immediately from your highnesse by and under your Highnesse letters patents And whereas also by a statute made in the first yeare of King Edward the sixth entituled an Act what seales and stile Bishops or other spirituall persons shall use it was ordained that all and singular Archbishops and Bishops and others exercising Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction should in their processe use the Kings name and stile and not their owne and also that their Seales should be graved with the Kings arms And forasmuch also as it must be highly derogatorie to the imperiall Crowne of this your Highnesse Realme that any cause whatsoever Ecclesiasticall or temporall within these your Highnesse Dominions should bee heard or adjudged without warrant or commission from your Highnesse your heires and successors or not in the name stile and dignity of your Highnesse your heires and successors or that any seals should be annexed to any promise but onely your Kingly seale and armes May it therefore please the King at the humble supplication of his Commons to have it enacted That the foresaid branch of the foresaid Act made in the first yeare of Queene Elizabeth her raigne and every part thereof may still remaine and for ever bee in force And to theend the true intent and meaning of the said statute made in the first year of K. Edw. the sixth may be declared and revived that likewise by the authoritie aforesaid it may be ordained and enacted that all and singular Ecclesiasticall Courts and Consistories belonging to any Archbishops Bishops Suffraganes College Deane and Chapter Prebendarie or to any Ecclesiasticall person or persons whatsoever and which have heretofore beene commonly called reputed taken or knowne to be Courts or Consistories for causes of instance or wherein any suite complaint or action betweene partie and partie for any matter or cause wherein judgement of law civill or Canon hath beene or is required shall and may for ever hereafter be reputed taken and adjudged to be Courts and judgement seates meerely Civill secular and temporall and not henceforth Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall and as of right belonging and appertaining to the Royall Crowne and dignitie of our Soveraigne Lord King James that now is his heires and successors for ever And that all causes of instance and controversies betweene partie and partie at this day determinable in any of the said Courts heretofore taken and reputed Ecclesiasticall shall for ever hereafter bee taken reputed and adjudged to be causes meerly Civill secular and temporall as in truth they ought to bee and of right are belonging and appertaining to the jurisdiction of the Imperiall crown of this Realme And further that your Highnesse Leige people may bee the better kept in awe by some authorized to bee your Highnesse Officers and Ministers to execute justice in your Highnes name and under your Highnesse stile and title of King of England Scotland France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. in the said Courts and Consistories and in the said causes and controversies Be it therefore enacted by the authorities aforesaid That all the right title and interest of in and to the said Courts and Consistories and in and to the causes and controversies aforesaid by any power jurisdiction or authoritie heretofore reputed Ecclesiasticall but by this Act adjudged civill secular and temporall shall for ever hereafter actually and really be invested and appropried in and to the Royall person of our Soveraigne Lord the King that now is his heires and successors Kings and Queenes of this Realme And that it shall and may be lawfull to and for our said Soveraigne Lord and King his heires and successors in all and every Shire and Shires Diocesse and Diocesses within his Highnesse Dominions and Countries by his and their letters patents under the great Seale of England from time to time and at all times to nominate and appoint one or moe able and sufficient Doctor or Doctors learned in the Civill Law to bee his and their civill secular and temporall Officer and Officers Minister and Ministers of justice in the same civill secular and temporall Courts and Consistories which in and over his and their royall name stile and dignitie shall as Judge and Judges doe performe and execute all and every such act and acts thing and things whatsoever in and about the execution of justice and equitie in those Courts according to the course and order of the civill Law or the Ecclesiasticall canons and constitutions of the Realme as heretofore hath beene used and accustomed to bee done by for or in the name of any Archbishops Bishops Colledge Cathedrall Church Deane Archdeacon Prebendary or any other Ecclesiasticall person or persons whatsoever And that all and every such civill secular and temporall Officer and Officers Minister and Ministers Judge and Judges in his and their processe shall use one manner of Seal only and none other having graved decently therin your Kingly armes with certaine characters for the knowledge of the Diocesse or Shire And further be it enacted c. That it shall and may be lawfull by the authoritie aforesaid for our said Soveraigne Lord the King his heires and successors from time to time and at all times to nominate and appoint by his and their Highnesse Letters Patents under the great Seale of England for every Shire and Shires Diocesse and Diocesses within his or their highnesse Dominions one or more able and sufficient persons learned in the Civill Law to be his and their Notarie and Notaries Register and Registers by him and themselves or by his or their lawfull Deputie or Deputies to doe performe and execute all and every such act and acts thing and things as heretofore â—â— the Courts and Consistories Ecclesiasticall aforesaid hath beene and â—ow are incident and appertaining to the office of any Register or Notarie And further at the humble suit of the Commons c. it may please the King to have it enacted that all and singular matters of Wills and Testaments with all and every their appendices that all and singular matters of Spousals and Marriages with their accessories that all and singular matters of defamation heretofore determinable in the Ecclesiasticall Courts and if there bee any other causes of the like meere civill nature shall bee heard examined and determined by the said civill and secular Officers and Iudges in the said civill and secular Courts according to the due course of the civill Law or statutes of the Realme in that behalfe provided And that all matters of Tythes Dilapidations repayre of Churches and if there bee any other of like nature with their accessories and appendices shall be heard examined and determined by the said civill and secular Officers and Judges in the said Civill and Secular Courts according to the Kings Ecclesiasticall Lawes Statutes and customes of the Realme in that behalfe heretofore used or hereafter by the King and Parliament to be established And at the humble suite of the Commons may it please the King to
against us that we which urge the same holy law for the bringing in of the discipline by pastors and elders should notwithstanding contrary to the same law intend the leaving out or altering any one of the three estates But which of the three estates was it that he meant should bee left out I trow there is none of the state of prelacie so ill advised as to take upon him the proof of this position viz. That the Lords spiritual The state of the prelacie is not one of the three estates in parliament by themselves alone doe make one of the three estates or that the statutes of England to this day have stood by their authorities as by the authoritie of those who alone by themselvs are to be accompted one of the three estates For if that were so how much more then might the great Peeres Nobles and temporall Lords challenge to make by themselvs an other estate And without contradiction to this day the commons summoned by the kings writ have ever been reckoned a third estate Now then if statutes have hitherto stood by authoritie of the Lords spirituall as of the first estate by the authoritie of the Lords temporall as of the second estate and by authoritie of the commons as of the third estate I would gladly be resolved what accompt the Admonitor made of the Kings estate It had not beene liegnes nor loyaltie I am sure howsoever hee spake much of the Lords spiritualls dutie and fidelitie in the execution of our late Queenes lawes to have set her Royall person authoritie and state behind the lobbie at the Parliament doore Either the kings Royall person then as not comprised within the compasse and circumcription of the three estates by his meaning which had beene but a very bad meaning must be thought to have beene hitherto secluded from authorizing the statute lawes made in Parliament Or els it is a most cleare case that the Lords spirituall themselves alone do not make any one of the three estates And what matter then of more weight may it happily seeme to be to alter the authoritie of the Lords spirituall and to leave them out of the Parliament when as notwithstanding they being left out the statutes of England may remaine and continue by authoritie of the three estates And it were not amisse for the Lords spirituall to consider that the bodie and state of the weale publike both now is and ever hath beene a perfect entire and complete bodie and State without the bodie and state of Prelacie and that the King and Nobles and Commons of the Realme without Prelates Bishops or Clerkes doe make up all the members and parts of the bodie and of the state and may therefore ordaine promulg and execute all manner of lawes without any consent Anno 36. h. 8. fo 51. h Anno m. j. fo 93. â— approbation or authoritie yeelded unto the same by the Bishops spirituall or any of the Clergie And thus much our Divines Histories and Lawes do justifie Sir Iames Dier Lord chiefe Justice of the Common pleas in his reports telleth us that the state and bodie of a Parliament in England consisteth first of the King as of the head and chiefe part of the bodie secondly of the Lords as principall members and lastly of the Commons as inferiour members of that bodie By a statute of provisoes it appeareth That the holy Church of 25. Ed. 3. holy church founded in the state of prelacie by the King England was founded into the state of prelacie within the Realm of England by the grand father of King Edward the third and his progenitors and the Earles Barons and other Nobles of the Realme and their Ancestors for them to informe the people of the law of God and to make hospitalities and almes and other workes of charitie in These uses are changed to the keeping of great horses great troopes of idlers wiâ—h long haire and great chaines of gold 6 Eliz. c. 1. The King bound to do lawes made without assent of prelates to bee kept as lawes of the realmes the places where the Churches were founded From whence it followeth First that the Archbishops and Bishops only and alone doe not make of themselves any state of prelacie but that the whole holy Church of England was founded into a state of Prelacie Secondly it is plaine that the Kings of England before they and the Earles Barons and other Nobles and great men had founded the holy Church of England into a state of Prelacie ought and were bounden by the accord of their people in their Parliaments to reforme and correct whatsoever was offencive to the lawes and rights of the crowne and to make remedie and law in avoiding the mischiefes dammages oppressions and grievances of their people yea and that the Kings were bound by their oathes to doe the same lawes so made to bee kept as lawes of the Realm though that thorough sufferance and negligence any thing should at any time be attempted to the contrary For whereas before the statute of Caerlile the Bishop of Rome had usurped the Seignories of such possessions and benefices as whereof the Kings of the Realme Earles Barons and other Nobles as Lords and Avowes ought to have the custodie presentments and collations King Edward the first by assent of the Earles Barons and other Nobles and of all the communaltie at their instances and requests und without mention of any assent of the state of prelacie in the said Parliament holden at Caerlile ordained that the oppressions grievances and dammage sustained by the Bishop of Romes usurpation should not from thenceforth be suffered in any manner And forasmuch as the grievances and mischiefes mentioned in the said Act of Caerlile did afterward in the time of King Edward the third daily abound to greater dammage and destruction of the Realm more than ever before and that by procurement of Clerks and purchasers of grace from Rome 31 Ed. 5 sta of â—â—ering the said King Edward the third by assent and accord of all the great men and commons of this Realme and without mention of any assent of Prelates or Lords spirituall having regard of the said Act of Caerlile and to the causes conteyned in the same to the honour of God and profit of the Church of England and of all this Realme ordained and established that the free elections of Archbishops Bishops and all other dignities and benefices elective in England should hould from thenceforth in the manner as they were granted by the Kings progenitors and founded by the ancestors of other Lords And in divers other statutes made by King Edward the third it is said that our soveraigne Lord the King by the assent of the great men and all the Commons hath ordained remedie c. That it was accorded by our Soveraigne Lord the King the great men and all the commons 36 Ed. 3. c. 6 8 Ed. 3. 3. statute of provisours
Scripture to be given them by God and therefore the King and Parliament may be pleased to abolish both them and their power as King Hen. 8. did abolish Monkes and Friars 26. 40. and 28 The challeng for Lordly primacy out of the great charter answered 28 The study of the civill Law and the professors of it may florish more than now they doe 28 Fees for probate of testaments let to farme 29 Fees dew for execution of functions of the Canon Law disproportionable for a Dâ—ctor of the Civill Law 30 An Act of Parliament for the advancement of the Civill Law is set downe and a forme laid for all proceedings in the Courts in which the Civill Lawyers should be Iudges 32 33 It will advance the honour of the King and the good of his subjects to have matters of tithes and testaments and matrimony reduced by act of Parliament to bee tried by the Iudges of the Common Law 37 Matters of tithes and other causes of light nature pertaine to civill justice 37 The temporall law may easily bee applyed to causes now reputed Ecclesiasticall 39 How legacies may be recovered at the Common Law 42 Matters of marriages more fit to bee decided by the Kings officers than by the Bishops 43 Much adâ—e in the Bishops Courts about Accipio and Accipiam 44 The common Law preferred by the Bishops above the Law of God and the civill Law 45 Causes of Adulteries Slander Heresie which by sufferance only have bin exempted from the Cognizance of the King may be arbitrated by the Iudges of the common Law 47 Hierarchy may be judged felony if it please the King 49 The cognizance of all crimes as well as of some by the Law of God belong to the King 50 No impeachment and impropriations in lay mens hands the stat of 15. Rich. 2. and the 4. Hen. 4. being observed for a Vicar endowes yet if it please the King Parliament a law may be made for reducing of impropriations which may bee done First by restitution Secondly by commutation Thirdly by redemption Fourthly by contribution 52 Parochiall Churches to what use they were founded 56 First restitution of many may and ought to be which are now accounted the temporall revenues of Archbishops and Bishops which were given to severall Churches are now spoyled of them by Archbishops and Bishops 55 56 57 58. Secondly commutations may be made of many of the Bishops lands given to superstitious uses for many impropriations in the Kings hand and the hands of many of the Nobility 56 58 59 Thirdly there may bee a redemption made of the same land or buying in of many impropriations by a common purse or treasury which will increase 1. When the people shall be discharged of the burden of Ecclesiasticall Courts 2. The treasure will increase by the dissolution of Chapels of ease and uniting two Parishes into one and especially in great Cities and Towns where often are but small Livings 61 Dissolution of Chapels no new thing Ibid. Chapels the Seminaries of hirelings 62 3. By sequestration of the Livings of non residents 4. By the forfeiture of penall Lawes due to the King 60 61 62 63 Sequestration of the Churches of pluralists may further the treasure for redemption of impropriations 63 By what contributions Impropriations may bee brought to the use of the ministery 63 Fourthly the fourth meanes viz by contribution wherby Impropriations may be reduced to the ministery 63 64 65 How and by what means impropriations may be reduced into the ministery 65 66 None of the three estates in Parliament is lost by removall of the Hierarchy as appeares by severall statutes viz. 25. E. 3. c. 24. 31. Ed. 3. Stat. of Herrings 3. R. 2. c. 3. 7. R. 2. c. 12. 1. E. c. 2. 68 69 70 71 72 73 The state of Prelacy founded by the Grandfather of K. E. 3. 69 The K. having the assent of the Nobles and Commons may repeale statutes without the assent of the Prelates 70 The argument answered in which it is said that it hath been alwayes dangerous to pick quarrels against laws setled 74 75 Lesse danger to reforme the Church by new lawes than to continue corruption by old lawes 74 That argument answered in which it is said that there must of necessity be in every Parish one Pastor a company of Seniors and Deacon or two at the least and all those to be found of the Parish 75 76 77 78 What kind of men ought to be chosen Seniors and Deacons 76 The judgment of the Commissioners of Ed. 6. touching Elders and Deacons 77 The election of Pastors by the people stands upon the ground of reason and nature rules of Christian equity and the law of God therefore by no Law or custome can justly be taken away though actually it was by the Pope 79 to 87 Dangerous to innovate unlesse there be evident utility in innovation 80 The common manner of election in the old Churches was by the people 81 The King without the people hath power to nominate the Kingly Bishop 82 M. Bilson confirmes the peoples election of their Pastor 83 A great difference betwixt the choice of Bishops in England and Pastors 86 No Schisme hapned by choice of Pastors by the people ancient schimes were ever from the election of Bishops 87 88 therefore a Stat. is desired for the giving of election of their Pastors 86 Election of publike officers in Cities and Boroughs is by the principall men of these places 90 91. therefore Ministers may bee elected the officers of Cities and Townes Corporate chosen without contention therefore Pastors may be also chosen 90 The people would be more carefull of their Election than Bishops have been the people could make no choice of insufficient Ministers unles the Bishops did make insufficient Ministers 93 94 The common people accused of backwardnesse in Religion the reason of that must needs be from their ill guides 95 Men of excellent gifts and men of no gifts are unequally matched in the ministery of the Gospell 96 The people may know a man to be a fit Minister though he be not brought up among them 98 What knowledge of a Minister is required in the people before they choose him No partiall suits can follow the election of Ministers by the people 100 The means to take away all symony for places in the Ministry 100 The inconveniences of Bishops ordination set downe 102 As many suits betweene the Bish and the Clerke 2. suits between the Clerke and the Archdeacon 3. suits betweene the B. and the Archdeacon 4. Riots and breaches of the Kings peace 5. unlawfull Fees for Letters of institution 6. unlawfull Fees for letters of sequestration 105. 7. Perjury by the Clerk and robbery by the Patron 8. Chopping of benefices and dispensations 106. A supplication to the Parliament to consider these inconveniences and likewise a briefe way is set downe of the redresse of them 107 Diverse things set down concerning ordination of Ministers
of the Common Law before the Kings Judges and Justices of the Kings bench and Common pleas By a Statute of 32. H. 8. c 7. it is cleare that all tyths oblations c. and other Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall profits by the lawes and statutes of the Realme may be made temporall as being admitted to be abide and goe to and in temporall hands lay-uses and profits From the reason of which statute it is cleare that those lawes likewise may be reckoned amongst us for temporall lawes which by the lawes and statutes of the Realme may be executed by temporall and lay persons and which are conversant about temporal and lay causes If then the execution of the Lawes touching these matters may lawfully remaine and abide in the hands of Doctors of the Civill Law being temporall and lay persons as alreadie under the Bishops they doe it cannot be denied but that the Kings Judges and Justices of both benches may bee as competible Judges to put in execution the lawes concerning these matters as Doctors of the Civill Law or other lay men be But the causes are not reputed and called temporall and lay causes amongst us What for that if in their owne nature simply considered these causes be merely lay and temporall causes such causes I meane as whereof the King a lay civill and temporall Magistrate by his lay civill and temporall Magistracie derived unto him immediately from the holy law of God may and ought to take cognizance and thereupon either in his owne Royall person or by the person of any of his inferiour Officers may give absolute and peremptorie judgement If I say these things be so what booteth it or what wisedome is it to contend that these causes and matters have been and are still adjudged to be therefore Ecclesiasticall and no temporall causes because through an abusive speech or through a vaine and evill custome they have beene so led and accompted in times past And what if it hath pleased the Kings Progenitors by sufferance to tolerate the executions of such Lawes as concerne these things to bee in the hands and power of Ecclesiasticall persons yet hereupon it followeth not that in very deede and truth the Magistracie of the said Ecclesiasticall persons was an Ecclesiasticall Magistracie or that they were Ecclesiasticall Magistrates but their Magistracie was and remained still a temporall magistracie and they were and abode temporall Magistrates For not more can the qualitie of the person alter the nature of the cause than can the qualitie of the cause alter the nature of the person And if it be true that matters determinable in times past by a Magistracie abusively called Ecclesiasticall be notwithstanding properly temporall matters and that the same Magistracie also be a temporall and no spirituall Magistracie what a childish and poore conceit is it to challenge and threp upon the temporall Magistrate that he hath none or very few temporall lawes touching those matters and that therefore the people should not solicit an alteration of abuses in Church government left for want of temporall lawes the people should bee without Ecclesiasticall discipline It will be no small matter saith he to apply these things to the temporall law yea and so say I to But what of that The question is not how hardly these things may be applyed to the temporall law but how small a matter it were to apply the temporall law unto these things For it is not said in any law that casus ex juribus but it is said in all lawes that ex casibus jura nascuntur The temporall law may easily be applyed to causes now reputed Ecclesiasticall And indeed the Phisition applyeth not the disease to his Phisick but he prepareth his phificke for the disease The husband-man he measureth not his ground by the seed but his seed by the ground The Draper he meateth not his yard by the cloth but his cloth by the yard If in like manner the temporall lawes and the grounds and rules thereof were applyed to these matters of tythes marriages c. whereof he speaketh what more alteration could there bee of the temporall law by such an application then there is an alteration of the plummet by laying it to the stone or than there is an alteration of the rule or yard by laying them to the timber and cloth Besides he that rightly and after an exact and equall proportion can apply one rule or maxime of the temporall law to many more cases than whereupon it hath beene usually in former times applyed hee may rather bee reputed an additioner than an alterer of the Law But how may the temporall Law be applyed to those matters how even so and so as followeth By the statute of 32. H. 8. c. 7. it is declared that tythes oblations how tythes may bee recovered in the Kings temporall Courts c. and other Ecclesiasticall or spirituall profits c. being lay mens hands to lay uses be no more Ecclesiasticall but temporall goods and profits and that if any person were diseased deforced wronged or otherwise kept or put from his lawfull inheritance estate seisin c. of in or to the same by any person claiming or pretending to have interest or title in or to the same that then in all and every such case the person so disseised deforced or wrongfully kept from his right or possession shall and may have his remedie in the Kings tempoâ—al Courts as the case shall require for the recoverie of such inheritance by writ originall c. to be devised and granted out of the Kings Court of Chancery in like maner c. It is there likewise provided that that Act shall not extend nor be expounded to give any remedie cause of action or suite in the Courts temporall against any person which shall refuse to set out his tythes or which shall detaine c. his tythes and offerings But that in all such cases the partie c. having cause to demand or have the same tythes shall have his action for the same in the Ecclesiasticall Courts according to the ordinance in the first part of that act mentioned and none otherwise Now then sithence every person whether he be lay or Ecclesiasticall having right to demand tythes and offerings hath the partie from whom those tythes be due bound and obliged unto him and sithence also the partie not dividing yeelding or paying his tythes doth actually and really detaine the same and thereby doth unjustly wrong the partie to whom they be due contrary to justice and the Kings lawes sithence I say these things be so what alteration or disadvantage could befall or ensue to the Common Law or the Professors thereof if so be it might please the King with his Parliament to have the last part of this Act so to be explained extended and enlarged as that the same might give remedy in the Kings temporall Courts by writ originall to be devised and granted out of the Chancerie against
of Yorke and Silby were there present In a booke intituled the burning of Pauls Church in London 1561. and in the fift question moved by a papist it is said that this manner of ministration of Sacraments set forth in the booke of Common prayers was never allowed nor agreed upon c. no not by the Clergie of England at the last Parliament but only it was agreed upon by the Laitie which had nothing a doe with spirituall matters or causes of religion Whereunto the reverend Father Master Pilkington Bishop of M. Pilkington Bishop of Durisme Duresme answering was there not saith he a disputation for Religion appointed by the Queenes Majestie wherein your Clergie was affraid to utter their foolishnesse in defending their superstition lest they had taken more shame in answering than they did in holding their peace I thinke the Vniversities with so many places of this Realme receiving religion and these other disputing for it may bee counted to be some part of the clergie of the Realme And so it was not received without consent of the Clergie But these were not of the Parliament What then But as Ioash Josaphat Ezechias and Iosias did not make a new Religion but restored that which was defaced and had long lyen buried so our Parliament did not set forth a new religion but restore that which was godly begun before the good K. Edward confirmed by the Parliament and Clergie then c. But nothing can bee concluded as a law by Parliament say they without consent of the Clergie there present But this having not their consent cannot be counted a law as they think I had rather saith M. Pilkington leave this to be answered by the Lawyers than otherwise Yet that the world may see that something may be said in it we grant him not this to be true that no law at all can be made without consent of Bishops Look your old statutes of Parliament when Bishops were highest afore Edward the third and ye shall read that they passed by consent of the Lords temporall and commons without any mention of the Lords spirituall which statutes many of them stand in strength at this day Then it may well be gathered that the consent of the Clergie was not alwayes so necessarie as they thinke it The Lawyers Judges and Justicers put in practice and execute these lawes therefore their doings may be a sufficient reason to lead the unlearned what opinion they have of this statutes For Religion except Justice Rastall first executing that and afterward running away may condemne the rest which I trust he may not I thinke they would not execute them except they had the strength and nature of lawes If they doe contrary to their knowledge and opinion they cannot be able to answer their doings but I think no wise men are of this opinion Only these corner creepers that dare not shew their face and would deceive the people go about to deface all good and godly order that displeases them In the dayes of K. Edward they had the like fond opinion that the king could not make lawes in his minoritie untill he came unto full age and to make the people to disobey their Prince Hitherto M. Pilkington L. Bishop of Durisme with whom the most worthy and learned M. Jewell late Bishop of M. Iewel B. of Salisburie Salisburie agreeth in every point The wise and learned faith hee could have told you that in the Parliaments of England matters have evermore used to passe not of necessitie by the speciall consent of the Archbishops and Bishops as if without them no statute might lawfully be enacted but only by the more part of voyces yea although the Archbishops and Bishops were never so earnestly bent against it And statutes so passing in Parliaments onely by the voyces of the Lords temporall without the consent and agreement of the Lords spirituall have neverthelesse beene alwayes confirmed and ratified by the Royall assent of the Prince and have beene enacted and published under the names of the Lords spirituall and temporall Reade saith hee the statutes of King Edward the first there shall ye find that in a Parliament holden at S. Edmundsbury the Archb. and Bishops were quite shut forth and yet the Parliament held on and good and profitable lawes were there enacted the departing or absence or malice of the Bishops spirituall notwithstanding In the Records thereof it is written thus Habito Rex cum suis Baronibus Parliamento Clero excluso statutum est The King keeping a Parliament with his Barons the Clergie that is to say the Archbishops and Bishops being shut forth it was enacted c. In provisione de matrona in the time of K. Edward the third whereas matter was moved of bastardie touching the legitimation of bastards borne before mariage the statute passed wholly with the Lords temporall whether the Lords spirituall would or no. and that contrary to the expresse decrees and canons of the Church of Rome And thus much the most reverend and godly Father M. Iewell Bishop of Salisbury Wherefore to conlude this point against the Admonitors position I dispute thus All those persons who by any necessitie are none of the three estates aâ—d by whose authorities the statutes of England to this day have not stood to leave out the same persons may happily seem a matter of lesse weight than all men do judge it But the Archbishops and Bishops are such persons as by nâ—cessitie are none of the three estates and by whose consents the statutes of England to this day have not stood Therefore to leave out the Archbishops and Bishops may happily seem a matter of lesse weight than all men doe judge it If our Evangelicall Bishops be of that opinion of which the Popish Bishops were viz. that the house of Parliament is an unfit and an unmeet place to have the holy cause of the religion of God debated and concluded upon and that the Laitie without the clergie ought not to conclude any thing in Religion and that in respect hereof their presences their voices and their assents are necessary in the â—arliament If our Evangelicall Prelates I say make this objection then besides that hereby they unseemely unmannerly and unchristianly accuse the whole land of ignorance and blindnesse in religion supposing neither King nor Nobles nor Commons to be able to discern betweene night and day besides this I say so shamefull an abuse of a whole Christian nation I would pray them to remember what the most reverend Fathers Master Pilkington and Master Iewell have answered to such cavillous slanders For what else intended they by many examples and proofes brought for the Parliaments of England consisting of the King the Nobles and the Commons to be lawfull Parliaments and to have right to establish religion but to justifie against Popish scoffers that religion might be conceived and established in Parliament notwithstanding the absence or exclusion of the Clergie Besides since our
lawes doe uphold the state and authoritie of the Convocation house for the examination of all causes Matters of religion not concluded in parliament before the same bee consulted of in convocation of Religion surely it cannot be truly averred that it is necessarie for Evangelicall Bishops to be members of the Parliamenthouse lest controversie of Religion should bee handled and discussed without them For how should any matter of religion bee concluded without them in Parliament when first of all the same is to be argued among themselves in convocation Or let them hardly if they can shew any one instance of any change or alteration either from religion to superstition or from superstition to religion to have beene made in Parliament unlesse the same freely and at large have beene first agreed upon in their Synodes and Convocations And what booteth it then to have a double or treble consultation and consent of Archbishops and Bishops in parliament Is the holy cause of God any whit bettered by their Bishops riding from Pauls to Westminster Or can it receive any more strength by their walking from Westminster Church to Westminster palace Nay it hath beene often times so farre from being promoted by their bishops as not only in their convocations but also in the Queenes parliaments the same thing hath beene shamefully intreated and taken the foyle as may witnesle the bill for the better observation of the Sabboth 27. Eliz. which being passed by both houses of parliament was notwithstanding gainesaid and withstood by none so much as by certaine Evangelicall bishops and which as there all men generally conceived was only stayed from being made a law by the Queene upon their counsell and perswasion ADMONITION Pag. â—8 It hath beene alwayes daugerous to picke quarrels against lawes setled ASSERTION And is it not morbus haereditarius in Prelates to pick quarrels against reformation of errours For even this did Stephen Gardener Stephen Gardeners argument and the adâ—onitors argument in effect one reason against the Lord Protector That in no case saith Stephen Gardener is to be attempted of the Lord Protector which may bring both danger to him and trouble to the whole Realme But innovation of Religion from that state wherein K. Henry left it may be and is like to be dangerous to the Lord Protector and to baeed troubles to the whole Realme Therefore innovation of Religion from the state that K. Henry left it is in no wise to be attempted And even of this stamp and of this streyne is the argument of pickking quarrels against laws setled for thus in effect he argueth That Discipline in no case is to bee brought into the Church by the King and Parliament which may be dangerous to lawes setled But to bring into the Church the Apostolicall discipline may be dangerous to lawes setled Therefore the Apostolicall Discipline in no case is to be brought into the Church by the King and Parliament But forasmuch as that noble and religious Lord Protector notwithstanding Stephen Gardeners sophistry continued constant and couragious in the abolishment of popery and superstition which king Henry left and did without dangerous alteration of laws then setled innovate religion How much more now may the Kings Majestie the Lords and Commons in Parliament attempt with effect an innovation of that state of Ecclesiasticall government wherein the Queene left the Church And if it cannot be denyed but it had beene far more dangerous for the Realm and for the Lord Protector not to have setled the holy doctrine of the everlasting Gospell by Lesse danger to reforme the Church â—y nâ—w lawes than to câ—ntinue corruption by old laws new lawes than to have maintained and continued antichristianitie by old lawes how should it be lesse danger for the king in these dayes to continue corruptions in the Church by toleration of old lawes than to have the same corruptions reformed by establishment of new lawes But unto whom or unto what hath it beene dangerous to pick quarrells against lawes setled Wha hath it beene dangerous to lawes setled No. For how should lawes setled be indangered by quarrelers sithence quarrellers are evermore in danger of lawes setled Or hath it beene alwayes dangerous for a king for a State for a people or for a Countrey to pick quarrels against lawes setled No. For what man is he or what face carrieth he that dare upbraid a countrey a people a State or a King minding to unsettle evill lawes and evill customes to be quarrellers against lawes setled Let it then only be dangerous for private persons upon private male-contentment to pick quarrels against good lawes well and rightly setled and let it not be hurtfull or dangerous for supreme Kings powers and principalities by publike edicts to alter evill lawes evilly setled For to what other end should evill lawes evilly setled be continued but to continue evill And what a thing were that This argument then for lawes setled being the sophisme of that Fox Stephen Gardener is but a quarrelsome and wrangling argument ADMONITION If this government whereof they speake be as they say necessary Pag. 78. in all places then must they have of necessitie in every particular parish one Pastor a company of Seniors and a Deacon or two at the least and all those to be found of the parish because they must leave their occupations to attend upon the matters of the Church But there are a number of Parishes in England not able to finde one tolerable Minister much lesse to finde such a company ASSERTION This argument seemeth to be drawne from kitchin profit and is but a bugbegger to scarre covetous men from submitting their necks unto the yoke of that holy discipline which our Saviour Christ hath prescribed and which the Admonitor himselfe confesseth to have beene practised by the Apostles and primitive Church And yet because this argument seemeth to lay a very heavie burden on mens shoulders such as is impossible to be borne it is an argument worthy That seniours and Deacons should bee found at the charge of the Parish is absurd to be examined though in it self the same be very untrue and absurd For who did ever fancy that a Pastor a company of Seniours and a Deacon or two at the least should be men of occupations or that they should be all found of the parish because they must leave their occupations to attend upon the matters of the Church Why there be many hundreds of parishes in England wherein there dwelleth not one man of an occupation And what reason then or what likelyhood of reason was there to father such an absurd necessitie upon the Church As for the necessitie of having one Pastour in every partilar parish and of his finding by the parish because it is his duety to attend upon reading exhortation and doctrine although he bee no man of occupation this I say is agreeable and consonant to the government of the Church practised by
company of him so excommunicated And for that cause also should excommunicate them as is here supposed lawfull to bee done were it not a cleare case that the body of that Church must now bee taken to consist only in the person of the Ordinarie and one member to become the whole body For if all under his jurisdiction were once excommunicated how could then any be in communion with him And if they all were once excommunicated must not the Ordinarie then alone be the common union and so make a communitie And what a deformed kind of excommunication then is that kinde of excommunication whereby it may fall out that to be one is to be many and that to be a Church a companie a societie and a fellowship is to be one of which nature and of which kind that manner of excommunication which by Pastours and Elders is to bee executed cannot be as hath already beene proved If then excommunication now used bee a deformed kind of discipline and therefore as we say to be no more tolerated and if excommunication by Pastours and Elders be a kinde of discipline for the inconvenience thereof as he saith not to be planted what manner of discipline by excommunication The Admonitor would have no excommunication at all would he have in these dayes trow we would hee have none at all verily I suppose none at all For so doe his words plainly insinuate by two reasons following First saith he the loosenesse of these dayes require discipline of sharper lawes by punishment of bodie and danger of goods which they do and will more feare than they will excommunication Secondly wee have saith he a good manner of discipline by the Ecclesiasticall commission which doth much good and would do more if it were more common But why did he not speake plainly and why did hee not affirme devoutly that discipline by excommunication was good where the Church was in persecution and that it is not necessarie nor so convenient under a Christian Magistrate as it may be otherwise For if Pastors and Elders were appointed joynt officers only for times of persecution and not to be under Christian Princes it followeth these joynt officers ceasing that all accessories appendices and consequences of their joynt offices must also cease unlesse it can be proved out of the holy Scriptures that the offices of Pastours ought still to continue and that the Offices of Elders ought not to continue because the offices of Elders with all their appendices have beene translated by our Saviour Christ unto Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons their Chancellours Commissaries and Officials For unlesse these Officers be Christs Officers the discipline which they use cannot bind the consciences of the people of God And for this cause is it very probable that he so commendeth discipline of sharper lawes and discipline by the Ecclesiasticall commission For if these officers by their discipline have not to do with the consciences of men then is it no marvaile that men feare not their discipline And therefore if they will be still officers it is requisite that they call for such a discipline as might cause men to stand in awe of their authoritie But were they indeed the officers of God and had they indeed the authoritie from God to execute discipline by excommunication as Pastours and Elders did in the Primitive Church then were the loosenesse of this age never so great yet that the children of God in England would more fear the losse of goods lands bodies or lives than the censure of Gods officers is one of the Admonitors paradoxes And here I appeale the consciences of all the reverend Bishops and Prelates in the land and let them answer me hardly if they judge themselves to bee the children of God and had seven times seven thousand lives whether they had not rather seven thousand times be committed to the Goaler of Winchester than once be delivered over to the Goaler of Hell And are not all the children of God in England their brethren And are they not all led by one and the selfe same spirit And how then can they lesse feare excommunication which is a deliverie of the soule to Sathan than the punishment of body and danger of goods And yet touching this point of Excommunication hee seemeth to be against himselfe for in the 137. page he telleth us that happily it may be a fault yea and a great fault that is found with the bishops in these dayes that they doe not excommunicate the Prince and Rulers and so constraine them to doe that which by perswasion they will not doe If then excommunication bee so terrible to Princes and Rulers how should it be of so light account with subjects And if it be so powerfull as it can constraine Princes and Rulers to doe their duties how much more fearefull would it bee to compell inferiours and men of low estate to live soberly in their vocations I will not here debate the matter touching rhe excommunication of Princes and Rulers much lesse touching the excommunication of the Prince and Rulers of our land But I would gladly be informed what they were or who they be that found great fault with the Bishops in these dayes for not endeavouring to excommunicate the Prince and Governours The Papists they thinke it sufficient that the Prince and Governours be excommunicated by the Pope and his Clergie The Ministers and people professing the Gospell and seeking for reformation of excommunication deny the Bishops to have any divine power granted by the Word of God to excommunicate a private man much lesse doe they thinke it lawfull for them to excommunicate the Prince and Rulers Who then I say find fault with the Bishopâ— that they do not excommunicate the Prince and Governours and so constraine them to do that which by perswasion they will not doe For my part I cannot ghesse whom he should meane unlesse he meant to give us to understand that some Prelatists have consulted about the excommunicating both Prince and Governors for not making sharper Lawes against such as whom the Prelates and their favourites have falsly slandered to be pestilent fellowes movers of sedition enemies to Caesar troublers and subverters of the state Act. 24. 5. Act. 1. 16. 20. 17. 6. Puritans and I wot not what chiefe maintainers of the sect of the disciplinarians unlesse I say he should mind some such Prelatists I can not ghesse any subjects within the land to bee so undutifull as to find fault with the Bishops for not attempting to bring our Late Soveraigne Lady the Queene deceased to their excommunication And therefore to enforme the people of an Author and not to bring him forth it argueth and breadeth great suspicion that Excommunication toucheth them onely which make profession to be of the Church the enformer was the Author himselfe Touching the loosenesse of some or of all in these dayes that are without the Church if hee intend that they require Discipline of sharper
wherof were lay men good or moderate discipline to be used by the Ecclesiasticall Commissioners And then were it fit that the people were resolved what a very good manner of Discipline Master D. W. and other Ecclesiasticall Commissioners used against Master E. whom by vertue of the Ecclesiasticall commission they excommunicated The tenor of which excommunication taken out of the Register at L. followeth In Dei nomine Amen Nos I. W. Sacrae Theologiae Doctor c. Cancellarius ecclesiae c. M. A. M. Armigeri M. H. civis civitatis c. Commissarij rite legitime procedentes I. E. de B. L. Dioceses ad hos diem locum legitime peremptorie citatum praecognizatum diuque expectatum nullo modo comparentem pronunciavimus contumacem in poenam contumaciae suae hujusmodi cum excommunicavimus in hijs scriptis Concordat cum Regio T Moreover it seemeth not an unmeet thing that some Ecclesiasticall Authority committed to Pursevants by the Ecclesiasticall commissioners If the Queen had specially commanded this search it is credible that her privy Counssellors shold have set to their hands rather than the High Commissioners Commissioners did make knowne unto the people whether banishment be an Ecclesiasticall Discipline and what moderate discipline Ecclesiasticall the Commissioners used when they banished religious Master Fullerton the Scot from dwelling at Warwicke or within certaine Miles thereof Or lâ—t them iâ—foâ—me the Realme what a very good moderation was used when by the Ecclesiasticall Commission for suppressing of Martines Books and other books of argument against the Hierarchy they authorized drunken and swearing Pursevants to search mens houses and to break up their chests c. the Copie of which their Letters is this viz. Whereas the bearer is say they by the Queenes Majesty especially appointed to make search and to apprehend certaine suspected persons according to such particular directions as he hath in that behalfe received these shall be to will and require and in her Majesties Name strairly to charge and command you and every of you to whom these shall appertaine to be by all good and possible meanes ayding and assisting to the bearer in the execution of this service by entring into all such houses as he shall think meete and hold suspected as well within liberty as without and that in them and every of them to make due and diligent search And to search all manner of writings letters papers bookes and all other things carrying note of suspicion sparing no studies chests cubbares lockes or walles as also to apprehend examine and bring before us such persons as by Her Majesties said direction therein appointed and wherein if he shall any way require your further assistance you may not faile to yeeld him the same with all diligence and dexterity according to the trust reposed in you as you will answer for your default for the contrary at your uttermost perill Directed unto all Mayors Sheriffes Justices of Peace and quorum Baylifes Constables Hedboroughes Tything-men and to all other Her Majesties Officers and Subjects c. But be it that all these manners of Disciplines were moderate and good Ecclesiasticall Disciplines and more to be used yet there may a scruple remaine which were fit to be discussed what a very good moderation and manner of Discipline within our remembrances was used betweene an Archbishop and a Bishop both high Commissioners against certaine Gentlemen and one of their Wives about these Articles following Articles objected by her Majesties High Commissioners for causes Ecclesiasticall against G. B. of B. and F. B. of B in the Countie of L. IN primis VVe object unto you G. B. and L. your wife that you have within these seven yeares and so at this present doe keepe company and use conference with diverse persons disobedient to her Majesties lawes and such as be suspected to resort and frequent unlawfull Conventicles Item wee object unto you to the end you might the better insinuate your selves into their companies you Quere whether this convention were lawfull for this cause Quere against what law this entertainment was and whether the Bishop of L. conversing with Popish Priests and traytors did not more offend have tabled and boorded vvith the same parties and that you or one of you have beene heretofore convented for the causes aforesaid before the novv Lord Archbishop his grace for entertaining into your house a person which stood then and yet standed suspended and deprived for disliking the Booke of Common Prayer and other godly orders established by Her Majesties authority in this Realme Item VVee object unto you the said G. B. and L. your Wife that you have not frequented divine service celebrated vvithin your Parish Church of Bothese vi 5. 4. 3. 2. or one yeares last nor doe not at this present at least every Sunday nor have received the holy Communion within your said Parish Church during the said yeares Item that you the said G. B. and L. your Wife vvithin the time aforesaid have not Christened nor baptized Quere whether the Bishop did not more offend the law of God by preferring these artioles than the Gentleman did by procuring his children to be Baptised by a preaching Minister having none at home your Children vvithin your Parish Church but contrary to the forme and order of Her Majesties Lavves in that case provided have either christened them at home privately in your ovvn house or have carried or caused them to bee carried to other Churches And let them declare what Church and vvhat Minister did baptise them and where and vvhether the same Minister did at the same baptisme signe the child vvith the signe of the Crosse and let them declare the cause vvhy they did baptize their children out of the Parish Item that the Ministers pevv or seate in the Church of B. aforesaid by the direction of the L. Reverend Father Note that the bishop of L. was not bishop of the Diocesse in God the Bishop of London that novv is being at the same Church as also by the consent of the Minister and Church-Wardens there vvas placed in a very convenient place of the Church to the end the Parishioners there might the better heare and understand the Minister at the time of reading the divine service Item We object unto you that you the said F. B. vvithin these vi or 3. moneths last past have vvithout any sufficient vvarrant or commandement from the Father in God the Lord Bishop of London or his Clancelour or other having authority therein very disorderly and contemptuously removed the same seat to the great offence of the Parishioners and bad example of others Item We object unto you that you knovv beleeve or have heard say that Za. G. is a Preacher of the VVord of God and a man of good life and conversation and lawfull Parson of B. aforesaid Item VVe object unto you that the premisses notwithstanding you the said F.
Cecill TO the end I may enforme your Lordship of my dealing in this Parliament-time against the undue claimed superiority of the Bishops over their inferior brethren Thus it was Because I was in the Parliament time in the 25. yeare of King Henry the eight In which time First all the Clergie aswell Bishops as others made an humble submission to King Henry the Eighth acknowledging his Supremacie and detesting the usurpation of the Bishops of Romes authoritie Vpon which submssion of the Clergie the King gave unto the said Bishops the same ample rule that before they had under the Pope over their inferiour brethren saving that the same rule was abridged by stature by this parenthesis following that is to say without offending the prerogative Royall of the Crowne of England and the lawes and customes of the Realme In the later end of the Statute it was added that whosoever offendeth in any one part of that statute and their Aydors Counsellors and Abbettors they did all fall into the penalty of the premunire And after I had recited this statute in the Parliament house I declared that in King Henry the Eight dayes after this There was no Bishop that did practise superio rity over their inferior brethren And in King Edwards dayes the said Bishops obtained a statute whereby they were authorized to keepe their Courts in the Kings name the which statute was repealed in Queene Maries dayes and was not received in her Majesties time that now is whereupon it was doubtfull to me by what authority the Bishops do keepe their Courts now in their owne names because it is against the Prerogative Royall of the Crowne of England that any should keepe a Court without sufficient warrant from the Crowne Whereupon I was answered that the Bishops doe keepe their Courts now by prescriptions and it is true that the Bishop may prescribe that King Henry the 8. gave them authority by the statute of 25. of his raigne to have authority and rule over their inferior brethren as ample as they had in the Popes time But this was no speciall warrant for them to keepe their Courts by and that in their owne names And yet they have none other warrant to keep their Courts as they doe now in their owne names to my knowledge And this was the cause that made them obtaine a statute in King Edwards dayes to keepe their Courts by in the Kings name Now it is a strange allegation that the Bishops should claime authority at this present to keep their Courts in their own names as they do by prescription because the statute of 25. doth restraine them generally from offending of the Prerogative Royall of the Crowne of England and the Lawes and customes of the Realme And no man may justly keepe a Court without a speciall warrant from the Crowne of England as is aforesaid And the generall liberty given by King H. the 8. to the Bishops to rule and governe as they did in the Popes time is no sufficient warrant to the Bishops to keep their owne Courts in their own names by prescription as I take it And therefore the Bishops had done wisely if they had sought a warrant by statute to keepe their Courts in the Queenes name as the Bb. did in K. Edwards dayes In which time Arch. Cranmer did cause Peter Martir and Bucer to come over into this Realme to be placed in the two Vniversities for the better instruction of the Vniversities in the word of God And B. Cranmer did humbly prefer these learned men without any challenge to himselfe of any superior rule in this behalfe over his inferiour brethren And the time hath bin that no man could carry away any grant from the Crowne of England by generall words but that hee must have speciall words to carry the same by Therefore how the B. are warranted to carry away the keeping of their Courts in their owne names by prescription it passeth my understanding Moreover where as your Lordship said unto mee that the Bishops have forsaken their claime of superiority over their inferior brethren lately to bee by Gods ordinance and that now they doe only claime superiority from her Majesties supreme government If this be true then is it requisite and necessary that my L. of Canterbury that now is do recant and retract his saying in his book of the great volume against Cartwright where he saith in plaine words by the name of D. Whitgift that the superiority of B. is Gods owne institution Which saying doth impugne her Majesties supreme government directly and therefore it is to bee retracted plainly and truly For Christ plainly and truly confesseth Ioh. 18. 36. That his Kingdome was not of this world And therefore he gave no worldly rule or preheminence to his Apostles but the heavenly rule which was to preach the Gospell saying Ite praedicate in omnem mundum qnicunque crediderit baptizatus fuerâ—t salvus erit qui non crediderit condemnabitur Goe and preach in all the world whosoever shall beleeve be baptized shall bee saved but he that will not beleeve shall be condemned Mark 16. 15. But the Bishops do cry out saying that Cartwright and his fellows would have no government c. So belike the B. care for no government but for worldly and forcible government over their brethren the which Christ never gave to his Disciples nor Apostles but made them subject to the rule of Princes who ought not to be resisted saving that they might answer unto Princes that they must rather obey God than men Acts 5. 29. and yet in no wise to resist the Prince but to take up the Crosse and follow Christ FINIS
than to plant the things required to be planted And alas what a resolution was that among pillars and Fathers for so they will bee counted of the Church Especially when as the things required to be redressed were required to bee redressed at the hands of the whole state of governement that is at the hands of the Queene the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and Commons in open Parliament assembled And could any dammage I pray you have ensued to the state of Government to the state of the Queene to the state of our Countrey People Common weale and Lawes or to the state of the Gospell if things amisse in the Church had beene redressed and things wanting in the Church had beene planted by so high and supreme a power I trow not Nay seeing our Countrey People and Commmon weale not only once and twice and thrice but many times have humbly and earnestly prayed and solicited in open Parliament a redresse of things amisse in the Church is it not most evident that things were not considered aright but amisse by these Fathers of the Church And that the considerers by keeping things unplanted rather aymed at their owne profit honour and dignitie than that our Countrey People and Common weale should fare the better by having things amisse to bee redressed The considerers then being them selves parties yea and such parties as by whom things were carried amisse in the Church and whose defects only were required to be redressed no marvell I say if they used all kinde of artificiall advisement and consideration to keepe things still unplanted by the planting whereof their owne unfatherly miscariages must have beene reformed On the other side if things required to be planted might indeed be once planted howsoever happily our former Church officers might bee somewhat male-contented and discouraged to have their superfluities pared and the edge of their swords abated yet is there no least cause at all for our Countrey people and Common weale to feare any trouble or hurly burly among us For if the hand of God be in Judah so that he give the people one heart to doe the commandement 2 Chron. 30 12. of the King and of the Rulers according to the word of the Lord and if the King the Nobles and Commons shall condescend and agree in one and if their voices shall be all but as the voice of one man to allow and approve that which doth touch and concerne them all then shall neither the Nobles have any occasion to disdaine the Commons nor the Commons any reason to envie the Nobles Much lesse can the Nobles be at variance with the Nobles nor the Commons be at defiance with the Commons For they bee all of them so prudent and so provident as that they will not bite one another lest they should be devoured one of the other And in deed why should any of our Clergie-Masters be so void of judgement as to deny the Nobles and Commons after foure and forty yeares experience of a most prosperous peace waiting upon the Gospell to be now growne so uncircumspect and simple witted as that a reformation of disorders to be made by their consents in others should bring forth a confusion in themselves What will they bicker one with the other will they beate and buffet one another when there is no cause of disagreement or variance betweene them For they shall be sure to lose neither libertie nor dignitie they shall endanger neither honour nor profit Our Nobles shall be tres-noble still they shall be Princes and Captaines over our people They shall be Deputies and Presidents in our publike Weale They shall be Peeres and Ancients of the Kingdome their Priviledges Prerogatives Preeminences stiles ensignes and titles of prowesle and honour shall not be raced defaced or diminished But they shall as they may and ought remaine and continue whole and inviolable both to them and their posterities throughout their generations Our Judges Justices and Lawyers shall have and enjoy their authorities credits and reputations as in ancient times They shall be recorders of our Cities Townes and Boroughs They shall be Stewards of Kings Leets and Lawdayes Our Knights Esquires and Gentlemen shall still bee Burgesses in Parliaments and Conservators of the Kings peace they shall bee Assistants to examine and represse thefts rapines murders robberies riots routs and such like insolencies yea they shall be our Spokes-men and our Dayes-men to arbitrate and compose striffes and debates betweene neighbour and neighbour Our common people they without disturbance shall quietly and peacably retaine and injoy as in former ages their immunities franchises and liberties as well abroad as at home as well in their houses as in their fields They shall possesse their tenancies without ejection they shall bee inheritors without expulsion as well to the lawes liberties and customes as to the lands and possessions of their Ancestors They shall not bee compelled to goe to warfare upon their owne costs they shall not be tryed arraigned or condemned by forraign power or by forraigne Lawes There shall no husbandry no clothing no handicraft no mariner no marchandise no lawes of the Land no manner of good learning whatsoever in Schoole Colledge or Vniversitie be decreased or laid aside Wherefore the Admonitor toying neversomuch howsoever hee hath made his flourish and cast about with his May bees his I feare his pray God his yfes and his andes howsoever I say it pleased him to trifle with these gew gawes yet shall none ever be able to prove by any proofes drawne from the holy Scripture or humane reason that any hinderance indignitie or incumbrance can ever betide our Nobles our Commons the state of our Countrey People Lawes or Common-Weale if the state of Church-governement were translated from Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons Chancellours Commissaries and Officials which are officers in the house of God only according to the commandements and traditions of men unto the government practised by the Apostles and primitive Church which they cannot deny but must confesse to have been according to the holy pleasure of God Nay our Nobles and our Commons are most assured to bee so farr from being endammaged or dosing ought hereby as hereby they shall purchase that unto themselves which never yet any oppugner of so good and holy a cause could attaine unto Namely they shall seale up unto their owne soules infallible testimones of good and sincere consciences testimonies I say of their fidelities unto God testimonies of their allegiance unto him by whom they have beene redeemed and testimonies of love and compassion unto the whole Church of God Nay further our Commons shall be so farre from bringing a-dammage upon themselves as they shall marvellously benefit the mselves First by purchasing unto themselves a large immunitie from many foule and great grievances and exactions of money imposed and levied upon them by Officers and Deputies of Arehbishops Bishops Archdeacons c. Secondly by having the Lord Christ whose cause
extraordinary alterations it is not only requisite to abolish all bad opinions out of the mindes of those that know not the drift of the enterprisers but it is also necessary that the defence of such alterations be made forcible against the opposition of all gainesayers we will descend to the particulars and joyne issue with the Admonitor And upon all allegations exceptions witnesses and records to bee made sworne examined and produced out of the holy Scriptures and Lawes of the Land already setled on the behalfe of our cause before our Soveraigne Lord the King his Nobles and Commons in Parliament we shall submit our selves and our cause to the Kings Royall and most Christian judgement In the meane time we averre that not only the former clause of this admonitory bill but that all other clauses following in the same bill for the invaliditie insufficiency indignitie and nullitie of them are to bee throwne out and dismissed from the Kings Court especially for that the particulars opened by the Admonitor can not serve for any reasonable warning to induce the common people to rely themselves upon his I am of opinion to the which we plead at barre as followeth ADMONITION First saith he the whole State of the Lawes of the Realme will be Page 77 altered For the Canon Law must bâ— utterly taken away with all Offices to the same belonging which to supply with other Lawes and functions without many inconveniences would bee very hard the use and studie of the civill Law will bee utterly overthrowne ASSERTION When by a common acceptance and use of speech these words whole State of the Lawes of the Realme are understood of the Common and statute lawes of the Realme that is to say of the Kings temporall Canon and civill Lawes no part of the Laws of the Realme but only by sufferance lawes and not of Canon or Civill lawes it cannot follow that the whole state of the Lawes of the Realme should be altered though the Canon and Civill Lawes with all offices to the same belonging should be utterly taken away and be wholly overthrown For no more could the Admonitor prove the Canon or Civill Law at any time heretofore to have beene any part of the Lawes of this Realme otherwise than only by ` a 25. H. 8. C. 21. in the preamble sufferance of our Kings acceptance long use and custome of our people than can any man prove a parsley-bed a rosemary-twigge or an ivie-branch to be any part of the scite of the Castle of Farnham And therefore he might aswell have concluded thus the whole scite of the Castle of Farnham will be transposed for the Boxetrees the Heythorne Arbours and the Quick-set hedges planted within the Castle-garden must bee removed and cast away which were but a proofe provelesse and a reason reasonlesse If then by the abrogation of the Canon or Civill Law scarce any one part of the lawes of this Realme should be changed what reason have we to thinke that the whole state of the lawes of the Realme must be altered Besides to conclude the whole by an argument drawne ab enumeratione partium and yet not to number the tenth part of such parts as were to bee numbred is I am sure neither good logick nor good law Moreover if all the Canon-law I mean all the Papall and forraigne Canon Law devised and ordeined at Rome or elsewhere without the Realm and consequently all the Offices and functions to the same belonging bee already utterly taken away what hope of reward can Civilians expect from the use of such things as are within the compasse of that law or of what efficacy is this argument to prove an alteration of any part of the lawes of this Realme or that the studie of the Civill Law should be utterly overthrowne For the whole state of the Lawes properly called the Lawes of the Realme hath stood and continued many years since the same Papall and Canon Law was abolished An imbasement for civilians to have preferment by offices of the Canon law The Canon law be abolished out of the realme and ought not to be used And as touching the Civilians for them to seeke after preferments by Offices and functions of the Canon Law is an embasement of their honourable profession especially since farre greater rewards might very easily bee provided for them if once they would put to their helping hands for the only establishment and practice of the Civill Law in the principall causes now handled by them in the Courts called Ecclesiasticall But how may it be proved that the Papall and forraign Canon law is already taken away and ought not to bee used in England For my part I heartily wish that some learned men in the Common Law would vouchsafe to shew unto the King and Parliament their cleare knowledge in this point In the meane season I shall not be negligent to gather and set downe what in mine understanding the Statute-Law hath determined thereof By the statute of submission 25. Hen. 8. revived 1 Eliz. as the very words and letter of the petition and submission of the Clergy of the body of the law and of the provisoes doe import the very true meaning and intent of the King and Parliament is evident and apparent to be thus as followeth and none other viz. That such Canons Constitutions and Ordinances Synodall or Provinciall which before that time were devised and ordained or which from thence orth should bee devised or ordained by the Clergie of the Realme being not contrariant or repugnant c. should only and alonely be authorised and to be put in ure and execution And consequently that all Canons Constitutions and Ordinances Papall and made by forraigne power without the Realm should wholly and utterly be abrogated adnulled abolished and made of no value The words touching the petition and submission mentioned in that Statute in substance are these Where the Kings humble and obedient subjects the Clergie c. have submitted themselves and promised in verbo Sacerdotii that they will never from henceforth presume No Canons provinciall or other to bee put in ure therefore no papall canons in force to attempt alledge claime or put in ure any Canons Constitutions Ordinances provinciall or other or enact promulge or execute any new Canons c. And where also divers Constitutions Ordinances and Canons Provinciall or Synodall which heretofore have beene enacted and be thought not only to bee much prejudiciall to the Kings prerogative Royall c. the Clergie hath most humbly besought Canons provinciall heretofore enacted being prejudiciall are to be abrogated the Kings Highnesse that the said Constitutions and Canons may be committed to the examination and judgement of his Highnesse and of two and thirty persons of his subjects c. and that such of the said Canons and Constitutions as shall bee thought and determined by the said 32. persons or the more part of them worthy to be abrogated
absolutely and as really is revested in the person of the Queene as is the said spirituall authoritie Therefore as all spirituall Officers for the execution of the said spirituall power must have their authoritie derived unto them from the person of the Queene under the great Seale so likewise must all temporall officers for the execution of their temporall offices have the like commission The consequence of which enthimeme followeth not though the antecedent be true For although as well all temporall as all the said spirituall authoritie improperly so called was really and absolutely in the person of the Queene yet hereupon it followeth not that by one and the selfe same meanes alone and namely by a commission under the great Seale all temporall and the said spirituall power in every part and branch thereof should be drawne alike from the Queenes person For there be divers and sundry meanes to derive temporall authority wheras there seemeth to be but one only means to derive the said spirituall authoritie and then marke the substance of the authors argument Some temporall Officers as Stewards of Leets Constables and sundry other Officers must not draw their temporall authoritie from the Queene by a Commission under the great Seale Therefore no spirituall Officers as Archbishops Bishops Archdâ—acons and sede vacante Deanes and Chapters must draw any of their spirituall authoritie from the Queen by a Commission c. Which argument drawne from a particular affirmative unto a generall negative what weaknesse it hath every young Logician can discerne And as for Stewards of Leets though they have no Commission Though all temporall officers draw not their power from the King by the great seale yet by one meanes or other withdraw it from the King under the great Seale yet for the execution of their Stewardships they have a Commission under the Seale of the Exchequer Constables Decennary or Tythingmen and Thirdboroughs have their authorities derived unto them from the Kings person by the very originall and institution of their offices Sheriffs of Countries Coroners Escheators and Uerderors have their offices and their authorities warranted unto them by the Kings writs out of the Chancerie But it was not the minde of the Law-makers saith the Author that the Ordinaries by a commission under the great Seale should draw their said spirituall power from the Queen What the mindes of the Law-makers were touching this point it mattereth little or nothing at all Neither is it to purpose whether a commission under the great seale be necessarily required or not required by vertue of that statute 1 Eliz. c. 1. to warrant the said spirituall power unto Ordinaries Only it sufficeth that the Queen having all power improperly called spiritual invested in her Royall person and being really and actually seised of all the said supreme spirituall authoritie could not have any part of the same spirituall power drawne from her but by some one lawfull and ordinarie meanes or other For if this rule be true in every common person quod meum est sine mea voluntate à me auferri non potest how much more doth the same rule hold in the Royall prerogatives rights priviledges dignities and supremities of a King wherfore to say that all supreme and ordinarie power improperly called spirituall was really and actually inherent in the Royall person of the Queen and to say also that some of the same inferiour and ordinarie power not derived from the Queen was neverthelesse in the persons of inferiour ordinaries is as much to say that some branches of a tree may receive nourishment from elsewhere than from the root that some members of the bodie are not guided by the head and that some streames flow not from their fountaines And now to conclude this part against the Canon Law and their Offices and functions thereof I dispute thus The forraign and papall canon law with all the accessories dependances offices and functions thereof is utterly abolished out of the Realme Therefore the same law is no part of the lawes of the Realm and therefore also it is evident that there will not follow any alteration of the Lawes of the Realme by the taking of it away Which Canon Law also with other lawes and functions how easily the same without any inconveniences may bee supplied shall God willing be presently made apparant if first we shall answer to that challenge which the state of Prelacie may seeme to make for the continuance of their Lordly primacie out of the words of the great Challenge for Lordly primacy out of the great Charter answered Charter Concerning which challenge namely that by the great Charter Lordly Archiepiscopall and Episcopall primacie or jurisdiction belonging to the state of Prelacie is belonging unto them I demand unto what Church this great Charter was granted And whether it were not granted unto the Church of God in England The words of the Charter are these Concessimus Deo hâ—c praesenti Mag. Charta c. 1. Charta nostra confirmavimus pro nobis haeredibus nostris in perpetuum quod Ecclesia Anglicana libera sit habeat omnia jura sua integra libertates suas illaesas We have granted unto God and by this our present writing have confirmed for us and for our heires for ever that the Church of England be free and that she have all her rights and liberties whole and unhurt Now by this Charter if the same bee construed aright there is provision made first that such honour and worship be yeelded by the King and his subjects his and their successors and posteritie unto God as truly and indeed belongeth unto him Secondly that not only such rights and liberties as the King and his progenitors but also that such as God had endowed the Church of England with should inviolably be preserved And in very deed to speake truly and properly such rights and liberties only are to be called the rights and liberties of the Church of England which God himselfe hath given by his Law unto his universall Church and not which the Kings of England by their Charter have bequeathed to the particular Church of England When therefore question is made that by the great Charter the Kings of England are bound to maintaine the rights and liberties of the Church of England wee are to enquire and search what rights and liberties God in his holy word hath granted unto his universall Church and so by consequence unto the Church of England one part of the Catholike Church And this questionlesse was the cause that moved the victorious Prince Henry the eight so effectually and powerfully to bend himselfe against the Popes supremacie usurped that time over the Church of England For saith the King we will with hazard of our life and losse of our Crowne uphold and defend in our Realmes whatsoever wee shall know to be the will of God The Church of God then in England not being free nay having her rights and liberties
have it further enacted That all manner of fees heretofore lawfull or hereafter by the King and Parliament to be made lawfull for or concerning the probat of Wills administration of the goods of the intestat letters of tuition receiving or making of accompts inductions to Archbishoprickes Bishoprickes Deanries Parochiall-Churches or other spirituall promotions and all other fees whatsoever heretofore lawfull or hereafter to be made lawfull for any travaile or paine to bee taken in or about the expedition or execution of any of these causes shall for ever hereafter be fees and allowances appropriated to the Judges and principall Registers of the said Courts equally to bee devided betweene them as heretofore hath beene accustomed and that the said Judges and Ministers within their severall charges shall be Collectors of the Kings tenths and subsidies granted and due by the Clergie taking for their travaile and paine in and about the same collection such fees as heretofore have beene accustomed Provided alwayes that none of the said civill and temporall Officers and Ministers nor any of them for any offence contempt or abuse to be committed by any person or persons in any wise incident to any of the said Courts and Consistories suspend excommunicate or interdict any person or persons but shall and lawfully may by authority of this present Act proceed against every offender and offenders by such ordinarie processe out of the said Register or Notaries office as is used upon a sub-paena out of the high Court of Chancerie and there upon default or contempt to proceed to attachment proclamation of rebellion and imprisonment of the partie offending as in the said high Court of Chancery is used Provided also that all appeales hereafter to bee made from all and every Court and Courts in the Shires and Diocesses of the Countrey shall bee made to the higher Courts as heretofore hath beene accustomed only with an alteration and addition of the names stiles and dignities of Archbishops Bishops and other Ordinaries unto the name stile and dignitie of our Soveraigne Lord the King his heires and successors And that upon the appeales so to be made it shall and may be lawfull for the Judges and Ministers of Justice of and in the said higher Courts to make out all manner of processe and processes and to do and execute all and every act and acts thing and things for the furtherance of Justice in the causes aforesaid as to them shalby the law seem equal right meet and convenient any law statute priviledg dispensation prescription use or custom heretofore to the contrarie in any wise notwithstanding Provided also that all and everie such Judge and Minister that shall execute any thing by vertue of this act shall from time to time obey the Kings writ and writs of prohibition of attachment upon prohibition and indicavit and not to proceed contrary to the tenour of such writ or writs in such and the same manner and form and condition as they have or ought to have done be ore the making of this act any thing in this act to the contrary notwithstanding Provided also that this act or any thing therein contained shall not extend or be interpreted to give any authoritie to the said Judges and Officers or any of them to put in execution any civill or Ecclesiasticall law repugnant or contrariant to the lawes statutes or customes of the Realme or hurtfull to the Kings Prerogative Royall And thus it may seeme to be but a small labour a little cost and an easie matter for the King his Nobles and Wisemen of the Realme to devise formes of judgement and manner of processe and proceedings without any offices or functions of the Canon law whereby the use and studie of the Civill Law and the reward and maintenance for Civilians might be furthered and increased and not utterly overthrown and taken away as the Admonitor uncivily beareth us in hand As for the alteration of the censure of excommunication for contumacy mentioned in this project we have the consent of the reverend Bishops in this admonition that the same may be altered For the Admonitor their Prolocutor speaketh on this wise viz. As for the excommunication Pag. 138. Excommunication for contumacie by the Admonitors judgement may be taken away without offence and with the good liking of the Bishops practised in our Ecclesiasticall Courts for contumacie in not appearing or not satisfying the judgement of the Court if it had pleased the Prince c. to have altered the same at the beginning and set some other order of processe in place thereof I am perswaded saith he that the Bishops and Clergie of the Realme would have beene very well contented therewith And speaking of a certain manner of civill discomoning used in the Church of Tigure he further addeth viz. Which or the like good order devised by some godly persons if it might be by authoritie placed in this Church c. I think it would be gladly received to shun the offence that is taken at the other ADMONITION And matters of Tythes Testaments and Matrimonie matters also of adulterie slander c. are in these mens judgements meere temporall c. therfore to be dealt in by the temporall Magistrate only which as yet have either none at all or very few laws touching those things therefore the common law of the Realme must by that occasion receive also a very great alteration For it will be no small matter to apply these things to the temporall law and to appoint Courts Officers and manner of processe and proceedings in judgement for the same ASSERTION Indeed we hold that all these matters wherof mention is here made Matters of tythes and other causes of like nature pertain to civill justice and all others of the like nature are merely civill and temporall and by the temporall Magistrate alone to be dealt in and to bee discussed if we consider the administration of externall and civil justice And this we thinke will be granted of all and not to be denyed of any unlesse they be too too popishly addicted In regard whereof we have drawn as before is mentioned a project how Courts and manner of processe and proceedings in judgement by Doctors of the Civill Law may be appointed by the King and his high Court of Parliament without that that the common Law of the Realme by the occasion of any such courts offices or manner of processe and proceedings must receive any alteration at all much lesse a very great alteration Howbeit if it should not please the King and that the Civilians could not finde favour in his sight by courts offices and manner of processe and proceedings in judgement before specified or by the like to have the studie of the civill Law advanced yet we thinke it convenient once again How matters of tyths c. may be dealt in by â—he Kings Iudges to be examined how these matters may be dealt in according to the rules and grounds
any person detaining his tithes and offerings the Hospitall of S. Leonards in Yorke of the Kings foundation and Patronage endowed of a thrave â—ospital of S. Leonard 1 2. h. 6. c 2 of Corne to bee taken yearely of every plough earing within the Counties of Yorke Comberland Westmerland and Lancaster having no sufficient or convenable remedie at the Common Law against such as with-held the same thraves it was ordained by the King in Parliament that the Master of the said Hospital and his successors might have action by writ or plaints of debt or detaine at their pleasure against all and every of them that detained the same thraves for to recover the same thraves with their dammages And by the Statute of 32. H. 8. c. 4. it is enacted That the Parsons and Curates of five Parish Churches whereinto the Towne of Royson did extend it self and every of them and the successors of every of them shall have their remedie by authoritie of that act to sue demand ask and recover in the kings Court of Chancerie the tythes of corn hay wooll lamb and calfe subtracted or denyed to be paid by any person or persons Againe Vicars Parsons or improprietaries do impleade any man in the Ecclesiasticall Court for tythes of wood being of the age of twenty years or above for tyth-hay out of a medow for the which time out of mind and memorie of man there hath only some Meade-silver beene paid or if a debate hang in a spirituall Court for the right of tythes having his originall from the right of Patronage and the quantity of the same tythes do passe the fourth part of the value of the benefice a prohibition in all these and sundry other cases doth lie and the matters are to bee tried and examined in the Kings Courts according to the course of the Common Law unlesse upon just cause there bee granted a consultation And if in these cases in maintenance of the Common Law the defendants have reliefe in the Kings Courts I thinke it more meet to leave it to the consideration rather of common than to the judgement of Canon Lawyers to determine what alteration the Common Law could sustaine in case if plaintiffes as well as some defendants might pray the Kings aide for the recoverie of tythes especially seeing at this day the manner of paying tythes in England for the most part is now limited by the common and statute lawes of the Realm and not by any forraigne canon law But there is some fact Object happily so difficile so secret and so misticall in these causes of tythes as the same cannot without a very great alteration of the Common law Answer be so much as opened before a lay judge or of the hidden knowledge whereof the Kings temporall Judges are not capable Why then let us What facts touching the upholding of tyths are examinable in the Ecclesiasticall courts see of what nature that inextricable fact may be I have perused many libels made and exhibited before the Ecclesiasticall Judges yea and I have read them over and over and yet for ground of complaint did I never perceive any other materiall and principall kinde of fact examinable in those Courts but only such as follow First that the partie agent is either Rector Vicar Proprietarie or Possessor of such a Parish-Church and of the Rectorie Vicaridge farme possession or dominion of the same and by vertue thereof hath right unto all tythes oblations c. apertaining to the same Church and growing within the same parish bounds limits or places tythable of the same Secondly that his predecessors Rectors Vicars c. time out of mind and memorie of man have quietly and peaceably received and had all and singular tythes oblations c. increasing growing and renewing within the Parish c and that they and he have beene and are in peaceable possession of having and receiving tythes oblations c. Thirdly that the partie defendant hath had and received in such a yeer c. of so many sheepe feeding and couching within the said Parish c. so many fleeces of wooll and of so many Ewes so many Lambes c. Fourthly that the defendant hath not set out yeelded or paid the tyth of the wooll and lambe and that every Tyth fleece of the said wool by commâ—n estimation is worth so much and that every tyth Lambe by common estimation is likewise worth so much c. Fifthly that the defendant is subject to the jurisdiction of that Court whereunto he is summoned Lastly that the defendant doth hetherto deny or delay to pay his tyths notwithstanding he hath beene requested thereunto These and such like are the chiefe matters of fact whereupon in the The Kings Iustices are as able to judge of exceptions against tyths as the Ecclesiasticall Iudges Ecclesiasticall Courts proofes by witnesses or records rest to be made for the recoverie of tythes And who knoweth not but that these facts upon proofes made before the Kings Justices may aswell bee decided by them as by any of the Reverend Bishops or venerable Archdeacons their Chancellors or Officials If there be any exception alleaged by the defendant as of composition prescription or priviledge the Kings Justices are as able to judge of the validitie of these as they are now able eo determine customes de modo decimandi or of the use of high wayes of making and repairing of Bridges of Commons of pasture pawnage â—estovers or such like Truth it is that of Legacies and bequests of goods the reverend Bishops by sufferance Legacies how they may be recovered at the common law of our Kings and consent of our people have accustomably used to take cognizance and to hold plea in their spirituall Courts Notwithstanding if the Legacie bee of lands where lands be divisible by Testament the judgement thereof hath beene alwayes used and holden by the Kings writ and never in any Ecclesiasticall Court Wherefore if it shall please the King to enlarge the authoritie of his Courts temporall by commanding matters of legacies and bequests of goods aswell as of lands to be heard and determined in the same it were not much to be feared but that the kings Justices the kings learned Counsell and others learned in the Law of the Realm without any alteration of the same law would speedily finde meanes to apply the grounds thereof aswell to all cases of Legacies and bequests of goods as of lands For if there be no goods divisible by will but the same are grantable and confirmable by deed of gift could not the kings Justices aswell judge of the gift and of the thing given by will as of the grant and of the thing granted by deed of gift or can they not determine of a Legacie of goods aswell as of a bequest of lands If it should come in debate before them whether the Testator at that time of making his will were of good and perfect memorie upon proofs and other
circumstances to be opened and made of the Testators memorie by lively testimonies either the Admonitor must condemne the kings learned and discreet Justices to bee malae mentis insanae memoriae or els it must be confessed that they be as well able to judge of the distraction of wits and unsoundnesse of memorie in a person deceased as they be to determine the question of Lunacie madnesse or idiocie in a man living If any question should arise upon the revocation of a former will of the ademption of a legacie or of a legacie given upon condition or in diem it would be no hard matter for the learned Judges upon sight of the will and proofes to be made to define which is the first and which is the last wil whether the legacie remaine or whether it be revoked whether it be legatum per rerum or in diem whether conditional or without condition And if it bee conditionall whether the same be possible or impossible honest or dishonest and if it bee in diem whether the day be past or to come But there lyeth no action at the common law for a legatorie against the executor to recover his legacie I grant But a creditor to recover his debt due by the testator upon specialtie may bring an action at the common law against the executor And then what is the cause that a creditor way recover his debt and that a legator cannot recover his legacie in the kings Court but only for that remedie could not bee given unto legatories complaynants by any writ out of the Chancery And therefore that 21 Ed. 1. statute upon the writ of consultation such plaintiffes might not be deferred of their right and remedie in such cases to their great dammage it hath pleased the kings by sufferance to tolerate the Church Officers to determine these cases Wherfore if it might please the king to cause writs to be made out of his Court of Chancerie for the recovery of Legacies it were cleare by the Common Law of the Realme as from the statute may bee gathered that the cognizance of these Cases did not appertaine any more to the Spirituall Court. For then might the legatorie by that writ bring an action against the Executor to obtaine his Legacie But how should that action bee tryed How even as other actions of debt detinue or trover bee tryed namely as the case should require either by the countrey or by the Judges upon a moratur in lege As Testaments with their adherences so likewise matters of Spousals Mariages divorces c. together with their accessories by common Matters of marriages more meete to bee decided by the Kings than by the Bishops officers right of the Imperiall Crowne did in ancient times properly appertaine to the examinations and sentences of the Emperours themselves and to their Provostes Deputies and Presidents of Cities and Provinces as by their severall titles de Testamentis Legatis Fidei commissis Nuptiis repudiis divortio dote c. in the bookes of the civill law appeareth By the Law of England also the king hath the mariage of an heire being within age and in his ward Widowes also that hold of the King in chiefe must not marie themselves without the Kings licence And by an Act made 4. and 5. Phil. and Mary there is a streight punishment provided against all such as shall take away Maidens that be inheritors being within the age of sixteen years or marry them without consent of their parents and what reason letteth them that the King might not as well have the care and cognizance of all the contracts of mariage especially of the mariage of all children and widowes in his temporall Courts as he hath of some parties to be contracted of the Dower of the joynture of the disparagment of the age of the taking away of the deflouring and of mariage without parents consent in some cases or what a very great alteration of the common law could ensue in case the Kings temporall Justices did examine and determine whether the contract were a perfect and simple or conditionall contract yea or no For if upon the statute made by Philip and Mary that maidens and women children of Noble men and Gentlemen c. being heires apparent c. and being left within age of sixteene yeares should not marry against the will or unknowing of or to the father or against c. If I say upon the publishing of this act there hath no alteration of the common law hitherto followed it is but a meere superstitious errour to feigne that a change of the Common law must follow if so be this statute were extended to all children both Sonnes and Daughters of what parentage sexe estate or age soever For if the King in his temporall Courts had the definition of all as well as of some contracts made by children without consent of parents then should a multitude of lewd and ungodly contracts made by flatterie trifling gifts faire and goodly promises of many unthrifty and light personages thereunto wonne by intreaty of persons of lewd demeanour be pronounced voide and of no efficacie yea and on the other side a number of honest lawfull and godly contracts should be confirmed and Much a doe in the Ecclesiasticall Courts about accipio accipiâ—m remaine in their full strength and force which now upon certaine frivolous and trifling quiddities and nicities of words and sillables are pronounced in the Ecclesiasticall Courts to bee no contracts And in good earnest is there now a dayes any soundnesse of reason at all to be heard amongst the Doctors and Proctors of those Courts where they informe out of the Canon law in these cases For doth not their whole dispute and information rest principally whether the contract be made by words of the present or of the future tence whether it be made with an oath or without an oath yea and do they not exceedingly besweat and besmyre themselves by turning and returning by folding and unfolding their great and hydeous volumes for proofe and reproof of accipio accipiam yea and sometimes of letters and accents If the young man and maide having both of them their parents consent shall answer only in the future tence I will have thee or I will take thee or I am content to take thee or I will have none other but thee or if ever I marry I will marry thee and do not answer directly I do take thee to mine husband or I do take thee to my wife oh it is a world to see and a wonderment to behold what canvasing heaving and shoving what a stirre quoyle and garboile the Canonists make about the lifting and removing of these fethers And whatsoever the holy Scriptures have determined of the necessitie of parents consent or of what necessitie likewise soever the “ Institu de nup. S. 1. civill law hold the consent of parents to bee yet in the Ecclesiasticall courts
the papall canon law must needs take place because by the same law consent of Parents is not de necessitate but The canon law preferred by the reverend Bishops before the law of God and the civill law de honestate tantum and because also matrimonia debent esse libera non pendere ex alieno arbitrio Wherein the reverend Bishops under their favourable patience can not clearely excuse themselves of much oversight in so slender managing of a matter of so great and high a consequence The holy law of God by publike authoritie hath been commanded within this Realme to bee sincerely and purely taught received and embraced The civill law hath not had her free course in this case hindered by any law of the Realme And how then commeth it to passe that the canon law being in this point repugnant to both these Lawes should notwithstanding be preferred beare sway and take place in this Realme before and above both these Laws especially Certain speciall points to be provided about mariages the same in this point as being against the law of God being utterly taken away The abuses past and mariages past under colour and pretext of this law may and ought to be bewailed and repented of yea and that no such mariages in time to come may be made I leave it to be considered whether it might not tend to the advancement of the Law of God be honourable for the King and commodious for the Common Weale providently to provide these things following viz. First that no matrimonie secretly contracted against the will or unknowning of or to the father or him or her that hath the keeping education or government of the partie to be maried before he or she come to a certaine age should in any sort be good or available to make the posteritie of those who shall bee so maried legitimate or inheritable Secondly that every contract of mariage concluded with consent of parents Tutor Governour or Gardian should be forcible and effectuall to bind both parties irrevocably whether the same contract with an intent to conclude a mariage be made by wordes of the present or future tence it skilleth not Thirdly that every man stealing away contracting and marrying a maide under the age of certaine yeares without consent of father tutor governour or gardian should be a felon and for such his felonious act suffer the paines of death And lastly that all licences to marry without banes asking according to the intendment of the booke of Common prayer bee forbidden and unlawfull for ever Which things if they might be observed it is very likely that mens inheritances as now many times they doe should not hang in suspence upon question of legitimation or illegitimation of their children to be allowed or disallowed by the commonlaw There should not any such long and tedious suites and variances hereafter fall out betweene the posterities and children of one man for the right and interest of their Ancestors lands Neither should Sir Thomas Lucie nor Sir Edmond Complaint heretofore made upon stealing away and marying mens daughters how they may cease Ludlow nor the Lady Norton nor Master Cooke the Kings Atturney generall nor many moe Knights Esquires and Gentlemen complaine and bewaile the stealing away and mariages of any their daughters Neeces neer Kinswomen or Wards Neither could it bee possible that one woman might procure foure or five severall licences for the mariage of foure or five severall husbands all of them being alive together and not one of them dead Neither should there any licence of mariage be granted out of any Ecclesiasticall Court to any man or woman with a blanck whereby the partie licensed was enabled to have maried another mans wife or his owne or his wives sister Neither should any couples maried and living together foure six or more yeers as man and wife upon a new and suddaine dislike or discontentment and upon a surmised precontract to be pretensedly proved by two suborned witnesses be adjudged by vertue of the canon law to be no husband and to be no wife Neither should any man being solemnly maried to a wife and afterward by reason of a precontract solemnly divorced from the same his wife and by censures of the Church compelled to marry her for whom sentence of precontract was adjudged be re-authorised by the same Consistorie about ten or twelve years after the divorce to resummon recall and rechallenge his first wife especially she having a testimoniall out of the same Consistorie of her lawfull divorce and being againe solemnly maried to an other husband Wherefore to conclude these matters of tythes testaments and Mariages if the King should not be pleased to have the studie of the civill law advanced by some such law as whereof the former project maketh mention I dispute for the enlarging of the common law thus If it stand with reason with the grounds and rules of the common law and with the Kings Royall prerogative that in cases of Tythes Testaments and Mariages the King if it may please him so to provide by Parliament may give remedie unto complaynants by writs out of the Charcorie and that complaints in such cases may effectually be redressed upon such writs in the Kings Courts And if also sundry matters of Tythes Testaments and Marriages bee already handled in the Kings Courts if these things I say be so and so may be then with little reason did the Admonitor warne us that a very great alteration of the common law must follow and that it will bee no small matter to apply these things to the temporall law But the antecedent is true as hath beene already shewed Therefore the consequent is true ADMONITION Indgements also of adulterie slander c. are in these mens judgments meere temporall and therefore to be dealt in by the temporall Pag. â—â— Magistrate only ASSERTION We are indeed of this judgement that in regard of the Kings Royall Office these judgements of adulterie and other criminall Causes comprised within this clause c. ought no more to be exempted from the Kings temporall Courts than matters of theft murder treason and such like ought to be And for the maintenance of our judgements we affirme that there is no crime or offence of what nature or qualitie soever respecting any commandement contained within either of the two tables of the holy law of God if the same be now corrigible by spirituall power but that some fault and contempt one or other of the like nature and qualitie as comprised under the same commandement hath beene evermore and is now punishable by the Kings Regall and temporall jurisdiction For adulterie as the same is to be censured by penance in the Ecclesiasticall Courts so is ravishment also buggerie and sodomie to bee punished in the Kings Court by paine of death And as hath beene accustomed that Ordinaries by censures of the Church may correct fornicators so fornication also as in some bookes
politike c. were at the first appropried only by the discretion of the Diocesans Predecessors to the reverend Bishops that now are unto Abbots Priors Nuns Friars c. and because the successors of those Diocesans be bound in the same band of iniquitie with their predecessors unlesse by all good meanes they labour that things may be brought to their first and pristinate state it seemeth equall and just that this commutation should likewise proceed and be drawne from the Diocesans and great Churches before specified The reasons whereof may be such as follow The Lands and possessions given by the Kings progenitors the Earls Barons and other great men of the Realme to Bishoprickes were not given as Master Bilson affirmeth to unburden the people Perpetuall power pag. 367. 25 Ed. 3. statutes for provisours Bishopricks founded to some sumptuous uses of the support and charges of their Bishops but they were given as the Law of our Land teacheth us first to informe the people in the Law of God in those Churches Secondly to keepe Hospitalities almes and other workes of charitie And thirdly for the soules of the founders their heires and of all Christians Now then if some of these conditions be such as for the impietie thereof ought not to be performed and if other some also being good and godly be not performed and so the things are to returne to their first nature as in the same statute is alledged then is it reason that the King and Nobles who are the just inheritours and successors to those who were first Donours and founders of those Churches should have as free a disposition and donation of those lands and possessions now as his and their progenitors and ancesters ever had And seeing it is maniâ—est that the lands and possessions of Archbishops Bishops Deanes and Chapters doe not for the most part now a dayes serve for those good uses for the which they were first granted namely to informe the people in the Law of God to keepe hospitalities almes and other workes of charitie but partly for the use of chaunting and singing in the quires and partly to vaine idle superfluous and pompous uses the king can not doe a better and more charitable deed than to convert a parcell of the same lands and possessions thus by defect of the conditions not performed returning to their first nature to and for the necessarie and perpetuall provision of learned able and preaching Ministers to be planted in parochiall Churches now destitute of sufficient pastors for want of sufficient maintenance nay sithence Archbishoprickes Bishoprikes and other prelacies by the very expresse letter of the statute are said to be founded to superstitious uses viz. for the soules of the founders their heires and of all â—hristian the same reason led King Henry the eight his Nobles and Parliaments to dissolve Abbeys and Monasteries and the same reason also which moved King Edward the sixth with his Nobles and Parliament to dissolve Colledges free Chappels and Chauntries the same reason may be a sufficient reason to perswade our Soveraigne Lord King IAMES that now is with his Nobles and Parliament to dissolve Archbishoprickes Bishoprickes Deanries c. First to the end these Prelacies and Dignities may never in any succeeding ages serve to any such superstitious uses as whereunto they were first erected Secondly that the King having them all in his owne hands and free disposition may be the only founder and donor of so many new Bishoprickes as might please him to erect and endow with such liberall and convenable endowments as might serve for learned Evangelicall Bishops to enforme the people in the holy Evangell of Christ to keepe hospitalities almes and to doe other workes of charitie rather than to bee expended as now for a great part they are upon the keeping of great horses caroches and troupes of serving idlers The commutation then whereof we speake and which wee most humbly commend to the consideration of the King is viz. That parcell of the temporall Lands and possessions of Archbishops and Bishops together with all the lands and possessions serving to the maintenance of idle Ministers and idle Songsters in Cathedrall and Collegiate Churches the Collegiate Churches of Eaton and Winchester and the Cathedrall and Collegiate Churches in Oxford and Cambridge excepted by an equall and reasonable proportion may be made with such impropriations as belong to the King the Nobles Commons Colledges Hospitals Schooles c. Provided as before hath beene said that there may be a liberall and convenable endowment for the learned Bishops or Pastors to be continued and placed in all the chiefe and principall towns and cities of the Realm And that the impropriations of Parochiall Churches may for ever be livings for the Ministers of the same Churches And therefore in the just defence of the innocencie of all such as require a godly and religious reâ—ormation we say that they ought not to have beene traduced before the king as robbers and ransackers of the Church And that some of the plotters for the Prelacie more honestly might have imploied both their Latine and their labour than lately they did When by drawing Letters as they pretended congratulatorie to the King only in the name of Preaching Ministers they procured notwithstanding ignorant and unpreaching Ministers to joyne in the action and to affixe their hands and names That such letters have beene made and signed is sufficiently to be proved but whether they have beene presented to the Kings hands is not yet knowne Only if they shall hereafter come then may they be knowne by these words Nos Concionatores c ab omni domestica capacitate eorum qui praetextu religionis ecclesiae insidiantur My Lord the King is wise 2 Sam. 14. 24. according to the wisedome of an Angell of God to understand all things whereof he is informed The third means to reduce impropriations unto the possession of Publike redemption of impropriations the Ministerie is by way of publike redemption or purchase For the accomplishment whereof it is necessarie that not only a common treasure be provided but also that the price of improptiations by a publike consent be valued at a reasonable rate to make which rate will bee a matter of small weight whether they bee valued to bee bought and sold at their old and ancient or at their new and improved rents To provide a common treasure though to some it may seeme a matter intricate and troublesome yet seeing the same possibly and conveniently may be done there is no cause that men should faint before thy fight or be at an end before they begin It is written that the cause when king Solomon raised the tribute to wit was to build the house of the Lord his own house and Millo and the wall of Ierusalem After 1 Kin. 9. 15 that wicked Athaliah and her children had broken up the house of God and had bestowed all the things that were dedicate for
Seniour or Deacon Therefore much lesse shall every Parish be burdened to find a company of Seniours c Where the Admonitor complaineth that many parishes are not Tolerable and intolerable Ministers able to finde one tolerable Minister we would gladly learne by what brand tolerable Ministers are knowne from intolerable Ministers according as the Lords spirituall judge or judge not of tolerable and untolerable Ministers For if all reading Ministers as needes with them they must bee or else why doe they tolerate them bee tolerable Ministers what a vaine and idle distinction hath hee coyned touching the scarcitie of maintenance for tolerable Ministers Considering all Ministers by intendment of law bee able to reade and considering also a very small maintenance is esteemed to bee a tolerable maintenance for reading Ministers For else why doe the great Bishops in their great Churches of Commendams and the rich Doctors in their rich Churches of non residencies make so small allowances to their reading and stipendarie Curates And where then is that parish in England that is not able to maintaine a tolerable Minister ADMONITION The next Argument that the people might not choose their Pastours Pag. 78. Elders and Deacons as is required is drawne partly from a feare that the same will be a matter of schisme discord and dâ—ssenâ—ion in many places partly from affection and want of right judgement of the people partly from the unrulinesse of the Parishes and partly from the broyle and trouble which may follow ASSERTION Vnto this objection if I should answer nothing at all but only should The objection of feare c. answered deny that any feare or any other inconvenience at all pretended in this place is to be feared to ensue my simple negation were more to be tolerated than his simple affirmation for by the canon Law non inficienti sed ponenti incumbit onus probandi And yet because Doct. in â—si cui de prebâ—â—â— the Lord hath spoken unto Iosua and in him unto us all that wee should not feare nor be discouraged to observe and to doe all that is written in the law for then sâ—ith the Lord shalt thou make thy way prosperous and then shalt thou have good successe therefore in the word of the Lord I say that none of all this feare broyle trouble or turmoyle is to be feared at all Nay that it is most assuredly and without all doubt to be hoped and looked for that he would so blesse the attempt of putting this order in execution as that the peoples approbation and allowance of their Ministers should be a matter of all peace quietnesse unitie concord good successe and prosperitie to the whole Church of God in England For what an heathenish incredulitie were it for us to reply upon the erroneous conceit of a timorous and suspicious fancy that feare and I wot not what unrulinesse and unquietnesse shall follow when wee receiving the lawes of peace from the Prince of peace have his most stable truth that his peace shall rest upon us and that all feare and evill successe shall cease and vanish away No busie headed body therefore shall be able to leade any man away to disquiet either Church or common wealth otherwise than as the Church in all ages by the malice of Satan and his instruments hath evermore beene disquieted if once the holy law of the Gospell touching this point were observed and put in ure And if it be feared that the choice to be made by the people of God and which is allowed unto them by the holy laws of God would prove to be a matter of schisme discord and dissention how much more reason have we to feare that the fiâ—e of schisme discord and dissention being blowen already should not breake out and fame among us if still one man alone be suffered to thrust upon the people of God not tolerable Ministers according to Gods heart but intolerable Ministers according to mans tradition The Admonitor hath insinuated unto us often in his Admonition that it is dangerous to innovate And so I say too unlesse there be evident â—â—de constitu prim L. 2. utilitie of innovation For saith the Emperour in rebus novis constituendis evidens esse utilitas debet ut ab eo jure recedatur quod diu aequum visum est But is it not as perillous yea sometimes much more perillous not to innovate for proof whereof it shall suffice to take witnesse of our owne times and of our owne experiences It seemed equall a long time and for many yeares that the Sacrifice of the Masse with all the pelf and trumperie thereof should not once be Dangerous to innovate unlesse ther be evident utilitiâ— of innovation spoken against But we all know that the abandoning thereof hath not yet brought any perillous subversion upon any nation that purely and soundly in place thereof hath embraced the holy sacrament of the Lords Supper It seemeth also to be equall for many ages past that the Bishop of Rome might have supreme and absolute power over all persons states and causes not onely in Rome Italy Spaine Germany and other forraigne kingdomes but also in England and Scotland But as yet to the view of all the world it hath not proved perillous for the King and Queene of England and Scotland to establish new laws for the alteration of that ancient abuse And why hath it not been dangerous so to do Why forsooth because there was evident utility in doing of it But how could an evident utilitie appeare before it was done How Forsooth because the holy law of God had warranted an alteration For faith having eyes to see the wisedome the power and the truth of God in his word discerned a far off that the institution of the Lords Supper was long before the sacrifice of the masse And therefore our Kings by abandoning poperie out of the Realme did not institute any new religion but onely they restored the old Now then if a same holy law of God do condemn the choice and thrusting of the pastour upon the people by one man alone and again it the same Law doe impugne the primacie of one pastour over all Pastours as well in a Diocesse or Province as in the whole West part of Christendome what danger can it be not to disfranchise the one sithence without any manner of danger we have abolished the other or what perill can it be not to countenance the sonnes sithence without perill we have discountenanced the father Especially seeing in this place of the admonition wee have a plaine confession that the common manner of election of Pastors Elders and Deacons in the old Churches was made by the people For if the examples of schism discord and contention did commonly appeare in the old Churches while that manner of election did continue then by his owne mouth Common manner of elections in the old churches was by the people that manner of election
spirit of one Prophet But in this platforme there is no mention made of the King if hee be patrone neither is there any institution spoken of and then how can any action of quare impedit be brought to try the right if two Patrons pretend title to the Patronage bâ—sides the Patron by this platforme must fetch his Clerks only from the Universities Schooles of learning and Nurseries of the Ministerie whereas now hee hath libertie to present any Clerke wheresoever or howsoever ordained Againe strife and contention may arise in the Presbyter between the Bishops and the Ministers themselves appointed to be examiners and ordainers which of the two Clerks nominated by the Patron is most worthy to be preferred If both the Patrons Clerks for non-abilities or criminousnes be refused who shal then nominate and to whom shall the election devolve And lastly what if the B. Presbyter shall disallow one for unabilite which indeed is notwithstanding of abilitie to teach to all these difficulties thus we answer If the Kings Majestie be Patrone to any benefice with cure of soules because we judge and confesse him to be a King endowed Touching the Kings patronage with a rare and singular spirit of zeal for the glory of our God with an excellent spirit of love for the salvation oâ— the soules of his subjects to be the Nehemiah of our age sent unto us from above for the building of the walls reedifying of the ports of the House of God which were broken down devoured we for our parts doubt nothing at all nay rather we most certainly perswade our selves his Highnesse having once beene pleaseâ— to prescribe all wholesome and commendable Lawes unto his peopâ—e will also vouchsâ—fâ— much more to prescribe lawes yea and to be a Law uâ—to himselfe And that his Majestie will set this businesse of the Lords house so neare unto his Kingly and Christian heart by the planting of able Ministers in H. de ley fidei 3 l. ex imperfecto all the Churches of his Highnes Patronage a that all other Patrons by his godly example will be excited reaâ—â—ily to walke in the Kings path to weare the Kings colours and to become the Kiâ—gs chief favourers in this so holy a worke And therefore touching the Kings Patronages cum Magistas imperatoria lâ—gibu essesâ—luta videatur we commend them wholly to the Kings most Christian care providence and fiâ—elitie The Bishops institution and writ of Quare impedit wee grant The Bb. institution may cease must cease but in place of institution the election and ordination by the Presbiterie succeedeth and the Clerke nominated by the Patron elected and ordained by the Presbyterie shall have idem jus ad Ecclesiam in Ecclesia which in former times the Clerk presented by the Patron and instituted by the bishop was wont to have If any suit in law happen for the right of Patronage between two or moe Patrons pretending title to the gift of one benefice It seemeth If suit fall out between two patrons what then may bee done that this gift might have far easier and more speedy way of triall by some other writ than â—y the writ of quare impedit for upon this writ many times by negligence or unskilfulnesse of the Atturnies it falleth out that one of the parties is driven sometimes to sit down by great losse and not to have his title tryed at all only for wanâ— of some ceremoniall form noâ— observed in the pleadings of the cause And therefore both Patrons within the time to be limited by the kings writ having nominated their Clerks to the Presbytere as hertofore they presented to the B. we leave it to be considered whether it were not meet and convenient that the Presbyterie should wholly defend â—he election and ordination of either their Clerks untill the right of patronage were finally adjuâ—geâ— before the K. Justices at the common Law upon which judgement passed they might then without scruple or impediment proceed to the full election ordination of that patrons Clerk for whom the judgment was given By which manner of tryall if the action might bee brought in the name of patron against patron the Clerkes should not only bee freed from much obloquie whereunto they are now subject by prosecution of suits at law one Clerke against another but also they should be exempted from all expence labour and turmoile with which heretofore they have incumbred themselves to the hinderance of their studies and decay of their estates by pursuing the Patrons title at their owne charge Neither might the occasion of suit about the right of patronage be any let or hinderance that the Church in the meane time should be left as a Widow destitute of an husband For any one of the Clerkes nominated by either of the patrons might be appointed by the presbyterie to preach the Word and publikely to pray untill the controversie were ended And out of the fruits also of the same Church remaining in the custodie of one of the patrons or sequestred by the king to the use of the next incumbent he might have such allowance as were requisite for the time of his continuance in that place And for the Sacraments if any were of necessitie to bee administred some other Minister neare adjoyning might be provided to administer the same as in many places it hath been and is now daily used in like cases of vacancie That the Patron should be curbed with too hard a bridle as being barred to fetch his Clerks from any other place than from the The curbing of a patron with too hard a bridle answered Vniversities or other Schools and nurceries of learning is a matter if it be well weighed of lesse importance than the Admonitor would insinuate the same to be First it is not of necessitie required that all patrons should at all times fetch all their Clerkes from those places and not from elsewhere For many times it may happen upon just cause for the benefit of the Church that a Clerk already ordained and placed in one Church may be removed from the same to another But only the meaning is according to the Lawes and canons alreadie setled that the greatest part of the patrons Clerks must of necessitie be called thence because they can not elsewhere be had Now then whereas the law intendeth every Church to be a wife and to have an husband to be a bodie and to have an head the law as a parent unto the Church hath provided untill she be widow indeed that no husband be provided for her And therefore by sundry â—â— de prebend c. tuis l. 6. de prebend fi Episcopus as well ancient Decrees as by Canons of Discipline made and published by the Bishops 1571. it is decreed and confirmed That the Bishop shall lay his hands on none or at any other time but when it shall chance some place of ministration is voide in the same Dioces
practice of the Primitive Church would be a meanes utterly to extinguish that schisme that remaineth yet among us that we have no Christian Ministers no Christian Sacraments no Christian Church in England Besides the Ministers for Letters of Orders Letters of Institution Letters of Inductions for Licences to serve within the Diocesse for Licences to serve in such a cure for Licences to serve two cures in one day for Licences to preach for Licences of resignation for testimonials of subscription for Letters of sequestration for Letters of relaxatâ—on for the Chancellours Registers and Somners dinners for Archidiaconall annuall and for Episcopall trienniall procurations the Ministers I say to be nominated elected ordayned approved confirmed and admitted by the Patron by the Presbytery by the People and by the King should be disburdened from all fees for these things and from all these and such and such like grievances Onely for the Kings writts and for the traveile and paines of His Highnesse Officers taken in and about the execution of the same wrâ—tts some reasonable fees as it shall please the King may be taxed and set downe The people also in soules in bodies and in their goods could not be much comforted relieved and benefited They should not henceforth to the perill of their soules have unlearned unable and undiscreete Ministers thrust upon them and set over them Neither should they bee compelled upon light occasions to take many frivolous oaths in vaine They should not bee summoned from one end of the Diocesse unto the other nor be posted from Court to Court and from visitation to visitation The Church-Wardens and Side-men of every Parish should not upon paine of excommunication be constrained once or twise in the yeare to pay six or eight pence for a sheet of threehalfepeny articles They shall not any longer out of the common treasury reserved for the poore beare the charge of their Parishes for making bills visitation and diverse other expenses There should be no more suits at Law between Clerke and Clerke about the Patrons Title no more suites of double quarrell betweene the Clerke and the Bishop no more debate betweene the Bishop and the Arch-deacon and lastly there should bee no occasion of any riots and unlawfull assemblies to bee made upon entries and possessions by vertue and colour of two presentations two institutions and two inductions into one benefice at one time The Patrons as being Lords and avowers of the Churches might have the custody of the Churches during their vacancies and their ancient right in this behalfe restored All swearing of Canonicall obedience unto the Bishops by the Ministers all 31. Eliz. c. 6. swearing and forswearing of Clerkes for any symoniacall bands promises or agreements betweene them and their Patrons and all robberies and spoyling of the Churches by the Patrons should determine and cease Especially if it might please the King and Parliament to have one clause of a Statute against abuses in election of Schollers and presentation to benefices enlarged For although every corrupt cause and consideration by reward gift profit or benefit to present be inhibited by that act yet notwithstanding by experience in many places we finde that the Patrons for small rents and for many yeeres are in possession some of the mansion houses some of the glebe lands and some of the tythes of such benefices as since the publishing of that act have beene bestowed upon Clerkes which breedeth great suspicion and jealousie in the mindes of men that the Clerke and Patron at the beginning directly or indirectly did conspire to frustrate and delude the intendement of the statute And therefore wee leave it to bee considered by the Kings Majesty and Parliament If any Clerke after confirmation A means to restrain patrons from corruption and possession to any benefice hereafter to bee made and given unto him shall willingly and wittingly suffer the Patron of the same benefice or any other person in his name or to his use directly or indirectly mediatly or immediatly to use occupy or enjoy the mansion house glebe land or other ecclesiasticall commodities or any part thereof belonging to the same Benefice In this case I say we leave it to be considered whether it were not meete and convenient that every such willing and witting sufferance by the Clerke and every such willing and witting possession use or occupation by the Patron should not bee adjudged to bee a just cause to determine the presentation to have beene first made upon corrupt respect and consideration And that therefore the Clerke ipso facto to â—ose the benefice and the Patron ipso facto to forfeite his right of Patronage to the King for the two next turnes following And these being the principall reasons and grounds of our desires wee are humbly to pray the Lords spirituall either to convince them of indignitie insufficiency and incongruitie or else to joyne with us unto the Kings Majestie for the restitution of that manner of Government which they themselves confesse to have beene practised at the beginning by the Apostles and Primitive Church but the Admonitor hath yet moe reasons unanswered against this platforme ADMONITION That every Parish in ENGLAND may have a Learned and discreet Minister howsoever they dreame of perfection no man is able in these dayes to devise how to bring it to passe and especially when by this change of the Clergie the great rewards of Learning shall bee taken away and men thereby discouraged to bring up their Children in the study of good Letters ASSERTION In some part to justifie this opinion I grant that no man is able in these dayes to devise to bring it to passe that every Parish should have a Learned and discreet Minister And why because in these dayes not any one Bishop hath afforded to ordaine one Learned and discreet Minister for five Parishes secondly because where some of the Reverend Fathers have ordained and placed in many Parishes many Learned and discreet Ministers some others of the same Fathers have againe disregarded and displaced those learned and discreet Ministers and in their roomes have placed many unlearned and undiscreet Ministers Now then if these dayes wherein so few learned and discreet Ministers and so many unlearned and undiscreet Ministers be ordained and wherein also so many learned and dâ—screet Ministers are disgraced and so many undiscreet and unlearned Ministers graced If these dayes I say were ended then albeit no perfection whereof never any one of us dreamed could be attained unto and albeit no one man were able to devise how to bring it to passe that every Parish should have a learned Minister Yet neverthelesse all good and holy meanes being used to ayme and to shoot after perfection and all good and holy men laying to their heads and applying their hearts to further this enterprise and service unto God we know that the Lord might call and make and fill with the Spirit of God in wisdome and in understanding and
untill hey shall plainly demonstrate unto us that the same is not Oligarchy For if hereafter they shall revoke their former disgracefull judgements against the discipline by Pastours and Elders containing in it the very nature of true Aristocracie and wiâ—hall instruct â—s better of the true nature of their owne government of the Church by Prelacie they shall find us filyable to their opinion so that it be grounded upon the principles and reasons of truth In the meane season after the fashion of the Admonitors manner of admonishing the people wee most humbly beseech the King and Parliament to be enformed that it is greatly to bee feared if Prelacy bee Oligarchie that the Prelates It is to bee feared least by the example of Prelates Oligarchie be brought in the common-weale will endeavour to transferre that manner of government from the Church unto the Common-Weale And that the Common-Weale shall as miserably be rent and torne with factions and uproares as now the Church is disquieted by schismes and divisions For if onely a few of the richest and welthiest sort shall get an head and beare all the sway in the Common-Weale they shall think by the Principles and reasons of Oligarchie that they have injuâ—y if they have not as much to doe in civill mattes as the Prelates have to doe in the matters of the Church And what hereof may follow as the Admonitor leaveth so doe I also leave it to the judgment of other Only if the way hereof already hath beene troden A caveat against Oligarchie out unto them by some who have not written nor spoken but yet practised the principles and reasons of Oligarchie in the Common-Weale onely then this I say and adde as a Caveat that the danger to come is more heedfully to be prevented For like as in good harmony to make the Musicke perfect is required a moderate and proportionate inequality of voices which if it too much exceed taketh away all the sweet melody so by too much immoderate inequality or disparitie of Citizens the Common-Weale falleth to ruine But why may not the Government of the Church by Prelacie The government of the Church by Prelacy is not Monarchicall be a Princely and a Royall Government Indeed this question if it should bee resolved by the Rules and Principles of the Canon Law I could hardly disprove that government to be Princelike for as hath been said before quilibet Ordinarius in Diocoesi est major quolibet Principe Yea and every Bishop by the same Law hath as absolute a spirituall power within his Diocesse as a King hath a temporall power within his Kingdome But because that Law with the rules and principles thereof is or ought to be discarded out of this Kingdome we will not wade in it Only wee say that the government of the Church by Prelacy cannot bee any kinde of Royall and Monarchiall government because Prelates have not like power spirituall as Kings and Monarchs have power temporall For there was never yet lex regia de Praelatorum spiâ—ituali imperio lata qua Praelatis in eos omne imperium suum potestatem aut Deus aut Institut de jure natur gent ci § Sed quod populus Dei contulerit And therefore where the people have made the fore said regall Law as there it is justly said quodcunque Imperator per Epistolam constituit vel cognoscens decrevit vel edicto praecepit legem esse constat and quod Principi placuit legis habet vigorem So likewise where there is no such regall Law made in the Church there it is justly affirmed quod Praelato placuit legis non habet vigorem quodcunque Praelatus per Epistolam constituit cognoscens decrevit vel canone praecepit legem non esse constat And then how can every Prelate or why doth every Prelate by his sole authoritie injoyne Canons Articles Injunctions and orders to bee observed as Lawes in all the Churches of his jurisdiction If the Admonitor supposed the government of the Church by Prelacy to bee Monarchiall because the Queene was a Monarch and that If the government of the Church by Prelacy be Monarchicall theÌ„ may the government by pastors beâ— so to the Reverend Bishop governed under a Monarch then what did he else but put a weapon into the hands of Pastors and Elders to prove their government also to be Princely and Monarchiall Because Pastors and Elders desire not to have that manner of government to bee brought into the Church otherwise than by the Royall assent Soveraigne authoritie and expresse commandement of Our most Gratious King and Monarch Besides if any government may bee therefore said to be a Monarchy because the same is derived from an earthly Monarch how much more than may the government of the Churches by Pastors and Elders bee adjudged Monarchicall by reason the same is deduced from our heavenly and everlasting Monarch For the Reverend Bishops by their publike M. Horne bishop of Winch. M. â—ewell bishop of Sali M. Bilson bishop of Winch. preachings and apologeticall writings testifie that power and authoritie to ordaine and depose Ministers to excommunicate and to absolve to devise and to establish rites and Ceremonies in the Church to define what is truth to pronounce what is falsehood to determine what is schisme and to condemn what is heresie our Reverend Bishops I say confesse this power to be originally decided unto the true Bishops and Pastors of the Church from the Kingly and Soveraigne power of our Saviour Christ By what name therefore soever the government of Pastours and Elders in the Churches be called there is no manner of cause to dislike of the planting of that government in a Monarchy because the same is instituted by No cause for a Monarch to feare that his Christian subjects should have the sense of Aristocracy in Church government the Monarch of Monarches who is able and ready to uphold the state of all Monarchies in Common-Weales together with the state of Aristocracie in his Church Neither is there any cause for any Monarch in the world to feare the making of Christian common people by familiar expâ—rience to have the sense and feeling of the principles and reasons of Aristocracy For if a people have once submitted their neckes to the yoke of Christ they can live a peaceable â—nd godly life under all kindes of powers because they know all kind of powers to be the ordinance of God But especially there is not neither ever was neither ever can there be any cause for any King or Monarch of England greatly as the Admonitor insinuateth to feare that the common people will very easily transferre the principles and reasons Aristocracie to the government of the Common-Weale and thereupon be induced to thinke that they have injury if they have not as much to doe in civill matters as they have in matters of the Church seeing they also touch their commoditie and benefit