insight of the mercies of God in his Christ which are the onely ioy and confidence of our soules And thus much of Gods mercie CHAP. VI. Of Gods Iustice in generall THe second part of Gods holines Iustice is his Iustice contained in the consequent part of the sentence and is distributed into two adiuncts Power and Order Power in that God will be sure to iudge and Order in that he will take no hastie courses whereby all should be done in confusion Excellent is our God for first beeing a God almightie he is able to doe what he pleaseth with his creature but secondly obserue his order and euery one shall confesse that he is a God of excellent wisdome for things done in good method stoppe the mouthes of all Two men that put on armour and like bulls of Basan push the one at the other are not discommended for their power and strength but that beeing men they wanted wisdome to vse their strength aright and that is that they kept no good order and therefore such execution of iustice as this is condemned so that if our gratious King had no more arguments but this one in forbidding all Duells it were sufficient for graunt the exercise the power of iustice yet where is this order and good method that the Lord would haue obserued of all his seruants Aristotle hath vnfolded vnto vs in his Ethicks fiue intellectuall vertues which if they concurre not in all our actions they will prooue exceedingly defectiue First intelligence which giues information of the cause and the reasons of it secondly science which disposeth of euery necessarie truth in those reasons so that thereby he shall iudge his cause to be good or bad for vt intellectus habet se ad verum ad falsum sic voluntas ad bonum vel malum the vnderstanding goes before and iudges of truth and falshood and the will follows after and embraceth good or euill the third vertue is sapience seeing how he may diduct and draw out of the truths of science other necessarie truths which could not appeare but by the discourse of this third vertue the fourth prudence which is the fourth perfection of our actions when we doe all the former in good and comely order the fifth Art the highest degree of perfection when I doe all nimbly and very skilfully in knowing in iudging discoursing applying These men may haue the three first vertues but they are altogether destitute of the two last they may know that their cause is good and that both of them hath reason to complaine of iniurie for braue spirits can not rest without mutuall prouocations secondly they may know that disgrace of their persons is their shame and the losse of their good name which they esteem better then the most pretious oyntment that they inioy to be such an iniurie that it can deserue no lesse then some kind of trial and so in the third place discourse of it and conclude that therefore they will haue iustice executed that they may bee reuenged for their wrongs but alas when they come to apply all this their former knowledge they want prudence and so leap ouer the lists of iustice and breaking good order spoile the exercise of all artes For first they breake the rule of diuinitie in sinning against God by murther the rule of ethickes for fortitude and manhood is abused the rule of politickes for the common-wealth is iniured by losse of such persons as might haue been his pillars the rule of nature complaines that would haue himselfe preserued in all his subiects Indeed special nature for the good of generall nature will seeme to crosse himselfe the fire will descend and the water will ascend before they will suffer such a stranger as vacuitie to possesse any place among them So indeed nature would neuerbe offended if they would shed their blood for their countrie Nature will make the hand to offer it selfe to be cut off before the head receiue the blowe because nature is wise in order knowing that the head is to be preferred before any other member because it hath in it the greatest part of life The people can tell Dauid thou art better then ten thousand of vs and therefore no matter if we be all cut off to saue thy life Blessed is that kingdome that is not onely powerfull in iustice but that keeps good order in the execution Indeed many may say I will reprooue thee but alas how few say I will set thine offences in order before thee Many lie in prison for a sic volo sic iubeo stat pro ratione voluntas authoritie vrged by violence of passion spoyles all Magistrates Aristotle saies that the law ought to be like the primum sensorium which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so the law must sauour of no qualitie but his owne for then would it neuer iudge aright And as the lawe is so ought the Magistrate to be voide of all his owne passions let the law rule him as he meanes to rule the people and then should all be done in good order and we should not heare these lamentable complaints I am in prison but I knowe not for what cause and the Magistrate saies I shall lie there vntil my bones rotte For the mercies of God let vs be mooued betimes as well to set mens sinnes in order as vse our power in reproouing of them lest the Lord come and handle vs most roughly in the power of his iustice for this most hainous offence committed in diuiding iustice against it selfe So then the distribution lets vs see that the power of God is neuer without his wisedome but that the Lord workes in all things intelligenter scienter sapienter prudenter artificiosè plainly truely wisely prudently and skilfully The power of Gods iustice is laid downe in these words I will reprooue thee first the cause I the Lord which in the first verse styled my selfe the God of Gods euen the Lord from heauen in comparison aboue all and in dominion ouer all without comparison therefore a mightie iustice that hath so great a cause Secondly from the species or kind of it a reproofe therfore vindicatiue and reuenging iustice stronger then remuneratiue or rewarding iustice for here appeares ira furor excandescentia anger a displeasure of short continuance furie a short madnesse the third an inueterate hatred that alwaies smoakes against sinne that kindles hote coales hinc ira ex candore fierinesse full of brightnesse Thirdly the obiect thee the sinne and the person I am out of loue with both and therefore will I discouer thy sinne which I know thou aboue all men mayest not endure to heare of Secondly what thou thy selfe art both in deceiuing and beeing deceiued shal plainly be knowne therefore most powerfull iustice whose cause is Iehouah nature vengeance obiect the most secret sinne and most deceitfull person free from all the iudgement seats of men Sect. 1. Of the cause Observ 1. The great God
from the obligation of the law That which is bound to the lawe is properly the subiect of the breach of the law now men and angels are only bound to Gods law therefore men and angels may only be tearmed the subiect their actions therefore onely as belonging vnto them are sinfull that is flowing from sinners and so are their workes so that mans nature worketh and sinne and God mans nature worketh and hath God working in it and so the action is good againe God beside his general influence concourse with his creature hath a speciall worke in the action which concernes himselfe and that is likewise good yea and verie good for it is the last end of the creature but the other cause which is sinne cleauing so fast vnto our nature qualifies our nature to doe sinfully The sunne-beames comming thorough a red glasse shines on the opposite wall with the tincture of the colour of the glasse now the question is whether the red colour be onely in the glasse or likewise in the shining surely it seemes that the whole colour remaines still in the glasse and rather dimmes the shining then infects it so the beames of Gods wisedome shining through our corrupt soules seemes to be an action tainted with sinne but surely the corruption stickes in our soules and onely hindred the bright beames of Gods glorie from appearing in our actions Reason 3. from the sole nature of an effect That which is onely an effect can neuer be a subiect nowe the motion is onely an effect and can no otherwise be considered and therefore is alwaies ioyned with his cause as a sinfull action is in sense and reason the action of a sinneful man that is whereof sinnefull man is the cause Hence beeing an effect it must needes exist or stand out by many causes and therefore according to euery cause hath his speciall affection so a sinfull action hath one reference vnto man an other vnto God and yet may stand out of both Christs death had many causes and all subordinate causes were according to Gods determinate counsell the action was sinfull yet the sinne did inhere in Pilate Herod and the accursed Iewes Reason 4. from the nature of goodnes That which is simply good cannot bee the subiect of sinne now actions are of this nature the reason is because causes giue beeing vnto things and therefore are absolute as causes now motion hauing no other being but that which it receiues from causes Causa cuius vi res est This vis must needs be Gods and causes producing that by a motiue force in themselues which force is from God cannot any wayes leaue in the effect an euill inherent but onely in themselues which wanted true force whereof the effect should haue existed hence we call sinne rather a deficient cause then an efficient cause Rom 6.12 Rom. 7.5 Indeede sinne in vs is said to raigne and haue force in our members and so sinne with his subiect is exceeding powerful but it is by turning Gods created force the wrong way euen as a wheele set a running wrong way is carried with as great force as when it runne the cleane contrarie so mans nature set a rebelling against God turnes Gods created forces against himselfe that the force is put into the action it is Gods but that it was put in by the hand of a rebell it became sinfull yet God will acknowledge his owne force in the action and turne the fault and crime to the proper owners That the Iewes and Pilate laid hands on Christ it was Gods created force in them but the abuse of it is their owne and takes vp a proper habitation in their miserable soules then causation beeing a created force and motion onely acknowledging the same well may the motion be Gods and yet no cause at all of sinne Reason 5. from priuation Sinnes are properly the priuation or want of action and therfore though they may bee both in one subiect yet neuer can the one be the subiect of the other for so should deadly enemies become louing freinds and the worst kind of opposites be reconciled for I am sure that priuation though he be no being yet he denies a beeing in the selfe same subiect which is capable of it Blindnes is a worse not being then not seeing for not seeing may be in a stone which is neuer the worse for it but blindnes can be no where but where sight may be and therefore the eye is much worse for it if then sinne bee the priuation of an action it can neuer bee in an action but alwaies against an action Reason 6. from action and passion which seeme to differ but in respect of the agent and patient and therefore the patient should sin more then the agent seeing the action wherein lies the sinne is most properly in the patient but frō the agent The action from the worker is a passion in the receiuer and therefore if sinne were in the action it should goe along with it to the patient yea rather should it be in the patient then the agent seeing the action rests most in the patient Hence murther should rather be the sinne of the patient then the agent seeing the action of murther as it is from the agent so most properly is in the party slaine and therefore the murtherer should be the murthered which is against reason It is plaine then that sinne abides in the murtherer the action is good let this therefore be obserued that God may be iustified euen in sinnefull actions yet no cause of sinne because sinne alone rests in the bosome of fooles and will not stirre one iotte out of that subiect it is therefore dangerous to defend that an action is the materiall cause of sinne for so should sinne not onely be said to be in the action but of the action and then I know not how God should worke the action and bee freed from sinne for causa causae est causa causati The words then are thus to be expounded Things are here put for actions by a metanomie of the cause for the effect for actions proceed frō things then actions for the sinnes which are committed by sinnefull things and so the action is an effect of the sinnefull man and is put for his cause which be sinnes in the things Neither is this any newe opinion Motus modus actionis for all agree that the motion is good onely the manner of doing is euill Now examine the point well and we shall alwaies find the manner in the doer and not in the thing done and therefore the euill is properly in the doer and not in the thing done onely it is said to be in it in that regard that an euill cause wrought it and so the motion is both Gods and mans yet not both of one manner of working Mans fall was an action therefore Gods and mans but man wrought it one manner of way and
God seeing man this way to determine his will Mansâ— determination made the determination thereof a iust way for his owne glorie God decreed mans fall and he also decreed that he himselfe would not be the cause but that man himselfe should onely cause his own ruine Thus then God did absolutely decree but not absolutely determine mans wil for that was left vnto man himselfe Determination no impulsion yet the determination of that determination was absolute and that without impulsion or coaction of mans will for determination is alwaies of things vnto their ends therefore is called absolute in regard of the end but coaction is onely of an efficient which is not necessarie for an absolute ende All Gods ends are absolute and necessarie yet the meanes that God vseth are of all kinds contingent necessarie dependent independent Suppose God had decreed to haue giuen man actuall grace as alreadie the angels haue it in heauen had it therefore been necessarie that man could not haue fallen or that God should haue constrained his wil to haue imbraced this grace no assuredly therefore on the contratie God decreed not to giue man this actuall grace of standing is therefore his auersion necessarie and constrained no but God by this meanes gaue way vnto the sinne of auersion and permissiuely yet willingly did suffer it for to enter for otherwise it could not haue entred and by a positiue decree resolued that auerting himselfe from the fountaine of all goodnesse and the rule of all righteousnesse he should runne into innumerable dangerous euills and grieuous sinnes both of commission and omission Omission is alwaies the first sinne Omission a priuation for a man falleth first from the loue of God before he can loue or desire any other thing now this sin beeing a neglect hath no positiue cause it selfe being a priuatioÌ„ neither need we seek any higher spring of it Non 〈…〉 then the will of such a creature as is defectiue and therefore doth not alwaies necessarily attend to the rule it should conforme it selfe vnto and thus of the first sinne we can find no cause in God because hee is no wayes defectiue The second sinne is commission which is a positiue act and therefore hath a positiue cause now God that neuer ceaseth to doe his worke of moouing but alwaies carrieth forward all things with restlesse motions cannot but cause the verie substance of a sinne of commission 〈…〉 of the Schâ—olman neither here am I of the opinion of the School-men that defend the very deformitie of this sinne to be nothing but the act and very substance of it for an act is a generall tearme and hath speciall limitations added vnto it therefore it is said to be well done when it keeps his rule euill when it misseth his rule now the Lord in no action goeth against the rule of his wisdome therefore he can work no deformed act only man that is defectiue may goe against the rule and so causeth the deformitie A cunning artificer makes a clocke but he suffers his apprentice to helpe to ioyne it together the deformitie of the motion is none of the artificers but onely from the vnskilfull apprentice yet will the skilfull artificer haue his praise in correcting of that aberration and turne the motion to his owne ende The causes then why sinne entred as efficient are properly the deuill and man as determined to an ende properly Gods who might well so determine of man seeing he created him mutable But to come more neerly How Gods lawe works sinne we may expresse this most familiarly in a comparison taken from an earthen pitcher dashed by the hand of a man against a stone wall that the wall breaketh it that is no fault of the walls but rather the coÌ„mendation of it working according to his owne nature but the fault is in the partie that dashed it against the wall so man being dashed by the deuill and himselfe and the serpent and the woman vpon the law of God too hard to bee ouerwrastled of man was broken in peices yet the lawe was without all fault onely the fault was in the deuill Adam and the woman the law therefore a most iust and holy cause of mans fall as the law caused mans sinne so I dare boldly say that God cansed it yet most holily and iustly Hence it followeth most plainely that God was no bare permitting cause or a forsaking cause but a working cause euen in the fall of man now as God did it so he was able to doe it and so to decree it to his owne glorie according as it seemed best vnto his own wisdome and so might it be willed as absolutely good and iust and therefore no sinne God made them the beginners of their owne actions beeing indued with free will by well doing they might deserue both praise and prize and by ill doing might deserue both dispraise and punishment But you will obiect then God might both will it and not will it Very true as God willed it it had respect of good and was iust and therefore to be willed but as they willed it it was euill and so God hated it and his law forbad it The sonne may desire the death of his father and so may God too but in so doing the sonne sinnes against God yet God is free from sinne the Iudge desires that a malefactor should die so doth the hangman yet may be the hang-man is guilty of murther when the Iudge is a true executioner of iustice Obserue then for the entrance of sinne these positions Positions for sinnes entrance First that to sinne is directly beside the scope intent and purpose of the law and therefore if the law cause sinne it is by acccident as to the law so to Gods wil which can neither intend purpose or will any impietie and therefore sinne is accidental and externall in regard of God now an accidentall principle is either in regard of necessitie or fortune How a cause by accident may be giuen vnto God now for necessitie to sinne that cannot be giuen vnto God for he can suffer of no causing principle and fortune is too strange a tearme to stand with Gods prouidence where then is this externall principle I answer if wee soberly conceiue of the nature of a cause by fortune we shal not much swarue if we say sinne was chance in regard of Gods will for chance and fortune according to true reason is nothing but the accident or euent of any thing beside his end and scope now only good is the end and scope of Gods will and therfore sinne which is not good is beside Gods scope and ende therefore it is accidentall in Gods scope and end But you wil say then God was ignorant of mans sinne I answer no because sinne is not onely accidentall to a good ende but also an aberration from the true rule of wisdome and must stand to the iudgement and sentence thereof
aduerse to a sinner and so the arguments differ Adam by creation was a iust man in habite but not in act and according to that which the Lord required and so death beeing taken away we are in the way to iustification but not actually iust vntill actually the law be performed in our selues or another And because the point is in controuersie thereasons to establish this truth may be these Arg. 1. Lex regale 〈◊〉 iustiâ—e That which is the perfect righteousnesse of the lawe is both actiue and passiue but that whereby we are iustified is of this nature For I demaund by what rule of righteousnesse is life and saluation conuaied vnto vs If they say by faith then I demaund what is that righteousnesse of faith is it the verie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then assuredly it excludes both the righteousnesse of Christ and that of the law and yet faith is said to establish both If it be the righteousnesse of Christ then I demaund is not that morall if morall then either perfect or imperfect if perfect then actiue and passiue That we apprehend Christs righteousnesse that is of grace but that Christ hath it for vs that is of the law The second Argument against this opinion may be this Christ did all as a nâ—ediator for those that haue need of a mediator That which Christ did as a Mediator was not onely for himselfe but for vs and for vs more principally then himselfe but all that Christ did were the actions of a Mediatour his humane nature had no subsistence but by the diuine and euery action beeing in supposito was of him as a Mediatour and therfore for vs and so both actiue and passiue obedience were for vs. But they will say his actiue obedience did fit him for our Mediatorship To this I answer if his actiue obedience be the obedience of a Mediator then in his whole latitude it was for vs and as soon as he was born he was fit to redeeme so neuer an action but it was for vs. If then these actions of fitting bee properly the actions of a Mediator then they tautologise speak no sense for so that fitting was nothing but redeeming for I am sure euery action of our Mediatour is to redeeme and to redeeme is to seeke those that were lost and so his actiue obedience was for those which were lost and if that then had we neede of all Christs obedience Argum. He fulfilled the ceremoniall law both actiuely and passâ—â—ely for others ergn the moral 3. Christ fulfilled all righteousnes morall ceremoniall The ceremoniall was not fulfilled by passiue obedience but also by actiue if the ceremoniall required both then much more the morall Deut. 4.1 Sam. 22. Hos 6.6 mercie more then sacrifice and knowledge more then burnt offerings and this in both was done for others he was circumcised for others for he was without sinne and therefore in Christ to signifie any pollution circumcision had no vse so was he baptized but it was not for the washing away of his owne filthines but ours The reasons why he must keepe the law for others are these 1. because perfect obedience depended on him for the performer 2. both the law morall and ceremoniall acknowledge him for Mediator for seeing it was impossible to be fulfilled of vs it was possible vnto him 3. because he did establish and fulfill both 4. he alone is the bond of both seeing then he performed actiue obedience to the Ceremoniall law and that not for himselfe but for vs. the like must be confessed of the morall especially the ceremoniall law beeing but an appendix and addition to the morall Argum. Against reason that death should cause life 4. Christs death could not bring life because no death can be the cause of life seeing they are contraries Fire cannot cause cold neither water heat blindnes cannot cause sight neither sight blindnes Christs death to take away death is good reason but to cause life is against all reason This is very agreeable with the Scriptures reason that as Christs death doth free vs from death so Christs life doth bring vs vnto life He died for our sinnes and rose againe for our iustification Dan. 9.24 the slaying of the Messias brings in the expiation of sinne and his liuing againe brings euerlasting righteousnesse Sinne brought in death therefore righteousnes must bring in life for if death should bring in life then life should be the reward of sinne for I am sure that the Scriptures affirme that death is the reward of sinne and the reward of sinne can neuer be the cause of life What hath a schoole-boy deserued when his master hath whipped him so what haue we deserued in Christ when we are onely punished in him Sinne and the reward of sinne haue no agreement with life Therefore it is true that the expiation of sinne is wrought by Christs passiue obedience and life by his actiue Argum. 5. All types whereof Christ is the truth Types prooue both actine and passiue obedience to bee found in Christ point at this assertion first in the couenant of grace there was the Arke and the Table Exod. 24.7 in the Arke was the booke of the law and so the booke of the lawe went with the couenant and was to be found in Christ for vs. Exod. 25.22 the Mercie-seat was betweene the two Cherubims and these were vpon the Arke of the Testament Mal. 3.1 therefore no seat of mercie without the Arke of the Testament The pascall lambe must be without spot eaten with sweete bread and sowre hearbs both must be in Christ therefore not onely the soure hearbs of his death and passion but the sweet bread of his righteousnesse Vrim and Thummim must be on the Priests breast when he carries the peoples iudgement before God and this must be had beside blood therefore righteousnes beside passion Ar. 6. From similitudes familiarly applied in the Scriptures whose end purpose are to prooue this First the wiues debt is made the husbands and we beeing married vnto Christ the debt that we owe God by our creation must be payed before he will admit of vs now that debt was Do and liue and this Christ hath done and so we shall liue Secondly Christ is the head of his Church and therefore must he giue vnto his members life motion and all things needfull Thirdly the suretie must pay and discharge the whole debt of him for whome he is bound all of vs are bankerupts and stand in neede to haue a great debt discharged for vs and likewise a new stocke purchased To conclude it is foolish to make such a distinction as this seeing all the actions of our Mediator are as wel actiue as passiue his life is not taken from him but he laies it downe willingly and euen from his conception his humanitie being assisted by his deity which could not suffer turned all Christs sufferings into actions I haue bin drawne to inlarge
is a day of his silence and there is a day of his iustice and the Lord will not breake his daies with the righteous and sinners vpon earth for the day of mercie man hath a bond from God but for the day of paying vengeance the Lord hath mans bonds man cares not how often God forfeit his bond of mercie for he would willingly haue God to be in his debt for euer yet the Lord is not so negligent in the requiring of the forfeit of his bond of iustice and therefore hauing alreadie discharged his bond of mercie it will be high time to looke vnto man that he answer him for his iustice especially seeing the wicked for Gods silence haue not broken forth with Dauid and said What shall we giue vnto the Lord for all his benefits nor as yet vpon conditions performed are able to say We haue taken the cuppe of saluation and called vpon our good God nay as yet we haue nor so much as resolued to doe it So that the Lord may most iustly breake silence and after the expiration of their daies of peace vexe them in his sore displeasure Reasons 1. from the nature of time From time appointed of God for all purposeâ— The Lord is before and after all times yet in his works he hath reuealed himselfe to performe all actions in time and he hath appointed euery thing his certen time Eccles. 3. that so euery worke of God might be seene distinctly The Lord hath a time for his silence and a time for his iustice that so the mercies which he shewes vnto the sonnes of men and the iudgements which he brings vpon them might be seene distinctly and he praised for them both 2. Reas Lone vnto his creatures First Loue to 〈◊〉 creature to shew his generall goodnes secondly to mooue him to repentance and thankefulnes for his patience and long suffering 3. Reas To leaue man without all excuse To leaue reaâ— without excuse seeing God hath laboured by mercies to allure and iudgements to terrifie so that when his last doome shall come the Lord shall say What are become of all my mercies and why was thou not reclaimed by my foretelling thee of iudgements therefore goe thou accursed wretch into hell fire where thou shalt neuer haue again the time of my silence 1. Vse reprehension either confutation of all those that cry Mal. 3 14. It is in vaine to serue the Lord and what pleasure haue wee that we haue bowed our selues before him surely you are blind that cannot see what large dayes the Lord hath giuen you here vpon earth and what long silence hath passed betwixt him you nay he hath not onely beene silent but also he hath been bountifull vnto you in many a temporall blessing euen aboue his owne Saints Second vse vnder this head is correction of the hastie desires of Gods children first to haue iudgment on their enemies and secondly to haue speedy dispatch of affliction in themselues Thus they hasten the time of the mercie and iustice of the Lord. Know therefore that God will haue his times completly ended and it is your duty to stay his leasure for he that beleeues will not make hast 2. Vse is instruction first an admonition to all the wicked that they harden not their hearts denie not Gods call but listen vnto him least they call when he will not heare them For your time is to day but Gods time is his will and pleasure in silence reproofe your time is present for time past is not called again with had I wist and the time to come is in Gods disposing 2. Branch is a direction to the godly that they make vse of all times for the Lord would haue them exact in the computation of the yeares of his mercie and iustice yea and of seasons in these times for he complaines for the want of it Isa 1. The oxe knowes his owner the asse his masters cribbe these know their masters and the times wherein they refresh them the swallow and the crane their appointed times therefore let it not be saide of Gods Israel that they know not him which doth all for them God is pleased to call them his people and what greater shame then this my people haue not knowne me 3. Vse is consolation first for tribulation Is this the day of Gods affliction then happie is my estate for the time of deliuerance is approching therfore in this Psalme v. 15. Call vpon me in the day of trouble and I will deliuer thee mourning may rest for a night but ioy comes in the morning Secondly for the day of prosperitie to haue a heart as ioyfull and glad to thinke of his affliction as then to puffe vp himselfe with his present estate Dauid hath more ioy of heart that Gods countenance is lifted vpon him then because his corne wine Psalm 4. and oyle are increased Heb. 11. Moses can take more ioy to be a partaker with Gods people then in the inioying of all the sinnefull pleasures of Egypt for a season Observ 4. from the order Silence goes before Gods reproofe as a silent ayre before a fearefull tempest The Lord spared the old world a long time before he drowned it he suffered Sodome and Gomorrha to burne a long time in lusts before he burnt them with fire and brimstone from heauen Reasons 1. Iust puwiâ—â—ment That iust cause may be giuen for all the wrath of God that falleth vpon the wicked 2. Reason because the sinne of man cannot be but in that which God hath made good no more then blindnes can be any where Good before euâ—ll but in the eie which had power to see now sight is before blindnes good before euill and therefore Gods silence before his iustice because iustice will not reprooue before man haue sinned 3. Measure of sinne Reason is because a measure of sinne is to be made vp Gen. 15. before God can iudge and therefore the Lord will be silent vnto that time that then he may answer them with a like measure of iudgement 1. Vse is reprehension which serues first for the confutation of the vngodly which thinke that God is forgetfull of his anger but let them know that method is the very rule of memorie and God keeping so close to an exact method can not by long silence forget what he hath to doe Indeede we say old things are out of date and long silence makes contentious matters cease but the Lord is the same to day he was when he began the world and Cains sinne is as fresh in his memorie as the sinne that is committed this day 2. Vse is correction of Gods children that can no sooner heare the faults of their brethren but presently they speake of them this is no good method they ought to haue paused on the matter by silence and after haue reprooued when time would haue serued 2. Vse is instruction 1. An admonition to the
not consent Quitacet consentire videtur yet he will spare mee for a time or howsoeuer I will hold mine own conclusions whatsoeuer the Lord shall doe vnto me IIII. Part. Of Gods reproofe and order in sinne Reprooue This word signifieth foure things First to argue or reason vpon any matter secondly by reasoning to prooue or disprooue any cause thirdly by proouing or disproouing to absolue or condemne any person fourthly after condemnation to punish or execute This fourth signification is specially meant in this place for he had his conuiction before therefore to reprooue in this place is as much as to plague for the reason following makes it plaine Oh consider this least I teare you in peeces shewing plainly what his reproofe was nothing but vengeance Set This word presupposeth things out of place secondly the placing of them againe in their rankes and orders shewing vs the nature of sinne First that sinne is gotten out of his own place for neuer a creature of God by his creatioÌ„ did acknowledge him and God himselfe did alwaies abhorre him therefore before the fal of men and angels Gods erâ—ation a deadly â—uemie to sinne sinne was like vnto that which we call in nature vacuum which is so abhorred of nature that the verie fire will descend and the verie water ascend before they wil yeeld him the least corner in the world so sinne by Gods creation was wholly excluded and God giueth his testimonie that euery thing that hee made was good and very good therefore that sinne should obtaine that in nature as to get him a place in the best of Gods creatures was neuer the placing of the Lord therefore the Lord cannot bee said to set sinne in this manner The way of Gods placing Cane The second setting is here vnderstood to wit bringing that into his proper place which hitherto hath beene out of his place and is done two manner of wayes First by bringing it vnto himselfe and the rule of his wisedome and so sin is set in the decree of God and ordered by his wisdome for that of the Philosopher is true Veritas iudex sui obliqui but what need we the testimonie of the Philosopher seeing that we haue the Apostle Paul Rom. 7.7 I knewe not sinne but by the lawe and without the law sinne is dead now the rule is alwaies before the breach of the rule therfore must needs determine of euerie fault Secondly sinne is set in order when it is brought vnto man by making him feele what his sinne was by the punishment of it Order Includeth three things Confusion diâ—ontion iâ—â—â—uâ—ination first confusion secondly comely disposition thirdly plaine reuelation as in the creation of the world Gods order is set forth vnto vs in the confusion of the first matter wherein all things were buried as in a dark dungeon Secondly how the Lord proceeded to bring out of this the heauens in their ranke with all the host thereof the firmament in his place the water and all therein in his place the earth and all thereupon in their place and thus was the worke of the Lord comely and full of beautie Thirdly the Lord brought foorth a light to separate from the darkenes and so was there a plaine reuelation of his workes so in this place here is sinne a greater confusion in mâ—n then euer was in that first chaos Secondly as the Lord brought all things out of that into their place so will he bring all the sins of man vnto a comely order so that plainly in the third place euery man shall see what he hath done to the dishonour of his creator This order is threefold according to a threefold booke the first is the booke of decrees 3. Bookes Gods decâ—es Law Consâ—ence the second is the book of Gods law the third the books of conscience and these three bookes doe most plainely order sinne The first booke being secret ordereth sinne secretly yet most iustly because most wisely for if the wisedome of God should not be seene in sin then should not God haue his glorie out of sinne therfore to answer all obiections that may arise out of this ordring of sin the prouing of the truth of this point I will in a few words take in hand the clearing of these two things first the remoouall of that which may obscure the truth secondly I will bring reasons for the confirming of this difficultie Answer The first obiection may be out of the words of the Psalme I will set them in order before thee therefore the order that is taken for sinne is after that sinne is committed For first God saith These things hast thou done 2. these things will I order 3. before thee all which plainely prooue that this order followeth sinne Answer To which I answer that in this place we are to vnderstand that the third booke which is the booke of the conscience is here to be vnderstood not excluding the former as though they were not but onely shewing that the bookes of conscience for the condemnation of a wicked man are sufficient and the onely cause of the execution of Gods plagues vpon him as appeareth plainly Reuel 20.12 And the bookes were opened and another booke was opened which is the booke of life and the dead were iudged of those things which were written in the bookes according to their works Here is mention of two bookes the booke of Gods decree and the booke of the Conscience Why the Lord tearmes the booke of conscience bookes called bookes because of the manifold bills and inditments that are written in the leanes of the conscience which are sufficient for the iudgement of the wicked therefore as often as we heare of Gods executions in punishing we heare nothing of the booke of his decree because to what purpose should God bring in his decree to conuince a wicked man when his conscience giueth in euidence sufficient against him it might rather cause cauill then true conuiction But in the execution of his mercie we heare of the booke of life because therein lieth a principall cause of our saluation Therefore I take it in this place Death only froÌ„ finne and therfore hath no â—â—gher cause further then the cause no inquiâ—â—e that the Lord speaking of bookes and of a booke would haue vs take notice that for iudgement we neede to looke no further then the bookes of conscience therefore I take it that the Scripture neuer speaketh of a booke of death Againe when we looke vpon our saluation we must eye the booke of life that so we may ascribe all the praise of our saluation vnto the Lord. So in this place the Lord is about his execution vpon the wicked God in himself workes out of all time in the are â—ure in due time therefore he pulls not out the booke of his decree but appeales vnto their owne consciences so that order which was before the Lord from all
not to bee are contradictorie these cannot differ respectiuely but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 integris essentijs simply and in their whole beeing if there be any difference then either of the will it selfe or the act or the obiect not of the will for first he cannot will it voluntate beneplaciti with his secret wil for that alwaies wils the best nec voluntate signi with his reuealed will for we are sure his law forbids it neither with both together for then if the one should will it then likewise should the other but we are sure that Gods reuealed will hateth sinne and the very beeing of sinne therefore no will in God that would sinne to be and not to be Againe for the act of his will we say it is threefold in the creatures first 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is according to his good pleasure this God approoues effects and is delighted with it and that can no wayes be carried to two contrarie obiects as to will sinne to come to passe and to will it not to come to passe The second act is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gods dispensation and this belongs to prouidence where God wils no euill thing to happen yet vpon the accident will he dispose of it A careful master of a family wills not euill to happen in his house yet he is carefull to dispose of any euill accident and this hath nothing to doe with Gods deeree The third action is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and here it is true that God does permit sinne but to permit sinne comes farre short of willing sinne to be and for the obiect that is most certaine that the verie tearmes are contradictorie to will sinne to be and to will it not to bee wherefore finding neither contrarie wills to bring forth contrarie acts nor contrary acts about one subiect nor one subiect to be applied to contrarie acts we conclude to will sinne to bee and not to be to defend contradiction Thirdly they make Gods will to haue euil effects as to incline to finne to harden not onely by desertion but actiuely and positiuely yea to impell constraine command Sathan and wicked men to conceiue plot and attempt mischeife nay more efficaciter procurare effectually to procure that they perform the same c. And thus much concerning the first argument drawne from that which they seeme to impose vpon Gods will I will produce the rest of the arguments and then I will resolue them 2. Obiect The second generall argument is from Gods decree that which makes Gods decree an effectuall cause of sin makes God himselfe the author of sinne but this seemes to bee done by our Diuines … um effiâ—ax pe … m first because they make Gods decree of sinne not a bare permission and then must it needs be the other which is effectuall for betwixt the permissiue decree of sinne and effectuall there is no meane and therefore either the one or the other and that they make it not the permissiue it wil appeare if we consider these three things primo quod deus vult vt fiat Eâ—ficere impedire pâ—â—mttere hoc efficaciter efficit secundo quod vult vt non fiat hoc efficaciter impedit tertio quod neque vult vtifiat neque vult vtmon fiat hoc permittit creaturae that is that which God would haue to be that God effecteth secondly that which God will not haue to be that he effectually hindreth thirdly that which he neither would to bee or not to be that he permits vnto the creature Now our men will not haue Gods decree to bee of this third kind and therfore must it be one of the former not the second for if God should will to hinder sinne then it could not be and if the first to will sinne to be then must hee needs effect it efficaciter and so an effectuall decree Secondly Iâ—â—editio dei euentus sunt causa eâ—feâ—tum the point is thus further vrged quod Deus non impedit ideo euenit quia Deus non impedit quod non est ideo non est quia Deus vult non esse that is Gods not impedition or hindrance and the euent that follows vpon it are coupled together as the cause and effect and that immediatly therefore if our Diuines hold that man falls because God doth not hinder it then must they needes make Gods not impedition or not hindring an energeticall or operatiue effecting of the euent existence or beeing of sinne And this is further to be pressed vpon our Diuines by the consideration of a double sinne one of commission and another of omission the one de vetito of the thing forbidden and that is commission the other de praecepto of the thing commanded and that is omission Now not to hinder a sinne of commission is by our Diuines to concurre to the very act which cannot be done of man without sinne yea and God is said so to concurre that he is the first cause of that act man the second God moouing man and in that sort that man necessarily must followe Gods power in moouing him and so of necessitie must produce this act and therefore the commission is principally laid vpon God Againe not to binder a sinne of omission is by their sentence not to giue man that grace whereby he might be kept from the sinne of omission or made able to performe the contrarie therefore God concurring to the first and denying his grace to the second must needes commit and omit that which man commits and omits Nay more then that not onely a concause but a sole cause because man can not resist the motion of the first cause and therefore cannot offend following an irresistable motion seeing hee could not sinne propria voluntate but by Gods compulsion Here then it seemes that the decree is effectuall 1. because not barely permissiue and 2. because they make the not hindring ioyne with the euent as a necessarie cause But here they distinguish first of the necessitie of consequence and the necessitie of a cause or the reasons themselues as if I should say a man is a lyon then the consequent is necessarie that he hath foure legges yet the reasons or parts are not necessarie for it is neither necessarie that man should be a lyon or foure footed But the answer may be infringed that the consequence is either of a proposition or a syllogisme and then the consequence which is the conclusion followes by way of cause as for the example if a man be a lyon then he is foure footed is a necessarie consequence but now assume a man is a lyon this is contingent yea false and will neuer suffer the consequent to be concluded But in Gods decree they make it also to assume and inferre the conclusion and therefore a cause As for example That which God hath decreed comes to passe but mans fall is decreed therefore it comes to passe Here Gods
on his sword Adam to sinne what arguments are they in reason surely causes and effects Now to kil and may kill fall and may fall sinne and may sinne what new inuention haue they brought into reason are they not still cause aâ—d effect A man may laugh therfore if he bring his facultie into exercise it is become necessarie Surely betwixt a reason in potentia in power to argue and actu there is no substantiall change The Coryphaeus of Logitians defines an argument quod est ad arguendum affectum that is which is affected to argue All men know that the power of a thing is more neere the beeing then the act and therfore a thing can part with his act but neuer with his power or facultie A man doth not alwaies laugh nay he may alwaies be a mourning Heraclitus yet he cannot part with the facultie And if it was contingent for Adam to fall surely beeing fallen the cause is not altered onely that which might be is come to passe That which I feared saies Iob is come vpon me when he feared it it was contingent but now it is necessarie strange reason that for bringing a thing into act that was in power to the act or for a little change of time nature should be altered fire will be fire wheresoeuer it is and nature will be nature whensoeuer it is Let any answer me this one thing did God intend to create all things necessarie or some things necessarie and some things contingent If all things necessarie then let vs become Stoickes if some things contingent then I aske when those contingent things were made did they then become necessarie where is then any contingent thing made of God Euery thing you say is necessarie when it is therefore when God had made all things all things were necessarie This kinde of discourse will hold no water and for my part away with this necessitie But doe you desire to know what a necessarie thing is then in a word it is this The definition of necessitie That which is alwaies true and neither can nor could be otherwise To be alwaies true is common to contingencie and necessitie for God with whome all things are present knew them alwaies to be true yet not necessarie but here lies the difference that neither can nor could be otherwise Dare any affirme this of Adam surely then farwell all libertie and make God the true cause of sinne for beloued immutabilitie and necessitie are most principally in God and therefore from him and where you finde them acknowledge God the author If then Adams fall was of this kind it must needes be from God This argument shall be cleared when I come to the answers 4. Obiect Is drawne from the end or if you like not that because may be you will say reprobation is not mans end but Gods glorie in reprobation therefore thus I frame the argument Reprobation is a punishment now our Diuines hold that God reprobated man without consideration of his sinne therefore he punisheth man and yet not for sinne which must needs be iniustice That it is a punishment I prooue it thus Punishments according to the Schooles are either poena sensus or poena damni the punishment of sense lies in sensible torments the punishment of the damned by an Emphasis is a separation from God now reprobation is a separation from God because it is Gods desertion of man thus then if they make Gods will euill the decree of his will an effectuall cause of sinne mans will necessarily thereunto compelled and reprobation mans ende or if you please a meanes vnto the same then will it follow that they make God the author of sinne but all this you see prooued and therefore our diuines make God the author of sinne The accusation is heauie in loue therefore vnto Gods Saints and the defence of his faithfull ministers I will labour to resolue euerie one of these arguments The resolution of the former arguments To the first argument from Gods will that he wills the being existing and euent of sinne I answer by this distinction that there is a double being Gods willing of sinne to be is not the beeing of sinne existing or euent of sinne in regard of a double cause First that which man giues vnto it proceeding from his free-will and this is none of Gods the second is from God and that is an existing beeing and euent which God will draw out of sinne and this is not sinnes beeing existing or euent but Gods therefore when they say God wills that sinne should be that is he wills a beeing out of sinne first his owne glorie secondly a better good then otherwise man could haue knowne and this fiat sit eueniat existat which be the words of our Diuines is good and that this is their meaning it is cleare for say they God wills sinne to be for his glorie now sinne in his owne nature is against his glorie therefore he cannot will the being of sinne for then should he will against his glorie but he wills some euent beeing or existing which he knowes will make for his glorie Secondly God wills sinne to bee exist happen from man onely but that is the first beeing of sinne as the sinnefull action lookes at the sinnefull man whereof you heard before that a sinnefull action was onely in sense an action done by a sinnefull person But you will say how should this be done without sinne I answer here God is first said to permiâ—it to be done secondly to worke it by accident but you will say comes any thing to passe because God permits yes therefore it comes to passe because God will permit for that which God will not permit cannot come to passe and this hee doth most willingly Now when God permits in this sort he is said not to concurre with the worker of the thing but leaues him freely to himselfe this is that desertion which our Diuines speake of for if God should haue concurred to haue produced in man the act of not willing sinne and haue confirmed him in the contrarie then man should not haue fallen and this is that which Caluin affirmes that God gaue Adam posse quod voluit sed non velle quod potuit that is to be able to doe what he would but not to will that which he had power to will therefore that not impedition permission or desertion was a cause why he did not will but none why he did will that which he did will But you will obiect that not to will was a sinne and God was the cause of that I answer it is both a sinne and no sinne a sinne when it flowes from a will that is immediately bound vnto it therefore the very not willing was in Adam a sinne of omission but that not to will which Adam might haue willed did not bind God at all for God was not bound to make Adam to will God might with-drawe himselfe from that
members become sinnefull It is not simply a sinne to looke on a woman for so much as to see is done by the concurrence of a rule of Gods wisdome but in that it is to lust after a woman and so here the eye looking vpon this tree is made sinnefull because inwardly she lusts after it and that is expressed in the next words when shee saies a tree to be desired and the ende of that is to get knowledge This ende is good but will not iustifie the action because the very eating for this end was expressely forbidden The 3. act is taking of the fruit thereof neither can this simply be condemned for it might be they might haue gathered the fruit and I am thereunto perswaded because this tree as well as the rest was for man and some good vse might haue beene made thereof 〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉 conâ—â—â—ing the first sinne The 4. act And did eate neither here am I of Arminius minde that meant subtilly to crosse an argument in M. Perkins by affirming that the very act was forbidden The natural act was good but onely the morall act which was respectiue and in reference to Gods law that onely was sinnefull The 5. act And gaue also vnto her husband this was likewise a sinne seeing God had made her a helper vnto him to become his ruine this was the breach of charitie The last act and he did eate To this some might reply but how could this bee a sinne seeing he was ignorant of it to which I answer 〈◊〉 present 〈…〉 in 〈◊〉 First I doubt not but by that excellent knowledge he had he was able vpon the very sight thereof to know that it was the fruit of the forbidden tree God brought him the beasts of the field and he named them according to their natures he knewe his wife when shee was brought vnto him these were farre more difficult then to know euery seuerall fruit in the garden seeing they are so easily distinguished by many outward appearances therefore questionlesse he knew the fruit But then you will obiect man was more foolish then the woman for shee did it by strong perswasions and he without any more adoe vpon his very wiues giuing it did eate thereof alas neuer thinke so But how then was he tempted surely I thinke it was not a new disputation betwixt his wife and himselfe that as the deuil had dealt with her so she might deale with her husband for if Adam had been absent all the while of that communication and then the serpent and the deuill in the serpent had been departed that Adam would so soone haue yeelded vnto her motion Secondly it is said that as soone as shee desired it she tooke it and did eate if this was done in the place where shee stood then assuredly her eyes would haue been open to haue seene the offence before she could haue brought Adam vnto it Thirdly if she must first haue plucked the fruit and then haue carried it to Adam and lastly haue disputed with Adam for the eating of it it had been too long a time for a woman with child in sinning and longing for an apple or a figge or what else the fruit was to haue staied her appetite so long and therefore as I doubt not but she presently are it so presently her husband yeelded too and so both their eyes were opened together But you will say did Adam stand by all the time of their disputation I know no other meaning of the text but that it should be so and therefore Adam was exceedingly too blame to suffer his wife to haue such communication with the serpent hee should haue shut him out at the first entrance for God set him to keepe the garden that no beasts should come in it Now tell me I beseech you what concourse Gods law had in mans fall and the selfe-same is my iudgement that God had in it Now the lawe stood at hand to haue ioyned with man to haue brought forth his obedience vnto God and haue kept him from all sinnes of omission but man would not heare the voice of the lawe but of the deuill against the law therefore no maruell if he fell So then the Lord concurred by his law I will vse the word of Arminius quantum decuit yea and quantum oportuit as much as was seemely and as much as was expedient and this none of our Diuines denie if I may speake it bona venia with the good liking of all Arminians so that God withheld none of this grace from him but as I said before the deede of his will or that velle quod potuit which was not of such absolute necessitie neither wanted man any concourse if he had been as good as his meanes were But you say further Gods will no irresistable motion to mans â—ill the motion was irresistable and so man was no faultie cause seeing he could doe no better Alas had they all those free actions in sinne and yet did nothing proprijs voluntatibus I see nothing at all done by them but was done most freely But then you say the will of God might haue beene frustrated Alas senslesse creatures when the Apostle saies who hath resisted the will of God at any time is most certaine in very reason it selfe for the superiour cause can neuer suffer of the inferiour cause therefore if mans will should goe about to resist or frustrate the will of God it were euen against reason it selfe for then should Gods wil suffer of mans will And againe with Arminius God forbid it should be otherwise but that consilium Deistaret that Gods counsell should stand and therefore God hath an irresistable will and if that then the motion of his will is also irresistable if this then man cannot resist it and if he cannot resist then is hee mooued irresistably to sinne Fiue propositions to explaine how Gods will cannot be resisted stay there the consequence is false I know you will graunt me these fiue propositions and I know no more that our Diuines defend first that Gods will is the supreame cause secondly that Gods will cannot suffer thirdly that none can resist it fourthly that his motion is likewise irresistable fiftly that neither men nor angels can resist it But tell mee how you can prooue your consequence therefore man in sinning followes Gods irresistable motion I know no such consequence either in the Scriptures or our men for euery motion of Adam and the woman were most free and they followed most willingly their owne motion But you will say God decreed this motion true yet no cause thereof for he decreed man should be the cause of it himselfe But could this be done and yet God be no cause thereof yes assuredly for you are deceiued of Gods decree by putting it into the thing when it is in himselfe And here I will cleare vnto you another way that God takes in his decree then you imagine First Gods decree ariseth from
before him in his creatures now Gods is first in himselfe and then in the things Secondly in man his plot is but a forme in his head distinct from his beeing but in God both the forme of his working and himselfe are all one Thirdly there is in man an Idaea or forme of working before he worke the thing in genesi that is before he compose any thing according to his first conceit which is not before but after himselfe but Gods is neither before nor after himselfe and therefore we must not looke first for Gods Idaeas in things and then in God but first in God and then in things And here I beseech you take notice of the absurditie of many Diuines and grosse ignorance concerning the point of Election and Reprobation expraevisa massa corrupta that it needs must be of man in the estate of his sinne and so make Gods Idaea or the plot of his counsell whereby he decreed to be first in the things and then in God which is cleane contrarie Indeede we vse to say you stand there therefore I see you and not I see you and therefore you are there but in God it is contrarie God saw Adam to fall and therefore be fell Againe prescience can not be properly in God seeing God directly sees all at once and together and therefore can not see one thing before an other yet as God lookes vpon the creature one thing is saide to goe before an other and this may be tearmed prescience but this is that second knowledge of God which we call indirect and here all things are seene of God as they are the images of his wisdome For if he see all things in himselfe then must he needes see all things out of himselfe indirectly the reason is because whatsoeuer God sees directly it is himselfe and therefore the creatures beeing not himselfe he sees them indirectly The Schoole-men speake much of this speculum trinitatis for say they Angels Saints see in God otherwise then by the creatures and therefore are able to know any thing It is true God can reueale yea and hath reuealed not onely vnto Saints in heauen but Apostles and Prophets many things that neuer came by the way of the creature yet we must conceiue that the Lord did irradiate and shine vpon their vnderstanding by an other image then his owne and therefore it was diuine reuelation by working vpon their vnderstandings an Idaea or plot of knowledge which is out of himselfe As God is said to view all principles that is the simple beeing of things he is called an intelligent wise and vnderstanding God 2. the truth of these things and this is Gods omniscience for the present God fore know ledge or prescience for future and neither of both are idle speculations Therefore Gods knowledge or foreknowledge beeing of truths and truths are to pronounce as things are and things are because God doth pronounce them to be therefore God vseth to say I know you not I doe not acknowledge you Againe the Lord knowes the way of the righteous that is works it approoues it And therefore it is not according to the Papists whome the Lord foreknew would doe good or the Lutherans whome he knew would beleeue or others whome he knew would not fall but his will and knowledge goe together I can as well say God had a will to doe all things that were possible as well as a prescience for his will was omnipotent as well as his knowledge and therefore hee could as well if it pleased him to will any possible thing to be as to foreknowe it to be yet this I am sure of that a thing possible and now come to passe was as well willed of God as foreknowne of God And though I would bring no strange opinions yet this seemes to be reasonable that whatsoeuer God knowes it is either something or nothing now something is immediately demonstrated from his will this thing is because God willed it for his will is the cause of all beings not his knowledge therefore to vs in any beeing we must first take notice of his will and then of his knowledge Man is fallen this is the will of God and not his meere foresight for things done can neuer be resolued into an higher cause then his will and for nothing that is alwaies vnderstood per oppositum ens by his contrarie which is some thing Now because further we find in the creatures No discourse in God yet in his creatures one reason puls in another prius posterius a first and a second so that here we conceiue of God as though he did discourse of one thing from another The truth is he sees them simul and semel yet because for our capacitie he hath said he hath antica postica a face and back parts and his back-parts are reuealed vnto vs by a prius and posterius a first a last we giue sapience vnto God which is of all coÌ„clusions and diductions from their true fountaines Againe because the Lord hath set an order and contriued euery thing most fitly and conueniently for time place and person we call him a prudent God And as he hath most substantially effected all things we call it great art and skill Now all this cannot be without the good will and pleasure of our God which respecting himselfe makes himselfe the chiefe good and therefore he made the world for no neede he had of it Secondly in respect of the creatures bearing his image they were all of them good yea and very good if all were done 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by his good pleasure or according thereunto then is God the most free agent because first most absolute 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 propriè and therefore Arminius blasphemes against God in saying that God doth worke most necessarily because he hath no libertie of will as well to euill as to good for saies he that which is onely vnto good hath no freedome but necessitie thereunto He knows not that liberum arbitrium free-will belongs to counsel and that cause that can worke by counsell hath free will For arbitrium belongs to reason liberum to will and therefore free-will Free-will a wit and a will or a â—â—lling wittines is nothing but a willing wittinesse and that is counsell To doe willingly is the worke of the wil and to doe wittingly is of the wit or vnderstanding Thus then you haue heard the concourse of God with his creature the creature depending must be gouerned beeing gouerned must obey obeying must obserue his rule and yet beeing mutable may leaue off to giue due respect vnto it and this non attendentia makes him slippe out of Gods way into his owne as may plainly be seene by the first sinne where the Law offered his concourse but man denied his Againe you see how God doth decree in himselfe and therefore first we are to know that God in decreeing follows no creature directa
necessarily must needes be a cause The answer is it is a necessarie conclusion by way of ratiocination or discourse but not from the argument it selfe the disposition makes it necessarie but the third reason is no necessarie cause seeing that the action of Gods decree as out of himselfe and in the creature is externally and materially to be considered and so is not necessarie but contingent temporarie and mutable and therefore if it had pleased God it might haue fallen out otherwise for euery necessarie truth is an eternall truth And therefore that which is in time and not eternall is contingent mutable and alterable That which is said to the interceding cause betwixt Gods decree and the fall Of the interceding cause to wit mans free will to exempt God from sinne is most true for God did not immediatly worke mans fall But you obiect that the remote cause is as well sinfull as the next because the deuill was the remote cause and yet guiltie of the same sinne Adam commited A speciall neuerprooues a generall The answer is when the causes are vniuocall homogeniall and of the same order of working but in causes heterogeniall and equiuocall which are of diuerse natures the remote cause is neuer tainted with the same fault that the next cause is As wine is a remote cause why a man is drunke yet no faultie-cause of his drunkennesse The Gospell and our Sauiour Christ came to send a sword into the world but yet were no true causes of sedition and quarrels among men The Sunne raiseth putrified creatures out of dead carkases it can harden as well the clay as melt the waxe A sonne desires the death of his father so doth God One thing effected of diuerse causes may bee faultie in one but not in another but the sonne breaks Gods commaundement God doth it according to the true rule of iustice a sonne would haue his father liue God would the contrarie yet a sinne in neither And therfore a remote cause is onely guilty of the same offence with the next when they worke all after one forme and manner otherwise the immediate cause is the onely author of the sinne al the rest by accident and by abuse The Gospel is the sauour of death vnto death as well as the free will of man but not eodem genere causandi after the same manner of working Pharaoh hardneth his owne heart so doth God but the one immediatly the other mediatly by the abuse of mans freewill Therfore the answer is from the distinction of remote causes in vniuocall causes the remote cause is as guiltie as the next and therefore the deuills will In causes vniuocall all are guiltie of the same crime but not in equivocall and mans will working vnivocally are both in the same offence but Gods will and mans worke equiuocally the one one way and the other another and therefore no neede of participation seeing they haue no next genus of a cause in which they should communicate Answer to Gods desertion To the third euasion betwixt infallibilitie and necessitie it is granted that man fell infallibly but not necessarily except we vnderstand it of Gods decree in himselfe and then the truth was an eternall truth And in this sense our Diuines hold it not of any necessitie in mans will therefore it was only necessarie in Gods wll but contingent in mans yet the truth it selfe in the thing is to God and man contingent to God most certen but to man vncertaine For desertion we hold that God did not forsake man in any necessarie requisite for his true obedience vnto the law onely he with-held his confirmation of man If a man were set in some office for triall of his gifts is it necessarie that he should be confirmed in it I trow not and therefore this desertion was of confirmation and not of necessarie helpes for execution And here our Orthodoxe writers when they answer to that argument that iustice and mercie presuppose misery Misâ—rie potentiall reall habituall make answer of a threefold miserie first actuall which is in sense and feeling secondly habitual which is in the bosome of a man but as yet puts not forth it selfe the third potentiall into which a man may fall and this they call a miserie in comparison Iob 4.18 Behold he found no steadfastnesse in his seruants and laid folly vpon his angels Iob 9.2 Howe should man compared vnto God be iustified Habituall and actuall miserie had no place in man by his creation but possible or potentiall miserie was laid in the freedome of his will which if God had inclined vnto good and man so determined then had he come into the estate of the blessed Angels and so miserie had been impossible and his estate should haue been confirmed vnto him with God for euer not from the freedom of his will but from his obedience and Gods promise thereunto Therefore that desertion and not collation of necessarie helpe to auoide sinne is to be vnderstood of this third grace which was not a grace of creation but a further liberallity which God might haue bestowed if it had pleased him But I dare not rest satisfied with this answer because I see this third grace was onely to be obtained by the obedience of the creature that is if he did the will of God then would God haue beene as good as his promise thou shalt liue therefore in my iudgement Confirmation of life by creation was to follow our obedience vnto the 〈◊〉 confirming grace was a subsequent grace to followe obedience and not an antecedent grace to goe before it and so the angels obtained it by their obedience and from their obedience are confirmed if then without their obedience they could not be confirmed then must confirming grace belong vnto the law of creation as well as any other for what grace should man haue receiued by creation but that which God would haue communicated vnto him by the rule of obedience doe this and thou shalt liue to confirme him in life was vpon his doing I answer therefore Desertion 1. in not rebuking Sathan 2. In diuiding of the lawe and his facultie 3. In that God suffered man to be distracted and did not hold him close vnto his law in despite of the deuill that desertion is no cause of mans sinne but that God was wel-pleased to suffer the deuill to worke more strongly in the temptation then mans will should be able to oppose not for power giuen but for present act and as in this temptation the law forsooke man so God may most iustly bee said to forsake him I haue before declared that two things are most necessary for euery good action rule and power which if both concurre not the action cannot bee produced Now the law concurred not and therefore man was forsaken of the lawe not actiuely but passiuely euen as a master should promise his seruant all aide and succour as long as hee would
be faithful but after he begins to manifest the least appearance of his infidelitie vtterly to cast him off so Gods law would haue vtterly vanquished the deuill but man proouing vnfaithfull Gods lawe wholly reiected him Secondly if it had pleased God he might haue kept the deuill from man or haue assisted his will that he might neuer haue yeelded vnto the temptation so then God not giuing the will and the deed and the law beeing forsaken no maruell if vpon these desertions man sinned the one had not beene wanting had not man been wanting vnto himselfe and the presence of the other was not necessarie neither did God in his wisedome thinke that it was conuenient man then had sufficient but not absolutely to stand and this desertion or confirming grace might well bee withdrawne from man And herein there was no merit of desertion except that of the lawe neither did God make man will any such thing yet concerning the former distinction it may well be said that Gods election freed his owne from the possibilitie of euerlasting miserie and so their fall was but a passage to a better life and reprobation on the contrarie suffered the rest to fall and lie in euerlasting miserie For the other that mans fall was a meere consequence of Gods decree it is false in simple propositions but in connexion it may be true where the parts do not force it but the connexion as if God decree then it must needes come to passe To the third argument from mans will I answer Concerning the freedome of mans will it is not necessarie that the thing which cannot be frustrated should constrain men to sinne The gates of hell shall not preuaile against Gods Church this is no constraining of the libertie of the wicked Rom. 9. the Iewes were cut off yet v. 6. it cannot be that the word of God should take no effect He is said to be frustrated of his hopes that misseth of his end but he that is certaine of his ende can no wayes be deceiued of his expectation neither for this purpose is it necessarie that the meanes tending thereunto should be brought in by violence To be frustrated is one thing to be constrained is another they are indeed both vnder a cause by accident yet the efficient is constrained in the one to produce his effect in the other not constrained yet produceth an effect beside his scope and intent To worke by violence and â—â—â—stra differ modo 〈◊〉 they haue both of them an externall worker yet in the one it is necessitie in the other fortune and chance the one is because of ignorance and so may bee frustrated of his intent but the other cannot haue his scope and libertie to goe about that which he intendeth Now with God there is no ignorance and he cannot worke any thing frustrà or in vaine and therefore nothing can fall out beside his scope I meane that which he intended directly to bring to passe therefore it is chance and fortune that makes vs giue God an infallibilitie of decreeing not a necessitie of performing it is one thing for God infallibly to bring a thing to passe and necessarily To the second The difference betwixt the internall and externall act libertie is not taken away because his act is to one thing therefore obserue this distinction there is a twofold act one internall which is immediately from the forme acting vpon his owne matter and this is eternall inseparable and immutable But the second which is more externall and working on obiects out of it selfe is mutable temporall and separable as for example the facultie of laughter as it flowes from the reasonable soule acting and bestirring it selfe in our bodies is an inseparable act yet that motion which should bee in regard of externall obiects of laughter is separable yea a man may be without it for euer So then to our purpose that libertie that ariseth from our wills inwardly acting is inseparable yet that which should worke vpon externall obiects is separable and God may determine it at his will and pleasure and yet let man haue his essentiall libertie The externall act is separable without which the wil is not a will If then in all naturall things the externall act or that which we call the second be separable why may not the will of man be depriued of such an act as this In sinne surely our will for externall obiects onely flies on euill yet that first act is not taken away whereby by Gods grace it may be set againe and that in heauen onely to runne vpon good the angels in heauen haue their libertie and yet they are al waies to act good God is most free yet he hath neither first nor second act which may possibly be inclined vnto euill Here Arminius for his opposition is faine to defend that God hath no libertie of willing and angels in heauen haue such as they might become deuills for I am sure if they haue freedome as well to good as euill then may they will euill which if he should vnderstand of the first act then it were most true but they are confirmed in the second act still to cry holy holy Lord God of Sabboths But Arminius saies and confesseth that although God by vs be defended to take away libertie which he saies is secundum motum voluntatis yet he affirmes that the naturall motion of the will is still remaning but neither libertie nor naturall motion can stand with coaction or violence seeing that both naturâ and consilio efficere to worke by nature and counsell are causes that produce by an internall and innate principle and therfore free from coaction and violence And here I admire that he hath forgotten his Logicke For the third reason it is true that necessitie and contingencie can neuer stand together but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wholly and simply differ and therefore I will neuer hold that man fell necessarily and in that I consent with Arminius To the fourth obiection that reprobation is a punishment it is thus answered Reprobation is either a simple reiection or preterition or els damnation it selfe The first is opus voluntatis liberae the second voluntatis necessariae The preterition of God is his most free will but damnation is a necessarie act of diuine iustice for sinne and transgression 2. Thess 1.6 that all men are vasa vessells that is from God but that they are vasa irae vessells of wrath that is from themselues Gen. 1. all Gods workes were good Ioh. 8. when the deuill speakes a lie ex proprijs loquitur he speakes it of himselfe because he is a lyar and the father of lies and therefore when we sinne we sinne of our selues Yet besides all this there is a third and that is vasa praeparata Reprobatio est praed imnaâ—â—â— non damnatio ipsa vessells prepared and that is from God So then Gods preterition is no
giue all men satisfaction and that no man would euer be able to make any sound replie to it it is become as the winde in the bowels that will not be remooued except the hotest medicines be applied and that by the iudgement of the best Physitians These rumours may daunt a weake spirit and make him despaire to encounter with such a tempest that strikes all downe before it But seeing God is in the calme more then in the rushing wind and that the truth is freely to be bought of all that meane not to sell him for the plausible opinions of the world I am bold in the confidence of my God and the loue of his truth to rescue a faithfull seruant of God out of the hands of as subtill an aduersarie as euer set pen to such a worke And why should I be afraid seeing he that walks in the midst of the golden Candlesticks holds euery starre in his right hand to protect guide and defend them as long as they walke with him O therefore thou which art the truth teach me in thy truth that I erre not thou which art the way guide me in thy way that I wander not and thou which art the life quicken my soule with the life of grace that I may speake in the chiefe mysterie of my saluation from the true experience of thy loue shedde abroad in mine owne heart M. Perk. Predestination is first to be grounded out of Gods word secondly out of true principles of reason I. Ar. It is true that the word of God and innate principles are the true foundation of all this doctrine yet because the fal hath blotted out these principles we must alwaies haue recourse to examine them by Gods word which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in stead of all Collation This is Christianly spoken on both sides indeed the Philosopher saies contra negantem principia non est disputandum he that denies principles is vnworthie to be disputed withall yet mans principles be they neuer so common are not to be trusted without Gods word M. Perk. First principle God is alwaies iust though man be not able to comprehend it in his owne reason I. Ar. This notion is most true onely caution is to be taken that we iudge not the cause by the effect it is iust therefore God wills it but from this antecedent God wills it therefore it is iust Collat. This confession as yet makes no breach betwixt them yet this I would adde that seeing we onely vnderstand God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 à posteriore and not à priore his backe-parts and not his face that it is lawfull to conclude from the effects to the cause as this thing is done and except God had willed it it could not haue bin done and therefore there is a iust reason for it in Gods will though we can not perceiue it which is the minde of M. Perkins which he would haue corrected M. P. 2. Principle God is independent from all second causes yet all second causes are dependent vpon him euen when they doe vniustly I. A. Occasion taken from the creatures is not to make God depend on them for his will but absolutely to will that occasion yet if that occasion had not bin giuen from them God would neuer haue willed decreed or ordained it The subiection of the creature to vanitie is from him that subiected it yet if man his cause had not giuen this occasion God had neuer willed this subiection It was Gods will that Christ should be sent which neuer had bin willed of God but vpon the occasion of mans fall It is Gods will that sinne should be punished yet mans fall gaue the occasion without which God would neuer haue punished man Gen. 18. Exod. 32.1 Sam. 2. The Iudge of the whole world will doe iustly 2. He that sinnes shall be put out of my booke 3. God forbid but that they that honour me should be honoured of me and they that contemne me should be contemned of me Yet in all this irrogation or imposing of punishment the Lord is absolute and independent otherwise the creature would leaue nothing vnassaied to escape Gods hand Collat. M. Perkins meaning is to make God independent euery wayes and therefore by a Synechdoche he puts second causes for all kind of reason that can bee drawne from them Now causation is the first and most perfect reason that can be in things from God therefore God is not onely independent as his creatures worke with him but also for all other reason that can be drawne from them Therefore occasion giuen by the creature beeing a reason must either depend from God or God must depend from it if it depend from God then Gods will was before it but if God depend from it then was this occasion before Gods will and to make any thing before Gods will is to denie his will to be absolute For the three examples First it is true that the occasion of the creatures subiection vnto vanitie was mans sinne but no occasion of Gods will who absolutely willed as much as hee occasioned For the second mans fall was the occasion of Christs sending into the world but not of Gods will to send his Son which was before all occasions For the third mans sinne is the occasion why God will punish but no occasion why hee should ordaine to punish For his admonition to distinguish betweene to ordaine and decree is profitable but not according to his exposition For saith he to ordaine is to set an order in things done and not to ordaine facienda vt fiant things to be done that they may bee But he is to know that discerno is to see asunder and is as generall as all reason wherby all Gods works are seene asunder Of the same signification is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from whence comes dialectica the art of reason now reason is first to find out things secondly hauing found them out to iudge them which iudgement is either of truth or falshood as in propositions or of consequence inconsequence as in Syllogismes or of order and confusion as in method And in this last part to ordaine is properly manifested therefore is a speciall branch of discerning and by a Synecdoche of the speciall for the generall may be put for decreeing yet properly to decree is a worke of counsell wisely discerning of euerie speciall reason truth consequent or any other thing that may make for his scope prefixed then to ordaine is the wise laying together of all these things that all confusion and disorder may be escaped and euery thing most sweetly brought vnto his end appointed of the Lord. Here take notice of three kinds of knowledge disputed among the Schoolemen Knowledge possibile actuall conditional 1. possibilis intelligentia 2. actualis 3. conditionalis The first is of all possible things that neuer shall be the secōd of all things that are or shal be the
third of such things as would bee if such and such things went before If Caine doe well he shall be accepted Gen. 4. if Dauid stay in Keilah the lords of the citie will deliuer him if I continue in beleeuing then I shall be saued if I continue in sinne I shall bee damned And on this knowledge for any thing that I can perceiue doe the Papists and Lutherans hang all predestination and so make Gods will the consequent in decreeing and mans will the antecedent in giuing God the occasion The deceit is this that from the connexion of things they iudge of Gods will about things which is most indirect and a knowledge that agrees not to God but at the second hand It is true that the first knowledge beeing iudged according to logicall inuention is of things possible for arguments or reasons afore they come to bee disposed are onely in potentia ad arguendum haue an affection to argue and so many things that might be haue this potentiall kind of reason and so we say they are knowne of God because we so conceiue of them The second knowledge which is more actuall is properly science the laying together of those things which before were onely in affection to argue The third is of these things which beeing laid together can no otherwise haue force of reason but vpon connexion and supposition and in this head would they tie Gods decree and knowledge when indeed God followes no such suppositions but absolutely knowes and wills what he pleaseth yet seeing his decree is as large as all reason it cannot otherwise be imagined but that in the manifestation of it all reason should appeare And so we grant a connexion supposition condition and occasion in all Gods works that is in the effects of his will but none of all these in the will it selfe Therefore they doe amisse to put that vpon his will which is the cause which ought to be in the effect of his will and thereupon no antecedent of Gods will but meere consequents That creation should go before the fall the fall before redemption redemption before saluation and sinne before damnation are all of them most necessarie suppositions connexions conditions and if you please occasions And thus much for that occasion which is to Arminius delphicus gladius but it cuts asunder such knots as God hath tied together whose will in all things drawes the first linke and cannot be drawne of any M. Per. 3. Principle in sense is this that God does all by counsell therefore he hath his scope which he knowes wills and disposeth vnto most prudently and therefore decrees euery thing therevnto I. Ar. The most wise God doth all things for some ende and purpose euen that which he doth not yet hee permits it for some ende and purpose therefore first it is a fault to say that God must either agere be doing or otiose spectare become an idle beholder which is no good distribution for agere and permittere to doe and permit are really distinguished and both these are for good purpose and therefore God must either be doing or an idle beholder are too scant for he may permit Secondly prudence is too short a word to inlarge it selfe to all Gods wisedome Thirdly adhibito certo fine the ende applied finis gratia and for the ende are not all one for no man workes for the ende applied but for the good therein implied Fourthly Deus non vult aut non decernit quod non potest God neither wills nor decrees that which he cannot here no sense except it be further added which he cannot do or permit and therefore the conclusion is most imperfect so God decreed to doe except this be added or permitted Collat. Agere prudenter to doe wisely will beare the sense of permission for permission comming from Gods wil is considered of vs as an effect this effect is produded by counsell therefore for a good ende and purpose so then that which God doth permittere he doth prudenter agere grant then that Gods permission comes from his counsell and aimes at his glorie and then it must bee more then a negatiue act But to speake the truth permission as it is expounded of Arminius maintaines nothing but absurdities First in regard of the cause for saies he permission is voluntatis remissae now such a will as this cannot be in God whose will is meere act and therefore cannot admit of degrees all remissiuenesse of Gods will is in regard of the subiect which is quantum and may be lesse and more but in regard of himselfe it is impossible Secondly a remisse will doth either will or not will or suspend to suspend is neither to hinder nor further the act and so the Lord should haue no stroke in sinne which is the deniall of his prouidence in the apostacie of man if his prouidence did not suspend nor his power then his wil was not to suspend in that action if he did more then suspend then it was either to will or not to will if not to will then sinne should not haue beene therefore God did will it per modum actionis That this may appeare Gods manner of working in sinne we are to consider what manner of efficient causes true reason laies downe vnto vs And the first manner of causes efficient are either to beget or preserue the second to worke alone or with others the third by himselfe or by accident and agere is giuen to euery one of these Let vs then see where Gods action in sinne comes in and because it is most apparent in the third I answer God is the cause of sin by accident And this will appeare if we consider how many causes wrought by an internal principle these were foure the deuill and Adam principally the serpent and the woman instrumentally and all these were blameable causes The externall cause was the lawe and will of God which in mans transgression did all they did by an externall facultie for the lawe is made the sauour of death vnto death not by his own facultie but by the deuills and mans free will and this work of the law was most holy and iust And this is a working cause iustified by the true rule of reason and not a bare permission If a man take a knife and thrust it into his bowels it is the cause of murder and no permission if man therfore was thrust thorow and wounded to the death by the law of God it was no bare permission but a working cause yet in all things vnblameable And therefore to denie Gods will all causation is impossible If a man would faine kill himselfe and could finde no instrument to effect it withall he would be kept from the fact for want thereof so if the Law had not bin man could not haue died Therefore it is most true when our Diuines speake of permission that they doe not in the generall latitude of action exclude it
not able to put life into that dead picture and therefore to goe before them was impossible it would not so much as follow them except they caried it and therefore beasts they were that saw how God went before them in a pillar of fire by night and in a cloud by day and when there enemies were behinde them made this pillar stand behinde them should now put their confidence in a dead picture The Papists say man is Gods image which may be painted therefore may there be an image of God Alas what Papist can paint the soule of man or the righteousnesse and holinesse that is in the foule Thomas Aquinas saies the starres might be worshipped but for feare of Idolatrie euen the selfe same as if I should say a man might cut an other mans throate but for feare of murther to cut the throate and murther are not farre asunder for the first is the cause and must needs bring in the other For heresie meere conceits This is my body Heresie therfore it is so in deed Christ is a rocke a stone a vine therfore he is so in deed nothing but a rocke a stone a vine surely stones and rockes will reason better then thus Christs man-hood is vnited to the deitie therefore it is euery where as though things vnited were confounded and the man-hood were equall with the deitie nay the very selfe same for to haue the same essentiall properties is to haue the same essence Christ must die therfore he is not Christ because be that dies endures not for euer as though the graue hauing shut in Christ three dayes should haue kept him for euer well he rose againe and hath openly manifested himselfe to liue for euer Diues calls in bel father Abraham haue mercie vpon me therefore to call to the Saints is no such intolerable thing a good argument that must needs be fetch out of hell to prooue so damnable an assertion Pope Alexander treading vpon the necke of Fredericke hath his conceit for it vpon the basiliske shalt thou goe the kissing of his feete because the sinner kissed the feet of Christ therefore his church because bone of his bone therefore the Pope because he is the church as beasts Psal 8. are subiect vnto man so all men vnto the Pope surely as beasts for he is the master beast of them all Reu. 13. Two swords in Christs family therefore two kingdomes on the Popes head Peter Act. 10. rise and kill therefore may the Pope excommunicate and kill Princes As good conceits as may be and at the best they are no better For profanation Profanation let vs sinne that grace may abound who will deale thus with a kind friend he is liberall vnto me therefore will I prouoke him to doe me good by my vnkindnesses the Physitian is skilfull and hath cured a deadly disease therefore I will drinke some more poyson that the physitian may not be idle the surgeon hath healed a dangerous wound therefore will I stabbe my selfe in the same place that I may trie him againe If I must be saued I must be saued if damned no remedie why then depriue I my soule of ioy in my pleasures If I should tell thee thou must liue and that is according to Gods appointed time why wilt thou eate or drinke this thou wilt say is a conceit therefore iudge so of the rest for the cause is alike Now I come vnto the reasons 1. Vâ—nity Reas Vanitie of minde Rom. 1.21 But became vaine in their imaginations and their foolish heart was full of darknesse Hence did arise those conceits following that the glorie of the incorruptible God was to be turned into the similitude of the image of a corruptible man and of birds and foure footed beasts and of creeping things this is Idolatrie They turned Gods truth into a lie there is heresie And for prophanation strange to consider what followed hereupon 2. Reason is the abuse of the obiect Selfe-conceit turning it vnto their owne conceit and not their conceit vnto it They would haue their knowledge like vnto Gods that first sees all things in himselfe and after all things in the creatures So would man doe he would first see all things in himselfe and then himselfe in all things when indeede by Gods creation man is made to looke vpon all Gods wisdome in the creatures and so by reflexion to see himselfe euen as a man sees a face in a glasse and by that knowes his owne and he that wil first know his owne face before he see it in Gods glasse will be sure his face shall be a good one and therefore will he neuer see any bad face in Gods law and so shall his iudgement be a conceit of himselfe 3. Reason the violence of passions which are in wicked men Violent 〈◊〉 as a melancholike humour in the bodie which makes men strangely conceited and so stiffe in their opinions that neither wise men by counsel or learned Physitians by purgations and cordialls are able to remooue it except they turne the conceit into an other by letting them plainly see that which fed their humour was so but now is otherwise Tralianus cured a woman that could not be perswaded but that shee had swallowed downe a serpent by causing her cast and priuily caused a serpent to be put into the bason and so shee was deliuered Philotomus cured a person that was conceited that his head was cut off by a tyrant by causing an yron ball to be put into his hat the waight whereof did so sore oppresse him that he cried out his head did ake the standers by tells him why then thou hast an head Some haue thought they haue beene dead men and therefore would not eate because dead men can not eate yet one faining himselfe to be dead and they putting meat into his mouth falls to eating and the conceited person seeing that he falls of eating too and so his life was preserued Others haue beene so resolute in their conceits that they haue died in them as Arthemidorus a Grammarian who vpon the sight of a crocodile was so sore amased that he forgat all his learning and became so madde that he thought his legges and armes were cut off neither would he euer be perswaded to the contrarie Euen thus falls it out with wicked men that either they see one conceit by another to prooue foolish or els they doe so strongly ground themselues in their conceits that they will neuer be drawne to any better perswasions As many an ignorant Papist his fathers were so and he hopes well of them and God forbid that they should be in hell therefore he liues as they did he hopes well Yet others after they haue seene as the Apostle saith no profit of those things whereof they are now ashamed become to change their minds and see all was but a conceit of pleasure Thus men become more wise after sinne committed then before because the passions
conceiue of God nor in life worship him as he ought to be conceiued of and worshipped and therefore Psal 96.4 all the gods of the Gentiles are called Idols Now the heart of man turnes the true God into an Idol by three thoughts 1. That God is not present in all places Psal 10.11 Tush God shall not see Isa 29.15 2. That there is no prouidence of God whereby he obserueth ruleth gouerneth and ordereth all things on earth in particular Psal 10.11 God hideth his face Zeph. 1.12 â— That there is no iustice in God as when men thinke that although they sinne yet God will not punish them Deut. 29.19 Psal 10.3 The wicked man blesseth himselfe in the desire of his heart The second way whereby a man in thought denieth God is by placing some thing in the roome of the true God Phil. 2. whose God is their bellie and riches are the couetous mans idol Col. 3.5 Ephes 5.5 Quest How can this be Ans Looke what soeuer a man thinkes to be the best thing in the world for him besides God that is his god thus riches and pleasures are called the gods of men because they set theiâ— hearts vpon them and take them for the best things in the world for after affection follows opinion And the fruit of this thought thus lead by affection is Atheisme wherby we sundrie waies deny God in practise in iudgement in practise many are infected with this sinne first hypocrites which giue their lips and bodies to God but hold backe their hearts secondly Epicures whereby men giue themselues to pleasures in eating drinking playing as though they were made for nothing els these do not eate that they may liue but liue that they may eate thirdly witches who either by tradition or expresse compact worship the deuill to these also belong those that seeke vnto witches â—s Saul c. Atheisme in iudgment hath three degrees first to conceiue otherwise of God then he hath reuealed himselfe in his word To this head first Turkes belong who though they hold Christ more famous then any Prophet yet will not haue him God and therefore worship God out of the Trinitie and so worship an Idol Secondly of the Iewe who though he acknowledge the true God yet he neither acknowledgeth nor worships him in Christ and therefore worships an idol for Ioh. 4.23 and 24. Christ saith that the Samaritans they worship they know not what Thirdly of the Papist whose religion in substance and scope is meere Atheisme for in word they acknowledge the true God the Trinitie the personall vnion of both Christs natures yet if we regard their manner of worshipping it is coloured and close Atheisme As appeares by these two reasons First the god that they worship is no true God for the true God is infinite in iustice and in mercie but according to their doctrine he is not so because for the iustice of God they hold that the satisfaction of sinneful men are sufficient to satisfie the iustice of God and for his mercie they make that imperfect in that they make a supply to Gods mercie by mans merit for if Gods mercie be not euerie way mercie it is no mercie for grace must euerie way be grace els it is no way grace Second reason the Church of the Papists is a false Church first in that they rob Christ of his manhood by teaching that he is not in heauen locally but in all places where the masse is offered Secondly they disgrace him in his offices in his kingly office in that they place the Pope aboue him his deputie in his presence whereas we know that all commission stayes in the presence of the King secondly in that they ascribe this vnto the Pope that his lawes bind conscience which is as much to take the crowne off Christs head and giue it to the Pope For his Priestly office which consists in satisfaction and intercession they likewise abuse Christ 1. of his satisfaction because they ioyne with it the satisfaction of men in the worke of redemption 2. of his intercession in that they ioyne the virgine Marie an intercessor for them in heauen thus they degradâ— him of his offices and so make him no Christ Now if they denie Christ then the faith 1. Ioh. 2.23 and that religion that denies the faith is no true religion but Atheisme in iudgement The second degree of Atheisme in iudgement is when men place some creature in the roome of the true God Thus the Gentiles worshipped the Sunne Moone and starres in the roome of the true God The third degree in iudgement is when a man holds and professeth no God at all the highest and most notorious degree of all These are not worthie the common breath of men For if a man that saies a lawfull Prince is no Prince must die for it much more is he worthie of death that holds God to be no God Now by the way let euery one of vs examine our selues whether we haue any of these thoughts and imaginations Euery one will say I neuer discerned any such thoughts in my self but alas soone may we deceiue our selues for there is in all of vs first a single thought when a man simply thinkes this or that secondly a double and reflecting thought when a man iudgeth and discernes what he thinks the first belongs to the minde the second to the conscience which is corrupted since Adams fall and therefore can not tell certenly but may be deceiued For the examination of our selues we must proceede by certaine tokens and signes whereby we may discerne this thought in vs Psal 14.3 notes 1. a disordered life 2. not to call vpon Gods name 3. contemning those that put their trust in God If we examine our selues by these three we shall find that this thought raignes among vs. For first we heare the word often but we are not amended and reformed by it I appeale to mens consciences Secondly men goe on in their calling but neuer call vpon God or if they doe it is but for forme and fashion in a few words at ordinarie times but who cries with a hunger after Gods graces or for a supplie of their wants Thirdly no loue of them that trust in God but their profession is hated and contemned Againe whosoeuer denies the presence of God it is a token he holds there is no God In the presence of men we will not offend men but in the presence of God we offend God Againe what is the cause that men vse all vnlawfull meanes to get riches but onely because they denie Gods prouidence Againe euery man reasons thus Though I goe on in my sinnes yet God is mercifull hereby Gods iustice is denied and so no God for the true God is as well a God of iustice as of mercie Here then we see what notorious sinners we are though we had no outward sinnes Eccles. 10.20 If a man curse the King in his priuie chamber the foules shall deuoure
free-will This doctrine hath two branches the first that all the thoughts of wicked men are corrupt and wicked the second that a good thing by accident may be the cause of euill for Thou thoughtest in this place is brought in as a consequent of Gods silence 1. Doct. All mens thoughts by nature are sinnfull this doctrine is alreadie cleared for these reasons haue beene formerly inlarged 1. The fountaine is altogether vncleane and who can bring that which is pure out of corruption not one of a thousand surely none but God 2. Man is depriued of all good consideration and therfore nothing is in his heart but the consideration how to doe euill 3. The vnderstanding is altogether blind the wil and affections neuer seeke after God the whole man is declined from good to euill and all that he doth is vnprofitable 4. Nothing can extend it selfe beyond his nature therefore man beeing carnall and sold vnder sinne cannot get vp so high in his meditations as the lawe of God which is spirituall 5. He who takes counsell with his owne flesh yeelds to his owne lusts discourseth against Gods wisedome lets his owne will raigne is captiuated by the deuill and allured by the world cannot but think of that which is euil against God and man Vse 1. reprehension 1. Confutation of Papists that magnifie free will 2. the world that say thoughts are free they haue good meanings c. Secondly correction of the godly for iudging the pollicies of the wicked as strong castles of defence Vse 2. instruction 1. Admonition to the wicked not to boast too much of their plots and deuices for all their imaginations thoughts are sure to come to naught Secondly direction vnto the godly alwayes to haue God in their thoughts Vse 3. consolation First in aduersitie to consider that all the plots of wicked men are not onely vanitie but also impietie and therefore as they cannot stand so shal they be seuerely punished Secondly in prosperitie to consider how God is the vpholder of their heads their lot portion and inheritance and therein to repose the sweetnesse of their thoughts 2. Doct. A good thing by accident may be the cause of euill as silence the cause of this thought Hos 7.1 When I would haue healed Israel then the impietie of Ephraim was discouered c. God here put on the person of a Physitian who while he goes about to heale the maladie makes it worse and finds the euill to be more gricuous 1. Because he finds the patient more peruerse and to vse all ill diet 2. the disease beeing stirred and so sturdie in his owne nature that it rebells against the remedie Rom. 7.8 sinne is dead without the law but the law makes it to liue hence wee see that God would heale vs but we turne our disease into putrifaction and rottennesse and so become incurable and no maruaile for though all men bee made of one mettall yet they bee not cast all in one mould there is framed of the selfe same clay as well the tile to keepe out water as the pot to containe licour the brickie nature of man will not be washed by Gods raine from heauen it shall haue no entrance into his soule The Sunne doth harden the durt and melt the waxe so the wicked being the filth of the world cannot be stamped with the beames of Gods wisdome but are hardened Fire maketh the gold to shine and the straw to smother perfumes refresh the doues but kill the beetles so the fire of Gods word smothereth in the wicked and the verie sweetnesse of it kills them The vine will spread by nature and the more we seeke by art to alter it the more in the ende we shall augement it It is proper for the palme tree to mount the heauier we load it the higher it sprouteth although yron be made soft with fire it turneth to his hardnes the silly mouse wil by no manner of meanes be tamed the subtill fox may wel be beaten but neuer broken from stealing his pray season the wood neuer so well the wine will tast of the caske translate the crabbe-tree where and whensoeuer you please and it will neuer beare sweet apple the blacke will take no other colour the stone Abeston beeing once made hot neuer will be made cold can the Ethiopian change or alter his skinne the Leopard his hew it is impossible to gather grapes on thrones or figs on thistles this cannot be brought to passe by any art the stone in Scicilia the more it is beaten the harder it is so the more God handles the wicked the worse they are He that stoppeth the streame causeth it to swell higher he that casteth water on the fire in the smiths forge maketh it to flame fiercer so is it with the wicked touch them and they sparkle in your face But alas they know not how the wound that bleedeth inwardly is most dangerous that the fire kept most close burneth most furiously that the ouen dammed vp baketh soonest that sores hauing no vent fester secretly Thus they swallow the baite which will breed their bane they swill the drinke that wil expire their date the Scorpion can feed on the earth the quaile can be fat with poyson but alas their food bee it neuer so good yet they wil sat vp themselues with it against the day of slaughter Thus then good things are peruerted to the wicked to their ruine The fire is an elemēt most necessary yet the wicked housholder may as wel make it burn his house as burne in it tryacle doth as well poyson as help if it be taken out of time wine immoderately taken kills the stomacke enflames the liuer and mischeifes the drunkard Physicke destroyes if it be not well tempered Lawe accuseth if it be not wel interpreted poyson is taken out of the hunny-suckle by the spyder venome out of the rose by a canker dung out of the maple tree by the scorpion so the greatest wickednesse out of the greatest good if it be abused O therefore I intreat you that haue beene deceiued by your own fancies the glasse of pestilēce or deluded by your own thoughts the gates of perdition be as earnest to seeke a medicine as you were eager to runne into a mischiefe God hath left as well endiue to delight and cure as hemlocke to endanger the rose to distill as well as the nettle to sting the bee to giue hony as the spider to yeld poyson so for the soule as well a word to saue as to destroy Indeede by accident wee make it to bee so and if hitherto wee haue wounded our selues by it let vs now leaue the point of this sword and catch it by the handle The Poets affirmed that Achilles speare could as well heale as hurt I am sure this can a great deale better heale then hurt the Scorpion though he stings yet he stints the paine though the hearb Nerius poyson some beasts yet is it a remedie to man
against poyson therefore if we haue made the word of God a Scorpion to sting vs yet let vs now make it a lenitiue to cease the paine if we like beasts haue poysoned our selues yet now like men created for God let vs recouer our selues againe by this word of life But to proceed Thou thoughtest this is the consequent of Gods silence not proper but by accident forced and befide the scope of it therfore this wicked thought of an hypocrite argueth strange corruption of heart that can frame no obiect vnto it selfe that shall make good thoughts Surely affections haue gotten the masterie ouer the mind so that now it must become a slaue to serue them and dispose it selfe that all his iudgments may aime at their satisfaction and thus the good word of God by accident becomes the cause of sinne Gen. 3. hath God said Yee shall not eate of the tree of knowledge of good and euill the Lord by this law debars you of great good for it is certaine when yee cate yee shall beas gods knowing good and euill therefore the law is too strict and rather an hinderer then furtherer of your good Men we see are very quiet vntil they be prouoked by the preaching of the lawe Steuen Act. 7. shall be stoned for his good sermon Christ shall be an enemie to church and common-wealth because he speaks against the Scribes and Pharisies Moses Aaron shal be hated of Pharaoh for preaching a deliuerance Iohn Baptist for telling Herod his sinne Elias shall be Ahabs enemy for telling him the truth and Paul shall become an enemie to the Galatians for telling them of their apostacie from Christ thus lawe and Gospel mercie and iudgement are abused of the wicked yet for all this the law is holy and iust as for example a man that holds a glasse in his hands as long as it â—ests there is safe but if they throwe it against the wall the wall will breake it but the sault will rest in the hands so when we take our selues dash our selues against Gods law the law breaks vs but the fault is in our selues the bankes are no cause of the furie and rage of the waters but the waters themselues so the lawe of God that banks in our corruption is no cause why it rageth but the nature of it which can indure no limits Reasons 1. Because sinne will indure no law There be three effects of the law that sinne cannot away withall First it stoppeth corruptioÌ„ hence the irritation of the law Secondly it terrisieth the conscience and that cannot be indured they that liue like gallie-slaues and are whipped euerie day will doe nothing but by force and are glad any waies to rid them-selues of such a burden Thirdly it exacts perfect obedience which our nature can not away withall to loue God with all our hearts with all our soules with all our minde and our whole strength is a lesson that will neuer be learned or practised Reas 2. A misconceit as a medicine against which the stomack ariseth will not be indured a plaister which stings at the heart must be throwne off and a glasse that sheweth vs an vgly face cannot be looked into so the misconceiuing of Gods silence makes it that it can neither become meate or medicine to our soules Thirdly the diuersitie of subiects the selfe same seed is sowne in all the foure grounds yet takes but root in one the hammar beats vpon all but it makes not all pliable to Gods worke the axe hewes at all but it timbers but some for building the rest it hewes downe for firing the fire burnes all but only the the gold loseth his drosse the light shines to all but only they that haue eyes behold it the salt seasons all but in some it cannot enter to the bone and therefore they putrifie and rotte away foode would feede all but some want stomacks appetite and digestion therfore they pine away with the best nourishment the goad prickles all but some are hardned that it cannot enter and therefore no maruell that the mercies and filence of God should worke no good effects in the wicked Fourthly the curse of God is vpon them therefore they shall eate but not be satisfied drinke but not to quench their thirst sleepe but not to take their rest for God alone giues rest vnto his welbeloued nay let them doe what they will all shall be nought pray or not pray sacrifice or not sacrifice come to church or not come to the church for they cannot lay aside their wicked thoughts and therefore according to our prouerb all is marred in the making Deut. 28.16 cursed shall they be in the towne and cursed shall they be in the field they shal make no good markets of that which god hath giuen them in the field cursed shall they be in the basket and in their dough bad prouision shall be in their houses when the Lord will not become both the master and the steward cursed shall be the fruite of his body and the fruits of his land the increase of his kine and the flocks of his sheepe extreame pouertie in the middes of all his wealth cursed shall he be when he comes in and cursed also when he goes out ill successe in his interprises neither will the Lord here make an ende These be foure great curses First he shall make no good market in buying and selling Secondly from this shall follow he shall haue no good prouision in his house Thirdly from this shall rise the next that he shall haue no true riches Fourthly to make that good fortune shall alwaies crosse him Fiftly to proceede yet further God will make him cracke his credit for trouble shame shall be vpon all that he sets his hand to do euerie man shall call him banke-rout neither shal he haue any law against theÌ„ for with God he hath lost his credit and therefore shall he perish quickly Sixtly that he may make his word good in all these the pestilence consumption feuer burning ague sword blasting mildew the heauens aboue shall be brasse and the earth vnder iron for raine dust and therefore no staie but perish thou must in bodie goods and good name Seuenthly to make the finall vp-shotte of his bodie he shall fal before his enemies and his carkeis shal be without all burial the foules of the ayre and the beasts of the field shall haue him for their pray and none shall rescue him if the enemies spare him God will smite him with the botch of Egypt with the Emorods with the scab with the itch euen worse then he hath done Egypt for he shall not be healed neither will God be defectiue in his methode for from these more sensible torments vpon the bodie he will proceede to greater iudgements vpon the soule which though least felt yet more fearefull madnes blindnes astonying of heart with all their ill consequents to grope at noone day to be oppressed powled and
men neither are they plagued with them but pride is as a chaine vnto them and crueltie couereth them as a garment What then can be answered for God surely still the consequence is not good bruit beasts may goe to the slaughterhouse without all baiting and it were questionlesse the part of a mad man to disturbe them that goe as heart would wish neither would the deuill for a thousand worlds that these men should once be disquieted to turn back againe and therefore yet you sticke in the question What then will you answer to an argument drawne from their life their eyes stand out with fatnesse they haue more then heart can wish they haue their tongues at libertie power to oppresse boast of it and yet presume thēy shall not be controlled for they dare speake against heauen and suffer their tongues to walke thorough the earth therefore God neither doth neither can he do any good to Israel Let Moses come to Pharaoh with let my people goe he shall be answered not as the deuills answered the Exorcists Act. 19.15 Iesus we acknowledge and Paul we knowe but who are yee It had been well if he had but said Aaron and Moses God I acknowledge and his p eople I know but who are yee that are so impudent with your king this is not his voice but who is God and Exod. 10.10 Let the Lord so bee with you as I will let you goe and your children behold for euill is before your face Here is blasphemie and execration of Gods people he imagines euill against them the Lord shall not preuent it and he desires that the Lord had no better affection to them then he was minded to let them goe What shall be answered to this proud argument that brings all into it they haue the controlment of heauen and earth and therefore how shall the Lord be good to Israel Well O flesh yet is God good to Israel this is but a small matter for neither heauen nor earth are in their hands it is an easie matter to turne their owne swords into their owne bowels for they haue fedde indeede but it is become a surfet and therefore if presently they be not like oxen knocked in the head they will pine away and neither God nor man shall haue profit by them they haue been licentious but soone may they be cooled they haue spoken wickedly of their oppression but a small matter will grauell them and bring them vnto an non plus they haue presumed but soone may they despaire they haue set their mouths against heauen but suddenly while they are about their mischiefe there may shine a most fearefull light yea lightning and thunder from heauen strike them to the ground make euerie ioynt breake a sunder the whole bodie tremble and the heart astonied neither shall they heare any voice from heauen Send for Ananias to put his hands vpon them that they may recouer their sight and haue their hearts comforted yet shall they heare a voyce from heauen Why haue you persecuted me it is hard for you to kicke against my prickes I will make your consciences pricke you to the death the sting shall neuer out of it there shall not be a Moses nor an Aaron to pray for you though you confesse with Pharaoh we haue sinned the Lord is righteous but I and my people are wicked Surely the spirit of God is strong my owne testimonie is answered the death and life of the wicked cannot euince the cause therefore I bring a third sort of reasons euen from the godly themselues v. 10. his people turne hither for waters of a full cup are wrung out to them Hence euen they say how doth God knowe it or is there knowledge in the most high wee dare boldly say the wicked prosper and increase in riches we haue clensed our hearts in vaine and washed our hands in innocencie to no purpose for daily haue we beene punished and chastened euery morning What may be said to this argument surely the testimonie of my brethren doth presse mee sore that they should bee so discouraged yet I hope when they shall haue considered my arguments propounded for the defence of their cause they shall recant their errour and say If I iudge thus behold the generation of thy children are vp against mee I haue therfore trespassed the reason was because I thought to finde out the discourse by my naturall reason but I confesse it was too painefull for mee therefore O Spirit the comforter of thy Church let me heare the arguments that will beare waight in the ballance of Gods sanctuarie First therefore I will begin with an artificiall argument which all men may gather out of the workes of God euen of his iustice They are set in slipperie places they stand but vpon the yee and therefore God may soone cast them into desolation which all the world may see to be done for how suddenly are they destroyed perished and horribly consumed all is but a dreame of their prosperitie but when I am awaked to see it and they to feele it then shall I consider my heauenly felicitie contemne all their vaine pompe and know assuredly that God makes all their image to be despised therefore I ingeniously confesse that the vexing of my heart and the pricking in my reines was because I was too foolish euen as a beast before God yet was I happie in all this for by faith I was alwaies with God and that my faith might not fall he hath holden me by his right hand Secondly for my selfe I haue taken this arguemnt that God will guide mee by his counsell and afterward receiue me to his glorie Thirdly I dare appeale vnto mine owne soule from both these arguments vnto a third whom haue I in heauen but God and I haue desired none in earth before him Fourthly I drawe an arguments from mine owne weakenesse and the daily experience I haue had of Gods goodnesse my flesh faileth and my heart also but God is the strength of mine heart and my portion for euer Therefore now I come to the determination of the question and thus I determine it for the wicked Loe they that withdrawe themselues from God shall perish thou destroyest all them that goe a whoring from thee and for my selfe I haue found that the deepest disputations doe alwaies bring forth the best conclusions and safest determinations therefore thus I resolue That as for me it is good for mee to drawe neere to God therefore I haue put my trust in the Lord God that I may declare all his works See but one place more Psal 77. When I entred the consideration of the dayes of olde and the yeares of auncient time called to remembrance my song of thankesginug in the night which vsually I sung in my prosperitie and now thinking vpon God am troubled and when I pray my spirit is full of auguish Thou keepest myne eies awaking all the long night it is time therefore to commune
his posteritie who couenanted with God for vs as well as for himselfe for performance of obedience therefore he breaking we breake likewise by the law of inheritance he was our father we his heires he was the root of all mankind and we were in his loynes the manner is by imputation of the transgression and so consequently of blame guilt and punishment Originall sinne is conceiued in vs by our next parents and so goes a long to all posteritie bodie and soule are the excellent worke of God as if a skilfull workeman should make all the wheeles of a clocke verie artificially but being put into the hands of an vnskilfull prentice is so disorderly set together that one wheele cannot go aright so God the maker both of bodie and soule hath left them to our first parents and so consequently to our next parents to put them together who hauing lost their first standing with God are become not onely vnskilfull but also vncapable of any vertue to put together a man brought forth in the image of God for as this was onely Gods creation so must it againe be the new creation of God so that man and woman being not the causes of bodie and soule but of the procreation of a third thing riing from both may truly be said to beget a man according to their owne image and similitude Lastly it is true that euerie man shall beare his burden for actuall sinne is not conueyed in speciall but in generall so that euerie one shall answer for his owne actuall sinnes without hee followe his forefathers steps and then shall he be punished for both because he will needs haue both imputed vnto him the first by nature the second by imitation Therefore if man may see in this world thus much of Gods placing of sinne for this is but our obseruation what shal then this God of all order do when he shal not only set it forth but apply it to our hearts and consciences then shall we experimentally know the causes of all our mischeife the consequents in the guilt of conscience and the punishments both vpon soule and bodie so that that which is in this world both sinne and punishment shall be felt of vs in hell in no other regard but as punishment In this world we haue had some pleasure in sinne but in hell all shall be onely in torment the miseries of the body in this world haue vexed vs and the soule hath beene senslesse of punishment but in hell both bodie and soule shall haue exquisite sense of Gods anger wrath and vengeance and the soule shal then exceed in feeling And this is the setting of sinne in his place and order Reas 1. Because things must be separated Now methode alone is the true diuider of things and makes euerie one to rainne and hasten to his home we see how euerie creature maketh hast vntill he be come to the place in which alone he can rest sinne therefore which is frozen with many things that it ought neuer to haue touched and will not out of them because then he knowes not where to haue rest must needs beâ— disioyned els would all lie together in a confusion You see how cold congeales together water earth stickes stones and many disagreeing natures but when the fire comes it dissolueth and parteth them and maketh euerie one appeare in his nature So method finding men and their sinnes all on heapes disioynes them lets them see what is Gods what is their own But because men are blind and will see nothing God hath prepared hell fire to dissolue these frozen soules that they may see what a strange confusion they haue made of the workes of Gods hands by their owne Reas 2. Is perspicuitie and cleare knowledge The onely rule of perspicuitie is methode and therefore sinne beeing fullest of darkenesse had neede of the best helpe to make all cleare and euident especially seeing that sinne is one of the haters of light The darkenesse of the night opposeth the day and likewise the day the night wee see the morning expells the darkenesse and the appearance of the Sunne makes the shadowes of the night part away they that haue gotten themselues into holes and rockes must be pulled out off their dens by violence A theife or murtherer that hath gotten a hole fights like a beare and roares before men can drawe him into the open view of the world and he comes to Gods iudgement seat as beares vnto a stake They that haue seene villaines pulled out of their holes may marke them to look like fiends comming out of hell therfore great need of method that must cleare so hard causes as these are and bring all things vnto the light Reason 3. Iudgement which can not begiuen before euidence haue bin brought in and therfore must methode needs cleare all the bills and inditments that are to be brought in against wicked and euill doers that so iudgement may be truly and substantially deliuered Reason 4. Because of the consciences of wicked men which haue bin so long accustomed to sinne that they are so confufed that they can giue no euidence against the sinner therefore must the Lord needs vse his methode before conscience can any way assist the Lord in his iudgement Reason 5. Gods glory which must shine brightly out of all workes euen out of the workes of darkenesse which cannot be imagined without methode the glory of a stately building is not seen in the confused masse of it lying vpon the earth but when it is reared vp to the view of the whole world Reason 6. Multitude of offences now wee can doe nothing with multitudes vnlesse we bring them vnto some heads How should a iust account be taken of all sinne if the Lord should not summe them vp into some generall how should the general be prooued except the order of the specials might be seene how they were contained in the generall Reason 7. Quicke dispatch If truths were to be tryed by Syllogismes with the Lord it would be a long time before all arguments should be brought in and euery conclusion inferred Again much time would be spent in prouing of euery doubtfull proposition and great dispute might be held on this side and on that therefore the Lord will speedily finish all in an exact methode which is alwaies full of breuitie and perspicuitie Reason 8. Remembrance neither God nor man should be able to carry in mind the sinnes of the world but for methode we might wonder how the Lord should tel vs all that euer we haue done except it were for this rule of methode and man could neuer make any good account out of his broken crafie memory except the Lord by his own method should helpe him Methodus mater memoriae Vse 1. Reprehension first a confutation of the wicked that thinke as they haue done all in the darkenesse so the darknes shal couer them for euer but Psal 139.12 the darknes hideth not from
conclude her saluation out of Gods word without any further reuelations yet still did the temptation grew vpon her insomuch that hauing a venice glasse in her hands and the selfe-same minister setting by her presently breakes forth into lamentable words You haue often told mee that I must seeke no further then Gods word but I haue been long without comfort and can indure no longer therefore if I must be saued let this glasse be kept from breaking and so she threw it against the walls Here might the Lords hand for this tempting of his maiestie haue left her to the euerlasting woes of her distrustfull heart yet the Lord that is rich in mercie hauing stamped her with the seale of his election was content to satisfie the languishing soule with a miracle the glasse rebounds againe and comes safe vnto the ground which the minister hauing gotten into his hands sayeth Oh repent of this sinne blesse God for his mercie and neuer distrust him more of his promise for now you haue his voyce from heauen in a miracle telling you plainly of your estate This was curiositie and might haue brought despaire yet it was the Lords mercie to remit the fault and graunt an extraordinarie confirmation of her faith But to proceede melan cholie persons that are giuen to contemplation if they be not well grounded in the word of God and haue resolued in all their speculations not to remooue one haire from the same are easily ouertaken and plunged in miserie and especially all such as haue their vocation consisting in such studies as philosophie c. which if they cary not a low saile and sometime to strike and lie at the anker of the Scriptures of God but hoist vp saile leaue it to the tempest of presumption are presently carried into the whirle-poole of Gods infinite secrets and are in daunger without the speciall grace of Gods mercie neuer to deliuer themselues for these men being not balanced with knowledge of Gods scriptures and assurance of his spirit are neuer able to abide the vglines of their sinnes when they shall once be vnfolded that narrow point of reprobation and election propounded vnto their melancholie braines and hearts and most miserable polluted soules Others which haue but some little knowledge of Gods word and practise answerable for want of the true apprehending of Gods reuealed will touching election and reprobation and the right methode of learning and conceiuing the doctrine causeth them to stumble and fall at this stone for a sword taken at the wrong ende is readie to wound the hand of the taker yet held by the handle is a fit weapon of defence so Predestination preposterously conceiued may through fault of the conceiuer procure hurt whereas in it selfe it is the most strong rock of assurance in al storms of temptations that can befall vnto bodie or soule because predestination is Gods immutable will the cause and rule of all iustice and vttermost of all reason in his workes Now if reason ascending to this supreame cause descend not againe to the meanes then when our sinnes shall meete with Gods iustice and we haue no eye to looke vpon his mercie in his sonne Christ we shall find nothing but the assurance of our owne destruction Againe if with the world we eye alone his mercie and consider not his iustice then miserable man who melteth as snow and vanisheth like a vapour before his iustice must needes perish eternally in that his carelesse presumption Againe as the melancholie person in generall and secondly in speciall 1. of giuing himselfe to contemplation 2. knowing Gods word vngroundedly so in the 3. place this makes the melancholie nature subiect to this passion when with a passionate humour he reads Gâ—ds word and doth as melancholy persons doe in regard of their bodie for if they read or heare of any disease presently they conceicue they haue it so deale they with the Scriptures they are guiltie of all iudgements and no sinne or iudgement but they either haue it or presently expect it and especially they resemble the one the other in this that they haue the strongest conceit of the most deadly diseases as consumptions and sicknesses incurable so the other of nothing but the sinne against the holy Ghost So that as ignorance before was their guide here ignorance and infidelitie linked together A fourth speciall manner in this melancholike subiect is the good and christian heart the waight of whose sinnes exceeding for a time the strength of their faith see not so clearely as they desire but euen as in a stormy tempest the ship seemeth at euery blast and sourge of the sea to be in danger of wracke and as the young ash bending to euerie blast of wind seemeth in perill of breaking and rooting vp when notwithstanding both the ship keepeth her constant course and the tree yet hath the rooting In winter we thinke the trees are dead and in a tempest we thinke wee haue lost the brightnes of heauen yet summer prooues the contrarie and the space of an houre may shewe the cleare heauens againe So when this tempest of Gods anger is ouer-blowne and his gracious countenance beginneth to shine on vs againe then the saith which was as it were hid for a time taketh life and sheweth foorth it selfe and plainely prooueth that as the trees when they bud in the spring time and bring forth fruite were not dead in the winter as they seemed so the faith of Gods children springeth afresh after the stormie winter of temptation and therefore no dead faith The diseases of the bodie make vs sometime seeme little better then dead corpses and yet the hidden life is after recouered and raised vp againe Thus saith by reason of our owne weakenes and thorough Sathans tempestuous malice bendeth seemeth feeble and yeeldeth to the force while notwithstanding it is built on the rocke and planted with the hand of God in the Eden of his gracious election and doth remaine a plant for euer in his Paradise of euerlasting felicitie Thus the lilly of God and euerie member of it though among many thornes is preserued because they are planted by the good husbandman watred with the dewes of heauen hedged and preserued by his continuall care for this husbandman is night and day in his field and yet he neuer sleepeth no not so much as slumbereth by his watchfull care for Israel his flocke Psal 121. In deed we had need of a good shepheard for wee are extraordinarie wandring sheep we had need of good gouernours for we are but punies in our wayes we had neede of a good guide on the seas of this world for we are but like vnexperienced trauailers by sea fearing euery weauing of the ship and â—â—ying with the disciples helpe vs Master or else we perish we imagine euery puffe of temptation to bee nothing but the gate of destruction when indeede it is the way of Gods dearest children and appointed of the Lord to bring vs
wind in vnconstancie and as fraile as the tender hearbs how soone should all become nothing therfore Gods decree being laid the first corner stone we may assure our selues that the building shall stand for euer therefore euery one in his conflicts with the deuill hath full assurance of the conquest for this roote is laid in him whose fruit and branches stormy tempests may nippe and shake yet the sappe shal neuer be dried vp in the roote neither shal any euil wind of Satan so blast that the immortall seede bee at any time quite withered yea though all fierie darts bend thereto with all might and maine employed yet the storme beeing blowne ouer by the spirit of grace and the comfortable sunne of consolation shining vpon our gloomy hearts it will budde forth againe into blossome fruit and branch as a most beautifull tree in the paradise of God Let the comparison of bodily sickenesse and the consideration of the kind of frailtie mooue vs we haue experience how diuers times the disease preuaileth ouer the sicke persons that actions faile and the faculties seeme quite to be spent neither hand nor foote is able to doe their duties the eie is dimme the hearing dul the tast altered and the tongue distasteth all things euen of most pleasant relish and the weake and feeble patient seemeth to attend the time of dissolution when as yet notwithstanding there remaineth a secret power of nature and a forcible sparke of life that ouercometh all these infirmities and consumeth them like drosse and rendreth to the body a greater purity and firmenesse of health then before the sicknes it did enioy euen so ought euerie one to esteeme of the spirituall case and consider that their soule is sicke but not dead faith assailed but not ouercome therefore let patience attend the finishing of this secret worke and so shall they see these burning seauers of temptations to be slaked and cooled by the mercie and grace of Christ and that sparke of faith which did he hid ouerwhelmed with heaps of temptations to breake forth againe consume the causes of the disease And as nature after a perfect crise dischargeth her selfe either by stoole vomite sweat bleeding or such like euacuations to the recouery of the former health euen so shall the faithful soule find in himselfe strange ease after these temptations by reason they haue caused diuers euacations of the filthines of sinne and therefore greater puritie must needs be in the soule Thus the Lord preserues the verie garments of his Saints that he suffereth them not to take any smell of the flame or the verie sweat of afflictions to sticke vpon them Psal 68.22 The Lord hath said I will bring my people againe from Bashan I will bring them againe from the depths of the sea Og the Gyant and all his fat bulls may push at the godly but their strength shall not preuaile against the strong one of Israel but euen the foote of his faithfull ones shal be dipped in blood and the tongues of the dogges of Israel may drawe out the verie heart blood of all these bulls So that after the conquest the triumph beeing giuen to the Lord they may truly celebrate it setting the singers before the players of instruments after so that the praise of God may be heard in his assemblies euen from all them that are deriued from the fountaine of Israel so that this knot betwixt God the faithfull soule more surely knit then that of Gordius can neuer be loosed by the deuill broken by his forces disanulled by his stratagemes or euer found out by his policies Therfore as Christ cried out O my God my God why hast thou forsaken me it is impossible that Christ should be forsaken therefore it is a voice more for the instruction of his children then to shew his owne discomforts if he cried out why may not we crie out yet as Christ was heard and freed from his feare so shall euery faithfull soule be sure to speede with his God and shall againe as Dauid was be restored to those wonted ioyes which they sometimes felt in the sweet mercies of the Lord. These assaults are at the first heauie and bitter if they come in great measure they may cause impatience Iob 3.1 if they continue then may the soule beginne to iudge them nothing but Gods wrath Iob 6.2 3. The arrowes of the Almightie are in me and the venome thereof doth drinke vp my spirit and the terrors of God are against me it brings afresh his old sinnes into remembrance to trouble him in his sleepe visions dreames and anxietie of spirit Yet in this miserie God supports his faith he feeling this gets experience Rom. 5.4 hence hope that grace shall neuer be wanting Iob 42.5 6 Heb. 12.11 Let Pharaoh feele but a little of this and he presently rebells yet the faithfull though they haue more feeling of their rebellious hearts and the deuill more strongly assailes them then any other yea God seemes to be their enemie yet Iob 13.15 Though he slay me yet will I trust in him Dauid Psal 22.1 O my God I crie by day but thou hearest not by night but I haue no audience words almost of desperation and as a man without faith yet then he saith My God a plaine argument of faith for Gods children can not forget their language Hence a man may in a manner see contrarie affections in their prayers for flesh and spirit struggle together Gen. 32.18 Iaakobs wrastling is a type of the conflicts of the faithfull with Christ he assailes them with the one hand and vpholds them with the other hence Iaakob is called Israel a preuailer with God The Church hath both his names Psal 130. and Psal 121. Mark 15.22 to 27. we see a strange conflict betwixt the woman of Samaria and our Sauiour Christ foure notable repulses are giuen her 1. silence 2. haish speeches of the Disciples Send her away 3. cold comfort I am come for the house of Israel of which thou art none 4. extraordinarie reproch Thou art but as a dogge therefore must thou haue none of the childrens bread yet we finde her to be more instant at euery repulse and when the most dangerous repulse was giuen her to bring an inuincible argument of her faith True Lord I yeild all if my place and deseruings must be considered then no mercie for me but Lord yet account of me as thou hast saide let me thy dogge but tast of the crummes of thy mercie and it shall suffice the hunger of my soule Thus Gods children ouerwhelmed with sinne turmoiled with Sathans conflicts and amazed with Gods anger can then lift vp their eye lids and giue a glimps to the brasen serpent Christ Iesus and fling themselues into his armes catch hold on Gods hand buffetting them and kisse it There be three grounds of temptation First our naturall weakenesse prooued by Sathan and the world Secondly the continuall buds of our originall sinne in
decree can haue no other force of reason to presse the conclusion but a cause Secondly they answer that the antecedent beeing granted and from thence the consequent concluded is causall when there comes no middle cause betwixt them but God decrees that man should fall by his free-will comming betwixt the fall and Gods decree thereof But this is no answer for so mans free-will came betwixt the Deuils temptation and the yeilding thereunto and so the Deuill should be no cause of mans fall this then is but a shift Thirdly they answer that God may will that man should fall and yet man might fall by his owne free will The answer is ouerturned because a man might haue fallen infallibly and freely but necessarily and freely can neuer stand together Infallibilitie is in respect of Gods infinite diuine prescience but necessitie is of the thing done Infallibilitas est â—ognitionis imnustibilitas rei which is immutable and immutabilitie takes away all contingencie in the thing and consequently libertie so then necessitie contingencie and libertie can neuer stand together Fourthly they answer per desertionem nempe ipsius non collationem necessary ad cauendum peccata auxilij vnde sequitur hominem necessariò peccare that is by desertion of him and not collation of necessary helps to beware of sinne man fell necessarily But this will not salue vp the matter because God gaue the lawe therefore it was necessarie that he should affoard man all necessaries to obey him otherwise the transgression might be giuen vnto God but they will say that Gods desertion had mans free will to come betwixt it and the fall but to that it may be replyed then man deserued that desertion But the question is whether man could wil such a thing or no if it be said he could then hee sinned freely but againe how could he will this if it be answered he could not then surely God made him will it if he could then what was the cause of it surely they defend that God did forsake him before he willed to bee forsaken in that he forsooke to giue him that grace which should haue kept him from sinne Lastly there commeth nothing betwixt Gods desertion and mans willing of it if so then either God or man must be the cause not man because he suffers it therefore God and indeede they confesse that peccatum est merum consequens decreti a meere consequent of Gods decree nothing interceding must necessarily be a cause But they answer this cause is deficient for desertion is but the taking away not concurring but this deficient cause was a necessarie cause why Adam should fall because he could not otherwise escape it And thus much from the Decree now I come to mans will impelled to sinne Obiect 3. That man is compelled to sinne Neceâ—â—â—â—e of Gods decree it is first prooued from the decree graunt the decree and then man could not abstaine from the act of sinne if he could then might he haue frustrated Gods decree Deâ—◠〈◊〉 of 〈…〉 but that is impietie once to thinke consilium enim deistat Secondly that which makes the wil to loose his libertie must needes compel the will the libertie is gone because it is not free ad opposita but must needes incline it selfe to one thing and that necessarily Neither are we here to conceiue coaction or violence for the will hath two motions one of nature another of libertie libertie is taken away when the will is carried with his naturall motion this is spontaneus assensus a natural willing which is alwaies of one thing To be happie is willed of all but neither by violence or freedome but natural inclination for no man wills miscrie Therefore Gods decree takes away his libertie but not his assent to mooue naturally which way God would haue it And though it be not constrained yet can it not resist neither indeede would it resist for this determination Necessitie and libertie cannot stand together Thirdly and lastly necessitie takes away all libertie because all libertie is in contingent things What libertie hath a man ouer the fire or any immutable thing Againe libertie is alwaies with consultation now consultation is in things contingent What man will consult whether the fire burne and surely God and man vnderstands one truth how then should I conceiue that necessarie to God which must be contingent to me Contingencie and necessitie can neuer stand together And to say Adam fell contingently and yet necessarily is an impossibilitie The principle of necessitie is immutabilitie not infallibilitie Certitude makes infallibilitie that which is certen is infallible Time changeth not nature and so may a contingent thing be certen Neither must we measure the thing by time for time is not of the essence of any thing but a thing adioyned to all created beeings Now then time past present or to come change not the nature of any beeing but diuersly qualifie him Was the thing contingent before it fell out then why should it be of the nature of necessitie when it is come to passe hath the time present made it otherwise then it was in time past Define me Adams fall was it not an apostacie from God his Creator this is one thing and is neuer changed now necessitie followes the nature of things and not of time in things You graunt it contingent vntill it came was not this a truth and truth I am sure pronunciat vti res est pronounceth as the thing is will you then make truth pronounce one thing before the thing was and another thing when it is is the nature changed because the time is varied then farwell all truths and that common axiome which is no more common then true That definitions of things are not onely to be conceiued in the present time but also past and to come Let vs examine the definition of contingencie and necessitie â—â—e definition of contingency Contingencie is that which is so true that it may be false is this onely for future no but thus may be false or might haue bin false I am sure you will say that mans fall might haue bin false for God might haue decreed otherwise and therefore marke what you doe affirme to wit that God might change necessarie truths then may he make contradictions true He may make a man and not reasonable fire but not hote Let it then be what it will be if once it might haue bin changed it can neuer be made an vnchangeable nature by time Achilles might haue killed Hector Saul might haue fallen on his owne sword Adam might haue runne into the finne of auersion from God These before they were done you confesse were contingent but Achilles hath slaine Hector Saul is fallen on his owne sword Adam is become an Apostata from God now the case is altered and they are become necessarie But do you not vnderstand reason tell me I pray you Achilles to kill Hector Saul to fall