either for Valor Prowess length of Reign acts of Chivalrie or the multitude of famous Princes his Children left behind him was one of the noblest Kings that ever England had RICHARD 2d Richard the 2d Son to the black Prince of Wales for having suffered himself to be misled by evil Counsellers to the great hurt and disquietness of the Realm was deposed also after 22. years reign by a Parliament holden at London the year 1399. and condemned to perpetual Prison in the Castle of Pomfret where he was soon after put to death and in his place was by free Election chosen the noble Knight Henry * Duke of Lancaster who proved afterwards so notable a King as the world knoweth HENRY 6th Henry 6th after almost 40. years reign was deposed imprisoned and put to death also together with his Son the Prince of Wales by Edward 4th of the House of York And this was confirmed by the * Commons and afterwards also by publick Act of Parliament because the said Henry did suffer himself to be over-ruled by the Queen his Wife and had broken the Articles of Agreement made by the Parlament between him and the Duke of York and solemnly sworn on both sides the 8th of Octob. 1459. though otherwise for his particular life he were a good man and King Edward 4th was put in place who was one of the renownedest for Martial Acts and Justice that hath worn the English Crown RICHARD 3d. This man having left two Sons his Brother Richard Duke of Glocester put them to death and being the next Heir Male was authorised in the Crown but Deposed again afterwards by the Common-wealth which called out of France Henry Earle of Richmond who took from him both life and Kingdom in the Field and was King himself by the name of Henry 7. And no man I suppose will say but that he was lawfully King also which yet cannot be except the other might lawfully be deposed If the said Deprivations were unjust the now Pretences are unlawful Moreover is to be noted in all these Mutations what good hath succeeded therein to the Common-wealth which was unjust and is void at this day if the Changes and Deprivations of the former Princes could not be made and consequently none of these that do pretend the Crown of England at this day can have any Title at all for that from those men they discend who were put in place of the deprived If Kings established may be Deprived much sooner Pretenders And if this might be so in Kings lawfully set in Possession then much more hath the said Common-wealth power and authoritie to alter the succession of such as do pretend Dignitie if there be due reason and causes to the same Wherein consisteth principally the lawfulness of Proceedings against Princes which in the former Chapter is mentioned What interest Princes have in their Subjects Goods or Lives How Oaths do Binde or may be Broken by Subjests towards Princes And finally the difference between a good King and a Tyrant CAP. IV. 1. Objection against the Assertions in the last Chapter BUt although by Nature the Common-wealth hath authoritie over the Prince to chuse and appoint him at the beginning yet having once made him and given up all their authoritie unto him he is no more subject to their correction but remaineth absolute of himself As every particular man hath authorised to make his Master or Prince of his inferior but not afterwards to put him down again howsoever he beareth himself towards him 2. Objection When the Children of Israël being under the Government of the High Priest demanded a King of Samuel he protesting unto them Well quoth he you will have a King hearken then to this that I will say Hoc erit jus Regis qui imperaturus est vobis He shall take away from you your Children both Sons and Daughters your Fields and Vineyards c. and shall give them to his servants and you shall cry unto God in that day from the face of this your King and God shall not hear you for that you have demanded a King to Govern over you Assertions of Bellay Yea Bellay and some other that wrote in flatterie of Princes in these our days do not only affirm That Princes are lawless and subject to no accompt or correction whatsoever they do But also That all goods chattels possessions and whatsoever else commodities temporal of the Common wealth are properly the Kings and that their Subjects have only the use thereof so as when the King will he may take it from them by right Answer to Bellay his First Assertion But for the first That Kings are subject to no Law Is against the very Institution of a Common-wealth which is to live together in Justice and Order for if it holdeth so insteed of Kings and Governors to defend us we may set up publick murtherers ravishers theeves and spoylers to devour us Then were all those Kings before mentioned both of the Jewes Gentiles and Christians unlawfully deprived and their Successors unlawfully put up in their places and consequentlie all Princes living at this day are intruders and no lawful Princes Answer to Bellay his Second Assertion Of the second saying also That all temporalities are properly the Princes and that Subjects have only the use thereof no less absurdities do follow First it is against the very first principle and foundation of the Civil Law which at the first entrance maketh this division of Goods That some are common by Nature to all men as the Aër the Sea c. Others are publick to all of one Citie or Countrie but yet not common to all in general as Rivers Ports c. Some are of the Communitie of a Citie or Common-wealth but yet not common to every particular person of that Citie as common Rents Theaters the publick hous and the like Some are of none nor properly of any man's Goods as Churches and Sacred things And some are proper to particular men as those which every man possesseth of his own Besides it overthroweth the whole nature of a Common-wealth maketh all Subject to be but very slaves for that slaves and bondmen in this do differ from freemen that slaves have only the use of things without property or interest and cannot acquire or get to themselves any dominion or true right in any thing but it accreweth all to their Master Lastly If all Goods be properly the King's why was Achab and Jezabel so reprehended and punished by God for taking away Naboth's vineyard Why do the Kings of England France and Spain ask Money of their Subjects in Parlament and that termed by the names of Subsidies Helps Benevolences Loans Prests Contributions c How have the Parlament oftentimes denied them the same Why are there Judges appointed for matter of Suits and Pleas between the Prince and the People Why doth the Canon Law inhibit all
this Reign drew all England into factions and divisions the States in a Parlament at Wallingford made an agreement that Stephen should bee lawful during his life onely and that Henry and his off spring should succeed him and Prince William King Stephen's son was deprived and made onely Earl of Norfolke King John to the prejudice of his Nephew Arthur This Henry 2 left Richard Jeffrey and John Richard sirnamed Coeur de Lyon succeeded him and dying without issue * John was admitted by the States and Arthur Duke of Britaine son and heir to Jeffrey * excluded who coming afterward to get the Crown by war was taken by his Uncle John who murthered him in prison Louys Prince of France to the prejudice of King John and King John's son afterward to the prejudice again of Louys But som years after the Barons and States of England misliking the government of this King John rejected him again and chose Louys the Prince of France to bee their King and did swear fealtie to him in London depriving also the young Prince Henry John's son of 8 years old but upon the death of King John that ensued shortly after they recalled again that sentence disannulled the Oath and Allegiance made unto Louys Prince of France and admitted this Henry * to the Crown who reigned 53 years The Princes of York and Lancaster had their best Titles of the autoritie of the Common-wealth From this Henry 3. take their first begining the two branches of York and Lancaster In whose contentions the best of their titles did depend upon the autoritie of the Common-wealth For as the people were affected and the greatest part prevailed so were they confirmed or disannulled by Parlament And wee may not well affirm but that when they are in possession and confirmed therein by these Parlaments they are lawful Kings and that God concurreth with them For if wee should deny this point wee should shake the states of most Princes in the world at this day The Common-wealth may dispose of the Crown for her own good And so to conclude As propinquitie of blood is a great preheminencie towards the atteining of the Crown so doth it not ever binde the Common-wealth to yield thereunto and to shut up her eies or admit at hap-hazard or of necessitie any one that is next by succession but rather to take such an one as may perform the dutie and charge committed For that otherwise to admit him that is an enemie or unfit is but to destroy the Common-wealth and him together What are the principal points which a Common-wealth ought to respect in admitting or excluding of any Prince that pretendeth to succeed wherein is handled largely also of the diversitie of Religions and other such causes CAP. IX Seeing the Common-wealth is to know and judg of the matter no doubt but God doth allow of her judgment HEe who is to judg and give the sentence in the things is also to judg of the caus for thereof is hee called Judg So if the Common-wealth hath power to admit or put back the Prince or pretender to the Crown shee hath also autoritie to judg of the lawfulness of the causes considering specially that it is in their own affair and and in a matter that depend's wholly upon them for that no man is King or Prince by institution of Nature but only by authoritie of the Common-wealth Who can then affirm the contrary but that God doth allow for a just and sufficient cause in this behalf the only Will and Judgment of the Weal-publick it self supposing alwaies that a whole Realm will never agree by orderly way of Judgement to exclude the next Heir in Blood without a reasonable Cause in the sight and censure The Pope is to obey the Determination of the Common-wealth without further inquisition except it be in Cases of injustice and Tyranny And seeing that they only are the Judges of this Case and are properly Lords and Owners of the whole business we are to presume that what they Determine is just and lawful though at one time they should Determine one thing and the contrary at another as they did often in England being led at different times by different motions and it is enough for every particular man to subject himself and obey simply their Determination without further inquisition except he should see that Open Injustice were done therein or God manifestly offended and the Realm endangered Open Injustice if not the true Common-wealth but some Faction of wicked men should offer to Determine the matter without lawful authoritie God offended and the Realm endangered where it is evident that he that is preferred will do what lieth in him to the prejudice both of God's glory and of the Common-wealth as if a Turke or some notorious wicked man and Tyrant should be offred to Govern among Christians Whence the Reasons of Admitting or Receiving a Prince are to be taken Now to know the true Causes and principal Points which ought to be chiefly regarded as well by the Common-wealth as by every particular man in the furthering or hindering any Prince we must return to the End wherefore Government was appointed which is to defend preserve and benefit the Common-wealth because from this Consideration are to be deduced all other Considerations for discerning a good or evil Prince For that whosoever is most likely to defend c. his Realm and Subjects he is most to be allowed and desired as most conform to the end for which Government was ordained And on the contrary side he that is least like to do this deserveth least to be preferred And this is the Consideration that divers Common-wealths had in putting back oftentimes Children and impotent People though next in blood from succession Three Chief Points to be regarded in every Prince And here shall be fitly remembred what Gerard recounteth of the King of France that in his Coronation he is new apparrelled three times in one day once as a Priest and then as a Judge and last as a King armed thereby to signifie three things committed to his charge first Religion then Justice then Manhood and Chivalrie which division seemeth very good and fit and to comprehend all that a Weal-Publick hath need of for her happie State and Felicity both in soul and bodie and for her end both supernatural and natural And therefore these seem to be the three Points which most are to be regarded in every Prince Why it is here principally treated of Religion For the latter two because they have been often had in Consideration in the Changes aforesaid and Religion whereof then scarce ever any question or doubt did fall in these actions rarely or never And because in these our dayes it is the principal Difference and chiefest Difficultie of all other and that also it is of it self the first and highest and most necessarie Point to be considered in the Admission of a Prince therefore it
his minion to put away his wife a goodly young Ladie daughter of Isabell his father's sister and to marrie another openly to her disgrace And in the last evil Parlament hee made would needs have all absolute autoritie granted to 6 or 7 his favorites to determine of all matters Grieved with these exorbitant indignities the more or better part of the Realm called home by their Letters Henry 4. deposed Richard 2. by Act of Parlament by his own confession of unworthie Government and his voluntarie resignation of the Crown to the said Henry by publick instrument All this without blood-shed And in almost all this Edmund L. D. of York the head of that familie together with Edward Duke of Aumale his eldest son and Richard Earle of Cambridge his yonger the Grand-father of Edward 4. assisted the said Henry That Henry 4. had more right to Succeed unto Richard 2. than Edmond Mortimer heir of Clarence much more any other King Richard 2. deposed the question is Whether Edmond Mortimer then alive his Father Roger being slain in Ireland a little before Nephew removed of Lionel Duke of Clarence or Henry Duke of Lancaster son of John of Gant should have Succeeded in right For Henry is alleged his being neerer to the former King by two degrees and proximitie of Blood though not of the elder Line is to be or hath been preferred in these cases 2. His Title came by a Man the others by a Woman not so much favored by Law nor Reason 3. The said Edmond being offered the Crown by Richard Earle of Cambridge who had married his Sister Anne and other Noblemen at Southampton he judged it against equitie discovered the Treason to Henry the fifth by whose command those Noblemen were executed 1415. Thirty years after which Richard Duke of York son of the aforesaid Earle and Anne for Edmond her brother died without issue set his Title on foot And whereas Roger Mortimer Father of this Edmond was declared Heir apparent by a Parlament 1382 that was done by Richard 2. from the hatred he bore to John of Gant and his son Henry rather than for the goodness of the others Title the cause whereof was Because immediately after the death of the Black Prince divers learned and wise men held opinion That John of Gant eldest son of Edward 3. then living should rather succeed than Richard jure Propinquitatis This made the old King Edward 3. confirm the Succession to Richard 2. by Parlament and the Oaths of his Uncles and made the yong King Richard 2. hold first and his son in jealousie and hatred ever after as distrusting the likelihoods of their Title Declaration of the Heir Apparent in the Princes life being Partial no sure president Partial establishing of Succession by Parlament is no extraordinary thing with Princes which yet most commonly have been to little purpose So did Richard 3. cause John de la Pole Earle of Lincoln and Son to his sister Elisabeth Dutchess of Suffolk to be declared Heir apparent thereby excluding his Brother Edward's four Daughters c. So did Henry 8. prefer the issue of his yonger sister before that of his elder So did Edward 6. declare the Lady Jane Gray his cozen Germain removed to be his Heir and Successor excluding his own two sisters Such say they was the aforesaid Declaration of Roger Mortimer by Richard 2. to as little purpose as from little equity Uncle preferred before the Nephew divers times Contra Sect. 83. That John of Gant should have in right succeeded his father rather than Richard himself as neerer to his father is proved by the course of divers Kingdoms where the Uncle was preferred before the Nephew 1. In Naples much about the same time Robert before Charles the son of Martel his elder Brother 2. In Spain Don Sancho Bravo before the Children of Prince Don Alonso de la Cerda from whom the House of Medina Celi is discended by sentence of Don Alonso the wise and of all the Realm and Nobility Anno 1276. 3. In the Earldom of Arthois Mande before Robert son to her Brother Philip by sentence of Philip le Bel of France confirmed by the Parlament of Paris and by his Successor Philippes de Valois whom he the said Robert had much assisted in the recovery of France from the English 4. In Britanie John Breno Earle of Montfort before Jane Countess of Bloys Daughter and Heir of Guy his elder brother by sentence of Edward 3. and the State of England who put him in possession of that Dukedom 5. In Scotland where albeit Edward 1. of England gave sentence for John Baliol Nephew to the elder Daughter excluding thereby Robert Bruse son to the yonger yet that sentence was held to be unjust in Scotland and the Crown restored to Robert Bruse his son whose posterity holds it to this day 6. The like whereof in Naples Lewis Prince of Taranto son to Philip prevailed before Joan the Neece of Robert aforesaid who was Philip's elder brother though Philip died before Robert because he was a man and a degree neerer to his Grand-father than Joan. 7. And in England it self Henry 1. preferred before William son and Heir of Robert of Normandie his elder brother And King John preferred before Arthur D. of Britanie the son and Heir of his elder brother Geoffrey because he was neerer to Richard his brother then dead than was Arthur Which Right of his the English inclined still to acknowledge and admit and thereupon proclaimed him King notwithstanding that the French and other Forrein Princes of stomach opposed themselves against it King John rightfully preferred before his Brother Arthur Against this last King Richard when he was to go to the Holy Land caused his Nephew Arthur to be declared Heir apparent to the Crown thereby shewing his Title to be the better Answ 1. It was not by Act of Parlament of England for Richard was in Normandie when he made it 2. Richard did it rather to repress the amhitious Humor of John in his absence 3. This Declaration was never admitted in England but renounced by consent of the Nobility in his absence 4. Richard himself at his return disadvowed it appointing John to be his Successor by his last Will and caused the Nobles to swear Fealtie unto him as to his next in blood The Opinion of Civil Lawyers touching the Right of the Uncle and Nephew Contra Sect. 83. This Controversie divided all the Lawyers in Christendom Baldus Oldratus Panormitanus c. for the Nephew Bartolus Alexander Decius Alciatus Cujatius c. for the Uncle Baldus himself at length concludeth That seeing rigor of Law runneth only with the Uncle being properly neerest in blood by one degree and that only indulgence and custom permitteth the Nephew to represent his Father's place whensoëver the Uncle is born before the Nephew and his elder brother dieth before his Father as in the case of John of Gant and Richard 2. he may be
the Order holdeth the Crown The Duke of Gasconie and Guyenne the First Banner quartered The Duke of Normandie the Second Banner quartered The Earle of Tholosa the Golden Spurs The Earle of Champanie the Banner Royal or Standard of War The Earle of Flanders the Sword Royal. And this day the King is apparrelled three times and in several sorts 1. As a Priest 2. As a King and a Warrier 3. As a Judge Philip 2d This day Lewis specially for the Coronation of his Son Philip Agustus whom he caused also to be Crowned in his dayes In this Coronation whereunto Henry 2. of England as Duke of Normandie who held the Crown and one of his Sons as Duke of Gasconie were present the King being summoned by the Archbishop to keep all Priviledges of the Church Law and Justice answered I do promise and avow to every one of you and to every Church to you committed That I will keep and maintain all Canonical priviledges law and justice due to every man to the uttermost of my power and by God's help shall defend you as a good King is bound to do in his Realm And then laying his hands upon the Gospel made his Oath in these words Au nom de Jesus Christ re jure promets au peuple Chrestien à moy Subject ces choses c. First that all my subjects be kept in the union of the Church and I will defend them from all excess rapine extortion and iniquitie Secondly I will take order that in all judgments justice shall be kept with equitie and mercie to the end that God of his mercy may conserve unto me with yo◠my people his holy grace and mercie Thirdly I shall endeavor as much as possibly shall lie in me To chase and drive out of my Realm and all my Dominions all such as the Church hath or shall declare for Hereticks as God shall help me and his holy Gospels Then he kissed the Gospels and after Te Deum sung and other particular Prayers said by the Archbishop he was Vested and the Ring Scepter Crown c. were put upon him with declaration what they signified After all that the Archbishop and Bishops did bless him and then by the said Archbishop and the other Peers was led unto the Seat Royal where the Crown was put upon his head c. France Author of this manner of Coronation Albeit the substance of the Ceremonie of Sacring and Anointing Kings be much elder than the Christian Kingdom of France yet is this particular and Majestical manner of doing it by way of Coronation the most antient in France above all other Kingdoms round about And it is probable that most of them have taken their forms of anointing and Crowning from her for the affinitie and likeness of the one to the other as may be seen by that of Germanie and Polonia before recited by that of Navarra brought in by certain Earles of Champanie according to the use of France and others But among all England seemeth to have taken it most particularly from them not only for that divers English Kings have come out of France but also for that in very deed the thing it self is all one in both Nations The Manner of Admission in England First As the Archbishop of Rheims doth this Ceremony in France so in England the Archbishop of Canterbury And the first thing the said Archbishop requireth at the King's hands is about Religion Church matters and the Clergie whereupon the King sweareth and giveth up his Oath in writing which he laieth down with his own hands upon the Altar the words are these That he will during his life have reverence and honor unto almightie God and to his Catholick Church and unto his Ministers and that he will administer Law and Justice equally to all and take away all unjust Laws Which after he hath sworn the Archbishop turning about to the People declareth what the King hath promised and asketh Whether they be content to submit themselves unto this man as unto their King or no under the Conditions proposed Whereunto having yielded he put's upon him the Royal Ornaments as the Sword the Ring the Scepter and Crown and namely he giveth him the Scepter of St. Edward the Confessor and then addeth this exhortation Stand and hold thy place and Keep thy Oath with a great commination on the behalf of almightie God if he taketh the place and breaketh his Oath Henry 4th In the admission of Henry 4. the People were demanded thrice Whether they were content to admit him for their King And the Archbishop of Canterbury having read unto them what this new King was bound by Oath unto he took the Ring wherewith to wedd him to the Common-wealth which wedding importeth a mutual Obligation which was shewed to the People by the High Constable and then put upon the King's finger who kissed the Constable in sign of acceptance c. Edward 4th Edw. 6th Mary Elisab In the admission of Edward 4th the Peoples Consent was asked at two several times very solemnly notwithstanding that he had proved his Title by Succession before in Parliament And in the Coronation of Edward 6. Queen Mary and Queen Elisabeth's the Peoples consent and their acceptation was not only demanded but the Princes corporal oath also taken upon the Evangelists What is due to only Succession by Birth and what interest or right an Heir apparent hath to the Crown before he be Crowned or Admitted by the Common-wealth and how justly he may be put back if he have not the other parts requisite also CAP. VI Belloy's Assertions upon this Matter Assertion First BElloy's Assertions about this matter are plain and gross flatteries and opposite to all reason of State and practise of the World First he saith That all Families which enjoy Kingdoms in the world were placed therein by God only and that he alone can change the same Which indeed if he refer unto God's universal providence it is true that all is from God either by his Ordinance or permission but speaking of the next and immediate causes clear it is that men do also concur therein and that God hath left them lawful authoritie so to do for the publick benefit Assertion Second His Second Assertion is That where such Princes be once placed in Government and the Law of Succession by Birth established there the Princes Children or next of Kinn do necessarily succeed by only Birth without any new choice or approbation of the People Nobilitie or Clergie or of the whole Common-wealth together Assertion Third Whereunto he joyneth That a King never dieth for that whensoever or howsoever he ceaseth by any means to Govern then entereth the Successor by Birth not as Heir to the former but as lawful Governor of the Realm without any admission at all having his authoritie only by the condition of his Birth and not by adoption or choice of any
both Polydore and Stow do affirm never to have been offered before to any Prince of England Admission is of more importance and hath prevailed against Right of succession Whence it is gathered That the Title of Succession without the Admission of the Common-wealth cannot make a lawful King and that of the two the second is of far more importance which may be proved by many examples As of William Rufus that Succeeded the Conqueror King Henry the first his Brother King Stephen's King John's and others who by only Admission of the Realm were Kings against the Order of Succession Henry and Edward the 4th did found the best part and most surest of their Titles and the defence thereof upon the Election Consent and good will of the People And for this cause the most Politick Princes that had any least suspicion of Troubles about the Title after their deaths have caused their Sons to be Crowned in their own days As Hugh Capetus Robert his eldest Son and Robert Henry the first his second Son excluding his elder Henry also procured the same to Philip the first his eldest Son And Louys le Gros unto two Sons of his first to Philip and after his death to Louys the yonger And this Louys again unto Philip 2. his Son The Prince of Spain is Sworn alwaies and admitted by the Realm during his Father's Reign The same Consideration also moved King David to Crown his Son Solomon in his own days And in England King Henry 2. considering the alteration that the Realm had made in admitting King Stephen before him against the Order of Lineal Succession and fearing that the like might happen also after him caused his eldest Son Henry the third to be Crowned in his life time So as England had two Kings Henry's living at one time with equal Authoritie How the next in succession by Propinquitie of Blood hath oftentimes been put back by the Common-wealth and others further off admitted in their Places even in these Kingdoms where Succession prevaileth with many Examples of the Kingdoms of Israël and Spain CAP. VII Examples of the Jews SAUL David Elected to the prejudice of Saul's Sons ALbeit God made Saul a true and lawful King over the Jews and consequently also gave him all Kinglie Prerogatives whereof one Principle is To have his Children succeed after him in the Crown yet he suffered not any of his Generation to succeed him but elected David who was a stranger by birth and no kinn at all to the deceased King Rejecting thereby from the Crown not only Isboseth Saul's elder Son though followed for a time by Abner Capt. General of that Nation with eleven Tribes but also Jonathan his other Son who was so good a man and so much praised in holy Scripture Whereby it is evident that the fault of the Father may prejudicate the Son's Right to the Crown albeit the Son have no part in the fault DAVID Solomon to the prejudice of Adonias and his Brethren David being placed in the Crown by Election free Consent and Admission of the People of Israël though by motion and direction of God himself no man will deny but that he had given him all Kinglie Priviledges and Regalities as among other the Scripture testifieth that it was assured him by God That his Seed should Reign after him yea and that for ever Yet this was not performed to any of his elder Sons but only to Solomon his yonger and tenth Son who by the means and perswasions of Queen Bersabé his Mother and Nathan the Prophet was chosen and made King by his Father to the prejudice of his elder Adonias and the rest of his Brethren * Whereby we are taught that these and like determinations of the People Magistrates and Common-wealths when their designments are to good ends and for just respects and causes are allowed also by God and oftentimes are his own special drifts and dispensations though they seem to come from man Jeroboam to the prejudice of Roboam Solomon's Son and Heir After Solomon's death Rehoboam his Son and Heir coming to Sichem where all the people of Israël were gathered for his Admission and having refused to yield to certain Conditions for taking away of some hard and heavie Impositions laid upon them by Solomon his Father which the People had proposed unto him ten Tribes of the twelve refused to admit him for their King but chose one Jeroboam his Servant a meer stranger and of poor Parentage and God allowed thereof for the Sins of Solomon leaving Rehoboam over two Tribes and Jeroboam over ten God's dealing in his Common-wealth a president for all others Although we may say that in the Jewish Common-wealth God almightie did deal and dispose of things against the ordinary course of man's Law as best liked himself whose Will is more than Law and is to be limitted by no Rule or Law of man and therefore that these Examples are not properly the act of a Common-wealth as our Question demandeth yet are they well brought in because they may give light to all the rest For if God permitted and allowed this in his own Common-wealth that was to be the Example and Pattern of all others no doubt but he approveth also the same in other Realms when just occasions are offered either for his service the good of the People and Realm or else for punishment of the sins and wickedness of some Princes Examples of SPAIN Four Races of Spanish Kings Spain since the expulsion of the Romans hath had Three or Four Races of Kings The first is from the Gothes which began to reign about the year 416 and endured by the space of 300. years until Spain was lost to the Moors And to them the Spaniard referreth all his old Nobility The second from Don Pelago who after the Invasion of the Moors was chosen King of Austurias about the year 717. and his Race continued adding Kingdom to Kingdom for the space of 300. years until the year 1034. The third from Don Sancho Mayor King of Navarra who having gotten into his Power the Earldoms of Arragon and Castilia made them Kingdoms and divided them among his Children And Don Fernando his second Son King of Castilia sirnamed afterward the Great by marrying of the Sister of Don Dermudo King of Leon and Asturias joyned all those Kingdoms together and this Race endured for 500. years until the year 1549 When for the Fourth the House of Austria came in by Marriage of the Daughter and Heir of Don Ferdinando sirnamed the Catholick which endureth until this day The First Race For the First Race because it had express Election joyned with Succession as by the Councils of Toledo it appeareth it can yield no valuable examples for this place The Second Race Don Alonso to the prejudice of Don Favila his Children In the Second Though the Law of Succession by Propinquitie
shall principally be treated of in this place The Felicitie of the Soul is the chiefest End appointed to every Common-wealth First we are to suppose That the first and chiefest End that God and Nature appointed to every Common-wealth was not so much the temporal Felicitie of the Body as the everlasting of the Soul And consequently that all other things of this transitory life are ordained to serve and be directed to that higher End And this was not only revealed to the Jewes by holy Scripture but also unto the Gentiles and Heathens by the instinct and light of Nature it self What End Pagan Philosophers and Law-makers had in their doings For there was never yet Pagan Philosopher that wrote of framing a good Common-wealth neither Law-maker among them that left Ordinances for the same purpose Which besides the temporal end of directing things for the bodie had not special care also of matters appertaining to the minde to wit of nourishing and rewarding virtue and for restraining and punishing of vice and wickedness Institution of Sacrifices by Nature Examples of Noah and Job And Nature did not only teach man that he should serve God but also how he should serve him to wit That the chiefest and supremest honor that could be done unto him in this life was the honor of Sacrifice and Oblations which we see was practiced even in those first beginnings of the Law of Nature before the Levitical Law For so we read in Genesis of Noah That he made an Altar and offered Sacrifices to God upon the same of all the Beasts and Birds that he had in the Ark Odoratúsque est Dominus odorem suavitatis And the like of Job that was a Gentile and lived before Moses Sanctificabat filios consurgénsque diluculo offerebat holocausta per dies singulos Example of the Indians Religion the chief End of a Common-wealth and Magistrates Among the Indians also where never any notice of Moses Law came there was never any Nation sound that acknowledged not some kind of God and offered not some kinde of Sacrifice unto him And though both in distinguishing between false gods and the true God and in the means of honoring him they have fallen into most gross and infinite errors as also the Gentiles of Europe Asia and Africa yet it is evident hereby that by God and Nature the highest and chiefest End of a Common-wealth is Cultus Dei And consequently that the principal care and charge of a Prince and Magistrate even by Nature it self is to look thereunto As among the Antients both Jews and Gentiles their Kings and chief Magistrates for many ages were also Princes And divers learned men do hold that the Privilege and preeminence of Primogeniture consisted principally in this That the eldest Sons were Priests The same proved by Authorities Nulla est gens saith Cicero tam fera nulla tam immanis cujus mentem non imbuerit deorum colendorum Religio And Plutarch writing against a certain Atheist of his time saith thus If you travel far Countries you may chance to finde some Cities without Learning without Kings without Riches without Money But a Citie without Temples and without gods and Sacrifices no man yet hath ever seen And finally Aristotle having numbred divers things necessary to a Common-wealth addeth these words Quintum Primum Circa rem Divinam cultus quod sacerdotium Sacrificiúmque vocant The absurd Atheism of our time in Politicks And therefore we see how false and impious is the opinion of divers Atheists of our time who affirm That Religion ought not to be so greatly respected in a Prince as though it were his chiefest care or the matter of most importance in his Government False and impious opinion specially among Christians who have so much the greater obligation to take to heart this matter of Religion by how much greater light and knowledge they have of God And for this cause also in all the Princes Oaths taken at their Admission as before hath been * recited the first and principal point of all other is about Religion and maintenance thereof not only by themselves but also by their Lievtenants c. The Oath given by the Emperor Justinian to all his Governors to take at their Reception And the Civil Law yieldeth a very solemn Form of an Oath which the Emperor Justinian was wont to give to all his Governors c. of Countries c. before they could be admitted to their Charges which is as followeth Juro per Deum omnipotentem filium ejus unigenitum Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum Spiritum Sanctum per Sanctam gloriosam Dei genitricem semper-virginem Mariam per quatuor Evangelia quae in manibus meos teneo per Sanctos Archangelos Michaëlem Gabriëlem puram conscientiam germanúmque servitium me servaturum sacratissimis nostris Dominis Justiniano Theodosiae conjugi ejus occasione traditae mihi ab eorum pietate administrationis Et quod communicator sum sanctissimae Dei Catholicae Apostolicae Ecclesiae nullo modo vel tempore adversabor ei nec alium quocunque permittam quantum possibilitatem habeam Et si verò non haec omnia servà vero recipiam omnia incommoda hìc in futuro seculo in terribili judicio magni Domini Dei salvatoris nostris Jesu Christi habebo partem cum Juda cum lepra Geizi cum tremore Cain in super poenis quae lege eorum pietatis continentur ero Subjectus Why Princes should be endued with Religion This Oath did all the Governors of Christian Countries take in old time By which Oath and the other Oaths which Emperors and Kings did make themselves at their admission about this point we may see that it is their chiefest and highest end and office to assist their Subjects to the attaining of their supernatural end by knowing and serving God in this life For that otherwise God should draw no other fruit or commodity out of humane Common-wealths than of an assembly of brutish creatures He that wanteth it is guilty of high Treason against God And therefore whatsoever Prince or Magistrate doth not help his Subjects to this end omitteth the first and principal part of his charge and committeth high Treason against his Lord and Master in whose place he is and consequently is not fit for that place and dignitie though he should perform the other two parts of Justice and Valor never so well Lack of Religion the chiefest Cause and justest to exclude a Prince Whereof it ensueth That nothing in the world can so justly exclude an Heir apparent from his Succession as want of Religion nor any cause whatsoever justifie and clear the conscience of the Common-wealth or of particular men that in this cause should resist his entrance as if they judge him faultie in this point If a Marriage may be dissolved
preferred for the elder brother cannot give or transmit that thing to his Son which is not in himself before his Father die nor can his son represent what the Father never had The Common-Law dealeth not with the Point of Succession to the Crown Touching the Common Law the right and interest to the Crown is not expresly decided in it nor is it a Plea subject to the rules thereof but superior and more eminent nor are the Maxims thereof alwayes of force in this as in others As in the case of Dower Copercenars and Tenancie by the courtesie No more ought they to be in this case of inheritance as by the former eight Presidents hath been shewed The Common Lawyers then refer this point of the Crown to Custom nothing being in effect written by them touching it Only the best of our old ones favored that title of Lancaster and Chancelor Fortescue and Sir Tho. Thorope chief Baron of the Exchequer in Henry 6. his time were much afflicted for it by the contrary faction The Princes of York often Attainted The Princes of York forfeited their Right by their Conspiracies and Attainder thereupon as R. Earle of Cambridge put to death therefore by the Judgment of his Peers his elder brother the Duke of York being one of the Jury that condemned him His son Richard Duke of York was also attainted of treason after many oaths to Henry 6. sworn and broken by him and his son Ed. 4. with the rest of his off-spring to the ninth degree at a Parlament at Coventry Anno 1459. But the House of Lancaster was never attainted of any such crime The Hous of York came to the Crown by Violence and Crueltie Edward 4. entred by violence wilfully murthering besides divers of the Nobilitie Henry 6. a good and holy King and his son Prince Edward dispossessing the Hous that had held the Crown about 60 years together in which time their Title had been confirmed by many Parlaments Oaths Approbations and publick Acts of the Common-wealth and the consent of all forreign Nations All which had been enough to have autorized a bad Title Those of Lancaster better Princes than those of York The 4 Henries of the hous of Lancaster were far more worthie Princes then the 4 Princes of the Houses of York as Edw. 4. Rich. 3. Hen. 8. Edw. 6. And if the affairs of any the former especially the 3d succeeded not the chief caus thereof was the sedition rebellion and troubles raised by those of York and their contention against the Princes of the Houses of Lancaster The Cruelty of the Princes of York one to the other The Princes of York have not been onely cruel to their enemies but to themselvs too embrewing their hands in their own blood Then when they had ruined th'other George Duke of Clarence conspired against Edw. 4. his own brother with whom reconciled Edw. caused him afterwards to bee murthered at Calis Rich. 3. murthered his two young Nephews and Henry 8. a great number of that Hous as Edmund de la Poole his Cousin German Henry Duke of Buckingham his great Ant 's son extinguishing that and ruining this familie Also Henry Courtney Marquis of Exceter his own Cousin german the Ladie Margaret Countess of Salisbury and daughter to George D. of Clarence and her son the L. Montague c. The kindness of the Princes of Lancaster But the Love Union Confidence Faithfulness Kindeness and Loialtie of the Princes of Lancaster towards th'other was very notable as in the 2 brothers of Henry 4 and the 3 brothers of Henry 5. and in five or six Dukes of Somerset their near Cosens which argueth both a marvellous confidence those Princes had in that quarrel and a great blessing of God unto the whole familie that agree'd so well The Successes of such noble Houses as followed either partie Another blessing seemeth to bee bestowed on them That no antient great Houses are remaining at this day in England but such as chiefly took their parts as Arundel Oxford Northumberland Westmerland and Shrewsbury whereas the chief partakers of the other Faction are all destroied as Mowbray Duke of Norfolk De la Poole Duke of Suffolk th' Earl of Salisbury th' Earl of Warwick and many others CAP. III. Examination of the Title of the Hous of Scotland Sect. 28. Allegations for the K. of Scots 1. THat hee is descended of the eldest daughter of Henry 7. without bastardie or other lawful impediment and therefore hath the right of prioritie 2. The benefit would accrew unto the Common-wealth by the uniting of England and Scotland a point long sought for 3. The establishing of true Religion in England Hee is not of the Hous of Lancaster but rather of York Hee is not descended truly of the Hous of Lancaster becaus not of the Ladie Blanch the true heir thereof but of Kathathine Swinford whose children were unlawfully begotten though afterwards legitimated by Parlament so that his best Title is by York inferior to that of Lancaster and therefore is to com in after them of that Hous Forrein birth not just impediment in Succession to the Crown of England Hee is Forrein born and therefore excluded by the Laws of England from inheriting within the land Answ 1. This Assertion in an universal sens is fals for a stranger may purchase and inherit by the right of his wife 7 9 Edw. 4. 11 14 Henrie 7. 2. The Statute of 25 Edw. 3. is to bee restrained unto proper inheritance onely viz. That no person born out of the Allegiance of England whose father and mother were not of the same Allegiance at the time of his birth shall not demand inheritance within the same Allegiance 3. This Statute toucheth not the Crown nor any except express mention bee made thereof 4. The Crown cannot properly bee called an inheritance of Allegiance or within Allegiance beeing held immediately from God 5. The Statute meaneth inheritance by descent onely but the Crown is a thing incorporate and therefore goeth as by Succession Now if a Prior Dean c. or other head incorparate though an alien may inherit or demand Lands in England notwithstanding the Statute much more may the Inheritor to the Crown 6. Express exception is made in the Statues of Enfants du Roi which word cannot but include all the King's off-spring and blood-Roial 7. King Stephen and Henry 2. born out of the Realm and of parents that were not of the Allegiance of England when they were born were yet admitted to the Crown without contradiction which argueth that by the cours of the Common Law there was no such stop against Aliens and that if the Statute would have abridged the antient libertie in this case of Succession it would have made special mention there which it doth not The King of Scots excluded by the last Will of Henry 8. Henry 8. his Will whereby he excludeth the off-spring of Margaret S. 4. Which though somwhat infringed by the testimony of two
or three S 7. yet 't is plain it was his own Will because he commanded it to be drawn written and sealed and never revoked it Besides it is subscribed by many witnesses and inrolled in the Chancery by his own command enough to make it good against the assertion of those few who to please the time wherein they spake in Queen Maries time might say and ghess the King was past memory when his stamp was put to it Now to make good what he did two Acts of Parlaments 28 35. of his Reign gave him full authoritie to dispose of this Point of Succession as he and his learned Council should think best for the Common-wealth By a Statute made in the 27th of Elisabeth 27. Elisah a Statute was made That whosoever shall be convinced to conspire attempt or procure the Queens death or is privie or accessary to the same shall loose all right title pretence claim or action that they or their heirs have or may have to the Crown of England Now the late Queen of Scots being attainted and executed by the authoritie of the said Parlament and for breach of the said Statute 't is easie to determine what Title her Son hath claiming only by her The Uniting of Scotland with England dangerous to the English or like to be 1. Only the increase of Subjects but those rather to participate the Commodities of England than to impart any from Scotland 2. The natural hatred of that People unto us and their ancient inclination to joyn with our enemies the French and Irish against us are Arguments of great mischiefs likely to ensue by that conjunction 3. The Scot must needs hold in jealousie so many Englishmen competitors of the Blood Royal and therefore will fortifie himself against them by those Forrein Nations of whom he is discended with whom he is allyed as the Scots French Danes and uncivil Irish which will prove intolerable to the English 4. The King both for his own safety and for the love he beareth to his own Nation will advance them and plant them about him in chief Places of credit which must needs breed Emulations and Controversies between them and the English Then must he of Force secretly begin to favor and fortifie his own to the incredible calamitie of the other as Canutus did his Danes and William the Conqueror his Normans neither of them enemies to the English blood nor evil Kings but careful of their own safeties for herein it is impossible to be neutral 5. The Romans with all their Power and Policie could never unite the hearts of England and Scotland in peace nor hold the Scots and North-Irish in obedience of any authority residing in England What then are we to hope for of this King herein The Religion of Scotland unpleasing to our State His Religion is neither fit for our State wherein Archbishops c. and Officers of Cathedral Churches are of much dignitie and there suppressed nor will be pleasing to our Nobilitie to be subject to the exorbitant and popular authoritie of a few ordinary Ministers which the King himself is there content to yield unto And therefore it is likely that few will be forward to entertain that King for the reforming of Religion here that hath no better Order in his own at home For the Ladie Arabella For the Ladie Arabella is alleged her being an equal degree of Discent with the King of Scots Her being above him in all hopes for herself or benefit to the English that can be expected in an English Prince and a Prince born in England Against Her Neither she nor the Scot are properly of the House of Lancaster and the Title of Lancaster is before the Pretence of York ut suprà 2. The testament of King Henry 8. barreth her as well as the Scot 3. Her Discent is not free from Bastardie for Queen Margaret soon after the death of her first Husband married Steward Lord of Annerdale who was alive long after her marriage with Anguis and it is most certain also That Anguis had another Wife alive when he married the said Queen All this confirmed by the Lord William Howard Father to the now Admiral sent into Scotland by Henry 8. of purpose to enquire thereof who reported it to King Henry Queen Mary and divers others For this cause King Henry would have letted the marriage between Anguis and his Sister and chiefly caused him to exclude her issue 4. She is a Woman and it were perhaps a great inconvenience that three of the weak sex should succeed one the other 5. All her Kindred by her Father is meer Scotish In England she hath none but by her Mother the Candishes a mean Familie and Kindred for a Princess CAP. VI Examination of the Title of the House of Suffolk being Darby and Hartford Sect. 29. 30. The Earle of Hartford's Children illegitimate THe Children of the Earle of Hartford Discending of Ladie Frances the eldest Daughter of Charles Brandon are proved illigitimate 1. Because the Ladie Katharine Gray their Mother was lawful Wife to the Earle of Pembroke when they were born not separated from him by lawful authority or for any just cause but abandoned by him because her House was come into misery and disgrace 2. It could never be lawfully proved that the said Earle and Ladie Katharine were married but only by their own Assertions not sufficient in Law Therefore was the marriage disannulled in the Arches by publick and definitive sentence of Parker Archbishop of Canterbury not long after the Birth of the said Children 3. When the Marquess of Dorset married their Grandmother the Ladie Frances he had another lawful Wife sister to H. Fitz-allen Earle of Arundel whom he put away to obtain so great a marriage as was the Lady Frances This bred much hate between the Marquess and Earle ever after but the Marquess favor with K. Henry deprived the other of all remedy And therefore may their Mother the Lady Katharine seem illegitimate too Bastardie in the issue of Charles Brandon Charles Brandon had a wife alive when he married the Queen of France by which wife he had issue the Ladie Powyse wife of the Lord Powyse and this wife of his lived some time after his marriage with the Queen Darby's Evasion This Wife say the Friends of Darby died before the birth of the Lady Eleonor the yonger daughter their ancestor though after the Birth of the Lady Francis Hartford's ancestor Hartford's Confutation of the first Bastardie To the first Bastardy of Hartford their Friends affirm That the Contract between the Lady Katharine and the Earl of Pembrook was dissolved lawfully and judicially in the time of Queen Mary Hartford's evasion of the second Bastardie in the behalf of his Second born Edward Seymore The Lady Katharine being found with Child affirmed the Earle of Hartford to be the Father Hereupon he being sent for out of France where he was with Sir N. Throgmorton and had got leave to
hee who represented her person was to bee preferred before her For the Duchess of Bragança and against the point of Representation Shee was born and bred in Portugal Philip and Parma were forrein 2. Shee was nearer by a degree unto Emanuel and Henry the Cardinal then the Duke of Parma 3. Against the representation urged by Parma that no representation was admitten in the Succession to the Crown of Portugal but that every pretender was to bee taken and preferred according to the Prerogatives onely of his Person as the next in propinquitie of blood or the man before the woman and the elder before the younger if they bee in equal degree of propinquitie to the former Kings Touching Representations Contra Sect. 40. The last King Sebastian entred the Crown by way of Representation not by propinquitie of blood the Cardinal beeing brother and hee but Nephew unto the former King John 3. Sect. 82. Answ. Hee was of the right descendant line of K. John 3. and the Cardinal but of the Collateral and all Law alloweth the right line to bee served and preferred before the Collateral bee admitted This was the caus of his coming to the Crown and not representation Allegations of King Philip's right to Portugal Seeing then that Representation was not admitted but every Pretendor considered in his own person onely Sect. 82. King Philip beeing in equal degree of propinquitie of blood with the Duchesses alleged hee was to bee preferred before them both becaus a man and born before them 2. The inheritance of Portugal besides that it belonged to the Crown of Castile of old evidently belonged to John King of Castile by the marriage of Beatrix daughter and heir of Ferdinand King of Portugal after whose death it was conferred by election of the People on John M. of Avis bastard-brother of the foresaid Ferdinand by him the said Beatrix and her posteritie wrongfully debarred and excluded King Philip his own carver in Spain When these contentions were at the hottest died the K. Cardinal before he could decide them Whereupon the K. of Spain taking his right to bee best and becaus a Monarch and under no temporal Judg thinking hee was not bound to attend any other or further judgment in the matter but might by force put himself in possession of his own as hee took it if otherwise hee might not have it hee entered upon Portugal by force of Arms and at this day holdeth it peaceably The end of the controversie An Objection in behalf of Representation in the Succession of England Representation taketh place in England So as the children of the son though women shall ever bee preferred before those of the daughter though men Therefore seeing the Ladie Philippes right to the Dukedom of Lancaster and Crown of England mentioned Sect. 70 72 c. is to bee preferred according to the Laws of England onely it followeth that the right of Succession pretended by the Princes of Portugal from the said Ladie Philippe should bee determined onely by the Laws of England which admit of Representation Answer to the former Objection The question is not here by what Law this pretence by Portugal to the Crown of England is to bee tried but rather who is the true and next heir of John of Portugal and the Ladie Philippe heir of Lancaster which once known it little importeth by what Law hee pretendeth his right unto England whether of Portugal or England though to determine this first and chief point of the Succession of Portugal the Laws of Portugal must needs bee the onely Judges and not those of England CAP. X. Whether it bee better to live under a Forrein or a Home-born Prince a great Monarch or a little King Against Forrein-Government the opinion of Law-makers ARistotle in all the different Forms of Common-wealths which hee prescribeth in his 8 books of Politicks ever presupposeth that the Government shall bee by people of the self-same Nation the same also do presume all the Law-makers therein mentioned as Minos Solon Lycurgus Numa Pompilius and the rest Of Orators and Writerr Demosthenes his famous invectives against Philip of Macedonia that desired to encroach upon the State of Greece and his Orations against Eschines who was thought secretly to favor the pretences of the said forrein Princes The books of the Italians when they speak of their former subjection to the Lombardes Germanes French and their present to the Spaniard The late writings of the French against the power of the hous of Guise and Lorrain whom they hold for strangers Of Nations by their Proceedings and Designs The desperate and bloodie executions of divers Nations to th' end they might rid themselvs from stranger's dominion are arguments of the very impression of nature herself in this matter for examples whereof see Q. Curtius lib. 5. 6. And the Sicilians who at one Evensong-tide slew all the French within their Iland whom themselvs had called and invited thither not long before And the English who murthered all the Danes at one time and would have don as much for the Normans if themselvs had been strong enough or the advers partie less vigilant And the French in the time of Charles the 7. when nothing could repress them from revolting every where against the English Government of which at length by hook and crook they wholly free'd themselvs Of Holy Scripture The autoritie of holy Scriptures is evident in this behalf Deut. 17. 16. Thou shalt make them King over thee whom the LORD thy GOD shall choos out of the number of thy brethren thou mai'st not set a stranger over thee which is not of thy brethren In the behalf of Forrein Government This hatred of Stranger's Government is but a vulgar aversion of passionate or foolish men Passionate by corruption of nature whereby men are inclined to think evil of others especially their Governors and the more the farther they are from us in kindred or acquaintance foolish as those that weigh not the true reasons causes or effects of things but onely the outward shew and popular apprehension grounded for the most part in the imagination or incitation of others who endeavor onely to procure tumults It importeth not what Countrimam the Prince bee so his Goverement bee good All passion against stranger or unto others laid aside wee are onely to respect the fruits of good and profitable Government the peace and proprietie of the Subject which what Prince bee hee native or forreign soëver procureth us is fittest for ours or any other Government for after a Prince is established the common subject hath no more conversation with him nor receiveth further personal benefits of him than of a meer stranger Then if hee govern ill what is the Subject the better by his beeing Home-born Home-born Princes and Tyrants As in the like case the children of Israël said of Rehoboam Quae nobis pars in David vel quae haereditas in filio Jesse 3 King 12. 16.