Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A59580
|
The Church of England's doctrine of non-resistance, justified and vindicated as truly rational and Christian; and the damnable nature of rebellious resistance represented. By Lewes Sharp, rector of Morton Hampstead, in Devon.
|
Sharpe, Lewes.
|
1691
(1691)
|
Wing S3007C; ESTC R219619
|
98,872
|
68
|
Sword and might warrantably oppose force to force from worldly Powers they would in a military Way have assisted and defended me against the Jews when they apprehended and dealt with me as a Malefactor but they could not pretend any Commission from me to repel with armed Force the most injurious and violent Usage from the Higher Powers for I did expresly forbid it vers 11. Put up thy Sword into thy Sheath said he there to St. Peter who rashly from a wild and ungoverned Zeal drew it in his defence Sect. 38. If you compare the Evangelists together you shall find that Christ's Disciples asked him If they should smite with the Sword Luk. 22.49 and St. Peter probably being naturally somewhat too eager and having an extraordinary tenderness for his Master's Person and perhaps a little leavened with an expectation of a temporary Kingdom without staying for an Answer drew his Sword and smote of Malchus the High Priest's Servants Ear who was likely most forward and busy in seizing of Christ and what was the Event our Saviour for the Reparation of the Injury miraculously pieced it up again to his head vers 51. and severely reprimands Peter for his bold and unwarrantable Action vers 52. Put up thy Sword again into his place and he gave him a Reason for it which obliged him and will have an unlimited and universal Obligation on all Subjects to the End of the World for all they that take the Sword shall perish by the Sword Which Words as you may learn from the Margine of your Bibles have reference to Gen. 9.6 and Rev. â— 10 and are in truth part of the moral Law and clearly intimate that when private Persons not authorized by the Higher Powers do use the Sword in a vindicative and destructive Way they are Murderers let their pretensions be what they will and must expect their allotment Vengeance is mine saith the Lord Rom. 12.19 I will repay and none but such as are commissioned by God can wield the Sword of Justice and claim a Power of Life and Death over Men which Private Subjects cannot pretend And if St. Peter's Resistance not of Caesar himself or the High Priest himself but only of Inferiour Officers Commissioned by them for the Preservation of Christ and Christianity too for the Assailants aimed at the Destruction of both and this done too rashly and indeliberately without any prepensed prejudice and malice be so blamable and an usurpation upon God's prerogative because he was a Subject and had no claim to the Power of the Sword I 'm sure no Man in the same Relation can have a warrantable Ground to avenge himself on his Sovereign Lord the King or resist his Commissioned Officers Sect. 39. And our Saviour having chid and threatned Peter into Obedience he presently declares to him that it was a plain Resistance to the Nature of the Design he was to accomplish in the World to attempt the Defence or Promotion of it by armed Force and Violence Jo. 18.37 to this end saith he was I born and for this cause came I into the World that I should bear witness unto the Truth every one that is of the Truth heareth my Voice q. d. my Kingdom is to subsist by the Power of the Truth and not by the Power of the Sword and all that are heartily zealous for the Truth will voluntarily submit themselves to my institutions And that I have no mind to Rescue my Person and settle my Kingdom by Force of Arms levied against the Powers of the World thou mayest infer from hence for thinkest thou said Christ to Peter that I cannot now pray to my Father and he shall presently give Twelve Legions of Angels Mat. 26.53 Who owed Subjection and Obedience to no earthly Powers and so were fitter Assistance in such a Case than Peter and the rest of his Disciples were Wherefore if it had been necessary proper or agreeable to that constitution of Things he was about to Establish he could have relieved himself without St. Peter's help with a forcible Resistance but that would not effect his Ends but destroy them For how then said he shall the Scriptures be fulfilled that thus it must be Mat. 26.54 Which foretold that he should quitely and patiently without any resistance submit himself to all sorts of ignominious and cruel sufferings from the Legal Powers of the World Is 53.3 to 8. Sect. 40. And as Christ preached and practiced the Doctrine of Non-resistance so did his Disciples and Followers also St. Paul in the first Verse of this Chapter where the Text is chargeth every Soul to be subject to the Higher Powers All Men of what Rank Order Degree or Quality soever the whole Body of the People as well as every individual Person which he enforceth with irresistible Reasons for there is no Power but of God the Powers that be are ordained of God whosoever therefore resisteth the Power resisteth the Ordinance of God And the Roman Power of Government was at this time probably in Nero's hand who was not only an Heathen but also a Man most prodigiously Tyrannical a fierce and barbarous Enemy to Christians and their Religion and such a Monster of Villany and Wickedness as hath scarcely been known in the World and St. Peter taught the same Doctrine Submit your selves to every Ordinance of Man for the Lord's sake whether it be to the King as Supreme or unto Governours as unto them that are sent by him for the Punishment of evil Doers and for the Praise of them that do well for so is the Will of God that with well-doing you put to silence the Ignorance of foolish Men 1 Pet. 2.13 14 15. and as the Apostles taught others to do so they themselves did They submitted themselves to the Civil Powers where ever they came honoured their Persons and obeyed their Laws unless inconsistent with their Obedience unto God and then they chose rather to obey God than Man Acts 3.29 and when punished for disobedience to unreasonable and unjust Laws they suffered with great serenity and submission of Mind without passionate Perturbations or bitter Reflections or appearance of any Inclination to Resistance When they were injuriously imprisoned Acts 4.3 and beaten Acts 5.41 they did not exclaim revile or calumniate but went away rejoycing So when Herod had butchered St. James and consign'd St. Peter to the same Portion there was no spreading of Libels raising of Tumults or confederation of Factions in the City but they possessed their Souls in Patience and Prayers and Tears were their only Weapons of Defence And certainly there is scarce any particular Instance wherein Christianity did more triumph in the World than in their exemplary Submission to the Civil Powers especially in the patient Endurance of unjust Penalties on their Persons and Possessions Sect. 41. And hereby they declared an acknowledgment That God had decreed and predestinated them as they were Christians to be conformed to the Image of his Son in his
this Preamble At the Request of the Commonalty by their Petition made before the King in his Parliament c. so again in 9 Edw. 3. 'T is thus prefaced Whereas the Knights Citizens and Burgesses desired our Sovereign Lord the King in his Parliament by their Petition and many of the Statutes are penned in this Imperial Stile The King Commands The King wills Our Lord the King hath established Our Lord the King hath ordained And of his special grace hath granted c. See 3 Edw. 1. and 6 Edw. 1. and 25. Edw. 3. Statute of Marleburdg 52 Hen. 1. and Statute of Quo Warranto A sufficient Evidence That all our Laws owe their Being to the King's Authority only Sect. 99. 2. All the judicial Courts of England are the King's Courts and derive all their Authority originally from him and are obliged to refer the Exercise of their respective Jurisdictions finally for the Preservation of his Person Crown and Dignity and consequently the High Court of Parliament is the King's Court too and depends on him for that Authority which is there exercised And 't is well observed by my Lord Coke That the King is Principium Caput Finis Parliamenti and answerably in the Parliament writ the King calls it Quoddam Parliamentum nostrum Thereby signifying a Subordination of the Estates convented in Parliament under him sitting there in his Royal Political capacity And consequently the Acts of the Two Houses of Parliament without an impress of Royal Authority are nothing worth to the Purposes of Government 'T is no Argument that the Two Houses of Parliament have a Co-ordination with him in his legislative Authority because he hath restrained himself from the Exercise and Use of it without their Request and Consent for it is no more than a Conditio sine qua non which hath only the Force of a Negative without the Concurrence of which the principal Efficient obtains not its Effect Sect. 100. 3. The Measures or Degrees of all Civil Authority and Power are to be taken either from the express Laws of any State or the immemorial Customs and Prescriptions thereof from a long Possession or from the Oaths the Subjects swear to their Princes This is acknowledged by the Author who pleads for a Co-ordination of the Houses of Parliament with the King in the Legislative Authority of the Kingdom as a proper Rule by which to judge where the Legislative Power of a Nation is lodged and this being impartially attended will evidently discover That the Legislative Power is in the King only For 1. If we consider what the Laws determine we shall find that they ascribe it wholly to the King See to this purpose the afore-quoted Preface to a Statute in 24. Hen. 8. where 't is thus said For by divers Old Authentick Histories and Chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the World governed by our Supreme Head and King having the Dignity and Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of the Same unto whom a Body Politick compact of all sorts and degrees of People divided in Terms and by Names of Spiritualty and Temporalty have been bounden and ought to bear next to God natural and humble Obedience he being also in Statute and furnished by the Goodness and Sufferance of Almighty God not of the People with Plenary whole and entire Power Preheminence Authority Prerogative and Jurisdiction to render and yield Justice and final determination in all Causes Matters and Debates Likewise in the Statute of the 35 of Eliz. this Submission after Non-conformity to divine Service is to be made openly in some Church I do acknowledge and testify in my Conscience that no other Person hath or ought to have any Power or Authority over His Majesty Which Statute was declared to be in full force in the 16 of Ch. 2. 2. This Authority and Preheminence as the former Statute mentioned implies is of immemorial Custom and Prescription and was so far as I can discover never questioned in any Parliamentary Convention of the States till 1642. and then by the Two lower States only too and then the Co ordination in the Legislative Power was asserted to warrant and justify one of the most unreasonable and barbarous Rebellions that ever was in this Kingdom 'T is declared by the Statute of 16 Rich. 2. That the Crown of England hath been so free at all times that it hath been in no earthly Subjection but immediately subject to God in all things touching the Regality of the same Crown and to none other and if to none other then not to the Two Houses of Parliament and in 1 Jam. 1. The High Court of Parliament wherein as they speak the whole Kingdom in Person or Representative was present i. e. all Estates and Degrees call themselves his Majesty's Loyal and Faithful Subjects and declare his Majesty to be their only Liege Lord and Sovereign and agnize their constant Faith Obedience and Loyalty to his Majesty and Royal Progeny And I will be so bold as to challenge this Author to shew from any Parliamentary Record that ever the Two Houses claimed or pretended to a Co-ordination with the King in the Legislative Power till the time above mentioned 3. What can be more evident for the Determination of this matter than the Oath of Supremacy by which every Subject is obliged to testify and declare in his Conscience that the Kings Highness is the only Supreme Governour of this Realm and of all other His Highnesses Dominions and Countries as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes as Temperal as He is Supreme He hath no Superior and as He is only Supreme He can have no equal they that wrest the Supremacy of the King's Government to import only the executive part of Government manifestly subvert the primary Design of the Oath which was to restrain and preserve the King's Subjects from a Submission to the usurped legislative and juridical Authority of the Bishop of Rome So that if the Bishop of Rome pretended to both parts of Government as 't is certain he did and still doth then the Oath directly intends an opposition to both and consequently ascribes the only Supremacy appropriately to the King both respectively to the Legislative and Executive part of the Government Sect. 101. 4. Suppose contrary to all this plain evidence that the legislative Power is lodged between the King and Two Houses of Parliament how will this prove a Superior Authority in them above that in the King Par in Parem non habet potestatem An Equal is no Superior Indeed according to our Authors affirmation here are Two to One which is very great odds if he intended to press to his Service that Maxim Major pars obtinet rationem totius the major part of the Legislators virtually are the whole For this will at the Pleasure of the Two Houses render the Concurrence of the King