Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	author_n	sin_n	will_n	1,685	5	6.8791	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A96805	The abridgment of Christian divinitie so exactly and methodically compiled, that it leads us, as it were, by the hand to the reading of the Holy Scriptures. Ordering of common-places. Vnderstanding of controversies. Cleering of some cases of conscience. By John Wollebius. Doctor of Divinity, and ordinary professor in the University of Basil. Now at last faithfully translated into English, and in some obscure places cleared and enlarged, by Alexander Ross. To which is adjoined, after the alphabetical table, the anatomy of the whole body of divinity, delineated in IX. short tables, for the help of weak memories.; Christianae theologiae compendium. English.	Wolleb, Johannes, 1586-1629.; Vaughan, Robert, engraver.; Ross, Alexander, 1591-1654.	1650 (1650)	Wing W3254; Thomason E1264_1; ESTC R204089	204,921	375

by Adam when he gave every creature its name according to its nature Gen. 2.20 XII The will was free indifferent to good or evil so that man might have persever'd in uprightness if he had pleased he received power if he would but not will and power There is a foursold liberty of will according to the foursold state of man In the first man the will was free to good or evil in man lapsed the will is onely free to evil In man regenerated or in the state of grace it is free from evil to good by the grace of God but imperfectly in the state of glory it shall be free from evil to good perfectly in the state of innocency he could not sin * A. R. When it is said here that in the state of misery man cannot but sin 't is not meant that man is forced to sin for he is free from compulsion both in the state of sin and of grace but he is not free from necessity for freedom and necessity may be together in the same will so it shall be in heaven when we shall necessarily yet freely will that onely which is good as the Angels do and even here the will is necessitated when it is determinated by the last act or practical judgement of reason why then may not grace in our conversion necessitate as well as reason determinate but man by his voluntary fall hath brought the necessity of sinning on himself So that with Saint Paul we do the evil which we would not do in that we have lost by the abuse of our free will both our selves and our free will in the state of misery he cannot but sin in the state of grace sin cannot reign in man in the state of glory he cannot sinne at all XIII The inferiour appetites and affections agreed with reason XIV Adam even in respect of his body was immortall but not simply as though his body being composed of the elements could not be resolved into its principles but by Divine covenant not as though it could not die but because it had a possibilitie not to die XV. Mans dominion over the inferiour creatures was not onely intire in respect of possession but milde also and gentle in respect of use and execution XVI That labour which was injoyned to Adam to keep and dresse Paradise was not toylsome but most pleasant CHAP. IX Of the fall of our first Parents the beginning of mans misery SO much concerning the government of man in the state of innocency the government of man in the state of misery is whereby God in his just judgement hath subjected man to divers miseries who of his own accord fell into sin This state of man consisteth in sin and in the miseries which follow upon sin Sin is a transgression of the Law or whatsoever is repugnant to Gods Law 1 Joh. 3.4 Under the name of Law in this place are understood both things commanded and things prohibited in the beginning proposed to man as also the law of nature printed in his heart But concerning the restoring and enlarging of the Law after the fall we are to speak in its own place The RULES I. By Sin is meant either the subject of transgression with the transgression it selfe in the concrete or the transgression alone in the abstract II. The definition of sin by thought word and deed is too narrow For so it is defined by the Pontificians but as it shall appeare afterward this definition belongs nothing to original Sin III. God cannot be called the author of sin without blasphemy IV. One and the same thing in a divers consideration may be both sin and the punishment of sin Sin is either primitive or derivative Primitive is the disobedience of our first Parents whereby they transgressed Gods commandement concerning the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil The RULES I. Neither God nor Gods Decree nor the denial of special Grace nor the permission of sin nor the stirring up of natural motion nor finally the government of that sinne were the causes of Adam and Eves transgression Not God because he most severely prohibited the eating of the fruit not his Decree because that infers a necessity only of immutability not of coaction neither doth it force any man to sin not the denyal of special Grace by which man should continue in his integrity for God was not bound to give that Grace to man which he gave him for he received possibility if he would although not a Will to that possibility not the stirring up of natural motion because motion of it self is not sin not the government of his fall because to turn evil into good is rather to be the author of good then of evil II. God did both will and nill the first Sin He nilled it so far forth as it was sin he willed and decreed it as it was a means of manifesting his glory mercy and justice III. The Procatartical or external * A. R. The direct cause of sin was mans own will the indirect cause was Satan by perswasion and suggestion For no external thing can necessarily move the will but the last end onely Satan may internally work upon the phantasie by representing forms to it and upon the appetite by moving it to passion by means of the spirits and heart But he cannot work upon the understanding and will cause was the instinct and perswasion of Satan that subtile Serpent IV. The Proegumene or internal cause was the will of man of it self indifferent to good or evil but by Satans perswasion bent to evil V. There be certain degrees of that sin by which Adam fell from God not at once but by little and little to wit 1. Incogitancie and curiosity of Evahs talking with the Serpent her husband being absent 2. Incredulity by which she began by degrees to distrust God and to give assent to Satans lies who called in question Gods good-will towards man 3. An inordinate desire to the forbidden fruit and an affection of divine glory 4. The Fact it selfe 5. The seducing of Adam and an inordinate affectation raised in him also VI. If you consider the parts of this sin you way justly call it the transgression of the whole Law of Nature For man sinned by incredulity diffidence ingratitude Idolatry whereby he fell from God and of himself indeavoured to make an Idol of himself by contemning Gods Word by Rebellion Homicide Intemperance Theft by laying hand on that which was anothers without the owners consent by assenting to false witnesse lastly by an ambitious affectation of too high an honour yea of that glory which belongs only to God whence the definition of this sin by Intemperance Ambition or Pride is too narrow VII Therefore with the blessed Apostle we rightly call this sin a transgression an offence and disobedience Rom. 5.14 18 19. VIII Adam in this businesse is to be considered not as a private but as a publique person and consequently as the Parent

God yet for our better understanding the Will is considered as the cause efficient the Decree as the effect Now whereas this word Will is taken diversly it is divers wayes distinguished by Divines to wit into the will of his good pleasure and the will of the signe into an antecedent and consequent into absolute and conditional into secret and revealed But these are not real distributions of the Divine will but distinctions only of the name For to speak properly there is in God but one only will which is called the will of his good pleasure because out of his most free good pleasure he hath decreed what shall be done It is called also his antecedent will because it had existence before any creature and from eternity with God it was established It is named also * A. R. The Schoolmen take Gods antecedent will in another sense for his velleity and they call it conditional they make his consequent will absolute and which is alwayes fulfilled the other not alwayes absolute because it depends upon Gods good pleasure and not from the things which are done in time Lastly it is called secret because in respect of priority it is known neither to men nor Angels But these things are improperly stiled by the name of Divine will which are comprehended in that ordinary verse Praecipit prohibet promittit consulit implet Commands forbids promiseth consulteth fulfilleth For as the Magistrates commands are called his will so the name of will is attributed to precepts prohibitions promises to effects also and events And this is it which is called the will of the signe because it signifieth what is acceptable to God and what he would have done by us It is also called his consequent will because it follows that eternal antecedent will And 't is a conditional will because Gods precepts prohibitions comminations and promises have the condition of obedience and disobedience annexed Lastly his revealed will because it is daily set forth in Gods word This distinction of the will is duly to be observed lest we should imagine that there are in God either really different or contrary wils III. What things are done against the will of God are not done besides his will For many things may be done against his revealed will which notwithstanding are consistent with his secret will or will of his good pleasure God by his revealed will desired not mans fall but most severely forbid it yet he did will and decree the same by the will of his good pleasure as it was a means for manifestation of his glory IV. Therefore by the decree and will of God good and evil come to passe Good by efficiencie Evil by permission V. Yet the decree or will of God is not the cause of evil or sinne although what God hath decreed necessarily comes to passe For when evil is decreed by Gods will not effecting but permitting it this decree of God is not the cause of evil neither again is the will of God the cause of evil because his decrees are without repentance and unavoidable for they come not to passe by the necessity of coaction but by the necessity of * A. R. Gods will is immutable because his substance is unchangeable and his knowledge unalterable therefore God changeth not his wil though he wils change in the creatures neither can God wil evil because it is not appetible and 't is repugnant to his nature and goodnesse immutability VI. The necessity of Gods decrees takes not away the liberty of the rational creature The reason is because there is no necessity of coaction but of immutability The fall of Adam if we look upon Gods decree came to passe necessarily In the mean while Adam sinned freely being neither commanded nor constrained nor forced or moved by God but rather most severely admonished that he may not sinne VII Nor doth this Necessity take away Contingencie in the second causes For many things are contingent in respect of the second causes which in regard of Gods decree come to passe necessarily VIII No moving or impulsive cause can be given of Gods decree except Gods most free will and good pleasure IX The chief end of Gods decree is his own glory X. Gods decree in it self is one and most simple neither is there priority or posteriority in it XI But in respect of the things which are decreed is so distinguished that in what manner or order they come to passe God is said to decree them that they should thus come to passe These are idle questions Whether God decreed this or that first Whether he first ordained the end or the means For whereas the decree of God in it self is one and a most simple action there is neither priority nor posteriority in it but it is distinguished only in regard of the things which are decreed in which respect we say that God 1. Decreed to create man 2. To bestow his Image upon him but so that it might be lost 3. To permit his fall 4. Of those who were to fall some he decreed to leave to themselves and others he appointed to raise and to save them eternally CHAP. IV. Of Predestination GOD's Decree in respect of the Creatures is either general or special The general Decree is that by which he appointed to declare the glory of his power wisdom and goodness in the creation and conservation of all things The speciall Decree called Predestination is that by which he appointed to manifest the glory of his grace mercy and justice in the Election and Reprobation of the reasonable Creatures The RULES I. Although Predestination in the minde of God be one and a most simple act yet by reason of the weakness of our understanding it is distinguished into that Predestination which decrees the end and that which decrees the means II. He that is predestinate to the end is predestinate also to the means Predestination is either of Angels or of men The Predestination of Angels is that by which God appointed to save eternally some of them in their first happiness and that in Christ their head but to leave others to themselves and to punish them eternally fOr deserting their station voluntarily this for the manifestation of the glory of his grace justice The * A. R. Predestination is a part of Divine Providence differing in this that Providence hath respect to a natural end Predestination to a supernatural man therefore being subject to Providence is also subject to Predestination Predestination of men is that by which God appointed out of the race of mankinde created to his Image but falling into sin voluntarily to save some through Christ eternally but others being left to themselves in their own misery to damn eternally and that for the manifestation of the glory of his mercy and justice The parts then of this Decree are two Election and Reprobation The RULES I. Predestination is a Decree partly absolute partly not II. It is

absolute in respect of the efficient impulsive Cause which neither is Faith in those which were to be elected nor sin in those which were to be reprobated but Gods most free will Foreseen Faith or Holiness is nor the cause of Election for man was not elected because he was to believe but therefore he believeth because he was elected Act. 23.48 And they believed so many as were ordained to life eternall Neither are we elected because we were to be holy but that we might be holy and unblameable before him through love Eph. 1.4 Neither is foreseen sin the cause of Reprobation for so we should be all reprobate but that God according to his most free good pleasure hath done what he did as manifest by that Luke 12.32 It is your Fathers pleasure to give you a Kingdom and Rom. 9.16 I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy and ver 18. Therefore he will shew mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth III. It is not absolute if we consider the matter or object and the means by which he puts this decree in execution IV. For the matter or object of election and reprobation is not man considered absolutely but as he was to fall into sin of his own accord The reasons are most evident because the decree of manifesting mercy wrath or justice presupposeth sin for there can be no mercy but towards him that is in misery and there can be no justice or just indignation but towards him that is a sinner 2. Because that onely can be reprobated which may be reprobated but man is reprobable or may be reprobated not as by God he was created but as by Satan he was defaced V. Sin therefore is not the impulsive cause of Reprobation but a necessary condition of the matter or object for though it be not the cause of Reprobation yet it is the cause of reprobability or why a man should be reprobated For Reprobation and reprobability differ as the act and possibility All men are reprobable or are liable to Reprobation for sin but all are not therefore actually reprobate VI. Reprobation then presupposeth the decree of mans Creation 2. Of the donation of Gods image upon him which Image was to be lost 3. Of the permission of mans fall VII But the means of execution are so ordered that albeit God worketh most freely and according to his good pleasure yet neither have the Elect any just cause to brag nor the Reprobate to complain for to those undeserved grace was bestowed and on these deserved punishment is inflicted VIII These are different questions 1. By what right doth God reprobate man which is his creature 2. Why did he not choose all but some and reprobate others 3. Why did he choose this man to wit Peter and reprobate that man to wit Judas To the first we answer from the materiall cause in that Adam as he was to fall was liable to reprobation To the second we answer from the end because God was willing to manifest the glory of his mercy and justice But to the third from the cause impulsive because it so pleased him To use the Apostles simile If it be demanded why the Potter out of the same lump makes vessels of such different conditions it is answered from the end because there be different uses of these vessels in the house If again it be demanded why out of one peece of the lump a vessel of honour is made and out of the other a vessel to dishonour it is answered from the cause impulsive because it so pleased the Potter IX Christ is to be considered either as God or as God and man the Mediator In the former respect he is with the Father and Holy Ghost the efficient cause of our election but in the latter respect he is the means of execution thereof We are then said to be elected in Christ Eph. 4. because by him we were to be saved The decree of saving us is called Predestination to the End but the decree bestowing Christ upon us as our Head is named Predestination to the Means X. Although these words of Predestination Prescience and Predetermination are sometime taken for the same yet or understandings sake they may be thus distinguished Predestination signifieth the very purpose of God to save us Prescience that free bounty by which he acknowledgeth us for his own but Predetermination imports Predestination as it hath reference to Christ and the other means of salvation Rom. 8.28 29. But we know that to those who love God all things work together for their good to those I say who are called of his purpose for whom he foreknew those he predestinate that they might be conformable to the image of his Sonne c. XI They are altogether * A. R. Predestination is a part of Providence so is Reprobation For as God by his providence hath ordained some to life eternal so by that same providence he was to suffer some to fall away from that happinesse foolish who acknowledge Election and deny Reprobation Because the Scripture teacheth that there is Reprobation as well as Election Esa 41.9 I have chosen thee and not cast thee away Mal. 1.3 Jacob have I loved and I have hated Esau Rom. 9.18 He will have mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth Rom. 11.7 The election hath obtained it and the rest have been hardened 1 Thess 5.9 God hath not appointed us to wrath but to salvation 2 Tim. 2.20 Vessels to honour and to dishonour Jud. v. 4. For there are certain men crept in which were before of old ordained to condemnation XII As Christ is the cause not * Christ is the efficient cause of Election as he is God equal with the Father He is the meritorious cause as he became our Mediator As head of the Church he is also the cause of Election Joh. 15.16 I know whom I have chosen and Joh. 13.18 I have chosen you In respect of his active and passive obedience he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the outward moving cause And if he be the cause of salvation he must needs be the cause of election on which salvation depends Causa causae est causa causati But because we are said to be elected in him as he became our Surety he is called the medium or mean of election rather then the cause As he is God we are elected by him as Mediator in him As God he is the principal efficient as Mediator the secondary or mean of election of Election but of Salvation so Infidelity is the cause not of Reprobation but of Damnation Damnation differs from Reprobation as the means of Execution from the Decree XIII Damnation is not the end of Reprobation but the manifestation of the glory of Gods justice Therefore to say that man was created that he might be damned is to say amisse for damnation is not the end but the means of execution of which man by his

belong the preventing concomitant and subsequent assistance of Divine Power X. Evil things are ruled by an actual permission and so they are permitted directed and determined XI Gods Providence remaineth ordered and undefiled even in those actions that are disordered and sinfull For in evil actions two things are observable the action it self and the irregularity thereof The action it self as all naturall motions is performed by Gods effectual operation but the irregularity or vitiosity comes to passe by Gods actual permission For sin is ordered 1. By permitting it 2. By determining and containing it within its bounds 3. By directing it to a good issue Now God cannot be said to be author of sin by any of these wayes Not by producing the matter of it or the natural action for as there is one cause of the horses motion another of his halting even so it is one thing to be the cause of the action another thing to be the cause of the adhering vitiosity Not by permitting the evil action because God is not forced by any law to hinder sin Not by determining it for as he who quenches a fire that it may not spread further is not the cause of the fire so he that setteth bounds to sin is not the cause of sin Not by directing it to a good end for as it is a main skill to prepare wholsom medicines out of venemous creatures so it is the glory of God to create light out of darkness and good out of evil Hence it is apparent how frivolous their device is who that they might vindicate God from any contagion of sin they flie to a bare idle permission of sin XII Although the Scripture ascribes many times the same action and the same work to God to the devil and to wicked men yet sin cannot be in any wise imputed to God In this case we must not have recourse to a bare permission but we must give an estimate of these actions according to their scope and end for in one and the same action God hath one purpose Satan another and wicked men another Jobs affliction is imputed to God God gave saith Job and God hath taken the same is ascribed to Satan to the Sabeans also and Chaldeans but according to the end we must judge of each of them It was Satans purpose to make Job despair It was the Chaldeans intent and Sabeans to enrich themselves by plundring that holy man but God determined to try and make manifest the faith of his servant So in the crucifying of Christ it was Pilates purpose to continue in the favour of Caesar and of the Jews the Jews drift was to satisfie their desire with hatred and revenge but Gods end was to redeem mankinde Hence they are said to do nothing but what the hand and counsel of God had determined Act. 4.28 XIII The hardening of the wicked is ascribed to God as a most just judgment so as God can neither be blamed as faulty nor can the wicked be excused The wicked are in this inexcusable because God only hardeneth those who harden themselves neither doth he harden the soft-hearted but in his just judgment he increaseth the hardnesse of them who were hardened before Now they harden themselvs by abusing those graces which should have softned them I. Gods long-suffering Rom. 2. v. 4 5. Or despisest thou the riches of his bounty patience and long-suffering not knowing that the bountifulnesse of God leadeth thee to repentance But thou after thy hardnesse and heart that cannot repent heapest unto thy self wrath against the day of wrath II. Gods Word 2 Cor. 2.28 For we are unto God the sweet savour of Christ in them that are saved and in them which perish to the one we are the savour of death unto death to the other the savour of life unto life III. Gods correction and rod by which as an anvil they are made harder Jer. 5.3 Thou hast stricken them but they have not sorrowed thou hast consumed them but they have refused to receive correction they have made their faces harder then a stone and have refused to return For this reason then are they most justly hardened by God who harden themselves who so often said of Pharaoh I will hold I will make obstinate I will harden his heart For not only doth he harden by permission but also 1. By letting loose the bridle with which he held in their exorbitant lusts Rom. 1.24 He delivered them up to their own lusts v. 28. God gave them up to a reprobate mind II. By delivering them to Satan as to a hangman 1 King 22.21 22. And there came forth a Spirit who stood before the Lord and said I will perswade him to wit Achab and the Lord said to him wherewith And he said I will go forth and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets And he said thou shalt perswade him and prevail also go forth and do so As therefore when the Magistrate delivers over to the Hang-man a guilty person to be punished he is neither the cause of his wickednesse nor of his destruction even so when God gives up wicked men to Satan neither is the cause of their wickednesse nor of their ruine to be imputed to God CHAP. VII Of the Government of Angels GOds actual providence doth cheifly appear in the government of Angels and men This government is either of good Angels or of bad the government of good Angels is that whereby God hath established them in their original integrity and happinesse in his Son as in their head to the praise of the glory of his grace The RULES I. The good Angels of their own nature were as apt to fall as the bad II. Therefore they ought to ascribe not to themselves but to the grace of God the Father to the Son as to their head their establishment or confirmation in goodnesse III. The Son of God is the head of Angels not by right of Redemption but of creation and of that gracious union with God For they could not be endowed with the image of God nor be adopted unto Sons but onely in the Son of God Who is the image of God made visible and first born of every creature 1 Col. 15. IV. That Angel who so often appeared to the Fathers in the shape of man as a Prologue or forerunner of his Incarnation was not a created Angel but the very Son of God Gen. 18.13 The Lord said to Abraham why doth Sarah laugh Gen. 32.28 the Angel said to Jacob Thou hast prevailed with an Angel which is thus explained Hos 12.4 He prevaileth with God Jos 6. v. 14. That man whom Josuah saw said I am as a Captain of the host of the Lord and v. 15. And the Captain of the Lords host said to Joshua See Zach. 1. v. 2 3. V. Although then is no ataxie or confusion among the Angels yet it is not to be found in Scripture that they have any Prince

root Hajah he was So it is the symbol of that Supream entity which was is and is to come from eternity to eternity Rev. 1.4.6 Because he remains still the same Psa 102.28 And is the cause of the being of all things Act. 17.28 Hence it is proper to God Esay 42.8 Neither is it ascribed to the creatures but Metonymically so far forth as they are symbols of Gods presence So it is given to the Altar Exod. 17.15 to the Ark Psa 47.6 to Jerusalem Ezech. 48.35 II. The same name in promises and Divine comminations or threatnings is of great force Hence are these phrases Thus saith Jehovah the word of Jehovah c. For Gods Word is as sure as himself is true or as he endureth still like himself III. The name Elohim though of the plurall number yet is not the personal but an essential Name of God and according to the Hebrew Idiotism it is spoken of one God and of each Person Hence there are not three Elohim or Gods but one alone As it is rightly said in the Creed of Athanasius The Father Almighty the Son Almighty and the Holy Ghost Almighty yet not three Almighties but one Almighty So because God is called Elohim from his power there are not three but one Elohim Psal 7. Elohim Zaddik just God The Divine properties are Gods attributes by which he is pleased to make himself known to us weak Mortals and is by them distinguished from the Creatures The RULES I. The Proprieties of God are not qualities or accidents or real entities different from the essence or from each other This will appear below in the attribute of Gods simplicity II. The Divine Properties are neither separable from the essence nor from each other This Rule overthrows the Lutheran Tenet concerning the transfusion of the Divine properties into the Humane Nature of Christ for if this be capable of ubiquity omniscience omnipotency why not also of eternity And these Proprieties are either incommunicable to the Creatures or communicable in some analogical effects Of the first rank are his Simplicity and Infinity Among these are reckoned his immutability and perfection but these are onely Corollaries or Appendices to his simplicity and infinity His Simplicity is that by which he is known to be an entity truly one and free from all composition His Infinity is that by which he is known to be an entitie infinitely true and good and without measure or bounds The RULES I. God is * A. R. * There is no composition in God neither Physical nor Logical nor Metaphysical because in him there is no priority nor posteriority as in composition where the compositum is posterior to the parts compounding 2. In composition there is act and possibility but God is all Act. 3. In composition the parts differ from the compositum but in God there is no difference 4. There is no composition in the form but God is a most simple form 5. Whatsoever is compounded hath a cause of that composition but in God there is no cause an entity truly and most simply One Because he is not compounded of parts nor of a genus and difference nor of substance and accidents nor of a possibility and act nor of entity and essence II. There is then nothing in God which is not God himself III. Gods essence is by us incomprehensible For there is no proportion between finite and infinite no more then between a nut-shell and the Ocean IV. God is altogether all all in himself all in all things all in every thing and all out of every thing V. God is neither circumscribed nor defined by place nor is included within it nor excluded without it VI. God is eternal without beginning without end without change The properties of the latter rank are 1. The Life of God 2. His Will 3. His Power His Life is the attribute of his being His Will of commanding His Power of execution The RULES I. The Proprieties of the latter rank are ascribed to God according to the proprieties of the first that is most simply and infinitely II. Hence these are predicated or spoken of God not onely in the concrete but in the abstract also For not onely is he named living wise just good but also life wisdom justice goodness III. Whereas the life of God is most simple and infinite it will follow 1. That his life and his actual living is all one 2. That though he hath no other cause then himself by which he liveth yet he is the cause of life in all living creatures in respect of whom their life is but as it were begged and borrowed 3. That the life of God is most perfect most blessed and immutable IV. Whereas the understanding of God is most simple and infinite it follows that he * A. R. Whereas to understand is to comprehend the thing understood God doth not properly understand that is comprehend himself for so he should be less then himself but he understands himself negatively that is he is not ignorant of himself understands himself primarily as an infinite object 2. That he knoweth all things most exquisitely though they are not revealed to the Creatures 3. That he knoweth all things by himself 4. And that by one and most simple act for he neeeds no revelation nor discourse either from the effect or from the cause from that which is more known to that which is less known 5. Things past and things to come are no less known to him then things present 6. His knowledge is infinite 7. Free from all ignorance and Oblivion V. Whereas the Will of God is most simple therefore 1. In him there are not either two or more or contrary Wills There are indeed divers distinctions of his Will as shall be seen in the Doctrine of Gods Decrees but these distinctions are nominal rather then real 2. The primary object of Gods will is God himself 3. The Will of God is most free 4. Nothing is done against the Will of God 5. The Will of God according to its divers objects hath divers names to wit of holiness goodness love grace mercy wrath justice and such like VI. Whereas the power of God is most simple and infinite it follows 1. That his power is one 2. That he is truly omnipotent for not only can he do what he will but also more then he will 3. From the power of God we must not infer * A. R. There is in God a twofold power the one absolute the other ordinary by that he can do all that may be done by this he can do only those things which his justice and will commands to be done the act or being of a thing unless when his will and power are joyned together 4. The object of Gods omnipotency is whatsoever is not repugnant to his nature or implies a contradiction and therefore is rather of not impossibilities then of possibilities Therefore to lie to make the thing done undone or to make mans

consisting of a reasonable soul infused into him by God immediately Here we disallow not the Philosophers definition by which they call man a reasonable creature but we describe man in the Divinity-School more fitly for our purpose as we have now described him The RULES I. There is a threefold miraculous production of mans body mentioned in Scripture the first was of the dust of the earth without father and mother the second production was out of Adams rib without a mother the third was of the blood of the Virgin without a Father II. The soul of man is not propagated of seed by traduction but is immediately created by God and infused into the body Of mans Creation Moses writes thus Gen. 2. ver 5. 7. The Lord breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and man became a living soul In this place three things are mentioned 1. The immediate Creation of the soul for it is called the breath of God 2. His breathing for he saith He breathed into his nostrils 3. The personal union of body and soul in these words And he was made a living soul metonymically that is a living sensitive creature But that the souls now are immediately created by God and infused into the body is proved by these subsequent Reasons 1. Because otherways our souls should have another original then Adams had for ours must proceed of some pre-existent matter whereas Adams proceeded of none Neither will that objection hold concerning the different way or reason of generation and creation for nothing is generated of matter but what in the beginning was created of matter 2. Because the soul of Christ was not formed of seed by traduction for he was conceived not by the help of man but by the operation of the holy Ghost of the blessed Virgins blood 3. Because the Scripture when it speaks of the original of our souls it speaks as of a work of Creation not of nature Job 33.4 The Spirit of God hath made me and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life Zach. 12.1 The Lord stretcheth out the heavens and layeth the foundation of the earth and formeth the spirit of man within him where it is plain that this is reckoned among the works of Creation 4. Such is mans generation as his dissolution is but mans dissolution is that his body returns to dust and his Spirit to God that gave it Eccl. 12.9 Whereas then in mans dissolution the Spirit returns immediatly to God doubtless it was immediatly formed by him 5. Because the Scripture doth plainly distinguish between the parts of bodies and Spirits Heb. 12.2 6. Because the soul is indivisible into parts therefore cannot be produced but of nothing 7. Because if it were generated by traduction either it must be generated of a soul or of a body or of a soul and body together but it is not generated of a soul * A. R. The soul could not be produced out of any pre-existent matter neither corporeal because it is not a body nor incorporal because spirits and incorporeal substances admit no change or transmutation because of that which is incorruptible nothing can be generated not of a body because it is not corporeal not of a body soul together because so it should be partly corporeal partly incorporeal seeing then it is produced of nothing it must be produced by God alone whose alone property it is to make things of nothing III. These Physical Axiomes Like begets like and Man begets man remain true also in this case both because man begets man a person begets a person as also because by the work of the Parents the body is begot as it were the subject of the soul and so is united to the soul which is infused by God and so thus the whole man is brought into this world by generation 'T is true that man is the efficient cause of man but not according to all his parts for as he is said to kill a man that kills only his body so man is said to beget man though he begets not the soul Neither again is man in this respect ignobler then other living creatures whereas rather for this very cause mans generation is more excellent in that Gods immediate operation concurs with natures work IV. Mans soul is immortal not simply as though God could not annihilate it but by Gods ordination and that it cannot be destroyed by second causes V. The faculties of the soul are really different from the soul as qualities or proper accidents from their subject The reason of this is taken from the event because the essence of the soul remains entire when the faculties are shaken and weakned VI. The souls faculties are either meerly organicall as the vegitive and sensitive facultie or are such onely in part and for a time as the understanding and will the former operate not when the body is corrupted but these without the help of the body can exercise themselves and operate when the body is destroyed VII Libertie from coaction is an essential property of the will Otherways the will were no will CHAP. VI. Of Gods actual Providence GOds actual Providence is that by which not only he preserveth his creatures but also according to his great wisdom goodness power justice and mercy he governs all things The RULES I. To deny * A. R. For he could not bo God if he did not order things to their end but this is providence 2. He were not God if he were not good but this is seen as well in the ordering as in the creating of the World 3. He were not God if he were not prudent but providence is the chief part of prudence this Providence is to deny God himself II. Actual Providence differs from eternal as Execution from the Decree III. As in Gods eternal Providence the will of his good pleasure so in this his revealed will is chiefly seen IV. Providence doth not only consist in knowledge but also in the Government of all things both great and small V. Gods Providence takes not away but establisheth the second causes VI. What * A. R. The world were not perfect if all things were necessary nothing contingent therefore God would have contingencies to depend from contingent causes and necessities from causes necessary therefore what falls out necessarily is because God hath so disposed it things are contingent in respect of the second causes are necessary in respect of Gods providence but this necessity is of immutability not of coaction VII Gods Providence is far different from the Stoicks fatall necessity For the Stoical fate ties God to the connexion of secondary causes but the Christian fate makes a subordination of the second causes to Gods most free will of which he makes use voluntarily not of necessity out of indulgence rather then indigence VIII By Gods Providence both good and evil are governed IX Good things are ruled by an efficacious action or effectual working to which

the Wife and Brother of the deceased Husband The law of God doth not disallow the marriages of Cosin-Germans by the Father and Mothers side but the Canon-Law doth and so do the Statutes of other Common-wealths as that of Basil The rason of this is that with the greater reverence we might abstain from the degrees prohibited by God XVIII In the unequal collateral line they cannot marry who are in stead of Parents who are collaterally joyned to the stock or their superiours Therefore the Nephew cannot marry with either Aunts nor the Neece with either Uncles As for Affinity marriage with the Wives Sister or with the Husbands Brother is forbid by the law of nature in others affinity doth not extend it self so largely the Husband should abstain from the Wives kinswoman but not the Husbands kinsman from the Wives kindred and on the contrary Therefore two Brothers may marry with two Sisters the Father and the Son with the Mother and the Daughter but not the Father with the Daughter or Son with the Mother for so the order of nature should be perverted Sons in law also may marry with Daughters in law but the Father and Son cannot marry two Sisters for one of them should be mother in law to the other XIX Regard must be had of Religion that marriages be not made between those of different religions It is one thing to speak of a marriage already made and of that which is to be made of the former the Apostle speaks 1 Cor. 7 but the other is most severely prohibited Exod. 34.12 c. Deut. 7.3 where a reason is added taken from the danger of seducing to which Pauls saying agrees 2 Cor. 6.14 Be ye not unequally yoked with the wicked Sad examples we have of the events of such marriages of the first world Gen. 6. of Solomon 1 King 22. of Ahab 1 King 21.15 of Jehosaphat who married Ahabs daughter to his son Joram who was seduced by her 2 King 8. Of Valence the Emperour who by his wife was seduced and drawn to Arianisme XX. The form of marriage consists in the mutual benevolence of the married couple under which word we understand mutual love help comfort and suck like See 1 Cor. 7.3 4 5. Ephes 5.22 c. 1 Tim. 2.8 1 Pet. 3.5 c. XXI Although the rite of publique consecration is not expressely commanded by God yet it is religiously observed among Christians XXII The chief end of marriage is Gods glory the subordinate is natural or adventitious natural is that for which marriage was at first instiuted to wit for procreation of children and for mutual help the adventitious is that now since our nature is corrupted it may be a help to preserve chastity and modesty XXIII The precept of marriage is not simply necessary nor doth it tye all men but bindes them onely who out of marriage cannot live chastely and therefore in a manner seem to be made for marriage Matt. 19.11 All cannot take this saying but they to c. XXIV Therefore as marriage is honourable so it becomes all orders among men Impiously then doe the Papists forbid the Priests to marry That it is honourable in it self is plain by the Apostles saying Heb. 13.4 and by the divine institution of it in the state of innocency Gen. 2. by the defending of it from abuses Matt. 19. and by Christs honouring of it with his presence and first miracle in Cana of Galilee Iohn 2. that it is also decent in Ministers is said lib. 1. c. 26. can 3. XXV If one marry her with whom he hath committed Adultery this is not marriage but a continuation of Adultery Some things are repugnant to marriage simply other things onely in some respect Those things are repugnant to it in some respect which disturb the peace and mutual benevolence of the married couple of which sort are 1. Jealousie 2. Sloth in houshold-affairs 3. Peevishnes and bitternesse 4. Stubbernnesse idle prating procacity But to marriage are repugnant simply Adultery and malicious deserting So is Adultery described in those places in which it is forbid as a deadly sin Levit. 18.20 20.10 Deut. 22.22 Prov. 5 and 6. Therefore that is onely adultery which is committed with an other mans wife whether he be a married or unmarried man that commits it but if the husband go to bed to a single woman or a whore that is called Fornication in Scripture Prov. 23.27 28. * A. R. Divorce is caused by either of these Divorce is either in respect of the Bed or in respect of Cohabitation and the Adultery is either publiquely known or else but suspected and hid known Adultery is to be punished by the Magistrate with divorce from bed and cohabitation for suspected and close Adultery the parties married may divorce each other from the bed not from cohabitation because this is a publique punishment and it is to be inflicted by a publique Magistrate But in every case of Adultery Divorce is not requisite or lawfull For 1. If the party offending repent the party offended ought to forgive and be reconciled 2. If there be danger lest the offending party fall into some desperate course upon divorcement 3. If the Husband prostitute his Wife to another he being the cause rather of the Adultery then shee 4. If the woman is ravished by another man against her will 5. If the man after the woman hath committed Adultery and he knows it admits her again unto his bed in this case he is not to divorce her for the former fact 6. If both the husband and wife be guilty of adultery the one is not to divorce the other 7. If the husbands long absence and silence hath occasioned the wife to conceive he is dead and she many another in this case if he return he is bound to receive his wife again In all these cases then Divorce is not to be used for Christ commands it not but permits it Again if a man intending to marry one sister unwitingly marries the other being deceived as Jacob was by Laban in marrying Leah in stead of Rachel he is not bound to divorce her Divorce is caused by either of these Matt. 19.9 But I say unto you whosoever putteth away his wife except it be for Fornication and marrieth another committeth Adultery 1 Cor. 7.15 But if the unbelieving depart let him depart a Brother or a Sister is not under bondage in such cases CHAP. XII Of Works belonging to the Eighth Precept AFter our duty in preserving our own and neighbours Chastity follows our duty towards our own and neighbours Goods Of this in the eighth Precept the summe whereof is That we endeavour justly to preserve our own and neighbours goods The Precept is Negative and Synecdochical Thou shalt not steale where by the name of theft Synecdochically is meant any kind of injustice towards the goods of fortune whence the Affirmative is inferred that in earthly things we deal justly The Vertues of this Precept