with true faith whereby they are rightly minded how can it bee saide of any particular church that it can not erre that then can much lesse be affirmed of those churches from whence the trueth is banished and wherein lyes doe preuaile and iniquitie it selfe and palpable darkenes They surely which are such cānot be the true church of Christ 1. Tim 3.15 if the church bee the pillar and ground of trueth Therefore we conclude that euerie particular flock and each seuerall sheep thereof can so farre forth not erre as it heareth onely the voyce of the shepheard Christ being guided by the holie ghost but as oft as it heareth not his voyce but harkeneth to strangers voices it cā straight waies do no other thē erre But in a word seing God in the scattering and dissoluing of all churches doeth yet reserue some vnto himselfe whome he holdeth in the trueth and by whose ministerie he will spread the same still to the ende of the world therefore we confesse that the whole catholicke church altogether is neuer suffred to erre XXII Without the catholicke church is no saluation Here hence we consequently learne beleeue that this catholicke church onely is so holie and hath saluation so annexed to it that out of it there is no holines no saluation sith that in it onely the trueth so shineth without which saluation can come to none that without it there can bee no trueth and lastly sith none but the bodie of Christ can be saued Ioh. 3.13 For no man ascendeth into heauen but he vvhich came downe from heauen the sonne of man vvhich is in heauen that is the whole sonne of man withal his whole bodie which is the church that not vnfitly Peter compared the church to Noahs arke in which alone mankinde was preserued 2. Pet. 2.5 and out of which whosoeuer were found perished in the waters of the floode Gen. 7.23 Nowe that which wee confesse of the whole church as a thing most assured the same of euerie particular one we cannot graunt namely to say that in this church alone or that in the Romish or that at Constantinople the rrueth and saluation is obtained so that without it should be no saluation and consequently to depart from it were nothing else then to forsake the trueth our saluation and Christ For some church may bee brought to that passe that vnlesse thou departest from the fellowship therof thou canst haue no parte nor fellowshipp with the catholicke church and her head XXIII The catholicke church is not tyed to certaine persons or places Moreouer we confesse this catholick church because it is catholick therefore to be tied to no certaine places persons or people so that who so would be of the church hee should needs get him to Rome or to Wittemberge or he must depend vpon the authoritie of their churches by shops or ministers Seing Christ is in all places and euerie where may the word be heard the seale of Baptisme receiued the commaundements of Christ kept and a communion with the Saintes had And wheresoeuer these things haue place ther is the church that not without good cause were the Donatists condemned who shutt vp the church in Africa onely and not in al Africa neither but in certaine parcells of it where they thēselues dwelt and taught that it was onely there Nor lesse worthily are they to be condemned which accompt the churches of no forraine countries for true churches but onely such as consist of men of their owne nation XXIV The catholicke church is partly visible and partly inuisible To conclude we beleeue this church to be partly indeed visible and partly inuisible but these in diuerse respects Visible in that it consisteth of men visibly hādling and hearing the word of God ministring and receiuing the sacraments praying not onely priuately but also publikely to God exercising the workes of loue towards their neighbours and glorifying God by their whole life which things can not indeede be performed but they must sensiblie be perceiued And if it should be meerly inuisible howe could it bee discerned from the Synagogues of the wicked Againe we call it also inuisible first because it hath in it many hypocrites mingled which performe all these outward things as the elect doe and who are the elect for of them onely consisteth the church surely it cannot be knowne of vs but onely of God according to that The Lord alone knoweth who are his 2. Tim. 2.19 Ro. 2.28.29 Whereunto also tendeth that of the Apostle He is not a Jewe which is one outward but one within Moreouer because the church in regard of the outward appearance being euermore pressed with manifold calamities in the worlde the number of the professours of Christs faith is sometimes so diminished all christian congregations thrust vpp into such narrowe straightes that it may seeme euen to be none at al remaining namely when there is no longer any publike assemblie wherein Gods name is called vppon as the histories both sacred and ecclesiasticall do most clearely and plentifully teach to haue often happened whenas notwithstanding it is very certaine that God alwaies reserueth some church vnto himselfe vppon the earth Mat. 16.18 28.20 the Lord himselfe saying And the gates of hell shall not preuaile against it and behold J am vvith you euen to the ende of the world and the same do we also with the whole church confesse in the creed saying I beleeue the holy catholick church namely to haue euer bin from the beginning to bee now and shal bee vnto the ende of the world euen vppon the earth For properly we beleeue alwaies those things which we do not alwaies see Heb. 11.1 This is our confession concerning the militant church what it is how it differeth from the triumphant howe diuerse oft times in it selfe howe of many particulars it is made one catholicke church by what markes the true may bee discerned from the false what manner of succession of byshops what māner of consent may proue a true church howe not for euery difference in the verie doctrine the vnitie of the church is to be broken what is ment by the name of ecclesiasticall vnitie and in what things it consisteth of what estimation it ought to bee in what respect also it may erre and in what it cannot erre and how without the church there is no saluation and lastly howe it is visible and howe inuisible It remaineth that we speake of the gouernment thereof CHAP. XXV Of the gouernment of the militant church and of the ecclesiasticall ministerie I. The church is gouerned of Christ WE beleeue Col. 1.17 that as all thinges were made haue their being and are ruled by Christ so hee also gouerneth the church which is his kingdome his bodie by a more peculiar meanes then all other things as being author king Eph. 1.23 Luc. 11.33 Heb. 3.6 and head of the same as the Angell saieth of
indeed such a magistrate is not in that behalfe the minister of God Wherefore if we must be subiect and obey the magistrate for conscience sake not for feare onely Rom. 13.5 then we conclude that where we cannot for conscience obeye him neither ought wee there for feare to obeye him In other matters Rom. 13.2 whoso resisteth the power we knovve that he resisteth God and shall receiue to himselfe damnation III. We must praye for all magistrats that vvhat there dueties are they may indeede performe and what the duetie of euerie magistrate is But seing the duty of euery free magistrate is to haue a diligēt care both in making lawes in giuing iudgement and also in punishing offences that their subiectes maye liue vertuouslie and after Gods lawes the summe wherof is that we should liue in this world Tit. 2.12 soberly therfore chastly and honestly and rightly therefore peaceably with our neighbours and godlilie towardes God and that no princes can performe this of themselues vnlesse God indue them with a knowledge of their duetie stirre them vp both to will and to performe therefore that which we do according to the Apostles precept Phil. 2.13 1. Tim. 2.2 the same wee teach others that they should also do namely that they must pray for all magistrats of what sorte soeuer that they maye both bee willing and able to performe that which is their duetie so may bring to passe that we may lead a quiet peaceable life in all honestie and godlinesse that is that wee may liue all friendly and in peace on with another that a publike honestie may be obserued and true pietie and religion preserued and encreased IV. It belongeth principally to a christian prince to take vppon him the care of christian religion And if he bee a christian and godlie magistrate wee beleeue that it chieflie belonges vnto him that besides the regard of the publike and politick good and profite of the publike and politick peace and honestie he should also take the peculiar care of christian religion sith the Lord hath made him the keeper of both the tables Ios 1.8 Deu. 13.2 c. and commaundeth him that as a prince he alwaies keep the law of God in his hands that he may punish aswell idolaters and blasphemors false Prophets and seducers as murtherers and adulterers and the same is aboundantly confirmed by examples of godlie kings in Israell and christian princes Constantine Valentinian Theodosius Iustinian others who not onely as priuate men but also as kings serued the Lord according to his commaundement euen as concerning their duetie and office Tō 2. ep 50. Saint Augustine most learnedly noted out of the second Psalme and declared it to Boniface V. The office of a godly prince concerning religion is two fold and wherein it chieflie consisteth Now sith the duetie of a godly prince that is a magistrate which hath a free power ouer any people and authoritie within his iurisdiction to institute and reforme religion is twofold which hee oweth to Christ and to the church in the cause of religion one about such things as belong vnto religion the other respecteth men which are in his iurisdiction and subiect vnto him for the first our beleefe is that he should diligently take heede that by the pure word of God rightly vnderstood and expounded by the verie word it selfe and according to the principles of faith that which they call the analogie or rule of faith religion may be instituted in his dominion or kingdome or where it is instituted may bee kept found and pure or where it is corrupted may be restored and reformed to the glory of God and saluation of his subiects For this we read hath beene commaunded of God and of Moyses and euer obserued of all godlie princes VI. A declaration of the former opinion by the parts We beleeue therefore the duetie of a godlie magistrate is first to knowe out of Gods word generally and according to the summe of the pointes of faith which is the true and christian religion and which is the apostolicall doctrine whereunto the church is to bee reformed that he may do or dare to do nothing onely by the iudgement of others but also vpon his owne sure knowledge Then this being thus knowne to haue a care that ministers which are meet men for the office not by his owne choise but according to the rule of Gods word may be chosen called and ordained Thirdlie to bring to passe that by them both the doctrine of saluation deliuered in the holie scriptures may be set forth expoūded and often beat vppon and also the sacraments according to Christs institution administred yea and the discipline ordained of Christ exercised Fourthly to haue a regard to this that schooles may be erected wherein aswell good artes and tongues may bee diligently taught as also the holie scriptures faithfully expounded and the studious may learne the summe of christiā wisedome Fiftly wherby ministers and teachers may be held in their duety and so true religion by them preserued in the church to do their best that priuate cōsultations yea and also prouinciall Synodes as is saide before may at least twise in the yeare be called Sixtly to carrie a speciall care to the goods of the church that they maye bee bestowed on the right that is on the true godly vses and that all necessarie things bee supplied to the church and to the ministers thereof VII A godly prince ought not to deale with all men of a diuerse religion after one manner But seing to say something brieflie of the other duetie of a prince concerning religion there be diuerse kinds of men which a prince may haue vnder his gouernement namely either meere infidells or such as indeede professe Christ but yet are also open idolaters or in manie things apostataes from the apostolicall church or in some article of the faith manifest heritikes or else erre vppon simplicitie or such as are rightly persuaded in all matters we doe certainly hold that a prince ought not to vse one kinde of measure towards all these sortes for some of them are to be loued cherished and honored some to bee winked at some not to be suffred other some to be quite cut off and none must bee permitted to blaspheme Christ or to worshipp idolls or retaine vngodlie ceremonies VIII All men must be subiect to the higher powers and all the higher powers must be subiect to Christ himselfe and to his word Lastlie we beleeue that euery soule that is Rom. 13.1 euerie man none except and therefore also euerie inferior power must bee subiect to the higher and greater power yea and that superior power also no lesse then the inferior and all other men must bee subiect to Christ the king of kings and Lord of all Lords Apo 17.14 1. Tim. 6.15 For it is Gods will that they should al kisse the Sonne and bowe their neckes vnder the yoake
anie portion of gouerning and keeping the clergie is committed and also a watchfullnes and inquirie that there be none in this order vngarded or vnlooked vnto Thus farre Bucer not onely rehearsing but also commending the custome of the auncient church ordaining diuers orders of ecclesiasticall functions whereof we before spake I should also haue had consideration of those churches which albeit they imbrace the gospell of Christ Iesus yet they still retaine their bissiops and Archbishops both in deed and name What that in the churches euen of the protestants neither bishops indeed nor archbishops are wanting whome hauing turned the names out of good greeke into badd latine they call Superintendents and generall Superintendents yea there also where neither those old names in good greeke nor these newe in ill latine are vsed at all yet there are wont to bee some superior persons in whose hands is almost the whole authoritie The controuersie then hath beene about the names but seing wee agree about the thing why should wee cōtend about the names By the way as I did not disallow the Fathers in that matter whereuppon the question is so can I not but loue the zeale of our men which do therefore hate those names because they are afraide least with the names the old ambition and tirannie should bee brought in againe to the destruction of the church Aphorisme 12. For neither did Christ ordaine any such head neither would the fathers admit therof because it was not expedient for the church but contented themselues with the foure Patriarches of Rome Constantinople Antioch and Alexandria all which were of an equall authoritie and power and euery of them conteined within his owne bounds as also it was decreed in the coūcel at Nice cōfirmed in others that not without many very weightie causes whereof in my iudgement this was not one of the least least there should bee a doore set open to tirannie in the church but rather if that any one durst attempt any thing against the sound doctrin of Christ against the libertie of the church then the other archbishops with their bishops of no lesse authoritie might oppose themselues against him suppresse his insolencie and cut of his tiranny The church in respect of Christ is a kingdome in respect of men which are in it and ether rule or be ruled it is an Aristocracie Aphorisme 21. These be two questions farre differēt whether bishops may also be princes and princes bishopps keeping also their principalities in their hands and whether they which are both bishops and princes besids their ecclesiastical authoritie may also haue ciuill power ouer those that are their subiects and so whether their subiects must obey them as princes or not In my Aphorisme I spake not one word of the former question for it was not needful but onely of the latter Now who seeth not how I shewed by apparent demonstrations that princes must be wholly obeyed howsoeuer rightfullie or wrongfullie they bee made princes For why should not they that are subiects both to the princes and Archbishops of Colone Mentz and Treuers in matters that are not repugnant to christian pietie be obedient vnto them Surely it were meere sedition in them not to obey them And if to these why should not they also which are within the iurisdiction of the bishop of Rome in the same matters for the same cause obey him For there is one and the same reason of them all Of the former question as I saye I spake not at all neither purposed I nowe in this briefe confession to discourse thereof knowing that all are not herein of one opinion much may be said to and fro both wayes that place in the 20 of Mat. Yee know that the Lords of the Gentiles haue dominion ouer them and they that are great exercise authoritie ouer them But it shall not bee so among you some expound it one waye of the Apostles onely and ministers of the word others another waye of all Christs disciples and all christians An appendix to the eleuenth chap. Of Christ the redeemer or of the person of Christ THey which write that the essentiall proprieties of the diuine nature are reallie communicated to the humaine nature not that they be in the same either essentiallie and formally or subiectiuelie and habitually but onely by the reason and respect of the personall or Hypostaticall vnion for so they speake darkelie indeede and ambiguouslie when both they might and ought to speake plainer if they meane this in no other sense then as Vigilius writ and thought namely that the proprieties of the natures are made proper to Christ himselfe but are common to the natures betwixt themselues not in thēselues but in Christ that is in his person I will not surelie gainesay them neither do I thinke that any good or learned man will gainesay them For Vigilius according to the catholick churches doctrine speaking out of the councell at Calcedon said and declared that the proprieties of the humaine nature were made commō to the diuine in the verie same sense that the diuine are also saide to bee communicated to the humaine But now these proprieties of the humanitie as to suffer or to die are so communicated to the deitie that for all that yet the verie deitie is not made in verie deede passible or mortall the cause whereof Vigilius setteth downe to be this namelie because to die and to suffer are not made common to the deitie but onely in the person so that they can not truely be said but of the humaine nature by it selfe and of the person in respect of the humaine nature Wherefore we must euen so thinke and saye altogether of the communication of the diuine proprieties Vigilius owne wordes bee these booke 5. chap. 2. And now sith out intention is chiefly bent against those which following the error of one nature doe with a willfull obstinacie resist the decree of the Calcedon councell I thinke it not amisse for the remoouing of their vaine contradictions and beating to peeces their glassie opinions with the mallett of truth to rehearse some fewe things concerning the humaine nature of the sonne of God which they euerie waye denie to be in him and to shew what want of christianity is in them and how farre of they bee from the hope of euerlasting life It is a rule of the catholick faith to confesse one and the same Lord Iesus Christ as true God so also true man one of them both not two into one the same without all time borne of the father the same in time borne of the virgine so that each of these births do so hold on Christ that he suffred not any losse in either retaining in himself that was proper to him both waies that is that the nature of the word should not be chaūged in the flesh the nature of the flesh was not swallowed vpp in the word Hereuppon the same Lord Iesus Christ
a garment For this manner of speach although it doe not perfectlie declare the personall vnion Hypostatica yet it sheweth a manifest difference beetweene the person of the sonne of god taking and our nature taken For this same cause we embrace those kindes of speaches of the Fathers as mans nature was borne of the sonne of god to subsist in the person of the sonne of God and such like separating the person of the sonne of god taking from the nature taken and teaching that the person of the sonne of God by the comming of mans nature was made neither other nor more perfect VII A confirmation of the former opinion with an exposition of the place of Athanasius Surelie we confesse with Athanasius that as the reasonable soule and flesh is one man so God and man is one Christ that is Christ is onelie one person although there bee in him two natures yet not that the person of Christ if we will speake properlie is constituted or made of both these natures as of the parts as to the perfect cōstitution of man no lesse the bodie as an essential part then the soule must ioyne together seeing the person of Christ was alreadie 1. Cor. 10.9 1. Pet. 3.19 and that whole and most perfect before it was shewed in the fleshe but the person of man as of Adam was none at all vntill the foule was coupled with the bodie and sith that nether the soule doth assume vnto it selfe a body or the body a soule as the sonne of God assumed vnto himselfe the seed of Abraham into vnitie of the same person And further sith the bodie and the soule are two existences as it is manifest in the creatiō of Adam but mans nature did neuer subsist by it selfe but onelie in the person of the sonne of God so that verie vniustlie doe some abuse this godlie saying of the holie man for proofe of their owne dreames For he which did shew himselfe and he is the person of the Sonne of god must needs differ frō the flesh wherein he did shewe himselfe and that not onelie before but also after his resurrection and sitting at the right hand of his father which as saith Augustine added a glorie to the flesh but took not away the nature VIII How Christ is one onely person and that eternall and vnchangeable but there are in the same two natures and how it is said to consist of them We therefore acknowledge and confesse against Nestorius that in Christ is onelie one person and that eternall most simple most perfect and the same shall remaine for euer namelie the person of the euerlasting sonne of God Further that vnto this eternall person there came in time not another person but another nature namelie mans nature and the same not as a parte of that person of whome it was taken but a thing farre different from it and yet takē vnto it into vnitie of the same And therefore we thirdly confesse that in one the selfe same person of Christ there is now two natures the diuine and the humaine in which we doubt not that the same doth subsist doth liue and doth worke for which cause also we feare not to speake thus Christ consisteth now of his diuine nature his humaine being taken into the vnitie of person that he is after a sort compounded of them both IX Hovve the tvvo natures are vnited into one person without alteracion or confusion the properties and actions of either of them remaining whole and distinct But we beleeue and confesse that these two natures are truelie and inseparablie ioyned and vnited into one person of Christ that yet we doubt not but each of them remaineth whole and perfect and the one truely distinct from the other yea and that they do hold the essentiall properties and operations of each of them distinct without all manner of confusion so that as the diuine nature holding the properties remaineth vncreated infinite immeasurable simplie omnipotent and simply wise euen so the humaine nature holding hirs remaineth created comprehensible determined with certen limitts And as the diuine nature hath will and power whereby Christ willeth worketh as god such things as are of God so hath the humaine nature will and power whereby Christ as mā willeth worketh those thinges which are of man so farre forth as Christ in that he is God hee willeth not nor worketh by humaine will or power so neither as he is man willeth he or worketh he by diuine wil or power as it hath bin learnedly determined by the fathers both against Eutyches and against Macarius We therefore did alwaies like wel of that saying of Leo the first Epi. 10. c. 4 writing vnto Flauianus about the same thing where he saith He which is true God the same is also true man and in this vnitie there is no vntrueth whereas there meet together the basenesse of manhood and the excellencie of the godhead For as God is not chaunged by the partaking so man that is mans nature in Christ is not consumed by the dignitie for each forme vvorketh with communion of the other their ovvne propertie namelie the vvord vvorketh that which is proper to the vvord and the flesh performeth that vvhich is proper to the flesh Thus farre Leo that learned man which hee afterwards fetteth out by examples whereby it is plainelie shewed that as the natures are truelie vnited in Christ yet remaine distinct and not confounded so also were and are the actions for thinges which were proper to the word the flesh did not performe but the word that which was proper to the flesh the word performed not but the flesh To raise againe Lazarus from death was proper to the word but to crie Lazarus come forth was proper to the flesh yet both those actions were vnited to the raising vp of Lazarus because they were both one and in one Christ tend both to one purpose and yet they were distinct Likewise to forgiue sinnes was a proper actiō to the diuine nature but to say thy sinnes bee forgiuen thee was proper to the humaine nature To restore his sight that was born blinde was an action of his diuine nature but to put clay vppon his eies and to say goe and wash was of the humaine nature Therefore this personall vnion as it did not confound the natures so neither did it the actions but kept them distinct neither yet did it confound the properties of the natures For there be in one the same person of Christ these three things Natures the proprieties and faculties of the natures and the actions of them and these proprieties of natures in Christ are after the verie same manner that the natures and actions are Therefore as it is cleere that one nature passeth not into another nor one action is confounded with another so is it apparent that their proprieties are after the same sorte X. That it cannot bee prooued by the vnion
Christ and he shall raigne in the house of Iacob for euer and the Apostle that he is as the sonne ouer his owne house and this house we are that is the church and in another place that he is the head of the church Eph. 5.23 the same is the Sauiour of his bodie II. Christ ordereth his church partly by himselfe and partly by assistance of fellowe labourers But the gouernment wherewith Christ guideth his church we know to be two fold one wherein he of himselfe and by his holy spirit without any help or seruice of man Phil. 2.13 Eph. 1.23 raigneth inwardly in the hearts of beleeuers and worketh in them to will and to performe and is euen all in all and mooueth vnto that which is good defending vs from euill against Sathan the worlde and all our enemies The other wherein he so guideth the church as hee also vouchsafeth to vse the help and ministerie of others aswell Angells as men especially to the preseruation of the church As of Angells the Apostle speaketh Heb. 1.14 They are ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes which shal bee heires of saluation 1. Cor. 3.5.9 and of men he saieth Wee are Gods ministers by whome yee haue beleeued For like as in a man the head of it selfe by vertue of the minde which liueth worketh chieflie therein doeth so rule the whole bodie that it also vseth the helpe of euerie member to the profite of the whole bodie so Christ the head of the church doth in like sort beare himselfe in the gouernment thereof not for his owne cause or that hee needeth our ministerie but doth it for our necessitie yea for our manifest commoditie and honour III. A difference betweene the ministerie of Angells and of men By the way wee acknowledge a difference betweene the ministerie of Angells and of men sith the Angells are not sent either to teach in the church or to administer Sacraments but to performe other dueties those for the most part inuisible neither come they ordinarily alwaies and to all but at such time and to such persons as God sendeth them but the ministerie of men is apparent and perpetuall and pertaineth to euerie one IV. Jt was most aduisedly done that Angells should not teach in the church but men And wee know it was most wisely and aduisedly done of God that Christ should teach in his church not by Angells but by men both because we can not more willingly suffer our selues to be informed familiarly of our equalles then to be taught of spirits of a farre diffring nature with an vnaquainted maiesty and also because we might more easily be deceiued of Satan falsly faining himselfe to bee sent of God and transforming himselfe to an Angel of light And those surely in our iudgement are two not the least causes why the sonne of God when he was to fulfill the office of a teacher in the church would bee made a man and our brother and familier and like vnto vs in all thinges sinne onely excepted whereto that same tendeth Heb. 4.15 Heb. 2.12 Heb. 1.1 I vvill declare thy name to my brethren in the midst of the congregation will I praise thee and that same In these last daies he hath spoken vnto vs by his sonne namely being nowe made man and liuing familiarlie in the church V. There be two kinds of men especially whose ministery Christ vseth to the gouernment and preseruation of the church And although there be not one member in this whole great body of the church but Christ vseth the same to some profite of the other mēbers 1. Cor. 12.7 and so of the whole bodie as Paule teacheth yet wee acknowledge two principall kindes of men whose help and seruice he is wont to vse for the gouernment and preseruation of the church namely first teachers and others to administer the word sacraments other ecclesiasticall dueties then godly princes and magistrats whose ministeries or offices we confound not but acknowledge them to be distinct and verie diuerse among which differences this also is not the least that the ministerie of teachers is alwaies verie necessarie to the church but of politicke magistrates not so sith the former the church cannot bee without but the other it often hath wanted and may want them VI. About what matters especially the ecclesiasticall ministerie is imployed But as the summe of christian pietie consisteth in three things in faith in Christ in continual repentance that is in the mortification of our flesh and of our sinnes and quickening of the spirite and lastlie in charitie towards our neighbour so also wee acknowledge three principall parts of the ecclesiasticall ministerie First to teach and to preach the worde of the gospell and also to administer the sacraments and offer vpp the publike sacrifice of praise to God through Iesus Christ Secondly to declared by the Apostles and lastly to do all such things which though they be not expressed in the scriptures yet doe belong to order and to decencie and do make for edification and not for destruction according to the generall rule giuen by the Apostle 1. Cor. 14.40 that all things ought to be done in the church in order decently and to edification Neither thinke wee that any authoritie is giuen vnto ministers beyonde the boundes of the word of God or to any other ende then for edification therefore we denie that one Bishop or all Bishops together haue authoritie to appoint any thing against the scriptures to adde or detract any thing or chaunge any thing in them to dispense with the commaundements of God to make new articles of faith to institute new sacraments to bring new rites into the church to prescribe any lawes which may binde consciences or may be thought equall to gods law to forbid any things which God hath graunted and left free or lastly to commaund any thing without the word of God as necessary to saluatiō sith not the whole church can haue or truely be said to haue this authoritie XXI The Bishops which are also princes their politicall authoritie is not denied By the way we disallow not but that bishops which are also princes besids their ecclesiasticall authoritie they haue also their politicall rites and secular powers euen as other princes haue the law of commaunding in secular causes the law of the sword some of them the law of choosing and confirming kinges and emperors and of directing and ordering other politicall matters and to constraine people that are their subiects to do them obedience and therefore we confesse that their politicall commandements which may be kept without breach of Gods law are to be obeyed by their subiects not onely for feare but also for conscience sake Rom. 13.5 For we know that all power is of God Rom. 13.1.2 and vvhosoeuer resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God and that kings are to be honoured 1. Pet. 2.17 and that we
theruppon and to the reuerend brethren N. N. and other coÌ„gregations round about vs who haue al of them liked very wel thereof Thus farre out of the letters of that learned man almost to the same purpose could wee bring many things besids out of letters written from other about the same matter but for that it greatly needeth not wee will for breuitie sake omitt the same Therefore to our matter An obseruation vpon the whole confession When we vse the word of condemning we meane nothing els theÌ„ that the heresies which haue bin condemned by the catholick church the same also wee condemne and which it allowed not the same also we allow not and this we desire to leaue witnessed to all posteritie Vpon the first chapter aphorisme 4. Whereas we haue giuen the first place next after the canonicall books to the Apocryphi in the volume of the Bible we did it induced by the authoritie of the greek and latine churches who did alwaies giue that honour vnto them that they should be ioyned with the canonicall books See the places in Hierome Cyprian and the councell of Laodicea cyted in the confession the first chapter fift aphorisme Moreouer we spake of books not of any manner of writinges For otherwise wee preferre the generall creeds before the Apocryphi Vpon the second chapter Of God The first aphorisme Though the propertie of existences bee to exist in the essence yet speaking of God we would rather vse another manner of speach that more vsuall for certaine causes as namely to teach against the reproches and skoffes of the Arrians of our time that the diuine essence is not found but onely in the persons and therefore that we do not make an essence aparte by it selfe subsisting from the persons wherein yet three persons should subsist as though the catholicke church should forge foure existences in God The third aphorisme Of this reall communication of the essentiall proprieties of God we haue also written a seuerall treatise in the booke which shal be intituled Of the incarnation of the sonne of God vppon the words to Phil. 2. Who when he was in the forme of God c. Vnto which we referre the reader who so he bee that desireth a further explanation of this doctrine Surely the Lord Iesus when he said No man knoweth the sonne but the father and no man knovveth the father but the sonne and he to whome the sonne will reueale him he plainely excepted his created minde from that essentiall knowledge wherewith the father knoweth that is as the schoolemen speak comprehendeth the sonne and the sonne the father teaching that what knowledge soeuer creatures haue in themselues coÌ„cerning God the same is some waye reuealed vnto them and therefore such knowledge is not the essential infinite knowledge which is in God but a created and a finite or determinate knowledge Vpon the 5. chapter of the worlds creation c. The 2. aphorisme That the heauen of the blessed wherein the Lord Iesus is now in his bodie doth differ froÌ„ the earth and from the other heauens and is aboue all those visible heauens besides that which hath bin already said these few proofs do also confirme Eph. 4. Christ is said to haue ascended aboue all heauens in another place he is read to haue ascended into heauen and to bee in heauen and to sitt at the right hande of the father Therefore this heauen is aboue the other heauens and differeth from them So in the third to the Colloss the Apostle distinguisheth the place where Christ is at the right hand of the father from the earth and calleth it vpward saying Seeke yee the things aboue sett your affections on things aboue where Christ is and in the 4. of the first to the Thess he saieth the Lord shall descend from heauen namely into these lower partes and all the godlie shal be caught vp into the ayre to meete Christ in the cloudes That heauen therefore is aloft not on the earth not in the ayre much lesse in euerie place For he shall come downe in the visible shape of his body froÌ„ the high heauen into these parts to iudge the quick and the dead Of this heauen wee haue spoken particularly in our bookes Do operibus dei of the workes which he created in the sixe daies Wee therefore disallow of that doctrine which is contrarie which distinguisheth not the heauen from the earth nor this heauen from other heauens but would proue it to be euerie where Vppon the 7. chapter The 11. aphorisme Among other thinges which Iulianus the Pelagian obiected to Augustine proouing defending originall sinne these were some that either he made God an author of sinne or the deuill a creator of man and that because the Pelagians thought that Aughstine made originall sinne the very substance of man Al which obiections he confuted in his 7. Tome against Pelag. the 5. booke and first chapter in these words Neither do we ascribe iniustice to God but rather equitie in that euen infants are punished not vniustly with such and so many euills as we see neither doe we attribute the making of man but the corrupting and depraâ—ing of mans originall to the deuill neither doe we graunt a substance in the sinne but an actâ— of it in the first man and a contagion thereof in all his posterity neither do we graunt vnto infants a conscience without knowledge in vvhome is neither conscience nor knowledge but he knewe what he did in vvhome all haue sinned and from whome all haue drawnâ— corruption c. Vpon the 9. chapter The 5. aphorisme How they can winde themselues out of this errour which denie that the fathers did eate the true flesh of Christ we see not as though because he was not as yet indeede existing in nature therefore he was not existing in the assured promise of Christ consequently could noâ— be apprehended and eaten by faith For this proposition is generall and to all men at all times belongeth Vnlesse ye eate the flesh of the sonne of man yee haue no life in you For life is not imparted but onely to those which by faith as members to the head are ioyned to the flesh of Christ by the flesh to the spirit or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To the word which is life Vpon the 10. chapter The 3. aphorisme For God would shew c. That which I said of the first second third and fourth estate had bin more cleare if I had told what man was before he sinned what after hee had sinned what vnder grace and what he shal be in his glorie Vpon the 11. chapter of Christ the redeemer aphorisme 6. That the person of Christ speaking properly is compounded of the diuine nature which is immeasurable and most pure and of the humaine which in respect of the diuine is lesse then a pricke to an infinite masse as of two partes truely and properly so called wee together with the schoolemen do
personally vnited to the diuine therefore the gifts of God conferred vpon the same are without measure as is declared in the aphorisme following The 12. aphorisme Although when I wrote this confession I thought to my selfe that I had hādled al things which belong vnto this article of the person of Christ yet I thought for the better explaining thereof to ioyne this also which followeth to that which I said before 1 There is and euer was one onely person of Christ For there is but one onely begotten sonne of God and one and the same Christ 2 This person being from all eternitie by the naturall begetting of the father is proper vnto the word but in time was made common to the humaine nature taken to it by vertue of the personall vnion For in the word the essence which it hath common yea the verie same with the father the holie ghost is to bee distinguished from the proper manner of subsisting whereby it comes to passe that it is a certaine Hypostasis or person distinct from the father and the holie ghost and therefore is and is called the Hypostasis or person proper to the sonne or to the worde But this eternall Hypostasis proper by nature vnto the word is by this vnion made common as we said with the diuine nature and the humaine taken vnto it namely that the vvorde doeth no lesse subsist really in this humaine form thē it doth in that diuine form in that respect is no lesse true and perfect man then true and perfect god yet the natures properties and actions remaining safe and distinct 3 Therefore into the vnitie of that immeasurable most pure and most perfect person was taken the humaine nature that is that lumpe consisting of the reasonable soule and flesh of man finite compounded and needing many things But how not so as that for example it cōtained that infinite person within the boūdes or limitts of it owne finite or determinate substance or that it spredd it selfe as it were stretched out into the largenesse of it And that which wee say of this propertie the same is to bee thought and beleeued of all the rest because they all remaine vnchaungeable and vnmixed How then was the humaine nature taken surely it was so taken into vnitie of the same person that yet it is not made the verie person but rather existeth in the person is borne and sustained of the person and euer dependeth wholly vpon the same For this vniō of the natures according to the Hypostasis or vniting of the Hypostasis is made without alteration confusion or diuision 4 Whereby it also followeth that the nature taken to speake properly is not a part of this person as is aforesaid For like as of the vnion of the two natures there is not framed a third nature so neither by taking the humaine nature into vnity of the diuine person is there framed as it were a new person which should be the proper person of Christ and should differ from the person of the word which is the word it selfe For it is altogether the verie same nor doth it differ from it selfe except herein that the same which subsisted onely in the forme of God and was onely God now subsisteth also in the forme of a seruant is also man and before was as a king naked but is nowe clothed with our flesh as with a purple garment so that for this cause the fathers not amisse called the same in some sort a compounded person But marke also this difference besids the rest that the garmēt pertaineth not to the essence of a king but the humaine nature in Christ is in such sorte that without it cannot be defined what Christ is 5 Which is the cause why the humaine nature thus takē is to be reputed acknowledged as it were a part of the person of Christ namely because it is so taken into vnity of his person that as the vvorde with this humaine flesh is said to be and is man so also this flesh in the word and with the word God is said to be and is God as Athanasius Gregorie Nazianzene Damascene and other fathers haue proued out of the scriptures for that flesh is God not by nature but by Hypostasie in which sense the same flesh is omnipotent and present in all places whereuppon it comes also that what honour belongeth to the word of it selfe the same is also to bee giuen to the flesh in the word and for the word because of them both there is but one and the same Hypostasie 6 Add this moreouer for better explications sake that the word although wheresoeuer it bee and it is in all places there also the same is not onely god but also man and that because it hath in all places the humaine nature vnited therunto by Hypostasie yet where soeuer it is it selfe it doth not make it selfe an Hypostasis or personal to the humaine nature but only there where the same nature existeth namely so as that nature is sustained borne and wrought or mooued by it For how should the same be said to bee sustained where it doth not exist the feete are sustained by the soule not wheresoeuer the the soule is be it in the head but onely where they themselues are existing When the flesh was in the virgins wombe the word being then personally vnited vnto it did not thē sustaine the same out of the wombe of Marie but onely it was Hypostasis vnto it in the womb which sustained the same there and not in any other place which is also to bee said of all the time of Christs life when he liued in diuers places Likewise after his death it was Hypostasis vnto his bodie when it was dead and buried sustained the same in it selfe but where surely not in heauen where the bodie was not but onely in the graue euen as also it was Hypostasis to his soule separated from his bodie not in the graue but out of the graue sustained the same in it selfe And now it sustaineth both the soule and bodie together in heauen not in earth much lesse euerie where 7 Neither doth it follow vppon this doctrine that the personall vnion is dissolued neither doeth it come to passe that the whole person is not Hypostasis to the flesh but onely in parte The reason is because this person of the word as it is infinite so also is it most simple and pure and therefore both is wholly Hypostasis to the flesh wheresoeuer the flesh existeth is also wholly Hypostasis in other places where the flesh existeth not being it selfe existing in the forme of god Indeed the soule as is aforesaide is wholly Hypostasis to the head giuing life to it and sustaining it but where not in euery part of the body but onely in that where the head it selfe is and out of the head is also wholly hypostasis to the feet sustaining them too not where the head is but where the
hypostaticall or personall vnion 19 Out of which place it euidently appeareth first that those things which are of the flesh are no lesse giuen to the word then the things of the word to the flesh then that they which belong to the word are giuen to the flesh after no other manner then they which pertaine to the flesh are giuen to the word lastlie that this manner of giuing is called the manner of mutuall pradication not simplie and in the abstractiue names of the natures but in the concretiue noting the person 20 Moreouer what this manner of praedication is and why it is so called the same Damascene expoundeth in the 4. chapter both by example and by the cause in these wordes This manner of mutuall praedication is vvhen those things vvhich are proper to one nature are spoken of the other nature by reason of the hypostaticall identitie or personall vnion of them both and for that the one nature is in the other for example vvee may say of Christ this our god was seene vpon the earth and conuersed with men and this man is vncreated not subiect to passion not circumscribed in any place And the examples added doe manifestlie shewe howe one nature doeth attribute those things which are proper vnto it selfe to the other and for what cause For God in that by this name is ment the diuine essence was not seene on earth but onely in that the person is ment by it which is both God and man 21 Therefore we mislike not that receiued description of the communicating of proprieties The communication of the proprieties is a praedication wherein the proprietie agreeable to one nature is giuen to the person in a name concrete because these two natures the vvorde and the humane nature taken are one existence or person 22 Thus therefore we iudge that the communication of the properties may not amisse be defined the communication of the proprieties is a praedication or a manner of speach wherein the proprietie that is the concrete name signifying the proprietie of one nature is spoken really of Christs person signified by the name of the other nature and is spoken onely in worde of the other nature in the concrete by reason of the coniunction of the natures the personall vnion thereof 23 But we say it is all one to be praedicated or said of the person signified by the coÌ„crete name of the other nature and to be said of the concrete name of the other nature signifying the person as also the proprietie and the concrete name signifying the proprietie of the one nature are in this matter alone 24 For this question was propounded by the fathers against the heretikes not so much about the things themselues as about the manners of speaking which the holy scripture vseth speaking of Iesus Christ when sometime it saieth The Lord of glorie vvas crucified sometime The sonne of man vvhen he vvas on earth vvas also in heauen and other such like namely how such phrases should be vnderstood 25 For none of any sound iudgemeÌ„t euer doubted but as the natures so also the essentiall proprieties of both the natures remained distinct whole and vnconfounded in the person of Iesus Christ after the vnion so as for example sake neither the deitie was made passible and locall nor the humanitie impassible and vncircumscribed as some heretickes falsifying the scriptures haue blasphemed 26 Now the very foundation of this whole exposition was the true and neere vniting of the two natures within themselues and a meeting of them into one and the same person vnspeakably made without conuersion without confusion without diuision without separation 27 For Damascene declaring this after he had taught how those things which are of the flesh are giuen to the vvorde and likewise how the things of the word are communicated to the flesh namely according to this manner of praedicaâ—ation he adioyneth the cause thereof saying by reason of the meeting together of the partes one with the other and the hypostaticall or personall vnion in the 4. chapter This is the manner saith he of mutuall predication vvhenas one nature doth giue the proprieties of one nature to the other which it doth in respect of the personall identitie the ioyning of the natures one with the other Now this ioyning of the natures one with the other is the very vnion that is an inward absolute and most perfect vniting them together As Damascene both els where especially in his 4. booke and 19. chapter expouÌ„deth it saying But the diuine nature once going through the flesh gaue vnto the flesh also an vnspeakable going to the diuine nature vvhich vvee call the vnion 29 We our selues add that this vnion is also the finall cause of this forme of speaking because therefore this reciprocall praedication is deliuered in the holie scripture that the true vnitie of the natures in one person of Iesus Christ might be shewed which is the cause why these verball praedications can by no meanes be said to be vaine or to no purpose seing they haue great vse shewing how the two natures are vnited into one person without confusion 30 Moreouer this same communication of the proprieties for example in this proposition God was crucified we say to be both verball and reall in diuers respects For in that by this concrete word God is ment a person which is not onely God but also man it is a reall predication For because he was man therefore he truly and indeed died But as the deitie is meant by the formall signification as they speake or as God simply is meant thereby it is a verball praedication and that a true one For god is truely said to haue died by reason of the person togither meant and that which is God indeed died not nor could die although he which is God did truely die 31 These thinges thus declared it is easie to iudge of the diuers enunciations which be tru and which false and in what manner of Praedication each one is to be taken Neither one nature nor the proprieties thereof can by any meanes neither in the abstractiue name nor in the concretiue be predicated or spoken of the other nature signified in the abstractiue For it is as false to say The humaine nature or the humanity is God as to say The humanity is the dietie And as false to say the humanity is immeasurable and infinite as to say the humanity is very immeasurablenesse or infinitenes Therefore in all the scriptures is no such kind of speech to be found 32 Neither can one nature or the proprieties thereof be spoken in the abstract of the other nature signified either in an abstractiue or concretiue name For both these propositions are false God is the humanity and the Deity is the humanity 33 Of either of the natures signified by what name soeuer the thinges that are proper therevnto may truely be spoken and that of them both in the concrete but of
the diuine in the abstract also by reason of the simplicity thereof For this proposition is as true and proper he deity is omnipotent as this God is omnipotēt yea euen omnipotency it selfe And againe Humanity and a man is mutable 34 Of the person expressed by the proper name and that name Rule 4 which noteth both the natures or by a name signifying the office of a mediatour as well the things which are proper to the one or to the other or to both the natures together may truely and properly be spoken as Christ is omnipotent also Christ is man Christ died Also Christ is a redeemer a mediatour Also the mediator is God is man is immortall died redeemed vs. 35 Of the person signified by a name of one nature Rule 5 the things which are proper therevnto may truely and properly be spoken as This God or onely begotten sonne of God is eternall and omnipotent Also This man or the sonne of man was borne in the last daies Rule 6 died 36 Those things which are proper to the wholle person cannot be spoken but by a Synechdoche a part taken for the wholle of one nature signified either by an abstractiue or concretiue name as The flesh quickeneth God redeemed his Church 37 Wherefore this saying of Leo each forma worketh that which belongeth to it selfe we with Damas say to be all one with this and that properly Christ worketh according to each forme 38 So where Iohn said his blood washeth vs from sinne and Christ saith my flesh is meate indeede also where it is said to quicken and that it is to be worshipped those wordes are put for concretiues namely the flesh of Christ for Christ incarnate and the blood of Christ for Christ by his blood 39 For he which said he that eateth my flesh hath eternall life the same said He that eateth me he shall liue by me And he which writ his bloode washeth vs from sinne the same expounding himselfe saith Christ shall wash vs from our sinnes by his blood And they which taught that Christs flesh was to be worshipped they also expressed the cause namely not because it was flesh but because it was flesh of God and therefore that Christians do worship not flesh properly but God incarnate 40 Of the person signified by the name of the one nature Rule 7 the things that belong to the other nature may indeede truely and really be spoken but yet improperly and figuratiuely by communicatiō of the proprieties As the sonne of man it both in heauen and on earth at once Also the onely begotten and Lord of glory was crucified 8. Rule 41 Here of followeth another of the one nature signified in a concretiue name the thinges propper to the other may truely be spoken by reason of the person togither noted yet not really but onely in respect of the name As God taken in the formall signification died man is eternall 42 Wherefore we say that those thinges are praedicated or spoken by communication of the proprieties which beeing proper to one of the natures are made common also to the other in the concrete by the mutuall manner of praedication namely while they are really attributed to the person wereof each nature is a part 43 For seeing Christ most truely and really is both God and man we doubt not to say and with the wholle Church to teach that he suffered namely for example sake according to the one nature and suffered not namely according to the other 44 And seeing the scripture saith both that God is immortall also that the same died was crucified we teach that in the former speech the name of God is taken essentially in the latter hypostatically or personally and therefore that both these are true in the speach concerning Christ but that both of them are spoken of the same in a diuerse manner of praedicatiō 45 Whatsoeuer things we reade to haue beene really giuen to Christ in time after the vnion the same may truely and really be spoken of the person in respect of the humanitie therfore also of the humanitie it selfe but it is to be vnderstood that they cannot be spoken in respect of the divinity and being signified by a concrete name but onely by communication of the proprieties An example of the first Esai 11. the spirit of wisdome shall rest vpon him c. An example of the other Ioh. 3. He hath giuen vnto him his sonne who is from heauen whōe the father sent his spirit aboue measure For he as he is the onely begotten sonne cannot be said to haue really receiued the spirit but onely by communication of the proprieties 46 But the thinges which we confesse were giuen after this manner were not the essentiall proprieties of God but onely gifts of creation and as they call thē habituall graces which belong partly to the perfection of Christs humaine nature partely to the perfecting of the office of a mediatour partely to the honour of the head of the Church 47 For the essentiall proprieties of God are vnited most really with the humaine nature in the same person but they are not really communicated to it in it owne verie essence 48 For to omitte almost infinite of other reasons testimonies of the Apostles aūcient Fathers what things Christ receiued as Man in the essence of his humaine nature he receiued the same that he might as beeing head deriue thē into his mēbers as Athanasius Cyril are witnesses seing he therefore sanctified himselfe that we also might be sanctified and the oile was powered vpon Aarons head that it might runne downe on al his members euen to the skirts of his clothing 49 And who except a mad man would saie that the essentiall proprieties of God are deriued vnto vs. 50 The cause also why Christ as he is God cānot be said to haue receiued gifts of creation is by Cyrill assigned to be this Because as God he needed them not Therefore if also as he is mā he receiued the essentiall proprieties of God really communicated vnto him he cannot then be said to haue receiued the created gifts of the holy ghost For to that ende serueth a finite power in him which is indued with an infinite power really communicated vnto him Finis