Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n authority_n jurisdiction_n power_n 1,683 5 4.9363 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A94265 Syllogologia; or, An historical discourse of parliaments in their originall before the Conquest, and continuance since. Together with the originall growth, and continuance, of these courts following, viz. [brace] High Court of Chancery, Upper Bench, Common-Pleas, Exchequer, Dutchy, and other inferiour courts now in use in this Commonwealth. J. S. 1656 (1656) Wing S93; Thomason E1646_1; ESTC R203463 29,703 88

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Assent of the King and of the Lords spirituall and Temporall and of the Commons it is enacted or thus It is enacted by the authority of this present Parliament It is also all one in effect and substance for the words assenteth and enacteth are equivalent in this case 7. H. 7.14 2 H. 7. ●7 as it is holden 7. H. 7.14 2. H. 7.27 whereas otherwise the necessitie of the Assent of all the 3. estates of Parliament is such as without any one of them the rest will lose their labour For it fell out upon a time that the King in Parliament willed that a certain man should be attainted and should lose his hands whereunto the Lords assented But because there was nothing spoken of the Commons it was adjudged by all the Iustices 4. H. 7.18 That this was no Acte that might binde 4. H. 7.18 and therefore the partie was restored Hitherto of the Continuance and Assent of this our first and highest Court This Court of Parliament maketh inlargeth diminisheth abrogateth repealeth and reviveth Lawes statutes c. concerning matters ecclesiasticall capitall criminall common civill martiall maritine c. Cook 1 Inst fol. 110. sect 164. see 4. Inst chap. Parlia ment whereunto after that I shall have added a word or two of the jurisdiction thereof I will proceed to the rest if all judgements as Cicero said be conversant either in the punishment of offences or in the decision of controversies then is the Judgment of our Parliament of as ample authority as the assent of any or all other Courts whatsoever for it declareth the lawes that do bind all persons in all Causes aswell ecclesiasticall as temporall whereof you may see a great many examples in the volume of the old saxon Parliaments how strange a thing so ever the popish Clergie in former times have thought it to be it hath jurisdiction also in such causes which have need of help and for which there is no help by any law already in force And whereon the erronious Judgments of any other Courts must be reversed by a higher authority this Court doth not only reverse the errors of the upper Bench formerly called the Kings Bench which is superior to all other but it may also amend the errors committed by the Parliament it self if any such shall at any time appeare Ecclesiasticall Courts were many in number diverse in nature whereof the Chiefe was the Convocation of the Clergie of the whole nation of England and Wales which was assembled together with the estates of Parliament and it consisted of the Deanes Chapters Archdeacons Procurators of all the Cathedrall Churches the next were the 2. provinciall Synods of Canterbury and of Yorke to the later of the which there were only three Bishopricks subject that is to say Durham Carlisle and Chester and all the rest owed their obedience to the See of Canterbury After those were the generall Courts of the Arch-Bishops of Canterbury that is to say the Consistory or Court of the Arches for Appellations the Court of Audience of the Chancellours Court which was wont to be in the Arch-Bishops house The Commissaries or the Praerogative Court which is now in being for probate of Testaments and the Court of Faculties for dispensations then followed the speciall Courts of this Arch-Bishop namely his Consistory holden by his Commissary at Canterbury for his diocaesse and lastly the Court of those peculiar Deanaries which did belong unto him and do ly in the diocaesses of other Bishopps The other Arch-Bishops and each other Bishop had in his owne Diocesse the Court of his Chancellour and the Court of his Archdeacon or his Officiall But forasmuch as the description of these ecclesiasticall Courts perteineth to another learning I meane to the Civill and Canon Laws by which they were governed and do withall require a double treatise by themselves I will content my self with this bare enumeration of them at this time and bend my labour to the discovery of the Lay or temporall Courts that now have place amongst us Lay Courts were of two sorts The sorts of Lay Courts in antient time at the first only base and high concerning the beginning whereof I read that even as Moses the speciall minister of Justice appointed by God finding himself unable to sustain the burden of deciding all the Controversies of the people Deut. 1. Exod. 18. did set Judges over Tribes Hundreds Fifties and Tenths of the multitude to whom he referred the determination of smaller causes reserving to himself the knowledge of matters that were of greater importance so also that Saxon but Christian King of England Alfred divided his whole Realm of England first into Shires Division of the Realm for juris diction then those shires into Rathes Rapes or Rideings and these again into Wapentakes or Hundreds and lastly those also into Leets Barons or Tything and did withall establish jurisdiction in every of these permitting to the Reeves or Judges of the lower roomes authority of hearing smaller suites granting greater power to the Shiriffs and Aldermen which have charge of greater Assemblyes and detaining to himself the decision of such matters as by just cause of appellation either for Law or equity should be brought unto him This Court of the whole Shire was of two sorts whereof the one then called Scyre-Gemote that is the Assembly of the Shire and now termed the Sheriffs turn was then as now also holden twice in one year And this Court was of like jurisdiction to the Court of the Leet or of the Boroughs or Tything as it was then called The second and the Hundred Court then named Hundre des-Gemote was in those appointed to be holden once in a month at the least and that was of like nature to the County Court which is now kept every month also unto the Court Baron antiently called healgemote and corruptly halymote that is as I said the Court of a Hall or chief place which is now at this day to be kept and maintained once in three weeks if the Lord will so have it I read further more in the Laws of the Saxon King Edgar thus ne Gesece nan man Sone Synz c. Let no man seek to the King in matter of variance unless he cannot find right at home but if that right be too heavy for him then let him seek to the King to have it lightned The very like whereof is to be seen in effect in the Laws of Canutus the Dane sometimes King of this Nation also The hygh Court of justice before the Conquest for Laws and equity Out of which laws I gather four things First that every man had means to use in these base Courts at home in the Countrey for the recovery of his right Secondly Then that no man ought to use it out of the County or to draw his plea from thence without good cause both which things lye plainly in the letter of this Law Thirdly that
the reign of the Conquerour the which also without all doubt he hath ever since continued Howbeit when I say writings I do not mean he had the authority of making originall writs here before the time of the Conquest for those came out of Normandy also as the very forms of the most of them being expressed in the book of the Norman customes may leade a man to think and that rather also because the Saxons our Ancestors whose proceedings in Judgment was deplano and without solemnty did not use so far as I have hitherto observed to call the parties by any writ or writing but to send for them by certain Messengers which they tearmed Theins that is to say Ministers or Serjeants yea and what that manner of summoning by Writ was brought into use here forthwith committed to the Chancellour For Originall Writs of this time had this form Teste Ranulpho de Glanvilla c. Which was the name of the chief Justice of the Kings Court then under whose sealing they passed abroad Nevertheless for as much as it is to be read in Bracton quod omnia bre●ia de pace which are prohibitions indeed irrotulari debent in Rotulo de Cancellaria and for that not onely the Statute of Westminster the second which was made in the 15. year of King Edward the first saith in plain words that the for me donne in reverter satis est in usu in Cancellaria and hath often mention of the Clerks there But also that other Statute of articuli super Chartas hath the express names both of the Chancellour and Chancery it must be confessed that the Chancellour had the keeping of the Rolls of Record and the making out of Writs either at the same time that the common lace was erected or not long after that is to say either under the reign of King Henry the third or else in the beginning of King Henry the third or else in the beginning of Edward the first which later King as Judge Prisot reporteth of him laboured carefully to reduce our Law into order and writing and in mine opinion may therefore not unworthily be accounted our English Justinian And albeit that the House of the Rolles which hath been of long time as it were the Colledge of the Chancery men was builded at the first by the same King Henry the third for another purpose namely for the sustentation of such Jews as would give their names to Christ and was thereof called Dominus Judeorum conversorum Mat. Paris yet that hindreth not but that the same House might shortly after be converted to another use upon experience as it is likely that sew converts was found amongst the Jews to inhabite it and then thus have you the Chancellour or now instead of him the Commissioners furnished with the Seal of Grace and Seal of common Justice and with him or them the Chancery for the keeping of Records and the Clerks thereof for the framing of Writs Coment ●43 and as touching the authority in Judgement I see not what Jurisdiction he had his Court of Equity and some powers given by late Statutes onely excepted which is not incident to the making or keeping of Records for he could not reform the errour of another Court yea errour committed in his own Court was reversed in the Bench of the King now called the upper Bench. Neither could he try any Issue taken before him ●4 E. 1. ●5 For that also was and is to be done in the upper Bench as a thing without his Jurisdiction It remaineth then that I speak of this Court of Equity which in my opinion is not altogether so antient as others Os the high Court of Chancery for as you have heard before King Edward the first and the Parliament took order that the Chancellour should follow the King even as the Justices of the Bench did to the end that he might alwaies have at hand all men for his direction in Suits that came before him the meaning hereof as I think was that the Justices should inform him of the Law and the Chancellour of Equity for otherwise I see not what use he could have of the Chancellour in this behalf but onely for that he being commonly a Bishop or other Spirituall person was the more meet after the opinion of men in those dayes to give advice according to equity and conscience In which respect also he was visitor for the King and bestowed his Benefices so that such as then sought relief by Equity were Suitors to the King himself who being assisted with the Chancellour and Counsell did mitigate the severity of Law in his own person when it pleased him to be present and did in absence either refer it to the Chancellour alone or to him and some others of the Counsell And this continued if I be not mistaken untill the 20th year of the reign of King Edward the third in which year when he made preparation for his wars in France it was enacted by Parliaments that the Chancellour and Treasurer should determine all complaints against extortion of Officers maintenance imbracery and such like offences and albeit that indeed this authority be neither granted to himself alone nor doth plainly erect any Court of Equity yet for as much as it is the very first severall power of this sort that I find committed to him from the King in which also it is to be thought that the proceeding was extraordinary and absolute even as the Kings own before was I suppose it to be the laying of the first stone of the foundation of the Chancellours Court But after this in the 36th year of the same Kings reign it was provided by Parliament That if any were grieved contrary to the Articles of that Parliament or others That he should have remedy in the Chancery without other Suit by which Law the Chancellour was not onely made sole Judge in this newly erected Court but was enabled so to proceed in Judgement after his own discretion or otherwise the words without other Suits were not Beneficiall After this also his authority was inlarged by sundry Parliaments as by one to award damages upon untrue suggestion made before him by another To send Proclamation of Rebellion against such as would not appear And by others To grant Commissions of divers kinds and to do many other things whereof it is not needfull to make rehearsall here And truly as these be first beginnings that I can find in Statute Law concerning this authority of Chancery Court so also I do not remember that in our reports of Common Law there is any mention of causes drawn before the Chancellour for help in Equity but onely from the time of King Henry the fourth in whose dayes by reason of those Intestine troubles Feofments to uses did either first begin as some have thought or else did first grow common familiar as all men must agree for remedy in which causes of uses chiefly the Chancery Court
might not be put off to shew cause from day to day which rather increaseth trouble and charges than either furthereth the suit for the hearing or benefits the parties in their cause Which thing whether it might be more couvenient than the present manner of motions I will leave to the judgement of such as have more wisdom to devise and power to execute And will sum up the rest of our Courts and make an end The Court of the Dutchy or County Palatine of Lancaster which is by a late Act of Parliament committed to the custody of a Commissioner grew out of the grant of King Edward the third The Court formerly called The Dutchy Court the jurisdiction whereof is now committed to a Commissioner or Commissioners County Palatine of Lanc. erected in Parliament 50 E. 3. and Iustices of Assises Gaole delivery and of the Peace have been since the erection of it Cook lib. 4. f. 204. 205. who first gave that Dutchie to his Son John of Gaunt and endowed it with such royall rights as the County Palatine of Chester had And forasmuch as it was afterward extincted in the person of King Henry the 4th by reason of the union of it with the Crown of the Realm the same King knowing himself more rightfully Duke of Lancaster then King of England determined to save his right in the Dutchy whatsoever should befall the Kingdom And therefore he separateth his Dutchy from the Crown and setleth it so in the naturall persons of himself and his heirs as if he had been no King or Pollitique Body at all in which manner it indured during the reign of King Henry the first and of King Henry the 6th that were descended of him But when King Edward the 4th had by recovery of the Crown recontinued the right of the House of York he feared not to appropriate that Dutchie to the Crown again And yet so as he suffered the Court and Officers to remain as he found them And in this manner it came together with the Crown to King Henry the 7th who liking well of that policy of King Henry the fourth by whose right he also obteined the Kingdom made by separation of the Dutchie as he hath done and so left it to his posterity It appeareth in our Books of the Tearms of King Edward the 4th The Star Chamber and the Report of cases happening under the usurpation of Richard the third This Court was in being before 28 E. 3. Cook lib. That sometimes the King and his Counsell And sometimes the Lord Chancellour and other great personages did use to sit Judiciall in the place then and lately called for that it is decked with certain Stats the Star Chamber But forasmuch as be like that Assembly was not ordinary therefore the next King Henry the 7th and his Son Henry the 8th took order by two severall Laws That the Chancellour assisted with others there named should have power to hear complaints against Reteinors Embraceries misdemeanours of Offices and such other offences which through the power and countenance of such as do commit them do lift up the head above other faults and for the which inferiour Judges are not so meet to give correction And because that place was before time dedicated to the like service it hath ever since also been so used untill it was taken away in the late King Charls his reign The Court of Requests The Court of the Requests being of the same nature as I said with the Chancery took beginning by Commission from King Henry the 8. before which time the Masters of the Requests had no warrant of ordinary Jurisdiction This Court had no warrant by act of Parliament or prescription to establ shit Cook lib. 4. fol. 97. but travailed between the Prince and Petitioners by direction from the mouth of the King The same King also established one Court of President and Counsell in the Marches of Wales 34. 35. H. 8. The Court of the Marches of Wales and that of the North parts were taken away in the late K Ch. his reign Anno 17. Car. And another like Court of President and Counsell in the North parts which Court in Wales was a Court of Law in its principall Jurisdiction although it did withall exercise other powers of equity by vertue of other severall Commissions that did accompany the same and the Court of York was in its principall Jurisdiction Equity and did exercise other powers by vertue of other Commissions Court of Wards The Court of Wards began about the 32th year of the reign of King Henry the 8 who also in the next year after added thereto the office of the Masters of the Liveries and withall conjoyned the names ordaining that it should be called The Court of his Wards and Liveries The same King likewise had erected one Court of the generall Surveiours of his Lands and one other of the Augmentations and Revenues of his Crown and a third Court of the first fruits and Tithes of Benefices But all these were afterwards dissolved and by Queen Mary united to the Court of Exchequer Thus having run along these Courts deriving them from the Crown I might proceed yet further to shew the originall and beginnings of some Courts erected by the late Parliament and the nature and beginning of the High Court of Justice that was erected in Westminster Hall Anno 1648. but they being so fresh in the memory of this age I shall not need to make mention thereof FINIS
was then fled unto as to the onely Altar of help and refuge But whence the Court of Equity took a beginning to be a distinct Court I have made proof as I think that the power thereof was alwaies in exercise and considering that formerly all the Princes of this Realm and now the Lord Protector of this Nation is the immediate Minister of Justice under God and sworn to deliver to the people aequam rectam Justitiam I cannot see how that it may otherwise be but that besides his Court of meer Law he must either reserve to himself or refer to others a certain preemment power by the which he may both supply the want and correct the rigor of that positive or written Law which of it self neither is or can be made such a perfect rule as that a man may thereby square out Justice in all causes that may happen For written Laws must needs be made in a generality and be grounded upon that which happeneth for the most part because no wisdome of man can foresee every thing in particular which in time experience doth beget and therefore although the written Law be generally good and just yet in some speciall case it may have need of correction by reason of some considerable circumstance falling afterwards which at the time of the Law making was not forseen whereas otherwise to apply one generall Law to all particular cases were to make all Shooes by one last or to cut one Glove for all hands which how unfit it would prove every man may readily perceive And here of this Equity hath this name in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. secundum and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 id est conveniens assimulatum because it doth not onely weigh what is generally meet for the most part but doth also consider the person time place and other circumstances in every singular case that cometh in question and doth thereof frame such a judgement as is agreeable and convenient to the same so that in summe the written Law is like a stiffe rule of Steel or Iron which will not be applyed to the fashion of the Stone or Timber whereunto it is laid and Equity as Aristole saith well is like to the leaden rule of the Leasbian Artificers which they might at pleasure bend and bow to every Stone of whatsoever fashion And hereby it may also appear what use there ought to be aswell of the positive or written Law as also of Equity it self for seeing that the positive or common Law is made meet for the most part and that Equity is added for help in few or singular causes it followeth by reason that commonly and singularly the positive Law should be put in ure and that Equity should be appealed unto but onely in rare and extraordinary matters least on the one side if the Judge in Equity should take Jurisdiction over all it should come to pass as Aristotle saith that the best should bear rule for so he calleth man whose judgement if it be not restrained by the chain of Law it is commonly carried away with unruly affection and on the other side if onely streight Law should be administred the help of God which speaketh in that Oracle of Equity should be denyed unto men that need it And therfore even as two Hearbs being in extreamity of heat or Cold be by themselves so many poisons and yet if they be skillfully contempered will make a wholesome medicine so also would it come to pass if either this Arithmeticall Government as they call it by rigor of Law onely or this Geometricall judgement at the pleasure of the Commissioners onely should be admitted And yet if they be well compounded together a most sweet and Harmonicall Justice will follow them And as a good Chancellour then would not so the Commissioners now will not make this Proclamation Nullus recedat a Cancellaria sine remedio and so receive Cognisance of every complaint which shall be made before them upon whatsoever suggestion and thereby both overthrow the authority of the Courts of Common Law and also bring in upon men such a confusion and uncertainty as hardly any man shall know how or when he shall hold his own assured but they will rather have the Common Law to have her just honour and not to be interrupted in her right course or current and will yet withall provide that the Gate of mercy may be opened in all calamity of Suit to the end that where need shall be the rigor of right may be amended by the Judgement of Equity in which behalf this our age hath greatly to thank God for that by the Ministry of our Protector he doth not onely leave to us the right use of the Courts of meer Law but hath also hitherto placed in that Praetoritall Room or Chancery men no less learned in the common Laws of the Nation than accomplished with the skill of this moderation and equity I see that occasion is offered me to enter into the handling of some few questious concerning the order of Chancery and chiefly of this one whether it be meet that the Commissioners should appoint unto themselves and publish to others any certain rules or limits of equity or no about the which men Godly and learned have differed in opinion For on the one part it is thought as hard a thing to prescribe equity any certain bounds as it is to make one generall Law to be a meet measure of Justice in all particular causes And on the other side it is said That if it be not known aforehand in what cases they will reach forth their help and where not then neither shall the people be assured how or when they may possess their own in peace nor the practiser of Law be able to inform his Clyent what may become of his action The later of which opinions I hold to be the best according to the late Regulation of the high Court of Chancery together with the Common Law in August the 22th Anno 1654. by his Highness the Lord Protector and his Counsell For though equity cannot be limited yet as it puts an end to controversies it must have certain rules prescribed to it otherwise it can neither be called a Court nor can the Suitors be certain of any relief to be had therein which Court were it so would soon be destroyed Because this and the like matters be of more difficultie than that I may with modesty take upon me to determine them And for that also it is not my present purpose to dispute what is convenient to be done in any Court but rather to discourse the beginning and acknowledge the benifit of them all I will onely wish this one thing That before any motion should be made for either the parties Plantiff or Defendant 4. or 5. dayes notice thereof were left with the Clerk in Court on the other side to defend that motion that so he