otherwise then that there hath but little good growen to the Common weale hitherto by the bishops and Cleargie men in the Administration of Ciuill iustice And that therefore such as haue written or spoken or preached againste Ciuill iurisdiction in the Eclesiasticall state haue done it for two vrgent and waightie considerations Friendes of reformation friendes of the queenes maiesties prerogatiue First not to encounter hir maiesties prerogatiue as it is falsely supposed but to teach their Lorde and maisters truth They haue not doone it in disobedience to hir crowne but in obedience to their God They know it is better to obey God then men and therefore they haue laboured faythfully by the worde of God to perswade hir maiestie and the estates of the Realme that these offices ought not by the Lawe of God to be resiaunt in one person and therefore hath exhorted hir maiestie and them in the name and feare of God to vse hir prerogatiue and theire authorities to the seuering of them Secondly they haue preferred the generall welfare and commoditie of the common weale before the vnlawfull honours and promotions of priuate men They know by learning and haue prooued by experience what detriment maye insue to the Common weale when offices are committed to men ignoraunt of such duties as belong vnto their charge A man that hath spent all the dayes of his lyfe in the studie of Grammar or Oratorie and hath alwayes taught the same were a very vnfit man at the age of threeschore yeares to be made a publique Keader in Phisicke or Law and yet notwithstanding to remayne a Schoolemaister still Expedit reipublicae vt quisque officio suo fungatur It is expedient for the Common weale that euery one execute his owne office And I am of opinion that the friendes of reformation are greater friendes and mayntainers to and of hir highnesse prerogatiue then the others be For they ascribe vnto hir maiestie indeede truth and veritie that which the others do but in worde shew and semblaunce onely They earnestly desire and craue that as hir highnesse hath beene annoynted and Crowned by the Lord him selfe Queene and gouernesse ouer them and as she is their naturall and onely lawfull Ladie and Mistresse and as she hath the name title and stile of supreame and chiefe ruler ouer all persons in all causes So likewise the causes now accōpted Ecclesiasticall beeing meere Ciuill shee might in deed truth and veritie haue all and all maner of iurisdiction executed in hir maiesties owne name as well in Courts and iudgements nowe reputed Ecclesiasticall as in other hir maiesties Courtes temporall whereby hir Ciuill gouernement might be more enlarged Which thing the abettours of reformation perceiue now to be otherwyse Forall summons actes proceedinges sentences decrees and iudgementes in all causes and controuersies determinable before Archbishops Bishops and Archdeacons are begunne continued and ended in the Archbishops bishops Archdeacons their Commissaries or Officials names stiles and dignities without any relation or mention of authoritie gyuen unto them as proceeding from hir maiestie then the which there can not seeme anye thing more preiudiciall to hir state Crowne and dignitie For be it that they be created Archbishops and Bishops by hir highnesse and inuested into their seas at hir Graces commaundement yet this argueth no greater prerogatiue belonging vnto hir maiesty ouer them then such as she hath ouer hir other subiectes whom she createth Barons or dubbeth knights But as concerning common and ordinarie iurisdiction in causes reputed Ecclesiasticall they haue no letters patentes from hir maiestie conuaying vnto themas from hir royall person any power ouer hir subiects to heare and determine their causes in hir highnesse name and vnder hir gouernement Onely they execute such iurisdiction as by popishe constitutions or popish customes hath beene heretofore annexed to their Archbishopprickes bishopprickes and Archdeaconries and that by an vtter enemy to hir royall person state and gouernment B. L. to his colleague Comissioners In so much that some of them by Letters hath signified vnto their Colleague Commissioners that common and ordinarie authoritie in causes ecclesiasticall chiefly and almost onely belong to them selues and their officers And that commissions from hir maiestie for reformation in matters ecclesiasticall graunt onely an extraordinarie authoritie And that therefore the sayde Commissioners haue not to heare matters of instance and such as requyre iudgement of lawe for that such causes belong onely to them selues and their officers whereby they haue insinuated hir maiestie to haue no common or ordinarie authoritie in causes ecclesiasticall as they them selues haue Whereas all other courts within hir highnesse Empyre as leetes courtes Baron courtes of regarde courtes of Forrestes I leaue to speake of hir highnesse owne Courtes at Westminster all liberties and franchises all parkes and free warrens belonging to any of the Nobilitie Gentrie or any Citie or borow of this Realme haue euer had their beginninges and establishmentes by the gratious fauour of the Kinges of this Realme as from whose prerogatiue such dignities and immunities ought franckly to proceed and by whom onely they haue beene graunted Onely oure Church gouernours challenge not their authoritie as from hir sacred seate of iustice and princely throone but they challenge their authoritie as a power belonging to their owne seats deriued from an vsurped and forren power 17. pag. ◠28. Henry c. 16. The statute made that euery Archbishop and bishop of this realme and of other the kings dominions may minister vse and exercise all and euery thing and thinges pertayning to the office or order of an Archbishop and bishop with all tokens ensignes and ceremonyes therevnto belonging and that all Archdeacons and Deanes and other hauing offices cures and dignities spiritual may by authoritie of this act and not by vertue of any forren power or authoritie administer vse and exercise all things appertaining to their dignities offices orders cures religions felowships and may lawfully hereafter vse all tokens ensignes and ceremonyes which they haue beene accustomed to vse in times past so it be not expresly against the lawes of God and this Realme This statute I say hauing beene the rule of our Archbishops and bishops consciences for their gracinges there Lordinges there vsheringes their kneelinges there tastinges their cupbearinges and such like improoueth no whit any part of the force of the former assertions but rather confirmeth and fortifieth the same First the statute hauing relation onely to tokens ensignes and ceremonies accustomably administred vsed and exercised before the making of the statute all which beeing Antichristian and therefore expreslye against the lawes of God are plainely by this statute abrogated and therfore ought no more to bee administred vsed or exercised For though the Kinge the peeres and commons at that time not instructed in the vnlawfulnesse of them did not holde and repute them to be againste the lawes of God and therefore did not specially abridge any particuler
and to take awaye all occasion from others to seeke preferment in that house at hir maiesties hands they of late haue inuented a new deuice and practized a new tricke where they were by the order and foundation of the house bound yearely to make elections of such schollers as might presently at the time of the election be placed in the vacant roomes they now either at one time choose a greater number of schollers for them selues then are places vacant and so make but one election in two yeares or else so soone as any place by the departure of any schooler is voyd they foorthwith in the name of the Deane or some Prebendarie chop an other in his roome by meanes whereof either hir maiesties letters are delayed vnto the ende of two yeares or else remayne altogeather frustrated so kinde hearted these no Precisians and these no Puritanes haue beene and so thankfull they haue shewed them selues for their maisterships Deanries and Prebendaries receiued at hir maiesties hands by hir gratious bountie and liberallitie And therefore since they striue so egerly for such tryfles and vse such foule shiftes to shut hir out of doores and make hir schollers packehorses and set them at the Cartes tayle in hir owne Colledges I thinke a man may gesse twice and yet not gesse so nigh as to gesse that Cleargie men enemies to reformation rather then they woulde loose their dignities woulde if it laye in their power gyue hir Highnesse prerogatiue the Canuysadoe They allow hir maiestie a royall power to shred greene Olyue braunches but to roote vp olde rotten dotterelles they deny hir anye such authoritie they can bee contented hir maiestie shoulde strippe poore men cloathed with sackecloath but mighty men decked in scarelet shee may not touch or once looke awrye vppon No cause of the name of ecclesiastical court Concerning the Courtes and iudgement seates of Archbishops bishops and Archdeacons hitherto reputed and called Ecclesiasticall Courtes I can see no reason in the worlde why they shoulde be any more so esteemed taken or reputed or why anye matter or cause or suite or controuersie commenced in those places shoulde or ought to be called or counted Ecclesiasticall For though in times past I meane in time of popery they might probably and coullorably be so called either for that Cleargy men alone were Iudges and exercised iudgement in them either for that such parties as betweene whom suites did depend were for the most part meere church men either for that all peticions and actions made and begunne in those Courtes were for such matters and causes as whereof church men onely by vsurpation challenged vnto them selues the decision and determination yet now so it is that all these reasons fayle and are of no force For with vs at this day though Archbishops bishops and Archdeacons be Cleargie men and chiefe amongest the ecclesiasticall seat yet notwithstanding Doctors of the Ciuill lawe meere laye men as they call them and no whit beneficed by priuiledge of Cleargie exercise all iurisdiction reputed Ecclesiasticall in their consistories and by the ordinaunces of the Realme are made competent and lawfull Iudges in these Courtes 25 Henrici octui Where one suite now dependeth or these manye yeares hath depended in the same Courtes betweene Cleargie men alone one hundreth almost are and hath beene depending betweene laye men alone the causes them selues are all for the moste part mere Ciuill and belong onely to the Ciuill court Approbations and insinuations of Willes and Testamentes by expresse wordes as you haue hearde out of the Ciuill lawe are absolutely prohibited vnto Bishops and all other Cleargie men And so consequently for that Appendices sequuntur principalis subiecti naturam Accessories follow the nature of the principall subiect All causes of Legacies Bequestes Accountes Inuentaries Commissions of Orphanes gooddes and whatsoeuer else may be incident to anye of those causes are vtterly forbydden Causes of wrongfull and iniurious slaunders infamous Libels and contumelious crymes causes of contractes and marriages causes of dowrie and diuorce causes of filiation and legitimation of children matters of Vsurie and whatsoeuer appertayneth to the decision of these causes are causes meere ciuill and pertaine to the ciuill magistrate and therefore sithence Archbish Bish and Archdea to disburthen them selues may lawfullye commit the hearing of these causes from them selues yea and very seldome or not at all execute their iurisdictions by them selues but continually and effectually do surrogate and depute Doctors or Bachelors of the Ciuill lawe What iniurie to their persons or alteration of the state and gouernment can it be in case hir maiestie by hir prerotiue did commit the same causes vnto the same men and make the bishops men hir men and their commissaries hir presidentes Touching matters of tith it is lawfull for the chiefe Iustice of the kings bench where any vsage or custome by any partie is pretended to paye lesse then the whole tith as suppose the twenteth or forteth part of his tithes Yea in some cases where no tith at all is payde as vpon the statute of tith wood beeing timber trees aboue twentie yeares groweth to prohibite in hir maiesties name euery iudge ecclesiasticall that hee proceed not to the determination of any such cause and so to take vnto him selfe the hearing and determination of the same according to the common lawes of hir highnesse realme There is small diuersitie of reason why the same or some other Ciuill magistrate may not as well heare and determyne all and singular causes of tithes after what maner or forme soeuer they be payde as whereby long continuaunce of tyme they haue beene customablye payde after such and such sort or where no payement at all hath beene made In the seconde or thirde instaunce when appeale is made from an Archbishop Bishop or Archdeacon into hir highnesse high Court of Chauncerie or Delegates in any case whatsoeuer hir maiestie by the prerogatiue of hir Crowne and dignitie hath absolute power to appoynt such men to set a finall ende and ordinate direction therein as by their wisedomes shall be thought consonant to equitie right and good conscience There is no disparity of reason why in the first instaunce shee maye not as well haue like authority or why like authority from her or by her Maiesty may not lawfullye bee committed to any of her subiectes though no ecclesiasticall persons but onely seculer and laye men Neyther by this meanes shoulde the course of Lawe touching appeales be taken away but the same might be still practised as now it is In the prouinces belonging to the Romaine Empire though presidents and Proconsulles had their Commissions from the Emperour yet appeales were notwithstanding made from those Gouernours vnto the Consistories and tribunall Seates of the Emperoures imperiall City of resyaunce and cheefe aboade And therefore though the Gouernmentes nowe reputed Ecclesiasticall but in trueth Ciuil were absolutely translated from Ecclesiasticall men and put into the hands
Panor in c. fin §. is autem nu 5. de offic deleg SI PRINCEPS c. If the Prince commit a cause to any and commaunde him personally to execute the same if in this case consist publike commodity this his commissary can not substitute an other no not euen with consent of parties because where the Prince either couertly or expresly doth make choyce of the industrie of any one particular person there the partie so chosen can not surrogate an other For the Prince herein doth personally qualifie the man and giueth vnto him the forme of his commission De offic c. deleg l. 6. c. si cui c. fin extra de offi delegat An example of this may be thus De offic delegat li. 6. c. si cui ex de offic deleg c. vlt. Suppose that the treasurership in Paules were voyd and that hir highnes had commanded the B. of London to prouide a fit man for the same roome whether now the B. may commit this his charge to be perfourmed by an other then by him selfe or no And it is answered negatiuely because in the choyce of a fit person consisteth great danger therfore the B. beeing but an executor of hir Maiest pleasure he may not substitute any other But suppose that hir highnes had cōmanded the same B. of Londō to haue giuē the same prebend to Lucius Titius whether thē might the B. in this case subdelegat Archdeacon Sempronius And the answer is affirmatiue that he might for now her Maiest by hir selfe hath nominated the partie to be placed hath not chosen the B. industry for that purpose and therfore he may assign this prouision vnto an other But it is otherwise where the industry of a Person is chosen concerning one to be elected for then he may not set ouer that his office to any other Now then out of these rules lawes I conclude that sithence it hath pleased the high Court of Parliament particularly and expresly by name to make choyce of the Archd. hath personally qualified him as their meetest man for this charge chosing the industry of his own person in presenting fit men to be made ministers or of his deputies in presenting fit men to be made Deacons and for so much also as in this action consisteth the publike benefit of the whole church and on the which hangeth the greatest perill daunger of the whole church For these causes I conclude that an Archd. onely must ought of necessitie present one to the B. to be made a minister that the B. can not dispence with him in this case and that neither the B. neither the Archd neither the party to be made a minister neither the clearkes and people present by their consents can alter or transpose any thing herin ff de pact l. ius publicum Publica vtilitas est pars agens Publike vtilitie is the party agent in this busines and Parta priuatorum inri publico non derogant The couenants agreements of priuate men doth not derogate from cōmon right And if the contrary haue been practized what may be concluded therof shal follow immediatly And againe by these proofes you may euidently see that the calling the triall the examinatiō the time the person appoynted to present and the age of one to be presented haue not been things meer contingent but rather essential not causas sine quibus non but causes formall to the making of Deacons ministers and such causes as beeing omitted haue been sufficient causes both to depose from their functions those that haue ben contrary wise ordained to punish the ordainers for their negligence in that behalfe And therefore that our tong tied ministers not made according to the order and forme of the statute be in deed and truth no ministers at all the act it selfe whereby they be made wherby they challenge their dignities being in deed no act in law hauing no law to approue the same therefore to be punished by the law of mā as wel for entring into a calling against the lawe of man as also for prophaning the holy and sacred misteries of God For what if respect be had to one or two or foure or moe of the solemnities and circumstaunces before rehearsed and those too perhaps of the least weight moment as vnto the age the time the B. particuler interrogatories the Archd. presentation and yet the rest of the greatest waight and importance as their learning their honesty their aptnes to teach c. be negligētly or wilfully omitted Shall the proceedinges by such as please them selues in their owne inuentions be both iudges parties thus in shew apparance only supposed to be done by them that are wise and vpright iustices whom publike profit ought to mooue to the redresse of disorders be reckoned to be don in deed and verity Yea if all the former solemnities yea euen those also of the least moment such as in truth might haue ben reputed accidentall rather then substantiall had it pleased the law makers to haue appointed them so haue beene are oftentimes omitted in the making of ministers one neuer called neuer tried neuer examined neuer known to the B. before that day to be of any vertuous conuersation not qualified as is requisit not learned in the latine tong not sufficiently instructed in holy scriptures as he that came to the B. of Winchester to serue in his Diocesse borne at Norwich and made a minister at Peterborow knew not how many Sacraments there were and requested a dayes respite to aunswere the bishop what the office of a Deacon was not made openly in the face of the congregation but priuately in the bishops Chamber or Chappell not hauing any Sermon not apt to execute his ministerie duely not presented by the Archdeacon the Bishoppe making ministers at Exceter and his Archdeacon at Oxenforde or the bishop making ministers at Leichfielde and his Archdeacon at Durham not mooued by the holye Ghost not admitted on a Sunday or holy daye not of 24. yeares of age not perswaded of the sufficiencie of the doctrine of the scriptures to saluation not an example in him selfe and his familie to the flocke of Christ not a minister of the doctrine and discipline of the Lorde Christ not a peacemaker but quarrelling at law for tithe Oynions apples and cheryes not a dispensour of the worde of God Fol. 11. p. 2. not a pastour and stewarde to the Lorde to teach to premonishe to feede and prouide for the Lordes flocke if such a one I saye yea if too too many such haue beene admitted into the holy ministery and all these solemnities vnsolemnly abused may it not be rightly concluded that such by our statute lawe be no lawful ministers at all Was the word of any Bishop onely the worde of the high bishop Iesus Christ excepted in any time or in any place a lawe against the Lawe
maye dispence with the reason of the law or take away the soul life of the law so none may dispence with the law or take away the law Now for as much as it is not lawfull for all the Princes in the earth to change or dispence or take away the reasons and causes of the Lawes prohibiting many benefices Therefore it is not lawfull for them to chaunge or dispence or take away the lawes against pluralitites The reasons vvherevppon pluralities are forbidden are reasons taken from the lawe of nature and from the equitie of the lawe of God Institutio de iure nat gen ci § sed naturaliâ— but none can alter or take awaye the lawe of nature or dispence with the lawe of God therefore none can alter or impugne or dispence with the reasons of either of them For as the lawe of nature is immutable so is the reason of the Lawe of nature immutable and as the vvill of GOD is vnchaungeable Iam. so is the equitie of his Lawe vnchaungeable to If then naturall reason be the cause and soule and lyfe of a naturall lawe and the will of God the onely cause of the Lawe of God and his onely will the rule of all iustice vnchangeably none can challenge authoritie to change or dispence with the Law of nature or with the lawe of God but hee must foorth with challenge authoritie to dispence both with the reason of the Lawe of nature and with the pleasure and will of God And theeefore out of the premises I conclude thus 1 Wheresoeuer the cause of a prohibition is perpetuall there the prohibition ought to be perpetuall 2 But the cause of the prohibition against pluralities is perpetuall 3 Therefore the prohibition ought to bee perpetuall 1 Euery law grounded vpon the reason of nature the equity of the law of God is immutable 2 But the lawes prohibiting pluralities are grounded either vppon the reasons of nature or vppon the equitie of the law of God 3 Therefore all the lawes prohibiting pluralities are immutable Institut de iure natu gent. ciui § sed naturalia THe first proposition of the firste syllogisme hath bene prooued already the first proposition of the 2. syllogism is manifest Omnia naturalia sunt immutabilia All naturall things are immutable Iames. and there is no altering or shadowing by turning with the almighty The second proposition of either syllogisme shall be manyfested by that that followeth But first to aunswere the falacies before spoken of because pluralities are not forbidden by law positiue of man alone but prohibited also by the lawe of nature and by the lawe of God therefore it followeth that they may not be tollerated by law positiue of man alone And therefore if pluralitie men woulde fitly argue to conclude their purpose they should frame the same after this sort 1 Whatsoeuer is prohibited by the lawe of man alone the same by the law of man alone may be licensed againe 2 But pluralities are forbidden by the law of man alone 3 Therefore they may be licensed by the law of man againe THe second proposition of which syllogisme beeing vtterly false you see euidently wherein the conclusion halteth and the fallacie consisteth and therefore I conclude against them thus 1 Whatsoeuer is forbidden by the law of nature and by the Law of God the same cannot be licensed by the law of man alone 2 But pluralities are forbidden by the law of nature and by the lawe of God 3 Therefore they cannot be licensed by the Lawe of man alone And againe 1 Whatsoeuer ratifieth a thing monstrous and against nature the same may not be priuiledged by the law of man 2 But dispensations for Pluralities ratify monstrous things and things against nature 3 Therefore dispensations for Pluralities may not be priuiledged by the law of man THE seconde Proposition of the first Syllogisme shal be prooued in his place The second PropositioÌ„ of the last Syllogisme I prooue from the etymology or discription of a priuiledge or dispensation for a priueledge a dispensation in effect signify both one thing Glos lib. 6. de rescript c. vers in principio Extra de iudic c. At si clerici § de adulteriis Priuilegium dicitur quod 〈◊〉 contrâ—… commune in fauorem aliquarum personarum super prohibitis disponsatur quia permissa iure communi expediuntur prohibita vero dispensatione egent A priuiledge is saide to be that that for the fauour of certayne priuate persons commeth foorth agaynst common rightâ—… things prohibited are dispensed with because thinges permitted are dispatched by common right but thinges forbidden require dispensation By which discriptions of a Pryueledge and dispensation it is apparant that a Priueledge and dispensation for pluralities must license and authorise that that the Lawe against Plurality doth infringe and disalow and so be a Lawe contrariant and repugnaunt to the Lawe against Pluralities but the Lawe against Pluralities is the Lawe of nature and the Lawe of God Therefore a Priueledge or dispensation for Pluralities is against the Law of nature against the lawe of God a more monstrous law was neuer established Now that pluralities are forbiddeÌ„ by the Law of Nature by the lawe of God which was the second Proposition of my first Syllogisme I prooue thus All the reasons whereupon the positiue Lawe of man against Pluralities was first established are taken and drawne from the Lawe of Nature and from the Lawe of God The reasons and causes of the prohibition are these First the auoyding of couetousnesse of Ambition of Theft of Murther of Soules of a Dissolute a roaging and a gadding Mynistery the necessity of comlinesse and decency in the Church are speciall and primary causes for the prohibiting Pluralities but all these are forbidden or commaunded by the Lawe of God therefore the causes of the prohibition of Pluralities are grounded vppon the will of God and therefore immutable and therefore not to bee dispensed with Againe for one man to haue the Stipends of many men for one man not able to discharge his duety in one place and yet to haue many chardges in many places committed vnto him for one man to hinder another man from ordinary meanes to doe good to the Churche all these causes I say are seconde causes for the prohibition of Pluralities but all these causes are causes of reason and nature therefore by the Lawes of reason and nature Pluralities are forbidden and therefore not to be dispensed with no more then theft or murder or blasphemy may be dispensed with And if Antichriste thinke it Theft Rauine Couetousnesse Ambition Pride Murder of soules for one man to haue many Benefices without dispensation if Antichrist account the hauing of many benefices without dispensation to be a meete meane to maintain a roauing a gadding and a dissolute Ministery to foster extortion and vnlawfull gaine what shall the seruauntes of the Lorde Christe the sonne of the
limitting parishes haue inlarged some with wyder borders and straightened some with narrower passages then was meete and conuenient So were it very good and commendable for men of wisedome in our dayes to yeelde to haue a better equallitie then that some should haue al and some neuer a whit some two or three thousand pounds by the yeare and some scarcely xx Nobles so that the pastor that now hath too little might by some meanes haue sufficient and that he that hath now too much might haue a conuenient competencie If Sempronius the taylor should make Titius his garment too short wasted and Seius his garment too long wasted it followeth not therefore that Caius the pilferer to make himselfe a garment shoulde by stealth conuey both garments away By the vnfolding of these fallacies you may iudge that if pluralitie men to serue their turne indeed could haue framed their argument skilfully they woulde then haue fashioned the same after this sort 1 Whatsoeuer is established and distinguished by man alone the same may be taken away and vnited by man alone 2 But Churches that is to saye Congregations of the Lords people pastours of these assemblies and the liuings for the pastours of these assemblyes were established and distinguished by man alone 3 Therefore Churches pastours and liuinges for pastours may be taken away and vnited by man alone Now because the Minor proposition of this Sillogisme is vtterly false therefore I conclude against pluralitie men thus 1 Whatsoeuer is established and distinguished by the Lord himselfe the same may not be taken away or vnited by man 2 But Churches that is to saye assemblyes and societies of the Lordes people pastours of these assemblies and liuings for the pastours of these assemblies are established and distinguished by the Lord himselfe 3 Therefore Churches that is to say assemblyes of people pastors and liuings for pastors may not be taken away or vnited by man THE Minor proposition of which Syllogisme to euerye man not minded to cauill at these wordes Established and distinguished is infallible and not to bee denyed for though boundes and lymittes of certayne parrishes are bordered out by man and that a certayne number of people called to make one Congregation and to heare at one time in one place one certayne pastour bee at the rule and disposition of man yet that these thinges shoulde be thus done is the speciall commaundement of the Lord. Moreouer when as this thing shal be once thus performed by man according to the Lords commaundement it shal be is lawfull for man again where the congregation is too great to make the same lesse and where it is too litle to make the same greater and in this sence I graunt that as it is lawful for man to establish distinguish so it is lawfull for man to take away and to vnite Churches and liuings But because this is not the meaning of pluralists for that they wil haue one pastor to be placed ouer many Congregations many congregations to finde one pastor many bodies to haue one head one head to haue many bodies many flocks to haue one shepheard one sheepheard to haue manie flocks Therfore mine argumēt without any cauil remaineth firm against thē And for these considerations as before so againe I deny the consequence made by plurified men for the possessing of manye benefices by one man For though by coullor of lawe they pretend right vnto them yet the law indeed yeeldeth them no such aduantage because dispensations for many benefices and parish Churches with cure of soules generally graunted are and ought by law to be vtterly voide and of none effecte as partly hath bin prooued and more at large appeareth by that that followeth Glos 1. q. 7. c. requiritis Dispensatio est iuris communis relaxatio faecta cum causae cognitione ab eo qui ius habet dispensandi A dispensation is a relaxation or release of common right graunted by him that hath power to dispence hauing first taken knowledge of the cause thereof that is hauing considered whether there bee iust cause to mooue him to graunt a priuiledge or dispensation against cōmon right or no. By which definition it is euident that Dispensare is diuersa pensare nam omnia quae ad causae cognitionem pertinent pensare debet qui Dispensare vult To Dispence is to ponder diuers thinges for he that will Dispence ought to waygh and to consider all those thinges which pertayne to the knowledge of the cause In which discriptions three thinges are principally requisite necessary First the person or iudge that hath authoritie to dispence Secondly the causes for the which dispensations may be graunted And lastly an examination or discussion of those causes So that if any dispensation or facultie whatsoeuer shall be graunted either A non Iudice by one that is no iudge either without a lawfull cause or lastly without aspeciall triall and sifting of that same lawfull cause before it passe euery such dispensation by a necessary consequence is meerely voyde because euery such dispensation agreeth not to the definition of a dispensation and therefore can not be the thing defined Glos extrauagant de prebend dignit c. execrabilis ver vltima Concerning the partie that hath power and authoritie to graunt dispensations and to take knowledge of the lawfulnesse of the causes requisite to make dispensations goodland auailable the same in this Realme is the Archdishop of Caunterbury H. 8. and vppon his refusall then such as hir highnesse shall appoynt to that office according to the forme of a statute prouided in that behalfe And therefore touching his person thus appoynted to be Iudge I conclude from the generall to the speciall as before that because the positiue lawes of man against pluralities are all grounded either vpon the law of nature or vpon the law of God And because as the lawes of nature and the lawes of God are immutable so shoulde the same positiue lawes remayne stable and vnchaungeable that therefore the Archbishop of Caunterbury beeing a man hath no more right to giue a dispensation againste the positiue lawes of man made againste pluralities then he hath to giue a dispensation againste the law of nature or against the law of God Glos extra de vot c. non est ver authoritate Extra de concel preb proposuit ver supra c. cum ad monasterium ex de statu monocho For sayth the glose in one place No dispensation against the law of nature or against the lawe of God is tollerable no not by the Pope him selfe As touching the causes wherevppon the sayde Archbishop or other officers should and ought be mooued by remitting the rigour of common right to graunt immunities and dispensations they are two fold One consisteth in the dignitie and worthinesse of the persons the other in the waightinesse of certayne speciall causes Vnto what maner of persons dispensatiōs ought to be
maruailously wounded grieued and molested and that the soules of the people are therby not gouerned at all but left at randon to their owne direction hauing no guyde to conduct them euery one may euydently discerne dispensations in that behalfe to be altogeather intollerable hauing no ground nor foundation of reason equity or lawe but onely graunted for the priuate gayne and lucre of some couetous vaine glorious persons Wheras it may be answered that the statutes of the Realme licensing diuers Ecclesiasticall persons qualified either by degree of schoole or by seruice vnto nobilitie ought more to be respected in this behalfe then the reasons of the Canon law Herevnto I answere that for my part I heartely desire and pray vnto God that these lawes might be respected and that the law of Englande might rule an English man in this case But alas our lawes are bels without clappers they are founded but they sound not they are bandes but they binde not For thogh by the statutes of the realm certain noble mens chappleines and others graduated in the Vniuersities be qualified made capable of dispensatiōs yet I deny the laws of this realm to approue any maner of dispēsations tollerable at al for any kind of these qualified men vnles the same be Frst in cases of necessity for the peace of the cōmon weal Secondly in cases of conueniency for the honor of hir highnesse person and lastly warranted by the holy scriptures lawes of god For though the statute make some men fit men for the Archb. to work vpon and as it were anuiles for him to strike vpon yet the same statute imposeth no necessity for the B. to work without the word But if it be lawful by the word then by the law he may if he wil. But if it be vnlawful by the word thē he may not thogh he would The law followeth Be it enacted that neither the king his heires and successors kinges of this realme nor any of their subiectes of this realm nor of the kinges dominions shall from thence foorth sue to the sea of Rome or vnto any person or persons hauing or pretending any authoritie by the same for licences dispensations impositions faculties grauntes rescriptes delegacies instruments or other writings of what kind name c. for the which any licence dispensation composition faculty graunt rescript delegacie instrument or other wryting heretofore hath ben vsed and accustomed to be had and obtayned at the sea of Rome or by authority therof or of any prelate of this realm nor of any maner of other licenses dispensatiōs compositions faculties grauntes rescriptes delegacies or any other instruments or writinges that in cases of necessity may lawfully be graunted without offending holy scriptures lawes of God but that from henceforth euery such licence c. aforenamed mentioned necessary for your highnes your heires or successors your their people and subiects vpon the due examination of the causes qualities of the persons procuring such dispensations licenses c. shal be granted had obtained frō time to time within this your realm other your dominions not els where in maner and form following no otherwise that is to say the Arch. of canterbury for the time being his successors shall haue power authority frō time to time by their discretions to giue grant dispose by an instrument vnder the seal of the said Archb. vnto your Maiesty and to your heires successors kings of this realm as well all maner such licenses dispensations faculties grants rescripts delegacies instruments all other writings for cases not being cōtrary or repugnant to the holy scriptures lawes of God as heretofore hath ben accustomed to be had obtained by your Highn or any your most noble progenitors or any of yours or their subiectes at the sea of Rome or any person or persons by authority of the same al other licences dispensatiōs faculties c. in for vpon al such causes matters as shal be conuenient and necessary to be had for the honor surety of your highnes your heires successors and the wealth profit of this your realm so that the said Archb. or any his successors in no maner wise shall graunt any dispensation licence rescript or any other writing afore rehearsed for any cause or matter repugnant to the law ofalmighty god This act is renued 1. Elizab. Prouided alwaies that this act nor any thing or things therin cōtained shal be hereafter interpreted or expounded that your grace your nobles subiects intend by the same to decline or vary frō the congregation of christ his church in any thing concerning the verye articles of the catholique faith of Christendome or in any other thinges declared by holy scripture and the word of God necessary for your and their saluations but onely to make an ordinance by policie necessarye and conuenient to represse vice and for good conseruation of this Realme in peace vnitie and tranquilitie from rauyne and spoyle In which Act is set foorth vnto vs what great care and circumspection our auncestors in the twilight of the Gospel had for the abolishing of corruptions the establishing of a sincere gouernment both in the Church and common weale and how diligently and faithfully they prouided that no maner of dispensatiōs licenses or immunities shold be had or obtayned but in cases of necessitie in cases not contrary or repugnant to the lawes of God in cases wherin the wealth profit peace and conseruation of the realm requireth in cases conuenient for the honor safety of the kings person with a due confideration alwaies of the causes qualities for the which of the persons to whom any licence or immunity shold be granted And therfore out of this statute first I conclude thus against plurified men 1 Whatsoeuer cause or matter is repugnant to the law of God the Archb. may not dispence with the same 2 But the matter of hauing many benefices or being Non residents is repugnant to the laws of God 3 Therfore the Archbish may not dispence with the same Againe 1 Whatsoeuer is not necessary for the wealth peace profite and conseruation of the realm the same by this statute is forbidden 2 But that one man should enioy by way of dispensation from the Archbish liuings appointed for many men is not necessary for the wealth peace profite and conseruation of the realme 3 Therefore the same is forbidden by this statute Lastly 1 Whatsoeuer is not conuenient for the honour and safety of hir highnes person the same by this statute is forbidden 2 But it is not conuenient for the honor and safety of hir highnes person to haue the Archbish disspence for many benefices 3 Therefore by this statute the Archbish is forbidden to dispence c. THe Minor proposition of the first syllogisme hath beene already sufficiently prooued by manye in fallible conclusions of Lawe and vndoubted truethes
precisely dissalowed cannot by the secōd branch of the same be generally approoued For how can one the self same law forbid and comand things so contrary and repugnant in themselues Or how can the Archbishop safely ground his iurisdiction vppon a lawe so contrary and repugnaunt vnto it selfe If the Archbyshop shall think that these two braunches may be reconciled that the meaning of the former maye and ought simply to be vnderstood as the words them selues import and that the second braunch may and ought to be vnderstoode to bound and limite such an authoritie to him selfe as whereby he might graunt such licenses as were had and obtayned at that time at the sea of Rome for matters not contrary or repugnant to the law of God yet neither by this interpretation is the Archbishop truely intituled vnto any authoritie therby to dispence for symony nonresidence many benefices marriages in Lent c. in as much as such maner of licenses obtayned at that time at the sea of Rome were obtayned for matters repugnaunt vnto the law of God and contrary to the truth of the doctrine of the Gospell and so by this statute flatly forbidden Which thinges our auncestors not thoroughly foreseeing neither duely examining for what maner of causes or matters licenses were at that time obtayned at the sea of Rome but onely in a generallitie inhibiting thinges repugnaunt vnto the law of God and neuer particularly describing what those things were but leauing the same wholy to the iudgement and discretion of one man the Archbishop alone haue fallen into two palpable absurdities the one that one man alone hath from time to time authoritie by his discretion to determine what causes are repugnaunt to the holy scriptures and lawes of God what causes matters are conuenient for the honour and safety of the King of England and what are necessary to be had for the wealth and profite of the realme three thinges of such waight and importaunce as the whole body of the realme at that time was scarceable to conceiue much lesse shall euer any one Archbish be able to practize The other absurditie is this viz. that by this statute soueraignity is giuen to the Archbishop and his successors to dispence with the king and his successors kinges and Queenes of Englande The wordes of the statute are plaine and euident But what reason is there for kinges and queenes of England to become wardes and pupils vnto an Archbishop of England Or howe agreeth it with the worde of God that a Christian king should in any sort be in subiection vnto his owne vassall Or what christian subiect dareth attempt to offer vnto his Christian soueraigne a tolleration For in case the matter of the sayde tolleration be pretended to concerne the conscience then if the matter be free and lawfull by the law of God a Christian king may as well and as freely vse the liberty of his conscience with out licence from his subiect as his subiect maye vse his freedome without dispensation from the king If it be contrary to the lawe of God then may neither a christian king neither a Christian subiecte be dispenced with For what man can dispence with the Lawe of God And in case the matter of dispensation concerne any thing appertayning vnto this life how then should the king receiue a dispensation from the Archbishop without impeaching his kingly dignitie and prerogatiue For either he must bee dispenced with for breach of the positiue Lawe of this lande and haue the payne of Lawe remitted him by the Archbishop which were to set the Archbishops keyes aboue the Kinges armes Or els he muste purchase a dispensation that he may breake his Lawe which were against his honour and safety For saith the Emperour Digna vox est maiestate regnantis legibus alligatum se principem profiteri C. De le cōstit princ l. digna It is a worde worthy the maiestie of a ruler to acknowledge himselfe as chiefe tyed vnto the lawes Moreouer this case between the king and the Archbishop is farre different from the case betweene the king and his Iustices at lawe determining matters according to the common lawes and customes of the Realme betweene the king and his subiectes For they remayne still the kinges vnderlinges and in deed giue but the kinges iudgements they iudge not the kinges person neither commeth any thing touching his person before them But dispensations from the Archbishop to the king concerne the kinges owne person The king in his royall person or by his proctor muste appeare in the Archbishops consistory he must alleage before the Archbishop sufficient matter whervpon the Archbishop but a subiect may be mooued to dispence with the King his soueraigne and finally the Kinges wisedome muste be subiected to the Archbishops discretion And therefore to confirme the Minor proposition of my third syllogisme I conclude 1 Whatsoeuer is dishonourable and dangerous for hir highnesse person the same can not be conuenient for hir honour and safetie 2 But it is dishonourable and daungerous to haue the Archbishop to dispence with hir highnesse 3 Therefore the same is not conuenient c. WHich reason also maye as well be applied to disprooue the vnlawfulnes of the Archbishops dispensations granted vnto any of hir highnes subiectes as vnto hir highnesse owne person in as much as hir kingly prerogatiue and supreame gouernment in matters lawful by the holy scriptures is therby impeached The Arch. iurisdictiō only aduanced the surety of hir royal person peace of the cōmō weal il prouided for Againe sithence euery one of sound iudgement vnderstandeth the honour and safety of hir highnesse person onely and wholly to consist in the protection and safegarde of our most mighty and most gratious God and that nothing can bee so honourable and safe for hir highnesse as humbly and reuerently to attend and to submit hir selfe to the scepter of his word the execution of this statute by the Archbishop can not be but most inconuenient and perillous for hir highnes person in as much as partly through a corrupt construction partly by a synister iudgement not rightly discerning what thinges are repugnant to the word of God the sayde Archbishop dispenseth in causes and matters contrary and repugnaunt to the holy scriptures which causeth the name of God to be euill spoken of and is a dishonour vnto God and therefore no honour nor safety vnto hir highnes person And therfore hir highnes is humbly to be intreated to take the entier dominion and whole soueraignty due vnto hir by the word of God into hir owne handes and not anye longer to suffer such a blemishe to remayne in hir gouenement Had hir highnesse moste noble Father vnderstoode his kingly person to haue vndergone the Censorship of his subiect no doubt he wold as couragiously haue fought against an Archb. as he did against an Abbot Pouerty of the person no cause for a dispensatiō As
ordayne that the Byshops and their superiours may freely dispence with those that eyther nowe do obtayne or hereafter shall obtayne vnder thee such Churches that they continuing at study for learning be not compelled to be promoted vnto orders vntill the ende of seuen yeares And though this Lawe seeme speciallye to haue respect vnto such as for studie sake are Dispensed with for not entering into the Mynisterye before the ende of seuen yeares yet the reason of the Lawe abridging the time of continuall absence and appoyntinge that the flocke be not left without one able to gouern and teach the same is to be extended to all manner of dispensations whatsoeuer where the like absence may breede the like daunger ff De. vi vi arm l. 1 §. quod vulgo ff De. legib l. non possuÌ„t Vbi eadem ratio idem ius statuendum Where one and the selfe same reason is there one the selfe same law is to be ordeined De similibus simile debet esse iudicium In cases alike a like iudgement ought to be had And it is expresly forbidden in the Chapter QVIA before mentioned that no perpetuall Dispensation for receyuing of Ecclesiasticall fruites be graunted no not by the Pope him selfe And there is expresse mention made of him that shall not be resident vpon one of his Churches that shall be Student in any Schoole of learning that shall be absent from his benefice eyther at the Court of Rome or at any other place whatsoeuer that euen such a one shall not haue any perpetuity by Dispensation thereby to receiue the fruites and profites of that Church from the which for any of those foresay de respectes he may be absent Therefore against perpetuities of Pluralities out of the Chapiter Is etiam out of the Chapter Quia before rehearsed I conclude thus 1 Euery Dispensation graunted for the enioying of the Fruites of any parish Church without limitation of a certayne time is a voyd Dispensation 2 But euery Dispensation graunted for the perpetuall receiuing of the fruites of anye Parishe Church is a Dispensation without limitation of a certaine time 3 Therefore euery such perpetuall Dispensation is a voyde Dispensation THe first Proposition of this Syllogisme is the Position of the law it selfe The minor is most plaine For whatsoeuer is perpetuall the same can not be limited and whatsoeuer is limited the same can not be perpetuall And this perpetuitie in this case an I sayde before hath euermore relation to the terme of life because he is sayd to haue a perpetuitie a benefice that hath a benefice for terme of life And to take away all synister and double dealing in this action you shal vnderstande that a dispensation graunted once for seuen yeares at the ende of the sayde seuen yeares maye not be renued and reiterated for so at the ende of euerye seuen yeares a new dispensation beeing had in effect à perpetuall dispensation might be tollerated and so a man by fraude and couen might enioy that from the which by equitie and lawe he is altogeather secluded Which fraudulent and disorderly dealing by certaine generall principles and rules in lawe is absolutely prohibited The maximes are these De diuor c. quanto §. fi de elec commissa l. 5 Extr. de regni iur c. cum quod ff de ver ad ciuili perti l. li. §. 1. No statutum ipsum fiat ludibrio debitoque frustretur effectu non rebus sed verbis cum sit potius contrarium faciendum let imposita videatur nullatenus ea vice poterit iterato conferri Quod direste prohibetur indirectè non conceditur cum quod vna via prohibetur alicui ad id alia via non debet admittiâ—… quid quis in persona sua facere prohibetur id per subiectam personam exercere non debet That the statute it selfe may not be deluded and frustrated of hir due effect and that the lawe may seeme to be made not for thinges but forwords when the contrary is rather to be done it may not by anye meanes be againe the second time conferred And that which is directly prohibited is not by another way indirectly to be suffered Whensoeuer a thing is forbidden any man one way the same man ought not to be admitted to the same thing an other waye And that which a man is forbidden to do in his owne person he ought not to exercise by a substituted person So that once againe I say if it might please God to stirre vp the hearts of hir highnes Commissioners to haue a mature and ideliberate consideratioÌ„ of the statute before mentioned they shall find matter sufficient to pronounce a great number of licenses faculties dispensations by law to be meerly voyde and of none effect And so many benefices to be voyd in the hands of hir highnes vnto whom by lapse right hath accrued to present For by that statute the Archb hath no power or authority to graunt any other licence faculty tolleration or dispensation theÌ„ such as before the making of the statute was vsed and accustomed to be had obtayned at the sea of Rome or by authority therof But no licence faculty tolleration or dispensation before that time was had or obtayned at the sea of Rome or by authoritie thereof for the Frutes of any parrish Church by way of any kinde or manner of any perpetual dispensation or for any longer time then for 7 years only as appeareth by the former Canons and constitutions therfore none other ought heretofore to haue beene graunted neither though they haue been graunted are they effectual or auailable being graunted Anon iudice contra formam iuris scripti by one that is no iudge and againste the forme of law writteÌ„ ff quod vi aut clam l. prohibeti § plane Iudex non potest vltra facere quam ei concessum est a lege vel consuetudine A iudge may not do beyond that that is graunted him by law or custome Extra de reb eccle non alienam c. It is forbidden that church goods should be alienated without a cause or without authority of the superior If therefore any alienation be made of Church goodes without a cause and 〈◊〉 by authority of the superiour the alienation is voyd 〈…〉 infectis haberi Thinges done contrary 〈◊〉 ought to be accounted as thinges vndon And againe Cod. de leg l. non dubium Cod. de precib imper offerend l. 1. Sufficit legislatorem aliquid prohibuisse licet non adâ—…cerit si contra factum fuerit non valere .. It is sâ—…fficient that the lawe maker forbid though he shall not adde that the thing don contrary to his prohibition shall be voyd And againe Imperiali constitutum est sanctione 〈…〉 ea quae contra leges fiunt non solum invtilia sed etiam pro infectis haberdit sint It is plainly decreed by an imperial constitution that the thinges done against
these two thinges must necessarily followe eyther our Byshoppes must vse the tytle of this custome which the popishe byshoppes vsed and so a corrupt tytle the consentes of the popishe Cleargye no sufficient title to barre the Lordes seruauntes or else they must challenge this custome as prescribed by some other lawfull tytle since the succession whiche cannot bee for two causes First as I sayd before they haue not bene in possession of their offices vnder the Gospell so manye yeares as are sufficient to the prescription of a custome Secondly whereas a continuall clayme by open writinges and preachinges hath beene made to the contrarie it appeareth that the possession they haue is altogether forced and violent and therefore an vniust possession And as touching the number of yeares before mentioned I would not haue the Papiste or any other take anye aduauntage by those speaches as though I ment that the Gospel hath not beene preached these threescore yeeares a time sufficient in Lawe to prescribe a custome in as muche as I knowe that the Gospell nowe preached is the same Gospell that hath beene preached from the beginning yea that hath beene from all eternity and preached by the Lorde Christe himselfe in the dayes of his humanitie and continued in his Churche euer since by his true disciples but my meaning is that since the time of the restitution thereof and of the returne of his people from out of the captiuitie of the spiritual whore of Babylon there hath not yet so many yeeres passed as may serue for a lawfull custome to the Bysh vnder the Gospell against their fellow brethren For though they succeede the Apostles and primitiue Churche in soundnes of doctrine and teach the same saluation that our sauiour himselfe taught and so haue a continuaunce and a possession of the doctrine of faith Yet thereby or therefore it followeth not that they likewise haue or may challenge the like defence for the former custome The Apostles them selues and the primitiue Church neuer vsing any such authority and therefore no such authority to be deriued or continued from them as in deed neuer begun or practized by them And therfore for this cause and in this respect also the former custome as an vnreasonable custome is in truth no custome at all For Consuetudo irrationabilis amittit nomen consuetudinis appellatur corruptela Panor in c. cum venerabilis extra de consuetud An vnreasonable custom no custome An vnreasonable custome looseth the name of a custome and is called a corruption I say this custome in the Church of Christe is an vnreasonable custome as neuer begun by the Apostles and seruauntes of Christ and therefore not to be continued by the followers successors of the Apostles the Apostles both teaching practizing the cleane contrary And therfore as euery law against the law of God is an vnreasonable law and therefore in truth no law So euerye custome against the law of God is an vnreasonable custome and so in deed no custome Consuetudo sayth Anto. de Butuo si tendit ad foelicitatem animae est rationabilis si vero repugnat fini aeterno consuetudo est irrationabilis A custome if it tende to the happinesse of the soule it is a reasonable custome but if it repugne the ende eternall the custome is vnreasonable Now that this custome where by the law of the Almightie is violated can not tende to the beatitude of the soule euery man must confesse And therefore I conclude thus 1 Euery custome not tending to the happines of the soule is an vnreasonable custome 2 But this custome that one shoulde excommunicate alone tendeth not to the happines of the soule 3 Therefore this custome is an vnreasonable custome The first proposition is the Lawe the second proposition I proue thus 1 Euery breach of the Lawe of God tendeth to the destruction of the soule 2 But this Custome is a breache of the Lawe of God 3 Therefore this custome tendeth to the destruction of the soule and if it tend to the destruction of the soule then tendeth it not to the happinesse of the soule THe seconde proposition of this syllogisme hath bene prooued before namely for that the Apostles haue taught and practised the contrary And in truth as hath beene already prooued it was begun aboue a thousand yeeres after the Apostles times and confirmed onely by a Pope vppon a politique reason drawn from the gouernment of common weales namely for that matters committed to one may in reason be easlier and speedilier dispatched then matters committed to many 1. Panor c. cum venerabilis Extra de consuet Agayne Consuetudo quae est inimica canonibus prima facie presumitur irrationabilis A custome that is enimy to the Canons is presently presumed to be vnreasonable Nowe the auncient Canons you haue seene before to be contrary and therfore what may be concluded let euery one iudge And hereby two other notable defects and impediments appeare againe to be in this custome which cannot be in any custome lawfully prescribed A custome not begun in good faith no lawful custome The one that it was not begun Bona fide iusto titulo By good fayth and vppon a iust Title the other that it was begun thorough want of the knowledge of the trueth and so ignorauntlye and erroniously which I prooue thus Whatsoeuer is begunne and continued in the Churche agaynst or without the commaundement of GOD as the same must needes bee begun Mala fide iniusto titulo by an euill conscience and by an vnlawfull title so must it followe that the same is begunne also without knowledge of the truethe for that neyther any good fayth neyther any trueth can bee founde to bee in any thing that is contrarye or without the worde of God And therefore this custome is agayne for these two respects vtterlye vnreasonable and therefore doth not excuse agaynste common righte Extra de consuet c. cum olim Quia consuetudo excusat in hiis quae sunt contra ius positiuum dum tamen sit rationabilis prescripta Because Custome excuseth in those thinges which are agaynste Positiue Lawe so the same bee reasonable and prescribed Nowe that no Byshoppe by common right coulde excommunicate correct or punish his subiectes alone before the time that Boniface the eyghte had giuen sentence for the Byshoppe of Pictauia Lib. 6. de consuet c. non est agaynste the Deane and Chapter of the same Churche complayning that the Byshoppe had dealt iniuriouslye with them for that hee had exercised Ecclesiasticall Discipline vvithout theire Counsayle hath beene alreadye prooued by the Canons and Constitutions before specified Which Canons were decreed long before and nearer the Apostles time and accordinge to the practise and vsadge of the aunciente Fathers And therefore since this Custome hath had a beginning but in the time of Boniface the eyghte no lawefull successor of the Apostles and that vppon a reason of pollitike
Lyndw. ne clerici vel monac c. vlt. PRESENTI DECRETO c. Wee ordeyne by this present decree that Clearkes beneficed or placed in holy orders bee neyther admitted gouerners of Villadges as to be Stewards or Bayliffes of such administrations by occasion whereof they might be lyable to make accounts vnto laye men neyther yet that they exercise anye secular iurisdiction speciallye those whereunto iudgement of bloode is annexed And from these decrees I conclude thus 1 Whosoeuer ought to attend vppon the alter and to giue him selfe to prayer and making of supplication ought not by anye testament to bee made a Tutor or Gardian 2 But euery one honored with the holy priesthood and placed in the ministery of Clearkes ought to attend vppon the Alter and apply him selfe to prayer making of supplication 3 Therefore none honoured c. and placed c. ought by any testament to bee made a Tutor or Gardian 1 Whosoeuer is gouernour of any Village Steward or Bayliffe of anye liberty or bayliwicke is by vertue of his office accountable to the laytie 2 But no Clearke beneficed or otherwise placed in holy orders by occasion of temporall officers ought to bee accountable to lay men 3 Therefore noe Clearke beneficed or anye other placed in holye orders ought to bee anye Gouernour Steward or Bayliffe THE lyke constitution was made by Octobone sometimes Legate from the Popes side here in Englande and speciallye publyshed againste the excesse of our Englishe Cleargy in this behalfe Constitu Octob. ne clerici iuris secular exerceant CVM HONESTATIS c. Insomuch as it is reputed a speciall decency of ecclesiastical honesty to be farre estranged from carnall actions we deeme it a very heynous and filthy thing that handes deputed vnto heauenly ministeries shoulde be intangled with secular affayres Or that certaine Clearkes seeking after earthly gaines and temporall iurisdiction thorowe a foule and greedy rauine doe receiue from lay men seculer iurisdiction and be called Iusticers and minister iustice which they cannot minister without a dissipation and iniury of ecclesiasticall order Therefore we desirous to extirpate this horrible vice straightly forbid all persons of churches and Vicars with perpetuities yea also all other manner of persons whatsoeuer placed in the ministery that they presume not to take any secular iurisdiction of any secular person or to exercise the same according to the precepts of holy Canons by this present Constitution we straightly inhibite that none placed in spirituall warfare presume to exercise in the secular court the office of an aduocate eyther in the cause of bloud or in any cause whatsouer saue onely in such causes as are permitted vnto him by Law And we likewise forbid that any cleargy man shoulde presume to bee eyther a iudge or an assessor Which constitutiō of Octobone as it seemeth in some sence and in some respect to exempt cleargy men altogether from the power and soueraignty of Kings and princes denying them indeed power ouer the Cleargy and so in this sense be contrary and repugnant to her highnesse Crowne and prerogatiue royall and therefore not authorised by act of Parliament though in the end the same Legate seeme to allowe the Kings priuiledges adding these words Saluis domini Regis priuilegiis Sauing the priuiledge of my Lorde the King So in another respect and in another sence if regard be had to the generall equitye of the inhibition we shall finde the same to agree altogether with the reasons of the former prouisions For in this constitution the Legate allegeth other reasons then before were alleaged and forbiddeth other offices then by the former were forbidden The reasons may be gathered thus 1 Whatsoeuer is iniurious vnto the ministerye or breedeth a dissipation of the ministerye the same may not be lawfully layde vppon the ministery 2 But to be deputed a minister of iustice to be made an aduocate a Iudge or an assessor is iniurious to the ministerye and breedeth a dissipation thereof 3 Therefore these offices may not be deputed vnto them 1 Whatsoeuer may be cause that the cleargy by any foule fault should swarue from the workes of fayth the same may not lawfully be layde vpon the cleargy 2 But to be made a Iustice an aduocate a iudge an assessor in seculer Courts may be cause that the Cleargye shoulde swarue from the workes of faith 3 Therefore Cleargye men lawfully maye not bee made Iustices aduocates Iudges or assessors in seculer courtes WHich two reasons of this prouinciall decree may probablie seeme to haue beene collected out of some more auncient Canons long before that time established wherby the like offices were forbidden and principally for these causes following 21. q 3. peruenit Gloss non exerceant Extra de vit honest cler c. clerici consecratio distinc 5. c. First that for filthy lucres sake they meddle not with taking to hire possessions seculer causes Secondly that thorough slouth idlenesse they separate not themselues from the holy ministeries Thirdly that they runne not a gadding to the Courtes of seculer princes And lastly because the Psalter should neuer be out of their handes And not onely vpon these groundes haue these Lawes at the first had their essence and establishment but sundry other considerations as forceable as these are apparantly known to the learned in the laws for the ouerthrow of ciuill Iurisdiction in ecclesiastical men In the administration of ciuil Iustice euery one in commission of peace without respect eyther of the person or of the cause oughte indifferenly and vnpartially to execute his office For bee a man once sworn in commission of peace he may not afterwards deale with hearing of what causes he list hee may not take notice of halfepeny matters and post ouer matters of bloud to his fellow iustice hee may not onely set an ende betweene neighbour and neighbour for shrewde wordes passed but he must prosecute the murtherer to death he must take his examination and he must send him with a Mittimus to the Iaile He must at the generall Sessions of gayle deliuery certifie the murtherers confession Now because it is a matter very haynous by the ecclesiasticall lawe in force that any ecclesiasticall person shoulde bee present in any place where any sentence is giuen for the sheading of bloud much lesse to bee a minister of Iustice in a cause of bloud Therefore ciuill iurisdiction for this cause also is forbidden ecclesiastical men And among many constitutions I haue thought good to recite onely these that follow Extra ne cleric vel mon. c. clericis CLERICIS IN SACRIS ORDINIBVS c. It is not lawfull by the Councell of Toletane for Clearkes placed in holy orders to handle iudgement of bloude Wherfore we prohibit that they by them selues neyther chop of any members or cause any to be chepped off For if any shall doe such a thing let him be depriued of his honour and of his place And agayne
Extra ne cleric vel monac c. sententiam A Byshop may not bee a iustice of peace in cause of bloud SENTENTIAM c. Let no Clearke indite or pronounce a sentence of bloud neither let him put in execution any sentence of Bloude or bee present where it is exercised Neither let any clearke indite or write Letters to bee destined for the auengement of bloud Therefore in the courts of princes let not this care be committed to Clearkes but to lay men And agayne Extra de exces prelat c. extra EPISCOPVS cuius authoritate c. Abishop by whose authority manslaughter is committed is deposed from the ministery of the Alter and from his pontificall office and from the administration of his Bishopricke A Bishop eyther directly or indirectly giuing cause that manslaughter be committed the same being committed ought to be depriued from his Byshoply and Priestly office to be remooued from the administration of his Bishopricke And that this Chapter may not seeme sayth the Glosse to be vnderstood of manslaughter or murder vniustly committed or perpetrated these words are added in the Text Quia propter furtum quidam fur suspensus erat Because for theft a certayn theefe was hanged In the time of Henrie the second I finde that the sayde King gaue certayne Priuiledges and immunities vnto the cleargy the Tenor of which graunt ensueth Math. Pari. H. 2. fol. 185. ARCHIEPISCOPI EPISCOPI c. The Archbishops Byshops and all persons of the kingdome which hold of the King in cheefe let them haue their possessions of the King as a barony and thereof let them aunswere to the Kings Iusticers and Ministers and let them follow and doe all the Kings customes and as other Baronnies so shall they be present in iudgementes of the Kings Court with the Baronnes vntill the matter come to the losse of member or to death By which priuiledge graunted vnto the cleargy as I suppose our Bishops at this day haue their seates in the Starre Chamber and are Lordes of the Parliament house For before the graunt made by this King it doth not appeare they had any such priuiledges the words of the king not ratifiyng or confirming any former graunt made by his auncestors and predecessours Kings of England as in all giftes of confirmation vsually is done but gratifiyng his Clergy and other of his subiectes by giuing them newe liberties and franchises whereof before his time they were not possessed for in the graunt there is no repetition or mention of an Inspeximus wee haue seene the charters of our father grandfather or great grandfather but here is a meere and absolute graunte deriued principallye from the kings owne person H. 2. Whereby I gather that these offices in Cleargy men haue not bene of any long continuance in England and that by the ancient laws and customs of England they do not properly belong vnto them onely the King by his prerogatiue hauing power to make Barons at his royal pleasure and to appoint Iudges in his Courtes at his gratious will hath by the same his Prerogatiue graunted vnto the Cleargy that which before time by the common laws of his Empire did not appertayn vnto them and that therefore as the common weale was gouerned iustice ministred and lawes executed in the Kings Courts by the Barons before the time of this graunt by H. 2. without the ayde and assistaunce of Cleargye men euen so might the common weale at this day be as well gouerned by the like gouernment without any help frō any of them as in deede and truth the same in matters of pollicye and greate state these 24. yeares hath bene wonderfully gouerned without them For which of the Cleargy men since the Lorde sealed vp the eyes of Queene Mary hath once set his foote within the Councell Chamber dore to consult with the Nobility of matters of state Which of them hath carried any sway or borne any stroake in the Starre Chamber otherwise then as the punie Baron there hath doone And if Archbish and Bysh may be spared in the Parliament house yea may not come into that assembly at all whensoeuer any statute is to be made touching felony or treason or the losse of any member or sheading of any bloud◠I see not but they may as well be spared in matters of possessions and inheritaunces and in other matters of state and pollicy whatsoeuer and so much more rather in these then in the former by how much more the life of man is more precious then all other earthly possessions or treasures And by howe much more the taking away of the life of an innocent is more odible and heynons before the Lorde in case it be not done according to his worde In which matters the diuines are fittest to bee consulted with and whose counsels are not to be omitted least life bee taken away where it is forbidden or death take no place where it is commaunded But be it so that our B. may pretend their iurisdiction in ciuill causes to bee more auncient then from the time of K. H. the second yea be it that they may deriue the same from Edgar or Canutus before the conquest yet because Canutus ordayned that the B. of the Diocesse should be present at the Courtes of euery shire onely to teach the people Gods Lawe as Edgar before him had appointed the Shirife to be present at the assemblies and Synodes holden by the Cleargy twise a yeare onely to teach the same clergy mans Lawe namely the lawe of the Realme They are not to boast of Antiquity for their iurisdiction in causes ciuill They haue beene appointed long sithence to meete in deede in Ciuill Courts but onely to exercise the spirituall sworde But were it so that by the Lawes of Edgar and Canutus they might seeme to challendge great regalities dignities and immunities yet they know that by the Lawes of the first King and last King of the most noble most highest and most holiest king the king of al Kings our Lord Iesus Christ whose vassalls in worde they professe themselues to bee they haue no such enfranchisemēts granted vnto them yea rather that they be precisely willed being ministers of the gospel not to be called Lords or to be deuiders of inheritaunces But we will goe forward For not onely the decrees and ordinances before mentioned against seculer iurisdiction and ciuill offices in Ecclesiasticall men haue bene made and published by the B. of Rome and his Legates or Messengers for the regiment of his Cleargy a kinde of people as he saith onely to be gouerned by such positiue lawes as proceede from his brest Ciuil gouernment forbidden by the ciuill law to ecclesiasticall men But the Emperour also by the Lawes of his Empire hath directlye and absolutely commaunded the same ALIVM AVTEM FIERI c. But we suffer not a Byshop or an elder in his owne name or in the name of his Church or ministery to be made a receiuer or
of this nature it is not of the nature of a priuate action betweene man and man nor of suite commenced betweene party and party but the case herein standeth betweene a meane person or a meere periuate man and the whole Church yea betweene the Lorde of Heauen and earth and a Byshop his pore creature It is not I say whether the same should bee executed by man onely because Firmius est iudicium quod plurimorum sententia confirmatur or by fewe vt facilius expedirentur negotia But whether the same should be executed onely by many and not by one because the ordinaunce of God is so And therefore the case standeth in effect thus whether a lawfull prescription by an Archbysh or Byshop agaynst a Deane and Chapter or the custome of an Archdeacon against Archbysh Bysh and Deane and Chapter by the Canon Lawe be a sound substantiall prescription and custome against the whole Church against the family of the Lord and against his ordinance For at the beginning it was not so Whereunto I aunswere that as Nullum tempus currit Regi nullum tempus currit reipub No time runneth against the King no time runneth against the common wealth so in this case and all other of the like nature Nullum tempus currit ecelesiae nullum tempus currit domino No time runneth the Church and no time runneth against the Lorde And therefore though the Byshop may perhaps affirme him selfe to haue obtayned right by prescription to excommunicate without any aduise of the Deane and Chapter yet shall he neuer be able to prooue that hee hath therefore lawfull authority to excommunicate alone sithence the vsadge of the first Church and the ordinaunce of the Lorde are quite and cleane agaynst his sayde assertion Yea I say more namely that euen by the Canon Law it selfe neither Archb. nor B. can truely iustifie any Excōmunication by one man alone at all the said popish custom now ceasing to be any more a custome For in deed the reason of this custome ceaseth to be any more a reasō for such a custom in our time the reason of the former lawes made before this custome vrgeth the same lawes to be practized again now a dayes And therfore as Cessante causa cessare debet effectus the cause ceasing the effect ought to cease vrgente ratione legis vrgenda est lex The reason of the Law vrging the Lawe is to be vrged So the sayde popishe custome ought in deede to cease and the sayde Canon Lawes ought to bee obserued Neyther is the Canon of Boniface the eyght made for the sayd custome any impediment hereunto First for that the saide custome is meerely against the worde of God with which no Pope coulde euer dispence And therefore as contrary to the Apologie of the fayth of the Church of England by no intendement of any statute or statute makers in England confirmed Secondly the Canon of Boniface made to confirme a custom not participating the nature properties and inseparable accidents of euerie good and laudable custome but onely made by a lawles absolute power contrary to the principles and axioms of Law is not confirmed by the statute of 25. vnlesse wee absurdly graunt eyther the said statute to confirme lawfull Canons and a law lesse custome or seuerally to establish a lawlesse custome and to infringe lawfull Canons For this decree of Boniface approoueth and ratifieth such a custome as hath no maner of fellowship or societie with any lawfull custom But to let these things passe and no further to vrge the defecte of the reason of the custome to abolish the custome or the efficacie of the reasons of the Law to establishe againe the law Let vs returne to the lawes and decrees before rehearsed authorising custom to binde as effectually as a law and by them let vs see whether this custome that one shoulde excommunicate alone authorized by Boniface the 8. participate the nature and proprieties of euery such custome as whereof mention is made in the lawes and decrees and if not then let vs conclude the same to be no custome at all Euery vsage is not a custome if no custome then no maner of excommunication either by lawe or custome to be vsed at all For euery vse creptin continued some long space is not therefore by and by a custom so of the nature of a law and of such power as foorthwith it may sholder out written law control cōmon right ff de consti princi l. in rebus Extra de prebend c. liceat de cleric non residen c. consuetudinē §. statuimus lib. 6. ff de legi l. Quod non Glos in c. aqua extra de consecr eccle ver consuetudine In rebus nouis constituendis euidens vtilitas esse debet vt recedatur ab eo iure quod diu obtentum est In ordeining new policies there ought to be an euident cōmodity for that law to be left that a long time hath bin obserued And againe Quod non ratione introductum est sed errore primum deinde consuetudine obtentū in aliis similibus non obtinet that that at the first was not begon by reasō but by error afterwards obteined by custom hath no place in other like cases Consuetudo quae est contra iuris naturam non prodest contra illudius non potest prescribi A custom that is against the nature of law profiteth not and against that law no prescriptiō may be For if the same shal be erronious vnreasonable not lawfully prescribed then is it of sufficient force to expel the law writtē therfore as hurtfull and preiudiciall for the gouernment of the church here after to be abrogated abolished For custome is no more priueledged then a lawe but as a law may be made dead taken away by a custome so like wise may a custome be made dead again by reuiuing a former law And though here might be vsed a peremptory chalenge against this custom begun continued in the popishe Synagogue contrary to the custome of the Church of Christ that for that cause in that respect only the same is farre vnmeet for vs therfore by vs to be vtterly abandoned Yet because we are as yet I can not tell how not altogether freed from the lawes and customes of the popish synagogue Let vs vse the reason of the same lawes to ouerthrow the same custome Neyther yet shoulde any man thinke that therefore the former popish lawes are to be approued as meete lawes for the Church of Christ to be gouerned by For weare there no other grounde of trueth that one shoulde not Excommunicate alone but the reason of the Popish law the obseruation therof wold not be vrged But because wee haue the trueth it selfe confirmed vnto vs at the commandement of the Lord by the Apostles mouth practised by the moste auncient fathers and by their authority and example drawn into
the popish Synagogue vntill the year of our Lord 1295. as the Canons before mencioned doe witnesse for this cause and in this respect onely are these former lawes to be put in execution and the former custome is to be abrogated The lawes woulde bee kept because in effect they containe the purity of the truth the custome woulde be left because the same degenerateth from the simplicity and practise of the former times and is but a meere corruption and a lawlesse deuise of a lawlesse Pope Boniface the eight And that euery one may be well and thoroughly instructed touching the reasons of the lawes following to ouerthrow the former custome hee is diligently to consider that as the Papistical synagogue always fashioned framed her selfe in obedience to her King his lawes and euermore liked that that her King liked and misliked that that he misliked so the congregation of Christe hath alwayes humbled herselfe vnto the will and pleasure of her Lorde and King Christe she hath consented to that onely that hath beene pleasaunt in his sight and hath dissented from whatsoeuer was displeasing vnto him euery one ought to consider that the Popes clergy are not the Lordes people their errours cannot agree with our trueth their ignorance with our knowledge their furie with our peace their deuill with our God their Beliall with our Christ And therefore though the foresayde custome be begon and still continued in the popishe synagogue as ratified by the secret consent of the popes subiectes Yet the same custome ought not eyther to be begone or to be continued in the Churche of Christ as indeede a custome neuer yet by the consent of the Lord himselfe nor any his faithful seruaÌ„ts approued to be any whit expedieÌ„t or necessarie for the good gouernment of his church And hauing thus layde this foundation it is farther to be vnderstoode that euery reasonable custome euerie custome not erronious and lawfully prescribed ought to haue these properties following The firste is this viz. It must be begon and continued ff de leg l. sed et Tacita ciuium conuentione by a secret couenaunt of the citizens agreeing together a long time and by many yeares vsing the same and doing some certayne actes therein For Gloss institu de iure natur § sine script ver consensu consuetudo est quasi communis assuetudo A custom is as it were a coÌ„mon vsage vnto which vse the consent of the people is necessarie and therefore error being contrarie to consent euermore hindereth and letteth a custome Extr. de Do. contumâ— c. 1. Consuetudo quae apud quosdam irrepserat impodire non debet quo minus preualeat veritas vincat A custome crept in amongst certaine ought not to hinder that the trueth preuayle not and ouercome And therfore though the Popes cleargie a long time and by many yeeres passed haue obserued and vsed this custome and haue secretly couenaunted giuen their consent and by their silence haue agreed together that Byshopps and other chiefe officers in their synagogues hauing iurisdiction might excommunicate alone yet the authoritie gotten after this sort by those Byshops in the time of papistrie doth little aduauntage or profit our Byshops in the time of the Gospell For what preiudice can the couenaunt of the popishe Clergye worke against the Citizens of the Lord the professours of the Gospel For though those Byshops haue vsed this authoritie by the space well nighe of three hundred yeares what is that to our Byshops who haue not had the vse possession and light of the Gospell scarcelye threescore yeares in whiche time too there hath beene a continuall outcry made by the Lords seruants against this abuse and a contynuall clayme for the restitution of the Lords owne order that the Lords people might be gouerned and ruled according to his ordinances And therefore that this custome cannot binde the Lords seruauntes I conclude thus 1 They who haue not secretly consented to this custome are not bounde by this custome 2 But the seruaunts of the Lord haue not secretely consented to this custome ff de legib l. de quibus 3 Therefore they are not bound by this custome THe first proposition is the lawe it selfe the second proposition I confirme thus At the beginninge of this custome it is euideÌ„t that the family of the Lord was very smale and the same oppressed in captiuity it beeing in seruitude and bondage coulde not freelye giue any secreat consent to any gouerment all manner of gouenrment beeing violently taken from them And as touching the time since the publishing of the gopsel how far they haue beene from yelding any priuie consent hitherto as well both the open and publicke protestations by the preachinges and writings of manye notable men in the churches with vs as also the vse practice of all reformed churches els where doe manyfest the cleane contrary to the whole world by means whereof the Byshops vnder the Gospell though they haue hitherto vsed authority to excommunicate alone yet therby haue they not gayned any iust title interest or dominioÌ„ therunto For that as yet they haue neuer proued themselues to haue any quiet and peaceable possession of this their iurisdiction and therefore cannot vse this pretensed custome as a lawfull defence against their bretherne and fellow seruaunts Cod de prescript â—rigi vel quadra anni l. si quis l. vlt. Extra de prescript c. sanctorum CONSVETVDO siue possessio debet esse pacifica non violenta sine interruptione ad hoc vt prescriptio locuÌ„ habeat A custome or possession ought to be peaceable not forced without interruption to the end prescription may take place And therfore I conclude againste this custome thus 1 Euerie vnpeaceable forced custom is an vnlawfull custome 2 But this custome that one should excommunicat alone is an vnpeaceable a forced custome 3 Therefore this custome is an vnlawfull custome THe first proposition is the law the second propositioÌ„ our knowledge experieÌ„ce teacheth vs euideÌ„tly inough for though this custome be peaceable in the popish synagogue yet it followeth not that the same therfore is peaceable in the church of Christe For the quiet possession of the predecessor is not coÌ„tinued vnto the successor or any whit aduantageth the successor vnles the successor challeÌ„ge his possession by the same cause by the same title that his predecessor did If the same will in his persoÌ„ continue the possession of his AuÌ„cestor so by prescriptioÌ„ atcheiue the dominioÌ„ or proprieti of any thing he must coÌ„tinue the possessioÌ„ by the same title that his AuÌ„cestor begaÌ„ the possessioÌ„ And therfore sitheÌ„ce our Byshops vnder the gospell the popish Bishops by fictioÌ„ of law be one the selfe same persoÌ„ therfore by al inteÌ„ts coÌ„structioÌ„s of law must of necessity vse the self same title for the continuaunce of their possession and the prescription of their custome one of