Ministers are by Act of Parliament severely commanded to do it BY the late Act before mentioned where the Doubt so it is called there about the Coercive power in Ecclesiastical Courts is clear'd and taken away One Proviso is That that Act nor any thing therein conteined shall extend or be construed to extend to give unto any Archbishop or Bishop or any other Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Judge c. any power or authority to exercise c. If any be peccant that way it ought to be amended Another Proviso forbids any Archbishop Bishop c. to tender or administer unto any person the Oath usually called the Oath Ex officio or any other Oath whereby such person to whom the same is tendred or administred may be charged or compelled to confess or accuse or to purge him or her self of any criminal matter or thing whereby he or she may be lyable to any censure or punishment This being now forbidden by Act of Parliament every Subject ought to give obedience therein But some now insulting and upbraiding the Ecclesiastical Courts that all this while they have oppressed the Subject with that proceeding which the Parliament hath taken away renewing the old cry in Queen Elizabeths time and ever since against such proceedings which never till now I alwayes except what was done in the late times of usurped government were legally prohibited Though I am far from questioning the reasons whereupon that Act passed but do humbly submit to it both in word and practice yet I hope it will be allowed to make some defence against such persons as so tax such proceedings before the passing of this Act. And herein I shall follow that most able Civilian Richard Cosin Doctor of the Laws and Dean of the Arches in that his Apology for sundry proceedings by Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical c. Mr. Cambden as before mentions him with honour as surely he well deserv'd and that work of his if nothing else evinces it Mr. Swinburn in that Work of his of Last Wills and Testaments printed at London for the Company of Stationers 1611. in the first part sect 6. numb 8. fol. 17. writes thus of him and of that Work of his that Apology I find saith he written by that learned and no less religious man Doctor Cosins at I take it in that worthy Work entituled An Apology for sundry proceedings by Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical c. and so he goes on Upon this subject he hath written so fully that I believe little can be added to it and if any should go about it excepting such additions as well may be added by reason of some emergencies since the time he wrote and some other additions and explications not derogatory from him they would be forced very much to plough with his Heyfer which would but look too much like a Plagiary I could wish the book were reprinted and haply it will be so which may serve for Topicks to this subject For as all the Poets after Homer are said to drink of his Fountain according to that picture or statue of his that denotes as much with that Inscription Ridet anhelantem post se vestigia turbam Even so must I conceive all do from Doctor Cosin that shall write upon this subject I was upon Epitomizing that Apology of his and had made some progress therein but upon second thoughts desisted thinking it better to refer the Reader to him rather then to adventure to abbreviate him and thereby perhaps wrong him an offence that too many Epitomizers are guilty of therefore I say I shall onely make use of some Notes as confessed arrows out of his quiver and sippe of some others elsewhere and point the Reader to his full stream where any that list may drink their fill Upon these words in the late Act Provided that this Act. nor anything therein contained shall extend or be construed to extend or give unto any Archbishop Bishop c. any power or authority to exercise or execute c. any jurisdiction which they might not have done before the year of our Lord 1639. or to abridge or diminish the Kings Majesties Supremacy in Ecclesiastical matters or affairs nor to confirm the Canons made in the year 1640. I say upon these words some are ready mistaking questionless the words and meaning of that Act to renew that old exploded Opinion or rather groundless Fancy That a several Royal assent to the executing of every particular Canon is required Hereto Doctor Cosin answers That admitting This were true then all the other opinions of those that oppugn the ordinary Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical stand in no stead and might be spared because this would cut off all at once For none that exercise ordinary Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical have it in particularity which by the oppugners seems to be meant otherwise then by permission of Law to every of their proceedings and impossible were it by reason of the infinity of it and troublesomness to procure such particular assent to the execution of every Canon His Majesties Delegates when Appeals are made to His Majesty in Chancery would signifie nothing could not exercise the power to them delegated by reason of the want of such particular assent and it is a gross absurdity to grant as even the Oppugners and Innovators do That Testamentary and Matrimonial causes are of Ecclesiastical cognizance to say nothing of the rest of Ecclesiastical causes and yet cannot by reason of this want be dispatched nor can be dealt in by any other authority according to any Law in force This would speak a defect in the publick Government that the Subject should have a right but no likely or ready mean to come by it and great offences by Law punishable and yet no man sufficiently authorized to execute these Laws Since the abrogation of Papal pretended Supremacy when the ancient rights of the Kings of England of being Supreme Governors over all persons within their Dominions as well in all spiritual or Ecclesiastical things or causes as Temporal and that no forreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction power superiority preeminence or authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm and so forth as in the Act and the Oath Since these rights were as it were ex postliminio restored and declared to have been as they ever ought to have been in the Kings of England many Laws have been made in several Parliaments for the strengthning of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and the more effectual execution thereof and some of the Ecclesiastical Laws were enlarged altered and explained * 25 H. 8.19 The Statutes for Delegates upon Appeals †27 H 8 130. 32 H 8.7 Not long after two Statues for assistance of ordinary Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and for the speedier recovery of Tithes in Courts Ecclesiastical * 34 35 H. 8 19. The like for the recovery of Pensions Procurations c. †1 Ed. 6. c. 2. In the time of Edw. 6.
comes to be overthrown this shall not prejudice the legataries for they shall notwithstanding this Judgement thus by fraud obtained be heard to maintain and set up this will again f Lib. 14. Dig. de appellat And as no man shall be prejudiced so none shall reap any advantage by the fraudulent practise of another neither though he was no party nor actor in the fraud himself Alterius circumventio alii non praebet actionem g Lib. 49. Dig. de reg jur One mans-fraud shall not create in another any right to sue The Civil Law can as little endure that the true sence and meaning of a Law should be destroyed by a fraudulent interpretation that keeps the words but perverts the end for which it is made In fraudem legis facit qui salvis verbis legis sententiam ejus circumvenit fraus legis fit ubi quod fieri noluit fieri autem non vetuit id fit h Lib. 29.30 Dig. de legib He deales deceitfully with the Law that transgresseth the true intent of it though he does not trespass against the formal and precise words And therefore when the Law forbids a man to settle any more upon his Bastard than what will barely keep him alive it will not permit him to settle any superfluous estate upon any other person for that Bastards use or the Bastard to receive any such estate from his Parent by another hand Cum quid una via prohibetur alicui ad id alia via non debet admitti That i Reg. 84. de reg jur in 6. which cannot lawfully be done one way or directly must not be done indirectly or by another In like manner as nothing is more precious among men than Life Property good Name Liberty and the right of Contracts in the which the whole civil interest and welfare of all people may be rightly said to be comprised So it is not enough to provide in a general way for them neither for it does not suffice to declare by a Law that neither the Life Property nor Liberty of any Subject shall be taken away but by course of Law and a lawful trial first had nor to forbid calumnies and slanders nor to command that the contracts and agreements of men shall be mutually observed but a special and most vigilant care is to be had also that all proceedings of justice when a suit is brought concerning any of them be answerable to those great interests and that nothing be admitted which can any way though obliquely or afar off infringe or overthrow any of them Whereof the Civil Law is so tender that by bringing the Action a mans right is rather improved than made worse Nemo in persequendo deteriorem causam sed meliorem facit k Lib. 87. Dig. de reg jur To try a mans right is rather an advantage than any prejudice When therefore any of these rights be in question if the Law of a State be so short and defective as that a mischief may be done and yet no remedy be found or not a sufficient one or if a prejudicial act may pass against me that may endanger my whole right in the end and I not present thereat nor called unto it or if I have not liberty to examine my adversary upon his oath to something which will cleare the whole matter and whereof I have no other testimony but his own conscience or if I may not be admitted to make out the matter as well by violent and strong presumptions as by clear and manifest proofs or if the testimony of one onely witnesse be sufficient in any matter whatsoever to cast and condemn me or if where I cannot have my witness to the Bar through sickness or absence beyond the Seas there be not some expedient allowed to have his testimony upon his oath sent to the Court where my trial is to be or if such just exceptions as may take away or at least extenuate the credit of the evidence brought against me will not be allowed or if the Justice of a nation be too quick and over hasty in concluding upon the rights of men before they can well prepare to defend them or on the contrary be too slow and tedious as not limit a time when suits shall determine of themselves if they be not judged before or if one sentence shall be so final that I may not appeale nor bring my right to a triall any more I say where these proceedings or such like be allowed and and practised whatsoever is most precious and of highest value amongst men be it Life Property Good name Liberty right of Contracts or whatsoever else is flying to the sanctuary of the Law it is subject to be destroyed and taken away For whether the rights of a people be prejudiced by an irregular way of bringing them to trial and iudgement or by the iniquitie of those Lawes that shall judge them in the end the mischief is all one A State therefore that will sufficiently provide for defence of their peoples rights must not onely take care that the Lawes that must definitively over-rule and determine them be equal just and rational but the formes of trial must be the same also that the same security and just dealing which is the end of both may be obtained And herein the Roman Civil Law has been more exact and careful than some other Lawes of the world have been for there is nothing of what nature soever it be but the Civil Law has ordained a means to bring it to a discussion and trial either by giving a special Action in the case l Tot. Tit. Inst de action or a general one m Dig de praescript verb. in fact action relieving by ordinary remedies or if those fail by such as are extraordinary n Tot. tit Dig. lo. de in integr res titu helping men jure actionis or officio judicis that is by way of complaining in their owne name or borrowing the name of the Magistrate o Gl. in s actio Inst de Action verb. quam jur to make their complaints more effectual so that one way or other a remedy may be had whatsoever the evil be nor does it suffer any just complaint to go away unremedied And although it gives the highest authority to Orders and Decrees of Court yet it is so tender of and has such a heedful respect towards the Rights and Interests of men that whether a man be concerned alone in a cause or whether others be concerned with him it allowes of no Act Order Decree or Judgement but against those onely that were first call'd to see it done And therefore every judiciall act done without warning given is accounted surreptitious and declared void and null p Marant spec part 4. Distinct num 10. The effect of which nullity is that as to him that was absent and not heard the Cause is to begin againe Judicatum tantum
rationum damonstrationum evidentia sic ordinis praestantia antecellunt The Roman Lawes saith he are made after the likenesse of the Decalogue and do not differ from those notions and principles of Reason which Nature hath implanted in all men And it is out of all question that setting aside Gods Law they are as more ancient so more renowned as of higher authority so truer and clearer in determination as of a more evident demonstration and reason so of a more excellent rank then other Laws that yet have been Which conformity and likenesse of the Civil Law to the Divine and Eternall has been the onely cause that the Casusts and Divines that have created upon cases of Conscience and have laboured to teach men what rules they must walk by to doe justice and to execute righteousness in their dealings and communications with one another they doe every where about their books and writings propose set down the very rules and maxims of the Civil Law as the best lessons of morality justice citing the very Lawes themselves and the authorities of that profession which were incongruous and vain for them to doe were not their justice equity and soundnesse unquestionable and their authority beyond all dispute even in those things for which their authority is brought by them Neither is it they alone that set this high estimate upon the authority of the Civil Law since the Learned in other faculties doe the same with whom there is nothing more frequent then when the duties of men one towards another in their severall relations com to be set forth as between Parents and Children Masters and Servants Husband and Wife Sovereign and Subject Magistrates and private Men Captain and Souldiers one Citizen with another or when the best rules and advantages are to be laid down for the first founding of a Common-wealth or the keeping of it in safety and splendour or when the justice and convenience of a Law is in question or the actions of Men even of Princes themselves be to be approved or condemned In all these cases and the like nothing I say is more usuall with Writers of highest renown for Learning and wisdome then to fort fiâ— their resolutions and dictates one way or other with the practice and discipline of the Roman State and to make the Civil Law their Touch-stone to try all things by and the best and most approved ballance to weigh them in judging the authority thereof to be beyond deniall in any thing that it does either defend or disallow and for such as it is presented does it passe currant with all men The Civil Law requires that an act should be worthy and laudable as well as lawfull that it should be faire equitable ingenuous and candid as well as strictly just Subtilties and niceties of words and those apices juris finesses of Law and fine-spun webs of Wit which are opposite to integrity and honest dealing and which through a precise form of words and strict propriety of speech would frustrate what was purely at first intended it will not allow of or endure Bonae fidei non congruit de apicibus juris disputare says Vlpian t l. 29. Parag 4. Dig Mandat It suits not with sincerity to contend about curiosities Sensum non vana nominum vocabula amplecti oportet u l. 2. Co De coust pecuu The true intended sense and not the bare litteral signification is to be pursued Scriptum sequi calumniatoris est boni verò judicis voluntatem scriptoris autoritatemque defendere says Gail x Lib 2. obs 132. out of Cicer pro Caeâ—inn It is the part of a Caviller to keep close to words but of an upright Judge to uphold the intent and meaning of him that spake them Qui pertinaciter à scripto recedere non vult perniciosè erraet sayes Peckius y Ca 88. De reg ju in 6. in in princ He shall offend perniciously that will grant but what the very words will bear and will be got to yield no further And therefore the Civil Law which we have now had it been in being in the third Punick War when the City of Carthage by a crafty exposition of words was quite demolished by order of the Roman Senate after they had first given their faith to the Carthaginians in these expressions Civitatem Carthaginis salvam fore jura privilegia immunitates easdem habituros quibus antea semper usi fuissent The City of Carthage should be saved and the same rights immunities and priviledges should be continued unto them which they always had would have condemn'd the whole Senate for such their breach of faith and treachery though there was not the life of any person touch'd For who could doubt but that the Carthaginians articling for the safety of the City did aim and intend to have the place preserved as well as the persons And it was a shameful defence to say as the Romans did that when the people of the City were all preserved and kept alive the true City was saved which was as much as they promised though the walls and buildings themselves were destroyed Civitatem maenibus urbis minimè contineri The word City does import the Men and not the Structure or Edifices thereof For although in strict propriety of speech there is that nice difference inter urbem civitatem quò urbs aedificia Civitas incolae sint yet leguleiorum est syllabas apices aucupari non militaris simplicitatis sayes Alberâ—cus Gentilis z De jur Bell lib 2. ca. 4. It is for Lawyers to catch at words and not for Souldiers whose plain meaning admits not of such nice distinctions In fide quid senseris non quid dixeris cogitandum est says Grotius a De Ju. Bell lib 2. ca 16. nu 1. out of Tully Where faith is given what was meant is to be regarded rather then what was spoken The Plataeans were as selfe and unworthy when after they had promised to send home the Prisoners taken slew them first and so sent them home dead quasi cadavera essent captivi mortuus homo esset homo says Albericus Gentilis b d. ca 4. as if it were to be believed that the Carkases were the Prisoners themselves or a man dead could be thought a man And as deceitful were the Baeotians too who having ingaged to restore the City did deliver it up not standing but rased and pulâ—d down So was it an act most treacherous and false in Alexander who first gave a besieged Town an Assurance that they should go forth of the Town safely and then after they were quite gone forth and set forward some part of their way put them all to the sword Grotius c d ca 16. out of Tully says truly ejusmodi fraudibus astringi non dissolvi perjurium by such fraudulent evasisions perjury is rather augmented then wiped away In Contracts between
His Majesties Prerogative or the known Laws of the Land Ecclesiastical or Temporal or the politick Government either in Church or State or which may give just offence I do hereby absolutely retract it as no wayes by me intended or thought of wishing this small taste may stir up others more able to make a further and better progress in this kind Anno 13. CAROLI II. Regis An Act for explanation of a Clause contained in an Act of Parliament made in the seventeenth year of the late King Charles entituled An Act for repeal of a branch of a Statute primo Elizabethae concerning Commissioners for Causes Ecclesiastical WHereas in an Act of Parliantent made in the seventeenth year of the late King Charles entituled An Act for repeal of a branch of a Statute primo Elizabethae concerning Commissioners for Causes Ecclesiastical it is amongst other things enacted That no Archbishop Bishop nor Micar General nor any Chancellor nor Commissary of any Archbishop Bishop or Micar General nor any Droinary whatsoever nor any other Spiritual or Ecclessastical Judge Dificer or Minister of Justice nor any other person or persons whatsoever exercising Spiritual or Ecclessastical Power Authority or Jurisdiction by any Grant License or Commission of the Kings Majesty his Meirs or Successors or by any Power or Authority derived from the King his Deirs or Successors or otherwise shall from and after the first day of August which then shall be in the year of our Lord Bod One thousand six hundred forty one award impose or inflict any Pain Penalty Fine Amercement Imprisonment or other corporal punishment upon any of the Kings Subjects for any Contempt Misdemeanour Crime Offence matter or thing whatsoever belonging to Spiritual or Ecclestastical Cognilance or Jucisdiction whereupon some doubt hath been made that all ordinary Power of Coertion and Proceedings in Causes Ecclessastical were taken away whereby the ordinary course of Justice in Causes Ecclessastical hath been obstructed Be it therefore declared and Enacted by the King most excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority thereof That neither the said Act nor any thing therein contained both or shall take away and ordinary Power or Authority from any of the said Archbishops Bishops of any other person of persons named as aforesaid but that they and every of them evercisting Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction may proceed determine sentence erecute and erecise all manner of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and all Censures and Coertions appertaining and belonging to the same before the making of the Act before recited in all causes and matters belonging to Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction according to the Kings Magesties Ecclesiastical Laws used and practised in this Realm in as ample manner and form as they did and might lawfully have none before the making of the said Act. And be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid that the afore recited Act of decimo septimo Caroli and all the matters and clauses therein contained ercepting what concerns the High Commission Court or the new erection of some such like Court by Commission shall be and is hereby repealed to all intents and parposes whatsoever Any thing clause or sentence in the said Act contained to the contrary notwithstanding Provided alwayes and it is hereby enacted That neither this Act not any thing herein contained shall ertend or he construed to revive or give force to the said branch of the said Statute mave in the said first year of the Reign of the said late Queen Elizabeth mentioned in the said Act of Parliament made in the said seventeenth year of the Reign of the said King Charles but that the said branch of the said Statute made in the said first year of the Reign of the said Queen Elizabeth shall stand and be repealed in such sort as if this Act had never been made Provided also and it is hereby further enacted that it shall not be lawful for any Archbishop Bishop Hicar General Chancellor Commissary or any other Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Judge Officer or Minister or any other person having or erercising Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction to tenver or administer anto any person whatsoever the Oath usually called the Oath Ex officio or any other Oath whereby such person to whom the same is tenvered or administred may be charged or compelled to confesse or accuse or to purge him or her self of any criminal matter or thing whereby he or she may be lyable to any censure or punishment any thing in this Statute or any other Law Custom or Mage heretofore to the contrary hereof in any wise not withstanding Provided alwayes that this Act or any thing therein contained shall not extend or be construed to extend to give unto any Archbishop Bishop or any other Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Judge Officer or other person or persons aforesaid any power or authority to exercise execute inflict or determine any Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Censure or Coertion which they might not by Law have done before the year of our Lord One thousand six hundred thirty and nine nor to abridge or diminish the Kings Majesties Supremacy in Ecclesiastical matters and affairs nor to confirm the Canons made in the year One thousand six hundred and forty nor any of them nor any other Ecclesiastical Laws or Canons not formerly confirmed allowed or enarted by Parliament or by the established Laws of the Land as they stood in the year of the Lord One thousand six hundred thirty and nine The Contents of the Chapters Chap. I. THe endeavours of the Innovators to change the course of Ecclesiastical proceedings That stupendious Fanatick Hackett his fearful end Mr. Cambdens judgment touching the Innovators Their perseverance in their design of Innovation in King James his time and afterwards The pretended taking away the Coercive power from the Ecclesiastical Courts how gained what use was made of it by the Innovators and how they boasted of their benefit by it Two passages in the Long Parliament touching two Inconformists Page 1. Chap. II. The two Proviso's in the late Act that takes away the doubt touching Coercive power in Ecclesiastical Courts Dr. Cosens Apologie for sundry proceedings by Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical That groundless Opinion That a several Royal assent to the executing of every particular Canon in required is confuted The validity of the Ecclesiastical Laws The clamours of Inconformists Innovators and Fanaticks against the putting of Ecclesiastical Laws in execution though the Ecclesiastical Officers and Ministers are by Act of Parliament severely commanded to do it p. 10. Chap. III. The Heads of the several Chapters in that Apologie of Doctor Cosens Part 1. p. 27. Chap. IV. By the late Act the manner of proceeding in Ecclesiastical Courts is not altered but left as it was A summary relation of what Dr. Cosens in his Apologie hath asserted and made good by Gods Word the practice of the Primitive Christians the opinion of the Father the
legi Ad recognitiones vel sacramenta praestanda Recognitionem item facere non significare testimonium perhibere vel respondere in jure sed debitum agnoscere fateri vel placita de Catalogis vel debitis tenere Juramentum ex officio in foris illis ut in aliis ex omni memoria fuisse exactum ad simoniam adulterium alia tenebrarum opera rimanda praesertim cum Insinuatio ut loquuntur fuerit clamosa Et quamvis nemo teneatur seipsum prodere tamen per famam proditum teneri oftendere utrum possit suam innocentiam defendere seipsum purgare quandoquidem poenitentia imposita non sit poena sed medicina ad peccatores curandos alios à peccato deterrendos scandalum tollendum juxta illud in Sacris Literis Pro anima tua ne confundaris dicere verum Est enim confusio adducens peccatum confusio adducens gloriam gratiam Sed qui de hiis immoror quum dissertationes Richardi Cosini Legum Doctoris Johannis Morrisii Lanceloti Andrewes eruditae hac de re utrinque praestent Regina haud ignara suam authoritatem per Episcoporum latera in hoc negotio peti adversantium impetus tacite infregit Ecclesiasticam Jurisdictionem illaesam conservavit That is Not onely these speaking of Hackett and his Complices but others also who had hitherto though in vain impugned the received Discipline of the Church of England by condemning the calling of Bishops and contumeliously slandering the Praelates having now drawn into their party some Common-Lawyers sharpned both their Tongues and Pens against their Jurisdiction and the Authority which the Queen delegated in Ecclesiasticall Causes as altogether unjust declaiming every where even in Books published that men were unworthily oppressed in the Ecclesiasticall Courts contrary to the Lawes of the Kingdom That the Queen could not by Law delegate such kinde of Authority nor others to whom it was delegated could exercise it That these Courts could not require the Oath ex officio from the defendent party when as no man is bound to accuse himself That Oath precipitates men to condemn themselves with ignominious confusion or into wilful perjury to the destruction of their Souls Besides they ought not to hold cognizance of any other causes then Matrimoniall and Testamentary according to that old Mandate of Rescript We command our Sheriff of our Counties of S. N. c. that they suffer not any in their Balive to come together in any places to make any Recognizances upon their Oaths but in Matrimoniall and Testamentary causes On the other side the Professors of the Ecclesiasticall Lawes maintain'd the Royall Authority in Causes Ecclesiasticall as vested in the Queen by Authority of Parliament To oppose this was nothing else then to offer violence to Royall Majesty and violating the Oath of obedience to insult over the Sacred Prerogative Royall The Ecclesiasticall Courts may hold cognizance of other Causes then Matrimoniall and Testamentary by the Statute of Circumspecte agatis and Artiouli Cleri in the time of Edward the first as they made it appeare That Rescript or Law which they produc'd was suspected because it was incertain for the time and is variously read Elsewhere I have read it To perform Recognisances and Oaths and to make recognition or recognizance doth not signifie to give testimony or to answer in Law but to acknowledge and confesse a debt or to hold plea of Inventaries or Debts That the Oath ex officio hath time out of mind been given in these Courts as in others to sift out Simonie Adultery and other works of darkness especially when the Insinuation as they call it becomes loud And though no man is bound to betray himself yet being betrayed by fame he is bound to shew himself whether he can defend his innocence and purge himself seeing the penance enjoyned is not a punishment but a medicine to cure sinners and to deter others from sinning and to take away scandall according to that in Scripture Be not confounded in speaking truth for thy souls sake for there is a confusion that brings sin and there is a confusion that brings glory and grace But what do I dwelling upon these things when the Learned discourses hereupon on both sides are extant of Richard Cosin Doctor of the Lawes and John Morris and Lancelot Andrewes The Queen not ignorant that Her Authority was in this business struck at through the sides of the Bishops tacitely crusn'd the violence of the Adversaries and conserv'd the Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction inviolate Thus in a few words he summes up part of them marrow of these Learned dissertations and gives his sound judgement thereupon But still they went on in their design in which I believe they will ever be found immoveable We have had sufficient experience that way at what they aime and that there is no hope of bending without breaking too In their admonition to the Parliament in that Queens Reign they tell us to this effect at least that if they cannot have what they desire by fair meanes they will have it by a way shall make our hearts ake and I think they have indifferently well made their words good Yet blessed be God we are delivered again from them god give us care to beware of them and not to fall again into their snares by those blessed Titles of Mercy and Moderation heavenly good surely if rightly applied Let us but contemplate our fresh miseries and the murther of our blessed King and Martyr King Charles the First and his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 't is well to be hoped 't will prove as much or more effectual then the Pages Memento to Philip of Macedon in another case These men for they were all of the same Leaven still persisted in their design all along the Reign of Queen Elizabeth and upon King James his coming in thinking upon that change to have wrought something extraordinary upon a Prince that had a great access of Dominion and probably at his entrance would endeavour to satisfie all or most so far as with reason it could be expected and to ingratiate himself as far as fitting with his new Subjects But it was our happiness though his trouble and vexation that he was well acquainted with the factious and seditious humours of that gang in Scotland with whom and ours here of the same mould I believe ever was and will be a correspondence and co-operation Ex virids observantia this is too demonstrable They then set upon King Iames with their most humble Petition called The Lincoln-shire Ministers Petition perhaps denominatio à majori it was a complication of many parts there they desire favour for tender Consciences and thereupon was the Conference at Hampton-Court granted where their Reasons were as it were brayed in a Mortar and they or most of them seem'd satisfied but many of them at least soon returned to their vomit In that Petition they promise all obedience
plagues wherewith Almighty God may justly punish his people for neglecting this good and wholsome Law Who would think had we not sadly felt their designs that the great Magnifiers of Parliaments for which I discommend them not so they keep within due compass would have been so bitter against those that acted but according to these strict Parliamentary charges CHAP. III. The Heads of the several Chapters in that Apologie of Doctor Cosens Part 1. C. 1. THE particular distribution of causes proved to be of Ecclesiastical cognizance besides Testamentary and Matrimonial With a discourse of C. 2. Bishops Certificates against persons excommunicated being a special point of their voluntary Jurisdiction where there is no party that prosecuteth C. 3. That matters in the former Chapter adjoyned to Testamentary and Matrimonial causes though properly they be not of Testament or Matrimony are of Ecclesiastical cognizance and how far C. 4. General proofs out of Statutes that sundry other causes besides Testamentary and Matrimonial are of Ecclesiastical cognizance C. 5. That Suits for Tithes of Benefices upon voidance or spoliation likewise that Suits for Tithes Oblations Mortuaries and Pensions Procurations c. are of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction is proved by Statutes especially C. 6. That Suits for right of Tithes belong to the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and how far is shewed out of the books and Reports of the Common Law so of places of Burial and Church-yards and of Pensions Mortuaries Oblations c. C. 7. Of right to have a Curate and of Contributions to Reparations and to other things required in Churches C. 8. Proofs in general that sundry crimes and offences are punishable by Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and namely Idolatry Heresie Perjury or Laesio fidei and how far the last of these is there to be corrected also of disturbance of Divine Service or not frequenting of it and neglect of the Sacraments C. 9. That Simony Usury Defamation or Slander beating of a Clerk Sacrilege Brawling or Fighting in Church or Church-yard Dilapidations or waste of an Ecclesiastical Living and all Incontinency are punishable by Ecclesiastical authority and how far C. 10. Several other matters reckoned in this tenth Chapter as ordeining of real Compositions and disannulling of them suspension ab ingressu Ecclesiae c. Interdiction of a Church Sequestration Excommunication Parish-Clerks fees Goods due to a Church deteined Blasphemy Idolatry Apostasie from Christianity violation and prophanation of the Sabbath Subornation of Perjury Attestation of a womans chastity Drunkenness filthy speech violation of a Sequestration or Induction hindering and disturbance to carry away Tithes enjoyning of Penance corporal contempt of obeying the Decrees of the Ecclesiastical Judge Fees due in Ecclesiastical Courts Curates and Clerks wages Forgery in an Ecclesiastical matter as of Letters Testimonial of Orders of Institution burying of excommunicate persons communicating with excommunicate persons frequenters of Conventicles digging up of Corps buried and generally for any matter Ecclesiastical indefinitely by the Articuli cleri may be cited All these are of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and proofs that any Subjeet Lay or other may be cited in any cause Ecclesiastical C. 11. That Lay-men may be cited and urged to take Oaths in other causes then Testamentary and Matrimonial C. 12. The grounds of the opinions to the contrary examined and confuted C. 13. That judgment of Heresie still remaineth at the Common Law in Judges Ecclesiastical and that the Proviso touching Heresie in the Statute 1 Eliz. 1. is onely spoken of Ecclesiastical Commissioners thereby authorized C. 14. That by the Statute Her Majesty may commit authority and they may take and use for Ecclesiastical causes Attachments Imprisonments and Fines Herein he writes also how the Law was at that time C. 15. That an Ecclesiastical person may be deprived of his Benefice without indictment or prosecution of party C. 16. That after forty dayes an excommunicate person may be otherwise punished then upon the Writ De Excommunicato capiendo and that the said Writ may and ought to be awarded upon contempts arising on other causes Ecclesiastical then any of those ten crimes mentioned in the Statute 5 Eliz. 23. C. 17. Of a Prohibition what it is where it lyeth not and where it doth and how it ceaseth by a Consultation and of the Writ of Indicavit C. 18. An Analysis or unfolding of the two special Statutes touching Praemunire with sundry questions and doubts about that matter requiring more grave resolution Then in the second part of his Apology the Doctor sets forth his Proofs together with his Answers to the objections made against the manner of practice of Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical by those that oppugn it C. 1. Of the distinction of Offences and several kinds and ends in punishing them with the necessity of punishments C. 2. Of two sorts of prosecution of crimes and offences viz. by a party and of office the practice of them in Scripture and in the several Courts of this Realm C. 3. Of the sundry kinds of objecting crimes by a party mentioned in the Civil Law as by reason of a mans publick charge and function also by way of Exception Supplication Complaint Delation and Accusation The true signification of the word Accusatio its divers acceptions definition and exposition thereof with some reason of the frequency of Accusation in Courts of the Civil Laws in former times is also declared C. 4. That the prosecution of crimes by way of Accusation is in most places forbidden or grown into disuse The reasons hereof be partly the danger to the Accusers and partly the hatefulness of that course Therein also is disputed whether all Accusation be unlawful and certain points delivered to be observed by all them that will accuse others C. 5. Of the several acceptions of the word Officium the signification of the words Inquisitio Questio crimina ordinaria extraordinaria the reason why enquiry by office came in place of Accusation Of Enquiry in general and special of Enquiry special Ex officio nobili sive mero mixto promoto and of the privileges of proceeding ex mero officio above the other C. 6. Of Denunciation a special means of stirring up the office of the manifold use thereof on the other side the Sea The general acception of that word and of four kinds of Denunciation how they differ one from another what is required in them and when a Denouncer is to be condemned or excused of expences and what course of dealing against crimes and offences is holden both in Courts of the Ecclesiastical Commission and in ordinary Courts Ecclesiastical of this Realm C. 7. That the Civil and Canon Laws allow sundry means to ground a special Enquiry of office against a crime besides Accusation and Presentment therein is also conteined an Answer to a supposed Rule and declared how from general they descend to special Enquiry And that besides those two either a fame or clamosa insinuatio or private judicial Denunciation or Canonical Denunciation
is the most frequent and onely mention almost of such a thing This very term to Swear you will scarce any where find it in the Old Testament but either under the word Hiphil that is the Imperative commanding conjugation in respect of him that gives the oath or under the word Niphal that is the passive suffering conjugation in respect of him that takes the oath And under the same rule are the Greeks amongst whom Orcos is the name of the oath which almost solely the holy Ghost acknowledges in the New Testament In that word is a kind of straitning necessity and as they say an exigengy no less then there is in the word Orcos for from the same word comes both that is of straitning Thereupon comes that common Proverb War and Oaths are voluntary evils and that they may be good they ought to be pressed and expressed as St. Augustine of Oaths sayes wittily either by the Authority of him that gives the oath or at leastwise by the hardness of his heart that believes not So that it is a sin either to swear or to make war except it be at least in some manner exacted and upon some and no light cause Therefore that it may be required or rather that it ought to be the very force of Nature the very force of the term it self evinceth it But whether from the Magistrate this is the second branch Yes surely from the Magistrate So the Divines of old Not onely every body but every soul is to be subject to the Powers Rom. 13.1 Therefore the Powers have power to commit the body to custody by imprisoning it lest it escape And so likewise the soul to commit that to custody by laying an oath upon it lest it should have any subterfuge by which name God himself hath most fitly called an Oath the Bond or prison of the soul Num. 30.13 by which the soul may as it were be tyed up and being so tyed up may be bound to answer appositely and readily But yet it comes nearer If it be lawful for the Master to force his servant to take an oath as Gen. 24.3 Abraham did if a father to his son as Jacob to Joseph Gen. 47.29 if a brother to a brother as the same Jacob to Esau Gen. 25.33 By how much better right is it lawful for the Magistrate to do it to his Subject whose command is more excellent then any other command I adde also about the right settling in marriage of a son if that be lawful as Abraham to his servant of chusing a fitting place of burial as to Joseph of passing away the right of Birth-right as Esau and in private causes I adde also of the least concernment if compared with the publick Then surely by better righr may the Magistrate do it in the common cause of the Commonwealth whose Interest is greater then any other Interest And that is provided for by Gods Law Exod. 12.8 in express terms in the case of a Pawn saith God let them come before the Magistrate In which place the Magistrates are named by the name of God himself and not by any name but by that very name which is taken from the force of an oath as though he should say Let them come before the Oath-givers or those who when they give the Law in Gods stead in his Judgment and in his Name may require his Oath to be taken That is Gods Deputies Psal 82.6 in Gods judgment 2 Chro. 19.8 the Oath of God Eccles. 8.2 therefore to the Magistrate It is lawful to the Magistrate I say as well Ecclesiastical as Civil Before him that is the Ecclesiastical Judge by Law the Woman is commanded to purge her self in a case of suspicion of breach of Wedlock bond Num. 5.19 Before him that is the Temporal Judge by law the man is commanded to purge himself in a cause of suspicion of breach of Social promise or Contract Exod. 22.8 The practice whereof we see and the practice of the Saints is the Interpreter of the Commandments of the Ecclesiastical Judge in Ezra who required an oath in a Matrimonial cause Ezra 10.5 Of the Temporal Judge in Nehemiah who forced an Oath in a cause of Usury Neh. 5.12 Neither hath the pious and religious Magistrate onely right to do this but the Heathen Magistrate too and that to Gods people Zedekiah gave his Oath of Allegeance to Nebuchadnezzar 2 Chron. 36.9 though forced he gave it and rightly too if we believe Ezekiel and afterwards by a sacrilegious boldness he attempted to break it he scaped not unpunished for it Ezek. 17.13 Lastly I adde that this was not lawful to do to their own people onely but also to guests and strangers living within their Territories either for trafficking or any other cause In which regard Joseph now become Vice-Roy of Aegypt imposes an Oath upon his Brethren in a case of Treason suspected though both by Law and by Nature they were Canaanites Gen. 43.3 therefore hence it now appears that it is lawful to impose an Oath and that it is lawful also to the Magistrate But whether is it lawful to do it to the party that is the party guilty or defendant the third thing I propounded Nor can that be called into question Exod. 22.8 He to whom the Pawn was concredited is the party guilty or defendant Num. 5.19 The woman suspected by the jealous husband to have wronged his bed is also the party guilty or defendant but to each of them is this oath to be given nor is it lawful for them to decline it In a few words I will summe it up Whether one deceitfully keeps his neighbours goods or perfidiously deteins his friends goods or restores not to the owner his found goods when he requires them Levit. 6.3 or as it seems to me in any other crime for it is mentioned indefinitely 1 Kings 8.31 in whatsoever he shall sin it is lawful for the Plaintiff or Agent to impose an oath upon the party that is the guilty or defendant or to lay an oath upon him as it is in the Hebrew phrase nor is it lawful for the guilty or defendant party to refuse it whether it be imposed by the Agent or Plaintiff or by the Magistrate Indeed I cannot deny but we are fallen into such times that it may be expedient to impose the oath upon the party Agent or Plaintiff and not onely upon the Defendant for it may happen that they may both prevaricate that is the party Agent or Plaintiff by calumniating and the party guilty or defendant by Tergiversation But if we would take the Law from Heaven from the holy Writ to the party guilty or defendant 't is more necessary to be given Examples are thereof Scarce will you find in the Law an oath laid upon the Agent or Plaintiff but very often may you find it upon the party guilty or defendant Moses renders the reason of it The actor who for the most part is the party
on that subject entituled Tenenda non tollenda or the necessity of preserving Tenures in capite c. and if it should be thought fit still to continue the abolition of Wardships c. whether the Tenures notwithstanding should be continued and whether a fitter retribution to His Majesty should be made then by Excise of Ale c. I need say no more of this but let Mr. Philipps book plead for it And also if it shall be thought fitting Rates to be set upon some Commodities for the sale of them that upon many more commodities then are yet the known rate and value of what they should be sold for should by indifferent and knowing men be set down considering the great hurt done by selling many commodities at unreasonable rates upon some accidental straits in regard of some accidents of time place or persons and many imposing upon the unskilful and unwary buyer very often as is notorious demanding more the double the price they will take In forreign parts both upon books and other commodities fitting rates are by Authority set down whereby the seller may have a just gain and the buyer not be over-reached Certum quid is the great satisfaction to the Subjects as in Fees certain in all Courts so at least in many commodities Also if it be thought fit that in point of dignity and precedency About dignity and precedency a fixt certain plain rule might be set down which probably would take away much emulation and grudging and quarrels oftentimes amongst many if it were clearly once determined And amongst others if it were so determined who should have precedency the eldest son of him whose father was a Knight and the first Knight of the Family or the eldest son of him whose father was but an Esquire but the eldest son of a Knight Senior to the Knight father of the former or whose Grandfather or direct Ancestor from whom he is lineally descended and is eldest son and heir was a Knight the second conceiving it is his right in regard he is the direct descendant and heir to the Senior Knight And that if it shall be thought fitting no person that bore Arms against the late King or His Majesty that now is or had any pretended Commission or authority so to do shall own the Title of General Lieutenant General Major General Commissary General Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Major Captain Lieutenant Cornet Ensign or any other Title by reason of any such pretended Commission or Authority nor any person shall so call them by any such Title under pain of a great Mulct toties quoties to be inflicted both upon the person that owns such Title and on the person that gives it or so calls them Nemo ex delicto consequitur beneficium and so bad a cause ought not in any implicite manner to be approved and rightly considered 't is an infamy to the parties to be called so And also Against the Act of limitation of actions in some cases if it be thought fitting that in regard that many who took the Kings part in the late wars could not have their right of suing for their own just due debts owing them and contracted either before the wars or in the time of the wars in the Courts of Justice then in being so that six years were elapsed according to that Act of 21 Jacobi 16. touching limitation of Actions and so they are thereby excluded to their great impoverishment There should be an abrogation or suspension of that Act so as to give remedy in this case that the spoiled may have reparation or retribution of justice if not reward for his Loyalty And also Against multiplicity of Statutes upon one and the same subject if it be thought fit that where Laws are doubtfully penned they may be explained and where there are multiplicity of several Statutes touching the same subject some repealing part of a statute some enlarging and altering so that the true meaning of the Statute becomes difficult and perplexed that in such cases all the said Statutes several so concerning the same subject may be repealed and one plain and clear Statute thereof to be made as namely these several Statutes in the Reigns of King Edward 6. Queen Mary Queen Elizabeth King James and King Charles 1. touching the prohibition of eating Flesh in Lent and other Fish-dayes and concerning Fasting-dayes may be so repealed and made void and one Statute made clearly and plainly to comprehend all that is necessary upon that subject Touching Ecclesiastical Persons Courts and Causes SOme have wished if it were thought fit The Clergies Proctors in the House of Commons that now the Lords Spiritual the Bishops being restored to their right in the Lords House that the Clergy should have their Proctors to sit in the House of Commons if they desired it representing the body of the Clergy as they used to do till about Henry the sixths time or not long before as it was then used since which time it hath been disused Some have affirmed that a Clergy-man of competent temporal estate having in King James's time been chosen Burgesse for a Corporation was not suffered to sit there nor a Clergy-man to say Prayers there Nor will some yield they can vote to chuse a Parliament-man either in County or borough so little of representation have they and yet when in Convocation they give the King Subsidies their grant must be confirmed by Act of Parliament Anciently such care was taken that Bishops should be present in Parliament that in their absence their Chancellors were summoned to sit there Also if it be thought fit About augmentation of Vicaridges that whereas before the dissolution of Monasteries the Bishops had power to augment poor Vicaridges out of the Tithes of Impropriations so they are now commonly called though the true name is Appropriations the Tithes having been appropriated to some Monastery or Religious house or other before the dissolution and after that falling into Lay-mens hands who held them improperly living by the Altar and doing nothing there got the Nick-name of Impropriators and Impropriations which now holds good such is the tyranny of Custom in this and many other cases Or if there were no Vicaridge endowed the Bishops might endow one nay and go so far as to leave to the Appropriator which then was that Religious house to which it was appropriated who then thought themselves as worthy to be kindly used as a man would think our Lay-Impropriators can do now not much more then a 50. part of the Tithes or thereabout It seems hard that the Lay-Impropriator should have a matter of 200. or 300 l. per annum Against Mensals or more and the poor Vicar a matter of 20. marks or 20. Pounds or thereabout and hardest in Mensals that is as it was usual when a Religious house could procure from the Patron the right of Presentation to some Living near their Monastery whither one of their