God as also a joy resting on God and a sufficiency of all good things in God as touching both soule and body freely bestowed by God through Christ on the Elect begun in this life and to be perfected in the life to come to this end to glorifie and magnifie God through all eternity The particular proofe of each part of this definition All the parts of this definition are taken out of the Scripture Gods eternall habitation in us John 14.23 John 14.16 It is the eternall habitation of God in us by the holy Ghost I and my Father will come unto him and will dwell with him He shall give you another Comforter that he may abide with you for ever Knowledge of God and perfect wisdome John 17.36 It is the knowledge of God and perfect wisdome This is life eternall that they know thee to be the onely very true God and whom thou hast sent Jesus Christ Righteousnesse Luke 20.36 It is righteousnesse They are equall unto the Angels and are the sonnes of God sith they are the children of the resurrection Joy John 16.22 It is joy in God Your joy shall no man take from you Sufficiency in God Revel 21.22 23. 1 Cor. 15.28 1 Cor. 13.33 It is sufficiency in God The Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the Temple of it And the City hath no need of the Sunne neither of the Moone to shine in it for the glory of God did light it and the Lamb is the light of it God shall be all in all All those good things which we possesse here shall then be perfect When that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be abolished Without interruption Revel 21.4 Luke 1.33 Dan. 7.27 It shall not be interrupted God shall wipe away all teares Of his Kingdome shall be no end And the Kingdome and Dominion and the greatnesse of the Kingdome under the whole heaven shall be given to the holy people of the most High whose Kingdome is an everlasting Kingdome that is which hath neither beginning nor ending Object Everlasting life is to live everlastingly But the wicked also shall be raised and be immortall because they shall live eternally Therefore the wicked shall have everlasting life Answ No consequence is currant or of force when it is deduced but from one part onely of a definition For by the name of everlasting life is not meant the presence of the soule in the body that is the naturall life but this being presupposed there is further meant a spirituall life which the holy Ghost worketh in the Elect by
his proper function and office Now though the wicked after the Resurrection shall be immortall yet their soul-life shall be no life but everlasting death For with the eternall life in the wicked shall be joyned 1. An eternall rejection from God 2. A privation and want of the knowledge and grace of God 3. A perpetuall and unutterable torment and vexation Their worme shall never dye There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth The everlasting death of the wicked Hereby is understood what everlasting death is and that it is so called not because the Reprobate by once dying shall fulfill it but because they shall dye perpetually and shall feele perpetuall torment without end 2. Who giveth everlasting life GOD alone giveth eternall life Rom. 6.23 Everlasting life the work of all three persons For Eternall life is the gift of God and the Father as the author and fountaine of all life giveth it by the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Sonne by the holy Ghost the holy Ghost by himselfe which order of working is naturall in the persons of the Divinity Of the Father it is said As the Father raiseth up the dead John 5.21 26. and quickneth them so the Sonne quickneth whom he will In which place the same is affirmed of the Sonne also as in like manner in these following John 1.4 Esay 9.6 John 10.28 John 3.5 Rom. 8.12 In him was life The Father of eternity I give unto them eternall life that is not by merit onely but also by power and working Of the holy Ghost likewise it is said Except a man be borne of water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdome of God He that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies by his Spirit dwelling in you And this testimony is to be observed for the confirmation of the God-head of both Object But the Ministers also give life according to that 1 Cor. 4.15 1 Tim. 4.16 In Christ Jesus I have begot you through the Gospel In doing this thou shalt both save thy selfe and them that heare thee Therefore God onely giveth not life Answ There may be many subordinate causes of one effect Christ and the holy Ghost give life by their own power the Ministers are only instruments by whom Christ worketh through the vertue of his Spirit Let a man so think of us 1 Cor. 4.1 3.5 6. as of the Ministers of Christ and disposers of the secrets of God Who is Paul then And who is Apollos but the Ministers by whom ye beleeved and as the Lord gave to every man I have planted Apollos watered but God gave the increase Repl. But Christ giveth life by a communicated power Therefore not by his proper power Ans He giveth it by a power communicated but communicated from everlasting as he was begotten from everlasting By retortion therefore it followeth thus He giveth life by a power communicated to him of his Father from everlasting John 5.26 Therefore he giveth it by his owne power As the Father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he given to the Sonne to have life in himselfe 3. To whom everlasting life is given EVerlasting life is given to all and only such as are elect from everlasting or All the Elect and they alone are partakers of everlasting life John 10 28. John 17.9 12. Rom. 11.7 to them that are converted in this life I give unto them eternall life that is to my sheep who are his elect and chosen I pray for them I pray not for the world but for them which thou hast given me for they are thine Those that thou gavest me have I kept and none of them is lost but the child of perdition Againe faith and repentance are proper to the Elect only The Elect have obtained it and the rest have been hardned We must observe in this place whereas the question is To whom everlasting life is given that it is better to answer That eternall life is given to the Elect * As they are elected so they are but chosen to eternall life as they are converted so they are in part admitted unto it and begin to be put in dossession of it then to say It is given unto the converted For Conversion and Faith are the beginning of eternal life And to say eternall life is given to the converted were all one as if you would say life is given to the living Also when the question is To whom the beginning of everlasting life is given we answer rightly Unto the Elect. For if you say It is given to the converted you answer no more then that which is in question and doubt seeing it is demanded who they are whom God converteth 4. For what cause everlasting life is given EVerlasting life is given unto us not for our works either present or fore-seen God of his free mercy giveth us for Christs sake everlasting ââsief that we might praise and magnifie the same his mercy for ever Rom. 6.23 Ephes 2.8 9 10. but for the alone free mercy of God and his love towards mankind and his will of shewing his mercy in saving the Elect for the alone satisfaction and merit of Christ imputed unto us by faith to this end that God may be magnified of us for ever The gift of God is eternall life through Jesus Christ our Lord. By grace we are saved through faith and that not of our selves it is the gift of God Not of works lest any man should boast For we are his workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto good works which God hath ordained that we should walke in them So God loved the world John 3.16 that he gave his only begotten Sonne that whosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but have everlasting life c. Wherefore the impellent or motive cause of everlasting life given unto us is not any work of us men either present or fore seen in us For before the beginning of eternall life that is before conversion all our works merit eternall death after the beginning thereof that is after conversion they are effects thereof and nothing is cause of it selfe We are indeed brought unto it by many meanes but the meanes by which we are led of God unto eternall life are one thing and the cause for which we are led unto it another The finall cause or end for which eternall life is given us is that the mercy of God might be acknowledged and magnified of us To the praise of the glory of his grace Ephes 1.6 wherewith he hath made us accepted in his beloved For the same cause God giveth us eternall life for which he chose us 5. How everlasting life is given unto us God giveth us everlasting life by ths outward ministery of the Word and the inward ministery of the Spirit EVerlasting life is given us by faith faith by the preaching of the Word and inward efficacy of the
in some sort made ours even by application The subject indeed wherein this justice is inherent is Christ we are the object to which this justice is directed sith it is imputed unto us 2. That the word Imputation is more strict than Application The former is spoken of God only the latter of God and us 3. That God otherwise applieth Christs justice unto us than we doe God applyeth it by imputation and we apply it by faith and acceptation 4. That this phrase of the Church To justifie The signification of the phrase To justifie proved by the Grammaticall derivation of it in divers languages In hipâââ signifieth not legally that is To make one just who is unjust by infusing the quality of justice but evangelically that is To repute him which is unjust for just and righteous and to absolve him from all guilt and not to punish him and this for anothers justice and satisfaction imputed unto him So the Scripture useth this word and almost in all tongues it beareth no other signification for the Hebrew word Hadzdik Exod. 23. â Prov. 17.15 signifieth To absolve a guilty person To pronounce him guiltlesse I will not justifie a wicked person He that justifieth the wicked and he that condemneth the just even they both are abomination to the Lord. The Greek word ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã signifieth sometime To pronounce a man just and righteous and sometimes To punish an offender and both on good knowledge of his cause by due examination and judiciall processe as Suidas well observeth Mat. 12.37 So saith Christ By thy words thou shalt be justified The former signification is used two waies in Scripture For either it signifies not to condemne but To absolve in judgement Rom. 8.33 as Who shall condemne the Elect of God it is God that justifieth Hee departed justified rather than the other or it signifieth To pronounce and proclaime just Luke 18.14 As Wisedome is justified of her children That thou mayest be justified in thy sayings Howbeit both significations in this Question come to one end But that to justifie should be used for to make just or to infuse an habit of justice is no where found amongst the Latines and were it read in Latine Authours yet in Scripture and in the Church it is otherwise used as the alledged places apparently prove which can be understood no other way than of the absolution and free accepting a sinner to grace and favour Who shall accuse Gods Elect it is God that justifieth The Publicane departed justified that is absolved and more accepted of God than the Pharisee Acts 13.39 For from all things from which yee could not be justified by the Law of Moses by him every one that beleeveth is justified Here To be justified doth evidently signifie to be absolved Rom. 3.24 26 28. 4.5 5.9 10. to receive remission of sins All are justified freely by his grace A justifier of him which is of the faith of Jesus A man is justified by faith without the workes of the law To him that worketh not but beleeveth in him that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse Being now justified by his bloud Reconciled to God by the death of his Son 6. Why Christs satisfaction is made ours or in what sort God imputeth it unto us for righteousnesse The cause of Christs satisfaction applyed and imputed is in God only not in us THe perfect fulfilling of the law performed by Christ for us is made ours or applyed unto us through the alone and free mercy of God as who from everlasting did predestinate us to this grace and freely chose us in Christ to whom he might apply of his meere grace of faith that justice and righteousnesse at his appointed time according to the good pleasure of his will as the Apostle speaketh that is according to his meere good pleasure not being moved with any holinesse which hee foresaw would be in us The reason is because there can be no good thing in us except God first worke in us Wherefore all imagination and affirmation of merit is to be taken away as which fighteth with the grace of God and is a deniall of his divine grace For the grace and mercy of God is the only cause of both applications He of his goodnes infinite and passing measure applyeth Christs merit unto us and maketh that we also may apply the same unto us The cause therefore why this application is wrought is in God alone but not at all in us that is it is neither any thing foreseen in us neither also our apprehension and receiving of this justice for all the gifts and graces which are in us are effects of the application of Christs merit and therefore that merit of Christ is no way applied unto us for the works sake which wee doe but this is done as the Apostle teacheth Ephes 1.5 According to the good pleasure of his will Whereupon also it is said What hast thou that thou hast not received 1 Cor. 4.7 By grace are yee saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God Ephes 2.8 Christ is then in respect of our justification 1. As the subject and matter wherein our justice is 2. As the impellent cause because he obtaineth it 3. As the chief efficient because he together with his Father doth justifie us and giveth us faith whereby wee beleeve and apprehend it The mercy of God is as the impellent cause thereof in God Christs satisfaction is the formall cause of our justification giving the very life and being unto it Our faith is the instrumentall cause apprehending and applying unto us the justice or righteousnesse of Christ We must note therefore How we are justified by the grace of God how by Christs merit and how by faith that we are justified by the grace of God by the merit of Christ and by faith but by each of these in a severall sense and meaning The first position is understood of the impulsive cause which is in God the second of the formall cause in Christ the third of the instrumentall cause in us We are justified by the mercy or grace of God as a principall impellent cause wherewith God being urged and moved justifieth and saveth us We are justified by the merit of Christ partly as by the formall cause of our justification inasmuch as by Christs obedience applied unto us we are accepted of God and being clothed as it were with this raiment are reputed just partly as by an impulsive and meritorious cause inasmuch as God absolveth us for his sake Wee are justified by faith as by an instrumentall cause whereby we apprehend Christs righteousnesse imputed unto us The common received opinion saith We are justified by faith correlatively that is we are justified by that whereunto faith hath relation to wit the merit of Christ which faith apprehendeth For faith and the
satisfaction of Christ are correlatives that is have a mutuall respect each to other the one being that which receiveth and the other that which is received This kind of speech is well and probably used because hereby faith is understood of the formall cause of justification that so the sense may be Christs merit justifieth us and not faith it selfe that which is apprehended doth justifie us and not the instrument which doth apprehend Neverthelesse this proposition We are justified by faith may be understood also without relation to wit we are justified by faith as a meane But this proposition of the Apostle Faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse and other the like Rom. 4.3 are necessarily to be understood with a relation to Christs merit and justice Faith was imputed unto him for righteousnesse as faith is the apprehending instrument of righteousnesse apprehended faith being as it were the hand wherewith the justice of Christ is received Quest 61. Why affirmest thou that thou art made righteous by faith only Answ Not for that I please God through the worthinesse of meere faith but because onely the satisfaction righteousnesse and holinesse of Christ is my righteousnesse before God a 1 Cor. 1.30 2.2 and I cannot take hold of it or apply it unto my selfe and other way than by faith b 1 Joh. 5.20 The Explication Three causes why faith alone justifieth WE say we are justified by faith alone 1. Because we are justified by the object of faith onely to wit by the merit of Christ alone besides which there is no justice of ours nor any part thereof For we are justified freely for Christs sake without works There is nothing which can be our justice and righteousnesse before God either in whole or in part besides Christs merit only by receiving and beleeving anothers justice we are justified not by working nor by meriting but by an apprehension and acceptation only we are just and righteous All works are excluded yea faith it selfe as it is a vertue or work 2. Because the proper act and operation of faith is for a man to apprehend and apply unto himself Christs righteousnesse yea faith is nothing else than the acceptation it self or apprehension of anothers justice or of the merit of Christ 3. Because faith only is the instrument which apprehendeth Christs satisfaction Hence it is evident for what causes we are to retain the exclusive particle Onely Foure causes why we are to maintaine against Papists that faith only justifieth Rom. 3 24 28. Marke 5 36. and to maintaine it against the Papists namely 1. For declaration of that which Paul speaketh Wee are justified freely by grace without works likewise of that which Christ saith Onely beleeve 2. That whatsoever works and merits of ours or of others may be excluded from being causes of justification and faith may be understood only with relation and respect to Christs merit which is our justice 3. That not only our merits but even faith it self may be wholly excluded from that which is received by faith and the sense may be we are justified by faith alone that is not by meriting but only by receiving as when wee say This poor man is enriched only by receiving the almes of charitable disposed people where all works and merits yea the very receiving of almes if it be considered as a merit are excluded Therefore Paul saith alwaies that we are justified a ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã by faith and b ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã through faith as by an instrument but no where faith c ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã for faith as the Papists say who will admit both these manners of speaking as if faith were not indeed the application whereby we apply unto our selves Christs justice but were also besides a certain work or merit whereby we deserve to be just which is quite repugnant to the nature of faith For if for faith we were just and righteous then faith were now no longer an acceptation of anothers righteousnesse but were a merit and cause of our own justice neither should it receive anothers satisfaction which now it should have no need of 4. That we may know what necessity there is of faith unto justification and may understand that we are not justified by the merit of faith and yet are not justified without faith apprehending the justice of Christ because it is the proper act of faith to lay hold on his righteousnesse 5. The Orthodoxall or right beleeving Fathers oft-times urge the exclusive particle Origen in Rom. libro tertio capite tertio Ambr. in Rom. 3. In cap. 10. by faith only Origen The Apostle saith that the justification of faith only is sufficient so that if a man beleeve onely hee may be justified yea though hee performe no work Ambrose They are justified freely who working nothing and rendring no recompence are justified by faith onely through the gift of God Again Ambrose How then may the Jewes thinke themselves to be justified by the works of the law with the justification of Abraham where they see that Abraham was not justified by the works of the law but by faith onely The law therefore needeth not when a sinner is justified before God by faith only In cap. 10. In 1. ad Cor. 1.4 And in the same place the exclusive particle Only is often reiterated The same Ambrose saith Because this is decreed by God that hee which beleeveth in Christ should be saved without any work receiving freely by faith only remission of sins Wee are therefore justified by faith onely that is by Christs merit onely received by faith This we must constantly maintain and defend 1. For Gods glory that Christs sacrifice be not extenuated 2. For our owne comfort that we may be assured that our righteousnesse dependeth not on our works for so should wee lose it many thousand times but only on the sacrifice and merit of Christ ON THE 24. SABBATH Quest 62. Why cannot our good workes be righteousnesse or some part of righteousnesse before God Ans Because that righteousnesse which must stand fast before the judgement of God must be in all points perfect and agreeable to the law of God a Gal. 3.10 Deut. 27.36 Now our workes even the best of them are imperfect in this life and defiled with sin b Esay 64.6 The Explication IN the former Questions the true doctrine of Justification hath been made manifest and confirmed It followeth that we proceed to the confutation of the Popish doctrine affirming that we are justified by workes or partly by faith and partly by works The argument is thus framed The justice which may stand in Gods judgement must be perfectly absolute and agreeable on all parts with Gods Law But our very best workes in this life are imperfect and stained with sin Therefore our very best workes cannot be our justice in the judgment of God neither in part nor wholly The Major
of this Syllogisme is evidently proved out of the law Hee that doth these things shall live in them Cursed is every one which abideth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to doe them The Minor is out of doubt Levit. 18.5 Deut. 27.26 Why our workes are imperfect seeing wee doe many evill things which we ought to leave undone and we leave many good works undone which we should doe yea we mingle much evill with that good we doe that is we doe it amisse The complaints and daily prayers of Saints are witnesse hereof Forgive us our sins Enter not into judgment with thy servant Wherefore imperfect works can make no perfect righteousnesse Psal 143.2 This is the first cause why we cannot be justified by our works namely Ten causes why wee cannot be justified by workes or partly by faith and partly by workes 1. Because our justice should by this meanes be imperfect seeing our works are imperfect Many other causes there are For 2. Though our workes were perfect yet are they due debt so that by them we cannot acquit our sins that are past When ye have done all those things which are commanded you say We are unprofitable servants we have done that which was our duty to doe 3. They are none of ours but Gods who worketh them in us 4. They are temporary and have no proportion with eternall rewards Luke 17.10 whereas between a merit and reward there must be some proportion 5. They are the effects of justification therefore not the cause 6. If by them we were justified we should have whereof to boast but the Scripture saith Not of workes lest any man should boast himselfe 7. The conscience should be destitute of solid or sure comfort 8. Christ should have died without a cause 9. There should not be the same way to salvation in both Testaments if Abraham were justified by faith onely and wee by works Ephes 2.9 Rom. 4.16 whether by works alone or works joyned with faith it skilleth not 10. Christ should be no perfect Saviour because some part of our righteousnesse and salvation should be without him Gal. 2.21 Quest 63. How is it that our good works merit nothing seeing God promiseth that he will give a reward for them both in this life and in the life to come Answ That reward is not given of merit but of grace a Luke 17.10 The Explication IN this Question is contained a prevention of an argument of the Papists brought for justification before God for our workes and merits Obj. 1. Reward presupposeth merit so that where reward is there is also merit for Reward and Merit are correlatives whereof if one be put the other is put also But everlasting life is proposed as a reward for good workes Therefore also the merit of good workes is everlasting life Answ The Major is sometimes true as concerning creatures as when men may merit or deserve of men But neither alwaies among men doth it follow that there is merit where there is reward for men also oftentimes give rewards not of merit or desert Now it is unproperly said of God that he proposeth eternall life unto our works as a reward for we can merit nothing at Gods hand by our works Or if they thus presse and urge their reason Object That is a merit whereunto a reward appertaineth But a reward appertaineth to good workes Therefore by order of justice good workes are merits Answ That is a merit whereunto a reward appertaineth by force of covenant or bond But the reward of good works is of grace In reward two things are to be considered 1. Obligation or binding 2. Compensation or recompensing Here is no obligation but compensation followeth works through grace There is therefore a reward of workes because compensation followeth them and God for this cause especially promiseth to reward our workes 1. To testifie unto us that good workes please him Three causes why God promiseth to reward our workes 2. To teach us that eternall life is proposed onely to them that strive and labour painefully 3. Because hee will as surely give us a reward as if wee had deserved it Hither may be referred all such like arguments of the Papists whereby they labour to establish the merit of workes Object 2. Wee are justified by faith Faith is a worke Therefore wee are justified by workes Ans 1. The consequence of this reason is denied because more is in the conclusion than in the premisses of which premisses this onely followeth Therefore wee are justified by that worke which wee grant to wit as by an instrument or meane not as any impellent cause as themselves understand it for wee are justified by faith as by a meane of attaining our justification and wee are not justified for faith that is for the merit of faith 2. The kind of affirmation is diverse For in the Major faith is understood with relation to Christs merit in the Minor it is taken absolutely and properly Object 3. Our justice is that whereby wee are formally or essentially just Therefore wee are by faith formally and essentially just Answ The consequence of this reason is to be denied because the kinde of affirmation is diverse For the Major is meant properly but the Minor correlatively and figuratively * Per Metalepsin else it were false For properly not faith but the correlative object of faith namely Christs merit which faith beholdeth and applieth to it selfe is our justice 2. Either there are foure termes in this Syllogisme because the Major treateth of Legall justice the Minor of Evangelicall or else the Major is false For Evangelicall justice is not formally in us as whiteness is in a wall but is without us even in Christ and is made ours by imputation and application through faith Object 4. That which is imputed unto us for righteousnesse for it we are righteous Faith is imputed to us for righteousnesse as Paul saith Therefore For faith we are righteous and not only By faith Ans Againe the kind of affirmation is of proper in the Major proposition made figurative in the Minor The Major is true of that which is properly and by it selfe imputed for righteousnesse The Minor is true of that which is correlatively imputed for righteousnesse because by faith is correlatively understood the object of faith unto which faith hath relation for Christs merit which is apprehended by faith is properly our justice and the formall cause of our justice The efficient of our justice is God applying that merit of Christ unto us The instrument all cause of our justice is faith And therefore this proposition we are justified by faith being Legally understood with the Papists is not true but blasphemous but being taken correlatively that is Evangelically with relation to Christs merit it is true For the correlative of faith is the merit of Christ which faith also as a joynt Relative or correlative
respecteth and as an instrument apprehendeth Object 5. Evill workes condemne Therefore good workes justifie Ans 1. These contraries are not matches For our evill workes are perfectly evill our good workes are imperfectly good 2. Although our good workes were perfectly good yet should they not deserve eternall life because they are debts Unto evill workes a reward is due by order of justice unto good works not so because wee are obliged and bound to do them For the creature is obliged to his Creator neither may hee of the contrary binde God unto him by any workes or meanes to benefit him And evill workes in their very intent despight God but good works yield him no profit or delight Object 6. Hee that doth righteousnesse is righteous Therefore not hee that beleeveth Answ 1. Hee is righteous before men that is by doing righteousnesse 1 John 3.7 hee declareth himselfe righteous to others but before God wee are righteous not by doing righteousnesse but by beleeving as it is written Rom. 3.20 By the workes of the Law shall no flesh be justified in his sight 2. John sheweth there not how wee are righteous but what the righteous are as if he should say that he that is regenerated is also justified because by doing righteousnesse he testifieth to the world that he is justified So then in this reason the fallacy is a taking that which is no cause of justification instead of the true cause thereof Object 7. Christ saith Many sins are forgiven her because shee loved much Luke 7.47 Therefore good workes are the cause of justification Ans 1. Christ here reasoneth from the latter to the former from the effect which cometh after to the cause which goeth before In that the woman loved Christ much Christ thence gathereth that many sins were forgiven her and because there was a great feeling in that woman of the benefit it must needs therefore be that the benefit is great and many sins are forgiven her That this is the meaning of Christs words appeareth by the parable which he there useth 2. Not every thing that is the cause of Consequence in reason is also the cause of the Consequent or thing it selfe which followeth in that consequence of reason Wherefore it is a fallacy of the Consequent if it be concluded Therefore for her love many sins are forgiven her For the particle because which Christ useth doth noâ alwaies signifie the cause of the thing following It followeth not The Sun is risen because it is day Therefore the day is the cause of the rising of the Sun The contrary rather is true Quest 64. But doth not this doctrine make men carelesse and profane Ans No For neither can it be but they which are incorporated into Christ through faith should bring forth the fruits of thankfulnesse a Mat. 7.18 John 15.5 The Explication THis Question of the Catechisme is a prevention of the Papists slander against the doctrine of Justification by faith Ob. 1. Doctrine which maketh men secure and profane is not true and therefore not to be delivered But this doctrine of free justification by faith maketh men secure and profane Therefore it is not true nor to be taught or delivered in the Church Ans Here is a fallacy of accident If the doctrine of free justification by faith make men secure this happeneth by accident The naturall effect of this doctrine is an earnest desire of shewing our thankfulnesse towards God But this accident objected by the adversaries of this truth falleth out not because men doe apply but because men doe not apply to themselves the doctrine of grace Repl. 1. Even those things which fall out to be evill by an accident are to be eschewed But this doctrine maketh men by an accident evill Therefore it is to be eschewed Ans Those things which fall out to be evils by an accident are to be eschewed if there remaine no greater and weightier cause for which they are not to be omitted which become evill to men through their owne default But wee have necessarie and weighty cause why this doctrine ought to be delivered and by no meanes to be omitted namely the commandement and glory of God and the salvation of the Elect. Repl. 2. That which cannot hart wee need not to eschew But according to the doctrine of justification by faith sinnes to come cannot hurt us because Christ hath satisfied for all both which are past and which are to come Therefore wee need not to beware of sinnes to come Now this is apparently absurd Therefore the doctrine whence this Consequent ariseth is likewise absurd Ans 1. We answer to the Major of this reason that we need not beware and take heed of that which cannot hurt namely whether it be taken heed of or no. But sins to come hurt not that is hurt not them which are heedfull and penitent yet they hurt them who are carelesse and unrepentant 2. Therefore we also deny the Minor for God is alwaies offended with sins and his displeasure is the greatest hurt that can befall man Further sins bereave us of conformity with God and purchase bodily pains unto the faithfull howsoever eternall paines be remitted unto them Hither belong other arguments of the Papists wherewith they oppugne this doctrine of Justification by faith such as are these following Object 2. That which is not in the Scripture is not to be taught or retained That wee are justified by faith only is not in the Scripture Therefore it is not to be retained Ans To the Major we say that which is not in the Scripture neither in words nor in sense is not to be retained But that we are justified by faith only is contained in Scripture as touching the sense thereof for we are said to be justified freely by grace without the works of the law Rom. 3 2â 28. Gal. 2.15 Ephes 2.8 9. Titus 3.5 1 John 1.7 without the law not of works not of our selves not of any righteousnesse which wee have done by faith without merit Also the bloud of Christ is said to cleanse us from all sin And these are all one To be justified by faith alone and To be justified by the bloud and merit of Christ apprehended by faith only by receiving and beleeving deserving nothing by faith or other works Now the reasons why we are to retain against the Papists the exclusive particle only have been heretofore declared and inlarged Object 3. That which is not alone doth not justifie alone Faith is not alone Therefore faith doth not justifie alone Ans If the conclusion be so understood as it followeth out of the premisses on this wise Faith therefore doth not justifie alone that is being alone the argument is of force For justifying faith is never alone without works as her effects Faith justifieth alone but is not alone when it justifieth having works accompanying it as effects of it but not as joynt causes with it of justification But if
in the Supper 8. Who are to come to the Supper 9. Who are to be admitted to the Supper The three former of these belong to the 75. and 76. Questions of the Catechism the fourth to the 77 78 79. the fifth to the 80. the sixth seventh eighth and ninth to the 81. and under them they shall be placed and handled 1. What the Supper of the Lord is The names given to this Sacrament and the reason of the names FIrst we will see by what names the Supper of the Lord is called then we will in few words define what it is This action or ceremony or rite instituted by Christ a little before his death is called The Lords Supper It is called 1. The Lords Supper from the first institution of it that is in respect of the originall or first beginning of this rite or in respect of the time wherein this ceremony was instituted which circumstance of time the Church for her liberty in case of this quality hath changed For it was a matter of casualty that this ceremony was instituted of Christ rather in the evening at supper time then in the morning or at noon day to wit because of the eating of the Paschal Lamb which by the law was to be celebrated in the evening and was afterwards to be abolished by this new Sacrament It is called of S. Paul 2. The Lords Table The Table of the Lord. It is likewise called Synaxis that is a covenant 3. A covenant of assembly in respect of the assembly and convent of the Church because some either few or many must assemble and meet together in celebrating of the Supper for in the first celebration the disciples were present to them it was said Take this and divide it among you Wherefore it must needs be that there was some number there which also appeareth by the Apostle repeating the first institution where in the end he addeth 1 Cor. 11.20 35. When ye come together to eat tarry one for another And further that moe ought to come together to celebrate the Supper this end of the Supper doth evidently enough shew in that it was instituted to be a token and even a bond of love For wee that are many 1 Cor. 10.17 are one bread and one body It is called also the Eucharist 4. The Eucharist because it is a rite and ceremony of thanksgiving Last of all 5. A Sacrifice it is called also a Sacrifice not propitiatory or meritorious as the Papists dream but gratulatory because it is the commemoration of Christs propitiatory sacrifice And at length it was also called Missa from the offering or from the dismissing of the rest who might not communicate after the Sermon which went before the celebration was finished We retain the name left in Scripture and call it The Lords Supper Now let us come to define the Lords Supper The definition of the Lords Supper The Lords Supper is a ceremony or Sacrament instituted and appointed of Christ unto the faithfull for a memoriall of him whereby Christ doth certainly promise and seal unto me and all the faithfull first That his body was offered and broken on the crosse for mee and his bloud shed for me as truly as I see with mine eyes the bread of the Lord to be broken unto me and his cup distributed And moreover That hee doth as certainly with his body crucified and his bloud shed feed and nourish my soul unto everlasting life as my body is fed with the bread and the cup the Lord received from the hand of the minister which are offered to me as certain seals of the body and bloud of Christ It may be also more briefly defined on this wise The Lords Supper is a distributing and receiving of bread and wine commanded of Christ unto the faithfull that by these signes he might testifie that hee hath delivered and yeelded his body unto death and hath shed his bloud for them and doth give them those things to eate and drink that they might be unto them the meat and dâink of eternall life and that thereby also hee might testifie that hee would dwell in them nourish and quicken them for ever And again That of the other side he might by the same signes binde them to mutuall dilection and love seeing Christ spareth not to give his body and bloud for us This is confirmed not only by Christ in the Evangelists but also by Paul who expresly saith The cup of the blessing which wee blesse is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ Moreover The signe and things signified in the Lords Supper the signes in the Sacrament are bread and wine bread broken and eaten wine distributed and taken The things signified are 1. The breaking of the bodâ and the shedaing of the bloud of Christ 2. Our union and conjunction with Christ by faith so that wee draw life everlasting from him and are made partakers as of Christ himselfe so also of all his benefits as the branches are made partakers of the life of the vine Wee are advertised of this our union and communion with Christ 1. By the proportion which the signes have with the things 2. By the promise which is adjoyned And the proportion doth chiefly propose and shew two things unto us 1. The sacrifice of Christ 2. Our communion with Christ because the bread is not only broken but is also given us to eat Breaking of the bread a part of the ceremony Now the breaking of the bread is a part of the ceremony because unto it a part of the thing signified doth answer namely the breaking of Christs body of which signification of this signe Paul doth testifie when he saith 1 Cor. 11.24 This is my body which is broken for you Here receiving and eating is part of the ceremony whereunto doth answer the thing signified to wit the eating of Christs body Now this divine and spirituall thing namely the breaking and communicating of Christs body is signified and confirmed by this ceremony which is the breaking and receiving of bread for two causes 1. Because Christ commandeth these rites unto which we ought to give no lesse credit then if Christ himself did speak with us 2. Because he annexeth a promise that they who observe these rites with a true faith must be assured and certain that they have communion with Christ. Wine is added that wee should know the perfection and accomplishment of our salvation to be in his sacrifice and that there was nothing which could be further desired The wine is severed from the bread to signifie the violence of his death because the bloud was sundered from his body 2. What are the ends of the Lords Supper THe ends for which the Lords Supper was instituted are Confirmation of our faith That it might be a confirmation of our faith that is a most certain testification of our communion and union with Christ
is fed with Christs body eateth it and is false being universally proposed For doth thy thigh or thine elbow therefore eate because it is nourished by the meat which thou conveyest in by thy mouth It sufficeth that eating is by the mouth as an instrument framed by nature to this end to minister nourishment to the whole body So it is not necessary that our bodies should eate Christs body with their mouches therewith to be fed unto eternall life but it sufficeth that the mouth of faith taketh the spirituall meate that spirituall nourishment and life may be transfused throughout the whole man Quest 79. Why then doth Christ call bread his body and the cup his bloud or the New Testament in his bloud and Paul also calleth bread and wine the communion of the body and bloud of Christ Ans Christ not without great consideration speaketh so to wit not only for to teach us that as the bread and wine sustaine the life of the body so also his crucified body and bloud shed are indeed the meat and drink of our soule whereby it is nourished to eternall life a John 6.55 But much more that by this visible signe and pledge he may assure us that we are as verily partakers of his body and bloud through the working of the holy Ghost as we doe receive by the mouth of our body these holy signes in remembrance of him b 1 Cor. 10.16 And further also that that his suffering and obedience is so certainly ours as though we our selves had suffered punishments for our sins and had satisfied God The Explication WHereas neither Transubstantiation nor Consubstantiation are signified by Christs words the question is Why the bread is called Christs body and the cup Christs bloud that is why the things signified are attributed to the signes and the signes called by their name There are two causes alledged hereof 1. For the naturall analogy or likenesse Two causes why the things signified are attributed unto the signes which Christs body and the bread have between themselves 2. For the certainty or confirmation of the joynt-exhibition of the signe and the thing signified in the true use The similitude and proportion of the bread and Christs body especially consisteth in these points 1. As the Bread and Wine nourish our body unto this life so the Body and Bloud of Christ nourish us unto everlasting life 2. As the Bread and Wine are received by the mouth The Analogy or proportion between the bread and Christs body in the use of the Supper so Christs body and bloud are received by faith which is the mouth of the soule 3. As the bread is not swallowed whole but eaten being broken so Christs body is received being sacrificed and broken on the Crosse 4. As the bread and wine profiteth not him that eateth without appetite but we must bring hunger and thirst unto the Table so Christs body and bloud profit none but them who hunger and thirst after righteousnesse 5. As of many corns is made one loaf and of many grapes one wine so we by participation or communion of these signes though many yet are made one body and grow up into one body with Christ and between our selves The certainty also or assurance of faith is a cause why we affirme that of the signes which is proper to the thing signified For the signes testifie that Christs sacrifice is accomplished and that indeed for our behoofe and salvation as verily as we have the signes yea that we are fed with Christs crucified body and bloud shed and poured out as truly as we receive these sacred symboles of his body and bloud ON THE 30. SABBATH Quest 70. What difference is there between the Lords Supper and the Popish Masse Ans The Supper of the Lord testifieth to us that we have perfect forgivenes of all our sins for that only sacrifice of Christ which himselfe once fully wrought on the Crosse a Heb. 10.10 12. 7.27 9.12 25. John 19.30 Matth. 26.28 Luke 22.19 Then also that we by the holy Ghost are graffed into Christ b 1 Cor. 6.17 10.16 12.13 who now according to his humane nature is only in heaven at the right hand of his Father c Colos 3.1 Heb. 1.3 8.1 and there will be worshipped of us d Mat. 6.20 21. John 4.21 22. 20 17. Luke 24.52 Acts 7.55 Col. 3.1 Phil. 3.20 1 Thes 1.19 But in the Masse it is denied that the quick and the dead have remission of sins for the only passion of Christ except also Christ be daily offered of them by their sacrificers Further also it is taught that Christ is bodily under the formes of bread and wine and therefore is to be worshipped in them e In Canone Missae de consec dist 2. Concil Trid. Sess 13.5 And so the very foundation of the Masse is nothing else then an utter deniall of that only sacrifice and passion of Christ Jesus and an accursed Idolatry f Heb. 9.26 10.12 The Explication THis question is necessary by reason of errours which by the Masse have crept into the Church It is otherwise demanded Why the Masse is to be abolished But here this question is also contained and comprehended because these differences and contrarieties of the Lords Supper and the Masse are the causes why the Masse is to be abolished For whereas it hath so many abuses in it flat repugnant to the Lords Supper it may not be confounded therewith nor be thrust on the Church in place thereof nor be permitted and tolerated in the Church by godly and religious Magistrates but it ought to be utterly abandoned and put downe First then let us speak a few words of the name of Masse or Missa The word Missa seemeth to have his name derived from the Hebrew Masah that is a tribute or voluntary offering which was wont to be paid of every one The originall of the word Missa which we call the Masse The word is found Deut. 16.10 Missach nidbath jadecha a free gift of thine hand Now that offering was called so being as it were an yeerly tribute which was yet no exaction but given freely Others interprete it to be a sufficiency which is that there should be given so much as was sufficient and perhaps this is the truer because the Lord commanded the Israelites that they should open their hands unto the poore Deut. 15. â and should lend him sufficient for his need This the Chaldee Paraphrast interpreteth to be Missah Hereof these our men think that it was called Missa as if it were a tribute and free-offering which should be every-where offered to God in the Church for the living and the dead But this is not of any likelihood to be true It is manifest indeed that the Church hath borrowed some words from the Hebrewes as Satan Osanna Sabaot Halleluja Pascha and such like But those words came
is conveyed by an Angel into heaven lyeth corporally under the formes of bread and wine is really carried up and downe in the hands of the Minister and received by the mouth of the Communicants These forgeries are repugnant to the Articles of Faith the Incarnation the Ascension and Intercession and the returne of Christ unto Judgement and to the nature of Sacraments in which the signes must needs remaine and not lose their nature 3. The Lords Supper teacheth us That Christ is to be worshipped in heaven at the right hand of his Father For it overthroweth not but establisheth and ratifieth the Articles of Faith and doctrine of the whole Gospel which sheweth that Christ is to be sought and worshipped Above Colos 3.2 Seek the things which are above where Christ sitteth at the right hand of God Acts 7.55 And Stephen when he was stoned saw Christ and worshipped him Above standing at the right hand of God The ancient Church also sang in their Liturgy or common Service and Prayer Sursum corda Wee lift up our hearts unto the Lord. On the other side the Masse telleth us That Christ is to be worshipped in the bread which adoration and worship questionlesse is idolatrous For To worship Christ in the bread is to direct our worship in soule minde cogitation and as much as may be in the motion of our bodies to the place in which the bread is and turning hereto to yield reverence unto Christ as if he were present there more than else-where So of old they worshipped God at the Arke turning thereto with their minds and as much as might be with their externall grace and inclination of body That this is idolatry we prove 1. Because no creature hath power to tie the worship of God to any thing or place Exod. 25.22 29.42 1 King 8.33 12.29 10 31. Dan 9.11 2 Kings 12.13 Amos 4.4 wherein God hath not commanded by expresse word himselfe to be worshipped and wherein God hath not promised to heare us And hereby is the cause of that difference plainly seen why the Jews directing their prayer to the Propitiatory or Mercy-seat did notwithstanding withall in spirit worship the true God and were by promise from him assured to be heard but worshipping in Dan and in Bethel and in the high places and in the Temple of Samaria were Idolaters not knowing what they worshipped and the cause of this thing is more at large declared 1 Kings 17.9 2. Because in the New Testament all worship which is tyed to any certain place on earth is utterly taken away and spirituall worship only required stirred and kindled by the holy Ghost and done with a true faith and knowledge of God Joh. 4.21 22 23. So Christ teacheth Yee worship that which yee know not wee worship that which wee know But the houre cometh when ye shall neither in this mountaine nor at Jerusalem worship the Father But the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth Whereas Christ saith in spirit not in this mountaine nor at Jerusalem he doth plainly take away worship tied and restrained to any certaine place on earth Wherefore we must also take away and have in detestation this impious invention of Christs corporall presence in the Mass or in the bread and wine which is the foundation of idolatrous adoration or worship For this being put that Christ is in body present in the bread whether it be said to be done by Transubstantiation or Consubstantiation the Popish adoration standeth fast For as in ancient times before the Ascension it was not only lawfull but behoovefull also to worship Christ wheresoever he was so now also if he be in the bread he must be worshipped in the bread whether he be there seen or not seen For much more were we to beleeve the voice of God then any sense of ours if it expressed and specified any such matter Likewise of the contrary side the presence of Christs body in the bread is taken away if we take away by Gods commandement this foule and shamefull Popish adoration of Christs body lying covertly by their judgements under the formes of Bread and Wine Here the Ubiquiraries except against us on their behalfe that Christ is present in the bread not to be worshipped but to be eaten and that he commanded not himself to be adored but to be eaten Answ In both these asseraions they conclude no more then that which is in controversie for Christ commanded neither of these If he be in the bread he must there be worshipped because of the generall commandement Let all the holy Angels of God worship him Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God They therefore imagine Christ in the bread and yet say it is not lawfull to worship him which is an open deceit and mockery Wherefore Musculus and others to salve this sore are content to fall downe before the Bread and worship Christ therein But Heshusius replyeth against us thus The Divinity is not adored in all the creatures though it be present in all Therefore neither is it necessary that the humanity should be adored in the bread though it be corporally present therein Ans The examples are not alike The adoration of the Divinity is not tyed to all creatures but it is tyed to the humanity assumed as to a proper peculiar Temple Wheresoever then Christs humanity is there the Divinity will be worshipped in it and with it And indeed by this their own maine argument The Ubiquity of Christs manhood confuted by the Ubiquitaries own argument the Ubiquity of Christs manhood is quite overthrowne For seeing the manhood is not to be worshipped in all creatures and every-where it followeth that it is not present in all peares apples ropes cheeses c. as the Ubiquitaries write thereof These differences did D. Vrsine in the yeare of our Lord 1569. thus inlarge and deliver 1. The Supper testifieth that Christs onely sacrifice justifieth The Masse-Priests say that the Masse justifieth for the very worke done as they use to speake that is through the externall rite and action 2. The Supper teacheth us that Christ redeemed us by offering himselfe for us The Masse-Priests say that we are redeemed by Christ offered by them 3. The Supper telleth us that our salvation is perfected by Christs owne sacrifice The Masse-mongers report that it is perfected by infinite numbers of Masses 4. The Supper instructech us how we are ingraffed into Christ by faith by means of the holy Ghost The Masse falsly feigneth that Christ entreth into us corporally or wee are ingraffed into Christ by his corporall conveyance into us 5. The Supper teacheth us that Christ having ended his sacrifice ascended into heaven Our Massemongers tell us that he in his body is on the Aliar 6. In the Supper bread and wine remaine and change not their substance because Sacraments retaine and change not the substance of the signe The Masse-Priests declare unto us that
works unto God but continue in their sins they are condemned for ever 1 Cor. 6.9 for so saith the Scripture Be not deceived neither fornicators nor idolaters nor adulterers Galat. 5.21 nor wantons c. shall inherit the kingdom of God Whereof I tell you before as I also have told you before that they which doe such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God Ephes 5 5. For this ye know that no whoremonger neither unclean person nor covetous person which is an idolater hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God For for such things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience 1 John 3.14 He which loveth not his brother remaineth in death We may farther observe that here is contained another cause of good works arising from the effect of the contrary namely of evill works because they which have not good works but persevere in sin cannot be saved seeing they are destitute of true faith and conversion ON THE 33. SABBATH Quest 88. Of what parts consisteth the conversion of men unto God Answ It consisteth of the mortifying of the old man a Rom. 6 1 4 5 6. Ephes 4.22 23 24. Col. 3.5 6 7 8 9 10. 1 Cor. 5.7 2. Cor. 7.11 and the quickning of the new man Quest 89. What is the mortifying of the old man Ans To be truly and heartily sorry that thou hast offended God by thy sins and daily more and more to hate and eschew them b Rom. 8.13 Joel 2.13 Hosea 6.1 Quest 90. What is the quickning of the new man Ans True joy in God through Christ c Rom. 5.1 14.17 Esay 57.15 and an earnest and ready desire to order thy life according to Gods will and to doe all good works d Rom. 6.10 11. Gal. 2.20 The Explication Here followeth the Doctrine of mans conversion unto God the chiefe questions whereof are 1. Whether mans conversion be necessary 2. What conversion is 3. What are the parts of mans conversion 4. What are the causes of conversion 5. What are the effects of conversion 6. Whether mans conversion be perfect in this life 7. In what the conversion of the godly differeth from the repentance of the wicked 1. Whether mans conversion unto God be necessary MAns Conversion unto God in this life is so necessary that without it no man can attaine unto everlasting salvation in the life to come according to the Scripture which saith Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit John 3.5 Luke 13.3 1 Cor. 6 9. Gal. 5.21 2 Cor. 5.3 Mat. 25.10 hee cannot enter into the Kingdome of God Except yee repent yee shall all likewise perish They which doe such things shall not inherit the Kingdom of God If we be clothed we shall not be found naked Hereunto belongeth the example of the foolish Virgins which are shut out from the Marriage because they had not burning Lampes filled with oyle And to this purpose is it that Christ gave commandement Let your loyns be girded about Luke 12.35 40 46. and your lights burning Be ye also prepared therefore for the Son of man will come at an houre when ye think not And againe The Master of that servant will come in a day when he thinketh not and at an houre when he is not ware of and will cut him off and give him his portion with the unbeleevers And here may we take up that notable sentence of S. Cyprian against Demetrianus When wee are once departed hence there remaineth no longer any place for repentance there is no work of satisfaction Here life is either lost or gained Here we procure eternall salvation by our worship of God and fruit of faith Neither let any man be bindered by sin or force from coming to obtain salvation For no repentance is too late for him that is yet abiding in this world c. Hence it appeareth how necessary conversion is unto the godly or those who are to be justified and saved and therefore that in our exhortations to amendment of life or conversion the foundation or ground is to be laid concerning the absolute and simple necessity of conversion it selfe in all those which are to be justified 2. What mans conversion unto God is THe Hebrew word signifying mans conversion is Thescubah the Greeke word ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã and ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã Some distinguish these two words Mat. 27.3 Heb. 12.17 Rom. 11.29 ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã 1 Sam. 15.11 29. so that ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã in their judgement is spoken only of the repentance of the godly and ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã signifieth also the repentance of the wicked for of Judas it is said that hee repented himselfe where the word ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã is used and of Esau it is said that hee found no place to repentance where the word ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã is expressed Howbeit of God Saint Paul saith The gifts of God are * We have no one English word to answer unto Resipiscentia for our English Repentance expresseth rather the Latine Poenitentia which agreeth as well to the wicked as to the godly without repentance and the Septuagint when they speak of God use either word indifferently It * repenteth me that I have made Saul King The holy One of Israel will not * repent The difference therefore is very little or none at all save that ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã importeth properly a change of the minde or understanding and ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã insinuateth an alteration of the will and purpose Now in mans conversion there is a change of both these parts the understanding and the will The Latines have many appellations and names whereby they expresse the same For they call it Regeneratio Renovatio Resipiscentia Conversio Poenitentia Among all these the Greeke ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã is very well interpreted in Latine by Resipiscentia there being the same reason of both names For as the Latine Resipiscentia is derived from Resipisco which signifieth to wex wise after we have done a thing so the Greeke ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã cometh from ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã which is also to wex wise after an error or fault committed to re-call or retract our judgement and opinion and to alter an evill purpose Some render ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã by the Latine Poenitentia that is repentance or penitency and this Poenitentia is said to be derived either from Poenitet which signifieth to be grieved and to repent or from Poema which signifieth paine and punishment because the griefe which is in repentance is as it were a punishment or as Erasmus is of opinion from pone tenendo as if to repent were to apprehend and lay hold on a latter advisement or to know and understand a thing after it is done However it be yet the name of Poenitentia or repentance is more obscure than the name of Conversio or
The furthering causes of conversion are The crosse and chastisements whether our own or others also the punishments benefits and examples of others The helping causes Jerem. 31.8 Psal 119.71 Mat. 5.16 Thou hast corrected mee c. The subject or matter wherein conversion is placed is the will minde heart and all mans affections wherein there is an alteration by means of conversion The forme of conversion is conversion it selfe with all the properties and circumstances thereof which are 1. In the minde and understanding The materiall cause The form of conversion a right judgement concerning God his will and works 2. In the will an earnest and ready desire and purpose of avoiding our former falls and a declining of Gods displeasure with a resolution to obey God according to all his commandements 3. In the heart new motions with good and reformed affections conformable with Gods law 4. Uprightnesse in our outward actions and whole course of life with obedience begun after Gods law The Object of conversion is 1. Sin or disobedience The object which is the thing from which we are converted 2. Righteousnesse or new obedience which is the thing whereunto we are converted The chief finall cause of conversion is Gods glory The finall causes Luke 22.51 Mat. 5.16 the next and subordinate end is our good even our blessednesse and fruition of everlasting life There is another end also of conversion lesse principall to wit the conversion of others To this place of conversion belong those questions of Pelagianism Whether a man be able to convert himself without the grace of Gods Spirit and Whether by free-will a man be able to prepare himself unto the receit of grace The former was maintained by Pelagius contrary to these expresse testimonies of Scripture Turne thou mee and I shall be turned God worketh in as both the will and the deed An evill tree cannot bring forth good fruit The later the Schoole-men and the Papists at this day defend contrary to the same words of Scripture and contrary to that direct proof against their opinion No man cometh unto mee except my Father draw him Thomas Aquinas attributeth preparation unto free-will Vid. Suââ Theolog Partis primae parte secunda quaest 109 Art 6. but not conversion Now this preparation he thus coloureth that it is indeeda furtherance to the habituall grace of conversion but yet through the free assistance of God moving us inwardly 5. What are the effects of mans conversion THe effects of conversion are 1. A true and ardent love of God and our neighbour 2. An earnest desire to obey God according to all his commandements without exception 3. All good works even our whole new obedience Vid. Cal. Institur lib. 3. cap. 3. Paragraph 16. 4. A desire of converting others and re-calling them into the way of salvation In a word the fruits of true repentance are all the duties of piety towards God and charity towards our neighbour 6. Whether mans conversion be perfect in this life OUr conversion unto God is never perfected and accomplished in this life but is here in perpetuall motion untill it attaine unto perfection in the life to come Wee know in part Hereunto beare witnesse all the complaints and prayers of the Saints 1. Cor 13 9. Pâal 19.12 Rom. â 2 Mat. â 10 Rom. â Gââ â leanse thou mee from my secret faults O wretched man that I am who shall deliver mee c. Forgive us our trespasses The wrestling also and conflicts between the flesh and the spirit in the converted testifie hereof The flesh lusteth against the spirit The exhortations also of the Prophets and Apostles that the converted should yet be more converted confirme this position Hee that is righteous c. Wee may thus make evident demonstrance hereof Revel â2 11 Neither the mortification of the flesh Both parts of coâveâsion are imperfect in this life nor the quickning of the spirit is absolute and perfect in the Saints in this life Therefore mans whole conversion cannot be absolute and peâfect Concerning the imperfection of man in the mortification of the flesh there can be no question or doubt thereof it is so apparent because the Saints of God doe not onely continually wrestle with the concupiscence of the flesh but oftentimes also yield and give over in the conflict oftentimes they sinne and slip and displease God though they defend not their sins but detest bewaile and study and endeavour more and more to shun and avoid them Touching mans imperfection in the quickning of the spirit the same combate giveth testimony and verity sith our knowledge is but in part only the renuing of our will and heart is even such for our will followeth our knowledge Two causes of this imperfection in man Now there are two evident causes why the will of the converted tendeth imperfectly to good in this life 1. Because the renewing of our nature in this life is never made perfect either concerning our knowledge of God or concerning our inclination to obey God whereof Saint Pauls onely complaint maketh sufficient proofe I know that in mee that is in my flesh dwelleth no good thing 2. Because the converted are not alwaies ruled by the holy Ghost Rom. 7.18 19. but sometimes forsaken by God for a season either to examine or try them or to chastise and humble them notwithstanding at length they are re-called to repentance so that they perish not Muke â 24 The ãâã why God ãâã râth ãâã mâârfeâtioâ to be ââman Pâââââ3 Ma. â 12 I beleeve Lord Lord helpe mine unbeliefe But the causes why God finisheth not as hee might mans conversion in this life are these 1. That his Saints may be humbled exercised in saith patience prayers and skirmishing with the flesh and not wex proud with an opinion of perfection but daily pray Enter not into judgement with thy servant O Lord. Forgive us our trespasses 2. That they may more and more goe forward unto perfection and covet it more earnestly 3. That contemning this world they may the more aspire and hasten to the heavenly life as knowing that their perfection is reserved untill then Set your affectioâs on things which are above Col 3 2 3 4. 1 Johâ 3.2 Your life is hid with Christ in God Mortifie therefore your members which are on the earth It doth not appeare what we shall be and we know that when he shall appeare we shall be like him Of this imperfection Calvin hath a notable saying In tit 5. 3. parag â This reparation or restoring faith he is not finished in one moment day or yeer but God bâ continuall and sometimes slow proceedings abolisheth the corruption of the flesh in his Elect. hee cleanseth them from their filth and consecrateth them temples unto himselfe bârenuing according unto true purity all their senses that they may exercise themselves in repentance their whole life time and they know that of
in God How beit they are acceptable unto him in Christ the Mediatour through faith that is for the merit and satisfaction of Christ imputed unto us by faith and for his intercession with the Father for us For as wee our selves please God not in our selves but in his Son so also our works being imperfect and defiled in themselves yet are accepted of God for the righteousnesse of his Son wherewith whatsoever is imperfect and uncleane in them is covered so that it cometh not into Gods sight The person who is the Agent of good works must first be acceptable to God and then the workes please him Otherwise the very best works of man without faith are not gratefull unto God but are an abomination unto him because they are nothing but hypocrisie And the works of the person which pleaseth God so please God as the person himself doth Now the person pleaseth God for the Mediatours sake that is by the imputation of the righteousness and sanctification or satisfaction of Christ being clad therewith as with a garment before God and therefore the works also of the person are for the Mediatours sake pleasing and acceptable unto God God doth not examine our imperfect justice and our works as they are in themselves according to the strict rigour of the law according to which he should rather condemne them but regardeth and considereth them in his Son Hence is it that God is said to have had respect unto Abel Gen. 4.4 and to his offering to wit in his Son in whom Abel beleeved Whence Christ also is called our High Priest by whom our workes are offered unto God Heb. 11.4 He is called also the Altar whereon our prayers and works being put are pleasing to God whereas otherwise they should stink in the fight of God Wherefore it followeth that we doe as it were supply and repaire our want and defect with the perfection of Christs satisfaction in Gods judgement Therefore saith Paul Phil. 3.9 That I might be found in him that is not having mine owne righteousnesse which is in the Law but that which is of the faith of Christ c. 5. Why we are to doe good workes and whether they be necessary BEfore in the 86. Question certain impulsive causes unto good works were specified and expressed which pertain unto this place namely Our regeneration having a necessary coherence with our Justification Our gratefulnesse for our Redemption Our glorifying and magnifying of God The confirmation of our faith and election and our good example unto others whereby to winne them unto Christ These weighty causes may most amply be enlarged if we reduce them to these three Classes or principall heads to wit if we say that good works are to be done by us in respect 1. Of God 2. Of our selves 3. Of our neighbour I. Inrespect of God they are to be done In respect of God that Because of the commandement Mat. 5.16 1. Because of the commandement of God Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorifie your Father which is in heaven God requireth the beginning of obedience in this life and the perfection thereof in the life to come Wherefore we are necessarily to give our selves to good works John 15.12 Rom. 6.13 1 Theff 4.3 that we may perform due obedience unto God who requireth it of us This is my commandement that ye love one another Being made free from sin yee are made the servants of righteousnesse This is the will of God even your sanctification For Gods glory For the glory of God For the setting forth of Gods glory is the chief end why God commandeth and will have good works to be done of us that both by them we may worship and magnifie God and others seeing the same may glorifie out heavenly Father like as that saying of Christ before alledged out of S. Matth. doth teach us To testifie our thankfulnesse Because of that thankfulnesse which the regenerate owe. It is right and just that by whom we are redeemed and from whom we receive exceeding great benefits and those of all sorts we should also love magnifie worship reverence him and declare our love and thankfulnesse towards him by our good works and obedience But God deserveth all our duties by his benefits and wee merit not his benefits by any or all our duties therefore wee owe unto him thankfulnesse in lieu of them which is to be declared in our obedience and good works Rom. 2.1 I beseech you brethren by the mercy of God that you give up your bodies a living sacrifice holy acceptable unto God which is your reasonable serving of God Ye are made an holy Priest-hood to offer up spirituall sacrifices acceptable to God by Jesus Christ II. We are to doe good works also in respect of our selves In respect of our selves and that For confirmation to our selves of our faith Mat. 7.18 James 1.20 Phil. 1.11 That by our good works we may make testimony of our faith and may be assured thereof Every good tree bringeth forth good fruit That faith which is without works is dead Filled with the fruits of righteousnesse which are by Jesus Christ unto the glory and praise of God Now by our works wee must needs know that wee have faith because the effect is not without his cause and wee must know the cause by his proper effect When as therefore we finde not in our selves good works or new obedience wee are hypocrites neither have we faith but an evill conscience For true faith only which never wanteth all her fruits bringeth forth as a fruitfull tree good works obedience and amendment of life and these fruits likewise discern and distinguish true faith from historicall and temporary faith and so also from hypocrifie For our assurance of remission of sins That we may be assured that we have obtained remission of sinnes through Christ and are for Christs sake justified before God for justification and sanctification are benefits linked together which so cleave together and that necessarily as they never can be severed or pulled asunder For Christ obtained both for us at once namely both remission of sins and the holy Ghost who stirreth up in us by faith the study and desire of good works and new obedience For our assurance of our Election 2. Pet. 1.10 That we may be assured of our Election and Salvation Give diligence to make your calling and election sure These proceed from the cause next going before For God hath chosen from everlasting of his free mercy those only which are justified for the merit of his Son Whom hee predestinated Rom. 8.30 them also he called and them also he justified Therefore we are assured of our Election through Justification and that we have received from Christ our Justification which is never given unto the Elect without Sanctification wee know by faith And that we have faith
the worship to be thus done unto him Wil-worship is false worship And To worship God truly is so to worship him as himselfe hath manifested in his word that he will be worshipped Contrariwise in this second Commandement is forbidden all will-worship that is all false worship namely not onely that creatures or Images be not reputed or worshipped for God but also that we resemble not him the very true God by any Image or shape neither worship him by Images and at Images or with any other kinde of worship which himselfe hath not commanded For when he condemneth the chiefe or grossest and most evident kind of false worships namely the worshipping of God at or by Images it is manifest that he forbiddeth also the other kinds of false worships seeing this is the head and fountaine of all the rest For he forbiddeth the most grosse kind of Idolatry not thereby to exclude others and acquit them from this inhibition but because this is the fountaine of all the rest Wherefore all worships whatsoever are instituted by men not by God and in which the same cause of prohibiting or forbidding appeareth are forbidden by the forbidding of this the grossest kind of the rest Therefore whatsoever things hinder Gods true worship they are all contrary to this Commandement Twofold Idolatry 1. Idolatry which is a false or superstitious worship of God Idolatry as we have heretofore shewed is of two sorts 1. When a false god is worshipped that is when in place of the true God or besides him honour or worship is given to some either imaginary or existent thing which is agreeing unto the true God onely This kinde of Idolatry is especially forbidden in the first Commandement and further also in some part in the third Commandement 2. When men erre in the kinde of worship that is when worship or honour is imagined to be done to the true God by some such worke which himselfe hath not commanded This kind is properly condemned in this second Commandement and is called will-worship Who are superstitious Esay 29.13 Mat. 15.9 Col. 2.8.16.22 23. or superstition adding mens inventions to Gods Commandements They are said to be superstitious whosoever adde humane inventions to the Commandements of God This superstition or wil-worship is condemned every where in Scripture In vaine they worship me teaching for doctrine mens precepts Beware lest there be any man that spoile you through Philosophy and vaine deceit through the traditions of men according to the rudiments of the world and not after Christ Let no man condemne you in meat and drink c. Which all perish with the using and are after the commandements and doctrines of men Which things have indeed a shew of wisdome in voluntary religion and humblenesse of minde and in not sparing the body neither have they it in any estimation to satisfie the flesh Hence we answer this objection Object Idolatry is forbidden in the first Commandement and in this second also therefore they both make but one Answ One kind of Idolatry is forbidden in the first Commandement to wit when another god is worshipped another in the second namely when the true God is worshipped otherwise then he ought Repl. Yea but still in both there is Idolatry committed and a strange god worshipped Ans There is indeed an Idol in both alwaies but not alwaies in the intent and profession of men Therefore whosoever offend against the second Commandement offend against the first because they who worship God otherwise then he will be worshipped imagine God to be another or otherwise affected and qualified then he is Therefore they worship not God but the invention of their owne braine which they perswade themselves to be so affected Hypocrisie Hypocrisie which is a pretending or feigning true godlinesse and worship of God doing the externall works commanded by God whether Morall or Ceremoniall without true faith and conversion This vice is depainted and described in these words by the Prophet Esaias This people come neere unto me with their mouth Esay 29.13 14. and honour me with their lips but have removed their hearts farre from me and their feare towards me was taught by the precepts of men Therefore behold I will againe doe a marvellous worke in this people Profanenesse Profanenesse which is a voluntary letting goe or contempt of all religion and of the whole worship of God both internall and externall or else of some part of divine worship This profanenesse is repugnant not onely to this Commandement but also to the whole worship of God in the first and second Table For defence of superstition some alledge Object 1. That such places and sayings as are brought against will-worship speake onely of Mosaicall and Jewish ceremonies and of the wicked and ungodly commandements of men but not of such precepts of men as are authorised by the Church Bishops and such as command nothing contrary to Gods word Answ That this is false which is replyed some demonstrances which are added unto certaine places declare which also reject those humane Laws and ordinances that command any thing in regard of divine worship which is not commanded by God although the same be a thing in his owne kinde not wicked nor forbidden of God So Christ rejecteth the Jews tradition of washing of hands Mat. 15.11 because they had an opinion of worshipping God thereby whereof he saith That which goeth into the mouth defileth not the man but that which cometh out of the mouth that defileth the man Hither also may that be referred which Christ speaketh Mat. 23.25 Woe be to you Scribes and Pharisees Hypocrites for ye make cleane the outer side of the Cup and of the Platter but within they are full of bribery and excesse Now that these and the like things are lawfull setting aside an opinion of superstition in them the Apostle in sundry places doth shew He that observeth the day observeth it to the Lord Rom. 14.16 and he that observeth not the day observeth it not to the Lord. He that eateth eateth to the Lord for he giveth God thanks and he that eateth not eateth not to the Lord and giveth God thanks Againe Whatsoever is sold in the shambles eate ye and aske no question for conscience sake 1 Cor. 10.25 For the earth is the Lords and all that therein is Wherefore they are not simply so condemned but only so farre as they are prescribed for divine worship that is if they be so prescribed as that by the performance of them God is honoured and dishonoured by the omission of them In the same respect is single life also condemned especially seeing the same is not a thing indifferent but to those onely who have the gift of continency according as it is said of Christ He that is able to receive this Mat. 19.12 let him receive it For all men as in the same place Christ saith cannot receive this thing save
Ghost whereof none repent and therefore it is not forgiven neither in this life nor in the life to come The other deniall is speciall and particular 2. Speciall which is the deniall of weaklings and is committed either through errour not voluntarily neither purposed or through feare of affliction when as not withstanding there remaineth still in the heart an inclination and griefe detesting that weaknesse and deniall and some purpose also to struggle out of it and to obey God by applying unto himselfe the promise of grace and by giving himselfe unto repentance Into this deniall may the Elect and Regenerate fall but they get out of it againe and returne unto the confession of the truth in this life as it is shewed and exemplified in Peter Matth. 26. thrice denying his Master through infirmity but at length repenting Dissembling of the truth Dissimulation or dissembling and hiding of the truth when as Gods glory and our neighbours safety requireth a confession of the truth which then requireth it when false opinions concerning God and his will or word or concerning the Church seeme to be confirmed and strengthened by our silence in the minds of men or when those things remaine secret and hidden which God will have knowne and manifest for the maintenance of his glory against the reproaches of the wicked for the convincing of the obstinate and for the instructing of those which are desirous to learn or lastly when our silence maketh us suspected to be approvers and abetters of the wicked So did the parents of the blind man dissemble and those chiefe Rulers also who would not confesse Christ for feare of the Jewes John 9.22 12.42 43. lest they should be cast out of the Synagogue Untimoly confession An unseasonable and untimely confession that is whereby without any advancing of Gods glory and without the furtherance of any ones safety and without any necessity of discharging his calling or duty there is stirred up either a derision and evill entertainment of the truth or the fiercenesse and cruelty of the enemies against the godly Such a confession whereas it doth rather darken then set forth the glory of God and rather hindereth then furthereth the safety of the Church swerveth plainly from the scope and end of true and lawfull confession and therefore is not a right using but an abusing of Gods Name Therefore Christ for biddeth it Give not that which is holy to dogges And Paul Matth. 7.6 Titus 3.10 Object 1 Pet. 3.15 Reject him that is an heretick after once or twice admonition c. Neither doth that crosse this which is said Be ready alwayes to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meeknesse and reverence For Peter willeth us to be alwayes in a readinesse or furnished to make answer concerning the summe and grounds of Christian doctrine and to repulse all slanders and cavils whereby the doctrine of the Gospel is traduced and defamed by the adversaries thereof yet so as that it is not necessary to utter and expound to every one but unto all those which require a reason and an account of our faith thereby either to learne it or know it or to judge of it But whom we see once to scoffe at the true doctrine which hath been expounded and confirmed unto them sufficiently if they againe require a reason and account of our faith we are not to make further answer For so Christ himselfe after he had sufficiently confessed and confirmed his doctrine by testimonies answereth nothing unto the High-Priest and Pilate touching the false witnesses And himselfe rendereth a reason of his silence If I shall tell you you will not beleeve me Matth. 26.63 and 27.14 Another reason is given by Esaiah He was oppressed and was afflicted and did not open his mouth that is because Christ knew he was to suffer according to his Fathers will after his cause was sufficiently defended he is not carefull of delivering his person from injuries contumelies and punishments for he knew that this obedience did tend to his fathers glory But contrariwise when the High-Priest adjureth him he confesseth himselfe to be Christ because then his silence would have given suspicion of contempt of the Name of God whereby he was adjured Object We doe not perceive who are swine and dogges wherefore we are to render a reason of our faith to all without putting any difference Answ Christ doth not call all wicked men swine or dogs but those only who contemne and make a mock of the doctrine confirmed which they have heard and which hath been expounded unto them 2. Christ willeth us not to judge of dogs and swine by the secrets of their hearts but by their present words and deeds If againe it be replyed In matters of difficulty and such as are hard to be judged except there be delivered some certaine and exact rule to judge and deale mens consciences are left wavering and in doubt But if also we are to judge of the outward shew of swine and dogs it is hard to pronounce who are to accounted for swine and dogs Therefore mens consciences are left in doubt unto whom and when confession must be made The Minor is false for Christ will have none to be counted for dogs and swine but such as shew manifest stubbornnesse and obstinacy in their words and deeds of whom it is no hard thing to judge out of the word of God And further the holy Ghost is promised unto all that aske him by whom their judgements and actions may be directed that they erre not And lastly seeing in this life we attaine not unto the perfection of Gods law neither in other things neither in this point they who joyne the desire of Gods direction with an earnest care of Gods glory and love of their neighbour may and ought to be certaine and assured either that their counsels are so ruled by the holy Ghost that they erre not or if they erre that yet their error is pardoned and forgiven them And this certainly sufficeth for the retaining of a good conscience If lastly it be objected that Tyrants and many Magistrates which persecute the Church are swine and dogges and therefore we according to Christs commandement are not to make answer unto them if they demand our Religion We answer that this reason is a fallacy of the accident For if the Magistrate demand our Religion or any other by their commission and in their name we are necessarily to make answer of our confession unto them both in respect of their office whereunto we owe obedience and also in respect of Gods glory according as it is said of Christ Marke 8 3â Whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words among this adulterous and sinfull generation Matth. 10. Luke 12. of him shall the Sonne of man be ashamed also when he cometh in the glory of his Father with
coyne some false-hood Suspiciousnesse is to take things well or ambiguously spoken in the worser part to suspect evill things of those that are good or to suspect without cause or also to make too much of true suspicions What suspiciousnesse is It is lawful for us sometimes to suspect Mat. 10.16 17. except wee will be fooles Beware of men be yee wise as serpents and innocent as doves But it is one thing to conceive a suspicion and another to dwell on it and continually nourish it What suspicion is Foure sorts of evill and good suspicion Now suspicion is an opinion of evill of some man for some probable cause whether true or apparent Suspicion is two-fold Good and Evill 1. Evill suspicion is when it proceedeth from a cause either altogether false or unsufficient as when a cause is feigned where no cause is or when our neighbour is innocent Good suspicion is when wee suspect on good ground or cause sufficient 2. Evill suspicion is when on bare suspicion wee determine something Good suspicion when the matter is left in suspence as long as there are probable reasons on both parts 3. Evill suspicion is when on suspicion wee take counsell how to harme some man Good suspicion doth the contrary 4. Evill suspicion is when on suspicion we conceive hatred Good suspicion doth the contrary In the excesse foolish credulity and foolish Flattery What Credulity is Credulity is hastily or unadvisedly to interpret any thing or to assent to one without just and probable cause or to beleeve a thing of another when there are manifest and probable reasons to the contrary What Flattery is Flattery or assentation is to praise or like things not to be praised thereby to get either the goods or favour of another man Fairnesse of mind is an assistant or speciall kind of truth Therefore it is also here together with truth commanded III Vertue Simplicity Simplicity which is open truth without wrinckles or fetches and compassings or it is a vertue which doth properly and plainly speak and doe such things as are true right and declared in arts and common life Truth is tempered with simplicity and fairnesse of mind or conditions The contrary vices The extremes of simplicity are Feigned simplicity and doublenesse in manners and conversation IV Vertue Constancy Constancy which is a vertue not departing from the knowne truth neither altering his purpose without good and necessary causes but constantly speaking and doing such things as are true just and necessary Or it is a vertue persisting in the truth once found knowne and approved and in the like manner professing and defending the same Constancy is necessary for the preservation and maintenance of the truth The contrary vices therefore it is here also commanded The extremes hereof in the defect are Vnconstancy or Lightnesse which is to alter true purposes and opinions without reason In the excesse the extremes are Pertinacy or Stoicall Stiffenesse and rigour which is a vice arising from a confidence in his owne wit or from pride and ostentation refusing to yield or depart from his opinion albeit it be such as hee seeth by strong reasons to be false but persisting in false opinions or unjust or unprofitable actions V Vertue Docility Docility or a readinesse to learne which is a vertue searching after the reasons of true opinions easily beleeving and yielding to those that teach or shew better things and that upon certain reason and framing his will ready to assent unto true or probable reasons and to leave those things which before hee held and imbraced The same are the extremes of Docility which are of Constancy whereunto also this Docility is necessary The contrary vices for Constancy without Docility degenerateth into Pertinacie and Docility without Constancy degenerateth into Levity Now all these vertues which have been numbred agree and are linked very well one with another For Truth must be tempered with Fairnesse of mind and Simplicity perceived and knowne by Docility preserved and maintained by Constancy And so these former vertues are required to the being of Truth the three vertues following are required to the profitable being of Truth in the world VI Vertue Taciturnity Taciturnity or silentnesse which is a vertue with-holding in silence things secret and unnecessary to be spoken where when and as far as is needfull and avoiding over-much babling and talkativenesse Or it is such a manner of professing the truth whereby secret things whether true or false are kept close and speeches unnecessary and unprofitable are avoided especially untimely and pernicious speeches and such as give offence The contrary vices 1. Pratling 2 Foolish-prating 3. Treachery The extremes hereof in the defect are Pratling Foolish prating and Treachery Pratling is not to be able to keep close any thing but revealeth all things even mens very secrets Foolish prating or futility and folly of speech is to speake unseasonably immoderately and foolishly Treachery is to betray honest attempts and enterprises to the hurt of them whose friend the tale-carrier seemeth or ought to be or not to defend one nor respect his danger when a man ought and may so do likewise to relate and detect things unworthy the mentioning and whose mentioning is harmfull to him to whom it is disclosed or discovered or to informe one of things which must needs be revealed upon no good mind and to no good end Lastly to give information with perjury or a lie In the excesse Haughtinesse Peevishnesse and dissembling of the truth where are necessary or probable causes Peevishnesse or morosity is an overmuch silentnesse In excesse 1. Peevishnesse or morosity 2. Silentnesse and a burying of the truth where Gods glory and the safety of our neighbour or our own or others cause or the love of our friend requireth us to speake VII Vertue Affability Affability or readinesse of speaking which is a vertue gladly and with signification of good will hearing answering speaking where need is upon a necessary and probable cause or it is a vertue easie entertaining the mutuall talks of others and giving signification of good will in conferences speech and gestures Or gentlenesse facility affability consist in giving eare and making answer to others Vide Arist Eth. 4. cap. 4. The contrary vices with some signification of good will The same are the extremes of affability which are of taciturnity or silentnesse likewise levity assentation or affected and laboured affability Silentnesse without affability becometh morosity or peevishnesse and affability without silentnesse becometh pratling and foolish prating babling out things hurtfull unnecessary vaine or secret Therefore Taciturnity and affability are vertues of neere affinity VIII Vertue Urbanity Vrbanity or pleasantnesse which is a vertue of speaking the truth with a certain grace and elegancy to teach comfort exhilarate and nip or touch or it is a certain sauce of truth and speech to wit the
and declared the law The compleatnesse therefore and perfection of our wisedome and salvation which wee have in Christ doth not exclude but include rather and comprehendeth the doctrine of the law OF PRAYER ON THE 45. SABBATH Quest 116. Wherefore is Prayer necessary for Christians Ans Because it is the chiefe part of that thankfulnesse which God requireth of us a Psa 50.14 15. Matth. 17.7 8. And also because God giveth them onely his grace and holy Spirit who with unfeigned groanings beg them continually of him and yield him thanks for them b Luk. 11.9 13. Matth. 13.12 The Explication MAny Questions may be moved concerning Prayer but the chief Questions hereof are foure 1. What Prayer is and how many sorts there are of Prayer 2. Why Prayer is necessary 3. What is required to true Prayer 4. What is the forme of Prayer prescribed 1. What Prayer is and how many sorts of Prayer there are PRayer is the invocation of the true God proceeding from an acknowledgement and sense of our necessity and need and from a desire of Gods bounty in true conversion of the heart and in a confidence of the promise of grace for Christs sake the Mediatour begging at Gods hands necessary blessings corporall and spirituall or giving thankes unto him for the receit of these Invocation the generall of praier The Generall of Prayer is Invocation or Adoration But Adoration is oftentimes taken for the whole worship of God because whom wee worship him wee account for the true God Prayer is a part of invocation For Invocation or To invocate or call upon God is To crave of the true God any thing that is necessary both for the soule and body and to give thankes for benefits received of him Hereof it is here used as the Generall of Prayer Wherefore Prayer compriseth these two specials or parts Prayer hath two parts 1. Petition 2. Thanksgiving What Petition is What Thanksgiving is What Thankfulnesse is namely Petition or Prayer in speciall so called and Thankesgiving Petition is a prayer craving of God blessings necessary both for the soul and for the body Thanksgiving is a prayer acknowledging and magnifying benefits received of God and binding the thankfull party to thankfulnesse acceptable to God Thankefulnesse in generall is an acknowledgement or profession of the quality and quantity of a benefit received and a voluntary binding to the performance of duties mutuall possible and lawfull Thankfulnesse therefore containeth two things Foure sorts of Prayer 1. Tim. 2.1 to wit Truth and Justice Saint Paul maketh mention of foure sorts of prayer 1. Deprecations against evill things 2. Petitions for good things 3. Intercessions and requests for others 4. Thanksgiving for benefits received and evils repelled or removed from us Prayer also is distinguished with respect unto the circumstances of person and place into private and publike prayer Private praye is the conference of a faithfull soul with God Private and publike prayer What private prayer is craving apart for himselfe or others certaine blessings or benefits or giving thankes for some received This is not tyed to words and places For oftentimes an anguished and pensive heart instead of words powreth out sighes and groans only 1 Tim. 2.8 What publike prayer is and the Apostle commandeth that men pray every-where lifting up pure hands Publike prayer is that which is uttered unto God undera certaine forme of words by the whole Church in their assemblies the Minister saying before them as in open congregations it is meet hee should To this is the use of our tongue required and therefore Christ said When yee pray say For to this end was the tongue especially made that God might be magnified by it and Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh Luke 11.2 Lastly hereby others also are to be invited to the lauding and praising of God 2. Why Prayer is necessary for Christians THe causes for which Prayer is necessary are these 1. The Commandement of God because God hath commanded that we call upon him and will this way chiefly and principally be worshipped and magnified by us Psal 50.15 Matth. 7.7 Luke 11.2 Call upon mee in the day of trouble Aske and it shall be given you When yee pray say Our Father c. 2. Our necessity and want For we receive not of God those blessings which are necessary for our safety and salvation except wee aske them of him For God hath promised them to such only as aske him So that prayer is as necessary for us as craving of almes is necessary for a beggar Now what wee speak of the necessity of prayer the same is also to be said of the necessity of thanksgiving For without giving thanks we lose those things that are given and receive not such things as are to be given and are necessary The necessity of both will easily appeare whether we consider the effects of faith or the cause of faith and so also faith it selfe Faith is kindled or increased in no man who doth not aske it no man hath faith who giveth not thanks for it and they which are indued with true faith aske the grace of God and they who have tasted of Gods grace shew themselves thankfull unto God for it and doe more and more crave and desire it The love of God shed abroad in our hearts by the holy Ghost Rom. 5.5 which is given unto us And the holy Ghost himselfe also is obtained by petition or prayers for the holy Ghost is given to none but to him that desireth him Obj. 1. But wee see the wicked also to receive many gifts of the holy Ghost who yet desire him not Therefore not onely they that desire him receive him Answ The wicked verily receive many gifts but not those principall gifts neither those that are proper to the Elect such as are faith repentance and conversion remission of sins regeneration and further what gifts the wicked receive those are not availeable unto them neither doe they receive them to salvation Repl. Infants crave not the holy Ghost and yet they receive him Ans The holy Ghost is not given but to them that aske him that is to those of yeeres and understanding who are able to aske him But even Infants also aske and crave the holy Ghost after this manner having to wit in possibility an inclination to faith and therefore potentially they aske the holy Ghost or have an inclination to aske him Out of the mouth of very babes and sucklings hast thou ordained thy praise Object 2. The effect is not before his cause Psal 8.2 But prayers are the effects of the holy Ghost inasmuch as no man can aske the holy Ghost who hath not the holy Ghost and hee alone worketh prayer in us Therefore the holy Ghost is not received by prayer but is in us before prayer and so by consequent hee is not given to them onely that aske him Answ The
of prayer Some demand Whether wee be so tyed to this forme of prayer that in praying wee may use no other Answ Christ delivered this forme unto us not that wee should be tyed to these words but that wee might know 1. What things aske 2. How to aske them For it is a generall forme of the manner whereby and the things which we are to aske Now it falleth out oftentimes that particular benefits are necessary for us which we must aske of God according to those sayings of Scripture Whatsoever ye shall aske the Father in my name he will give it you John 14.13 James 1.5 Matth. 24.20 If any of you lack wisdome let him aske of God and it shall be given him Pray that your flight be not in the winter But these as touching the words are not in this prayer There are also many examples of prayer in the old and new Testament which as concerning the words 2 Chron. 20.6 2 King 8.15 Dan. 9.4 John 17.1 Acts 4.24 differ from this as the prayers of Josaphat Salomon Daniel Christ himselfe the Apostles and others which neverthelesse were heard of God Wherefore the forme of prayer delivered unto us by Christ is wholly a thing indifferent Object Wee may not be wiser than Christ Therefore seeing hee hath appointed us a certaine form of prayer we must hold us contented therewith and therefore we do amisse when we use other formes of prayer Ans We may not depart from that forme if Christ will have us tied unto it but he will not have us tyed to these words because his purpose was when he taught his Disciples to pray to deliver a briefe summe of those things which we are to aske of God Repl. That is to be retained than which no better can be invented Wee cannot invent a better forme and better words than are these of Christ himselfe Therefore wee must retaine also the forme and words of Christ. Answ We cannot invent better words neither a better forme to expresse this summe of such things as are to be desired which is as it were the generall of all things that are to be desired These generals of Gods benefits which Christ in this forme hath prescribed unto us to be desired cannot be proposed in a better forme but Christ will have us also to descend to specials and aske particular benefits according to our necessity For that form prescribed by Christ is nothing else but a set or course of certaine heads or generals whereunto all benefits as well corporall as spirituall may be referred And when Christ willeth us to desire the generals hee willeth us also to desire the specials And further also those which are here put in generall we are in like manner for this cause to declare in speciall that we may be led into a consideration of our necessity to a desire of making of our petition to God to help our necessity Now that we may doe this we have need also of speciall formes of praying For to the explication of generals by their specials we have need of another form But yet all other formes of prayer must agree with this forme prescribed by Christ Hence Austine testifieth August ad Prob. that All the prayers of saints extant in Scripture are contained in the Lords Prayer And he addeth farther that It is free for us to say the same things in other words when we pray but it is not free for us to say or mention other things than are comprised in this forme of prayer Quest 120. Why doth Christ teach us to call God our Father Answ That presently in the very entrance and beginning of the prayer hee might stirre up in us such a reverence and confidence in God as is meete for the sonnes of God which must be the ground and foundation of our prayer to wit that God through Christ is made our Father and will much lesse deny unto us those things which wee aske of him with a true faith than our earthly Parents deny unto us earthly things a Math. 7. v. 9 10 11 Luke 11. v. 11 12 13. The Explication THis Prayer of Christ hath three parts a Proeme Petitions and a Conclusion The Proeme is Our Father which art in heaven The Proeme hath two parts 1. A calling on the true God in these words Our Father 2. A description of him in these which art in heaven And the Lord used this kind of Proeme because he will be called upon with due honour This honour consisteth 1. In the true knowledge 2. In true confidence 3. In obedience Obedience compriseth 1. True Love 2. True Feare 3. Hope 4. Humiliation 5. Patience Our Father God is called Our Father 1. In respect of our creation The sonne of Adam the Sonne of God 2. In respect of our redemption God is our Father in three respects Luke 3.38 and receiving into his favour by his Son our Mediatour Christ is the only begotten and naturall Sonne of God wee are not his sons by our own nature but are for Christs sake adopted to be sons 3. In respect of our sanctification or regeneration by the holy Ghost in Christ Christ will have us to call God Father and so to invocate him Five causes why we here call God Father 1. In regard of the true invocation of God who is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ 2. In regard of the true knowledge of him that we may know him to be our Father who through and for his Son the Mediatour hath adopted us to be his sonnes when otherwise wee were his enemies John 20.17 I goe unto my Father and unto your Father and who farther also for his Sons sake regenerateth us by the holy Ghost and endoweth us with all gifts and graces necessary 3. In regard of reverence namely that in us may be stirred up and raised true reverence towards him that seeing hee is our Father wee therefore behave our selves as becometh sonnes and be affected with such reverence towards him as it becometh children to be affected towards their Father especially being adopted children and unworthy of Gods blessings and benefits 4. In regard of confidence that the same be raised in us whereby we may be assured that we shall be heard and that hee will give us all things which pertaine to our salvation For seeing God is our Father Rom. 8.32 and even so loving a Father to us That hee hath given his onely begotten Sonne for us to death how then shall hee not give us together with him all things necessary to our salvation 5. For a memoriall of our creation Now God will heare those onely that âo pray because in them hee obtaineth the end of his blessings and benefits Object 1. We invocate the Father according to the prescript of his owne Son Therefore wee must not invocate the Sonne and the holy Ghost Ans The consequence of this reason is denied because the consequence holdeth not from the
heed lest he fall A declaration of the miseries of this life A declaration of the miseries of this life lest we should wexe secure and love and cleave to the world A confession of Gods providence A confession of Gods providence whereby as Cyprian testifieth is shewed that the Divell can effect nothing against us except God first permit him that so our whole feare and reverence might bend to God-wards seeing in our temptations that wicked one can doe nothing except power be given him of God Now the Divell hath power over us according as our sinnes reigne in us as it is said Who gave Jacob for a spoile Esay 42.24 and Israel to the robbers did not the Lord because we have sinned against him For they would not walke in his wayes neither be obedient unto his Law And this power indeed is given him to a double end either to our punishment when we offend or to our glory when we are tried c. Thus far Cyprian The order and coherence of the petitions Now we are to observe the order and coherence of these petitions 1. The Lord commandeth us to desire the true knowledge of God and his promise which is the cause of all other his blessings 2. He willeth us to desire that God would governe us by his Spirit and so continually preserve and confirme us in this knowledge 3. That every of us may doe and fulfill thereby his duty in his vocation and calling 4. That he would give us those things whereby every one may doe his duty namely corporall blessings The fourth petition then agreeth with the former because if we must at all be in our own vocation and calling we must live and have things necessary for the maintenance of our life 5. He adjoyneth next after the petition of spirituall and corporall blessings a very fit objection of our unworthinesse That thou mayest give us spirituall and corporall blessings forgive us our debts Wherefore the fifth petition is the ground and foundation of the rest which being overthrowne the rest fall to ground For if thou resolve not that thou hast God gracious and favourable unto thee how shalt thou have him to be mercifull How shalt thou continue in that knowledge which thou hast not How shalt thou doe thy duty and the will of God seeing thou art his enemy and endeavourest the contrary How shalt thou ascribe all things to God How shall they turne to thy salvation 6. After the petition of spirituall and corporall blessings there followeth lastly the petition of our deliverance from evils both present and to come And from this last petition we returne againe to the first Deliver us from all evils both of crime and paine both present and to come that we may know thee to be our perfect Saviour and so thy name may be hallowed and sanctified of us Quest 128. How concludest thou this Prayer Answ For thine is the kingdome the power and the glory for ever that is we aske and crave all things of thee because seeing both thou art our King and almighty thou art both willing and able to give them all unto us a Rom. 10.11 12. 2 Pât 2.9 And these things we therefore aske that out of them not to us but unto thy holy Name all glory may redound b John 14.15 Jâââm 33.8 9. Psalme 115.1 The Explication THis last part of prayer serveth to confirme our faith and beliefe or confidence of being heard and obtaining our desire to wit that God will and is able to give us those things which we desire Thine is the kingdome Thine is the kingdome This first reason is drawne from the duty of a King which is to heare his subjects to defend and preserve them Therefore thou O God seeing thou art our King mightier then all our enemies having all things in thy power good and evill evill so that thou art able to represse them good so that there is no good so great which thou canst not give as is agreeing and standing with thy nature and seeing we are thy subjects be present and assist us with thy power and save us as who art loving unto thy subjects and thy protection and safe-guard is alone saving and preserving He is called a King 1. Because he hath power over all creatures 2. Because he is the peculiar King of the Church The power And the power The second reason is drawne from the power of God Heare us O God and give us what we desire because thou art mightier then all our enemies thou art able to give us all things and thou only art able in thee alone resteth this power joyned with exceeding goodnesse The glory And the glory The third reason is taken from the end or finall cause We desire these things for thy glory From thee alone the true God and soveraigne King we desire and expect all good things and professe thee to be the Author and fountaine of all good things And verily because this glory is due unto thee therefore also do we desire them of thee Heare us therefore for thy glory For this petition and expectation of all good things from thee is nothing else but the attributing and yeelding unto thee thy due glory and honour and especially because thou wilt also for thy glory sake give us those things which we desire For what things serve for thy glory the same wilt thou performe and do but those things which we desire serve for thy glory therefore thou wilt give them us Give us therefore these things that we desire and the glory shall returne and redound unto thee if thou deliver us For so shall thy kingdome and power and glory be manifested Object We seeme to bring perswasive and moving arguments unto God whereby we may move him to doe what we desire But in vaine are reasons used to him who is unchangeable God is unchangeable Therefore in vaine use we these reasons unto him Ans This is a fallacy putting that for a cause which is no cause For we grant this argument in respect of God but not in respect of us For we do not when we thus speak use reasons to move God or perswade him to do it but to perswade our selves that God will do this and to confirm and assure us that we shall be heard and to acknowledge our necessity and the goodnesse and truth of God Wherefore these reasons are not adjoyned to our prayers as thereby to move God but only to confirme and assure us that God will doe what we desire because these are the causes why he doth it Thou art a most good King therefore thou wilt give these things to thy subjects Thou art most powerfull and mighty therefore thou wilt shew thy power in giving these gifts which are most great and which can be given of none other but of thee alone It shall be to thy glory therefore thou wilt doe it because thou hast care of
de veritate mat Art 26. q. 7. An. Christi 1270. The sufficiency of Christs merit is equally extended to all but not the efficacy thereof which comes to passe partly by free-will partly by Divine election by which the effect of Christs merits is conferred in mercy on some and in Gods just judgement it is with-drawn from some Idem in cap. 5. Apocal. We may speake two wayes of that Redemption which was performed by the suffering of God Either according to sufficiency and so his suffering redeemed all because he delivered all so far as concerned him for he is sufficient to save and redeeme all although there were infinite worlds as Anselme saith lib. 2. Cur Deus homo c. c. 14. or according to efficacy and so he redeemed not all by his suffering because all do not adhere to the Redeemer and therefore all have not the efficacy of redemption Peter Lombard l. 3. dist 22. Christ offered himselfe for all to God the Trinity in respect of the sufficency of the price but only for the Elect in respect of efficacy because he effected salvation only for the predestinated Peter Galatinus de arcanis Cathol veritatis l. 8. c. 14. on that place of Esay cap. 53. My just Servant shall justifie many Though the suffering of Christ is sufficient to blot away the sins of all men yet it was not to blot them all away but of those only who were to beleeve in him and were to repent for that cause he saith And he tooke away or âare the sins of many IX Thus besides the Schoole-men the Orthodox Fathers also teach So Prosper Aquitanicus in the yeare of Christ 460. Resp ad object Vincent object 1. Whereas it is rightly said that our Saviour was crucified for the redemption of all the world for undertaking the affaires of humane nature and for the common losse in Adam yet it may be said that he died only for these to whom his death was profitable And Cyril on John l. 11. c. 19. saith That Christ is an Advocate for the sins of all the world that is not only for the Jews but also for other Nations or for all who being called by faith attaine to righteousnesse and sanctification so that the benefit of a Mediatour not without cause belongs only to them whose Mediatour and High-Priest he is X. But of all men Austin speakes most clearely whose opinion because it is altogether ours I thought to set in opposition to some Sycophants Thus he speaks If we consider * Tom. 1. ad Art falsò imp Art 1. the greatnesse and power of the price and that it belongs to the only cause of mankinde the bloud of Christ is the redemption of the whole world but they that passe out of this life without faith and the Sacrament of regeneration they are not partakers of redemption Whereas then by reason of that one nature of all and the one cause of all undertaken by our Lord truly all are said to be redeemed and yet not all are delivered from captivity doubtlesse the propertie of redemption is in them out of whom the Prince of this world is ejected and now they are no more the vessels of Satan but the members of Christ Whose death is not so spent upon mankinde that they also who are not regenerated should appertaine to his redemption but so that what by one example is done for all by a particular Sacrament should be celebrated in each one for that cup of immortality which was composed of our infirmity and of our verity and of divine verity it hath in it selfe that which may benefit all but if it be not drunke it doth not cure A monition of PHILIP PARRY to the Reader THis doctrine of the efficacy of Christs death D. Parry handled more at large in the first part of the golden Ladder of salvation where he wrote a particular Exercise of it As also in the Epitome of Arminianisme or The examination of the five Articles of the Remonstrants in the Netherlands As also in the Body of Christian doctrine to the 40. Question Edit posthumae Also Collegio 18. disp 23. of Christs death for all And lastly in that peculiar Speech which we placed among the Orations declaimed in the University Tom. 2. oper Theol. D. Parry In which Writings he defends and retaines that distinction of the Schoole-men and Ancient Fathers of sufficiency and efficacy with other Orthodox Divines But the good old man a little before his death when he understood that in the Provinciall Synod of Dort this was called into question unwisely by some brethren under Parries name and authority he began to think more seriously of it supposing that it was not altogether so necessary whereas without it these ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã or seeming contradictions of Scripture may seeme to be fitly reconciled XI We therefore with all our heart reject the Epicurean blasphemies of the late Pelagians namely Huberus Puccius and such like by which the foundation of Christian faith is utterly overthrowne as 1. That Christ so died for all men that by his death truly and undoubtedly all men are freed from all sin and condemnation whether they beleeve or not 2. That by Christs death God was reconciled to all mankind and that he hath truly received into his favour the whole race of mankinde whether they be Turks Jews or Epicures 3. And that he hath also received them to mercy who before his death were in hell For Huberus in his 66. These saith That Christ died effectually for them 4. That remission of sins is given equally to all Idem Thes 270. Puccius de âffiâ pag. 7. Idem lâb MS. cap. 24. 5. That the pardon of sin is generall 6. That the Reprobates were as well saved by Christ as others 7. That all and every one by the bounty and universall grace of God the Father in Christ are saved 8. That as Christ was the Creator so he is the Redeemer of all and every one One Egge is not liker to another then Huberus is to Puccius they both build upon one foundation to wit upon the generall redemption pardon and salvation by Christs death without any particular faith from which notwithstanding Infidels fall away here is only the difference that what is covertly and sophistically spoken by Huberus is roundly professed by Puccius to wit Pelagianisme necessarily resulting thence as is shewed in Margarita Aurea that there is no originall sin seeing that by the power of Christs death all men and every one are borne as they are men according to Huberus as they are redeemed men according to Puccius in the state of grace and salvation saith he in the bosome and grace of God saith this and therefore in the state of blessednesse so they procure not their owne destruction by infidelity Let the Church yea let God judge betweene these two and betweene Osiander with what conscience he can deny that there is any controversie about this to wit
mankinde did predestinate some to life eternall to be saved in Christ is none other in the counsell of God then what in time moved him that he should bestow upon his Elect according to his revealed word faith and life eternall to wit his meere good pleasure and free-will of electing them in a Christ and not their fore-seene holinesse or good b works for they were all sinners alike and unapt for good c works unlesse that God doth operate these in them because he had predestinated and d elected them before Testimonies of Scripture a Rom. 9.18 He will have mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth Ephes 1.5 Who hath predestinated us whom he hath adopted to be sons in Christ Jesus to himselfe according to the good pleasure of his will Mat. 11.26 Even so Father because it hath pleased thee b 1 John 4.10 In this is love not that we loved God but that he loved us John 15.16 You have not chosen me but I have chosen you Rom. 9.11 Not of works but of him that calleth Tit. 3.5 Not by the works of righteousnesse which we have done but by his mercy he hath saved us Ephes 1.4 He hath elected us in him in love Deut. 7.7 Not because you were many hath God above all people loved and chosen you but because the Lord loved you c Ephes 2.3 We were all the children of wrath as others were Mat. 7.8 An evill tree bringeth not forth good fruit d 2 Cor. 3.5 Not that we are sufficient of our selves to thinke any thing as of our selves but our sufficiency is of God See also Ephes 1.4 Rom. 8.30 X. Why God did not choose all or did not forsake all but some onely and why he chose us rather then others I say Jacob Peter and Paul rather then Esau Judas and Simon Magus in Gods eternall counsell no other reason can be given then what is revealed in his Word to wit why he did not call all in time or not call convert or not convert to wit the gracious and just pleasure of his a will and not the fore-seene inequality worthinesse or unworthinesse of men as if God had fore-seene that these should be good in themselves and others should be wicked for God saw all men equally corrupted and therefore in respect of worth he might have justly b rejected all S. Paul tells us that the cause of this good will and pleasure of God was the manifestation of his mercy and c wrath but why that seemed good to God thus and not otherwise it is that unsearchable depth of the wisdome of God to be adored by us with the Apostle O the d depth The cause may be hid it cannot be unjust saith e Austine Testimonies of Scripture and of the Ancient Fathers a Mat. 11.25 26. I thank thee Father Lord of heaven and earth that thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent and hast revealed them to babes Even so because it pleased thee O Father See also Ephes 1.5 6. b Rom. 9.11 The children being yet unborne when they had done neither good nor evill that the purpose of God might remaine sure according to election that is not of works but of him that calleth c Rom. 9.22 What if he being willing to shew his wrath and make knowne his power hath suffered with much gentlenesse the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction and to make knowne the riches of his glory towards the vessels of mercy c. Rom. 9.17 For this cause have I raised thee that I might make knowne my power on thee and that my Name might be declared through all the earth Prov. 16.4 God made all for himselfe even the wicked for the evill day d Rom. 11.33 O the deep riches of the wisdome and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgements and his wayes past finding out e August ad Paul epist 59. Why some belong to predestination some do not belong the cause may be occult it cannot be unjust XI But the cause why God chooseth not these as uncleane vessels ordained to wrath and eternall a damnation is none other then why now and for ever according to Law and Gospell he punisheth and condemneth them to wit in regard of God his most just anger against b sin in regard of the reprobate their sins malice and c infidelity for as God in his justice punisheth none but for d sin so he predestinated no man to punishment but for sin Testimonies of Scripture a Prov. 16.4 God hath made all for himselfe the wicked also for the evill day See Rom. 9.22 Mat. 25.41 Jude 4. b Psal 5.6 He hateth all the workers of iniquity c Ephes 5.6 For these things the wrath of God cometh upon the children of disobedience d Ezek. 18.4 That soule that sinneth shall die XII Therefore there is no injustice in Gods predestination but all things are done graciously and justly for it is an act of grace to pardon the Elect that debt which he might have justly exacted from them and it is an act of justice to require it of the reprobate which he was not bound to remit unto a them yea God should be just if he punish b both because he found both in the same corruption they then that are condemned cannot pretend that they have not deserved punishment nor can they who are justified glory that they have deserved grace and c salvation Testimonies of Scripture and of Ancient Doctors a Mat. 20.13 15. Friend I do thee no wrong may not I do with mine own what I please Is thine eye evill because I am good Rom. 11.35 Or who hath first given to him that he might be repaied b August de bono perseverant cap. 8. He should be just though he punished both he who is delivered hath cause to give thanks he who is condemned hath no cause to complaine c Ambrose l. 2. c. 1. De vocat Gent. Neither is the complaint of the damned man just nor the bragging of the justified true if either the one say that he hath deserved punishment or the other affirme that he hath merited grace XIII All things saith Luther depend upon Gods predestination to wit In praefat comment ad Rom. who are to beleeve who not who are to be freed from sin who are to be blinded who are to be condemned and who justified For in them who are elected to life he worketh by calling them to repentance faith justice comfort a glory in those that are predestinated to damnation he doth not worke but in them he findeth sin infidelity injustice desperation and shame in many notwithstanding he worketh most just b induration and in all eternall desertion and rejection from Gods c presence Testimonies of Scripture a Rom. 8.29 30. Whom he fore-knew he also predestinated to be conformable to the image of his Son that he might be the first-borne among many brethren Those whom he predestinated he called whom he called them he hath justified whom he justified
Dr. DAVID PARRY In Witteberg An. 1592. a.d. Disputed the 23. of May IN WHICH The Orthodox Doctrine of the Person of JESUS CHRIST is asserted according to the rule of holy Scripture and the consent of pious Antiquity The Argument of HUNNIUS his Theses Of the hypostaticall Union THese positions of Hunnius have in their front and title honey cunningly couched but in the belly very gall The front extends almost to the 17. Thesis so far orthodoxally enough if you except the ambushes they confute the old Heresies by proving that Christ is a person God and Man consisting of two natures true and intire to wit the divine and the humane and that the Son of God the Word was made flesh not by conversion of the deity into flesh but by assumption of the divinity into God to which who freely and heartily subscribes not he is not Orthodox The belly swels with Ubiquitary poyson in the next Thesis to the 39. for he layeth certaine hypotheses or suppositions concerning the manner and force of the union as it were foundations of the future Disputation concerning the reall communication of the properties and of the omnipresence of his flesh which he paints with wonderfull Sophistry but all of them are false to wit That the whole Word did assume the whole flesh so that as the flesh is never without the Word so the Word is never without the flesh that is without the dimensions of the flesh that such an union is the dwelling of the whole fulnesse of the deity within the flesh that without the flesh the deity of the Word is no where that finally the flesh hath most eminently transcended all locality being in the illocall person of the Word and that it hath truly obtained an illocall manner of existing that is to be illocall in the union In the interim he cunningly conceales the definition and forme of the hypostaticall union which he ought first to have explained as being the head of the whole dispute and not delude people with a lying title But this he did lest the manifest falshood of the specificall difference should have weakened and shaken his cause before its time The taile againe shews the honey but hides the sting for he deduceth foure consectaries or corollaries 1. That the union should be defined by the true and solid communion 2. That the person of the Word be communicated and conferred upon the flesh ineffably 3. That the deity of the person of the Word or the whole fulnesse of the deity be communicated to the humanity 4. That finally under this plenitude of the whole deity the majesty of the properties of the Word be infallibly understood No Orthodox man will contradict these points if they be meant of the true union of the natures and communion of the properties in the concret but that both these and the precedent passages for the most part all of them are nothing else then treacherous subterfuges of Ubiquity even those that have but weake eyes may see and this in a briefe examination shall be shewed The Positions of Hunnius concerning the union I. Jesus Christ in the true knowledge of whom consisteth our eternall salvation is God and man that is a person subsisting of two natures to wit the divine and the humane The Animadversion How the person of Christ is made up of two natures Thus speake some of the Fathers and almost all the Schoole-men that the person of Christ doth consist is made up is constituted is compounded is made of two natures the divine and humane or of three substances the deity the soule and the body but so they explaine this that they neither make any confusion of natures nor any imperfection of the person of the Word before the Incarnation nor yet a quaternity of the persons in the divinity for they teach that diverse wayes one thing may be made up of two or three things One way is when of two or more things remaining entire and perfect one thing is made up as in those A thing is said diversly to be made up of more things the forme whereof is composition order or figure so a heape of wheat is made up of many graines and a City of many Citizens Another way is when one thing is made up of others which remaine not in their perfection but are changed as when a mixed body is made up of the elements Metheglen is made of water and honey The third way is when some third thing different specifically is made up of two imperfect things without mixture as of matter and forme as man is composed of the reasonable soule and the body None of these wayes is the person of Christ said to consist of two natures or properly composed of them for the hypostaticall union is not the confusion of the natures or onely an ordered disposition betweene themselves as was that Nestorian parastasis rather then hypostasis ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã See Cassian l. 1. de Incar neither is it a permixtion for some of the Ancients improperly called it a mixtion neither is it a composition of matter and forme into one third thing which is neither of them for the Word is not the forme of the flesh nor is this the matter of the Word neither againe was the Word by assuming the flesh made a person or an other person which the 8. and 12. Thesis confesse The fourth way is when improperly and at large a thing is said to consist of many in which many things are put together and so at length they say in this sense that the person of Christ consisteth or is compounded of two natures whereas a composition in a large sense is the position of many things together for so they call the hypostaticall union a composition Wherefore to avoid errour they speake more warily and they say that the person of Christ subsisteth in two natures which phrase the Orthodox Writers retaine as being more proper although we thinke it not fit to contend about words with any who have a right opinion of the matter it selfe II. The divine nature and so this word God is not here taken absolutely for so the whole Trinity should be incarnate but relatively is understood the second person the onely begotten Son who in the bosome of the Father and with the Father is one and the same John 1. and 10. The Image of the invisible God Col. 1. The brightnesse of the Fathers glory and the character of his substance Heb. 1. God the Word John 1. The mighty God Isaiah 9. God blessed for ever Rom. 9. The Animadversion Damascen and the Ancients write that the divine nature assumed the flesh in one of the persons or in the person of the Word It is rightly said then that the divine nature in Christ is not to be understood absolutely as a nature but relatively as a person Therefore Thomas and the Schoole-men use rather to say that the person of the Word assumed the nature then
and in the obedience of faith by the grace of the holy Ghost On the other side what sort of men he hath appointed to condemne to wit such as are not converted Infidels strangers from Christ both which is taught in the Gospell So many good men chiefly Politicians judge of this Article neither do they think it fitting to wade deeper into this Controversie especially seeing it seemes to ascribe all the meanes of salvation fully to God to Christ and to grace And truly here should be no question if the Authors meant onely this that by this Article is explained the popular doctrine of the qualities of those that shall be saved or damned But because in the Conference they professe Coll. Hag. p. 84. That this Article containes the doctrine of predestination to salvation but deny that the qualities of those that shall be saved to wit faith and perseverance proceed from predestination as from their fountaine but contend that these are in order before predestination or election and not obscurely they make them depend upon mans will whence necessarily God must be robbed of the full glory of our salvation man must be puffed up with pride our Christian comfort in life and death must be undermined free justification and the assurance of salvation must be denied whatsoever they pretend in their garnished speeches to the contrary Therefore this Article cannot be simply approved of and it is full of equivocations and dangerous swelling phrases under which Pelagianisme is under-hand brought into the Church which fraud that it might appeare the lesse they purposely abstaine from the word predestination Now in Austines time the Pelagian Heresie was thus 1. That Adams sin hutted no man but himselfe and that man is not borne now in a worse condition then he was created 2. That Christ was seene and died to expiate all sins committed by imitation of Adam 3. That salvation in Christ is so proposed to all men that whosoever will beleeve and be baptised may be saved 4. That God fore-knew before the foundation of the world who were to beleeve and doe good works and who were to continue in the Faith being assisted by grace and that he predestinated for his kingdome whom he fore-saw being freely called would beleeve above others and would be worthy of their calling and should die an happie âeath 5. That the grace of God was given to all men according to their merit for the better using of their free-will 6. And that in this life so much is given that man may if he will be free from all sin Against this Heresie Hierome and Austine disputed at large and Austine retracted three whole Chapters Tom. 7. in opusculis 1. Concerning originall sin 2. Of grace and the cause of predestination 3. Of the perfection of righteousnesse Pelagius in the Synod of Palestina being condemned did so farre revoke his errour that he wished Anathema to him that thinks or sayes Apud Augustin de grat Christi cap. 2. that the grace of God by which Christ came into this world to save sinners is not necessary not onely every houre or every moment but also to every one of our actions and who goe about to take this away they shall be punished eternally Who would not cleere Pelagius in this case but under the buskin of this word grace he deluded the Palestine Bishops as Austine sheweth he left behinde him two disciples Caelestius and Julianus young men of a sharpe wit and with whom Austine in Africa had much adoe At last this infection flew over the Mediterrane-sea into Sicilie and Marsiles in France not all of it but onely so much as concerned the point of grace and predestination and the death of Christ the Asserters of which were called Semi-pelagians and the remainders of the Pelagians of which points there are extant the Epistles of Prosper Aquitanicus and of Hilarius Arelatensis to Austine whose learned Answer contained in two Books of the predestination of the Saints and of the good of perseverance and in a third concerning correction and grace To which Answer if the Authors of these Articles at this day would stand as they may and should stand for it is altogether S. Pauls doctrine the matter had beene decided ere this For indeed Arminius with his followers have at this day re-assumed the cause of the Marsilians and Syracusians but somewhat more handsomly dressed Neither could he be ignorant of this and therefore he used but little ingenuity in his tergiversation when he wrote in the Articles That he acknowledgeth neither Semi-pelagianisme objected against him nor nine nor five nor foure inches of it But to returne to the Article in it there be divers equivocations as shall appeare 1. The first lofty phrase lieth hid in Gods immutable Decree According to Scripture that is Gods immutable Decree which absolutely is not changed nor by the creatures can be changed for so God pronounceth himselfe immutable and his counsell immutable Mal. 3.6 Isaiah 46.10 I am God and change not My counsell shall stand and I will do all that I have decreed But they understand that God by an immutable Decree indeed hath decreed to save beleevers in regard of the species that is none but beleevers but not by a decree altogether immutable in respect of the individuals to wit of this or that beleever but under a condition if this or that beleever do not cause a change For they thinke as appeares by the fifth Article that they who beleeve to day may be unbeleevers to morrow and againe of unbeleevers may come to beleeve consequently therefore they thinke that God to day may decree not to save which yesterday by his immutable decree he appointed to save and that againe he can decree to save them still changing their condition If this be to give to God an immutable decree let themselves judge sure Jam. 1.17 no shadow can be more changeable then such a decree which the Scripture denieth The Authors Decreti Holland pag. 5. place such a decree in God Mat. 11.21 23.37 denying That any by God are invited to salvation to whom he hath not altogether decreed to give salvation for this being granted we must say that God had altogether decreed to give salvation to the Cities of Judea and Galilee whom Christ by preaching invited to salvation but seeing they beleeved not they were not saved therefore either he before did âot decree to save them or afterward he changed his decree 2. The second ââââing phrase and that the chiefest the foundation of the rest containing the âââââe of the whole cause and difference of both parts is in the word appointed This according to the Scripture signifieth to us that God not onely from eternity appoâââed to save them who in time beleeve and persevere and are saved but also to elect them in Christ and to predestinate them to salvation and decreed to bestow on them qualities requisite to salvation to wit faith
is the most proper effect of predestination so that without perseverance predestination cannot be fulfilled 4. Because Christ prayed Coll. p. 344. and doth pray for the perseverance not of Peter alone but of all who were to beleeve by the Apostles preaching but the Father alwayes heares the Son Luke 22.32 Joh. 17.20 John 11.42 c. 5. Because they that are ingraffed into Christ by true faith Coll. p. 344. pray incessantly for their owne perseverance but whatsoever they aske of God by faith they obtaine it And this was Austines second Argument for the good of perseverance 6. Because they that are ingraffed by faith into Christ truly Coll. p. 345. are by the power of God faithfully preserved in faith persevering to the end Coll. p. 345. 1 Pet. 1.5 7. Because they that are by true faith ingraffed into Christ have their salvation sealed in their hearts by the earnest of the holy Ghost and consequently their faith and perseverance are sealed too Coll. p. 346. 2 Cor. 1.21 Ephes 1.13 c. 8. Because true beleevers are like a tree that doth not wither the wise man that built upon the rock the seed cast into the good ground c. according to Scripture Coll. p. 346. 9. Because true beleevers are distinguished from temporary back-sliders by reason the faith of those is rooted in their hearts but the faith of these hath no roote 10. Because the Scripture expresly confirmes Coll. p. 347. that the true beleevers can or shall never utterly fall away Rom. 6.2 8 9 10 11. 1 Joh 3.9 1 Joh. 5.4 Against these points all that with much verbosity are handled by the Novelists in the Conference from page 414. to page 459. come to this one point of the condition required in the faithfull which exception wee have already shewed both to be weake and also to be overthrowne by the promises themselves now all are reduced to this one solid and unanswerable demonstration from the position of sufficient causes to the position of the effect thus To whom God hath promised to give certainly perseverance in faith and who are kept by the power of God in faith to the end and for whose perseverance Christ hath prayed and doth pray and who pray themselves incessantly for the same and whose perseverance is grounded in Gods eternall predestination their perseverance in true faith unto the end is not doubtfull but sure according to the Scripture All ingraffed into Christ by true faith are such to whom God hath promised to give perseverance Jer. 32.40 Psal 25.1 c. and who by the power of God are preserved by faith unto salvation 1 Pet. 1.5 and for whose perseverance Christ did and doth pray John 17.20 Rom. 8.34 and who daylie in the Lords Prayer call upon God for the same whose perseverance at length is founded in Gods eternall predestination Mat. 24.24 Rom. 8.30 Ephes 1.11 14. 1 Thes 2.13 14. c. Therefore the perseverance of all those who are inserted by true faith into Christ is not doubtfull but certaine according to Scripture No lesse firme a demonstration doth the proximate cause yeeld which begets true faith alwayes remaining in the Elect out of two sayings in Scripture joyned together 1 Pet. 1.23 You are renewed not of mortall seed but of immortall by the word of God which abideth foe ever And 1 John 3.9 He that is borne of God sinneth not because the seed of God remaineth in him nor can he sin because he is borne of God Hence we reason thus They who are borne of the immortall seed of Gods word and in whom this immortall seed notwithstanding their infirmities doth remaine in them also faith abides nor doth it finally faile and consequently perseverance which is faith it selfe not failing but remaining and persevering the reason of this is the individuall knitting of the cause and the effect because the immortall seed of Gods word remaineth not in whom it doth remaine but by faith All that are ingraffed into Christ by true faith are borne againe of the immortall seed of Gods word as Peter the Apostle witnesseth and in them abideth this immortall seed not withstanding their infirmities witnesse John the Apostle In all then that are by true faith ingraffed into Christ faith remaines neither doth it ever utterly faile and consequently perseverance c. What need many words If the perseverance of the Saints be doubtfull then is it not given certainly by God to all them that aske it daylie praying with all their heart Hallowed by thy Name thy Kingdome come thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven Leade us not into tentation Cyp. de Orat. Aug. de bono persev c. 2.3.6 but deliver us from evill c. In which Petitions Cyprian and Austine learnedly and religiously teach that perseverance is begged of God then 2. this promise of God besides others will be vaine Heare O house of Jacob who have beene carried by me from the wombe even to your old age I am with you and till you be hairy I will carry you Isaiah 46.3 Phil. 1.6 I have made I will beare I will also carry and will deliver 3. In vaine will the Apostles most hearty perswasion confidence and promise be I am perswaded that he who hath begun a good worke in you will perfect it Rom. 8.33 1 Cor. 1.8 untill the day of Jesus Christ For I am perswaded that neither life nor death c. can separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus God will confirme you to the end unblamable untill the day of our Lord Jesus Christ 4. In vaine will be the prayer and confidence of the Saints praying with David O God forsake me not in mine old age and when my head groweth gray Thou hast shewed me many and great afflictions but thou hast returned and quickned me 5. Justifying faith will be in vain or the assurance of the remission of sins for the time present for he that doubteth of Gods promise for the time to come feignes that he beleeves the promise of the time present Isai 46.3 Isai 43.25 for these are conjoyned I did beare you I will beare you till your old age I I am he who blot out thine iniquities c. and will not remember thy sins any more 6. In vaine finally is the faith of eternall life and salvation because he that doubts of his perseverance in faith without which life eternall is not obtained how can he be confident of life eternall for he that doubts if he shall live till the morrow how can he be assured he shall live eternally so instead of faith a fallacious opinion shall take place in mens consciences hesitation doubting feare anxiety undermining and overthrowing all Christian comfort and confidence will domineere These are the fruits which the deniall of perseverance will bring forth all which are false impious blasphemous against which the perseverance of the Saints stands as a strong