of this Syllogisme is evidently proved out of the law Hee that doth these things shall live in them Cursed is every one which abideth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to doe them The Minor is out of doubt Levit. 18.5 Deut. 27.26 Why our workes are imperfect seeing wee doe many evill things which we ought to leave undone and we leave many good works undone which we should doe yea we mingle much evill with that good we doe that is we doe it amisse The complaints and daily prayers of Saints are witnesse hereof Forgive us our sins Enter not into judgment with thy servant Wherefore imperfect works can make no perfect righteousnesse Psal 143.2 This is the first cause why we cannot be justified by our works namely Ten causes why wee cannot be justified by workes or partly by faith and partly by workes 1. Because our justice should by this meanes be imperfect seeing our works are imperfect Many other causes there are For 2. Though our workes were perfect yet are they due debt so that by them we cannot acquit our sins that are past When ye have done all those things which are commanded you say We are unprofitable servants we have done that which was our duty to doe 3. They are none of ours but Gods who worketh them in us 4. They are temporary and have no proportion with eternall rewards Luke 17.10 whereas between a merit and reward there must be some proportion 5. They are the effects of justification therefore not the cause 6. If by them we were justified we should have whereof to boast but the Scripture saith Not of workes lest any man should boast himselfe 7. The conscience should be destitute of solid or sure comfort 8. Christ should have died without a cause 9. There should not be the same way to salvation in both Testaments if Abraham were justified by faith onely and wee by works Ephes 2.9 Rom. 4.16 whether by works alone or works joyned with faith it skilleth not 10. Christ should be no perfect Saviour because some part of our righteousnesse and salvation should be without him Gal. 2.21 Quest 63. How is it that our good works merit nothing seeing God promiseth that he will give a reward for them both in this life and in the life to come Answ That reward is not given of merit but of grace a Luke 17.10 The Explication IN this Question is contained a prevention of an argument of the Papists brought for justification before God for our workes and merits Obj. 1. Reward presupposeth merit so that where reward is there is also merit for Reward and Merit are correlatives whereof if one be put the other is put also But everlasting life is proposed as a reward for good workes Therefore also the merit of good workes is everlasting life Answ The Major is sometimes true as concerning creatures as when men may merit or deserve of men But neither alwaies among men doth it follow that there is merit where there is reward for men also oftentimes give rewards not of merit or desert Now it is unproperly said of God that he proposeth eternall life unto our works as a reward for we can merit nothing at Gods hand by our works Or if they thus presse and urge their reason Object That is a merit whereunto a reward appertaineth But a reward appertaineth to good workes Therefore by order of justice good workes are merits Answ That is a merit whereunto a reward appertaineth by force of covenant or bond But the reward of good works is of grace In reward two things are to be considered 1. Obligation or binding 2. Compensation or recompensing Here is no obligation but compensation followeth works through grace There is therefore a reward of workes because compensation followeth them and God for this cause especially promiseth to reward our workes 1. To testifie unto us that good workes please him Three causes why God promiseth to reward our workes 2. To teach us that eternall life is proposed onely to them that strive and labour painefully 3. Because hee will as surely give us a reward as if wee had deserved it Hither may be referred all such like arguments of the Papists whereby they labour to establish the merit of workes Object 2. Wee are justified by faith Faith is a worke Therefore wee are justified by workes Ans 1. The consequence of this reason is denied because more is in the conclusion than in the premisses of which premisses this onely followeth Therefore wee are justified by that worke which wee grant to wit as by an instrument or meane not as any impellent cause as themselves understand it for wee are justified by faith as by a meane of attaining our justification and wee are not justified for faith that is for the merit of faith 2. The kind of affirmation is diverse For in the Major faith is understood with relation to Christs merit in the Minor it is taken absolutely and properly Object 3. Our justice is that whereby wee are formally or essentially just Therefore wee are by faith formally and essentially just Answ The consequence of this reason is to be denied because the kinde of affirmation is diverse For the Major is meant properly but the Minor correlatively and figuratively * Per Metalepsin else it were false For properly not faith but the correlative object of faith namely Christs merit which faith beholdeth and applieth to it selfe is our justice 2. Either there are foure termes in this Syllogisme because the Major treateth of Legall justice the Minor of Evangelicall or else the Major is false For Evangelicall justice is not formally in us as whiteness is in a wall but is without us even in Christ and is made ours by imputation and application through faith Object 4. That which is imputed unto us for righteousnesse for it we are righteous Faith is imputed to us for righteousnesse as Paul saith Therefore For faith we are righteous and not only By faith Ans Againe the kind of affirmation is of proper in the Major proposition made figurative in the Minor The Major is true of that which is properly and by it selfe imputed for righteousnesse The Minor is true of that which is correlatively imputed for righteousnesse because by faith is correlatively understood the object of faith unto which faith hath relation for Christs merit which is apprehended by faith is properly our justice and the formall cause of our justice The efficient of our justice is God applying that merit of Christ unto us The instrument all cause of our justice is faith And therefore this proposition we are justified by faith being Legally understood with the Papists is not true but blasphemous but being taken correlatively that is Evangelically with relation to Christs merit it is true For the correlative of faith is the merit of Christ which faith also as a joynt Relative or correlative
respecteth and as an instrument apprehendeth Object 5. Evill workes condemne Therefore good workes justifie Ans 1. These contraries are not matches For our evill workes are perfectly evill our good workes are imperfectly good 2. Although our good workes were perfectly good yet should they not deserve eternall life because they are debts Unto evill workes a reward is due by order of justice unto good works not so because wee are obliged and bound to do them For the creature is obliged to his Creator neither may hee of the contrary binde God unto him by any workes or meanes to benefit him And evill workes in their very intent despight God but good works yield him no profit or delight Object 6. Hee that doth righteousnesse is righteous Therefore not hee that beleeveth Answ 1. Hee is righteous before men that is by doing righteousnesse 1 John 3.7 hee declareth himselfe righteous to others but before God wee are righteous not by doing righteousnesse but by beleeving as it is written Rom. 3.20 By the workes of the Law shall no flesh be justified in his sight 2. John sheweth there not how wee are righteous but what the righteous are as if he should say that he that is regenerated is also justified because by doing righteousnesse he testifieth to the world that he is justified So then in this reason the fallacy is a taking that which is no cause of justification instead of the true cause thereof Object 7. Christ saith Many sins are forgiven her because shee loved much Luke 7.47 Therefore good workes are the cause of justification Ans 1. Christ here reasoneth from the latter to the former from the effect which cometh after to the cause which goeth before In that the woman loved Christ much Christ thence gathereth that many sins were forgiven her and because there was a great feeling in that woman of the benefit it must needs therefore be that the benefit is great and many sins are forgiven her That this is the meaning of Christs words appeareth by the parable which he there useth 2. Not every thing that is the cause of Consequence in reason is also the cause of the Consequent or thing it selfe which followeth in that consequence of reason Wherefore it is a fallacy of the Consequent if it be concluded Therefore for her love many sins are forgiven her For the particle because which Christ useth doth noâ— alwaies signifie the cause of the thing following It followeth not The Sun is risen because it is day Therefore the day is the cause of the rising of the Sun The contrary rather is true Quest 64. But doth not this doctrine make men carelesse and profane Ans No For neither can it be but they which are incorporated into Christ through faith should bring forth the fruits of thankfulnesse a Mat. 7.18 John 15.5 The Explication THis Question of the Catechisme is a prevention of the Papists slander against the doctrine of Justification by faith Ob. 1. Doctrine which maketh men secure and profane is not true and therefore not to be delivered But this doctrine of free justification by faith maketh men secure and profane Therefore it is not true nor to be taught or delivered in the Church Ans Here is a fallacy of accident If the doctrine of free justification by faith make men secure this happeneth by accident The naturall effect of this doctrine is an earnest desire of shewing our thankfulnesse towards God But this accident objected by the adversaries of this truth falleth out not because men doe apply but because men doe not apply to themselves the doctrine of grace Repl. 1. Even those things which fall out to be evill by an accident are to be eschewed But this doctrine maketh men by an accident evill Therefore it is to be eschewed Ans Those things which fall out to be evils by an accident are to be eschewed if there remaine no greater and weightier cause for which they are not to be omitted which become evill to men through their owne default But wee have necessarie and weighty cause why this doctrine ought to be delivered and by no meanes to be omitted namely the commandement and glory of God and the salvation of the Elect. Repl. 2. That which cannot hart wee need not to eschew But according to the doctrine of justification by faith sinnes to come cannot hurt us because Christ hath satisfied for all both which are past and which are to come Therefore wee need not to beware of sinnes to come Now this is apparently absurd Therefore the doctrine whence this Consequent ariseth is likewise absurd Ans 1. We answer to the Major of this reason that we need not beware and take heed of that which cannot hurt namely whether it be taken heed of or no. But sins to come hurt not that is hurt not them which are heedfull and penitent yet they hurt them who are carelesse and unrepentant 2. Therefore we also deny the Minor for God is alwaies offended with sins and his displeasure is the greatest hurt that can befall man Further sins bereave us of conformity with God and purchase bodily pains unto the faithfull howsoever eternall paines be remitted unto them Hither belong other arguments of the Papists wherewith they oppugne this doctrine of Justification by faith such as are these following Object 2. That which is not in the Scripture is not to be taught or retained That wee are justified by faith only is not in the Scripture Therefore it is not to be retained Ans To the Major we say that which is not in the Scripture neither in words nor in sense is not to be retained But that we are justified by faith only is contained in Scripture as touching the sense thereof for we are said to be justified freely by grace without the works of the law Rom. 3 2â— 28. Gal. 2.15 Ephes 2.8 9. Titus 3.5 1 John 1.7 without the law not of works not of our selves not of any righteousnesse which wee have done by faith without merit Also the bloud of Christ is said to cleanse us from all sin And these are all one To be justified by faith alone and To be justified by the bloud and merit of Christ apprehended by faith only by receiving and beleeving deserving nothing by faith or other works Now the reasons why we are to retain against the Papists the exclusive particle only have been heretofore declared and inlarged Object 3. That which is not alone doth not justifie alone Faith is not alone Therefore faith doth not justifie alone Ans If the conclusion be so understood as it followeth out of the premisses on this wise Faith therefore doth not justifie alone that is being alone the argument is of force For justifying faith is never alone without works as her effects Faith justifieth alone but is not alone when it justifieth having works accompanying it as effects of it but not as joynt causes with it of justification But if
wit as touching their accomplishment and consummation Some reconcile the difference of these two in this manner Faith apprehendeth the promises proposed in the Creed concerning things to come Hope the things themselves promised which are to come But this reconcilement is not so popular and easie to be conceived by the vulgar fort as is the other Object 2. Faith is the evidence of things which are not seen Therefore not of things present Answ It is the evidence of things which are not seen to wit by the outward sense but they are seen by the eyes of the mind even as if they did lie open to the eyes of the body Again they are not seen as is afore-shewed in respect of their accomplishment and consummation 5. What are the causes of faith How the H. Ghost is the principall efficient cause of faith Ephes 2.8 THe first and principall efficient cause of faith both historicall temporary and of working miracles is the holy Ghost howbeit hee is cause of these by his divine generall working only but he is cause of justifying faith by a speciall kinde of working By the grace of God ye are saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God who enlightneth the minde that it may understand the word and moveth the will that it may assent unto the word once understood Object The divell hath historicall faith It is therefore wrought in him by the holy Ghost Ans Yea even whatsoever faith is in the divell is wrought by the Spirit of God but that by a generall and universall working only as hath been said whereby he worketh in all not by a speciall and proper action because by such a kind of working the holy Ghost fashioneth and frameth a justifying faith in the elect alone For verily whatsoever knowledge and understanding is in divels and hypocrites God effecteth it by his Spirit but not so as to regenerate or justifie them that they might rightly acknowledge him to be the authour of this gift and magnifie him therefore for after this manner hee worketh faith in the elect alone The divels therefore and hypocrites have faith from the Spirit of God but the elect from the Spirit of God sanctifying them The word of God preached the instrumentall cause of faith Rom. 1.16 Rom 10 17. 1 Cor 4.15 The instrumentall cause of faith in generall is the whole word of God comprehended in the books of the old and new Testament in which writings also are contained many works and miracles of God besides the word But the chief and proper instrument of justifying faith is the preaching of the Gospel The Gosel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that beleeveth Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God This instrument doth the holy Ghost use yet not as necessary in regard of his working but arbitrary and at his own good pleasure both to stir up faith in us and to nourish strengthen and increase the same Wherefore ordinarily justifying faith is never engendered in those who are of yeers to receive it without the preaching of the Gospel Speciall revelation the cause of faith of miracles The formall cause of faith The object of faith The subject of faith The ends of faith The cause of that faith which worketh miracles is not simply the word of God but there must necessarily come thereto an especiall or immediate revelation from God The formall cause of justifying faith is a certain knowledge and confidence in Christ The object of it is whole Christ and his benefits promised in the word The subject or part of man wherein it remaineth is the understanding will and heart of man The end or finall cause 1. The glory of God to wit the celebration of his truth justice bounty mercy which hee hath shewed in the sending of his Son and in the giving of faith in him 2. Our salvation that wee may receive the blessings which are promised in the word 6. What are the effects of faith The effects of faith THe effects of justifying faith are 1. The justifying of us before God 2. Joy resting on God and peace of conscience Being justified by faith we have peace with God 3. Our whole conversion regeneration and all our obedience which followeth faith and beginneth at the same time with faith For by faith God purifieth our hearts Rom. 5.1 To the effects of faith appertaine also the consequents thereof that is increase of spirituall and corporall gifts and the receiving of the things themselves which faith aimeth at Acts 15.9 The first then and immediate effect of justifying faith is justification from this afterwards flow all other benefits purchased by the bloud of Christ which all we beleeve to be given us by faith faith it selfe being the cause of them for That which is the cause unto any cause of any effect is likewise a cause of that effect If thererefore faith be the next cause of our justification in respect of us it is also a cause of those things which necessarily follow justification Thy faith hath saved thee Luke 8.48 In a word The effects of faith are justification and regeneration which is begun here and is to be perfected in the life to come Rom. 3.28 10.10 Acts 13.39 7. Unto whom faith is given Justifying faith is given to all the elect and to them only Joh. 6.44 10.26 Matth. 13.11 Acts 13.48 Rom. 8.30 Ephes 2.8 Rom. 10.16 2 Thes 3.2 Mat. 7.22 JUstifying faith is only proper to the elect and that to all of them for it is given to the elect alone and to all the elect even to infants as concerning some inclination No man can come to mee except the Father which hath sent mee draw him Ye beleeve not for ye are not of my sheep It is given to you to know the secrets of heaven but unto them it is not given And they beleeved as many as were ordained to everlasting life Whom he predestinated them also he called and whom hee called them also hee justified Faith is the gift of God All have not hearkened to the Gospel For all men have not faith Temporary faith and the faith of miracles is given to those who are members of the visible Church only that is hypocrites Have wee not by thy Name done many great works Cast out divels But now neverthelesse this faith of miracles ceaseth which flourished in the primitive Church for that now the doctrine is sufficiently confirmed Historicall faith all they have who are by profession of the Church whether they be of the godly or reprobates yea and they also who are not members of the Church but enemies as divels and tyrants Historicall is a part of justifying faith because there can be no assent or perswasion of a thing which is not first known Object Historicall faith is a good work The divels have historicall faith Therefore they have good works Answ Historicall
in some sort made ours even by application The subject indeed wherein this justice is inherent is Christ we are the object to which this justice is directed sith it is imputed unto us 2. That the word Imputation is more strict than Application The former is spoken of God only the latter of God and us 3. That God otherwise applieth Christs justice unto us than we doe God applyeth it by imputation and we apply it by faith and acceptation 4. That this phrase of the Church To justifie The signification of the phrase To justifie proved by the Grammaticall derivation of it in divers languages In hipâ—â—â— signifieth not legally that is To make one just who is unjust by infusing the quality of justice but evangelically that is To repute him which is unjust for just and righteous and to absolve him from all guilt and not to punish him and this for anothers justice and satisfaction imputed unto him So the Scripture useth this word and almost in all tongues it beareth no other signification for the Hebrew word Hadzdik Exod. 23. â— Prov. 17.15 signifieth To absolve a guilty person To pronounce him guiltlesse I will not justifie a wicked person He that justifieth the wicked and he that condemneth the just even they both are abomination to the Lord. The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth sometime To pronounce a man just and righteous and sometimes To punish an offender and both on good knowledge of his cause by due examination and judiciall processe as Suidas well observeth Mat. 12.37 So saith Christ By thy words thou shalt be justified The former signification is used two waies in Scripture For either it signifies not to condemne but To absolve in judgement Rom. 8.33 as Who shall condemne the Elect of God it is God that justifieth Hee departed justified rather than the other or it signifieth To pronounce and proclaime just Luke 18.14 As Wisedome is justified of her children That thou mayest be justified in thy sayings Howbeit both significations in this Question come to one end But that to justifie should be used for to make just or to infuse an habit of justice is no where found amongst the Latines and were it read in Latine Authours yet in Scripture and in the Church it is otherwise used as the alledged places apparently prove which can be understood no other way than of the absolution and free accepting a sinner to grace and favour Who shall accuse Gods Elect it is God that justifieth The Publicane departed justified that is absolved and more accepted of God than the Pharisee Acts 13.39 For from all things from which yee could not be justified by the Law of Moses by him every one that beleeveth is justified Here To be justified doth evidently signifie to be absolved Rom. 3.24 26 28. 4.5 5.9 10. to receive remission of sins All are justified freely by his grace A justifier of him which is of the faith of Jesus A man is justified by faith without the workes of the law To him that worketh not but beleeveth in him that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse Being now justified by his bloud Reconciled to God by the death of his Son 6. Why Christs satisfaction is made ours or in what sort God imputeth it unto us for righteousnesse The cause of Christs satisfaction applyed and imputed is in God only not in us THe perfect fulfilling of the law performed by Christ for us is made ours or applyed unto us through the alone and free mercy of God as who from everlasting did predestinate us to this grace and freely chose us in Christ to whom he might apply of his meere grace of faith that justice and righteousnesse at his appointed time according to the good pleasure of his will as the Apostle speaketh that is according to his meere good pleasure not being moved with any holinesse which hee foresaw would be in us The reason is because there can be no good thing in us except God first worke in us Wherefore all imagination and affirmation of merit is to be taken away as which fighteth with the grace of God and is a deniall of his divine grace For the grace and mercy of God is the only cause of both applications He of his goodnes infinite and passing measure applyeth Christs merit unto us and maketh that we also may apply the same unto us The cause therefore why this application is wrought is in God alone but not at all in us that is it is neither any thing foreseen in us neither also our apprehension and receiving of this justice for all the gifts and graces which are in us are effects of the application of Christs merit and therefore that merit of Christ is no way applied unto us for the works sake which wee doe but this is done as the Apostle teacheth Ephes 1.5 According to the good pleasure of his will Whereupon also it is said What hast thou that thou hast not received 1 Cor. 4.7 By grace are yee saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God Ephes 2.8 Christ is then in respect of our justification 1. As the subject and matter wherein our justice is 2. As the impellent cause because he obtaineth it 3. As the chief efficient because he together with his Father doth justifie us and giveth us faith whereby wee beleeve and apprehend it The mercy of God is as the impellent cause thereof in God Christs satisfaction is the formall cause of our justification giving the very life and being unto it Our faith is the instrumentall cause apprehending and applying unto us the justice or righteousnesse of Christ We must note therefore How we are justified by the grace of God how by Christs merit and how by faith that we are justified by the grace of God by the merit of Christ and by faith but by each of these in a severall sense and meaning The first position is understood of the impulsive cause which is in God the second of the formall cause in Christ the third of the instrumentall cause in us We are justified by the mercy or grace of God as a principall impellent cause wherewith God being urged and moved justifieth and saveth us We are justified by the merit of Christ partly as by the formall cause of our justification inasmuch as by Christs obedience applied unto us we are accepted of God and being clothed as it were with this raiment are reputed just partly as by an impulsive and meritorious cause inasmuch as God absolveth us for his sake Wee are justified by faith as by an instrumentall cause whereby we apprehend Christs righteousnesse imputed unto us The common received opinion saith We are justified by faith correlatively that is we are justified by that whereunto faith hath relation to wit the merit of Christ which faith apprehendeth For faith and the
satisfaction of Christ are correlatives that is have a mutuall respect each to other the one being that which receiveth and the other that which is received This kind of speech is well and probably used because hereby faith is understood of the formall cause of justification that so the sense may be Christs merit justifieth us and not faith it selfe that which is apprehended doth justifie us and not the instrument which doth apprehend Neverthelesse this proposition We are justified by faith may be understood also without relation to wit we are justified by faith as a meane But this proposition of the Apostle Faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse and other the like Rom. 4.3 are necessarily to be understood with a relation to Christs merit and justice Faith was imputed unto him for righteousnesse as faith is the apprehending instrument of righteousnesse apprehended faith being as it were the hand wherewith the justice of Christ is received Quest 61. Why affirmest thou that thou art made righteous by faith only Answ Not for that I please God through the worthinesse of meere faith but because onely the satisfaction righteousnesse and holinesse of Christ is my righteousnesse before God a 1 Cor. 1.30 2.2 and I cannot take hold of it or apply it unto my selfe and other way than by faith b 1 Joh. 5.20 The Explication Three causes why faith alone justifieth WE say we are justified by faith alone 1. Because we are justified by the object of faith onely to wit by the merit of Christ alone besides which there is no justice of ours nor any part thereof For we are justified freely for Christs sake without works There is nothing which can be our justice and righteousnesse before God either in whole or in part besides Christs merit only by receiving and beleeving anothers justice we are justified not by working nor by meriting but by an apprehension and acceptation only we are just and righteous All works are excluded yea faith it selfe as it is a vertue or work 2. Because the proper act and operation of faith is for a man to apprehend and apply unto himself Christs righteousnesse yea faith is nothing else than the acceptation it self or apprehension of anothers justice or of the merit of Christ 3. Because faith only is the instrument which apprehendeth Christs satisfaction Hence it is evident for what causes we are to retain the exclusive particle Onely Foure causes why we are to maintaine against Papists that faith only justifieth Rom. 3 24 28. Marke 5 36. and to maintaine it against the Papists namely 1. For declaration of that which Paul speaketh Wee are justified freely by grace without works likewise of that which Christ saith Onely beleeve 2. That whatsoever works and merits of ours or of others may be excluded from being causes of justification and faith may be understood only with relation and respect to Christs merit which is our justice 3. That not only our merits but even faith it self may be wholly excluded from that which is received by faith and the sense may be we are justified by faith alone that is not by meriting but only by receiving as when wee say This poor man is enriched only by receiving the almes of charitable disposed people where all works and merits yea the very receiving of almes if it be considered as a merit are excluded Therefore Paul saith alwaies that we are justified a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by faith and b 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 through faith as by an instrument but no where faith c 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for faith as the Papists say who will admit both these manners of speaking as if faith were not indeed the application whereby we apply unto our selves Christs justice but were also besides a certain work or merit whereby we deserve to be just which is quite repugnant to the nature of faith For if for faith we were just and righteous then faith were now no longer an acceptation of anothers righteousnesse but were a merit and cause of our own justice neither should it receive anothers satisfaction which now it should have no need of 4. That we may know what necessity there is of faith unto justification and may understand that we are not justified by the merit of faith and yet are not justified without faith apprehending the justice of Christ because it is the proper act of faith to lay hold on his righteousnesse 5. The Orthodoxall or right beleeving Fathers oft-times urge the exclusive particle Origen in Rom. libro tertio capite tertio Ambr. in Rom. 3. In cap. 10. by faith only Origen The Apostle saith that the justification of faith only is sufficient so that if a man beleeve onely hee may be justified yea though hee performe no work Ambrose They are justified freely who working nothing and rendring no recompence are justified by faith onely through the gift of God Again Ambrose How then may the Jewes thinke themselves to be justified by the works of the law with the justification of Abraham where they see that Abraham was not justified by the works of the law but by faith onely The law therefore needeth not when a sinner is justified before God by faith only In cap. 10. In 1. ad Cor. 1.4 And in the same place the exclusive particle Only is often reiterated The same Ambrose saith Because this is decreed by God that hee which beleeveth in Christ should be saved without any work receiving freely by faith only remission of sins Wee are therefore justified by faith onely that is by Christs merit onely received by faith This we must constantly maintain and defend 1. For Gods glory that Christs sacrifice be not extenuated 2. For our owne comfort that we may be assured that our righteousnesse dependeth not on our works for so should wee lose it many thousand times but only on the sacrifice and merit of Christ ON THE 24. SABBATH Quest 62. Why cannot our good workes be righteousnesse or some part of righteousnesse before God Ans Because that righteousnesse which must stand fast before the judgement of God must be in all points perfect and agreeable to the law of God a Gal. 3.10 Deut. 27.36 Now our workes even the best of them are imperfect in this life and defiled with sin b Esay 64.6 The Explication IN the former Questions the true doctrine of Justification hath been made manifest and confirmed It followeth that we proceed to the confutation of the Popish doctrine affirming that we are justified by workes or partly by faith and partly by works The argument is thus framed The justice which may stand in Gods judgement must be perfectly absolute and agreeable on all parts with Gods Law But our very best workes in this life are imperfect and stained with sin Therefore our very best workes cannot be our justice in the judgment of God neither in part nor wholly The Major
in God How beit they are acceptable unto him in Christ the Mediatour through faith that is for the merit and satisfaction of Christ imputed unto us by faith and for his intercession with the Father for us For as wee our selves please God not in our selves but in his Son so also our works being imperfect and defiled in themselves yet are accepted of God for the righteousnesse of his Son wherewith whatsoever is imperfect and uncleane in them is covered so that it cometh not into Gods sight The person who is the Agent of good works must first be acceptable to God and then the workes please him Otherwise the very best works of man without faith are not gratefull unto God but are an abomination unto him because they are nothing but hypocrisie And the works of the person which pleaseth God so please God as the person himself doth Now the person pleaseth God for the Mediatours sake that is by the imputation of the righteousness and sanctification or satisfaction of Christ being clad therewith as with a garment before God and therefore the works also of the person are for the Mediatours sake pleasing and acceptable unto God God doth not examine our imperfect justice and our works as they are in themselves according to the strict rigour of the law according to which he should rather condemne them but regardeth and considereth them in his Son Hence is it that God is said to have had respect unto Abel Gen. 4.4 and to his offering to wit in his Son in whom Abel beleeved Whence Christ also is called our High Priest by whom our workes are offered unto God Heb. 11.4 He is called also the Altar whereon our prayers and works being put are pleasing to God whereas otherwise they should stink in the fight of God Wherefore it followeth that we doe as it were supply and repaire our want and defect with the perfection of Christs satisfaction in Gods judgement Therefore saith Paul Phil. 3.9 That I might be found in him that is not having mine owne righteousnesse which is in the Law but that which is of the faith of Christ c. 5. Why we are to doe good workes and whether they be necessary BEfore in the 86. Question certain impulsive causes unto good works were specified and expressed which pertain unto this place namely Our regeneration having a necessary coherence with our Justification Our gratefulnesse for our Redemption Our glorifying and magnifying of God The confirmation of our faith and election and our good example unto others whereby to winne them unto Christ These weighty causes may most amply be enlarged if we reduce them to these three Classes or principall heads to wit if we say that good works are to be done by us in respect 1. Of God 2. Of our selves 3. Of our neighbour I. Inrespect of God they are to be done In respect of God that Because of the commandement Mat. 5.16 1. Because of the commandement of God Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorifie your Father which is in heaven God requireth the beginning of obedience in this life and the perfection thereof in the life to come Wherefore we are necessarily to give our selves to good works John 15.12 Rom. 6.13 1 Theff 4.3 that we may perform due obedience unto God who requireth it of us This is my commandement that ye love one another Being made free from sin yee are made the servants of righteousnesse This is the will of God even your sanctification For Gods glory For the glory of God For the setting forth of Gods glory is the chief end why God commandeth and will have good works to be done of us that both by them we may worship and magnifie God and others seeing the same may glorifie out heavenly Father like as that saying of Christ before alledged out of S. Matth. doth teach us To testifie our thankfulnesse Because of that thankfulnesse which the regenerate owe. It is right and just that by whom we are redeemed and from whom we receive exceeding great benefits and those of all sorts we should also love magnifie worship reverence him and declare our love and thankfulnesse towards him by our good works and obedience But God deserveth all our duties by his benefits and wee merit not his benefits by any or all our duties therefore wee owe unto him thankfulnesse in lieu of them which is to be declared in our obedience and good works Rom. 2.1 I beseech you brethren by the mercy of God that you give up your bodies a living sacrifice holy acceptable unto God which is your reasonable serving of God Ye are made an holy Priest-hood to offer up spirituall sacrifices acceptable to God by Jesus Christ II. We are to doe good works also in respect of our selves In respect of our selves and that For confirmation to our selves of our faith Mat. 7.18 James 1.20 Phil. 1.11 That by our good works we may make testimony of our faith and may be assured thereof Every good tree bringeth forth good fruit That faith which is without works is dead Filled with the fruits of righteousnesse which are by Jesus Christ unto the glory and praise of God Now by our works wee must needs know that wee have faith because the effect is not without his cause and wee must know the cause by his proper effect When as therefore we finde not in our selves good works or new obedience wee are hypocrites neither have we faith but an evill conscience For true faith only which never wanteth all her fruits bringeth forth as a fruitfull tree good works obedience and amendment of life and these fruits likewise discern and distinguish true faith from historicall and temporary faith and so also from hypocrifie For our assurance of remission of sins That we may be assured that we have obtained remission of sinnes through Christ and are for Christs sake justified before God for justification and sanctification are benefits linked together which so cleave together and that necessarily as they never can be severed or pulled asunder For Christ obtained both for us at once namely both remission of sins and the holy Ghost who stirreth up in us by faith the study and desire of good works and new obedience For our assurance of our Election 2. Pet. 1.10 That we may be assured of our Election and Salvation Give diligence to make your calling and election sure These proceed from the cause next going before For God hath chosen from everlasting of his free mercy those only which are justified for the merit of his Son Whom hee predestinated Rom. 8.30 them also he called and them also he justified Therefore we are assured of our Election through Justification and that we have received from Christ our Justification which is never given unto the Elect without Sanctification wee know by faith And that we have faith
passeth unto posterity either by the Body or by the Soule or by the Sinne of Parents and merit of this privation of righteousnesse If the Major I say be thus proposed the fault of the Argument is soon espied for as Originall sinne first sprung in our Parents by their offence so by the same it is conveighed unto posterity This is not that little chinke of which the Schoolmen so doubtfully dispute to wit of the deduction of our soule from our sinfull Parents and of the pollution of the soule by meanes of the body coupled therewith but this is that wide gate by which originall sinne violently rusheth into our nature as Paul witnesseth By one mans disobedience many were made sinners Repli 1. The privation or want of originall righteousnesse is sinne Rom. 5.19 But God inflicteth this punishment of privation creating our soule in us bereft of those gifts which otherwise he would have endowed it withall if Adam had not sinned Therefore herein God is the authour of sinne Answ There is in the Major a fallacy of Accident This privation is sinne in respect of Adam and us sith that by his and our fault with might and maine we pull it unto us and greedily receive it for that the creature should be destitute of righteousnesse and conformity with God it is repugnant to the Law and is sinne But in respect of God it is a most just punishment of Adams and our disobedience agreeable unto nature and the Law of God Repli 2. Yea but God ought not to punish Adams offence with such a punishment whereby he knew the destruction of all mankind would follow and ensue Answ Yea rather let Gods justice be satisfied and let the whole world perish and come to nought It behoved God in regard of his exact justice and truth to take vengeance in this sort on the pride of man because the offending and displeasing of the highest good merited the most extreme punishment that is the eternall destruction of the creature and God hath said Thou shalt die the death Now it is of his free mercy that out of this generall ruine he saveth some I meane the Elect through Christ Object 2. The desiring of their proper objects is naturally incident to each faculty and appetite Therefore it is no sinne Answ The ordinate desires of their objects which God appointed them are no sins but the inordinate and such as are against the Law they are sinnes For simply or meerly to desire is of it selfe no sinne and the appetite or desire is good because it is naturall but to desire contrary to the Law this is sinne Object 3. Originall sinne is taken away from the Saints of God Therefore they cannot derive it unto their posterity Answ We answer to this Antecedent that originall sinne is taken away from the Saints of God as concerning the guilt of it which is remitted unto them by Christ but yet as concerning the pure essence thereof that is as it is a sinne repugnant to the Law so it remaineth in them For although they be withall regenerated by the holy Ghost unto whomsoever their sinne is forgiven yet that renewing is not perfected in this life Wherefore the godly also doe derive such a corrupt nature to their posterity as themselves have Repli That which the Parents themselves have not they cannot derive unto their posterity But the guilt of Originall sinne is taken away from regenerate Parents Unrighteousnesse and damnation from our Parents but righteousnes by the grace of Christ Therefore at least the guilt is not derived Answ We must distinguish of the Major The Parents indeed conveigh not that to their posterity which by nature they have not But they are freed from the guilt of sinne not by nature but by the grace and benefit of Christ Wherefore Parents by nature derive unto their posterity not righteousnesse which is freely imputed but unrighteousnesse and damnation unto which themselves by nature are subject And the cause why they derive their guilt unto them Why the parents righteousnesse is not derived unto their children and not their righteousnesse is this Because their posterity are not borne of them according to grace but according to nature neither is grace and justification tied to carnall propagation but to the most free election of God Examples hereof wee have Jacob and Esau c. Austin illustrateth this point by two similitudes the one is of the graines of corn which though they are sown purged by threshing from their stalke chaffe beard and eare yet spring againe from out of the earth with all these and this cometh to passe because the purging is not naturall to the graine but is the work of mans industry The other is of a circumcised father who though himselfe have no fore-skin yet he begetteth a son with a fore-skin and this cometh to passe because Circumcision was not by nature in the father but by the Covenant Object 4. If the root be holy the branches also are holy Rom. 11.16 Therefore the children of the Saints are holy and without originall sinne Answ Here is committed a fallacy of ambiguity for holinesse in this place signifieth not a freedome from sinne or integrity and uprightnesse of nature but that prerogative and priviledge of Abrahams posterity whereby God for his league made with Abraham had appointed alwayes to convert some of his posterity and to endow them with true and inward holinesse and because all the posterity of Abraham had obtained the right and title of the externall Church Object 5. Your children are holy Therefore without originall sinne 1 Cor. 7.14 Answ This is a fallacy drawne from the abuse of a common manner of speech They are holy not that all the children of holy men are regenerate or have holiness from carnall propagation for it is said When they had neither done good nor evill I have loved Jacob Rom. 9.11 13. and have hated Esau but the children of the godly are holy in respect of the externall fellowship of the Church that is to say they are to be counted for Members or Citizens of the Church and so also for the chosen and sanctified of God except themselves when they come to age declare themselves to be others by their unbeliefe and impiety Object 6. They are more miserable unto whom the sins of all their ancestors are derived then they unto whom have stretched but the sins of some of their ancestors But if sin passe from the Parents unto the children then unto the latest of their posterity come the sins of all the ancestors unto the former only their sins that lived before them So then the latter are more miserable then all the rest which would be absurd and not agreeable to the justice of God Answ 1. It were not absurd although God would punish more heavily and more forsake the latter of the posterity then the former For how many more sins are committed and heaped up by mankind
that God plagueth and scourgeth sin with sin and the sins which follow are the punishments of sins which went before Actuall sin Wherefore also God gave them up to their hearts lust unto uncleannesse they wrought filthinesse and received in themselves such recompence of their errour as was meet Objects of sin Rom. 24 27. 2 Thes 2.1 Therefore God shall send them strong delusions that they should beleeve lies c. But whereas the wit of man to such a height of insolency it is grown is accustomed to frame the like arguments for the excusing of it selfe and shifting and posting it from it selfe unto God we must here enter some large discourse of the causes of sin and shake off mans frivolous pretences in his owne behalfe Destiny Some derive the originall cause of sin from the destiny of the Stars saying Foure pretended causes of sin I have sinned because I was borne under an unluckie Planet The Divell Others when they sin and are rebuked for their sinne they make answer Not I but the Divell was in fault that committed this deed Gods will Others leaving excuses directly cast the fault upon God saying God would have it so for if he would not I should not have sinned Gods permission Others When God say they might have hindered me and yet did not himselfe is the authour of my sin With these and the like pretences it is no new thing for men to sharpen their blasphemous tongues against God For our first Parents when they had sinned and were accused of their sin by God they translate and passe over the fault committed from themselves to others neither ingenuously confesse the truth Adam returneth the fault not so much upon his wife as upon God himselfe The woman saith he which thou gavest to be with me she gave me of the tree Gen 3.12 13. and I did eate as if he should say Except thou hadst joyned her to me I had not sinned The woman simply imputeth the fault to the Divell saying The Serpent beguiled me and I did eate These are the false impious and detestable judgements concerning the originall of sinne whereby the majesty truth and justice of God is grievously offended For the nature of man is not the cause of sinne for God created it good and perfect according as it is said And God saw all things which he had made and lo they were very good Sin is an accessary quality which took possession of man after the fall and no substantiall property although after the fall it became naturall and is fitly so termed by Augustine because now we are all borne in sinne Ephes 2.3 and are by nature the children of wrath as well as others But this point would be more amplified and enlarged 1. They who make Destiny a cloak for sinne define Destiny to be a linked order through all eternity and a certaine perpetuall necessity of intents and workes according to the counsell of God or according to the evill Planets Now if you aske them Who made the Planets God say they Therefore these men lay their evill to Gods charge but such a destiny did not all the sounder Philosophers maintaine Destiny is not the cause of sin Lib. 2. cap. 6. much lesse Christians Saint Augustine against two Epistles of the Pelagians unto Boniface They saith he who hold destiny maintaine that not only actions and events but also our wils themselves depend on the position of the Planets at the time of every ones conception or nativity which they call constellations But the grace of God surpasseth not onely all the stars and all the heavens but also the Angels Let us conclude these things with the word of the Lord by his Prophet Jeremy pronouncing to this sense Jer. 10.2 3. Thus saith the Lord Learne not the way of the Heathen and be not affraid for the signes of heaven though the Heathen be affraid of such for the customes of the people are vaine Wherefore that the Astrologers call the Planet of Saturn unmercifull sharp and cruell and the Planet of Venus favourable and gentle it is the vanity of vanities for the stars have no force of doing good or ill and therefore the fault of sinners ought not to be imputed unto them 2. That the Divell is not the onely authour of sin who when as wee commit sin The Divell not the only author of sin should beare alone the blame of the sin and our selves be free from fault it is most of all declared in this that he is able to induce and entice a man to evill but not to compell him For God keepeth under the Divell by his power that he cannot doe what he will but only what and so much as God permitteth him Nay hee hath not so much as power over filthy Swine much lesse over the most noble Soules of men He hath indeed a subtilty great force in perswading but God is stronger who also never ceaseth himself to put good motions into mans mind neither permitteth he more to Sathan then he maketh profitable for man Which wee may see in that most holy man Job in the example of Paul and in his words 1 Cor. 10.13 God is faithfull which will not suffer you to be tempted above that you be able Wherefore they are vain men who unload the blame of their wickednesse on the Divels shoulders 3. It remaineth that we shew also that God is not the authour of sin God is no cause of sin God say these miscreants would have it so for if hee would not I should not have sinned Againe When he might have hindered me and yet did not himselfe is the author of my sin These are meere cavils and foisty Sophismes of the impious rout God might by his absolute power hinder evill but he will not corrupt his creature man being just and righteous Wherefore he dealeth with man after the order of man he proposeth lawes unto him he proposeth rewards and punishments he willeth him to imbrace good and flye evill To the doing of which thing neither denieth he his grace without which we can do nothing neither refuseth he our diligence and labour Here if a man cease and give over the sinne and negligence is ascribed to man not to God though he could have hindred it and did not because he ought not to hinder it lest he should trouble his appointed and settled order and destroy his owne work Wherefore God is not author of evill or sin Now in the processe of this our discourse wee will gather in one the testimonies of Scripture resolve certain doubts and discover the very fountain and originall of sin Many are the testimonies of Scripture which teach us that God is not the author of sin of which it shall suffice to propose only some few God made not death Wisd 1.13 Ezek. 13.11 Psal 5.4 5. neither hath he pleasure in the destruction of the living I desire not
but not contrariwise all that is contingent is free 2. What difference there is of the free-will which is in God and that which is in reasonable creatures Angels and men Two things common to God and creatures in their will TWo things there are common to God and reasonable creatures as touching the liberty of Will 1. That God and reasonable creatures do things upon deliberation and advice that is they chuse or refuse whatsoever objects with an understanding going before the action and a will accompanying the action of chusing or refusing 2. They chuse or refuse any thing of their proper and inward motion without constraint that is the Will being fit in it owne nature to will the contrary of that which it willeth or to suspend the action it intendeth of it owne accord inclineth to the one part Psal 104.24 115.3 Gen. 3.6 Isa 1.19 Mat. 23.37 Difference of liberty in God and his creatures But the differences also of this liberty in God and in the creatures are three 1. In the Understanding In the Vnderstanding because God understandeth and knoweth all things of himself perfectly and from all eternity without any ignorance or errour of judgment but the creatures know neither of themselves neither all things neither the same at all times but they understand of God his will and works so much and at such time how much and when it pleaseth God to reveale unto them And therefore many things they are ignorant of and erre in many The testimonies of this difference are Mat. 24.36 Dan. 2.21 Isa 40.13 Heb. 4 13. Of that day and houre knoweth no man no not the Angels of heaven but my Father only He giveth wisdome unto the wise and understanding to those that understand Who hath instructed the Spirit of the Lord Neither is there any creature which is not manifest in his sight John 1.9 He lightneth every man that cometh into the world In the Will In the Will The will of God is governed by no other nor dependeth of any other cause but of it selfe But the wils of Angels and men are so the causes of their actions that neverthelesse they are carried by the secret counsel of God and his providence to the chusing or refusing of any object that either immediatly by God or mediately by instruments some good some bad which it seemeth good unto God to use so that it is impossible for them to do any thing beside the eternall decree and counsell of God And therefore the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to be absolutely his own at his owne will and in his own power whereby the Greek Divines expresse Free-will agreeth more properly unto God who perfectly and simply is his owne and at his owne will But of the creatures more rightly is used 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is voluntary and free which word the Apostle useth to Philemon Ver. 14. Hebr. 10.26 1 Pet. 5.2 The testimonies and arguments of this difference are laid down in the doctrine of Providence And that God indeed is the first cause of his counsels these and the like sayings of Scripture doe testifie Psal 115.3 Dan. 4.32 He hath done what soever he would Who according to his will worketh in the army of heaven and in the inhabitants of the earth But that the wils and counsels of the creatures depend on Gods beck and permission these and the like speeches doe prove Gen. 24.7 Exod. 3.16 Acts 2.23 3.18 4.27 28. The Lord shall send his Angel before thee c. Goe and gather the Elders of Israel together c. Him being delivered by the determinate counsell and fore-knowledge of God ye have slaine But God hath fulfilled these things Herod and Pontius Pilate gathered themselves together to doe whatsoever thine hand and thy counsell had determined before to be done I know Jer. 10.23 that the way of a man is not in himselfe neither is it in man to walke and to direct his steps The Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord Therefore the wils of Angels and men Pro. 21.1 and all other second causes as they were created of God their first supreme and soveraigne cause so are they ruled of him but the will of God is ruled by no one of his creatures because as God hath no efficient cause without and besides himselfe so neither hath hee any moving or inclining cause otherwise hee were not God that is the supreme and soveraigne cause of all his workes and the creatures should be invested in Gods room The wils of the creatures are râ—led by God not inforced Moreover God ruleth and bendeth the wils of his creatures and doth not draw or enforce them that is by objects represented to the mind hee effectually moveth affecteth and allureth the Will to will that which then the mind judgeth good and refuse that which seemeth evill In the will and understanding In the Vnderstanding and Will both together because God as hee unchangeably knoweth all things so also he hath determined from everlasting and will unchangeabâ—y all things which are done as they are good and permitteth them as they are sins Now as the creatures notions and judgements of things so also their wils are changeable so that they will that which before they would not and will not that which before they would For seeing that all the counsels of God are most good most just and most wise he never disliketh correcteth or changeth them as oftentimes men do when as they do perceive themselves to have determined any thing unadvisedly before Hither appertain those sayings God is not as man Num. 23.19 that hee should lye I am the Lord and change not Object Mal. 3.6 The unchangeablenesse of Gods purpose taketh not away the liberty of his will Hee that cannot change his counsell and purpose hath not free-will but God cannot change his counsell and purpose which he hath once appointed Therefore his will is not free First we deny the Major For not he which doth not change his purpose which he hath once appointed hath no liberty of will but he which could not purpose any other thing being let by some external cause But the liberty of God consisteth not in the change of his will or purpose but in this that God will all things whatsoever he will altogether with his will and of himself and could have had otherwise decreed or not decreed all things which he decreed from everlasting of the creation preservation and government of things according to these sayings With men this is impossible Mat. 19.26 Luk. 18.27 but with God all things are possible These and the like sayings shew that God hath so appointed from everlasting with himselfe the creation of things and the gathering and saving of his Church not as if he could not have not done this or not have appointed it otherwise but because so it seemed good to him
Wil taken away or diminished in them but rather is increased and confirmed as who with all willingnesse choose and doe those things only which are just Fourthly Many places of Scripture confirme the necessity of those actions the liberty of which yet both we and our adversaries acknowledge it is shewed by many testimonies of Scripture that the Wils and voluntary Actions of good and wicked men which our adversaries maintaine to be and have been free and we also according to the right meaning of this word Liberty doe willingly confesse are so guided by the secret and unchangeable purpose of God that they neither can or could either doe or be otherwise Wherefore either so many manifest places of Scripture must be denied or openly corrupted or it must be granted that one and the same Action of the Wil is free contingent in respect of the Wil and necessary in respect of Gods government Fiftly it is declared by many places of Scripture Contingent effects lose not their contingencie by reason of any necessity imported by Gods decree The same is to be said of the effects of the will which are in respect thereof contingent that is free and might as well not be done as be done that al contingent effects doe retain their contingency which they have from the nature of their causes although they be done by the unchangable determination of the purpose or providence of God But al voluntary effects or motions are contingent in respect of the Wil which by nature was alike able to have done the plaine contrary unto them They therefore retain their contingency that is their liberty for this is the contingency of the actions of the Wil although they be so determined of by Gods Wil that there can be no other The reason of the Major in this argument is for that God so moveth the second causes and by them bringeth to passe what he wil that in the mean season by this providence he doth not destroy or abolish their nature which he gave them at their creation but rather preserveth and nourisheth it so that as concerning their nature some work contingently some necessarily although in respect of the liberty of Gods purpose al work contingently and in respect of the unchangeablenesse of his decree all work necessarily so as they doe For when God by the rising of the Sun lightneth the world hee maketh not the Sun so as if being risen it did not necessarily lighten or were apt by nature not to lighten and yet it is in the power of God either to change the nature of the Sun or that remaining as it is not to lighten the world as he shewed in Egypt and at the passion of Christ In like manner when the Quailes light at the Tents of the Israelites and the Ravens carry meat to Elias and one sparrow falleth on the ground God doth not make the nature of these living creatures such as could not be carried elsewhere and yet that they can have no other motion then that which they have by reason of the wil of God interposed coming betweene the Scripture plainly affirmeth Whereof it is manifest that as in other things which work contingently their contingency so in the will the liberty which is given it of God is not taken away but rather preserved by Gods government Now then if our adversaries in their argument understand that Liberty which consisteth in the deliberation of the mind and free assent of the wil we do not only grant but also better maintaine then they the liberty of wil in all actions thereof and so the Major of their argument shal be false to wit that those things which are done by the unchangeable decree of God are not done by the free-wil of men and Angels For this liberty the providence of God doth so not hinder but rather establish and confirm that without this that liberty cannot so much as be for God both keepeth his order which he appointed at the creation by his perpetuall efficacy and operation and doth inspire into al by his vertue true notions and right election But if they challenge a liberty unto the creature depending of no other cause wherby it is guided we deny their whole argument as knowing such a liberty of creatures to stand against the whole Scripture and that it onely agreeth unto God For him alone doe all things serve In him we live and move and have our being he giveth unto all not onely life or power of moving themselves but even breathing too that is very moving it selfe The will worketh together with God and is not meere passive Object 2. If the will when it is converted by God or turned and inclined to other objects cannot withstand it is even meere passive and so worketh not at all Answ This consequence deceiveth them because in the Antecedent there is not a sufficient ennumeration of those actions which the will may have when it is moved of God For it is able not onely to withstand God moving it but also of it owne proper motion to assent and obey him And when it doth this it is not idle neither doth it onely suffer or is moved but it selfe exerciseth and moveth her owne actions and yet this is to be understood of the actions of the Will not of the new qualities or inclinations which it hath to obey God For these the Will receiveth not by her owne operation but by the working of the holy Ghost The will of man withstanding the revealed will of God is yet guided by his secret will and therefore resisting doth not â—esist Object 3. That which withstandeth the will of God is not guided by it But the will of men in many actions withstandeth the will of God It is not therefore alwayes guided by the will of God Answ The consequence here faileth because there are four termes For the Major is true if both the revealed and the secret will of God be understood so that simply and in all respects it bee withstood and that bee done which simply and by no meanes it would have done that which is impossible to come to passe because of the omnipotency and liberty of God But in the Minor the will of God must bee understood as it is revealed For the secret decrees of Gods will and providence are ever ratified and are performed in all even in those who most of all withstand Gods commandements Neither yet are there contrary wils in God for nothing is found in his secret purposes which disagreeth with his nature revealed in his word and God openeth unto us in his law what he approveth and liketh and what agreeth with his nature and the order of his mind but hee doth not promise or reveale how much grace hee will or purposeth to give to every one to obey his commandements God though the mover of wicked wils yet not the mover of the wickednesse of the wils Object 4. If all
glorification The fourth degree of liberty is in man perfectly regenerated after his glorification or after the end and consummation of this present life In this liberty the Will shall be only free to chuse good and not to chuse evill and this shall be the perfect liberty of our will by which we shall not only not sin but shall abhorre nothing more then sin and also shall not be able to sin any more The reasons thereof are these 1. Because in the mind shall shine the perfect knowledge of God Two reasons of our perfect liberty after glorificatâ—on and his will in the will and heart a most perfect and exceeding inclination to obey God an exceeding love of God and a joy resting in God and an agreeablenesse or conformity with God Wherefore no place shall be for ignorance for errour or any doubting of God yea or for the least stubbornnesse against God 2. That conformity in the elect of all their inward powers and faculties with God and the effectuall guiding of the holy Ghost shall be continued to all eternity This last degree or liberty after mans glorification greater then the first before hâ—s fall because thâ—s excludeth all possibility of falling the other did not For the blessed Saints are never forsaken but continually ruled by the holy Ghost in all their actions in the celestiall life For which cause it cannot possibly be that any motions or actions of man there should once swerve from righteousnesse And therefore it is said They are as the Angels of God in heaven Neither by this meanes is the liberty of will taken away or diminished but is truly confirmed and perfected in the blessed Angels and men Forasmuch as both the understanding is free from all errour ignorance and doubtfulnesse and lightened with the perfect knowledge of God Mat. 22.30 and the heart will free from all stubbornnesse and without all soliciting or suggestion to withstand God is carried with an exceeding love of God and an alacrity to obey the known will of God And hence it appeareth also how much more excellent our state shall be then was Adams before his fall Adam truly before his fall was perfectly conformed to God but hee could will both good and evill and therefore had some infirmity joyned with his excellent gifts even a power to depart from God and lose his gifts that is hee was changeably good But we shall not be able but to will good only And as the wicked are only carried to evill because they are wicked so shall we also onely love and chuse good because we shall be good It shall be then impossible for us to will any evill because we shall be preserved by Gods grace in that perfect liberty of will that is The use of this doctrine concerning the diversity of liberty which is in God and in man and of the divers degrees of mans liberty we shall be unchangeably good It is necessary that this doctrine Of the similitude and difference of free-will which is in God and his creatures and in divers states and degrees of mans nature delivered hitherto out of the Scripture should be manifest and known in the Church for many and weighty causes 1. That this glory may be given to God that he alone is the most free agent whose liberty wisdome dependeth of no other and that all the creatures are subject to his government 2. That we may remember that they who wittingly and willingly sin or have cast themselves into a necessity of sinning are not at all excused and so not God but their own wils declining of their owne accord from Gods commandements to be the cause of their sins 3. That wee may know God alone to be of himselfe and unchangeably good and the fountaine of goodnesse but no creature to be able neither to have nor to keep more goodness then God of his free goodnesse will work and keep in him and therefore he must desire it of him and ascribe it received to him 4. That we knowing God to be a most free governour of all things may confesse that hee is able for his glory and our safety to change those things which seem most unchangeable 5. That we knowing from what excellency of our nature we have fallen by our owne fault may the more deplore and bewaile our unthankfulnesse and magnifie Gods mercy who advanceth lifteth us up even to a greater excellency 6. That knowing the misery and naughtinesse of our nature and disposition if once God forsake us we may be humbled in his sight and ardently desire to wade and come out of these evils 7. That having knowledge of that liberty into which the Son of God restoreth us we may the more desire his benefits and be thankfull unto him for them 8. That knowing wee are by the mercy of God alone severed from them that perish that we rather then they might be converted we be not lifted up with an opinion of our goodnesse or wisdome but ascribe the whole benefit of our justification and salvation not to any cause appearing in us but to the mercy of God alone 9. That acknowledging the weaknesse corruption which remaineth even in us regenerated we may seek for justification in Christ alone and may withstand those evils 10. That knowing our selves not to be able to stand against tentations without the singular assistance of the holy Spirit we may ardently daily desire to be preserved and guided by God 11. That understanding that we are not preserved against our will but with our wils we may wrestle with tentations and endeavour to make our calling and election sure 12. That understanding the counsel of God concerning the converting of men by the doctrine of the Gospel and ministery of the Church we may embrace earnestly and desirously the use thereof On the fourth Sabbath Quest 9. Doth not God then injury to man who in the Law requireth that of him which he is not able to performe Answ No a Eph. 4.24 For God hath made man such a one as hee might performe it b Gen. 3.13 1 Tim. 2.13 Wisd 2.23 but man by the impulsion of the Divell c Gen. 3.6 Rom. 5.12 Luk. 10.30 and his own stubbornnesse bereaved himselfe and all his posterity of those divine graces The Explication THis question is an objection framed by humane reason against the question here proposed For if man be so corrupt that he is no way apt to do any thing well in vain God seemeth and unjustly to require at his hands perfect obedience to the Law Object He that requireth or commandeth that which is impossible is unjust God in the Law requireth of man that which is impossible to wit perfect obedience which hee is not able to performe Therefore God seemeth to be unjust Ans The Major is to be distinguished He is unjust that commandeth things impossible 1. Except himselfe first gave an ability to perform those things
or while they perceive not the causes of these evils and the secret government of God they fall to doubting whether there be any God who hath care over the world and humane affaires But that there is a God The reasons which doe prove there is a God is proved by many main arguments common to Philosophy with Divinity The arguments are these The beautifull order of nature The beautifull and goodly order of nature beheld in the world that is the disposing of every part of the world and the continuall succession of divers motions and operations therein with constant and strict observation of their stablished and perpetuall laws cannot be instituted and kept but of a wise understanding and omnipotent nature which is God This argument is enlarged Psal 8.19.104.135.147.148 Acts 1. 17. Rom. 1. The excellency of mans minde A reasonable nature having some cause cannot derive his originall but from an intelligent and understanding nature for that the cause is not worse or baser then the effect bringeth But the minde of man is a nature indued with reason and hath some cause Therefore it hath his being from an understanding cause which is God Job 32.8 Psal 94.97 Acts 17.28 Surely there is a spirit in man but the inspiration of the Almighty giveth understanding Yet they say The Lord shall not see c. We are also his generation The Minor of the precedent Syllogisme is thus proved likewise by reason Whatsoever hath a beginning is from another because it must needs be from something and of it selfe it cannot have being or beginning because nothing is cause of it selfe but mans minde hath a beginning Therefore from another which other must needs be God The general rules and principles naturally ingendered in the mind of man The notions of generall rules or principles born in us and with us such as are the difference between things honest and dishonest numbring understanding of consequences in discourse and reasoning c. cannot come by chance or from a sensible nature common to us with brute beasts but are necessarily in-bred in us by some intelligent cause which is God whereupon wee frame this Syllogisme Notions are not engendred nor have their being but from a cause intelligent for no man maketh another wise who himself is not wise But in men there are notions not coming by use nor received from men Therefore they are from God Rom. 2.15 The Gentiles shew the effect of the law written in their hearts Man is the image of God c. This principle of it selfe naturally in-bred in man That there is a God The naturall notion of this principle There is a God Principles are true because they are divine wisdome and because the contrary or opposite thereto being granted nature is thereby destroyed But That there is a God is a principle First Because every one hath private experience hereof in himself Secondly All wise men confesse it Thirdly All nations consent in it for no nation is so barbarous but that it maintaineth some religion and contendeth and striveth for the advancement thereof and supposeth that there is some God Rom. 1.19 That which may be known of God is manifest in them that is in the mindes of men for God hath shewed it unto them The terrours of conscience in the wicked The terrours of conscience which are stricken into the mindes of the wicked after they have sinned cannot be inflicted but by an intelligent Judge which discerneth honest and dishonest things detesteth those things which are dishonest beholdeth the mindes and hearts of men and exerciseth judgement upon the minds but in all the wicked is this torment Isa 66.24 57.21 Deut. 4.24 Rom. 2.15 Their worm shall not die neither shall their fire be quenched There is no peace saith God to the wicked God is a consuming fire They shew the effects of the law written in their hearts their conscience also bearing witnesse and their thoughts accusing one another or excusing Against the beasts of the world who think the doctrine of God to be but a cunning device of the wiser sort to keep the simple people in order And hence is apparant the impudency of Epicures and Academicks who deem all religion to be devices of subtill men coyned to this end and purpose that the rest of the common people might through fear of a superiour power be kept in good order For first if through deceivablenesse other men beleeve that God is and dread him Why then are these men themselves who will seem by their sharp in-sight to espy the guile most of all tormented with the conscience and privie acknowledgement both of this their blasphemy as also of other misdeeds Moreover the sole and bare asseveration and word of a few could not have been sufficient neither to perswade all mankinde neither to maintain the perswasion once brought in to all succeeding ages neither doth that lighten the force of those arguments which are deducted from this notion That there is a God and from the conscience in that they say There are many found who neither beleeve there is a God neither are moved with the conscience of their sins for although they covet never so much to perswade themseves that there is no God yet is their conscience alwaies against them And therefore it is most false that these men imagine that any one of the wicked is free from the gnawing of his conscience for how much the more every one despiseth God and all religion and endeavoureth to represse the pricks of conscience so much the more is he tormented and at every mentioning and signifying of God he trembleth and shaketh with horrour and how much the slowlier with so much the more severe dolour and paine is his security shaken from him Whereupon wee see those whose whole life was profane and secure for the most part when they are oppressed with the terrour of Gods judgement to perish in despaire Now that which is said The ungodly is so proud that he careth not for God Psal 10.4 14.1 53.2 neither is God in all his thoughts The fool hath said in his heart There is no God that this hath not this meaning as if the wicked were void of all knowledge and feare of God or doe not confesse that there is a God but that framing unto themselves another then he indeed is who hath manifested himselfe to wit one that careth not for mens affairs defendeth not nor delivereth the good and punisheth the wicked they place an idoll in room of the true God David himselfe doth sufficiently declare whenas he describeth the same profanenesse of the wicked in these words For he hath said in his heart Psalm 10.12 Tush God hath forgotten he hideth away his face and he will never see it The punishments of the wicked Which punishments are not to be imputed to the Magistrates severity and wisdome for two causes From
Creation of the world and the principall Questions of Creation are these 1. Whether the world was created of God 2. How it was created 3. For what cause it was created 1. Whether the world was created of God Five significations of the word world FIrst the words and terms are to be understood The name of the world is diversly used in the Scripture 1. It signifieth the universall frame of all things namely heaven and earth and all things which are in them visible and invisible besides God himself The world was made by him John 1.10 2. Worldly concupiscence 3. All mankind 4. The wicked or those that are not regenerate in the world 5. The elect That the world might beleeve John 17.9 21. John 3.16 So God loved the world Here we consider it in the first sense To create signifieth three things To create signifieth 1. To ordain or constitute as the Latines used it Creare Consulem to create a Consull 2. To make something of nothing without any motion with a beck or word only so it is taken in this place 3. The continuating of creation or creation continued which is the providence of God The creation of the world proved That the world hath not been from everlasting but had when it seemed best to the Creatour according to his eternall counsell and will a beginning once and was created of that only true God who hath manifested himself in the Church that he is the eternall Father and Son and holy Ghost wee know By testimonies of Scripture By testimonies of holy Scripture as by the whole history of the creation set down by Moses Likewise Psal 33.6 9. Psal 104. 113. 124. 136. 146. Isa 44. Acts 4.17 out of other testimonies of Scripture very many By the word of the Lord were the heavens made and all the hoste of them by the breath of his mouth Hee spake and it was done hee commanded and it stood or was created There are other places also in the Psalmes where more largely and amply the wonderfull works of God and the principall parts of the world created by God are proposed to be considered of us that through the consideration thereof wee may learn to put our trust and confidence in God For this purpose did the Lord himself propose unto Job his marvellous and incomprehensible works conspicuous in heaven and earth Job 38. 39. and other things also created by him to declare his justice power and providence 2. By reasons Furthermore besides testimonies of Scripture almost innumerable it is confirmed also by firm and true reasons that the world was created of God such as these following 1. The originals and beginnings of nations and people shew it which could not be fained of Moses when as some remembrance and memoriall of them was then extant amongst many which yet in processe of time perished 2. The novelty and latenesse of all other histories compared with the antiquity and ancientnesse of the sacred story 3. The age of man decreasing which sheweth that there mas greater strength in nature at the first and that not without some first cause it hath decreased hitherto 4. The certain course and race of times even from the beginning of the world unto the exhibiting of the Messias 5. The constitution and founding of common-weals 6. The order of things instituted in nature which must needs have been produced and framed by some intelligent mind far superiour to all things 7. The excellency of the minde of men and Angels These intelligent mindes have a beginning Therefore they have it from some intelligent cause 8. The principles or generall rules and naturall notions ingenerated in our minds 9. The trembling of conscience in the wicked 10. The ends of all things profitably and wisely ordained therefore by some cause understanding and ordaining them 11. Lastly Those other arguments and reasons also which prove that there is a God prove in like manner that the world was created of God 3 Naturall reasons Thirdly besides these reasons it may be enforced by philosophicall arguments drawn out of the bosome of nature That the world was created and that it was created of God although by them we are not able to demonstrate the time when it was created For 1. There is no infinite processe in nature of causes and effects for if so nature should never attain unto her end even the producing of effects Therefore this world had a beginning 2. The noblest and excellentest of all effects is the world Therefore it proceedeth from the noblest and excellentest cause which is God How the creation is unknown to Philosophers Other questions as Whether the world was created from everlasting or in time that is Whether it be an effect of equall perpetuity with his cause and so co-eternall or Whether it once so began to be that before it had no being Again Whether if sometimes it were not yet it was necessary that it should be created And Whether it shall endure for ever And if it endure Whether it shall remain the same or it is to be changed These and such like questions cannot be decided by Philosophy The reason is because all these things depend upon the meer will of God the first mover of all things who doth nothing of necessity but with most absolute freedome Now this his will is not known to any creature but to whomsoever God himselfe revealeth it Therefore it is not manifested to heathenish Philosophers but declared to the Church alone for they cannot possibly collect any thing hereof by proceeding from a continuing effect unto his cause It followeth indeed that there is some cause of those effects but it followeth not that those effects were produced of that cause either at this or that time or from all eternity because a free agent may either act or suspend his action at his pleasure The whole demonstration hereof is thus brought in form No effect depending onely of such a cause as worketh freely or contingently can be demonstrated by that cause But the creation of the world is such an effect Therefore the creation of the world cannot be demonstrated by the will of God the first mover of all things that it either was made from everlasting or in some beginning of time Arguments of Philosophers against the creation of the world Now whatsoever arguments are brought of Philosophers against the creation of the world it is easie to perceive that these were not framed out of true Philosophy but by the imaginations of men if the order of the generation and mutation of things instituted in nature which was created of God be discerned from creation Object 1. It is absurd say the Philosophers to imagine that God is idle Ans Nay rather it is absurd to term him idle who administreth and ruleth the world Repl. This I grant but he could not govern the world when as yet the world was not
duty Whereupon we pray Let thy will be done in earth as it is in heaven They are also called gods 5. Gods Psalm 8.5 Hebr. 2.7 What is meant by the names Gabriel Raphael and Michael Dan. 10.13 12.2 Jude 9. Rev. 12.7 because the nature and Majesty of God shineth in their strength vertues functions and marvellous works Which is also signified both by the name of Gabriel that is the strength of God and by the name of Raphael that is the medicine of God For the same cause also the name of Michael that is who is like God is given to the Son of God an Angel who is called the Arch-angel either because the Son of God is head of the Angels or because God doth according to that measure which seemeth best to him distribute his gifts to the Angels and shew forth his powerfull operation by them 2. Of evill spirits or Angels THey which now are evill spirits or Angels although they also were at their creation good and adorned by God with the same holinesse and righteousnesse and blessednesse wherewith the rest were yet notwithstanding by their owne will and that free and therefore by their owne fault they averted themselves from God and revolted from his love and from obedience due unto him so that they left the habitation of God and no longer continued their conformity with God but ever burn with an horrible hatred of God and men and that they may despight God force men to sin and by force and fleights attempt to cast all down headlong into destruction God spared not the Angels that had sinned 2 Pet. 2.4 but cast them downe into hell and delivered them into chains of darknesse Jude 6. to be kept unto damnation The Angels which kept not their first estate but left their owne habitation hee hath reserved in everlasting chaines under darknesse unto the judgement of the great day Yee are of your father the Divell and the lusts of your father yee will doe John 8 4â— Hee was a murtherer from the beginning and abode not in the truth When hee speaketh a lie then speaketh hee of his owne for hee is a liar and the father thereof 1 John 3.8 Hee that committeth sin is of the Divel for the Divell sinneth from the beginning John 13.25 Sathan entred into Judas Sathan filled Ananias his heart that hee should lie unto the holy Ghost Acts 5.8 Ephes 2.2 and keep away part of the price of the possession According to the course of this world and after the Prince that ruleth in the ayr the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience 2 Thes 2.9 The divels appellations with their reasons 1. The wicked 1 Joh. 3.12 Ephes 6.16 It is said of Antichrist Whose coming is by the working of Sathan with all power and signes and lying wonders and in all deceivablenesse of unrighteousnesse among them that perish because they received not the love of the truth that they might be saved And therefore hee is called The wicked Cain which was of the wicked That yee may quench all the fiery darts of the wicked And every where in the Scripture hee is called Satanas that is 2. Satanas 1 Chro. 21.1 the adversary of God and men And Sathan stood up against Israel and provoked David to number Israel And hee is in like manner called Diabolus Divell because hee depraveth the word of God 3. Divell and is a slanderer of men as in Paradise 4. Serpent and Job 1. 2. And the Dragon that old serpent Revel 12. 20. because speaking by a serpent in Paradise hee seduced mankind through his subtiltie neither ceaseth hee to seduce them still The great Dragon that old Serpent called the Divell and Sathan was cast out which deceiveth all the world Again The accuser of our brethren 5. Accuser Rev. 12.10 6. Destroyer Rev. 5.11 7. The god and prince of this world 2 Cor. 4.4 Joh. 12.31 14.30 16.11 which accuseth them before our God day and night And hee is called Abaddon and Apollyon that is destroying Hee is also called The god of this world blinding the eyes of unbeleevers and the prince of the world both for his power and forcible working which hee sheweth on the wicked and for that tyrannie which hee exerciseth against the godly also by Gods permission as withall for that obsequie homage and obedience which is done him by the wicked even those who professe the worship of the true God Ephes 6. 1 Pet. 5. 1 Kings 22. 1 Cor. 10. John 8. The refutation of the Manichees who held two first causes By these places is made manifest the impiety of the Manichees who fained two causes or two gods co-eternall the one good whom they called the light and minde the other evill whom they termed the darknesse and matter the former whereof had created good natures the latter bad abusing those testimonies of Scripture where the Divell is called The god and prince of the world the father of the wicked authour of sin and death the power of darknesse and standing most of all on this argument That a good God should not make the cause of evill For neither hath the Divell any more power either over the godly or over the wicked or over other creatures for which hee is called The prince and god of the world then is granted him of God as appeareth by the first and second Chapters of the story of Job Matth. 31.22 and by the invasion of the swine Neither is the creation of the wicked but the corrupting and enforcing them to evill attributed to the Divell Neither is there any need lest God should be made authour of sinne to make another God of the Divell seeing the Scripture teacheth of Divels and men that both were created good and holy by God but the Divell revolting from God and seducing men corrupted both himself and men The evill spirits are unchangeably evill and damned And although of their own proper and free will they rush and bend themselves against God yet by the just judgment of God they are so forsaken and abjected of him that they are without all change or alteration unrecallably evill and subject to everlasting torments Wherefore Jude saith Jude ver 6. Mat. 15.41 that they are reserved by God in everlasting chains under darknesse And Christ Go ye cursed from me into everlasting fire which is prepared for the Divell and his angels For though doubtlesse these evill spirits were even from their fall dispoiled of the celestiall habitation and blessednesse yet notwithstanding both they and reprobate men shall be at the last judgment adjudged to more grievous punishment as contrariwise the felicity and glory of the godly shall then at length after the resurrection of their bodies be in all respects consummated and made perfect 2 Pet. 2.4 Jude ver 6. Matt. 8.29 Therefore these spirits are said to be reserved unto
and corruption to will and permit that together with the action which God worketh by his creature and in respect of God most just the sin of the creature may concurre by the comming whereof that action in respect of the creature is made evill and highly displeasing God 3. Because notwithstanding God so moveth inclineth and ruleth by his secret and generall providence the will and all the actions of the creature so forsaken as that by the creature sinning himselfe doth execute the most just decree of his owne will For such is the liberty wisedome goodnesse and power of God that no lesse by vicious than by good instruments he moâ—t well justly and holily worketh what he will Neither is Gods worke by reason of either the goodnesse or badnesse of the instrument more or lesse good as neither the worke of the wicked men is made good for that God doth well use it For God doing in all things what he will willeth alwayes doth that which is right The creature worketh together with God working well if God correct him Now that together with him working well the creature may also worke well it is necessary that the speciall working of God therin concurre with his generall working that is that he correct the creature by his spirit When as therefore God doth move the creature only by a generall working and not by a speciall the creature doth necessarily though yet freely swerve and defect from rightnesse God himselfe notwithstanding working holily and accomplishing by his creature the just good worke of his will and providence God correcteth whom he will If any man demand why then God doth not correct vicious instruments that God using them well themselves also may worke well God himselfe answereth him I will have merry on whom I will have mercy O man Exod. 33.19 Rom. 9.15.20 11.35 who art thou that pleadest against God Hath not the Potter power of the clay who hath given unto him first and it shall be recompenced God performeth nothing of duty but all of mercy unto his creatures It is free therfore to him to do what and in what sort how far forth and to whom he will according as it is said Is it not lawfull for me to doe as I will with mine owne Math 20.15 What permission 15. Permission therefore is the withdrawing of the grace of God whereby God when hee executeth the decrees of his will by reasonable creatures 1. Either doth not open his will wherby he would have that worke done to the creatures 2. Or doth not incline the will of the creature to obey his will in that action Or Permission is the secret providence or will power of God 1. Whereby he effectually willeth moveth and moderateth the motions actions even of men sinning as they are actions and punishments both of them and others 2. But sin it selfe he neither willeth nor worketh neither yet hindereth it but in his just judgment suffereth it to concurre with their actions 3. And this also he useth to the illustrating of his glory This description of Gods permission of sins Permission of sin confirmed by sundry places of Scripture according as it was before described Psal 5.4 is confirmed by many places of Scripture For first that God neither willeth nor worketh sins as they are sins is confessed by all the godly and all such as are of found judgment seeing both the infinite goodnes of God cannot be the cause of evill which hath in it no respect and quality of good and God himselfe doth often avouch this of himselfe I am not a God that loveth wickednesse Neither are there fewer places of Scripture which teach most clearly that the actions of the wicked which they doe when they sin are done and ruled though by the secret yet by the good and just will of God Joseph saith Gen. 45.8 That he was sent of God into Egypt We learne Exod. 7. 10. 11. Deut. 2. Jos 11. Judg. 3. 4. that the indurating hardning of Pharaoh other enemies of the Israelites was wrought by the Lord and that to this end thereby to punish his enemies and to shew forth his glory 2 Sam. 12.11 16.10 24.1 Job 12.25 Psal 119.10 Esay 20.6 63.17 Lam. 3.37 Jer. 48.10 Acts 2.23 4.28 Rom. 11.8 13.23 These the like places of holy Writ doe shew by two reasons or arguments That God did not permit without some working also of his owne but did effectually will that working of Pharaohs will and others whereby they opposed themselves against Israel For 1. These Scriptures referre the cause of their indurating wrought by themselves to an indurating wrought by God that is that therefore they would not the dismissing of the people or the entering of a peace or league with them because God did incline their wils to this that they should not will it 2. These Scriptures adde further the finall causes of this counsell and purpose of God even that his enemies might be punished and the glory of God magnified For seeing God would the ends hee would also most justly the means by which he would come unto them the Kings notwithstanding and people themselves neither respecting nor knowing it neither being inforced or constrained thereto and therefore sinning and perishing through their owne fault and demerit Moreover by these few and other infinite places of Scripture it is apparent that God though by his secret yet effectuall consent motion instinct doth most justly work those actions or works by his creatures which they with sin perform for because that they being destitute of the grace of the holy Ghost either are ignorant of the will of God concerning those works Or when they doe them they respect not this to execute the knowne will or commandements of God but to fulfill their own lusts against the law of God Therefore they working together with God work ill when God worketh well by them For neither doe the creatures therefore sin for that God doth by their will and actions execute his judgments for then also should the good Angels sin by whom God sometimes punisheth the wickednesse of men but because in their action they have no respect to Gods commandement neither doe it to that end as thereby to obey God Further that God doth in such sort permit sin Permission is the withdrawing of Gods grace as that he doth not illighten their minds with the knowledge of his will or doth not bend their hearts and wils which by his arcane and secret efficacy he inclineth whither himself listeth unto this as for the obeying of God to pursue or flie these or those objects that is doth not conforme the wils of sinning creatures to his will Rom. 14.23 Deut. 13.1 2 3. these sayings of Scripture witnes Whatsoever is not of faith is sin If there arise among you a Prophet or a Dreamer of dreames saying Let us goe after other gods
him heire of all Hee hath made him heire of all things All that the Father giveth mee shall come to me Thine they were and thou gavest them mee Him hath God lift up with his right hand to be a Prince and Saviour to give repentance to Israel and forgivenesse of sins God hath made all things subject under his feet and hath appointed him over all things to be the head of the Church Now whereas he is our Lord after a far more excellent manner than others we also are far more bound to his allegeance and obedience For he is so our Lord that he doth indeed with us what he will and hath full right and power over us but yet he useth that his power to our salvation only For we receive daily of this Lord moe and by infinite parts more excellent benefits than doe any other throughout the whole world And therefore we ought alwaies to acknowledge the dominion and power TWO parts of our acknowledging Christs dominion over us which Christ hath over us Which acknowledging of his dominion is 1. A profession of so great a benefit of Christ as that he hath vouchsafed to be our Lord and to set free us his enemies into this so fruitfull and glorious a liberty 2. A confession of our bond and duty For Christ being so mercifull a Lord unto us we ought both in word and life to professe our selves as his servants to be bound to faithfull subjection and obedience unto him in all things that he may be magnified of us for ever What is then the meaning of this article I beleeve in Christ our Lord Ans Three divers speeches are here to be observed The meaning of the Article I beleeve in Christ our Lord. 1. To beleeve that Christ is Lord. To beleeve this is not sufficient for we beleeve also that the Divel is Lord but not of all or ours as we doe beleeve Christ to be Lord of us all 2. To beleeve that Christ is Lord and that of all and also ours Neither is it enough to beleeve this For the Divels beleeve also that Christ is their Lord as he hath full right and authority not only over all other things but over them also to determine of them whatsoever pleaseth him 3. To beleeve in Christ our Lord that is so to beleeve Christ to be our Lord that in him we place our trust and confidence and be throughly perswaded that by him we are wholly freed and delivered from all evill and are defended and safeguarded against all our enemies and this is it which we especially ought to beleeve When as therefore we say that we beleeve in our Lord we beleeve 1. That the Son of God Christ is Creatour of all things and therefore hath power over and is Lord of all creatures John 16.5 All things that the Father hath are mine 2. But especially of his Church which being purchased with his own bloud he guideth defendeth and preserveth by his spirit 3. And that I am also one of his subjects whom being redeemed from the power of the Diven he mightily preserveth ruleth maketh obedient unto him and at length enricheth with eternall glory that is I beleeve that hitherto I have been by and for Christ preserved and shall hereafter be preserved of him through all eternity and lastly that he useth and will use his dominion and power which he hath as over all other creatures so over mee unto my salvation and his own glory ON THE 14. SABBATH Quest 35. What beleevest thou when thou saiest He was conceived by the holy Ghost and born of the Virgin Mary Ans That the Son of God who is a John 5.20 Joh. 1.1 17.3 Rom. 1.3 Col. 1.15 and continueth true and everlasting God b Rom. 9.5 took the very nature of man of the flesh and bloud of the Virgin Mary c Gal. 4.4 Luk. 1.31 42 43. by the working of the holy Ghost d Matth. 1.20 Luke 1.35 that withall hee might be the true seed of David e Româ—n 1.3 Psal 132.11 2 Sam. 7.12 Luke 1.32 Acts 2.30 like unto his brethren in all things f Philip. 2.7 Heb. 2.14 17. sin excepted g Heb. 4.15 The Explication The adversaries against whom this doctrine of Christs taking flesh of the Virgin is maintained THE Explication of this Question is very necessary for the convincement and suppression of ancient and late Heretickes who denyed and now deny that the flesh of Christ was taken out of the substance of the Virgin For the Eutychians argue thus Christ was conceived by the holy Ghost Therefore the flesh of Christ was produced out of the substance of the Divinity or out of the essence of the holy Ghost and by this means the divine nature was changed into the humane The particle by in the Article conceived c. implieth not a materiall but an efficient cause Ans The fallacy of this argument is drawn from an abuse of misconstruing of a common phrase of speech For the termes by the holy Ghost or of the holy Ghost doe not signifie unto us a materiall but an efficient cause so that the flesh of Christ proceedeth not out of the essence of the holy Ghost as out of the matter whereof it was made but the whole man Jesus Christ was conceived in the Virgins wombe by the vertue and working of the holy Ghost as appeareth out of the words of the Angel The holy Ghost shall come upon thee Luke 1.35 and the power of the most High shall over-shaddow thee Christ is called the seed of Abraham the sonne of David Therefore hee took his flesh of these Fathers not of the holy Ghost And as wee are born of God because he made us not that we are of his substance So Christ was conceived by the holy Ghost that is hee was conceived by the vertue and operation of the holy Ghost not that he was conceived of the substance of the holy Ghost Object If in this article He was conceived of the holy Ghost the particle Of imply not a materiall cause then in like sort the Article which followeth Born of the Virgin Mary the same particle Of cannot imply a materiall cause and so Christ cannot be said to have taken his flesh of the Virgin Ans The case is not alike in both of these but in this latter Article it must needs signifie a materiall cause The reason is because it was necessary that Christ should come of the seed of David But when it is said Three reasons why the particle ex signifying by or of though in the Article Born of c. it import a materiall cause yet it doth not so in the Article Conceived of c. Three things to be observed in the Conception He was conceived of the holy Ghost the particle Of intimateth no materiall cause The reasons are 1. Because if this were true it could not be true which followeth that Christ was
concurre unto one person because they being united doe make one person or one subsistent incommunicable not sustained in another or of another The Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost are not united in person or personall properties because they have these not the same but distinct By this which hath been said it is manifest that the Union in nature and naturall perfections is an equality of properties and nature but the personall union is when two unlike natures are coupled so that each retaineth his naturall properties and operations whole and distinct but yet have both one and the same subsistence wholly or it is the joyning of two natures different in properties to constitute the substance of one individuall or person that is such a connexion or knitting of them together as they are one individuall subsisting by it selfe or the substance of one individuall But that in Christ the Vnion of the flesh with the Word is not essentiall Why the union of the flesh with the Word cannot be essentiall made in the nature or any essentiall property of the God head is shewed by these reasons 1. Of the God-head and flesh assumed there ariseth not any third Essence but each is and abideth an Essence so perfect and whole as neither especially the Divine as being in it selfe a person and simply void of all change cometh into the composition or compounding as we properly take this word of the other 2. If the Union of the flesh with the word were essentiall it would follow that the humanity once assumed and taken was equalled with the God-head in essentiall properties so by a consequent to be made of the same nature and essence with the Word So Vigilius sheweth Lib 4. The ancient heresies into which they fall who maintaine an Essentiall Union that the Eutychians held two substances to be in Christ of the same nature Wherefore they who will have the essentiall properties of the God-head to be really communicated and common with the flesh so that the flesh should truly and really be and be called omnipotent omniscient and whatsoever else the God-head is they indeed howsoever in words they mightily stand against it hold this Union to be made in essential properties and in nature and both with Eutyches and Swenckfield they confound both natures and take away the difference between the creature and the Creatour and also with Nestorius they frame and make two persons and so bring in a quaternity For albeit they say that they in their confusion or as themselves call it with their Master Swenckfield deifying and majesticall exaltation of the flesh doe retaine the substance of the flesh yet two substances having really the same and like perfections are two subsistents or persons of one nature as are two men and whatsoever other individuals of the same kind or nature Lastly with Sabellius and the Patripassians they incarnate the whole Trinity For there is one and the same essence in number of the divine person and the same essentiall properties Wherefore that which is united and equalled with one of these three according to essence must needs be also united and equalled with the rest Wherefore the Union of both natures in Christ is personall or according to the subsistence proper unto the Word both natures keeping and retaining in that Union their properties whole and unconfounded For the Word did not by uniting humane nature unto it make the same God-head or God and omnipotent immense and infinite but it took the manhood which retaineth still the properties belonging unto it and so did joyn and knit it unto it selfe as to be one person with it and the substance of one Christ Neither is it absurd that a thing which neither is made or is one with another in kind neither any Homogeneall part thereof should yet exist in the same subsistence with it or should subsist in it self wherwith it is united For a graffe hath his subsisting in a tree of another nature or kind The same is the subsistence both of the sprig ingraffed of the tree sustaining the sprig that is they are one and the same individuall tree yet have they and so doe reaine natures in properties most diverse The like reason is there in the two natures of Christ both subsisting in or of the same person of the Son Object The humane nature is united with the Word in person but not in nature Therefore the person is divorced and sundered from the nature Againe The person onely of the Sonne is united with the humane nature Therefore not the divine nature it selfe of the Word Answ In both these arguments is a fallacy from that which is no cause as if it were a cause and both offend in this for that they who so reason against the maintainers of true doctrine and men sound in faith either know not or are not willing to distinguish between these two phrases of speech To be united in nature and to be united to or with a nature when notwithstanding the difference is very great and most familiar and knowne unto the Schoolemen For To be united in nature is to be equalled that is to be made one essence or nature with another To be united to or with a nature is to be coupled and joyned therewith to one subsistence or personality Wherefore the flesh is united to or with the Word not in nature or in essentiall properties that is it is not made with the Word one essence neither made equall unto it in omnipotency wisdome and nature for so should the whole Trinity be incarnate Yet it is united to the omnipotencie wisdome nature and essence of God not simply but of God the Word Now this is nothing else than the flesh to be united to the person of the Sonne or to the Word in person which person is the very divine nature or essence omnipotent wise and whatsoever else is proper to the God-head But albeit the flesh taken or assumed is truly united both to the person and to the nature of the Word For the person is not any severall thing or really differing from the essence but is the essence it selfe yet is it well said that the flesh is united to the Word in person onely and likewise that the person onely of the Word is incarnate The reasons hereof are 1. Because not the Father nor the holy Ghost were incarnate but the Sonne onely 2. Because the first and neerest terme of this union is the person only of the Word assuming and taking the flesh but not the God-head For the person onely is proper unto the Word the essence of the God-head is common to him and the same with the Father and the holy Ghost This is plainly taught by the sixth Toletan Councell Concil Tolet. 6. cap. 1. in these words in these words The Sonne onely took the humanity in singularity of person not in the unity of divine nature that is in that which is proper unto the
the God-head signifieth not the person which hath both names but only the divine nature it selfe But of God which is the concrete name the properties not of the God-head only but of the man-hood also may be affirmed because God signifieth not the divine nature but the person which hath both the divine nature and the humane Object 3. There is no proportion between temporall punishment and eternall Christ suffered onely temporall paines and punishments therefore he could not satisfie for eternall punishment Answ There is no proportion between temporall and eternall punishment if they be considered as being both in the same subject but in diverse subjects there may be The temporall punishment of the Son of God is of more value and worth than the eternall punishment of the whole world for divers causes heretofore alledged Object 4. If Christ satisfied perfectly for all then all must be saved But all are not saved Therefore he satisfied not perfectly for all Answ Christ satisfied for all men as concerning the application of his merit and satisfaction True it is that Christ fulfilled the Law two wayes 1. By his owne righteousnesse 2. By satisfying for our unrighteousnesse and both these he performed most perfectly But the satisfaction is made outs by our private application which is two-fold the former is wrought by God when he justifieth us for his Sons merit and causeth us to cease from sin the latter is effected by us through faith For we then apply unto our selves the merit of Christ when by a true faith we are perswaded that God remitteth our sins for his Sons sacrifice and satisfaction and without this application Christs satisfaction availeth us nothing Object 5. There were also propitiatory sacrifices in Moses Law Answ There were no sacrifices which might properly be termed expiatory but those that were were shadowes onely of Christs sacrifice which onely is propitiatory Hebr 10.4 1 John 1.7 1 John 2.2 For it is impossible that the bloud of Buls and Goates should take away sinnes The bloud of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sinne He is the propitiation for the sinnes of the whole world 2. Whether Christ suffered according to both natures CHrist suffered not according to both natures neither according to his God-head but according to his humane nature onely both in body and soule For his divine nature is immutable impassible immortall and very life it selfe which cannot die Now he so suffered according to his humanity that by his death and passion he made satisfaction for infinite sinnes of men And the divinity sustained and upheld the humanity in the griefes and paines thereof and raised it againe to life when it had been dead Christ was put to death concerning the flesh but was quickned in the spirit 1 Pet. 3.18 4.2 John 2.19 Rev. 1.18 John 10.18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sinnes the just for the unjust that he might bring us unto God Destroy this Temple and I will raise it up againe in three dayes I was dead and loe I am alive I have power to lay downe my life and to take it up againe These testimonies prove that there was another nature in Christ besides his flesh which other nature neither suffered nor died Irenaeus saith As Christ was man that so he might be tempted Lib. 3. cont hares so he was the Word that so he might be glorified The Word indeed and Deity so resting in him that he might be tempted crucified and suffer death and yet united to his humanity that so he might overcome temptation death c. Object God purchased the Church with his owne bloud therefore the God-head suffered Ans It doth not follow Acts 20.28 because an argument from the concrete which is God to the abstract which is the God head is of no consequence Againe the kind of affirmation is altered God is said to have dyed by a figurative speech which is Synecdoche use when we signifie the whole by a part as whole Christ by God and by a communicating of the properties But when it is said The God head died this affirmation admitteth no figure seeing the subject in it is a meer abstract The concrete signifieth the subject or person having the nature or forme but the abstract signifieth the bare nature and forme onely Wherefore as the argument doth not follow A man is compounded of the clements and is corporeall Therefore his soule also is corporeall this cannot follow because all things agree not to the forme which agree to the subject the soule is the forme of man man is the essentiall subject of the soule So neither doth it follow Christ-God died therefore Christs God-head died For from the concrete to the abstract the reason doth not follow 3. The causes impellent or motives of Christs Passion John 3.16 1. THE love of God towards mankind So God loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son 2. The mercy of God towards man fallen into sin Of his mercy he saved us Titus 3.5 3. The will of God to revenge the injury of the Devill who in reproach and despight of God averted us from him and maimed the image of God in us in despight of the Creatour 4. The finall causes or ends of the Passion THE finall causes and fruits of Christs Passion are all one save that they differ in divers respects For in respect of Christ who suffered they are termed finall causes in respect of us they are called fruits The finall causes or ends of his Passion are 1. The manifesting of the love goodnesse mercy righteousnesse of God while he punisheth his Sonne for us 2. That his Passion might be a sufficient ransome of our sins or the redeeming of us The chiefe finall causes then are The glory of God and our salvation To the former finall cause belongeth the knowledge of the greatnesse of sinne that we may know how great an evill sinne is and what it deserveth To the latter belongeth our justification wherein all the benefits are comprehended which Christ merited by dying and by his freeing himselfe from death Hence know we that death is not now pernicious and hurtfull to the godly and therefore not to be feared Quest 38. For what cause should he suffer under Pilate as being his Judge Answ That he being innocent and condemned before a civill Judge a John 18.38 Mat. 27.24 Luk. 23.14 15. John 19.4 might deliver us from the severe judgement of God which remained for all men b Psal 69 5. Esay 53.45 2 Cor. 5.21 Gal. 3.13 The Explication MEntion is made of Pilate in Christs Passion 1. Because Christ did receive from him a testimony of his innocency that thereby we might know that he was pronounced innocent by the voyce of the Judge himself 2. That we might know that he though innocent was notwithstanding solemnely condemned 3. That we might be advertised of the fulfilling of the prophecy Eâ—ck â—1 27 I will over-turne
reason of the latter is because all the elect and faithfull and they alone doe by faith apply unto themselves the merit of Christs death and by his application obtaine the efficacy thereof even their justification and salvation according to that saying of Scripture He which beleeveth in the Son hath life everlasting The rest are excluded from this efficacy of Christs death by their own infidelity according as it followeth in the same place He which beleeveth not shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him Wherefore John 3.36 whom the Scripture cancelleth from the participation of the efficacy of Christs death for them Christ cannot be said to have died with respect of the efficacy of his death but in respect only of the sufficiency of his sacrifice because the death of Christ is sufficient to save them if they beleeved but it saveth them not because they beleeve not If any demand what the will of Christ herein was whether he had a will to die for all hee is answered by the same distinction For as hee died so would hee die Whether Christ would die for all men As therefore he died for all in respect of the sufficiency of his ransome but for the faithfull alone in regard of the efficacy of the same so would hee also die for all in generall as concerning the sufficiency of his merit that is hee would in most sufficient maner demerit for all by his death grace righteousnesse and life everlasting seeing he would that nothing should be wanting on his part that there should be no defect in his merit that so all the wicked and reprobate might perish without excuse But for the elect alone hee would die as touching the efficacy of his merit that is hee would not only sufficiently merit grace and salvation but also effectually impart them on the elect alone namely hee would give unto them faith and the holy Ghost and accomplish or effect in them that they should apply unto themselves by faith the benefits of his death and so obtain the fruits thereof In this sense Christ is well said to have died in a different maner for the faithfull and unfaithfull Neither hath this interpretation any inconvenience consequent thereon but accordeth not only with Scripture but even with very experience also both which testifie unto us that the salve of sin and death is most sufficiently and plentifully offered in the Gospel unto all but it is applyed and it cureth the faithfull alone The whole current of Scripture restraineth the efficacy of redemption to some particulars only as to Christs sheep to the elect and to the beleeving whereas on the other side it apparently abandoneth and sequestreth from the grace of Christ the reprobate and unfaithfull as long as they remain such What concord hath Christ with Belial or what part hath the beleever with the infidell Again 2 Cor. 6.15 Christ prayed for the Elect only and beleeving and such as hereafter should beleeve on him I pray not for the world but for those whom thou hast given mee If Christ would not pray for the world to wit for the unfaithfull much lesse would he so die for them John 27.9 as by his death to effect their salvation For it is a lesse thing to pray for a man than to die for him and intercession and suffering of death are the two individuall or inseparable parts of Christs sacrifice of which if Christ deny the ungodly the one who is he that dareth reach out unto them the other Lastly the sounder Fathers and Schoole-men doe thus restraine these texts of Scriptures The opinion of Fathers herein Aug ad cap. ob cap. 1 in Ioh. tract 52. serm 137. de temp Cyr. in Ioh. lib. 11 cap. 19. Prospâ—r ad cap. Gallorum Lumb lib. 3. dist 22 Sum. de veâ—it Mat. 26. Quaft 7. and distinguish on them as we doe especially Augustine Cyril and Prosper Lombard thus writeth Christ offered up himself to God the Trinity for all men as touching the sufficiency of the price pay'd but for the elect alone as touching the efficacy because he wrought salvation only for the Predestinate Thomas saith The merit of Christ as concerning the sufficiency thereof equally belongeth unto all but not concerning the efficacy which hapneth partly by reason of free-will and partly by reason of Gods election whereby the effects and fruits of Christs merits are mercifully bestowed on some and by the just judgement of God are with-held from others This is the language of other School-men also Whence it is evident that Christ so died for all that notwithstanding the benefits of his death properly concern the faithfull alone to whom only they are availeable Object 1. The promise of the Gospel is universall as appeareth in that Christ saith Come unto mee all And againe That every man might be saved Also That hee might have mercy on all Therefore it concerneth not the faithfull alone Ans The promise indeed is universall but in regard of the faithfull and penitent For to extend it unto filthy dogs and hogs that is to the reprobate were open blasphemy There is saith Ambrose a certain speciall university of the elect and fore-knowne of God severed and discerned from the generality of all This manner of restraint is deduced out of the very letter of the promise John 3.16 Rom. 322. That every one which beleeveth should not perish but have everlasting life The righteousnesse of God by the faith of Christ Jesus unto all and upon all that beleeve Come unto mee all yee which labour and travell and I will refresh you Hee is rich unto all that call upon him Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved Mat. 11.28 Acts 2.21 Heb. 5.9 Mat. 7.6 Hee is made the authour of salvation unto all that obey him And out of the words of Christ Give not that which is holy unto dogs and cast not pearles before swine Obj. 2. Christ died for all Therefore his death appertaineth not to the faithfull only Answ Christ died for all as touching the merit and sufficiency of his ransom for the faithfull only as touching the application and efficacy thereof For inasmuch as the death of Christ is imparted unto them and profiteth them only it is rightly said to appertain properly unto them alone as before hath bin proved at large Quest 41. To what end was he buried also Ans That thereby he might make manifest that he was dead indeed a Act. 13.29 Mat. 27.59 60 Luk. 23.52 The Explication THE causes of Christs buriall are many For 1. He would be buried in testimony of his true death that we might know that hee was dead indeed For the living are not buried but the dead only As then after his resurrection hee offered himselfe to be seen handled c. for evident proof of the truth of his body raised from death so after his death he offered his body to be
a benefit Christ is made unto us righteousnesse wisdome sanctification and redemption Ye are compleat in him 1 Cor. 1.30 Col. 2.9 which is the head of all principality c. The death of Christ is the impellent or motive cause in effectuating as well our justification as our regeneration in two respects 1. In respect of God because for the death of Christ God pardoneth us our sins and giveth us the holy Ghost and restoreth in us his image Being justified in his bloud Rom. 5.9 10 Gal. 4.6 Being reconciled to God through the death of his Son Because ye are sonnes God hath sent forth the spirit of his Sonne into your hearts which cryeth Abba Father 2. In respect of us also it is an impellent cause because they who apprehend Christs merit by a true faith and apply his death unto themselves for them it is impossible to be unthankfull or not indeavour to live to the praise and honour of his name which is to begin newnesse of life The application of Christs death and the consideration thereof will not suffer us to be ungratefull but forceth us to love Christ again and prove therein our thankfulnesse for so inestimable a benefit No man therfore may imagine any remission of sins without regeneration and he lieth unto himselfe and the world who boasteth of Christs death applied to himself yet hath no desire to live godly and holily to the honor of Christ For all after they are once justified prepare and addresse themselves to doe those things which are gratefull unto God For regeneration or the desire and endeavouring of obeying God cannot be separated from the applying of his death unto us nor the benefit of regeneration from the benefit of justification All who are justified are also regenerated and sanctified and all who are regenerate are also justified Object The Apostle attributeth our regeneration to Christs resurrection why then is regeneration here attributed to his death 1 Pet. 1.3 Answ It is attributed unto Christs death as touching his merit for he merited regeneration for us by dying And it is attributed to Christs resurrection in respect of the applying of it for by rising from the dead hee applyeth unto us regeneration and giveth us the holy Ghost Eternall life Eternall life is also the fruit of Christs death God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but have everlasting life John 3.16 1 John 5.12 God hath given unto us eternall life and this life is in his Son The meaning of the Article I beleeve in Christ dead Now what is it To beleeve in Christ dead Ans It is to beleeve that Christ hath not only suffered extreme torments for my sake but also death it selfe and hath by his death obtained for mee remission of sins and reconciliation with God and consequently also the holy Ghost who beginneth in me a new life that I may again be made the Temple of God and at length attain unto everlasting life wherein I shall worship and magnifie God for ever Quest 44. Why is there added He descended into hell Ans That in my greatest paines and most grievous tentations I may support my selfe with the comfort that my Lord Jesus Christ hath delivered me by the unspeakable distresses torments and terrours of his soule into which hee was plunged both before a Psal 18.5 6. 116.3 Mat. 26.36 27.46 Heb. 5.7 and then especially when he hanged on the Crosse from the straits and torments of hell b Esay 53.5 The Explication Two things are here to be handled 1. The true sense and meaning of this Article 2. The use 1. What the true sense of this Article is or what the descent of Christ into Hell signifieth HEll in Scripture is taken three waies For it signifieth 1. The Grave Three significations of hell in Scripture Then yee shall bring my gray-head with sorrow unto hell Thou wile not leave my soule in hell neither wilt thou suffer thine holy One to see corruption 2. The place of the damned as in the story of the rich man and Lazarus The Glutton being in hell in torments Gen. 42.38 Psal 16.10 lift up his eyes and saw Abraham a farre off and Lazarus in his bosome If I lye downe in hell thou art there 3. The paines of hell that is the terrours and torments of the soule and conscience The paines of hell gate hold upon mee Luke 16.23 Psal 139.8 The Lord bringeth downe to hell and raiseth up that is into exceeding paines and torments out of which afterwards he againe delivereth Psal 116.3 In this third sense it is taken in this Article For it cannot be understood in the first sense of the Grave 1. Because it is said before Hee was buried If any say Why he I is not here taken for the grave that this latter Article is an exposition of the former he saith nothing For as often as two speeches expressing the same thing are joyned together so that the one is an exposition of the other it is meet that the latter be more cleere and open than the former which here is cleane contrary For. To descend into hell is more obscure than to be buried 2. It is not likely in this so brief and succinct a Confession that the same things should be twice spoken in other words Neither can this place be understood of the place of the damned Why hell is not here taken for the place of the damned as is proved by this division 1. If Christ did locally descend into Hell he descended either as touching his God-head or as touching his soule or as touching his body Not as touching his God-head For this is every-where Nor as touching his body For that rested in the grave three dayes as was prefigured by Jonas the type of Christ Because no part of Christ could be in hell neither rose it from any other place but from the grave Nor us touching his soule 1. Because Scripture no where expresseth and mentioneth it 2. Because Christ dying on the Crosse Luke 23.46 23 4â— Christs soule descended not locally said of his soule Father into thy hands I commend my spirit And to the Theefe This day shalt thou be with mee in Paradise Therefore the soule of Christ after his death was in the hand of his Father in Paradise not in Hell And that cavill little steadeth the Adversaries of this doctrine that hee might be also in the hand of his Fatheâ— that is in his Fathers protection even in Hell according to that Psal 139.8 If I lye downe in Hell thou art there that is there also will God have care of me and there also will he keep me that I perish not for one place interpreteth another And he had said before unto the Thief This day shalt thou be with me in Paradise Luke 23.43 that is in
effect likewise is taken away The wages of sinne is death Further Rom. 6.23 if he hath abolished death and that by a sufficient satisfaction for our sins which satisfaction he hath shewed and declared by his resurrection to be sufficient it is certain that his resurrection is a most certain testimony of our resurrection for he having performed a sufficient satisfaction for the sins of his members the members cannot remain in death But the resurrection of Christ the head is an argument of the perfect satisfaction for the sinnes of his members Therefore Christs resurrection is also an argument of the perfect resurrection of his members 3. As the first Adam received the blessings for himselfe and all his posterity and lost the same from all So Christ the second Adam received life and all other gifts for himselfe and others and therefore also will communicate eternall life with us 4. Seeing the same spirit dwelleth in us which did in Christ he shall work also the same in us which in our head he did For the spirit is alwayes alike neither could he work in the head and sleep in the members Therefore seeing Christ hath raised himselfe up by his spirit from the dead he will verily also raise us up If the spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you Rom. 8.11 he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies because that his Spirit dwelleth in you 5. Because Christ is man and our brother for except he were man we should have no hope of the resurrection of our flesh For 1 Cor 1â— 11 by man came the resurrection Therefore for his tender love and affection he will not leave us in death and so much the rather in regard of his power and glory For if he being dead raised himselfe much more being alive shall he be able to raise us up and if in the time of his humiliation he had power to raise himselfe much more may he raise us out of the grave now he reigneth in glory aâ— the right hand of his Father Object 1. Then the wicked shall not rise againe because Christs resurrection is neither an argument nor the cause of the resurrection of the wicked but of the godly onely Answ There be other causes for which the wicked shall rise againe even for the just judgement of God whereby he hath appointed them to eternall paines For the same thing may have moe effects and diverse causes Object 2. These are the benefits of his death therefore not of his resurrection Ans They are of his death as by it he deserved them of his resurrection 1. In respect of the manifestation of them for by his resurrection he declared that those benefis were purchased for us For by escaping from this punishment he made plaine proofe of his full and perfect satisfaction for sinne 2. In respect of the application of them Because by his resurrection he applieth his benefits unto us 2 Cor. â— 9 He being rich was made poore and being poore was made rich againe that he might enrich us Object 3. The effect is not before the cause The cause of these benefis which is his resurrection was not before the first resurrection therefore neither the effect that is the benefits themselves Answ The resurrection was not as touching the accomplishment thereof but in the counsell of God and in efficacy and vertue it was in the Old Testament For then also were men received into favour they were indued with the holy Ghost and received the other benefits but for and by the Mediatour which was in time appointed to be humbled and glorified Knowledge that Christ is the prophecied Melâ—ias By Christs resurrection we know him to be the Messias as in whom the prophecies were fulfilled Assurance that he is the Mediatour By it we are assured that he now executeth the office of the Mediatour that he applyeth unto us the benefit of redemption that he preserveth us perpetually in that righteousnesse which he hath applied unto us that he beginneth in us a new life and so doth also assure and ascertain us of the consummation and accomplishment of eternall life all which he could not doe except he had risen againe Affurance that he will alwaies defend his Church Seeing he now liveth and reigneth for ever we are certaine that he will preserve and defend his Church The consummation of all his benefits The last though not the least fruit of Christs resurrection is The consummation and perfecting of all his benefits and the glorifying of his Church For Christ did therefore die and is therefore risen and hath therefore perfectly delivered us from sin that we may be joynt heires with him of his kingdome and glory Col. 1.18 Rom. 8.17 He is the first-borne of the dead We are the heires of God and heires annexed with Christ He shall conforme and make us like unto himself because we live by the same spirit whereby he doth And this spirit is not unlike himselfe Rom. 8.11 If the spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies because that his spirit dwelleth in you John 14.3 I will come againe and receive you unto my selfe that where I am there may ye be also The summe of the fruits of Christs resurrection is that seeing Christ is risen it is manifest that he is declared to be the Son of God and as touching his humanity is endowed with that glory which becometh the nature of the Sonne of God and further that he endueth us also with his spirit regenerateth us by the vertue of his spirit and will at length consummate and perfect the new life begun in us and make us co-partners of the same his glory felicity and everlasting life The meaning of the Article He rose againe from the dead Now what is the meaning of this Article I beleeve in Christ which rose againe the third day from the dead Answ The meaning hereof is that I beleeve 1. That Christ did truly recall his soule into his dead body and quickned it 2. That he retained a true soul and true body but both now glorified and free from all our infirmities 3. That he rose by his owne vertue and power 4. That he rose to this end to make me a partaker of his righteousnesse sanctification and glorification which he had purchased for us by his death Quest 46. How understand you that He ascended into heaven Answ That Christ his Disciples looking on was taken up from the earth into heaven a Acts 1.9 Marke 16.19 Luke 24. â—1 and yet still is there for our sakes b Hebr. 9.24 4.14 Rom. 8.34 Col. 3.1 and will be untill he come againe to judge the quick and the dead c Acts 1.11 Mat. 24.30 The Explication CHrists ascension into heaven is a
that he should magnifie him for ever which cannot be if there were no resurrection nor judgement All other proofs and arguments may be referred unto these 2. What is the last judgement IN every wordly judgement are the Accused the Accuser the Judge the Cause Examination and Hearing of the cause the Law according to which judgement is given the Sentence of absolution or condemnation and the Execution thereof according to the Law Worldly judgement then in generall is an inquisition or examination of a cause by an ordinary and lawfull Judge according to just lawes and a pronouncing of sentence and the execution thereof according to the just lawes Now it is easie to define this last judgment of God which he will execute by Christ This Judge hath no need of inquisition or examination of the cause or of witnesses and accusers seeing he himselfe will make the works of all manifest because he is himselfe the searcher of hearts Therefore there shall be only the Judge and the offenders on whom sentence shall be given and the law according to which sentence shall be given and executed The definition of it is this 1. The last judgement is a judgement which God shall exercise in the end of the world by Christ The definition of the last judgment who shall then visibly descend from heaven in a cloud in the glory and majesty of his Father and Angels by whom also then shall be raised from the dead all men which have died since the beginning of the world unto the end thereof but the rest who are then living shall be suddenly changed and all presented before the tribunall seat of Christ who shall give sentence on all and shall cast the wicked with the divels into everlasting torments but shall receive up the godly unto himselfe that they may with him and blessed Angels enjoy eternall happinesse and glory in heaven Acts 1.11 A more brief definition Hee shall so come as yee have seen him goe into heaven It may be defined more briefly on this wise The last judgement shall be a manifestation of the hearts and inward thoughts of all men and a declaration of all their actions and a separation of the just and unjust who ever have lived or shall live from the beginning of the world unto the end proceeding from God by Christ and a pronouncing of sentence on these men and an execution thereof according to the doctrine of the law and Gospel the issue whereof shall be the perfect delivery of the Church and the finall abjection of wicked men and divels into everlasting punishment The confirmation of each part The parts of this definition we will now in few words confirme 1. The judgement shall be a manifestation of the just and unjust For the books shall be opened that the secrets of hearts may be laid open Rev. 20.12 2. There shall be a separation of the just and unjust For Christ shall place the sheep on his right hand but the goates on his left hand 3. This manifestation and separation shall be wrought of God by Christ Mat. 25.28 If of God then shall it be a most divine and just judgement If God be unrighteous how shall he judge the world It shall be made and wrought by Christ because Rom. 3.6 The Father hath committed all judgement to the Son John 5.22 Acts 17.13 God hath appointed to judge the world by a man 4. It shall be a pronouncing of sentence because the judge shall say to them on his right hand Come yee blessed of my Father To those on the left Goe yee cursed into everlasting fire Mat. 25.34.41 which is prepared for the Divell and his Angels 5. It shall be an everlasting execution And these shall goe into everlasting fire and the righteous into life eternall 6. After this manner the wicked and the godly shall be judged according to the Law and Gospel that is they shall be pronounced and declared just or unjust before the tribunall seat of Christ For the absolution of the just shall be principally according to the Gospel but shall be confirmed by the law The condemnation of the unjust shall be principally by the law but shall be confirmed of the Gospel Sentence shall be given on the wicked according to their owne merit Sentence shall be given on the godly according to Christs merit applied unto them by faith a testimony and witnesse of which faith shall be their workes Therefore also shall the godly confesse that the retribution of rewards cometh not by their merit but by his grace they shall say When saw we thee hungring or thirsting By nature we are all subject unto the wrath of God but we shall be pronounced blessed of God Mat. 25.37 not in Adam but in the blessed seed even in Christ Therefore the sentence shall be given according to the Gospel Object Vnto every man shall be given according to his workes Therefore judgement shall be given to all Rom. 2.6 not according to the Gospel but according to the doctrine of the Law Ans In this sense shall be given also unto the elect according to their works not that their works are merits but in that they are the effects of faith Wherefore then unto the elect shall be given according to their workes that is they shall be judged according to the effects of faith and to be judged according to faith is to be judged according to the Gospel Two causes why Christ will in the last â—ay raâ—her judge us according to the effects of faith than according to faith Now Christ shall rather judge according to workes the effects of faith than according to faith 1. Because he will have it known to others why he so judgeth lest the ungodly and condemned persons might object that he giveth us eternall life unjustly He will prove by our works the fruits of our faith that our faith was sincere and true and that therefore we are such as to whom life is due according to the promise Wherefore he will shew them our works and will bring them forth as restimonies to refute them that we have in this life applied unto us Christs merit 2. That we may have comfort in this life that we shall hereafter according to our works stand at his right hand 3. Who shall be Judge CHrist shall be the Judge John 5.22 27. the same person which is the Mediatour For the Father hath committed all judgement unto the Sonne and hath given him power also to execute judgement Acts 10.42 and 17.31 The Father and the holy Ghost shall judge by consent and authority in that he is the Sonne of Man Hee hath committed all judgement unto the Sonne Hee is ordained of God a Judge of quick and dead Hee will judge the world in righteousnesse by that man whom hee hath appointed Neither yet are the Father and the holy Ghost removed from this judgement But Christ immediatly shall
contradiction as if thou shouldst say I am certain of my reward therefore I will not run for a reward is not given but to him that runneth These propositions do one mutually follow another To be certain of salvation and To have a desire of conversion and amendment of life 2. What predestination is The difference between predestination and providence PRedestination differeth from providence as a speciall from the generall For providence is the eternall counsell of God concerning all creatures but predestination is the eternall counsell of God concerning the saving of men and angels Wherefore predestination is the eternall most just and unchangeable counsell of God of creating men of permitting their fall into sin and eternall death of sending his Son into flesh that he might be a sacrifice and of converting some by the word and the holy Ghost for the Mediatours sake and saving them in true faith and conversion justifying them by and for him raising them up to glory and bestowing on them eternall life and of leaving the rest in sin and eternall death and raising them up to judgment and casting them into eternall pains Here is spoken of men which shall be saved and not saved therefore to them onely and not to angels doth this definition of predestination agree The parts of predestination are Election and Reprobation Election is the eternall Election unchangeable free and most just decree of God whereby he hath decreed to convert some to Christ to preserve and keep them in faith and repentance and by him to give them eternall life Reprobation is such a decree of God as whereby he hath decreed to leave some Reprobation according to his most just judgement in their sins to punish them with blindnesse and damnation and condemn them being not made partakers of Christ everlastingly That election likewise as also reprobation are both the decree of God these and the like sayings do prove I know whom I have chosen His grace was given to us before the world was John 13.18 2 Tim. 1.9 Rom. 9.18 He hath mercy on whom he will But therefore election and reprobation were made by counsell and therefore both are a decree and that eternall because there is no new thing in God but all from everlasting and the Scripture doth manifestly say Ephes 1.4 that God hath chosen us before the foundation of the world Seeing then he hath chosen us hee hath therefore rejected the rest that which the very word of choosing doth shew For whatsoever is chosen the same is chosen other things being rejected 3. What are the causes of predestination or election and reprobation THe efficient and motive cause is the good pleasure of God It is so O Father The efficient cause of our election Gods good pleasure not any thing in us Ephes 2.3 because thy good pleasure was such God hath not foreseen any thing in us for which he should choose us for there can be no good in us as of our selves seeing we are by nature the children of wrath as well as others For if any good be found in us that he doth work wholly in us and he worketh nothing in us which he hath not decreed to work from everlasting Wherefore the alone gracious and free good pleasure of God or the alone free mercy of God is the efficient and motive cause of our election Our election I say is of grace and free that is not in respect of any good foreseen in us Rom. 9.18 John 15.16 He hath mercy on whom he will that is he freely giveth what he giveth Ye have not chosen me but I have chosen you God hath predestinate us to be adopted through Jesus Christ unto himselfe The cause of reprobation is in GOD. Ephes 1.5 according to the good pleasure of his will See further Rom. 9.11 Col. 1.12 2 Tim. 1.9 10. In like manner also the efficient cause of reprobation is the most free good pleasure of God For we being all by nature the children of wrath had all perished if sinne were the cause of reprobation Wherefore the cause of reprobation is not in men themselves but that is in God his will of shewing forth his justice Therefore of particular men why this man is elected and the reprobated there can be no other reason given but the good pleasure of God only But the cause of damnation is altogether in men which is sin For God will declare his justice in the damnation of the reprobate He therefore condemneth no man not ordaineth unto condemnation unlesse it be for sin neither willeth he the damnation as it is damnation but as it is a just punishment Now punishment taketh not place but there where sin was before seated The cause of damnation is the free will of divels and men The principall cause therefore of damnation is the free will of Divels and men because of their owne accord they fell from God But the first cause of salvation is the eternall and free election of God whereof God foresaw no cause in us why he would convert us unto Christ rather than others why he would save and redeeme us out of the common and generall destruction wherein all were plunged rather than others The supreme finall cause of Predestination is Gods glory and the last and proper finall cause of election is the manifestation of Gods goodnesse and mercy in freely saving the Elect. The next and nearest finall cause of our election is our justification when God doth in his Sonne freely account us for righteous Both which finall causes the Apostle compriseth in these words He hath predestinated us to the praise of the glory of his grace wherewith he hath made us freely accepted in his beloved Ephes 1.6 Likewise of the contrary The first finall cause of reprobation is the declaration of Gods justice severity and hatred against sinne in the reprobate Rom. 2.9 God would to shew his wrath and to make his power knowne suffer with long patience the vessels of wrath prepared to destruction Object 1. God did foreknow our workes therefore he chose us for our works Ans He did foreknow those good things which he purposed to work in us as also he foreknew the persons otherwise he could not have foreknowne any good workes So could he not have foreseene any evill except he had purposed to permit the same Object 2. Whomsoever God chose in Christ them he found in Christ for he in Christ benefiteth none but those who are in Christ Ephes 1.3 God chose us in Christ Therefore he found us in Christ that is he foresaw that we should be accepted of Christ that we would beleeve rather than others and would become better than others and therefore he chose us Answ We deny the Major For the reason alledged holdeth not true in election but in the effects of election and in the consummation of Christs benefits which are imparted unto none but such as are in
mannage the affaires of the Common-wealth let the Preacher instruct the Church on the good heape rewards on the evill aggravate punishments Let honour be given to whom honour belongeth Rom. 13.7 and tribute to whom tribute belongeth There is also another division of Justice namely Of the person and Of the cause Justice of the person when a person is just and agreeable to the Law Justice of the person and of the cause Of the cause when he hath a just and good cause in any controversie whether the person himself be good or bad Herewith David doth oftentimes comfort himself in his Psalmes It is otherwise called The justice of a good conscience A briefe Table comprehending the partition of Justice set downe in the second Chapter of this tract of Justification Justice in generall is a conformity with God or with the Law of God Or it is a fulfilling of Gods Law This Justice is divided into 1. Uncreated justice which is God himselfe whose whole effence is meere Justice 2. Created justice which is an effect of God in reasonable creatures whereby they be conformable unto Gods Law It is divided into 1. Legall justice or justice of workes which is perfect obedience of the Law performed by Angels or Men. This again is distinguished into 1 Universall justice which is an observing of all the lawes which belong unto us It is divided into 1. Perfect justice which is an external and internal conformity with the Law of God and other lawes of men which concern us 2. Imperfect justice which is a conformity indeed but begun onely This is again subdivided into 1. Philosophicall or humane justice which is a knowledge of Gods Law and vertues imperfect obscure and weake c. 2. Christian justice which is a knowledge of God and his Law imperfect indeed yet apparent kindled in the heart by the holy Ghost through the Gospel and joyned with a serious inclination of the will and heart to obey God according to all his commandements 2. Particular justice which is a vertue giving to every man his owne and is divided into 1. Commutative justice which observeth an equality of things and prices in contracts and exchanges 2. Distributive justice which observeth a proportion in distributing offices goods rewards punishments 2. Evangelicall justice or justice of faith which is a fulfilling of the law performed not by us but by another for us that is the ransome of the Son of God imputed unto us 3. In what Justice differeth from Justification JVstice is the very conformity it selfe with the law and the fulfilling of the law and the thing whereby we are just before God which is the very satisfaction of Christ performed on the Crosse Justification is the application of that justice and by this application the thing whereby we are just even that justice and satisfaction of Christ is made ours and except that be made ours or applied and imputed unto us we cannot be just as neither the wall is made white except whitenesse be applyed unto it For even in like maner Justice differeth from Justification or justifying as whitenesse from whitening So application and imputation are not all one for imputation is not extended so far as application For God alone doth impute but we also doe apply unto us Now Justification is divided in like sort as is Justice For there is one Justification legall which is a working of conformity with God or with the Law of God in us Legall Justification This is begun in us by the holy Ghost when as we are regenerated There is another Justification evangelicall which is an application of his evangelicall justice unto us Evangelicall Justification or it is an imputation of anothers justice which is without us in Christ or it is an imputation and applying of Christs righteousness which he performed by dying for us on the Crosse and rising againe It is not a transfusing of the qualities into us but an assoiling and absolving us in judgement for anothers righteousnesse Wherefore Justification and Remission of sins are all one For to justifie is that God should not impute sin unto us What it is to justifie but accept us for just and absolve or pronounce us just and righteous for Christs justice imputed unto us That this word is thus to be understood is proved In thy sight shall no man living be justified that is shall not be absolved Psal 143.3 22. shall not be pronounced just to wit by inherent righteousnesse Blessed are they Psal 32.1 2. Rom. 4.7 whose iniquities are forgiven and whose sins are covered Blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth no sin Out of these words Paul interpreteth justification to be the remission of sins where the word impute is seven times used Object Hee that is just and righteous is conformed and agreeable to the law To justifie is to make just Therefore to justifie is to make one agreeable to the law All this is granted To justifie is to make one agreeable unto the law either in himselfe which is called our own justice inherent infused legall justice or in another which we terme imputed righteousnesse righteousnesse of faith the righteousnesse of the Gospel and anothers righteousnesse because it is not inherent in us but in Christ this is also a conformity with the law Rom. 3.31 For faith maketh not the law to be of none effect but establisheth it And such now is our Justice and Justification For the question is concerning that righteousnesse whereby we sinners are just in this life before God not of that whereby we shall be just in the other life or had bin just before the fall if man had not sinned 4. What is our justice or righteousnesse before God Our righteousness is Christs satisfaction which consisteth in his humiliation OVr justice or righteousnesse that is the justice or righteousnesse of the Gospel whereby wee are just in the sight of God is not our conformity with the law nor our good workes nor our faith but it is Christs satisfaction onely performed unto the law for us or the punishments which hee sustained for us and so his whole humiliation from the beginning of his conception untill his glorification that is his taking of flesh his undertaking of servitude penury ignominy and infirmity his suffering of that bitter passion and death all which he did undergo for us but willingly finally whatsoever he did or suffered whereunto himselfe as being just and the Sonne of God was not bound and that humiliation and satisfaction freely of God imputed unto us his faithfull and beleevers For that satisfaction is equivalent either to the fulfilling of the law by obedience or to the abiding of eternall punishment for sin 1. Cor. 2.2 Col. 2.10 Rom. 5.19 Esay 53.5 6. Luke 22.20 Rom. 3.24 25. 4.7 5.9 10. to one of which wee were bound by the law I esteemed not to know any thing among you save
which are not converted is done without faith and is therefore sin and abomination before God First therefore those things which are spoken of Conversion are in few words to be expounded Then ensueth the common place of good works for by them we declare our thankfulnesse towards God and true conversion cannot stand without good works Afterwards is adjoyned the doctrine which intreateth of the law whereby we learn to know good works For those are truly said to be good works by which we worship God aright and shew our selves to be thankfull which are done by faith according to the rule and prescript only of Gods law Because God will chiefly be worshipped of us and magnified by invocation and for this cause we shew our thankfulnesse most of all by prayer and thanksgiving at length the common place of prayer shall be lastly annexed These things we purpose to declare briefly and in order here following ON THE 32. SABBATH Quest 86. When as wee are delivered from all our sins and miseries without any merit of ours by the mercy of God only for Christs sake for what cause are we to doe good works Answ Because after that Christ hath redeemed us with his bloud he reneweth us also by his Spirit to the image of himselfe that we receiving so great benefits should shew our selves all our life time thankfull to God a Rom. 6.13 12.1 2. 1 Pet. 2.5 9. 1 Cor. 6.20 and honour him b Matt. 5.16 1 Pet. 1.12 Secondly that every of us may be assured of his faith by his fruit c 2 Pet. 1.10 Matth. 7.17 18. Galat. 5.6 22. And lastly by our honest and good conversation may win others unto Christ d 1 Pet. 2.12 Romans 14.19 Matthew 5.16 The Explication THis Question concerning the impulsive causes of good works is moved in the first place and before we come to handle the Question of mans conversion not that good works goe before conversion but for the orderly connexion of this latter part of Catechism with the former For out of the doctrine of free satisfaction humane reason thus argueth He is not bound to satisfie for whom another hath already satisfied Christ hath satisfied for us Therefore there is no need that we should do good works Ans The Conclusion containeth more then the premisses enforce that which followeth out of the two former propositions is this Therefore we our selves are not bound to satisfie and thus much we grant 1. In respect of Gods justice which exacteth not a double payment 2. In respect of our salvation for which if wee were bound to satisfie it should be no salvation at all Farther also we are obliged unto obedience and good works in regard of those causes which are in this Question inlarged 1. Because good works are the fruits of our regeneration by the holy Ghost which is perpetually united with free justification For whom hee called them also he justified and glorified Rom. 8.30 Such were some of you but ye are washed but ye are sanctified 1 Cor. 6.11 Therefore they who perform no good works declare themselves to be neither regenerated by the Spirit of God nor redeemed by Christs bloud 2. To testified our thankfulnesse towards God for the benefit of our redemption Rom 6.13 12.1 Give your members weapons of righteousnesse unto God Give up your bodies a living sacrifice holy acceptable unto God which is your reasonable serving of God 3. That God may be honoured by us Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorifie your Father which is in heaven Mat. 5.16 That by your good works which they shall see 1 Pet. 2.12 they may glorifie God in the day of visitation 4. Because good works are fruits of faith by which we judge of our owne faith and of the faith of others Give diligence to make your calling and election sure 1 Pet. 1.10 after which words of Peter certain copies insert these words by good works Matth. 7.17 Every good tree bringeth forth good fruit A good tree cannot bring forth evill frruit Galat. 5.6 22. Faith worketh by love The fruit of the Spirit is love joy peace long-suffering gentlenesse goodnesse faith meeknesse temperance 5. That we may win others unto Christ When thou art converted Luke 22.32 1 Pet. 3.1 strengthen thy brethren Let the wives be subject to their husbands that even they which obey not the word may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives Let us follow those things which concern peace Rom. 14.9 and wherewith one may edifie another These causes are with diligence to be urged and unfolded unto the people in our sermons of exhortation and hereunto tendeth the whole sixth Chapter and part of the eighth Chapter of the Epistle to the Romans as far as the sixteenth Verse Three causes why justification and regeneration have a necessary coherence For farther declaration of the first cause we may observe that the benefit of justification is not given without the benefit of regeneration 1. Because Christ hath merited both to wit remission of sins and the dwelling of God in us by his holy Spirit Now the holy Ghost is never idle but alwaies working and so maketh those men in whom he dwelleth conformable unto God 2. Because by faith the hearts are purified Acts 15.9 For in them to whom Christs merit is by faith applied is kindled a love of God and earnest desire of performing things acceptable unto him 3. Because God imparteth the benefit of justification to none but to them which prove thankfull But no man can prove thankfull but he which receiveth the benefit of regeneration Therefore neither of these can be separated from the other We are farther to note the difference of the first and second cause The first sheweth us What Christ worketh in us by the vertue and power of his death The second teacheth us What things we are bound unto in regard of the benefits we have received Quest 87. Cannot they then be saved which be unthankfull and remain still carelesly in their sins and are not converted from wickednesse unto God Ans By no means For as the Scripture beareth witnesse neither unchaste persons nor idolaters nor adulterers nor theeves nor covetous men nor drunkards nor slanderers nor robbers shall inherit the kingdome of God a 1 Cor. 6.9 Ephes 5 5 6. 1 John 1.14 The Explication THis Question is a collection or consequent issuing out of the former Question and depending thereon For whereas good works are the fruits of our regeneration and are the thanks we owe unto God and evident arguments of true faith which whosoever have they onely are saved on the contrary it followeth that evill works are the fruits of the flesh unthankfulnesse to God and cleer arguments of infidelity wherein whosoever persevere they cannot be saved Therefore they who are not converted from their evill
we perceive by the works of faith true obedience and true conversion For exercise of our faith That by good workes our faith may be exercised cherished strengthened and advanced For they who give themselves over to corrupt lusts against their conscience in them faith cannot be and therefore neither a good conscience neither a confidence and trust in God as being appeased and favourable unto them For wee have through faith only a feeling of Gods favour towards us and a good conscience If yee live after the flesh ye shall die I put thee in remembrance Rom. 3.13 2 Tim. 1.6 that thou stir up the gift of God which is in thee by the putting on of my hands To grace our calling Ephes 4.1 That by good workes wee may shew forth and grace our life profession and calling I pray you that ye walke worthy of the vocation wherewith yee are called For avoiding of punishments Mat. 7.19 Rom. 8.13 Psal 39.12 That we may escape temporall and eternall punishments Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is cut downe and cast into the fire If yee live according to the flesh ye shall die Thou with rebukes doest chasten man for sin To obtaine rewards 1 Tim. 4.8 That we may obtain at Gods hands corporall and spirituall rewards which according to the promise accompany good works Godlinesse is profitable unto all things c. For except God would have the hope of rewards and the feare of punishments to be motive causes unto good works hee would not use them in admonitions promises and comminations III. We must doe good works also in respect of our neighbour To edifie him by our example 2 Cor. 4.15 Phil. 1.24 That wee may be profitable to our neighbours by our good example and so edifie them In respect of our neighbour and that All things are for your sakes that most plenteous grace by the thankesgiving of many may redound to the praise of God That I abide in the flesh is more needfull for you To avoide offence Mat. 18. â— Rom. 2.24 That offences may be avoided Woe be unto that man by whom offences come The Name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you To winne the faithlesse unto Christ Luke 22.32 That we may winne unbeleevers and by our words and deeds and example convert them unto Christ When thou art converted strengthen thy brethren Here the question is moved Whether good workes be necessary to salvation Some have defended simply and peremptorily that they are necessary thereunto others on the contrary have maintained stifly that good works are pernicious to salvation Both formes of speech are ambiguous and scandalous especially the latter which seemeth to condemne not onely the confidence on good works but also the study and desire of performing them Wherefore the latter is utterly to be rejected The former must thus be declared or expounded That Good workes are necessary to salvation not as a cause of our salvation nor as a merit deserving such a reward but as part of salvation it selfe or an Antecedent of salvation which is to come after or as a meanes without which we cannot attaine the end And after the same sort also may be said That good workes are also necessary unto justice and righteousnesse or unto justification or in them that are to be justified namely as a consequent following Justification wherewith Regeneration is unseparably joyned But yet I would not use these kindes of speaking 1. Because they are ambiguous and doubtfull 2. Because they breed contentions and administer occasion of cavalling unto the Adversaries 3. Because the Scripture doth not use them which must be followed of us in speaking more safely say that good works are necessary in them that are justified and them that are to be saved To say that they are necessary in them who are to be justified is an ambiguous kind of speech seeing it may be so understood that they are required before Justification and so become a cause of Justification But Augustine hath rightly refuted this opinion saying Good works goe not before them that are to be justified but follow them that are justified Hence ariseth a direct answer to this objection Obj. That is necessary to salvation which whosoever have not they cannot be saved But they which have no good workes cannot be saved as it is said in the 87. Question of this Catechisme Therefore good works are necessary to salvation Ans We answer by distinguishing the Major proposition That without which no man can be saved is necessary to salvation that is either as a part of salvation or as some necessary precedent of salvation and so we grant the conclusion but not as a cause or merit of salvation If the Major be thus understood wee condescend unto it For good works are very necessary to salvation or rather in them that are to be saved for it were better so to speak and avoid ambiguity as a part of their salvation and as a precedent thereof but not as a cause or merit 6. Whether good works merit any thing before God THis sixth Question ariseth out of the fifth as the fourth did out of the third For when men heare that we receive rewards of God by our workes they presently conclude that we merit somewhat by them Wherefore we are to know that good works indeed are necessary and therefore are to be done also for the rewards insuing them Out works merit not at Gods hands but yet that they merit nothing no not the least of Gods gifts either corporall or spirituall The reasons hereof are most true and evident Because they are imperfect and that 1. In parts 2. In degrees Gal. 5.17 Our works are imperfect as well in parts as in degrees of accomplishment In parts because we omit many things which the Law prescribeth and do many evill things which it prohibiteth and alwaies mingle evill with good as both Scripture and experience testifieth The flesh lusteth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh and these are contrary one to the other so that ye doe not the same things that ye would Now imperfect works not only merit nothing but are also condemned in the judgement of God Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things c. They are imperfect in degrees Deut. 27.26 because the best workes of the Saints are uncleane and defiled in Gods sight seeing they are not done by such as are perfectly regenerate nor with so great love of God and our neighbour as the Law requireth The Prophet saith even of good workes Esay 64.6 Wee have all been as an uncleane thing and all our righteousnesse is as filthy clouts Phil. 3.8 Paul Pronounceth as much of his I think all things but losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Jesus my Lord for whom I have counted all things losse and doe judge them to be dung that I might winne Christ Thus
withall or for some dangerous kind of ornament 2. Whether all worshipping at Images be forbidden and may not in any sort be defended TO this question we make answer out of the second part of the commandement which simply forbiddeth us to impart divine honor and worship to Images and pictures not onely that which is given thereby or referred to creatures but also which is referred to the true God Thou shalt not bow downe to them nor worship them Object 1. We worship not the Images say the Papists but God of whom those are signes and tokens according to those versicles of the second Nicene Councel That which the Image sheweth is God the Image it selfe is not God Look on the Image but worship in thine heart that which thou beholdest therein and according to those of Thomas Whensoever thou passest by the Image of Christ see thou doe obeisance yet worship not the Image but worship that which the Image representeth Answ 1. We deny that Images are signes of God because God cannot be truely signified by them seeing he is immense and though he could yet he ought not because he hath expressely forbidden them and because it is not in the power of any creature to ordaine or establish any signes whereby to signifie God but onely in the will and pleasure of God Answ 2. In this argument our adversaries tender and alledge unto us a false and needlesse cause For not onely the worshipping of Images is the cause and forme of Idolatry but even the very worship of God also which is given to Images or other creatures besides or contrary to his word 1 Kings 12.28 Exod. 32.5 as the story of Aarons and Jeroboams calves doth sufficiently declare For though these men said Behold O Israel thy gods which brought thee up c. To morrow shall be the holy day of the Lord yet God both detested and severely punished those worships as horrible and abominable Idolatry Wherefore howsoever Idolaters pretend the name and honour of God yet in Idols not God but the Devill is worshipped according as Paul testifieth of the Gentiles 1 Cor. 10.12 These things which the Gentiles sacrifice to Idols they sacrifice c. though even they also in their worshippings pretended the name and honour of God Object 2. The honour which is given unto the signe is the honour of the thing signified Images are a signe of God Therefore the honour which is given unto Images is also given unto God Answ We againe deny the Minor or distinguish of the Major thus The honour of the signe is also the honour of the thing signified namely when the signe is a true signe that is ordained by him who hath authority to ordaine it and when also that honour is given to the signe which the right and lawfull author of it will have done to the signe For not the will of him that honoureth but of him that is honoured is the rule which must prescribe the due honour Now whereas God hath forbidden both these namely that Images should be erected to him and that himselfe should be honoured at Images erected to him or to any creatures he is not honoured but contumeliously wronged and reproached when any honour done to images is fastned on him Repl. Whatsoever contumely is done to the signe that redoundeth on God although the signe be not instituted by his commandement Therefore the honour also that is given to the signe redoundeth on God although that honour be not commanded to be given to the signe Answ This reason doth not follow because then are contrary things rightly attributed to contraries when the contrariety of the attributes dependeth of that according to which the subject is opposed and not of some other thing So we grant that contumely against God followeth indeed the contumely against the signe albeit the signe were not instituted by God but not simply in respect of the signe it selfe unto which that contumely was done but in respect of his corrupt and bad will who by shewing contumely against the sinne which is thought to represent God purposeth himselfe and is minded to despite with contumely and reproach God himselfe For to the shewing of despite and contumely against God it sufficeth if there be any intent or purpose of departing from his commandement But if through a desire that we have to avoide Idolatry we detest Images and other false reputed signes of God by this contumely done to the signes we rather promote further and advance Gods glory But the honour of God doth not follow the honour of the signe except both the honour and the signe be ordained by God because it is not the intent and purpose of honouring God that sufficeth to the doing of honour unto God but the manner also which himselfe hath prescribed whereby to be honoured is required and must be observed Object 3. It is lawfull to honour the Images of noble renowned and well-deserving men Therefore much more is it lawfull to honour the Images of blessed Angels and Saints Ans 1. To the Antecedent we answer That honour of monuments is lawfull which is a gratefull and honourable memory of those whose monuments they are and also that which is applyed to the use which themselves would justly have it and not to the worship of them or to the worship of God by their monuments yea and the defacing and utter razing of those monuments if necessity require such a change so it be done without any will or desire of despighting or dishonouring them whose monuments they are is also lawfull But by no meanes may we attribute divine honour unto them such as that is which these Papists yeeld unto their Idols whether they cloak it with the name of adoration and worship or veneration and service 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. The images or monuments of notable men must be such as have not been drawne into Idolatry for if so we are not to honour them but to suppresse them altogether after the example of the brasen Serpent which Ezekias brake in peeces 2 Kings 18.4 Num. 11.8 9. when it was abused to Iolatry though in former times it were kept as a monument of Gods goodnesse shewed in the wildernesse in healing by the aspect or beholding of it them that were bitten with the fiery Serpents Quest 98. But may not Images be tolerated in Churches which may serve for the use of the common people Answ No. For it is not seemly that we should be wiser then God who will have his Church to be taught with the lively preaching of his word a Rom. 1.17 2 Pet. 1.19 2 Tim. 3.16 17. and not with dumb images b Jer. 10.8 c. Hab. 2.18 19. The Explication THis is their demand who grant that indeed the picture and images of God and Saints are not to be adored but maintaine that they are to be retained in Christian Churches as the books of lay-men and for other causes also so
heed lest he fall A declaration of the miseries of this life A declaration of the miseries of this life lest we should wexe secure and love and cleave to the world A confession of Gods providence A confession of Gods providence whereby as Cyprian testifieth is shewed that the Divell can effect nothing against us except God first permit him that so our whole feare and reverence might bend to God-wards seeing in our temptations that wicked one can doe nothing except power be given him of God Now the Divell hath power over us according as our sinnes reigne in us as it is said Who gave Jacob for a spoile Esay 42.24 and Israel to the robbers did not the Lord because we have sinned against him For they would not walke in his wayes neither be obedient unto his Law And this power indeed is given him to a double end either to our punishment when we offend or to our glory when we are tried c. Thus far Cyprian The order and coherence of the petitions Now we are to observe the order and coherence of these petitions 1. The Lord commandeth us to desire the true knowledge of God and his promise which is the cause of all other his blessings 2. He willeth us to desire that God would governe us by his Spirit and so continually preserve and confirme us in this knowledge 3. That every of us may doe and fulfill thereby his duty in his vocation and calling 4. That he would give us those things whereby every one may doe his duty namely corporall blessings The fourth petition then agreeth with the former because if we must at all be in our own vocation and calling we must live and have things necessary for the maintenance of our life 5. He adjoyneth next after the petition of spirituall and corporall blessings a very fit objection of our unworthinesse That thou mayest give us spirituall and corporall blessings forgive us our debts Wherefore the fifth petition is the ground and foundation of the rest which being overthrowne the rest fall to ground For if thou resolve not that thou hast God gracious and favourable unto thee how shalt thou have him to be mercifull How shalt thou continue in that knowledge which thou hast not How shalt thou doe thy duty and the will of God seeing thou art his enemy and endeavourest the contrary How shalt thou ascribe all things to God How shall they turne to thy salvation 6. After the petition of spirituall and corporall blessings there followeth lastly the petition of our deliverance from evils both present and to come And from this last petition we returne againe to the first Deliver us from all evils both of crime and paine both present and to come that we may know thee to be our perfect Saviour and so thy name may be hallowed and sanctified of us Quest 128. How concludest thou this Prayer Answ For thine is the kingdome the power and the glory for ever that is we aske and crave all things of thee because seeing both thou art our King and almighty thou art both willing and able to give them all unto us a Rom. 10.11 12. 2 Pâ—t 2.9 And these things we therefore aske that out of them not to us but unto thy holy Name all glory may redound b John 14.15 Jâ—â—â—m 33.8 9. Psalme 115.1 The Explication THis last part of prayer serveth to confirme our faith and beliefe or confidence of being heard and obtaining our desire to wit that God will and is able to give us those things which we desire Thine is the kingdome Thine is the kingdome This first reason is drawne from the duty of a King which is to heare his subjects to defend and preserve them Therefore thou O God seeing thou art our King mightier then all our enemies having all things in thy power good and evill evill so that thou art able to represse them good so that there is no good so great which thou canst not give as is agreeing and standing with thy nature and seeing we are thy subjects be present and assist us with thy power and save us as who art loving unto thy subjects and thy protection and safe-guard is alone saving and preserving He is called a King 1. Because he hath power over all creatures 2. Because he is the peculiar King of the Church The power And the power The second reason is drawne from the power of God Heare us O God and give us what we desire because thou art mightier then all our enemies thou art able to give us all things and thou only art able in thee alone resteth this power joyned with exceeding goodnesse The glory And the glory The third reason is taken from the end or finall cause We desire these things for thy glory From thee alone the true God and soveraigne King we desire and expect all good things and professe thee to be the Author and fountaine of all good things And verily because this glory is due unto thee therefore also do we desire them of thee Heare us therefore for thy glory For this petition and expectation of all good things from thee is nothing else but the attributing and yeelding unto thee thy due glory and honour and especially because thou wilt also for thy glory sake give us those things which we desire For what things serve for thy glory the same wilt thou performe and do but those things which we desire serve for thy glory therefore thou wilt give them us Give us therefore these things that we desire and the glory shall returne and redound unto thee if thou deliver us For so shall thy kingdome and power and glory be manifested Object We seeme to bring perswasive and moving arguments unto God whereby we may move him to doe what we desire But in vaine are reasons used to him who is unchangeable God is unchangeable Therefore in vaine use we these reasons unto him Ans This is a fallacy putting that for a cause which is no cause For we grant this argument in respect of God but not in respect of us For we do not when we thus speak use reasons to move God or perswade him to do it but to perswade our selves that God will do this and to confirm and assure us that we shall be heard and to acknowledge our necessity and the goodnesse and truth of God Wherefore these reasons are not adjoyned to our prayers as thereby to move God but only to confirme and assure us that God will doe what we desire because these are the causes why he doth it Thou art a most good King therefore thou wilt give these things to thy subjects Thou art most powerfull and mighty therefore thou wilt shew thy power in giving these gifts which are most great and which can be given of none other but of thee alone It shall be to thy glory therefore thou wilt doe it because thou hast care of
said to be free 164.165 Free-will The state of the maine question about free-will 75. What it is 76. The difference of it in God Angels and Men. ibid. 77.78.79 Whether there be any free-will in us and what it is 82.83 The manner and degrees of mans free-will 83.84.86.87 The beginning of mans will to good whence it is 91. Reasons why the Regenerate use liberty not onely to good but to evill also 92.93 G GOds Whence sprang the multitude of gods 163. But there is but one proved by eight arguments 168.169 Glory Two things signified by Gods glory 156. God How he is the cause of sinne not as sinne but as punishments 67. Vide plura 68.69.70 Sin is not made of God because it is no creature but the corruption of a creature 71. God though the mover of wicked wils yet not the mover of the wickednesse of the will 80. God is said to wish any thing two waies 87. Meerly GOD could satisfie for man 114. Three causes of mens doubting whether there be a God 146. Reasons proving that there is a God ibidem c. Who and what God is 149.150 Why Nature cannot throughly shew what GOD is 150. The Theologicall and Philosophicall descriptions of GOD. 151. A threefold difference of God and Idols ibidem How the parts of mans body are attributed to GOD. 152. More concerning the explication of Gods attributes 152.153.154.155 c. Three things meant by Gods unchangeablenesse and five reasons of it 157. How he is said to repent ibidem Of his goodnesse and righteousnesse 160. Proofes that there is but one God 168.169 Two significations of the word GOD. 169. God a Father in divers respects 179. Gods providence what and why to be knowne 193.197 Arguments against the Divinity of the Sonne and holy Ghost 262.263 How GOD is said to be Our God 532. What it is to have other gods 533. Errours touching God ibid. God Foure significations of Gods Name 556. Goodnesse Six significations of Gods goodnesse in Scripture 160. All good is done by the will of God 199. what things are said to be good ibid. Gospel The differences betweene the Law and Gospel are two pag. 2.126 yea foure 130. The Gospel what and its threefold signification 127. What order is to be observed in teaching the Law and the Gospel 128. It s perpetuity in the Church ibid. c. How the Gospel was promised to our Fathers 129. It s proper effects 131. It s certainty how it appeareth ibid. Grace Gods deniall of grace no cruelty but oft a way to greater mercy 85. Readinesse of minde to receive grace is not before conversion but after 89. Gravity What. 594. H HAllow What it signifieth 632. How wee pray for the hallowing of Gods name 633. Hand What the right hand of God signifieth 322. Foure things wherein Christs sitting at Gods right hand consisteth 322. A full description of it 323. How he may be said to sit alwaies there 324. With other circumstances 325.326 Head Christ is our head in three respects 235. Heaven Two Arguments why GOD is said to be specially in heaven 184. Heaven is the seate of the Elects blessednesse ibid. What heaven signifieth 313. How Christ ascended thither 314. Vide Ascension Hell Of Christs descending into hell 303. The significations of the word hell in Scripture ibid. c. The use of Christs descending into hell 306. Heresies Divers sorts of them confuted 296. Holy What it signifieth 632. Vide Hallow Holy Ghost Of the sinne against the holy Ghost 59. Why called Vnpardonable ibidem c. Why so called 60. Rules touching this sinne ibid. The differences betweene other sinnes pardoned and this of the holy Ghost 60.61 It is not incident to the Elect. ibid. c. We may not judge any man to sin against the holy Ghost untill we see him dead in apostasie and blasphemy 61. How the Sonne was conceived by the holy Ghost 270.271 What we beleeve concerning the holy Ghost 335. With many necessary circumstances concerning that person in Trinity à pag. 335. and 346. It s proceeding from the Sonne proved three waies 338. It s divers titles 341. Its gifts of two sorts 342. What is meant by giving the holy Ghost 343.344 The sending of it is no locall motion 344. How retained and how lost 345. A distinction between blasphemy against God and against the holy Ghost 558. vide Spirit Hope Faith and Hope how they differ 137. Vices contrary to Hope 536. Humanity What. 600. Humility What. 538. Hypocrisie What. 541. I JEhovah No English word will retaine it but the word Lord. 261. Jesus Why the Son of God was called Jesus 220. What the name signifieth and the differences between his name and others so named 121. How the whole three persons may be said to be Saviours ibid. From what evils and how Jesus saveth us 222.223 Whom he saveth 224. Why Jesus is called Christ 226. Two causes for which Jesus was called Christ 227. Idols Idolatry A three-fold difference of God and Idols 151. Idolatry what it is 527. Two sorts of Idols 334. A twofold Idolatry 540. Image What the image of God is in man 42. How far lost 43. How repaired 44. Christ called the image of God in two respects 43. So Angels and Men. ibid. The ends for which God preserveth a remnant of his image in man 44. Whether any images may be made 546.547 The divers names of an image 547. Images not simply forbidden 547. Two sorts of unlawfull images 548. Foure reasons of the unlawfulnesse of making an image of God 548. A Table for the distinction of images 549.550 Whether all worship at images be forbidden 590. Why images are to be abolished 551. Eight causes why images are to be abolished in Churches ibid. How and by whom they are to be abolished 552. Three differences between the images in Solomons time and ours 553. Impossibilities Whether God were unjust in imposing impossibilities pag. 99. The causes and ends of his commanding them 100. Incarnation A confession of the incarnation of the Word by the father of Antioch 289. c. Inclinations Proofes that corrupt inclinations are sin 51. Indifferent Things indifferent are diligently to be discerned from Gods worship 541. Indignation What. 599. Infants Whether they sin wanting will 54. Their baptisme proved to be meet and lawfull by foure arguments 417. Anabaptists objections against it answered 418.419 How infants beleeve 420. Two reasons why infants may not be admitted to the Lords Supper though they are to Baptisme 421. Intercession How Christ maketh intercession for us 318. Judge Judgment Of the last Judgement with 13. circumstances thereof See à pag. 327. ad 334. Just Justice Christ perfectly just foure waies 115. How we are just before God 379.382 What our justice is and how manifold 380.381 In what Justice differeth from Justification 381. How Christs satisfaction is made our justice 383. Vide Righteous or Righteousnesse Communicative Justice what 606. What originall justice towards God and our
Our sacrifices differ from Christs three waies 236. How sacrifices and sacraments differ 400. A propitiatory sacrifice cannot be without bloud 461. Save Saviour Vide Jesus How the whole three persons may be said to save 221. 222. Christ is our most perfect Saviour 223. Why all men are not saved by Christ and why onely the faithfull 132. Scriptures Their authority depend not on the Church 5. 6. Objections against this answered 6. 7. Arguments shewing the certainty of Scriptures 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Why no doctrine but the Scripture is to be received into the Church 12. It is the rule of faith ibid. The difference of it and other mens opinions 13. The Scriptures sufficiency proved by the Ancients 14. Objections against it answered ibid. c. The Papists objection of the Scriptures obscurity answered 18. 19. Some places of Scripture more darke then other some confessed and instanced 19. Three points observable in the interpretation of Scriptures 20. 438. Not the Church but the holy Ghost is Judge of the Scriptures 21. Six waies of deciding doubts in Scriptures 21. 22. Servant Whence the word is derived and what it signifies 269. Shamefastnesse What it is 603. Silence What 612. Simplicity What. 612. Sinne Vid. Wickednesse What sinne and what manner of sin the first sin of man was pag. 45. It consists in six things pag. 45. 46. What were the causes of its first sinne ibid. c. and effects 47. The cause of its permission by God with excellent uses of it 47. 48. How we know that sin is in us 48. What sin is 49. A two fold nature of it ibid. Two proofes that corrupt inclinations are sinnes 50. What originall sin is ib. 51. proofes of its being derived to posterity ibid. Foure causes why Adams posterity abideth the punishment of his sinne 53. Whether Infants sinne seeing they want will 54. Actuall sin what ibid. Of reigning sinne and why so called ibid. of mortall and veniall sin that Popish distinction 55. The Elect may sin against conscience yet not unto death 55. All sinne mortall in its owne nature 56. Of sin against and not against conscience 59. Of the sin against the holy Ghost what and why unpardonable 59. 60. Sin what it is of it selfe 62. The vertues of the unregenerate are sins by accident ibid. What the causes of sinne are 64. An order in the causes of sinne ibidem Foure pretended causes of sin 65. God no cause of it ibid. It ariseth from man himselfe 66. It s beginning is from the Devill 67. GOD is the causer of sinne not as sinne but as punishments ibid. The proper ends of sinne ibid. Sinne is a naturall property of man corrupted 71. The fearfull effects of sinne 72. 73. All sinnes not equall 73. God in sinne though he be the mover of the wicked will yet he is not the mover of the wickednesse in the will 80. Three causes why God is said to permit sinne 201. The Question of Gods being thought to be the cause of sinne decided 209. 210. 211. c. Sin is not of the nature of mans flâ—sh but by accident only 275. The Article of remission of sins 361. Sit. Sitting Why it is said Christ sitteth at the right hand of God 321. 322. Vide Hand of God Slandering What. 611. Sonne Vide Christ How Christ can be called the onely begotten Sonne of God when wee also are called his sonnes 238. 246. Divers sorts of sonnes ibidem How Christ is the onely and first begotten Sonne of GOD. 239. How the naturall Sonne of God 239. 244. and co-eternall 244. 245. Christ so named before he tooke our flesh 245. The onely begotten Sonne of God 246. The Sonne hath all things from the Father not by grace but by nature 260. Hee doth all things with the Father as the Father doth ibidem Arguments against the Sonnes Divinity answered 264. 265. Why the Sonne is called Lord and why Our Lord. 268. How the Sonne was conceived by the holy Ghost 270. Soule Whether immortall 365. sundry places of Scripture alledged against the immortality of the soule 366. The Elects soules estate separated from the body 369. Spirit Vide holy Ghost The divers names which are given in the Scripture to the Spirit 341. Suffering Vide passion pag. 290. 291. 292. c. Whether Christ suffered according to both natures 293. why hee suffered under Pontius Pilate 294. why on the Crosse 295. Ancient types of that death ibidem Superstition Who are superstitious 540. Supper Vide Sacraments What the Lords Supper is 426. 427. It s manifold names 427. Its ends 428. How Baptisme and the Lords Supper differ 429. What it is to eate the flesh of Christ in the Lords Supper 430. who ought to approach to the Lords Supper and who not 462. what the wicked receive in the Lords Supper 463. Three causes for which the wicked are said to eate unto themselves condemnation 464. The right and lawfull use of it 465. Who are to be admitted to it 466. Vide Passeover page 467. c. Reasons against the reall presence 477. Suspicion What it is 611. Foure roots of good and evill suspicion 612. Swearing Of right and lawfull swearing 568. Whether lawfull to sweare by the creatures 569. By whom wee must sweare 570. Five causes why we must sweare by GOD alone 570. 571. Two principall causes of swearing 573. Vide Oathes T. TEmperance What it is 603. Temptation What it is with its kinds 650. What it is to leade into temptation 651. Testament The Old and New Testament in what they agree and how they differ 126. Thanks Thankfulnesse Why the knowledge of our thankefulnesse is necessary 35. 36. What mans thankefulnesse is and what Christian Thankefulnesse is 498. 560. the danger of omitting of it or being cold in it 560. 561. Transubstantiation Of it very largely and learnedly 448. 449. c. And Consubstantiation 450. Trinity What it is 172. Heretikes Objections answered that say that they are not named in the Scripture 173. The number of persons in Trinity ibidem Six strong proofes of the three persons in Trinity 174. How distinguished 175. Their order ibidem Their Attributes Effects and Operations what 175. 176. The doctrine of the Trinity necessary to bee held and maintained in the Church 177. Heretikes opposing that doctrine 178. Truth Six waies whereby we are taught the truth of GOD in Scripture 162. Truth what 610. V. UBiquitaries Their opinion refuted by many strong Arguments 477. 478. c. Three pestilent weeds that grow in their Garden 318. Vertue Two causes why the vertues of Ethnickes please not God pag. 44. The vertues of the Vnregenerate are sinnes by accident 62. The difference betweene the vertues of the Regenerate and of the Vnregenerate 63. Unchangeablenesse Gods unchangeablenesse proved 157. 158. Union The similitude of mans body to declare our union with Christ 234. Of the union of Christs two Natures and what it is in Nature what in Person 278. 279. W WIckednesse Whence the
Arch-Palatinate of Heidelberge Andrew Pragai an Hungarian then answering Novem. 1. 1617. Also his Assertion or Defence against the foolish scoffes of Maximilian Sandaeus Priest and Jesuite of Herbipolis WHereas one Maximilian a Jesuite Conzio-Sandaeus or Sandaeo-Conzius hath lately in a satyricall wanton straine boldly canvised and with lies torne and defiled the secular Theme concerning the causes why an hundred yeers since Popery which is alwaies to be avoided was driven out of our Evangelicall Churches which Theme was the former yeere the first of November proposed and divulged at Heidelberge by publick authoritie D. David Parrie Professor of Divinitie being President and Andrew Pragai an Hungarian a Candidate or Student in Divinitie at that time Respondent But the Jesuite doth nothing in this unusuall to his Sect which hath from the cradle resolved to restore with all the lies they can the decayed condition of the Roman Antichrist and to keep under the doctrine of the Gospel of Christ with their calumnies and sophistrie But wee must look for nothing else from them who if they dare belye the sacred Name of our Saviour JESUS what wonder if they lye in every thing else But because he hath made no scruple to direct by writing and obtrude to us his lies we thought it was our part not to reject altogether his provocation not yet to answer a foole according to his folly therefore we thought it best to divulge againe the whole secular Theme with a short Defence of those passages which we find depraved by his lies and sophistrie whence the ingenuous Reader may easily judge that the causes demonstrated in the secular Theme are no waies shaken or weakned by that thick close joyned heap of lies reproaches and calumnies which the folly malice and impudence of Sandaeo-Conzius hath so incredibly complicated He makes shew as if he did not deny but that an Apostolicall Synagogue an Idolatrous profanation and Tyrannicall crueltie ought to be avoided and exterminated but hee denies that any of these is to be found in Poperie I warrant you as that servant in Terence excusing his masters naughtinesse Eunuch 5.4 Who quoth he ever saw in a whores house any man apprehended for an adulterer Will you exspect that the Beast will confesse himselfe to be the Beast Or that the whore will professe her selfe to be the great Whore Or that her worshippers will not deny what they doe The contumelies of ancient Christians belong nothing to them in that they were called Asinarii Sarmentitii Semissii These do no more belong to Poperie then the praises of the Virgin to Bacchus these were so many badges of the Christians innocencie That these men doe not worship the Whore who sits upon the seven-hilled Citie that they are not the ministers of Antichristian tyrannie and that they doe not sacrifice to Idols the Christian world will then beleeve when they give over to practise such vanities Your fornication is too naked and apparent God by the light of his word hath detected your filthy pollutions that for the covering thereof this Sandaeo-Conzius doth in vaine crack of the Protestantick Synagogue calling our Assemblies so in scoffe In vaine doth he goe about to paint the Whore and to hide her filthinesse from us by casting a cloak patched up of so many calumnies and of old torne and rotten complaints upon us of purpose to blind-fold us All which are either apparently false or reproachfull or frivolous and ridiculous and indeed documents of Jesuiticall falshood ignorance and impudence of purpose devised to avoid open plea in the Court of Justice in which the guilty partie convented ought first to put in his answer to the interrogatories before he can have libertie to sue his accuser Now whereas there are above two hundred Positions he hath scarce snapt at and gnawn the fourth part of them and that cursorily or like that little curre Lycisca hee hath barked at the Moon But though wee give him leave to bark yet our cause remaines unconquered But it is sufficient that we have pointed at this As for his Corybantick Scheme or cloak fit for the Corybantes Cybelles Priests which he calls the Protestantick Synagogue hee should rather have named it The Jesuiticall sink of lies reproaches and pratling whereas his filth belongs not to us we returne it to the authors of it by the postliminian right or that law whereby things unlawfully taken away were lawfully recovered The secular Theme or Argument of the causes why an hundred yeers ago by Gods great mercy Popery still to be avoided was driven out of the Evangelicall CHURCHES Against the wranglings subtle shifts and calumnies of Maximilian Sands Jesuite briefly asserted 1. Whosoever will be saved above all things 't is needfull that he avoid Popery 2. For Popery is the overthrow of the whole Christian Religion under the name of Christ which cannot stand with salvation 3. Christian Religion consisteth in Faith and Evangelicall obedience obedience in worship and discipline 4. Popery hath turned Faith into Apostasie worship into Idolatrie discipline into Tyrannie 5. So the many causes of abandoning by Gods assistance Popery of old being by others handled at large we will briefly reduce to three First the damnable apostasie from faith Secondly horrible Idolatrie in stead of Gods worship Thirdly Antichristian tyrannie for Evangelicall discipline I. The damnable apostasie of Popery from the faith which we beleeve and by which we beleeve 6. Concerning the apostasie of Poperie from the faith wee will not handle a past but a present history 7. To shake first the principle of faith which is beleeved and into which Christian faith is lastly resolved is to fall off from the faith to overthrow faith and salvation 8. The principle of faith which is beleeved and lastly terminating Christian faith is the holy Scripture contained in the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles and that alone 9. For The Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine for reproofe 2 Tim. 2.16 for correction for instruction in righteousnesse that the man of God may be perfect thorowly furnished unto all good workes 10. This principle of faith which is beleeved Poperie hath many waies and at this day is still pulling at it 11. It teacheth that in the holy Scripture there is no Divinitie but what it receiveth from the Church The Assertion The Jesuite in a whispering way hath allowed of these ten Positions therefore they need no defence but by the way we must note that the distinction of faith Lib. 12. de Trinit c. 2. which we beleeve and by which we beleeve is extant in Austine and is delivered by Lombard l. 3. distinct 23. C. Against the eleventh he exclaimes Parrie lies What if the Jesuite lie Parrie wrote truth out of Andradius the Portugall Doctor Lib. 11. defensionis pag. 257. the authentick Defender of the Councell of Trent whose words are these Neither is there in the bookes themselves in which the
two or three parts of our justice are either three perfect justices of Christ every one of which apart satisfieth the Law or they are so many imperfect justices concurring to make up one perfect righteousnesse If they are imperfect do they not manifestly derogate from the death of Christ If perfect how is not God unjust who for one fault demands two or three perfect satisfactions whereas his justice requires but one 8. If a part of our justice must be sought for here a part there a part in the death a part in the actuall Antecedent obedience and a part in the naturall holinesse of Christ is not our faith dangerously distracted and our comfort undermined 9. Lastly that which chiefly with-holds me is that I reade no-where in Scripture such a tripartite or bipartite division of our justice I reade no-where that Christs humane holinesse is imputed to us that either it or any part of it is our righteousnesse If any man hath read it I intreat him to shew it that I may also reade and beleeve it Neither do I reade this any-where of actuall obedience nor do the five testimonies which they bring prove any such thing which I briefly shew thus Out of that saying Rom. 5. they conclude more then followes for the consequence will not hold We are justified by Christs obedience ergo by his active obedience The Apostle sets in opposition Christs obedience and Adams disobedience not as action against action but as satisfaction against the fault as the remedy against the disease otherwise the sinnes of omission were not transgressions but Adams sin was not onely a perpetration of evill but the omission of good also Now the obedience which he understands here in another place he doth more expresly declare saying He was made obedient to death even the death of the Crosse But this was the obedience of his exinanition and of death and of the same obedience Theophylact interprets both places Therefore we deny that in this other place which they object the second time any mention is made of two obediences for the text sheweth that the Apostle speakes of his continuated obedience Even to the death of the Crosse Phil. 2. which began when he assumed a servile condition and ended with his death Gal. 4. Neither doth that place Gal. 4. availe any whit to the active obedience for how Christ for us was made subject to the Law the Apostle himselfe explaines cleerely chap. 3. He redeemed us from the curse of the Law being made a curse for us that the blessing of Abraham may be extended upon the Gentiles in Christ Jesus But this is understood of Christs voluntary humiliation even to the death appointed by the Law for our sins How notwithstanding this place may be understood of the servitude to the whole Law I will speake hereafter In that saying to the Corinthians 1 Cor. 1. the Apostle joyneth foure things but not as parts of imputed justice for who will reckon among these wisdome or redemption it selfe but as the chiefe heads of Christs benefits of which some do helpe us onely by imputation as justice others by reall participation also in this life inchoatively in the other life perfectly as all the rest Hence then no partition can be proved In that place to the Romans is the fallacy of Figura dictionis Rom. 8. for there The Law of the Spirit of life doth not signifie life or Christs active obedience much lesse his formall holinesse but it signifieth the doctrine or quickning grace of the Gospell The place is somewhat obscure but by the scope the simple meaning may be knowne that the remainders of the flesh condemne not godly men if so be they make resistance against them by the helpe of the Spirit What the Apostle said in the first verse he proves in the second by supposing his owne person from the effect of the Gospell The Law saith he of the spirit of life that is the doctrine or grace of the Gospell which is the ministery of the Spirit of life or of that which makes us live in Christ Jesus hath made me free that is hath absolved me and all the faithfull and pronounceth us free from the law of sin and of death that is from condemnation with which the Law threatneth sinners therefore the Apostle opposeth here the law of the Spirit and the law of death as he opposeth the ministery of the Spirit and the Ministery of condemnation 2 Cor. 3.8 as if he would say Although that killing law endeavoureth to condemne those that are justified in Christ Jesus because of the remainders of sin in them with which as yet they wrestle yet the Law of the Spirit of life that is the living doctrine and grace of the Gospell doth absolve them from damnation notwithstanding these remainders of sin seeing these also are pardoned them through Christ for The bloud of Jesus Christ purgeth us from all sin and from all remainders of sin This without prejudice to other mens judgements seems to me to be the genuine meaning of the Apostle But this by the way I hasten to the other Arguments To the sixth wee have already answered Christ wholly quickneth us but one way as he is the efficient another way as he is the matter of righteousnesse And neverthelesse he all justifieth although his passion or death is onely said to be imputed for he all suffered and dyed Neither is his active obedience excluded from merit or justification though it is not said to be imputed which is that the seventh Reason would have For how can the efficient cause or that which is called sine qua non be excluded from its effect Truly both the obediences as well the active as the passive were required in the Mediatiour for our justification but after a divers way that as the cause sine qua non or without which the effect cannot be produced as also his naturall holinesse this as the matter In the eighth Reason we deny the Antecedent For it was never heard that the Law did oblige both to obedience and punishment at the same time but every law obligeth dis-junctively not copulatively either to obedience or to punishment For so long as obedience is performed the Law obligeth no man to punishment that is it pronounceth no man guilty of punishment but promiseth life but when obedience is violated then the Law obligeth the sinner to punishment This is generally true both of divine and humane lawes Therefore their suppositions which they here assume are untrue and repugnant to Gods justice 1. That Adam before his fall at once was tyed to obedience and punishment 2. That man after his fall and so the Mediatour for man was obliged both to fulfill the Law and to suffer punishment When obedience indeed is violated the sinner is bound to make satisfaction by punishment this being performed he is no more a sinner and he is tyed to obedience not to that for the violation
is his eternall counsell in saving us before others for from this fountaine flowes the outward calling and inward also to faith in Christ of all those who shall be saved Hence flow faith and repentance justification obedience and perseverance in faith yea our whole salvation and glorification which the Scripture perspicuously teacheth and confirmes in these and such like sayings Whom he predestinated Rom. 8.30 Rom. 11.7 Act. 13.46 Eph. 1.3 c. them he called whom he called them he justified whom he justified them also he glorified Also Election hath obtained the rest waxed hard Also So many as were ordained to salvation beleeved Also He elected us in Christ before the foundations of the world that we might be holy and blamelesse before him in love whom he hath predestimated unto adoption by Jesus Christ De bono persev c. 14. Praesat ad Rom. to the praise of his glorious grace c. Austin confirmes the same saying This predestination of the Saints is nothing else but a preparation of Gods bounties by which they are most assuredly freed who are freed Luther also very emphatically confirmes the same in these words Both flow and have their originall from Gods eternall predestination to wit who shall beleeve who shall not beleeve who shall be absolved from sin who not that all this may be out of our power and onely in the hand of God that we are justified That this fountaine therefore must chiefly be knowne by Divines and by all who will be strengthened in faith and comfort and that it is to be perspicuously and soberly taught in Schooles and Churches who will doubt and that specially for two causes 1. For the glory of God that knowing the meanes and causes of salvation and the qualities of those that are to be saved and salvation it self not to depend from us but from Gods good pleasure alone we may ascribe our salvation not to our selves but wholly to Gods mercie 2. For our consolation that being assured that our faith perseverance and salvation depend not from our owne strength or free-will but that they are grounded on Gods eternall and immutable counsell we may be confident that the same is certaine and immoveable and in this confidence 2 Pet. 1.9 we may studie to make our election and vocation sure to us by continuali prayers and good works ordained by God for this end But this Article doth altogether foule and obstruct this most cleere fountaine with the dirt of equivocation for it denieth see the Conference that our faith and perseverance proceed from the fountain of eternall election as the effect from the first cause and it ascribeth both these in shew to Gods grace but indeed to mans will because it makes mans will the mistresse of Gods resistible grace it makes mans free-will stronger and more powerfull then Gods grace which can be resisted and makes the whole difference of those that are to be damned and saved depend on mens wills by which meanes it is plain that the glory of mans salvation cannot be wholly ascribed to God but he is of necessitie robbed of it Hence it utterly overthrowes both the certaintie of faith grace justification perseverance and indeed of our whole salvation and consequently of our onely comfort in life and death For who doth not understand that the assurance of grace justification perseverance salvation and our whole comfort in life and death can no waies consist with resistible grace and with mans will resisting or able to resist as it were with two principles either repuguant to each other or changing every houre Hence it is apparent what we are to judge of tolerance for who can say that an Article so equivocall and so captious with dangerous high tragicall straines is tolerable Who wittingly and willingly would buy or eat sugar mixt with poyson Who will account that a benefit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to have the apple of contentions flung into our Churches which will afford matter of perpetuall strife Will Physicians endure in their Schooles that Empericks adulterate or deny their doctrine of diseases Can Mathematicians endure the false delineations of Mechanicks introducing for example into a quadrangle a false sine for a true one and so overthrowing the grounds of their science Much lesse should equivocall doctrines be tolerated in the Church which using the pretext of grace Prosper Epist ad August deny grace by which the originall of salvation is placed in man mans will is preferred to Gods will therfore one is helped because he wills it but doth not will because he is helped Men are made beleeve that they who are originally evill receive the beginning of their goodnesse not from God but from themselves and 't is taught that God is pleased by other means then by those which he himself hath given And so much of the equivocations of the first Article but how that is rightly to be understood filled up and formed is explained * Cothurno 2º above ARTICLE II. Therefore Jesus Christ the Saviour of the world dyed for all and singular and so far that he hath obtained reconciliation and remission of sins for all by his death but on this condition that no man can really enjoy the said remission of sins except the faithfull man and this is according to the Gospel John 3.16 God so loved the world that he gave his onely begotten Son that whosoever beleeveth in him might not perish but have life eternall And 1 John 2.2 And he is the propitiation for our sins and not for ours alone but for the sins of the whole world The Examination THis is no new matter which the Remonstrants handle in this Article for of old the Semipelagians in Marsiles and Syracusa held the same in these words Our Lord Jesus Christ dyed for all mankind Prosper Epist ad August and no man at all is exempted from the redemption of his bloud although his mind hath been quite averse all his life from him because the mysterie of mercy belongs to all men by which therefore many are not renewed because they are fore-knowne that they account it needlesse to be renewed Therefore so far as concernes God life eternall is prepared for all but as for mans liberty of will it is received by them who of their owne accord shall beleeve God and shall receive the help of grace by the merit of their faith By this Article although in shew they amplified Gods grace and mans redemption yet in effect they minced both giving to God an indifferent grace to Christ the merit of redemption but to free-will the efficacie of both And while they would overthrow the doctrine of Predestination which Austin did maintaine out of the Apostle they did indeed shake the whole Gospel in ascribing the cause of faith and perseverance and consequently of mans salvation to God and Christ indifferently but to mans wit and free-will determinately which what it is they that are taught by God
all men it is well if they meane of the greatnesse of the price of Christs death which was most sufficient for all men but if they meane the fruit and efficacy impetrated or purchased for all men although both in life and death they be strangers to Christ they do not assent to Scripture and to the event but to the Massilian Semi-pelagianisme 4. It is true that of all men some in order after Christs death become faithfull but 't is false that in order after Christs death some become unfaithfull for Christ being to die in order found all men in impiety sin and enmity Rom. 5. v. 6.8 9. therefore he found all in infidelity 5. In that they know how to discriminate betweene the state of a sinner in his infidelity and before it they doubtlesse had not this knowledge in Scripture which knoweth not the state of sin or of sinners before infidelity or without it Rom. 11.31 Ephes 2.2 5.6 Col. 3.6 but testifieth that all men are borne the sons of wrath of infidelity and of disobedience This then is that corrupt lurking sort of mystery of the new Prophesie and the first lye upon which the five Articles and divers other both manifest and occult are built to wit that man is borne without infidelity and that there is no infidelity till man be growne up and rejects the Gospell and from hence that originall sin if any such be is a punishment not a fault and hence is it that the naturall man hath free-will to good and evill otherwise wrongfully is faith demanded of him who hath not the faculty of beleeving hence are predestination and election of fore-seene faith hence an universall impetration of reconciliation by Christs death hence is resistible grace or indifferent hence is the apostacy of the Saints uncertain perseverance doubtful faith other hid matters which time wil reveale Out of all this two things we have to observe One is that by this cunning shift of the order of faith to Christs death the contradiction is not unfolded or avoided by which they are forced to entangle themselves in this Article That Christ died absolutely for all and singular and obtained reconciliation for all and yet that he died not for Infidels whereof there be many nor obtained reconciliation for them which is an evident argument of an evill cause For when the Adversary is driven to admit of contradictions he is gone The other because this Article troubles the Church with contradictions and equivocations and overthrowes it selfe that it is not to be suffered in the Church ARTICLE III. Man hath not saving faith from himselfe nor by force of his free-will seeing that in the state of defection and sin he cannot of himself either thinke or do any good which is good indeed such as saving faith is but it is necessary that he be borne over againe by God in Christ through his holy Spirit and that he be renewed in his minde will affections and all his faculties that he might think understand will and performe that which is good according to that of Christ John 15.5 Without me yee can do nothing ARTICLE IV. This grace of God is the beginning progresse and perfection of all goodnesse and that so far that the regenerate man himselfe without this first or adventitious exciting consequent and co-operating grace can neither will thinke or do any good nor resist any evill tentation so that all the good workes which we can imagine are to be ascribed to the grace of God in Christ As for the true manner how that grace worketh that is not irresistible for it is said of many They resisted the holy Ghost Act. 7. and else-where in many other places The Examination ALthough these two Articles in some sort differ for the third is concerning the operating cause of faith and conversion in an unregenerate man the fourth in the former part is concerning the operating cause of the progresse increment and perfection of all good in the regenerate man the other part is concerning the manner by which that cause produceth both faith and conversion in the unregenerate and the progresse increment and perfection in the regenerate notwithstanding they do altogether cohere and therefore in the Conference were conjoyned by the parties that conferred yea and the fifth which is concerning the perseverance of the Saints Coll. p. 206. 225. 237. 268. is knit to the fourth because the way of operating grace hath relation as well to that perfection which is obtained by perseverance as to its beginning and progresse The third needs not much examination if we follow the naturall sense of the words in both parts it is consentaneous to holy Writ 1. That the procreating cause of saving faith in man is not man himselfe or his free-will because in the state of sin man is not fit to think or doe any good thing of himselfe according to Scripture Ephes 2.9 2 Cor. 3.5 c. 2. That man necessarily must be by God in Christ through the grace of the holy Ghost regenerated or illuminated in his minde renewed in his will affections c. to understand think will and perfect that which is good according to the place alledged John 15.6 The fourth also in the former part if you looke upon the words is true and gives glory to God because it ascribes the beginning progresse and perfection of all goodnesse in the regenerate man to God or to grace according to these sayings Jam. 1.7 Ephes 2.9 Phil. 1.6 c. Neither would the orthodox men in the Conference reprehend any of these if they be understood according to the meaning of holy Scripture But there is poyson in the taile The closure concerning the way of the operation of that grace takes away what before was granted They deny this way of operation to be irresistible in the Conference they call it resistible These words in their very sound are horrid and barbarous and not without a Solecisme they are barbarous because not knowne to Latine Writers for ought I know nor to the holy Scriptures unheard also in the Schooles of orthodox Protestants and perhaps of the Jesuites too I have not read all the Jesuites but Bellarmine the chiefest of them an exact Disputer of generall and speciall assistance or indifferent and not indifferent motion and grace in his Books of Grace Free-will hath it no where as I remember It seems that Arminius his party hath devised this high buskin of irresistible grace to the great benefit of their cause to make the truth the more envied As if forsooth the orthodoxall party did teach that grace were irresistible that is coactive or coaction Even in sense and signification the termes are barbarous for that is irresistible which cannot be resisted resistible which may be resisted By what Authour will they prove this to be spoken passively Why may not rather actively irresistible signifie that which cannot resist resistible which can resist Many verbals indeed in
question in their Conference they plainly take it away yet nor without buskin-phrases but such as bring in the same inconveniencies which before they did so that either they betray themselves to be equivocating disturbers or entangle themselves with contradictions which thus appeare In the appendix or addition they say But whether they who by true faith are inserted into Jesus Christ and therefore partakers of his quickning Spirit may not forsake the beginning of their being in Christ fall away from faith lose grace is to be more exactly considered out of Scripture before they can teach it with confidence that is they doubt whether it be true But if before they speak the truth they cannot doubt of this For if they who by true faith are inserted into Christ have sufficient strength to obtaine the victory over sin Satan c. and Christ in all tentations is present with them and reacheth out his hand that they cannot be seduced or taken out of Christs hand by any cunning or strength of Satan how I pray can it be doubted but that such by reason of the helps given to them by Christ and by reason of his assistance and of his confirming and aiding of them in all tentations but chiefly of defection can never forsake the beginning of their being in Christ can never fall away from faith and can never be robbed of their grace In questioning then that which before they asserted and that indeed most truly doe not they fight against themselves They except that their assertion is not categoricall but conditionall that Christ by his Spirit is present with them that hee stretcheth out his hand to them and confirmes them that are inserted into him by true faith if so be they are ready for the fight and beg his help nor be wanting in performance of their duty c. But that this condition is not placed or performed by many and that therefore no conflict followes But I pray what kind of God doe they feigne here whom secretly they exclude What kind of Christ What kind of Spirit To wit such an one who indeed furnisheth those who by true faith are engraffed into Christ with the meanes of resistible grace but doth not fit them for the combate in their tentations suffers them so to snort that they seek not for his help that they are wanting in the performance of their dutie but Gods promises and asseverations doe teach far otherwise for albeit the condition of the combate of prayers and vigilancie which they require be altogether necessary for perseverance yet that this is not so much proposed by the faithfull which is all these men would have as effected by the Spirit of God in the faithfull is cleere by these and such like testimonies Deut. 30.6 Jer. 32.40 De bono persev c. 2. Ezech. 36.27 Isa 59.21 The Lord thy God shall circumcise thine heart and the heart of thy seed that thou maist love the Lord thy God with all thine heart I will put my feare in their hearts that they shall not depart from mee Which words Austin citing for the good of perseverance thus explaines So great shall my feare be which I will put in their hearts that they shall adhere to me continually I will put my Spirit in the midst of you and I will make that you shall walke in my precepts and keep my judgements and doe them This shall be my covenant with them saith the Lord My Spirit which is in thee and my words which I have put in thee shall not depart from thy mouth I will poure upon the house of David and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem Zach. 13.10 1 Cor. 1.8 Phil. 1.6 1 Pet. 1.5 the spirit of grace and supplication and they shall look on mee whom they have pierced c. God will strengthen you even to the end He that hath begun in you a good worke will perfect it untill the day of the Lord Jesus who by the power of God are kept by faith to salvation c. Either these are vaine promises which God forbid or the assumption is false that the condition is not proposed or performed by many who are not engraffed into Christ by true faith Cavilling to the contrary will not availe That these promises are not absolute but to be understood with a condition to be performed by the faithfull that being strictly understood they exclude the least offences of the Saints that a condition is commanded not promised c. which are vaine shifts For the promises speak plainly concerning the very condition of faith prayers perseverance in the faithfull to be wrought by the holy Ghost Nor will it follow that the working of perseverance is not promised because it is commanded and required of the faithfull For it is commanded also that they feare God that they walke in the commandements of God c. and yet God promiseth I will put my feare c. I will make them to walk in my precepts Now this is commanded not because they can but because they should do what is required and De grat lib. arb c. 16. For this cause saith Austin God commands some things which we cannot doe that we may know what to beg of him Hearing then the command they aske for that which is commanded saying with Austin Give me what thou commandest and command what thou wilt De dâ—no persev c. 20. Which words of mine saith he Pelagius at Rome could not endure when they were rehearsed by a certaine brother a fellow Bishop of mine in his presence and in an angry way contradicting him he had almost fallen foule with him that did repeat them The orthodox men at this day are in the like condition with them and yet these promises do not exclude the faillings of the Saints whether their sinnes be great or small but they lift up those that are fallen from their fall for these promises are sometimes also directed to just men that fall Psal 37.24 Psal 89.34 If the righteous fall he shall not be bruised because the Lord supporteth him If his sons shall forsake my Law c. I will visit with the rod their transgressions but my mercy I will not take from him If then this Article in the three former members is true and certaine as it is most true and certaine it cannot by the condition inserted be excused from this manifest conflict and contradiction of the adversative addition thus All ingraffed into Christ by true faith and therefore partakers of his quickning Spirit are so confirmed by Christ that by no deceit of Satan or by any force can they be seduced or taken out of Christs hand this is true and certaine and All ingraffed into Christ by true faith are so confirmed that they cannot be seduced nor taken from Christ this is not true and certaine but doubtfull and uncertaine and more exactly to be weighed according to Scripture This conflict againe is a manifest argument of an
delivered but shall sustain punishment eternall which is without end 4. Christ also himself hath fore-told that it was necessary that he should die Except I go away John 9.7 the Comforter will not come unto you John 13.8 If I wash thee not thou shalt have no part with me In this question therefore three memorable circumstances concurre 1. That it was necessary that Gods justice should be satisfied 2. That this satisfaction was to be made by death 3. That it was to be accomplished by the death of the Son of God alone Out of this which hath bin said we may draw these doctrines 1. That sin is most of all to be eschewed of us which could not be expiated but by the death of the Son of God 2. That we ought to be thankfull to the Son of God for this his so great a benefit of unspeakable grace and favour bestowed upon us 3. That all our sins how many how great and how grievous soever they be are expiated and done away by the death alone of Christ 3. For whom Christ died Or whether he died for all WE must answer this question by distinguishing the termes thereof that so we may reconcile such Scriptures as carry a shew of contrariety For in some places Christ is said to have died for all Testimonies of Scripture alledged on both sides and for the whole world as Who is a reconciliation for our sins and not for our sins only but for the sins of the whole world That by Gods grace he might taste of death for all men 1. That Christ died for all 1 John 2.2 Heb. 2.9 2 Cor. 5.1415 1 Tim. 2.6 We thus judge that if one be dead for all then were all dead And he died for all that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves but unto him which died for them and rose again Who gave himself a ransom for all men Contrariwise in as many places Christ is said to have died prayed offered up himselfe 2 That Christ died not for all but for many John 17.9 Mat. 20.28 Mat. 15.24 Mat. 1.21 Mat. 26.28 Heb. 9.28 Esay 53.11 Ephes 5.25 c. only for many only for the elect for his peculiar people for his Church for his sheep c. Not for the world not for the unfaithfull I pray for them I pray not for the world but for them which thou hast given me for they are thine that is for the elect alone The Son of man came not to be served but to serve and to give his life for the ransome of many I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel He shall save his people from their sins This is my bloud of the New Testament that is shed for many for the remission of sins Christ was once offered to take away the sins of many By his knowledge shall my righteous servant justifie many for he shall beare their iniquities Christ loved the Church and gave himself for it A two-fold reconciliation of such Scriptures as plead for All 1. B restraining All to all that beleeve What shall we say then Is Scripture disagreeable with Scripture No verily Howbeit it seemeth so unlesse these generall and particular Aphorismes be reconciled by some pithy and plausible distinction The distinction and reconcilement of these places is two-fold either of which is true and sound 1. Some interpret these generall allegations of the whole number of the faithfull or of all the beleeving because the promises of the Gospel do properly appertain to all the faithfull and because the whole course of Scripture restraineth those promises to the beleeving Whosoever beleeveth in him John 3.16 Rom. 3.22 Acts 10.43 shall not perish The righteousnesse of God by the faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all that beleeve Through his name all that beleeve in him shall receive remission of sins S. Ambrose expoundeth the generall texts of Scripture on this wise Lib. 1. cap. 3. de vocat Gent. The people of God saith he have their fulnesse and although a great number of men neglect or cast from them the grace of their Saviour yet there is a certain speciall university of the elect and fore-knowne of God severed and discerned from the generality of all to this intent that a whole world might seem to be saved out of a whole world and all men might seem to be redeemed from out of all men Thus is there no repugnancy no contrariety between these Scriptures For all true beleevers are those many that peculiar people that Church those sheep those chosen which were given unto Christ and for whom Christ gave himself By the distinguishing between the sufficiency efficacy of Christs death Others reconcile these Scriptures by a distinction of the sufficiency and efficacy of Christs death For certain wrangling Sophists there are who admit not this restriction of these generall promises to the faithfull alone that is they deny that the letter of Scripture enforceth any such restriction and for proof of their conceit they quote and alledge certain places which seem to impart redemption and salvation not only to the faithfull but to Hypocrites also and Apostates as that of Peter Denying the Lord which hath bought them And Hath forgotten that hee was purged from his old sinnes 2 Pet. 2.12 2 Pet. 1.9 all which Scriptures it is manifest are to be understood and interpreted either of the vaine glorying of Hypocrites of their redemption and sanctification or of the extent and sufficiency of Christs satisfaction Wherefore that wee be not forced to maintaine frivolous contention with such crabbed perverse disputers touching the restriction of these generall promises before specified and for more sound and ample answer unto those places concerning the redemption of Hypocrites some chuse rather and not unfitly as I suppose to interpret those Scriptures in shew contrary one to the other partly of the sufficiency and partly of the application and efficacy of Christs death They answer therefore that Christ died for all And againe died not for all in a diverse respect How Christ is said to have died for all men and again not to have died for all men 1. Christ died for all men absolutely and without exception as touching the sufficiency of the price which hee pay'd 2. Christ died not for all men but for the elect alone and the faithfull as touching the application participation and efficacy of his merit and Passion The reason of the former is because Christs ransome is of such weight and worth that it may serve and be sufficient to purge and cleanse all the sins of all men if at least all men would apprehend by faith this salve of sin For it can no way be said that it is insufficient lest this blasphemous inconvenience which God forbid should follow That some cause of the destruction of the wicked resteth in the defect of the merit of the Mediatour The
it be thus understood Therefore faith alone doth not justifie meaning that it hath not alone the act of justifying which is the apprehending of Christs justice then either the conclusion containeth more than the premisses enforce or the Major is evidently false For I alone may speak in a hot-house and yet not be alone there A thing may be not alone but joyned with others and yet may alone have this or that act For example The will is not alone but joyned with the understanding yet it willeth alone A mans soule is not alone but joyned with the body yet it understandeth alone It is commonly and that rightly called a fallacy of Composition the reason being deceitfully composed For the word alone is composed and joyned in the conclusion with the Predicate which is the word justifie but in the premisses it is joyned with the Verb is Object 4. That which is required in those who are to be justified without the same faith doth not justifie Good works are required in those who are to be justified Therefore without good works faith doth not justifie and so faith alone doth not justifie Ans Here also is the same fallacy With what difference faith and works are reqâ—ired in them that are to be justified For the particle without is ambiguously and doubtfully taken For in the Major it is taken thus Faith without it that is being without it doth not justifie For though it be not or exist not alone but is alwaies united and coupled with charity whereby it worketh yet it justifieth alone that is it alone hath the act of imbracing and applying to it selfe Christs merit The Minor also of this objection is more at large to be explained that it may the better be rightly conceived In them who are to be justified faith and workes are required but not after the same manner Faith with her proper work without which it cannot be considered is required as a necessary instrument whereby we apply Christs merit unto us But good works are not required that by them we may apprehend Christs merit and much less that for them we should be justified but that by them we may shew our faith which without good works is dead and is not known but by them that is good works are required as effects of faith and as it were a testimony of our thankfulnesse towards God Whatsoever is necessarily co-herent with the cause that is not therefore necessarily required to the producing of the proper effect of that cause So good workes although they are necessarily co herent and joyned with faith yet are they not necessary for the apprehension of Christs merit that we should over and besides faith by them also apply the same unto us Object 5. Where moe things are required there the exclusive particle onely may not be used In them that are to be justified besides faith good workes are required Therefore we cannot say that faith onely justifieth Answ This argument is all one with the former and therefore the answer unto it is the same In them that are to be justified more things are required but in a diverse manner faith as a meane or instrument apprehending anothers justice good works as a testimony of our faith and thankfulnesse Object 6. He that is justified by two things is not justified by one only But we besides that we are justified by faith are justified by the merit and obedience of Christ Therefore not by faith only Ans Againe we must yield the same answer He that is justified by two things is not justified by one only that is after one and the same manner But we are justified by two things after a divers manner For we are justified by faith as by an instrument apprehending justice but by the merit of Christ as by the formall cause of our justice Object 7. Knowledge doth not justifie Faith is a knowledge therefore faith doth not justifie Ans Knowledge alone doth not justifie But justifying faith is not a knowledge only but also a confidence and sure perswasion whereby as a mean we apply Christs merit unto us And furthermore knowledge and this sure perswasion are much different Knowledge is in the Understanding but this is in the Will Knowledge and confidence differ Therefore a sure perswasion or confidence is not only a knowledge of a thing but also a will and purpose of doing or applying that which we know and of resting in it so that wee are thereby secure and take joy of heart therein So then to beleeve in God is not only to acknowledge God but also to have confidence in him Else the Divel also hath a knowledge of God and of his promises but without confidence Therefore his knowledge is no justifying faith but historicall only whereof S. James speaketh saying The Divels beleeve and tremble James 2.19 Of such a faith we easily grant the Papists argument but not of a true and justifying faith Object 8. S. James saith Yee see then how that of works a man is justified and not of faith only Therefore faith only justifieth not James 2.24 Ans There is a double ambiguity in the words and first in the word justified For S. Jam. speaketh not of that justice whereby we are justified before God that is whereby we are reputed of God just for unjust but he speaketh of that justice whereby through our works we are justifed before men that is are approved just or are found to be justified This is proved 1. Out of the 18. verse Shew me thy faith by thy works and I will shew thee my faith by my workes Shew it me saith he to wit who am a man Wherefore hee speaketh of manifesting our faith and righteousnesse before men 2. Out of the 21. verse Was not Abraham our Father justified through works when he offered his Son upon the altar Gen. 15.60 This cannot be understood of justification before God For the story testifieth that Abraham was reputed just by God long before the offering of his Son And Paul saith Abraham was justified before God not by works but by faith S. James his meaning is that Abraham was justified before God because it is written Abraham beleeved God and it was imputed to him for righteousnesse Rom 4.1 2. Gen. 15 6. but by good works and obedience towards God he witnessed his justice before men This is the first ambiguity in the word justified The second ambiguity is in the word faith For S. James when he taketh away justification of faith speaketh not of a true or lively faith as Paul doth but of a dead faith which is a bare knowledge without confidence or works This appeareth in those words Even so faith if it have not works is dead in it self and such faith he ascribeth to divels who questionlesse have not true justifying faith Lastly in the 16. ver he compareth that faith which he denieth to justifie with a dead body but such is not true and
in God beleeve also in me for be you confident For there he comforts the Apostles Lord who is he that I may beleeve in him for that I may confide in him Saving faith with us is joyned with confidence of the promise of the Gospel or of the promised mercie of God concerning remission of sins through the bloud of Christ Rom 3.28 As when we are said to be justified by faith there faith signifieth confidence and to be justified by faith is in the confidence of Christs merits to be absolved from sin which sense the Apostle delivers when he saith Whom God set forth as an atonement by faith in his bloud to declare his justice by the remission of sins past Where faith in his bloud can signifie nothing else but confidence in Christs bloud But with them faith is assent onely and to beleeve is to give an assent this appeares because in the Article the words John 3.36 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are rendred by them thus But who assenteth not to the Son for who beleeveth not the Son then their slippery disputes concerning faith teach the same In which for the most part they require not confidence in faith and they will have faith to justifie or to be imputed for justice not because it applies to it selfe Christs merits but because the very act of faith is reputed a fulfilling of the Law which was the opinion of Alberius Triuncurianus a pitifull man Therefore seeing this Article doth deprave the true doctrine of Predestination with so many equivocations and conceales the false it cannot be simply allowed Whether this Article be sufficient or may be tolerated setting Predestination aside But you 'l say What need we dispute so much about Predestination Is it not sufficient to salvation to hold the summe of the Gospel delivered in this Article Who beleeveth in the Son of God hath life eternall Who beleeveth not the wrath of God remaines on him And may not this Article hitherto be tolerated I know some judge so yea some men otherwise learned and pious have written that we ought not to dispute of Predestination now under the Gospel but onely preach upon the universall promises of grace But these good men observe not that by writing thus they contradict the holy Ghost who in the Gospel hath delivered the doctrine of Predestination as above cothurn 2. in the alledged places may be seen These unwise men seem under this pretext either to overthrow the foundations of our faith and comfort or else not to take notice that they are overthrowne by others therefore that religious speech whether of Ambrose or Prosper Lib. 1. de vocat Gent. c. 7. is to be held concerning Predestination These things are not to be searched into what God will have concealed and what are manifest are not to be denied lest in them we be found unlawfully curious and in these damnably ingratefull As it is then unlawfull curiositie to search into the mysteries of Predestination not revealed in the Gospel so it is damnable ingratitude to deny or suppresse what God hath revealed concerning Predestination in the Gospel But to the Quere thus we answer For Sufficiencie you may as well aske in the Church If the doctrine of the Catechisme be sufficient to salvation concerning mans miserie and deliverance by Christ and concerning gratitude Why then should we reade the Bible or higher points of divinitie In Logick is it not sufficient to hold that there are so many Figures of Syllogisms and so many Moods then what need is there of Aristotles Organum in the Schooles In the Politicks is not the popular knowledge of right and equitie sufficient to guide a State what need is there then of such a number of lawes and so great toile as the studie of the law requires In the Mathematicks is it not sufficient to know that a triangle hath three angles equall to two c. that the diameter to the circumference is in a subtriple proportion c what need is there then of Euclyd's hard and intricate demonstrations To these any man may answer with facilitie that to some the first rudiments of these sciences or the knowledge of the quid sit is sufficient but not to all To the Catechumeni or Novices in the Church the catecheticall Rudiments of salvation may suffice as milk is sufficient nutriment for infants but to those that are adult in faith who require more solid meat this is not sufficient Not to School-Doctors not to the Pastors of the Church whose office and conscience require of necessitie a fuller measure of Theologicall knowledge To young Logicians the knowledge of so many Moods Figures is enough for their syllogizing but Philosophers must have the science propter quid delivered in Aristotle's Organum to wit whence and why there are so many and why there can be no more To an inferiour or pedant Judge the elements of law and justice are sufficient but to a Doctor of the law to an Advocate or Chancellour the fountaines of the law must necessarily be knowne For a Mechanick the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of a triangle and circle is sufficient to work by but a Mathematick Doctor who is studious of demonstrations requires the science of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 After the same manner we may say that this Article putting now aside all equivocations is sufficient for salvation to the Catechumeni and private vulgar men which are not capable of sublimer mysteries and this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is enough what they must be and what meanes they must use to attain salvation to wit that they must beleeve in Christ that they must persevere in faith and obedience of faith to the end by the ministerie of the Word and Sacraments and by grace co-operating with these But to those that are more adult in faith especially to the Doctors of Schooles Churches whoso will say that there is nothing besides this needfull his judgement will be accounted very weak and jejune yea rather it is necessarie that they should search the Scriptures and more exactly know the very 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the foresaid doctrine that is the fountaine and prime cause revealed in the Scriptures whence these qualities and meanes of salvation with grace and salvation it selfe may originally descend on us from whence also may proceed that difference which wee see of people and particular persons which are to be saved from the multitude of those that perish lest perhaps which by ignorance or by forsaking the fountain must need◠come to passe we digge to our selves broken cisternes Jerem. 2.13 which will hold no water that is lest we ascribe vocation faith perseverance and our salvation either to the wit strength or merit of men or else to grace which is indifferent and to our owne free-will in part or in whole not without dishonour to God and destruction to our selves Now this fountaine this prime and supreme cause is Gods eternall predestination that
evill cause and a bad conscience neither doe they elude the conflict but tye the knot while they say That they question not the doctrinall point of perseverance Coll. p. 401. but desire onely to be further instructed But they dispute so through all their Conference of the perseverance of the Saints and they desire to be instructed that among their divers tergiversations they may prove the very same to be plainly false and impious which in the former members of the Article they did assever to be true and certaine Furthermore in the same Conference every-where whether it be to avoid this conflict or to draw envy upon orthodox men sophistically changing the subject of the Article they write that our orthodox Divines teach That they who once beleeved can never againe fall Coll. p. 403 404.353.354 355.372 nor shall fall but are perswaded that let them sin as often as they will they can never lose their faith nor fall from grace but inevitably shall persevere and shall be saved And it is but only this opinion of perseverance as they say or manner of it which they cal in question Coll. p. 353. or dislike For the refuting then and overthrowing of which the engines of seven Arguments are properly directed to overthrow the orthodox doctrine pag. 356. 1. Because of it self it is repugnant to true piety and good works pag. 359. or because the preaching of it is scandalous pag. 360. and the beliefe of it licentious 2. Because it takes away the meanes of exhortations pag. 361. promises pag. 362. and threatnings c. 3. Because it makes the warnings and caveats which the holy Ghost gives us against Satans trecheries ineffectuall pag. 363. 4. Because examples testifie that many who have beleeved have totally and finally fallen from the faith 5. Because many faithfull men are recorded to have fallen grievously and that they have committed the workes of the flesh and hainous wickednesse with which filthy deeds faith could not consist 6. Because this being granted all baptised Infants that are borne of faithfull Parents should be saved 7. Because many faithfull men do so defile themselves with wickednesse that they are to be excommunicated and are excommunicated by the Ministers of the Church But truly if this be all and onely this which they question and oppose they shew themselves to be vaine wranglers I will not say rash disturbers of the Church and State who make such stirre about an opinion which the orthodox no lesse then themselves would have not onely to be examined according to Scripture but also as a scandalous doctrine and manifestly false they oppose it reprove it and judge it fitting to be thrust out of the Church or surely they fasten a notable calumny upon orthodox men fathering an opinion upon them which they do no wayes acknowledge to be theirs And therefore these seven engines of Arguments beate upon that false opinion onely and no wayes hurt the orthodoxall Tenet as is shewed in the Conference Now the Calumnies appeare thus Coll. p. 368. to 398. The first is in the Subject who once beleeve For the Orthodox do not affirme that all such persevere whereas hypocrites also and temporary beleevers not perseverers are said equivocally to beleeve but of these onely they speake who by true faith are inserted into Christ Coll. p. 341. and are partakers of his quickning spirit The other Calumny is in the first Attribute That they can never nor ever shall fall for both Scripture and experience testifie and the Orthodox think and teach that the Saints or such as are ingraffed into Christ being they are men and subject to humane infirmities may not onely fall but have oftentimes fallen through the infirmities of their flesh into small and great sins The third is in the other Attribute Let faithfull men sin never so much yet they may and ought to be perswaded of their perseverance and this is that absurd doctrine of the Saints perseverance But this is as foolish and plaine a piece of Sophistry or fallacy of the accident as if they had said Because sound men may and ought to run and labour so sick men who are in a Fever or in a fit of the Gout may and should run and labour but as sickly dispositions accidentally hinder the vitall actions of the body so the infirmities of the flesh accidentally hinder the spirituall operations of faith and of the Spirit The fourth Calumnie is in the third Attribute The faithfull can never lose their faith nor fall from grace This sounds to them as an absolute impossibility but the Orthodox use a limitation thus The faithfull cannot fall if you looke upon Gods gracious promises for the holy Ghost is a faithfull keeper and the counsell of God concerning the salvation of such as are predestinated is unchangeable and that out of the mouth of our Saviour Mat. 24.24 John 10.28 But if we looke upon the treacheries and strength of Satan and the infirmities of the faithfull when they are left to themselves then they are too part and that every moment to be supplanted by Satan and their owne flesh Coll. p. 36. and they openly professe that in that respect they may fall away and perish The fifth is in the same Attribute To lose faith to fall from grace which these men understand absolutely but the Orthodox understand a limitation That they cannot lose faith nor fall from grace altogether or totally to wit so as to become of faithfull men Infidels and enemies to God as they that sin before regeneration which is false both by testimonie of Scripture and experience The sixth is in the fourth Attribute But shall persevere inevitably They think that we meane any sort of men even such as are carnally secure as if they should persevere nill they will they which is farre from the minde and candor of orthodox Divines And so having unfolded their buskins and removed the calumnies that the orthodoxall doctrine concerning the perseverance of the Saints in faith is true and sound is shewed by ten Arguments taken out of the Scripture in the Conference 1. Because God in his word hath promised to the faithfull in Christ Coll. p. 147. a totall and finall perseverance Jer. 32.40 Psal 125.1 John 10.28 c. Therefore he performes it because he cannot lye This is Austines first Argument for the good of perseverance De bono persev c. 2. Coll. p. 343. 2. Because the Apostles witnesse that God doth and will faithfully performe his promises concerning their preservation in the faith 1 Cor. 1.8 10.13 Phil. 1.6 1 Thes 5.23 c. 3. Because out of the Apostles doctrine Coll. p. 344. Lib. 3. De justif c. 12. Rom. 8.30 the perseverance of those that are called according to Gods Decree is the proper effect of predestination so that Bellarmine himself a great Patron of indifferent or resistible grace doth plainly confesse That perseverance