He thus reasoneth by way of comparison he had endured the troubles and trialls procured by his son who sought his life whereas Shemei was a stranger vnto him and did but raile vpon him in words much more was it fit he should beare this reproach 3. He sheweth the fruit that might come of it it may be that God would do him good for his cursing not that this affliction was the cause of his reward but it is an order and course which the Lord obserueth to raise them vp whom he had humbled so he dealt with Ioseph and Iob. 4. And hee speaketh doubtfully because we haue no certaintie of these temporall things but of his spirituall state his euerlasting saluation Dauid made no doubt at all 6. Quest. v. 10. Whether Dauid did well in bearing Shemei his reproachfull words and what a reproach is and how to bee borne 1. A reproach is offered either in word as Shemei reuiled Dauid or in deede as Abshalom defiled his fathers concubines not so much of lust as to disgrace his father 2. Reproaches some are meere slaunders as those were which Shemei obiected to Dauid some are true as when one obiecteth such crimes as are true but after a reproachfull manner 3. Some reproachfull words are vttered by way of disgrace and they are sinne some onely are by way of discipline to amend and correct and make one ashamed of his sinne as when Magistrates rebuke offenders and ministers in their sermons sharpely reprooue sinne as the Prophet Isay called the cheife of Israel Princes of Sodome c. 1.10 and S. Paul saith O yee foolish Galatians and such kind of reproaches are not sinne 2. Reproachfull and reuiling words proceede either from anger and desire of reuenge as here in Shemei or from pride as in Rabsake against Hezekiah or from foolishnesse as Nabal reuiled Dauid 3. How we are to behaue our selues in bearing of reproaches these considerations are necessarie 1. that generally we must followe that rule of Christ if one smite vs on the one cheeke wee should turne to him the other also that is not alwayes to doe so in fact for Christ beeing smitten vpon one cheeke did not turne the other but our heart must alwaies be prepared for Christs sake to suffer all wrongs in word and in deed 2. Yet there is a time when a foole must be answered in his foolishnesse and a reuiler must not bee suffered to goe away without a rebuke as if either his reproach tend to the hinderance of our good name or our brothers and they which heare it are by our silence apt to beleeue the slander and if a discreet reproofe may be a means to make him see his sinne 3. And there is a time when a foole is not to be answeared in his foolishnesse least we be like him Prov. 16.4 if we thinke that we shall growe too hotte and cholerike and exceede measure in reproouing it is better for vs to hold our peace and when we see in respect of the slaunderer that his word is of no credit and our defence needeth not in respect of the standers by or if the reuiler is like to be more prouoked by our admonition in all these cases it is better to be silent 4. And where defence is needefull it is not onely lawful for vs priuately to rebuke the slaunderer but to make complaint vnto the Magistrate to preserue our good name as a theife of our goods may be brought before the Magistrate so much more he that stealeth away our good name 5. And as concerning Dauid it was a worthie and commendable part in him to beare Shemeis slaunderous speach for hee was innocent he therein considered the Lords purpose to trie him it was then no time for him to seeke reuenge he had opportunitie offred afterward to meete with this reuiler Mart. 7. Quest. v. 10. How the Lord is said to haue bidde Shemei curse Dauid and how sinne standeth with the will of God and whether he is any way the author thereof 1. First that God is no way the author of sinne by these and such like reasons it is made plaine 1. God is not the author of any thing whereby a man is made worse for if an artificer will not marre his owne worke much lesse God but by sinne man becommeth much worse 2. God is the reuenger of sinne therefore not the author 3. God hateth nothing which he hath made but he hateth sinne 4. He that doth or procureth sinne is a sinner but God cannot without horrible blasphemie be said to be a sinner 5. If God should prouoke vnto sinne we should make him a dissembler an hypocrite who forbiddeth one thing and yet doth an other 6. The Lord saith by his Prophet Hosea thy destruction is of thy selfe then sinne also the cause of destruction is of our selues 7. Our Sauiour saith that when the deuill speaketh a lie he speaketh of his owne sinne then is peculiar vnto the deuill therefore nor to God 8. Christ wept ouer Ierusalem beeing grieued for the calamitie that should befall it much more was he grieued for sinne which was the cause thereof then is he not the author of sinne 9. Tyrants make seuere lawes and then compell men to breake them that they may punish them So God should be a tyrant if he procured or made men sinne and transgresse his lawes 10. If God were the author of sinne he could not be the Iudge of the world 11. If God any wayes should stirre vp vnto sinne there must needs be two contrarie wills in God one whereby he willeth sinne to be the other whereby he disliketh it and is displeased at it 12. The wicked should be in no fault for they might turne all the blame vpon God 13. Men had no reason to be grieued for their sinne but to reioyce seeing they doe that which God is the author of if he were the author or worker of sinne 14. If God would haue men saued then hee would haue them also vse the meanes vnto saluation then would he not haue them sinne which doth hinder their saluation 2. Secondly the reasons on the contrarie that God may be charged with sinne are these 1. The Apostle saith Rom. 1.26 that God gaue vp the Gentiles to vile affections 2. The Lord is saide to haue hardened Pharaohs heart and Isa. 6.10 to make the eyes of the Israelites heauie and to shut their eyes 3. We say in the Lords prayer Lead vs not into temptation 4. He that is the cause of the cause is the cause of the effect procured by that cause But God is the cause and creator of mans will and affections which are the cause of sinne he may seeme then to be the cause of sinne 5. The Lord said to the spirit that offered to goe be a false spirit in the mouthes of Ahabs Prophets goe and prosper 1. King 22. 6. Sinne is an action but all actions proceed from God the first moouer and beginner
disposeth that it shall not rage or raigne in all nor in all times nor further then he seeth it to be for his glorie But good actions the Lord willeth after an other sort not onely permitting them to bee done but effecting working finishing and perfitting in vs euery good worke 5. Further there are three things to be considered in sinne 1. The guilt of sinne which is nothing else but obligatio ad poenam a binding and tying of him that sinneth vnto punishment and this is an act of Gods iustice who after one hath sinned holdeth him guiltie of punishment 2. Then there is the act of sinne which is the subiect and this God is the cause of who giueth power to mooue to will to doe this or that vnto his creatures which power hee restraineth not but suffereth euerie thing which he hath made and enableth it also to exercise the naturall properties and faculties thereof Thus God is the author of the action but the euilnes of the action proceedeth from mans corrupt nature like as the soule and life in the body is the cause it mooueth but the lamenesse of the legge or other part affected is the cause of the halting thereof So God as an vniuersall agent giueth life and motion to his creatures as the soule doth to the bodie but the abusing and deprauing of these actions ariseth from the corruption of mans nature 3. There is in sinne the punishment to be considered So God is said to punish sinne with sinne as the Apostle sheweth how the Lord gaue ouer the Gentiles to a reprobate sense and to vile affections as a punishment of their Idolatrie Rom. 1. In this manner as hath been shewed how the Lord may be said to haue to do with sinne but he is no way the author thereof or properly the cause And that is no imperfection in God that he cannot sinne nor will sinne but it is his perfection who beeing perfect goodnesse it selfe cannot abide any thing that is euill for if he should will sinne to bee he should turne men from himselfe which were to denie himselfe which as the Apostle saith God cannot doe God cannot denie himselfe 2. Tim. 2.13 This thâ—n is the summe of all that God is not properly the cause of euill but 1. either by remouing and withholding his grace 2. by disposing in his infinite wisedome and power euen of euill actions to serue his glorie 3. by ministring occasion which the wicked may abuse and peruert to their further hardening 4. in permitting things to be done as farre as hee seeth expedient for the vniuersall good 5. the guilt of sinne in iustice he procureth 6. the generall action he causeth 7. as it is a punishment he inflicteth it c. 7. Now according to these conclusions set downe the former reasons which seemed to make God accessarie vnto euill may thus be answered 1. God is said to giue vp the Gentiles to vile affections because hee left them to themselues and iustly depriued them of his grace 2. God hardened Pharaohs heart and blinded the Israelites eyes occasionaliter by ministring the occasion which they abused Gods workes were an occasion of Pharaohs hardening and his word of the others blinding but not of themselues the other through their peruersnesse tooke occasion to doe euill where none was giuen and turned that which was good to be an occasion of euill 3. The Lord is said to lead into temptation because the deuill who is the tempter can doe no more then God permitteth God tempteth not to euill as hee is not tempted Iam. 1. And we of our selues are tempted of our owne concupiscence therefore our Sauiour saith to his Apostles watch and pray least yee enter into temptation Matth. 26.41 4. God is the creator of mans will but not of his corrupt will which is the cause of sinne and not his will simply as God created it 5. When God saith to the euill spirit goe and prosper that is to be referred to the ende which was the death and punishment of Ahab but the meanes which was by beeing a lying spirit God willed not nor commaunded to be done but hindred not the doing of it because the Lord knewe how to vse it to his glorie 6. It is not denied but that the subiect of sinne which is the action in generall is from God who is the moouer of all things but it followeth not that the euilnesse of the action therefore is from God 7. God is said to deceiue the Prophet and people not in respect of the cause thereof which proceeded from their owne corrupt heart but in regard of the euent because God vsed that seduction for their punishment 8. God is said to turne their hearts to hatred because the prosperitie of the Hebrewes which God caused gaue occasion of enuie and hatred to the Egyptians the hearts of the Canaanites were hardened non emolliendo because God mollified them not And so God gaue them which beleeued not the truth strong delusions as a iust iudge punishing their hardnes of heart and vnbeleefe with blindnes peruersnesse 9. God willeth the meanes but after an other manner his will is that persecutions should be not simply but as they tend to his glorie and to the propagation of the truth 10. It is crueltie in man if he suffer one to fall and helpe him not because a man is bound in charitie to doe it but God is bound to none many graces he giues vnto the wicked which they abuse he is not bound to giue all he may doe with his owne as it pleaseth him 11. God is the author of the action which bringeth forth euill but not of the euilnesse of the action 12. Concerning the death and suffering of Christ God willed it in respect of the ende which was our redemption the meaneâ— as the treacherie of Iudas the malice of the Iewes he ordained not but disposed he willed not but vsed them 8. Quest. How Gods prouidence and mans will may stand together Here are two errours to bee taken heed of in two extreames Some doe so hold Gods prouidence as that they exempt some thingâ— from it some on the contrarie do ascribe all things to the diuine prouidence as thâ—t they impose a necessitie vpon the will of man depriuing the same of the naturall libertie and freedome thereof 1. Of the first opinion was Plato affirming that there are many things in the world which God is no wayes the cause of Lib. 2. de Republic as of euill things which is true if he speake of the proper efficient cause of sinne but yet euen in such things Gods prouidence sleepeth not directing ordering and disposing euill things vnto such ende as seemeth best vnto himselfe 2. Damascene also in some sort impugneth Gods prouidence when hee saith that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that onely those things which are not within vs not the things within vs Lib. â— de fide c. 29. are subiect to Gods prouidence whereas
for in him we liue mooue and haue our beeing Act. 17. 7. The Lord saith by his Prophet Ezechiel c. 14.8 If the Prophet be deceiued when he hath spoken a thing I the Lord haue deceiued him c. so Ieremie saith cap. 4.10 that the Lord had deceiued his people so Isay saith 63.17 O Lord why hast thou made vs erre from thy wayes 8. Psal. 105.25 Hee turned the heart of the Egyptians to hate his people Iosh. 11.20 It came of the Lord to harden their hearts that they should come against Israel in battell 2. Thess. 2.11 the Apostle saith Hee shall send them strong delusions to beleeue lies 9. As God willeth the end so also hee willeth the meanes which tend vnto that ende but it was Gods will that Christ should be deliuered vp vnto death and that the members of Christ as the holy Apostles and Martyrs should be tried thereof it was Gods will also that Iudas should betray Christ and that the tyrants should raise persecution against his Church which were sinnefull acts 10. If God can hinder a man from sinne and will not and take away from him the helpes which should keepe him from sinne he should seeme to be accessarie vnto it as if we see a man readie to fall into a pit and forwarne him not of it or take from one a staffe whereon he leaneth so that he falleth we should be guiltie of his hurt so it should seeme to be betweene God and man if he should withdraw from him his grace whereby he might stand 11. Seeing God doth bring forth substances by vnhonest action as children begotten in adulterie why may he not as well produce actions per malam voluntatem by the euill inclination and will of man 12. The Apostles say in their prayer that Herod and Pilate had assembled themselues together to doe whatsoeuer thine hand and counsell had determined before to bee done By these and such like places of Scripture and reasons some shew may be made that God hath some hand in the sinfull workes of men 3. In the third place the diuerse opinions must be touched of this matter 1. Some doe indeede most blasphemously make God the author and worker of euill as the Libertines which blasphemie is to be abhorred and to be condemned to hell with the authors thereof 2. There are that vnderstand these places of Scripture of Gods permission onely 3. Some doe thinke that God is an agent euen in euill actions which as they proceede from man are euill but as God concurreth it is iust the reason whereof if we cannot comprehend we must rest in the iudgement of the Scripture this opinion shall afterward be more fully declared and confirmed 4. Further it must be considered what sinne is it is not a substance nor yet any subiect or habit in a subiect but onely a defect and priuation as blindnes is of the sight and malum esse non potest nisi in bono euill cannot be but in that which is good as blindnesse is in the sight euill is of two sorts it is either culpa the fault or poena the punishment the fault is the absence or priuation of some vertue or grace and the punishment is the priuation of some benefit as sickenesse is of health and there is something that is both a sinne and punishment as originall sinne 5. Now more fully and distinctly to determine of this question these conclusions following shall be set downe 1. God properly is not the cause of euill nor author of sinne for the habite neuer of it selfe produceth the priuation as light bringeth not forth darkenesse but if the light be remooued then the darkenesse followeth of it selfe But like as the Sunne is not the cause of darkenesse but the Sunne beeing remooued from our hemisphere then darkenesse of it selfe succeedeth so when God taketh away his grace which he doâ—h to make man know and vnderstand that he can do nothing without grace then followeth darkenesse and ignorance in our hearts So that God is not properly the cause of sinne but onely remouens the remoouing cause So that there neede no efficient or positiue cause to be made of sinne as the Maniches made two Princes the one of light to whom they ascribed why was good and the others of darkenesse whom they made the beginning of euill for by the absence of light and grace darknesse and euill doe succeede of themselues by the corruption of our nature 2. Here we must consider of a threefold action of God 1. One is generall in the works of his prouidence whereby euerie thing is preserued and maintained in it kind and nature for in him we mooue we liue and haue our beeing 2. An other is speciall and particular whereby he worketh all good things in his Saints 3. The third is betweene both whereby God carrieth an ouer-ruling hand in all actions making all things good and bad reasonable and vnreasonable creatures to serue vnto his glorie and to be instruments of his will And thus God disposeth euen of the sinnefull acts of men that thereby his will is effected and accomplished and yet he is no way accessarie to their sinne so that in the same act God and mans will may concurre but after a diuerse manner God may iustly will that and to a good end which man willeth wickedly and vniustly as God determined the death of Christ for the redemption of mankind but Iudas betrayed him of a wicked mind and Sathan prouoked Iudas as an enemie vnto God and the truth And Augustine further sheweth how in the same thing God willeth and man willeth Euchirid ad Laurent c. 10. but diuersly by this instance A wicked sonnes father is sicke Gods will is he shall die and so the wicked sonne desireth hee should die also but to an other ende that he may enioy his inheritance So likewise one may will that which God willeth not and yet bee without sinne As the good child of loue toward his father desireth his life whom Gods will and pleasure is shall die of that sickenesse 3. God may minister an occasion which of it selfe is good but the wicked abusing it are thereby stirred vp to doe euill as when Moses and Aaron brought a message vnto Pharaoh to let his people goe Pharaoh thereupon was incensed to oppresse the people more grieuously so God might be said to harden Pharaohs heart but occasionaliter and accidentaliter by ministring an occasion and accidentally onely 4. The Lord also permissiue by way of permission may be said to haue on hand euen in euill actions which he permitteth to be done which his permission is in him a kind of will for if he permitted or suffered any thing nolens against his will it would shew an impotencie and want of power but euen in Gods permission his power appeareth so permitting euill to be done in the world as he knoweth how to make it serue for his glorie and so he permitteth sinne as that he so
meritorious causes of their punishment 3. Neither doth God recompence all euill doers according to their workes but such onely as are obstinate and impenitent Mar. CHAP. 4. 1. Quest. v. 3. What Berothites and when they fled to Gittaim 1. SOme vnderstand it of Baanah and Rechub the two captaines of Ishbosheth that they fled away from Ishbosheth because of some crime which they had committed some for that they had conspired with Mephibosheth who discouered them ex Mart. But the historie it selfe is against this sense for how could these two haue opportunitie to kill Ishbosheth and to haue such free ingresse to the house of Ishbosheth if they had fled before and had beene as it were banished from him 2. Therefore it is better referred to the inhabitants of Beroth not that they all fled away because of this conspiracie of Baanah and Rechub as Osiander for this their flying and departure went before this treason practised against Ishbosheth 3. But the truth is that the Berothites had fled aâ—ay from Beroth a towne of Beniamin Iosh. 19.25 when they had heard of the death and ouerthrow of Saul then the Philistims came and dwelt in ther Cities they remooued therefore from Beroth to Gittaim which was neither a towne in Edom or Arabia but in Beniamin Nehem. 11.33 Iun. Borrh. Genevens Vatab. 4. And this is the cause why mention is made of this flight that these captaines beeing Berothites might be known to be of the children of Beniamin because they were Berothites though at this time their citie were inhabited by the Philistims yet it was reckoned still with Beniamin Iun. 2. Quest. v. 4. Why mention is made of Mephibosheth 1. This narration is inserted to shewe the purpose and drift of these two captains in killing of Ishbosheth they saw that none remained of Sauls house who was likely to succeed in the kingdome and to reuenge Ishbosheths death but onely Mephibosheth who was a lame man Iun. and beside he was but a child not aboue 12. yeare old for 5. yeare old he was at the time of Sauls death and Dauid had now raigned toward seauen yeares in Hebron Saul had other sonnes by Rispah his concubine but they could not be heires to the kingdome Borr. 2. Further hereby appeareth the prouidence of God so disposing all things for Dauids good that the kingdome might be deuolued vnto him without his owne seeking for seeing there was none left of Sauls house sauing Ishbosheth who was afterward killed and Mephibosheth the one lame in bodie the other impotent in mind the people of necessitie were now to looke after Dauid and to desire him to be their King as it followeth in the next chapter Pellic. 3. Quest. v. 6. How these captaines disguised themselues when they entred in to kill Ishbosheth 1. The Chalde thinketh that they came as merchants to buy corne so also Vatab. but if they had beene strangers it is not like they should haue had such readie accesse 2. Some thinke they came as to fetch corne for the souldiers and the campe Martyr 3. But seeing the word lakach signifieth as well to beare as to take or fetch it is more like that they made as though they were domesticall seruants and so came in bringing of wheate Iun. Pag. 4. The Septuag read that the doore keeper was cleansing and purging of wheat but there is no such thing in the text 4. Quest. v. 7. Of Ishbosheths secure sleepe 1. Though it seemeth to haue beene vsuall in those countries to haue their afternoone nappes as we read of Dauid c. 12.3 both because the nights were short and therefore they tooke vp some part of their sleepe in the day Mar. and the heate of the day which is verie feruent in those countries made them also drowsie Ioseph 2. Yet this heauie sleepe of Ishbosheth beeing now left naked and without defence Abner beeing slaine sheweth both his securitie touching his owne estate and his negligent administration of the kingdome so Ionas slept in the ship when the tempest arose and great daunger was at hand and the disciples were asleepe when their master was in his greatest agonie Matth. 26.40 3. But sleepe it selfe is not to be accused for as some are ouertaken in their sleepe so sometime it is a meane of deliuerance and to escape danger as Plutarch hath a storie how Mithridates sent one Oltacus to kill Lucullus who comming thither as to doe a message of some importance and answer beeing returned that he was asleepe and it was against his health to be awaked he thereupon fledde away least he should haue beene further sifted 4. And seeing Ishbosheth was thus slaine in his sleepe it teacheth vs to commend our selues vnto God when wee goe to our rest because we knowe not what may happen vnto vs in our sleepe Martyr 5. Quest. v. 8. Of their words to Dauid The Lord hath auenged my lord c. 1. True it is that this came to passe by the secret working and disposing of Almightie God that Dauid might be established in his kingdome and it was iust that Ishbosheth should come to such an ende because he vsurped vpon the kingdome which the Lord had appointed to an other 2. But this was no good excuse or defence of their vnlawfull act in killing their Lord for by this meanes Iudas treacherie toward his Lord might be excused because it was done according to the determinate counsell of God Indeede when Alexander in his rage and wine had killed Clitus and afterward was stricken with griefe Aristander did comfort him by laying the cause and originall thereof vpon the fates wherewith Alexanders griefe was somwhat qualified 3. Neither had these two murderous and bloodie men any such intent herein to obey Gods will but respected only their owne aduancement and preferment therein Mart. 6. Quest. v. 9.10 Of Dauids answer to the traytors that brought Ishbosheths head 1. Dauid vttereth three excellent sentences the one in saying as the Lord liueth who hath deliuered me shewing that vnlawfull meanes must not be vsed to hasten the Lords worke but that we must with patience waight vpon God the other that we must not reioyce in the destruction of an enemie as Dauid did not neither in Sauls death nor Ishbosheths the third that honestie is to be preferred before profit and vtilitie and that the counsels and enterprises of the wicked must not be approoued though they be for our profit Borr. 2. Dauid will much more be avenged of these men then of the Amalekite that said he killed Saul both in respect of their persons who were seruants to Ishbosheth and of the same tribe whereas the Amalekite was a stranger and not of Israel as also of him that was slaine who was a righteous person in respect of them which conspired against him he had deserued well of them so had not Saul of the Amalekites whom he had destroyed and Saul had alreadie his deaths wound and could not recouer but Ishbosheth
Why the Lord smote Vzzah and how 1. Some of the Rabbines thinke that Vzzah was smitten because when he saw the Arke declining he had such an inward thought as though God were not able to stay it but no such thing is in the text Petrus Camestâ—r gesseth it waâ— for that hee had companied with his wife the night before which conceiâ— riseth of their prophane and base opinion of marriage which the Apostle calleth honourable the cause is euident out of the text because they had put the Arke into a caâ—t whereâ—s it was to be caried vpon the Leuites shoulders Mar. and because beeing no Priest he touched the Arke which it was not lawfull for the Leuites to doe Osiand both these causes are rendered of this iudgement the first 1. Chron. 15.3.14 the other 1. Chron. 13.10 2. How Vzzah was smitten it is not expressed some thinke he was striken with a thunderbolt Hierome is of opinion that his shoulder and arme waâ— suddenly withered and dried vp because he should haue borne the Arke vpon his shoulder De mirabilib Script lib. 2. c. 12. Augustine thinketh he was presently suffocated so died as they which are taken with an apoplexie but it seemeth it was a violent death and that by some rent rupture or diuision of his bodie as the place was thereupon called Perâ—z Vâ—zah the rent breach or diuision of Vzzah 3. Vzzah is smitten here whereas the Philistims were not punished at all for carting the Arke for they knew not the law of God and therefore were excused by their ignorance but the Israelites if they transgressed the law did it of carelesse negligence and forgetfulnesse as Vzzah here and therefore this punishment is laid vpon him Pellican 4. And Vzzah is smitten rather then Ahio not as Hierome thinketh if hee be the author of the traditions vpon the Chronicles bâ—bâ—cause Abinadab had Vzzah carie the Arke vpon his shoulders and he refused Mar. But though Ahio with the rest of the Priests and Leuites were all guiltie of the first fault in putting the Arke into a cart yet this fault was peculiar to Vzzah in that he presumed to touch the Arke which it was not lawfull for the Leuites to doe Num. 4.11 and therefore he was smitten and not Ahio Iun. 12. Quest. v. 7. Of thâ— right vse which is to be made of this iudgement vpon Vzzah 1. The Pope grossely abused this place against the Emperour who hauing made some constitutions in Germanie concerning râ—ligion and namely that of the interim was threatned by the Pope with the vengeance that did light vpon Vzzah for medling with things that appertained not vnto him But therein the Emperour did no more then other godly Kings before him Salomon Esechias Iosias and those Christian Emperours Constantine Theodosius Honorius Arcadius Mart. 2. But this example hath this application rather 1. It condemneth all will-worship and humane deuises brought into the seruice and worship of God as Nadab and Abihu were slaine for offering with strange fire 2. It teacheth vâ— ne in alienam functionèm nos ingreamus that we intrude not our selues into an others function as Vzzia the King was smitten with leprosie because he tooke vpon him to offer incense Osiander 3. The Arke also signifieth the Scripture quae non est illotis manibus tractanda which must not be handled with vncleane hands Pellican 4. It sheweth also that a good intention declining from the prescript of Gods word is not acceptable to the Lord Osiander For Vzzah here of a good meaning staied the Arke with his hand but because it was against the Law it displeased the Lord. 13. Quest. Why Dauid was displeased 1. Whereas the words in the originall are Dauid was angrie or anger was to Dauid some take it that Dauid was angrie not with the Lord for God could not be accused of iniustice here and it was farre from Dauid to lay any such imputation vpon God but he was angrie with the negligence of the Preists and his owne ouersight in such an apparant transgression of the Law Mart. 2. But the text giuing this reason because the Lord hath smitten Vzzah sheweth that this indeed was the cause of Dauids greife therefore the meaning is that displicuit Dauidi it displeased Dauid I.G.B. or Dauid was mooued and troubled as Samuel was mooued when the Lord had cast off Saul and cried vnto the Lord all night 1. Sam. 15.11 where the same phrase is vsed 3. As Dauid was mooued and troubled so it is said Dauid feared the Lord that day which both sheweth that Dauid setting before him the like punishment vpon the Philistims first then vpon the Bethshemites for their irreuerent behauiour toward the Arke feared the like punishment himselfe and therefore durst goe no further with the Arke Mart. And beside it made Dauid more carefull afterward nihil tentare praeter doctrinam legis to attempt nothing beside the doctrine of the Law Pellican 14. Quest. Whether Dauid did well in going no further with the Arke 1. Some think that Dauid was herein ouerseene and though he were an holy man yet he was not without his faults for if he were assured that it was the Lords will to bring the Arke to Ierusalem he should not haue giuen ouer notwithstanding this crosse successe and if he were not he should neuer haue begunne and taken it in hand Mart. 2. To the same purpose Osiander that Dauid exceeded a due measure in this his feare in that he sendeth away the Arke from him as many now a dayes because they thinke themselues vnworthie to receiue the Sacrament do along time forbeare and will not receiue it at all 3. But Dauid herein rather obeyed as it seemed to him the Lords will which hee might thinke was not at this time that the Arke should be brought to his house as was declared by this fact Iun. so aguoscit se indignum c. he acknowledgeth himselfe vnworthy with whome the Arke which was the seat of God should remaine and dwell Pellic. 15. Quest. v. 10. Of the leauing of the Arke in the house of Obed Edom the Gittite 1. The most doe thinke that this Obed Edom is called a Gethite or Gittite because he had sometime soiourned with Dauid or vpon some other occasion in Gath a citie of the Philistims Pellic. Vatab. and it might be he fled thither when Saul put the Priests to death Mart. But he was so called of Gath Rimman one of the cities giuen in common by the tribe of Manasses and of Dan to the Kohathites the Leuits Iosh. 21.24 Iun. 2. And with him the Arke is left not that Dauid forced him to take the Arke and so would turne the daunger vpon an other which he feared But it seemeth rather that Obededom dwelling in the way and beeing a good man and also a Leuite that he was willing to giue entertainement vnto the Arke Osiand Martyr Rupertus thinketh that Dauid as yet knew not the cause why the Lord