the Church should be at the call and commaundement of the secular power whereby they might be eyther wholly dispossessed of their places or continually troubled interrupted in ordering the affaires of the Church and the matters of God and finally iniuriously and contumeliously handled which thing the holines of their places and persons wil in no wise suffer For the answere of this doubt it is plaine in the word of God that all ecclesiasticall persons whatsoeuer yea the chiefe priestes in them the high priest himself the prince and head of the priestes who was the type of Christ the Oracle of God and on whom the whole glory and maiesty of the priesthood was bestowed was no lesse subiect to the iurisdiction of the kinge then he which had the basest place and calling in the common-wealth The trueth heereof appeareth by the lamentable tragedie of Abimelech 1. Sam. 2. who being summoned by Saule to appeare came with all the priestes that were with him and being come acknowledged Saulâ— to be his Lord Verse 12. and did not appeale froÌ„ his vniust sentence of death to any other power The same end befel his son Abiather who for that he tooke part with Adonia was by Salomon put out of his office and condemned to die 1. King 2.26 And likewise Zachariah the son of Iehâ—ida 2. Chro. 24.21 Now although two of these kinges did impiously and tyrannically abuse their authority yet it doth appeare that they had authority ouer them yea not onely these examples but the course of the whole scripture and equitie it selfe doth shew that it ought to be so We knowe that euen Christ himselfe more holy in person and office then all the priestes men or angels in the world did throughout the whole course of his life submit himselfe to the ciuill power and at the end of it did suffer himselfe to be violently apprehended contuâ—eliously entreated yea vniustly coÌ„demned by the deputy of a heathen Emperour Likewise the Apostle Paule did appeale and subiect himselfe to the authority of Caesar. Neyther is there any cause or reason why it should be otherwise For howsoeuer the Romish prelates haue not only drawen out their neckes from the subiection of princes but also haue inuaded their thrones and subdued them vnder their feete and the whole cleargie say to the ciuill power come not near nor yet once touch me because I am holier then thou and think themselues too good to be iudged by any but by their owne ordinarie yet the trueth is that all persons as well ciuill as ecclesiasticall are and ought to be by the word of God equally subiect to the ciuill power For shall Christ himselfe and in him God himselfe stand before the iudgement seat of princes and shall sinfull men nay shall wretched wormes thinke them too prophane to be competent iudges in their causes no no the seruant is not aboue the master nor the creature aboue the creator and therefore we say with the Apostle that al soules that is euery man that hath a soule that none shoulde thinke himselfe exempted ought to be subiect to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 The ground of the contrary errour is an arrogant opinion which presumptuous men bearing function in the Church haue of their own holinâ—sse in respect of others whereas in the Church of God men who haue ciuil callings are no lesse holy then they who haue ecclesiasticaâ— yea somtimes much more holy they who haue ecclesiastical holy callings being otherwise wicked prophane for it is truly said althougâ— impiously applied by the rebellious company of Corah Numb 16.3 That not only Moses Aaron but euen the whole multitude of the common people much more the Lords annoynted is holy In the next place we are to search whether that as al persons so likewise al causes belonged to the authority of the King of Israell First of ciuill then of ecclesiasticall causes in the first kinde it is not needful that we should insist forsomuch as all men euen they who are most sparing and wary in giuing power to these kinges doe acknowledge that all ciuill causes did properly belong to their iurisdiction And so it was indeede For the king had authoritie to appointe all the publike officers of his kingdome who should be his counsellers at home or his Captaines abroad who shoulde be the iudges of the people and who of the chiefe senate in Ierusalem and good reason it was that he shoulde haue this power in these causes For seeing that his office was especially to iudge the causes of the people and to fight their battailes for the which purpose the people desired a king it could not be denied vnto him to appointe those to be his deputies whom he thought most able to discharge these dueties Yea further it belonged to him to call all publike assemblies and to order them to make peace with whom he would and to goe to battaile against whome â—e when 〈◊〉 thought good The trueth of this pointe doth 〈◊〉 plainely appeare throughout the whole storie that we need not insist in it Sect. X. NOwe we are to enquire what was the authoritie of the kinge in the matters of the Church to wit in ordering the state of religion and of the seruice of God Whereof there is greate question made whilest some doe wholly exclude him out of the Church not permitting him to intermeddle with any affaires belonging vnto it others suffer him to deale in these causes yet not to beare any great sway or to ouerrule in them and the third sort giueth vnto him the greatest part of that ecclesiasticall authoritie which belongeth to man The which distinction is necessarely to be considered for God hath not giuen to any man such ful and absolute authoritie in the Church as in the common-wealth for he hath made Christ the soueraign Lord and King of the Church to rule it by his owne lawes and worde Yet one parte of ecclesiasticall iurisdiction belongeth to men who are to establish the diuine lawes of the worship of God and to make ecclesiastical constitutions for that purpose But who hath authoritie to doe this there is all the controuersie In the first opinion or rather grosse and palpable errour are the Bishops of Rome with their adherentes who that they might through the Church enter into the common-wealth inuade the riches preferments and pleasures of kinges and vsurpe their states and crownes haue thrust out of the Church this king of Israell least that by his example other magistrates shoulde challenge to themselues â—uthoritie in causes ecclesiasticall In the second opinion are men otherwise syncere in iudgement who in a good meaning affection to the Church thinke it not safe or conuenient to permitte her wholly to the ciuill power and in a reuerent opinion of her iudge it vnmeete that ciuill rulers should order diuine matters and so make the Church say vnto the magistrate touch me not for I am more holy then thou
although more enioyed then considered as also for that they may in part be gathered of that which hath beene spoken Sect. III. THus we haue by the generall doctrine of magistracie an entrance made to the speciall doctrine of the kingdome of Israell wherein we haue many seueral points to consider which for order and memorie sake may be reduced to two heades whereof the first containeth the state of this kingdom in respect of nâ—en or of the people of Israel the second the state of it in respect of God The first head hath the greatest part of the difference of this kingdome from the former gouernment of Iudges consisting especially in two thinges the speciall power which it had ouer the people and the speciall maiestie of it both which were exceeding great in this state yea so great that in these respectes the gouernment of the iudges may seeme not onely a meane but almost a priuate estate Hence it is that this kingdome of Israel is by Iacob prophecying of it Gen. 49.9 compared to a Lion the which doth in strength and especially in a maiesticall statelinesse so farre exceede all other beastes that it is vsually called the king of them If we desire to knowe howe it came to passe that there was so greate power and maiestie giuen to this kingdome we must haue recourse to the originall of it The causes of the setting vppe of this estate were two The first is that which may be saide to bee the cause of all thinges in the worlde to witte the eternall counsell and decree of God by the which it was before al ages appointed that the king of Israell shoulde be a type of Christ and his temporarie gouernment a type of the spirituall and eternall kingdome of Christ as is afterwarde to be declared Nowe that this kingdome might be a fitte and liuely type it was needfull that it shoulde be endued with a greate measure of power and maiestie that so it might the more liuely represente the infinite power and authoritie which the Messias was to haue ouer all creatures in heauen and in earth and likewise his vnspeakable and incomprehensible maiesty and glorie filling the heauen of heauens The second cause of the greate power and maiesty of this kingdome was the desire or rather the will of the people who did so earnestly yea so eagerly and importunately call for this stately gouernment that they would take no denyall nor heare any thing which coulde be alledged to be contrarie For that the people did alwaies desire this state we may see Deutro 17.14 where God foretelleth this that when they were once possessed of the lande they woulde haue a King and Iudg. 8.22 where they offer to make Gedeon king and more plainely Iudges 9. where they like Abimeleches opinion saying that it was better for them to haue one then many to raigne ouer them Neyther did they desire to haue one sette ouer them with the bare name and title of a kinge or with anie meane authoritie but that hee shoulde haue power and maiestie in the highest degree For howsoeuer it might seeme that this their desire was in some respecte incommodious to themselues for that the greater power they gaue to the king the lesse libertie they lefte to themselues and the greater that his pompe and maiestie was the more heauie tributes must be imposed on them for the maintayning of it yet they did so vehementlie desire to be like to other nations in a stately monarchie that they thought no price too greate for it thinking belike as it is commonlye saide that it was greater honour for them to make a mightie and a glorious Kinge then to be kings theÌ„selues as euery one was in the time of the Iudges wherein euery man did that which was good in his own eyes because they had no king to order them Iudg. 18.1.19.1 And yet we do not deny but that in ordaining so mighty maiestical an authority they thought it would be for their owne good howsoeuer it might seeme to derogate from their liberty and profitte and that the commodities would be moe and more waightie then the inconueniences of it wherein whether they did iudge right or no let others determine Sect. IIII. NOW we are to come to the particular declaration of these things First of the power of this kingdome and secondly of the maiestie of it The doctrine of the power hath in it these foure questions The first is whether the power of the king were whole or deuided The second whether it were generall ouer all persons and causes or restrained The third whether it were absolute or tied to lawes The last whether it were a milde or a peremptory power The power whereof we doe intreate is the full supreame and vniuersall authoritie for of any inferiour power we doe not speake of gouerning the people and of ordering all their publicke affaires the which before that this kingdome was set vp was not wholy in any one hand but deuided amongst many For it was partly in the handes of God partly in the handes of the iudge which was for the time partly in the handes of the elders or senat and partly in the handes of the bodie of the people For the first where we say that God had a part of this authoritie we doe not consider him simply as God for in that respect not a part only but the whole supreame power not of that country onely but of all the nations in the world yea of heauen and earth was and is in his handes but we consider him as he was after a speciall manner the king and ruler of this people so as he neuer was or will be to any other nation The actions of God which did proceede from this his regal authoritie were these First that he gaue to this people iudiciall lawes and constitutions which is part of the office not of God for then these iudiciall lawes should belong to the whole world seeing GOD is the God not of the Iewes only but also of the gentils But other nations are not tyed to these laws but only to the morall law and to these Iudicials so farre as they are morall to wit to the grounds and equitie of them but not to the lawes themselues The second thing which God did by vertue of this authoritie was the supreme administration of their battailes in cases of greate extremitie For as greate princes sende captaines to fight in their steade yet according to their direction and appointment so God did immediately either by his word or spirit stirre vp some man to fight the battailes of the people and did directe them in such actions And this Gedeon acknowledgeth Iudges 7.20 Where hee saith the sworde of the Lorde and of Gedeon In these respectes GOD was the kinge of this nation as Gedeon doth confesse Iudges 8.23 who so answereth the people going aboute to make him kinge that neyther hee nor anie of his posteritie shoulde
raigne ouer them but God shoulde still bee their kinge But after that they had made a kinge neyther did the iudiciall lawes retayne their full force neyther did GOD himselfe appoynte Captaines ouer the Armies but all was done according to the will and commaundement of the kinges who although they did keepe the iudiciall lawe in parte and for the greate extremities in warre asked counsell of God yet they were free in both these respectes as we are afterwarde to declare more at large So that by the comming in of these kinges God himselfe if we may so basely speake of his glorious maiestie was put out of his office as hee himselfe doth confesse 1. Sam. 8.7 where hee speaketh to Samuell not to be grieued for that the people had cast off his and his sonnes gouernment for indeede saith God they haue not despised or cast awaie thee but mee and haue refused that I shoulde raigne ouer them In the seconde place the iudges had parte of this supreame authoritie who although in the greatest matters they were ouer-ruled by the worde of God yet in the ordinarie administration especially of warelike affaires they were the chiefe And therefore the state of the common wealth from Moses to Saule the first king is called the gouernment of the Iudges the which did wholly cease after that Saule was created king for the Captaines of the warre were either the kinges themselues or whom it pleased them to appointe So wee â—eade that Dauid placed and displaced Ioab at his pleasure Thirdlie the bodie of the people ioyning together in a general assembly had a part yea the greatest part of this authoritie and likewise the elders who were a compendious bodie of the people had their part especially in ciuill administration in the time of peace Iudg. 20. The children of Israel came together as one man to the Lord in Maspha to whome the leuite maketh his complaint as vnto them who had authoritie to reuenge the villanie done vnto him desiring them to determine of that cause as they did with greate seueritie The causes why the people and the elders had parte of this supreme authoritie were these First for that they did neuer giue the whole power ouer themselues into the handes of anie of the Iudges but onely did as it were vse them to be their Captaines and leaders in the time of warre the which beeing ended vsually the iudge returned to his owne house and priuate estate till the like necessitie called him abroade againe but during the time of peace they did not meddle much with ciuill iurisdiction but onely hearde those causes which were brought vnto them as to fitte arbiters because they were men renoumed eyther for their valour or because they were prophetes as were Debora and Samuell or had the office of the high prieste as had Ely Hence it is that in this booke of iudges there is no mention made of their ciuil iudgements or that they did cal together the Senate or the people vnlesse it were to warre or of any edictes which they made or of faults which they did redresse or punish Only of Samuel it is written that he went about the land to iudge the people and of Debora that the people brought their controuersies to her The second cause of the authoritie of the elders and people was the want a Iudge for whenas the Iudge died they did not streightway put another in his place vntill they had occasion giuen by warre during which time of vacation the elders and people in euery citie did iudge their owne causes and meeting together in a common asseÌ„bly did order publike matters although seldome and negligently as the people vse to gouerne So that they wanted a Iudge as often as they had one But when once they had a king created there did no more any supreame authoritie remaine either in elders or people all being giuen vnto the hands of the king who had no man which did participat with him in his authoritie For we are not to thinke that in this state the king was the chiefe gouernour and the elders senators and inferiour officers fellow gouernours and as it were his mates For all within the land of Israel were to the king meere priuate men so that if any had authoritie in respect of the people they had it all from him as from the fountaine all the officers of the kingdome all the Iudges of ciuill causes and the captaines of the armies were appointted by him Yea they were so farre from hauing any authoritie in respect of the king that all the people with their magistrates and officers of what kinde soeuer are vsually called the kinges seruantes so 2. Chro. 10.6 The counsellers of Salomon are saide to haue stood before his face to wit waiting and attending his pleasure so Esa. 37.5 Officers of the king and elderâ— of the priestes are called the kings seruantes For the state of this kingdome was not such a gouernment as both hath beene and is at this day in vse in many places where the people to auoide confusion and for the administration of iustice and of other publike affaires doe for one ouer them yea and giue vnto him although improperly the name of a king reseruing to themselues authority eyther to displace him at their pleasure or at the least to controll his doings which they thinke to be wrong to call him to account of his administration yea if need be to rise vp in armes against him and to lay violent handes vpon him This was no such gouernment but a kingdome both in name and in trueth wherein none had any iot of supreame authority saue the king onely Sect. V. BVT if it be graunted that there was no authoritie in the land which could associate it selfe with the authoritie of the king or any way intermeddle with his lawful administration as long as he did rule with religion and iustice for the glory of God the good of the people yet it may seeme that there was some authoritie to restraine him if at any time he should be imperious or vniust in his gouernment whereby he should be eyther brought to a lawfull manner of ruling or else if he were incorrigible deposed from his kingdome For otherwise the people might be miserably oppressed religion defaced yea all thinges turned vpside downe and in the ende the commonwealth vtterly ouerthrowen and therefore that both wisedome reason and necessitie iâ— the glorie of God and the good of men doe require that there should be in Israell some other authoritie eyther in the people or in the priestes in the senate or in the inferiour magistrates the which should neuer be eyther vsed or once mentioned but against those kinges which did degenerate into violent and bloody tyrantes euen as men vse a false vnder raine to pull in strong headed horses which otherwise woulde runne into some pit so destroy both themselues the riders This reason taken
But we follow the thirde opinion thinking that the ecclesiasticall authoritie of this land was chiefely yea in a manner wholly in the handes of the king and that by his authority the state of religion in generall was wholly set vp maintained repaired and ordered yea ecclesiastical lawes for this purpose established howsoeuer in making them the aduise and consent of others were for diuers necessarie causes to be required The trueth heereof will easely appeare if we marke that God did deferre the building of his Temple the inlarging and beautifying of his worshippe vntill the time of the kinges of whome Dauid and Salomon which are in this respect to be counted the first Saule being reiected did make the state of religion most glorious established new orders and lawes and that by their owne authoritie although they had the worde of God both in themselues and from other prophets for their direction Yea the generall practise of all the kinges of Israel of whome euery one by his sole authority did either set vp or pul downe religion doth declare how much they had to doe in the gouerning of the Church and to passe ouer with silence the rest of the kinges let vs onely see how far Ezechia did meddle with Church affaires of whome we read 2. Chro. 29.3 That he opened the doores of the temple brought the priestes into it made a solemne oration vnto them teaching them their dueties and stirring them vp to the carefull perfourmance thereof then when the priestes had according to his direction clensed the temple before they doe any seruice in it they returne to the king to know what he would haue further done Verse 18. Then the king with the nobles came and brought a sinne-offering which the priest offered at the commaundement of the king verse 24. then verse 27. the king commaundeth that the whole burnt-offering should be offered Againe verse 31. he commaundeth that the peoples offeringes shoulde be brought in Further in the 30. chapter he held a councel sent his postes for the keeping of a passeouer yea which is worthy to be noted when as the people being vncleane did receiue the passouer Ezechias himselfe did publikely pray for them and so made them cleane verse 20. likewise chap 31. verse 2. Ezechia appointed sundry companies of the priestes and leuites after the diuersity of the ministrations to serue in the temple and commaunded the people to make prouision of all thinges needfull for them and verse 8. and 9. he came and viewed their prouision and questioned with the priestes about it And vers 11 He bad prepare the chambers in the Temple for store yea it is added verse 20. that according to this manner he did throughout all Iuda and that all the workes about the seruice of God were begunne and prosperously ended by him The same manner of ordering the state of the Church appeareth in the storie of Iosias and other Kinges wherein this may plainely be seene that whatsoeuer was done in Church matters was done by the commaundement and authoritie of the kinge The occasions of the contrary opinions whereby the authoritie of this kingdome in this behalfe is abridged and cut short eyther in whole or in part are these First for that it is thought that as ciuill and diuine temporall and eternall matters do not onely greately differ but also are opposite to each oother so that the common-wealth and the Church are two distinct yea contrary bodies gouerned and ordered by their seuerall heades as in this state they make the king to be the chiefe gouernour of the common-wealth and the high priest of the Church But it is farre otherwise for the Church is not heere a perfect bodie by it selfe but maketh the ciuil body more excellent happie For euen as when any people being rude and barbarous are brought to learning and all kinde of humanitie there is not a new state or body added vnto them but the former estate becommeth better so it is whenas any nation of infidels becommeth religious they haue not one head in respect of their religion and another in ciuill matters but one and the same for both But heereof more at large in the treatise of the publike Church Neyther ought we to thinke that eyther the office authoritie or person of this King was any way prophane or vnholy or in any respect vnfitte to intermeddle with diuine matters for he was and that by the institution of God more holy then oâ—hers As for the hurt which came to the Church by beeing permitted to wicked kinges to be ordered at their pleasure we confesse that it was very greate for many of them did cleane ouerthrow the true worshippe of God Yet there was no remedie for it in the handes of any saue onely of God who is and was able to turne the hearts of kings as the riuers of waters yea to shorten their daies if they continued obstinate in their wickednesse and to raise vppe in their places good and godlie kinges zealous of his glorie who abolishing all idolatrie and establishing the true religion by their soueraigne and absolute authoritie in ecclesiasticall causes did recompence the losse and comfort the griefe which the Church had by the wicked Kinges for if the peoele had resisted the wicked and idolatrous kinges in their proceedinges they shoulde haue diminished the authoritie of godlie kinges and by vsing violence against the wickednesse of the one shoulde haue bounde the hands and hindred the godly indeuours of the other And this is the cause why men vnto whome the good estate of the Church hath beene deare and pretious haue beene loth to permitte the ordering of Churche-causes to ciuill rulers because many of them haue beene open enemies to all religion and godlines and authors of all disorders Yea Emperours Kinges and Princes haue so horribly stained themselues and beene drunke with the blood of the seruantes of God which they ought to haue cherished and preserued and haue so often ouerthowen the Church which they shoulde haue built and maintained that many are afraide to commit the Church to their hands who haue oftner shewed themselues cruel wolues then careful sheepherds And therefore it hath beene said by many that princes should looke to their palaces and leaue the whole care of the Church to the ministers of the worde but we see the contrary in this example And therfore we ought not to speake vntruethes no not in the cause of God or to maintaine the state of religion in Israel by spoyling the king of that power which god hath giuen vnto him Lastly as touching ecclesiastical lawes which were to be made by men for the putting in practise of the worship of God it may seem that although the setting vp and pulling downe the reforming and deforming of religion were in the hands of the king yet to be very vnmeete that he should meddle in the making of them whereunto we answere that if the whole ordering of the
those places or by the fauour and consent of the people obtained that great authotitie for themselues and their posteritie Yea often a temperate and meane power being graunted doth increâ—se to this immoderate and absolute authoritie whereof we speake The which although it were at the first conquered by violence and vniust dealing yet if afterwardes it be by the generall and continuall consent of the people admitted acknowledged and obeyed it is to be accounted a lawfull authority Now in many of those kingdomes the rulers are not tied to any couenants or conditions by the which they shoulde rule but onely so farre forth as they doe voluntarilie submit themselues for the more quiet obtaining enioying of their kingdoms Yea they haue the full and absolute authority of the land in their owne handes and inhereÌ„t in their own persons insomuch that al others within their dominions ioyntly and seuerally considered are in respect of them priuate men Of this kinde was the kingdome of Israell as hath beene shewed in the former treatise and many other in the which that we may apply this to our purpose it was not lawfull for any of the people to resist the ciuill authority by open force no not in the cause of setting vp or maintaining the Church as appeareth by the historie and examples of the saide kinges Yea this is agreeable to the word of God which teacheth that we ought not to doe that which is good but by good lawful and ordinarie meanes but to resist the ciuill power is euill and greatly displeasing in the eyes of God Yet we ought to vse all lawfull meanes for the setting forward of this worke when it is hindered by these magistrates as first to solicite the cause of the Church at their hands yea euen with our owne danger as did Hester Est. 4.14.16 Nehemias Neh. â— 4 and to labour to bring them to the knowledge of the truth Yea further if it be so needfull to redeeme the freedome of religion with our goods by paying to our rulers great tributes that the Church may be established Also by shewing our faithfull obedience loyal submission and duetifull seruice euen to the vnbeleeuing rulers as did Daniel Nehemias and many other godly men By the which meanes and such like the Lord working together in whose handes the heartes of kinges are to turne at his pleasure it may happely come to passe that they will become louers and furtherers yea members of the Church or at the least not haters and hinderers of it but if they doe continue obstinate and as it vsually commeth to passe become persecutours of the Church Then in the first kinde of gouernment the people may vse eyther that secret authoritie which as yet remaineth in their owne handes or else the libertie and benefit of conditionall obedience and so notwithstanding the ciuil ruler build the Church as they ought to doe But in the other kind of gouermeÌ„t we may not build with the one hand hold our weapons with the other against that gâ—eat absolute and maiesticall authoritie for here God giueth no other weapons where withall to fight saue onely patience to suffer their vngodly dealing and if they become malitious and bloudy persecutours of the Church winges to flie For that in time of persecution moued eyther by our owne magistrates or by any other power we may fly for our safetie we are taught euen by the light of nature which moueth euery one to preserue his life by all good meanes But nature is an euill counseller in cases of religion and therefore we haue a more sure ground whereon to rest in this behalfe euen the worde of God whereunto we are to hearken giuing vs this libertie yea this counsell that when we are persecuted in one place we should fly to another as the primitiue Church was dispersed except the Apostles Act. 8.1 yea this is good not onely for our selues but also for the Church for by this meanes we preserue the Church which otherwise would be destroyed in vs. Besides those who are weake and doubt of their constancy ought not to tempt God by vndergoing extreame daunger Yea the Lord vseth thiâ— meanes for the inlarging of his Church Act. 8.4 yet sometimes God doth not graunt vnto vs this libertie of flying but giueth the persecutour power ouer vs that by this meanes he may try our soundnesse and constancy in the profession of his trueth Yea sometimes it is also expedient for the Church that we doe not vse this liberty though we may as if our suffering be like to bring many to the profession of the trueth or to confirme the weake or to auoyd the slaunder of the enemy obiecting to vs fearefulnesse hypocrisie want of faith and of the hope of eternall life Sect. 7. Of the building of the Church hindered by the ciuill ruler being a christian THus much of professed hinderers being open enemies to the Church Nowe we come to those who although they professe themselues members of the Church and such as do by all meanes labour to build it yet in trueth they doe hinder the same yea often more then the opeÌ„ enemy doth And to let others passe the greatest hurt is done by those who are publicke in the Church vnto whome the building and furthering of this worke doth belong as namely the ciuill ruler being a member of the Church and the ecclesiasticall gouernour or the minister of the worde For as when the light of the body is darkenesse how greate is that darkenesse so when the builders of the Church are the hinderers of it how great is that hurt For the first the ciuill ruler for so we speake as of one because that kinde of gouerment is most vsuall may greatly hinder the building of the Church although he doe in part further the same as namely if together with the profession of the true worship of God he doe retaine some part of some false worship or the reliques and memorials of it whereby many are offended and hindered Secondly if he hinder the establishing of any part of the gouernment of the Church commaunded in the worde or else the function of any office and finally if he doe by any meanes hinder the course of the gospell and the building of Gods Church in that place Heere we haue other meanes to vse the ciuill ruler being a member of the Church For first we may be more bolde in mouing him to regard the building of the Church the which doth as much concerne his owne good and saluation as the good of any other We may also haue greate hope that he will be moued by the aduise of them who are godlie wise and learned in his realme Yea those that are the ministers of the worde of GOD by whose meanes the Church is built may deale more plainely with him and exhort yea charge him in the name of God who will one day take an accounte of him howe he hath discharged his duetie to
although in respect of the simple handling of the matter it be vnworthy to be accepted and red by the meanest yet no man can doubt or will deny but that the fitnesse of the argument is a probable excuse for this presumptuous dedication Lastly we desire thee good reader to vse christian moderation in suspending thy iudgement of vs till happely time make that manifest which now is doubtfull in regard of two opinions contained in these treatises the which will seeme somewhat strange to some and perhaps to thy selfe among the rest The one is that we enfraunchize the papist Arian al other heretickes professing the gospel of Christ into the catholicke Church by the which we meane nothing else but the whole Church militant here on earth from the which many doe vtterly reiect them as mere infidels and straungers from the couenant and commonwealth of Israel The other opinion is in that we giue to the christian magistrate especially in great and absolute Monarchies greater authoritie both in ciuill and ecclesiasticall causes then seemeth to stand with the good of the Church or the trueth of Gods word For the former we neede not trouble our selues with the defence of it any further then it is declared in the treatise it being held and professed by many sound diuines who are in euerie respect far more able to maintaine it Likewise for the other we haue nothing to say in this place saue onely that we are to desire thee not to attribute it to flattery rather then to a constant and setled perswasion the suspition whereof it is hard for him to auoyde who doth any thing whereby the power and authoritie of mightie men is maintained and enlarged and so their fauour as vsually it commeth to passe procured We doe indeed intend in publishing this treatise the good and peaceable estate of this kingdome and the maintaining of that powerfull and maiesticall authoritie whereunto it hath pleased God to make vs subiect Yea we doe earnestly desire of him that these treatises may haue that effect in al their hearts into whose handes they shal come that they if there be any such who doe nourish in their breastes any sinister affections or opinions in this behalf may be by meanes of them wonne to heartie loue to so gratious a prince loyall subiection to so lawfull and excellent a kinde of gouernment Yea that they who haue alreadie receaued these graces from God may encrease in them and perfourme all dueties which are needfull in regard eyther of the safetie or the maiestie of their prince more williâ—gly and chearefully then before as being perhaps resolued of some pointes â—hereof before they doubted And lastly that as touching the religion and worship of God professed in this land they who accounte vs no Church by whome we affirming their opinion to be such as might easely be shewed out of the word of God to be erroneous haue beene vehemently charged in the name of God to publish somewhat of the true nature and constitution of a Church for the manifesting of the trueth in that behalfe may be moued to thinke and acknowledge that God iâ— truely serued his word preached his sacramentes administred and his name called vpon in all the publicke assemblies throughout this land especially by considering the doctrine nature and state of a publicke Church the which kinde of Churches not being in vse in the daies of the Apostles and therfore not mentioned in their writiâ—gs seemeth strange to many This we confesse that we intend in this action and are perswaded that we may lawfully yea in some respectes ought necessarely to doe but we trust that God will neuer so giue vs vp to a senselesse minde as to doe any thing for the procuring of the fauour of men contrarie to the trueth of Gods word and the good of his Church He maketh an euill bargaine that throweth himselfe into the bottomlesse sea or rather into the burning furnace of Gods wrath in aduenture of mans fauour which is vncertaine and momentaniâ— sooner lost then gottâ—n in respect of true happinesse altogether vnprofitable But we trust good reader that this apologie might haue beene spared and that thou wilt take these simple treatises in good part as thou hast done the like heretofore Thus I commend thee as I earnestly desire to be commended by thee to the word and spirit of God to be led into all trueth and preserued without blame till the day of Christ. T. M. The Arguments of these treatises THE former treatise declareth the state of the kingdome of Israell the which we haue endeuoured to learne and set downe in plaine manner out of the scripture wherein there is nothing but truth especially out of the bookes of Samuell the Kings Chronicles wherein the first originall continuance and end yea the whole nâ—ture and condition of this gouernment is at large declared Where by the kingdome of Israell we doe not meane that apostaticall rebellious and idolatrous kingdome of the ten tribes vsually called the kingdome of Israell or the kingdome of Samaria but the kingdome of Iuda the which we call by the first ancient and right name of Israell because our purpose is to entreate of the state of it as it was at the first instituted by Samuell and as it continued vnder Saule Dauid and Salomon in whose time it was called the kingdome of Israell But in the beginning of the raigne of Râ—boam it lost ten of the tribes and together the right name which vsually followeth the greater part For the which cause in the time following it was called the kingdome of Iuda for that the tribe of Iuda did not onely make the greatest part of it but also had the prerogatiue of the kingdome annexed vnto it The causes by the which we are moued to thinke the state of this kingdome most worthy to be carefully sought out and truely knowen are these because of all the kingdomes in the world this onely was instituted by God himselfe or at the least approued by him and also registred and fully described in the bookes of the scripture yea and first practised in the Church of God In the which respectes we cannot doubt but that the true and perfect knowledge of it doth greately belong to the Church and to all the members of it And yet we doe not speake of it as of the onely lawfull forme of gouernement and that which ought to be vsed of the Church in all places For there is no kinde of gouernment which may not lawfully bee established among Christians and as lawfully vsed amongest them as this Neyther as if all kingdomes shoulde be squared according to this rule from the which they may farre differ without any blame for the iudiciall lawes of the commonwealth or of the kingdome of Israel doe not belong to the Church Neyther yet doe we affirme this kingdome to be the most excellent and conuenient state and that which christians according to the example of
this people shoulde earnestly desire and seeke after wishing rather that euerie one be content with that gouernment which is already established in the place where he liueth not thinking of any alteration which is verie dangerous and bringeth with it as alwaies great troubles so often a finall ouerthrow to the people But we leaue it to them who professe knowledge and experience in these matters to determine what kinde of gouernment is eyther most excellent in the owne nature and in contemplation or most conuenient to be put in practise Onely we purpose to make a bare and historical narration of the state of this kingdome the which we trust is not vnprofitable but will serue for the good of the reader in diuers respectes especially in those which haue bene already mentioned The former treatise hath these Sections SEction 1. Of the occasion meaning and diuision of the wordes of the text Pag. 1 Sect. 2. Of magistracie in generall Pag. 4 Sect. 3. Of the state of this kingdome in generall Pag. 9 Sect. 4. That the authoritie of the land was wholly in the handes of the king all other being priuate persons in respecte of him Pag. 12 Sect. 5. That it was nâ—t lawfull to vse any violence against the persons or the proceedinges no not of the wicked kinges Pag. 17 Sect. 6. Of the obiections which are made against the former position Pag. 22 Sect. 7. What was the behauioâ—r of the subiectes in regarde of iniuries offered by their kiâ—ges Pag. 28 Sect. 8. Whether the setting vp of this monarchicall estate were commodious or hurtful to the people Pag. 30 Sect. 9. That no person whatsoeuer was exempted from this power Pag. 34 Sect. 10. What was the power of this kingdome in ecclesiasticall causes Pag. 39 Sect. 11. That the power of this kingdome was free from positiue lawes and a peremptorie power Pag. 46 Sect. 12. Of the causes of the great maiestie of this kingdome Pag. 50 Sect. 13. Of the particulars in the said Maiesty Pag. 54 Sect. 14. That this kingdome was a lawfull kinde of gouernement and how it was subiect to God Pag. 61 Sect. 15. Of the actions of Samuel Pag. 67 The Argument of the latter treatise is the Church militant considered in general in the first chapter of the catholiick Church sections 8. particular in the members of the catholicke Church dispersed abroad in the second chap. sections 3. ioyned together in a particular Church whereof we are to entreate seuerally declaring in generall the definitioÌ„ of a particular Ch. in the attributes chapter 3. Sections 3. the building of it to wit the laying the foundation Ch. 4. Sect. 4. the setting vp the frame by establishing lawes ecclesiasticall diuine Ch. 5. Sect. 2. humane C. 6. of ecclesiasticall constitutions sect 5. of the diuers states of it Ch. 7. Sect. 11 In particular the diuerse kindes of a Church which is eyther priuate Ch. 8. Sect. 3. or publicke Chap. 9. Sections 9. Ioyntly in the coniunction of some particular Churches Chap. 10. Sect. 4. all the which make the visible Church Chap. 11. The Argument Chapter 1. Of the catholicke Church SEction 1. Of the name and definition of the catholicke Church pag. 1 Sect. 2. Of the place of the catholicke Church pag. 3 Sect. 3. That hypocrites are members of the catholicke Church pag. 4 Sect. 4. That heretickes are members of the catholicke Church pag. 8 Sect. 5. Of those who dissemble their profession pag. 16 Sect. 6. Who are without the catholicke Church pag. 17 Sect. 7. Of the attributes of the catholicke Church pag. 18 Sect. 8. Of the distribution of the catholicke Church pag. 21 Chapter 2. Of the dispersed members of the Church Sect. 1. For what cause men are separated from the Church pag. 22 Sect. 2. How they serue God pag. 25 Sect. 3. What to thinke of their saluation pag. 26 Chapter 3. Of a particular church Sect. 1. Of the originall of it pag. 29 Sect. 2. Of the definition of it pag. 30 Seâ—â— 3. Of the number of iâ— pag. 32 Chapter 4. Of the planting of a particular church Sect. 1. Of what people a Church may consist pag. 35 Sect. 2. By whom a church ought to be planted pag. 37 Sect. 3. How the word should be preached to infidels pag. 39 Sect. 4. How men conuerted ought to be ordered pag. 44 Chapter 5. Of ecclesiasticall gouernment Sect. 1. Of church gouernment in generall pag. 48 Sect. 2. Of the diuers kindes of church gouernment pag. 53 Chapter 6. Of ecclesiasticall humane lavves Sect. 1. How these lawes diffâ—r from the lawes of God pag. 57 Sect. 2. 3. Of the matter of these lawes pag. 58 Sect. 4. After what rules they are to be made pag. 62 Sect. 5. Of the number of them psg 66 Chapter 7. Of the diuers states of a particular church Sect. 1. Of a state vnestablished pag. 67 Sect. 2. Of a pure and perfect state of a church pag. 70 Sect. 3. Of a flourishing state pag. 71 Sect. 4. Of that state wherein the building of the ch is hindred pag. 74 Sect. 5. Of professed hinderers pag. 78 Sect. 6. Of the ch hindred by the ciuil ruler being a professed enemie pa. 79 Sect. 7. Of the church hindred by the ciuill ruler being a member of it p. 83 Sect. 8. Of the church hindered by the ministers of the word pag. 87 Sect. 9. Of an imperfect state of a churâ—h pag. 88 Sect. 10. Of a currupt state of a church namely of idolatrie pag. 90 Sect. 11. Of a church corrupt in doctrine pag. 93 Chapter 8 Of a priuate Church Sect. 1. What a priuate Church is Pag. 95 Sect. 2. Of the specials in planting a priuate Church pag. 120 Sect. 3. Of the state of it being planted pag. 99 Chapter 9. Of a publicke or nationall Church Sect. 1. Of the obiections which are made against publick Ch. pag. 102 Sect. 2. Of the coniunction of the church and the commonwealth p. 106 Sect. 3. That a publicke Church with the commonwealth make but one bodie vnder one head pag. 107 Sect. 4. That ciuill and ecclesiastical functions may be together in the same persons pag. 114 Sect. 5. Of the chaunges which happen eyther â—o the Church or common wealth by this coniunction pag. 116 Sect. 6. Of the first mouer in the planting of a publicke Church pag. 118 Sect. 7. Of the special manner of planting a publicke Church pa. 120 Sect 8. Of the establishing of it pag. 123 Sect. 9. To whom the authorizing and aduising of ecclesiastical lawes belongeth in a publicke Church pag. 125 Chapter 10. Of the coniunction of particular Churches Sect. 1. Of the voluntarie coniunction of particular Churches vnder the gouernment of councels pag. 131 Sect. 2. Of whom counsels may and ought to consist pag. 133 Sect. 3. Of the necessarie coniunction of particular Churches vnder the gouernment of the same ciuill power pag. 134 Sect. 4. How the seuerall prouinces of a national church are to be
by the fame of the true religiō some haue bene conuerted so was Rahab liuing in Iericho of whome it is saide Heb. 11. that she beleeued or by reading bookes containing the doctrine of religion Lastly it may please God to vse for this purpose that knowledge which remaineth in the minds of men since the fall of Adam and which is stirred vp by the contemplation of the creatures and all those meanes which naturall men haue for the attaining of knowledge These or any other meanes God may vse extraordinarily yea he may doe it without any meanes but in his ordinarie working none of these aforesaid meanes are auailable for faith is gotten ordinarely onely by hearing the worde preached and therefore we are to esteeme and iudge of them who haue not the ministerie of the worde that they wante the ordinarie meanes of attaining a true and sauing faith alwaies excepting the power and extraordinarie worke of God the which is not tyed to any meanes CHAP. III. Of a particular Church Sect. 1. Of the originall of particular Churches THus much of the dispersed mēbers of the catholicke Church the which state God doth accept where it cannot be amended but so that he wil haue al his seruantes to indeauour by al means possible to come liue together for their mutuall edification and therefore as for the more commodious maintaining of our temporall liues he hath appointed ciuill societies so for the beginning and maintaining of spirituall strength and life in vs he hath appointed holy assemblies which are particular Churches out of the which a christian may liue this spirituall life but yet in great weakenesse and danger euen as a man may preserue his naturall life in a desert place but he cannot haue perfect strength and health vnlesse he liue in some place frequented by men and replenished with thinges needfull for that purpose And therefore we are now to declare what a particular Church is Sect. 2. Of the definition of a parlicular Church A Particular Church is a company of men separated from the infidels of the world to serue God vnder al the same diuine and humane lawes or vnder the same ecclesiasticall gouernment both diuine and humane This definition doth in some sort comprehend in it the whole nature and essence of a particular Church and therefore a great part of this treatise is to be spent in the explication of it wherein that we may proceede in some distinct and plaine order we haue these three heads to obserue First the separating of those of whom the Church is to consist from the infidels of the world Secondly the diuine lawes by the which they thus brought together are to be ordered And lastly the humane lawes which are added to the lawes of God For euen as it is in the establishing of a common wealth or kingdome first men must be brought together who are to be the inhabitantes of that citie or country Secondly there must certaine generall and fundamentall lawes be made containing the very state and forme of gouernment and of subiection which must stand in force continually without any alteration and lastly there must be added some speciall positiue lawes which are often to be changed as present occasion shall require so is it in the establishing of a Church First men are called from infidelity to faith as from barbarisme to ciuility then they haue giuen vnto them the lawes which God in 〈◊〉 word hath made for the gouernment of his Church till the end of the world and lastly the changeable ecclesiasticall lawes of men Againe as we see men doe in the building of a house first they prepare stones then they ioyne them together in some fourme of a house till by little and little they set vp the whole frame of it and lastly they adde doores windowes fenses and whatsoeuer may serue for the vse of the dweller in like manner the calling of men to the knowledge of Christ is the preparing of the matter of a Church secondly the establishing of the gouernment of the Church the māner of seruing God is a setting vp of the frame of it an lastly the making of ecclesiasticall constitutions is the applying of this gouernment to the speciall vse of those men whome we woulde bring vnto the fourme of a Church that it may be a fit dwelling place for them This latter similitude we desire the reader to marke the rather for that we are to vse it throughout this whole treatise And that because it hath pleased the spiritte of GOD to teach vs so to doe who in the scripture doth for the most parte compare the Church to a house and to the buylding of it as we may see 1. Cor. 3.11.12 1. Tim. 3.15 1. Pet. 4.17 In this definition the last wordes onely the rest being of themselues plaine enough neede this explication that by humane lawes we doe not meane ciuill lawes but ecclesiasticall constitutions added to the lawes of GOD appointed in the worde by the which humane lawes being alwaies in some pointe or other differing from the lawes of other Churches particular Churches haue their difference and distincte limittes appointed to them For therefore we haue inserted this partickle all in the definition because many yea all the Churches in the worlde may agree in some ecclesiasticall constitutions but not in all So that the same gouernment maketh one and the same Church yea although they be distinguished into diuerse congregations and haue many distinct places of seruing God As if the lawes of any towne doe stretch to the suburbes and villages aboute there is but one corporation or ciuill bodie And to vse our accustomed similitude as that is one familie which hath the same gouernour ouer it the same orders in it although they be in diuerse roomes so it is in this behalfe a distincte gouernment maketh a distinct Church The gouernment is then distincte when eyther the humane Church lawes are diuerse or at the least the rulers and gouernours of the companie haue in their handes authoritie to make diuers lawes in that manner which we are afterwardes to declare So that where we see many distinct and diuerse assemblies or congregations of christians all to depend vpon one company hauing in their handes the saide authoritie and from thence to fetch all their constitutions and determinations of causes they are to be accounted not many but one onely particular Church which notwithstanding if they did no waie depend vpon any other were to be accounted so many distinct Churches So the Church of Israell although it did consist of many distinct townes and cities the which had their proper leuites and gouernours yet because for gouernment they did all depend vpon the high priest and the other priestes which did offer sacrifice in the temple at Ierusalem they all made but one Church So that those christians are to be accounted a particular Church which are ioyned together not onely in the same faith as the
with the multitude there commeth in confusion and corruption And the ciuill power being in the person of the magistrate ioyned to the church doth often too much abridge the vse of christian liberty taking to it selfe as it may lawfully do full power in making those ecclesiasticall lawes which belong generally to all the churches within the compasse of it But in these churches the whole authoritie of establishing lawes orders and the appointing of rites and ceremonies is in the Church it selfe Lastly it is vsually obiected against these priuate Churches that they are the causes of tumults and ciuil dissensioÌ„ and so consequently do breâ—d the ruine of those common-wealthes and kingdoms wherâ—in they aâ—e tollâ—rated therefore that it is the part of wise rulers who tender the good and peaceable estate of the people not to suffâ—r them within their dominions to this we answere confessing that through the peruersnesse of our corrupt natures the which are 〈◊〉 inflamed with bitter enmitie against God and all gooâ—nesse it commeth often to passe that â—â—uersitie of religion doth stirre vp great debate in kingdomes cities and families for this cause the Church desired to be separated in place from the idolatours least thâ—y should exasperate their mindes against them Gen. 46.34 Exod. 8.26 yea Christ doth professe that this would follow the Gospell that the father should be at deadly variaunce with the sonne and the mother with the daughter and that a mans nearest friend shoulde for this cause become his cruell enimie Yea the bloudie and tragicaâ—l tumults which haue of late times risen and continued vpon this occasion in diuerse places do testifie the truth here of But yet we ought not therefore to banish the Church out of our dominions For it is better to haue the true worshippe of god with warre trouble and dissention then idolatrie with quietnesse So that we ought to say with Christ that seeing the Gospell is euen as a fierbrand in the world what shoulde be our desire but that it be preached for although for a time it breed trouble yet in the end it will be found the onely meanes of true quietnesse CHAP. VIIII Of a publick Church Sect. 1. Of the obiections which are made against publick churches THus much of a priuate Church Besides the which there is another kinde of a church namely when any whole citie countrie or nation doth generally professe the faith and so becommeth a Church consisting not of any smale or meane number but of great multitudes of people euen of whole nations As we see at this day that diueâ—s great kingdomes and common-wealthes haue receaued the gospell of Christ so that in them the church doth not lurke in any family or priuate corner or is in some few places but is openly publickly and generally set vp in all places by the authority of the ciuill rulers and the common consent of all men This we call a publick Câ—urch such as we see at this day most of al the cities commonwealthes countries and kingdomes in Euâ—ope to be Of the which one is distinguished from another by hauing a proper gouernment of the owne being ruled by the same humane lawes both ciuill and also ecclesiasticall But it may be here thought that these countries are no true churches but that there are churches in them and that not all the people generally but only some fewe of them separated from the rest are to be accounted the true churches of God and that for these reasons first because there was no such churches established by the apostles or recorded to haue bene in the first ages of the gospell Secondly for that although it be not impossible to God to conuert the harts of all men to embrace the gospell yet it is not agreable to his vsuall dealing so to blesse any nation as that all of them without exception should beleeue and become faithfull men Thirdly because of the great confusion and many fould corruptions which are vsually found in such Churches the which seldom or neuer can be brought to the right order of the Church of Christ. Lastly because they are not called to the profession of the faith by the ministerie of the word of God but are in a manner forced thereunto by the lawes edictes of princes and other rulers Whâ—reunto we answere that these things doe not hinder these whole cities or nations from being the true churches of God As touching the first we do confesse that there weâ—e no such publick and generall churches in the daies of the apostles neither in the ages following the cause whereof we may plainly see to be this That then was the â—ime of the infancie of the gospell in respect of the number of beleeuers it hauing been but lately published to the world but this is the time wherein the lord hath appointed that the fulnes of the gentiles should come in which is the conuersion of whole nations and many countries Yea the apostle witnesseth that the fulnes of the Iewes shal be then whenas that whole nation shal generally embrace christ as the sauiour of the world Rom. 11.26 To the second doubt we answere that all the people of any countrie may haue a general faith whereby they do knowe and professe that Iesus Christ is the sauiour of the world that their profâ—ssion hereof although it be not effectual to their saluation yea although it be meerly hypocritical they thinking no such thing yet it is sufficient to make them members of the visible chuâ—ch As touching the corruptioÌ„s which are in such churches we doe confesse that it is greater then either it is to be wished it were or then is in priuat churches where the nuÌ„ber of beleeuers is lesse and that they cannot so easely be brought to and kept in that holy order which christ hath appointed for his church and further that these publick churches so seldome attaine to any pure or perfect estate because in them the church and the common-wealth are so ioyned linked together the whole affaiâ—es and state of the Church depending on the ciuil estate that the manifold alterations wheruÌ„to al kingdoms coÌ„mon-wealthes are subiect do make many chaunges in the church Yet this doth not take from them either the being or the name of the church For it is no straunge thing that there should be greater confusion and moe corruptions in great multitudes of people then in small congregations For so we see euen in the first congregation of Câ—ristians which the Apostles themselues did gouerne that when the number of disciples did encrease then there was murmuring among them and so euen this priuate Church did tend to some confusion Act. 6.1 yea this thing hath long ago been obserued to haue been conâ—inually the state of the Church the which as long as it was in persecution did florish not in the number so much as in the time of peace but yet it was farre better ordered godlines loue and vertue did
ought to haue vse and shew in all his dealings with the Church and especially in giuing lawes for the ordering of it For although in other matters his will may in some sort stand for a law yet in this case he ought not to be so peremptorie or wilfull but that he doe willingly suffer himselfe to be ruled by the worde of God to doe that which is most agreeable vnto it And forasmuch as in indifferent things wherof these lawes are to be made it is not alwaies easie to see what is most right and meete to be done and for that ciuill rulers haue not the extraordinarie assistance and the spirit of God to direct them in these actions therefore it is needfull that they consult with others take their aduise in making lawes for the Church and so much the rather as an ouersight in gouerning the Church is more hurtfull then it is in ciuill mattes If it be here asked who ought to be admitted to this waightie consultation and what is the whole order of this action we referrâ—â—he answere hereof to the next chapter CHAP. X. Of the coniunction of particular Churches Sect. 1. Of the voluntarie coniunction of particular Churches vnder the gouernment of councels THVS much of a particuiar Church seuerally considered and being distinguished from all others by the proprietie of humane ecclesiasticall lawes or more plainely by a distinct gouernment euen as we see one citie countrie or kingdome to be separated from another by the owne limits whether hils riuers seas or any other thus the Church which was planted at Corinth by the Apostle was free from all other Churches being not bound to their lawes and orders Yet often it commeth to passe that they are ioyned together and that euen in this bonde of humane gouernment by the which they are vsually seuered one from another Of this coniunction we are briefly to entreate the which we find to be of two sortes the one voluntarie the other necessarie voluntarie coniunction is that whereby particular Churches which otherwise are free from all humane authoritie and iurisdiction doe submit themselues to a common-guernment for their common good as we see that free cities enter into a league and a common-gouernment that so they may be the better ordered The subiect of this authoritie are councels prouinciall naturall and generall which are assemblies of certaine men sente from particular Churches with authoritie to iudge and determine of the waightie causes of those Churches In these councels we are to consider first their originall and authority and secondly of whom they doe consist For the first although the gouernment which God hath appointed for the ordering of Churches in particular be in it selfe sufficient for that purpose yet there is many waies great vse of this common-gouernment of counsels For there is not so greate force and authoritie for the repressing of the stubborne and disobedient for the resoluing of doubtes the deciding of waightie controuersies the confirming of the trueth of doctrine the resuting of pernitious heresies the making of ecclesiasticall constitutions of rites and ceremonies and finally for the ordering of great waightie matters in the ministerie of any one Church as there is in a greate number whose godlinesse wisedome and learning are famously knowen to all men Yea there is among many excellent men greate varietie of knowledge wisedome and all spirituall graces the which being ioyned together are more auailable for the edifying of the Church then if they were onely seuerally vsed in particular Churches For these causes was this common gouernment of councels instituted in the Church at the first and hath continued in all the ages of it The first example of a councell in the time of the gospell is Act. 15.6 where all the Apostles and the whole Church which was at Ierusalem come togâ—ther for the deciding of a great controuersie moued about the keeping of the cerâ—moniall lawe But this counsell although in force and authoritie it was occumenical or generall in that the constitutions made then by the Apostles did belong to all the Churches in the worlde yet in act and in deede it was a particular assemblie of that one Church which was at Ierusalem consisting of the Apostles Elders and of the whole people as appeareth Vers. 22. so that this example serueth not for our purpose neyther proueth the diuine institution of prouincial councels Yea as it seemeth we haue not any example or precept of this coniunction of particular Churches mentioned in the actes writinges of the Apostles or elsewhere in the holy scripture Wheâ—eof some haue gathered that these councels are vnlawfull and their authoritie vsurped being not of God but from man and that there is no other gouâ—rnment appointed for the Church but that which may be had within the compasse of euerie particular Church For answere whereof we knowe that of lawfull things some are necessarie being commaunded by God so that the omitting of them is sinne in his sight but other things are so lawfull as that they may laâ—fully be left vndone being not commanded but permitted to vs to doe when we shal thinke them conuenient Of this latter kinde are these common councels and this voluntary coniunction of diuerse Churches vnder one gouernment For we haue no flat commaundement in the word as touching it neither can any Church be compelled to ioyne in this manner yet one Church may lawfully vse the helpe of an other for their mutuall good If it be here obiected that it is not in the power of man to appointe any other forme of Church-gouernment then God himselfe hath prescribed in his worde we answere that these common councels do not take away the gouernment of particular churches but rather do establishe it yea make it more effectuall and forcible and supplieth the wantes the which by reason of the infirmitie and wants of men are often found in it The reason why these councels are not mentioned in the scripture is for that in the daies of the Apostles the Churches could not ioyne themselues together in this manner not only because they were not fully setled within themselues but cheifely because they were fewe in number and so farre distante one from another that they could not with any conuenience communicate ordinarely together Yea the Apostles were to them in steed of the most generall councels for they referred all their doubts controuersies and matters of importaunce to their determination wherein the rested as in the word of God Whereby it appeareth that although these councels haue not their originall and authority immediatly and directly from God as the ministerie of a particular Church hath yet that they haue bene instituted and vsed by the Church for iust and necessarie causâ—s according to the worde and will of God Likewise the authority of these councelles is the full authoritie of those Churches from the which the seuerall commissioners or delegates were sent And therefore it ought to be
of the same ciuill power THus much of the voluntarie coniunction of particular Churches vnder the gouernment of councels now followeth the necessarie coniunction of them so called because it is not in their power to shake off that common authoritie whereunto they are subiect This necessarie coniunction hath place then whenas diuerse particular Churches are tyed together in obedience to the same ciuill authoritie by the which they are ruled as hath beene declared in the former chapter Yea it may be seene almost in all publick Churches the which vsually consist of so great a number of professours as cannot possiblie be contained within the compasse of one Câ—urch for if any one populous citie doe generally professe the gospell it must of necessitie be deuided into diuers particular Churches much more a christian country nation or kingdome cannot but containe in it many particular Churches All which although they haue their proper rulers or teachers and orders as free Churches haue yet they haue also a common gouernment and lawes proceeding from the ciuill power to the obedience whereof they are all bound For in publicke Churches the ciuill power hath the greatest sway in gouerning by the which being one the whole Church and euery particular assembly is brought to a conformitie both in doctrine as also in gouernment yea it is requisite needfull that it should be so for otherwise if euery particular Church did differ from the rest in gouernment the whole Church could not be ordered without great trouble and confusion But yet this common gouernment of the magisâ—â—ate doth not take away the grouernment of particular Churches no more then the councels whereof we haue spoken do from free Churches This is to be done by the authoritie of the ciuill ruler yet by the aduise of others In the choise of whom as it is lawfull for the prince to call or passe ouer whom he thinketh meete or vnmeete so it will be conuenient for the good of the Church the which it is not lawfull for him eyther wholly to neglect or lightly to regard to call of all sortes of men those who are endued with best giftes yet so that some be had out of euery particular Church as if they were free Churches And especially the ministers of the word are to be called for the reasons declared in the former section when they by his authoritie are gathered together he is to take vnto himselfe the ruling of the whole action vnlesse it be needful that he delegate his authoritie to some other and by praying for the blessing of God vpon their consultations declaring the cause of their meeting to begin it Then he is to propound in the first place those wants faults and corruptions of the Ch. which he himselfe hath obserued would haue supplied and taken away to shewe the manner how he thinketh it most meet to be done which being done he is to giue liberty to euery one present to speake their mindes freely of those things which he hath propounded as also of any other thing which they thinke good for the Church that which is agreed vpon doth appeare to al or to the most of them right meete to be decreed he is to establish giuing vnto it the vertue of an ecclesiastical law the which the whole Ch. ought to obey That which cannot be agreed vpon is to be deferred to another time of meeting which ought to be somuch the sooner as the matters controuersed are of greater importance for more mature deliberation with themselues and others will make that cleare and euident which before was doubtfull If there be any thing which neyther can be agreed vpon by the consent of the greater part neither yet deferred without great hurt to the Church the chiefe ruler may with the consent of some of the councell decree and enact that which they thinke needfull to be done Yet he is not to vse this authority in this manner but vpon vrgent necessitie for many inconueniences do follow the enacting of ecclesiasticall laweâ— without the full consent of the councell yea the suspitioÌ„ of tyrannizing ouer the Ch. of God is by al meanes to be auoyded In regard wherof many christian Emperors rulers did resigne their authoritie which they had in gouerning the ch to these councels insomuch that they had the ful power not only of aduising lawes but also of enacting or the giuing vnto them the force of laws But as hath bene shewed this mâ—y easely turne to the hurt of the Ch. and therefore it ought not wholly to bâ— followed yet it sheweth how great regard ciuil rulers ought to haue of the iudgement aduise of those who are godly wise and learned in the ordering of the Churches subiect vnto them And therefore that which the councell thinketh good to be done or the greater part of them ought to be greatly regarded Yet if the chiefe ruler cannot be brought to giue his assent vnto it it cannot haue the force of an ecclesiastical lawe or be imposed vpon the whole Ch. in that name As touching the number wherof any national councel doth consist there caÌ„not any be defined but it must be left to the appointmeÌ„t of the chief ruler to whom the deposing authorizing of this whole action doth belong Yet it ought to be proportionable to the quantity of the Ch. to the number of the particular Churches so that if some be had out of euery one of theÌ„ it wil make the lawes enacted to be much more willingly receaued obeyed whenas it shal be knowen that some of theÌ„ selues did in the name of the rest consent vnto them And especially this is requisite in respect of the chiefe end and vse of these councels both in free and publicke churches whereof we will briefly speake The which is to bring the whole Church to a conformitie of doctrine this is needfull and good to be done and that for these causes first for the repressing of heresies which doe continually arise in the Church For the which purpose the generall consent of the Church is very forcible for eyther the consent and iudgement of the whole Church will be of great waight to take the said heresies out of the mindes of those who doe maintaine them or else the authoritie by which the trueth oppugned is publickly established will be able to remooue the maintainers of them out of the Church Secondly this forme of doctrine agreed vpon by many will be effectuall to strengthen and confirme those who are weake in the faith and not fully grounded in some pointes of christian religion Yea it may be a meanes to helpe forward those who haue not as yet taken vpon them the profession of the gospel Not that we ought to build our faith vpon the authority of men but for that we ought to take from the Church a confirmation of our faith seeing we may be greatly helped and strengthned by this meanes And lastly this forme of
heretike Heretikes haue giuen their liues for the gospel Difference to be put betwixt the simple professours of errours and the obstinate maintainers of them What is the foundation of reliligion before and since the comming of Christ. The deuil hath knowledge but neither faith nor the profession of faith Mahometisme a mystical Ariaanisme No saluation The caâ—holicke Church cannot erre in the foundatioÌ„ of religion The catholicke Church hath often beene in most grieuous errours The catholicke Church doth continually encrease in number and in knowledge The catholicke Church hath no head oâ— outward gouernment The catholicke Church inâ—isible Dispersed Christians with the Churches professing the gospel make the Catholicke Church Eremeticall separation from the Church vnawfull How the sacraments may be priuately receiued God accepteth the imperfect seruice of those who cannot be in the visible Church Dispersed christians ought to labour by all meanes to ioyne themselues to some Church By what meanes God calleth those who are with out the visible Church Three things required to the constitution of a Church A diuerse gouernment maketh a distinct Church The whole nation of the Iewes made but one particular Church A particular Church often contained in one familie Why it was needful that the whole nation of the Iewes should be one particular church Better for a Church to consist of many christians then of a fewe No kinde of men excluded from being the Church of God The most barbarous may become Christians The planting of Churches belongeth to theÌ„ who haue either extraordinarie callings or the most excellent gifes Great care to be had in planting a Church The ministerie of the word was more effectuall in the primitiue Church then it hath bene at any time since The Iewes are to be conuerted by the generall consent of the Gentiles in receauing the gospell How infidels ought to be prepared for the doctrine of the gospell How the doctrine of the gospell is to be propounded to infidels Baptisme is the badge or liueray of christians Baptisme circumcision sacraments of the lawe of death Great seueritie in punishing open offences to be vsed in the planting of Churches The establishing of ecclesiasticall lawes among beleeuers maketh a Church Ecclesiasticall lawes or ecclesiasticall gouernment is partly diuine and partly humaâ—â— None but God can appoint the substance of Church-gouernment The gouernment of the Church alwaies changed to a better estate What was the state of the Church before the lawe What was the state of the Church vnder the lawe The state of the Church in the time of the gospel Thâ— Church in the time of the Gospel hath more of inward grace lesse in outward shewes and ceremonies The gouernment of the Church neuer altered but by men sent immediately from God The difference betwixt diuine and humane ecclesiastical lawes Humane ecclesiastical lawes are made of the circumstances of Gods worship How humane ecclesiastical lawes are set downe in the word of God In conuenieÌ„t lawes may lawfully be obeyed In making ecclesiastical lawes regard must be had of the knowledge or ignornance of the time Sharper laws to be made for one people then for another For what causes the multitude of ecclesiasticall lawes ought to be auoyded The difficulty of planting a Church maketh an vnâ—stablished state The number of Christians is to encrease daily The primitiue Church did most florish in spirituall giftes God maketh the building of the Church troublesomâ— and dangerous for the trial of those who build it The Church vttâ—râ—y â—uer throwen to mans iudgement Two kiâ—des of ciuil authoritie and 〈◊〉 What magistrates may be resisted in the cause of the Church The original of absolute authoâ—itie Vniust conquest and vsurpation may become a lawfull dominion Fliâ—ht iâ— time of persecution alwaies lawful and often good for the Church The Censures of the Church belong as well to christian rulers as to â—he people What cautions are to be obserued in excommunicating the câ—uill ruler Excommunication is no curse neither toucheth the authoritie of the magistrate Publicâ—e wants are to be priuately sâ—â—plied How we may lawfully remaine in an imperfect Church No corruption maketh them who holde the foundation of religion to be no Church The tenne tribes in their defection were the Church of God The ten tribes in thâ—ir defectâ— on were the Church of Gâ—d Idolatâ—ie the worship of the true God ioyned gâ—thâ—r The errours of the Iâ—wes before the comming of Christ. No publicke Church sauâ— the people of the Iewes til the daies of ConstaÌ„tine The causes of a priuate Câ—urch Priuate men may plante priuate Churches Euery one ought to builde the Church so farre as his authoritie stretcheth Christians in priuate Churches ought not to abhorre the company of infidels Priuate Chuâ—ches consist of the most sweeâ—e Chrisâ—ians What a publick Church is Why there were no publick Ch. in the daies of the Apostles Why publick churches can not be so perfect as priuaâ—e How publick Churches are called to the faith Publicke Churches stand no longer then they are vpheld by the ciuill magistrate The ministerie is a member of the ciuill bodie Magistrates haue charge of the soules their subiects No man ought to passe the limits of his calling in building the Church Christ is the head of the Church after another manner then men are The setting vp of a publicke Church doth not alter the forme of ciuill gouernment Ciuill states wel ordered are more fit harbours for the Ch. then disordered states In the first planting of a publicke Church the false worship is to bâ— abrogated by little little Obstinate infidels may be compelled to heare the word but not to be of the Church In case of necessity men of meane gifts may be admitted to the ministerie of the word The state of a priuate Church is popular but the state of a publicke Church is according to the forme of the ciuil gouernment Why the authoritie of the ciuill ruler ouer the Church is not mentioned by the Apostles in their writinges The vse of councels Why there is no meâ—tion made of couÌ„cels in the writings of the Apostles For what causes others besides the ministers of the word are to be admitted to ecclesiastical coÌ„sultations No ecclesiastical law can be made made in a publicke Ch. without the consent of the ciuill ruler The general consent of the Church confirmeth faith How the visible Church hath changed the dwelling place