sinnes for which Christ hath satisfied cannot hurt but christ hath satisfied for sinnes past and to come Therefore sinnes past and to come cannot hurt vs. Aunswere Nowe knitte and force this reason that wee maie see whither it tendeth Reply That which hurteth not we neede not to eschue sinnes to come hurt not therefore wee neede not beware of sinnes to câ—me Auns 1. The Minor is false For god is offended with sinnes which is the greatest hurt and further sinnes bereaue vs of that conformity with God purchase bodily paines vnto the faithful But we are to distinguish between these questions 1. How a reasonable creature may be iust before god 2. Hâ—w maÌ„ being a sinner may be iust before god 3. Whether a reasonable creature may merit or deserue ought at gods hands To the first question we answere That a reasonable creature may be iust before God by the conformitie with the law inherent in him as blessed men and Angels are iust To the second That man being a sinner is iust by the imputation onely of Christs merit and of this question is our speech when we speake of iustification To the third That no reasonable creature can deserue ought at gods hands Luk. 17.10 When yee haue done all say Wee are vnprofitable seruantes For neither is Christes obedience verily any merit in this respect as if any good came to God by it but in respect of the dignitie of the person bicause it was Christ that suffered it is called merite But a man which is a sinner cannot bee iust before God 1. Because before his iustification his woorkes are corrupt 2. Also after his iustification the works of a man which is a sinner are vnperfect 3. And when they are perfect as in the life to come they shal be yet can we not satisfie for the sinnes past for we owe those workes when we doe them 5 How Christes satisfaction is made our iustice and righteousnesse THIS question is adioined because it seemeth absurd that we should bee iustified by that which is another mans Christs satisfaction made ours two waies 1 By God imputing it or applyeng it vnto vs. and not ours The satisfaction or iustice of Christ is made ours or applied vnto vs two waies that is by a double application The former application is Gods who in respect of that fulfilling of the Law perfourmed by christ accepteth vs and applieth the same vnto vs that is he imputeth it no lesse than if wee had neuer sinned or at least had paied and suffered sufficient punishment for our sinnes For albeit to iustifie signifieth to make iust yet in the Church it signifieth another thing and is taken in another sense Or god doth applie it when hee imputeth the fulfilling of the Lawe perfourmed by Christ vnto vs euen as if it were perfourmed by vs neither wil at all punish vs. But to impute is to accept christs satisfaction performed to this end that it might be our iustice righteousnes 2 By our selues applyeng it vnto our selues We then also applie vnto vs the fulfilling of the Law perfourmed by Christ when we are stedfastly persuaded that God doth impute applie giue it vnto vs and for it reputeth vs for iust absoluing vs from al guilt Without this application the former is not at all and this latter is also from God For God first imputeth vnto vs Christes satisfaction then he engendereth faith in vs whereby wee maie applie the same vnto vs. Whence also it appeareth that Gods application doth go before is the cause of our application which is of faith albeit his is not without ours as christ also saith Ioh. 15.16 Ye haue not chosen me but I haue chosen you Moreouer wee may then bee assured and certaine that the righteousnesse or satisfaction of Christ is imputed vnto vs of God When wee may be assured of Christs satisfaction imputed vnto vs. when wee earnestly desire the grace of God and feele the holy ghost to work in vs a true confidence in the Mediatour of the faithful That which we haue nowe spoken of both applications both gods and ours doth manifestly shew what is meant in this place by iustifieng Which is that to iustifie is not to make one iust who is vniust but to repute him for iust and righteous who is vniust and to absolue the vniust and vnrighteous from al guilt and not to punish him and this for anothers iustice and righteousnesse imputed by faith vnto vs. Obiection But to iustifie is to make one iust who is vniust Aunswere This indeede is true in general but in the Church it is taken otherwise For the legall iustification is a woorking of iustice and righteousnesse in vs as in one subiect But the iustification of the gospell whereof wee speake here is a farre diuerse thing For the subiect of that iustice and righteousnesse which is made ours by the Gospels iustification that is whereby being appplied by faith vnto vs wee are reputed iust and righteous is Christ himselfe and wee are onely the obiect of this iustice and the matter about which it is conuersaunt but the matter wherein it is inherent is Christ only 6 Why Christs satisfaction is made ours THE perfect fulfilling of the Law performed by Christ for vs is made ours or applied vnto vs The cause of Christs satâ—sfaction applied imputed is in God onely not in vs. through the alone and free mercie of God as who from euerlasting did predestinate vs and freely chuse vs to whom he might apply of his mere grace by faith that iustice and righteousnesse at his appointed time Wherefore al imagination and affirmation of merit is to bee taken awaie as which fighteth with the grace of God and is a denial of his diuine grace For the grace and mercie of GOD is the onely cause of both applications Hee of his goodnesse infinite and passing measure applieth Christes merit vnto vs and maketh that we also may apply the same vnto vs. The cause therefore why this application is wrought is in God alone but not at al in vs that is it is neither anie thing foreseene in vs neither also our apprehension and receiuing of this iustice For all the giftes and graces which are in vs are effectes of the application of Christes merit and therefore that merit of Christ is no waie applied vnto vs for the workes sake which we doe but this is done as the Apostle teacheth Ephes 1.5 according to the good pleasure of his wil. WhereupoÌ„ also it is said 1. Cor. 4 7. What hast thou that thou hast not receiued And Ephes 2.8 By grace are ye saued through faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God And here it is to be obserued that to bee saued by the grace of God and to be iustified by faith are not all one for that signifieth the impellent or motiue cause in God this the instrumental cause in vs whereby we apprehend the righteousnesse
of Christ imputed vnto vs. Christ is in respect of our iustification 1. As the subiect matter wherein our iustice is 2. As the impellent cause because he obtaineth it 3. As the chief efficient because he together with his Father dooth iustifie vs and 4. Because he giueth vs faith whereby we beleeue and apprehend it The mercy of god is as the impellent cause thereof in GOD. Christes satisfaction is the formal cause of our iustification giuing the very life and being vnto it 7 Why Christes satisfaction is made ours by faith onelie Faith the apprehensiue instrument of Christs satisfaction CHRISTES satisfaction is made ours by faith alone 1. Because faith is the onely instrument which apprehendeth Christs satisfaction 2. Because the proper act operation of faith and not any other act of vertue is the application or apprehension of Christes merite yea faith is nothing else than the acceptation it selfe or apprehension of anothers iustice and of the merit of Christ 3. It is done by faith onely because we are iustified by the obiect of faith onely to wit by the merite of Christ alone besides which there is no iustice of ours nor any part thereof For wee are iustified freely for Christes sake without woorkes There is nothing which is our iustice and righteousnes before God neither in whole nor in part besides Christes merite onely by receiuing and beleeuing anothers iustice and not by working wee are iustified Not by working nor by meriting but by apprehension and acceptation only we are iust and righteous Wherefore we are iustified by faith onely by faith as Saint Paul speaketh as by a mean and instrument but not for faith as the Papistes say who wil admit both these maners of speaking as if faith were indeede the application whereby we apply vnto our selues Christes iustice but were also besides a certaine work or merite whereby we merite to bee iust Nowe the exclusiue particle onely is added that whatsoeuer merit of ours may bee excluded and faith vnderstoode with relation and respect to Christes merit which is our iustice That so the sense may be Christes merite iustifieth vs and not faith it selfe that which is apprehended dooth iustifie vs and not the instrument which doth apprehend Neuerthelesse this proposition Wee are iustified by faith may bee vnderstoode also without relation to wit wee are iustified by faith as by a meane But this proposition of the Apostle Faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse and other the like are necessarilie to bee vnderstoode with a relation vnto Christes merite and iustice Faith was imputed vnto him for righteousnes as faith is the apprehending instrument of righteousnes apprehended faith beeing as it were the hande wherewith the Iustice of Christ is receiued and by this means faith is wholy excluded frō that which is receiued by faith vnto which nature notwithstanding of faith it were repugnaunt That For faith we should be iust and righteous For if for faith then faith were nowe no longer an acceptation of anothers righteousnesse but were a merit and cause of our owne iustice neither should receiue anothers satisfaction which now it should haue no neede of Obiections against this Doctrine of Iustification 1 OBiection Wee are iustified by faith Faith is a woorke Therefore we are iustified by the woorkes thereof that is by the merite of faith Aunswere First the consequence of this reason is denied because more is in the conclusion than in the premisses of which premisses this onely followeth That by that worke wee are iustified as by an instrument or meane not as an impellent cause Nowe it is one thing to be iustified by faith that is to be iustified faith only being the meane to receiue it by the bloode of Christ and it is another thing to be iustified for faith that is for the merite of faith 2. The kinde of affirmation is diuerse for in the Maior faith is vnderstoode with relation to Christes merite in the Minor it is taken absolutelie and properlie 2 Obiection Justice is that whereby wee are formallie or essentiallie iust Faith is iustice Therefore we are by faith formallie and essentiallie iust Aunswere The consequence of this reason is to bee denied because the kinde of affirmation is diuers For the Maior is meant properly but the Minor * Per Metalepsin figuratiuely one thing being taken for another faith for the obiect of faith which is Christs merite and iustice 3 Obiection Faith is imputed for righteousnes as Paul saith Therefore for faith we are righteous Aunswere This is also figuratiuely vnderstood because by faith which is imputed for righteousnes is correlatiuely vnderstood the obiect of faith vnto which faith hath relation For Christs merite which is apprehended by faith is properly our iustice and this merite of Christ is the formall cause of our iustice The efficient of our iustice is God applying that merite of Christ vnto vs. The instrumental cause of our iustice is faith And therefore this proposition We are iustified by faith being legallie vnderstoode with the Papists is not true but blasphemous but being taken correlatiuely that is Euangelically with relation to Christs merit it is true For the correlatiue of faith is the merit of Christ which faith also as a ioint-relatiue or correlatiue respecteth and as an instrument apprehendeth 4 Obiection That which is not alone dooth not iustifie alone Faith is not alone Therefore faith dooth not iustifie alone Aunswere Here is a fallacie of composition the reason beeing deceitfully composed For the woorde alone is composed and ioined in the conclusion with the predicate which is the woorde iustifie but in the premisses or antecedent it is ioined with the verbe is The Argument is true if in the conclusion alone bee not sundred from the verbe is or from being which is the participle of is but bee ioined with it on this wise Faith therefore doth not iustifie alone that is being alone For if it be so vnderstood the argument is of force for faith is neuer without workes as her effects Faith iustifieth alone but is not alone when it iustifieth hauing workes accompanying it as effects of it but not as ioint-causes with it of iustification 5 Obiect That which is required in those who are to be iustified without the same faith doth not iustifie Good works are required in those who are to be iustified Therefore without good workes faith doth not iustifie Auns The particle without is ambiguously doubtfully taken for in the Maior it is taken thus Faith without it that is being without it doth not iustifie So that the same fallacie is in this obiection which was in the former The Minor also of this obiection is more at large to be explaned In them who are to be iustified moe things are required but not after the same maner Faith is required in them who are to be iustified as an instrumēt apprehending anothers iustice Good works are required in them not as a cause of
iustification but as effectes of faith and as it were a testimony of their faith and thankefulnes For faith is not without her fruit Now to applie the merit of Christ is the proper act of faith but other good workes are not so though they also proceede from faith Wherefore also the apprehension of Christs merite is after another manner required in them that are to bee iustified than are other good woorkes For faith with this her proper act without which faith cannot bee considered is required as a necessarie instrument whereby we applie Christs merite vnto vs. But good woorkes are not required that by them we may apprehend Christs merite and much lesse that for them wee should be iustified but that by them we may shew our faith which without good woorkes is dead and is not knowen but by them Whatsoeuer is necessarily coherent with the cause that is not therefore necessarily required to the proper effect of that cause but good workes although they are necessarily coherent and ioined with faith yet are they not necessarie for the apprehension of Christs merit that we should ouer and besides faith by them also apply the same vnto vs. 6 Obiection The Messias bringeth euerlasting iustice and righteousnes Jmputed righteousnes is not eternall Therefore wee are not thereby iustified Aunswere It is said that Christes righteousnesse shall bee an euerlasting righteousnesse but after a diuerse manner For in the life to come wee shal bee iust after another manner than in this life For although we shall then be iust by the same righteousnes euen by the righteousnes of Christ imputed vnto vs yet with this shall also the legal iustice and righteousnesse be continued so that then also by the legall righteousnesse we shall be perfectly iust because now onely we are as concerning that but in part and beginning iust Each iustice both the iustice of the Law and the iustice of the Gospel is eternall by continuation And the iustice and righteousnesse of the Gospell that is the iustice of Christ imputed vnto vs is eternal by continuation of the imputation The iustice of the Law is eternal by continuation of good woorkes euen as it is continued by good woorkes first and beginning in this life vntill at length after this life it bee perfected and become perfect and so continue to al eternity 7 Obiection Knowledge dooth not iustifie Faith is a knowledge Therefore faith doth not iustifie Aunswere Knowledge alone dooth not iustifie But iustifieng faith is not a knoweledge onely but also a confidence and sure persuasion whereby as a meane we apply Christes merit vnto vs. And furthermore Knowledge and this sure persuasion are much different Knowledge is in the vnderstanding but this is in the will Therefore a sure persuasion or confidence is not only a knoweledge of a thing but also a will and purpose of doing or applieng that which wee knowe or of resting in it so that wee are thereby secure and take ioie of heart therein 8 Obiection Saint Iames saith cap. 2.24 Yee see then how that of workes a man is iustified and not of faith onelie Answere 1. Hee speaketh of that iustice whereby wee are iustified through our workes before men that is are approued iust or are found to be iustified but he speaketh not of that iustice whereby we are iustified before God that is whereby wee are reputed of God iust for vniust For hee saith in the same chapter Shew me thy faith by thy works and J will shewe thee my faith by my woorkes 2. He speaketh not of a true or liuely faith but of a dead faith which is without works 9 Obiection Euil workes condemne Therefore good workes iustifie Ans 1. These contraries are not matches for our euil works are perfectly euil our good workes are imperfectly good 2. Although our good woorkes were perfectly good yet should they not deserue eternal life because they are debts Vnto euil workes a reward is giuen by order of iustice vnto good works not so because we are obliged and bound to doe them For the creature is obliged vnto his creator neither may he of the contrary bind god vnto him by any works or means to benefit him 10 Obiect Saint Iohn saith 1. Ioh. 3.7 He that doth righteousnes is righteous Therefore not he that beleeueth Ans 1. He is righteous before mē that is by doing righteousnes he declareth himself righteous to others but before god we are righteous not by dooing righteousnes but by beleeuing 2. He sheweth there not how we are righteous but what the righteous are when he saith that hee that is regenerated is also iustified 11 Obiection Christ saith Luk. 7.47 Many sinnes are forgiuen her because she loued much Therfore good works are the cause of iustification Ans 1. Christ here reasoneth from the latter to the former from the effect which commeth after to the cause which goeth before Manie sins are forgiuen her Therefore shee loued much and because there is a great feeling in that woman of the benefite it must needes therefore bee that the benefite is great and many sins are forgiuen her That this is the meaning of Christes woordes appeareth by the parable which hee there vseth 2. Not euerie thing that is the cause of consequence in reason is also the cause of the thing it selfe which followeth in that consequence of reason Wherefore it is a fallacie of the consequent if it bee concluded Therefore for her loue manie sins are forgiuen her For the particle because which Christ vseth doth not alwaies signifie the cause of the thing folowing It foloweth not The Sunne is risen because it is day Therefore the day is cause of the rising of the Sun the contrarie rather is true 12 Obiection That which is not in the Scripture is not to be taught or reteined That wee are iustified by faith onelie is not in the Scripture neither the wordes themselues nor the sense of the woords Therefore it is not to be reteined Aunswere To the Maior we say That which is not in Scripture neither in words nor in sense is not to be reteined But that we are iustified by faith onely is conteined in Scripture as touching the sense thereof For we are said to be iustified freely Rom. 3.27 Gal. 2.16 Eph. 2.8 9. Tit. 3.5 1. Iohn 1.7 without the workes of the Law by faith without merite Not of anie righteousnesse which we haue doone The blood of Jesus Christ cleanseth vs from al sinne Therefore no woork shall be meritorious If no worke Therefore are we iustified by faith onely apprehending Christes merit Wherefore wee are necessarily to retaine the particle onelie 1. That all merite either of faith or our workes maie be remooued from this woork of our iustification 2. That it maie be shewed that faith not the merite of faith is necessarily required to iustice because the iustice or merite of Christ is giuen by faith onely and by this meane alone we receiue that iustice and
all euill For these are the effectes to come of that present and perpetuall wil of God towards vs which wee apprehend by faith Rom. 8.24 Wee are saued by hope but hope that is seen is not hope But if we hope for that we see not we doo with patience abide for it 1 Obiection Life euerlasting is a thing to come We beleeue life euerlasting Wee beleeue therefore that which is to come that is faith is also of things to come and so faith is hope it selfe Ans The Maior must bee distinguished Life euerlasting is to come tru as concerning the consummation or accomplishment therof But it is present vnto vs as cōcerning the wil and vnchaungeable purpose of God who hath decreed from euerlasting that which he hath begun in vs and will also in due time accomplish it Againe it is present vnto vs as concerning the beginning therof For euerlasting life is begun here in the elect by the holy ghost Wherefore faith apprehendeth it as it is present both in respect of the purpose of God in respect of the beginning thereof in vs. For he that beleeueth feeleth and knoweth that he is quickened and resolueth this to bee the will of God that that quickening and reuiuing which is here begunne shall bee absolued in another life Iohn 5.24 He that beleeueth in the sonne hath passed from death to life Iohn 17.3 This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only verie God and whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ Gal. 4.6 God hath sent forth the spirit of his sonne into your harts which crieth Abba father Rom. 8.24 We are saued by hope 1. Ioh. 3.2 Now are we the sonnes of God but it doth not yet appear what we shal be By faith thē we are certein that those blessings also which as yet we haue not are notwithstanding ours for Gods promise for the vnchangeable will in God to giue them vs but in certain hope wee looke for them as concerning their accomplishment Faith apprehendeth the promises of thinges to come hope relieth on the thinges promised The summe is There is one and the same act and operation of faith and of hope but they differ in consideration It is called faith as it doth apprehend things to come as if they were present in regard of the vnchangeablenes of Gods will It is called hope as it doth certainlie look for the bestowing of those things Therfore Heb. 11 1. it is shewed that faith is the ground substance of things which are hoped for that is it is that which maketh things which are hoped for to be extant and present in that manner as hath bin shewed Shorter thus Faith apprehendeth the promises concerning things to come as they are to come Hope the things themselues which are promised 2 Obiection Faith is the euidence of thinges which are not seene therefore not of thinges present Aunswere It is the euidence of thinges which are not seene to wit by the outward senses but they are seene by the eies of the mind euen as if they did lie open to the eies of the bodie Againe they are not seene in respect of their accomplishment or consummation 5 What are the causes of Faith THE first and principall efficient cause of faith is the holie ghost illightening the minde that it may vnderstand the word and moouing the will that it may assent vnto the woord once vnderstoode Yee are freelie saued by faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God Ephes 2.8 Obiection The Diuel hath faith It is wrought therefore in him by the holie ghost Aunswere What faith is in the Diuel is wrought by the spirit of God but that by a generall woorking onely whereby hee worketh in all euen in Diuels and hypocrites what-soeuer knowledge or vnderstanding is in them 1. Cor. 12. c. not by a speciall and proper action or working wherby to regenerat or sanctifie them that they might truely acknowledge him to bee the author of this gift and magnifie him therefore after which maner hee woorketh faith in the elect alone The Diuels therefore and hypocrits haue faith from the spirit of God but the elect from the spirit of God sanctifieng them The instrumentall cause of faith in generall is the whole worde of God the Lawe and the Gospell written spoken readde heard The chiefe instrumental causes of ingendering iustifieng faith are the preaching of the word and the vse of the sacramentes meditated likewise many works miracles of God in the world But the chiefe and proper instrument of iustifieng faith is the preaching of the Gospell the vse of the sacraments For these doth the holy ghost vse as instruments yet not necessarie but arbitrarie at his own good pleasure both to stir vp faith in vs and to nourish strengthen increase the same Rom. 10.17 Faith commeth by hearing Rom. 1.16 The gospell is the power of God vnto saluation to euerie one that beleeueth 1. Cor. 4.15 I haue begottē you through the gospel Mar. 16.16 He that shall beleeue and be Baptized shall be saued Act. 22.16 Wash away thy sins 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread which we break is the communion of the bodie of Christ Wherefore ordinarilie iustifieng faith is neuer engendred in those who are of yeares to receiue it without the preaching of the gospell The cause of that faith which worketh miracles is not simply the woorde of God but there must necessarily come thereto an especiall and immediate reuelation from God The formal causes of faith a sure and ful confidence in Christ The obiect of faith Christ and his benefites promised The final causes of faith Gods glorie our saluation The formall cause of iustifieng faith is a certaine knowledge confidence in Christ The obiect of it is Whole Christ and his benefits promised in the word Likewise God fauorable to vs through Christ The subiect wherein it remaineth is the vnderstanding will of man The end or finall cause 1 The glorie of God to wit the celebration of his trueth iustice bountie mercie which hee hath shewed in the sending of his Sonne and in the giuing of faith in him 2 Our Saluation that we may receiue the blessings which are promised in the worde 6 What are the effects of faith The effectes of faith iustification and regeneration THe effects of iustifieng faith are 1 The iustifieng of vs before God 2 Peace of conscience or ioy resting on God Rom. 5.1 Beeing iustified by faith we haue peace with god 3 Our whole conuersion which followeth faith and beginneth at the same time with faith For by faith are our hats purified 4 The fruits of conuersion repentance euen good woorkes For whatsouer is not of faith is sinne Hither may be referred also the consequences of faith that is encrease of spirituall corporal giftes The first then and immediate effect of iustifieng-faith is Iustification from this afterwardes flow al other benefites
of Gods presence which knoweledge the Scripture calleth knowledge by the spirite and face to face 16 Faith which is onely historicall breedeth though by an accident despair and the grieuousnes of Gods iudgement 17 Temporary faith breedeth a certaine ioy but not a quiet conscience because it ariseth not from the true cause as also it maketh shew of confession and some shew of good woorkes but that only for a season 18 Faith of miracles doth obtain of God those miracles whereof it is conceiued 19 By faith only applying to euery one the promise of grace we obtaine and receiue righteousnes before God and the participation or communion of Christ with al his benefits 20 As before this faith cannot goe true conuersion and the beginning of true obedience according to all the commaundementes of God so can they not but needes accompanie the same OF THE CREEDE OR SYMBOLE OF THE APOSTLES AFter we haue intreated of FAITH Why the creede is called a symbole it directly followeth now that we speake of the sum of those things which are to bee beleeued which we cal the Symbole of the Apostles or the Apostolick Symbole The especial Questions here are 1 What a Symbole is 2 What are the parts of the Apostolique Symbole 1 WHAT A SYMBOLE IS THis woorde Symbole is deriued from a greeke woorde which signifieth either a common collation of diuerse men to the making of a banquet or a signe token and marcke whereby a man is discerned froÌ„ others Such as is the militarie signe whereby fellowes are desciphered from enimies The Symbole so termed in the Church is a breefe and summarie forme of christian doctrine or a briefe summe or confession of the points of Christian religion or Euangelical doctrine Nowe it is called by the name of Symbole because it is as a token or profession whereby the Church with her members is discerned from all her enimies and from al other sects Some say that this briefe summe of Euangelical doctrine was called a Symbole for that this doctrine was collated as it were and imparted by the Apostles and euery one of them did bestow some part thereof but that cannot be proued But if you wil deriue it thence this reason also nothing absurde may be rendered thereof for that the Articles of faith are the squire and rule whereunto the faith and doctrine of al Orthodox or right beleeuing Christians ought to agree and be conferred This Symbole is called Apostolique 1. Because it conteineth the summe of the Apostolique doctrine which the Catechumens were enforced to hold and professe 2. Because the Apostles deliuered that summe of doctrine to their Scholers and Disciples which the Church afterwardes held as receiued from them This selfesame Symbole is called also Catholick because there is but one faith of al Christians Question Were there not new Symboles made as Athanasius Symbole the Symbole of Nice of Ephesus of Chalcedon Aunswere These are not other from this Apostolique Symbole but certaine words are added as an explication of this by reason of heretiques by whom because of the shortnes thereof this was depraued There is no change either of the matter or of the Doctrine but onely of the forme of declaring it as easily appeareth by comparing them together 2 What are the parts of the Apostolicke Symbole or Creed THe principall parts thereof are three 1 Of the Father and our creation 2 Of the Sonne and our redemption 3 Of the holy ghost and our sanctification that is of the workes of our Creation Redemption and Sanctification How our Creâ—tioÌ„ RedemptioÌ„ Sanctification are ech appropriated to some one person of the Trinitie and yet all three persons haue their ioint working in them Obiection Vnto the father is ascribed the creation of heauen and earth vnto the Sonne the redemption of mankind vnto the holy ghost sanctification Therefore the Sonne and the holy ghost did not create heauen and earth neither did the Father and the holy ghost redeeme mankinde neither do the Father the Sonne sanctifie the faithfull Answere It is a fallacie grounding vpon that which is affirmed but in respect as if it were simply affirmed For the creation is giuen to the Father redemption to the Sonne sanctification to the holy ghost not as they are simply an operation or woork for so should other persons be excluded from it but in respect for the order and manner of woorking which is peculiar and proper to euerie of them in producing and bringing forth the same externall woorke A more open declaration hereof may be this The woorkes of our creation redemption sanctification are the operations of the Godhead outwardly that is externall operations which God worketh on his creatures and they are vndiuided that is common to the three persons which they by common wil and power woork in the creatures by reason of that one and the same essence and nature of the Godhead which they haue For the Scripture attributeth the Creation not onely to the father but to the Sonne also and the holy ghost Ioh. 1.3 Al things were made by it Gen. 1. The spirit of the Lord moued vpon the waters Mat. 1.20 That which is conceaued in her is of the holy Ghost Likewise our redemption is attributed to the father and the holy Ghost Iohn 3. God sent his Sonne into the woorlde that the world might be saued by him Tit. 3. Hee saued vs by the renewing of the holie ghost which he shed on vs abundantly And sanctification both to the father and to the sonne Gal. 4.6 God hath sent the spirit of his sonne into your harts crying Abba Father 1. Thess 5.23 The very god of peace sanctifie you throughout 1. Cor. 1.30 Christ is made sanctification vnto vs. Eph. 5.26 Christ sanctifieth the Church Al the persons therefore create redeem sanctifie Neuerthelesse yet in respect of that order of woorking which is betweene them Creation is ascribed vnto the father Because hee is the fountaine as of the Diuinitie of the Sonne and the holie Ghost so also of those diuine operations which hee woorketh and perfourmeth by the Sonne and the holie Ghost Redemption is ascribed vnto the Sonne because hee is that person which executeth the fathers will concerning the redeeming of mankinde and dooth immediatly perfourme the woorke of our redemption For the Sonne onely was sent into flesh and hath paied the ransome or price for our sinnes not the father nor the spirit To the holy ghost is ascribed sanctification because he doth immediatly sanctifie vs. For the father createth but mediatly by the Sonne and the holy Ghost The Son from the father and the holy Ghost from the father and the sonne The father and the holy ghost redeeme vs but mediatly by the sonne But the son immediatly from the father by the holy ghost The father and the son sanctifie vs but mediatly by the holy ghost but the holy Ghost immediatly from the father and the sonne The workes of the trinitie external
righteousnesse 13 Obiection Jf Christ hath satisfied for vs we shall not be iustified freelie but for merite and desert Aunswere Wee are iustified freely in respect of vs not freely in respect of Christ whom the sauing of vs cost full dearely 14 Obiection Reward presupposeth merite So that where reward is there is also merite For reward and merite are correlatiues whereof if one bee put the other is put also But euerlasting life is proposed as a reward for good workes therefore also the merite of good workes is euerlasting life Aunswere The Maior is sometimes true as concerning creatures as when men may merite or deserue of men But neither alwaies among men doth it folowe that there is merite where there is reward For men also oftentimes giue rewards not of merit or desert Now it is vnproperly saide of God that he proposeth eternal life vnto our workes as a reward for we can merite nothing at Gods hands by our workes But for this cause especially doth God say that he wil giue a reward to our workes thereby to shew that good workes are grateful and pleasing vnto him 15 Obiection That which is not required vnto iustification is not necessarie to be done Good woorkes are not required vnto iustification Therefore it is not necessarie to doe them Answere The Maior is false if it bee meant generallie because wee ought to doe good woorkes in token of thankefulnes But if the Maior be meant particularly then nothing can bee concluded the premisses beeing meere particular nowe good woorkes are as an effect without which the cause to wit faith cannot be Therefore good workes verily are necessarie but not as any cause or merite of iustice 16 Obiection He that is iustified by two things is not iustified by one only But we besides that we are iustified by faith are iustified also by the merite and obedience of Christ therefore not by faith onely Answere He that is iustified by two things is not iustified by one onely that is after one and the same manner But we are iustified by two thinges after a diuerse manner For we are iustified by faith as by an instrument apprehending iustice but by the merit of Christ as by the formal cause of our iustice 17 Obiect Doctrine which maketh men profane is not to be deliuered But this doctrine that we are iustified by works maketh men profane Therefore it is not to be deliuered Ans If it should so fal out with any man it were but an accident Reply Euen those thinges which fall out to bee euils by an accident are to be eschued But this doctrine maketh men by an accident euil Therefore it is to be eschued Aunswere Those thinges which fal out to be euils by an accident are to be eschued if ther remain no greater cause for which they are not to bee omitted which by an accident make men euil But we haue greater causes why this doctrine ought to be deliuered 1. The commaundement of God 2. Our owne saluation 18 Obiection Christ hath brought vs eternall iustice This applied iustice is not eternal Therefore this is not our iustice but God himselfe is our iustice Aunswere The Lorde is our iustice that is our iustifier But that our applied iustice is eternal hath been shewed before because the imputation thereof is continued to all eternity That iustice also of the Lawe which is begunne in vs in this life shall bee continued and perfected in the life to come But that iustice which is God himselfe is not in vs because so God should be an accident to his creature and become iustice in man For iustice and vertue are thinges created in vs not the essence of God Moreouer Osiander who obiecteth this doth not discerne the cause from the effect As we liue not or are wise by the essence of God for this is all one as to say that wee are as wise as God so also we are not iust by the essence of God Wherefore nothing is more impious than to say That the essentiall iustice of the creatour is the iustice of the creatures for thereof it would follow that wee haue the iustice of God yea the verie essence of God The cause must be discerned from the effect increate iustice from created iustice 19 Obiection Where sinne is not there is no place for remission or imputation Jn the life to come sinne shall not be Therefore no place there for remission or imputation Aunswere In the life to come shall not bee remission of any sin then present but the remission which was graunted in this life shall continue and endure for euer And that conformity also which we shal haue with God in the life to come shal be an effect of this imputation 20 Obiection Ten Crownes are part of a hundred Crownes in paiment of a debt Therefore good workes also may be some part of our iustice Aunswere There is a dissimilitude because ten Crownes are a whole part of an hundred Crownes But our workes are not a whole and perfect part 21 Obiection It is said that Phinees worke and deede was imputed vnto him for righteousnes Answere The meaning of the place is That God did approue his worke but not that he was iustified by that worke Why we are iustified by christs merit onely We are iustified by the merite of Christ onely 1. For his glorie that his sacrifice might not bee extenuated and made of lesse value 2. For our owne comfort that we may be assured that our iustice doth not depend vpon our owne woorkes but vpon the sacrifice of Christ onely otherwise we should leese it a thousand times Why we are not Iustified partly by faith and partly by works Gal. 3.10 We are iustified not partly by faith partly by works 1. Because works are vnperfect and therefore our iustice also should be then vnperfect Cursed is euerie man that continueth not in all thinges which are written in the booke of the lawe to doe them 2. Although they were perfect yet are they due and debt So that wee cannot satisfie for an offence past by them When ye haue done all that yee are commaunded say wee are vnprofitable seruants 3. They are Gods works who worketh them in vs. 4. They are temporarie neither haue anie proportion with eternall blessinges 5. They are effectes of iustification therefore no cause 6. They are excluded that wee might not haue whereof to glorie 7. If they were part of our iustification our conscience should be destitute of stable and certaine comfort 8. Christ should haue died in vain 9. We should not haue the same way to saluation 10. Christ should not be a perfect Sauiour Why our works are vnperfect therefore cannot merit Now our workes are vnperfect 1. Because we omit manie things which we should doe and doe manie things which we should not doe 2. Because we blend and mingle euil with that good which wee doe that is wee doe good but wee doe it ill The thinges
Vnrighteousnes and damnation from our parentes but righteousnes by the grace of Christ subiect to defects and euil inclinations If they replie that therefore the guilt stretcheth not to the posteritie because the Parents are freed from it the Aunswere is that that is not deriued from the Parents to their posteritie which the Parents by nature haue not and that they are freed from the guilt not by nature but by the grace and benefit of Christ Wherefore they deriue vnto their posteritie not righteousnes which is freely imputed but vnrighteousnes and damnation vnto which themselues by nature are subiect Why the Parents righteousnes is not deriued vnto their childrē And the cause why they deriue their guilt vnto them not their righteousnes is this because their posteritie are not borne of them according to grace but according to nature neither is grace and iustification tied to carnall propagation but to the most free election of God As it is said Iohn 1. Which are borne not of blood nor of the wil of the flesh nor of the wil of man but of the wil of god 3 Obiection It is said by the Apostle Rom. 11. If the roote be holie so shal be the branches also Aunswere This hindereth nothing at al. For hee vnderstandeth not here by holines remission of sinnes and regeneration but this worthines of Abrahams posteritie for that God for his league made with Abraham had appointed alwaies to conuert some of his posteritie and to indow them with true and inward holines Rom. 9. 4 Obiection It is said vnto holie Parentes Your children are holie Answere The Apostle in that place sheweth that neither al the children of holie men obtaine remission of their sinnes or are regenerated by the holy ghost neither the holines of the children proceedeth from carnal propagation For of Iacob and Esau it was said when they had neither done good nor euil I haue loued Iacob and haue hated Esau The meaning therefore of Paul is that the children of godly Parentes although one of the Parentes be an infidel yet they are holy in respect of the external fellowship of the Church that is that they are to be counted for members or citizens of the Christian Church and so also for the chosen and inwardlie sanctified of God except themselues declare are themselues to be others by their vnbeliefe and impiety But neither is outward nor inward sanctifie of the nature of the parents seeing neither is found in it but both befal as wel to the children as to the Parents of the free mercy and couenant or promise of God 5 Obiection They are more miserable vnto whom their sinnes of al their ancestors are deriued the they vnto whom haue stretched but the sinnes of some of their ancestors But if sinne passe from the Parents vnto the children then vnto the latest of their posteritie come the sinnes of al the ancestors vnto the former onely their sins who liued before them So then are the latter more miserable then al the rest which would be absurd and not agreeable to the iustice of God The first aunswere to this is that it would be neither absurd nor vniust although god should punish more heauily and more forsake the latter of the posteritie then the former For how manie more sinnes are committed and heaped vp by mankinde so much the more vehemently is his wrath kindled and the punishment is more aggrauated Whereupon are those sayinges Genes 15. The wickednesse of the Amorites is not yet ful Matt. 23. That vpon you may come all the righteous blood 2. God therefore suffereth the sinne of our first Parents to passe vnto al their posteritie as concerning the corruption of nature and guilt that hee might satisfie his owne iustice and that himselfe might haue occasion of exercising his mercy in his sonne Rom. 5. and 11. But of the actual sinnes of euerie man he saith that he visiteth the iniquitie of the father on the children vnto the third and fourth generation that is according to his iustice hee punisheth the sinnes of the parents in their posteritie and yet of his mercy doth set bounds and limits for sinne that the posteritie may not alwaies pay for the sinnes of their ancestors or imitate them and that it may not be of necessitie that the children of euil Parents should be euil or worse or more miserable then their Parentes euen as also he exerciseth his mercie vnto the thousand generation of them that loue him and yet retaineth the liberty of his election so that not alwaies good Parents haue their posteritie good also The reason of this difference betweene Original and Actual sinne is because that righteousnes and life euerlasting was not lost first by the posteritie but by our first Parents Obiection But God wil not punish the posteritie for the Parents sins Answere 1. True except they persist in them 2. If the Parents had not receaued this conformity with God both for themselues and their posterity so that if they did retaine it their posteritie also retaine it and if they did leese it also from their posteritie 2 Causes for which God doth iustly punish in the posteritie both their own sins and their parents Hereof it may bee vnderstood that god for two causes doth iustlie punish in the posterity both their owne sinnes and their auncestors first because the whole nature of the Parents sinning is guiltie and the childrē are as it were a part of the Parents because they proceede out of their substance or masse Wherefore that cannot bee but guiltie as wel after as before the propagation from the Parents vnlesse by some singular benefit remission of that fault befal vnto it which now before in the Parents themselues it did commit Againe because the Parents haue receaued the giftes of God to be imparted also vnto their posteritie of that condition if the Parents them selues did retaine them and if they did cast them away and leese them that their posteritie also should be depriued of them Wherefore after the Parents did bereaue themselues of righteousnes and the grace of God they cannot being themselues vncleane bring foorth cleane but corrupt children and like to themselues and therefore guilty as well of their owne as of their Parents sinne because they partake of it being deriued vnto them consenting vnto it either in act as to vs who are come to some yeares or by inclination as infantes except by the singular mercie of God this their in-bred corruption be corrected Why after the fall came this general corruption There was added in the definition of Originall sin that this corruption of nature ensewed vpon the fal in our first parentes For of man not yet fallen it is said that he was made to the image of God and all thinges which God had made were verie good but of man fallen and his posteritie All the imaginations of the heart of man are onelie euill continuallie Wherewithall wee are taught
and rightnes without which they cannot please God If any man vrge That the works euen of the regenerat also are not perfect Why the works of the regenerate doe please God neither yet for al that are they counted sins and that therefore wee must not so seuerelie giue sentence against others the answere is at hand that faith shineth on the works of the godlie but not on the works of the wicked And therefore they please God their imperfection is couered through the satisfaction and intercession of Christ which falleth not so out with the works of the wicked And lastly in those is begunne the true and inward obedience of the wil and hart but in these not so and therefore these are hypocrisy which is seuerely condemned by God himselfe So also if they be saide to bee recompensed with reward and therefore not to be sins First we answer that to be approued and rewarded in them which is good but that euil which cōcurreth is not only condēned punished but the good also which the wicked do is depriued of the honor name and so of that eternal reward of those works which are indeed good please God Secondly we answere that these are somtimes recompensed with temporall rewards but neuer with aeternall Thirdly that they are recompensed of God with these rewardes not as that he simply liketh of them or so acknowledgeth thē for good that he doth not withal repute them for euil but that he might inuite by these rewards others aswel vnbeleeuers as beleeuers to keepe and obserue externall discipline and honesty Because he wil that in mankind there bee kept some order necessarie for the preseruation of the society of man yea euen amongst the wicked hypocrits Fourthly those rewardes are rather a diminishing and mitigation of their punishmentes than any rewardes because they make nought for their saluation to whom they befall And God will according to the order of his iustice punish greater sins with greater punishmentes and lesser with lesser both in this life and in the life to come The morall actions of the vnregenerate are not therefore to be omitted of vs because in them they are sinne but we must auoide the sinne and performe the action Moreouer this is a fallacie of the accident If any collect and gather that wee must not doe the morall workes of the vnregenerate because they are sinnes For those workes which are of themselues sinnes that is are forbidden of God wee ought of necessitie to auoide but those which are sinnes but by an accident ought not to be omitted of vs but corrected by vs and so done that they may bee performed without any sinne concurring or intermingled with them For they are not condemned for themselues but for the sinnes which are adioyning to them Now it followeth not that that good which remaineth shoulde be reiected or abolished because of the imperfections and defects but rather it should be nourished and increased clensed from those euils wherewith it was stained Discipline therfore is necessary euē in the vnregenerat Wherefore externall and ciuill discipline is necessary in the vnregenerate in respect of the commandement of God for auoiding the grieuousnes of punishmēts which ensueth vpō the breach of Discipline for the preseruation of the peace and society of mankinde for a way entrance to conuersion which is stopped by perseuering persisting in manifest offences If instance be giuen The good action of hypocrites is not to be omitted but their hypocrisy therein onely to be eschewed Hypocrisie is sinne of it selfe and is to be auoided as Math. 6. it is saide Be not as Hypocrites But the Discipline or outward behauiour of the wicked is Hypocrisie Therefore it is sinne of it selfe and they should omit it We aunswere to the Maior by distinguishing the diuersitie of Hypocrisie There is a double hypocrisie one is in workes not commaunded of God done for ostentation sake or to deceiue as those which Christ mentioneth Math. 6. To make a trumpet be blowen before him when he giues almes to pray standing in the Synagogues and in the corners of the streets to looke sourely and disfigure his face in fasting and all other superstitious and humane traditions which appertaine not to the edifiyng of the Church That these thinges are to bee omitted and left vndone there is no doubt as it is saide In vaine doe they worshippe me teaching doctrines the dommaundements of men And therefore they are here expresly condemned forbidden of Christ There is another hypocrisie in workes commanded of God but not done after that manner which God requireth These are not to bee left vndone but to be corrected to be done without hypocrisie that is with true faith godlines as in the same place Christ teacheth of almes praier fasting not to be omitted of the godly but to be otherwise perfourmed than they were of hypocrites By this which hath beene spoken it is manifest The vse of the difference betweene sinnes which are of them-selues sins and those which are made so by an accident for what cause this difference of sinnes which are of themselues sinnes and by an accident sinnes is necessarie least that a false persuasion of their owne righteousnes or merites should rest in mens mindes and least with sinnes which are of themselues sinnes shoulde bee cast away also good thinges which come to be sinnes but by an accident and so shoulde bee encreased and heaped vp the sinnes and punishments of mankind The workes of the regenerate and vnregenerate differ seuen maner of waies IN this place is to bee obserued the difference betweene the workes of the regenerate and vnregenerate They differ seuen waies Why one and the same worke is good in the regenerate and sinne in the vnregenerate For one and the same worke commaunded of God is good in the regenerat and sinne in the vnregenerat 1. Because the regenerate are reconciled to God The vnregenerate are not 2. The regenerat doe it to the glory of God The vnregenerat no way do so 3. In both of them that good worke is imperfect but that of the godly is couered by the satisfaction and intercession of Christ that of the vngodly not so 4. The worke of the godly is ioined with a beginning obedience that of the vngodly with sinne raigning 5. The good worke which is in the wicked is made euill But the good which is in the godly though it be contaminated with sinne yet because it is hidden by the satisfaction of Christ it is not punished neither is it obiected vnto him that he doth defile the giftes of God with his sinnes neither doth the Lord for that worke bereaue the regenerate man of euerlasting life all which hee doth in those who are not regenerat 6. The good worke in the wicked is onely adorned with temporall rewards that not as if it pleased god but for to inuite by this meanes others to
sinnes are the causes of all that follow The reasons 1. Because by one man sinne entred into the world 2. Because man and the Deuill are able by their owne nature to sinne against the lawe And that first sinne or first fall in Paradise is the cause of originall sinne both in Adam who fell and in others who haue their discent from him Originall sinne is the cause preparatiue as it were of all actuall sinnes according to that of Paul Sinne that dwelleth in me doth it and euill and corrupt inclinations doe carry me to euill actions Causes impulsiue of sins are those obiectes which sollicite men to sinne Yea actuall sinnes are the causes also of those sinnes that follow them Former actuall sinnes cause of others which follow after not onely in them which first sinned but also in others Furthermore whereas the scripture teacheth that the sinnes which followe are the punishmentes of those that went before and the fault or desert is an impulsiue cause of punishment it is manifest that actuall sinnes which goe before are the causes also of those that follow them euen as of other punishments or calamities which are purchased by our sinnes And that is to bee vnderstood aswell of the falles of those that commit the sin as of others fals with which aswel they are punished whose falles they are as they who first sinned as the sinnes of the Parents are punished by the sinnes of the children the sinnes of the subiects by the sinnes of the Magistrates or contrariwise as cap. 1. to the Romans of purpose is declared Wherefore God gaue them vp to their hartes lusts vnto vncleannes And 2. Thes 2. Whose comming is by the working of Satan with al power and signs and lying wonders in all deceiuablenes of vnrighteousnes among thē that perish And Exod 2. I the Lord thy God am a iealous God visiting the sinnes of the fathers vpon the children vnto the third and fourth generatiō of them that hate me And 2. Sam. 12. Thus saith the Lord behold I will raise vp euill against thee out of thine owne house and will take thy wiues before thine eies and giue them vnto thy neighbour God the causer of sinnes as they are punishmēts but not as they are sinnes If humane reason doe here obiect That God is the author causer of punishmēts If therefore sins be the punishments of sins it followeth that God is the cause of sinnes We answere that there is a fallacie of the accident in the Minor For it commeth to passe by an accident that is by the fault of those who sinne that when by the iust iudgement of God either themselues or others are punished by euil men they in the meane season God permitting that is not shewing them that he would haue those things to be done by them for to punish them which things yet he hateth and which he will punish both in this life and the life to come do fulfill their desires swaruing from the law of God estrainging themselues more and more from God by sinning doe purchase more grieuous punishmentes vnto themselues Or if we will distinguish the Maior it is in effect the same For punishments come from god as author and causer of them as they are punishmentes but in asmuch as they are sinnes so they come God neither willing them nor approuing them nor causing but onely permitting For to permit this kinde of punishments which sinners by sinning inflict ether vpon themselues or others is nothing else than not to cause that euill men shoulde doe this which God woulde haue done for punishment to the same ende that they may obey this will of God So also we answere to that Argument The priuation or want of righteousnes and diuine wisedome god inflicteth as a punishment vpon men but that priuation is sinne Therefore god is the causer of sinne For this priuation is not sinne as by the iust iudgement of God it is inflicted but as it is of men themselues voluntarily brought vpon them by their owne misdeedes and demerites and is admitted or receiued into the minde will and hart euen as euill actions are not sinnes as they are gouerned by god but as they are done by men They say further He that mindeth the end mindeth also the meanes God mindeth the ends of sinne Punishment and the manifestation of Gods glory and iustice are not the endes of sinne because men are not by them moued to sinne that is punishment and the shewing of his iustice and wrath in punishment Wherefore he mindeth sinnes also by which those ends are come vnto But the Minor is to be denied that punishment the manifestation of the glory of god are the endes of sinne For the end is that which moueth the efficient cause to bring forth an effect but punishment or the manifestation of the glory of god do not moue the sinner to sinne These cannot therefore bee saide to bee the ends of sinne But those are the proper ends of sinne which the Deuils and men respect in sinning that is the destruction of men the fulfilling of euill desires the oppression and reproche of God and his truth God respecteth those as ends not of mens sin but of his permission of their sinne If they reply that men indeede haue not those endes but that god respecteth them For that which god permitteth to shewe his iustice by punishing it the end which god proposeth thereof is the punishment of the sinners and his owne glorie But he permitteth sin to punish it and to declare himselfe iust by punishing it therefore these are the endes of sin in respect of the purpose intent of god we deny the Maior For God suffering sin to be committed respecteth as the end not of an others worke that is of the sin of Deuils or mē but of his own work that is of his permission of sinne the punishment of sinnes and the manifestation of his owne iustice For sin is one thing and the permission of sinne another whereof is spoken Exod. 9. For this cause haue I appointed thee to shew my power in thee and to declare my name throughout all the world Prouerb 16. The Lorde hath made all thinges for his owne sake yea euen the wicked man for the day of euill Roman 9. God being willing to shew his truth and to make his power knowen hath suffered with long patience the vessels of wrath prepared to destruction Wherefore punishment is not the end but the consequent or proper effect of sinne and an accidentary effect thereof is the manifestation of the glorie of God as Paul sheweth Rom. 3. For if the veritie of God hath more abounded thorough my lie to his glorie c. If here againe they reply He that will the consequent will also the antecedent How God is said to will punishment which is the consequent of sinne and not sinne it selfe which is the antecedent But God will these things which are
either doth not moue the next cause of the effect or doth not intend and mind the effect neither is appointed thereunto it cannot be said to be a cause of that effect but by an accident as when of a good father is borne an euil and euil-liuing sonne or of a good father a good and wel-liuing son when a godly Magistrate by his commandement moueth the will of a wicked executioner to execute a guilty person and he being impelled either by desire of reuenge or by hatred or by cruelty reioiceth at his euil whom he executeth and so committeth murther before God and lastly when one maketh a sword and another vseth it either wel or il Now as often as the next cause is either before the bringing foorth of the effect depraued or in the verie bringing of it foorth either by it selfe or by another cause then bringeth it forth a bad effect which the cause remoued or a farre off that either bringeth forth or moueth this next cause neither intendeth neither as by any ordination or appointment vnto it produceth As when the wil hand of the cleauer purpose to cut a thing and the iron being too dul causeth that to break which is taken in hand to be cut So also God maketh and moueth the wil but because the wil of men is depraued by the diuel and it selfe it bringeth forth sin which God neither when he maketh nor when he moueth the wil intendeth or mindeth to bring forth Wherefore it followeth not at al that God is the cause of those sins which are committed by his creatures depraued and corrupted of themselues Likewise it is obiected Second causes are able to do nothing without the first cause which is God Wherefore neither is sinne brought forth neither doe they depraue themselues but that also the first cause worketh it with them God the first cause doth not concur with secondarie causes to the bringing forth of sinne We aunswere to the antecedent The second causes do nothing without the first cause that is without the first cause preserue them and mooue them to doe so far forth as it is good which they doe but they doe without the first cause concurring with them to the bringing forth of euil as it is a fault or of sin Isa 30. We to the rebellious children saith the Lord that take counsel but not of me and couer with a couering but not by my spirit that they maie laie sin vpon sin How the good will of man corrupted it selfe Likewise they obiect That which is good cannot by sinning corrupt it selfe except it be some other waie corrupted as it is said A good tree cannot bring forth euil fruit The wil of the diuel and Adam before the fal of both was good Therefore it could not corrupt it selfe by sinning except it were by some other means corrupted We deny the Maior For although the creature be good yet God not preseruing his goodnes that is mouing or willing that his wil should be moued by outward obiects neither in the meane season lightning and gouerning the wil with the knowledge of his own diuine will it is not only possible but it must necessarily folow that he must sinne become an euil tree and thorough his owne wil and fault auert himselfe from God run to worse and worse and purchase blindnesse the iust punishment of sin both vnto him and his as it is said Without me ye can doe nothing Againe it is obiected He that withdraweth grace from the sinner without which sin cannot be auoided he is the the cause of sinne God did withdraw his grace frō man without which hee could not persist in righteousnes Wherefore God was the cause of mans sinne Wee deny the Maior First because God was not bound to man to preserue that grace in him which he gaue him Secondly because he withdrew his grace for man beeing willing thereunto and reiecting it of his owne accord Thirdly because he withdrewe his grace not that he did enuie man righteousnes and eternal life or that he is delighted with sin but to trie him that is to shew how the creature is able to doe or keepe no goodnes without the singular goodnes and mercy of his creator and so god is not at al the cause of sin although sin doth necessarily follow this withdrawing in him from whom the grace is withdrawn So then when God did withdraw his grace frō man not God withdrawing it but man reiecting it is the cause of his owne sin destruction Againe they say God wil the temptation of man yet not the sinne of man He that wil haue him to be tempted whom he knoweth certainly wil fal if he be tempted he will the sinne of him who falleth But God would that man should bee tempted of the diuel whō he knew certainly would fall for otherwise mā could not haue bin tempted Wherefore God is the cause of his fal Here also we deny the Maior For he is not the cause of sin who wil haue him that will fall tempted for to try or to make manifest the weaknes of his creature but the diuell tempting man to this end that he may sinne and be separated from God and man obeying the tempter against the commandement of God are the causes of sin For the antecedent which being put must necessarily haue another thing consequent thereof is not the cause of the consequent except it worketh somewhat in producing the consequent But God neither in withdrawing his grace neither in that he doth wil the temptation of man worketh in producing of sin as it is sin because he neuer intended it Againe they obiect That is not of God but of man and the Diuel which maketh sinne He that is the cause of those thinges which make sin is the cause of sin God is the cause of those things which make sin that is of the action which is the matter and of the priuation of rightnes in man which is the form of sin Wherefore he is the autor of sin To these the aunswere hath beene made before For the Minor is to be denied Because the action priuation of the diuine light direction do make sinne as they are contrarie to the Law And they are contrary to the law of God and make sin as they are committed by man are in him but as they are guided by God inflicted they are not sin but a trial of him that would sin or a punishment of him that had sinned Wherefore that is not of God but of man and the Diuell which maketh sin Whether God would the fall of Adam and how Last of al they vrge Seeing that God would the fa◠of Adam either as it was sin or as a punishment and coulde not will it as a punishment because no sin had gone before which should be therewith punished it seemeth to follow that God would that worke as it was sin But this consequence also is deceitful
paied for vs and imputeth it vnto vs that it maie no more bee necessary for vs to bee subiect vnto euerlasting damnation But his obedience or purity of life that is perfect loue of God and our neighbour hee perfourmed for himselfe not for vs neither dooth hee impute it vnto vs. 1. Because himselfe is bound by nature to perfourme it in that he is man For euery reasonable creature in that he is a creature oweth perfect conformity and correspondence to the Lawe and his creatour 2. If Christ had perfourmed his obedience vnto the Lawe for vs wee surelie should bee no longer bound vnto it as neither is it necessarie that wee should susteine euerlasting punishment for our sinnes because they were once punished in Christ 3. The Lawe and iustice of God doth not exact both together that is both obedience and punishment but the one of them onely that is either obedience or punishment The third way that Christ dooth fulfill the Law is by fulfilling of it in vs by his spirite when as he regenerateth vs by it and maketh vs able that euen in this life we may beginne both inwarde and outwarde obedience which the Law requireth of them who are reconciled to GOD and may perfourme that wholy and fully in the life to come Fourthly hee fulfilleth the Lawe by teaching it and by purging it of errors and corruptions and by restoring the true vnderstanding of the Scripture or sacred doctrine For as it appeareth by the Euangelist S. Matthew the Scribes and Pharisies had so corrupted the spirituall meaning of the Lawe wholly restraining it to bodily actions that Christ was enforced thereby to giue the right sense of manie places thereof and so by the light of the trueth to scatter the mist of their corruptions Our Mediatour was to bee true God 3 It was requisite that hee should bee God not an imaginary GOD and onely adorned with excellent giftes aboue all the Angels and Sainctes but very god by nature and that chiefly for these causes which here followe The first is that hee might bee able to sustaine the infinite wrath of GOD or greeuousnesse of punishment which shoulde bee temporall and yet equiualent to eternal paines Nowe a mere creature by reason of his infirmity woulde haue beene brought to nothing or beeing oppressed by the weight of so great a punishment would haue remained for euer subiect vnto the wrath of GOD. That there might therefore be a proportion betwixt the punishment of our Mediatour and all the sinnes of all men which was altogether required by the infinite iustice of God it was behoouefull that that person shoulde bee of infinit strength and so to bee GOD who should suffer without falling into despaire or beeing brought vnto nothing a punishment finite in time but in greatnesse and worthinesse or valewe infinite Nowe necessarilie was that punishment finite in respect of time Because that our Mediatour might accomplish the benefite of our Redemption and nowe when it was perfectly merited apply it or bestowe it vpon vs by his forcible working that is might effectually saue vs it was necessary that hee shoulde by his power overcome death and first depell it and shake it off from himselfe These thinges coulde not haue beene doone by a meere man who of what strength soeuer hee bee cannot by his owne force or power wrastle out of the handes of Death Wherefore it was requisite that the Mediatour shoulde bee God Obiection No mere man able to perform the punishment due for sinne But a meere man was able by his obedience perfectlie to fulfill the Lawe Aunswere If wee graunt this yet that obedience coulde not haue beene a price for anothers debt because himselfe shoulde haue beene bound to perfourme it as beeing man It was required therefore that our Mediatour shoulde pay a sufficient punishment for vs which hee shoulde not haue been able to beare and ouercome Wicked men Diuels satisfie in neuer satisfiing except hee had beene withall true GOD. For not the Diuels themselues are able to sustaine the waight of Gods wrath much lesse shoulde wee men bee able to doe it Reply But all the Diuels and wicked men are constrained to beare sustaine the wrath of God Therefore creatures doe beare and sustaine it Aunswere They indeed beare the immeasurable wrath of God and sustaine sufficient punishment but so that the wrath of God is neuer satisfied by them and so they neuer recouer out of punishment For their punishment is extended to all eternitie The wicked die neuer dying But the Sonne of God did so beare the burden of Gods wrath that after he had satisfied for our sinnes hee did shake off that burden and draue it away both from himselfe and from vs. Why Christes punishment being but temporal was yet equiualent to eternal For his temporarie punishment was equiualent to eternall 1 In respect of the worthinesse of the person for the Sonne of God did suffer Acts. 20.28 God hath purchased the Church with his own blood Rom. 8.3 God hath sent his Sonne 2. For the grieuousnesse of the punishment because hee sustained the torments and the feeling or sense of the wrath of God and the horrors of death for the whole world He descended into hell Psal 18.5 The sorrowes of hel haue compassed me about Deutr. 4.24 God is a consuming fire Isay 53.10 He hath laid the iniquity of al of vs vpon him hee would breake him c. And hence is it also vnderstood why christ did so greatly tremble at death whereas many Martyrs haue without feare or trembling offered their throate to the persecutors But it was necessarie that it should be a finite punishment because otherwise there had beene no satisfaction if it had beene intended for euer The second cause is that his punishment might be a sufficient and full woorthy merit and ransome for the purging of the sinnes euen of the whole world and for the repairing of that righteousnesse and glorie which they had lost The worthines of this price must be infinit therfore so must the person also be himselfe which paieth such a price For that the creator suffered for the sinnes of the woorlde is by infinite more than the death of al the creatures and the conformitie or correspondence of all the Angels and holy men with God Wherefore the Apostles when they speake of Christs passion euer almost make mention of his Godhead Acts. 20.28 God hath purchased the Church with his blood 1. Iohn 1.7 The blood of Iesus Christ cleanseth vs from all sinne Ioh. 1.29 Behold the Lambe of God which taketh away the sins of the world Yea God himselfe in Paradise ioyneth these two Gen. 3.15 The seede of the woman shal breake thine head and thou shalt bruse his heele Wherefore not only the woorthinesse of the person himselfe doth declare the worthinesse of this price but also the multitude and greatnesse of sinnes which are committed from the beginning of the world
principles beeing borne in vs and with vs could not come by chance or from a sensible nature common to vs with brute beasts Whereupon we frame this Syllogisme Notions are not engendred nor haue their being but from a cause intelligent for no man maketh another wise who himselfe is not wise but in men there are notions not comming by vse nor receiued frō men Therefore they are from God Rom. 1. God is said to haue manifested his righteousnesse to men Likewise Man is the image of god Seeing then these effects are attributed vnto God as proper there must needs be a God 4. This principle it selfe That God is 4 From the naturall notion of this principle whereby wee affirme that god is Principles are true Because they are diuine wisedome and because the contrary or opposite thereto beeing granted nature is thereby destroied But That God is is a principle 1. Because euery one hath experience hereof in himselfe 2. All wise men confesse it 3. All nations consent in it because they haue some religion and about that they contend and striue 4. Rom. 1.19 That which may be known of god is manifest in them that is in the minds of men for god hath shewed it vnto them Therefore god is 5 The terors of conscience 5 The terrors of conscience which are stroken into the mindes of the wicked after they haue sinned The torment of minde which ensueth vpon sinnes committed is inflicted of a iudge which knoweth both honest and dishonest thinges detesteth those things which are dishonest beholdeth the mindes and harts exerciseth iudgement vpon the minds But in al the wicked is this torment Rom. 2.15 They shew the effect of the law writtē in their harts their conscience also bearing witnes Isa 57.20.21 The wicked are like the raging sea that cannot rest There is no peace saith my god to the wicked Isa 66.24 Their worme shall not dy neither shall their fire bee quenched Therefore there is some such iudge But he cannot be except he be God because this punishment cannot come but from God Deutr. 4. God is a consuming fire Against the beastes of the world who think this doctrine of God to bee but a cunning deuise of the wiser sort to keepe the simple people in order And hence is apparant the impudencie of Epicures and Academicks who deeme al religion to be deuises of subtill men coined to this end and purpose that the rest of the common people might through fear of a superiour power be kept in good order For first if through deceiueablenes other men beleeue that God is and dread him why then are these men themselues who wil seem by their sharp insight to espy the guile most of al tormēted with the conscience priuy acknowledgement both of this their blasphemy as also of other their misdeeds Moreouer the sole and bare asseueration word of a few could not haue bin sufficient neither to persuade al mankind nether to maintain the persuasion once brought in to al succeeding ages Neither doth that lightē the force of those argumēts which are deducted from this notion that there is a God from the conscience in that they say there are many found who neither beleue there is a god nether are moued with the conscience of their sins For although they couet neuer so much to persuade themselues that there is no God yet is their conscience alwaies against them And therefore it is most false that these men imagine that any one of the wicked is free from the gnawing of his conscience For how much the more euery one despiseth God and al religion and endeuoreth to represse the prickes of conscience so much the more is he tormented and at euery mentioning and signifieng of God hee trembleth and shaketh with horror and how much the slowlier with so much the more seuere dolor paine is his security shaken from him Whereupon wee see those whose whole life was profane and secure for the most part when they are oppressed with the terror of gods iudgement to perish in despair Now that which is said Psa 10. The vngodly is so proud that hee careth not for god neither is god in all his thoughts Ps 14. 53. The fool hath said in his hart there is no god that this hath not this meaning as if the wicked were void of al knowedge and fear of god or do not confes that there is a god but that framing vnto themselues another than he indeed is who hath manifested himself to wit one that careth not for mens affairs defēdeth not nor deliuereth the good and punisheth the wicked they place an idol in the roum of the tru God Dauid himself doth sufficiciently declare when as he describeth the same prophanenesse of the wicked Ps 10. in these words For he hath said in his hart tush god hath forgotten he hideth away his face and he wil neuer see it 6 From the punishmēts of the wicked 6. The punishmentes of the wicked which they suffer besides the torments of conscience For the euents of al times cōstrain men to confesse that their sins are punished with grieuous punishments in this life cōtrariwise the lot end of the good to be more pleasant Wherefore there is a minde or vnderstanding power which discerneth honest things frō dishonest iudge of mankind punishing the wicked defēding the good And that this may not be ascribed to the wisedome or seuerity of magistrats or other men this first withstādeth hindereth for that it must needs be that this natural instinct whereby men iudge that offender are iustlie punished must proceed from some mind which is enimy to wickednes Again for that oftentimes by marueilous inexpected and vnlooked for meanes they are drawen to the iustice and punishment of the Magistrates whose sinnes before had beene priuy or who seemed to haue bin able by their owne power or subtilty easily to escape their handes and that especially for that many who through either the negligence or whiteliuerdnes of Magistrats are not punished by them yet run into calamities and haue allotted vnto them ruthful ends And whē transgressions sins encrease too much their impunity whole nations and common-wealthes with horrible and manifest examples of gods wrath perish as the world in the deluge Sodom by fier cast from heauē Pharao in the red sea the Iewes many florishing kingdomes by most lamentable ouerthrowes That these things cānot come to passe by chaunce neither any other way than by the iudgement and power of him who is Lord of mankind nature both Gods comminations and threatnings and the conscience of euery one and the order of iustice whereby these folow and ensue vpon impiety and the very hugenes waight and greatnes of things doth conuince Wherefore it is said Ps 58. The righteous shal reioice when he seeth the vengeāce he shal wash his footsteps in the blood of the vngodly So that a man
order of his minde declared in the nature of thinges and in his woorde and what agreeth therewith and disagreeth and all his woorkes and the works of all creatures past present and to come all the causes and circumstances of all things And moreouer That al Angels and men haue no more knowlege of diuine and humane matters than God doth woork maintaine in their minds For among other thinges the most beutiful and sightlie order which is in the nature of thinges the endes and vses of all things the signification of future euents arts and sciences the euerting and ouerturning of those deuises which the Diuell and wicked men haue most craftily contriued against God and all the godly doe enforce all men to confesse that these things could not proceed but from a most wise artificer and author Wherefore also the scripture it selfe willeth vs to consider the wisedome of God shining in these his woorks Eccle. 3.11 God hath made euerie thing beutiful in his time Isai 44.7 Who is like me that shal cal shal declare it set it in order before me since I appointed the ancient people Ioh. 5.13 He taketh the wise in their craftinesse And of these hee concludeth that the wisedome of God is immense vnconceiueable As Ps 145 7. His wisdom is infinit Rom. 11.32 O the deepenesse of the riches both of the wisedome and knowledge of God! But here again is to be obserued a difference betweene Philosophie and the word of God First that euen in the creation the knowen or legall wisedome was darkned and maimed in men through sinne and therefore needeth a renewing by the woorde deliuered to the Church And then that men without this heauenlie doctrine are altogether ignorant of that especial wisedome of God reuealed in the gospell whereby he saueth the Church gathered from amongst mankind by the son As it is said Mat. 11. I giue thee thanks O father bicause thou hast hid these things from the wise men of vnderstanding and hast opened them vnto babes The Goodnes of God diuerslie taken in scriptures The goodnesse of God signifieth sometimes his bountifulnes as Psa 106.1 Praise the Lord because he is good sometimes all the vertues and whatsoeuer is spoken of the nature of God As Psalm 14. Let thy spirite leade mee thorough the right waie That which also is meant by the name of holines or sanctity and light 1. Iohn 1. So in this place first by the name of goodnesse are vnderstoode al those thinges which are attributed to god in his woorde and are represented and resembled in his image as those thinges which are termed good in Angels and men as life power wisedome ioy righteousnesse c. For such is the nature of God as it hath manifested it selfe in the Lawe and Gospel and the goodnesse of the reasonable creature is an image of the diuine goodnesse And therefore here also differ philosophy and the Scripture in that Philosophy attributeth onely to God that his goodnesse which was opened in the Lawe and yet neither that wholie but of his goodnesse reuealed in the Gospell it is altogether ignoraunt Secondly by reason of the great and huge difference betweene the creatour and the creature we vnderstand those good thinges to bee in GOD which are agreeing to his diuine nature and maiestie For those which are proper vnto created natures woulde not bee good in GOD but rather a diminishing of his goodnesse Thirdly By reason of the immensitie of his diuine nature those things which are finite in creatures are in GOD infinite And therefore against sundry and diuerse disputes of Philosophers concerning the chiefest good we learne in the Church that GOD is the chiefest good Fourthly because nothing is vnperfect or not subsisting by it selfe in GOD whatsoeuer is attributed vnto him is not in him as formes or accidentes in creatures but such is his essence and nature in a manner not able to bee comprehended by our knoweledge and vnderstanding Fiftly His nature and will is a rule of that goodnesse and vprightnesse which is in creatures For so farre foorth thinges are and are called good as they agree with the wil of God Sixtly GOD is the onelie fountaine of goodnesse and the first cause of all good thinges So that all thinges haue so much goodnesse as God dooth create and maintaine in them And in this sense is it said Luke 18. There is none good but God onelie euen so as hee is most perfectly good and the fountaine of goodnesse The righteousnesse of God sometimes in Scripture signifieth that which is accounted righteousnesse before him The righteousnes of God both generall and particular and whereby he maketh vs righteous that elsewhere legall which is holines of life or conformity with the law of God which God worketh in vs by his spirit begun in this life to be perfected in the life to come as Iam. 1.20 The wrath of man dooth not accomplish the righteousnesse of God Or sometimes Euangelicall which is the righteousnesse of Christ imputed to beleeuers of the free mercy of God As Roman 3.21 But now is the righteousnes of God made manifest without the Law hauing witnesse of the Lawe and of the Prophetes to witte the righteousnesse of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vppon all that beleeue Sometimes is meant that righteousnesse whereby himselfe is righteous and then also in many places it signifieth the faithfulnesse or mercie and benignitie of GOD who according to his promises preserueth defendeth and deliuereth the faithfull as Psalm 31.1 Deliuer mee in thy righteousnesse But when it is properly spoken of the righteousnesse of GOD whereby himselfe is righteous as in this place First hee is called iust in respect of his generall iustice and righteousnesse which is the order or nature of this diuine vnderstanding and will whereby GOD will and approoueth doth himselfe and woorketh in others vnchaungeablie and vnspeakeablie such thinges as hee hath commaunded in his Lawe and neither will nor approoueth nor woorketh nor causeth nor furdereth any thing whatsoeuer disagreeth from this order but horribly hateth and detesteth them as it is said Psalm 11.17 The righteous Lord loueth righteousnesse Secondly In respect of his particular iustice and rightiousnesse which is the vnchaungeable will of God whereby God giueth to himselfe and will haue giuen him by others that glory which is due vnto the chiefe good as he saith I wil not giue my glory to another punisheth al sin with such punishment as is equall to the offence that is with eternal as in them who perish or with equiualent as in his Sonne Christ susteining the punishment for al those who are saued by him according as it is saide Thou shalt not depart thence vntill thou host paied the vtmost farding and cannot iniury anie creature whatsoeuer he determineth of him or doth vnto him because he oweth no man any thing as it is said Psa 45. God is iust in
common to all three persons yet the order and manner of woorking is different and appropriate to eache But the Ransome the Sonne onely hath paied Secondly The Sonne is called the onelie Sauiour in respect of the creature to whom hee is opposed and from whom hee is discerned that is from the woorke of saluation not the Father and the holy Ghost but the creatures onely are excluded For no creature deliuereth from sinne and death So 1. Corinth 2.16 it is saide The thinges of god knoweth no man but the Spirite of god But it followeth not hereof that the Father and the Sonne knowe not themselues For the Spirite in that place is compared with the creature not with the Father and the Sonne Replie But there haue beene manie Sauiours of the people and some of them also called by the same name as Iosua Therefore not CHRIST onelie is Sauiour Aunswere Other were termed Sauiours but in a most diuers respect First Because they carried a type of this IESVS as our true onelie and designed Sauiour by GOD. Nowe albeit the Patents of Iosua when they gaue him this name coulde not so much as suspect that by him shoulde come the deliuerie of the people of Israell yet was it decreed with GOD from euerlasting that hee as also others shoulde bee a type of the onelie Mediatour and Sauiour Wherefore by his secrete and vnknowen prouidence hee so mooued and ruled his Parentes willes that they shoulde call him Iosua Secondlie GOD by them bestowed onelie corporall and temporall benefites vpon the Israelites But by this Iesus he saueth all the chosen dispersed through the whole world from all euils both of bodie and soule from sinne and death euerlasting Thirdly Christ is the author of all good things both temporal and eternall and these he by his owne efficacie bestoweth on whom he will They were onelie instruments and ministers by whom Christ gaue safety and benefites temporal to the people 2 Iesus is the perfect sauiour 2 Moreouer that this Iesus is the perfect Sauiour and doth most perfectlie deliuer vs from all euils these places testifie Col. 2.9 In him dwelleth all the fulnes of the godhead bodilie And verse 10. Yee are compleat in him that is Christ is that one and perfect God the fountaine of all knowledge and good therefore he is sufficient for your saluation he who hath Christ cannot bee ignoraunt or want any of those thinges which are necessarie to eternal blessednes neither hath any need to aske them elsewhere 1. Iohn 1.7 The bloud of Iesus Christ clenseth vs from all sin Hebr. 7.25 Christ is able perfectlie to saue them that come vnto God by him seeing he euer liueth to make intercession for them Against the Papists merits and intercessions of saintes Hereof in the 3â— question of the Catechisme is inferred a notable consequence against the Papists who couple their owne woorkes and the intercessions of Saintes with Christes merite and intercession namely that they indeede spoile and robbe Iesus of this glorie whereby hee is the perfect and onelie Sauiour Which is also true of them who seeke for but the least iot of saluation or felicitie in themselues or other thinges without Christ The collection is this He is the perfect and onelie Sauiour who bestoweth saluation neither iointlie with others nor in part onelie but full intire and whole But this Iesus the sonne of Marie is that Sauiour which is the onelie and perfect Sauiour whereof demonstration hath beene made a little before Wherefore hee bestoweth saluation neither iointlie with others neither part thereof onlie but he alone performes the whole and by a consequent they who ioine moe intercessours with Iesus or craue and expect anie part of saluation elsewhere doe indeede denie the onelie Sauiour Iesus Obiection To pray for others is to make intercession God will that one should pray for another as the Saintes for Saintes Therefore he will that one make intercession for another And by a consequent the glorie of Christ is not impeached if the intercessions of Saints be adioined vnto his intercession Answere There is an ambiguitie both in the woorde Praier and in the word Intercession God wil that one pray and make intercession for an other But this they must doe not standing on the worthines of their owne intercession and merites but on the worthines of the intercession and merites of the onely Mediatour Christ Christ maketh intercession for vs because he prayeth will and obtaineth and effectuateth it himselfe that for his owne sacrifice and prayers wee may bee receiued of God the father into fauour and bee reformed according to his image Christ therefore maketh intercession for vs by the vigour and vertue of his owne proper worthines and merite for his own worthines be is heard and obtaineth what be desireth After this sort doe not the Saints make intercession one for another Wherefore seeing the Papists faigne that the Saintes doe by their owne merites and praiers obtaine for others grace and certain good thinges at Gods handes they manifestly derogate from the glorie of Christ and denie him to bee the onelie Sauiour 2 From what euils he saueth vs. HE deliuereth vs from all euils of all both crime Christ saueth vs from all euils both of crime and paine and paine most fullie and perfectly Math 1.21 He shal saue his people from their sinnes 1. Iohn 1.7 The bloud of Iesus Christ clenseth vs from all sinne that is that it may not bee imputed vnto vs and that it may not raigne in vs but bee abolished and so wee at length leaue off to sinne Wherefore also hee deliuereth vs from all paine and punishment For the cause being taken away which is sinne the effect is taken away which is punishment Rom. 8.1 Now then there is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesus Iohn 10.28 I giue vnto them eternall life The saluation then which this our Sauiour Iesus Christ bringeth vs is righteousnes and life euerlasting Dan 9 24. Seuentie weeks are determined to finish the wickednes and to seale vp the sinnes and to reconcile the iniquitie and to bring in euerlasting righteousnes 1. Cor. 1.30 He is made vnto vs wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption 3 How he saueth HE saueth vs after two sorts First by his merite that is yeelding a sufficient punishment or satisfaction for our sinnes Christ saueth vs â— By his merit whereby hee hath merited for vs remission of sinnes reconciliation with God the holy Ghost saluation and life euerlasting Vnto this beare many places of holy Scripture witnesse in plentifull sort 1. Iohn 2.2 If anie man sinne wee haue an Aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ the iust And hee is the reconciliation for our sinnes and not for ours onelie but also for the sinnes of the whole woorld Rom. 3.25 Whom God hath set forth to be a reconciliation through faith in his bloud to declare his righteousnesse by the forgiuenesse of sinnes Rom 5
but hee furthermore keepeth and gardeth vs as his owne flocke and proper people whome hee hath purchased with his bloode hee gouerneth vs also and guideth vs by his spirite hee woorcketh in our heartes faith and obedience that wee maie doe things acceptable vnto him and so fenceth vs against all the temptations of the Diuel and the flesh that we may neuer fal from him Therefore he is our Lord after a farre other sort than the Diuels and the reprobates 2 By right of redemption 2 Hee is our Lorde by right of redemption For hee alone paying the raunsome for vs deliuereth vs from the power of the Diuel by his spirit regenerateth vs and causeth vs to beginne to serue him and in this liberty whereunto hee hath brought vs by his merite and power hee also preserueth vs against al both outward and inward enemies euen to the end and being raised from the dead he fully enfreeeth and deliuereth vs from all sin and miserie and endoweth vs with eternal blisse and glorie And seeing hee hath deliuered freed vs it is manifest that we were Seruants and truely so wee were and are by nature Seruantes and bound-slaues of the Diuell from whose tyrannie Christ hath deliuered vs and heereupon nowe are wee the Seruants of Christ because vs who were by nature his enimies and deserued to be destroied of him hee notwithstanding preserued and deliuered For * The reason of this deriuation of the name Seruant could not be expressed in English as it is in latine from whēce our English word commeth Serui which signifieth seruants commeth from Seruando that is saued or preserued serui or seruants were first so named by the Romans from seruando which is in signification preserued bicause whē in the wars they might haue bin slain of their enemies they were preserued But this dominion of Christ ouer vs is speciall that is extendeth it selfe onely to the Church Obiection Jf we bee redeemed from the power of the Diuel therefore a ransome hath bin paid him for our redemption For from whose power wee are redeemed vnto him is the price and ransome due But God gaue not him the raunsome Therefore wee are not redeemed from the power of the Diuel Answer From whose power we are redeemed as hauing bin supreme Lord ouer vs and holding rightly his dominion ouer vs vnto him the price ransome is due But the diuel is no supreme Lord but the executioner of the supreme lord Wee are saide to bee redeemed in respect of god wee are deliuered in respect of the Diuel which is God who alone hath and holdeth by right dominion ouer vs. Wherefore in respect of God Christ redeemed vs for vnto him he hath paid the price But he hath deliuered vs or set vs at liberty in respect of the Diuell For wee are giuen vnto Christ our redeemer to bee his owne neither hath the Diuell nowe anie more right or power ouer vs. And this christs dominion and power ouer vs cost him enough who therefore also hath care of it and preserueth it Of that Dominion we dispute especiallie in this place For the Diuell dooth not acknowledge Christ to bee such a Lorde vnto him as wee confesse him to bee vnto vs because hee hath redeemed vs and because hee guideth vs with his spirite 3 In respect of our preseruation Christ is our Lorde 3 By right of preseruation because he defendeth vs vnto the end keepeth safegardeth vs to eternall life not only by defending our bodies from enimies but our soules also from sins Of this Dominion himselfe speaketh None of them are lost which thou gauest mee No man shal pluck my sheepe out of my hands He keepeth the wicked to destruction and defendeth their bodies only 4 In respect of Gods ordinance 4 In respect of Gods ordinance because the Father ordeined the woord and this person Christ vnto this that by him hee might woorke all thinges in heauen and in earth The Father gaue vs vnto him manifested him vnto vs to bee our Prince King Head hath made him heire of al. Now whereas he is our Lorde after a farre more excellent manner than others we also are far more bound to his allegeance obedience For he is so our lord that he doth indeed with vs what he wil and hath full right and power ouer vs but yet he vseth that his power to our saluation only For wee receiue dailie of this Lord moe and by infinite partes more excellent benefites than doe any other thoroughout the whole world And therefore wee ought alwaies to acknowledge the dominion and power which Christ hath ouer vs. Which acknowledging of his dominiō is 1. A profession of so great a benefit of christ as that he hath vouchsafed to be our lord to set free vs his enimies into this so fruitfull glorious a liberty 2. A confession of our bond duty For christ being so merciful a Lord vnto vs we ought both in word and life to professe our selues as his seruantes to bee bound to faithfull subiection and obedience vnto him in all thinges that he may bee magnified of vs for euer WHICH WAS CONCEIVED BY THE HOLY GHOST BORNE OF THE virgin Mary In the conception three thinges to bee obserued 1 The forming of Christs flesh First christ is said here to haue bin conceiued by the holy ghost Whereby three thinges are signified 1. That the masse of his humane nature was created or formed in the wombe of the Virgin miraculouslie and beside the order of thinges disposed of God in nature by the immediate working operation of the holy Ghost without the seede and substance of man Obiection But we are also formed and made of God Answere We mediately Christ immediately 2 The sanctifieng of his flesh 2. That the Holy Ghost did in the same moment and by the same operation cleanse this masse and from the verie point of the conception sanctifie it that is he caused that originall sinne should not issue into it and that for these causes First that hee might bee a pure sacrifice and a sufficient ransome for our redemption 2. Cor. 5.12 He hath made him to be sinne for vs which knew no sinne that we should be made the righteousnes of god in him Secondly That he might also sanctify vs by his sanctitie and holynesse For if Christ had beene a sinner hee could not haue satisfied for vs but himselfe should haue remained in death Therefore could he not haue bin our sanctifier neither by merit nor by his power and efficacie Heb. 2.11 For he that sanstifieth and they that are sanctified are all of one Heb. 7.26 Such an high Priest it became vs to haue which is holy harmelesse vndefiled separate from sinners Thirdly Iohn was not agreeable vnto the Word the eternall sonne of god to vnite personallie vnto him humane nature being stained defiled where in hee dwelleth as in his owne temple For God
from the concrete to the abstract the reason doth not follow Christ therefore suffered according to his humane nature onelie making a sufficicnt and most perfect satisfaction thereby for our sins Which his satisfaction is made ours by applicatioÌ„ which is double The one from god who iustifieth vs for christs merit maketh vs to cease from sin The other from our selues who by faith apprehend applie vnto vs Christs merit by being fully persuaded that God for the ransome of his Son doth pardon vs our sinne Nowe that there was another nature in christ which nether suffered nor died is proued by these testimonies Ioh. 2.19 Destroie this Temple in three daies I wil raise it vp again 1. Pe. 3.18 was put to death concerning the flesh but was quickned in the spirit Reu. 1.18 I was dead and behold J am aliue Ioh. 18. I haue power to laie downe my soule and power to take it vp againe 3 The causes impellent or motiues of Christs Passion 1 THE loue of God towardes mankind Ioh. 3.16 So God loued the world that he gaue his onlie begotten Sonne 2. The mercy of God towards men fallen into sin 3. The wil of God to reuenge the iniurie of the Diuel who in reproch and despite of God auerted vs from him and maimed the image of God in vs in despite of the creator But here it maie be demaunded whether Christ fulfilled the Lawe or no and secondly if he did why then hee shoulde suffer so bitter a Passion Whereunto we aunswere first that he fulfilled the Law 1. By his righteousnes in obseruing it 2. By satisfaction in suffering punishment for our sinnes who had transgressed it Both which are most perfect Nowe to the second demand then why if Christ fulfilled the law was he so grieuously punished of God seeing punishment is the wages of sinne and sinne was not in him who neuer committed anie We answere that it was not for himselfe but for vs that hee was punished Reply A righteous man ought not to be punished for the vnrighteous Aunswere True except first he voluntarilie offer himselfe for them Secondly except he willinglie do suffer in such sort for them as that he yeelde a sufficient ransome and payment Thirdly except he haue the power of recouering himselfe out of the punishment once suffered Fourthly except he be able to bring to passe that they also for whom he offereth himselfe to satisfie leaue off to transgresse and sinne hereafter Fifthly except he bee of the same nature with them for whom he satisfieth If such a satisfier bee substituted there is nothing committed against the iustice of God for in so suffering both are saued both he that suffereth and they for whome hee suffereth Now such a suretie and satisfier was Christ who is not onelie man or of the same nature with vs but wee are also his members when the whole suffereth punishment the members also and partes are punished And for this coniunction of ours with Christ our head the Apostles commonly say that he suffered in Christ 4 The final causes or ends of his Passion THE first final cause or end of his passion is That his passion might bee a sufficient ransome for our sins or the redeeming of vs. 2. The mâ—nifesting of the loue goodnes mercie righteousnes of God while he punnisheth his sonne for vs. The chiefe finall causes then are Our saluation and the glorie of God To the former belongeth the knowledge of the greatnesse of sinne that we may knowe how great an euil sinne is and what it deserueth and further to knowe that death is not now pernicious and hurtfull to the Godly and therfore not to bee feared To the latter belongeth our Iustification wherein all the benefites are comprehended which Christ merited by dying euen our deliuery from death which hee bestoweth vpon vs. Obiection If hee haue satisfied for all then al should be saued Answere He satisfied for al as touching his satisfaction but not as touching the application thereof al not applying it vnto them Wherefore hee hath satisfied for al but doth not deliuer all but only those who by faith applie it And those he deliuereth 1. Because the Father ordeined him to this or because the Father will 2. Because the Son willingly offereth himselfe 3 Because this ransome is sufficient SVFFERED VNDER PONTIVS PILATE MEntion is made of Pilate in Christs passion 1. Because Christ would receiue from him a testimony of his innocencie that thereby we might knowe that he was pronounced innocent by the voice of the iudge himselfe 2. Beecause it was requisite that he should be solemnly coÌ„demned that we might know that hee though innocent was notwithstanding condemned that we might not be coÌ„demned as also he sustained death that we might be freed from it 3. That wee might be aduertised of the fulfilling of the Prophecy Gen. 49.10 The scepter shall not depart from Iudah nor a Law-giuer from betweene his feete vntill Shilo come For then was the Scepter taken from Iudah when Christ was a little after condemned of Pilate a Romane gouernour of whom before he was absolued This circumstance therefore is diligently to be coÌ„sidered in Christs passion that we may know him to be the Messias because al conditions are fulfilled in him which are required in the Messias Whereof this Prophecie of the taking away of the Scepter from Iudah was one 4. That we might know that Christ was condemned of God himselfe also and therefore that hee satisfied God for vs. For the head and gouernour of ordinarie iudgement is God himselfe Wherefore Christ was not to haue beene priuily taken away by the Iewes neither to be drawen to death by tumult and disorderlie but by lawefull order and iudgement and by inquisition made concerning all the accusations of Christ God would haue him first to be examined that his innocencie might appeare Secondly to be condemned that it might appeare that hee beeing before pronounced innocent was now condemned not for his owne fault but for ours and that so his vniust condemnation might be insteed of our most iust condemnatioÌ„ Thirdly to be put to death both that the prophecies might bee fulfilled and also that it might appear that both Iewes Gentils did put Christ to death CRVCIFIED I Beleeue in Christ Crucified that is I beleeue Christ did vndergo this punishment and this curse of the Crosse for my sake and that he was made obnoxious for my sake to Gods curse which I and we all deserued a type also of which curse was the death of the Crosse cursed by God himselfe Now for three causes would God haue his Sonne suffer the punishment of so ignominious a death 1 That we might knowe The curse due for our sinnes to haue laine vpon him so should be stirred vp to greater thankefulnesse considering how detestable a thing sinne is so that it could not be expiated or satisfied for but with the most bitter and most opprobrious and shamefull
All other proofes and arguments may be referred vnto these 2 What is the last iudgement IN euerie iudgement are the Accused the Accuser the iudge the cause examination hearing of the cause the Law according to which iudgement is giuen the sentence of absolution and condemnation and the execution thereof according to the Lawes Judgement then in generall is an inquisition or examination of a cause by an ordinarie and lawfull iudge according to iust Lawes and a pronouncing of sentence and the exequution thereof according to iust Lawes Nowe is it easie to define this iudgement of God This iudge hath no neede of inquisition or examination of the cause or of witnesses and accusers seeing he is himselfe the searcher of harts Therefore there shal be only the iudge men of whom sentence shall be giuen the law according to which sentence shal be giuen execution The definition of it is this 1 The last iudgement is a iudgement which God shal exercise in the end of the world by christ who should then visiblie descend froÌ„ heauen in a cloud in the glorie maiesty of his Father Angels by whom also then shall be raised from the dead all men which haue died since the beginning of the world vnto the end thereof but the rest who are then liuing shal be sodainly chaunged and all presented before the tribunall seate of Christ who shall giue sentence of al and shal cast the wicked with the diuels into euerlasting tormentes but shall receiue vp the godlie vnto himselfe that they maie with him and blessed Angels enioie eternal happinesse and glorie in heauen It may be defined more brieflie on this wise The last iudgement shall bee a manifestation or declaration and separation of the iust and vniust who euer haue liued or shall liue from the beginning of the woâ—ld vnto the end proceeding from God by christ and a pronouncing of sentence on these men and an execution thereof according to the doctrine of the Law and Gospel The partes of this definition wee wil now in few wordes confirme 1. That iudgement shall be a manifestation of the iust and vniust For Reuel 20.12 The books shall be opened that the secrets of hartes may bee laied open 2. There shall bee a separation of the iust and vniust For Mat. 25.32 Christ shall place the sheep on his right hand but the goats on his left hand 3. This manifestation and separation shal be wrought of God by Christ If of God then shal it bee a most diuine and iust iudgement Rom. 3.6 Jf God bee vnrighteous how shall hee iudge the world Jt shall bee made and wrought by christ because Iohn 5.22 The Father hath committed all iudgement vnto the Son And Act. 17.31 God hath appointed to iudge the worlde by a man 4. Jâ— shall bee a pronouncing of sentence Mat. 25.34 Come yee Blessed of my Father We are Blessed of God not in Adam but in his seed and therefore the sentence shall bee giuen according to the gospel For by nature wee are subiect vnto the wrath of God Therefore also shall the godly say When saw wee thee hungering or thirsting They shall confesse that the retribution of rewardes commeth not by their merit but by his grace Furder after this manner the wicked and the godly shall bee iudged according to the Lawe and Gospell Absolution shall bee principally according to the Gospel but shal be confirmed by the Law Condemnation shal bee principally by the Lawe but shall be confirmed of the Gospel Sentence shal bee giuen on the wicked according to their owne merite Sentence shall be giuen on the godlie according to Christes merite applyed vnto them by faith a testimonie and witnesse of which faith shal be their workes Now to be iudged is to bee declared iust before the tribunal of Christ and to enter into euerlasting life and that with a respect and condition of faith which is required in the Gospell Obiection But vnto euerie man shall be giuen according to his workes Therefore iudgement shall be giuen on al according to the doctrine of the Law Aunswere In this sense shal be giuen also vnto the elect according to their works not that their works are merites but in that they are the effects of faith Wherefore vnto the elect shal be giuen according to their woorkes that is they shal be iudged according to faith to be iudged according to faith is to be iudged according to the Gospel But the iudge maketh mention of our woorks and not of faith First because he wil haue it knowen to others why he so iudgeth least the vngodly condemned persons might obiect that hee giueth vs eternal life vniustly Wherefore he wil shew them our workes and will bring them forth as testimonies to refute them that we haue in this life applyed vnto vs Christes merit Secondly That wee maie haue comfort in this life that we shall hereafter according to our works stand at his right hand 3 Who shall be iudge CHrist shall bee the iudge Iohn 5.22 Hee hath committed all iudgement vnto the Son Neither yet are the Father the holie Ghost remoued from this iudgement But Christ immediatly shal speake and giue sentence and that in his humane nature And when he speaketh God shal speake not onely because he himselfe is God but because the Father shal speake by him The iudgement then shall belong vnto all three persons of the God-head as concerning their consent and authority but vnto Christ as touching the publishing and exequuting of the iudgement For Christ shall visibly giue sentence of all which sentence he shal also together execute The church also shal iudge as touching the approbation and allowing of this iudgement as Christ saith Luk. 22.30 That the Apostles shal sit on twelue seates and shall iudge the twelue tribes of Israel that is they shall subscribe vnto Christes iudgement and approoue his sentence The causes why Christ man shall bee iudge are these 1. Because the church is to bee glorified by the same Mediatour by whom and for whom it was iustified Act. 17.31 God wil iudge the woorld in righteousnesse by that man whome hee hath appointed Matth. 24.30 They shal see the sonne of man come in the cloudes of heauen with power and great glorie Ioh. 5.27 The Father hath giuen power to the Sonne to execute iudgement in that hee is the Sonne of man 2. That we maie haue comfort knowing him to bee our iudge who hath purchased vs with his bloode and who maketh vs his brethren yea his parts and members For he is 1 Our brother and our flesh 2 He hath promised and saide Ioh. 3.36 He that beleeueth in the Sonne hath eternall life cap. 6.24 Verilie verily I say vnto you hee that heareth my word beleeueth in him that sent me hath euerlasting life and shall not come into condemnation but hath passed from death vnto life The third cause why he commeth is to deliuer his Church
reuerence him and declare our loue and thankefulnes towardes him by our good workes and obedience Rom. 12.1 J beseech you brethren by the mercies of God that ye giue vp your bodies a liuing sacrifice holy acceptable vnto God which is your reasonable seruing of God 1. Pet. 2.5 Yee are made an holie Priesthoode to offer vp spiritual sacrifices acceptable to god by Jesus Christ We are to doe good workes also in respect of our selues 1. That by our good workes we maie be assured of our faith Mat. 7.17 Euerie good tree bringeth forth good fruite Iames 2.20 That faith which is without workes is dead Phil. 1.11 Filled with the fruites of righteousnesse which are by Iesus Christ vnto the glorie and praise of god Now by our workes we must needes know that wee haue faith because the effect is not without his cause and wee must knowe the cause by his proper effect when as therefore we find not in our selues good works or newe obedience we are hypocrites neither haue we faith but an euil conscieÌ„ce For true faith only which neuer waÌ„teth al her fruites bringeth foorth as a fruitful tree good woorkes obedience amendment of life and these fruites likewise discerne and distinguish true faith from historical and temporary faith and so also from hypocrisie 2. That we maie be assured that we haue obtained remission of sinnes through Christ and are for Christes sake iustified before God for iustification and sanctification are benefites linked together which so cleaue together and that necessarily as they neuer can be seuered or pulled asunder For Christ obtained both for vs at once namely both remission of sinnes and the holy Ghost who stirreth vp in vs by faith the study and desire of good works and new obedience 3. That we maie be assured of our election and saluation 2. Pet. 1.10 Giue diligence to make your calling and election sure These proceede from the cause next going before For god hath chosen from euerlasting of his free mercy those onely which are iustified for the merit of his sonne Roman 8.30 Whom he predestinat them also hee called and them also he iustified Nowe that wee haue receiued from Christ iustification which is neuer giuen vnto the Elect without sanctification we knowe by faith And that we haue faith wee perceiue by the woorkes of faith true obedience and true conuersion 4. That by good woorkes our faith maie bee exercised cherished strengthned and aduaunced For they who giue themselues ouer to corrupt lusts against their conscience in them faith cannot be and therefore neither a good conscience neither a confidence and trust in god as beeing appeased and fauourable vnto them For wee haue through faith onelie a feeling of gods fauor towards vs a good conscience Rom. 8.13 Jf yee liue after the flesh yee shal die 2. Tim. 1.6 J put thee in remembrance that thou stirre vp the gift of god which is in thee by the putting on of my hands 5. That by good works we may shew forth and honest our life and calling Ephes 4.1 I praie you that yee walke worthie of the vocation whereunto yee are called 6. That wee maie escape temporal and eternal punishmentes Matth. 7.19 Euerie tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is cut off and cast into the fire Rom. 8.3 If ye liue according to the flesh ye shal die 7. That we maie obtaine corporall and spirituall rewardes which according vnto the promise accompanie good workes 1. Timot. 4.8 Godlines is profitable vnto al things which hath the promise of the life present and of that that is to come Except God woulde haue the hope of rewards and the feare of punishments to be motiue causes vnto good works he would not vse them in admonitions We must doe good woorkes also in respect of our neighbour 1. That wee maie bee profitable vnto our neighbours by our good example and so edifie them 1. Cor 15. All things are for your sakes that most plenteous grace by the thankes-giuing of manie maie redound to the praise of god Phil. 1.24 That I abide in the flesh is more needefull for you 2. That offences maie bee auoided Matth. 18.7 Woe bee to that man by whome offences come Rom. 2.24 The name of god is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you 3. That wee maie winne vnbeleeuers and by our woordes and deedes and example conuert them vnto Christ Luk. 22.32 When thou art conuerted strengthen thy brethren We see now then what are the causes for which we must necessariely doe good workes as also how or in what sense our workes are said to be necessarie for vs vnto saluation to wit not as a cause of our saluation but as mean or way without which wee come not vnto it And after the same sort also it maie be said That good woorkes are necessarie vnto iustice and righteousnes or vnto iustification or in them that are to be iustified namely as a consequent following iustification wherewith regeneration is vnseparably ioined But yet I would not vse these kindes of speaking 1. Because they are ambiguous doubtful 2. Because they breed contentioÌ„s minister occasioÌ„ of cauilling vnto the aduersaries 3. Because the Scripture doth not vse them which must be followed of vs in speaking 6 Whether good woorkes merit any thing before God THIS sixt question ariseth out of the fift as the fourth did out of the thirde For when men heare that wee receiue rewardes by our woorkes they presently conclude that we merit somewhat by them Wherefore wee are to know that good workes indeede are necessarie and therefore are to bee doone also for the rewardes ensuing them but yet that they merit nothing no not the least of gods giftes either corporall or spirituall The reasons hereof are most true and most euident 1 Our woorkes are vnperfect wherefore we can merit nothing by them Gal. 5.17 The flesh lusteth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh and these are contrarie one to the other so that yee do not the same thinges that yee would 2 The good workes what euer we are able to doe are all due Luk. 17.10 When ye haue doone all those thinges which are commanded you say we are vnprofitâ—ble seruants 3 Our woorkes are impure and vitious how-euer they seeme most good Isay 64.6 Wee haue all beene as an vncleane thing and all our righteousnesse is as filthy cloutes Phil 3.8 J thinke all things but losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Jesus my Lord for whome I haue counted all thinges losse and doe iudge them to be dongue that J might winne Christ 4 If we doe any good woorkes they are not ours but are belonging to god onely Phil. 2.13 Jt is god which worketh in you both the will and the deede euen of his good pleasure 1. Corinth 4.7 What hast thou which thou hast not receiued We are euill trees if then we doe any good that must needes come from God onely Mat 20.15 Is it
From what euils he saueth vs 433 How he saueth 434 VVhom he saueth 437 Of Christ What is signified by the name of christ 437 What Christes vnction or annointing is 438 What his Prophetical function 444 VVhat his Priesthood 448 VVhat his kingdome 451 Of the communion of the faithful with Christ vvhat the Annointing of Christians is 452 In what sense christians are called prophets 456 vvhat is the Priesthoode of christians 456 vvhat is the kingdom of christians 458 Of Christ the Sonne of God How manie waies men are called sons 461 How christ is the son of God 463 vvhy christ is called the only begotten and first begotten sonne of God 464 Of Christs Diuinitie The sonne of God is a subsistent in the flesh borne of the virgin and before the flesh 467 The sonne of God Christ is a person reallie distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost 498 The Worde is equall consubstantial with the Father 500 503 Other rules whereby the obiections of the Arrians are dissolued 507 The principall arguments against the Diuinitie of the Sonne and the Holie Ghost with the answeres vnto them 509 Of Christ our Lord. In what sense christ is called Lord 514 For what causes he is our Lorde 515 Of christs conception by the holy ghost and birth of the Virgin Marie 518 The common place of the two natures in Christ vvhether there be two natures in christ our Mediatour 520 vvhether christ be one person or moe 525 vvhat maner of vnion this is of the two natures in christ and how made 529 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of both natures in christ 536 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of christ the Mediatour 544 vvhy it was necessary that two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God 550 Of Christs humiliation that is of his Passion vvhat Christ suffered 554 According to which nature christ suffered 556 The causes impellent or motiues of christes Passion 55â— The final causes oâ— ends of his Passion 558 Of Christs death How christ is said to haue beene dead 561 vvhether it was requisite and necessary that christ should die 562 The fruit of christs death 564 His burial 566 His descension into hel 567 Of Christs glorification that is of his Resurrection vvhether christ rose againe 571 How christ rose 571 For what cause he rose 572 vvhat are the fruits of christes Resurrection 576 Of Christs Ascension into heauen vvhither christ ascended 580 How wherefore christ ascended into heauen 582 587 vvhat is the difference between christs Ascension and our 588 vvhat are the fruits of christs AscensioÌ„ 589 Of Christs sitting at the right hand of GOD. vvhat the right hand of God signifieth 591 vvhat is to sit at Gods right hand 591 vvhether christ did alwaies fitte at the right hand of God 595 vvhat are the fruites of christes sitting at the right hand of the father 597 Of Christs comming to iudgement vvhether there shal be any iudgement 599 vvhat the last iudgement is 601 vvho shal iudge 603 vvhence and whither christ shal come 604 Howe christ shall come to iudgement 605 vvhom christ shal iudge 605 vvhat shall be the senteÌ„ce executioÌ„ 606 For what cause that iudgemeÌ„t shal be 607 vvhen it shal be 608 vvherefore God woulde haue vs certaine of the last iudgement 608 For what causes God would not haue vs certain of the time of iudgement 609 For what cause GOD differreth that iudgement 609 Whether the last iudgement be to bee wished for 610 The third part of the Creede of the Holie Ghost the sanctifier What the name spirite signifieth 610 Who and what the holie Ghost is 611 What the office of the holy gost is 617 Of whom the holie Ghost is giuen and wherefore 621 To whom the holie Ghost is giuen 622 How he is giuen receiued 624 How the holie Ghost is reteined 625 Whether and how the holie ghost may be lost 625 wherefore the Holie Ghost is necessarie 626 Howe wee may knowe that the holie ghost dwelleth in vs. 627 Of the Church What the Church is 627 How many waies the Church is taken 629 What are the tokens and markes of the church 631 Why the church is called Holy Catholicke 633 In what the church differeth from the common weale 634 Whence ariseth the difference of the church from the rest of mankinde 635 Whether any one may be saued out of the church 636 Of Predestination Whether there be Predestination 636 What Predestinâ—tion is 641 What are the causes of Predestination or Election and of Reprobation 642 What are the effects of Predestination 644 Whether Predestination be vnchangeable 645 How far forth Predestination Election and Reprobation are known vnto vs. 645 Whether the elect be alwaies meÌ„bers of the church the reprobate neuer 646 Whether the elect may fall from the church and the reprobate abide alwaies in the church 648 What is the vse of this doctrine 649 Of the communion of Saints 649 Of the remission of sinnes What remission of sinnes is 651 Who giueth remission of sinnes 652 For what remission of sinnes is graunted 653 Whether remission of sinnes agreeth with Gods iustice 653 Whether remission of sinnes be freely giuen 654 To whom remission of sins is giuen and how 655 Of the Resurrection of the flesh What the Resurrection is 656 The Errours concerning the Resurrection 656 Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall certainely be 657 For what end the Resurrection shall be 659 By whom the Resurrection shal be 660 How the Resurrection shal be 660 When the Resurrection shal be 661 What bodies shal rise 661 Whether the soule be immortall 662 Of euerlasting life What euerlasting life is 670 VVho giueth euerlasting life 672 To whom euerlasting life is giuen 673 For what cause euerlasting life is giuen 673 VVhen how euerlasting life is giuen vnto vs 674 675 VVhether wee can bee assured in this life of euerlasting life 675 Of Justification VVhat iustice or righteousnes is in generall how manifold it is 677. 678 In what iustice differeth from iustification 679 VVhat is our iustice 680 How Christs satisfactioÌ„ is made our iustice and righteousnes 681 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours 683 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours by faith onely 684 Obiections against this doctrine of iustification aunswered 685 Of Sacraments VVhat sacraments are 694 VVhat are the ends of sacraments 697 In what sacraments differ from sacrifices 699 In what sacramentes agree with the word and in what they differ from it 700 How the sacraments of the old new Testament agree how they differ 702 VVhat the sacramentall vnion is 703 In what the thinges differ from the signes 704 VVhat phrases and formes of speaking of the sacraments are vsuall vnto the church and scripture 705 VVhat is the right and lawful vse of sacraments 705 VVhat the wicked receiue in the vse administration of the sacraments 706 How