the Proclamation was published whereby all Jesuites and Priests ordained by forrein authority were commanded to depart out of this kingdome by a certain time prefixed After which time he began to lurk and to change his name howbeit at last he was apprehended in Dublin and committed to prison in the Castle there Upon his first Examination taken by the Lord Deputie himself he acknowledged that he was a Priest and ordained by a Popish Titulary Bishop that he had accepted the title and Office of the Pope's Vicar-generall in the three Dioceses before named and had exercised spirituall jurisdiction in foro conscientiae and in sundry other points he maintained and justified the Pope's authority onely he said he was of opinion that the Pope had no power to excommunicate or depose his Majestie because the King is not of the Pope's Religion The next Term after he was indicted upon the Statute of 2 Eliz. enacted in this Realm against such as should wilfully and advisedly maintain and uphold the jurisdiction of any forrein Prince or Prelate in any causes Ecclesiasticall or Civil within this Realm By which Statute the first offence of that kind is punished with losse of goods and one year's imprisonment the second offence incurreth the penaltie of the Praemunire and the third offence is made high Treason Upon this Indictment he was arraigned convicted and condemned and so rested in prison during the next two Terms without any farther question He then made petition unto the Lord Deputie to be set at liberty whereupon his Lordship caused him to be examined by Sir Oliver Saint John Sir James Fullerton Sir Jefferie Fenton the Atturney and Solicitor generall At first he made some evasive and indirect answers but at last voluntarily and freely he made this ensuing acknowledgement or confession which being set down in writing word for word as he made it was advisedly read by him and subscribed with his own hand and with the hands of those who took his examination and afterwards he confirmed it by his oath before the Lord Deputie and Counsell The Confession or Acknowledgement of Robert Lalor Priest made the 22. of December 1606. FIrst he doth acknowledge that he is not a lawfull Vicar-generall in the Dioceses of Dublin Kildare and Fernes and thinketh in his conscience that he cannot lawfully take upon him the said Office Item he doth acknowledge our Sovereign Lord King James that now is to be his lawfull chief and Supreme Governour in all causes as well Ecclesiasticall as Civil and that he is bound in conscience to obey him in all the said causes and that neither the Pope nor any other forrein Prelate Prince or Potentate hath any power to controll the King in any cause Ecclesiasticall or Civil within this Kingdome or any of his Majestie 's Dominions Item he doth in his conscience believe that all Bishops ordained and made by the King's authority within any of his Dominions are lawfull Bishops and that no Bishop made by the Pope or by any authority derived from the Pope within the King's Dominions hath any power or authoritie to impugn disannull or controll any Act done by any Bishop made by his Majestie 's authoritie as aforesaid Item he professeth himself willing and ready to obey the King as a good and obedient Subject ought to doe in all his lawfull commandments either concerning his function of Priesthood or any other dutie belonging to a good Subject After this Confession made the State here had no purpose to proceed against him severely either for his contempt of the Proclamation or offence against the Law So as he had more liberty then before and many of his friends had access unto him who telling him what they heard of his Confession he protested unto them that he had only acknowledged the King's Civill and Temporall power without any confession or admittance of his authoritie in Spirituall causes This being reported unto the Lord Deputie by sundry Gentlemen who gave faith unto what he said his Lordship thought sit that since he had incurred the pain of Praemunire by exercising Episcopall jurisdiction as Vicar-generall to the Pope that he should be attainted of that offence as well to make him an example to others of his profession for almost in every Diocese of this Kingdome there is a Titulary Bishop ordained by the Pope as also that at the time of his Trial a just occasion might be taken to publish the Confession and acknowledgement which he had voluntarily made signed and confirmed by oath before the Lord Deputie and Councell who have likewise subscribed their names as witnesses thereof Hereupon in Hillarie Term 4 Jacobi an Inditement was framed against him in the King's Bench upon the Statute of 16 Rich. 2. cap. 5. containing these severall points 1. That he had received a Bull or Brief purchased or procured in the Court of Rome which Bull or Brief did touch or concern the King's Crown and dignity Royall containing a Commission of Authoritie from the Pope of Rome unto Richard Brady and David Magragh to constitute a Vicar-generall for the See of Rome by the name of the See Apostolick in the severall Dioceses of Dublin Kildare and Fernes within this Kingdome of Ireland 2. That by pretext or colour of that Bull or Brief he was constituted Vicar-generall of the See of Rome and took upon him the style and title of Vicar-generall in the said severall Dioceses 3. That he did exercise Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction as Vicar-generall of the See of Rome by instituting divers persons to Benefices with cure of souls by granting dispensations in causes Matrimonial by pronouncing sentences of divorce between divers married persons and by doing all other acts and things pertaining to Episcopal Jurisdiction within the said several Dioceses against our Sovereign Lord the King his Crown and dignity Royal and in contempt of his Majesty and disherison of his Crown and contrary to the form and effect of the Statute c. To this Inditement Lalor pleaded Not guilty and when the issue was to be tried the name and reputation of the man and the nature of the cause drew all the principal Gentlemen both of the Pale and Provinces that were in town to the hearing of the matter At what time a substantial Jury of the City of Dublin being sworn for the trial and the points of the Inditement being opened and set forth by the King's Serjeant the Attorney general thought it not impertinent but very necessary before he descended to the particular evidence against the prisoner to inform and satisfie the hearers in two Points 1. What reason moved us to ground this Inditement upon the old Statute of 16 Rich. 2. rather then upon some other later Law made since the time of King Henr. 8. 2. What were the true causes of the making of this Law of 16 Rich. and other former Laws against Provisors and such as did appeal to the Court of Rome in those
and other Ordinaries having Episcopal Jurisdiction to punish and chastise Priests Clerks and Religious men being within the bounds of their Jurisdiction as shall be convicted afore them by examination and lawfull proof requisite by the law of the Church of Advoutrie Fornication Incest or any other fleshly Incontinency by committing them to ward and prison there to abide for such time as shall be thought to their discretions convenient for the quality and quantity of their trespass And that none of the said Archbishops Bishops or Ordinaries aforesaid be thereof chargeable of to or upon any action of false or wrongfull imprisonment but that they be utterly thereof discharged in any of the cases aforesaid by virtue of this Act. Rex est persona mixta because he hath both Ecclesiastical and Temporal Jurisdiction By the Ecclesiastical Laws allowed within this Realm a Priest cannot have two Benefices nor can a Bastard be a Priest but the King may by his Ecclesiasticall power and Jurisdiction dispense with both of these because they be mala prohibita and not mala per se In the Reign of King Henry the Eighth BY an Act of Parliament made in the 24. year of King Henry the 8. that is to say by the King 24 Bishops 29 Abbots and Priors for so many were then Lords of Parliament by all the Lords Temporal and the Commons in that Parliament assembled it is declared That where by divers sundry old authentick Histories and Chronicles it was manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the world governed by one Supreme Head and King having the Dignity and Royal estate of the Imperial Crown of the same unto whom a Body politick compact of all sorts and degrees of people divided in terms and by names of Spiritualty and Temporalty been bound and ought to bear next to God a natural and humble obedience he being also institute and furnished by the goodness and furtherance of Almighty God with plenary whole and entire Power Preheminence Authority Prerogative and Jurisdiction to render and yield Justice and final determination to all manner of folk resiants or subjects within this his Realm in all causes matters debates and contentions happening to occur insurge or begin within the limits thereof without restraint or provocation to any forrein Princes or Potentates of the world The Body Spiritual whereof having power when any cause of the Law Divine happened to come in question or of Spiritual learning that it was declared interpreted and shewed by that part of the said Body politick called the Spiritualty then being usually called the English Church which alwaies had been reputed and also found of that sort that both for knowledge integrity and sufficiency of number it had been always thought and was also at that hour sufficient and meet of it self without the intermeddling of any exteriour person or persons to declare and determine all such doubts and to administer all such offices and duties as to the rank spiritual did appertain For the due administration whereof and to keep them from corruption and sinister affection the King 's most noble Progenitors and the antecessors of the Nobles of this Realm did sufficiently indow the said Church both with honour and possessions And the Laws Temporal for trial of property of lands and goods and for the conservation of the people of this Realm in unity and peace without ravine or spoil was administred adjudged and executed by sundry Judges and Ministers of the other part of the said Body politick called the Temporaltie And both their Authorities and Jurisdictions did conjoyn together in the due administration of Justice the one to help the other And whereas the King his most noble Progenitors and the Nobility and Commons of the said Realm at divers and sundry Parliaments as well in the time King Edward the 1. Edward the 3. Richard the 2. Henry the 4. and other noble Kings of this Realm made sundry Ordinances Laws Statutes and Provisions for the entire and sure conservation of the Prerogatives Liberties and Preheminences of the said Imperial Crown of this Realm and of the Jurisdiction Spiritual and Temporal of the same to keep it from the annoiance as well of the See of Rome as from the authority of other forrein Potentates attempting the diminution or violation thereof as often and from time to time as any such annoiance or attempt might be known or espied And notwithstanding the said good Statutes and Ordinances made in the time of the King 's most noble Progenitors in preservation of the Authority and Prerogative of the said Imperiall Crown as is aforesaid yet nevertheless fithence the making of the said good Statutes and Ordinances divers and sundry inconveniences and dangers not provided for plainly by the said former Acts Statutes and Ordinances have risen and sprung by reason of Appeals sued out of this Realm to the See of Rome in causes Testamentary causes of Matrimony and Divorces right of Tithes Oblations and Obventions not onely to the great inquietation vexation trouble costs and charges of the King's Highness and many of his subjects and resiants in this his Realm but also to the great delay and lett to the true and speedy determination of the said causes forasmuch as the parties appealing to the said Court of Rome most commonly did the same for delay of Justice and forasmuch as the great distance of way was so far out of this Realm that neither the necessary proofs nor the true knowledge of the cause could be so well known or the witnesses there so well examined as within this Realm so that the parties grieved by means of the said Appeals were most times without remedy In consideration thereof the King his Nobles and Commons considering the great enormities dammages long delaies and hurts that as well to his Highness as to his said Noble subjects Commons and resiants of this his Realm in the said causes Testamentary causes of Matrimony and Divorces Tithes Oblations and Obventions did daily ensue did therefore by his Royall assent and by the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in that Parliament assembled and by Authority of the same enact establish and ordain That all causes Testamentary causes of Matrimony and Divorces rights of Tithes Oblations and Obventions the knowledge whereof by the goodness of Princes of this Realm and by the Laws and Customes of the same appertained to the Spiritual Jurisdiction of this Realm then already commenced moved depending being happening or hereafter coming in contention debate or question within this Realm or within any of the King's dominions or Marches of the same or elsewhere whether they concern the King his Heirs or Successors or any other subjects or resiants within this Realm of what degree soever they be should be from thenceforth heard examined discussed clearly finally and definitively adjudged and determined within the King's Jurisdiction and
Authority and not elsewhere in such Courts Spiritual and Temporal of the same as the natures conditions and qualities of the Cases and matters aforesaid in contention or thereafter happening in contention should require without having any respect to any custome use or sufferance in hinderance lett or prejudice of the same or to any other thing used or suffered to the contrary thereof by any other manner person or persons in any manner of wise any forrein Inhibitions Appeals Sentences Summons Citations Suspensions Interdictions Excommunications Restraints Judgements or any other Process or Impediment of what natures names qualities or conditions soever they be from the See of Rome or any other forrein Courts or Potentates of the world or from and out of this Realm or any other the King's dominions or Marches of the same to the See of Rome or to any other forrein Courts or Potentates to the let tor impediment thereof in any wise notwithstanding as by the said Act appeareth By an Act of Parliament in 25 H. 8. it is declared by the King the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in that Parliament assembled That neither the King his Heirs nor Successors Kings of this Realm nor any his subjects of this Realm nor of any other his dominions should from thenceforth sue to the said Bishop of Rome called the Pope or to the See of Rome or to any person or persons having or pretending any Authority by the same for Licences Dispensations Impositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies or any other Instruments or Writings of what kind name nature or quality soever they be for any cause or matter for the which any Licence Dispensation Composition Faculty Grant Rescript Delegacy Instrument or other Writing theretofore had been used and accustomed to be had and obtained at the See of Rome or by authority thereof or of any Prelat of this Realm nor for any manner of other Licences Dispensations Compositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies or any other Instruments or Writings that in cases of necessity might lawfully be granted without offending of the Holy Scriptures and Laws of God But that from thenceforth every such Licence Dispensation Composition Faculty Grant Rescript Delegacy Instrument and other Writing afore named and mentioned necessary for the King his Heirs and Successors and his and their people and subjects upon the due examination of the causes and qualities of the persons procuring such Dispensations Licences Compositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies Instruments or other Writings should be granted had and obtained from time to time within this his Realm and other his dominions and not elsewhere in manner and form following and not otherwise That is to say The Archbishop of Canterbury for the time being and his Successors should have power and authority from time to time by their discretions to give grant and dispose by an Instrument under the Seal of the said Archbishop unto the King and unto his Heirs and Successors Kings of this Realm as well all manner of such Licences Dispensations Compositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies Instruments and all other Writings for causes not being contrary or repugnant to the Holy Scriptures and Laws of God as theretofore had been used and accustomed to be had and obtained by the King or any his most noble Progenitors or any of his or their subjects from the See of Rome or any person or persons by authority of the same and all other Licences Dispensations Faculties Compositions Grants Rescripts Delegacies Instruments and other Writings in for and upon all such causes and matters as should be convenient and necessary to be had for the honour and surety of the King his Heirs and Successors and the wealth and profit of this his Realm so that the said Archbishop or any his Successors in no manner wise should grant any Dispensation Licence Rescript or any other Writing before rehearsed for any cause or matter repugnant to the Law of Almightie God as by the said Act also appeareth If it be demanded what Canons Constitutions Ordinances and Synodals provincial are still in force within this Realm I answer that it is resolved and enacted by Authority of Parliament That such as have been allowed by general consent and custome within the Realm and are not contrariant or repugnant to the Laws Statutes and Customes of this Realm nor are to the dammage or hurt of the King's Prerogative royal are still in force within this Realm as the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of the same Now as consent and custome hath allowed those Canons so no doubt by general consent of the whole Realm any of the same may be corrected inlarged explained or abrogated For example There is a Decree that all Clerks that have received any manner of Orders greater or smaller should be exempt pro causis criminalibus before the Temporal Judges This Decree had never any force within England First for that it was never approved and allowed of by general consent within the Realm Secondly it was against the Laws of the Realm as it doth appear by infinite precedents Thirdly it was against the Prerogative and Sovereignty of the King that any subject within this Realm should not be subject to the Laws of this Realm In the Reign of Queen Elizabeth BY the said Act of Parliament whereupon the principal case then in question partly dependeth made in the first year of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth it is declared That where in the time of the Reign of King Henry the 8. divers good Laws and Statutes were made and established as well for the utter extinguishment and putting away of all usurped and forrein powers and authorities out of this Realm and other her dominions and countries as also for the restoring and uniting to the Imperial Crown of this Realm the ancient Jurisdiction Authorities Superiorities and Preheminences to the same of right belonging and appertaining by reason whereof her most humble subjects from the 25. year of the said King Henry the 8. were continually kept in good order and were disburthened of divers great and intolerable charges and vexations before that time unlawfully taken and exacted by such forrein power and authority as before that was usurped And to the intent that all usurped and forrein power and authority Spirituall and Temporal might for ever be clearly extinguished and never be used or obeyed within this Realm or any other her dominions or countries It was by the Authority of that Parliament enacted That no forrein Prince person Prelate State or Potentate Spiritual or Temporal should at any time after the last day of that Session of Parliament use enjoy or exercise any manner of Power Jurisdiction Superiority Authority Preheminence or Priviledge Spiritual or Ecclesiastical within this Realm or within any other the Queen's dominions or countries that then were or hereafter should be but from thenceforth the same should be clearly abolished out of this Realm and all other her dominions for ever any Statute
Ordinance Customes Constitutions or any other matter or cause whatsoever to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding And it was then also established and enacted by the Authority of that Parliament That such Jurisdictions Priviledges Superiorities and Preheminences Spiritual and Ecclesiastical as by any Spiritual or Ecclesiastical power or authority had heretofore been or might lawfully be exercised or used for the visitation of the Ecclesiastical state and persons and for reformation order and correction of the same and of all manner Errours Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities should for ever by Authority of that Parliament be united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm And that the Queen her Heirs and Successors Kings or Queens of this Realm should have full power and authority by virtue of that Act by Letters Patents under the great Seal of England to assign name and authorize when and as often as the Queen her Heirs or Successors should think meet and convenient and for such and so long time as should please the Queen her Heirs or Successors such person or persons being natural-born Subjects to the Queen her Heirs or Successors as the said Queen her Heirs or Successors should think meet to exercise use occupy and execute under the said Queen her Heirs or Successors all manner of Jurisdictions Priviledges and Preheminences in any wise touching or concerning any Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction within these Realms of England and Ireland or any other her dominions and countries and to visit reform redress order correct and amend all such Errours Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities whatsoever which by any manner Spiritual or Ecclesiasticall power authority or jurisdiction could or might lawfully be reformed ordered redressed corrected restrained or amended to the pleasure of Almighty God the encrease of vertue and the conservation of the peace and the unity of this Realm And that such person or persons so to be named assigned authorized and appointed by the said Queen her Heirs or Successors after the said Letters Patents to him or them made and delivered as is aforesaid should have full power and authority by virtue of that Act and of the said Letters Patents under the said Queen her Heirs or Successors to exercise use and execute all the premisses according to the tenour and effect of the said Letters Patents any matter or cause to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding as by the said Act also appeareth It was adjudged in the Court of Common Pleas by Sir James Dyer Weston and the whole Court that a Dean or any other Ecclesiasticall person may resign to the Crown as divers did to King Edward the 6. for that he had the Authority of the supreme Ordinary From the 1. untill the 11. year of Queen Elizabeth's Reign no person of what perswation of Christian Religion soever at any time refused to come to the publick Divine Service celebrated in the Church of England being evidently grounded upon the Sacred and infallible Word of Almighty God and established by publick Authority within this Realm But after the Bull of Pius Quintus was published against her Majesty in the 11. year of her Reign containing amongst other things too long to be repeated for this purpose these words Pius Bishop Servant of God's servants c She Queen Elizabeth hath clean put away the Sacrifice of the Mass Prayers Fastings Choice or difference of meats and Single life She possessing the Kingdome and by usurping the place of the Supreme Head of the Church in all England and the chief Authority and Jurisdiction of the same hath again brought the said Realm into miserable destruction Unto her all such as are the worst of the people resort and are by her received into safe protection c. We make it known that the said Elizabeth and as many as stand on her side in the matter above named have run into the danger of our Curse We make it also known that we have deprived her from that right she pretended to have in the Kingdome aforesaid and also from all and every her Authority Dignity and Priviledge We charge and forbid all and every the Nobles Subjects and people and others aforesaid that they be not so hardy as to obey her or her Admonitions Commandments or Laws upon pain of the like accurse upon them We pronounce that all whosoever by any occasion have taken their Oath unto her are for ever discharged of such their Oath and also from all Fealty and Service which was due to her by reason of her Government c. as by the said Bull more at large appeareth After this Bull all they that depended on the Pope obeyed the Bull disobeyed their gracious and natural Sovereign and upon this occasion refused to come to the Church The publishing of this Bull by a subject against his Sovereign as appeareth by that which hath been oftentimes said was Treason in the highest degree by the ancient Common Laws of England For if it were Treason to publish a Bull of Excommunication within this Realm against a Subject thereof as it was adjudged in the Reign of King Edward the 1. Ã fortiori it is Treason in the highest degree to publish such a Bull against the Sovereign and Monarch her self After this Bull many Bulls of Absolution and Reconciliation to the Church of Rome were published and dispersed amongst her Majestie 's subjects to withdraw them from their natural Loyalty and Allegeance to their Sovereign whereupon no small inconveniences as hereafter appeareth followed And therefore at a Parliament holden in The 13. year of her Reign it was declared by the whole Body of the Realm That divers seditious and very ill-disposed people minding very seditiously and unnaturally not onely to bring this Realm and the Imperial Crown thereof being in very deed of it self most free again into the thraldome and subjection of the forrein usurped and unlawful Jurisdiction Preheminence and Authority claimed by the said See of Rome but also to estrange and alienate the minds and hearts of sundry the Queen's subjects from their dutiful Obedience and to raise and stir Sedition and Rebellion within this Realm did then lately procure and obtain to themselves from the said Bishop of Rome and his said See divers Bulls and Writings the effect whereof had been and then was to absolve and reconcile all those that would be contented to forsake their due Obedience to the Queen and to yield and subject themselves to the said feigned unlawful and usurped Authority and by colour of the said Bulls and Writings the said persons very secretly and most seditiously in such parts of this Realm where the people for want of good instruction were most weak simple and ignorant and thereby farthest from the good understanding of their duties towards God and the Queen did by their lewd and subtil practices and perswasions so far forth work that sundry simple and ignorant persons had been contented to be
reconciled to the said usurped Authority of the See of Rome and to take Absolution at the hands of the said naughty and subtil practisers whereby did grow great disobedience and boldness in many not onely to withdraw and absent themselves from all Divine Service then most godly set forth and used within this Realm but also to think themselves discharged of and from all Obedience Duty and Allegeance to her Majesty whereby most wicked and unnatural Rebellion did ensue and to the farther danger of this Realm was thereafter very like to be renewed if the ungodly and wicked attempts in that behalf were not by severity of Laws in time restrained and bridled For remedy and redress whereof and to prevent the great mischiefs and inconveniences that thereby might ensue it was enacted by the Queen with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in that Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That if any person or persons after the first day of July then next coming should use or put in ure in any place within this Realm or in any the Queen's dominions any such Bull Writing or Instrument written or printed of Absolution or Reconciliation at any time theretofore obtained and gotten or at any time thereafter to be obtained or gotten from the said Bishop of Rome or any his Successors or from any other person or persons authorized or claiming authority by or from the said Bishop of Rome his Predecessors or Successors or the See of Rome Or if any person or persons after the said first day of July should take upon him or them by colour of any such Bull Writing Instrument or Authority to absolve or reconcile any person or persons or to grant or promise to any person or persons within this Realm or any other the Queen's dominions any such Absolution or Reconciliation by any speech preaching teaching writing or any other open deed Or if any other person or persons within this Realm or any the Queen's dominions after the said first day of July should willingly receive and take any such Absolution or Reconciliation Or else if any person or persons had obtained or gotten sithence the last day of the Parliament holden in the first year of her Reign or after the said first day of July should obtain or get from the said Bishop of Rome or any his Successors or the See of Rome any manner of Bull Writing or Instrument written or printed containing any thing matter or cause whatsoever Or should publish or by any waies or means put in ure any such Bull Writing or Instrument That then all and every such act or acts offence and offences should be deemed and adjudged by the Authority of the said Act to be high Treason and the Offendor and Offendors therein their Procurors Abettors and Counsellours to the fact and committing of the said offence or offences should be deemed and adjudged high Traitours to the Queen and the Realm and being thereof lawfully indicted and attainted according to the course of the Laws of this Realm should suffer pains of death also lose and forfeit all their Lands Tenements Hereditaments Goods and Chattels as in cases of high Treason by the Laws of this Realm ought to be lost and forfeited as by the said Act appeareth And albeit many of her subjects after the said Bull of Pius Quintus adhering to the Pope did renounce their former Obedience to the Queen in respect of that Bull yet all this time no Law was either made or attempted against them for their Recusancy though it were grounded upon so disloyal a Cause Now that these speechless Bulls were declared by Act of Parliament to be so dangerous then in place of them Jesuites and Romish Priests were sent over who in secret corners whispered and infused into the hearts of many of the unlearned subjects of this Realm that the Pope had power to excommunicate and depose Kings and Princes that he had excommunicated the Queen deprived her of her Kingdome and discharged all her subjects of their Oath Duties and Allegeance to her and therefore they ought not to obey her or any of her Commandments or Laws under pain of the Pope's Curse This was high Treason by the ancient Laws of England And thereupon Campion Sherwin and many other Romish Priests being apprehended and confessing that they came into England to make a party for the Catholick cause when need should require were in the 21. year of the said Queen's Reign by the ancient Common Laws of England indicted arraigned tried adjudged and executed for high Treason against their natural Allegeance which they ought their liege Sovereign But all this time there was no Act of Parliament made either against Recusants or Jesuites or Priests her Majesty still desiring and expecting their conversion and that by clemency and mildness they might be reclaimed to their former obedience and conformity before the said Bull. After Priests and Jesuites were punished by sentence of Law according to their demerits then great numbers of slanderous and seditious Books libri falsidici against her Majesty and the State were dispersed and scattered within this Realm tending to the inciting and stirring of the Subjects to Insurrection and Rebellion Her Majestie in open Parliament having with the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons mature consideration of so weighty and important causes in the 23. year of her Reign made two several Laws One against the makers and publishers of Seditious Books ordaining that offence to be Felony another against Recusants inflicting the penalty of twenty pounds the month for their Recusancie and yet upon their submission according to the Act to be thereof freely and absolutely discharged a milde and merciful Law considering their former Conformity and the cause of their Revolt But after these Jesuites and Romish Priests coming daily into and swarming within the Realm instilling still this poison into the Subjects hearts that by reason of the said Bull of Pius Quintus her Majesty was excommunicated deprived of her Kingdome that her Subjects were discharged of all Obedience to her and by all means endeavouring to withdraw them from their Duty and Allegeance to her Majesty and to reconcile them to the Church of Rome in the 27. year of her Reign by Authority of Parliament her Majesty made it Treason for any Jesuite or Romish Priest being her natural-born Subject and made a Romish Priest or Jesuite sithence the beginning of her Reign to come into any of her dominions intending thereby to keep them out of the same to the end that they should not infect any other Subjects with such treasonable and damnable perswasions and practices as are aforesaid which without controversie were high Treason by the ancient Common Laws of England Neither would ever magnanimous King of England fithence the first establishment of this Monarchy have suffered any especially being his own natural-born
waters Yet during this King's reign they wone that point of jurisdiction which they attempted to get but failed thereof in the time of King William Rufus namely That Appeals might be made to the Court of Rome For in a Synod at London summoned by Henr. Bishop of Winchester the Pope's Legate it was decreed That Appeals should be made from Provinciall Councils to the Pope Before that time Appellationes in usu non erant saith a Monk of that time donec Henricus Winton Episcopus malo suo dum Legatus esset crudeliter intrusit Thus did the Pope usurp three main points of Jurisdiction upon three severall Kings after the Conquest for of William Rufus he could win nothing namely upon the Conquerour the sending of Legates or Commissioners to hear and determine Ecclesiasticall causes upon Hen. 1. the Donation and Investiture of Bishopricks and other Benefices upon King Stephen the Appeals to the Court of Rome Now are we come to King Hen. 2. in whose time they made a farther encroachment upon the Crown whereby they endeavoured to make him but half a King and to take away half his Subjects by exempting all Clerks from Secular power Hereupon rose that long and great contention between King Hen. 2. and Thomas Becket which on Becket's behalf may be rightly termed rebellion and treason the just cause and ground whereof was the same that made the late difference between the Pope and the Venetians For a Priest had committed a foul murther and being thereof indicted and convicted prayed the benefit of his Clergie which being allowed unto him he was delivered to the Bishop of Salisbury being his Ordinary to make his purgation which the murtherer failing to doe should by the Law have been degraded and delivered back to the Secular power But the Bishop contemning the Law of the land to enlarge the liberties of the Church sent his prisoner to Thomas Becket then Archbishop of Canterbury who shifted him into an Abbey and so rescued him from the capital punishment he had justly deserved This gap of impunitie being once opened the Clergie grew so outrageous as the King was informed of a hundred murthers committed by Clerks and yet not one of them executed for the same for that the Archbishop had protected them all after the same manner For this the King was justly incensed against the Archbishop who justified his doing herein Whereupon a common Council as well of the Bishops as of the Nobility was called wherein they did revive and re-establish the ancient laws and customes of the Kingdome for the government of the Clergie and ordering of causes Ecclesiasticall whereof these were the principal Heads or Articles 1. That no Bishop nor Clerk should depart the Realm without the King's licence and that such as obtained licence should give sureties that they should procure no hurt or damage to the King or Realm during their absence in forrein parts 2. That all Bishopricks and Abbeys being void should remain in the King's hands as his own demesnes untill he had chosen and appointed a Prelate thereunto and that every such Prelate should doe his homage to the King before he were admitted unto the place 3. That Appeals should be made in causes Ecclesiasticall in this manner from the Archdeacon to the Ordinary from the Ordinary to the Metropolitan from the Metropolitan to the King and no farther 4. That Peter-pence should be paid no more to the Pope but to the King 5. That if any Clerk should commit Felony he should be hanged if Treason he should be drawn and quartered 6. That it should be adjudged high Treason to bring in Bulls of Excommunication whereby the Realm should be cursed 7. That no Decree should be brought from the Pope to be executed in England upon pain of imprisonment and confiscation of goods To these and other Constitutions of the like nature made at Claringdon all the rest of the Bishops and great men did subscribe and bound themselves by oath to observe the same absolutely onely the Archbishop would not subscribe and swear but with a Saving salvo suo ordine honore sanctae Ecclesiae yet at last he was content to make the like absolute Subscription and Oath as the rest had done but presently he repented and to shew his repentance suspended himself from celebrating Masse till he had received absolution from the Pope Then he began to maintain and justifie the exemption of Clerks again whereat the King's displeasure was kindled anew and then the Archbishop once again promised absolute obedience to the King's Laws See the fickleness and mutability of your constant Martyr The King to bind fast this slippery Proteus called a Parliament of the Bishops and Barons and sending for the Roll of those Laws required all the Bishops to set their Seals thereunto They all assented but the Archbishop who protested he would not set his Seal nor give allowance to those Laws The King being highly offended with his rebellious demeanour required the Barons in Parliament to give Judgement of him who being his Subject would not be ruled by his Laws Citò facite mihi justitiam de illo qui homo meus ligeus est stare Juri in Curia mea recusat Whereupon the Barons proceeding against him and being ready to condemn him I prohibit you quoth the Archbishop in the name of Almighty God to proceed against me for I have appealed to the Pope and so departed in contempt of that high Court Omnibus clamantibus saith Hoveden Quò progrederis proditor exspecta audi judicium tuum After this he lurked secretly near the Sea-shore and changing his apparell and name like a Jesuit of these times he took shipping with a purpose to fly to Rome but his passage being hindered by contrary winds he was summoned to a Parliament at Northampton where he made default wilfully for which contempt his Temporalties were seized and his body being attach'd he was charged with so great an account to the King as that he was found in arrear thirty thousand marks and committed to prison whence he found means to escape shortly after and to passe out of the Realm to Rome He was no sooner gone but the King sends Writs to all the Sherifs in England to attach the bodies of all such as made any Appeals to the Court of Rome Hereupon many messages and letters passing to and fro all the Suffragans of Canterbury joyn in a letter to the Pope wherein they condemn the fugitive Archbishop and justifie the King's proceedings Upon this the Pope sends two Legates to the King being then in Normandy to mediate for the Archbishop They with the mediation of the French King prevailed so far with King Henry as that he was pleased to accept his submission once again and promised the King of France that if he would be obedient to his Laws he should enjoy as ample liberties as any Archbishop of Canterbury ever had and so sent him into England with
recommendation unto the young King his Son then lately crowned who hearing of his coming commanded him to forbear to come to his presence untill he had absolved the Archbishop of York and others whom he had excommunicated for performing their duties at his Coronation The Archbishop returned answer that they had done him wrong in usurping his office yet if they would take a solemn oath to become obedient to the Pope's commandment in all things concerning the Church he would absolve them The Bishops understanding this protested they would never take that oath unless the King willed them so to doe King Henry the Father being hereof advertised into France did rise into great passion and choler and in the hearing of some of his servants uttered words to this effect Will no man revenge me of mine enemies Whereupon the 4 Gentlemen named in the Stories of that time passed into England and first moving the Archbishop to absolve the Bishops whom he had excommunicated for performing their Duties at the young King's Coronation and receiving a peremptory answer of deniall from the Archbishop they laid violent hands upon him and slew him for which the King was fain not onely to suffer corporal penance but in token of his humiliation to kisse the knee of the Pope's Legate And this is the abridgement of Becket's Troubles or rather Treasons for which he was celebrated for so famous a Martyr And thus you see by what degrees the Court of Rome did within the space of one hundred and odde years usurp upon the Crown of England four points of Jurisdiction Viz. First sending out of Legates into England Secondly drawing of Appeals to the Court of Rome Thirdly donation of Bishopricks and other Ecclesiasticall Benefices And fourthly exemption of Clerks from the Secular power And you see withall how our Kings and Parliaments have from time to time opposed and withstood this unjust Usurpation Now then the Bishop of Rome having claimed and welnigh recovered full and sole jurisdiction in all causes Ecclesiasticall and over all persons Ecclesiasticall with power to dispose of all Ecclesiasticall Benefices in England whereby he had upon the matter made an absolute conquest of more then half the Kingdome for every one that could read the Psalm of Miserere was a Clerk and the Clergie possessed the moietie of all temporall possessions there remained now nothing to make him owner and proprietor of all but to get a surrender of the Crown and to make the King his Farmer and the people his Villains which he fully accomplished and brought to passe in the times of King John and of Hen. 3. The quarrell between the Pope and King John which wrested the Scepter out of his hand and in the end brake his heart began about the Election of the Archbishop of Canterbury I call it Election and not Donation or Investiture for the manner of investing of Bishops by the Staffe and Ring after the time of King Hen. 1. was not any more used but by the King's licence they were Canonically elected and being elected the King gave his Royall assent to their election and by restitution of their Temporalties did fully invest them And though this course of election began to be in use in the time of Rich. 1. and Hen. 2. yet I find it not confirmed by any Constitution or Charter before the time of King John who by his Charter dated the fifteenth of January in the sixteenth year of his Reign granted this privilege to the Church of England in these words viz. Quod qualiscunque consuetudo temporibus praedecessorum nostrorum hactenus in Ecclesia Anglicana fuerit observata quidquid juris nobis hactenus vindicaverimus de caetero in universis singulis Ecclesiis Mâ—nasteriis Cathedralibus Conventualibus totius regni Angliae liberae sint in perpetuum electiones quorumcumque Praelatorum majorum minorum Salvâ nobis haeredibus nostris custodiâ Ecclesiarum Monasteriorum vacantium quae ad nos pertinent Promittimus etiam quod nec impediemus nec impediri permittemus per ministros nostros nec procurabimus quin in universis singulis Monasteriis Ecclesiis postquam vacuerint praelaturae quemcunque voluerint libere sibi praeficiant electores Pastorum petitâ tamen à nobis priùs haeredibus nostris licentiâ eligendis quam non denegabimus nec differemus Et similiter post celebratam electionem noster requiratur assensus quem non denegabimus nisi adversus eandem rationale proposuerimus legitimè probaverimus propter quod non debemus consentire c. But to return to the cause of his great quarrell with the Pope The See of Canterbury being void the Monks of Canterbury suddenly and secretly without the King's licence elected one Reignold their Subprior to be Archbishop who immediately posted away to be confirmed by the Pope But when he came there the Pope rejected him because he came not recommended from the King Hereupon the Monks made suit to the King to nominate some fit person to whose election they might proceed The King commends John Gray Bishop of Norwich his principall Counsellour who was afterward Lord Justice of this Kingdome who with a full consent was elected by them and afterwards admitted and fully invested by the King These two elections bred such a controversie as none might determine but the Pope who gave a short rule in the case for he pronounced both elections void and caused some of the Monks of Canterbury who were then present in the Court of Rome to proceed to the election of Stephen Langton lately made Cardinal at the motion and suit of the French King who being so elected was forthwith confirmed and consecrated by the Pope and recommended to the King of England with a flattering Letter and a present of four Rings set with precious stones which were of great value and estimation in those days Howbeit the King more esteeming this Jewell of the Crown namely the Patronage of Bishopricks returned a round and Kingly answer to the Pope That inconsiderately and rashly he had cassed and made void the election of the Bishop of Norwich and had caused one Langton a man to him unknown and bred up and nourished amongst his mortal enemies to be consecrated Archbishop without any due form of election and without his Royal assent which was most of all requisite by the ancient laws and customes of his Realm That he marvelled much that the Pope himself and the whole Court of Rome did not consider what a precious account they ought to make of the King of England's friendship in regard that his one Kingdome did yield them more profit and revenue then all the other countries on this side the Alpes To conclude he would maintain the liberties of his Crown to the death he would restrain all his subjects from going to Rome And since the Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates within his dominions were as learned and religious
proved fully all the parts of the Indictment First it was proved by Lalor's own Confession upon severall Examinations taken before the Lord Deputie and Lord Chancellor and others that he had accepted the Office and title of Vicar-general in the Dioceses of Dublin Kildare and Fernes by virtue of the Pope's Bull. Secondly it appeared by the copies of sundry Letters found among his papers at his apprehension that he styled himself the Pope's Vicar in this form Robertus Dublinien Kildaren Fernen Dioeces Vicarius Apostolicus Thirdly there were produced the copies of divers Acts and Instruments written for the most part with Lalor's own hand some of Institutions of Popish Priests to Benefices others of Dispensations with Marriage within the degrees others of Divorces others of Dispensations for non-payment of Tithes Whereby it was manifestly proved that he did execute the Pope's Bull in usurping and exercising Episcopall jurisdiction as Vicar-generall of the See Apostolick within the Dioceses before named To this evidence he made a threefold answer First That he was no suiter for the office of Vicar-generall but it was imposed on him and he accepted virtute obedientiae onely to obey his Superiours Next That he did exercise the office of Vicar-generall in foro conscientiae tantum and not in foro judicii And lastly that those copies of Institutions Dispensations and Divorces were many of them written with his man's hand as precedents of such Acts and Instruments without his privity or direction Hereupon Sir James Ley Chief Justice told him that he could not well say that he accepted that unlawfull office virtute obedientiae for there was no vertue in that obedience That he ow'd an obedience to the Law and to the King who is the true Superiour and Sovereign over all his subjects and hath no Peer within his dominions and that the Superiours whom he meant and intended were but Usurpers upon the King's Jurisdiction and therefore this excuse did aggravate his contempt in that it appeared he had vowed obedience to those who were apparent enemies to the King and his Crown And though it were manifest that he exercised jurisdiction in foro judicii for every Institution is a Judgement and so is every Sentence of divorce yet were his offence nothing diminished if he had executed his office of Vicar-generall in foro conscientiae tantum for the court of man's conscience is the highest tribunall and wherein the power of the Keys is exercised in the highest degree Hereunto the Atturney generall took occasion to adde thus much That Lalor had committed these high offences not onely against the Law but against his own Conscience and that he was already condemned in foro conscientiae For that he upon his second Examination had voluntarily acknowledged himself not to be a lawfull Vicar-generall and that he thought in his conscience he could not lawfully take upon him the said office He hath also acknowledged our Sovereign Lord K. James to be his lawfull Chief and Supreme Governour in all causes as well Ecclesiasticall as Civile and that he is in conscience bound to obey him in all the said causes c. as it is contained in his Acknowledgement or Confession before set down Which being shewed forth by the Atturney generall the Court caused it to be publickly read and thereupon demanded of Lalor if that were not his free and voluntary confession signed with his own hand and confirmed by his oath before the Lord Deputie and Councill He was not a little abashed at the publishing of this Acknowledgement and Confession in the hearing of so many principal Gentlemen to whom he had preached a contrary doctrine therefore said he the shewing forth of this Confession is altogether impertinent and besides the matter Howsoever he could not deny but that he made it and signed it and swore it as it was testified by the Lord Deputie and the rest Then was it demanded of him whether since the making of this Confession he had not protestâ—â—o divers of his friends that he had not acknowledged the King's Supremacie in Ecclesiasticall causes His answer was That indeed he had said to some of his friends who visited him in the Castle of Dublin that he had not confessed or acknowledged that the King was his Supreme Governour in Spirituall causes for that the truth is in the Confession there is no mention made of Spirituall causes but of Ecclesiasticall This is a subtile evasion indeed said the Atturney generall I pray you what difference do you make between Ecclesiasticall causes and Spirituall causes This question said Lalor is sudden and unexpected at this time and therefore you shall doe well to take another day to dispute this point Nay said the Atturney generall we can never speak of it in a better time or fitter place and therefore though you that bear so reverend a title and hold the reputation of so great a Clerk require a farther time yet shall you hear that we Lay-men that serve his Majestie and by the dutie of our places are to maintain the Jurisdiction of the Crown are never so unprovided but that we can say somewhat touching the nature and difference of these Causes First then let us see when this distinction of Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall causes from Civile and Temporall causes did first begin in point of jurisdiction Assuredly for the space of three hundred years after Christ this distinction was not known or heard of in the Christian world For the causes of Testaments of Matrimony of Bastardy and Adultery and the rest which are called Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall câ—uses were meerly Civil and determined by the rules of the Civil Law and subject onely to the jurisdiction of the Civil Magistrate as all Civilians will testifie with me But after that the Emperours had received the Christian Faith out of a zeal and desire they had to grace and honour the learned and godly Bishops of that time they were pleased to single out certain speciall Causes wherein they granted jurisdiction unto the Bishops namely in causes of Tithes because they were paid to men of the Church in causes of Matrimony because Marriages were for the most part solemnized in the Church in causes Testamentary because Testaments were many times made in extremis when Church-men were present giving spiritual comfort to the Testator and therefore they were thought the fittest persons to take the probates of such Testaments Howbeit these Bishops did not proceed in these causes according to the Canons and Decrees of the Church for the Canon Law was not then hatched or dream'd of but according to the rules of the Imperiall Law as the Civil Magistrate did proceed in other causes neither did the Emperours in giving this Jurisdiction unto them give away their own Supreme and absolute power to correct and punish these Judges as well as others if they performed not their severall duties This then is most certain that the primitive Jurisdiction in all these causes was
Realm of England and Ireland and to visit reform redresse order correct and amend all such Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities whatsoever which by any manner of Spiritual or Ecclesiastical power authority or jurisdiction can or may lawfully be reformed ordered redressed corrected restrained or amended to the pleasure of Almighty God the encrease of vertue and the conservation of the peace and unity of this Realm And that such persons so to be named assigned and authorized should have full power and authority by virtue of that Act and of such Letters Patents under her Highnesse her Heirs and Successors to exercise use and execute all the premisses according to the tenour and effect of the said Letters Patents any matter or cause to the contrary notwithstanding And afterwards the said Queen by her Letters Patents under the great Seal of England bearing date the ninth day of December in the six and twentieth year of her Reign according to the tenour of the said Act did authorize the Archbishop of Canterbury the Bishop of London and divers others or any three or more of them to enquire amongst others of the Statute of the first year of her Reign concerning the Book of Common Prayer with this Clause also contained in the said Letters Patents videlicet Also we give and grant full power and authority to reform redresse order correct and amend in all places of this Realm all Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses Contempts and Enormities Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall whatsoever which by any Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall power authority or jurisdiction can or may lawfully be reformed ordered redressed corrected restrained or amended by Censure Ecclesiasticall Deprivation or otherwise c. And upon proof thereof had and the offences aforesaid or any of them sufficiently proved against any person or persons by Confession lawful witness or by any due manner c. That then you or three of you shall have full power and authority to order and award such punishment to every such offendor by Fine Imprisonment Censure of the Church or otherwise or by all or any of the said ways and to take such order for the redresse of the same as by your wisedomes and discretions shall be thought meer and convenient as by the said Letters Patents more at large appeareth And further they found the Statute of the first year of the Reign of the said Queen by which it is enacted That the offendor against that Act concerning the Uniformity of Common Prayer being thereof lawfully convicted according to the Laws of the Realm by Verdict of twelve men or by his Confession or by the notorious Evidence of the fact should forfeit for the first offence the value of his Spirituall living for one whole year and should suffer six months Imprisonment for the second offence to be committed after such Conviction he should be deprived ipso facto of all his Spiritual livings and for the third offence to be committed after two Convictions as is aforesaid he should be deprived of all his Ecclesiasticall livings and be imprisoned during his life And that the said Robert Caudrey before the time of the trespass supposed was deprived of his said Benefice before the said High Commissioners as well for that he had preached against the said Book of Common Prayer as also for that he refused to celebrate Divine Service according to the said Book and shewed particularly wherein Which said Sentence of Deprivation was given by the Bishop of London cum assensu A. B. C. D. c. collegarum suorum And the Jury concluded their Verdict That if the said Deprivation were not warranted by Law but void then they found the Defendant guilty of the trespass And if the Deprivation were not void in Law then they found the Defendant not guilty And this Case was solemnly and oftentimes debated at Barre by the Counsel of either party and at the Bench by the Judges and after great and long deliberation and consultation had with the rest of the Judges was in the Term of S. Hillary in the 37. year of the said Queen adjudged And it was argued by the Counsel of the Plaintif that the said Deprivation was void for 4 causes First The said Book of Common Prayer being authorized and commanded to be observed by the said Act of the first year of the Queen upon the forfeitures and punishments therein comprised the offence of the Plaintif is against that Act for that Act onely doth command the observation of the said Book and inflicteth punishments in severall degrees for depraving or not observing of the same and consequently if the offence be against that Act the Plaintif ought to have been proceeded withall and punished according to the same And it was said that the said Act was an Act of great moderation and equity for the offendor for his first offence should not be ipso facto deprived but should onely lose the profits of his Ecclesiasticall livings for one year and suffer Imprisonment for six months to the end that such as were froward might have a time to repent and the well-minded a time to consent And such care had the Act of the offendors in this behalf as if they committed one offence and then another and after the second many more yet should not the offendor be deprived for any of the latter offences unless he had been first judicially convicted of record by verdict of 12 men or by confession or notorious evidence of the fact So as the second offence for which he must be deprived by the said Act must be done and committed after such a judiciall and solemn Conviction and punishment according to the said Act And then if such an open punishment and infliction should not give him understanding and open his heart to repent then upon a like Conviction for a second offence to be committed after such a Conviction Deprivation should follow But in the case now in question Caudrey the Plaintif was deprived from his said Parsonage of South-Luffenham for his said first offence being never convented or convicted for any such offence before And therefore it was concluded for this first point That the said High Commissioners had not pursued the form and order prescribed by the said Act non observata forma infertur adnullatio Actus and consequently the Deprivation of the Plaintif is void and therefore Judgement ought to be given for him And it was said by the Plaintif's Counsell by way of anticipation That albeit there was a Proviso in the same Act for Archbishops Bishops and their Chancellors Commissaries Archdeacons and other Ordinaries having peculiar Jurisdiction yet that did not give any strength to the said Deprivation for two causes First that the Commissioners by force of the said Act of 1 Eliz. and of the said Letters Patents are not within the said Proviso but onely Archbishops and Bishops their Chancellors Commissaries c. in respect of their ordinary Jurisdiction 2. Admitting it should
extend to the said High Commissioners yet ought they to proceed according to the form and order of the said Act for an offence done against that Act. Secondly it was objected by the Counsel of the Plaintif That Caudrey the Plaintif was not deprived either by the verdict of 12 men or by confession or by the notorious evidence of the fact but by default in respect he appeared not being duely precognizated or warned which case as it was objected was Casus omissus oblivioni datus and not within the said Act. Thirdly it was objected on the behalf of the Plaintif That the said Sentence given by the said High Commissioners was utterly void for that they or any 3 or more of them having authority by force of the said Act and of the said Letters Patents under the great Seal ought to joyn in the Sentence and that one alone with the consent of 2 or more of the other Commissioners cannot give a Sentence for that every Commissioner hath equal authority and by the said Letters Patents three or more must give the Sentence with consent of others and such a Judgement given by any Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer or other Commissioners or Judges of the Common Law were utterly void and of none effect Fourthly and lastly it was objected That the said Commissioners were not nominated and appointed according to the said Act for the Jurisdiction and power given by the said Act to the Crown is to name such Commissioners as be natural-born Subjects and it doth not appear by the said special verdict that the said Commissioners were natural-born subjects And albeit the Judges as private men in their particular knowledge did know them to be natural-born subjects yet they being Judges of record ought onely to see with Judicial eyes and to take knowledge of no more then doth appear to them within the Record for upon that and not upon private knowledge out of the Record they onely must give their Judgement and upon that Record enter their Judgement also of record And seeing that the said Queen had as it was said by the Plaintif's Counsel Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction by the said Act of Parliament and by the same power was given unto her to name Ecclesiastical Commissioners she of necessity must make her nomination according to the said Act having no other power as was objected but by the said Act. And seeing it was not specially found that they were natural-born subjects de non apparentibus non existentibus eadem est ratio for this cause also the said Sentence of Deprivation was void as given by Commissioners not warranted by the said Act. Asto the first and second Objections both being grounded upon the said Act of Parliament it was resolved by the whole Court that notwithstanding these two Objections the Sentence was not to be impeached for either of them and that for three causes First for that the said Act concerning the Uniformity of Common Prayer being in the affirmative doth not abrogate or take away the Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall unless words in the negative had been added as and not otherwise or in no other manner or form or to the like effect And this appeareth by the general rule of all our Books as it appeareth in 46 E. 3.4 47 E. 3.10 20 H. 6.11 36 H. 6.3 3 E. 4.27 3 H. 7.1 14 H. 7.10 15 H. 7.16 33 H. 8. Dyer 50. 4 Mar. Dyer 135. Stradlings case Pl. Com. 207. c. 2. The Ecclesiasticall Law and the Temporal Law have several proceedings and to several ends the one being Temporal to inflict punishment upon the body lands or goods the other being Spiritual pro salute Animae the one to punish the outward man the other to reform the inward And this appeareth in 12 H. 7.22 10 E. 4.10 c. Then both these distinct and several Jurisdictions consist and stand well together and do joyn in this to have the whole man inwardly and outwardly reformed 3. The Proviso in the said Act doth make this question without question for by it is provided ordained and enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all and singular Archbishops and Bishops and every of their Chancellors Commissaries Archdeacons and other Ordinaries having any peculiar Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction should have full power and authority by virtue of that Act as well to enquire in their Visitations Synods and elsewhere within their Jurisdiction as at any other time and place to take informations of all and every the things above mentioned done committed or perpetrated within the limits of their Jurisdictions and authority and punish the same by Admonition Excommunication Sequestration or Deprivation and other Censures and Processe in like form as heretofore had been used in like cases by the Queen 's Ecclesiasticall Laws as by the said Act appeareth So as seeing if that Act had never inflicted any punishment for depraving or not observing the Book of Common Prayer yet the same being allowed and commanded to be observed for uniformity of Common Prayer and the unity and peace of the Church the Ecclesiasticall Judge may deprive such Parson Vicar c. as shall deprave or not observe the said Book as well for the first offence as he might have done by the Censures of the Church and the Ecclesiasticall Laws if no form of punishment had been inflicted by that Act. And this doth evidently appear by the said Proviso For thereby notwithstanding any thing in that Act contained they may punish such offendors by Admonition Excommunication Sequestration or Deprivation and other Censures and Processe in like form as heretofore hath been used in like cases by the Queen 's Ecclesiasticall Laws and are not bound to pursue the form prescribed by the said Act which is to punish the offendor according to the Temporal Law And it was reâ—olved That if the Jurisdiction of the Archbishops and Bishops and their Chancellors Commissaries Archdeacons and other Ordinaries having any peculiar Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction were provided for by the said Act à fortiori the High Commissioners authorized by another Act in the same Parliament were tacitè provided for Ouia cui licet quod majus est non debet quod minus est non licere As to the third Objection it was also resolved by the whole Court that the Sentence given by the Bishop by the consent of his Collegues was such as the Judges of the Common Law ought to allow to be given according to the Ecclesiasticall Laws For seeing their authority is to proceed and give sentence in Ecclesiasticall causes according to the Ecclesiasticall Law and they have given a Sentence in a cause Ecclesiasticall upon their proceedings by force of that Law the Judges of the Common Law ought to give faith and credit to their Sentence and to allow it to be done according to the Ecclesiasticall Law For cuilibet in sua arte perito est credendam And this is the common received opinion of all our Books as
Subjects to live that perswaded his Subjects that he was no lawfull King and practised with them within the heart of this Realm to withdraw them from their Allegeance and Loyalty to their Sovereign the same being crimen laesae Majestatis by the ancient Laws of this Realm BY this and by all the Records of the Indictments it appeareth that these Jesuites and Priests are not condemned and executed for their Priesthood and Profession but for their treasonable and damnable Perswasions and Practices against the Crowns and Dignities of Monarchs and absolute Princes who hold their Kingdoms and Dominions by lawful Succession and by inherent Birth-right and descent of inheritance according to the fundamental Laws of this Realm immediately of Almighty God and are not Tenants of their Kingdomes as they would have it at the will and pleasure of any forrein Potentate whatsoever Now albeit the proceedings and process in the Ecclesiastical Courts be in the name of the Bishops c. it followeth not therefore that either the Court is not the King 's or the Law whereby they proceed is not the King's Law For taking one example for many every Leet or View of Frank-pledge holden by a Subject is kept in the Lord's name and yet it is the King's Court and all the proceedings therein are directed by the King's Laws and many subjects in England have and hold Courts of Record and other Courts and yet all their proceedings be according to the King's Laws and the Customes of the Realm Observe good Reader seeing that the determination of Heresies Schisms and Errours in Religion Ordering Examination Admission Institution and Deprivation of men of the Church which do concern God's true Religion and Service of right of Matrimony Divorces and general Bastardy whereupon depend the strength of mens Discents and Inheritances of probate of Testaments and letters of Administration without which no debt or dutie due to any dead man can be recovered by the Common Law Mortuaries Pensions Procurations Reparations of Churches Simony Incest Adultery Fornication and Incontinency and some others doth not belong to the Common Law how necessary it was for administration of Justice that his Majestie 's Progenitors Kings of this Realm did by publick authority authorize Ecclesiasticall Courts under them to determine those great and important Causes Ecclesiastical exempted from the Jurisdiction of the Common Law by the King's Laws Ecclesiastical Which was done originally for two causes 1. That Justice should be administred under the Kings of this Realm within their own Kingdome to all their Subjects and in all Causes 2. That the Kings of England should be furnished upon all occasions either forrein or domestical with learned Professors as well of the Ecclesiasticall as Temporall Laws THus hath it appeared as well by the ancient Common Laws of this Realm by the Resolutions and Judgements of the Judges and Sages of the Laws of England in all succession of ages as by Authority of many Acts of Parliament ancient and of latter times That the Kingdome of England is an absolute Monarchy and that the King is the onely Supreme Governour as well over Ecclesiasticall persons and in Ecclesiastical causes as Temporal within this Realm to the due observation of which Laws both the King and the Subject are sworn I have herein cited the very words and texts of the Laws Resolutions Judgements and Acts of Parliament all publick and in print without any inference argument or amplification and have particularly quoted the books years leaves chapters and such like certain references as every man may at his pleasure see and reade the Authorities herein cited This Case is reported in the English and Latine tongues as some other Writers of the Law have done to the end that my dear Countrymen may be acquainted with the Laws of this Realm their own Birth-right and inheritance and with such evidences as of right belong to the same assuring my self that no wise or true-hearted English-man that hath been perswaded before he was instructed will refuse to be instructed in the truth which he may see with his own eyes lest he should be disswaded from errour wherewith blindfold he hath been deceived For miserable is his case and worthy of pity that hath been perswaded before he was instructed and now will refuse to be instructed because he will not be perswaded FINIS Of what quality and credit Robert Lalor was His apprehension and first examination His first inditement and conviction His second examination His confession or acknowledgement The Inditement of Lalor upon the stat of 16 Ric. 2. The true cause of making the Statute of 16 R. 2. and other Statutes against Provisors The Statute of Praemunire made at the prayer of the Commons The effect of the Statute of 16 R. 2. c. 5. The effect of the Statute of 38 Edw. 3. cap. 1. The Statute of 27 Ed. 3. cap. 1. The Statute of 25 Edw. 3. reciting the Statute of 25 Ed. 1. These Laws made by such as did professe the Romish Religion Laws against Provisors made in Ireland When the Pope began first to usurp upon the liberties of the Crâ—wn of England A comparison of the spiritual Monarchy of the Church with the temporal Monarchies of the world The Pope had no jurisdiction in England in the time of the Britans The first usurpation of the Pope upon the Crown began in the time of King William the Conquerour By sending Legates into England In the time of William Rufus the Pope attempted to draw Appeals to Rome but prevailed not In the time of K. Henry the first the Pope usurpeth the donation of Bishoprikks c. Histor Jornalensis M S. in Archiv Rob. Cotton Eq. Aur. In the time of King Stephen the Pope gained Appeals to the Court of Rome In the time of K. Henry 2. the Pope claimed exemption of Clerks from the Secular power A brief of Th. Becket's troubles or rather treasons The Constitutions of Claringdon Four points of jurisdiction usurped upon the crown of England by the Pope before the reign of K. John The cause of the quarrell between K. John and the Pope When Canonical election began first in England King John's round and Kingly Letter to the Pope The Pope curseth the King and interdicteth the Realm King Edw. 1. oppâ—seth the Pope's Vsurpation E. 2. suffereth the Pope to usurp again E. 3. resisteth the Vsurpation of the Pope King Rich. 2. The Evidence against Lalor Lalor's Confession publickly read When the distinction of Ecclesiasticall Spirituall causes from Civil and Temporal causes began in the world Caudrey's Case The objections of the Counsell of the Plaintif 1. 2. 3. 4. The resolutions of the Court to the 1. and 2. To the 3. To the 4. What causes belong to the Ecclesiasticall Court. see Circumspectè agatis 13 E. 1. W. 2. 13 E. 1. cap. 5. versus finem Artic. cleri 9 E. 2. 15 E. 3. c. 6.31 E. 3. cap. 11.2 H. 5. c. 7.1 H. 7. cap. 4.23 H. 8. cap.
in the Civil Magistrate and so in right it remaineth at this day and though it be derived from him it remaineth in him as in the fountain For every Christian Monarch as well as the godly Kings of Juda is custos utriusque Tabulae and consequently hath power to punish not onely Treason Murther Theft and all manner of Force and Fraud but Incest Adultery Usury Perjury Simony Sorcery Idolatry Blasphemy Neither are these Causes in respect of their own quality and nature to be distinguished one from another by the names of Spirituall or Temporall For why is Adultery a Spirituall cause rather then Murther when they are both offences alike against the Second Table or Idolatry rather then Perjury being both offences likewise against the First Table And indeed if we consider the natures of these Causes it will seem somewhat absurd that they are distinguished by the name of Spirituall and Temporall for to speak properly that which is opposed to Spirituall should be termed Carnall and that which is opposed to Temporall should be called Eternall And therefore if things were called by their proper names Adultery should not be called a spirituall offence but a carnall But shall I expresse plainly and briefly why these Causes were first denominated some Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall and others Temporall and Civil Truly they were so called not from the nature of the Causes as I said before but from the quality of the persons whom the Prince had made Judges in those Causes The Clergie did study spirituall things and did professe to live secundum spiritum and were called spirituall men and therefore they called the Causes wherein Princes had given them jurisdiction spirituall causes after their own name and quality But because the Lay-magistrates were said to intend the things of this world which are temporall and transitory the Clergie called them secular or temporall men and the Causes wherein they were Judges temporall causes This distinction began first in the Court of Rome where the Clergie having by this Jurisdiction gotten great wealth their wealth begot pride their pride begot ingratitude towards Princes who first gave them their Jurisdiction and then according to the nature of all ungratefull persons they went about to extinguish the memory of the benefit for whereas their Jurisdiction was first derived from Caesar in the execution whereof they were Caesar's Judges so as both their Courts and Causes ought still to have born Caesar's image and superscription as belonging unto Caesar they blotted Caesar's name out of the style of their Courts and called them Courts Christian as if the Courts holden by other Magistrates had been in comparison but Courts of Ethnicks and the Causes which in their nature were meerly Civil they called Spirituall and Ecclesiasticall So as if the Emperour should challenge his Courts and Causes again and say Reddite Caesariquae sunt Caesaris they would all cry out on the contrary part and say Date Deo quae sunt Dei our Courts bear the name and title of Christ the superscription of Caesar is quite worn out and not to be found upon them And this point of their policy is worth the observing that when they found their jurisdiction in Matrimoniall causes to be the most sweet and gainfull of all other for of Matrimony they made matter of money indeed to the end that Caesar might never resume so rich a perquisite of their Spirituall jurisdiction they reduced Matrimony into the number of the 7 Sacraments after which time it had been Sacriledge if the Civil Magistrate had intermeddled with the least matter that had relation to Matrimonie or any dependencie thereupon So then it appeareth that all Causes whereof Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall persons have cognisance or jurisdiction by the grants or permission of Princes are called Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall causes And as all their Courts are called Spirituall Courts so all Causes determinable in those Courts are called Spirituall Causes And therefore where Mr. Lalor hath acknowledged the King's Majestie to be Supreme Governour in all Ecclesiasticall causes he hath therein acknowledged the King's Supremacie in all Spirituall causes wherein he hath but rendered to Caesar that which is Caesar's and hath given unto his Majestie no more then all the Bishops of England have yielded to his Predecessours not onely in this latter Age but also in former times both before and since the Conquest as hath been before at large expressed Here the day being far spent the Court demanded of the prisoner if he had any more to say for himself His answer was That he did willingly renounce his office of Vicar-generall and did humbly crave his Majestie 's grace and pardon And to that end he desired the Court to move the L. Deputy to be favourable unto him Then the Jury departed from the Bar and returning within half an hour found the prisoner guiltie of the Contempts whereof he was indicted Whereupon the Solicitor generall moved the Court to proceed to Judgement And Sir Dominick Sarsfield Knight one of the Justices of his Majestie 's chief place gave Judgement according to the form of the Statute whereupon the Indictment was framed OF THE KING' 's Ecclesiasticall Law IN the Term of S. Hillary in the 33. year of the Reign of Q. Elizabeth Rotulo 340. Robert Caudrey Clerk brought an action of Trespasse against George Atton for breaking of his Close at North-Luffenham in the County of Rutland the 7. day of August in the 31. year of the Reign of the said Queen The Defendant pleaded not guilty and the Jury returned and sworn for triall of this issue gave a speciall Verdict that is they found the truth of the Case at large referring the same for the Law to the judgment of the Court to this effect They found that the Plaintif before the Trespasse supposed to be done was Parson of the Rectory of South-Luffenham in the County aforesaid whereof the place wherein the Trespass is alledged was parcell and found the Statute made in the first year of the said Queen's Reign by which in effect it is enacted That such Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall as by any Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall power hath heretofore been or may lawfully be exercised for the Visitation of the Ecclesiasticall estate and persons and for reformation order and correction of the same and of all manner of Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities within this Realm should for ever be united and annexed to the Imperiall Crown of this Realm And that her Highnesse her Heirs and Successors should have full power and authority by virtue of that Act by Letters Patents under the great Seal of England to assign nominate and authorize such persons being natural-born Subjects as her Highness her Heirs or Successors should think meet to exercise and execute under her Highnesse her Heirs and Successors all and all manner of Jurisdiction Priviledges and Preheminences in any wise touching or concerning any Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction within this