good cause hath not at all times good successe I haue laboured in vaine I haue spent my strength for naught but my iudgment is with the Lord and my worke with my God saith the Prophete Isai 49.4 A Minister therfore must goe on with courage ☜ though he seeth no fruite of his labours for his reward is with God Some mislike the vnceasonablesse of this motion they could wish in their hearts they say I had tarried longer waited for some more ceasonable opportunity for the diuulging of these points To whom I answer Gods truethes may not waite attendance till men be at leisure to receiue them and why not now as well as hereafter vnlesse these men thinke these times so desperatly euill as ther 's no hope left that they will giue eare vnto wholesome Doctrine But my feare is that their season is whē I am out of season after my death and so they hope the point should dye with mee but I haue peuented them I am by the mercy of God neither so afraid nor so ashamed of Gods cause as to deny it my best furtherance countenance in my life time were I ashamed of God this Trueth before men I might iustly susspect that God wold be ashamed of such a seruāt before his Angels in heauē Some say that there are others in the Church in many regards more fit then I for a matter of this weight and therefore they could wish that I had neuer stirred in it for now I haue marred the cause quite and cleane by my meannesse c. T is true indeede I freely confesse it there are many much more fit then I and I hartely wish it that any of them had taken my place labour but this wee know that the most fit and able men to doe God seruice they are not euer the most redy and willing to doe it had it bene a point the reuealing whereof might haue wone credit applause preferment and the like I beleeue you had heard of it long err now but it being a point of much and hard laboures the reward like to be nothing but danger reproch and heard censures and like to meete with greate enemies many in such a point wise men will take leisure and giue any body leaue to goe before them What hope could I haue that others of better worth would vndertake this taske when as before I published my former booke many men of greate lerning conscience to whom I communicated my Notes for confirmation or confutation they did neither but rather turned my vtter enemies for this cause sake wherefore I was not rash as some men count rashlinesse but after I had waited as Elihu did vpon the auncient and more lerned found no courage in their heartes nor word in their mouthes to speake for God then I spake in my turne shewed myne opinion let no man blame my zeale it was for God T is true the meannesse of my person will be a greate blocke in the way to the progresse of this cause especially in these clyming dayes wherein the word of God is so much receiued with respect of persons for men esteeme of the cause iust as they doe of the person hence it is that before many will giue audience to the matter they will first know of the man as whither he be one of their side or no approued of by them and whither learned witty eloquent and well red or no or whither honoured with Titles eminency and preferment or no in so much as if the Prophet Amos were now liuing and teaching Gods trueth it is to be feared his booke of prophecy would not be regarded being he was a Neat-heard and if S. Paul were now to preach the new doctrine of the gospell it may be thought it would not be entertained he being a Tayler or Tentmaker But where are those Noble Bereanes who serched the Scriptures and examined the cause without regard had to Pauls person where is that Eloquent and lerned Apollos that gaue heed vnto the instructions and matter which Aquilla and Priscilla his wife taught him of whom he lerned the way of God more perfectly without respect vnto their persones for the one was a woman that taught him and both were Taylers of Tentmakers If therefore A Trueth fareth the worse for the meannesse of the Author it shall be so but at the hands onely of such persons as doe not vnfeinedly desire the sincere milke of the word that they may growe thereby as did those Noble Bereanes and it shall be so but at the hands onely of such whose lerning is not sanctified and seasoned with Humility as Apollos his was Some obiect that the broching of this point will breed stirres and distractions in the Church c. To whom I answer t is a trueth they say when euer entred any new Trueth or was any old Trueth receiued but it came in with stirres and distractions at the first It fareth in these cases as it doth with phisicke which a sikly man takes to recouer his health at first it makes him sicker then he was before it causeth him pains in his belly head heart c and albeit the pacient know all this before hand yet will he take this potion in hope of a more perfect health afterwards and so I trust will it be in this case though for the present it occationeth stirres distractions distempers yet it will be so onely in the minds of some such as doe abound with euill humores neuerthelesse the conclusion will be good by the mercy of God a more perfect health will be obtained When Luther first stirred to reforme the second Commandement there was then greate stirres and distractions in the Church but by this time and long agone there hath bene a sweete accorde that vpon better conditions then formerly and why may wee not hope for like successe I mary say some scoffingly and we shall haue an other Luther now shall we what will you proue an other Luther now such a disdainfull enuiouse scoffing age we now liue in that that which shold be a mans greatest honour as to imitate the most virtuouse it is wrested as a matter of his reproch derision in other cases we desire to iustifie our actions by the like actions of the godly and wise that haue gone before vs and to make vse of them for our incouragement and why should I onely be denied this benefit I pray tell me is it not a laudable thing for any to become followers of Luther Caluîne Zwinglius of Paul Peter Christ When euer I propound examples to my selfe they shall euer be the best and most eminent let these scoffers imitate the worst for so they doe they are the sonnes of scoffing Ishmael Were it an infallible note of pride to imitate the most excellent Paul would neuer haue exhorted vs to become followers of him as he was of Christ Neither could Christians
albeit the Court knovveth not hovv he is able to make good proue his information yet it being a matter probable seeing it is the Kings cause both the Iudge and all the Iustices euen the whole Court doe countenance the cause yea so farre forth take in vvith it as that if it be possible so as no iniustice be done nor any Lavv of the Realme thereby violated he that informeth for the King shall haue the day rather then a priuate subiect and good reason for it Well in the case of the Lords Sabbaths I informe for the King of kings the King of heauen earth it is novv the parte of all Gods Ministers both superiour as Bishops inferiour as common Preachers to take in with this cause of Gods Sabbaths as Gods cause their Lord King to countenance it to their vtmost yea so farre forth to backe it take part vvith it as Gods Sabbaths may haue the day if no law of God nor text in Scripture be thereby violated as I dare pawne my life for it there shall not If Ministers in the Church both superiours and inferiours doe not thus honour God before the people by giuing his cause the preeminence the Magistrates of the common weale shall rise vp in iudgement against them condemne them I come now to the last vse of the point Is it so that thou louest the lavv of God then take vp a daily lamentation for the lamenesse imperfection of Gods lavv for the vveekly violation of Gods 4th com and for the profanation of Gods Sabbaths if we haue not Gods Law in its integrity and perfection as we haue not if vve vvant his Sabbath therein commanded then haue vve but a lame imperfect lavv and if the Saturday be Gods Sabbath as I haue shovvne it is and shall further proue hereafter then is the 4th com vveekly broken and Gods Sabbaths weekly profaned As Dauid hath bene our President shevving vs hovv vve should loue Gods law so let him be our President to shevv vs hovv vve should mourne for the violation transgression of Gods Lavv Mine eyes gush out saieth he with riuers of waters because they keepe not thy Law Psal 119.136 And againe I saw the transgressours was grieued because they kept not thy word Psal 119.158 It is a property then of a Godly man to mourne and to grieue to see Gods Lavvs transgressed and the reason of that his sorrow griefe is because he loueth Gods Law as Dauid did Oh then that all sorts of people would bevvray their loue to Gods Lavv by their sorrow of heart to see it transgressed weekly in the profanation of Gods Sabbaths Againe doest thou indeed loue the Lavv of God how canst thou but take it to heart to see this holy and Diuine Lavv of thy God so mangled defaced so lame imperfect as in these dayes it is in all Christian Churches It is and euer hath bene a speciall fauour of God to betrust any Nation or people vvith his word and Oracles as we may see it in Rom. 3.1.2 What is the preferment of the Iew c. much enery way for chiefly because vnto them were of credit committed the Oracles of God Where the Apostle counteth it a preferment of the Iew and the chiefe preferment to haue the word of God committed vnto their custodie and it is reported of them that they haue bene euer very faithfull in keeping the letter of the text vncorrupted Among all Nations and people it hath pleased Almightie God to preferr this our English Nation with this chiefe preferment and to be trust vs with the custodie of his word and Oracles those 10 Commandements wrote with his owne finger our Church is now become the receptacle and House of God wherin he hath laid vp his word for its conseruation it is the grownd and pillar to supporte and beare vp this trueth as Paul caleth it 1. Tim. 3.15 hath God thus in speciall fauour to our Nation preferred vs aboue many Nations and that vvith his chiefe preferment to betrust vs vvith the custody of his Law and Oracles and shall we proue so vnfaithfull to him as to take care but of some peeces of these Oracles onely What Nation saith Moses is so greate that hath ordinances Lawes so righteouse as all this Law which I set before you this day Deut. 4.8 hath God betrusted vs with a righteouse Law and with a Law so righteouse as no Nation vnder heauen but such as know God and such as haue the very same hath the like to it Yea not onely are some peeces of this Law so righteouse but all the whole Law is of the same nature so saith Moses so righteouse as all this Law is which I set before you this day and shall not we preserue then all this Law the whole Law intirly in its perfection we should blush for shame to doe otherwise we should lament mourne to see it otherwise T is true we keepe these Oracles intirly in the letter so doe Papistes but vvhat 's the letter when we weaken diminish and abolish the binding force of it for vve say this parte of Gods Oracles But the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not doe any worke doth not bind vs Christians In it that is in it 7th day thou shalt not vvorke saith God I but this prohibition bindeth not novv say some Ministers no vvhat doe vve vvith Lavves if they bind vs not as good take avvay the sense of the vvords of the Lavv and so it shall be senslesse as to take away the binding of the Law wherby it is made forcelesse the binding povver of a Lavv is the life and soule of the Law take avvay then its binding povver it is but a deadlieflesse Lavv it is but a Cipher or a blanke and so the Church shall be but like the Lottery pot vvhich houldeth some blankes among the prises suppose vve should say of the other 9 Oracles that vve preserue the letter of them intirly but herevnto vve should add this that they binde not vs Christians now vvhat bauocke should we thus make of the Morall Lavv it is all one therfore to reiect the Lavv as to reiect its binding power vvherby it bindeth vs. We haue alredy shovvne hovv this Lavv of God is mangled and defaced oh that all people vvould bevvaile this oh that the King vvould take it to heart so did the good King Josiah vvhen the Lavv had bene lost for a time he rent his cloathes 2. King 22.11 oh that the Bishops of the Land would take it to heart so did Elie the Priest vvhen he heard that the Arke of God vvas taken from them 1. Sam. 4.17.18 he died for grief of heart vvhy the Lords Sabbaths vvere his hallovved times as the Arke his holy place Oh that the people of the land vvould take it to heart so did the people in Nehemiahs time for saith
one yeere vpon one day of the weeke and the next yeere vpon an other Wherefore since it is the most likely that Pentecost day then fell vpon some other day of the weeke as Saturday or the like hovv vvill they proue it fell novv vvhen Peter preached on the Lords day or Sunday 3. I answer but suppose we that it was the Lords day wherin all this vvas done it yet doth not follow that this day was therfore a Sabbath day for these actions were no proper actions of a Sabbath day done onely vpon Sabbath dayes for they were common weeke dayes actions such as might be may be and were done vpon any day of the weeke let vs rune thorough the particulars briefly and first for the Holy Ghostes descending how will they make it appeare that the Holy Ghost in his discent doth vvaite for a Sabbath day to come downe in vve reade of the Holy Ghosts descending in Act. 10.44 and in Act. 19.6 But not a vvord that these dayes were Sabbath dayes If notable actions done in a day must sanctify that day for a Sabbath day vvhy are not good Friday wherin Christ suffered Hallow Thursday vvherin Christ ascended made Sabbaths also for these workes vvere as behoofefull for the Church as was the descent of the Holy Ghost 2. For the Sacrament of Baptisme the administration of this is no proper worke for a Sabbath but may be done in any common day Else why doe vvee baptise children on any day of the vveeke and vvhy did Phillip Baptise the Eunuch on a trauailing day Act. 8.38.39 Paul baptized Lydia hir houshold vpō the Saturday Sabbath Act. 16.15 Sacraments were neuer appropriated to the Sabbath day as vve may see in Circumcision it vvas on the 8 day were it Sabbath day or not the Passeouer it was on the 14th day of the moneth were it Sabbath day or not Christ did eate the Lords Supper on Thursday night the night before he was crucified 3. For Peters sermon we know preaching is no worke so proper vnto the Sabbath day as it may not be on any day of the weeke also else why preach wee on Lecture dayes on any of the weeke dayes preaching may be on any day of the weeke according to that 2. Tim. 4.2 preach the word be instant in season and out of season Christ preached on a vvorking day to the Samaritan vvoman his Disciples being gone into the Citty to buy meate Ioh. 4.8 the Apostles preached daily in the Temple and from house to house Act. 5.42 thus it appeareth that these are such actions as may be done on any day of the weeke hovv then will it follow that this day of Pentecost was Sabbath day because these actions vvere done in that day these are farr from necessary consequences I am suer No maruaile they pretend necessary consequences for the Lords day and magnify their reason so highly in the want of a Commandement for the day I see novv ther is some cause indeede that they should set a good face vpon the matter and hauing no Com. from Christ for the day yet they should make the world beleeue that they haue good consequences for the purpose and doe you not see how good they are had they neither consequence nor Com. for the day they should haue iust nothing for it they had need therefore extoll their necessary consequences Doe not vve on a Christmas day vvhen it falleth on a working day or weeke day both pray preach vse the Sacraments and rest from laboures and sing Psalmes in the Congregation and vvill any wise man say ther 's necessary consequence in it that we keepe it for a Sabbath day what vanities are these The vtmost that can be collected by good consequence from this Text Act. 2. is that the Church kept this day of Pentecost for a Lecture day like as vve haue Lecture dayes euery vvhere on vveeke dayes on Tewsdayes or Thursdayes the like Further it is to be noted that Peters Sermon heere it vvas meerly occationall extraordenary therfore can not binde vs to ordenary practise For vpon the extraordenary Myracle of the Holy Ghosts deseent in clouen fiery tounges some people vvere amazed astonished doubting said what may this be Act. 2.12 Others mocked and said the Apostles vvere full of new wine and drunken Act. 2.13 now here vvas greate occation for Peter to preach a Sermon vnto them partly to informe instruct those that vvere amazed doubted partly to confute those vvho scosted at the Apostles as if they had bene drunken so heere was matter enough to moue Peter to preach though he had no respect vnto the day as a Sabbath day It is true hence a Minister by consequence may gather such a consequent or doctrine as this namely that it is the duety of Ministers to preach the vvord vpon all occations but for any to collect hence not onely that vve must preach vpon all occations but more then this as namely that vve must also euer more preach vpon the same day and in the same time vvherin the Apostle Peter preached that is vpon the Lords day vvhither there be extraordenaty occation or none this is idle absurde for the Text will not beare vs out in any such collections nor can it be gathered hence that vve are bound to preach at all vpon either one day or vpon an other vnlesse it be vpon extraordenary occationes such as vvere Peters here in this Texte Further vve may aswell coliect hence also concerning the place as the time saying that vve must euermore preach in a populouse and famouse Citty also as London Norwich and the like for Peter preached in Ierusalem a famouse Citty And also when vve preach there we must keepe that day for a Sabbath day too 4. My 4th last answer to this text is by shewing their absurd consequence hence for if that the coming downe of the holy Ghost Peters sermon the convertion of 3000. the baptizing of them c. did declare the day to be a Sabbath day wherein they were done then is Pentecost a Iewish ceremoniall feast day moralized made a Christian Sabbath day and so Iewish abrogated ceremonies shall be reuiued in the Church the reason thereof is because the holy Ghost doth not call this day here Lords day or first day of the weeke but he calleth it Pentecost day and when the day of Pentecost was come Act. 2.1 This day might be called by 3 seuerall names as 1. Lords day 2. The first day of the weeke and 3. Pentecost day Now in that the holy Ghost reiecteth both those names of Lords day and first day of the weeke which should make for their purpose chooseth this name Pentecost day which was a ceremoniall day it followeth that if these actions had any force or virtue to declare the day whereon they were done to be a Sabbath day they shewed vs that this day considered
to smother it and suffer it to dye with mee I haue aduentured to publish it to defend it saying with Quene Aester If I perish I perish and with the Apostle Paul I passe not at all neither is my life deare vnto mee so that I may fulfill my course with ioye Actor 20.24 What a corziue would it prove to my conscience on my deaths bedd to cale to minde how I knew these things full well but would not reueale them how could I say with S. Paul that I had reuealed the whole Counsaile of God and haue kept nothing backe that was proffitable Act. 20.20.27 what hope could I then conceiue that God would open his gate of Mercy to mee who whilst I liued would not open my mouth for him Thus Gentle Reader I haue both giuen thee my reasons mouing me to wright and also showne thee the many discouragements opposing me how I haue encountered them now in the last place my request vnto thee shall be 1. that thou expectest not from me expressions of greate Schollarship reading elegancy of phrase and the like but onely soundnesse plainnesse and godly simplicity as this is all you shall find so is it as much as I desire you should finde Touching Method I could wish that here and there some things were otherwise placed but considering that nothing is more tediouse vnto me then vnnecessary wrighting of one thing twise ouer whereby such slipes might haue bene amended I trust I shall obtaine thy patience and the rather considering that after this worke was first finished it laying still by mee I had occation to add too many and sondry things here and there and not finding roome enough in the margent of my Notes to inserte them were I would was forced to thrust them in where I could 2. Whereas in some passages a harsh word or two may fale from my pen which the temperate Reader may thinke might better haue bene spared In this case I desire him to thinke that he is not yet so sensible of the foulnesse of the cause as my selfe who haue peraduenture better weighed circumstances for I consider of the foulnes of the matter seeing it most palpably of the obstinacy of the aduersaries after sufficient meanes of conviction tendered long a gone vnto them and of the dangerouse consequences arising from their greate errours in a matter of greatest weight and moment it being about a Morall Law a parte of Gods worship and a most Ancient ordinance of Gods I see their absurd answers distinctons and arguments and how by their subtilty they corrupt the Scriptures and abuse the well minded people of the Land obserue it and you shall still find some of these things the foregoing occation of euery tarte speech I vse now these things my Reader at first cannot be possessed of as I am who can speake of such foule things without some expressions of a iust indignation against them In specialll I haue often occasion to vse the word Puritan◠Hereat let none be offended for I vse it not in reproch vnto sanctity and purity or the professours thereof considered as truly such for I honour purity in my heart endeauor after it in my life I vse the word therfore but onely as a note of distinction to point at some men with whom I haue to deale rather then others grieued I am at my heart and in my soule that I must haue to deale against persons so qualified T is true this cause concerneth all men none excepted whither Ministers or people yet in speciall as cause there is for it I direct my speech chiefly against Ministers of Ministers there are two sortes puritanes and such as are no puritanes these as I find them not redy to imbrace things new so I find them not redy to condemne a cause before they haue heard it wherefore spareing them my speech is onely against puritane Ministers of these also there are two sortes some who happily neuer so much as haue heard of this question or if they haue yet neuer raised slaunders oppositions against it but carying it temperatly and discreetly wish it a due triall that so the trueth may be boulted out these mē I reuerence but there are others in speciall those tenn Ministers named in the title lease at the begining of this booke these men in speciall I oppose for these after they haue had my Notes and also my former booke and conference with me now fowre yeeres past yet still doe raise vp all the oppositon against both my person and my cause that they can and that both publikly and priuatly Salomon telleth vs there is an appointed time for all things A time to laugh and a time to weepe A time to rend and a time to sowe A time of warre and a time of peace A Time to keepe silence and a time to speake Eccl. 3. my former booke was a time of silence for there I laboured to couer the spotes blemishes of these my brethrens errour hoping a word had bene enough to the wise but they abusing it this booke is a time to speake and lay them forth in their cullers My former booke was a time of peace for there I handled the matter meekly mildly and in all friēdlinesse hoping these my brethren would redly haue imbraced Trueth with peace but they proclaiming open warres against me Gods cause in my hand this booke is a time of warre here I take them for Gods enimies and myne Let me desire my Reader therfore to giue me patience to prosecute these enemies of Gods Trueth rowndly not sparing them though they be Ministers Happily thou wilt say in their behalfe oh but these men whom you would so prosecute they are Ministers whom we exceedingly reuerence and who doe truly feare God as your selfe cannot deny c. Yea they are your brethren c. And so doe I reuerence them too but with this limitation in their virtues and wherin they doe well And they truly feare God as I am strongly perswaded yet they haue not at all times a respect vnto all Gods Commandements as the Prophet Dauid speaketh for they transgresse the 4th Com. weekly by prophaning of Gods Sabbathes I may not vnfitly resemble these 10 Ministers vnto that clowd which had a light and a darke parte when I behold their light parte see them walking in teaching the trueth I cannot loke enough on them I may truly speake it but when I looke on their darke parte and see them in their errours I abhorre their sight as one abhorreth the darknesse The Prophet Dauid was to be exceedingly reuerenced yet not in his sinnes of murther adultery against the 6th 7th com Hee truly feared God yet at this time he had not a respect vnto these two Commandements of murther and adultery The Apostle Peter being a Minister was to be highly reuerenced yet not in his deniall of Christ He truly feared God yet when he
for the dueties in the time either they haue vtterly abolished them also as hath bene showne or at the best they haue but counterfeit Sabbath dueties for true Sabbath dueties so much of the dueties Lastly they haue as hath bene showne taken away the very subiect matter of the 4th comm so as now God commandeth vs to Remember a nothing and to sanctify a nothing and so Gods commandement is made ridiculouse Loe this foule errour it is an errour worthy the discouery and high time it is that God should raise vp some man to discouer these things and to stand in defence of his 4th com and for this cause as I haue intitled my booke a defence of the Lords Sabbaths so haue I intitled it also a defence of the 4th com for you see how they haue by blotting out the Lords Sabbaths also defaced the whole commandement with them It is strang to see what violence this one finale portion of Scripture to wit Gods 4th com hath vndergone and it is the more strang considering the learning and knowledge of these times what vaine friuolouse distinctions of a Sabbath the Sabbath of one day in 7 of the Sabbath belonging to vs as it signifieth a Rest as it belongeth vnto all Nations that the time is a ceremony the duties in the time morall by all which they exclud the proper time in this 4th com and yet then againe to contradict themselues though the time of day be abolished yet still they will haue the day and a day out of the 4th com and a day too of 24 houres long and though the Sabbath day be abolished as they hold yet they vvill haue a Sabbath day still out of the 4th com too The 10. commandements they call them the Morall Law but bring them to this point of the Sabbath day and then they are become partly Morall partly ceremoniall they might as well say that that which in common speech they call white as the snovv that it is partly white partly blacke The Papists are blamed for making the 2d com Iewish and Ceremoniall and yet say we this 4th Comm. touching the Sabbath day is Iewish and Ceremoniall thus hauing contradicted our selues then vve fall to botching and cobling of the Commandement first it is fained that the Lords Sabbath day is abolished and vvorne out of vse and then to repaire the losse and breach againe that there may be a full number of ten Commandements the 4th comman wherein the breach vvas must be cobled vp againe the nevv leather where with all it must be amended it is the Lords day and it is put into the roome of the old and ouer vvorne Sabbath day so we haue now a new-old com or an old-new com whither you vvill for it is partly old and partly new Lastly as if all the former were not enough after sondry contradictions and after sondry fine distinctions whereby they haue violently torne a sunder what the Almightie hath inviolably and inseperablie ioyned together at last they cast them all quite away abolishing both time and dueties in the time and commandement all thes with others which I might reckone vp and with other violences and abuses which yet I am to discouer hath this one small portion of Scripture the 4th com vndergone I cannot thinke any one portion of Scripture in controversy betvvixt vs and Papists hath bene more wrested and abused by them then this by vs God amend it Paul telleth Timothy 1. Tim. 1.7 that there were some among them which desiring to be teachers of the law vnderstood not what they said nor whereof they affirmed This Scripture is verified of some Teachers in these dayes as may appeare by the premisses and as shall yet further appeare hereafter I come now to the word Remember and touching this word a reason may be demanded why the Lord should put a Memorandum vnto this com aboue any others of the 10 and why the Commandement should be expressed by this word Remember The common reason hereof rendered by diuins is to preuent carelesnes and forgetfulnesse on the six working dayes of the Sabbath day next ensuing least men should leaue some common workes of the six dayes to be done on the 7th day Sabbath this I confesse a trueth indeed but this is not all I suppose for if one demandeth a reason why God prefixed a Memento to this Com. more then vnto any other of the commandements this cannot be the reason because that by mens not forethinking of the Sabbath some vvorkes are left vndone on the six dayes to be done on the Sabbath day and so the Sabbath is profaned and the 4th com transgressed For seeing that vve are in like danger of breaking euery other of the Commandements by a carelesnes and a not forethinking of our dueties in them enioyned it should haue bene needfull therefore to haue had a Memorandum prefixed vnto euery one of the 10. Com. as vvell as vnto this 4th com least we breake them also through forgetfulnesse but since a Memorandum is put to this com and not vnto others such a reason therefore would be sought as agreeth to this com and not vnto others Novv in this point if I may take leaue to deliuer mine opinion I cannot finde out a better reason then this God foreseeing that after a long time that is about 364 yeeres after Christ for then was the Sabbath day abolished by the Laodicean Counsaile as afterwards you shall heare more this his Sabbath day vvould be not in part violated and profanely kept but that it vvould be vtterly and altogether blotted out of remembrance in all Christian Churches for 1200 yeeres together as it is to this day to preuent which forgetfulnesse and vtter neglect of his Sabbath day it pleased God to prefixe a Memento to this com that so if it be forgotten it might in time by one meanes or other be brought to remembrance againe which God graunt If we take a suruey of all the 10 Com. we shall find that nothing commanded in any of them is so wholly and vtterly buried and forgotten as is the Sabbath day commanded in the 4th com vvhen they had buried Christ they laid a stone vpon him and sealed it to make all sure that he might neuer rise againe so haue they buried the Lords Sabbath day and least it rise againe they haue cast an heape of stones vpon it calling it Iewish and Iudaisme and a signe and shaddow and a buried abolished ceremony and vvhat not and all to bring it out of remembrance Now though Papists haue foully forgotten the 2d com yet all Protestants remember it well enough God be thanked I know not any one thing in all the 10. Commandements forgotten by Reformed Churches but this one thing onely to vvit the Lords Sabbath day and as for this this is forgotten of all both Protestants and Papists it was very needfull therefore that the Lord should prefixe a Memorandum to this
God then they were wont presently they be labour it to extinguish this light in them to these I may fitly apply that word of the Lord Ierem. 23.30 Therefore behold I will come against the Prophets saith the Lord that steale my word euery one from his neighbour These then be sacrilegiouse theeues who will not sow the seed of Gods word in the hearts of their people but vvill watch vvhen it is sowne that they may come steale it away againe I trust Gods Ministers will bridle corrupt nature and giue me leaue to lay the plaister where the sore is knowing it is their office to doe the like to others dayly they vvho teach others to take a reproofe are not to learne in this point Let me speake one vvord novv to all these 3 sortes of Ministers together vvhy are yee you Tribe of Leuie such enemies to the integrity wholnesse perfection of the Lavv of your God deliuered vvith such maiestie and terrour vpon Mount Sinai Exod. 20 Why oppose you your selues also against those iotes titles of this lavv ratified by our Lord Christ vnto eternity in his sermon on the Mount Mat. 5.1.8 Why doe you not according to his vvill mind teach the people this least commandement touching the proper time of his worship and seruice Nay why are you so vnlike your selues For it is a rule approued in expounding of the Scriptures that things are to be taken in the largest sense if nothing hinder Now why then in expounding of this 4th com doe you abridge it excluding the proper time thereof as if nothing but the dueties of rest and holinesse belonged vnto vs Whereas you ought to expound it more largly as including both the time of the 7th day the dueties of rest holinesse also since there is nothing that you can iustly say against the time Againe it is another rule in expouding of Scripture in speciall of the Morall law that vnder one thing expresly commanded or forbidden are comprehended all of that kind with the least cause or occasion thereof See here how they enlarge the lavv to be vnderstood not onely of the things there by name mentioned but also of things not mentioned as of the causes occasions and yet the same men being to expound the 4th com are so farre off from enlarging it as they will miserablie curtaile it and clippe it and pare it vntill they haue quite pared away the 7th day Sabbath Why are you so inconstant so vnlike your selues is it a rule with you that things not mentioned in the Comm. are to be brought in that so the Com. may haue the largest scope compasse and will you exclude and thrust out things by name mentioned in the Com. as the 7th day Sabbath Againe when we are to deale against Papists then we are very zealouse for the integrity perfection of the law witnesse M. Perkins in his first Volume pag. 400. where he proueth that a Papist cannot goe beyond a Reprobate because they make the whole law vaine and this he affirmeth in these words If one frustrate but any one point of any one commandement the whole law thereby is made in vaine Cannot a Papist goe beyond a Reprobate if he frustrate any one point of any one commandement can a Protestant goe beyond a Reprobate when he doeth frustrate some one point in some one commandement as we doe in the 4th comm Must the law stand in euery point of euery commandement vvhen we haue to doe vvith our Aduersaries abroade is the case altered when we be among our selues at home It is made a marke of sincerity and of the trueth of grace vvhen a man hath respect vnto all Gods commandements without exception of any But come vpon the matter with them then they that deliuer this marke to others can scarcely finde it in themselues For albeit they seeme by this marke to iustify the law in the integrity and perfection of it yet aske them what they thinke of Gods 7th day Sabbath commanded in the 4th com and this they will baulke and except vnder one pretense or other by miscalling it Iewish Ceremoniall and by saying falsely that it is abolished and is this the respect they haue vnto all Gods commandements It is a rule also that the law it is wholly copulatiue that is the things therein commanded are firmly combined knit together so as not any one thing can be seuered from the law and thus farre they maintaine the law in its perfection integrity but how then cometh it about that novv you haue made such a hiatus such a gape in this lavv one of the Linkes of this chaine is broken the commanded time of 7th day in the 4th com is taken out and seuered from all the rest so novv this copulation is vncoupled and the lavv is not wholly copulatiue it is but partially copulatiue Behold how the enēmies to the Lords Sabbaths to the integrity perfection of the Lavv of God say and vnsay it againe abroad vvith our aduersaries t is a point of reprobation to frustrate but any one point of any one commandement at home t is a point of Iudaisme to maintaine defend them all What should I say more iustly may the Lord lament ouer England as once he did ouer Ierusalem saying O my people they that leade thee cause thee to erre Isa 3.12 SECT XI Thus I haue defended the Morall lavv against both Anabaptists Libertins and also the integrity perfection of this lavv against Protestants and Papists to this end I haue opened expounded one branch of this lavv to vvit the 4th com and discouered many foule grosse errours in the ordinary receiued exposition thereof Now for conclusion I purpose to adde an Exhortation to the loue of this lavv of God It is called a royall Lavv But if yee fulfill the royall law according to the Scripture c. Iam. 2.8 It is called a righteouse Law What nation is so great that hath ordinances and lawes so righteous as all this law which I set before you this day Deut. 4.8 It is as a light in darkest night Thy word is a lanthorne vnto my feete and a light vnto my path Psal 119.105 Of all men the Prophet Dauid excelleth in this argument in his 119 Psalm Thy Testimonies are my delight my counsailers v. 24. My delight shall be in thy commandements which I haue loued v. 47. Thy statutes haue bene my Songes in the house of my pilgrimage v. 54. Oh how loue I thy Law it is my meditation continually v. 97. I hate vaine inuentions but thy law doe J loue v. 113. Yee see heere how Dauid was in loue with Gods lavv Now this his loue he doth expresse partly by his desirs and prayers and partly by comparisons by prayers Open mine eyes that I may see the wonders of thy Law v. 18. Hide not thy commandements from mee v. 19. Mine heart breaketh
they haue taught and this they cannot beare for so the people as some of them haue saied would neuer beleeue them againe this is such a discredit as they that haue euer liued in credit and neuer denied themselues in such a point as this cannot tell how to beare it therfore can beare no good will to the cause 3. That they should receiue this point from so vile and contemptible a person as first brocheth it this cannot be borne it cannot be thought their high spirits will stoope so lovve 4. That the profession of this trueth may endanger them the losse of their faire liuings 5. It crosseth supposed Antiquity 6. It crosseth vniuersality 7. It is impossible to be reformed These the like raigning ruling in their mindes how can it be but suspitious that they haue no good will to the cause why then should it not be lavvfull for me to except against these mens testimony to haue them dravvne so as they may passe no verdict touching the Lords Sabbaths For their testimony is quit disabled as you see therefore to be reiected Furthermore parties vve say are no fit Iudges Novv Ministers in this case are parties for they are violent against the Lords Sabbaths vvherefore they are no compitent Iudges if therefore people vvill haue any knovvledge of this part of Gods Lavv they must get it themselues by their owne study of the point they must serch my bookes for Gods Sabbaths and their bookes sermons against Gods Sabbaths vnpartially weigh the arguments on both sids vvithout any regard had at all to the Authours Thus yousee that if a man hath knowledge of this trueth hath Honestie also yet if his goodwill be wanting his opinion iudgment is of no worth yet fruther I argue if that a mans testimony be worth lesse for want of goodwill to the cause when as he once by wisdome knovveth the trueth first then much more worth lesse is it when he was stuffed with a preiudice of the point before he knew it that is when he had euill vvill to the point before he knew it novv this is the case of our Ministers as may be coniectured by the cōsideration of those 7. argumēts before mētioned for at theire very firsthearsay of the point before they had read the booke or studied the point thes stumbling blockes appeared instantly to vvit if they imbrace it there follovveth losse of credit losse of liuing the rest so as theire minds are so forestalled vvith feares of these dangers as they cannot regard vvhat they heare nor vvhat they read their iudgement is quite ouerthrovvne for the most part in this case say that they reade the booke about the pointe they reade rather vvith a minde desirouse to carpe cavvill at euery thing as ioyfull to make false vvhat they feare to imbrace rather then to be further inlightened in the point as I appeale to theire consciences if I say not true of them further the trueth hereof appeareth that theire minds iudgements are forestaled against this point before they reade or study the point for many Ministers yea the most who neuer studied the point no nor euer savv so much as the out side of my former booke yet at the first hearesay of it cry burne the booke the like wherfore if people shall say I but novv our Ministers haue better studied the point they haue seene redd his booke are yet as violent against it as before c. vvhy vvhat maruaile seing they set vpon readinge it vvith a forestaled opinion they resolued by reading it to get no good by it but to see vvhere it vvas vveake in theire conceit so to blaze that a broad for they vvant that propertie of an allovvable witnesse to vvit goodwill And vvhat though people say their Ministers are many who are of the same minde for the opinions of 10000. of them are not worth a rush in this case the opinion of some one Minister who speaketh for the Lords Sabbath with hazard to loose his liuing and credit with the rest is more to be esteemed and prized by the people I auowch it then is the opinions of 10000. Ministers who speake against the Lords Sabbaths not daring to doe otherwise for feare of losse of liuing credit and those other discommodities forementioned the Testimony of one Martyr is of more worth then of all his persecutors for the witnesse of these many is to be suspected to speake for their proffit rather then for a good conscience but the witnesse of that one is to be thought to speake rather for his conscience then for his proffit Wherefore if people vvil be led by the iudgment of others rather then by themselues or if they will leane any thing at all to other mens iudgments let them choose to follow the opinion of him that looseth by his iudgment rather then of them who make againe by their opinion That this point may be yet cleerer see what a power carnall feare hath ouer a good conscience in the dayes of Christ it is saied Ioh. 12.42 Neuerthelesse among the chiefe Rulers many beleeued in him but because of the pharises they did not confesse him lest they should be cast out of the Synagogue loe here what a carnall feare vvill doe it can make men afraide to speake and confesse what they belecue is a trueth the feare of being excommunicated made them that they durst not confesse Christ him selfe you know also how some of the Martyres through feare haue for a season denied the trueth you know also how Peter through feare denied his Lord Master yea and forswore him too wherefore be it that Ministers haue vvisedome lerning doe know this trueth be it also that they be godly make conscience why all this may be yet of feare they may deny Gods trueth when they doe know it also much sooner of feare they may refuse to learne to knovv this trueth vvhen it is tendred them for Peter knew Christ Peter was a godly Minister also and made conscience so the Martyres yet you see how farr feare to displease men feare of damage may preuaile The consideration therfore of these many stumbling blockes in the way of Ministers whereof they cannot be ignorant should me thinke strike them vvith a feare that they speake partially and corruptly vvhen they speake against the Lords Sabbaths knowing how easy a thing it is for mens minds to be forestaled with a preiudice when a point is tendred vnto them attended with so many discommodities as this is I wish they would stay vpon the meditation of this point a while that it may doe them good Now as for people since they haue heard at large how insufficient the opinion iudgement of their Ministers is vvhilst they speake against the Lords Sabbathes if hereafter they will still cleaue vnto their iudgments for the tryall of this trueth they shall bewray their
the text all the people wept when they heard the words of the Law Nehe. 8.9 And is there not like cause for our people to vveepe also when in the Congregation they heare these Tenn Oracles reade and yet but nyne or nyne a peece of them kept for that vvhich concerneth the 7th day Sabbath is altogether by euery one neglected Ezra the Priest vvhen he tooke into consideration the vnlavvfull Marriages of the people it is said he rent his cloathes and pluckt of the haire of his head and beard and sate downe astonied Ezra 9.3 because of their strange Marriages hovv should vve then be affected to thinke of the strange Sabbathes vvhich now are kept for vve haue diuorsed put avvay from vs Gods ancient Sabbaths and vve are married to a nevv Lords day Sabbath a strange Sabbath neuer heard of in Scripture for a Sabbath Greate cause we haue to lament for 1. the Sacred holy day vvhich is of greatest antiquity is profaned this Holy day being as ancient as the vvorld it selfe Genes 2.3 secondly the most honourable Holy day is vnhallovved For God him selfe made it an holy day by blessing it and sanctifying it Genes 2.3 Yea and God himselfe rested on it Genes 2.2.3 Therfore it is two vvaies honourable 3. That day vvhich God expresly commanded Exod. 20.8 is profaned and by profaning of it not onely Gods 4th Com. is violated but also Gods example is profaned and set at naught for vve doe not novv imitate God by resting on the 7th day as he did vve haue an other day to vvit the 8th day And also Gods reason vvhich he annexed to the 4th Com. to allure and persvvad men to keepe his 7th day Sabbath this is nullified and out of all vse in these our dayes so Gods reasons are profaned as not vvorth the naming in our Churches is not this to be lamented vvhen neither Gods Com. nor Gods example nor yet Gods reasons can auaile vvith vs somtimes things honourable somtimes things Auncient are admired and esteemed but heere loe neither the Antiquity nor yet the Honourablenesse of the Lords Sabbaths can auaile vvith vs and is not this to be lamented vvhat an yron age liue vve in that none of all these cane moue vs A 4th cause of lamentation is because by this neglect of the right day and keeping of a vvrong day by setting a common vnhallowed day to wit the Lords day in roome of a Sanctified and holy day namly the Sabbath day all our Religion in keeping this vnballowed day for God neuer hallovved it in Conscience of the 4th com is meere superstition and God may say vnto our people an other day vvho required this at your hands thus are people abused and is not this a cause of lamentation some lament for the Ceremonies of the Church as the Surplisse and the like some complaine of Arminianisme how it spreads some complaine of Popery vsed in corners of the land euery one complaines of his grievance but I heare none of them all complaine of the profanation of the Lords Sabbaths of Gods example of Gods reasons and of Gods 4th com no man takes these to heart albeit euery one of them haue theire hands in these profanationes I wish the current of mens complaintes vvould turne vnto these things which more neerley concerneth them then those others A 5th cause of lamentation is because vnto the conscionable sanctifying of the Lords Sabbaths there are promises annexed see Isa 58.13.14 and on the other side to such as profane them there are curses annexed se Numb 15.32.35 Nehem. 13.1718 now inasmuch as vve profane that very day to wit the Saturday Sabbath vnto vvhich these promises were properly made it follovveth that we are not novv capable of any of those promises because vve keepe not the day vnto vvhich the promises vvere made I confesse that our Diuines haue and doe apply these promises vnto a Counterfaite day to wit the Lords day that they might doe it with the lesse suspition with the greater applause they haue like counterfaiters dissemblers called this Lords day Sabbath day thus by their humane imposition of new names vpon the daies of the weeke the simple vvell meaning people are beguiled but the day vnto vvhich these promises properly doe belong it is the day called in a Divine accompt Sabbath day not vnto the day so called in an humane accompt not vnto the day called Lords day And is not this to be lamented when people neglect their proffites commodites on the Lords day some loose their Corne some their Hay many poore men their labour and vvorke wherby they maintaine their families vvith many other losses and damages to their estates which might be rekoned vp and all these the vvell minded people of the land doe vvillingly neglect and loose all in hope of these promises trusting to make a better exchang that for losse of erthly things in conscience to Gods Command they shall gaine heauenly things and interest into Gods promises but behould they must faile of the promises because they faile God in the Condition for Gods promises rune thus if thou performe the condition which is to Sanctify the day named Sabbath day not the day named Lords day tell me novv is not this matter of iust lamentation to see the people of the land thus beguiled and deceiued and that both in their temporall estate also of the promisses of God if men haue any compassion brotherly loue in them they cannot but sorrow and mourne for these things On the contrary as for those forementioned Curses annexed to the Sabbath day and the profaners of it vvheras our people hope to auoide them by a religiouse sanctifying of the Lords day behould the people to be pittied for all that they fale into the danger of these Curses because they profane that very day named Sabbath day vnto the profanation of vvhich these curses vvere poperly made for these curses were neuer made vnto the profanation of the day named Lords day or vnto the day nicknamed counterfeitly called Sabbathday as now the Lords day is for these curses were threatened long before euer the Lords day had any being or could be kept for a Sabbath day if it had euer so bene kept as for their religiouse sanctifying of the Lords day in conscience of this 4th com God may say vnto them who required it at your hands is not this also matter of iust lamentation to see well minded people striue and endeauor with greate dilligence to auoide Gods Curses and yet by reason of miseinformation corrupt teaching to fale into danger of them yea it is the more pittifull in that the selfe same labour deuotiōs had they bene performed both on the day before they had for certaine out of all doubt both bene liable to all the promisses made to them that keepe Gods Sabbaths and also bene freed from the least danger of the Curses
threatened to such as breake the Lords Sabbaths The 6th and last cause of lamentation is to see the priests of the Lord of all men Gods Ministers turne enemies to Gods Law for they vvill needs vvithout any necessity at all make somthing in Gods Law ceremoniall and so abolished Iudaicall so to be hated they cannot abide that Gods 10. command should be like a chaine of 10. linkes all of pure gold one linke as vvell as an other but though all the 9. be pure gold yet some one of the 10. must be partly gold partly leade partly morall partly ceremoniall as if snovv could be partly vvhite partly blake or a shadovv and ceremony placed in the hearte of a morall Lavv thus they make Gods Lavv like vnto Nebukadnezzars Image which he savve in his dreame Dan. 2.32 partly gold and partly clay surely this their fiction is but a dreame Gods Lavv must be morall in euery iot and Title of it it must be all gold or none gold all clay or none clay but our Ministers will be partiall in the Lavv they will not endure it to be morall in all the partes therof they are enemies to the integrity perfection of it that servants should not take parte with the commandements of their Maisters but oppose them that children should not take parte with the command of their fathers but turne enemies to them that subiects should not take in vvith their King to defend his Lavves but set them selues against them it is vndutifulnesse disloyaltie and rebellion but that Ministers whom God hath taken so neere vnto him as to make them of his Counsaile and to make it their proper office to defend his Lavves to this end hath allowed them large maintenance as the Tyeth of the Realme c. that these kinde of men should refuse to defend his Lavv and turne enemies vnto it in whole or in parte what should I say it is high tyme the world were at an end as the Sabbath is Gods ordinance so the Decalogue is Gods Law novv were men professed enemies to God then if they should doe what in them lieth to abolish his Sabbaths to reiect as much of his Law as possiblie they could with any colour devise it were but sutable to their profession but that wee who are professed friends to God and to his Lavv therfore should imbrace as many of his ordinances and as much of his Lavv as possiblie vve could that wee I say should reiect any of Gods ordinances and desire and indeauour to reiect and abolish as much of Gods Lavv as possiblie by any wite we can deuise this is monstrously horrible and much to be lamented This I dare considently auowch that if our Ministers pleased but to take parte with God and vvould but speake for Gods Sabbaths what vvith a very little study they are inabled to speake both by partes of nature and Arte that all the world could neuer be able to vvithstand them they would victoriously beare downe all oppofition and is it not to be lamented when Ministers vvill not doe for God vvhat they can or may doe but in stead of their little studie in defence of this cause all their care and study is hovv they may be still ignorant of the point lest by knowledge of it they should speake for it and so indanger their liuings reputations and the like for generally they doe eschew the reading of my booke wherby they might be instructed in the point without their labour vnlesse it be some fewe vvho read it only to spie a mote in myne eye and that they may picke out somthing to say against it yea they eschevv also all arguing conferences among them selues in priuate wherby the point may be scanned and come to light they permit not any of their brethren to take vp a defence of the Lords Sabbaths to argue against the Lords day albeit he doth it but for argument sake the better to boult out the trueth if any in the company will be more ingenuouse and true harted then the rest as desirouse by opposeing of our tenets to find out the trueth the shall be snibed curbed some man of eminency in the place will put all to silence with such words as these no more of this point now no more of this argument in this place thus they are afraid least God should by theire conferences inlighten them these things haue bene related to me by credible persones and are not these things to be lamented any man shall haue free liberty heart and good will to speake in their company any thing he can invent against Gods Sabbaths for the Lords day but not on the contrary to speake for the Lords Sabbaths against the Lords day take my word for it you shall neuer heare 2. Ministers scann this point pro and con before any of the people as you shall heare them in some other pointes of doubt nay it were to be wished that any 2. Ministers vvould by themselues when none heare them argue the point seriously pro con the one taking the one parte the other its contrary that so Gods trueth may be found out but I feare me a man shall as soone dravv a Beare to the stake to be baited with dogges as dravv them to any such course as may bring the point to light they cannot but foresee the issue of this course vvould be what they would should not be is not this to be lamēted if I should not preuaile with them in so reasonable a request as this is I desire my brethren of the Ministri to take into deepest consideration Gods Sabbaths to study the point seriously to cast a side preiudice out of a loue to this ordinance of Gods study but vvhat may be found in its defence to study but with a like good will to defend this point as they doe other pointes and is not this to be lamented if I shal not preuaile When Paul was to take his last farvvell of the Church of Ephesus he could say with a good conscience that he was pure from the blood af all men because he had kept nothing backe but had shewed them all the counsaile of God Act. 20.26.27 But how many of our Ministers when they lye a dying shall be able thus comfortablie to pleade for themselues I know not can they say they haue kept nothing backe of Gods counsaile what not his Sabbaths can they say to their flocke they haue shewed them all the Counsaile of God what all the Lavv in its integrity and perfection what euery Iote Title of the Law haue they baulked nothing for feare carnall respectes or for vvant of that industry that might ought to haue bene in them in serching out euery iot title of Gods Lavv in its perfection for this let them knovv that they must be countable to God not onely for baulking concealing vvhat they knovv but also for not declaring vnto the people
lighted vpon men on the Lords day vnto their contempt of Gods ordinances of preaching and prayers performed in that day it is rather to be thought that God punisheth the contempt of his ordinances then the neglect of the day for such as profane the Lords day come not at Church then to serue God vvhen euery body doth serue God it is a signe that they be ordenary contemners of Gods worship seruice most iustly therefore may God plague them for contempt of his ordinances when they are growne to that height of impiety that they dare ordenarily neglect Gods worship yea and vpon solemne times also appointed by the Church and vvhen all men meete together to vvorship God then to shew a contempt is a greater sinne then otherwise so it is rather the contempt of Gods ordinances then the neglect of the day that God punisheth 3. Well nigh all men are perswaded in their consciences that the Lords day is the Sabbath day inioyned by the 4th Comm. albeit in trueth Saturday is the Sabbath day by the 4th Com. now if men doe neither giue God the right day through their ignorance nor yet will giue God a wrong day whereof they are notvvithstanding well persvvaded in their consciences that it is the right day then they sinne against conscience whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Rom. 14.23 now it is iust with God to plague men if they will neither giue him the 7th day for a Sabbath nor the 8th day neither for so they are guilty of the breach of the 4th Com. in that they giue God no day no Sabbath no not that day vvhich their consciences tell them is Sabbath day thus God may punish them for a sinne against conscience though not for the day sake and hereby it appeareth that their arguing is amisse when they say that God punisheth men for breach of the Lords day for it is rather to be thought that God punisheth for other causes SECT XIX Their second argument fetched from Testimony is from the practise of the primitiue Churches after the Apostles for the Histories of the Church say they make mention that they kept the Lords day constantly Herevnto I answer 1. that it seemeth this practise was not vniuersall in all Churches but onely in some places or not in all times but at some time onely for Mr. Perkins vpon the 4th Com. affirmeth out of the Histories of the Church that the Sabbath meaning it of the Lords day Sabbath was neglected of those Churches which succeeded the Apostles but afterwards it was reuiued established by Christian Emperours And for confirmation hereof he alleageth his Author Leo and Anton. Edict of Holy dayes Whereby it appeareth by the History of the Church also by confession of M. Perkins that this Lords day vvas not kept in the primitiue Churches constantly as now we keepe it in our Churches for it was not kept vntill Christian Emperours established it now the first Christian Emperour that enacted a Law for the Lords day as farr as I can find was Constantine this was about 300 yeeres after Christ so that this Lords day was not onely not kept by the primitiue Churches but also it was not kept in all probability not of 300 yeeres after Christ so that they haue no greate cause to alleage the practise of the primitiue Church for their Lords day 2. I ansvver but admit the primitiue Churches had kept it constātly in all places at all times alwaies yet there is a tvvofould keeping or solemnizing of a day the one is the keeping it a Sabbath day the other is the keeping of it for an Holy day now I deny that they kept it for a Sabbath day for it is most likly that they kept it for an holy day vvhich is more remise and slenderly kept then a Sabbath day and this appeareth 1. by Ignatius in his Epistle to the Magnesians where he exhorteth both to the keeping of the Sabbath day also to the keeping of the Lords day both in one the same page novv it is not likely that Ignatius did exhorte his people to keepe two Sabbath dayes in a vveeke the Saturday Sunday and therfore it is likely that the Lords day they kept it slenderly as an holy day Againe hee cales the Lords day there the Quene Princesse of dayes where you see he left an higher roome for the Sabbath day accounting it as the King prince of dayes therfore it is likly kept not the Lords day as they did the Sabbath day Yet furher it is to be noted that Ignatius exhorting his people to the keeping of both the Sabbath day the Lords day he refuseth to giue that word vnto the Lords day vvhich he giueth to the Sabbath day vvhich is most proper for a Sabbath day for in exhorting to the Sabbath day he vseth this vvord Sabbatizet but in exhorting to the Lords day he changeth the vvord and vseth this vvord celebret 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in liklihood noteth a difference in the vse of these two dayes the one being kept as a Sabbath the other as a Festiuall day 2. It appeareth by a law made by Constantine as any may reade it reported by M. Fox in his booke of Martyres the new Edition pag. 93. thus The Sunday hee commanded to be kept holy of all men and free from all Iudiciary causes from markets Martes fayers all other manuall laboures onely hushandry excepted Where you see the workes of husbandry as plowing the like excepted this might be done in those dayes and in that Church on the Lords day Now Constantine was the most famouse defender of the Lords day of any Emperour would he thinke you haue giuen men leaue to goe to plough carte on the Lords day if hee had esteemed it as a Sabbath day no surely for this is plaine contrary to the very letter of the 4th com In it thou shalt doe no manner of worke no not in earing time nor in haruest Exod. 34.21 wherefore since Constantine gaue leaue to plough sowe the like workes of husbandry on the Lords day it is a manifest thing that in his time the Lords day was not kept for a Sabbath day but rather as a light holy day hereby it appeareth that the patrones of the Lords day haue little cause to glorie so much in the law that Constantine made for the keeping of the Lords day holy 3. It appeareth by this that Constantine made a law for the keeping holy of Friday of Sunday both the Friday because of Christ his passion the Sunday or Lords day because of Christs resurrection For this see Euseb de vita Constant lib. 4. Cap 18. and see Sozom. lib. 1. Cap. 8. these ij dayes were inacted in one the same law in one the same manner whereby you see that the Lords day vvas accounted in the primitiue Churches no more an holy
sanctified by virtue of the 4th Com. I could alleage other Testimonies out of S. Augustine to the same effect but these are sufficient V. Soe much for the iudgement of the Auncients the Primitiue Churches for the first 400 yeeres vpwards I come now vnto our later times My 5th Testimony then shall be that of Peter Martyr cited by Marlorate in his Commentaryon 1 Cor. 16.2 who thus writeth Like as the Sabbath day was celebrated by the Law in memory of the Creation so is now the Lords day in vse in memory of the Resurrection but when this chang alteration was made we haue it not expressed in the Scriptures and then againe a little beneath saith he Neither are we therefore to be accused as obseruers of dayes times as if we placed more holinesse in one day then in an other for we assemble rather on the Lords day then on any other day onely for ciuill respectes for the order of the Church It is plaine then that this Holy man accounted the Lords day to be an ordinance of the Church onely and a ciuill thing kept onely for order sake he knew of no Diuine institutiō for it nor of any 4th com belōging vnto it nor thought he that there was any difference to be made betvvene the Lords day other dayes of the vveeke in any respect vnto Christs institution of it for he saieth expresly that it is not found in the Scriptures vvhen the Lords day vvas set vp how then vvill men doe to proue the Lords day to be of Diuine institution VI. My 6th Testimonie shall be that of Brentius in Leuit. 23.2 recorded by Doctour Bownde in his booke of the Sabbath Pag. 109. thus saith he The kepeing Holy of the Lords day is not commanded by the Authoritie of the Gospell but rather receiued into vse by the publique consent of the Church And a little after thus againe The obseruation of the Lords day is proffitable not to be reiected but yet it is not to be accounted for a Commandement of the Gospell but rather for a Ciuill ordination Then this what can be more plainly spokē Brentius saith the Lords day hath no authority for it in the Gospell that it is but a Ciuill ordinance but many now a dayes vvould make vs beleeue if we were so credulouse that it hath authority from Christ his Apostles and that it is a Diuine ordinance Should I haue called it a Ciuill ordinance albeit I know assuredly it is no better how should I haue bene rated for it reuiled by some Ministers But I am glad I am not the first that haue so called it nor am I alone in this opinion VII My 7th Testimony shall be that of Caluine on Galat. 4.10 where he thus writeth When wee now a daies obserue a difference of daies we doe not put any bonde or tie of necessitie vpon mens consciences we make no difference of daies as if one day were more holie then an other we place no religion in them but we onely prouide for order concorde c. I but had Caluin held the Lords day to haue bene of Diuine institution he vvould haue placed religion in its obseruation there had bene more in it then to haue kept it onely for order sake for peace sake c. Yea had he iudged this day to stand by virtue of the 4th Com. he would must haue made a difference of dayes accounting one day to vvit the 7th more holy then the rest yea he must haue put a bond tye of necessity vpon mens consciences for it is necessary that the 4th Com. should be obeied Againe see Caluin on Coloss 2.16 vvhere he thus writeth We obserue no daies as if there were any Religion in holy daies or as if it were vnlawfull to worke in them but we haue respect vnto policie order not vnto daies Thus speaketh Caluine of all holy dayes in generall both the Lords day others ioyning them all together His iudgement is direct for our purpose that this holy day of the Lords day together with other holy dayes are sanctified but for order sake with respect vnto gouernment and further he saith plainly that it is no vnlawfull thing for a man to doe the workes of his calling on the Lords day how pregnant is hee for our purpose VIII My 8th Testimony shall be that of Zanchie on the 4th com Thesis 1. who there doth plainly affirme it that the Apostles left the Lords day at libertie to the Church that we are not tied to sanctifie it by any tie or bond of conscience c. And for confirmation of this his iudgment in the same place he giues his reason also thus Zanchie IX My 9th Testimony shall be that of Vrsinus in his Catech. on the 4th Comm. pag. 637 vvhere he thus vvriteth The Sabbath is twofould one of the old Testament which was tied to the 7th day its obseruation was necessarie and the worship of God The other of the new Testament and this dependeth on the libertie of the Church who chose the first day of the weeke for certaine causes it is to be obserued for order sake but without any opinion of necessitie Thus you see the iudgment of Vrsinus was that the Lords day or first day of the weeke is at the plesure of the Church for its sanctification And Moreouer that there is no necessitie to sanctifie it surely Vrsine did not beleeue as many with vs doe that Christ and his Apostles raised vp the Lords day for a Sabbath nor yet that the 4th com had any thing to doe with it But it matters not what Vrsinus his iudgement was nor Caluines nor Zanchies the rest we haue some Ministers that haue bene zealouse preachers for and Patrones of the Lords day Sabbath they haue preacht for it they will preach for it they haue erred they will err they haue misled the people they will doe so still they haue resolued to liue to dye in it they will preach for it they say as long as they liue X. My 10th Testimony shall be that of Paraeus in his Comment on the Romanes cap. 14. pag. 1512. vvhere he maketh this his third Hypothesis saying The Holie daies of Christianes remaine free at libertie so as they may be altered and changed from one day vnto an other by the Church c. And by and by he addeth two reasons amongst others one is this because neither Christ nor his Apostles did determine any certaine holy daies to his Church but left them at libertie The other is a Testimony of Augustine in his 118. Epistle saying All these things are at libertie in their obseruation Totum hoc genus rerum liberas habet obseruationes Here Paraeus saith plainly that neither our Sauiour Christ no nor his Apostles did determine of any certaine holy dayes for his Church but left it to liberty so then they
sauing their libertie to doe otherwise In which passage we may learne these things from Bastingius 1. That the Church hath alloted the Lords day or First day 2. That the Church may either wholly omit the Sanctification of the Lords day or change it vnto an other day And that it is at the liberty of the Church to doe otherwise in this pointe then they now doe if they please XIX My 19th Testimony shall be that in the Harmony of Confessiones de feriis c. pag. 168. and in the Appendix at the latter end of the booke Where it is thus recorded But we teach that Traditions are not to be condemned which command nothing contrary to the Law of God and haue some politicall end to wit which are made for this purpose that things may be done in the Church in order of which sorte are the Traditions of Holy dayes as of the Lords day the Natiuity the rest These things we willingly retaine in our Churches as things indifferent which out of the case of scandall may be omitted lawfully Here we may note these particulars 1. That the Sanctification of the Lords day is no better then a Tradition 2. That the Lords day and Christmas day are both of like authority 3. That the Lords day is a thing indifferent XX. My 20th Testimony shall be that of the lerned Minister and Godly Martyr of Christ M. William Tyndall who suffred Martyrdome in the dayes of King Henry the VIII as we finde it in his workes bound with the workes of M. John Fryth Doctour Barnes all iij in one Volume Will. Tyndall in his Answer to Sir Thomas Moores Dialogue pag. 287. where hee thus writeth And as for the Sabbath we be Lords ouer the Sabbath may yet change it into the Monday or into any other day as we see neede or may make euery Tenth day Holie day onelie if we see a cause why Neither was there any cause to chang it from the Saturday but to put a difference betwixt vs the Jewes Neither need we any Holie day at all if the people might be taught without it Thus we see M. Tyndall was of iudgement that the Sabbath or Lords day is of no higher nature then that the Church may freely alter and chaunge it hither and thither at their plesures And that the Church may aswell keepe Monday for the Sabbath day as Sunday or the Lords day XXI My 21th Testimony shall be that of an other lerned Minister godly Martyr of Christ M. Iohn Fryth vvho also suffred Martyrdome for the Gospell in the dayes of King Henry the viijth as vve finde it in his vvorkes bound together with the vvorkes of M.W. Tyndall Doctour Barnes Iohn Fryth in his Declaration of Baptisme pag. 96. vvhere he thus writeth Our forefathers which were in the begining of the Church did abrogate the Sabbath to the intente that men might haue an ensample of Christian libertie c. How be it because it was necessarie that a day should be reserued in the which the people might come together to heare the word of God they ordained in steade of the Sabbath which was Saturday the next day following which is Sunday And all though they might haue kept the Saturday with the Iewes as a thing indifferent yet did they much better to ouersett the day to be a perpetuall memorie that we are free not bound to any day we are in a manner as superstitiouse in the Sunday as they were in the Saturday yea and wee are much more madd for the Iewes haue the word of God for their Saturday sith it is the 7th day they were commanded to keepe the 7th day solemne wee haue not the word of God for vs but rather against vs for wee keepe not the 7th day as the Iewes doe but the first day which is not commanded by Gods law And by by againe he addeth He that thinketh that a man sinneth which worketh on the Holy day if he be weake or ignorant he ought better to be instructed so to leaue his hould But if he be obstinate perseuere in his sentence hee is not of God but of the Deuill for hee maketh sinne in such things as God leaueth free In which passages of Mr. Iohn Fryth we may obserue these remarkable things 1. How the Godly Martyr affirmeth that our forefathers did ordaine and appoint the Sunday for an holy day so then Christ his Apostles did not ordaine it 2. Hee affirmeth that now the Sabbath day to wit the old Sabbath day being abolished wee are free and not bound to sanctify any day at all so consequently we are not tied to sanctify the Lords day 3. He affirmeth that such as so zealously doe sanctify the Sunday or Lords day they are in so doeing no better then Supperstitiouse 4. He affirmeth that they who so zealously sanctify the Lords day they are besides theire right wittes or become frantick and madd his reason thereof is this because they practise that for which they haue no scripture or word of God but rather the word of God is against them We haue some Ministers not ashamed to tell their people they will giue their liues for the Lords day Sabbath but heere you see two worthy lerned Godly Ministers and Martyres to wit Mr. Tyndall and Mr. Fryth who did not say only they would but did also giue their liues for Gods trueth these men you see would neuer haue giuen their liues for the Sunday Sabbath for they would not so much as spend their breathes for it or speake a good word of it but altogether against it 5. Saith Mr. Fryth hee that thinketh that a man sinneth by working on this Holy day or Lords day if he obstinatly perseuereth in the same opinion he is not of God but of the Deuill that because he maketh a sinne where God maketh none If this be so how many in this Land who professe themselues the Ministers of God are notwithstanding of the Deuill For they make the people beleeue that they sinne fearefully and damnably if they doe any seruill worke on this holy day the Lords day let this speech of the lerned and Godly Minister and Martyr be well obserued XXII My 22th Testimony shall be the iudgement of the Lords Spirituall Temporall with the Commons assembled in Parliament in the fifth yeere of Edward the Sixte In an Acte intituled An Act for the keeping of holy daies c. In which Statute it is thus inacted It is not to be thought that there is any certaine time or definite number of daies prescribed in holy Scripture but that the apointment both of the time also of the number of daies is lefte by the Authoritie of Gods word to the liberty of Christs Church to be determined assigned orderlie in euery Country by the discretion of the Rulers Ministers thereof as they shall iudge most expedient Be it therefore enacted by
all this it may remaine still as a sacred day and time for Gods worship as a day to keepe memory of the Creation still as a fit time to refresh man and beast in by Rest from the toilsome labours of the former Sixe dayes and so as an helpe and furtherance vnto these morall dueties of Rest from labour and performance of Religiouse exercises For the clereing of this I referre you to what hath bene said in Section the 18. onely here let me giue a touch Circumcision and the Passeouer hauing either of them a double type or signe when the one was fulfilled yet these Sacraments were vsed with respect to the other vnfulfilled and admit the Sabbath should abolish as a shaddow of Christ why may it not remaine as a signe of the Creation Exod. 31.17 The difference of meates is abolished as a shaddow of Christ but remaine as in a fast and admit the Sabbath be abolished as a shaddow of Christ why may it not remaine as an helpe and furtherance vnto morall dueties and if the Proselite Gentiles obserued the Passeouer with the Iewes neglecting such things therein as were peculiar vnto the Iewes and onely obserued such things therein as were common to Iew and Gentile both as hath bene showne in Sect. 18 why may not we Gentiles neglect the Sabbath as a sâ—addow of Christ wherein it was peculiar vnto the Iewes and obserue it still in such respects as it is common to Iew and Gentile both as it is a signe of the Creation and as it is an helpe and furtherance vnto other morall dueties so much for answer to this text Col. 2.16.17 And thus like a friend to God his law and ordinance therein I haue reconciled these two textes Exod. 20.8 Col. 2.16.17 the which other men doe make to fight together like deadly enemies Before I conclude this Section let me render a reason why I doe on all occationes distinguish betwixt the 7th day Sabbath the anniuersary Sabbathes my reasones are these 1. because the 7th day Sabbath is more auncient then the yeerly Sabbaths for these began but after the giuing of the Law but that begane before the giuing of the Law 2. Because God Sanctified and hallowed the 7th day Sabbath in a speciall manner Genes 2.3 the which honour he did not to the yeerly Sabbaths these were holy but by precept but that also by President these were holy but by destination onely but that was holy by consecration also 3. Because they are distinct in themselues the one being once euery weeke the other once euery yeere 4. Because God placed the weekly 7th day Sabbath in his morall Law and in the heart or first Table thereof but the yeerly Sabbaths were excluded thence and neuer came into the Tables of stone 5. Because the 7th day Sabbath was a signe of and kept in memory of the Creation which belongeth vnto all men alike but so was it not with the yeerly Sabbaths there is good reason therefore why I should distinguish the weekly Sabbath from the yeerly Sabbathes according as I haue done in all my answers SECT XX. Hauing in the former Sections of this Chapter answered all their arguments brought against the Lords Sabbath so as it manifestly appeareth that it cannot be proued that it is abolished but that it is still in force now in the last place I purpose to spend this last section of this Chapter in a Disswasory-declaration of the common sinne of our time to wit the sinne of Sabbath breaking And here I would not be mistaken at the very Threshold entry of my discourse for by the sinne of Sabbath-breaking I doe not vnderstand the sinne of profanation of the Lords day which now a daies is called the sinne of Sabbath-breaking by our Ministers for they in this point make more sinnes then euer God made they deale by the Lords day as players doe with some of their fellowes whom they make a Counterfait King in the sight of the people by putting vpon him some robes ornaments like those of the true King thus doe our Ministers that they might honour this Lords day in the eyes of the world they haue made it a counterfait Sabbath day and that by miscalling of it Sabbath day like as if a man should cale one man by an other mans name thus they haue robbed the 7th day of its proper honourable name that they might robe and decke with it the 8th day but to leaue them to their vanities counterfaitings by Sabbath day I meane the 7th day from the creation the Saturday day wher on God himselfe Rested which is mentioned in his Morall Law and by the sinne of Sabbath-breaking I vnderstand the violation and profanation of this day contrary to Gods expresse commandement The persones guilty of this sinne are both Ministers and people for the people first let them know take speciall notice of it that they lay vnder the guilte of the sinne of Sabbath-breaking vnto this day without repentance are liable to those curses threatened in the booke of God against transgressoures of the Lawes of God I speake what I thinke is the trueth in my soule conscience I haue good cause thus to thinke for you haue seene that it cannot be certainly infallibly proued to the vndoubted satisfaction of any mans conscience that euer God did abolish this Sabbath day now if it cannot be most euidently apparantly proued that it is abolished then though there could nothing be said for it more yet it is a sinne to profane it but I haue more to say for it as you shall heare in the next Chapter for time to come therefore let men beware that they doe no more profane the Lords Sabbath day it will be a dongerouse matter to sinne goe on in sinne after admonition and information this let them take notice of as being forewarned that they doe liue and lye in the weekly breach of one of Gods Lawes for euery 7th day or Saturday they doe not onely neglect the worship of God but also notoriously profane the Lords Sabbath day by buying and selling by riding and goeing too market and fro market by ploughing and carteing by working in their Shoppes and howsen euery man in his seuerall trade and occupation and by doeing the most base drudgery and kitching workes on this sacred day when God should be most in our minds then he is furthest from our thoughtes let this be thought on by all such as make any conscience of Gods commandements But herevnto the people will reply saying Alas what would you haue vs to doe we are no schollers if it be an errour it is in our Ministers and teachers not in vs you should doe well to apply this doctrine vnto our Ministers not vnto vs we cannot iudge in such matters of difference difficulty c. To whom I answer Alas indeed I pitty you from my heart this your errour
is radically indede in your Ministers for the blind doe leade the blind neuerthelesse you haue your share therin because you iustify their doeings approue of their sayings doctrines in this point Gods proceedings are on this wise that if the Minister doth not admonish the people of those things which are sinnes the Ministers indede shall answer to God for thy blood but what will this auaile thee for Thou shalt die for thine iniquity as you may reade Ezek. 33.8 for this cause it is fite I should giue you notice therof albeit I meane to lay the chiefeload vpon your Ministers backes lastly whereas you pleade that you are not able to iudge in such points as these Herevnto I answer that men should be ashamed to say they cannot iudge considering the time as the Apostle speaketh for men haue now bene trained vp a longe time in the doctrine of Christian religion therefore should be able to iudge the Apostle biddeth vs to Trye all things keepe that which is good 1. The 5.21 againe he saith I speake as vnto them which haue vnderstanding iudge yee what I say 1. Cor. 10.15 Here you see the Apostle would haue common people to be iudges of that which hee taught such were those noble Bereans Act. 17.11 wherefore you ought to iudge of this point to this end to reade about it to conferre of it and to studdy it It is true were it a point to be studdied out by your owne labour from the roote of it there were difficulty in it perhapes aboue your capacities but when a point is alredy studied to your hand a path way beaten oute for your foote steppes now there is no invincible difficulty in the matter it is true that commō people cannot plead a cause before the Iudge yet can they iudge hauing heard both parties plead people cannot preach yet can they iudge of a sermon preached so in this point of the Sabbath though people could not first finde it out nor yet dispute it when foūd out yet can they iudge of the cause when they see it laied plainly open before their eies if they will open their eyes to see it they may iudge of the cause when they haue seene it pleaded on both sides to this end I haue penned this booke wherein you haue the argumentes on both sides plainly laid downe so as you may easily discerne the trueth from errour Yet further to take away all excuses the point in question touching this Sabbath day commanded in the Morall Law it is A Catechisme point for all the 10. commandements they are Catechisme pointes like as are the Creede the Lords prayer now it hath pleased Almightie God to lay downe these Catechisme pointes of all other pointes in religion most plainly most familiarly that he that runeth may reade them the 10 cōmandements are expressed to the capacety of the meanest in the Congregation of all the 10 commandements there is not any one laid downe in more familiar easy termes words to be vnderstod then is this 4th com touching the Sabbath day for God hath most liuely plainly painted pointed it out from all other daies of the weeke so that no man can doubt which day of the weeke is that which God would haue for his Sabbath day no nor yet what dueties God requireth to be done in that day it is plaine that that is the day which is properly called Sabbath day in Scripture account which is the 7th day in Scriptures account namly our Saturday the dueties are Rest Holy actiones performed in that Rest these things are so plaine in the com as they neede no exposition for they are put downe in so many words in the com now what neede then is there of such store of lerning to attaine to the knowledge of these things as if common people cold not vnderstand them nor any but Ministers men of lerning could iudge of them men may as well say they vnderstand not English as to say they cannot vnderstand iudge which is the 7th day of the weeke what is meant by Rest from labour performance of Holy actiones for which is the 7th day we cannot but knowe since the Sunday or Lords day is the first day what is meant by Holy actiones or sanctifying of the day we know by the like actiones we performe on euery Lords day a smale deale of lerning is enough for a man to iudge of these points wherefore that is but an excuse for people to say they are no schollers they cannot iudge of such matters what can you not iudge of your Catechisme points which you lerned in your Childhoode I confesse for all this there is difficulty about this point to such as are not exercised in it by the way it is a shame for any man not to be so well exercised in all Gods 10 commandements as not to be able to defend them vnto the least iote title against all opposers but I desire thee good Reader but to obserue where the difficulty lieth for the cleering of this note with me these ij things The 4th com the opposition made against this 4th com For the former of these the 4th com together with the things therin commanded are laid downe most familiarly plainly as hath bene showne so as ther 's no difficulty at all about that no man but may easily vnderstand what it is which God requireth therin which day of the weeke God inioyned for a Sabbath wherefore the difficulty that is it is in the opposition made by Ministers against something commanded in the 4th com now it is true indeede that in this opposition there ariseth difficulty because they trouble the waters of mens vnderstāding by bringing many intricate reasones out of Scriptures against the Sabbath day written in the 4th com which intricate arguments if these Ministers would forbeare then there were no difficulty at all all were as plaine as a beaten path way wherefore since you see where the difficulty lieth my counsaile to all such people as plead ignorance want of lerning in this controuersy shall be that they would therefore rather follow God then their Ministers for Gods way is a plaine smooth easy beaten way so as euery man lerned or vnlerned may easily know what it is which God requireth in this Catechisme point of his 4th com but their Ministers way in setting themselues to abandon and roote out Gods Sabbath it is such a rugged way such a difficult way full of so many secret hidden windings turnings as people of common capacety cannot conceiue it nor iudge of it as themselues say wherefore my counsaile vnto these is this that they rather take parte with God with his Sabbath then with their Ministers against God his Sabbath because Gods way is an easy knowne way but mans way is an intricate
that there should haue bene no place left in the world for the Apostles to haue begune a reformation of Iewish ceremonies if they durst not refaine them for feare it should come to the hearing of the Iewes wherfore the Apostles kept not the Sabbath at Philippi for to please the Iewes onely nor onely for feare of offending them Yet further there is not want of good reason to shew that the Apostles kept not the Sabbath for the weaknesse of the Jewes onely this being laied for a grownd that if they be supposed to keepe it for the weaknesse of the Iewes onely that then it was a ceremony so abolished my reasons are these 1. Because the Apostles kept it voluntarily when they might haue auoided it as appeareth 1. Because the Apostles remained certaine daies with the Church at Antioch Act. 13.42 44. and with the Church at Philippi Act. 16.12 Now any day of the Sixe had bene as fit for the Gentiles as the Sabbath if the Sabbath was a ceremony 2. Because the Gentiles besought the Apostles to preach to them the next Sabbath day Act. 13 42. Now what is obtained by request of Superiors is at their liberty to grant now can any thinke the Apostles would vse an abolished ceremony when it was at their choise and libertie to vse it or not forasmuch as the strong ought to beare the infirmities of the weake it was a burden for an Apostle to vse a Iewish Ceremony and would the Apostles then take an vnproffitable burden on their backes when they might auoide it 2. If the Sabbath was kept for the weaknesse of the Iewes and so appeared to be but a Ceremony then had the Apostles rune vpon ij dangerouse rockes 1. As touching the Iewes how could this but harden the heart of the Iewes in their Iudaisme and retaining still of Ceremonies when they saw S. Paul the greatest enemy to Ceremonies of all the Apostles to obserue the Sabbath day still not onely when he was among them but whersoeuer be came yea among the Gentiles also 2 As touching the Gentiles if the Sabbath had bene kept for the weaknesse of the Iewes onely as a ceremony then had S. Paul by keeping the Sabbath among the Gentiles infected them with Judaisme by his practise yea so taught them that now in practise which he must afterwards beate downe vnteach againe by Doctrine Thus the Apostles should be supposed to make themselues worke first to infect then to heale cure further if their answer be good then was Paul bound to permit suffer the Christian Churches in Iudaisme for the strong ought to beare the â—â—firmities of the weake Rom. 15.1 Now Paul was strong those Iewes were weake 3. To suppose the Apostles to keepe the Sabbath among the Gentiles for the weaknes of the Iewes is absurd for by so doing the Gospell should receiue no aduantage for looke what a superstitiouse Iew was eased therby by so much a beleeuing Gentile was burdened combered he being intangled with a Iewish Ceremony now what were this better then if the Apostles should pull a thorne out of the foote of a Iew and thrust it into the foote of a Gentile 4. Obserue that S. Paul was the Doctour of the Gentiles Gal. 2.7 Now by Gentiles here we must not vnderstand such congregations as consisted only of Gentiles for of all the Churches which Paul planted there were fewe such but for the most parte they were all a mixed people of Iewes Gentiles both as you may see Act. 17.2.4 Act. 18.4 Act. 19.10 Act. 13.14.42 Act. 14.5 wherefore suppose yee that the Sabbath had no where bene kept among the Gentiles that is in such a congregatioÌ„ wherin there were none but GeÌ„tiles yet is the cause the same still for first it is plaine that Paul kept the Sabbath frequently in these Churches which were mixed of Iewes and Gentiles see Act. 17.2.3 Act. 18.4 And secondly it is plaine that these were the Churches which Paul planted ouer whom he was set now if the keping of the Sabbath had bene a ceremony as meats drinkes were then had Paul committed a foule errour by vsing of this Ceremony in his Churches the Churches of the Gentiles for he had constrained therby the Gentiles vnto Iudaisme the which fault he sorely reproued Peter for Gal. 2.14.12 For Pauls keeping the Sabbath must as well constraine the Gentiles to Sabbathizing as Peters refraining of Meates did constraine these Gentiles to doe the like 5. If Paul did Sabbathize among the Gentiles for the weaknes of the Iewes onely and that ordenarily and customarily for so he did Act. 13.14.42.44 Act. 17.1.2 Act. 18.4 Then this absurdety followeth that Paul did also circumcise the Gentiles for the weaknesse of the Iewes and that ordenarily and customarily for there is as greate reason that Paul should haue vsed circumcision among the Gentiles in fauor of the Iewes as to haue vsed the Sabbath day among the Gentiles in fauor of the Iewes for the Iewes were as zealouse for circumcision as they were for the Sabbath Herevnto I might also add that Paul must as well haue vsed their new moones abstinance from prohibited meates among the Gentiles for the sake of the Iewes as the Sabbath day if these were all alike Ceremonies and if there were no more morallity in the Sabbath then in the new moones and prohibited meates 6. As touching things indifferent and the Ceremoniall Law Paul became all things vnto all men c. Vnto the Iewe who had the Ceremoniall Law he became a Iewe vnto the Geâ—tile who were without this Law he became a Gentile that is when he was among the Iewes then he vsed the ceremoniall Law but when he was among the Gentiles then he behaued himseâ—fe without Law he vsed no Ceremonies from this text then thus expounded it is plaine that Pauls Sabbathizing among the Gentiles it was no Ceremony nor done for the weaknesse of the Iewes for among the Gentiles he was without law that is he vsed no Ceremonies To thinke otherwise were to thinke that Paul did not onely vnto the Iewe become a Iewe but absurdly that vnto the Gentile also he became a Iewe. 7. If the Sabbath was a Ceremony and obserued by the Apostle in those Churches where he kept it for the weaknesse of the Iewes then this absurdety followeth that he did not roote out Ceremonies or refraine Iudaisme in those Churches consequently that he left behind him many famouse Christian Churches pestered with Ceremonies infected with Iudaisme for he kept the Sabbath day in many famouse Churches see Act. 13.14.42.44 Act. 16.12 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 Now if Paul was forced to obserue Ceremonies for the weaknesse of the Iewes at that time then so must he for the same cause haue done euer after during his life for the Iewes remained weake in this matter of Ceremonies to Pauls dying day since that all confesse it that Ceremonies had for their
Sabbath daies meales and this is an other case of necessity whereinto we fale if we keepe the Sabbath day and for the auoiding whereof we may make a chang of the Sabbath day into the Lords day for a season Hence it is that obedience to the 4th commandement requireth an assent and fellowship of others which is not required in the other commandements for a man may yeeld obedience to euery other commandement singlie and alone by himselfe though no man else will ioyne with him but for this 4th commandement it cannot be obserued as it should be without the fellowship and society of others ioyning with him Now a word or two for the iustifying of these two necessities touching the soule to be true necessities and such as may warrant a chang of a day appointed by God for the former namely Assemblies the want of assemblies was one cause of the change of the Passeouer day by Hezekiah as you may reade ij Chro. 30.3 For the latter namely Ministers the want of Ministers or Priests was an other cause of the passeouer dais chang by Hezekiah as you may reade in the forealleaged place And the King and his Princes And all the congregation had taken counsaile in Ierusalem to keepe the Passeouer in the second moneth for they could not keepe it at this time because there were not Priests enough sanctified neither was the people gathered to Jerusalem 2 Chro. 30.2.3 Where you see the want of the peoples assembly and the want of Priests were the ij causes of the chang of this day from the first moneth to the second moneth I confesse our new Translatores reade it thus because the Prists had not sanctified themselues sufficiently But this cometh still to the same for our Ministers haue not yet sanctified their vnderstandings from a profane opinion of the Lords Sabbaths and therefore we cannot haue their helpe to the sanctification of the Sabbath day so it is all one whither there be not Ministers enough or whither those that be are not willing to yeeld vs their helpe for both waies we shall want the helpe of the Ministry if we keepe the Sabbath day and if the Priests vnsufficiency were cause enough to chang the day much more then when Priests and Ministers are both vnsufficient and also vnwilling so as they cannot be perswaded to lend vs their helpe and thus you see that the want of people and the want of Ministers are a sufficient cause to make a chang of a day and that the old day should be profaned whilst an other is kept in its roome and steade If any shall aske me now why I keepe not the Sabbath day since it is my iudgement that it ought to be kept my answer shall be 1. That a man is not bound in all cases and at all times to put in practise what he knoweth should be done as I haue showne by the examples of Moses touching diuorcement of Israelites omitting Circumcision of Dauids spareing Ioab and eating Shewbread and the rest And further and more particularly I keepe it not because as I haue proued by two good arguments that an other day may be kept for it for a season 2. My answer shall be that I keepe not the Sabbath day because I cannot keepe it necessity lying vpon me Now I cannot keepe it 1. Because so I should haue but 5 daies in a weeke to follow my caleing 2. Because so I should impouerish my selfe and my family which is a iustifiable plea in this case of the Sabbath 3. Because I cannot haue assemblies on the Sabbath to ioyne with in holy Sabbath exercises and specially because Ministers will not preach to vs vpon the Saturday or Sabbath for how should we keepe the Saturday Sabbath when Ministers will not come to Church and preach vnto vs on the Saturday and my 4th reason and necessity is that as I am a Subiect so J stand bound to obey my gouerners so long as they command me nothing which Gods word hath forbidden mee now they command me to follow my caling on the Saturday Sabbath the 4th com doth not forbid me the same I being considered as a Subiect seruant vnto my superioures But herevnto some will be redy to say why if you can not keepe the Sabbath day as you would why keepe it then as you may without assemblies and without a Minister for God requireth no more of a man then he can doe c. Herevnto I shall giue none other answer then this that the same obiection layeth as well against the practise of the godly King Hezekiah as against mee hereby the absurdety thereof shall appeare why might not you as well obiect to Hezekiah when he put off the passeouer day from the 14th day of the first moneth to the 14th day of the second moneth vpon my reasons saying why did not Hezekiah keepethe passeouer vpon the 14th day of the first moneth which is the right day the day established at the institution of the passeouer since it was his iudgement that it ought to be then kept what and if he could no haue the assemblies of the people as he would why yet he might haue kept the passeouer with that company he had in Ierusalem as himselfe and his Princes and Courtieres and Cittizens of Ierusalem what needed he to profane the first passeouer day and to chang it vnto an other day for want of the residue of the people and what if he had not priests enough already sanctified or not sufficiently sanctified why yet he might haue kept the passeouer as he could with those priests he had or with the priests such as they were whither sufficienly or vnsufficiently sanctified for whē Hezekiah had tarried till the secōd day yet thē many in the Congregation were not sanctified as they should be therfore he praied saying The good Lord be mercifull toward him that prepareth his whole heart to seeke the Lord God though he be not cleansed according to the purification of the Sanctuary ij Chro. 30.18.19 And why could not Hezekiah haue kept the passeouer on the first day with people and Priests vnsufficiently sanctified as well as on the second day yet for all these obiectiones you see Hezekiah in hope to haue things in better order and in hope of a reformation against the second day therefore he neglected and profaned the first day and made a chang of the day Others will be redy to obiect thus why your soules neede not pine for you may haue supply the next day by keeping Sunday or Lords day also and herein you shall haue assemblies and Ministers both Herevnto I answer 1. That is more then euer God required that we should keepe two Sabbaths in one weeke and also it is more then the necessity of our caleings will permit 2. Suppose we should keepe the Lords day also yet so doeing we should want our daily bread that is that spirituall foode which is appointed of God for
worship of God and when common and vnhallowed dayes are offred and consecrated vnto God in stead of pure and sanctified dayes Loe how Gods worship is polluted XI Yet further if I shall make it appeare that multitudes I doe not say all are guilty of Idolatry vntill a Reformation cometh then you will say with me it is high time indeed to seeke for a reformation For this purpose you must know that there is as well a puritane Idolatry as a Popish Idolatry for as when A Crucifix the Breaden God the Images of Christ the virgine Mary the rest come in presence instantly Papists vncouer the head and performe much honour in respect of them So no sooner doth the Lords day Sabbath come but forthwith Puritanes vncloth themselues of their base aray and attire themselues in their best apparell and they lay aside all seruile laboures for that time as a profanation of that sacred time and much religiouse honour and deuotion is performed in respect of this daies presence yea greate conscience is made of it Pardon me beloued the sinnes of Gods children must not be clocked neither must I be partiall no neither must I deale ouerly but tell euery man or ranke of men of their sinne without baulking I cale it Puritane Idolatry because these are the greate Patrones thereof That I may discouer it vnto you first we will begine with the word Idolatry this word is a greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is compounded of two wordes the one whereof signifieth an image and likenesse of a thing or an imagination and fiction of the braine the other signifieth honour and reuerence now put both these together and they signify an honour and reuerence of an image and liknesse of a thing or of an imagination and fiction of the braine thus you haue the signification of the word Idolatry Now when diuine and religiouse honour is giuen to a similitude or fiction of the mind then it is a dangerouse matter and when the conscience stands in awe of a similitude or fiction of the braine reuerencing it for a diuine ordinance then it is Idolary Now to apply this The Lords day is this Idoll and they that preach for it and practise it are the Idolaters to make this good you shall see how fitly these may be caled Idolaters and their practise Idolatry first touching that parte of Idolatry which consisteth in imagery liknesse you shall see how like they haue framed the Lords day to the Sabbath day made it a very image similitude liknesse of the Sabbath day consequently an Idoll for 1. They haue giuen the very name the proper name of the Lords Sabbath vnto it for doe they not vsually cale the Sunday or Lords day the Sabbath day 2. They sanctify and keepe the Lords day like vnto the Sabbath day with a resting from all seruile laboures with preaching and prayers and the like 3. they keepe it in conscience of the 4th com like as the Sabbath day was 4. They apply all those textes of Scripture vnto the Lords day which were wont to be applied to the Sabbath day and which indeed are proper to the Sabbath day as Neh. 13.15 Isa 58.13 Math. 12.1.2.3 c. with others behold then if they haue not made the Lords day as like as like may be to the Sabbath day an image or picture cannot be more like a man then they haue framed this Lords day vnto the Sabbath day nay the images similitudes which Papists make of God of Christ or of Saintes are not so like vnto God Christ Saints as this Lords day is made fashoned like the Lords Sabbath day like as idolatrouse Jeroboam made a feast vnto his calues like vnto the feast that was in Iudah 1. King 12.32 so haue these made a new Sabbath like vnto the Lords Sabbath in the Morall Law 2. Touching that other acception of the word where it is taken for an imagination or fiction of the minde or braine And in this sense an Idoll is Nothing as the Apostle speaketh 1. Cor. 8.4 An Jdoll is nothing in the world that is it is no such thing as it is imagined fansied to be in this sense also the Lords day is an Idoll the obseruers of it are Idolaters their sanctification of it Idolatry for 1. whereas they cale the Lords day Sabbath day it is a mere fiction for they neuer found it so named in the Holy Scriptures 2. That the Lords day should be kept like the Sabbath day with a rest from laboures all day long is an imaginary conceipt for they find no such obseruation of it by Christ nor by his Apostles 3. That the Lords day should be obserued by virtue of the 4th com is not onely a fiction but an absurd foolery 4. That Christ instituted the Lords day is a mere forgery and fansy of mens braine as hath bene formerly showne and thus you see that the Lords day is a mere Idoll or a very Nothing that is nothing but a fansie fiction of mens braine of this day therefore we may say as the Lord said of Ieroboames Moneth which he had consecrated vnto his Idoles that it was the moneth which hee had forged of his owne heart 1 King 12 33. so this Lords day is the Sabbath day which men haue forged of their owne hearts And thus we haue cleered and made apparent the two first things in this Idolatry to wit that the Lords day is an Image and liknesse and that the Lords day is an imagination and fiction or an Idoll and Nothing I come now to the third thing which maketh compleate Idolatry and that is Honour and Reuerence for that is properly Idolatry when religiouse honour and reuerence is attributed vnto Images and similitudes or vnto Imaginations and fictions of the braine or vnto Idoles and Nothing as when men reuerence these as Diuine things and as ordinances of God Now I shall easily demonstrate vnto you that men giue Honour Reuerence vnto this Lords day yea no ciuill honour but diuine religiouse Honour For 1. The patrones of the Lords day they doe esteeme one day aboue an other the Lords day aboue and before any other day in the weeke and that in a religiouse manner thus they honour it by aduancing it aboue all other daies yea by holding the cause of the institutiō of the Lords day to be greater then the cause of the institution of the Sabbath day they must hold that the Lords day is an higher more honourable day then was the Sabbath day for they say that the worke of the Redemption was the cause of the institution of the Lords day now the worke of Redemption they hold to be a greater worke then was the worke of the Creation which was the cause of the institution of the Sabbath day and thus you see they must haue the Lords day in more honour then the Sabbath day was
forswore his Lord and Master therein he bewraied it not Let good men therfore Holy be defended no further then their goodnesse and holinesse will extend and suffer them to be prosecuted and discouered in their erroures sinnes that they may reforme them I confesse they are my brethren so I acknowledge them but what then may not their erroures therfore be discouered and reproued Peter was Pauls brother did Paul therfore cloke Peters errour no Paul discouered it and reproued it to his face and that publikly before all men Gal. 2.11.14 shall the sinnes of the people be reproued and not the sinnes of Ministers shall Ministers haue a patent to sinne without reprofe our Sauiour reproued Peter saying get thee behind me Satan I hold sinne is lesse to be borne withall in a Minister then in a priuate person especially if it be both in their life and doctrine as that is for which I shall reproue them for when they not onely practise it but also erroniously teach it hereby they draw whole multitudes after them and therefore sinnefull errour would be snibed in them as a riuer would be stopped in the fountaine Perhapes thou wilt further say for them but what is it you haue against them it seemeth by these words that you haue some greate matter against them which we cannot beleeue since we know them to be men so Holy so lerned and euery way so qualified as we cannot say black is their eye c. Why amongst others these things I haue against them In generall I challeng them for their false and erroniouse doctrine where with all they haue now a long time deceiued and seduced the people of God wherein they still stifly persist he particulars whereof are these by their vngodly and abhominable reiecting of that most ancient ordinance of Gods Sabbath by name commanded in the Morall Law 1. They are become companiones to those wicked Priests who were partiall in Gods Law Mal. 2.9 for they deny the Integrity perfection of the Law and teach it onely by halues by parceles and peeces and so make Gods Law a lame and defectiue Law 2. They deny God a parte of his holy worship and seruice prescribed in the first Table of the Decalogue and this they neglect and omit weekly 3. They haue vtterly abolished and by their doctrine nullified the whole 4th Commandement both roote and branch 4. They haue most shamefully abused the 4th Commandement by their most grosse false and erroniouse expositions of it so as I neuer saw any one portion of scripture more corruptly and falsly expounded by any Popish Iesuit Whereby they worthily deserue the Title to be called The corrupters of Gods Law 5. They doe shamefully abuse certaine Textes and portions of Scripture and that by setting Scriptures together by the eares for they wrest certaine Scriptures of the New Testament to the vnnecessary contradicting and ouerthrowing of things commanded in the Decalogue and 10 Commandements of the Old Testament 6. They haue and doe most vnschollarlike abuse the 4th Com. by applying it to the Lords day the which God directed properly vnto the Saturday or 7th day of the weeke 7. They teach and maintaine that the Lords day is the Sabbath day by Christ his institution and to this purpose they haue most vnlernedly dishonestly wrested and abused diuerse sondry portiones of sacred Scripture a thing which one day they must account to God for and hereby they haue shamefully abused many of the well affected people of the land nursing them vp in Superstition will worship and idolatry If I shall make these 7 things good against these 10 Ministers as in this booke I shall then I trust you will pardon me if now and then I let fale an harsh word or two against them and then I trust you will not blame me for taking vp the bucklers against them as Gods enemies in these cases I could not haue taken these things so euilly at the hands of any as of puritans nor of any puritans as of puritane Ministers for at their hands I looked for better As for them these 10 Ministers I require and charge them as they will answer it before the Tribunall of Almightie God at the generall day of Iudgement that they study the 4th Commandement better and other the Scriptures now in controuercy so that they may deliuer nothing to the people but the pure word of God in their exposition and that they forbeare these erroniouse doctrines in pulpit and in priuate yea and reuoke these their foule erroures making a mends to the people of God whom they haue wronged by acknowledging the same vnto them before either they or any of their people departe this present life it is no dallying with mens soules and Gods matters Or else let them answer this my booke and so honestly acquite themselues of these things I charge them withall it is but equall that I demaund that they should either confirme my booke or confute it some of them say they will giue their liues for the Lords day Sabbath I trust then they will giue their laboures which is lesse to defend it I doubt not but you shall heare them make many shiftes friuolouse excuses that they may not answer me as hitherto they haue done when moued to answer my former booke but this is but still to maintaine their credit among the people as if they could easily answer all but they will not wast their time forsooth Happily the combination of these 10 Ministers will agree euery man to preach an invectiue sermon or two euery man in his owne parish against this booke and so raise a greate cry against me picking partially some fewe things in my booke to cauill at as it is no hard matter for a Rhetoricean to delude the people with words and for a Sophister to beguile them with seeming arguments and answers but my request vnto them is that they would answer my booke and that punctually from point to point not snaching and catching here and there at things and that they would print it as I haue done and so they shall stand to what they say without alterationes and after minceings and extenuationes An Author may be much wronged and abused in pulpit as I haue bene alredy by M. Chappell reporting to the people things out of my former booke falsly which I neuer wrote there so confuting their owne phantasies in stead of my booke and the Author hath no remedy but patience To auoide the like I desire them to forbeare pulpit confutations and come to printed confutations that so they may be answered againe What remaineth Christian Reader but that in the last place I craue thy single eye and vnpartiall censure and that you carry a minde voide of all preiudice euill will either to the person or the cause whereabouts thou art redy to be imployed in reading Remember we are not to receiue the word of God with respect of
persons nor yet to stop the eare and winke with the eye least we should see and vnderstand for so thou shalt both wrong thy selfe and thy Author Remember thou art now in the place of a Iudge for thou must reade the Controuercy of the Lords Sabbathes pleaded pro con betwixt these 10 Ministers and mee they against Gods Title and I for Gods Title they against Gods Sabbaths and I for them and betwixt them and mee thou must Iudge passe sentence now a Iudge must not be carried away with partiality and respect to persons nor suffer his minde to be prepossessed with an ill will to the cause before he heareth it these things are but equall and right which I craue of thee wherefore I trust I shall obtaine with thee This onely note that if thou wiâ—t suffer thy selfe to be swaied rather on the one side then on the other thou oughtest rather to take in with mee then with them for the Sabbath day it being an ancient ordinance of Gods a long time in vse in his Church therefore the cause and Title it is Gods and since I stand in defence of this Sabbath day therfore I stand in defence of Gods cause and Gods Title so side it with God but they setting themselues against Gods Sabbath set themselues not onely against me but also against Gods cause Gods Title wherfore iudge thou whither it were better for thee to take in with them or with mee against Gods cause Title or with Gods cause Title And so I commend thee to the grace of him who is able to build vs vp further in the knowledge and loue of his Trueth Thine in Christ Jesus THEOPHILUS BRABOURNE The Contentes of this Booke Chapt. I. This Chapter conteineth A defence of the Morall Law or 10 Commandements of Almightie God wherin for the defence of Gods Sabbathes it is proued that this Law is in force vnto Christianes and here Libertines Anabaptists Antinomians are confuted who deny that the Law of God consequently his Sabbaths doe belong vnto Christians and their obiectones to the contrary are answered Chapt. II. This Chapter conteineth an Exposition of the 4th Commandement together with a discouery of the manifould shamefull corruptiones abuses of this diuine Law by many Diuines of these times who doe wrest it mancle it corrupt it by their idle answers distinctions false glosses most absurd Expositiones from all which this Holy Law is vindicated by the Authour restored to its proper genuine ancient sense againe Here also it is made apparent that the whole 4th Commandement is abolisbed nullified by the common doctrine of these times Furthermore and by the way here it is showne how long a Sabbath day is as namely that it is but the time of Day light onely here is discouered the errour of such diuines as hold teach that the Sabbath day is to begine at midnight or in the Euening before or to last from morning to morning 2. By the way also here it is showne that there is no such preparation to the Sabbath to be made on the euening before by a cessation from the workes of our callings the like as some Ministers doe wright call for Lastly this Chapter is concluded with an Exhortation to the loue of Gods Law the Integrity perfection thereof Chapt. III. This Chapter conteineth A discouery of the vanity of all their Arguments brought for the maintenance of the Lords day to be a Sabbath day of their abuse of sondry Scriptures to that end This is handled in two questions the one shewing that it can neuer be proued that the Lords day was in the Apostles dayes constantly weekly obsâ—rued weeke by weeke as we now obserue it The other That it cannot be proued that so much as any one Lords day was euer kept in the Apostles dayes for a Sabbath day and that therfore it is no sinne against God but Lawfull for Husbandmen to make Hay in Hay seile to sow corne in wheat seile to reape corne in Haruest for all sortes of Tradsmen Taylers Shomakers Brewares Bakers Weauers and the rest to doe the ordenary workes of their callings as well vpon the Lords day as vpon any other day of the weeke Yet further here it is proued that the Lords day is but an indifferent thing that by the Testimony of the best writers some lerned Godly Martyrs the State and Church of England assembled in Parliament Here also the Lords day is discouered to be but A Popish Tradition so all Romish reliques are not yet remoued Finally it concludeth with an Admonition Dehortation from Superstition voluntary-religion will-worship Chapt. IV. This Chapter conteineth an Answer vnto all those Textes of Scripture reasons and arguments profanly impiously brought against the 7th day Sabbath commanded in the Morall Law It sheweth the absurdeties which the vndertakers against Gods Sabbath doe fale into And it wipeth off that slaunder of rigorousnesse of the Iewish Sabbath and sheweth that God required no more stricktnesse of Iewes then then the patrones of the Lords day doe require of Christians on the Lords day now Chapt. V. This Chapter conteineth sondry Substanciall Arguments prouing vndeniably that the 7th day Sabbath mentioned in the Morall Law is still in force ought to be to the worlds end This is proued both out of the Old Testament out of the New Testament also out of the ancient Records of the Church For 1. God Commanded it 2. Christ the Sonne of God ratified it 3. The Apostles after Christ practised it 4. The Primitiue Churchs religiously obserued it And in this last passage by the way it is showne 1. when the Lords day first sprang vp to be a sole Sabbath day and who were the founders thereof 2. When the Lords ancient Sabbath was first throwne downe who were the wicked Authors thereof Occationally in this Chapter the obseruation of the old Sabbath is freed from the uniust slaunder of being Iewish and Iudasme with the like Here also are confuted the vaine Euasions distinctions which are vsually framed against the ancient Sabbath day Lastly here is a discourse of the Antiquity of the Sabbath where it is proued that the Sabbath day it from the Creation so as ancient as the world Chapt. VI. This Chapter conteineth A dispensation shewing that Christians who desire the Ancient Sabbath are not necessarily bound in conscience to make A rent from our Church in their present obseruation of it but that they may waite for the opportunity of a publike Reformation by the Magistrate prouided they keepe the Lords day for the Sabbath day by way of a change in the meane season 2. It concludeth with an Exhortation to vse all possible lawfull meanes for a speedy publike generall Reformation amongst other Motiues therevnto these are touched that vntill A Reformation 1. The Decalogue is defaced of
if Gods Sabbaths come into question they all forsake them like as the Disciples did Christ when he vvas apprehended nay vvorse they turne enemies vnto them they nickname them reprochfully and smite them with the tounge calling them Iuish Iudaisme and ceremonies shaddowes vvhy be it that this parte of Gods law touching his Sabbaths be not certainly knowne vnto thee to belong vnto thee only thou hast but some probabilities coniectures common presumptions that it doth belong vnto thee yet if thou doest not improue all these probable arguments and manage these common coniectures and presumptiones to the vtmost for god and for his Sabbaths it bewraieth that thou art not so faith full in executing the vvill of thy god as many Excecutors are in execution of the vvill of theire deceased friend for they vvil omit no debt that they can haue any inkling of but thou bast notice of a debt of the Sabbath day owing to god and yet vvilt not side it vvith god nor improue these tidings to the vtmost in behalfe of thy god It bevvraieth also that thou takest not Gods law to be thine Inheritance for if thoudidst thou couldest not sit still in silence when thou hast notice brought thee that some moitie and portion therof is vvrongfully detained from thee A 2d motiue is because a mans taking in vvith Gods Sabbaths vvill declare him to be a friend to the lavv of god euery man would be esteemed a frend vnto Gods lavv well then let it appeare thou atte so indeed and not in name only by taking in with this parte of Gods lavv which commandeth the Saturday Sabbath vse thy wites imploy thy study thy toung thy frends and vvhat thou canst for the furtherance of this part of Gods lavv concerning his Sabbath The Lords 7th day Sabbath it is lost as vvas the vvomans Groate luk 15.8 she had 10. groates and hauing lost but one of the 10. shee neuer leaues sweeping and seeking till shee hath found it so should we for this one command lost from the 10. if a man hath an 100. sheepe looseth but one of them saith our Sauiour he leaueth the nynty and nyne in the vvildernesse goeth after that one vntill he find it Luk 25.4 so should we take more paines and care study to regaine this Command touching the Lords Sabbaths then after all the other nyne and an halfe but how can they be esteemed frends to Gods lavv vvho side it vvith those that side it against Gods Sabbaths A 3d motiue is from the worth and excellency of Gods Law the Prophet Dauid telleth vs that it is to be loued aboue gold yea aboue most fine gold Ps 119.127 and it was vnto him better then thowsands of gold and siluer Ps 119.72 if therfore thou knowest not the price and vvorth of Gods Law the Sabbaths therin commanded learne it of Dauid who knew the value of it it is better then gold and siluer yea as good as all riches put together Ps 119.14 no man vvill be an enemy to gold to siluer be not thou then an enemy to Gods Sabbaths for they are better then thowsands of gold and siluer we may beleene the Prophet Dauid euery man vvill be a frend vnto riches why be thou a frend then vnto Gods Sabbaths for they are as good as all riches in the vvorld A 4th motiue to stirr the vp to side it with Gods Sabbaths is because in so doeing thou shalt side it take parte with God himselfe for the 7th day Sabbaths they are Gods and therfore he calleth them his saying mine holy day Isa 58.13 and the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God Exo. 20.10 they are Gods because God commanded them Remember the Sabbath day Exod. 20.8 whosoeuer therfore taketh parte with the Lords Sabbaths hee taketh parte with God also whos 's those Sabbaths are it is vsuall vvith God man to take that as done to them selues which is done to that which by way of excellency they call theires euery man vvould be glad to take parte vvith God they say al though it were against all the world for God is strongest wisest able to reward a man well for his paines his fauour is better then liefe well then stand for Gods Sabbaths for they are Gods and so thou shalt take in with God fight vnder his Banner But woe to that man that opposeth Gods Sabbaths for as the other bewraieth him selfe to be a friend of Gods so this bewraieth him selfe to be an enemy to God and God wil destoy all his fees If this argument vvill not auaile with men I know not what will if they had rather take parte with men against God that which is Gods then with God that which is Gods against men then let them goe on if it goe vvell with such I shall not care how I liue heere It is houlden good pollicy to side it with the strongest for my parte I know none stronger then God I will therfore side it with him For that 's the safest vvherefore I haue resolued vpon it to take parte with Gods Sabbaths and with them to liue and to dye The 5th last motiue shall be from the consideration of the Title whose it is this is to be regarded for if the Title in controuercy be but a common mans then to oppose it is but common danger but if it be the Title of a King then men had need take heed how they take parts against it so the Title of the Sabbaths now in controuercy to be tried if they were called mans Sabbaths of mans institution then to oppose them the danger were not so great But these Sabbaths are called Gods Sabbaths of his institution therfore the Title here is not mans but Gods the King of kings here then take heed if euer thou tookest heed hovv thou oppose Gods Title if a father hath the Title of his land in triall before the Iudge though the bastard regardeth not whither he wine or loose because he knoweth that he shall neuer inherit yet the true borne sonne wisheth in his heart that his fathers Title may haue the day so long as he seeth there is a probability that it is his fathers So doubtlesse euery true borne sonne of God cannot but wish from his heart that the Title of God his father touching his Sabbaths may preuaile rather then goe downe but he that regardeth not which end goeth forward as we say he bewraieth himselfe to be no sonne but a bastard but he that not onely regardeth not which end goeth forvvard but vvhich is farre vvorse turneth himselfe enemy to his fathers Title insomuch as he dareth with an impudent face dispute and openly in Court plead against and in pulpit preach against his fathers Title what a one he bewraieth himselfe to be I haue no names bad enough to giue him If an informer cometh into the Court informeth for the King