inaudita Here is at length some certainty Some truth mingled among to give the better grace and to be as it were the Vehiculum of a lye For Iohn Scory in King Edward his times Bishop of Chichester and after of Hereford was one of those that ordained Doctor Parker and preached at his Ordination But that was the Ordination effected as you call it We are now in that which was not effected but attempted only And here we seek again who were these quidams that laid Hands on Scory We may go look them with Laudasensis the Archbishop of Ireland Well hear the proofs Master Thomas Neal Hebrew Reader of Oxford which was present told thus much to the antient Confessors they to F. Halywood This proof by Tradition as you know is of little credit with Protestants and no marvel For experience shews that reports suffer strange alterations in the carriage even when the Reporters are interested Irenaeus relates from the antient Confessors which had seen John the Disciple and the other Apostles of the Lord and heard it from them That Christ our Saviour was between forty and fifty years of Age before his Passion I do not think you are sure it was so For my part I had rather believe Irenaeus and those Antients he mentions and the Apostles than Father Halywood and his Confessors and Master Neal. But possible it is Mr. Neale said he was present at Matthew Parkers Ordination by John Scory These Confessors being before impressed as you are with the buz of the Ordination at the Nags-head made up that Tale and put it upon him for their Author Perhaps Mr. Neal did esteem Iohn Scory to be no Bishop and so was scandalized though causelesly at that action Perhaps Mr. Neale never said any such Word at all To help to make good this matter he saith It was after enacted in Parliament That these Parliamentary Bishops should be holden for lawful I looked for something of the Nags-Head Bishops and the Legend of their Ordination But the lawfulness that the Parliament provides for is according to the Authority the Parliament hath civil that is according to the Laws of the Land The Parliament never intended to justifie any thing as lawful jure divino which was not so as by the Preamble it self of the Statute may appear In which it is said That divers questions had grown upon the making and consecrating of Archbishops and Bishops within this Realm whether the same were and bâ— duely and orderly done according to the Law or not c. And shortly to cut off Father Halywoods surmises the case was this as may be gathered by the body of the Statute Whereas in the five and twentieth of Henry the Eighth an Act was made for the Electing and Consecrating of Bishops within this Realm And another in the third of Edward the Sixth For the Ordering and consecrating of them and all other Ecclesiastical Ministers according to such form as by six Prelates and six other learned Men in Gods Law to be appointed by the King should be devised and set forth under the great Seal of England Which Form in the fifth of the same Kings reign was annexed to the Book of Common Prayer then explained and perfected and both confirmed by the Authority of Parliament All these Acts were 1 Mariae 1 2 Philippi Mariae repealed together with another Statute of 35. Henry 8. touching the Stile of Supreme Head to be used in all Letters Patents and Commissions c. These Acts of repeal in the 1 Elizabeth were again repealed and the Act of 25. Hen. 8. revived specially That of 3 Edw. 6. only concerning the Book of Common Prayer c. without any particular mention of the Book or form of Ordering Ministers and Bishops Hence grew one doubt whether Ordinations and Consecrations according to that Form were good in Law or no. Another was Queen Elizabeth in her Letters Patents touching such Consecrations Ordinations had not used as may seem besides other general Words importing the highest Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical the title of Supreme Head as King Henry and King Edward in their like Letters Patents were wont to do And that notwithstanding the Act of 35 Hen. 8. after the repeal of the former repeal might seem though never specially revived This as I guess was another exception to those that by vertue of those Patents were consecrated Whereupon the Parliament declares First That the Book of Common Prayer and such Order and Form for consecrating of Archbishops and Bishops c. as was set forth in the time of King Edward the Sixth and added thereto and authorised by Parliament shall stand in force and be observed Secondly That all Acts done by any person about any Consecration Confirmation or investing of any elect to the Office or Dignity of Archbishop or Bishop by vertue of the Queens Letters Patents or Commission since the beginning of her Reign be good Thirdly That all that have been Ordered or Consecrated Archbishops Bishops Priests c. after the said Form and Order be rightly made ordered and consecrated any Statute Law Canon or other thing to the contrary notwithstanding Theâ—e were the Reasons of that Act which as you see doth not make good the Nags-head-Ordination as F. Halywood pretends unless the same were according to the Form in Edward the Sixth's days His next proof is That Bonner Bishop of London while he lived always set light by the Statutes of the Parliaments of Queen Elizabeth alledging that there wanted Bishops without whose consent by the Laws of the Realm there can no firm Statute be made That Bonneâ— despised and set not a Straw by the Acts of Parliament in Queen Elizabeths time I hold it not impossible and yet there is no other proof thereof but his bare Word and the antient Confessors tradition of which we heard before Admitting this for certain there might be other reasons thereof besides the Ordination at the Nags-head The stiffness of that Man was no less in King Edwards time than Queen Elizabeths And indeed the want also of Bishops might be the cause why he little regarded the Acts of her first Parliament For both much about the time of Queen Maryes death dyed also Cardinal Poole and sundry other Bishops And of the rest some for their contemptuous behaviour in denying to perform their duty in the Coronation of the Queen were committed to Prison others absented themselves willingly So as it is commonly reported to this day there was none or very few there For as for Doctor Parker and the rest they were not ordained till December 1559. the Parliament was dissolved in the May before So not to stand now to refute Bonners conceit that according to our Laws there could be no Statutes made in Parliament without Bishops wherein our Parliament Men will rectifie his Judgment F. Halywood was in this report twice deceived or would deceive his Reader First that he would make that exception which
your Ordination there is no Word said And as little there is in Scripture of your Sacrifice which makes Christ not to be a Priest after the order of Melchisedeck c. with much more to this purpose Where my Defence for your Ministry hath been this That the Form Receive the Holy Ghost whose sins ye remit they are remitted c. doth sufficiently comprehend the Authority of preaching the Gospel Use you the same equity towards us and tell those hot Spirits among you that stand so much upon formalities of Words That to be a Dispenser of the Word of God and his holy Sacraments is all the duty of Priesthood And to you I add further that if you consider well the Words of the Master of the Sentences which I vouched before how that which is consecrated of the Priest is called a Sacrifice and Oblation because it is a Memorial and Representation of the true Sacrifice and holy Offering made on the Altar of the Cross and joyn thereto that of the Apostle that by that one Offering Christ hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified and as he saith in another place through that Blood of his Cross reconciled unto God all things whether in Earth or in Heaven you shall perceive that we do offer Sacrifice for the Quick and Dead remembring representing and mystically offering that sole Sacrifice for the Quick and Dead by the which all their sins are meritoriously expiated and desiring that by the same we and all the Church may obtain remission of sins and all other Benefits of Christs Passion To the Epilogue therefore of this your last Motive I say in short Sith we have no need of Subdeaconship more than the Churches in the Apostles times and in truth those whom we call Clerks and Sextons perform what is necessary in this behalf Sith we have Canonical Bishops and lawful Succession Sith we neither want due intention to depute Men to Ecclesiastical Functions nor matter or Form in giving Priesthood deriving from no Man or Woman the Authority of Ordination but from Christ the Head of the Church you have alledged no sufficient Cause why we should not have true Pastors and consequently a true Church in England CHAP. XII Of the Conclusion Mr. Waddesworth's Agonies and Protestation c. YEt by these you say and many other Arguments you were resolved in your understanding to the contrary It may well be that your Understanding out of its own heedless hast as that of our first Parents while it was at the perfectest was induced into error by resolving too soon out of seeming Arguments and granting too forward assent For surely these which you have mentioned could not convince it if it would have taken the pains to examine them throughly or had the patience to give unpartial hearing to the Motives on the other side But as if you triumphed in your own conquest and captivity you add that which passeth yet all that hitherto you have set down viz. That the Church of Rome was and is the only true Church because it alone is Antient Catholick and Apostolick having Succession Vnity and Visibility in all Ages and Places Is it only antient To omit Ierusalem are not that of Antioch where the Disciples were first called Christians and Alexandria Ephesus Corinth and the rest mentioned in the Scriptures antient also and of Antioch antienter than Rome Is it Catholick and Apostolick only Do not these and many more hold the Catholick Faith received from the Apostles as well as the Church of Rome For that it should be the Vniversal Church is all one as ye would say the part is the whole one City the World Hath it only succession where to set aside the enquiry of Doctrine so many Simoniacks and Intruders have ruled as about fifty of your Popes together were by your own Mens Confession Apostatical rather than Apostolical Or Unity where there have been thirty Schisms and one of them which endured fifty years long and at last grew into three Heads as if they would share among them the triple Crown And as for dissentions in Doctrine I remit you to Master Doctor Halls peace of Rome wherein he scores above three hundred mentioned in Bellarmine alone above three-score in one only head of Penance out of Navarrus As to that addition in all Ages and places I know not what to make of it nor where to refer it Consider I beseech you with your wonted moderation what you say for sure unless you were beguiled I had almost said bewitched you could never have resolved to believe and profess that which all the World knows to be as false I had well nigh said as God is true touching the extent of the Romish Church to all Ages and places Concerning the agonies you passed I will say only thus much if being resolved though erroneously that was truth you were withholden from professing it with worldly respects you did well to break through them all But if besides these there were doubt of the contrary as methinks needs must be unless you could satisfie your self touching those many and known Exceptions against the Court of Rome which you could not be ignorant of take heed lest the rest insuing these agonies were not like Sampsons sleeping on Dalilahs knees while the Locks of his Strength were shaven whereupon the Lord departing from him he was taken by the Philistins had his Eyes put out and was made to grind in the Prison But I do not despair but your former resolutions shall grow again And as I do believe your religious asseveration that for very fear of damnation you forsook us which makes me to have the better hope and opinion of you for that I see you do so seriously mind that which is the end of our whole life so I desire from my Heart the good hope of salvation you have in your present way may be as happy as your fear I am perswaded was causeless For my part I call God to record against mine own Soul that both before my going into Italy and since I have still endeavoured to find and follow the truth in the Points controverted between us without any earthly respect in the World Neither wanted I fair opportunity had I seen it on that side easily and with hope of good entertainment to have adjoyned my self to the Church of Rome after your example But to use your words as I shall answer at the dreadful day of judgement I never saw heard or read any thing which did convince me nay which did not finally confirm me daily more and more in the perswasion that in these differences it rests on our part Wherein I have not followlowed humane conjectures from foreign and outward things as by your leave methinks you do in these your motives whereby I protest to you in the sight of God I am also much comforted and assured in the possession of the truth but the undoubted Voice of God in his Word which is more
English Translators had failed He thought the use of the Scriptures was the only way to let the knowledge of Religion in among the Irish as it had first let the Reformation into the other parts of Europe And he used to tell a passage of a Sermon that he heard Fulgentio preach at Venice with which he was much pleased It was on these Words of Christ Have ye not read and so he took occasion to tell the Auditory That if Christ were now to ask this Question Have ye not read all the Answer they could make to it was No for they were not suffered to do it Upon which he taxed with great zeal the restraint put on the use of the Scriptures by the See of Rome This was not unlike what the same person delivered in another Sermon preaching upon Pilate's Question What is Truth he told them that at last after many searches he had found it out and held out a New Testament and said There it was in his Hand but then he put it in his Pocket and said coldly But the Book is prohibited which was so suited to the Italian genius that it took mightily with the Auditory The Bishop had observed that in the Primitive times as soon Nations how barbarous soever they were began to receive the Christian Religion they had the Scriptures translated into their vulgar Tongues And that all people were exhorted to study them therefore he not only undertook and began this Work but followed it with so much industry that in a very few years he finished the Translation and resolved to set about the printing of it for the bargain was made with one that engaged to perform it And as he had been at the great trouble of examining the Translation so he resolved to run the venture of the Impression and took that expence upon himself It is scarce to be imagined what could have obstructed so great and so good a Work The Priests of the Church of Rome had reason to oppose the printing of a Book that has been always so fatal to them but it was a deep fetch to possess reformed Divines with a jealousie of this work and with hard thoughts concerning it Yet that was done but by a very well disguised method For it was said that the Translator was a weak and contemptible Man and that it would expose such a work as this was to the scorn of the Nation when it was known who was the Author of it And this was infused both into the Earl of Strafford and into the Archbishop of Canterbury And a bold young Man pretended a lapse of the Benefice that the Bishop had given to the Translator and so obtained a Broad Seal for it though it was in the Bishop's Gift This was an abuse too common at that time for licentious Clerks to pretend either that an Incumbent was dead or that he had no good right to his Benefice or that he had forfeited it and upon that to procure a Grant of it from the King and then to turn the Incumbent out of Possession and to vex him with a Suit till they forced him to compound for his peace So upon this occasion it was pretended that the Translator had forfeited his Living and one Baily that had informed against him came down with a Grant of it under the great Seal and violently thrust him out of it The Bishop was much touched with this and cited Baily to appear before him He had given him a Vicarage and had taken an Oath of him never to hold another so he objected to him both his violent and unjust intrusion into another man's right and his Perjury Baily to cover himself from the last procured a Dispensation from the Prerogative Court notwithstanding his Oath to hold more Benefices The Bishop lookt on this as one of the worst and most scandalous parts of Popery to dissolve the most sacred of all Bonds and it grieved his Soul to see so vile a thing acted in the name of Archbishop Vsher though it was done by his Surrogates So without any regard to this he served this obstinate Clerk with several Canonical admonitions but finding him still hardned in his wickedness he deprived him of the Benefice he had given him and also excommunicat'd him and gave orders that the Sentence should be published through the whole Deanry upon which Baily's Clerk appealed to the Prerogative Court and the Bishop was cited to answer for what he had done He went and appeared before them but declined their Authority and would not answer to them He thought it below the Office and Dignity of a Bishop to give an account of a spiritual Censure that he had inflicted on one of his Clergy before two Laymen that pretended to be the Primate's Surrogates and he put his Declinator in 24 Articles all written with his own Hand which will be found at the end of this Narrative he excepted to the incompetency of the Court both because the Primate was not there in person and because they that sate there had given clear Evidences of their partiality which he had offered to prove to the Primate himself He said the appeal from his Sentence lay only to the Provincial Synod or to the Archbishop's Consistory and since the ground of Bailys Appeal was the dispensation that they had given him from his Oath they could not be the competent Judges of that for they were Parties And the Appeal from abusive faculties lay only to a Court of Delegates by the express words of the Law And by many Indications it appeared that they had prejudged the matter in Baily's favours and had expressed great resentments against the Bishop and notwithstanding the dignity of his Office they had made him wait among the croud an hour and an half and had given directions in the management of the Cause as Parties against him they had also manifestly abused their power in granting Dispensations contrary to the Laws of God and now they presumed to interpose in the just and legal Jurisdiction that a Bishop exercised over his Clergy both by the Laws of God and by the Kings Authority Upon these grounds he excepted to their Authority he was served with several Citations to answer and appeared upon every one of them but notwithstanding the highest contempts they put upon him he shewed no indecent passion but kept his ground still In conclusion he was declared Contumax and the perjured Intruder was absolved from the Sentence and confirmed in the possession of his ill-acquired Benefice It may be easily imagined how much these Proceedings were censured by all fair and equitable Men The constancy the firmness and the courage that the Bishop expressed being as much commended as the injustice and violence of his Enemies was cryed out upon The strangest part of this transaction was that which the Primate acted who though he loved the Bishop beyond all the rest of the Order and valued him highly for the zealous discharge of
his office that distinguished him so much from others yet he could not be prevailed on to interpose in this matter nor to stop the injust Prosecution that this good Man had fallen under for so good a Work Indeed it went further for upon the endeavours he used to convert the Irish and after he had refused to answer in the Archbishop's Court it appears that he was in some measure alienated from him which drew from the Bishop the following Answer to a Letter that he had from him Most Reverend Father my honourable good Lord THE Superscription of your Grace's Letters was most welcome unto me as bringing under your own hand the best evidence of the recovery of your health for which I did and do give hearty thanks unto God For the Contents of them as your Grace conceived They were not so pleasant But the Words of a Friend are faithful saith the Wise Man Sure they are no less painful than any other Vnkindness cuts nearer to the Heart than Malice can do I have some experience by your Grace's said Letters concerning which I have been at some debate with my self whether I should answer them with David's demand What have I now done or as the wrongs of Parents with Patience and Silence But Mr. Dean telling me That this day he is going towards you I will speak once come of it what will You write that the course I took with the Papists was generally cryed out against neither do you remember in all your life that any thing was done here by any of us at which the Professors of the Gospel did take more offence or by which the Adversaries were more confirmed in their Superstitions and Idolatry wherein you could wish that I had advised with my Brethren before I would adventure to pull down that which they have been so long a building Again What I did you know was done out of a good intention but you were assured that my project would be so quickly refuted with the present success and event that there would be no need my Friends should advise me from building such Castles in the air c. My Lord All this is a riddle to me What course I have taken with the Papists what I have done at which your Professors of the Gospel did take such offence or the Adversaries were so confirmed what it is that I have adventured to do or what piece so long a building I have pulled down what those Projects were and those Castles in the air so quickly refuted with present success as the Lords knows I know not For truly since I came to this place I have not changed one jot of my purpose or practice or course with Papists from that which I held in England or in Trinity Colledge or found I thank God any ill success but the slanders only of some persons discontented against me for other occasions Against which I cannot hope to justifie my self if your Grace will give ear to private informations But let me know I will not say my Accuser let him continue masked till God discover him but my Transgression and have place of defence and if mine Adversary write a Book against me I will hope to bear it on my Shoulder and bind it to me as a Crown For my recusation of your Court and advertisement of what I heard thereof I see they have stirred not only laughter but some coals too Your Chancellour desires me to acquit him to you That he is none of those Officers I meant I do it very willingly For I neither meant him nor any Man else But though it concerned your Grace to know what I credibly heard to be spoken concerning your Court neither as God knows did I ever think it was fit to take away the Iurisdiction from Chancellours and put it into the Bishops hands alone or so much as in a dream condemn those that think they have reason to do otherwise nor tax your Grace's Visitation Nor imagine you would account that to pertain to your reproof and take it as a wrong from me which out of my duty to God and you I thought was not to be concealed from you I beseech you pardon me this one errour Si unquam posthac For that knave whom as your Grace writes they say I did absolve I took him for one of my Flock or rather Christs for whom he shed his blood And I would have absolved Julian the Apostate under the same form Some other passages there be in your Grace's Letters which I but I will lay mine Hand upon my Mouth and craving the blessing of your prayers ever remain Your Grace's poor Brother humble servant Will. Kilmore Kilmore March 29. 1630. The malice of Mr. King's Enemies was not satiated with the spoiling him of his Benefice For often it falls out That those who have done acts of high injustice seek some excuse for what they have done by new injuries and a vexatious prosecution of the injured person designing by the noise that such repeated accusations might raise to possess the World with an Opinion of his guilt which much clamour does often produce and so to crush the person so entirely that he may never again be in a capacity to recover himself and to obtain his right but be quite sunk by that vast encrease of weight that is laid upon him But I will give the Reader a clearer view of this invidious affair from a Letter which the Bishop writ concerning it to the Earl of Strafford Right honourable my good Lord. THat which I have sometimes done willingly I do now necessarily to make my address to your Honour by writing My unfitness for conversation heretofore hath pleaded for me and now your Lordship's infirmity allows and in a sort inforces it The occasion is not my love of contention which I have committed to God or any other matter of profit but God's honour and as he is witness yours I have lately received Letters from my Lord of Canterbury whereby I perceive his Grace is informed that Mr. King whom I imployed to translate the Bible into Irish is a Man so ignorant that the Translation cannot be worthy publick use in the Church and besides obnoxious so as the Church can receive no credit from any thing that is his And his Grace adds That he is so well acquainted with your Lordship's disposition that he assures himself you would not have given away his Living had you not seen just cause for it I account my self bound to satisfie his Grace herein and desire if I may be so happy to do it by satisfying you I do subscribe to his Grace's assured perswasion that your Lordship had you not conceived Mr. King to be such as he writes would not have given away his Living But my Lord the greatest wisest and justest Men do and must take many things upon the information of others who themselves are Men and may sometimes out of weakness or some other cause be deceived Touching
Mr. King's silliness which it concerns me the more to clear him of that I be not accounted silly my self I beseech your Lordship to take information not by them which never saw him till yesterday but by the ancient either Church or Statesmen of this Kingdom in whose eyes he hath lived these many Years as are the Lord Primate The Bishop of Meath the Lord Dillon Sir James Ware and the like I doubt not but your Lordship shall understand that there is no such danger that the Translation should be unworthy because he did it being a Man of that known sufficiency for the Irish especially either in Prose or Verse as few are his matches in the Kingdom And shortly not to argue by conjecture and divination Let the Work it self speak yea let it be examined rigoroso examine If it be found approveable let it not suffer disgrace from the small boast of the Workman but let him rather as old Sophocles accused of dotage be absolved for the sufficiency of the Work Touching his being obnoxious it is true that there is a scandalous Information put in against him in the High Commission Court by his despoiler Mr. Baily as my Lord of Derry told him in my hearing he was and by an excommunicate despoiler as my self before the Execution of any sentence declar'd him in the Court to be And Mr. King being cited to answer and not appearing as by Law he was not bound was taken pro confesso deprived of his Ministry and Living Fined an hundred Pound Decreed to be attached and imprisoned His Adversary Mr. Baily before he was sentenced purchased a new Dispensation to hold his Benefice and was the very next day after as appears by the date of the Institution both presented in the King's Title although the Benefice be of my Collation and instituted by my Lord Primate's Vicar Shortly after inducted by an Archdeacon of another Diocess and a few dayes after he brought down an Attachment and delivered Mr. King to the Pursevant He was haled by the Head and Feet to Horseback and brought to Dublin where he hath been kept and continued under Arrest these four or five Months and hath not been suffered to purge his supposed Contempt by Oath and Witnesses that by reason of his sickness he was hindered whereby he was brought to Death's Door and could not appear and prosecute his defence And that by the cunning of his Adversary he was circumvented intreating that he might be restored to liberty and his cause into the former estate But it hath not availed him my Reverend Colleagues of the High Commission do some of them pity his Case others say the Sentence past cannot be reversed lest the credit of the Court be attached They bid him simply submit himself and acknowledge his Sentence just Whereas the Bishops of Rome themselves after most formal proceedings do grant restitution in integrum and acknowledge That Sententia Romanae Sedis potest in melius commutari My Lord if I understand what is Right Divine or humane these be wrongs upon wrongs which if they reached only to Mr. King's person were of less consideration but when through his side That great Work the Translation of God's Book so necessary for both his Majesty's Kingdoms is mortally wounded pardon me I beseech your Lordship if I be sensible of it I omit to consider what feast our adversaries make of our rewarding him thus for that service or what this example will avail to the alluring of others to conformity What should your Lordship have gained if he had dyed as it was almost a miracle he did not under Arrest and had been at once deprived of Living Liberty and Life God hath reprieved him and given your Lordship means upon right information to remedy with one word all inconveniencies For conclusion good my Lord give me leave a little to apply the Parable of Nathan to King David to this purpose If the way-faring man that is come to us for such he is having never yet been settled in one place have so sharp a Stomach that he must be provided for with Pluralities sith there are Herds and Flocks plenty suffer him not I beseech you under the colour of the King's name to take the coset Ewe of a poor Man to satisfie his ravenous appetite So I beseech the Heavenly Physician to give your Lordship health of Soul and Body I rest My Lord Your Lordship 's most humble servant in Christ Jesus Will. Kilmore Decemb. 1. 1638. By these practices was the printing of the Bible in Irish stopt at that time but if the Rebellion had not prevented our Bishop he was resolved to have had it done in his own House and at his own charge and as preparatory to that he made some of Chrysostome's Homilies the three first upon the parable of the rich Man and Lazarus together with some of Leo's all which tended chiefly to commend the Scriptures in the highest strains of Eloquence that were possible to be translated both into English and Irish and reprinting his Catechism he added these to it in both Languages and these were very well received even by the Priests and Friers themselves He lived not to finish this great design yet notwithstanding the Rebellion and confusion that followed in Ireland the Manuscript of the Translation of the Bible escaped the storm and falling into good Hands it is at this time under the Press and is carried on chiefly by the zeal and at the charge of that Noble Christian Philosopher Mr. Boyle who as he reprinted upon his own charge the new Testament so he very cheerfully went into a Proposition for reprinting the Old But this is only one of many instances by which he has expressed as well his great and active zeal for carrying on the true interest of Religion as by his other publick labours he has advanced and improved Philosophy But to go on with the concerns of our Bishop as he had great zeal for the purity of the Christian Religion in opposition to the corruptions of the Church of Rome so he was very moderate in all other matters that were not of such importance He was a great supporter of Mr. Dury's design of reconciling the Lutherans and the Calvinists and as he directed him by many learned and prudent Letters that he wrote to him on that subject so he allowed him 20 l. a year in order to the discharging the expence of that negotiation which he payed punctually to his Correspondent at London And it appeared by his managing of a business that fell out in Ireland That if all that were concerned in that matter had been blest with such an understanding and such a temper as he had there had been no reason to have despaired of it There came a company of Lutherans to Dublin who were afraid of joyning in Communion with the Church of Ireland and when they were cited to answer for it to the Archbishop's Consistory they desired some time might be
sever not For it is not by humane but râ—ther divine power that spiritual marriage is dissolved when as by translation or cession by the authority of the Bishop of Rome whom it is plain to be the Vicar of Iesus Christ a Bishop is removed from his Church An admirable interpretation of the Text Quos Deus conjunxit by which the Pope not only challengeth that which is proper to Gods judgment only as he saith viz. to dissolve the Bond of spiritual Wedlock but because that is the stronger of carnal it seems also when it shall please him The anointing of a Prince since Christs coming is translated from the Head to the Shoulder by which Principality is fitly designed according to that which is read Factus est principatus super humerum ejus for signifying also whereof Samuel caused the shoulder to be set before Saul Who should ever have understood these Texts if your infallible Interpreter had not declared them But this is nothing yet to the exposition of those Texts which the Pope interprets in his answer to the Emperour of Constantinople as Subditi estote omni humanae Creaturae propter Deum c. He tells him that S. Peter wrote that to his own Subjects to provoke them to the merit of humility For if he had meant thereby to lay the yoke of subjection upon Priests it would follow that every Servant were to rule over them since it is said Omni humanae creaturae After It is not barely set down Regi praecellenti but there is put between perhaps not without cause tanquam And that which follows ad vindictam malefactorum laudem verò bonorum is not to be understood that the King or Emperor hath received the power of the Sword upon good and evil Men save only those who using the sword are committed to his jurisdiction according to that which the Truth saith They which take the Sword shall perish with the Sword For no Man ought or can judge anothers Servant since the Servant according to the Apostle standeth or falleth to his own Lord. For the love of God consider this Interpretation and compare it with S. Chrysostome upon Rom. 13. Nay do but read the Text attentively and judge of the infallibility of your interpreter Straight after he tells the Emperor That he might have understood the prerogative of Priesthood out of that which was said not of every Man but of God not to the King but to the Priest not to one descending of the Royal Stock but of the Priestly Linage of the Priests to wit which were in Anathot Behold I have set thee over Nations and Kingdoms to pull up and destroy to build and to plant See the Prerogative of the Priesthood out of Ieremies calling to be a Prophet O if he had been high Priest This had been a Text for the nonce But he goes on It is said in Gods Law also Diis non detrahes Principem populi tui non maledices Which setting Priests before Kings calls them Gods and the other Princes Compare this exposition with David's and Paul's Psal. 82. and Acts 23.5 and ye shall see how the Interpreter hath hit the mark Again you ought to have known quod fecit Deus duo magna luminaria c. See the Exposition and the difference between the Pope and Kings both in the Text and Gloss. Now although the Gloss-Writer were no excellent Calculator yet out of Clavius the account may be cleared who tells us the Sun exceeds the Moon 6539. times and a Fifth I let pass the collection out of Pasce oves meas that he belongs not to Christs Fold that doth not acknowledge Peter and his Successors his Masters and Pastors out of Quodcunque ligaveris that nothing is excepted Indeed the Pope excepts nothing but looseth Vows Contracts Oaths the Bond of Allegiance and Fealty between Subjects and their Princes The Commandment of Christ Drink ye all of this c. But our Lord expounds himself Iohn 20. Whose sins ye remit they are remitted c. Ex ore sedentis in Throno procedebat gladius bis acutus This is saith the Pope the Sword of Solomon which cuts on both sides giving every Man his own We then who albeit unworthy hold the place of the true Solomon by the favour of God do wisely exercise this Sword when such causes as in our audience are lawfully canvassed we do with Iustice determine This interpretation first corrupts the Text for it hath not out of the Mouth of him that sate on the Throne but that sate on the Horse next it perverts it for it is not the Sword of Iustice but of Christs Word which is more piercing than any two-Edged Sword that issueth out of his Mouth As for that of Iustice he never assumed it but renounced it rather when he said Man who made me a divider to you Luke 12.14 ¶ To prove that in other Regions besides the patrimony of the Church the Pope doth casually exercise temporal Iurisdiction it is said in Deuteronomy Si difficile sit ambiguum c. And because Deuteronomy is by interpretation the second Law Surely by the force of the Word it is proved that what is there decreed should be observed in the New Testament For the place which the Lord did chuse is known to â—e the Apostolick See For when as Peter fleeing went out of the City the Lord minding to call him back to the place he had chosen being asked of him Lord whither goest thou answered I go to Rome to be crucified again The Priests of the Tribe of Levi are the Popes coadjutors The high Priest or Iudge he to whom the Lord said in Peter Quodcunque ligaveris c. His Vicar who is a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedeck appointed by God the Iudge of quick and dead He that contemns the Popes Sentence is to be excommunicated for that is the meaning of being commanded to be put to death Doth not this well follow out of the word Deuteronomy And Rome is the place that Christ did choose because he went he said to be crucified there Only there is a scruple of the High Priest for as much as he that is High Priest after Melchisedeck's Order 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hath a Priesthood that passes not into another Heb. 7. He adds there that Paul that he might declare the fulness of power writing to the Corinthians saith Know ye not that ye shall judge the Angels how much more the things of the World Is this then the Popes plenitude of Power to judge secular things or was Corinth the Apostolick See and so many Popes there even of the meanest of the Church What shall we say to that Exposition of the famous Text Tu es Petrus super hanc petram aedificabo Ecclesiam meam The Lord he saith taking Peter into the fellowship of the undivided Vnity would have him to be
quietly carried was made when the same Inquisition should have been put upon Millaine sixteen years after Yet these people were neither Geuses nor Calvinists Another great means to alienate the Minds of the people of the Low-Countries from the obedience of the Catholick Majesty hath been the severity of his Deputies there one of which leaving the Government after he had in a few years put to death 8000 persons it is reported to have been said The Country was lost with too much lenity This Speech Meursius concludes his Belgick History withal And as for France the first broils there were not for Religion but for preferring the House of Guise and disgracing the Princes of the Blood True it is that each side advantaged themselves by the colour of Religion and under pretence of zeal to the Roman the Guisians murthered the Protestants being in the exercise of their Religion assembled together against the Kings Edict against all Laws and common Humanity And tell me in good sooth Mr. Waddesworth do you approve such barbarous Cruelty Do you allow the Butchery at Paris Do you think Subjects are bound to give their Throats to be cut by their fellow Subjects or to offer them without either humble Remonstrance or flight to their Princes at their meeâ— wills againsts their own Laws and Edicts You would know quo jure the Protestants Wars in France and Holland are justified I interpose not my own Judgment not being throughly acquainted with the Laws and Customes of those Countries but I tell you what both they and the Papists also both in France and Italy have in such Cases alledged First the Law of Nature which they say not only alloweth but inclineth and enforceth every living thing to defend it self from violence Secondly that of Nations which permitteth those that are in the protection of others to whom they owe no more but an honourable acknowledgment in case they go about to make themselves absolute Soveraigns and usurp their Liberty to resist and stand for the same And if a lawful Prince which is not yet Lord of his Subjects Lives and Goods shall attempt to despoil them of the same under colour of reducing them to his own Religion after all humble Remonstrances they may they say stand upon their own guard and being assailed repel Force with Force as did the Macchabees under Antiochus In which case notwithstanding the person of the Prince himself ought always to be sacred and inviolable as was Sauls to David Lastly if the inraged Minister of a lawful Prince will abuse his Authority against the fundamental Laws of the Country they say it is no rebellion to defend themselves against Force reserving still their Obedience to their Soveraign inviolate These are the Rules of which the Protestants that have born Arms in France and Flanders and the Papists also both there and elsewhere as in Naples that have stood for the defence of their Liberties have served themselves How truly I esteem it hard for you and me to determine unless we were more throughly acquainted with the Laws and Customes of those Countries than I for my part am For the Low-Countries the World knows that the Dukes of Burgundy were not Kings or absolute Lords of them which are holden partly of the Crown of France and partly of the Empire And of Holland in particular they were but Earls And whether that Title carries with it such a Soveraignty as to be able to give new Laws without their consents to impose Tributes to bring in Garisons of Strangers to build Forts to assubject their Honours and Lives to the dangerous trial of a new Court proceeding without form or figure of Iustice any reasonable Man may well doubt themselves do utterly deny it Yet you say boldly they are Rebels and ask why we did support them It seems to some that his Catholick Majesty doth absolve them in the Treaty of the Truce An. 1608. of all imputation of Rebellion And if they were Rebels especially for Heresie why did the most Christian King support them As for Queen Elizabeth if she were alive she would answer your question with another Why did Spain concur in Practice and promise Aid to that detestable Conspiracy that was plotted against her by Pius V. as you may see at large in his Life written by Girolamo Catena It is you say an easie matter to pretend Priviledges But it is no hard matter to discern pretended Priviledges from true and Treason from Reason of State and old Corruptions from old Religion But to take Arms to change the Laws by the whole Estate established is Treason whatsoever the cause or colour be and therefore it was Treason in the Rebels of Lincolnshire and York-shire in King Henry's days and in the Earls of the North in Queen Elizabeths though they pretended their old Religion and the same must be said of all Assassinates attempted against the Persons of Princes as Parryes Somervilles Squires against Queen Elizabeth and the late Powder-Plot the eternal Shame of Popery against King James To your Argument therefore in form admitting that it is no true Church which is founded and begun in Malice Disobedience Passion Blood and Rebellion no nor yet a true Reformation of a Church for in truth the Protestants pretend not to have founded any The Assumption is denied in every part of it And here I must needs say you have not done unwisely to leave out the Church of England as against which you had no pretence all things having been carried orderly and by publick Counsel But you have wronged those which you name and either lightly believed or unjustly surmised your self touching Luther Calvin Knox the French and the Hollanders when you make them the raisers of Rebellion and shedders of Blood Whose Blood hath been shed like Water in all parts of those Countries against all Laws of God and Man against the Edicts and publick Faith till necessity as they plead enforced them to stand for their Lives Yet you presume that all this is evident to the World whereas it is so false and improbable yea in some parts impossible as I wonder how your heart could assure your hand to write it Give me here leave to set down by occasion of this your motive that which I profess next to the evidence of those Corruptions which the Court and Faction of Rome maintains hath long moved my self And thus I would enlarge your Proposition That Monarchy as now without lisping it calls it self which was founded supported enlarged and is yet maintained by Pride Ambition Rebellion Treason murthering of Princes Wars dispensing with Perjury and incestuous Marriages Spoils and Robbery of Churches and Kingdoms worldly Policy Force and Falshood Forgery Lying and Hypocrisie is not the Church of Christ and his Kingdom but the Tyranny of Antichrist The Papacy falsely calling it self the Church of Rome is such Ergo. The Assumption shall be proved in every part of it and in truth is already