Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	authority_n	church_n	see_v	1,737	5	3.7569	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A43640	The third part of Naked truth, or, Some serious considerations, that are of high concern to the ruling clergy of England, Scotland, or any other Protestant nation and also a discovery of the excellency of the Protestant religion as it stands in opposition to papistical delusions, being a representation of what is the true glory of Protestants, and what are the base, contemptible and ridiculous principles, on which those that are called Roman Catholicks do build, as upon the sand being very necessary for all Protestant families in this present juncture of time.; Naked truth. Part 3	Hickeringill, Edmund, 1631-1708.	1681 (1681)	Wing H1830; ESTC R2673	42,995	50

Heart smote him And some things he was about to do for the prevention of which he gave solemn thanks to God For we find that Davids Heart smote him after he had numbered the people and after he had but cut off the Skirt of Sauls Garment 2 Sam. 24.10 and 1 Sam. 24.5 And he gives solemn Thanks for Abigails being an Instrument to prevent him from shedding Blood 1 Sam. 25.32 For if the Church of Rome do punish others really and indeed upon the Principle of Disobeying her Authority though she dare not pretend this openly lest her Cruelty and Blood-Guiltiness being for no other Cause should be so manifest that it would never be able to admit of a competent Apology Colour or Excuse And therefore leaving this she insists upon the Ground of Her Persecution as it is for Herefie only But if we on the other hand punish others not only with loss of Goods but with loss of Liberty Banishment and perpetual Imprisonment which is far more Cruelty than Immediate Death it self and would be more willingly chosen by most men and do all this for a Non-conformity and Disobedience to the Orders and Rites of the Church without so much as a pretence to any Guilt of Heresie Then Where is the difference between these two sorts of Persecutors unless the Ruling Clergy of our Church have done it more daringly and more Broad-facedly than the Church of Rome doth But which is more to be considered and laid to heart If the Church of Rome do not punish those that acknowledge her to be a True Church but those only that condemn her as a false Church and who do under this Notion professedly separate from her as from that Babylon mentioned in the Revelations And if we on the other hand punish those that own not only the same Faith and Doctrine But the very same Principles of Reformation with our selves and who therefore give no just Provocation nor use any such reproachful Language to our Church as the Protestant Churches generally do to the Church of Rome Where then is the difference unless it be that she renders evil to her professed Enemies who cannot but openly own a Hatred and Contempt for her We inflict all manner of Evil upon our Brethren that supplicate for Peace with us and would be glad not to separate from us and which of these two then is the more ingenious But which is yet more If we as we are Protestants cannot but grant that there is to be a Subordination of the Church not only immediately to the Lord Jesus Christ himself but to HIS Word and that we utterly deny that he hath any such One as a Vicar upon the Earth and utterly deny that any man whatever hath any power to dispence with the Commands of our Lord Jesus Christ so far as they appear to be clear to us from his Word wherefore if we notwithstanding we make these things to be the very Profession of our Faith yet shall never punish any But such as keep exactly to all and every of these Principles and shall observe them conscientiously and strictly Whereas the Popish Clergy on the contrary punish none but such only who deny or oppose wholly the things which their Church affirms Where then is the Reasonableness of our Punishment and the Unreasonableness of theirs and which of these two hath the greater Resemblance of Hypocrisie even in our own Judgment whether our Punishment or theirs seeing we punish men for following the Principles we allow They never punish any but for following those Principles that they totally disallow But the evil of this Persecution further appears thus for if we as Protestants say we have separated from the Church of Rome out of Conscience First because she imposed those things that were Inscriptural upon us And secondly because she was guilty of Blood and that the Characters of a false Church did for both these Reasons lye upon her and therefore that we cannot but give thanks solemnly unto God for our Deliverance out of her power And if the Ruling Clergy of a Protestant Church have nevertheless not spared to persecute unto Blood even those that have not only out of the same two Motives separated with us But by persisting constantly in the said Motives do daily justifie us How comes our Blood and Persecution to be less sinful than hers and why should it be less crying unto God for had we never so intently studied how we might have put the greatest stumbling-Block we could before our Adversaries or how we might have brought the greatest Blemish Scandal and Reproach that was possible upon our Reformation or how we might have opened the Complaints and Exclamations of men most against us What Course could possibly have been taken to all these ends that could have been more effectual than this For how can he that is thus persecuted by the Ruling Clergy of a Protestant Church give Thanks unto God solemnly for his Deliverance out of the Church of Rome's Thraldom when the very same Persons that pretend to be delivered with him Imposeth nevertheless the like Thraldom upon him Or how shall he that is thus persecuted be any way able to imagine and much less to believe that the Church which persecutes him is serious in her Profession of Thanks unto God for her own freedom when she is no sooner freed her self but she brings others into the same Hardship and Servitude that she her self did but a little while since greatly complain of and groan under But leaving these things to be most seriously considered by all Protestant Churches in these three Kingdoms and elsewhere even by all whomsoever they Concern I shall now proceed to give in this place A Description of the Absurd Ridiculous and Contemptible Grounds and Foundations on which the Papists Build Though nothing is more Evident than this that the Thraldom or Bondage of the Church of Rome doth principally consist in the disagreeableness of her Doctrines to the Rule of the Scripture yet nevertheless it is Matter of Fact That the Church of Rome doth not in plain and express Terms deny the Truth or deny the Authority of the Scripture or deny the end of them as they are appointed for the Church And if we cannot for this Cause justly charge her with any of these things Then we must necessarily grant that the said Doctrines so far as they are corrupt and have a real Inconsistency with the Scripture it self could have their Rise at first no otherwise Than by vertue of her Authority as a Church And consequently that as they had thus their Rise at first so they have had their whole Maintenance and Support ever since no otherwise than as this Authority being Absolute and Arbitrary hath defended them against whatever might be said from the Authority of the Scripture in opposition to them And therefore here we shall lay open her Shame and Nakedness and her great Absurdity that lyeth in the Manner and Method and

just ground to examine her Doctrines or Authority by it and to withdraw from her or to assert there is a necessity that divers things should be reformed in her And for this Reason it is therefore that she neither hath any Subjects nor can or will admit of any to be her Subjects whether of the Laity or Clergy who will not withdraw their Obedience immediately from the Letter of the said word and from the Authority of it and give it to her as a Church Which injury against the Authority of the Scripture or written Letter of the word of it as it is therefore knowingly wittingly and willingly committed by the Church of Rome must for this cause be much the greater But the greatness and heinousness of it is made most manifest by that Argument which the Apostle useth Heb. 2.2 3. Heb. 10.28 29. Heb. 12.25 For if the Law or Covenant of Moses how divine soever was given to the Church nevertheless by one that was no more than a Servant only in Gods house And if that the Grace and Truth which came by Jesus Christ was given us by the only Son of God who was properly the Lord himself of the House Then a Sin or Crime done purposely against the Gospel of Christ and out of a real intent or design to turn men from the express Word or Letter of that Law or Covenant which was set up by Christ must be a far greater Evil or Impiety against God than the like sin attempted against the Law of Moses with a purpose or intent to turn men from the Letter and express Word of it There is such Force and Strength in this Argument added to what hath been already said as there needs no more to be said to manifest the abominableness of this Evil and therefore we shall herewith conclude this Discourse as with that great word of Truth which ought in this case to be most of all pondered and considered by them whom it most concerns For if it were evil in any even in him that had the name of a Prophet to turn men from the Law or from the Word of Moses who was but the Servant of God with an intent that they should rely upon another word different from it even upon his Word or upon such a Sign or Wonder as was wrought by him who did desire so to turn them from Moses and if this was such an Evil as was by Gods own Command to be punished absolutely with Death Then how much greater evil must it be in the sight of God to go about to turn men from the express Word and Law of the Lord Christ who was the only begotten Son of God with an intent that they should rely upon another Word different from it and to do this not only wilfully but avowedly and professedly by preaching to men openly that it is not their duty to rely upon the Word of Christ as it is immediately and expresly set down by the Holy Spirit but upon the Church only and what the Church shall declare to them concerning the said Word and when to effect this also the better men shall throw so great Contempt and Scandal upon the said Word as to affirm it to be so dark and confused that no certain or infallible Sence either is in it or can possibly be had from it And if this sin were the greater under the Law because of those Miracles which God had wrought by Moses to testifie him to be the Servant of himself Then it must be an aggravation of the said sin under the Gospel Because God hath not only by Miracles but even by Moses himself and by many other means and ways in his Providence born a far greater Testimony to the Lord Jesus Christ than ever he did bear unto Moses and hath abundantly manifested That he was the Only begotten Son of himself And if any man under the Law that did attempt to turn men from the word of the said Law was to be accounted as a false Prophet much more then ought he to be so accounted that doth both with all Industry and set Design indeavour to do this under the Gospel FINIS

equally and with as good warrant be alledged Secondly she discerns that if she should allow the Grammar of the Scripture to be Authoritative at all she should never be able to prevent the pretences that others would have even among the Laity it self to be as competent Judges of the said Grammar as her self Thirdly besides these two extreme Inconveniences which by her are not to be endured she evidently also seeth that the Words of Scripture themselves will not of themselves by any literal Construction or Exposition of them be sufficient to prove any such Authority as she claims and that should the words of the Scripture be urged therefore no further than according to the express Tenor of them or according to the sence that the Grammar it self would bear of them she should be so far from gaining the Power and Commission which she pretends to have a Warrant for that instead of it she should expose her Authority to a manifest hazard even not only to be sifted ventilated and discussed by others but as freely censured by such as should observe the nature of her Inferences and how weakly and infirmly they are deduced with respect to the genuine Force or Construction of the words themselves And therefore as for all these Reasons she apparently discerns that the Grammar of the Scripture is an Adversary absolutely to her so she doth as smartly and dexterously perceive that the Scripture it self were the Authority of it allowed to be in the Grammar would be as great an Enemy every way to her as even the literal and Grammatical Sence of it is For in as much as these three things are at once both equally and necessarily Incumbent upon her and such as cannot any of them possibly be dispensed with by her viz. First to prove the peculiarity of her Authority above any other Church beside her whatever And Secondly to justifie the Incorruption of her Doctrine And Thirdly to preserve the pretence that she hath by this consequently to Infallibility And seeing these three do so much concern her that it is a thing very plain and very easie to perceive that unless they can all be maintained upheld and defended in some measure rationally by her she can no way keep up her temporal Power nor any way avoid a lyableness to a Reformation Wherefore having upon a due and serious survey of the Letter and Grammar of the Holy Scripture sufficiently found and clearly observed that the Scripture as thus strictly considered in the Order Disposition and Construction of its Letter will never be serviceable to her in any one of these three Respects but will on the contrary expresly oppose her As she is hereby expresly convinced then that there can be no cause why she should magnifie the express word of it and much less any cause why she should trust in it or appeal to it so lest that others should be carried away with a rational Opinion of it and should for this cause be induced to urge and press several things against her from it She saw it but necessary that she should come to a deliberate Resolution with her self To weaken the Credit of the Scripture wholly and not only to deny all Authority and even all Divinity it self to be in the Word Letter and Grammar of the Scripture strictly considered by it self but to deny also that any Sence is capable to be certainly had from it or any truth that is infallible which how hold a thing soever it might seem to be yet she saw it no way avoidable by her because she had no way besides this to secure her self against all that Inconveniency that she knew the Scripture would and must otherwise cast upon her necessarily by vertue of the expressness and Authority of its Letter Having then taken up this Resolution in the first place considering nevertheless maturely with her self that if she should cast off all her Relation to the Scripture wholly and entirely she could not maintain the very Authority of the Church it self and much less should be able to defend either the Divinity or the Infallibility of those things that are sought by her She therefore cometh to a second Resolution which she judgeth no less necessary and expedient for her than the former viz. To maintain the Divinity and set up the Authority absolutely of the Scripture though not in the express Letter of it nor in the Sence proper to it yet as we have said already in another Sence that she sets up instead of it That is according to such a Sence which she judges convenient that she her self should as a Church put upon it and put upon it in such manner also and with such a Construction and Exposition as might be most sutable to her own end and most answerable to her own particular Interest which Sence she therefore stiles by the specious Name or Appellation of the Catholick Sence or of the Sence of the Universal Church in distinction at least from and for the better avoiding of that Sence which is truly literal and is properly Constructive and Grammatical And as it is this Sence alone therefore as Catholick that she confines both the Authority and Divinity of the Scripture to and that also entirely So she doth this in her own more than ordinary Judgment and Prudence In regard she is sure that this Sence will never fail her but will always be ready to abett whatever shall upon any occasion be determined by her Because this Sence requires no deeper Reason nor any firmer Bottom or Ground at any time for it Than what resolves it self at length into the meer arbitrary Will and Pleasure of her self And so she can never be accountable further for it than barely to declare it or affirm it to be the Catholick Sence because she saith it is the Sence of the Universal Church And is not this rare Policy And therefore to justifie this medly Sence which if what she saith be true is both the Sence of the Scripture and is not And which must necessarily be the Sence of the Scripture because the Church will so have it and not because it is a Sence really properly or radically inherent in it To justifie also her Rightful throwing off the Authority of the Grammar it self and to justifie her transferring the whole Divinity of the Scripture from the natural Order and Construction of its Words to a Sence altogether forreign to its Letter and to the expressness of it I say to justifie ALL THIS she pleads her own Authority not only as Divine but as absolute and infallible and consequently as that which ought to be submitted unto by every one and that readily as to the very Ordinance and Appointment of God himself Which being the very Question it self that was in dispute and that very thing therefore that was first of all necessary to be proved by her she is constrained by this means whether she will or no to run round in a Circle viz. To