Commissioners to tax men secundum faculâ—ates and so make all mens estates Arbitrary the answer is that in lâ—vying of publicke aydes upon mens goods and estates which are variable and probably cannot be certainly knowne by any but the owners it is impossible to avoyd discretion in the assesments for so it ever was and ever will bee By this appeares that the Votes of the two Houses against the Commission of Array were against the Law The death of the King dissolves the Parliament H. 9. if Kings should referre to the politick capacity it would continue after his death 2 H. 5 â— parâ— instit â—6 4 pars Iust 46 which proves that the King cannot be said to be there whâ—â— he is absent as now he is there is no inter regnum in the Kingdome the dissolution of the Parliament by hiâ— death shewes that the beginning and end thereof referrs to the naturall person of the King and therefore he may lawfully refuse the Propositions 2. H. 5 Chap. 6. to the King onely it belongs to make Leagues with Forraigne Princes this shewes where the supreame power is and to whom the Militia belongs 8. H. 6. numb 57. Rott Parl. Cooks 4 pars instit 25. H. 6. No priviledge of Parliament is grantable for treason felony or breach of the peace if not to any one Member not to two not to ten not to the major part 19 H. 6.62 The Law is the inheritance of the King and his people by which they are ruled King and people And the people are by the Law bound to ayd the King and the King hath an inheritance to hold Parliaments and in the ayds granted by the Commonalty If the major part of a Parliament commit treason they must not be Judges of it for no man or body can be Judge in his own cause and aswel as ten or any number may commit treason the greater number may aswell The King by his Letters patents may constitute a County palatine and grant Regall rights 32 H. 6.13 Plowd 334. this shewes where the supreame power is 17. Ed. 4. Rot. Parl. numb 39. Ed. 4. No priviledge of Parliament is grantable for treason fellony or breach of the peace if not for one not for two or more or a major part The same persons must not bee Judge and party Calvins Case 7. pars fol. 11 12. A corporate body can commit no treason nor can treason be committed against a corporate body 21. E. 4.13 and 14. but the persons of the men who make that body may commit treason and commit it against the naturall person of him who to some purposes is a body corporate but quatenus corporate no treason can bee committed by or against such a body that body hath no soule no life and subsists onely by the fiction of the Law and for that reason the Law doth conclude as aforesaid Plow com 213. therefore the Statue of 25. E. 3. must bee intended of the Kings naturall person conjoyned with the politique which are inseparable and the Kings naturall person being at Holmby his politique is there also and not at Westminster for the politique and naturall make one body indivisible If all the people of England should breake the league made with a forraigne Prince 19 Ed. 4.46 22 Rd. 4. Fitz. jurisdiction â—â—st plaeite without the Kings consent the league holds is not broken and therefore the representative body is inferiour to his Majesties The King may erect a Court of Common pleas in what part of the Kingdome he pleaseth by his letters patents can the two Houses do the like 1 Ed. 5. fol. 2 It cannot be said that the King doth wrong 1 Ed. 5. 4 Ed. 4.25 5 Ed. 4 29. declared by all the Judges and Serjeants at Law then there The reason is nothing can be done in this Common wealth by the Kings grant or any other act of his as to the Subjects persons goods Lands or liberties but must be according to established Lawes which the Judges are sworne to observe and deliver betweene the King and his people impartially to rich and poore high and low 2 Pars instit 158. and therefore the Justices and the Ministers of Justice are to be questioned and punished if the Lawes be violated and no reflection to be made on the King All Counsellors and Judges for a yeere and three moneths untill the tumults began this Parliament were all left to the ordinary cause of Justice what hath been done sithence is notorious For great Causes and considerations an Act of Parliament was made for the surety of the said Kings person R. 3. 1 R. 3. cap. 15. if a Parliament were so tender of King Rich. the 3. the Houses have greater reason to care for the preservation of his Majesty The Subjects are bound by their allegiance to serve the King for the time being Hâ—n 7. 11 H. 7. c. 1. against every Rebellion power and might reared against him within this Land that it is against all Lawes reason and good conscience if the King should happen to be vanquished that for the said deed and true duty and allegiance they should suffer in any thing it is ordained they should not and all Acts of processe of Law hereafter to be made to the contrary are to be void This Law is to be understood of the naturall Person of the King for his politick capacity cannot be vanquished nor war reared against it Relapsers are to have no benefit of this Act. It is no Statute â—â— H. 7.20 4 H. 7.18 Henry 8. 7 H. 7.14 if the King assent not to it and he may disassent this proves the negative voice The King hath full power in all causes to do justice to all men 24 H. 8. c. 12. 25 H. 8. c. 28 this is affirmed of the King and not of the two Houses The Commons in Parliament acknowledge no superiour to the King under God the House of Commons confesse the King to be above the representative body of the Realm Of good right and equity the whole and sole power of pardoning treasons fellonies c. 27 H. 8. c. 2â— Note belong to the King as also to make all Justices of Oyer and Terminer Judges Justices of the peace c. This Law condemns the practice of both Houses at this time The Kings Royall Assent to any Act of Parliament signed with his hand expressed in his Letters patents under the great Seale and declared to the Lords and Commons shall be as effectuall 33 H. 8. cap. 21. as if he assented in his owne person a vaine Act if the King be virtually in the Houses The King is the head of the Parliament the Lords the principal members of the body Dier 38. H. 8. fo 59.60 the Commons the inferiour members and so the body is composed therefore there is no more Parliament without a King then there is a body without a head There is
constantly in this Parliament that the King to the onely supreme Governour in all causes ever all persons at this present time For what of verball or personall commands of the King which is objected we affirme few things to be subject thereto by the Law But his Majesties Command under his Great Seale which in this warre hath been used by the Kings Command for his Commission to â—savie and array men that is no personall command which the Law in some cases disallowes but that is such a command so made as all men hold their Lands by who hold by Patents all Corporations have their Charters which hold by Charters and all Judgesa and Officers their places and callings It is Objected 〈…〉 the King cannot suppresse his Courts of Justice and that this warre tended to their suppression The answer is Sol. 7 pars The â—a le of Westmerlands Ca e. 1 Eliz. Dier 165. 7 pâ—rs Cooke the King cannot nor ought to suppresse Justice or his Courts of Justice nor ever did but Courts of Justice by abuser or non user cease to be Courts of Justice when Judges are made and proceedings in those Courts holden by others then Judges made by the King and against his command under the great Seale The case of discontinuance of Processe and his Majesty is not obeyed but the Votes of the Houses and his Judges breaking that condition in Law of trust and loyalty implyed in their Patents are no longer his Judges they obey and exercise their places by vertue of Writs and Processes under a counterfet Seale The King onely can make Judges the twenty seventh of Henry the eighth Chapter the twenty fourth Justices of the Peace c. The Kings Patent makes Judges 28 H. 8. Dâ—â—r 11. The chiefe Justice of the Kings Bench is made by the Kings Writ onely of all the Judges The Great Seale is the key of the Kingdome Artiâ—uli super chartas cap. 5. 2 pars instit 552. and meet it is that the King should have the key of his Kingdome about him which confutes their saying that the King got the Seale away surreptitiously The King Brittâ—n sol 23. and he only may remove his Courts from Westminster into some other place at Yorke the Tearmes were kept for seven yeares in Edward the first 's time but for the Court of Common Pleas the placâ— must be certaine for the Kings Bench and Chancery the King by the Law may command them to attend his person alwaies if it seeme so meet unto him but the removing of the Common Pleas must be to a place certaine and so notified to the people All the Bookes of Law in all times agree that the King may grant conusance of all Pleas at his pleasure within any County or Precinct to be holden there onely and remove the Courts from Westminster to some other place for the Common Pleas 6 H. 7.9 6 Eliz Dier 226. the place must be certaine and so notified to the people and adjourne the Tearmes as he sees cause All which the two houses have violated Some seeming objections of Master Prinn's scattered in divers books answered and the truth thereby more fully cleered THE first of Henry the fourth 1 Ob. revived the Statute of the eleventh of Richard the second and repeales the one and twentieth of Richard the second whereby certaine persons were declared Traytors to the King and kingdome being of the Kings Party by 11 Rich. 2. True but note the eleventh of Richard the second Sol. a Parliament beset with 40000. men and the King assents to it so an Act and besides the first of Henry the fourth declares that the Treasons mentioned in the Act of the eleventh of Richard the second being but against a few private men shall not be drawne into example and that no Treason should be but such as the twenty fifth of Edward the third declares 9 Ed. 4. fol. â—0 All these are Acts passed by the King and the three Estates nor to be drawne into example in a tumultuous time by a besieged Parliament with an Army and Henry the fourth being an Usurper makes that Act of the first of Henry the fourth to secure himselfe Also what is this to the Votes of the two Houses onely at this time The Court of Parliament is above the King 2. Ob. for it may avoyd his Charters Commissions c. granted against the Law And the Law is above the King By the same reason you may say that the Courts of Chancery Sol. or any of the Courts of Law at Westminster are above the King for they make of no effect the Kings Charters which are passed against the Law and the King is subject to Law and sworne to maintaine it Againe it is no Parliament without the King and the King is the head thereof he is principium capus finis of a Parliament as Modus tenendi Parliament hath it and two houses onely want principiwn caput finis of a Parliament and it is a sorry Parliament that wants all these And therefore to say that Parliaments are above the King is to say the King is above himselfe The Parliament can enlarge the Kings Prerogative 3. Ob. therefore it is above him If the King assent Sol. otherwise not and then it is an Act of Parliament and otherwise no Act. Bracton saith God the Law 4 Ob. and the Kings Court viz. his Earles and Barons are above the King viz. in Parliament as Mr. Prynne expounds it Where is then the House of Commons Indeed take God the Law Sol. and Earles and Barons together it is true but to affirme that the Earles and Barons in Parliament are above the King the King being the head of the Parliament and they one of the members how an inferiour member is above the head is hard to conceive besides that position destroyes all Mr. Prynnes discourse who attributes much to the House of Commons The King is but one of the three Estates of Parliament 5 Ob. and two are greater then one therefore above The Legs Armes Sol. and Trunke of the body are greater then the Head and yet not above nor with life without it the argument holds for quantity but not for quality and in truth the King is none of the three Estates but above them all the three Estates are the Lords Spirituall the Lords Temporall and the Commons Cake their Oracle in his Chap. of Parl. f. 1 In Corporations the greater number of voyces make all the Acts of the Corporation valid 6 Ob. therefore so in Parliament By this reason the Kings assent is needlesse Sol. and to no end and all the Acts of Parliament formerly mentioned and Law-bookes have quite mistaken the matter which with unanimous voyce requires the Kings assent as necessary besides the Corporations are so constituted by the Kings Charters and the greater number of votes shall make their Acts valid The King
THE VVORKS OF THAT GRAVE and LEARNED LAVVYER Iudge Ienkins Prisoner in Newgate UPON Divers STATUTES Concerning the Liberty and Freedome of the Subject With a perfect Table thereto annexed Plebs sine Lege ruit LONDON Printed for J. Gyles and are sold at his shop at Furnivals-Inne MDCXLVIII Here JENKINS stands who thundring from the TOWER Shook the bold Senat 's Legislative Power Six of whose words twelve Reames of votes exceed As mountaines mov'd by graines of mustard-seed Thus gasping Lawes were rescu'd from the Snare He that will save a Crowne must know and dare Sould by I. Giles at Furnivals-Inn-gaw J. Berkenhead The Contents The Law of the Land The King Treason A Parliament The present Parliament Certaine Erroneus Positions and Proceedings of both Houses of Parliament The like of the House of Commons The Propositions of the Parliament of both Kingdomes sent to New-Castle The Kings Party The Parliaments Party are Delinquents The Army serving the two Houses The Army Rescuing the King The Liberty of the Subject Messellanâ—a The Law of the Land THE Law of the Land hath for its ground 1. Custome 2. Judiciall Records 3. Acts of Parliament The two latter being Declarations of the Common Law and custome of the Realme pag. 5.21.23 The Law of Royall Government is a Law Fundamentall p. 5. The Kings Prerogative and the Subjects Liberty are determined and bounded by the Law p. 131. The King claimes no power but by the law of the land p. 131. The Law the onely Rule and Direction of the Subject in this present Warre pag. 42 131. Vbi Lex non distinguit â—bi non est distinguendum p. 132. The King THE King of England hath his Title to the Crowne and to his Kingly Office and Power not by way of trust from the two Houses of Parliament or from the people but by inherent Birth-right from God Nature and the Law p. 24 25. 38. 52 53 54 56. 57. There was never King Deposed but in tumultuous and madde times and by the power of the Armyes and they who were to bee the succeeding Kings in the head of them as Ed 3. and Hen. 4. p. 54. Usurpers were Kings de factâ— not de jure p. 54. The King is assisted by the advice of the Judges his Counsell at Law Sollicitor Atturney Masters of Chancery and counsell of State hence the Law hath setled severall Powers in the King p. 27.28 The Kings of England enjoyed that Power in a full measure till King Iohns time p 6 7 8. How Rights of Soveraignty continued in practise from Hen. 3. till 1640 p. 6. The Kings Power not separable from his Person p. 70 71. The Body Naturall and Politique in the King make but one body p. 2.38.71 Every Subject swears homage to the King p. 8. The Law gives reverence to the Person of the King p. 10. Foule mouthed Pamphlets against the King condemned p. 21. The Supream Power is in the King p. 7.13.14.16.57 58. The Oath of Supremacy in relation to the Parliament p. 67.133 The King Supream in Ecclesiasticall causes p. 10. The King the onely Supreame Governour and all other persons have their power from him by his Writ Patent or Commission p. 20 21 22.36 37. 64 65. The power of the Militia is in the King p. 8.37 In the time of Parliament p. 8. The Commission of Array in force p. 13.36 The Power of making League with Forreigners is in the King p. 8.15.17 The power of War in the King p. 20.21 The power of making Officers in the King p. 8. The King onely hath power to make Justices of Peace and of Assize p. 45 100.12â— The power of coynadge in the King p. 8. The power of pardoning onely in the King by Law p. 8.66.74.78.84.128.130 The King hath power to remove the courts at Westminster p. 45. The King can do no wrong but his Judges Counselloâ—â—s and Ministers may p. 37.41 So long as men manage the Laws they will be broken more or lesse p. 29. Treason IN the Reign of Ed. 2. the Spencers the Father and the Sonne to cover their Treason hatched in their hearts invented this damnable and damned opinion that Homage and Oath of Allegiance was more by reason of the Kingâ— Crowne that is his Politique Capacity than by reason of his person upon which opinion they inferred three execrable and detestable Consequences First if the King do not demeane himselfe by reason in the right of his Crowne his Leidges are bound by Oath to remove the King Secondly seeing the King could not be reformed by suit of Law that ought to be done per asperte that is by force Thirdly his Leidges be bound to Governe in aid of him and in default of him p. 9.70 Severall Treasons by the Statute 25. 8d 3. p. 12 13 14 15 16 76. The word King in the 25. Edw. 3. must be understood of the Kings natural Person p. 12 13 77. Other Treasons not specified in that Act are declared to bee no Treasons untill the King and his Parliament shall declare otherwise p. 77.101 To seize the Kings Forts Ports Magazine of Warre is High Treason p. 11. 22â— 37.77 To remove Counsellours by Arms is high Treason p. 22.40 To leavie Warre to alter Religion is high Treason p. 40. To leavie war to alter the Law is high Treason p. 11.40.77 To counterfeit the great Seal is high Treason p. 37. To adhere to any State within the Kingdom but the Kings Majesty is high Treason 24.39 To imprison the King untill hee agree to certaine demands is high Treason p. 1â— 22.77 They who imprison the King purpose to destory him p. 163. Deposers of the King adjudged Traitors by the Law of the Land p. 54. A Body Corporate cannot commit Treason but the persons can p. 16. Noble men committing Treason forfeit their Office and Dignity p. 143. Treason how punished by the Law p. 42. Treason doth ever produce fatall destruction to the Offender and never attaines to the desired end and there are two incidents inseparable thereunto p. 135. A Parliament THe word Parliament cometh from the French word Parler to Treat p. 81. The King is Principium Caput Finis Parl. p 26.48.122 The King assembles the Parliament by his Writ Adjournes Prorogues and dissolves the Parliament by the Law at his pleasure p. 57. The Writ whereby the King assembled the two Houses which is called the Writ of Summons at all times and at this Parliament used and which is the warrant ground and foundation of their meeting is for the Lords of the House of Peers to Consult and Treat with the King that is the Parler of great Concernments touching 1. The King 2. The defence of this Kingdome 3. The defence of the Church of England p. 24.34 p. 25.81.120 121. Counsell is not command Councellors are not Commanders p. 26. The Writ of summoning the Judges Counfell of Lâ—w and 12 Masters of Chancery is to appeare and attend the Parliament to give Counsell p.
Soveraigne Lord at all seasons when need shall be Here the supreame power in the time of Parliament by both Houses is declared to belong to the King At the beginning of every Parliament all Armes are 7. Ed. 2.4 pars instit 14. or ought to be forbidden to be borne in London Westminster or the Subburbs This condemnes the multitudes comming to Westminster and the Guards of armed men All who held by Knights service 1 Edw. 2. de Militibus and had twenty pounds per annum were distraynable ad Arma militaria suscipienda This agrees with the Records of ancient time continued constantly in all Kings times but at this Parliament 3. November 1640. The King out of his grace discharged this duty which proves that the power of warre and preparation thereto belongs not to the two Houses but only to the King The two Spencers in Edw. 2. Edw. 3. Caâ—vins Case Cookâ—e 7. fol. 11. time hatched to cover their Treason this damnable and damned opinion viz That Ligeance was more by reason of the Kings politick capacity then of his person upon which they inferred these execrable and detestable consequences First if the King demeaned not himselfe by reason in the right of his Crowne his Lieges are bound by Oath to remove him Secondly seeing the King could not be removed by suit of Law it was to be done by force Thirdly that his Lieges be bound to governe in default of him All which tenets were condemned by two Parliaments the one called exilium Hugonis in Ed. 2. time the other by 1. Edw. 3. cap. 2. All which Articles against the Spencers are confirmed by this last Statute the Artiles are extant in the booke called vetera Statuta The separation of the Kings person from his power is the principall Article condemned and yet all these three damnable detestable and execrable consequents are the grounds whereupon this present time relies and the principles whereupon the two houses found their cause The Villeine of a Lord in the presence of the King cannot be seized â—â—â—nden com 322. â—y ass pl. 49 for the presence of the King is a protection for that time to him This shewes what reverence the Law gives to the person of a King Regis 33 Ed. 3. â—yde de roy 203 Fitz 30 H. 7.16 sacro oleo uncti sunt capaâ—es spiritualis jurisdictionis But the two Houses were never held capable of that power Rex est persona mixta cum sacerdote haâ—et Ecclesiasticam spiritualem jurisdictionem This shewes the Kings power in Ecclesiasticall Causes The Lands of the King is called in Law Patromoniâ—n sacrum Com. Sur. Littl Sect. 4. The Houses should not have meddled with that sacred Patromony 3 Ed. 3.19 The King hath no Peere in his Land and cannot be judged Ergo the two Houses are not above him The Parliament 15. Ed. 3. was repealed for that is was against the Kings Lawes and prerogative 4 part institâ— fol. 25. This shewes cleerely the Propositions sent to Newcastle ought not to have beene presented to his Majesty For that they are contrary to the Lawes and his Prerogative The Lords and Commons cannot assent in Parliament to any thing that tends to the dis-inherifion of the King and his Crowne 4 Part Cooke inâ—â—it fol. 14. 42. E. 3. to which they are sworne This condemnes the said Propositions likewise To depose the King Parliamenâ— Rol. num 7. Rex 〈◊〉 suetudâ— Parâ—amenti to imprison him untill he assent to certaine dedemands a warre to alter the Religion established by Law or any other Law or to remove Councellors to hold a Castle or Fort against the King are offences against that Law declared to be treason by the resolution herein after mentioned by that Law men are bound to ayd the King when warre is levied against him in his Realme 25 Ed. 3. cap. 2. King in his Statute must be intended in his naturall body and person that only can dye for to compasse his death and declare it by overt Act is declared thereby treason to incounter in fight such as come to ayd the King in his warres is treason Compassing of the Qâ—â—ens death of the Kings Eldest Sonne to coyne his money to counterfeit his Great-Seale to levy Warre against him to adhere to such as shall so doe are declared by that Act to be high treason This Statute cannot referre to the King in his politique capacity but to his naturall which is inseperable from the politick for a body politick can have neither Wife 〈◊〉 13. nor Childe nor levy Warre nor doe any Act but by the operation of the naturall body A Corporation or body politick hath no soule or life but is a fiction of the Law and the Statute meant not â—â—ctitious persons but the body naturall conjoned with the politique which are inseperable The clause in that Act that no man should sue for grace or pardon for any offence condemned or forfeiture given by that Act 21 Ed. 4.14 â— 2.11 an was repealed by a subsequent Act in 21. R. â— holden unreasonable without example and against the Law and custome of the Parliament This condemnes the Proposition for disabling the King to Pardon 4 pars instit fol. 42. 4. Pars instit fol. 42. The Act of 11. R. 2. so much urged by the other side was an Act to which the King consented and so a perfect Act yet Note the Army then about the Towne Note that that Law is a-against private persons and by the 3. cap. thereof the treasons there declared are declared to be new treasons made by that Act and not to be drawne to example it was abrogated 21. R. 2. and revived by an usurper 1 H. 4. to please the people and by the tenth chap. thereof enacts that nothing shall be treason but what is declared by 25. Ed. 3. 16. Ed. cap. 5.16 R. 2. cap. 5. H. 4. The Regality of the Crowne of England is immediately subject to God and to none other Plaine words shewing where the supreame power is The Commission of Array is in force and no other Commission Rot. Parlm 5. H. 4. numb 24. an Act not printed this Act was repealed by 4. and 5. P. M cap. 2. this repealed by the Act of 1 Iacobi and so it is of force at this day for the repealing Statute is repealed 4. pars instituâ— fol. 51. 125 published fithence this Parliament by the desire of the house of Commons their Order is printed in the last leafe of the commentaries upon Magna Charta Sir Edward Cooke A booke alowed by Sir Na Brent called the reason of the War fol. 65. by their party is holden for the Oracle of the Law who wrote the said fourth part in a calme and quiet time and I may say when there was no need to defend the authority of the Commission of Array For that objection that that Commission leaves power to the
viz. Rex vic Wilts Saltem Quia Nos de avisamento assensia consilii nri pro quibus arduis urgentib negotiis nos statune defensionem Regni nri Aug. Eccles Anglie concernentibus quoddam Parliamentum nrum apud B. teneri ordinavimus ibid. cum Prelatis Magnatib proceribus dicti Regni nri Colliquium habere tractatum â—ibl precipimus firmiter injungendo quod facta Proclamatione in prox Comitatu tuo post receptionem ejusd Brevis duos Milites gladiis cinctos c. eligi faceas ad faciendum consentiendum hiis quae tunc ibidem de Commâ—â—â—i Concilio uro 4 pars Inst 241. Angl. foventi Deo contigerit ordinari super Negotiis ante dictis ita quod pro defectu potestatis bujusmodi seu propter improvidam electionem Mileum Civium Burgensium praed dicta negotia ura infect a non remanerent The King is Principium a pars Instit fol. 3. 4 capâ—â— finis Parliamenti the body makes not the head nor that which is posterior that which is prior consilium non est Preceptum consiliarii non sunt Preceptoris for Counsell to compell a consent hath not been heard of to this time in any age and the House of Commons by the Writ are not called ad co silium the Writs to the twelve Judges Kings Counsell twelve Masters of the Chancery are consilium impensuri and so of the Peeres The Writs for the Comminalty Ad faciendum consentiendum Which shewes what power the representative body hath they have not power to give â—n Oath neither doe they claime it The King at all times The Oath of the Justices 18 of E. 3. among Statutes of that yeare when there is no Parliament and in Parliament is assisted with the advice of the Judges of the Law 12 in number for England at least hath two Sergeants when fewest an Attorney and Solicitour twelve Masters of the Chancery his Councell of State consisting of some great Prelates and other great Personages versed in State affaires when they are fewest to the number of twelve All these persons are alwales of great substance which is not preserved but by the keeping of the Law The Prelates versed in divine Law the other Grandees in affaires of State and managery of Government The Judges Kings Sergeants Attorney Solicitour and Masters of the Chancery versed in the Law and Customes of the Realme All sworne to serve the King and his people justly and truly the King is also sworne to observe the Lawes and the Judges have in their Oath a clause that they shall doe common right to the Kings people according to the established Lawes notwithstanding any command of the King to the contrary under the Great Seale or otherwise the people are safe by the Lawes in force without any new The Law finding the Kings of this Realme assisted with so many great men of Conscience Honour and skill in the rule of Common-wealth knowledge of the Lawes and bound by the high and holy bond of an Oath upon the Evangelists settles among other powers upon the King a power to refuse any Bill agreed upon by both Houses and power to pardon all offences to passe any Grants in his Minority there are many great persons living hold many a thousand pounds a yeare by patents from Edward the sixth passed when he was but ten yeares of age not to be bound to any Law to his prejudice whereby he doth not binde himselfe power of war and peace coyning of Mony making all Officers c. The Law for the reasons aforesaid hath approved these powers to be unquestionable in the King and all Kings have enjoyed them till 3 Nov. 1640. It will be said notwithstanding all this fence about the Lawes the Lawes have been violated and therefore the said powers must not hold the two Houses will remedy this The answer to this is evident There is no time past nor time present nor will there be time to come so long as men manage the Law but the Lawes will be broken more or lesse as appeares by the story of every age All the pretended violations of this time were remedied by Acts to which the King consented before his departure 10. Jan. 1641. being then driven away by Tumults And the Houses for a yeare and almost three Moneths from 3 Nov. 1640. to 10 Jan. 1641. as aforesaid being a yeare and almost three Moneths had time and liberty to question all those persons who are either causes or instruments of the violation of any of the Lawes Examine how both Houses remedied them in former times First touching Religion what hath been done this way Both Houses in Henry the eights time tendred to him a Bill to be passed called commonly the Bill of the six Articles this was conceived by them to be a just and a necessary Bill Had not Henry the eight done well to have refused the passing of this Bill Both Houses tendred a Bill to him to take the reading of the Scriptures from most of the Laity Had not King Henry the eight deserved much praise to reject this Bill In Queene Maries time both Houses exhibited a Bill to her to introduce the Popes power and the Roman Religion had not Queene Mary done well to have refused this Bill Many such instances may be given The two Houses now at westminster I am sure will not deny but the refusall of such Bills have beene just the King being assisted as aforesaid and why not so in these times For the Civill Government what a Rill did both Houses present to Richard the third to make good his Title to the Crowne had it not beene great honour to him to have rejected it What Bills were exhibited to Henry the eight by both Houses for bastardizing of his Daughteâ— Elizabeth a Queene of renowned memory to settle the Crowne of this Realme for default of Issue of his body upon such persons as he should declare by his Letters Patents or his last Will and many more of the like had not this refusall of passing such Bil's magnified his vertue and rendered him to Posterity in a different Character from what he now hath And by the experience of all times and the consideration of humane frailty this conclusion is manifestly deduced that it is not possible to keep men at all times be they the Houses or the King and his Councell but there will be sometimes some deviation from the Lawes and therefore the constant and certaine powers fixed by the ancient Law must not be made voyd and the Kings Ministers the Lawes doe punish where the Law is transgressed and they onely ought to suffer for the same In this Parliament the Houses exhibited a Bill to take away the suffrages of Bishops in the upper House of Parliament and have sithence agreed there shall be no more Bishops at all might not the King if he had so pleased have answered this Bill with Le
the Reformers and Martyrs and practised in the time of four Princes Fifthly these Propositions taking away from his Majesty all his power by Land and Sea rob him of that which all his Ancestors Kings of this Realme have enjoyed That enjoyment and usage makes the Law and a right by the same to his Majesty They are against their owne Protestation made this Parliament viz. to maintain his Royall Person Honour and Estate They are against their Covenant which doth say that they will not diâ—inish his just power and Greatnesse For these reasons his Majesty hath lest them and as is beleeved will refuse to agree to the said Propositions as by the fundamentall Law of the Land he may having a Negative Voice to any Bils proposed The result of all is upon the whole matter That the King thus leaving of the Houses and his deniall to passe the said Propositions are so far from making him a Tyrant or not in a condition to governe at the present that thereby he is rendred a just Magnanimous and pious Prince so that by this it appeares clearely to whom the Miseries of these times are to be imputed The remedy for all is an Act of Oblivion and a Generall Pardon God save the King DAVID JENKINS now Prisoner in the Tower 28 Aprilis 1647. The Vindication of Iudge Jenkins Prisoner in the Tower the 29. of April 1647. I Was convened upon Saturday the 10 of this moneth of Aprill before a Committee of the House of Commons wherein Master Coâ—bet had the Chaire and I was there to be examined upon some questions then to be propounded to me to which questions I refused to give any other answer then that which wâ—t set downe in a paper I then delivered to the said Mr. Corbet which followeth in these words Gentlemen I stand committed by the House of Commons for High Treason for not acknowledging nor obeying the power of the two Ponses by adhering to the King in this warre I deny this to be Treason for the supreame and onely power by the Lawes of this Land is in the King If I should submit to any examination derived from your vpwir which by the Negative Oath stands in opposition to the Kings power I should confesse the power to be in you and so condemne my selfe for a Traitour which I neither ought nor will do I am sworne to obey the King and the Lawes of the Land you have not power to examine me by those Lawes but by the Kings writ Patent or Commission if you can produce either thereof I will answer the questions you shall propound otherwiss I cannot answer thereto without the breach of my Oath and the violation of the Lawes which I will not do to save my life You your selves all of you this Parliament hive sworne that the King is our onely and supreame Governour your Protestation your Vow and Covenant your solemne League and Covenant your Declarations all of them publisht to the Kingdome that your scope is the maintenance of the Lawes those Lawes are and must be derived to us and enlivened by the onely supreame Governour the Fountaine of Iustice and the life of the Law the King The Parliaments are called by his writs the Iudges sit by his Patents so of all other Dâ—cers the Cities aud â—ownes corporate governe by the Kings Charters and therefore since by the Law I cannot be examinâ—b by you without a power veriveâ— by his Mâ—jesty I neither can nor will nor ougte you to examine me upon any questions But if as private Gentlemen you shall be pleased to 〈◊〉 me any questions I shall really and truely answer evâ—ry such question as you shall demand April 10. 1647. David Jenkins This Paper hath beene mis-represented to the good people of this City by a printed one stilling it my Recantation which I owne not and besides is in it selfe repugnant just like these times the Body fals out with the Head To vindicate my selfe from that Recantation and to publish to the world the realty of the Paper then delivered to Mr. Corbâ—t and the matter therein contained I have published this ensuing discourse No person whoâ— hath committed Treason Mutter 〈◊〉 â—elony hath any assurance at all for so much as one houre of life Lands or Goods without the Kings grâ—tions pardon 27. Hen. 8. cap. 24. The King is not virtually in the two Houses at VVestminster whereby they may give any assurance at all to any person in any thing for any such offence 1. The House of Commons have beelarâ—d to the Kingdome in their Declaration of the 28 of November last to the â—cots Papers p. 8. That the King at this time is not in a condition to goverâ—e No person or thing can derive a vertue to other men or things which it selfe hath not and therefore it is impossible that they should have a vertue from the King to govern which they declare he hath not himselfe to give 2 The Law of the Land is 5 Elizab. cap. 1. That no person in any Parliament hath a vayce in the House of Commons but that he stands a pâ—rson to all intents and purposes as if he had uevâ—r boeu electâ—d or returned if before he sit in the Hause he take not hâ—s Datâ— upon the holy Evangel sts that the Kings Majesty is the onely ond supreame Governour over all persons in all Canses All the Members of the said House have taken it and at all times as they are returned do take it otherwise they have no colour to intermeddle with the publick Affaires How doth this Solemne and Legall Oath agree with their said Declaration That the King is in no condition to govern 〈◊〉 By the one it is sworne he is the only supreme Governour by the other that he is not in a condition to governe 3. The Oath is not that the King was or ought to be or had been before he was seduced by ill Councell our onely and supreame Governour in all Causes over all persons but in the present tense that he iâ— on t only and supream Governont at this present in all causes and over all persons So they the same persons swear one thing and declare to the Kingdome the contrary of the same thing at the same time in that which concerneth the weale of all this Nation 4 The Ministers in the Pulpits do not say what they swear in the House of Commons Who ever heard fiâ—hence this unnaturall Warre any of their Presbyters attribute that to his Majesty which they sweare The reason is their Oath is taken at westminster amongst themselves that which their Ministers pray and preach goes amongst the people To tell the people that the King is now their only and supreame Governour in all Causes is contrary to that the Houses doe now practise and to all they act and maintaine They the two Houses forsooth are the only and supreame Governours in default of the King for that he hath lest his great Councell and
will not come to them and yet the King desires to come but they wil not suffer him but keepe him prisoner at Holmby so well doe their Actions and Oathes agree 5. They sweare now King Charies is their only and supreame Governor but with a resolution at the time of the Oath taking and before and after that he shall not be only or supreame Governour or only and supreame but not any Governour at all For there is no point of Government but for some yeares past they have taken to themselves and used his name only to abuse and deceive the people 6. That this virtuall power is a meere fiction their Propositions sent to Oxford to Neweastle to be signed by the King doe prove it so What needs this adoe if they have the virtuall Power with them at Wistminster 7. To affirme that the Kings power which is the vertue they talke of is separable from his person is High Treason by the Law of the Land which is so declared by that learned man of the Law Sir Edward Cocke so much magnified by this present Parliament who in the 7 part of his Reports in Calving case fol. 11 saith thus In the reigne of Edward the second the Supencers the Father and Sonne to cover the Treason hat hed in their hearts invented this damnable and damned opinion that homage and Oath of Legeance was more by reason of the I Kings Crowne that is of his potitick capacity theu by reason of ohe person of the King upon which â—â—inion they inferred three execraâ—le and detestable consequences h. If the King to not demeaue himselfe by reason in the right of his Crowne his Lieges are bound â—y Oath to remove the King 2 seeing that the King â—ould not be retormed by â—nte of Law that ought so be dene per aspertes that is by orce 3. That his Lieges be beund to governe in â—yde of him and in default of him all which wâ—re condemned by two Parliaments one in the raigue of Edw. 2. called exilium Hugonis le Spencer and the other in anno 1. Edw 3 cap. 2. And that the naturall body and politick maks one indivisible body that these two bodies incorporate in one person make one body and not divers is resolved as the Law of Eng. 4 Ed 3 Ploydon Com. fol. 213 by Sir Co bet Catlin L. Chiefe Justice of Eng. Sir Iâ—mes Dâ—er L. Chief Justice of the Common pleas the L. Sanders L. Chief Baron of the Excheâ—ner by the rest of the Judges viz. Justice Restall Justice Browne Justice Corbet Justice weston Baron Frevylâ— Carus and Powâ—rel Sergeant to the Queene Gerrard Auturny Generall Carell Atturney of the Dutchy Pâ—owdon the learnedest man of that age in the knowledge of the Law and Customes of the Realme 8. The Law in all ages without any controversie is and hath been that no Act of Parliament bindes the Subjects of the Land without the assent of the King â— Hâ—â— 3 Mogn Charta So in every Age till this dâ—y and in every Kings time as appeares by the Acts in Print 1 part of the Iustit Sect. 234. 〈◊〉 fine where many of the Law-Bookes are â—iied 7 Hen. 7.14.12 of Hen. 7.20 either for Person Lauds Goods or Fame No man can shew any sillable letter or line to the contrary in the bookes of the Law or printed Acts of Parliament in any age in this Land If the virtuall power be in the Houses there needs no assent of the Kings The stiles of the Acts printed from 9 Hen. 3. to 1 Hen. 7. were either The King ordaines at his Parliament c. or the King ordaineth by the advâ—ee of his Prelates and Barâ—â—rs and at the humble Petition of the Commons c. In Hen. 7. his time the Stile altered and hath fithence continued thus It is oâ—dained by the Kings Majesty and the Lords spirituall and temporall and Commons in this present Parliament assembled So that alwayes the Assent of the King giveth the life to all as the soule to the body and therefore our Law bookes call the King the Fountaine of Justice and the life of the Law 9. 2 Han. 4 Cap 22 4 pars instit 42. Mr. â—â—in in his Treatise of the great Seal fol. 17.27 Hen. 8 Chap. 24. Mercy as well as Justice belongs by the Law of the Land onely to the King This is confessed by Mr. Pryn and it is so without any question The King can onely pardon and never more cause to have sufficient pardons then in such troublesome times as these and God send us pardons and peace None can give any pardon but the King by the Law of the Land The whole and sole power of pardoning Treasons and Felonies belongs to the King are the words of the Law and it is a delusion to take it from any other and utterly invalid 27. Hen. 8. c. 24. 10. Queene Elizabeth summoned her first Parliament to bee held the 23. of Jan. in the first yeare of her Majesties Raigne The Lords and commons assembled by force of the same Writ the 21 day the Queen fell sick and could not appeare in her person in Parliament that day and therefore prorogued it untill the 25 of the same Month of January Resolved by all the Judges of England that the Parliament began not the day of the returne of the Writ 3 of Eliz. Dier 2â—3 viz. the 23. of January when the Lords and Commons appeared but the 25 of the said Moneth when the Queene came in person which sheweth evidently that this virtuall presence is a meere deluding fiction that hath no ground in Law reason or sence They have the King now a prisoner at Holmby with guards upon him and yet they governe by the virtuall power of their prisoner These are some few of the causes and reasons which moved me to deliver that paper to Mr. Corbet which I am ready to justifie with my life and should hold it a great honour to dye for the honourable and holy Lawes of the Land that which will save this Land from destruction is an Act of Oblivion and his Majesties gracious generall pardon the Souldiers their Arrears and euery man his own and truth and Peace established in the Land and a favourable regard had to the satisfaction of tender Consciences April 29. 1547. David Ienkins THE ARMIES INDEMNITY WITH ADDITION Together with a DECLARATION SHEWING How every Subject of ENGLAND ought to be tried for Treasons Felonies and all other Capital Crimes as is set down in the Lawes of the LAND By DAVID IENKINS now Prisoner in the Tower of London Printed in the Yeare 1648. The Armies Imdemnity c. UPon the publishing of the Ordinance of the 22 of May last for the Indemnity of the Army certaine Gentlemen well affected to the peace of the Kingdome and safety of the Army desired mee to set down in writing whether by the Law of the Land the said Ordinance did secure them from danger as to
the Parliament time by all the Members of the House of Commons and is required by the Law to be taken in all Parliaments otherwise they have no power nor colour to meddle with the publick Affaires This Oath being taken in Parliament that the King is the only and Supream Governour in al causes then it followes in Parliament causes over all persons then over the two Houses Let them keep this Oath and we shall bee sure of Peace in the Land and good Lawyers ought to desire peace both for the publicke good and their private and not dishonour that Noble profession as many doe in this miserable time The Gent. sayes Wee do not swear that the King is above all Law nor above the safety of his people neither do we so swear but his Majesty and we will sweare to the contrary and have sworne and have made good and will by Gods grace make good our Oath to the world that the KING is not above the Lawe nor above the safety of his people the Law and the safety of his people are his safety his Honour and his Strength AD 8. The Gent. concludes That Acts of Parliament are not formaly binding nor compleat without the Kings assent yet the Houses have a virtual power with out the Kings particular assent to doe things in order to publique justice and Safety viz. In setting up the Excise in raising and maintaining of Armes in Taxing the people at pleasure with Fifth and Twentieth part Fifty Subsidies Sequestrations Loans Compositions imprisoning the King abolishing the Common prayer Book felling the Churchs Lands c. all these are in order to the publick Justice and Safety Mr. H. P. you are of my profession I beseech you for the good of your Country for the Honour of our Science perswade your selfe and others as much as in you lies to beleeve and follow the monition and councell of that memorable reverend and profoundly Learned in the Lawes and Customes of the Land the Lord COOKI 3 par Inst pag 36. who writes as becomes a great and a learned Iudge of the Law a person much magnified by the two Houses in these words Peruse over all Books Records and Histories and you shall finde a Principle in Law a Rule in Reason and a Triall in Experience that Treason doth ever produce farall and finall destruction to the offender and never attains to the desired end two incidents inseparably thereunâ—o therefore let al men abandon it as the poysonouâ— bait of the divil follow the Precept in Holy Scripture SERVE GOD HONOUR THE KING AND HAVE NO COMPANY WITH THE SEDITIOVS Conclusion I say againe that without an Act of Oblivion a gratious Generall pardon from his Majesty the arrears of the Souldiers paid a favourable regard had to tender Consciences theâ—e will he neither Truth nor Peace in this Land nor any mansâ—cure of any thing he hath By me David Jenkins Prisoner in the Tower A DISCOURSE TOVCHING The Inconveniencies of a Long-continued PARLIAMENT A Perpetuall Parliament is repugnant to the Act made this Parliament for a Triennial Parliament for how can every three yeares a Parliament beginne if this bee perpetuall which may bee so if the two Houses please 2. An adjournment of the Parliâ—ment makes no Session 4 pars institut fol. 27. Howbeit before the adjournment the KING gives His Royall assent to some Bills Cookeibid 3. There is no Session till a Prorogation or dissolution of the Parliament 4. This Parliament as appeâ—res by the Act for not dissolving thereof set downe in the printed Statutes of this Parliament Plowd com 33.8 Bro. relation 35. Bro Parl. 86. Dâ—â— 1. Mariae 8 fol. 138. cannot be prorogâ—ed or dissolved but by Act of par liamènt There hath been as yet no Act of Parliament in that behalfe And therefore all the Acts of this Parliament are Acts of one Session 5. All Acts of one Session relate to the first day of the Parliament and all the Acts of such a Parliament are acts of one day so the Act for the Trienniall and the Act for this Perpetuall are two Acts of one day by the Law 6. 4 Ed. 3. cap. 36. Ed. 3. cap. 10. A Parliament is to be holâ—en once every yeare and more often if need shall bee those Acts are confirmed by the Act for the Trienniall Parliament How doth a perpetuall Parliament agree with a Parliament once every yeare or with the intention of those Lawes How doth a Parliament every three-years agree with a Parliament for ever which may be if the two Houses please 7. The result is this atâ—ent day in Law this Parliament two acts have passed for howbeit the one was in 16 Carol. and the other in 17 Carol. yet both in Law are Acts of one day the one saith there shall be a Trienniall Parliament after the end of the sitting of this Parliament The other this Parliament shall sit for ever if they please The one will have a Parliament with an end the other a Parliament without an end When an Act of Parliament is against common Right or Reason 1 Pars. Doct. Bon. hams case â—o 11 8. 8. E. 3 3.30.33 E. cassaâ—it 32. 27. H. G. Anuity 41. 1. Eliz. Dâ—er 113. or repugnant or impossible to be performed the Common Law shall controle it and adjudg this Act to be void they are the words of the Law An Act of Parliament that a Man shall be judg in his own Cause is a void Act. Hobbart Fol. 120. Begin with Common Right It is against Common Right that indebted men should not pay their debts That if any Member of the House of Commons doe any Subject wrong by disseising him of his land or dispossessing him of his goods or blasting of his fame or doing violence to his person that such persons during their lives should not be questioned by a Priviledg of Parliament and that extended also to many other beside themselves common right doth abhor these Enormities which a perpetuall Parliament doth beget besides the utter destruction of al mens actions real personall or mixt 21. Iac c. 16. who have to doe with Parliament-men by the statute of Limitation which confines Suites to certaine yeares For Common Reason Parliaments were ordained for remedies to redresse publique greivances it is against reason they should make publique and insufferable Grievances The Law of the Land allowes no protection for any men imployed in the service of the Kingdome but for a yeare to be free from Suites and in many Suites none at all howbeit he be in such service 39. H. 6.39 but a Parliament perpetuall may prove a protection not for a yeare but for ever which is against all manner of reason For impossibility The death of his Majesty whose life God prolong dissolves 〈◊〉 necessarily for the Writ of Summons iâ— Carolus Rex in hoc individuo and Carolus Rex is in this particular habiturus colloquium tractatum cum prelat is
which are the Common lawes of the land Doth Excise the Fifth and Twentieth parts Meal-money and many more Burdens which this Land never heard of before maintaine the Liberties of the people You and that party of the two Houses made the Army by severall Declarations before Engagement believe that you would preserve the Kings Honour and Greatnessâ— the Lawes and Liberties of the people The Army and the whole Kingdome now facta vident see your Actions and have no reason longer to believe your Oathes Vowes and Declarations and since that party in the two Houses refuse to performe any thing according to their said Oathes Vowes And Declarations the Army and the Kingdome may and ought both by your own principles and the Lawes of the Land to pursue the ends for which they were raised And so your first Quare is resolved whereby it is manifest that specious pretences to carry on ambitious and pernitious Designes fix not upon the Army but upon you and the prevailing party in both Houses 3 par Inst f. 12.39 El. 1 Iac. ibi 3 3. E. 6. c. 3 11. 〈◊〉 7. c. 1. The solution of the second Quaere The Army to their eternall honour have freed the King from imprisonment at Holmby It was High Treason to imprison his Majesty To free his Majesty from that imprisonment was to deliver him out of Trayterous hands which was the Armies bounden duty by the Law of God and the Land That party refused to suffer his Majesty to have two of his Chaplaines for the exercise of his Conscience who had not taken the Covenant free accesse was not permitted doth the Army use his Majesty so all men see that accesse to him is free and such Chaplaines as his Majesty desired are now attending on his Grace Who are the guilty persons the Army who in this action of delivering the King act according to Law or the said parâ—y who acted Treasonably against the Law Who doth observe the Protestation better they who imprison their King or they who free him from prison That this Army was raised by the Parliament is utterly false The Army was raised by the two Houses upon the specious pretences of the Kings Honour common safety and the preservation of Lawes and Liberties which how made good hath beene shewed before and all the people of the Kingdome do finde by wofull experience The two Houses are no more a Parliament than a Body without a Head a Man 14 H. 8 3.36 H. 7 Dier 60 4 pars Instit p. 1 3 12 14.16 R. 2 c. 1â— 5 Eliz. c. 2 17. Carol. The Act for the continuance of this Parliament The two Houses can make no Court without the King they are no Body Corporate without the King they all Head and Members make one Corporate Body And this is so clear a Truth that in this Parliament by the Act of 17. Caroli it is declared That the Parliament shall not be dissolved or prorogued but by Act of Parliament but the two Houses may respectively adjourne themselves Two Houses and a Parliament are severall things cuncta fidem vera faciunt all circumstances agree to prove this truth Before the Norman conquest and since to this day 4 par Instit p. 18.4 par Instit p. 4 9 5 Eliz c. i 2 the King is holden Principium caput Finis that is the beginning Head and chiefe end of the Parliament as appeareth by the Treatise of the manner of holding of Parliaments made before the Norman Conquest by the Writ of Summons of Parliament whereby the Treaty and Parler in Parliament is to be had with the King only by the Common Law by the Statute-Law by the Oath of Supremacy taken at this and every Parliament it doth manifestly appeare that without the KING there can be no coulour of a Parliament How many Votes have they revoked in one Session yea and Bills Was there ever the like done Nay is not the constant course of Parliaments violated and made nothing thereby They are guarded by armed men divide the publike Mony among themselves and that party endeavours to bring in a Forraigne Power to invade this Land againe If they be no Parliament as clearly they are none without his Majesty they have no privâ—ledges but do exercise an Arbitrary Tyrannicall and Treasonable power over the people By the Law of the Land 7 E. 4 20 8 E. 4 3 9 E. 4.27 4 H 7 18 27 H 8 23. when Treason or Felony is committed it is lawfull for every Subject who suspects the Offendor to apprehend him and to secure him so that Justice may be done upon him according to the Law You say the disobedience of the Army is a sad publick president like to conjure up a spirit of universall disobedience I pray object not that conjuring up to the Army whereof you and the prevailing party in the Houses are guilty who conjured up the spirit of universall disobedience against his Majesty your and our onely Supreme Governour but you and that party in the two Houses and even then when the House of Commons were taking and did take the said Oath of Supremacy For the Covenant you mention it is an Oath against the Lawes of the Land against the petition of Right devised in Scotland wherein the first Article is to maintaine the Reformed Religion in the Church of Scotland And certainly there is no Subject of the English Nation doth know what the Scottish Religion is 2 par Coll. of Ord. pag. 803. 3 par Inst fol. 165. Petition of Right 3. Car. â— pars instit 71â— I beleeve the Army tooke not the Covenant No man by the Law can give an Oath in a new case without an Act of Parliament and therefore the imposers thereof are very blameable and guilty of the highest Crime The Writer of these Quaeres seems to professe the Laws Let him declare what Act of Parliament doth justifie the tendring giving or taking of the said Oath he knoweth there is none he knoweth that all the parts of it are destructive of the Laws and Government to maintaine which the Law of Nature and the Law of the Land hath obliged them The Oath of the Covenant makes the Houses supream Governours in causes Ecclesiastical the Oath of Supremacy makes the King so and yet both taken by the same persons at the same time What credit is to be given to persons who make nothing of Oathes and contradict themselves How do the Covenant the Oath of Supremacy agree How do their protestation and the Covenant agree How do their Declarations and Oaths agree The Lord be mercifull to this Land for these Oaths It is a sad thing to consider that so many Gentlemen who professe the Lawes and so many worthy men in both Houses should be so transported as they are knowing that the Lawes of the Land from time to time and in all times are contrary to all their actions and that they yet should amuse
affirmes That the sending propositions to the King and desiring his concurrence is scarce worth an answer for Subjects may humbly petition for that which is their strict right property c. The propositions sent to Newcastle are in print wherein the two Houses are so farre from humbly petitioning that they stile not themselves his Majesties Subjects as appeares by the propositions That they have a strict right or property to any one of these propositions is a strange assertion every one of them being against the Lawes now in force Have the two Houses a strict right property to lay upon the people what Taxes they shall judge meet To pardon all Treasons c. that is one of their Propositions Have they a strict right and property to pardon themselves and so for all the rest of their Propositions These propositions have been Voted by both Houses the Kings assent they being drawn into Bills makes them Acts of Parliament Hath the King no â—ight to assent or dis-assent 12 H. 7 20. 1 Iac. c. 1.1 Car. c. 7. Waâ— the sending but a Complement All our Law-books and Statutes speak otherwise This Gent. and others must give an account one time oâ— other for such delusions put upon the people AD. 4. The Gent. saith They affirme not that the Kings power is separated from his person so as the two Spencer affirmed c. His Majesties person iâ— now at Holâ—by under their Guards have they not severed his power from him when by no power they have left him he can have two of his Chaplains who have not taken their Covenant to attend him for the exercise of his conscience For the three conclusions of the Spencers 15. Ed 2. Exilium Hugonis Calvins case 1 E. c. 2.7 pars â—â—ports 11. do not the two Houses act every of them They say his Majesty hath broken his Trust touching the Government of his people They have raised armies to take him they haue taken him and imprisoned him they governe themselves they make Laws impose Taxes make Judges Sheriffes and take upon them omnia insignia summae potestatis Is not this to remove the King for misdemeanours to reforme per asperte to govern in aid of him the three conclusions of the Spencers Doe they think the good people of England are become stupid and will not at length see these things The Gentleman saith Plowd 4. Eliz. 213. the Kings Power and his person are indivisible They doe not separate his power from his Person but distinguish it c. His power is in his legall Writs Courts and Officers when they counterfeit the Great Seal and seale Writs with the same make Judges themselves Courts and Officers by their owne Ordinances against his consent declared under his true Great Seale of England not by word of mouth letters or ministers onely their Seale is obeyed their own Writs their own Judges their owne Courts their own Officers and not the Kings The time will come when such strange actions discourses will be lamented AD. 5. The Gentleman goes on We take not from the King all power of pardening Delinguents we only say it is not proper to him quarto modo c. What doe you meane by quarte modo I am sure Omnis Rex Angliae solus Rex semper Rex can doe it and none else read the bookes of the Law to this purpose collected by that reverend and learned Judge Stanford Stanford pleas 99. 27 H. 8. c. 24. Dier 163. from all Antiquity to his time who died in the last yeare of King Philip and Queene Maries Reigne you shall finde this a truth undeniable and this power was never questioned in any Age in any Book by any untill this time that every thing is put to the question You Gentlemen who proâ—esse the Law and maintaine the party against the King returne at length and bring not so much scandall upon the Law which preserves all by publishing such incredible things We hold only what the law holds Bract. lib 3 cap 14. fol. 132. 1. pars Instit pag. 344. Plow 3. Eliz 236. 237. the Kings Prerogative and the subjects Liberty are determined and bounded and admeasured by a written Law what they are we doe not hold the King to have any more power neither doth his majesty claime any other but what â—he Law gives him the two Houses by the Law of this Land have no colour of power either to make Delinquents or pardon Delinquents the King contradicting and the Army under Sir Thomas Fairfax howbeit but Souldiers doe now understand that to be Law and doe now evidently see and assuredly know that it is not an Ordinance of the two Houses but an art of Parliament made by the King Lords and Commons that will secure them and let this Army remember their exccuted fellow-Souldier and the Law was alwaies so taken by all men untill these troubles that have begoâ— Monsters of opinions AD. 6. This Gentleman sayes The Parliament hath declared the King to be 〈◊〉 condition to governe c. There is no end of your distinctions I and you professe the Law shew me Law for your distinctions or lâ—tter syllable or line in any Age in the books of the Law that the King may in one time be in no condition to govern and yet have the habit of governing and another time he may viz when the two Houses will suffer him the Law saith thus Vbi lex non distinguit non est distinguendum He saies The King is not barred from returning to His Parliament as he calls the two Houses he knowes the contrary the whole City knows the contrary Nos juris consulti sumus sacerdotes as Justinian the Emperour hath it in the first book of his Institutions and therefore knowledge and truth should come from our lips Worthy and ingenious men will remember and reflect upon that passage of that good and wise man Seneca Non qua itur sed qua eundum follow not the wayes of the Lawyers of the House of Commons God forgive them I am sure the King will if they be wise and seek it in time AD. 7. The Gent sayes â—e swear that the King is our supreme Goverour ouer all persons in all causes 5 Eliz. ch 1. Cawdreys case 5 pars fol. 1. c. Why hath he left out the word onely for the Oath the Members now take is that King Charles is now the only and supreame Governour in all causes over all persons and yet they keep their only Supreme Governour now in prison and act now in Parliament by vertue of their prisoners Writ and by a concurrent power in this Parliament and by their own strict right and property as the Gentleman affirms in his Answer These things agree well with their Oath This Oath is allowed by the common-Law Law of the Land that the King is the onely Supreame Governour in all causes over all persons This Oath is taken now in