and instruct them that knew too little and so in time he should pass for currant amongst them all It was no hard matter for the King to accomplish this the greater part of the Kindom being pre-ingaged unto his Title and of them many depending upon him for livelihood if he failed they must look to lose all But the present occasion urged more importantly the Title to the Crown was already put to the question by the pretentions of one that named himself Duke of York And it is now high time for the Law to declare it self to direct the people in such a Case What shall the people do where Might overcomes Right or if days come like those of Henry the Sixth wherein the Subjects should be between Two Mill-stones of one King in Title and another King in possession for whom must they take up Arms If for Edward the Fourth then are they Traitors to Henry the Sixth If for Henry the Sixth then are they Traitors to Edward the Fourth And so now if for Henry the Seventh then they may be Traitors to the Duke of York If for the Duke of York then are they Traitors to Henry the Seventh For though the Duke of York was said to be but a contrivance of the House of Burgundy yet a great part both of the great men and others were of another opinion and the King himself was not very certain of his condition for the space of six years thereby This puts the Title of Allegiance and that power of the Militia to the touch at length both King and Parliament come to one conclusion consisting of three particulars First That the King for the time being whether by right or wrong ought to have the Subjects Allegiance like to that of the wise Counsellor of that brave King of Israel Whom the Lord and his People and all the men of Israel chuse his will I be And this is not onely declared by the express words in the Preface of the Law but also by the Kings own practice For he discharged such as aided him against Richard the Third then King by pardon by Parliament but such as aided him being King by declaration of the Law. Secondly That this Allegiance draweth therewith ingagement for the defence of that King and Kingdom Thirdly That the discharge of this Service whereto the Subjects are bound by Allegiance ought not to be imputed unto them as Treason Nor shall any person be impeached or attained therefore The first and the last of these need no dispute The Second is more worthy of consideration in the particular words set down in the Statute viz. That the Subjects are to serve their Prince in his Wars for the defence of him and the Land against every Rebellion Power and Might reared against him and with him to enter and abide in Service in Battle Wherein two things are to be considered the Service and the time or occasion The Service is to serve the Prince in his Wars and with him to enter and abide in service in Battel which is the less to be stood upon because there is a condition annexed if the case so require which must be determined by some Authority not particularly mentioned Albeit that whatsoever is therein set down is onely by way of supposal in a Preface annexed to the Law by the King and permitted by the Commons that were as willing the same should be allowed as the King himself both of them being weary of Wars and willing to admit this Conclusion for the better security of them both in these doubtful times But to lay all these aside for the Case is not stated till the Cause be considered all this must be onely when and where the King's Person and Kingdom is endangered by Rebellion Power or Might reared against him So as the King's Person must be present in the War for the defence of the Kingdom or no man is bound by his Allegiance to hazard his own life And then this point of Allegiance consisteth onely in defending the King in the defence of the Land or more particularly in defending the King's Person he being then in the defence of the Land and defending him in order to the defence of the Land. So as no man can rationally infer from hence that the King hath an universal power of Array when he pleases because the King when he pleases may not levy War nor make other War than a defensive War when the Land is endangered or when need shall require as another Statute hath it But who shall determine this need or danger neither in these or any other Laws is mentioned either out of want of occasion or by reason of the tenderness of the times wherein both Prince and People were willing to decline the Question Secondly the persons that are to do this service are to be considered of and although they are indefinitely set down under the word Subjects it may be supposed that the word is not to be taken in so large a sence as to comprehend all of all Ages Sexes Callings and Conditions in regard that even by the Common-Law some of each of these sorts are discharged from such service But it may seem the King was neither satisfied with the expressions of this first Law concerning the occasion or time of this service nor did he see sufficient ground under the notion of bare Allegiance to desire more New ways are by him found out his Patentees were not a few and although few or none could ever boast much of any cheap Purchases gained from him for he was wont to be well paid beforehand for his Patents either by Money or that which was as beneficial to him yet he was resolved that their holding should be no less advantageous to him than their having And therefore in plain words he lets them know that notwithstanding former consideration upon which they had their Patents at the first they must fight for him if they will live upon him and either adventure their Lives or their Benefit chuse they which and if they find fault with their condition he touches them with the Law of their Allegiance And thus he makes way to intimate a claim of a more absolute Allegiance for being to shew the Equity of the Law in regard of their Allegiance he tells them That every Subject is bound by his Allegiance to serve and assist his Prince and Soveraign Lord at all seasons when need shall require General words that affirm nothing in certainty yet do glance shrewdly upon an absolute and universal assistance Then coming to drive the Nail home it is said that the Patentees are bound to give their attendance upon his Royal Person to defend the same when he shall fortune to go in his person to Wars for the defence of the Realm or against his Rebels and Enemies And as another Statute addeth Within the same Realm or without and according to their Allegiance and not to depart without especial License or
and nothing shall hinder it but the special reservation of the donor and yet he saith that such gift or grant taketh not away the right of the Lord Paramount in his Tenure albeit the gift be in free Alms. Nevertheless it seemeth to be such restraint that the Templars and Hospitallers were fain to find out a new way which was to protect mens Tenements from execution of Law by levying crosses thereon albeit the right of the Lords was not barred and therefore Edw. 1. provided a Law to make this also in nature of a Mortmain within the Statute made in the seventh year of his Reign called the Statute de Religiosis by which it was enacted that in case of such alienations in Mortmain the Lord should have liberty to enter if he failed then the Lord Paramount or if he failed the King should enter and dispose of the same and that no license of Mortmain should be sued out but by the mean Lord's assent and where part of the premises remain still in the Donor and the original Writ mentioneth all the particulars And thus at length was this issue for the present stayed which hitherto wasted the strength of the Kingdom and by continual current emptying it into the mare mortuum of the Clergie consumed the maintenance of Knight service by converting the same to Clerk-service No Judge shall compel a Free-man to make Oath without the Kings command So is the sence of the Law rendred by an ancient Authour and I hope I shall not wrong the Text if I affirm that the Ecclesiastical Judge was included within the equity though properly he be not Balivus for the Law intends to shew that it is a liberty that the Subject hath not to be compelled to take Oath without the Kings especial command and by consequence it sheweth also that the King at that time and until then had the directory of Oaths for it was an ancient Liberty given in the Kings Charters unto such as they pleased viz. to impose Oaths and to punish for breach of Oath and this passed under the word Athae or Athas and so Edmund the Saxon King gave to the Abbey of Glastenbury amongst other Athas Ordulas and the Church-men that first procured vacations from Suits of Law during holy times procured a Law also to be setled by Edward the Saxon King and Gunthurne the Dane that Ordeal and Oaths should be forbidden upon the holy Feasts and lawful Fasts And a wonder it is how it escaped the gripe of the Clergie so long who catched at any thing that had but a glance of Gods worship in it And if this were the Subjects Liberty not to be compelled to Swear surely much more not to be compelled to accuse himself unless by the Law he be especially bound for it is Glanvil's rule Ob infamiam non solet juxta legem terrae aliquis per legem apparentem se purgare nisi prius convictus fuerit vel confessus in curia But the power of the Clergie now was grown strong and they begin to remember themselves and that Oaths are of a holy regard and they men for holiness best able to judge when and to whom they shall be ministred and therefore now they begin to enter their claim and to make a sure Title they get a grant from Pope Innocent to Steven Langton Arch-Bishop of Canterbury of a faculty of licensing administration of Oaths during the time of Lent and he accordingly enjoyed it during the mad time of Henry the Third But Edward the first quarrelled it and left it questionable to Edward the Second who being in his condition as a lost man had less care of such smaller matters and therefore allowed that his Judges of Assizes should be licensed by the Arch-bishop to administer Oaths in their Circuits in the sacred times of Advent and Septuagessima and this course continued till Henry the Eighth's time The Clergie having thus gotten the bridle gallop amain they now call whom they will and put them to their Oaths to accuse other men or themselves or else they are Excommunicated Henry the Third withstood this course if the Clergie-mens complaints in the times of that King Artic. 9. be true and notwithstanding the same the Law holds its course and in pursuance thereof we find an attachment upon a prohibition in this form ensuing Put the Bishop of N. to his pledges that he be before our Justices to shew cause why he made to be summoned and by Ecclesiastical censures constrained lay-Lay-persons men or women to appear before him to swear unwillingly at the Bishops pleasure to the great prejudice of our Crown and Dignity and contrary to the custom of the Kingdom of England And thus both King and Clergie were at contest for this power over the peoples Consciences to which neither had the right otherwise than by rules of Law. Bigamists shall not be allowed their Clergie whether they become such before the Council of Lyons or since and that Constitution there made shall be so construed Whatsoever therefore their Synods in those times pretended against the married Clergie it seemeth by this Law that they had Clergie that were married once and again and yet before and after the Council were admitted as Clerks in the judgment of the Law. But the general Council interposes their authority and deprives them that are the second time married of all their priviledges of Clergie It was it seemeth twenty years and more after that Council before the Church-men in England were throughly reformed for either some were still Bigami at the making of this Law or as touching that point it was vain nor is it easie to conceive what occasion should after so long a time move such exposition the words of the Constitution being Bigamos omni privilegio clericali declaramus esse nudatos Now whether this slow Reformation arose from the defect in Law or in obedience thereto may be gathered from some particulars ensuing First it is apparent that the Canons of general Councils eo nomine had formerly of ancient times gotten a kind of preheminence in this Nation but by what means is not so clear In the Saxon times they were of no further force than the great Council of this Kingdom allowed by express act For the Nicene Faith and the first five general Councils were received by Synodical confirmations of this Kingdom made in the joynt meeting both of the Laity and Clergie and during such joynt consulting the summons to the general Councils was sent to the King to send Bishops Abbots c. but after that the Laity were excluded by the Clergie from their meetings and the King himself also served in the same manner the Summons to the general Council issued forth to the Bishops immediately and in particular to each of them and to the Abbots and Priors in general by vertue whereof they went inconsulto Rege and sometimes Rege
redemption of their Captive King for Knighting of the Kings Son and for his Daughters Marriage because these three might be due by the Common-Law the two latter by custom the former by common right although mentioned from the late disaster of King Richard which King John might with shame enough remember and expect the same measure from the censure of an unquiet conscience I shall not enter into debate concerning the omission hereof in the later Charters possibly it might seem a tautology Nor concerning the restriction as if it did imply that the Burgesses had Vote only in cases of general assesments but shall leave it to the consideration of the Reader No Distress shall be taken for greater service or other matter than is due Distresses are in nature no other than a summons in act or the bringing of a man to answer by seizure of part of his Goods and it was used by the Saxons as hath been shewed and because the rich men under colour of seeking their right many times sought for wrong and though they could not prevail in the issue yet prevailed so far that the Defendant could not escape without charge and hinderance therefore the Law provided a Writ of remedy against unjust vexation which Glanvil remembreth us of and yet because that remedy also carried with it matter of charge and disturbance to the Plaintiff and so the remedy might be worse than the disease therefore the Law defined distresses by circumstances of person matter time and place under penalties of fine and amercement besides the recompence to the party first it must not be taken but by leave from the Kings Court unless in case of matters due by common right and upon complaint made by the Plaintiff The King sent out a Summons in this manner Henricus Rex Ang. Hominibus Abbatis de Ramsey salutem Precipio quod cito juste reddatis Abbati Domino vestro quicquid ei debetis in censu firma debitis placitis quod si nolueritis ipse vos inde constringat per pecuniam vestram And in all cases of matters due by common right the distress never was done in an arbitrary way but by Judicial Act in the Lord's Court. Secondly no distress for suit shall be made out of the Fee nor against any person but such as are of that Fee. Nor shall any distress be made in the King's High-way or open street but by the King's Officer and special Writ because distress is incident to service and that is due as from the Fee and therefore by common right the same must be recovered from the Fee and such as owe service in the same but the High-way or open street are more properly a Franchise belonging to the King although the Soil haply may be the Lords And therefore it was an old Law that they should be under the King's safeguard Sit pax publica per communes vias and no violence must be there tolerated but by the King 's special Writ which presupposeth the especial notice taken by the King of the nature of the occasion A moderation also must be observed in the taking of the distress for it must not be excessive and also in keeping thereof for if the owner will he may replevy the same according to the ancient course and the Sheriff must grant replevy if it be demanded although formerly no replevy was without special Writ and yet that also not always readily obeyed for the times were such as the Lords were bold with the King's Courts and Ministers and refused the order of the Law. Now in such cases wherein the matter concerned contempt of the King's Authority a Fine was set upon the Offender but in case it concerned onely a Tort done to the party he was amerced The one is called Redemption because the penalty otherwise must lie upon the person if it be not redeemed by pecuniary Fine the other is called Amercement which is originally a satisfaction unto the party wronged by recompence out of the personal Estate of the Delinquent Thirdly as touching the matter of the distress it must not be of Plough beasts or Sheep unless in case of damage fesant if other distress may be had for the Law had a care of such Cattel as were most of publick concernment and which was the main stock of subsistence so far as Justice would allow And therefore the unjust taking of any man's Cattel by any person whatsoever is liable to the same penalties that unjust distresses are Fourthly concerning the using of the distress it must not be sold no not in the King's case till fifteen days be past after it is taken nor must it be carried out of the County but it must be so impounded as the owner may come to feed it and it must be discharged if the owner give security of satisfaction before the return of the Writ Fifthly the intent of the distresses must be that which is just and therefore not for other suit than by the Feoffment is due or else by Prescription and in case many are joyntly seized the suit shall be by one and the rest shall contribute Nor must any man be compelled to shew his Title to his Land by distress The Common-pleas shall be holden in one certain place The Office of Judge of the Common-pleas was in my opinion distinct and several from that of the Crown-pleas nor though one and the same man might execute both Authorities doth it therefore follow that it was by one and the same power as if being Judge he had thereby power in all matters of the Common-pleas and also of the Crown For though it be true that Bracton saith The King hath one proper Court wherein are the Chief Judges which both by his own Testimony and Briton's also did hear and determine Causes of all sorts yet is it true also that it was by Appeal or Writ of Errour as in case of false Judgment and that the King had plures curias which doubtless had their proper work And in the time of Henry the second it is clear that six were especially assigned for the Common-pleas throughout the whole Realm and yet by another especial Commission or Letters-Patents the same men might also have power to determine matters of the Crown as at this day in their several Circuits This Law therefore doth not as I conceive work any alteration but onely in this that whereas formerly the Judges of Common-pleas attended on the King's Court continually as all other Judges did and whither the King removed they did the like which was a great uncertainty and grievance unto the Commons henceforth they are fixed to a certain place Assize of Novel Disseisin and Mortdancester shall be determined in the proper County onely and by the Justices itinerant sent by the King or his Chief Justices The Law was so declared in Henry the second 's
the Diocess of Lincoln into two Diocesses by advice of the Bishops Princes and other wise and holy men and turned the Abbey of Ely into a Bishop's See. But it was their wisdom to preserve the ancient Land-marks and no less both wisdom and care to continue their due Priviledges and Interests to each Every County had its Court and every Court its wonted Jurisdiction No complaint must be to the King's Court if right may be done in the County no distress must be taken but by Warrant from the County and that must be after complaint thrice made The County-court must be called as our Ancestors have appointed Such as will not come as they ought shall be first summoned and in case of default distrained at the fourth default the Complainant shall be satisfied out of the distresses so taken and the King also for his Fine These are the express Laws of the Conquerour's own establishment the last of which also Hen. 1. confirmed by another express Law saving that he would allow but of two Summons and two Distresses before execution And as it was one principal work that he undertook to reduce the Laws into course which had been intermitted during the violent times of his Father and Brother the first of whom never had liberty for reformation and the latter never had will so amongst other Laws he setled those concerning the County-court namely 1. That the Bishops Earls and chief men should be present for direction 2. That it should be holden once each month 3. That the Church-matters should precede and then the Crown-pleas And lastly the Common-Pleas besides some other particulars concerning pleading and proceedings in the handling of Causes Neither were these Causes of a petty regard onely but of greatest concernment One example I shall remind the Reader of and not recite in terminis but refer to Mr. Selden's own Pen. The occasion was this Odo the Conquerour's half Brother was by him made Earl of Kent and therewith had the gift of a large Territory in Kent and taking advantage of the King's displeasure at the Archbishop of Canterbury possessed himself by disseism of divers Lands and Tenements belonging to that See. Lanfrank the succeeding Archbishop being informed hereof petitioned to the King that Justice might be done him secundum legem terrae and the King sends forth his Writ to summon a County-court The Debate lasted three days before the Free men of the County of Kent in the presence of many chief men Bishops and Lords and others skilful in the Laws and the Judgment passed for the Archbishop Lanfrank upon the Votes of the Free men This County-court was holden by special summons and not by adjournment as was allowable by the Saxon Law upon special occasions And this Suit was originally begun and had its final determination in the County-court and not brought by a Tolt out of the Hundred-court as is supposed by an honourable Reporter nor by the ancient Laws could the Suit commence in the Hundred because the Lands and Tenements did lie in several Hundreds and Counties The upshot of all is that the County-courts in those days were of so great esteem that two of the greatest Peers of the Realm one a Norman the other an Italian did cast a Title in fifteen Mannors two Townships with many Liberties upon the Votes of the Free-holders in a County-court and that the Sentence was allowed and commended by the King and submitted to by all In the next place we are to come to the Hundred-courts of which there are by the Normans allowed two sorts the first whereof was holden twice a year This was formerly called the Torn and was the Sheriff's Court hereof little notice is taken saving that by the Laws of Henry the first its work seems to be much designed to the view of free pledges But the more ordinary Court is that which belongs to the Lord of the Hundred unto whom also belong the Fines in cases there concerned This Court is to be holden once in each month and no Suit to be begun in the King's Court that regularly ought to begin in the Hundred No Distringas shall issue forth till three demands made in the Hundred And three Distresses shall then issue forth and if upon the fourth the party appear not Execution shall be by sale of the Distress and the Complainant shall receive satisfaction But by the latter Laws of the same King there are but two Summons allowed and then two Distresses and in case no appearance be Execution shall be for the Complainant and for the King 's Fine Lastly as the case concerned either persons or places sometimes they used to joyn several Hundreds together into one Court but this was by special Commission or Writ As touching inferiour Courts of Towns and Mannors there 's little observation to be had being of too private a regard to come into fame in those rough times yet in Hen. the first 's Laws it is ordered that Town-courts should meet every month and that Lords should hold Pleas either in their own persons or by their Stewards and that the chief man in the Parish with four other of the chiefer sort and the Minister or Parish-Priest should joyn their assistance in that work But in nothing more did the Norman Kings shew their paternal love to the Commonwealth than in the Law of Pledges or Decenners for as of all other Beauties this suffered most blemish from the storm of the Norman Invasion so was it their especial care to renew the life thereof not now amongst the Natives onely but joyning the Normans to the Saxons in the same bond of Brotherhood utterly drowned thereby all memory of Lordly power and so of divers peoples making one conquered even Conquest it self if any were and made all joynt-partners in one common Liberty Every Free-man must be under Pledges to satisfie Justice in case of delinquency Over every nine persons under Pledges there must be one man in Authority View of free Pledges must be to see that the Decennaries be full and if any be departed to enquire the cause and if any be come in whether he be under Pledges or not And thus the Norman Kings had their people under treble guard one of Fealty the other of Association and the third that of Pledges and all little enough to secure that which they in their own Consciences might have some cause to question whether it belonged to them or not CHAP. XLIX Of the Immunities of the Saxon Free-men under the Norman Government THE freedom of an English-man consisteth in three particulars First in ownership of what he hath Secondly in voting any Law whereby that ownership is to be maintained And thirdly in having an influence upon that Judicatory power that must apply that Law. Now that the English under the Normans enjoyed all this freedom unto each Man 's own particular besides what
declared according to the entry in that Case aforesaid Habito Concilio cum Episcopis Comitibus Baronibus adjudicavimus c. The honour of this Court was great so long as the Lords had liberty or care to attend thereon but when Kings began to have private interests they would have these to be more private Councils which weakned the esteem of Conclusions that there passed and reduced the honour thereof scarce to the degree of a Conventicle And by this means the necessity of calling together the whole Body-Representative was made more frequent the power of the Nobility of England decayed and this Court forfeited all its Juridical power to the three Courts at Westminster viz. the Kings-bench Common-pleas and Exchequer saving still the supreme Judicature unto the grand Convention of Estates in Parliament where all the Lords had liberty of meeting and free voting without impeachment CHAP. LIX Of the state of the Clergie and their power in this Kingdom from the Normans time IF the Prerogative of Kings prevailed not to its utmost pitch during the Normans time it did much less in these times succeeding wherein the Clergie took up the Bùcklers and beat both King and Commons to a Retreat themselves in the interim remaining sole Triumphers in the Field In their first Adventure they paced the Stage no man appearing to oppose Steven then was King by their leave and their Bond-servant and they might have any thing sobeit they would suffer him to enjoy his Crown His Brother the Bishop was the Pope's servant the Church-mens patron and the King's surety in whom the Clergies favour to the King and his good behaviour toward them and all men concentred Besides all this the King was but so upon condition and there being no better Title than Election Conscience in those times was well enough satisfied in the breach of Covenant on their part when on the King's part it was first broken All this the King saw full well and therefore what can he deny to such Benefactors Vacancies of Churches he readily parts with and his right of investiture of the Mitred Clergie he dispensed so as he open'd the way to his Successours of an utter dereliction of that Priviledge He sees his Brother the Legate deflower the Crown of England by maintaining Appeals from the Courts in England unto the Court of Rome and he says nothing he is contented with the stump of the Crown and with Saul if he be but honoured above or before all others of the people it is enough But the Clergie like the barren Womb hath not yet enough The King hath allowed them Castles and too late he sees that instead of being Defences against the Imperial power of the Empress they are now made Bulwarks against the lawful power of a King he had therefore endeavoured to get them down and gotten some of them into his power The King himself is now summoned to answer this before a Legatine Council wherein his Brother is President That was a bold adventure in them but it was extreme rashness in him to appear and plead the Cause of the Crown of England before a Conventicle of his own Subjects And thus to secure Rome of Supremacy in Appeals he suffers a recovery thereof against his own person in a Court of Record and so loses himself to save the Crown Thus are Synods mounted up on Eagles wings they have the King under them they will next have the Crown Within a while Steven is taken prisoner The Empress perceiving the power of the Clergie betakes her case to them now assembled in Synod they now proud of the occasion and conceiting that both Law and Gospel were now under their decree publish That the Election of the King belongeth unto them and by them the Empress is elected Queen in open Synod Steven's Brother leading the game and had she been as willing to have admitted of the Laws as Steven was she had so continued and had left a strange President in the English Government for Posterity But the Citizens of London who had made the way to the Throne for Steven reduced the Synod to sober consideration and helped the King's return unto his Throne again wherein he continued a friend to the Clergie during the rest of his time Henry the second succeeded him as brave a man as he but beyond him in Title and Power and one that came to the Crown without pre-engagement by Promise or Covenant saving that which was proper for a King. A man he was that knew full well the Interests in the Government the growing power of the Clergie and the advantages lost from the Crown by his Predecessor And to regain these he smooths his way towards these braving men speaks fair profers fair he would act to increase the bounds of the Church He would have the Pope's leave to do him a kindness and sobeit he might gain an interest in Ireland he would take it from the Pope who pretended as Heir of Jesus Christ to have the Islands and utmost parts of the Earth for his possession and as if he meaned to be as good to the Church as Steven was and much better he desires the Pope's kindness for the confirmation of the Liberties and Customs of his Crown and Kingdom and no sooner desired than obtained This was a second Example of a King of England but the first of an English King that sought to Rome for Right in the Crown and thereby taught the Pope to demand it as a priviledge belonging to the Tripple Crown Nor was Henry the second less benign to the Church-men till he found by his dear-bought experience that he had nourished Scorpions and would have suppressed them but was rather suppressed himself as in that shameful success of the death of Becket may appear wherein he yielded the day up to the Clergie who formerly scorned to stoop to the greatest Potentate on Earth The State of Kings is to be pitied who must maintain a politick affection above and sometimes against Nature it self if they will escape the note of Tyranny in their Undertakings and of a feeble Spirit in their Sufferings For the King having made Becket Chancellor of England and then Archbishop of Canterbury he became so great that his Feathers brushed against the King's Crown who begins to rouse up himself to maintain his Honour and Prerogative Royal. The Bishops side with Becket the King intending the Person and not the Calling singles out the Archbishop and hunts him to soil at Rome yet before he went the King puts the points of his Quarrel in Writing and made both Archbishop and Bishops signe them as the Rights of his Crown and as the Consuetudines Avitae But Becket repenting went to Rome and obtained the Pope's pardon and blessing the rest of the Bishops yielding the Cause The particulars in debate were set down in the nature of Laws or Constitutions commonly called the Constitutions at Clarindon which shew the prevailing humour that then
continually plagued them A Clerk taken upon Felony being demanded shall be delivered to the Ordinary but being indicted shall not be dismissed by the Ordinary without due purgation With due respects to the judgment of those grave and honourable persons of the Law it seemeth to me that before the making hereof the use was that if a Clerk was defamed or appealed by an Offender for Felony before Conviction he was forthwith imprisoned Nor could he be delivered unto the Ordinary upon demand before Inquest taken unless upon sufficient Security to endure the Tryal before the Judges itinerant which thing was not easie to be had for a Clerk as times then were This Law therefore was made in favour of the Clergie who required that such as were Clerici noti honesti should forthwith upon their apprehending be sent unto their Ordinary and those which were vagi incogniti should upon demand be delivered to be judged by their Ordinary freely and non expectatis Justiciariis quibuscunque Such wandring Clerks therefore the Clergy will have delivered before Inquisition if demand be made Nevertheless because the Indictment passed many times before the Demand came for by the fifteenth Article of the Clergies Complaints foregoing it appears that the Lay-Judge made more than ordinary speed for fear of stop This Law provided that such also should be delivered to their Ordinary and that due purgation should pass before the party were delivered and in case the Ordinary neglected his duty herein he was liable to a Fine or Amercement Thus is Briton to be understood in this point whereas Bracton speaking of such as are convicted affirmeth That if demand be made of such as are not indicted for of such he speaketh they ought to be delivered without Indictment I suppose he meaneth by the Church-Law for till this Statute the Temporal Judges practice was otherwise as appeareth by the fourteenth Article of the Clergies Complaint foregoing and so by this Law the fourteenth and fifteenth Articles of the Clergies Complaint are answered Disturbers of the Freedom of Elections fined With submission to the judgment of others I suppose that this was framed principally for the satisfaction of the Clergies Complaints in the third fourth and fifth Articles foregoing and I am the rather induced hereto because as touching Elections into Temporal places of Government several Laws are especially framed such as are Elections of Sheriffs and Coroners whereof the one is West 1. cap. 10. the other Artic. super Cart. cap. 10. and no Law is especially made as touching the Elections of the Clergie if not this Ordinaries having the Goods of the Intestate shall answer his Debts Originally the Goods of the Intestate passed by a kind of descent to the Children afterward by a Saxon Law the Wife had her part and this continued all the Normans time But now the strength of the Canon-Law growing to its full pitch after a long chase attached the prey In Henry the first 's time they had gotten a taste for although the Wife and Children or next of kin had then the possession yet it was for the good of the Soul of the deceased and the Ordinary had a directing power therein and so was in the nature of an Overseer and somewhat more Afterwards in the time of King John the Clergie had drawn bloud for though the possession was as formerly yet the dividend must be made in the view of the Church and by this means the dividers were but meer instruments and the right was vanished into the Clouds or as the Lawyers term it in Abeyance But in Henry the third's time the Clergy had not onely gotten the game but gorged it Both Right and Possession was now become theirs and wrong done to none but the Clouds This was not well digested before Edward the first recovered part of the morsel and by this Law declared the use to be for the benefit of the deceased And thus the one was satisfied in having what he used not the other in using what he had not But these are but gleanings the Law of Circumspecte agatis brings in a Load at once For the Clergie being vexed with the passing of the Statute of Mortmain whereof hereafter when we come to speak of the Clergies losses they make grievous complaints of wrongs done to their priviledges And after six years the King is at length won and passed a writing somewhat like a grant of Liberties which before-times were in controversie and this Grant if it may be so called hath by continuance usurped the name of a Statute but in its own nature is no other than a Writ directed to the Judges in substance as followeth Take good heed that you do not punish the Bishop of Norwich and his Clergie if they hold plea in Court-Christian of things merely spiritual for in such cases the Ecclesiastical Judge hath cognisance notwithstanding the King's prohibition It is therefore neither Grant nor Release but as it were a Covenant that the Clergy shall hold peaceable possession of what they had upon this ground that the King's prohibition hath no place in such things as are merely spiritual So as hereby the Clergy got a Judgement against the Crown by confession and an Estoppel upon this maxime that spiritual things belong to spiritual men into which rank the King's person cannot come thus thought they but what are spiritual causes and why so called are they such as concern spiritual persons and things this was the old way mark but if we bring into this Category Adultery Fornication Incest c. we shall marâ—all Linwood tells us that mere spiritualia are such as are sine mixtura temporalium there may be somewhat in this though I cannot find it nor can I make out the sence of the term any other way but to limit it to such things which by common custom the Ecclesiastical Judge had cognizance of for otherwise neither King nor Law ever intended it to be expounded by the Canon nor was it the intent of this Writ Law or License call it what you will thus to conclude as the particulars following will manifest Fornication Adultery and such-like punished sometimes upon the body and sometimes upon the purse These crimes the Saxons punished by the Temporal power as I have already shewed The Normans continued this course if we may believe the Conqueror's Laws which gave the fine in such cases to the Lord of the Delinquent And it is confessed that Henry the first and the second continued it as the Clergies own complaint just or unjust doth witness And what course was holden in the time of King Steven and John is to me unknown nor is it much to be regarded seeing the latter did he cared not what and the former to gain the good will of the Clergie regarded not what he did The custom therefore cannot be made good for the Clergie much less to punish the bodies of
to the degree of Laws if the Parliament liked them Nevertheless National Synods in England undertook the quarrel of general Councils for Arch-bishop Peckham in a Synod 1280. enjoyned the Constitutions made in the Council at Lyons to be observed under a curse without consultation first had with the Parliament or before he knew whether they would be right or wrong And before him Boniface made Constitutions in opposition to the customs of the Kingdom so as the matter was now come to a kind of contest whether Synods or Parliaments should hold supremacy in doubtful cases concerning the limits of the Ecclesiastical and Temporal power For henceforth Kings must bid adieu to the Synods and sit no more amongst them and Synods now think themselves free to consult and determine what they please without speaking under correction nor was there other remedy left to Kings but threats by Writs directed to the Bishops firmiter inhibendo quod sicut Baronias quas de Rege tenent diligunt nullo modo praesumant concilium tenere de aliquibus quae ad coronam Regis attinent vel quae ad personam Regis vel statum suum vel statum concilii sui contingunt quod si fecerint Rex inde se capiat ad Baronias suas And this prevailed so effectually that the Bishops durst not adventure too far lest they should go beyond their guard and therefore they come and ask leave of the Parliament in cases that trenched upon the Law of the Kingdom as they did in the case of Bastardy wherein they would have had their consent That Children born before Marriage might be made legitimate by the Marriage subsequent And yet they could not prevail for they were answered Nolumus leges Angliae mutari notwithstanding that the Canon-law and the Laws of the Normans sided with them And so they obtained not their desire although they still retained the Tryal of general Bastardy unto themselves Nevertheless the times were such as Kings being too weakly assisted by the people and the Clergie strongly seconded by the Pope they took advantage of those times of distraction so as to hold themselves no farther obliged to the King than the Pope and their own covetousness would allow them and to make all sure they had setled it so far as they were able by a Constitution that the Clergie were not bound to aid the King Papa inconsulto and they put it in practice in a Synod under Arch-bishop Winchelsie Anno 1295. in the time of Edward the First and although the King prevailed in the conclusion at that time yet from the times of Henry the Third the Clergie for future times granted their aids to the King by themselves and apart from the rest of the body of the Kingdom and held themselves not bound by any aid granted by the Parliament albeit that their own aids granted in their Synods were not obligatory unto the body of the Clergie in this Kingdom unless first allowed and confirmed by the Parliament And thus is England become like a two-bodied monster supported with one pair of Legs CHAP. LXVII Of the condition of the Free-men of England of the Grand Charter and other Statutes during the Reigns of these Kings SHattered asunder by broyls of Civil Wars the Freemen having laid aside that regard of the ancient mutual covenant and bond of Decenners are now become weak and almost enthralled to the lust of Kings Lords Pope and English Clergie and therefore it is no wonder if Taxes and Tributes were many and new although most of them deserved not to march under any banner but the colours of oppression nor did any thing save them from the worst Tenure of all but the several interests of those superiour powers which oftentimes did justle with one another and thereby gave the Commons liberty to take breath so as though for the present they lost ground and hunted upon a cool scent yet they still retained the prey within their view Sometimes they were cast far behind other times they recovered themselves a Truce is cried and Laws are made to moderate all and determine the bounds of every one and thus comes the Grand Charter upon the publick Theatre The Historian saith it was the same with that of King John's framing and yet by comparing them together we find them disagreeing both in words and sence and therefore shall sum the same up as shortly as I can observing the difference of the two Charters as I pass along The First Chapter concerned the Church of which sufficient hath been spoken The Freemen shall enjoy these Liberties to them and their Heirs for ever The Heir in Knight-service shall pay the ancient relief That Reliefs were setled by the Saxons hath been already shewed and also that they were continued and confirmed by Henry the First onely in those times they were paid in Horses Arms c. But in after-times all was turned into money which was more beneficial for all Lords shall have their Wards bodies and Lands after homage received until the full age though the Ward be formerly Knighted The Law of Wardship may seem more anciently seated in this Kingdom than the Normans times for if the Statutes of Scotland bear any credit that Law was in Scotland before those times The Lords were not to have the Wardship before they were possessed of the Tenure because it was theirs as a fruit of the Tenure according to the Saxon Law concerning distress that it could not be in the power of the Lord to distrain till he was possessed of the service And if by fraudulent conveyance the Heir did hold the Lord out of possession a Writ of Ward did lie against him and if he did not appear the Lord might seize the Lands unless in case of Wardship per cause de guard And in case the Lord would hold the Wardship longer than the full age of the Heir an Assize did lie against the Lord for the Heir could not enter without Livery But if the Heir were of full age at the time of the Ancestor's death the Lord could not enter the Lands and yet he should have a Relief and the primer seisin And if the Heir entred the Lands before Homage done he gained no Free hold though he were Knighted before as this Law provideth For it may seem that these times of Civil War brought forth a trick of Knighting betimes as an honourable encouragement for young sparks to enter the field before they were compleat men of discretion to know whether the cause of War was good or evil And yet reason might induce a conceit that he that was thought meet to do Knight-service in his own person might expect the maintenance fit for the ability of the person and honour of the service Grantees or their Assigns or Committees of Wardships shall preserve the Land c. from Waste and the Tenants from extortion They shall yield up the same stocked
for the most part are but for enquiry All which saving the Justices itinerant in ancient use were instituted about these times and therewith ended both the work and common use of the ancient iters and yet all these later Courts joyntly considered have not the like comprehensive power that the iters had for they had the power of hearing and determining all causes both of the Crown and Common-pleas albeit in a different manner That is to say in the first times promiscuously united into one and the same person but soon after the Norman times and more clearly in the time of Henry the Second that power was divided into several persons some sitting upon the Common-pleas others upon the Crown-pleas The Judges of these journeying Courts were specially assigned by the King as in the case of the Gaol-delivery or setled by the Law upon the Judges of both Benches at Westminister as in case of Oyer and Terminer and of the Assizes or Nisi prius saving that in the last case they were associated with Knights in the Counties for the taking of Assizes Now concerning the Courts that were setled some were setled or annexed to the King 's personal residence as the Chancellor's Court for in these times it began to have a judiciary power of eminent stature and growing out of the decays of the great chief Justice of England Then also the Kings-Bench was annexed by the same Law unto the Kings Court or personal residence as it anciently ever had that honour although it seems the endeavours were to make it like the Common-pleas in that particular Another and last Court that was setled in this manner was the Marshals Court which in the original onely concerned the Kings houshold but afterwards compassed in a distance of the neighbouring places because the Kings attendants were many in those times whenas the Courts of Justice continually attended on his person and this precinct was called the Verge and all cases of debt and covenant where both parties were of the Houshold and of Trespasses vi armis where one of them was of the Houshold were handled in the Court of the Verge or the Marshals Court. And Inquests of death within the same shall be taken by the Coroner of the County with the Coroner of the Houshold Other Courts were rural and affixed also to some certain place either of the County or Town or other particular place That of the County suffered in these times great diminution even almost to destruction by a Law restraining the power thereof onely to Trespasses of 40 s. value or under for though formerly the Kings Justices incroached upon the County-Courts and contracted suits before themselves which by the ancient Law they ought not yet it was ever illegal and the County-Courts held their right till this Law was made which kept under those inferiour Courts and made them of less account than formerly Nevertheless the Kings Justicies or Writ to the Sheriffs oftentimes enableth the inferiour Court to have cognizance of cases of greater value Lastly a rule was set to the smaller Courts of Corporations Fairs and Markets viz. That no person should be sued in any of them which was not a debter or pledge there CHAP. LXIX Of Coroners Sheriffs and Crown-pleas COroners shall be chosen in the County from the wisest greatest and chief men of the Country Of these Officers formerly hath been spoken as touching their election qualification and work this Law brought in no change of any former Law but onely of a former Custom gained by these degenerating times which brought men into place that were far unfit who otherwise of poor and mean condition maintained themselves by bribery and extortion and being found guilty had not sufficient to give recompence This Law therefore revives the first Law and holds these men to their work of taking Inquests and Appeals by Indenture between themselves and the Sheriff and these were to be certified at the next coming of the Justices The Free-holders in every County if they will shall elect their own Sheriff unless the Sheriffwick be holden in Fee. This was indeed the ancient custom as the Officers of the Kingdom were elegible by the Common-council of the Kingdom so were all the Officers of the County chosen by the County But within a few years in the time of Edward the Second comes another Law That the Sheriffs shall be appointed by the Chancellor Treasurer Barons of the Exchequer and the Justices Which Law was made in favour of the people as by the file of that Statute doth more fully appear for though at the first blush it may seem a priviledge lost by the Freemen that these great men should have the election of the Sheriff yet it proved a great advantage to the common quiet of the people in those times of parties and was so apprehended Otherwise as the case stood in those days of Edward the Second it was no time for him to gain upon the peoples Liberties Nor had the Statute of Articuli super cartas whereof we how treat been penned with these words if they will. And questionless in these days we now live in if the people had but a little taste of this seeming liberty of electing Sheriffs in the County-court as formerly it was used it would be soon perceived that the election of these chief Officers were better disposed in some other hand if rightly pursued Homicide by misfortune shall not be adjudged murder That the Saxons made difference between Homicide by misfortune and that which was done felleo animo or with a spirit of gall formerly hath been shewed now what it was that altered the case I cannot say unless the violence cruelty and oppression of the times Formerly all kind of Manslaughter was finable I mean in the Norman times and so might more rationally be ranked into one degree but now the punishment began to change from forfeiture of Estate and loss of Member to death and forfeiture of Estate and therefore it was more necessary to make the difference in the penalty seeing in the fine formerly a difference was observed and this difference to assert by a Law that might limit the invenomed spirits of the Judges of those days Robbery punished by death This crime hitherto was punished by fine and loss of member at the utmost but is now made capital and punished with death One example whereof and the first that Story maketh mention of we find of an Irish Nobleman in the days of Henry the Third who suffered death for piracy and it was a Law that then though rigorous yet seasonably was contrived to retard the beginnings and hasten the conclusion of a Civil War in a Nation who value their Estates and Liberties above their own lives Rape upon the complaint of the party violated made within forty days shall have right If the Delinquent be convicted without such complaint made he shall be fined
within the memory of this present Age of the danger of the person and honour of Kings and yet on the other side they saw that in such cases of Treason the King's honour was made of reaching Leather and might easily be strained within the compass of a wound of Majesty therefore Edward the Third imitating Tiberius reduced the crime of wound of Majesty in the Person of the King into certain particular instances out of the compass whereof the Judges of the Law in ordinary course must not determine Treason These concern either the safety of the Person of the King or of the Succession in the Royal Throne Or lastly the safeguard of the publick Right by the Broad and Privy seal the value of Money and by persons in matters of Judicature judicially presiding all of them reflecting upon the King considered in his politick capacity For otherwise many crimes might have been mentioned more fatally reflecting upon the King in his natural capacity which nevertheless are omitted as not worthy of so high a censure Other Treasons are left to the determination of the Parliament as occasion should offer it self whereof divers examples of a new stamp occurred within forty years next ensuing which were of a temporary regard and lived and died with the times To these two notions of Majesty and Treason I must adde a third called Legiance for it is that which maketh Majesty to be such indeed and lifteth it into the Throne and whereof the highest breach makes Treason And because that which hath been already said reflecteth upon an Opinion or rather a knot of Opinions for I find them not punctually adjudged in Calvin's Case I must a little demur to them because as their sence is commonly taken it alters the fundamental nature of the Government of this Nation from a Common-wealth to a pure Monarchy In handling of this Case the honourable Reporter took leave to range into a general discourse of Legiance although not directly within the conclusion of the Case and therein first sets down the general nature thereof That it is a mutual bond between an English King and his people and then more particularly sets forth the nature of this bond in the several duties of obedience and fealty fol. 5. a. and those also in their several properties viz. Natural Absolute fol. 7. a. due to the King omni soli semper fo 12. a. in his natural and not publick capacity fol. 10. a. Whereas he saith this bond is natural he meaneth that it is due by birth fol. 7. a. By absolute if I mistake him not he meaneth that it is indefinite fol. 5. b. viz. not circumscribed by Law but above Law and before Law fol. 13. a. and that Laws were after made to enforce the same by penalties fol. 13. b. and therefore he concludeth that this legiance is immutable fol. 13. b. and fol. 14. a. Thus having slated the point as truly as I can both for the nature of Legiance and the object thereof viz. the King and not the People otherwise than in order to the safety and honour of the King's person considered in his natural capacity as he is a man I shall in the next place examine the grounds as they are severally set down and therein shall lead the Reader no further than the Reporters own concessions Not troubling the Reader with any doubt whether this Bond consists in obedience onely or in that fealty and in all shall ever be mindful of the honour of that Pen with which I have to deal First whereas it is said that English Legiance is natural and grounded upon the birth of each party within the Kings Dominions and protection it needeth no debate so as the same be taken sano sensa viz. for a qualified Legiance without those sublimities of absolute indefinite immutable c. for otherwise if such a high strain of Legiance be due from every English man by birth then all the Magna Charta or Laws concerning the Liberties of the people come too late to qualifie the same because they cannot take away the Law of Nature fol. 14. a. And thus the party once born English must for ever remain absolutely obliged to the King of England although haply he lives not two Months under his protection all his ensuing life-time Secondly the Legiance of an English-man to his King ariseth from that civil Relation between the two Callings of King and Subject and therefore it is not a natural bond which cannot be taken away The first is true by the Reporter's own concessions Protectio trahit subjectionem subjectio protectionem so he saith fol. 5. a. fol. 9. b. and therefore though it be granted that Magistracy in general is from Nature as he saith fol. 13. a. yet of weak birth is that inference which he maketh viz. That English Allegiance is a principle in Nature Unless it be also admitted that all men on Earth that submit not to English Legiance do sin against Nature The difference then will stand thus Magistracy is founded in Nature therefore Legiance also But English Magistracy is from Civil constitution therefore is English Legiance of the like nature In the next place the Reporter saith that before any Municipal Law was made Kings did dare jura and he mounts as high for an example as the Trojans Age by the Testimony of Virgil. But I believe he intended not much strength in this seeing it is well known by any that knows the Scriptures that there were Municipal Laws given and that concerning the Office of a King by Moses which were more ancient than those of Troy and long before the time of Virgil who neither tells us in what manner those Trojan Laws were made though the Kings gave them nor if all were according to the Reporter's sence is the testimony of a Poet who sometimes useth his Poetica licentia to be taken in terminis In the next place the Reporter voucheth the Testimony of Fortescue c. 12 13. which is as absolutely opposite to the main point in hand as any Pen can declare For he tells us of divers sorts of Kingdoms some gotten by Conquest as those of Nimrod and Belus c. But saith he There is a Kingdom politick which is by the association of men by consent of Law making one chief who is made for defence of Law and of his Subjects Bodies and Estates and he cannot govern by any other power and of this nature faith he the Kingdom of England is fol. 30. 31 32. A second piece of the foundation of this opinion of the Reporter is taken ab inani it is a vain thing saith he to prescribe Laws but where by Legiance foregoing people are bound to obey But this compared with the words of Fortescue formerly mentioned falls of it self to dust and therefore I shall not further enlarge concerning it Thirdly The Reporter brings in to help the matter the consent of the Law in elder times by
wounds the heart and being of as little use in a Commonwealth as of benefit therefore is laid aside nor need I to speak any more concerning it There is one thing more somewhat like a Torniament but that it is in good earnest and that is called Duel This cometh likewise within the Cognizance of this Court but in a Ministerial way and as subservient to the Common Law in cases of Appeal and Right Hereof needs likewise little more than the naming and therefore I shall leave the Reader that would understand the particular managing thereof unto the discourse compiled by the Duke of Gloucester in Richard the Second's time Lastly As touching the antiquity of this Court though it may be great yet the power thereof was doubtful and scarce taken notice of in any publick Act of State till about these times whenas a complaint was made by the Commons for the encroachment of that Court upon the Liberty of People and bounds of the Courts of Common Law. Nor is it strange that such unquiet times brought forth such Precedents but much more strange that the Common Law held up its head against such violent irruptions of War. CHAP. XII Of the Peace YOu have seen the Kingdom in Armour now see it in Robes and you will say that its Majesty therein is as grave as it was in the other brave It is true the tempers are so contrary as it may be wondred how one and the same should be wise and willing for both but when God will do much he gives much and can make a People as one man like unto Caleb fitted both for War and Peace Besides the Times were now much conducing hereto It is vain to endeavour to allay Humours in the Body which are maintained by Agitation they must be purged out or the whole will still be endangered and therefore although Kings hitherto did endeavour to establish a peaceable Government yet being led by ill Principles of private Interests they laboured to little purpose But now the Scene is altered and one wise moderate King that was as wise as valiant did more than they all And first set a rule upon his own desires contenting himself with the condition of an English King and then upon his people making them contented with the condition of English men The order herein was no less observable for the former wrangling Times having trained up the mindes of men in a tumultuous way nor could they skill to pace in the steps of Peace the King led them into Foreign parts to spend their heat till being either weak or weary they are contented to return home and study the happiness of a quiet Life These men thus ordered the rest at home are made more cool like a Body after Physick and all are now contented to submit to Law and Magistracy 〈◊〉 fitting time now it was for Justices of Peace to come upon the Stage in their best garb For though the work was more ancient yet like some loose Notes laid aside in several places it was not to be found but at a distance and after long delay But Edward the Third sums up all into one brief and brings a compleat Model thereof into the World for future Ages to accomplish as occasion should lead the way The course was now established to have Justices setled in every County there to be resident and attending that Service First they were named Guardians or Wardens of the Peace but within a few Years altered their Title to Justices First they were chosen out of the good and lawful men of each County After that they were two or three chosen out of the worthiest men and these were to be joyned with Lawyers Then was one Lord and three or four in each County of the most worthy men adjoyned with Lawyers Afterward in Richard the Second's time the number of the Justices in each County might attain to the number of Six and no Steward of any Lord to be admitted into the Commission but within half a year all is at large so be it that the choice be out of the most sufficient Knights Esquires and Gentlemen of the County Again within two years the number in each County is set at Eight yet in all these the Judges and Serjeants were not reckoned so as the work then seemeth not so much as now a days although it was much of the same kind and yet it grew up into that greatness which it had by degrees Before they were setled by Edward the Third there were Custodes pacis which might be those whom we now a days call the High Constables of the Hundred whose work was purely Ministerial Afterward about the second year of Edward the Third the Guardians of the Peace had power of Oyer and Terminer in matters of riding armed upon the Statute 2 Edw. 3. After that they have power of enquiry by Indictment in certain Cases within four years after they have power of Oyer and Terminer in Cases of false Jurors and Maintenance and about ten years after that they obtained like power in matters of Felony and Trespass The way of Commissions in case of Life and Member thus opened another occasion of Commission offers it self for a determinative power in case of offences against the Statute of Labourers and the Cognizance hereof is soon setled upon Commissioners in the Counties specially chosen for that Service which questionless as the Times then stood was as commendable work as it was necessary For Souldiers were so many that Labourers were very few and those that once are accustomed to Arms think ever after meanly of the Handicraft nor will they ever stoop thereto after their Spirits are once elevated by mastery of Adventures And secondly those few Labourers that remained of the Sword Plague and other disasters of these wasting times understood their advantage and set a value upon their Labours far above their merit apprehending that men would rather part with too much of a little than to let their work lie still that must bring them in all they have But these Commissioners lasted not long though the work did The Justices of Peace are looked upon as meet for that service and it is a vain thing to multiply Commissions where the work may be done by one that before this time had obtained an additional Cognizance of all Causes of Riots Batteries wandering dangerous persons and offences in Weights and Measures and in Purveyance To them I say all this work concerning Labourers is also committed by the Parliament and herewith a way was laid open for Crimes of greatest regard under Felony to be determined by Trial in the Country according to the course of Common Law. The issue of all which was not onely ease to the people but a great escape from the rigour of the Council-Table in the Star-chamber and the Kings Bench at Westminster on the one side and also
and made all practices contrary to the rule damageable to the party Thus far concerning the matters in Cognizance now touching the power of the Keys English Prelacy having laid aside the pretentions of Rome they put the world to a gaze to see which way they would go In the innocent infancy of Prelacy it was led by the hand by the Presbytery and would do nothing without them afterwards having gained some degree of height and strength they entred themselves to be Chariot-horses to the Roman Sun till they had set all on fire Now unharnest it is expected they should return to their former Wits nevertheless forgetting their ancient Yoak-fellows the rural Presbyters they stable with the King use his name sometimes but more often their own serving him with Supremacie as he them with authority beyond their Sphere They raise him above Parliament he them above Councils so as they do what they list let the Plebeian Presbyter will or nill they are the onely numeral Figures and the other but Cyphers to make them Omnibus numeris absoluti Nevertheless the Canon still remains the same Episcopi se debent scire Presbyteros non Dominos nec debent in clerum dominari Episcopus se sedente non permittat Presbyterum stare Episcopi noverint se magis consuetudine quam dispensatione Presbyteris majores Kings may make them Lords but as Bishops they hold their former rank assigned by the Canon as Lord s the King never gave them the Keys and as Bishops the Canon did not yet as under the joynt Title of Lord-Bishops they hold themselves priviledged to get what power they can Two things they reach at viz. The absolute power of Imprisonment and of Excommunication in all causes Ecclesiastical The Common Law would never yield this some Statutes in some Cases did pretend First As touching Imprisonment the Statute of Henry the Fourth concerning Heresie doth lisp some such power of what force the same Statute is hath been already observed In case of incontinency of Church-men it is more directly given them by a Statute in Henry the Seventh's time before which time the Statute it self doth intimate that an Action did lie against them for such Imprisonment which Law also was made useless by another in Henry the Eighth's time who gave a way to Statutes for the punishing them at the Common Law. First with Death which continued for some Moneths and that being found too heavy it was punished by another Law with Forfeiture and Imprisonment And the same King likewise gave way to a Law for the like punishment in case of Heresie By that Law that revoked the Statute of Henry the Fourth formerly mentioned although till Trial the same was bailable And thus continued till the time of Edward the Sixth But as touching Excommunication it was to no purpose for them to struggle the Common Law would never permit them to hold possession quietly but did examine their Authority granted Prohibition enjoyned the Ordinary to grant Absolution where it saw cause Nevertheless in some cases Henry the Eighth gives way to some Statutes to allow them this power as in the â—evying of Tenths In the next place the Prelacy had not this Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction in themselves so as to grant it to others but the Parliament did dispose thereof not onely to Bishops but to Chancellors Vicars general Commissaries being Doctors of the Law and not within holy Orders and limiting their Jurisdiction in cases concerning the Papal Jurisdiction and their manner of sending their Process and Citations to draw men from their proper Diocess and also their inordinate Fees in Cases Testamentary The Prelates therefore might possibly make great claim hereof for generally they were still of the old stamp loved to have all by Divine Right and lived they cared not by what wrong But the Laity enclining too much to the new Religion as then it was termed refused to yield one foot unto their pretentions And so like two Horses tied together by their Bits they endeavour after several courses ever and anon kicking one at another yet still bestrode by a King that was joynted for the purpose and so good a Horseman that neither of them could unhorse him till Death laid him on the ground And thus was the Roman Eagle deplumed every Bird had its own Feather the great men the Honours and Priviledges the meaner men the Profits and so an end to Annates Legatine levies Peter-pence Mortuaries Monasteries and all that Retinue the vast expences by Bulls and Appeals to Rome to all the cares expences and toil in attendance on the Roman Chair The beginning of all the happiness of England CHAP. XXXI Of Judicature THese two Kings were men of towring Spirits liked not to see others upon the Wing in which regard it was dangerous to be great and more safe not to be worthy of regard Especially in the times of Henry the Eighth whose motion was more eager and there was no coming nigh to him but for such as were of his own train and would follow as fast as he would lead and therefore generally the Commons had more cause to praise the King for his Justice than the Nobility had Both the Kings loved the air of profit passing well but the latter was not so well breathed and therefore had more to do with Courts which had the face of Justice but behind were for the Kings Revenue Such were the Court of Requests of mean Original mean Education yet by continuance attained to a high growth The Court of Tenths and first-Fruits The Court of Surveyors The Court of the Lord Steward of the Houshold The Court of Commission before the Admiral The Court of Wards The Court of the President of the North The Prerogative Court The Court of Delegates The Court of Commission of Review Others of more private regard And that which might have given the name to all the rest the Court of Augmentation Besides these there were some in Wales but that which concerned more the matter of Judicature was the loss of that grand Liberty of that Country formerly a Province belonging to this Nation and now by Henry the Eighth incorporated into the same and made a Member thereof and brought under the same Fundamental Law a work that had now been long a doing and from the time of Edward the Third brought on to perfection by degrees First by annexing the Tenure of the Marches to the Crown Then upon occasion of their Rebellion by loss of many of their wonted Liberberties Afterwards Henry the Eighth defaced the bounds of divers the ancient Counties and setled them anew and the bounds of the Marches also and appointed Pleas in Courts of Judicature to be holden in the English Tongue And last of all re-united them again to the English Nation giving them vote in Parliament as other parcel of the English Dominions had True it is that from their
until general Proclamation of dismission In short therefore here is a new Militia as touching the King's Patentees they must attend the King's Person whither ever the King will lead them either within the Realm or without whether against such as he will suppose to be his Enemies abroad or if he will mistake his Subjects for his Enemies at home And this under the colour of Allegiance published in doubtful expressions as if it were not meet that Henry the Seventh that loved not to yoke himself to the Law should yoke his Laws under the Laws of plain Language Or rather that he held it a point of Policy to publish his Laws in a doubtful stile that such as durst question his Laws might have no positive Charge against them and such as dared not to enter into the Lists with him might not be bold to come nigh the breadth of them Nevertheless neither doth the glance of Allegiance in the Preface of the former nor in the body of the later Statute any whit confirm that what is in them enacted is done upon the ground of Allegiance but contrarily whenas the first Statute cometh to the point it startles from the ground of Allegiance and flies to the ground of a kind of Equity or Reason And the second resorteth to the first as its proper ground as being a supplement thereunto in Cases forgotten and so omitted though it may be rather thought that the King creeping up into his height by degrees made the former onely as an Essay to prepare the way for the later like the point of the Wedge that maketh way for the bulk and body thereof The truth of this Assertion will be more manifest from the nature of both these Laws being limited both in regard of time and person In regard of time for both these Laws are but temporary and to continue onely during the Life of Henry the Seventh in regard the advancements therein mentioned as the moving Cause are onely the advancements made by himself In regard of the person for all persons that received Advancements from him are not bound thereby namely those that come into such Advancement by purchase for Money Neither are Judges and other Officers excepted persons in the said Statutes If therefore Allegiance had been the ground of these Laws it had equally bound all who are under the Bond and no Equity could have given a general Rule of discharge unto such condition of men It had likewise bound as well formerly and afterwards as during this King's Reign and therefore whatever semblance is made therein concerning Allegiance there had been no need of such Law if Allegiance could have done the deed or if the power of Array had been of that large extent as it hath lately been taken In my conceit therefore these two Laws do hold forth-nothing that is new but a mind that Henry the Seventh had to fill his Coffers though his mind would not so fill He would have Souldiers but they must be his Patentees not for any skill or valour in them above others but he hoped they would compound with him for Licenses to absent rather than to adventure themselves and so he might get the more Money that could find pay for Souldiers more and better than they were or would be For otherwise the Patentees might by the Statute have been allowed to serve the King by their Deputies which would have done the King better service in the Wars than themselves could have done And for this very purpose much use was made of these Statutes as well by Henry the Seventh as Henry the Eighth both for Licenses and Pardons for composition in such Cases as their Records do plentifully shew Secondly Let the Claim of Kings be what they will yet the matter in fact shews plainly that they never had possession of what they claimed Both these Kings pretended a Foreign War each of them once against one and the same Nation and to that end advanced to one place with their Armies although the one went in good earnest the other in jest Their Armies were not gathered by Prerogative but of Voluntiers This not onely the Records but also the Statutes do clearly set forth Some Souldiers served under Captains of their own choice and therefore the Law inflicteth a Penalty upon such Captains as bring not their number compleat according to their undertaking other Souldiers are levied by Commission by way of Imprest which in those days were Voluntiers also and expecting favour from the Publick the rather because they devoted themselves thereto without relation to any private Captain they willingly therefore received Imprest-money And of this course the State saw a necessity both for the better choice of men and for the more publick owning of the Work. For such as had been usually levied by the Captains were fit onely to fill up room and make up the number and yet many times there was a failing in that also and this manner of raising the Infantry was continued by Henry the Eighth as by the like Law in his time may appear As touching the levying of the Horse although divers Statutes were made for the maintenance of the breed of Horses and Persons of all degrees of ability were assessed at the finding and maintaining of a certain number of Horses yet do none of them tell us that they shall find and maintain them armed compleatly for the Wars nor shall send them forth upon their own charge and therefore I suppose they were raised as formerly These two Kings had the happiness to be admired the one for his shrewd cunning Head the other for a resolute and couragious Heart And it was no hard matter to find men that loved to ingratiate themselves and endeavour to catch their favour though with the adventure of their Lives especially if they looked after Honour and Glory which as a Crown they say pitched at the Goal of their Actions Thirdly Concerning the Pay of the Souldier the Law was the same as formerly the same was ascertained by the Statute-Law the payment was to be made by the Captain under peril of Imprisonment and forfeiture of Goods and Chattels and the true number of the Souldiers to be maintained and listed under the like peril Fourthly As touching the Souldiers service the same course also was taken as before if they desert their Colours they should be punished as Felons and the manner of trial to be at the Common-Law Fifthly For Fortifications the power properly belongeth to the Supreme Authority to give order therein For the People may not fortifie themselves otherwise than in their particular Houses which are reputed every man's Castle because publick Forts are Enemies to the publick Peace unless in case of publick danger concerning which private persons can make no determination And furthermore no Fortifications can be made and maintained without abridgement of the Common Liberty of the People either by impairing their Free-hold or exacting their
Reserve unto the King's Letters-patents Yet in that the Power is limited not onely in regard of the manner and time but of the persons and also of the Statutes that are to be repealed it is sufficient to vindicate the nature of this Prerogative if such it were to be no ways inherent but acquired by Concession But as touching the Legislative Power they would not trust it in the least manner to any other King. The Parliament had crowned Proclamations at the instance of Henry the Eighth with that Royal Title of Laws in manner as formerly hath been noted Now all Interests both of the Popish and of the reformed parties of this Nation are against it the former because they saw the King 's present way to be against them and both it and the latter because the thing it self was abominable unto the Liberties of the people and therefore it is soon taken away by Repeal and the Legislative Power is wholly re-assumed to themselves as formerly For though in matters Ecclesiastical the Power of the Crown might seem to be more pre-eminent in regard of the Supremacy and some particular powers in making Bishops by Election without Conge d'eslire yet did the Parliament neither yield or acknowledge any Legislative power to be in the Crown thereby but proceeded on in that way of the thirty and two Commissioners formerly agreed upon by them in the time of the King's Father Thus the King though an Infant was a gainer and the Crown nevertheless still the same Secondly That Crown that may be worn by an Infant may much rather be worn by a Woman whose natural endowments do far exceed the other and are not inferiour unto the most of men Of this we have two Examples in these times Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth of several professions in matters of Religion and liable to exceptions in regard of their Sex by men of the counter-profession on both sides yet both upheld the Honour of the Crown though therein the one more especially being neither ingaged in the Roman Cause nor in the Estate of Marriage as the other was This was Queen Elizabeth in person a Woman but in mind endowed with all the perfections of a man she could not endure to abate one hairs breadth of her State and yet upon the sole regard of her Sex she submitted her Title of Supremacy to a more moderate name of Supream Governour whereas her Father would be called Supream Head as if it were not onely hazardous but hideous for a Woman to be Supream Head of the Church And for this cause would she not receive that Statute made by her Father and continued by her Brother Edward the Sixth and repealed by her Sister Queen Mary Nevertheless such as she was she had all such Jurisdictions Priviledges Superiorities and Pre-eminencies Spiritual or Ecclesiastical as by any Ecclesiastical Power or Authority formerly had been or might be lawfully exercised for visitation of the Ecclesiastical State and Persons and for Reformation Order and Correction of the same and all manner of Errours Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities She had therefore neither absolute Empire nor absolute Jurisdiction over the Churches neither power to make declare alter or repeal any Law neither did she ever exercise any such power but onely by Act of Parliament She had a Power over Ceremonies in the Worship of God which was given her by the Parliament to execute by advice and therefore was limited as also was all the remainder of her Power in Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical For she could do nothing in her own person but by Commission and these Commissioners must be Natives and Denizons not Foreigners and the same to be but in certain Cases and with certain Process Some Cases of Ecclesiastical Cognizance were referred to Trial at the Common Law viz. Such as concerned the publick Worship of God in cases of Forfeiture and Imprisonment Lastly Neither had the Queen nor her Commissioners nor Bishops absolute power over the Church-Censures no Censure was regarded but Excommunication and that no further than in order to the Writ De Excommunicato capiendo and in all Cases the same was to be regulated according to the Statute in that case provided or by the Common Law in case of Action In all which we find no Jurisdiction in Cases Ecclesiastical that is absolutely setled in the Crown In matters Temporal the thing is yet more clear she never altered continued repealed nor explained any Law otherwise than by Act of Parliament whereof there are multitudes of Examples in the Statutes of her Reign and what she did by her Judges was ever under Correction A Woman she was and therefore could be no Judge much less in the Cases of difference concerning her self and her Crown A Queen she was and might make Judges but she must go according to the Law new Judicatories she could make none nor judicially make declare alter or determine the power of any Court or Judge in case of difficulty but by her Parliament As in the cases concerning the power of the Lord-Keeper the powers of the Commissioners of Sewers and charitable uses the Courts at Westminster and the County-Courts in the several Statutes concerning the same may more fully appear And which is yet of a meaner size her Power extended not to redress any inconvenience in process of Errour or Delay in Courts of Law nor to remedy Errours in Judgement Fines Recoveries Attainders or other matters of Record or Trial whereof the Statutes of her time are full and also the opinions and judgements of the Judges of the Common Law concurring therewith I mention not the power of Life and Member which without all contradiction hath ever been under the protection of the known Law. So as upon the whole account it will be evident that this Queen had no absolute Pre-eminence in all cases but either in contradiction to Foreign power or the power of any particular person and not in opposition to the joynt interest of the Representative of England Queen Mary comes next although a Woman as well as she yea her elder Sister and Predecessor yet came short of her in the point of Supremacy by a double submission both unto the Law of a Husband and of a Foreign power in Cases Ecclesiastical although the same was with such qualifications as it was much more in Title and pretence than in reality and so in the conclusion neither approved her self to be good Wife good Catholick nor good Queen She could be no good Wife because she was too great for her Husband within the Realm and resolved not to be without A Catholick she was but the worst that ever held her place her Father appeared what he was spake plain English and was easily discerned But she told the Pope a fair Tale of disclaiming Supremacy and reconciling her Kingdom yet none of her Predecessors did go beyond her in
embasing of Money against forein Money not made currant against counterfeit and false Money For according to the goodness of the Money so will the Trade be more or less For the Merchant will rather lose in the price of his Commodity in Money than in exchange for other Commodity because the value thereof is less certain and the Transportation more chargeable Secondly as touching the plenty of Money that is as necessary to the advance of the Trade as of the goodness of it For according to the plenty thereof will be the plenty of the Manufactures because Handicrafts-men having no Commodities but their labour cannot work for exchange nor can exchange supply Rents and maintenance to the greater sort of people To this end therefore it is provided against melting of Money and Exportation of Silver and Gold. And yet to encourage or not discourage Importation of Silver and Gold liberty was given to every man to Export so much as they did Import provided that what they carry away must be of the new stamp or Minted in this Nation By this means Bullion came in with probability that much thereof would remain in the Nation in lieu of Commodities exported or if not the greater part yet at least the Mint gained and that was some benefit to the Nation Thirdly for the fuller currance of the Money the Issue was established in several parts of this Kingdom according to the ancient custom and this was advantageous both to the Mint and to the Stock of Money in the Kingdom This establishment was with this difference that though the Mint was setled by the Parliament yet the Exchange was left to the Directory of the King and his Council Because the Exchange is an uncertain thing subject to sudden alteration in other Nations and it is necessary that in this Country it be as suddenly ballanced with the Exâ—change in other Countries or in a short time the Nation may receive extream damage In regard whereof and many other sudden exigencies in Trade it seemeth to me convenient that a particular Council were established for continual influence into all parts of these Dominions to take into consideration the quantity of the Staple-Commodities necessary to be retained as a Stock at home for the use of the people and the Manufactures and accordingly to ballance the trade of Exportation and Importation by opening and enlarging or shutting and straitning the Stream as occasion doth require And lastly to watch the course of the Exchange in forein parts and to parallel the course thereof in this Land thereto For otherwise the publick must necessarily suffer so long as private men seek their own particular interests onely in their course of Trade CHAP. VIII Of Legiance and Treason with some Considerations upon Calvin's Case AS Times change Manners so do Manners change Laws For it is the wisdom of a State when it cannot over-rule Occasion to pursue and turn it to the best issue it can Multitude of Laws therefore are not so much a sore to the people as a symptome of a sore people Yet many times Laws are said to be many whenas they are but one branched into many particulars for the clearing of the peoples understanding who usually are not excellent in distinguishing and so become as new Plaisters made of an old Salve for Sores that never brake out before Such sore times were these whereof we now treat wherein every touch made a Wound and every Wound went to the Heart and made the Category of Treason swell to that bigness that it became an individuum vagum beyond all rule but the present sence of timorous Judges and a touchy King. Thus were many of the ignorant and well-meaning people in an hideous danger of the gulf of forfeiture before they found themselves nigh the brim All men do agree that Treason is a wound of Majesty but all the doubt is where this Majesty resteth originally and what is that Legiance which is due thereto the breach whereof amounteth to so high a censure for some men place all Majesty in one man whom they call an absolute Monarch Others in the Great men And others in the People and some in the concurrence of the King and body of the People And it is a wild way to determine all in one Conclusion whenas the same dependeth wholly upon the constitution of the Body Look then upon England in the last posture as the rigider sort of Monarchical Politicians do and Majesty will never be in glory but in the concurrence of the King and Parliament or Convention of Estates and so upon the whole account it will be upon the People whose welfare is the supream Law. Rome had Kings Consuls Dictators Decemviri and Tribunes long before the Orator's time and he saw the foundation of an Empire or perpetual Dictatorship in the person of the first of the Caesars any of all which might have challenged the supremacy of Majesty above the People And yet the often change of Government shewed plainly that it rested upon another pin and the Orator in express words no less when speaking of the Majesty of that Government he allotteth it not to those in chief command but defineth it to be magnitudo populi Romani Afterwards when the pride of the Emperours was come to its full pitch in the times of Augustus and Tiberius an Historian of those times in the Life of Tiberius tells us That he declared the bounds of Treason to be determined in Three particular instances of Treachery against the Army Sedition amongst the People and violating the Majesty of the People of Rome In all which men were not punishable for words but for actions and endeavours I do not herein propound the Government of the Roman Empire as a model for England but à majori may conclude that if the proper seat of Majesty was in the people of Rome when Emperours were in their fullest glory it is no defacing of Majesty in England to seat it upon the whole body from whom the same is contracted in the Representative and so much thereof divided unto the person of the King as any one Member is capable of according to the work allotted unto him These several seats of Majesty making also so many degrees do also imply as many degrees of wounding for it is written in Nature That the offence tending to the immediate destruction of the whole body is greater than that which destroyeth any one Member onely and when the written Law maketh it Treason to compass the destruction of the King's Person it leaveth it obvious to common sence that it is a higher degree of Treason to compass the destruction of the Representative and above all to destroy the whole body of the people Crimes that never entred into the conceit of wickedness it self in those more innocent times much less saw they any cause to mention the penalty by any written Law. Nevertheless because many sad examples had occurred