to the Prophets and Apostles do cry down this error Exod. 17.14 and 34.27 Deut. 31.19 Isa. 8.1 and 30.8 Ier 30.2 Hab. 2.2 Re. 1.11.19 14.13 19.9 21.9 The testimonies of the Apostles proclaiming that nothing was said or written by mans advice or counsel cry out against this error John 20.31 But these things are written that ye might believe c. Rom 15.4 But what things are written are written for our learning that through patience and comfort of the Scriptures we might have hope 1 Cor. 10.11 These things are written to admonâ—sh us 1 Tim. 3.16 All Scripture is given by divine inspiration And 2 Pet. 1.20 21. So that ye fiâ—st know this that no Prophesie in the Scripture is of any private motion for Prophesie came not of old time by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost Lastly these precepts cry out against them by which we are directed to the wâ—itten word in matters of salvation Isa 8.20 To the law and to the testimâ—ny John 5 39. Search the Scriptures V. We acknowledge therefore no other principle of Divinity than the written word of God VI. It is an unquestionable Principle amongst Christians that the Holy Scripture is both of a divine original and authority VII It is then a question ill beseeming a Christian to demand whether the Scripture or holy Bible be Gods word or not For as in the Schools there is no desputing with him who denies Principles so we account him unworthy to be heard who will deny this principle of Christian Religion VIII Among Christians it is lawful to ask By what testimony do we know that the Scriptures are by divine inspiration So we ask not for this end to seduce others or to cavel but onely to be instructed IX Now this testimony is twofold the one principal the other ministerial The principal testimony is that of the Holy Spirit outwardly in the Scripture it self inwardly in the minds and hearts of the faithful being illuminate by him speaking and perswading the divinity of the Scriptures But the ministerial testimony is the testimony of the Church Outwardly in the Scriptures themselves the holy Ghost when he speaks of the divine original and authority of the VVord useth these phrases The word of the Lord Thus saith the Lord. Iesus said All Scripture is by divine inspiration 2 Tim 3.16 Holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost But inwardly in the hearts of the faithful he perswades the divinity of Scriptures so far forth as he openeth the eyes illuminates the mind of him that reads the Scripture with prayer and humility that he makes him see the wonders of God and causeth him to acknowledge the voice of Gods Spirit sounding in the Word The Romanists urge the Churches authority alone which they have in such high esteem that they will have the whole authority of Scriptures to have its dependence from the Church and for this only cause they will have it to be Gods Word because the Church is the witnesse of it But this is not to make the Church a witnesse of the Scriptuâ—es divinity but to make her self capable of divinity But we will prove by these ensuing arguments that the testimony of Gods Spirit alone is it which firmly assures us of the scriptures divinity 1. His testimony concerning the Scriptures is most firm by whose inspiration the Scripture was written For every one knows his own hand best and is best aâ—quainted with his own stiâ—e But the Scripture was written by the inspiration of the holy Ghost 2 Tim. 3.16 2 Pet. 1.20 21. Ergo c. 2. He that together with the Scripture is promised in a most neer conjunction to the faithful his testimony of the Scripture is most firm But the Holy Ghost is promised to the faithful in a most neer conjunction with the Scripture Esa. 59.21 My spirit which is in thee my words which I have put in thy mouth shall not depart from thy mouth 3. Without whose illumination the wonders of the Scripture are not seen his testimony alone of the Scripture is most firm But without the illumination of the Holy Ghost no man sees the wonder of the Scripture Psal. 119.18 Open my eyes that I may see the wonders of thy Law Ergo c. 4. VVhose office it is to lead us into all truth he it is that witnesseth this truth to wit that the Scripture is Gods word But it is the office of the Holy Ghost to lead us into all truth John 16 13. Ergo c. Now as for the Churches testimony although it is to be received as from Gods Minister yet it is false that the Scriptures authority depends on it For what can be more absurd than to make the words of the Master to receive their authority from the Servant or the Fathers letters to receive credit from the footâ—post or the Princes mandates from the Printer or that the Rule should have its dependence from the thing ruled VVe know that the oracles of God are committed to the Church Rom. 3.2 and that she is the pillar ground of truth 1 Tim. 3.15 But as it is foolish to tell us that the candle receives its lights from the candle-stick that supports it so it is ridiculous to ascribe the Scriptures authority to the Church The Churches testimony may be prevalent with those who as yet know not the Scriptures and have not received that sincere milk of the word nor by it are grown up 1 Pet. 2 2. But in those who have tasted the sweetnesse of divine oracles the testimony of Scriptures and of the Holy Ghost is most firm and effectual For as he who tasteth hony himself hath a more sure knowledge of its sweetnesse than he that believeth another speaking witnessing of it even so he knoweth more assuredly the Scriptures to be Gods Word who hath tasted its sweetnesse than he who gives credite to the Church witnessing this sweetnesse The Samaritans at first believed the woman when she spake of Christ but after they heard Christ himself they say to the woman Now we believe not because of thy saying for we have heard him our selves and know that this is indeed the Christ the Saviour of the world Joh. 4.42 Even so he that having begged the assistance of Gods Spirit reads the Scriptures again again at length saith Now I believe no longer for the Churches testimony that the Scriptures are divine but because I have read them my self and in reading have stamped this Syllogism in my minde 1. That Scripture which everywhere brings in God himself speaking 2. Which is written by those men who being furnished with the gifts of prophesying and miracle from God extraordinarily do with such faithfulnes record all things that in rehearsing of sins and infirmities they neither spare themselves nor friends 3. Who record not only truths and things agreeing with right reason but
divine matters also and such as transcend all reason 4. After a divine manner and in a wonderfull harmony of circumstances in the same things rehearsed by different Writers 5. To the Glory of God alone and our salvation 6. With admirable efficacy both in moving the hearts and corroborating them against most exquisite tortures 7. In the miraculous preservation of it against Diabolicall and Tyrannical fury That Scripture I say which thus delivereth these things is doubtless divine both in its Original and in its Authority But such is the holy Scripture Therefore it is Divine both in its Originall and in its Authority That I may then contract the matter in brief the Testimony of the Church is first in respect of time but that of the Holy Ghosts is first in regard of Nature and efficacy VVe believe the Church but not for the Church but we believe the holy Ghost for himself The Churches Testimony doth monstrate but not demonstrate it shews the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that the thing is but the holy Ghost Testimony shews the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the cause The â—wasive power is in the Church but the perswasive in the spirit onely The Churches Testimony begets an opinion but the Testimony of Scripture begets Science and â— firm Faith X. The Canonical Books of Scripture are partly of the Old partly of the New Testament To the Old belong the five Books of Moses Josuah Judges Ruth these Books are single the Books of Samuel of the Kings of the Chronicles are double The Books of Ezra Nehemiah Esther Job Psalms Proverbs Ecclesiastes Canticles the four greater Prophets and the twelve lesser are single Now of the New Testament are The four Evangelists The Acts of the Apostles The Epistles of Paul to the Romanes one To the Corinthians two to the Galathians EEphesians Philippians and Colossians single To the Thessalonians and Timothy double to Titus Philemon and Hebrews single The Epistles of Peter two of John three of James and Jude single and the Revelation XI But for the books of Tobiah Judith Wisdom Ecclesiasticus Esdra 3 4. of Machabees 1 â— 3. of Baruch 1 The Prayer of Manasses The Epistle of Ieremiah The Additions to Daniel and Esther Although they may be read with profit yet they come short of that authority which is in the Canonical Books for proving Articles of Faith and therefore they are called Apocrypha that is hid or obscure The reasons be these 1. Because they were not written by the Prophets but they have been written for the most part since Malachi the last of the Prophets 2. Because they are not written in the Stile or Phrase of the Prophets or in the Hebrew Tongue 3 Because they are never alledged in the New Testament 4. Because in reading of them we finde many passages contrary and inconsistent with Canonical Scripture besides many fabulous and repugnant to Faith and Pâ—ety XII The Holy Scripture is sufficient to Salvation 2 Tim. 3 16 17. The whole Scripture is by Divine inspiration and is profitable for Doctrine for Reproof for Correction for Instruction in Righteousness that the man of God may be perfect and throughly furnâ—shed to every good work XIII Therefore as the constitutions of the Church conducing to the right usage of outward Rites are in their one place to be regarded so no tradition is to be admitted as necessary to salvation except the Scripture The Romanists do not onely fight for popish Traditions but also equal them nay prefer them to the holy Scriptures but we are content to rest in that command of God which forbids to adde to or take away from his word Deut. 4.2 and 5.32 and 12.32 Rev. 22.18 XIV The search of holy Scripture is injoyned to all Christians Joh. 5.39 Search the Scriptures Colos. 3.16 Let the word of God dwell plentifully among you Neither is that obscurity of holy scripture which the Pontificians pretend any obstacle to this our assertion for though it be obscure in some places yet in other places it explains it self and delivereth the prime articles of Religion with great perspicuity XV Therefore the translation of the Bible â—nto vulgar Tongues is necessary XVI Yet no translation is authentical but that which agreeth with the Original fountains of the Hebrew and Greek XVII Although the Interpretation of Scripture is committed to the Church yet the onely supream Iudge of this interpretation is the Holy Ghost speaking in it Esay 59.29 My Spirit which is in thee and my words which I have put in thy mouth shall not depart from thee 2 Pet. 1.20 21. So that you first know this that no prophesie in the Scripture is of any private motion for the prophesie came not of oâ—d time by the will of man but holy mâ—n of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost Therefore sacrilegiously do the Pontificians arrogate to the Church of Rome or to the Pâ—pe alone this right of supreme judge XVIII The sense and meaning of each Scripture is but one yet in the Prophesies of the Old Testament it is composed of a history and mystery For example Hos. 11. ver 1. In these words When Israel was a child then I loved him and called my son out of Egypt I be sense is compounded for literally historically they are to be understood of the delivery of the Israelites out of Egypt but â—ypically and mystically of Christs calling out of Egypt Matth. 2. â—5 XIX The means to finde out the true sense of Scripture are Frequent prayers the knowledg of tongues the looking into the Fountains the consâ—deration of the scope argumentâ— the distincâ—ion of proper tâ—rms from figurative the logical analysis or nothing of the Causes the circumstances the passages going before and coming after the comparing of obscure places with cleerer of like with like and of disagreeing places with each other lastly the analogie of faith XX. As God is the proper and prime object so is he also the principal and suprem end of Divinity XXI Whereas then the cheif end and the cheif good are one and the same thing it is manifest that Christian Divinity only doth rightly teach us concerning the chief good XXII The subordinate end of Divinity in our salvation which consisteth in the union and fruition of God The parts of Divinity are two The first is of the knowledge of God the second of the worship of God The first containeth faith or the things to be believed the second works or the things to be performed THE FIRST BOOK OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOD. CHAP. I. Of the Essence of GOD. GOD is a Spirit existent eternally in himself One in Essence Three in Persons Father Sonne and Holy Ghost God is known in himself and in his works In himself he is known absolutely in his essence relatively in the Persons Gods essence is known by his Names and by his Properties The names of God are either taken from his essence as Iehova Iah
the Churches union is shewed 1 Cor. 10.17 We being many are one bread and one body for we are all partakers of that one bread XIII The words This is my body can neither be meant of transubstantiation nor of consubstantiation but the meaning is This to wit the Bread is the Sacrament of my body The Papists interpret the words thus That which is contained under the kind of Bread is my Body The Lutherans thus in with under this is my Body The reason of our interpretation is explained in the former Chapter They say that it is absurd to use tropical phrases which are obscure in Christs will and Legacie But 1. This supposition of theirs is false that tropical phrases are obscure for we use tropes oftentimes to illustrate 2. It is false also that tropes are not used in Wills and Testaments for Iacobs Will shews the contrary Gen â—9 And Moses's Deut. 33. David's 2 Sam. 23. Tobias 4. Matathias 1 Mac. 2.3 If there be no trope in the Lords Supper then let them shew how the Cup can be called the New Testament in his blood without a trope That saying of Austins Advers Adimant Maniâ— cap. 12. is worthy here to be set down The Lord doubted not to say this is my Body when he gave the Signe of his Body XIV It is one thing to say that Christ is present in the Bread and another to maintain his presence in the Supper for Christ is present in his Deity and Spirit he is present also in his body and blood by a Sacramental presence 1. Of the Symbol not that he is present in the Bread but that he is presented by the bread as by a symbol 2. Of Faith whereby we apply Christ with his merits to us 3. Of Vertue and efficacie XV. The proper end of the Supper not to speak of others is to seal our spiritual nutrition or preservation to life eternal by the merit of Christs death and obedience whence depends the union of the faithfull with Christ and with themselves XVI It is an intolerable abuse to take this Sacrament to prove ones innocency in the courts of justice to confirm mens covenants to prosper our purposes and actions c. XVII The Lords Supper must be often times taken As often as you shall eat this bread c. 1 Cor. 11.26 XVIII The Supper differs from Baptism not only in external signes but in its proper end because Baptism is the sign of spiritual Regeneration but the Supper of nutrition also in the object or subject to which for Baptism is given to Infants the Supper to those onely who are of years and have been tryed they differ also in time for Baptism is used but once the Lords Supper often times XIX The Popish Masse is altogether repugnant to the Lords Supper 1. The holy Supper is instituted by Christ the Masse by the Pope 2. the Supper is a Sacrament instituted in memory of Christs sacrifice which was once offered but the Masse among Papists is the sacrifice it self to be offered every day the Ancients indeed called the Lords Supper a sacrifice yet not expiatory for sins but Eucharistical and such as is joyned with prayers and charitable works which are acceptable sacrifices to God 3. Christ did not offer himself in the Supper but on the Crosse but â—hey will have Christ to be offered in their Mass. 4. Christ instituted his Supper for the living but the Masse is celebrated for the dead also 5. In the Holy Supper Christs body was already made by the virtue of the Holy Ghost not of bread but of the Virgins blood In the Masse Christs body is made anew by the Priest uttering his five words and that of bread 6. In the holy Supper there was and remained true Bread and true Wine and it obtained this name even after consecration In the Masse if we will believe it there remain onely the outward species of the Element and the accidents 7. In the Holy Supper they all drank of the câ—p as Christ commanded in the Masse the Lay-people are denied the cup. 8. In the Supper Bread was broken to represent Christs body broken on the Crosse In the private Masse the bigger Hoast is broken into three parts the first is for the triumphant Church the second for the Church in Purgatory the third for the Church here on earth CHAP. XXV Of the Nature of the visible Church HItherto of the outward communion of the Covenant of grace Now follows the external society of the visible Church where by all that be called are accounted for members of the Church For the Church is considered either in it self or in opposition to the false Church the Church is considered in her self in respect of her own nature and outward administration The visible Church then is a visible society of men called to the state of grace by the Word and Sacraments The RULES I. The name of Church and Synagogue is the same with the Hebrew Kahal and Edah but the society of Christians is mâ—re usually called the church II We must carefully here observe the distinction of the word that we may know of what Church we speak III. For whereas it is distinguished into the triumphant and militant that belongs to the doctrine of the state of glory this is for our present consideration IV. The militant Church is divided into the visible and invisible V. The invisible Church is the company of the Elect onely This is called invisible not as if the men that belong to her were not visible as they are mâ—n but that they are not perceived as they are elect for the Lord knows only who are hiâ— 2 Tim. 2.19 VI. This belongs to the doctrine of special vocation for by her proper effects to wit faith charity and such like the elect which are the invisible Church are known VII The visible Church is the company of all that are called in common as well Reprobates as Elect. VIII This word Church visible is ambiguous for properly it is meant of the universal Church dispersed through the whole World more strictly of any particular Church as of France England Holland c. but most strictly of the representative Church or the company of Pastors and Elders IX Her efficient cause in common is the holy Trinity in particular Christ. X. The matter of the Church are they who are called in common and received into the Covenant of grace and Infants that are born in the Church XI Neither unbaptised Infants nor Catechumeni nor excommunicate persons are to be excluded out of the number of the Churches members The two foâ—mer soâ—ts of men belong to the Church by the righâ— of covenant though nâ—t of profession but for the third kinde though they be cast out of some particular Church yet they are not simply ejected out of the catholike though the Papists excommunicate them XII The form of the Church consisteth in a double union the first is of her conjunction with Christ her
and his posterity As out of a venemous root nothing can proceed that 's wholsome so all that are come of Adam naturally are born guilty of that primitive sin X. That primitive sin therefore is not only personal but natural also because by it whole Nature is destroyed of which also Adams prosterity is held guilty to wit all that are naturally sprung from Adam Christ then is excepted from this guilt for he was born of Adam but not by Adam not by naturall generation but by the vertue of the Holy Ghost XI As therefore the Person infected Nature so afterward Nature infected the Persons XII We religiously believe that our first Parents were received into favour by God CHAP. X. Of Original Sinne and Free-will THat Sin which is derived from the first or primitive Sin is either original or actual original Sin is that native corruption derived into the whole man and to the whole race of man naturally descending from Adam whereby man having utterly lost his freedom to good becomes prone to evil The RULES I. This sin in Scripture is named by way of excellency Sin and the Body of sin Sinful-sin Inhabiting-sin The law of our members The Old-man Flesh II. It is called also Concupiscence Rom 7.7 I had not known lust or concupiscence unlesse the Law had said thou shalt not covet or lust or Jam. 1 14 15. III. Therefore the Papists doe erroniously exempt it from being a sin reckoning it among the works of God By the name of Concupiscence is understood either that natural faculty of desire which was in man even before his fall or that corruption which naturally adheres to it as it is in it in the first act and as it inclines man onely to evill IV. The proximate cause of Original sin is the guilt of the first sin in respect of which it is a most just punishment from God to wit a part of that death which God threatened to man V. Although the soul is immediately infused by God into man yet being united to the body it is made guilty presently of the first sin imparted to the whole man and therefore is infected with Original contagion VI. Neither for this cause doth Original sin cease to be sin in that it is not wittingly nor willingly committed for it is sufficient that the irregularity of our nature is present though spontaneousnesse be absent VII From this Original sin except Christ alone no man is free not the blessed Virgin Mary Neither is it only in Infants but it is in the Embryo scarce as yet conceived and before the birth and it appears still more and more as the rapacity of Wolves shews it self in their whelps Psal. 51.7 Behold I was borne in iniquity and in sin hath my mother conceived me 2 Cor. 5.21 For he hath made him to be sin for us who knew no sin VIII Original sin doth consist not onely in an impotency and inaptitude to goodnesse but also in pronenesse to evill neither is it onely the amission of Original good but also the immission of the contrary evill IX By Original sin our natural gifts are corrupted but supernatural are utterly lost X. The Vnderstanding remained but darkened the Will remained but depraved the inferiour Appetite remained but altogether vitiated XI Hence it is that in natural and civil actions an irregenerate man can do no good without special grace XII Without this special grace no excellent thing could be performed by the Gentiles XIII Whatsoever good then that was which they did it was mixed with much vanity so that their chief vertues were in Gods sight but glorious enormities XIV For those are not good works which are good in themseâ—ves but which are done well A work is said to be good either univocally or equivocally univocally so such a work is simply good in respect of all circumstances equivocally a work is good in it self but withall vitious either in respect of the subject or object or means or the end for if we look upon the actions of the Gentiles we shall finde that they aimed more at their own than at Gods glory in them XV. Although the affections of the wicked are kept in by God as with a Bit yet they are not healed XVI But supernatural gifts were utterly lost to wit the claritie of the intellect the rectitude of the will and the conformity of the appetite with reason XVII Hence there is no principle of knowledge or performance of spirituall things in us either in act or in possibility XVIII They seek then the house in the ashes who ascribe to an unregenerate man free-will or other faculties by which he may do well or prepare himself to his own conversion or to the acceptation of Gods grace For this is the errour of Pelagians and Semi-pelagians XIX Mans will remained free from coaction but not to good and evill XX. Yea it is free to evill onely and therefore deserves rather to be called servile than free As for the understanding the natural man comprehends not the things that are of Gods Spirit 1 Cor. 2.14 If you look upon the will the imagination of mans heart is onely evill Gen. 8.21 Finally the Scripture cries out that the whole man having lost his spiritual life lieth dead in sin Ephes. 2.1 Col. 2.13 XXI Although this sin is pardoned in the sanctified Parents notwithstanding by generation it is tansmitted to posterity The reason is because the corruption dwelling in us is not altogether taken away by pardon although the guilt be done away and as faith is the gift not of generation but of regeneration so man not as he is regenerate but as man begets man even as seeds being winnowed from the ears chaff and husks do spring up again with the same CHAP. XI Of actual Sin SO much of Original sin Actual sin is whereby Gods Law is broken by thoughts desires words or deeds The RULES I. According to the diversity of circumstances there are diverse sins II. From the efficient cause sin is either of publique or of private persons as they are in more or less dignity III. From the matter which are things thought desired said or done IV. From the form it is either of commission or omission V. From the end it is either of incogitancy or of affectation and against conscience and that rather of malice than of infirmity or contrarily rather of infirmity than malice VI. From the subject it is of the soul chiefly or of the body or of both VII From the object it is either committed against God or our neighbour VIII Sin committed against God is either with a kind of unwillingness or with a full desire this later sin the Scripture cals the sin against the holy Ghost and to death Matth 12.32 1 John 5.16 IX The sin against the Holy Ghost or to death is when one is convicted in his conscience by the testimony of the Holy Spirit resisteth notwithstanding the same
the end of the Law Rom. 10.4 when it is called a School-master to lead us to Christ Gal. 3.24 and when the Law is said not to be contrary to him who doth the works of the Spirit Gal. 5.22 23. For that righteousness which the Law requires that the Gospel exhibites in Christ to the Believer and albeit we cannot in this life yield full satisfaction to the Law yet the regenerate begin to obey it by the grace of sanctification CHAP. XVI Of the Person of Christ God and Man THe parts of the Gospel concerning Christ our Redeemer are two the first is of his person the other of his Office In respect of the Person the Redeemer is God and man that is Gods eternal Son being incarnate or made man in the fulnesse of time John 1.14 And the word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us Gal. 4 4. But after the fulnesse of time came God sent his Son made of a Woman 1. Tim. 3 16. and without controveâ—sie great is the mystery of godliness God made manifest in the flesh The RULES I. The Incarnation of Christ originally is the work of the whole blessed Trinity but terminatively or in respect of the object it is the work of the Son alone For the son onely assumed mans nature which the father in the Son by the Holy Ghost formed of the substance of the blessed Virgin II The person of Christ is considered either disjunctively as the Word and the eternal Son of God or conjunctively as God and man the first consideration is according to Divinity the latter according to Oeconomie or Gods gracious dispensation III. Likewise the divine nature is considered either in it self and simply or relatively as it is in the Person of the Word by dispensation IV. Althâ—ugh then it be true that Christ-God is become man yet it follows not that therefore the Divinity is incarnate or because the Son is Incarnate that the Father also and Holy Ghost are Incarnate V. The matter out of which the Incarnation was effected is the seed of the Woman or of the blessed Virgin Gen. 3.15 VI. The forme of it consisteth in the Personal Vnion whereby the word was made flesh and Christ remained the same he was and became what he was not VII The end is Gods glory and our salvation VIII Both the truth of God as also our salvation do evince the necessity of Christs incarnation IX The truth of God because in the Old Testament it was uttered by divers Prophesies and was shaddowed by divers types These are the chief Prophesies Gen 3.15 I will put enmity between thee and the Woman and between thy seed and her seed it shall bruise thy head and thou shalt bruise his heel Gen. 22.18 In thy seed all nations shall be blessed Esa. 7.14 Behold a Virgin shall conceive and bring forth a Son and they shall call his name Emanuel Esa. 9.6 7. For unto us a child is borne and unto us a Son is given Jer. 23.5 Behold the dayes shall come in which I will raise to David a righteous branch and a King shall reign and prosper and shall execute judgement and justice on the earth In his dayes â—udah shall be saved and Israel shall dwell safely and this is his name whereby he shall be called The Lord our righteousness But his types were the Tabernacle the Arke of the Covenant and such like of which we have said but chiefly Melchisedeck without father without mother Hebr. 7.3 and that humane shape or form in which he appeared of old frequently to the Fathers X. Our salvation for this cause doth evince and prove the necessity of his Incarnation in that we could not be saved but by such a redeemer who was both God and Man in one Person or God-man XI That he should be God was requisite in respect of both parties on the one side the Majesty of God required it on the other side our wants the greatness of the evil that was to be removed and the good that was to be restored Such is the Majesty of God that no man could interpose himself but he who was one with the Father the very Angels durst not do this because they also stood in need of Christ the Mediator Col. 1.16 17. Because they being compared with God are unclean Ioh. 15.15 and for this cause they cover their faces in Gods presence Isa. 6.2 How much lesse then could any man intercede whereas there is not one just person Rom. 3.10 The evill that was to be taken away was sin and the consequents of sin the wrath of God the power of Satan both temporal and eternal death Now I pray by whose suffering could that infinite Majesty be satisfied which was offended unlesse by his suffering who was also Infinitâ— By whose Intercession could the wrath of God be appeased but by his onely who is that best beloved son of God By whose strength could Satan with the whole power of darknesse be overcome except by his who in power exceeds all the Devils who finally could overcome death except he who had the power over death Heb. 2.15 But the good things that were to be â—estred were perfect righteousness adoption into sons the Image of God the gifts of the holy Ghost life eternal and such like but now who could bestow that righteousness on us except he who is justice it self Who is so fit to make us the sons of God as he who is by nature the Son of God Who was so fit to restore in us the image of God as he who is himselfe the Image of the invisible God who can bestow on us the holy Spirit so assuredly as he from whom the spirit proceedeth Who at last can give us life eternal but he who is life it self Iohn 1.4 XII That he might be man the justice of God required which as it leaves not sin unpunished so it punisheth not sin but in that nature which sinned The first branch of this Rule is plain both by the justice and by the truth of God By his justice because God by this doth not onely resist but also punish sin Psal. 5.4 5 6. For thou art not a God that hast pleasure in wickednesse nor shall evil dwell with thee the foolish shall not stand in thy sight thou hatest all workers of iniquity thou shalt destroy them that speak lies the Lord will abhor the blody and deceitful man Now by the truth of God because the threatning which was given before the fall could not be in vain therefore Socinus is idle and foolish who that he might overthrow the merit of Christ feigns such a justice of God which doth not necessarily inflict eternal death or require satisfaction and which in this respect can be content to loose its own right but if sins were to be punished they were surely to be punished in our nature for to man the Law was given and to man death was threatned therefore it lies upon man to suffer the punishment
Christ did manifest it selfe in the state of his Humiliation chiefly by miracles yet this was little in comparison of that glorious manifestation of him in his exaltation In the state of Humiliation he performed his Prophetical office not only mediately by sending Iohn Baptist his Herauld before and by the Apostles whom he called but also immediately to his lost sheep especially of Israel by preaching to them the heavenly Truth with great constancy patience and efficacy both of his doctrine and miracles But his Sacerdotall office he administred in this state making a most full satisfaction and an humble intercession for us The satisfaction of Christ is that whereby he being subject to the Law for us did undergo the curse due to our sins and performed most perfectly obedience to the Law which was required of us and so hath freed us from the curse and hath restored us to life This consisteth in suffering the pains and in perfect justice in that is seen cheifly his passive in this his active obedience I do purposely adde this restriction that we may not think his active and passive obedience so to differ as if the suffering of â—he punishment consisted only in his passive obedience and his perfect justice only in his active for they differ not in time seeing both of them continued from the first moment of his incarnation till his death Nor do they differ in subject because the same obedience in a different respect is both active and passive and consequently Chriâ—â—â— obedience is an active passion and a passive action for as passion is a receiving of the punishment it is called passive obedience but as it is a testimony of his great love it may be called active Neither is the division of obedience into active and passive a division into parts but onely a distinction taken from the end to wit the twofold satisfaction for punishment and for life eternal The curse upon the transgressoâ—s of the Law requires the former Deut. 27.26 The promise of life under the condition of perfect obedience and righteousness requires the latter Lev. 18.5 Therefore we are said Analogicaly by that one and most perfect satisfaction of Christ both to be freed from the punishment because he suffered the punishment for us and to be invested in the right of life eternal because he fulfilled the Law for us The suffering of punishment is whereby he undertook upon himself the punishment due to us and offered himself of his own accord a holy Sacrifice to God for us This consisteth both in the sufferings which went before his great and last Passion but especially in this last agonie The RULES I. No part of Christs Passion must be excluded from his Satisfaction The reason because he did not suffer for himselfe in any thing but all for us II. Therefore those innumerable sufferings which Christ endured until his last journy to Jerusalem are not to be separated from the price of Christs redemption for although the Passion of Christ which went before his last agony might be called a preparative to his death yet it is indeed an integral part of satisfaction As it cannot be denied that the payment of an hundred pounds by him who oweâ—h divers tuns of gold is an integral part of the paymenâ— although iâ—â—e but a smal sum in respect of the whole and principal debt III. Yet the Scripture synecdochically and by way of excellency doth describe his last passion as the price of our redemption and his death or oblation on the altar of the cross as an expiatory sacrifice Of this see the 9. and 10. chapter to the Heb IV. The principal efficient cause of this passion was the holy Trinity the ministring causes were Christs enemies both Iews and Gentiles V. the Person that suffered for us is not the Father nor the Holy Ghost but the Son of God VI. Although God is rightly said to suffer yet the God-head suffered not God suffered in the flesh not with the flesh VII The sufferings of Christ were divers of which there were three ranks to wit some before his death death it self and some after death VIII Of those that went before his death some were internal some external IX The internal were his sadnesse anxieties and tortures proceeding from the fiercenesse of Gods wrath and the conflict he had with that tentation of dereliction which cast him into that bloody sweat and made him cry out My God My God why hast thou forsaken me X. But although he wrestled with the tentation of dereliction yet he fell not into desperation neither did he yield to the tentation but overcame it by a strong confidence in his God The undoubted argument of his victory was this that in his greatest agony he failed not to call God his God XI His external sufferings were the tortures of his body which he endured in a manner in all his members senses for his head was torn with throns and beat with reeds his face was defiled with spittle and bruised with buffeting his ears were wounded with scoffs and railings his eyes were troubled with the mourning of his Mother and his disciples his tongue was scorched with thirst and poisoned with vinegar and gall his body was stript and torn with whipping and the same was fastned to the Crosse his hands and feet being pierced with nailes and was hanged between Thieves his sinews were racked and his side was pierced with a lance XII The Cross was chosen to die on which was no ordinary kinde of death but an accursed one for of old it was made execrable by the mouth of God Cursed is he that hangeth on a Tree Deut. 21.23 XIII In Christs death the Personal Vnion was not dissolved the soule indeed was severed from the body but neither of them from the Personality or Hypostasis of of the sonne of God XIV The sufferings that followed his death were not joyned with any pain yet they wanted not disgrace or ignominie such was his burial and the three dayes lying in the grave XV. His burial was a part of his sufferings whereby Christs body no other ways than the carcasses of other men was cast into the grave XVI His three dayes detention or stay in the grave is the last degree of his Humiliation at which time his soul being translated to Paradise his body was detained under the pains and bands of death as if he had been altogether overcome and swallowed up by it his enemies in the mean while triumphing over him as if he had been quite cut off Acts 2.24 Whom God raised having loosed the sorrows of death XVII When mention is made of Christs descent into hell in the fourth Article of the Creed it is demanded of what part of Christs passion that must be understood That opinion of the Papists concerning Christs local descent into Limbus Patrum or the place of the Fathers and their delivery from thence is fabulous and very ridiculous from which their
poor and riding upon an Asse CHAP. XIX Of Christs Exaltation THus of the state of his Humiliation the state of his Exaltation is that wherein Christ being raised from the dead was exalted to heaven and being set down at his Fathers right hand was crowned with the highest degree of glory The RULES I. The efficient cause of this Exaltation wa◠〈◊〉 whole Trinity II. But Christ considered according to dispensation is the object thereof III. The exaltation of Christs person was according to both natures IV. According to his humane nature he was exalted by laying aside the infirmities which he assumed by obtaining those gifts which before he wanted For he attained as great a perfection both in his body and soul as the creature was capable of V. He was exalted according to his divine nature not by accession of any dignity to it being considered in it self but by the manifestation of that majesty which before was hid under the form of a Servant VI. Christ attained to this exaltation by his obedience not as it were by merit but as it were by the means or way VII The end hereof was to witnesse that he faithfully performed the office enjoyned him in his humiliation and to manifest his divine power by which he doth powerfully apply his merit to us The parts or degrees of this are three His Resurrection his Ascension to Heaven and his sitting at the Fathers right hand His Resurrection was the first degree of exaltation by which Christ having overcome the power of death was raised the third day in that very flesh which he had laid down that he might live to God for ever The RULES I. Christ was not onely the object but also the efficient cause of his resurrection Rom. 1.4 Being declared with power to be the Son of God according to the Spirit of sanctification by the resurrection from the dead 1 Peâ— 3.18 He died concerning the flesh but was quickned in the Spirit II. The matter of the Resurrection is â—he same body that was crucified but â—ndowed and glorified with new quaâ—ities III. Neither was it so changed as to lose its quantity and three dimensions For otherwise it had been no body not had Christ remained man in his Resurrection IV. The Form consisteth in a new and indivisible union of soul and body V. Although Christs Resurrection was altogether miraculous yet it is false that his body passed through the stone which covered the grave or that it passed through the doore after his Resurrection Matt. 28 2 The Angel of the Lord rolled a way the stone Joh. 20.19 The doors being shut not through the doors that were shut VI The end of his Resurrection besides that general end which was mentioned before is the assurance of our Resurrection both from the death of sin as also from death corporall Rom 6.1 2. c. and 1 Cor. 15.12 c. His ascension into Heaven was the second degree of his Exaltation in which Christ after he had conversed forty days with his Disciples upon Earth ascended into Heaven The RULES I. Christ ascended both according to his divine and humane nature according to his humane as the object according to his divine as the efficient cause II. The form consisteth in Christs real and local translation from this World to the highest Heaven III. Here we need not trouble our selves about penetratâ—on of bodies both because Heaven is not a solid thick or iron body as the Philosophers would have it as also because one body can easily yield to another and the creature to the Creator IV. The doctrine of Christs corporal presence here on Earth doth utterly overthrow that of his ascension V The special end of Christs ascension is to assure us of our threefold ascension the first is of faith and godlinesse in this life the second of our souls in death the third of body and soul in the last day The sitting of Christ at his Fathers right hand is the highest degree of his Exaltation by which being placed in Heaven he is exalted above all power Eph. 1.20.21.22 He hath set him at his right hand in the heavenly places far above all principaâ—ities and powers and might and dominion and every name that is named noâ— in this world onely but in that also which is to come and hath made all things subject under his feet and hath appointed him over aâ—l things to be the head to his Church which is his body and the fulness of him that filleth all in all things The RULES I. To sit at Gods right hand is to have the next power after God After the manner of Kings who use to set them on their right hand to whom they will give the chief honor next to themselves Psal. 45.10 The Queen is at thy right hand 1 King 2.19 When Baâ—â—sheba came to Solomon to speak unto him for Adoniiah the king rose to meet her and bowed himself to her and sat down on his Throne and he caused a seat to be â—et for the kings mother and she sat at his right hand Matt. 20.21 Command that my two Sons may sit the one at thy right hand the other at thy left in thy kingdom II. Christ according to both Natures sits at Gods right hand III. The Humanity was so exalted that yet it was not made equall to the divinity he received glory above all creatures yet not equall to that essential glory which he hath in common with the Father and the Holy Ghost In this highest degree of Exaltation Christ hath not left to do his office He performs his Prophetical office by furnishing his Ministers with gifts of old extraordinarily but now by ordinary meanes propagating his Gospel through all the World with most happy successe Ephes 4.11 Some he gave to be Apostles c. His Priestly Office he exerciseth not in offering himself again or in casting himself with cries and sighs at his Fathers knees but in appearing before his Father for us with the merits of his most full satisfaction and in applying the same effectually to us Psal. 110.4 The Lord hath sworn and will not repent thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedek Heb. 9.24 He hath not entred into the Sanctuary made with hands which are similitudes of the true Sanctuary but is enâ—red into the very Heaven to appear now in the sight of God for us Lastly He useth Kingly office not onely by ruling the Triumphant Church but also by gathering together the Militant Church by preserving protecting and delivering it as also by overthrowing the Enemies thereof Psal. 110 1. The Lord said to my Lord sit thou at my right hand until I make thine Enemies thy foot stool The RULES I. This Kingdom of Christ is not that essential which from eternity he obtained with the Father and Holy Ghost but a personal donative and oecumenical which as our Head and Mediator he had of the Father II. Yet he hath for ever administred this
different men but also in one and the same man so that sometimes it is weaker sometimes stronger but so that it can never be utterly lost Isa. 42.3 He shall not break the bâ—used reed nor quench the smoaking flax Phil. 1.6 I am perswaded that he who hath begun a good work in you will perfect it until the day of Iesus Christ. Heb. 12 2. looking unto Iesus Christ the Author and finisher of our Faith CHAP. XXX of Iustification THe mediate effects of Vocation proceeding from faith are Justification Sanctification Assurance of salvation and Christian liberty Justification is Gods free action whereby the Elect through the most full satisfaction of Christ are absolved from their sins and are declared rightous and inheritors of life eternal The RULES I. Iustice in Scripture is either of the Cause or of the person Iustice of the cause is when a man otherwise sinfull is said in this or that particular to be innocent and just Iustice of the person is either begun or it is perfected This is called Legal as it is required by the Law and Evangelical as it is shewed in Christ by the Gospel Begun justice is that which the Holy Ghost begins in the faithful in this life and perfects it in the other The perfect righteousnesse of Christ then is the gift of Iustification but that which is begun is the gift of Sanctification II. To justifie in this place is not to punish nor to infuse inherent righteousnesse as the Pontificians will have it but in the sense it is taken in the Courts of justice it is to absolve from sin and to pronounce one just Prov. 17.15 To justifie the wicked and to condemn the just both are abomination to the Lord. Isa. 5.23 which justifie the wicked and take away the righteousnesse of the righteous Matth. 11.19 wisdome is justified by her children Lu. 7.29 when these things were heard all the people and the Publicans justified God Luk. 10.29 He willing to justifie himself III. The efficient cause of Iustification actively understood is the whole Trinity 2 Cor. 5.19 God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe 1. Cor. 6.11 But you are washed but you are sanctified but you are justified in name of the Lord Iesus and by the Spirit of our God IV. The internal moving cause â—is meer grace or Gods free favour That this is a free favour and not an infused grace will appear by these testimonies Rom. 3.24 For they are justified freely by his grace Ephes. 2.8 you are saved by grace through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God Tit. 3.4.5 But after the goodnesse and love of God our Saviour appeared towards man not by the works which we had done but by his mercy he hath saved us V. The external moving cause is Christ God and man Christ as the Son of God is the efficient cause of justification in common with the Father and Holy Ghost but as he is God-man and our Mediator he is the outward moving cause because by his merit he hath procured this gift for us VI. The instrumental cause of this is the word of the Gospel For it is the power of God to every believer Rom. 1.16 VII If we take Iustification passively in reference to man who is justified it hath no other cause but faith the instrumental VIII This phrase We are justified by faith is metonymical and equivalent to this We are justified by Christs merits apprehended by faith IX Faith only is said to justifie in respect of works which are effects following upon faith but not the causes of Iustification for they do not precede him that is to be justified but follow him that is justified Although this particle alone in so many letters and syllables is not found in Scripture yet it is expressâ—d by like phrases Such are Without works freely by grace Rom. 3.24 27 28. But by faith Eph. 2.8 Gal. 2.16 Though then faith be not alone but is joyn'd with works yet it justifieth alone As the Sun is not in Heaven alone yet he alone makes day X. Faith doth not justifie as if it were a work or by its own dignity but as it is an instrument apprehending Christ. The Papists grant that we are justified by faith but then they take faith here as a work Now faith in Scripture hath nothing ascribed to it but as it aprehends as a Gold-ring bears a high price for the Jewel in it And hence it appears how finely those places of Scripture do agree in which we are said to be justified now by grace then by Christs merits then by faith for we are justified through Gods grace for Christs merits apprehended by faith XI The matter of justification taken actively is Christs whole satisfaction whereby he suffered the punishment due to our sins and yielded perfect obedience to the Law We have shewed above cap. 18. that Christs satisfaction is placed both in his suffering and in his actual obedience XII The matter of this taken passively is man miserable in himself but elected by God called and indowed with faith Though then vocation naturally is before faith and faith before justification yet in time there is no difference For as soon as man is effectually called he is endowed with faith and justified by faith XIII The form of it actively understood is in the imputation of Christs whole satisfaction whereby it is made all ours as if we had performed it our selves That justice which is imputed to the believer is in Christ by inhesion in us by imputation Our adversaries deny that in Scripture there is any mention of this imputation But what can be cleerer than these ensuing places Rom. 4.6 As David calleth that man blessed unto whom God imputeh righteousnesse without works Phil. 3.8.9 I account all things dung that I may gain Christ and may be found in him not having my own righteousnesse which is of the Law but that which is by the faith of Christ that is the righteousnes which is of God by faith This is chiefly seen in that antithesis whereby our sins are imputed to Christ and his justice imputed to us 2 Cor. 5 21. He made that he should be sinne for us who knew no sin that we might be made the righteousness of God in him The Papists also think it as absurd that we should be justified by the justice of another as if one would be called learned for the learning that is in another But these examples are not like for one man is not so united to another as the faithfull are to Christ their head Againe they will not have Christs justice imputed to them and yet they stick not to say that the merits of dead men and the Justice of Monks are imputed to them XIV Yet for understandings sake the form of justification is expressed by two acts by remission of sinns and imputation of justice by judging our sins to be none and our righteousnesse to be perfect XV.
affection of the mind to maintain inlarge the glory of Gods Name with just sorrow indignation against those things that are contrary to his glory Examples of this are in Lot 2. Pet. 2.8 in Moses Exod. 32.19 in Phiâ—eas Numb 25.7 8. in David Psal. 69. and â—19 53 in Elijah 1 Kin. â—19 10 in Ieremiah Jer. 23.9 10.11 in Iohn Baptist Matt. 14.4 in Christ Ioh 2.14 c. in Paul Act. 14.14 and 17.16 17. To this is opposite Stupidity not caring for the glory of God erring zeal which is without knowledge inconsiderate zeal counterfeit zeal The Sanctifying of Gods Name in effect or actually is either by words or by deeds Sanctifying by words is a holy using of Gods Name and a constant confession thereof The holy using of his Name is whereby we never speak of him but in cases of necessiâ—y and that with great reverence and admiration praising the glory shining in it Deut. 28.58 Thou shaâ—t fear thaâ— most glorious and terrible Name of the Lord thy God To this is contrary superstitious silence or concealing of Gods Name the taking of it in vaine jests made of Scripture phrases and blasphemie or disgrace cast immediately upon the Name of God An example of horrible blasphemie is in the Assyrian King Iâ—a 10. and in Rabshaketh his Captain Esa. 37. The holy using of Gods Name is in three kinds to wit in Consecration Swearing and casting of Lots Consecration is when things for our use are sanctified by the Word of God and by Prayer To sanctifie in this place is to separate for a good and lawful use thus Temples Ministers the works of our vocation meat and drink are consecrated 1 Tim. 4.4 5. For whatsoever God hath made is good neither is any thing to be rejected if it be received with thanksâ—giving for it is sanctified by the word of God and by Prayers To this consecration is opposite besides the intermission of it superstitious consecration when in certain forms of words there is believed to be a singular force efficacy so likewise Magick inchantments and consecrations This consecration is intermitted by them who eat drink without Prayer and Thanksgiving among Papists there are many examples of superstitious â—oÌ„secrations of water salt wax c. Magick consecrations and inchantments are not excusâ—ble because the words are good For Gods Word is abused when it is not used in a good way By Swearing Gods Name is sanctified both in a simple Oath and in adjuration A simple Oath is the taking of God to witnesse in weighty matters as the Testifier of truth and the Revenger of lying The RULES I. An Oath in it self is good and holy First because it is commanded by God Deut 6.13 and 10 20 Esa. 65.16 Ier. 12.16 Secondly because God and his Angels have sworn Gen. 2â— Psal. 9â— Hâ—b 3 and 6 Rev. 10. c To this purpose is that of Tertullian O happy are they for whose cause God swearetâ— and O miserable are we that will not believe God when he swears II. The person swearing must be such a one as may lawfulâ—y swear and not Children 2. Mad-men 3. Such as are convicted of perjury III The matter of an Oath should be things weighty of good moment and lawful IV The forme of it is explicated or unfolded by contestation and imprecation abridged and contracted or consisting of either part V. The end is the confirmation of truth the decision of strife the illustration of Gods glory and the salvation of man Heb 6.16 VI. The object of an Oath by which we must swear in god only For so it is commanded Deut. 6.13 Fear the Lord thy God and serve him and swear by his name Because 1. God is the only searcher of hearts who sees all things who is alone Omnipotent and who revengeth Perjury 2. Because an Oath is joyned with invocation which only belongs to God as it is said above Vâ—I Where the Saints in their oaths mention the creatures metonymically either God himselfe is understood or his vengeance which man wisheth to himself So Gen. 31.53 Jacob swore by the fear of his Faâ—her that is by God whom his Father Isacc feared So Paul 2 Cor. 1.23 I call God for a record upon my soul that is that â—e will punâ—sh me if I knowingly deceive Vâ—II In respect of adjuncts an Oath is divided into that which is publique and solemn and injoyned by the Magistrate or private and voluntary yet not rashly offered Also into an assertory a promissary Oath IX Oaths must be kept though they be extorted from us and be hurtfull to us Psalm 15.4 That sweareth to his â—urt changeth not But here it is demanded if an oath made to a thief to free our selves from him ought to be kept Answ. Either the Oath is only to redeem our selves or else it is to conceal the whole matter we are bound in the former to keep our promise but not in the latter seeing we are first and more strictly bound to the Magistrate whose office it is to suppresse thieves and robbing therefore whosoever out of fear of death binds himself to a thief in this respect he may declare the matter to the Magistrate and by reason of the tie and obligation to him he may be absovled by publique authority X. Near to swearing is a weighty asseveration Such Asseverations are Gen. 42.15 c. By the life of Pharaoh that is as truly as Pharaoah lives and as I wish he may live So 1 Sam. 1.26 As my soul liveth my Lord I am that Woman To this purpose is that usual asseveration of Christs Verily Verily To swearing in the defect is opposite the denial of it or a refusal to take an Oath it being lawfully profered The Anabaptists offend the former way pretending Christs saying Matth. 5.34 Swear not at all and that of Iames Jam. 5.12 But they observe not that in both these places idolatrous and rash Oaths are forbidden not such as be lawful The latter way they offâ—nd who when they may by an Oath promote Gods glory or the safety of their neighbour yet they refuse to do it In the excesse are opposed to swearing 1. Perjury 2. A rash Oath 3. An unjust Oath 4. An idolatrous Oath Perjury is when a thing is falsly asseverated or a promise is made without purpose of performance or when the purpose of performance is not performed This sin must be avoidâ—d 1. Because of the grievousness thereof for a perjured man offends against God whom he calls uâ—on to be witnesse to â—his lye and so profaneth his most holy name he offends against his neighbour whom he circumvents with his perjury and grievously scandalizeth he offends against himself having wished so many evils to fall upon him 2. Because of the grievousnesse of the punishment for perjuries are never unrevenged examples are in the Kings of Sodom c. Gen. 14.4 in Hâ—shea King of Israel 2 Kings 17 4. in Zediciah
of it violently by our own hands and unlawfull preserving of it Thâ—y who neglect the mean of preserving life they sin by omission but thâ—y that put violent hands on themselves sin by commission Nâ—w there be certain degrees of self-murther for either it is done directly by Sword Halter or Poyson or any such way or else indirectly so they kill themselves who rashly wantonly expose themselves to danger as Wrestlers Rope dancers Drunkards Gluttons c. the unlawfull preserving of life is which is done by lying or such like means The study of preserving our neighbours life is when not onely we abstain from hurting it but we love his life and preservation and defend it according to our power To this is opposite the neglect of it and unjust slaughters hatred cursing railing or upbraiding of any offence committed or inhering infirmities An example of neglect is in them who when they may defend those that unjustly suffer death do not Prov. 24.11 c. If thou forbâ—aâ— to deliver them who are drawn unto deaâ—h and those that are ready to bâ— slâ—in if thou sayest behold we knew it not c. How grievous unjust slaughter is which is done out of private desire and not by the Magistrate or publique authority and how grievous a punâ—shment this deserveth may be seen Gen. 9.6 Who sheddeth mans blood by man his blood shall be shed because God made man after his image Of hatred thus saith Iohn 1 Epist. 3 15. Whosoever hateth his brother is a man-slayer Of evil speaking or cursing Christ saith Mat. 5.22 Whosoever shall say to his broâ—her Racha shall be in danger of the Counsel but whosoever shall say thou fool he shal be in danger of Hel fire To this duty are subordinat two kindes of vertues some whereof conduce to withhold our selves and some to withhold others and deterre them from murther Of the first kind are Innocency Mildenesse Clemency Moderation Innocency is when we avoid all means of hurting our neighbour To this is opposite Injury in word and deed and counterfeit innocency That words are injurious and hurtfull to mans life is manifest for he is not esteemed to live but he that lives well Hence Christ accounts evil words murther Mat. 5. of counterfeit innocency we have in Pilate an example in washing his hands Matth. â—7 Mildnesse is a vertue whereby we curbe and bridle our anger that it may not wax inordinately hot Matth. 5.5 Blessed are the meek for they shall inhâ—rt c. To meeknesse is opposite anger unjust wrath too much gentlenesse or want of just anger desire of revenge Of anger Solomon saâ—th Eccles. 7 9. Be not hasty in the spirit to be angry Of unjust angeâ— Moses Le. 19.18 Thou shalt not avenge nor bear a grudg against the children of thy people Of Eli the Priest's too much gentlenesse we read 1 Sam. 2. The desire of revenge is condemned in the place of Lev. 16. above alledged Clemency is a just moderation in inflicting of punishments To this is opposite fiercenesse or Cruelty and too much Indulgence Both sins are kinds of murther for by too much rigour and too much indulgence we sin against the life of our neighbour He hurts the good that spares the evil Moderation is a vertue much like to Clemencie whereby we are content to part with our right either for the publike good or for the good of them who offend or for avoiding of scandal This differs from Clemency because this is properly ascribed to the Magistrate but moderation is required of all Christians Phil. 4.5 To this is opposite too much Right which is commonly called too much Wrong Of the later sort are Vindicative Justice and Fortitude The former is when offences are curbed with fit Punishments that one rather may perish than unity To this is opposite too much Lenity 〈◊〉 begets too much liberty in sinning Not onely is it a sin to kill but also not to kill when the Law requires it Of this we have an example in Saul 1 Sam. 1â— Fortitude is that whereby according to the strength vigour of a high and unconquered minde we endure difficulties and undertake high matters to Gods glory our neighbours safety To this sluggishness is opposite or pusilanimity arising out of fear of dangers or desire of pleasures Temerity also and too much boldness To this also belong Duels undertaken for deciding of doubtfull rights or upon other light and rash occasions Such Conflicts may be fiâ—ly reduced to Self-murther Both these to wit Justice and Fortitude appear either in Peace or in War War is publike hostility which the Magistrate exerciseth with armed power for ends pleâ—sing to God and profitable to the State The RULES I It is as lawfull for Christians to wage war as it was of old for the Iews The reason is because it is no where prohâ—bâ—ted in the New Testament And that Captain of the Capernaites Matth. 8 and Cornelius the Centurion Acts 10. are reckoned amongst the faithfull Neither did Iohn dehorâ— the souldiers from wars but from injustice Luke 3. II. War is to be managed by the Magistrate not by private authority III. War must not be mâ—de but that which is just and necessary IV. It will be just in respect of the matter form and end if it be made in a just cause for a good end and according to the prescript of Gods word V. It will be necessary if the matter be tried by Councel before it be handled by Arms VI. When war is undertaken it matters not whether it be managed by strength or policy VII Policy joyned with lying and breaking of covenants is not to be allowed but it may be approved with dissimulation VIII Although the Church is built by the Word not by the Sword yet being built is justly to be defended by the Sword against unjust violence CHAP. XI Of Vertues and Works belonging to the Seventh Commandment Thus of our duty toward the life of our neighbor In the seventh Precept is set down how we must preserve our own and neighbours Chastity the sum whereof is that the Heavenly law-giver would have our own and neighbours chastity preserved inviolable This precept is negative Thou shalt not commit adultery Synecdochical also for under the name of Adultery all lust and intemperance is understood Hence ariseth the affirmative that by endeavouring temperance we preserve our own and others chastity There be two-means to preserve chastity Temperance and Wedlock the first is enâ—oyned to all men the other to those that are called to Wedlock Temperance is a vertue moderating the affections of our mind in pursuing and avoiding bodily pleasures Tit. 2.11 12 13. The grace of God which bringeth salvation to all men hath appeared teaching us to deny ungodliness and worldly lusts that we should live soberly justly and godly in this present world looking for that bâ—essed hope and glorious appearance of the mighty God and of our Saviour Iesus Christ.