8. These qualifications before faith are saving in the Elect because God intends them as a means unto a saving work afterwards to be wrought infallibly by him in them in his accepted time Ans This Objection is already answered in the distinction of the Notion Preparatory in the explication of the terms where you may please to see it Thus to argue is as if you should thus speak God intends this work present in it self common unto which he hath made no promise of salvation as a means unto a further work Saving yet to come unto the which he hath promised salvation therefore this preparatory work present is saving Or as if in other words you should say God intends to do such a good therefore he hath done it God intends it therefore he hath promised it that is revealed his intent whereas the truth is God having but intended it therefore he hath not revealed it Who seeth not in this reasoning not only a Non-sequitur but an implyed contradiction The Event in a perfect birth sheweth that God intended the formation thereof when it was yet but an Embrio as preparatory unto the infusion of a reasonable soul But none will say This preparatory disposition of the matter for the infusion of the Soul was the infusion of the Soul it self nor could any man God not having yet signified his Intent in that respect have ascertained the after-infusion of the Soul into such conception It might in it self and to us have proved an abortion Exod. 21.22 Gods Intent that it should proceed to a perfect birth was only known to him the previous disposition of the matter was therefore from the first instant to him preparatory really but not so to us We must distinguish between Gods Intent Praedestinatio nibil penit in praedestinato Tho. 1. q. 23.2 and his execution of his Intent His Intent meerly causeth not any alteration in the creature only the execution thereof causeth an alteration therein his Intent is an immanent work the execution is a transient work his Intent is from Eternity the execution thereof is in time his Intent is himself intending as Election is God electing the execution thereof is a creature Obj 9. Vocation is not a sanctifying work Vocation is a saving work Therefore Every saving work is not a sanctifying work Ans Transeat The whole argument granted concludes not the present question The question is not Whether there be a saving work that is not a sanctifying work but Whether there be a saving work before the grace of faith If any notwithstanding the doctrine of many godly learned distinguishing sanctification into sanctification taken strictly and sanctification taken more generally yet judg faith not to be a part of sanctification they may please to consider the concurrence of our most able and godly Writers asserting the contrary in their Disputations against the Arminians together with the occasion of the Query and their Arguments leading them unto the Affirmative It may yet haply be said Where these qualifications are there may be a seed of faith This may be either supposeth faith where salvation is ascertained if so 't is that we defend and yeilds the Cause Or it supposeth salvation may be ascertained where faith is not Polan Synt. l. 9. c. 6. Ames Cor. Art 4. c. 4. Idem de Praepar pec ad conversionē Span. Ex. de gr erot 28. Credere in Christū non est motus successivus sed instantaneus Twiss l. 3. Errat 8. Sect. 1. which hath been disputed against and how far disproved let the Reader judg Or it supposeth a middle condition wherein the Soul neither hath faith nor is without faith as if faith were ex traduce which both the nature of faith and the concurring Judgment of the godly Learned refuse teaching regeneration and faith to be wrought in an instant not successively To beleeve in Christ saith Dr Twisse is not a successive but an instantaneous motion that is 't is wrought in an instant Query 1. What are the Inconsequences of the affirmative Tenet 1. Laedunt enim gratiam Dei in verbo Dei patefactam quotquot eam obsourant terminos ampliores quam Deo visum fuerit ipsi praefigunt Twiss de Elect. l. 1. par 2. sect 27. It obscures the grace of Christ For they saith Dr Twisse hurt the grace of God made known in his Word whosoever darken it and enlarge its bounds above what hath seemed good unto God 2. It denyeth the power of the Potter over a non-beleever thus qualified and so sins against the freedom of the Soveraignty of God and Christ in making God a Debtor of mercy before his time 3. It is a nourisher of spiritual pride teaching the Soul to think far more highly of it self then it ought to do in thinking it self to be in a safe way when it is in a perishing condition 4. It hinders the work of kindly humiliation in exempting the Soul thus qualified from looking at it self as indeed it ought to be prostrate at the feet of the good pleasure of God in Christ Jesus under the Sicredideris of the Gospel 5. If the Soul by parting with sin understandeth a saving parting therewith it holdeth it under an unwarrantable expectation teaching it to seek power to part from sin in that way sc without Christ wherein Wisdom professeth it is not to be had which is to seek the living amongst the dead 6. If by parting with sin the Soul understands a legal parting therewith it is a dangerous way to presumption thus it procrastinates the conversion of both and troubles the kindly conversion of many Witness their after spiritual sorrows and unsetlings for such former carnal considences when they come to be more clearly enlightened 7. Notwithstanding all scruples are always religiously and tenderly to be removed in any measure more or less questioning the work of faith by other gracious Truths dispensed at the same time with this Tenet yet since no Error is a medium of faith the Spirit of Truth refusing to mix with or work by mans untruth if the Proposition disputed against be found an Ercor it will also be found so far from being a help to faith as that the Spirit never did nor ever will work faith thereby Query 2. What Encouragement doth the Gospel hold forth unto a Soul under Preparatory Work before Faith 1. It is truth that every such Soul may be saved Sufficit ex parte objecti consideratio infiniti valoris meriti Christi ab dignitatem personae gravitatem passionum ex parte subjecti quod Deus ei copiam fecit omnium mediorum externorum quae electis Dei salvandis in Ecclesia adhiberi solent Spanh ex de grat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. 2. The Gospel that is the free tender of Salvation by Jesus Christ a sufficient Saviour to every one that beleeves is to be holden forth to every such perishing Soul with a Command to beleeve 1 John 3.23
unto God for salvation by Jesus Christ which glorifying of God in way of thankfulness is a more effectual Motive unto obedience vvith a believer notvvithstanding the remainders of sin then the obtaining of life and that according to order of justice was unto Adam though vvithout sin as appears by the Apostacy of the one and perseverance of the other through Grace The means whereby faith is wrought are twofold External Of the means of faith or Internal External scil the Word by divine Institution the Instrument of Conversion hence called the Word of Faith Rom. 10.8 Which moveth by propounding Arguments and by perswading 2 Cor. 5.11 By Woing John 3.29 By Commanding 1 John 3.23 it is by Divines commonly called a Moral Suasion or Moral Cause acting only by way of propounding the Object no cause properly but improperly and Metaphorically it produceth not the effect without the concurrence of the Spirit vvhich is the Efficient Cause The internal means is the supernatural saving and effectual Motion of the Spirit concurring vvith the Word of Faith or which is all one with the Word of Grace and in an accepted time vvorking in the soul that faith which the Word calleth for Hence called the Spirit of Faith 2 Cor. 4.13 Whence the Moral Suasion of the Word becometh effectual by the real persvvasion of the Spirit The Word calleth upon us to believe the Spirit causeth us to believe The Word calls upon us to will and to do the Spirit of Christ worketh in us to will and to do the Word commands us to be according to our duty the Spirit vvorketh in us to be according to the Word God in the Creation spake the Word that such a creature should be and therewithal sent forth a power causing that creature to be according to his Word So whilest the Angel reveals unto Mary the Conception of Christ the Power of the Highest overshadowed her Whence it vvas with her according to his Word Luke 1.35 38. So also whilest Jesus cried vvith a loud voice Lazarus come forth there proceeded from him a Power whereby Lazaras doth come forth John 11.43 44. The Ministery of the Word whether Law or Gospel is but a dead letter and profiteth nothing without the Spirit 1 Cor. 3.7 Neither is he that planteth any thing nor he that watereth but God that giveth the increase After all instructions Timothy must vvait if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth 2 Tim. 2.25 No Oratory how excellent soever can prevail with the blind to see with the deaf to hear or with the dead to live God is not only an Orator Deus Autor non tantum Orator gratiae Twiss de Elect. l. 1. p. 2. dig 6. Sect. 16. but a Creator of grace Which notwithstanding yet are we vvith diligence to attend upon God in the use of means for though the means cannot work vvithout the Spirit the Spirit ordinarily will not work upon subjects of discretion without the means Man is a reasonable creature therefore God proceedeth with him by vvay of Arguments but because man is a dead creature therefore he must work in him that which he persvvades thereunto The Proposition of the Word of Faith is the External Ames Coron de Convert 4 cap. 1. the Operation of the Spirit of Faith is the Internal Call that as was said before is a moral Suasion this is a real Perswasion that a moral Cause this a physical Cause that commands us who are unwilling to be willing Interna gratiae Efficatia quae praedestinationis decretum exsequitur sine dicenda sit actio physica ut loquuntur Dominica vel potius divina supernaturalis vel occulta cui fortasse aptius nomen non occurrit sicut cautiùs in Augustino nostri fere statuunt uon multum interest Prideaux this through its powerful Efficacy by a real and as it were a physical change of the Will of unwilling makes us willing By the first God stands at the door and knocks Revel 3.20 By the second he opens the door i. e. the hearts of his Elect Luke 24.45.16.14 As the Word is called the Word of Faith Rom. 10.8 And the Spirit the Spirit of Faith 2 Cor. 4.13 So the conjunction of both is called the Door of Faith Acts 14.27 The Manner of the working of faith is irresistable The Manner of working of Faith Non alium enim irresistibilitateÌ„ propugnant nostri quam realem efficacem donationem cujus vi effectum certò vel infallibilitur Existit Coron art 4. cap. 3. that is it is such Whence notwithstanding the resistance made by corrupt nature yet at last prevaileth over all opposition whatsoever and causeth the effect certainly and infallibly to follow Jer. 24.7 I will give them an heart to know me and they shall be my people And Chap. 31.18 Turn thou me and I shall be turned ver 33. I will write my Law in their hearts and they shall be my people Ezek. 36.27 28. I will put my Spirit within you Concursus volunâ—atis cum gratia in opere conversiones non est co-ordinatus sed subordinatus Prideaux Motives to believe and cause you to walk in my Statutes c. And ye shall be my people John 6.37 All that the Father hath given me shall come unto me The Concurrence of the Will with Grace in the Work of Conversion is subordinate not co-ordinate the drawing of the soul is efficacious but not violent God by an Omnipotent Facility on his part and after an experimental impossibility in some measure at least on our part doth not force us unwillingly but of unwilling makes us willing Amongst many other precious means for both the obtaining and confirming of faith Consider 1. The Love of God to man though a sinner Tit. 3.4 'T is not our sin which fell out after the beginning of time that can alter the affection of God which was before time Those of whom the Apostle saith ver 3. That they were sometimes foolish disobedient deceived serving divers lusts and pleasures living in malice and envy hatefull and hating one another When such though not as such God loved God hateth sin loveth not any as sinners but loveth his Elect though sinners Rom. 5.8 2. What Christ hath done for sinners He hath obeyed the Law and suffered the punishment Rom. 5.8 And actually procured the application of grace and reconciliation Col. 2.15 Rom. 5.10 Though there be many strengthless Representatio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dei Christi eâ—â—icacissimum medium ad ingenerandaÌ„ fidem Spanh ex de grat resp ad Erot. 14. ungodly sinners enemies whom neither God loveth nor Christ died for yet all whom God hath set his heart upon or that Christ died for either are or have been such If thou neither wert nor art nor becomest such Christ never died for thee 1 Tim. 1.15 The high account which that great Preacher of Free-grace and Doctor of the Gentiles had
thus 1 In what sense the term Justification is here used 2 What Justification by Faith is 3 The causes of Justification viz. Efficient Meritorious Material Formal Final Instrumental 4 Plow Faith justifieth 5 Divers objections satisfied 6 Many mysteries that shine forth in the doctrine of Justification 7 The peace of conscience following thereupon In what sense the term Justification is used in this question Justification is the making of a person just or righteous and it is done either by infusion or declaratively by ajudicial sentence To justifie by infusion Justitia imputata est quoad essentiam idem ille status coram Deo quem perdidimus in Ademo B. ex T. 4. lib. 6. cap. 1. Pemble Treanise of Justification Pag. 2. is to make a person inherently righteous by infusing into him an indwelling principle of holinesse So Adam was made just Eccl. 7.29 To justifie declaratively is when a person accused or both accused and convicted as an offender is justly acquitted by the judicial declaration of his Legal innocency and freedome from guilt and punishment To justifie in this place is not by way of infusion viz. to sanctifie that is of a person unclean unholy and unjust to make him formally and inherently pure holy just by working in him the inherent qualities of purity sanctity and righteousnesse but judicially to absolve a guilty sinner at the Tribunal of Gods Justice from guilt and punishment and to declare him righteous Justification in this place doth not signifie a change of our nature but a change of our state i. e. of our spiritual condition in order to the curse and promise so as the person which was under the Law before is now not under the Law but under grace Rom. 6.14 It is a Court-phrase taken not Physically but Judicially for a Judicial not a Physical act it signifieth a relative Justification of accounting a man just not an habitual Justification of making a man just thus Barrabas a Thief is acquitted judicially whence followed a Legal not a Physical change of Barrabas Justification is sometimes applyed to God when a man justifieth Psal 51.4 Rom. 3.4 Luke 7.29 Matth. 11.19 Luke 7.35 sometimes to man between man and man Deut. 25.1 Isa 5.23 Prov. 17.15 2 Sam. 15.4 In which last places and the like Pemble after others observeth that to justifie is in judicial proceeding to absolve a party from fault and blame whether it be rightly or wrongfully Ezek. 16.52 Luke 16.15 Sometimes unto man between God and man Exod. 23.7 Isa 50.8 Rom. 8.33 34. 1 Cor. 4.4 Act. 13.38 39. which places can intend no other but a judicial or declarative not a physical or infused Justification whereby a person of unjust is made just Infused righteousnesse which is sanctification is distinguished from Justification Though they are inseparable yet they are distinguished as light and heat in the Sun 1 Cor. 1.30 6.11 The subject of our Justification is Christ the subject of Sanctification is the Beleever Justification is onely imputative Sanctification is inherent Justification makes a relative change Sanctification an inherent Physical change Justification is an individuall act all at once Sanctification is gradual by degrees Justification is perfect in this life Sanctification is imperfect It is plain that the Apostle by Justification intends remission of sins therefore not inherent righteousnesse We are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus Rom. 3.23 24. which redemption is remission of sins Eph. 1.7 Col. 1.14 See Rom. 8.33 Act. 13.38 Justification is opposed to Condemnation Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opouitur 3 ad Rom. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Grec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opouitur 3 ad Rom. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lat. Jujtificare opouitur 3 ad Rom. Condemnare Rom. 5.18 As condemnation therefore consists not in infusing a principle of guilt into a person but in a Legal pronouncing of a person to be guilty so Justification is not by infusing a principle of righteousnesse into a person but onely the pronouncing of a person to be righteous To justifie is not to make a person habitually righteous Praeterea nullo nec Hebraico nec Greco nec Latino nec Vernaculo idiomate justificare est habitualiter justum efficere Par. in Rom. c. 3. neither in the Hebrew Greeke Latine nor any other Tongue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used in the Old Testament many times yet it is but once used in any other sense which also is observed of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the New The Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to justifie never signifieth to make inherently but alwayes to make declaratively just excepting Dan. 12.3 where it signifieth not those that pronounce righteous but those who instruct others unto righteousnesse The Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by which the Hebrew is rendred hath the same signification in the New Testamenent and difficult it is to produce it in any other sense except Rev. 22.11 This observation saith Pareus is firmly to be urged against false teachers Haec observatio fermiter tenenâ—a urgenda est emtra Sophistas quia evincit justificationem Apostolo nequaquam significare justificationem seu habitualis justitiae infusionem quod illi contendunt sed gratuitam absolutionem à peccatis justitiae impulationem propter Christi meritum Pareus in Rom. 3.28 Praeter unum locum ex Danielis 12. alterum ex Apocrypho Syracida ecclesiast 18. tertium ex Apocalypsi his exceptis audacter dico non dari posse alium Cham. Tom. 3. lib. 21. c. 5. n. 11. because it doth evince Justification in the Apostles sense in no wise to signifie the making of one righteous or the infusion of habitual righteousnesse which they contend for but a free absolution from sins and imputation of righteousnesse for the merit of Christ These places being excepted viz. Dan. 12.3 Rev. 22.11 Chamier boldly affirms that there cannot be found another place in Scripture where Justification is used in any other sense What Justification by Faith is What Justification by faith is Justification is a gracious act of God upon a beleever whereby for the righteousnesse sake of Christ imputed by God and applied by faith he doth freely discharge him from sin and the curse and accept him as righteous with the righteousnesse of Christ and acknowledge him to have a right unto eternal life The Efficient cause of Justification is the gracious good pleasure of God Efficient cause the Father Son and Holy Ghost In the Scriptures it is called Grace In the Schools grace that makes us acceptable He is God Lord Law-giver and Judge whose will is the rule of righteousnesse Sin as sin In scripturis appellatur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Scholis gratia graâ—â—n faciens is properly committed against God Psal 51.4 and God only can remit sin Mark 2.7 It is called the Righteousnesse of God Rom. 3.22 The righteousnesse
though we are made partakers of it by a power which is without us yet it is inherent in us as in its proper subject and in that notion is opposed to the righteousnesse of Christ whereby we are justified whereof he is not only the worker but which also is inherent in him as its proper subject therefore the justification of a Beleever is by way of imputation No sinner remaining a sinner when he is justified can be justified otherwise than by imputed righteousnesse but all Beleevers though justified yet remain sinners while they live in this world 1 Joh. 1.8 therefore all Beleevers are justified by an imputed righteousnesse The final cause is the manifestation of the glory of grace The finall cause in a way of Mercy tempered with Justice in a way of Mercy in that he justifieth the ungodly Rom. 4.5 and that freely Rom. 3.24 tempered with Justice in that he justifieth not without Christs full satisfaction unto the Law Rom. 3.26 The instrumental cause or instrument of our Justification The instrumental cause or instrument for faith here is but a meer instrument is faith the fuller understanding of this Proposition followeth in the next particular Here observe the intent and consent of such Scriptures as speak diversly of the cause of Justification we are sayed to bee justified by grace Rom. 3.24 i. e. as the Efficient cause by his Blood Rom. 5.9 i. e. as the Meritorious cause by his obedience Rom. 5.19 i. e. as the Material cause by imputation of his obedience Rom. 4.6 i.e. as the Formal cause by faith Rom. 5.1 i. e. as the instrument This Proposition We are justified by faith is figurative How Faith justifieth i.e. Metonymical whereby that which belongs to the principal cause is attributed to the instrumental cause Faith justifieth not for its own worth but for the worth of the object which it apprehends Faith doth not justifie as an act of ours but all the vertue thereof proceedeth from its object the vertue that healed the Israelites proceeded from the object viz. the brazen Serpent they looked upon not from the looking upon the Brazen Serpent and the vertue that healed the Woman Luke 8.46.48.50 proceeded out of Christ who was touched not out of the Womans touch we are declared righteous upon our beleeving Faith in the matter of our Justification is the instrument apprehending and applying that which doth justifie the proper act of Faith is to receive the righteousnesse of another we are justified by faith correlatively that is we are justified by that which is the correlate of faith namely the obedience of Christ the meaning is it is the Obedience of Christ not Faith that justifieth that which is apprehended not that which apprehendeth Faith alone justifieth that is faith as it justifieth is alone but justifying faith is not alone that is faith as it justifieth is without workes but the faith that justifieth is a working faith We are justified by faith alone 1 Because as it justifieth it is not a work Rom. 4.5 2 Because we are not justified by our own righteousnesse i. e. that righteousnesse whereof we are the subjects 3 Because we are justified by the righteousnesse of another sometimes called the righteousnesse of God viz. that whereof God is the Author and Ordainer sometimes the righteousnesse of Christ viz. that whereof he who is God-man is both the Worker and the Subject 4 Because we are justified by a righteousnesse that is made ours by imputation not by infusion as Abraham was justified 5 Because we are justified by a righteousnesse that is actually procured before we doe beleeve Our righteousnesse is compared unto a garment Reval 19.8 Rom. 13.14 Gal. 3.27 which we put on by beleeving yet faith never took stitch in it What was accounted to Abraham for righteousnesse Zanch. in Phil. 3. Not the action by which but that which he did beleeve or as others speak faith not in respect of it self apprehending but in respect of the object apprehended Zanchy Gen. 15.6 Quid reputatum ad justitiam non actio quâ sed id quod credidit seu ut alii loquuntur ipsa fides non sui apprehendentis sed objecti apprehensi respectu This Proposition We are justified by faith understood legally with the Papists is not true but Blasphemous but being taken correlatively it is true Vrsin Haec propositio Ursin explicat catech part 2. qu. 63 fide justificamur legaliter intellecta cum Papist is non est vera sed Blasphema correlativè autem accept a hoc est Evangelicè est vera Faith as a quality doth not justifie but as an instrument receiving and applying to us the imputed righteousnesse of Christ Rivet Fides pro qualitate sumpta Rivet Cathol orthod tract 4. q. 10 non justificat nos sed justificat tanquam instrumentum recipiens applicans nob is imputatam Christi justitiam Faith justifies relatively to wit by a Metonymy whereby the effect of the principal is attributed to the instrumental cause Faith justifieth not habitually as a quality but relatively Paraeus Fides justificat relatè Paraeus in Rom. 3. phrasi nimirum Metaleptica quâ effectus causae principalis tribuitur instrumentali Fides justificat non habitualitèr ut qualitas sed Relatè Faith justifies not simply but relatively after the manner of an instrument applying Chamier Fides justificat Cham. Tom. 3. l. 22. c. 11 non simpliciter sed Relatè per modum instrumenti applicantis He saith Calvin shal be said to be justified by faith that being excluded from the righteousnesse of workes doth by faith take hold of the righteousnesse of Christ wherewith when he is cloathed he appeareth in the sight of God not as a sinner but as righteous and saith he after a few lines we say that the same consisteth in the forgivenesse of sins and imputation of the righteousness of Christ Contra justificabitur ille fide Calvin institut lib. 3. cap. 11. s 2. qui operum justitia exclusus Christi justitiam per fidem apprehendit qua vestitus in Dei conspectu non ut peccator sed tanquam justus apparet ita nos justificationem simpliciter interpretamur acceptionem qua nos Déus in gratiam receptos pro just is habet eámque in peccatorum remissione ac justitiae Christi imputatione positam esse dicimus Confer Sect. 21. 23. Faith doth not justifie as a work Welleb comp l. 1. c. 30. but as an instrument apprehending Christ Wollebius Etsi igitur fides sola non sit sed cum operibus conjuncta sola tamen justificat Fides non tanquam opus sed tanquam instrumentum Christum apprehendens Justification consists in faith organically Spanh de gr un erot 21. in the obedience of Christ objectively and meritoriously Spanhemius Justificatio consistit in fide organicè in Christi obedientia objectivè meritoriè We say with the Apostle Beza in confe majore c.
In the putting on of the Garments of Christs righteousnesse there is a putting off of the filthy rags of our own righteousnesse In this sense Christ cloaths only the naked and he that is cloathed savingly owneth his own nakednesse and the unrighteousnesse of his own righteousnesse Our unrighteousnesse strikes against the Law but our righteousnesse takes away grace that is against God this against God and Christ that makes us need the remedy this keeps us incurable by it that is against the command this is against the promise Gal. 3.14 that makes the Law weak Rom. 8.3 this submits not unto the strength of the Gospel Rom. 10.3 the beleever accounts much of the righteousnesse of Christ and loatheth his own Phil. 3.8 he abhorreth himself for his own high account of his own righteousness onr own righteousness is called our shame Phil. 3.15 Christs righteousnesse is our glory Isa 55.25 In the Lord shall the seed of Israel be justified and shall glory The beleever how great a sinner soever formerly though a Murtherer Adulterer Lyar c. by this one act of beleeving Jesus Christ and his righteousnesse yeeldeth more obedience unto God than ever he committed disobedience honoureth God more than ever he hath hitherto dishonoured him pleaseth God better than if he had ever continued in innocency and never sinned God makes much account of the obedience of faith because faith makes much account of the grace of God It is a name of honour unto Christ to be called Our Righteousnesse Jer. 23 6. and a name of honour to the people of God that according to their duty they are known to acknowledge Christ according to this name And this is the name wherewith He shall be called The Lord our Righteousnesse Jer. 33.16 Object Bellar. de Just l. 1. c. 10. If we are justified by faith then faith is in order before justification and consequently the act is before the object whereas on the contrary the act depends upon the object and not the object upon the act To this effect Bellarmine Answ 1. We may distinguish between the being of Justification and our being justified that is between Justification taken in an abstract sense viz. without the receiving-subject thereof namely the beleever And Justification taken in the concrete sense i. e. together with the beleever Justification considered in the abstract i. e. simply and in it self in which sense it signifieth remission of sins and righteousnesse to acceptation prepared though not yet conferred upon the Elect hath before faith a being not onely in the purpose of God but also in the Covenant between the Father and the Mediator and in the purchase of Christ This truth held forth in the Gospel makes the object of faith and thus the object is before the act Or thus distinguish between Justification actually procured and actually applied Justification was eminentially procured before faith Docet A minius Christum satisfactione sua nactum esse jus peccatorum remittendorum non peccatorum remissionem Twiss de permiss l. 2. er 4 p. 84. in respect of those who beleeved before Christ dyed when it was as entire to God to justifie for the merit sake of Christ to dye as it is now for the merit sake of Christ dead it is actually procured for those who beleeve after the death of Christ though it be not actually applied before faith This actuall procuring of Justification as did also the eminential procuring of it before Christ giveth a being to Justification as considered in it self and constitutes the object of justifying faith Justification is compared to a garment our being justified to the putting on of that garment the garment is made before it be put on Justification is compared to a pardon our being justified unto the Delinquents being pardoned the pardon is procured before the Delinquent is pardoned These then are both truths First Justification hath a being before the Elect do beleeve Secondly That the Elect are not justified before they do beleeve Justification is the object faith is the act the object is before the act our being actually justified is an effect faith is the instrumental cause the cause is before the effect That Justification is actually and absolutely procured for the Elect before faith and shall infallibly be applied to them all in time seemeth to reach the scope intended by the godly Learned whose spirits have more particularly laboured to hold forth the full truth in this precious part of the soul-reconciling and soul-supporting mystery of the Gospèl To say that we are justified by vertue of a singular promise in the Court of Conscience and in our own persons in which sense the Scripture constantly saith that we are justified by faith is not that I know affirmed by any The grounds of this Distinction are thus evidenced Justification was in Gods Decree before faith before sin yea from all Eternity Gal. 3.8 whom God hath set forth that is fore-ordained Rom. 3.25 The Justification of the Elect is absolutely and actually procured for them by Christs satisfaction before faith Col. 2.14 The hand-writing of Ordinances cannot be limited to the Ceremonial Law onely because it had respect unto the Gentiles then living to whom the Ceremonial Law belonged not God hath declared his acceptation of this satisfaction of Christ whereby he hath actually procured Justification for the Elect before faith It is no small part of the Ministry of Reconciliation that God imputed unto Christ the sins of the world of the Elect before they did beleeve and will not impute them unto the Elect 2 Cor. 5.18 19. this great Gospel-truth is of special use to beget justifying faith in the heart of a sinner the same Apostle confirms Beleevers concerning their salvation Rom. 5.10 from this argument namely that their reconciliation was wrought for them when they were enemies that is unbeleevers Here then is a twofold Reconciliation mentioned one at the death of Christ before Paul or the Romans some of them at least here spoken to were beleevers The other at our Conversion The first Reconciliation though it was vertually wrought before by the Lamb slain in Gods appointment acceptance together with his own consent from the beginning of the world Rev. 13.8 yet it was not actually wrought untill the death Christ for this satisfaction sake God imputes not sin unto the Redeemed for he cannot impute sin to Christ and the Elect both yea he accepteth us in the Beloved Eph. 1.6 Loving the persons of the Elect Rom. 11.28 though hating theirs sins and also their state under the curse of the Law Ro. 6.14 Ch. 7.6 Eph. 2.3 The second is wrought at our Conversion when the enmity of nature is slain by the infusion of grace our persons are justified in themselves and our state changed by faith in Christ Jesus This place then seemeth not to be understood as that Rom. 4.5 God justifieth the ungodly viz. objectively that is such who were ungodly till they were justified
p. 16 The Divine Idaea what c. 4 p. 54.55 The eternall Idaea what c. 15. p. 332 Jesus Christ God-man is of the object of faith c. 9. p. 200 The Incarnation Miracle of Miracles c. 3. p. 38 The inconsequences of the tenet holding saving qualifications before faith c. 8. p. 190 191 Immensity in God what c. 1. p. 8 Immutability in God what c. 1. â—b Inexcusablenesse in respect of sin what c. 7. p. 151 Infinitenesse in God what c. 1. p. 9 The interpretation of Rom. 7.4 Mat. 13.44 Mat. 18 11. Mat. 11.28 with their vindication from the interpretation thereof in defence of saving qualifications before faith c. 1. p. 179 182 185 188 Justice in God what c. 7. p. 146 The Justice of Divine government is not prejudiced by sin by things falling out alike to those who are not alike by things not falling out alike in this life in matter of suffering to them who are alike in transgressing from the adversity of the godly or prosperity of the wicked c. 5 p. 96 97 98 99 100 118 119 120 121 122 Justice in God what c. 1. p. 15 Justice in God essentiall and relative or morall c. 7. p. 146 Divers considerations for the better understanding Gods Justice c. 7. p. 146 147 148 149 150 151 Gods executing Justice according to the rule of righteousnesse doth no wrong can do no wrong c. 7 p. 149 The acknowledgement of the Justice of God of what use c. 7. p. 150 In what sense the term Justification is used in the doctrin thereof c. 14. p. 298 What Justification by faith is c. 14. p. 300 The causes thereof efficient ibid. Meritorious c. 14. p. 301 Materiall c. 14. p. 302 Formall c. 14. p. 305 Finall and Instrumental c. 14 p. 307 Justification absolutely and actually purchased for us before faith but not actually applied unto us till faith c. 14. p. 315 What is really and positively wrought in the Soul in Justification c. 14. p. 318 God just in punishing men for sin largly proved c. 7. p. 145 c. K. The blessed know one another in Heaven c. 15. p. 346 Created knowledge in Christ beatifical infused experimental what and how distinguished in Christ c. 3. p. 47 L. The parts of preparatory work wrought by the Ministry of the Law which c. 7. p. 142 Divers acceptions of the Dominion of the Law in Scripture c. 8. p. 180 Liberty in God what c. 1. p. 18 The liberty of God in the Decree what c. 4. p. 57 The liberty of the second cause wherein it doth consist c. 4. p. 74 The light of glory what c. 15 p. 253 The light of glory elevateth the glorified understanding unto the vision of God c. 15 p. 333 Lordship in God what c. 1. p. 11 A lost estate what c. 7. p. 154 The Soul according to ordinary dispensation is sensible of its lost estate before vocation c. 7. p. 155 156 Sensiblenesse of our lost estate presupposeth three things c. 7. p. 155 Thorough sensiblenesse of our lost estate is wrought by the Ministry of the Gospel c. 7. p. 157 Christ is not the cause of the love of God c. 4 p. 58 59 God loveth his Elect though sinners c. 9. p. 214 M. Man considered as yet to be is the object of the Decree as concerning man c. 4. p. 56 The manner of the beatifical vision c. 15. p. 132 133 134 The manner of union between Christ and the Beleever c. 13. p. 289 290 The manner of the working faith is irresistable c. 9. p. 213 The active and passive obedience of Christ concur to the matter of our Justification c. 14. p. 302 303 304 The doctrin of the absolutenesse of the Decree is a furtherance not a hinderance to the use of means c. 4 p. 79 80 The means whereby faith is wronght external or internal and what c. 9. p. 211 We are to attend in the use of means though the means cannot work without the Spirit c. 9. p. 213 We must not separate between the end and the means c. 4. p. 83 Divers precious means for both the obtaining and confirming of faith c. 9. p. 214 215 c. Christ Mediator as God-man c. 3. p. 40 Christ a Mediator from the foundation of the world c. 3. p. 41 Objections concerning Christs being Mediator answered c. 3. p. 43 44 45 The two states wherein Christ performed the Office of Mediator c. 3. p. 49 Mercy in God what c. 1. p. 14 The Meritorious cause of Justification opened c. 14. p. 301 Four things to be attended in a saving motion from the Spirit of grace c. 10. p. 190 Many Mysteries of the Wisdome of God shine forth in Justification c. 14. p. 322 The Mystical Body of Christ what and how glorious c. 13. p. 293 294 295 N. Names of God Hebrew and Greeke especially tending to make known the Divine Essence c. 1. p. 2 3 The humane Nature of Christ an individual being not a person c. 3. p. 37 Necessity and liberty consist together c. 4. p. 76 Negative Attributes what in number five c. 1. p. 5.6 All things besides God came from Nothing and are in themselves Nothing c. 4. p. 98 O. How the Obedience of Christ as it is an ingredient into the meritorious cause differs from the Obedience of Christ as it is the materal cause of our Justification c. 14. p. 305 The greatnesse and largenesse of the Obedience of faith c. 9. p. 209 110 211 Obediential subjection what c. 12. p. 258 The creature as placed in its condition of possibility is the Object of the decree c. 4. p. 54 The Object of the decree is not to be sought for out of God himself c. 4. p. 55 The summe of the special object of faith what c. 7. p. 158 The speciall primary Object of saving faith what c. 9. p. 195 The Object of faith universal or special and what c. 9. p. 194 The Object of the beatifical Vision what c. 15. p. 327 331 Many remarkable truths in the first Object of saving faith c. 9. p. 195 Full satisfaction to all Objections in Christ c. 9. p. 216 Sundry Objections against Justification by faith answered c. 14. p. 314 315 316 317 318 319 c. Objections against the freenesse of grace answered where Eph. 1.4 1.6 are cleered c. 10. p. 225 226. seq The Office of Christ c. 3. p. 40 The parts of his Office with the order and reason thereof c. 3. p. 41 42 Omnipotency of God what c. 1. p. 19 Omnipotency and all power both in Christ and how c. 3. p. 46 The Order of union c. 13. p. 291 The Order of the dependence of communion upon union c. 13. p. 292 Original sin how propagated c. 7. p. 143 P. Parting with sin what and how distinguished c. 8. p. 182 183 What it is for the soul to be passive in Vocation c. 12. p. 257 258 The Doctrine of the passiveness of the soul in Vocation is a fundamental
beings themselves as appeared but now from the instance of fire and may further be seen in the example of the Sun which whilest experience witnesseth to warm and heat us upon Earth with the presence of its virtue yet Sense and Reason shews to be far absent in respect of its body being in the Heavens Yet such is the nature of the first Cause as that wheresoever it worketh it worketh immediately both with the immediation of his virtue without which there could be no effect and with the immediation of his presence because he is in every place Although the first Cause worketh immediately in respect of the immediation of its being and virtue yet in respect of those things which it acts by means of second causes whether by the mediation of the beings themselves Ames Med. lib. 1. cap. 9. or of their virtues into which things the second agents do send their influence by virtue of their proper forms I say in respect of such things it worketh mediately whence the first Cause is said to be a mediate cause in respect of the order of the second causes Vna estactio I ei creaturae respectu operis sed non respectu modi agendi 4. Determining For though as the beings so the operations of the second causes are from the first Cause efficiently yet they are from their next causes formally God causeth the burning of the fire yet we do not say God burneth but the fire burneth God worketh repentance in the Soul yet it is not a truth to say God repenteth but man repenteth God is the next efficient Cause but not the next formal Cause 4. The first Cause so concurreth as it determineth the second cause in its operation This is readily granted in natural agents in free-rational agents it is proved thus If the futurition of the operation of the second cause is determined by the Decree of God then the operation it self is determined by the Efficiency of God 1. Because the Efficiency is adequate to the Decree 2. Because there can be but one absolute Determiner 3. If the operation of the second cause were not absolutely determined by the Decree God might suffer disappointment in respect of the Decree Either the Will is determined by God in its operation or else it would follow either that there were not an essential subordination of the second cause unto the first that is of man to God which were repugnant to the nature of the second cause it being imperfect and dependent or that the first Cause were subordinate to the second which were repugnant to the nature of the first Cause being perfect and universal If as often as the Will doth not will it therefore doth not will because God hath not determined that it should will then as often as it willeth any thing it therefore willeth because God hath determined that it should will But as often as the Will doth not will it therefore doth not will because God hath not determined that it should will Therefore the Minor appeareth in two particulars 1. As often as the Will doth not will God hath not determined it to will 2. The Non-determination or Suspension of the Determination of God is the Antecedanious Cause in respect of God this cause cannot be positive A positive cause cannot be terminated in a Non-ens such as mans Non-volition i. e. Not-willing is it must therefore be suspensive The meer Suspension or withholding of the Influence of God without any positive action sufficeth to the annihilation of the creature that is Twiss lib. 2. crim 3. therefore the Suspension of the Determination of God sufficeth to the preventing of that operation of the creature which yet is not Obj. 1. If All-efficiency be from the first cause Against the All-Efficiency of God then the second cause hath no efficiency it doth nothing neither good nor evil man neither sinneth nor obeyeth no difference between good and evil the high way to confusion Thus the Libertines Ans Causes are either co-ordinate namely such as in respect of their Efficiency depend not upon their co-working cause or subordinate namely such as in respect of their efficiency depend upon their co-working cause In co-ordinate causes the Argument holds but second causes in respect of the first being subordinate and therefore as in their being so also in their working depending upon the first cause the Argument is of no force To deny the Efficiency of the second cause Tho. Part. 1. q. 105. art 5. Calvin contra libert c. 13 14 15 16 Suarez Metaph Tem. 1. disp 17. S. 1. is to deny that which experience proclaimeth namely That the Sun shineth or the fire burneth The denyal of the proper and formal efficiency or working of the second cause is repugnant to the whole Order of Nature Things that have not life it depriveth of their first qualities which are nothing else but active principles as power to heat in the fire power to cool in the water It disinables us from collecting effects from second causes or second causes from effects because it denyeth all such causes and effects It makes void all those dispositions in several creatures that tend to action Vain is the disposition in fire to ascend or in the earth to descend if there be no motion of ascent nor descent by them It takes away all perfection from those creatures as also from all other which consists in action Lastly If action be only the first cause in the presence of such a creature and not by the second cause we can no better conclude that the fire is hot from its burning nor that the water is cold from its coolness then we can conclude that the fire is cold or that the water is hot from such operations of heat and cold The reason is the first cause can as well make hot in the presence of water or make cold in the presence of fire as the contrary It takes away all difference between things that have life and things that have no life that which takes away action takes away life Take away action from the second cause and you take away the vegetative soul and its operations from living creatures You take away the sensitive soul and its operations from the sensitive creature The reasonable soul and its operations from the reasonable creature There is no difference to be found between reasonable creatures and sensible creatures between reasonable sensible and those creatures which are vegetative only having life Between reasonable sensible and vegetative and those that are lifeless in respect of their formal and most noble difference which is a principle of action with the operations thereupon ensuing There remains indeed a difference between them in respect of their outward shape but not in regard of the respect fore-mentioned It takes away the distinction between good and evil actions for that which denyeth actions simply denyeth all kind of actions whether good or evil therefore man in all
of himself as it is a great sin for the greatest sinner to be without hope in respect of Christ Carnal presumption of mercy because our sins are comparatively little lessens the demerit of sin Despair of mercy because our sins are great lessens the Merit of Christ A mans nearness unto or remoteness from the participation of grace according to Gods ordinary Dispensation is not to be judged according to his Commission of more or fewer sins but according to his proceeding in the preparatory work A man may have committed many sins yet being Ministerially disposed in respect of the receiving of Grace he is near to salvation A man may have committed fewer sins yet being without the preparatory Work of Law and Gospel he is far from salvation 'T is not a mans former commission of sin but his continuance in sin that keeps him far from salvation For the fuller clearing the description of Free-grace some Objections are to be removed the former whereof concern the Freeness of grace in respect of Election the other in respect of the Application of the good of Election i.e. that good whereunto we are elected Obj. 1. Ephes 1.4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the Foundation of the world Here the Apostle seemeth to make Christ the Cause of Election therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Though it be be rendred through in English 'T is in in the Greek Election is not a free act Ans The Particle In is not always taken causally 2 Thes 2.13 Because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation in sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth i. e. in sanctification and belief of the truth as the way not as the cause of salvation True the Apostle saith We are elected in Christ but he saith not That we are elected for Christ We are said to be elected in Christ because Christ is the Meritorious cause of the Application of the good of Election so that in Christ in this place is the same with by Christ 1 Thes 5.9 For God hath appointed us to wrath but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ 'T is here said We are saved for Christ because Christ is the cause of our salvation but 't is not said We are elected for Christ because Christ is not the Cause of Election To be elect in Christ and to be elect for Christ are not to be confounded * Est quaedam Dei Dilectio erga nos unde profecta est Missio Christi John 3. Twiss vind grat de elect lib. 1. part 2. deg 3. Sect. 1. Etenim ex dicto Petri constat ChristuÌ„ ut MediatoreÌ„ qualis hic consideratur non esse praedèstinationis causam sed effectum 1 Pet. 1.20 Pisc de praedest N. 97. Meritum Christi nonest absolutum Cham. To. 3. l. 9. c. 1. S. 7. That we may rightly discern this truth of so spiritual and high a nature we must carefully distinguish between Election and the Application of the good of Election between Gods Act of willing grace and glory to be applyed and the actual application of grace and glory willed by God God electeth that is he willeth grace and glory to be applyed unto his people without any respect of the Merit of Christ as a Cause or Motive of that volition but the actual Donation and Application of that grace and glory is for the Merit sake of Jesus Christ Christ is the Effect of Election or of the Love of God but he is the Cause of the salvation of the Elect. He is the Effect of Election therefore called a Servant and said to be elect of God Behold my Servant whom I uphold my Elect in whom my soul delighteth Isai 42.1 His Incarnation Heb. 10.5 His Office John 6.27 His Acceptation in that Office Jes 53.10 all proceeds from the Love of God Election is God himself electing according to that received and regulating Proposition Whatsoever is in God is God To say then That Christ is the Cause of Election or of the Love of God were to say There might be given a Cause of God yea that God is an Effect and consequently that God is not God God hath ordained that the Merit of Christ should be the cause of our salvation but he hath not ordained that Christ should be the Meritorious cause of his so ordaining which implyeth a manifest contradiction Christ then is the Cause of the gift of Eternal life but not of Gods Will to give Eternal life unto us Christ is the Cause of salvation but not of Gods Decree to save Christ Ephes 1.4 is made the Cause of Sanctification And 1 Thes 5.9 he is made the Cause of Salvation but he is no where made the Cause of our Election Christ is the Meritorious Cause the Application of all spiritual Benediction in Heavenly places but not of Election Obj. 2. Ephe. 1.6 To the prayse and glory of his grace wherein he hath made us accepted in the Beloved If accepted in Christ then loved only in Christ therefore Christ is the cause of Gods Love Ans The Love of God is taken for the Act of Love it self viz. Election or for the effect of his love viz. Vocation Justification c. Christ is the cause of the latter not of the former By Acceptation in this place we are to understand Justification of which Christ is the cause He is the cause why we are justified but he is not the cause of Gods Decree to justifie us Gods special Love is his Will to bestow all saving good upon us All which good he willeth to us without Christ as a cause of his volition but not without Christ as a cause of the application thereof 'T is the same Volition or Act of Willing in God by which he willeth the Being of a Mediatour and the Salvation of the Elect for the Merits sake of this Mediatour The Salvation of the Elect is not the last end of the Merit of Christ but Gods Supream end is the Manifestation of the glory of his grace in a way of mercy tempered with justice whereunto both the Merit of Christ and the Salvation of the Elect conjoyned are the means and make one fit Medium thereunto Like Objections from some other Texts of like nature may receive the like answer Notwithstanding it be a truth That Christ is not the cause of Election yet it is also a fundamental Truth That Christ is the Meritorious cause of the Application of the good of Election 1 Thes 5.9 2 Cor. 1.20 Acts 4.12 Particulo gratis excludu tur merita nostri non Christi Bucan loc 31. quest 16. Foedus graetiae nullaÌ„ propriè dictam aut antecedentem conditimem requirit Med. cap. 22. th 19 Ex tali inquam conditione si pendereÌ„t promissiones Dei actum esset de salute nostra Coron artic 4. cap. 3. Cham. Tem. 3. lib. 15. c. 3. 5. Si feceris hoc vives parâ—icula si est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
hearing and learning of the Father John 6.45 The Life act of faith is the souls immediate comming unto Christ upon its being drawn taught of God and having heard and learned of the Father By the infusion of the habit the immediate and irresistable work of the Spirit of grace God converteth the soul By the Life-act the soule being converted converteth it self unto God By the insusion of the habit God maketh us his people Hos 2.23 1 Pet. 2.10 By the Life-act we avouch him to bee our God we say it in truth and lye not we unsay it not again By the habit we are made good trees by the life-act we bring forth good fruit The habit or first act doth not alwayes infer the second it may be without the second but the second alayes supposeth the first Two contrary habits may be together in the same subject as grace and originall concupiscence in the soul heat and cold in the same water but there cannot be two second acts proceeding from those contrary habits at the same time The habit is a principle inhering in the wil as its subject and denominating it willing after the nature of a quality the life-act floweth efficiently from this principle and is accountable to us as a good act unto which God in his mercy hath appointed a reward The habit unto the act Suarez Meraph Tom. post disp 44. Sect. 8. is as the faculty of sight to actuall seeing or vision Aristotle compareth the habit to a man sleeping the act to a man waking The habit of faith which also holds in any other grace precedes the second act or exercise thereof The habit of faith precedes the second act or exercise of faith The habit of faith which also holds in respect of any other grace goeth before the second act commonly called the act or Life-operation or exercise of faith appeareth thus from the order of the first and second act The habit is the first act the Life-operation is the second act First as before Second The nature of the thing teacheth the being of grace which is life it self to be before the vital operation of that grace the grace of faith is the being of faith it self called the Spirit of faith 2 Cor. 4.13 The vitall operation of faith expressed by the acts of coming to Christ Joh. 5.4 6.44 45. Eating of his flesh vers 54. Drinking of his blood ibid. answering the call of God must needs follow the being of faith we cannot act before we are we cannot act acts of life such as coming eating drinking answering are before we are alive the cause precedeth the effect the grace of faith is an efficient cause the Life-operation is the effect All creature-effects i.e. all such effects as proceed from the creature according to the order of second causes whether acts or habits for acquired habits follow acts presuppose a principle virtually or formally containing such effects But supernatural life-operations are creature-effects whose principle is the same with an habit as hath been cleared in the explication of an habit therefore supernatural life-operations presuppose a principle foregoing such acts That supernatural life-operations are creature-effects is manifest grace the new-creature whether considered in part or whole is a creature That creature-effects presuppose a principle in the subject formally or virtually containing such effects appeareth by this induction All creature-effects or actions are either supernaturall proceeding from a supernatural principle infused or inspired or moral whose principle is the Law written in the heart Rom. 2.14 hence are actions of external conformity to the Law or artificial whose principle is right reason or natural which flow from inclination or instinct Obj. 1. Acquired habits as Arts and Sciences ex gr the knowledge of a Physician the faculty of a Scrivener the skill of a Tradesman c. are gotten and caused by multiplied acts therefore all creature-effects do not presuppose principles in the subject formally or virtually containing such acts Resp 1. Albeit acquired habits were such creature-effects as did not presuppose their principle as before in the subject it weakned onely the argument not the cause which proceeds onely concerning such natural creature-effects as acquired habits are not but the argument ex abundanti proving all creature-effects and consequently acquired habits to presuppose some principle of them in the subject concludes the question much more evidently in respect of supernatural creature-effects 2 Notwithstanding there be many artificial acts that may be done without a habit acquired as he may scrible that hath not the faculty of writing well yet even those acts according to the ordinary course of second causes be not done without some inherent principle they may be done without a habit i.e. Such a principle that so affects the subject as to enable it to act promptly easily and with delight but they cannot be done without a principle simply to enable the subject to act Obj. 2. The act of Prophesying was not by way of habit therefore there were not principles thereof in the subject Answ The gift of Prophesie was miraculous therefore falleth not under the compasse of creature-effects proceeding according to the order of second causes 2 Principles are either transient or inherent the act of Prophesie flowed from the transient and passing inspiration of the Spirit whence they prophesied when they were inspired though not from an inherent principle therefore could not prophesie when they pleased We may distinguish between the matter of Prophesie and the act of publishing that matter of Prophesie the matter of Prophesie was miraculously inspired therefore without the limits of the question as before the publication of that matter was a creature-effect proceeding from principles natural rational and spiritual Obj. 3 The act i.e. the Life-act of faith by which the soule commeth to Christ is given in the work of Vocation without any foregoing habit Ans 1 This as it is barely affirmed without any reason given may untill then be sufficiently answered with a denial 2 We must distinguish between Vocation wherein is infused into the soul a power to come to Christ and the terme of Vocation wherein is contained our actuall coming to Christ If the act of faith be given in Vocation without any habit in order of Nature foregoing it then it will follow Either that the soul is not passive in Vocation or Conversion a pure Arminian affection justly opposed and abhorred by the joynt vote of orthodox Divines Or that Vocation precedes believing that is one may be a Member of the Catholick Church and consequently be a Member of Christ in order of Nature at least before he is a belecver which none will affirme Or that Vocation followeth the act of faith whereby the Soule cometh unto Christ which were to affirme Vocation to follow our union active receiving of Christ and Justification an assertion in no meane degree repugnant both unto Divinity and Reason That they i.e. the Arminians suppose the act
Pemble of grace and faith p. 59. in Divine graces goes before the habit is saith Pemble an assertion in Divinity not tollerable which tels us the tree must be good before the fruit can be good and that question which Christ put to the Pharisees Mat. 12.34 How can yee that are evil speake good things is more than any Arminian can tell how to answer Either the Life-operation or Life-act presupposeth life or the Life-act is life it selfe or there may be a Life-act without life But there cannot be a Life-act before life nor is that Life-act life it selfe otherwise there being an intermission or cessation of that act there would be a cessation of life Whence would follow interitus gratiae a falling a way from grace the immortal seed 1 Joh. 3.9 should become mortal the beleever so oft as the act of faith ceaseth by reason of sleep or sinne or what else becometh an unbeleever and dying asleep must either not be saved or be saved without faith therefore the Life-operation necessarily presupposeth life If the Life-act of faith whereby the Soule cometh unto Christ have no habit preceding it in order then it will follow either that there is no infused habit of faith or that this infused habit followeth the act of faith but true it is First that there is an infused habit Secondly that this infused habit followeth not the act of faith as we have already seen Obj. How doth it appeare that there is any habit it being no Scripture terme Ans Though the word Habit were not in the Scripture yet the thing signified by that word being in the Scripture it is sufficient according to that received Proposition Whatsoever is contained in the Scripture either in termes or by manifest consequence is Scripture So Divines defend the use of the terms Effence Person Trinity and Merit c. though the words in so many letters are not there found That the thing which those words habit of faith intend is contained in Scripture is manifest from the nature of a Habit thus An infused inherent permanent quality disposing the subject through assisting grace to supernatural acts is the thing signified or intended by the words Habit of faith the grace of saving faith is such an infused inherent permanent quality therefore the grace of faith is a Habit this inherent quality or habit is in the Scripture called the Spirit of faith 2 Cor. 4.13 a power Eph. 3.20 the will Phil. 2.13 the lust of the Spirit Gal. 5.17 the Divine nature 2 Pet. 1.4 the seed remaining 1 Joh. 3.9 for though the most appellations mentioned seeme not to be given to the grace of faith only but to the whole frame of habitual grace yet in that they are given to the whole frame of habitual grace yet in that they are given to the whole whereof faith is a part they are also given to faith as a part of that whole The word habit is a Scripture terme used Heb. 5.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rendered habit by the Latine Translators generally who by reason of the habit have their senses exercised to discerne good and evil the inherent faculty of doing good and eschewing evil is called an habit The infused and inherent grace of faith whether it be called a power principle or habit no way prejudiceth the truth asserted by which of these termes soever it be called the thing is the same therefore the cause is the same and as firme So cleare is the doctrine of infused habits whereof faith is one that many of the School-men both ancient and late Dispositio aut habit us ille supernaturalis c. requiritur simpliciter ad actum istum supernaturalem Rescript Ames ad Grev. c. 10. attest thereunto Those habits Ad quaestionem tamen dico quod oportet ponere fidem infusam propter auctoritatom Scripturae Sanctorum Scot. lib. 3. dist 33. qu. 1. idem lib. 1. dist 17.9 3. 11.30 whereby man is disposed to such an end as exceeds Nature are of necessity in men by Divine infusion We ought faith Scotus himselfe to beleeve the habit of faith infused for the authority of the Scripture and of the Saints Scotus is commended for deducing out of the Master of the Sentences such inferences as might be apprehended not to have denied all supernatural habits Valentia Valentia Tom. 2. disp 4.9.3 p 4. Vbi fusè tractat quaestionem Utrum aliqui habit us infundant ur nobis supernaturaliter à Deo unwilling that the Council of Trent should bee thought to have denied infused habits notwithstanding he denieth not the testimony of Sotus who was there present to be true namely that the Council no wonder if that were difficult to be pronounced by the Adversaries of the Doctrine of Grace industriously abstained from the word habit yet endeavoureth to prove the thing signified by the word being taught by them not the dislike of the word but rather some other reason mentioned by him to have been the cause why they abstained from the use thereof In the same place hee asserreth the being of Habits from Argument Scripture and Authority and mentions other of the principal School-men like-minded with himselfe The Arminians though they could not be ignorant how much it concerned their cause to oppose the habit of faith yet none of them openly denied it before Grevinchovius Faith faith Fstius both in Infants Fides est habitus à Deo infusus tam in baptismo parvulorum quam in justificatione adultorum Estius l. 3. d. 23. s 1. 11. collat is cum dist 24. s 1. and in persons of discretion is a habit infused of God alone In receiving the habit of Grace In receiving the habit of Grace the Soul is passive whether we are to understand thereby the solitary habit of saving faith or the habitual frame of the New Creature of which before chap. 11. the Soule is passive The proof of this Proposition appeares by Scriptures Arguments Authorities By Scriptures thus Phil. 2.13 For it is God which worketh in you Velle non de substantia voluntatis sed de nova qualitate accipitur Bucanâ—oc 18 qu. 10. both to will and to doe of his owne pleasure The Apostle here distinguisheth between doing and a power to doe which hee calleth the will both these are wrought of God to will or power to doe he worketh without us to doe he worketh by us in the first we are passive and not active manifest it is the Soul cannot actually doe whilst it is but yet receiving power to doe in the second we are not only passive but also active yet so as wee are passive before we are active A second Scripture for the confirming of this truth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we have Phil. 3.12 But I follow after if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ The Apostle here expresly as those that understand the Original know makes mention of himselfe in
which is of God Phil. 3.9 Because God is the Author of it it is opposite to our righteousness namely that whereof we are the workers or the subjects Phil. 3.9 and to the righteousness of the Law Rom. 10.5 namely that which is prescribed in the Law and according unto which the Law justifieth 'T is God onely that was the Inventor of this Robe and Garment of Justification The meritorious cause is the whole legal obedience of Christ consisting of his habitual conformity The meritorious cause together with his active and passive obedience from the instant of his Incarnation unto his passion inclusively performed by him as God-man our Mediator and Surety in way of Covenant The application of Redemption whereof Justification is a part is due unto the Elect for Christs sake according to order of Justice by vertue of the promise made unto Christ Isa 53.10 Four things are to be attended in the meritorious cause First The Person Secondly The Office Thirdly The Service Fourthly The Merit whereupon debt ariseth according to order of Justice The obedience of Christ was meritorious not from the dignity of the Person onely as such but from the constitution of God who by his free promise made himself a Debtor of the application of salvation unto them for whom Christ satisfied Hereof see Chap. 10. Though the word Merit be not in the Scripture yet the sense of it is frequent Act. 20.28 which he hath purchased with his own blood which is the earnest of our inheritance untill the redemption of the purchased possession Eph. 1.14 For God hath not appointed us unto wrath Ad sensum meriti accedit vox 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 verbum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Par. in Ro. 5. but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ 1 Thess 5.9 i.e. Vnto the salvation purchased by our Lord Jesus Christ The word translated Purchased in the two former places is used in the third and is in effect with the Merit To this purpose the death of Christ is called a Ransome Matth. 20.28 Marc. 10.45 a Counterprice turned a Ransome 1 Tim. 2.6 A Redemption that is a restoring of a Captive by way of buying his freedom at a full price Luke 1.68 2.38 Heb. 9.12 Gal. 1.14 Heb 9.15 1 Cor. 1.30 A propitiation for sin or expiation for sin Rom. 3.25 Heb. 9.5 1 Joh. 2.2 Christs obedience merited Justification much more than Adams disobedience demerited condemnation Rom. 5.18 Had Adam stood he had merited life for himselfe much more Christ by vertue of the Promise whereby God hath freely indebted himselfe to give life according to the order of Justice Mediatorly satisfaction unto the Law for the Elect whereunto he was no debtor must be acknowledged to have merited Christ hath procured a right of remission of sins Christus nactus est jus remittendorum peccatorum sed non ojusmodi jus quo possint remitti sed quo remitti debent omnia illis pro quibus per mortem ejus satisfactum est alioquin injustus esset Deus qui non ageret cum Christo filio suo secundum exigentiam meritorum ejus Twiss de permiss l. 2. cr pag. 79. Vide etiam p. 84. 85. yea such a right whereby they not only may be remitted but whereby they ought to be remitted unto all those for whom he satisfied by his death otherwise God should be unjust who should not doe with his Son Christ according to the exigence of his Merits Christs merit is absolute in respect of its efficacy though the obedience could not have merited absolutely i. e. of it selfe without Gods acceptation The Material cause of our Justification The Material cause is the whole course of the active and passive obedience of Christ together with his habitual conformity unto the Law The righteousnesse of Christ is either essential Willet on Rom. 5. cont 25. wherewith he is righteous as he is God this is increated or Personal wherewith he is righteous as man though he had never been Mediator Willet Synops cent 4. err 57. for Christ being both God and Man must needs be a righteous Man this though created abideth with him and is not imputed unto any Or fide-jussory that is Mediatorly namely the righteousnesse of him as a Surety Et ejus obedientia nobis in justitiam imputatur Calv. 1 Cor. 1.30 Perk. on Gal. 2. v. 16 17. This is that which was in and performed by Christ as Mediator for the Elect and so remaines in him as its formal subject that it s made the Beleevers by imputation as really as if it had been wrought and performed by them Not the passive obedience of Christ alone but both the active and passive obedience of Christ is the Matter of our Justification The passive obedience of Christ were not obedience if it were not in some kinde active his Soul set it self an offering for sin Isa 53.10 He layed down his life according to the commandement received from his Father Joh. 10.18 He gave himselfe Tit. 2.14 Christ in suffering obeyed and in obeying suffered there cannot otherwise any sufficient reason be given of so long viz. for the space of neer thirty four years and so much active obedience it must be yeelded either to have been for himself or for us not for himself there was no use of it If for us what better reason can be given than this the active obedience after his suffering is of use for the demonstration and application of the good of Redemption and therein of Justification Rom. 5.25 if holinesse was requisite in Christ before his suffering that he might purchase our redemption Heb. 7.26 1 Pet. 19. and the actions of Christ after his suffering were of use for the application of Redemption Rom. 8.34 Heb. 7.25 1 Cor. 15.14 and therein of Justification in particular Rom. 5.25 How wel doth it agree that his active obedience both before and in his suffering should be looked at as done in obedience to the Law in our stead and consequently as matter of our Justification This two-fold righteousnesse answereth to our two-fold misery viz. of the guilt of sinue and the defect of righteousnesse Rom. 3.22 23. If the Justification of a sinner consisteth not only in the non-imputation of sinne but also in the imputation of righteousnesse then not only the passive but also the active obedience of Christ is required to our justification But the Justification of a sinner consisteth not only in the not-imputation of sinne but also in the imputation of righteousnesse it is not enough for us not to be unjust but we must also be just therefore not only the passive but the active obedience of Christ is requisite to our Justification That obedience which the Law requireth unto life Christ fully performed but the Law required active obedience unto life Levit. 18.5 Gal. 3.10 which if a man doe he shal live in them and in case of sinne hath required passive obedience for
in that day that thou eatest therof thou shalt surely dye Gen. 2.17 that is either in thy selfe or in thy surety therefore Christ performed both active and passive obedience If the Law requireth not only passive but active obedience and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the Law then he in whom they beleeve and that as the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience but the Law requireth active and passive obedience as is evident in the foregoing Arguments and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the righteousnesse of the Law Rom. 8.4.10.4 therefore he in whom they beleeve and that as he is the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience This further appeareth in that Christ was to answer the Law instead of the Elect and that the Law pronounceth every one accursed that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to doe them Gal. 3.10 If Christ had no done what the Command required of us as wel as suffered for our disobedience unto the command Obedientia Christi est una copulativa Alsted Theol Sect 3 loc 22 how wil it appear either that Christ is a perfect Saviour or that any man can be saved the whole obedience of Christ both active and passive make up one intire and perfect obedience why should any particle of the one or the other be excluded As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Rom. 5.19 It were too strait an interpretation to restraine the words to his passive obedience only And for their sake I will sanctifie my selfe Joh. 17.19 Obj. Justification is often in the Scripture ascribed unto the death of Christ Mat. 20.28 and 26.28 Act. 20.28 Rom. 3.24 25. and elsewhere therefore not the active and passive but the passive obedience of Christ only seems to be the matter of our Justification Ans 'T is true that Justification is often ascribed in the Scripture unto the death of Christ but to his death as the Meritorious cause not as the material cause of our Justification neither yet is it ascribed to his death as the Meritorious cause wholly but partly a part being put for the whole viz. the passive for both active and passive obedience a trope often used in the Scripture and as in the places alleged the part or at least that which is as a part is put for the whole in respect of the cause so also is there a part put for the whole in respect of the effect of that cause viz. Justification which is but a part of the good of Redemption is put for the whole good thereof Take for example Mat. 26.28 For this is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins by remission of sins which is but a part of the good of Redemption we are to understand the whole good of Redemption with the application of it Que. If the obedience of Christ be an ingredient into the Meritorious cause and be also the whole Material cause how then doth the obedience of Christ as it is an ingredient into the Meritorious cause differ from the obedience of Christ as it is the Materiall cause of our Justification Ans In the Meritorious cause it is considered together with the Person Office actual execution of that Office and Merit In the Material cause it is considered as distinct from all these They are distinguished as the cause and effect Obedience considered in the Material cause is in part the effect of obedience considered in the Meritorious cause they are distinguished as the whole and the part Christs obedience is but a part only of the Meritorious but the whole of the Material cause in the Meritorious cause it is both a Legal and Evangelical act Christs obeying the Law is Legal but his obeying it for us is Evangelical in the Material cause 't is only an Evangelical act it is given to us freely Willet Synops cent 4. error 56. qu. 1. in that it is considered formally in this vertually though Christ obeyed the Law formally yet 't is not the formal working of obedience or doing of the command but the good vertue and efficacy thereof that is imputed to the Beleever there it is considered as wrought by him for us here as applied to us there it is as a garment made here as a garment put on there it may be compared to the payment of the Mony by the Surety for the Debtor here to the Mony both payed and accompted unto the use of the Debtor The formal cause of Justification is by imputation The formal Cause Imputation is the actual and effectual application of the righteousnesse of Christ unto the Beleever To impute reckon or account in this place intend the same thing the same word in Greek being translated indifferently by any of these three To impute Perkins in Gal. câ—p 3. ver 6. is to reckon that unto another which in way of righteousnesse whether of Justice or Grace or both belongs unto him Imputation is either Legal imputing unto us that which we have done so the word is used Rom. 4.4 or Evangelical imputing unto us that which another hath done thus to impute is for God in his act of justifying a sinner to account the righteousnesse of Christ which is not ours formally not by debt to be ours by Grace as verily and really as if it were wrought by us and in this sense the word is used ten times Rom. 4. v. 3.5 6.8 9 10 11.22 23 24. The justification of a Beleever is either by righteousnesse inherent or imputed but not by righteousnesse inherent therefore by righteousnesse imputed The righteousnesse whereby man is justified before God is perfect but the inherent righteousnesse of a Beleever is not perfect It were destructive to the merit and righteousnesse of Christ to say we were justified by a righteousnesse inherent in us We are made righteous by the obedience of Christ as we are made unrighteous by the disobedience of Adam But this is by imputation therefore All justification of the ungodly that is such as are under the guilt and power of their-sins is by imputed righteousness but the Justification of a Beleever Justificat impios in sensu diviso non in sensu composito Trelcat sen Justificat impios antecedenter non consequenter Paraeus in Rom. 4.5 is the Justification of the ungodly Rom 4.5 therefore God justifieth the ungodly viz. objectively not subjectively that is such who were ungodly until they were justified but doe not remain ungodly being justified That Justification which is by the righteousnesse of another is by way of imputation but the justification of a Beleever is by the righteousnesse of another that is such the matter whereof is the righteousnesse of Christ as we saw largely in the Material cause of our Justification Paul calleth Sanctification his righteousnesse Phil. 3.9 for