esteeme it as a doctrine of men not of God as a priuate conceipt not a publike assertion We haue no such doctrine neither haue the Churches of God As for the truth of this in practise looke we but to the daies of Queene Mary when more suffered for religion in 5. years then haue done for treason in 45. since did any theÌ„ rebel against the life of that Queen did they not suffer the losse of goods liberty country lands and life praied rather that their soueraigns eies might be opened theÌ„ her years diminished And though diuers amongst vs who cannot conforme theÌ„selues are by the sentence of our consistories depriued of their liuings do any of them lay hands vpon the Lords annointed do not the Protestants in France the like at this time And surely if we well consider amongst many arguments to perswade the truth of our religion the falsity of popery this is not the least that our religion without equiuocation is an obedient merciful coÌ„passionate religion though our aduersaries preferre Turks before vs theirs is a cruel merciles bloudy religion burning al such as denie their breaden God murdering such gouernors as do but fauour of our true Catholicke Christian faith As for this auctor because the auctor of the protestaÌ„ts Apology for Catholicks may bring him in an enemy to magistracy I wish in some points he had written more sparingly He saith if a gouernour come vpon a subiect to spoyle him and kill him by the law of nature he may defend himselfe We say with Tertullian it is better to be killed then to kill and to answer them defence and offence are not a like He saith Dauid might haue killed Saule we lay with Dauid God forbid I should lay hands vpon the Lords annointed and Dauid being annointed king had another gates warrant than they can shew He saith in publike and notorious tyrannie subiects may craue aide from forrain Princes we say Blessed are they that suffer And blessed be God our gouernors are such as we need not to seeke aid against them He saith the Heluetians did wel in shaking of the yoake of Austria we say a particular is no generall rule He saith that the Iewes did well to rise against Antiochus we say the fact was extraordinary In a word there is nothing in him nor I hope in any Protestant writer which will warrant conspiracies against Princes which doctrine was deuised by the diuell nourced by the Pope learned in Seminaries practised more of late by Iesuites then euer it was before written as Dracoes lawes by the fauor of God in their own bloud And if we read diligeÌ„tly this coÌ„mon place of magistracie we shall see that the author was no enemy to gouernment who doubtles thinketh that the king is to be honored as a second from God only inferiour to God alone as Tertullian saith You haue added to your author 8. questions answers returne againe vnto him what is the generall end of politicke admistration and magistracie or magistrates Publike peace the preseruation of pietie and Religion or that right lawfull worship of God Vnto which two heads we may referre all lawes ciuill For hence commeth vengeance to the bad defence of the good safegard of goods rewards of vertues discipline of maners execution of malefactors and robbers and in a word the safetie of mans life To conclude by this means the Eutaxie good order of all things yea of religion it selfe is preserued or as Agapetus writeth to Iustinian by this all men being assembled together instructed in Gods word may vnfainedly adore safely keepe without feare practise his vpright righteousnes To which purpose Stigelius hath these two golden verses Vtque alios alij de relligione docerent Contiguas pietas iussit habere Domos That one might teach an other pietie God houses ioyn'd with contiguitie To this end Paule saith pray ye for kings and for all set in authority I say set in authority that vnder them we may liue a quiet and peaceable life in all godlines and honesty What vse make you of this doctrine of mgistracy Surely in regard of the magistrates 1. that they labour to recognize their dignity vse it with good conscience that they maintaine adorne it with the greatest piety to God integrity of life equity towards men care of their charge diligeÌ„ce in their calling that possibly they can Deut. 1.16 2 Cron. 19 6 7. c. 2. That they may comfort theÌ„selues and hope of Gods aide being indeed in a most troublesome but yet a most holy calling in that they are Gods Ambassadors or viceroys vpon earth yea that they may know that God cares for them according to that of the Psalmist I wil sing vnto thee O lord a new song who giueth saluatioÌ„ to kings But in regard of subiects that they with thanks to god acknowledge so great a benefit with good coÌ„science submit theÌ„selues to Gods ordinance giuing Caesars to Caesar tribute to whoÌ„ tribute praying for the life of their gouernors maintaine it by the hazard of their own both life liuelyhood if need require What now is coÌ„trary to this doctrine of magistracie 1 The heresy of the Donatists who tooke away the authority of magistrates in hatred to this order doe reckon vp many persecutions which some magistrates haue made against the Church of God 2. The error of the Anabaptists Libertines who were so called because they seek liberty in outward things for which in the memory of our forfathers they moued the common people to take arms against their gouernors these deny i. that magistracy is to be exercised amongst â—hose christiaÌ„ spirituall people whom the truth to wit Christ hath made free b Ioh 8.32 2. They admit of no suits in law seats or sentences of Iustice or any defence of a mans selfe wheras the internal liberty of coÌ„science which God by his spirit worketh in the harts of his elect takes not away the subiection of the outward man due to gouernors c Gal 5 1 2 Cor 7 21 3. They are of opinion that God would not haue Christians at all to become soldiers in warr because Paule saith speaking of spirituall not corporall warfare 2. Cor. 10.7 The weapons of our warfare are not carnall but spirituall But Paule speakes not heere of politicke magistrates but of the Pastors of the Church armed on all sides with the word of truth the weapons of righteousnesse 2. Cor. 6.7.4 They speake euill of such as are in authoritie d Iude 8. 3 The seditious rebellions of the Pope all his papall Cleargy who vpon certaine forged immuâ—â—ties presume to take the sword of authority out of the magistrates hand and to make all Princes vassals to them yet Peter himselfe whose successors they would be commaunds Bishops in plaine termes that they should not be Lords ouer Gods inheritance e 1. Pet. 5 3 yea bids all men to honour the King f 1. Pet. 2.17 But saith a papist Persona praecipientis non continetur in persona loquentis Peter commaunds this in his owne person therfore is not bounden to it in his owne person Well then Peter saith before Feare God is he by this commâ—undement excluded from Gods feare It seemeth surely his successors are who because they will not honor gouernors shew to the world that they feare not God for he that feareth the king of kings will honor and obey his vicegerents and Ambassadors 3 The flatteries of such as so either extol the power of princes that they derogate from Gods power or denie that princes in causes both Ecclesiasticall ciuill haue supreme authority headship ouer subiects wher as the princes of Israel are ofteÌ„ in the scripturs called heads of the people not as the Pope wold be to giue life to the church for so only is Christ the head but to coÌ„mand direct that people ouer whoÌ„ it pleaseth god to place kings in suprem authority 4 All such maners rites edicts consultations which are not agreeable to that eternall rule of honouring God and louing our neighbour permitting thefts robberies vnbridled and promiscuous lusts or any other monsters of the like nature 5 Seditious coÌ„motions of turbuleÌ„t rebels against their magistrats 6 Anarchy or want of gouernors which is worse then either the excesse or defect of any magistrate a Iudg 17 6 〈◊〉 21.25 〈◊〉 made Chrysostome in his sermon to the people of Antioch to say It were better to haue a Tyrant king then no king and Cornelius Tacitus to say in the first booke of his history It is better to liue vnder a bad prince than vnder none Laus Christo nescia finis 1. Pet. 2.17 Feare God honour the King To feare God is the beginning of this Booke To honour the King is the end of it FINIS
dependeth this power Not vpon the person or worthines of the ministers for indeed they cannot properly eyther bind or loose any man or open or shut the kingdome of heauen vnto any man at their pleasure but it dependeth vpon their lawfull ministerie or rather vpon God himselfe who by the holy ghost is powerfull in the ministerie of the word as often as the minister doth duely execute his office a heb 4.12 In which sense those sayings Marke 2.7 Who can forgiue sinnes but God alone namely in his owne right and by his owne authoritie and that Iohn 20 23. Whose sinnes ye remit namely instrumētally or by preaching in the name of Christ they are remitted must be reconciled To whom are these keyes giuen Not to Peter alone but equally to all the Apostles and to the faithfull Pastors of all ages to whom Christ saith Receiue the holy Ghost if you remit the sinnes of anie they are remitted vnto them if you retaine the sinnes of any they are retayned Iohn 20.23 Which is the other part of Ecclesiasticall power It is called the power of Order because it hath a certaine and set rule namely the word of God which it must alwaies follow And it is rhar power of the Church whereby it is occupied both about doctrine and the principles of faith and is callled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Doctrinall and also about the making of lawes in the Church for the outward gouernment thereof and is specially called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is ordained or appointed VVhat is the power of the Church concerning Doctrine It is of two sorts Common and Speciall Common is the common right belonging to the whole Church not to the Pastors onely but to euerie member thereof 1 To keepe and preserue the scriptures with verie great faithfulnesse like a Notarie or Register diligently to read them and not by way of authority to iudge of the scriptures for the Church it selfe is subiect to the scriptures but to iudge according to the scriptures and to distinguish and discerne like a Moderator the true naturall and right scriptures from the false imaginarie and counterfeit the spirit of God being their guide for the sheepe know the voyce of the shepheard Iohn 10.4 2. To know admit and approoue true Doctrine out of the scriptures Iohn 5.39 Search the Scriptures And to reproue false doctrine Mat 7.15 Beware of false Prophets And Luke 12.1 Take heede of the leauen of the Pharises And Galat. 1.8 If any man teach another doctrine let him be accursed Whereupon Augustine lib. 11. Contra Faustum cap. 5. The scripture is set in a seat on high whereunto euerie faithfull and godly vnderstanding must stoope And in another place lib. de Religione cap. 31. It is lawfull with pure hearts to know the eternall Law but to iudge it is altogether vnlawfull and wicked Speciall power the Church hath none to frame new Articles of faith or to teach any thing beside the word of God written but like a Cryer to publish and preach the scriptures to propound onely the word of the Prophets and Apostles to omit nothing 〈◊〉 alter nothing to adde or inuent nothing of their owne a Deut. 4.2 12 32 Reue. 22.18 19 and to referre all things according to the word to Gods glorie and the edification of the Church Furthermore so to expound and prooue the Principles out of the Canonicall scriptures and to interptete the same Scriptures not out of any preiudicate opinion or the priuate sense of any one man but out of the fountaines and originals by examination of euerie seuerall word by obseruation of the style and phrase of the scripture by consideration of the state of the question and matter in hand and of the things going before and comming after and by conference of one scripture with another that they may agree with the Analogie rule and square of faith briefly comprehended in the Apostles Creed a Mat. 23.8 28.20 Rom. 12.6 1 Pet. 4.11 Lastly to take away all ordinances or rather phantasies of all men of what degree soeuer they bee that the decrees of God alone may remaine firme and established 2. Cor. 4.7 These are those spirituall weapons mightie b 2 Cor. 10 4.5 through God to cast downe strong holds whereby the faithfull souldiers of God may cast downe the imaginations and euerie high thing which is exalted against the knowledge of God wherby they may build the house of Christ ouerthrow Sathan feed the sheep driue away the Wolues instruct them that are apt to learne to proue them that are stubborne and froward lastly whereby they may lighten and if neede be thunder and resting themselues vpon the power of Christ may rule and gouerne all from the highest to the lowest but all things according to the word of God and so as no man must take vnto himselfe any authoritie to teach in the Church eyther by writing or word without a lawfull calling where indeede Order preuaileth which no man with a good conscience can despise for this were to open a window to the Anabaptistical furie and that The Spirits of the Prophets may be subiect to the Prophets 1. Cor. 14.30.31 Albeit that all Christians ought mutually to teach exhort reprehend and comfort one another in the Lord and that all housholds should so be gouerned of the maisters and mistresses of the family that they should beare a representation of so many priuate Churches no man will denie Are we simply to heare the voyce of the Church to receiue whatsoeuer it teacheth No but whatsoeuer it is taught of God and commaunded to teach and is able to approoue by the authoritie of the word of God Is it in the Churches power to consigne the Canon of Scripture The Church cannot make Bookes not Canonicall to be Canonicall but onely is a meanes that such Bookes be receiued as Canonicall which in truth and of themselues are such The Church I say doth not make Scripture to be Authenticall but declareth it to be so For that onely is called Authenticall which is of it selfe sufficient which commendeth supporteth and prooueth it selfe and from it selfe hath credit and authoritie May not yet the Church be a meanes to beleeue that there is a word written and other thinges which pertaine to saluation It is indeede a meanes not a principall meanes but onely an externall and ministeriall meanes but the principall cause of beleeuing is the spirit of God and the Church is a lesse principall instrument that is by which not for which we beleeue Paule doth plant and Apollo doth water but God giueth the increase 1 Cor. 3.6 The church hath no efficacie to reueale without the spirit neither can the Church make that true thinges in themselues be beleeued of vs for true but by the testimonie of the holy Ghost shee doth commend the Scripture which is her chiefe office Truely the Church sometimes may compell men by her authoritie and perpetuall testimonie that they
dying What then should haue become of man in the conclusion if he had not sinned should he haue euer liued vpon earth No but he should in the end haue remoued into heauen indeed without death which is the dissolution of the soule from the body but yet not without some change such as the Apostle speaketh of 1. Cor. 15.51 shall be in the bodies of the elect who shall be then liuing in the comming of the Lord they shall remoue hence into heauen What things be contrary to this doctrine The errour of the Pelagians who affirmed that man should haue died although he had neuer sinned against those speeches Gen. 2.17 and 3.3 Rom. 5.12 and 1. Cor. 15.21 The twelfth common Place of Mariage What thinke you of Mariage is it a diuine humane or politike constitution IT is diuine 1. because it was instituted by God in Paradise a Gen. 1.27 2.15 betwixt Adam and Eue in their innocencie they then bearing the true image of God 2. Because it was a type of that truly diuine and spirituall mariage which was to be betwixt Christ and his Church b Ephes 5.23 3. Because it was ordained for the propagation of the Church and for the further helping forwards the saluation of man It is also humane or politike or as I may say of humane constitution 1. because it was instituted for the propagation of mankind and ciuill societie vpon earth for in heauen they marry not but are like the Angels of God Mat. 22.30 2. Because for the most part it dependeth vpon the honest constitutions made by man for that purpose How proue you that mariage was instituted by God Gen. 2.18 God said that is in his most wise counsel decreed and ordained it is not good for man to be alone let vs make an helper or companion of his life like vnto him and when he could finde none for Adam before him God brought vpon him a dead sleepe and whilest he was asleepe and so being brought as it were into an extasie voide of griefe and was naturally ignorant what was done took one of his ribs and thereof made woman whom he brought vnto Adam who being led by the spirit of God did prophesie saying This is bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh she shall be called Ischa that is Vira Mannesse because she was taken out of man being as it were alter-ipse a second self For this cause shall man leaue his father and mother and cleaue vnto his wife and they shall be one flesh And after the deluge God confirmed mariage and blessed it saying Increase and multiply b Gen 9.1 At length the Sonne of God himselfe restored it being somewhat decaid c Math. 19.4.5.6 honoring the same both with his presence and miraculous gift d Ioh. 2.11 c. To conclude God not onely instituted mariage but also stirreth vp mutuall loue betweene the bride and the bridegroome and furdereth mariage e Genes 24.14 50 51. Whence it followeth first that mariages are not by chance or depending on mans arbiterment onely but are fatall and gouerned by Gods prouidence Secondly that mariage is a good and a holy thing Thirdly that it is to be vndertaken in the feare of God and inuocation for his direction But are not Moses and Paul contrary one to another where it is said Gen. 2.18 It is not good for man to be alone and 1. Cor. 7.1 g Gen. 2.18 It is good for man not to touch a woman h 1. Cor. 7.1 No for that Paul speaketh first of good which is profitable and not of honestie and he doth not oppose good vnto vice or sinne but vnto inconuenient Secondly because that in Genesis is vnderstood of the species or greatest part of mankind which wold decay if it were not continued and increased by mariage neither can a man liue chastly without mariage but Paul speaketh of certaine indiuidua or persons hauing the gift so as they can liue chastly without mariage for of others he saith It is better to marrie then to burne i 1. Cor. 7.9 But tell me whether Paul speaking of a virgin 1. Cor. 7.38 k 1. Cor. 7.38 and saying He that bestoweth her not in mariage doth better do meane that virginitie deserueth more the fauour of God then mariage He speaketh onely of some outward commodities of the single life for the present necessitie that is imminent persecutions l verse 26. and for that the vnmaried is more expedite and fit to teach to serue the Church to vndergo the dangers of his profession and the duties of piety with a better and freer mind m verse 32.34 and insinuateth more difficulty to be in mariage then in the single life as he speaketh concerning the maried Such shall haue trouble in the flesh n verse 28 and more distraction of thoughts and care for the things of this world o vers 33.34 and therfore that the single life is more profitable vnto him that hath the gift of continencie and lesse subiect to distractions and troubles and in this respect more blessed then mariage p verse 40. Notwithstanding the godly maried may also care for those things which belong vnto the Lord as Abraham Isaac Iacob Zacharias Iohn Baptists father and the like What is contrary to this doctrine concerning the efficient cause of Matrimonie The heresie of Montanus the Tatians Saturnians Manichees Marcionites Priscillianists Encratites who condemned mariage as the doctrine and worke of the diuell Pope Syricius differed not much from this heresie who called matrimonie vncleannesse of the flesh in which no man might please God Vnto all whom that saying of S. Paul is to be opposed 1. Tim. 4. 1. Tim. 4.1.2.3.4 Of the matter of Mariage Of how many and of what manner of persons ought Mariage to consist Of two onely one man and one woman for so saith the Lord Two shal be one flesh a Gen. 1.27 2.24 Mat. 19.5 and so many suffice for procreation of offspring But whenas the maried couples giue themselues mutually one to another they are both the second causes efficient and they also the matter of mariage What is contrary to this Polygamie not of hauing many wiues successiuely when one succeedeth another but of enioying more then one at one and the same time Gen. 4.19 which corruptiō of lawful mariage begun in Lamech of Cains race and was afterwards permitted vnto the Fathers not for wantonnesse but for increase of an holy seed both for that politick customes were at that time as also that God might thereby manifest his promise of an innumerable seede to spring of a few But Christ condemned it afterwards Mat. 19.8 5.32 saying It was not so from the beginning and declaring that who so putteth away his wife and taketh another committeth adulterie For that God being about to giue Adam a wife tooke not two or more but one ribbe out of
happen to returne againe which was thought dead The later mariage contracted by meere ignorance shal be dissolued the fault being thus fouÌ„d to haue bin eithers shal not be imputed vnto either of them Doth barrennesse breake off Matrimonie No for that defect is commonly hidden vnknowne God hath often holpen it when as it hath bin couÌ„ted desperate a. 2. Seeing that God giueth children who shutteth openeth the womb according to his own good pleasure he seemeth after a sorr to lay violent hands vpon God who reiecteth the wife giuen him by God because she beareth him no children Is diuorcement to be permitted for offences or for ciuil death as to be condemned to the Gallies or mines or banishment or els perpetuall imprisonmeÌ„t or els by reason of some disease fallen into after the consummation of mariage or for any other the like causes Herein the iudgements of Doctors do differ for some denie DiuorcemeÌ„t for any such cause because god hath said Whom god hath conioyned let no man separate b Mat. 6. but man separateth when he doth it without Gods word But God hath not granted Diuâ—rcement in his word for such causes But this question were superfluous if the magistrate did his dutie for he should cut off such offendors and so should the innocent party be prouided for Now as concerning ciuill death the Canons teach that the wife is to follow the husband either in banishment or imprisonment As touching diseases caught after lawfull mariage the rule is to be obserued Ill accidents are patiently to bee borne in mariage where there is no fault committed But yet Leprosie is wont to be reckoned amongst the causes of Diuorce for seeing there is a law concerning the Leprous that they dwel apart by themselues that it is incurable that the clean person ought not to be infected with that disease yea the law hath also a caution for the children that contagious children be not procreated of infected parents to the certaine destruction of the whole common weale it is very conuenient that the sound person be not compelled to coÌ„pany with the infected yoak-fellow Hitherto belongeth madnesse which breaketh out into manifest and incurable rage which is to be restrained with bonds least they hurt their owne children or wise or else whomsoeuer they can come by Concerning crueltie ill vsage of one toward the other Theodosius his law the Canon law also the iudgement of the best Diuines do permit in such cases after reconciliation hath bin often tryed in vaine and domesticall separation for a time diuorcement to be made least the innocent party being too much broken with griefe attempt some vnlawful thing For patience being too much hurt turneth into furie But let the innocent party c 1 Cor. 10.13 Mat. 19.8 in the meane time make account that he is called to single life in faith craue victorie of him who suffereth not his to be tempted aboue their strength Therefore as Christ accused not but excused Moses for granting Diuorcement for the hardnesse of their hearts so many at this day thinke that the Christian Magistrate is to be excused in helping by diuorcemeÌ„t those who are miserably vniustly tyrannously and cruelly oppressed for they thinke it better for them to liue apart angelically than together diuelishly but yet if both of them doe one rage against another with words or stripes they thinke separation ought so to be made so as that all hope of new mariage againe be taken from them that yet by this meanes whatsoeuer before this be admitted they may bee reconciled Cod. l. 8. de repud But our consistorie laws do very wel appoint to try al means whatsoeuer before this be admitted Wherein they agree with Iustinian who saith Euen as wee forbid the dissolution of mariage without iust cause so we desire to haue those that are oppressed with aduerse necessitie to bee freed with a necessarie though an vnhappie helpe What is to be done thinke you if either of them being become an vngodly Apostate or obstinate heretike endeuour to draw and compell the other into the same Apostacie and impietie or into any other crime Heere the Magistrate is to make diuorcement with the sword according to Gods commaundement That whosoeuer teacheth Apostasie or turning away from the Lord God he should be slaine and so euill might be taken from the midst of the people a Deut. 13 6 VVhat if the Magistrate neglect his dutie Let the Apostles precept bee of force Auoid an Hereticke after once or twice admonition b Tit. 3.16 Luke 14.26 And so also the Atheist Apostate and Blasphemer Also that of our Sauiour If any come vnto me and hateth not his father mother wife c. is not worthy of me And againe If thine eye offend thee plucke it out c Math. 5.29 And againe whosoeuer forsaketh house field or wife c. shall receiue an hundred fold d 19.29 Hath the wife the like right against her husband that he hath against her in suing for diuorcement If you respect the right which the one hath in the others bodie the bond is equall Wherefore e Cor 7 4 in an equall Obligation it is meet that the same right be granted vnto the one as to the other prouided that modestie be obserued which becommeth the woman towards her husband being agent By whome ought the diuorcement to be made By no priuate person or by the innocent partie or of their owne priuate authority for no man may bee iudge in his owne cause but by lawfull Iudges as well Ecclesiasticall as ciuill if they may be had because mariage consisteth of the Diuine f Mat. 18.15 16 17. humane law mixt not rashly but after reconcilement hath beene sought and the cause lawfully knowne and iudged by alleaging and prouing on both sides For Abrahaam did not put away Hugar vpon his owne priuate iudgement but by the manifest commandement of God g Gen. 21.12 What contrarieth this Doctrine The errour of the Romanists who affirme that there may bee a lawfull separation of mariages for the attaining of Euangelicall perfection as they call it expounding that place of Mathew amisse e Mat 19.12 For they are said to castrate themselues for the Kingdome of Heauen which abstaine from mariage and by the gift of God liue continently that they may serue God more freely as if they wanted their virill parts such as is the cutting off the foote hand and the pulling out of the eye Secondly that it may be broken for the profession of a monasticall life yea though one of the maried couple be against it and that only by the Popes authoritie 3. Lastly this is against the peruerse opinion of such which thinke that that law of Moses concerning Diuorce which is Deu. 24.2 ought now to be of force in the Church of Christ The fourteenth common place of the gouernment of the world or Gods
ouer all things authoritie of iudging and euen the decree it selfe Dan. 7.9.10 The auncient of daies did sit and he sat in iudgement and the bookes were opened and Iohn 16.8 When the holy Ghost commeth he will reproue the world of sinne of righteousnesse and of iudgement 2. The vrgent cause in vnbeleeuing men is originall and actuall sinne against the law of god also the contempt of the gospell but in god most vpright iustice being an auenger of iniquitie and a maintainer of pietie according to the eternall decree of god himselfe 3. But as concerning the manner or exercise of the iudgement the Efficient cause and helper of iudgement or the Iudge that shal be is Christ the sonne of God as he is man or the sonne of man For truely euen he shall iudge who was iudged himselfe that the wicked may behold his glorie whose meekenesse they despised Ioh. 5.22 The father iudgeth no man but hath committed all iudgement to the sonne And ver 27. To him he hath giuen power to execute iudgement in that he is the sonne of man Act. 10 42. He commaunded vs to preach vnto the people and to testifie that euen Christ is ordained of God a Iudge of quick and dead And chap. 17 31 God hath appointed a day in the which he will iudge the world in righteousnesse by the man whom he hath appointed Ro. 2 16 There shall be a day wherein God shall iudge the secrets of men by Iesus Christ 2 Tim. 4 1. Iesus Christ shall iudge the quick dead in that his glorious cōming in his kingdom 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Angels shall be ministers who shall be present to serue Christ in the execution of his iudgement for they shall gather before him all people they shall separate the elect from the reprobate they shall carie the elect to meete Christ in the ayre they shall cast of the reprobate with the diuell and his Angels into euerlasting fire a Math. 25.31 Shall then the sonne without the father and the holy spirit be the iudge and execute that iudgment Not simply but after a sort that is according to the argumēts and reasons which in this separate him from the father because the father iudgeth no man namely a part as the Iewes thought but hath committed all iudgemēt to the sonne that is to say that he might iudge and gouerne all things by the sonne Ioh. 5.22 Or because the sonne is wisdome and trueth begotten and proceeding from the father and representing him perfectly and iudgement ought to bee performed in wisdome and trueth therefore is the power of iudgement giuen to the sonne of God by a certain appropriation that as the father worketh all things by the sonne Ioh. 1.3 for as much as he is the cunning of the father saith Augustine lib. 6. de Trinit So likewise doth he iudge all things by the sonne for as much as he is the wisedome and trueth of the father which is signified Dan. 7.9 13 where first it is said that the auncient of daies did sit and after is added that the sonne of man came euen to the ancient of daies who gaue him dominion and honour and a kingdome whereby is giuen vs to vnderstand that the authoritie of iudging is in the father from whome the sonne receiueth power to iudge Therefore is not the father said to iudge in that day for in the iudgement to come the father shall not appeare in visible forme but the sonne shall in the forme of a seruant which truely is not the forme of the father but of the sonne saith Augustine neither is it that forme of the sonne wherein he is equall with the Father but wherein hee is lesse then the father that in iudgement hee may bee cleerely perceiued of the good and bad and may performe those parts which belong to a Iudge Math. 24.30 Doth the povver of iudging accord in Christ as he is man and not as he is God onlie It doth because the father hath giuen him power to execute iudgement in that he is the sonne of man not truely for the condemnation of humane nature for nothing could let all men to be iudges but for the glorious condition which followeth the personall vnion of the diuine and humane nature because in his humane nature he is head of the whole Church a Eph. 1.12 Col. 1 18 God hath subdued all things vnder his feet 1. Cor. 15.27 and because of the entercourse of the Diuinitie to the soule of Christ it is meete for him to knowee and iudge the secrets of all hearts Therefore the iudiciall power accordeth in Christ not onely as he is God together with the father but also according to his humane nature for the agreeablenesse and affinitie betweene men and him moreouer they that are to be iudged shall behold him their iudge Who shall sit in companie vvith Christ the Iudge The Apostles and the rest of the Saints Mat. 19.28 a luk 22.30 I appoint vnto you a Kingdome saith Christ that ye may sit on seates iudging the twelue tribes of Israell And 1. Cor. 6.2 Know yet not that the Saints shall iudge the world that is the route of the vngodly and that we shall iudge the Angels meaning the wicked b Iud. 14 Reue. 20.4 which is said therfore to be 1 In as much as the Saints are the members of Christ the iudge 2 Because God hath ordained to gather all his aduersaries before himselfe and before the assembly of the Church c Ioel. 3.2 3 Because the Apostles shall iudge the world by their doctrine which they haue preached and shall approue the sentence pronounced by Christ and to his iudgement shall all the godly subscribe 4 The godly also shall iudge the wicked by the example of Faith and repentance by which meanes the Apostles faith shall take away all excuse from the Iewes for as Christ saith of the Queene of the South and of the Niniuites Luk 11 31. that they shall rise in iudgement and shall condemne that generation which was not moued at his preaching Who are they which shall be iudged All men without exception as many as haue bin since the creation of the word as it is in the Creede he shal come and iudge the quick namely whom he shall finde remaining on liue at his comming who shall be changed in a moment that is they shall bee translated from a mortall condition to an immortall and all the dead that is which are departed this life before the last day whom he will raise vp from death d Rom. 14.12 2 Cor. 5 10. We must all appear before the iudgement seat of Christ 2 And the Angels which sinned and kept not their first estate but left their own habitation are reserued in euerlasting chaines vnder darknes vnto the iudgement of the great day 2. Pet. 2.4 Iud. 6. 3 The man of sinne himselfe especially that sonne of Perdition Antichrist
before God hauing a couering on his head in which was granen the holines of God that God might be pleased with them Exod. 28.6 Although it appeareth and that by ancient institution 1. Chron. 24.2.3 that there were two priests who in course did exercise the Priesthood yet so as one was chiefe and the other next vnto him as it is plaine out of 1. Kings 25.18 and Luke 3.2 note we heere that it was not vnaduisedly done that the holy Ghost doth neuer in the New Testament giue the name of Priest or Priesthood peculiarly to the Ministers of the Gospell for Christ being made a Priest for euer according to the order of Melchisedech by the oath of God Hebr. 7.21 hath no companions of his Priesthood neither left he to his a Priesthood but a Ministerie and that because there remained for vs no such propitiatorie sacrifices to be performed as that was which was procured by the Priests in the law yet by a certaine similitude as they who preach the Gospell do kill with the spirituall sword and consecrate men to God they may be called Priests as also sometimes all the godlly are so called to whom it is said If ye will keepe all my commaundements you shall be vnto mee a kingdome of priests Exod. 19.6 What are Leuites Num. 8 7 They were inferiour Priests comming from and called so of Leui Iacobs sonne by Leah of whom some serued vnder the Priests in the Tabernacle and after in the Temple and they being purified by a holy water and sacrifice before the Church b Num. 18 6.3.6 did carie the Tabernacle which was portable and other things of vse and did minister to the high Priests as they sacrificed seruing them in the whole administation of sacrifices but they had not authoritie to sacrifice b Num. 18 6.3.6 and they themselues did pay tythes of their tythes to the Priests c Num. 16.26 for this cause the Deacons of the New Testament properly so called are by the ancient compared with them But of these afterward Dauid appointed holy Singers Treasurers for holy things Ouerseers and Porters and these from twentie yeares til 50 killed the sacrifices d 1. Chro. 23 35. but others being dispersed through diuers countries partly did seruice in the Synagogues and partly did sit in iudgement with the elders in the gate e EZec. 44.15 What were Scribes Of them there were three sorts one which stoode before Kings as 2. Kings 12.10 another who did write priuate contracts and instruments such as we call Notaries or Scriueners such were Cinney f 1 Chro. 2.55 Ierem. 32 1â— Psal 45.2 and in a word they were called Scribes being more skilfull then others in Gods law and they especially were of the Tribe of Leui g Ioh. 1.18 Esd 7.6 who both in the Synagogues and in the Temple did teach the law for the which cause they were called Lawyers and Teachers of the law h Mat. 17.29.23.2 Mark 12.18 so also they were called Scribes because they did write and interpret the law as it were keepers and teachers of the holy Tables i Iere. 8.8 What were Prophets They were persons immediately and extraordinarily called by God who should speake k Mat. 13.52 Hebr. 1.1 by an extraordinarie instinct of Gods alone Spirit those things which they did vnderstand that is such as were extraordinarily raysed vp for the gouernment of the Church to aske God vpon present occasion concerning her present calamities l 1. Sam. 2 27. as also in want of Priestes to deliuer to others doctrine immediately receiued from God to interprete the Lawe to restore Gods worshippe and as often as the people fell awaie to reprooue with great zeale and sharpenes of speach the Priests and Kings sinning or negligent in their office m 2. Sam. 12.7 Exod. 22.21 and so should instruct them and stirre them vp to good workes foretell certainly things to come as the mutation of Empyres punishment of sinnes speciall euents and deliuerance to the glorie of God and good of the people and which was most principall to comfort the people with the hope of the Messias to come and therefore being mooued by diuine inspiration they prophecied in seuerall prouinces assigned them of his Conception Natiuitie Passion Death Resurrection comming to iudgement and euerlasting kingdome a These were called Prophets of the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to foretell to which answereth that Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Isay 1.6 er 14. c. Ezâ—ch 1.2.3 1 Pet. 1.1 2. Pet. 1.21 Esai 7.14 9 5.6 Mich. 5.2 Esai 53. Luke 24.27 Mantenesthai yet so as this belonges to profane prophets that to holy prophets Yet this is also true that they also are called prophets but distinguished from these who were ordinarie teachers and brought vp in the doctrine of the Law by men b Ier. 26.11.29.1 whence it is that Paule sometime vseth the word Prophecie for the interpretation of prophecies euen without the Spirit of fore telling things to come b Ier. 26.11.29.1 But by way of excellencie Christ the heade of all Prophets is called that Prophet Deut. 18.15 Iohn 1.45 Acts. 3.12 c 1. Cor. 14.29 Hovv vvere true Prophets made to prophecie Eyther by Visions and figures or Images offered to their minde or eyes d Num. 12.6 Whereupon they were called Seers e 1. Sam. 9.9 Thus Ieremie sawe an Almonde tree and a seething pot f Ier. 1.11.13 Ezechiell foure beastes and so many wheeles g Eze 1. Daniell the handwriting on the wall h Dan. 5.24 25. Zacharie a man riding vpon a red horse betwixt the Myrâ—le trees and foure hornes i Zach. 1.8.20 or by Dreames sent from GOD or by inward inspiration of Gods Spirit k 2. Pet. 1.21 or by expresse word by the apparition of an Angell representing GOD l Gen. 18.13 or by God himselfe speaking face to face with them that is familiarlie as hee did with Moses m Num. 12. 16.20.20 How did prophets differ from priests 1 Priests were euer of the tribe of Leui but prophets also of other trybes n Esa 1.1 20.2 Dan. 1.3 Amos 7.14 2. The Priests duety was not onely to pray and teach but also to performe holy rites which prophets did not for in that Elias sacrificed and that out of that place chosen by God o 1. King 18 38. it was extraordinary because he was moued by a priuate inspiration from God contrary to the generall law as Augustine saith in his 56 question vpon Leuiticus The lawgiuer when he commaundeth any thing contrary to his lawes his commaundement is to be reputed as a Law 3. Priests were chosen only by succession and had an ordinary ministery but prophets were sent by god at his pleasure after an extraordinarie sorte and inspired by his spirit without respect had euen of sex a Iud. 4.4 2. King 2.15 fourthlie priests might
and giue not that honour vnto the holy and sacred ministerie that is meete 7 The Symony of the Papists and their buying and selling of holy orders all neglect of law Diuine and Ecclesiasticall in the popish elections as namely that they haue no regard of learning or life but promote rude asses and those of most filthy wicked life They vse vaine ceremonies of annointing shauing wax candles and such toyes they attribute that to the ministerie of men which is only the worke of God alone they transforme the ordination of ministers into a sacrament They doe no more thinke of feeding the flock then a cobler doth of ploughing 8 In conclusion all the popish hierarchie and the primacie of the Pope of Rome contrary to the word of God First that from the authority of saint Paul they make Peter the Bishop of Rome Secōdly the Romane Bishops which would be thought to be the successors of Peter call thēselues indeede the seruants of seruants yet are not saluted by any other name then our most holy Lords they translate Empyres and Kingdomes and finally they vsurpe vnto themselues all gouernment pure and mixt they domineere in manner of Kings they boast of the patrimony of Peter vsurpe a double sword spirituall and temporall and yet haue neyther of both and chalenge vnto themselues power to draw all men to hell without cause and cause euen Kings to kisse their feete 3 They alleadge that the Priests of Moses law were a figure of the Pastors of the Church of Christ and their Masse-priests they tearme by a false name of Presbyters or Priests 9 All those proud and arrogant titles of the Antichristian counterfeit Cleargie of Patriarches Princes and such like 10 The errour of them which make an equalitie betweene the Ministers of the Gospell In holy functions they make no difference betweene those that are temporarie and those that are perpetuall they that acknowledge no Priestes but those that haue charge to teach publikely 11 Those that vsurpe that authoritie in the Church which was peculiar to the Apostles for this is that which the Apostle a complaineth to be then done by some who boasted themselues as if they were Apostles 12 The conceipt of Morellius concerning the bringing againe into the Church of the Democraticke policie 13 The subuersion of the christian ministerie the confusion of Ecclesiasticall offices the robbing of the Ecclesiasticall possessions the end whereof what it is like to be the historie of b Achan teacheth vs. 14 The sinne of those who make no difference betweene the distribution of the Churches stocke and the disposing of our publike goods which is a thing meerely ciuill but confound these two treasuries the naming of all which things is the confuting of them The three and fortieth common place Of the power and authoritie of the Church as also of Synods Is there any power of the Church YES there is 1. Because no family no honest societie no common-wealth and therefore not the Church which is the most excellent society of all can long stand or cōtinue without policy and gouernment 2 Because God hath prescribed lawes to his Church therefore he hath giuen power also to iudge according to those lawes 3 Because in ancient time the Priests and Leuites bare rule ouer Ecclesiasticall matters a Leuit. 14.3 Deut. 24.8 and the Synedry or Counsell for the administring of Gods behests was compacted of the Priests Leuites Lawyers or Scribes and the heads of families or the elders of the people b 2. Cro. 19.8 9.10.11 Mat. 5 22. Mat. 18.19 4 Because in the place of that Synedry or Counsell of the Synagogue Christ did ordaine c in the Christian Church an Ecclesiasticall Senate and the Apostles haue diligently retained the same d 1 Tim. 4.14 so as the Church hath alwaies had the like 5 Because the power of the keyes is committed vnto the Church 6 Because the preaching of the word would bee altogether vnprofitable vnlesse the Church had power to bridle the contemners of the same 7 Because as we must giue to Caesar that that is Caesars so to the Church that which is the Churches must be yeelded Mat. 22.21 By what name is it called Power authority Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction the keyes of the kingdome of heauen Mat. 16.19 I will giue thee the keyes of the Kingdome of heauen So called by a Metaphore whereby is signified the power of a Steward in admitting in and keeping from comming into the house whom his master pleaseth a Esa 20.22 because the kingdome of heauen which is the Church is administred that is to say is opened to the beleeuer and shut to the vnbeleuer by the preaching of the Gospell yea euen heauen it selfe is propounded vnto vs as a mansion house vnto the which there is onely one entrance by Christ Iesus And to Christ faith only leadeth vs which the holy ghost doth create in vs by the ministery of the word and Sacraments which ministerie because it is committed vnto the Pastors therefore they are said to beare the keyes of the kingdome of heauen VVhat is the Ecclesiasticall power It is that power that is giuen to the Church to be exercised by those that are set ouer the Church to establish and preserue the puritie of the doctrine and of the worship of God decencie order holinesse of manners honestie aswel publicke as priuate in the Church and the members therof and that not of any liberty to commaund euery thing or at pleasure but by the prescript rule and according to the meaning of the written word of God for the saluation and edification of the Church VVhence or from whom is this power From God by Iesus Christ for if you looke vnto men by whom this power is administred it is onely a meere ministery But if ye looke vnto Christ it is a most high authority then which there is vpon earth none greater more profitable or more excellent But the efficacy of it is from the holy Ghost which worketh in the ministerie of the word Iohn 20.22 Receiue the holy Ghost c. Doth this Ecclesiasticall authority differ from the ciuil authority Yes indeed witnes Christ himselfe Luke 12.14 a 22.15 26. 2 Co. 10.4 They do agree indeed in the cause efficient for the author of both is God But they differ first in the matter For the matter of ciuil authority is a society of men and the preseruation therof for the leading of this corporal life vnder one the same magistrat But the matter of Ecclesiastical authority is a company of Christian men so farre forth as they are called of God and consecrated to lead a spirituall life in the true obedience of God Moreouer ciuill authority hath reference vnto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say things earthly and transitory which belong to the vse of this life b 1. Cor. 6.3 Ecclesiastical authority is referred vnto things spirituall and those which appertaine to the
Sathan is not in respect of bodily affliction as some doe expound it seing Ecclesiasticall censures doe not appertaine to the bodie as ciuill doe but properly vnto the soule but amongst the Iewes there was casting out from the Synagogue a Ioh. 9.22 and to be cut off from the people b Gen. 17.14 Leuit. 7.2 and to be reputed for an heathen and Publican that is for profane and altogether irreligious c Mat. 18.17 but to bee excommunicated amongst Christians is to lose the right of a Christian citie vntill he repent and to bee made a vassall of Sathan who ruleth out of the Church Who are to be cited to this censure Not altogether aliants such as this day the Iewes and Turkes are neither Schismaticks hereticks and such as haue made a secesssion altogether from the Christian Church or such as neuer did associate theÌ„selues to the true Church but those especially which yet are as conuersant in the bosome of the Church and haue not yet manifestly gone to them of a separation the Apostle testifying if any being named a brother that is which doth professe himselfe a member of the Church be an Adulterer a couetous person or an Idolater or slanderer or drunkard or an extortioner with such an one eate not nor haue any commerce with him for what haue I to do to iudge of them without doe not you iudge those that are within take away therefore the euill one from amongst you 1. Cor. 5.11.8 Who is the Author of the Ecclesiasticall censure God himselfe for alwaies from the beginning of the world this discipline was vsed in the Church of God wherby the Church in generall was not onely discerned from men which were manifestly profane as in times past before the flood the sonnes of God that is the godly which were deriued from the posteritie of Seth from the sonnes of men that is from the wicked of Caines familie d Gen. 4.26 6 4 but those which did misdemeane themselues were cast out of the bosome of the Church in which sense the ancient fathers thought Caine to bee cast out from the presence of the Lorde And those which were of mature yeares being vncircumcised if they did neglect circumcision or being by their parents neglected was approued of them were cut off by the commaundement of God from his people that is from the societie of the Saints g Gen. 17.14 and by the law of God diuerse rites concerning pollution as of the leaprosie and other seuerings purgings and expiations a Leuit. 5 1.2 13.2.40 14.2 Numb 5 2 6 19. were appointed to the consistorian Synagogue Lastly Christ himselfe hath expresly appointed this order being as we haue learned deriued vnto vs from the Church of Israell b Mat. 18.18 and Paul himselfe at Corinth and else where hath commanded the same to be kept c 1 Cor. 5.1 2.3.4.5 c. 1. Tim. 1.20 and 2. Thes 3.14 saith d 1. Cor. 1.2.18 if any harken not to our speech by Epistle marke him e 1. Tim. 4.14 to wit with the note of excommunication Who ought to haue the power of excommunication The Bishop and the Gouernours of the Church which the Pastor ought to denounce as it is apparant 1. Cor. 5.4 saith Paul being assembled with my spirit for the whole Church ought to haue notice of the same otherwise how can she auoid the familiar society of the partie excommunicated for it is manifest wheÌ„ Christ did dispute of this thing f Mat. 18.17 that he ment the consistorie or the Ecclesiasticall Senate applying his speach to the custome of his times And the power of Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction was in their power which were called the chiefe rulers of the Synagogue g Mar. 5.22 who did also manage the affaires of particular Churches Examples heereof we haue Ioh. 9.22 h 12.42 16.2 and Paul 2. Cor. 16. saith that it is sufficient that such a man was rebuked not in priuate not publick before the whole Church but of many namely being done in the consistorie Whence it is manifest that all the excommunications of that Antichrist of Rome and all his Hierarchie are in trueth none at all How farre forth may a lawfull conuocation vse this spirituall sword Not at their owne arbitrement or priuate authority but. 1. By a precedent lawfull knowledg 2. Vpon iust causes 3. By the prescript of Gods word 4. In the feare of the Lord. 5. In the name of our Lord Iesus Christ that is Gods name being called on as it beseemeth them who do not regard theit owne worke but the Lords businesse according to his worde and with the power of the Lord a 1 Cor. 5.4 6 with the spirit of meeknesse and with especiall clemencie and charity b Gal 6.9 for that which is vnlawfully and wickedly acted on earth cannot be ratified in heauen Vpon whome ought it to be exercised Vpon blaspheemers enemies of Gods glory his trueth obstinate sinners hereticks and seducers worshippers of Idols Schismaticks or Sectaries periured or faithlesse and on open malefactors as rebels to the admonitions of their superiours murtherers whoremongers vsurers railers drunkards extortioners inordinate liuers and such as are condemned in their owne conscience and after their conscience hath beene conuinced do perseuere in their obstinacie vnbridled vncorrigible despising all Christiâ—â— admonition but present not absent c Mat. 18.17 1 Cor. 5.11 2 Thess 3 1â— Tit. 3 11. From what things is the excommunicate person excluded Not only from the participation of the Sacraments for this is only a suspention but from the whole bodie and benefite of the Church and from the ordinarie conuersation speech cohabitation society of life with other meÌ„bers of the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for wee must haue no voluntarie familiar for our minde sake coÌ„mixtion coÌ„sociation or fellowship with any excommunicate person e Rom 16.17 2. Thes 3.14 couple not or consociate not your selues to him 1. Cor. 5.11 But he must be as an Ethnick and publican to vs as Christ doth aduertise vs. Mat. 18.17 neither must we eat with him neither receiue him into our house neither salute him 1. Cor. 5.11 d 2. Ioh. 5.10 but we must fly from him and yet so as our children wife subiects in respect of the magistrate be not exempted from due reuetence least there be a confusion of all neither must they for the offence of the maister of the familie bee accounted as excommunic te prouided that they do not by their conuersation with him giue any assent to his crime As for others they must auoide an excommunicate person Notwithstanding he is not to be depriued of the benefit of the f 1 Cor. 14.2 word by which meanes the offender may bee reclaimed 2. Thess 3 14 if any doe not yeeld obedience to our speech haue no fellowship with him yet saith the Apostle Admonish him as
these cautions following are to be obserued 1 Burning or pulling downe of villages trees that beare fruit cutting vp and spoyling of cornefields vnlesse the enemies abuse the same to our preiudice are not allowed by the word of God b deut 20.19 2 In iust warres it is lawfull and meete to vse against our enemies spies ambushes pollicies yea and stratagems but so as no promise made vnto the enemie be broken for wee must keepe faith euen with the enemie so long as he doth not breake with vs. Whereupon Augustine hath this speach c Psal 15 4 Lib. quest Quest 83 VVhen warre is once iustly vndertaken it skilleth not whether a man fight openly in the field or closely by way of ambush And this he proueth by the authoritie of God himselfe who commanded Ioshua that he should lye in waite against the Citie of Ai d Ios 8.2 And commaunded also Dauid that he should turne about behind the Philistines come vpon them on the other side e 2 Sam 5 23 For in warre that sentence is verie true Dolus an virtus quis in hoste requiret If once I fight against my foe I looke for fraud let vertue goe And we see that euen by the commaundement of God spies were sent from the hoast of Israell vnto the promised land and that good men euen Caleb and Ioshua f Numb 13 17 3 When the enemie seeketh peace the law of suppliants and of those that yeeld and submit themselues is to be obserued by which meanes the Gibeonites were spared Ioshua 9.3 4 In Cities or Townes that are vanquished by force after once the victorie doth appeare certainly to be thine refrain from shedding the bloud of the Citizens that are taken and so also from crueltie towards women infants and old decrepite men and aboue all beware of rauishing or deflowring of women for the law of God neuer tolerateth adulterers or rauishing of virgins or matrones but most seuerely condemneth it and so long as the enemie liueth so long continueth the diuine bond of mariage Those whom God hath ioyned together let no man put asunder Math. 19.6 5 The victorie must be vsed moderately and difference made betweene the causes that moued the leaders and the error of the people and the armie or people yeelding themselues must not be cruelly put to the sword g 2 Cron 28 18. For saith Augustine writing to Boniface As he that fighteth it out and resisteth is to be requited with violence so the conqueror oweth mercy to him that is taken captiue specially if he be such a one as in whom there is no feare of disturbing the common peace And therefore the Romans are commended because they knew Parcere subiectis debellare superbos To pitie those that subiect were And stubborne proud ones downe to beare And in generall vnlesse there be a speciall and peculiar commandement of God to the contrarie clemency is more to bee commended then too much seueritie For it is no vnaduised speach that in lenitie and mercie is the chiefe part of the victory 6 The ransackings and spoyles taken in warre doe of right belong to the Conquerour and are of right his goods and that as Ambrose saith by the verie lawe of warre For there is a iust translation of things from one to another when he that wageth lawfull warre doth possesse the substance of them that are offenders as Cyrus was iustly made ruler of the king of the Babylonians a Isay 45.1 And this point is confirmed by the examples of Abraham b Gen. 14.21 Dauid c 1 Sam. 30 20 and the Israelitese. 7 There must be a meane vsed in the defending of places besieged that we fight not with mans nature d Ios 22 8 but with men our enemies as Xenophon in his first booke of the matters of Greece reporteth that Anaxilaus being accused before the Spartane Iudges for yeelding into the enemies hands the citie of Byzantium which was committed to his charge when he saw many die for hunger he made answere that he defended it as long as the warre was betwixt them and the enemie but when he saw that the warre was betweene them and nature and that such men perished as in warre vse to be spared he then thought there was an ende of the warre which honest excuse when the Iudges heard they acquited and discharged him for warlike offices haue their bounds confirmed by the law of God and nature 8 As for common souldiers and those in garrison trauelling along the countries eyther of their companions they haue these lawes giuen them by Iohn Baptist Luke 3.14 Doe violence to no man neyther accuse any falsely and be content with your wages And the sentence of the Emperour Aurelian in Vopiscus is worthie of exceeding great cōmendation who gaue vnto the Tribune his vicegerent these commaundements If thou wilt be a Tribune nay if thou wilt liue restraine the hands of the souldiers let no man take another mans pullen let no man touch another mans sheepe let no man take away other mens grapes nor destroy their corne nor exact of them oyle salt or wood let euerie one be content with his diet let him take part of the enemies pray not of the teares of the inhabitants c. Seeing that for the most part Princes make warre of an euill and corrupt affection how shall the subiects that are their souldiers satisfie their consciences They are thus to be perswaded that the warre is made vpon a iust cause and that it is not vndertaken against the word of God which is spoken to this end that subiects should not suffer themselues wittingly and willingly to be compelled to oppugne iust and true causes But because subiectes cannot alwaies vnderstand the true causes and counsels of their Princes in this case in the middest of their doubtfulnesss this rule is to bee followed hold that which is certaine and leaue that which is vncertaine Now this is certaine that wee must obey authoritie when it commaundeth not things manifestly vniust And as in the law of Moses Exod. 21.13 there was a refuge and sanctuary appointed for him that had killed another man not willingly nor of set purpose so are the subiects worthie of excuse when in a doubtfull cause they obey their Prince Are those mercenarie souldiers to be allowed of that being hyred with a price will follow eyther side No in no sort For. 1 The most of them doe not fight for their owne magistrate but for forraine Princes 2 They doe most filthily forsake the calling that they haue from God and leauing their parents their wiues their children their trades or their husbandrie they betake themselues to such a kinde of life as there cannot be at this day a worse or a more wicked life deuised 3 They propound vnto themselues none other end but spoile or to satisfie their lust and they are for the most part of the number of those that shed
it d 1 Sam. 24 6 what would he haue bin if he had shed his bloud yea when one brought him word that he had slaine him did he not command him to be executed as a traitor e 2 Sam. 1.14 15 And this he did that he might not make himselfe a president for traitors by a discontented spirit through his example to kill kings Nay he thought it better to make a deere account of his Soueraignes life though he sought his Tertullian hath to this purpose an excellent speech Christianis praestat occidi quam occidere It is better for Christians to be killed then to kill This made Paul to say let euery soule be subiect to the higher powers f Rom. 13.1 this made him to exhort that praiers and supplications be made for Kings g 1 Tim. 2.1 euen for such kings as Nero was in his time this made Peter to say Feare God Honour the King h 1. Pet 2 17 This made Solomon to say My son feare God and the King and meddle not with them that are seditious 1 Prov. 24 21 and to aduise all men in the booke of the Preacher not so much as to curse the king in their hearts k Eccle. 10.20 But seing you set downe this true Doctrine of obedience tell me whether this be the Doctrine of popery The ansvvere is â—n â—â—ridgment of the Exâ—ct aâ—scorse that it is lawfull for any man to kill a Prince who is of a contrarie Religion to Popery Questionlesse it is as may be proued first by their owne assertions Secondly by their seuerall practises Thirdly by the Popes owne pardons for and commendations of such seditious persons as haue either attempted or atchieued the like treasons What are the assertions of papists in this point They do not only say that Heretick neighbors may be spoyled lawfully of their goods Decret papa â—pud grat c. 15. q. glossa that protestant ministers may be defrauded of their tythes b Aâ—â—â— us Card. Et personus that Heretick creditors are not to be payed c Symanchalnst cath Tit. 46. Toletus Ios Insti sacerd de Excom Gratia c. 15 quib that Keepers of forts are freed from such Lords d ibidem Sym that wiues are not bounden to such husbands e Sym Instit that Fathers may disinherit such children f Alanus that children may deny such parents g Alanus pars that kinsfolkes may kill such kindred h Grat. l 5 causa 13.9 Cap legi and that one borne in an hereticall country may deny his country i Alan pars but that by Heresie a man nay a king is depriued of al his iurisdiction whether naturall ciuill or politick k Sym. iâ—stit Tit 46. sect 47 And the tenor of the oath of the league in France is thus If euer I make mariage vse traffick yeeld aid hold friendship giue credence to hereticks or once salute them let God confound me l Ludou de Orl. Part. â—9 Shewe this in particular One of their owne Bishops saith As soone as a Christian King becomes hereticall forthwith the people are freed from subiection m Simâ—ncha Inst Tit. 23 sect 11 A Cardinall saith As long as the prince continueth excommunicate as he must doe euer if he be not a Romanist for the Pope excommunicates ipso facto all hereticks the subiect is freed from the oath of subiection n Tol. Instr. saâ—erd L 1. c. 13 but by whome By the Pope saith a Iesuite who vpon iust cause hath power to absolue from oaths both himselfe as Gregory the 12. did when hee sware that if hee were chosen Pope he would giue it ouer and all others o Ar or Ies mar c. 15 If he be personally excommunicate Then saith their Lawyer subiects are freed from their allegiance and all his hereticall assistants are to bee rooted out and their Land to be exposed to be possessed of strangers Catholicks p Massov Iuriscons de maiest 〈◊〉 â—â—eccl par 2 L 4. de imp pag 676 Nay saith another Lawyer if he be not excommunicate yet if his heresie be publickly knowne q Panorm cap cum in hom there needeth no pronuntiation of the sentence of excoÌ„munication so that saith the Iesuite subiects may lawfully deny him obedience r Valent. Ies Tom 3 in Thomae d sâ— q. 12 p. 2. pâ—g â—63 How so For the euidence of the crime saith their whole school make it a matter of certainty faith doth infer a senteÌ„ce of condenation Å¿ Bannes â—n 2. 2 q. 12. act 2 concl 2 because as the more common opinion doth define it there must we vnderstand the Popes will to haue him excoÌ„municate whom vpon the knowledge of his fault he would excommunicate Nay suppose that a Protestant Prince haue a iust Quarrell yet no warre can be lawfully denounced or waged by the Queen being excommunicate by name though otherwise in it selfe it were most iust because her power is vnlawfull a Alens letter to â—â—â—ley Come we next to practises shew me them First Pope Gregorie the seauenth alias Hildebrand beginneth this Pageant We by the Apostolicall authoritie doe absolue all from their oathes which they haue giuen to persons excommunicate b apud grat c. 17. 6. 6 And another Gregorie vseth the like tenor we excoÌ„municate al hereticks that they who are bounden vnto theÌ„ by oath may know that they are absolued from all duetie of fidelitie c Greg 9 L. 9 decr Tit 7. c. 5 Lastly Pius Quintus their successor in place but superiour in malice saith We coÌ„mand all subiects absolue theÌ„ froÌ„ the faith they haue plight with their queen Elizabeth d Pius 5 in bulla But this is onely for obedience to Kings what can you shewe for offering violence to Kings Costerus saith This power of deposing Kings of their crownes and Emperours of their dignities in behalfe of the good of the Church was euer peculiar to the Pope who hath no lesse authoritie as Christs Vicar ouer Christians then the hireling ouer his beasts e In Apol pro part 1. ench p. 64 So the pope hath authoritie ouer the Emperour saith Molinia because the Emperour is but the popes Minister and is to vse his temporall sword onely at his beck f de Inst dispâ— 29 tract 2 And if Kings will not enthrall themselues to the Popes authoritie It is not lawfull for Christians saith the Cardinal to tolerate any such King who draweth his subiects to heresie g Bellarm. L 5. c 6 7 4. de Ro P But subiects ought saith Sanders to set vp another in his place h De visib monarch L 2 c. 4 Yea they ought saith Creswell to expell him out of his Kingdom as the enemy of Christ which is as he calleth it i in philop pag. 194 an vndoubted doctrine among the learned and agreeable to Apostolicall truth Yea which is
more though the Pope saith Bannes should tolerate an hereticall King yet may the Common wealth remoue him k In thoma 2 2 q. 12 art 2â— And then who shall remoue the Iewes and the Stewes tolerated by the Pope euen in Rome But yet behold a greater mysterie of this iniquitie for suppose that the King deposed shall bee willing to be reconciled to the Church yet notwithstanding saith Simancha hee may not recouer his crowne e In stit Catho Tit. 33 sect And doth not the Bull of Pius or rather impious Quintus roare thus We commaund the subiects of England to take armes against their Queene Elizabeth m bulla piâ— Q. p M Doth not another say Anie man may lawfully murder a Tyrant which I defend by common consent n Libro de Abdica Henrâ— 3. p. â—62 270 Now it is euident saith Reinolds that foxe that euerie heretick prince is most properly and perfectly a Tyrant o in Rosao and if saith a Spanish Iesuite they may be bereaued of their liues much more of their liuings and renownes p Valentia Toâ—o 3 disp 1 q 11 punct 2 Nay Hereticall Kings saith Simancha deserue more grieuous punishment than priuate men Therefore the Scythians as hee well deserued did put to death their King Scylen for violating their Bacchanals q Instit cath Tit 23. sect 12 13 Behold your faces in this Scythian Glasse you Priests of Baall But to goe on were not the Iesuites the causes of all that tyranny which was exercised amongst the Indians r Mercur gallobelâ—g toâ— mo 2. L 10 and which yet cryeth for vengeance from heauen Did not Duke Randolphe persecute the Emperour Henry his King by force of armes that only at the popes instigation a Abbas vsp Crant in Cron 2 Did not Clemens that mercilesse Monke murder Henry his king in France Did not Parrey Lopez diuerse others attempt the like against Queene Elizabeth haue not those monsters of men those infamous traitors of late attempted the like against our King and country and one of them seduced by Iesuits died in it that it was no sin Doth not Reinalds speake against the King of Nauarre to the French in these words Will you proclame Nauarre a Caluinist king of the most christian Kingdome of France What is this else but to aduance a dog to be Soueraigne ouer men Shall Catholicks pray God saue that King whom they may not admit into their houses But now that France is theirs as they thinke this Iland of Britaine is a great eyesore to them and to the end they might haue a prince to their purpose they can write whole volumes to aduance a woman stranger and to disable the iust title of our dread Soueraigne King Iames. Remember these children of Edome Psal 137.7 O Lord whoe said of Ierusalem downe with it downe with it vnto the ground But you cannot shewe that any Romanists haue commended this practise Yes that I can Bellarmine saith Many Popes haue iustly deposed many princes c L. 5. de Rom. pontif c. 6 et 7 Cardinall Allen d To siâ— vvilliam Staâ—ly Reinolds e in Râ—saeo Parsons f in hâ—s Dol â—aÌ„ that is his deceitful man inciting subiects to take armes against their Prince doe perswade by examples meerely rebellious as the resisting of King Iohn of Edward the second Richard the second of Henry the sixt as presidents to be followed The author of the book of Deposing Henry king of France doth sing a Gaudeamus for his death g Libro de insta abdic H. 3 And again Allen doth approue the perfidious rendring vp of Deuenter encorageth the English maleconteÌ„ts to ioyne their forces with the Spanish inuasion h To sir vvillaÌ„ Stanley 1587. And I haue haue read an Oration made at Rome 1588. by Georgius Picchae to Pius Quintus other Christian Princes pro Britannico bello indicendo for inuading of England So the Colledge of Iesuites at Salamancha approued the insurrection of Tyrone i Admon to the nobility of England And what traitor is there who hath suffered for treason is not amongst them canonized for a Saint it may bee our late Traitors in policy shall not be so because it was not felix scelus And when that seduced seruant of Catesby Bates began but to doubt whether the late treason was lawful did not a priest tel him that it was meritorious and that he sinned because he so much as doubted Furthermore it is plaine that Xistus Quintus doth commend in a panegyrical Oration k Habita in consist 1589. the murther of the French King as a notable rare memorable act But why Because he slewe not saith he a King painted in paper or grauen in stone but the King of France in the middest of his host This saith he was a fact done by the admirnble prouidence will and succour of almighty God a far more maruailous worke then that of Iudith And that English traitor Parry had his pardon from the Pope to kill the Queene and Lopez his pay to poyson her And Cardinall Poole when the Emperour was going against the Turke hee aduised him to diuert his forces from the Pagans and to enforce them vpon Henrie the eight as vpon an enemy more pernicious than the Turke a Card pool ad H 8. L. 3 Pag. 38 4 Iude. 8. Thus we see that these are the men who resist gouernment and because their Pope must be head of the Church as they will haue it therefore they giue Commonweales Leaue to choose a king limit him at their pleasure b Parson in his Dolman saying that maiesty is seated rather in the kingdome than in the king that people are not ordained for the prince c Ies de Instit abridge in h 3 but the prince for the people d Dydimus pag 26 1 Stapleton that a king is but a creature of maÌ„s creation e Rotiqual duâ— de iusta auctoritate pag. 8. But haue not Lutherans Caluinists and such as are called Puritans defended practised the murdering or at the least deposing of princes and doth not this author whoÌ„ you haue translated defend the like It may be that some of these haue not spoken so aduisedly of the authority of princes as they ought liuing themselues mostly in free states cities wher gouernors are chosen by election as thinking that when such princes shall go about to alter the ancient pure religion of God dilapidate consume the reuenues of the crown tyrannize by exactions ouer their subiects beat them as Rehoboam did with scorpions that then the general state the peers and Parliament of the land may labour to redresse such disorder But that a king should be deposed by his subiects murdered by a priuate maÌ„ or assaulted by forraine force eyther it cannot be proued out of their writings or if it be we are to